The effect of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 75-06 and 77-06 experience

Significant interruptions in radiotherapy during curative treatment for prostate cancer are correlated with poorer oncological outcomes

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of radical radiotherapy (RT) relevant interruptions (RRI), single (sRRI) or multiple (mRRI), on Biochemical Failure-Free Survival (BFFS), Metastases-Free Survival (MFS) and Overall Survival (OS) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 383 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) who received radical RT between March 2013 and April 2021, with doses ranging from 60 to 80 Gy (median dose 76.0 Gy), either alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of sRRI and mRRI radiation-related interruptions on BFFS, MFS, and OS using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, we adjusted for relevant prognostic factors using three multivariate Cox regression proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, it was observed that patients who experienced unexpected RRIs (50.1%: 35.5% sRRI and 14.6% mRRI), resulting in a median overall treatment time prolongation of five days, exhibited a higher incidence of biochemical failure (BF) and metastases (Met). However, no difference was observed in OS. In the multivariate analysis, it was found that RRIs were significantly associated with increased hazards of BF (sRRI, aHR: 4.61, 95% CI: 2.80-7.60; mRRIs, aHR: 9.92, 95% CI: 5.61-17.54), Met (sRRI, aHR: 4.20, 95% CI: 1.97-8.94; mRRI, aHR: 7.01, 95% CI: 2.94-6.71), and all-cause mortality (mRRI, aHR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.18-3.03).

CONCLUSIONS

sRRIs were associated with both lower BFFS and MFS, while mRRIs with both BFFS, MFS and OS.

Optimal timing of radiotherapy in high risk prostate cancer: Do missed days matter?

Introduction

High-risk prostate cancer is associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and biochemical control compared to more favorable risk groups. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is widely used; however, outcomes data are limited with respect to time elapsed between diagnosis and initiation of EBRT.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients diagnosed with high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate who received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and definitive EBRT. Logistic regression was utilized to determine covariates associated with missing EBRT treatments. OS was analyzed using multivariate cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching.

Results

9,610 patients met inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 40.6 months and median age of 72 years. Median PSA was 8.7 and median EBRT dose was 78 Gy. ADT was initiated at a median of 36 days and EBRT at a median of 63 days post-diagnosis. Median number of prolonged treatment days was 2.2. Black race (OR: 1.40; p < 0.01), treatment at a community clinic (OR: 1.32; p < 0.01), and living in an urban/densely populated area were associated with prolonged treatment. Time elapsed between ADT and EBRT > 74 days (HR: 1.20; p = 0.01) and prolonged treatment>3 days of EBRT (HR: 1.26; p = 0.005) were associated with an increased hazard of death. The 5-year OS was 79.6% and 82.9% for patients with prolonged treatment of 3 days or more of EBRT and those missing 3 days or less, respectively (p = 0.0006).

Conclusion

In this hypothesis-generating study, prolonged treatment delays and missing three or more EBRT treatments was associated with poorer OS in patients with high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Treatment interruptions affect biochemical failure rates in prostate cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy: Report from the multi-institutional proton collaborative group registry

INTRODUCTION

To date, no studies examining the effect of treatment interruptions (TI) with proton beam therapy (PBT) have been published. The goal of our study was to determine the predictors of TI amongst patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with PBT and to determine whether TI are associated with biochemical failure (BF). We hypothesized that any correlation between TI and biochemical control would be more pronounced in high risk groups.

METHODS

Data for 4278 patients with PCa was obtained from the prospectively collected Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) data registry. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to model possible predictors of BF. A subset analysis was performed for high risk patients treated with ADT and PBT. Finally, propensity score (PS) analysis was performed to account for any indication bias caused by lack of randomization.

RESULTS

Total treatment duration (OR, 1.05 [1.04-1.06]; p < 0.001) increased the likelihood of TI on MVA. TI did not have a statistically significant correlation with BF (OR, 1.44 [0.86-2.39]; p = 0.162) amongst PS matched patients. However, on subset analyses of high risk group patients with PS matching, there was a trend towards worse BF in patients with TI (OR 3.85; 95%CI (0.96-15.44); p = 0.057).

CONCLUSION

In the first analysis of its kind, the results suggest that TI in high risk PCa patients treated with PBT and ADT have worse BF rates. Interventions such as increased patient education, proper maintenance of proton facilities, and decreasing total treatment duration with alternative fractionation schedules may help avoid the unintended negative effects on tumor control due to TI. However, future analyses on a larger patient population is needed.

Voxel-level biological optimisation of prostate IMRT using patient-specific tumour location and clonogen density derived from mpMRI

AIMS

This study aimed to develop a framework for optimising prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on patient-specific tumour biology, derived from multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). The framework included a probabilistic treatment planning technique in the effort to yield dose distributions with an improved expected treatment outcome compared with uniform-dose planning approaches.

METHODS

IMRT plans were generated for five prostate cancer patients using two inverse planning methods: uniform-dose to the planning target volume and probabilistic biological optimisation for clinical target volume tumour control probability (TCP) maximisation. Patient-specific tumour location and clonogen density information were derived from mpMRI and geometric uncertainties were incorporated in the TCP calculation. Potential reduction in dose to sensitive structures was assessed by comparing dose metrics of uniform-dose plans with biologically-optimised plans of an equivalent level of expected tumour control.

RESULTS

The planning study demonstrated biological optimisation has the potential to reduce expected normal tissue toxicity without sacrificing local control by shaping the dose distribution to the spatial distribution of tumour characteristics. On average, biologically-optimised plans achieved 38.6% (p-value: < 0.01) and 51.2% (p-value: < 0.01) reduction in expected rectum and bladder equivalent uniform dose, respectively, when compared with uniform-dose planning.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that varying the dose distribution within the prostate to take account for each patient's clonogen distribution was feasible. Lower doses to normal structures compared to uniform-dose plans was possible whilst providing robust plans against geometric uncertainties. Further validation in a larger cohort is warranted along with considerations for adaptive therapy and limiting urethral dose.

Twice- vs. thrice-weekly moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: does overall treatment time matter?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of overall treatment time (OTT) in disease control, acute, and long-term side effects with moderate hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa) delivered either twice- or thrice-a-week.

METHODS

157 patients with localized PCa were treated consecutively with 56 Gy in 4 Gy/fraction delivered either twice (86 patients, from 2003 to 2010, group-1) or thrice a week (71 patients, from 2010 to 2017, group-2) using IMRT or VMAT techniques. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were scored according to the CTCAE v3.0 grading scale. Median follow-up was 110 and 56 months for groups 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, patients treated thrice-a-week experienced higher acute ≥ grade-2 GU toxicity compared to those treated twice a week (25.4% vs 5.8%, p = 0.001) even though none presented ≥ grade-3 GU or GI toxicity in the thrice-a-week group. The 5-year ≥ grade-2 late GU toxicity-free survival was higher in group-1 (95.9 ± 2.3%) than in group-2 (81.5 ± 4.9%, p = 0.003), while no differences in ≥ grade-2 late GI toxicity-free survival were observed between both groups (97.5 ± 1.7% vs. 97 ± 2.1% for groups 1 and 2, respectively). The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was not different for patients treated twice compared to those treated thrice-a-week (80.6 ± 4.5% vs. 85.3 ± 4.8%, respectively, p = 0.441), as much as for patients treated in > 5 weeks vs. those treated in ≤ 5 weeks (81.3 ± 4.4% vs. 84.4 ± 5.1%, respectively, p = 0.584).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective hypothesis-generating analysis, less vs. more than 5 weeks OTT may increase acute and late GU toxicities without significantly improving bRFS in patients treated to high effective doses (> 80 Gy) with moderate hypofractionated RT. Prospective trials evaluating the impact of OTT on hypofractionated schedules for PCa are warranted.

Long-term results of a phase II study of hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer: moderate versus extreme hypofractionation

Background

We performed a prospective phase II study to compare acute toxicity among five different hypofractionated schedules using proton therapy. This study was an exploratory analysis to investigate the secondary end-point of biochemical failure-free survival (BCFFS) of patients with long-term follow-up.

Methods

Eighty-two patients with T1-3bN0M0 prostate cancer who had not received androgen-deprivation therapy were randomized to one of five arms: Arm 1, 60 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE)/20 fractions/5 weeks; Arm 2, 54 CGE/15 fractions/5 weeks; Arm 3, 47 CGE/10 fractions/5 weeks; Arm 4, 35 CGE/5 fractions/2.5 weeks; and Arm 5, 35 CGE/5 fractions/4 weeks. In the current exploratory analysis, these ardms were categorized into the moderate hypofractionated (MHF) group (52 patients in Arms 1–3) and the extreme hypofractionated (EHF) group (30 patients in Arms 4–5).

Results

At a median follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 1.3–9.6 years), 7-year BCFFS was 76.2% for the MHF group and 46.2% for the EHF group (p = 0.005). The 7-year BCFFS of the MHF and EHF groups were 90.5 and 57.1% in the low-risk group (p = 0.154); 83.5 and 42.9% in the intermediate risk group (p = 0.018); and 41.7 and 40.0% in the high risk group (p = 0.786), respectively. Biochemical failure tended to be a late event with a median time to occurrence of 5 years. Acute GU toxicities were more common in the MHF than the EHF group (85 vs. 57%, p = 0.009), but late GI and GU toxicities did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the efficacy of EHF is potentially inferior to that of MHF and that further studies are warranted, therefore, to confirm these findings.

Trial registration

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01709253; registered October 18, 2012; retrospectively registered).

Moderate Hypofractionated Protracted Radiation Therapy and Dose Escalation for Prostate Cancer: Do Dose and Overall Treatment Time Matter?

PURPOSE

This was a retrospective study of 2 sequential dose escalation regimens of twice-weekly 4 Gy/fractions hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): 56 Gy and 60 Gy delivered within a protracted overall treatment time (OTT) of 6.5 and 7 weeks, respectively.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

163 prostate cancer patients with cT1c-T3a disease and nodal involvement risk ≤20% (Roach index) were treated twice weekly to the prostate ± seminal vesicles with 2 sequential dose-escalated IMRT schedules: 56 Gy (14 × 4 Gy, n=81) from 2003 to 2007 and 60 Gy (15 × 4 Gy, n=82) from 2006 to 2010. Patient repositioning was made with bone matching on portal images. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 grading scale.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences regarding the acute GU and GI toxicities in the 2 dose groups. The median follow-up times were 80.2 months (range, 4.5-121 months) and 56.5 months (range, 1.4-91.2 months) for patients treated to 56 and 60 Gy, respectively. The 5-year grade ≥2 late GU toxicity-free survivals with 56 Gy and 60 Gy were 96 ± 2.3% and 78.2 ± 5.1% (P=.001), respectively. The 5-year grade ≥2 late GI toxicity-free survivals with 56 Gy and 60 Gy were 98.6 ± 1.3% and 85.1 ± 4.5% (P=.005), respectively. Patients treated with 56 Gy showed a 5-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) of 80.8 ± 4.7%, worse than patients treated with 60 Gy (93.2 ± 3.9%, P=.007). A trend for a better 5-year distant metastasis-free survival was observed among patients treated in the high-dose group (95.3 ± 2.7% vs 100%, P=.073, respectively). On multivariate analysis, only the 60-Gy group predicted for a better bPFS (P=.016, hazard ratio = 4.58).

CONCLUSIONS

A single 4-Gy additional fraction in patients treated with a hypofractionated protracted IMRT schedule of 14 × 4 Gy resulted in a similar and minimal acute toxicity, in worse moderate to severe urinary and GI late effects, but a significantly better biochemical control.

Split-course, high-dose palliative pelvic radiotherapy for locally progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Local progression, in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, often causes significant morbidity. Pelvic radiotherapy (RT) provides effective palliation in this setting, with most published studies supporting the use of high-dose regimens. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of split-course hypofractionated RT used at our institution in treating this group of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 34 men with locoregionally progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer, treated with a split course of pelvic RT (45-60 Gy in 18-24 fractions) between 2000 and 2008 were analyzed. The primary endpoints were the response rate and actuarial locoregional progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, compliance, and acute and late toxicity.

RESULTS

The median age was 71 years (range, 53-88). Treatment resulted in an overall initial response rate of 91%, a median locoregional progression-free survival of 43 months, and median overall survival of 28 months. Compliance was excellent and no significant late toxicity was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The split course pelvic RT described has an acceptable toxicity profile, is effective, and compares well with other high-dose palliative regimens that have been previously reported.

Toxicity report of once weekly radiation therapy for low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma: preliminary results of a phase I/II trial

Background

Increasing clinical data supports a low α/β ratio for prostate adenocarcinoma, potentially lower than that of surrounding normal tissues. A hypofractionated, weekly radiation therapy (RT) schedule should result in improved tumour control, reduced acute toxicity, and similar or decreased late effects. We report the toxicity profile of such treatment.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a multi-institution phase I/II trial of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for favourable-risk prostate cancer (T1a-T2a, Gleason ≤ 6 and PSA < 10 ng/ml). RT consisted of 45 Gy in nine 5 Gy fractions, once weekly. Primary end-points were feasibility and late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (RTOG scale), while secondary end-points included acute GI toxicity, acute and late genitourinary (GU) toxicity, biochemical control, and survival.

Results

Between 2006 and 2008, 80 patients were treated. No treatment interruptions occurred. The median follow-up is 33 months (range: 20-51). Maximal grade 1, 2, and 3 acute (< 3 months) GU toxicity was 29%, 31% and 5% respectively (no grade 4). Acute GI grade 1 toxicity was reported in 30% while grade 2 occurred in 14% (no grade 3 or 4). Crude late grade ≥ 3 toxicity rates at 31 months were 2% for both GU and GI toxicity. Cumulative late grade ≥ 3 GI toxicity at 3 years was 11%. Two patients had PSA failure according to the Phoenix definition. The three-year actuarial biochemical control rate is 97%.

Conclusions

Weekly RT with 45 Gy in 9 fractions is feasible and results in comparable toxicity. Long term tumour control and survival remain to be assessed.

Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5,969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy

PURPOSE

There are reports of a high sensitivity of prostate cancer to radiotherapy dose fractionation, and this has prompted several trials of hypofractionation schedules. It remains unclear whether hypofractionation will provide a significant therapeutic benefit in the treatment of prostate cancer, and whether there are different fractionation sensitivities for different stages of disease. In order to address this, multiple primary datasets have been collected for analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven datasets were assembled from institutions worldwide. A total of 5969 patients were treated using external beams with or without androgen deprivation (AD). Standard fractionation (1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction) was used for 40% of the patients, and hypofractionation (2.5-6.7 Gy per fraction) for the remainder. The overall treatment time ranged from 1 to 8 weeks. Low-risk patients comprised 23% of the total, intermediate-risk 44%, and high-risk 33%. Direct analysis of the primary data for tumor control at 5 years was undertaken, using the Phoenix criterion of biochemical relapse-free survival, in order to calculate values in the linear-quadratic equation of k (natural log of the effective target cell number), α (dose-response slope using very low doses per fraction), and the ratio α/β that characterizes dose-fractionation sensitivity.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the α/β value for the three risk groups, and the value of α/β for the pooled data was 1.4 (95% CI = 0.9-2.2) Gy. Androgen deprivation improved the bNED outcome index by about 5% for all risk groups, but did not affect the α/β value.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall α/β value was consistently low, unaffected by AD deprivation, and lower than the appropriate values for late normal-tissue morbidity. Hence the fractionation sensitivity differential (tumor/normal tissue) favors the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules for all risk groups, which is also very beneficial logistically in limited-resource settings.

When tumor repopulation starts? The onset time of prostate cancer during radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To analyze published clinical data and provide a preliminary estimate of tumor repopulation rate and its onset time during radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS

Data on prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) by Perez et al. (2004), Amdur et al. (1990) and Lai et al. (1991) were analyzed in this study. The stage-combined pelvic control rate from Perez et al. was calculated to be 0.95±0.01, 0.87±0.02, and 0.72±0.04 for patients treated ≤7 weeks, 7.1-9 weeks, and >9 weeks respectively. Based on the Linear-Quadratic model, extended to account for tumor repopulation, the least χ² method was used to fit the clinical data and derive the onset time (T(k)) and effective doubling time (T(d)) for prostate cancer. Similar analysis was performed for the other two datasets.

RESULTS

Best fit was achieved with onset time T(k)=34±7 days and doubling time T(d)=12±2 days. These parameters were independent of the choice of the α/β values currently published in the literature. Analyses of the other two datasets showed T(k)=42±7 days with T(d)=9 ± 3 days, and T(k)=34±6 days with T(d)=34±5 days, respectively. T(k) was found to be dependent on tumor stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent values for onset time T(k) were obtained from different datasets, while the range of doubling time T(d) was large. Tumor repopulation starts no later than 58 days (at 90% confidence level) in the course of EBRT for prostate cancer.

Prolongation of total treatment time because of infrequently missed days of treatment is not associated with inferior biochemical outcome after dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Prolongation of treatment time with radiation therapy (RT) is associated with inferior disease control for many rapidly proliferating tumors, but it is uncertain whether the same effect is seen in prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

596 patients underwent with curative-intent RT for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. By National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria, men were classified as having low-risk (30%), medium-risk (40%), or high-risk (30%) disease. The median RT dose was 72 Gy. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) was used in 45%. The idealized treatment time was defined as the total elapsed time (including weekends) to complete treatment if started on a Monday. Missed days of treatment, defined as the number of days beyond the idealized treatment time, was recorded for all patients. Missed days were added to the end of therapy resulting in a longer treatment time. Analysis was conducted for missed days and other standard prognostic variables against freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF).

RESULTS

The median number of missed days was 2 (range, -3 to 22). With a median follow-up of 51 months, men with 5 or more missed days had similar 4-year FFBF rates (79% vs. 83% in men with <5 missed days, p = 0.0809), especially in the subset of men receiving 74 Gy or greater (89% for both groups, p = 0.8008). Analysis of missed days was performed for the subsets of dose, ADT, and risk category. Men without ADT had a lower FFBF rate with more missed days (p = 0.0030), but this association was not seen in men treated to a dose of 74 Gy or greater (p = 0.7425). On multivariate analysis, dose (p = 0.0010), T stage (p = 0.0145), and prostate-specific antigen level (p < 0.0001) were associated with FFBF, but Gleason score (p = 0.1351) and missed days (p = 0.3767) were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Slight prolongation of treatment time (e.g., ≤7 days) was not associated with inferior FFBF, especially in men receiving an RT dose of 74 Gy or greater.

Does treatment duration affect outcome after radiotherapy for prostate cancer?

PURPOSE

The protraction of external beam radiotherapy (RT) time is detrimental in several disease sites. In prostate cancer, the overall treatment time can be considerable, as can the potential for treatment breaks. We evaluated the effect of elapsed treatment time on outcome after RT for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1989 and November 2004, 1,796 men with prostate cancer were treated with RT alone. The nontreatment day ratio (NTDR) was defined as the number of nontreatment days divided by the total elapsed days of RT. This ratio was used to account for the relationship between treatment duration and total RT dose. Men were stratified into low risk (n = 789), intermediate risk (n = 798), and high risk (n = 209) using a single-factor model.

RESULTS

The 10-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) rate was 68% for a NTDR <33% vs. 58% for NTDR >/=33% (p = 0.02; BF was defined as a prostate-specific antigen nadir + 2 ng/mL). In the low-risk group, the 10-year FFBF rate was 82% for NTDR <33% vs. 57% for NTDR >/=33% (p = 0.0019). The NTDR was independently predictive for FFBF (p = 0.03), in addition to T stage (p = 0.005) and initial prostate-specific antigen level (p < 0.0001) on multivariate analysis, including Gleason score and radiation dose. The NTDR was not a significant predictor of FFBF when examined in the intermediate-risk group, high-risk group, or all risk groups combined.

CONCLUSIONS

A proportionally longer treatment duration was identified as an adverse factor in low-risk patients. Treatment breaks resulting in a NTDR of >/=33% (e.g., four or more breaks during a 40-fraction treatment, 5 d/wk) should be avoided.

Is the α/β Value for Prostate Tumours Low Enough to be Safely Used in Clinical Trials?

There has been an intense debate over the past several years on the relevant alpha/beta value that could be used to describe the fractionation response of prostate tumours. Previously it has been assumed that prostate tumours have high alpha/beta values, similar to most other tumours and the early reacting normal tissues. However, the proliferation behaviour of the prostate tumours is more like that of the late reacting tissues, with slow doubling times and low alpha/beta values. The analyses of clinical results carried out in the past few years have indeed suggested that the alpha/beta value that characterises the fractionation response of the prostate is low, possibly even below the 3 Gy commonly assumed for most late complications, and hence that hypofractionation of the radiation treatment might improve the therapeutic ratio (better control at the same or lower complication rate). However, hypofractionation might also increase the complication rates in the surrounding late responding tissues and if their alpha/beta value is not larger that of prostate tumours it could even lead to a decrease in the therapeutic ratio. Therefore, the important question is whether the alpha/beta value for the prostate is lower than the alpha/beta values of the surrounding late responding tissues at risk. This paper reviews the clinical and experimental data regarding the radiobiological differential that might exist between prostate tumours and the late normal tissues around them. Several prospective hypofractionated trials that have been initiated recently in order to determine the alpha/beta value or the range of values that describe the fractionation response of prostate tumours are also reviewed. In spite of several confounding factors that interfere with the derivation of a precise value, it seems that most data support a trend towards lower alpha/beta values for prostate tumours than for rectum or bladder.

Impact of tumor repopulation on radiotherapy planning

PURPOSE

Biologic/functional imaging (e.g., fluorodeoxyglucose/3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography) is promising to provide information on tumor cell repopulation. Such information is important in the design of biologically conformal radiotherapy for cancer. The questions remaining unclear are whether it is necessary to escalate the dose to the regions with rapid cell repopulation in the tumor target and, if so, by how much. The purpose of this work was to address these questions using radiobiologic modeling.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The generalized linear-quadratic model, extended to account for the effect of clonogenic cell repopulation, was used to calculate the cell-killing efficiency of radiotherapy. The standard Poisson tumor control probability (TCP) model was used to bridge cell killing to treatment outcome. Prostate cancer was chosen as the example for this study. In situ measurements of prostate cancer patients have shown that the potential doubling time of tumor cells has a large variation, ranging from 15 to 170 days. On the basis of the linear-quadratic and TCP parameters (alpha = 0.14 Gy(-1), alpha/beta = 3.1 Gy, and the number of clonogens K = 10(6)-10(7) cells) determined in earlier studies, we evaluated the influence of tumor cell repopulation during protracted treatment courses on treatment outcome. The dose escalations, which can be used to combat aggressive cell repopulation in regions with different doubling times (15-170 days) and sizes (5, 10, 15, and 40 cm(3) of a 40-cm(3) tumor), were calculated for commonly practiced radiotherapy modalities. The influence of linear-quadratic parameters on this calculation was also considered.

RESULTS

The impact of tumor cell repopulation on TCP and the corresponding dose escalation required to account for this impact were investigated for both external beam radiotherapy and permanent implantation. The results indicated that for regions with aggressive tumor cell growth, dose escalation is necessary to compensate for the repopulation effect. For example, for tumors with an effective doubling time changing from 42 days to 15 days, the prescription dose of external beam radiotherapy needs to be increased from 75.6 to 81 Gy to maintain a target TCP of 80% for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. For (125)I implants, dose escalation from 152 to 160 Gy is required for the same target TCP. These data were calculated on the basis of an alpha/beta ratio of 3.1 Gy. Greater dose escalations are required if the alpha/beta ratio is 1.5 Gy (e.g., 88 Gy for external beam radiotherapy or 180 Gy for (125)I implantation for the same treatment outcome). Our study results showed that it is important to cover the entire tumor volume, including all aggressive spots, with the desired prescription dose, especially for low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation is necessary to offset the accelerated tumor cell repopulation during prolonged treatment courses. This study provides a preliminary estimate of the dose escalation for prostate cancer based on the in situ measurements of potential doubling time and radiobiologic models. The proposed dose prescriptions are technically feasible for clinical trials.

Impact of elapsed treatment time on outcome of external-beam radiation therapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of elapsed treatment time in external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 1083 patients with localized prostate carcinoma treated between 1970 and December 1999 with external irradiation alone were reviewed. Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 4-24 years). Since 1987, prostate-specific antigen levels were obtained in 687 patients before the initiation of radiation therapy, and all patients seen in follow-up had prostate-specific antigen determinations. There were 344 patients with T1c, 496 with T2, and 243 with T3 tumors. The elapsed treatment time was divided into < or = 7, 7.1-9, or > 9 weeks. Local tumor control was determined by rectal examination and cause-specific survival or prostate-specific antigen failure according to American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus criteria. Because of dose-escalation studies, tumor dose levels ranged from 66-73.8 Gy, given in 1.8- to 2-Gy fractions.

RESULTS

In patients with stage T1c, local failure ranged from 0% to 10% with doses < or = 72 Gy with; elapsed treatment time had no impact. No pelvic failures were detected in 88 patients receiving doses > 72 Gy. In patients with T2 who received < or = 70 Gy, overall pelvic failure rate was 4% (12/306) in those with an elapsed treatment time of < or = 9 weeks, in contrast to 27% (12/44) for those with an elapsed treatment time > 9 weeks; at 10 years, patients with T2 tumors treated in > 9 weeks had a higher actuarial pelvic failure rate (35%), in contrast to 5% to 18% with shorter treatment times. For patients with T2 tumors who received 70-72 Gy, pelvic failure rate ranged from 0% to 32%, and there were no failures in 37 patients treated to higher doses. In patients with prostate-specific antigen values whose tumors were stage T1c, the chemical failure rate was 41% (60/147) with a tumor dose < 70 Gy, compared with 17% (4/24) in those who received higher doses. In patients with stage 2 disease who were treated with < 70 Gy, the chemical failure rate was 31%, and the rate was 12%-18% in those who received higher doses. In stage T3, the clinical pelvic failure rate ranged from 25% to 32% in the three elapsed time groups, and the chemical failure rate ranged from 48% to 69%, and there was no significant correlation with elapsed time or total irradiation dose. Cause-specific survival without chemical failure in patients with stage T1c disease at 10 years was 85%-90% in the three elapsed treatment time groups. In patients with stage T2 disease, the corresponding values were 80% and 90% for elapsed treatment times < 9 weeks, in contrast to 65% for patients treated > 9 weeks. In patients with stage T3 disease, cause-specific survival was about 60% in all elapsed treatment groups. There was no significant correlation of elapsed treatment time with urinary or rectal morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with radiation therapy for stage T2 localized prostate carcinoma showed a greater incidence of pelvic and chemical failures and a lower cause-specific survival when elapsed treatment time was > 9 weeks in comparison with the failure and survival rates occurring with shorter times. Higher doses of irradiation (> 72 Gy) eliminate the influence of prolongation of treatment time on outcome.

Compliance to the prescribed dose and overall treatment time in five randomized clinical trials of altered fractionation in radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinomas

PURPOSE

To investigate compliance to the prescribed dose-fractionation schedule in five randomized controlled trials of altered fractionation in radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Individual patient data from 2566 patients participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22791, EORTC 22811, EORTC 22851, Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH), and continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) head-and-neck trials were merged in the fractionation IMPACT (Intergroup Merger of Patient data from Altered or Conventional Treatment schedules) study database. The ideal treatment time was defined as the minimum time required to deliver a prescribed schedule. Compliance to the prescribed overall treatment time was quantified as the difference between the actual and the ideal overall time. An overall measure of compliance in an individual patient, the total dose lost (TDL), was calculated as the dose lost due to prolongation of therapy (assuming a D(prolif) of 0.64 Gy/day) plus the difference between the prescribed and the actual dose given.

RESULTS

The time in excess of the ideal ranged up to 97 days (average 3.9 days), and 25% of the patients had delays of 6 days or more. World Health Organization (WHO) performance status and nodal stage had a significant effect on TDL. TDL was significantly higher in the conventional than in the altered arm of the EORTC 22851 and CHART trials. In the PMH trial, TDL was significantly higher in the hyperfractionation than in the conventional arm. Centers participating in the three EORTC trials varied significantly in their compliance. There was a significant improvement in compliance in patients treated more recently.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in randomized controlled trials, compliance to the prescribed radiation therapy schedule may be relatively poor, especially after conventional fractionation. This affects the interpretation of the outcome of these trials.

Morbidity effect of the time gap between supplemental beam radiation and Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To determine if gap time variations between prostate brachytherapy and supplemental beam radiation (EBRT) affect postimplant morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-one patients with 1997 AJC clinical stage T1c-T2a prostatic carcinoma, Gleason grade 7-9, or PSA 10-20 ng/ml, were randomized to implantation with 90 Gy Pd-103 versus 115 Gy (NIST-1999) with 44 Gy versus 20 Gy preimplant supplemental beam radiation, respectively. Pd-103 implantation was performed by standard techniques, using a modified peripheral loading pattern. Beam radiation was delivered with a four-field arrangement, designed to cover the prostate and seminal vesicles with a 2-cm margin, reduced to 1.0 cm posteriorly. A post-implant computed tomography (CT) scan was obtained on the same day. Dosimetric parameters analyzed included the V100 - the percent of the postimplant prostate or rectal volume covered by the prescription dose, and the D90 - the dose that covers 90% of the post-implant prostate or rectal volume. For EBRT rectal D90s, the rectal volume included slices 0.9 cm above and below the seminal vesicles and apex, respectively. Treatment-related morbidity was monitored by mailed questionnaires, using standard American Urologic Association (AUA) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Use of alpha-blockers to relieve obstructive symptoms was not controlled for, but was noted at each follow-up point. Median follow-up at the time of this analysis was 21 months, with a range of 18-26 months.

RESULTS

Variability in the total radiation delivery time within each treatment arm was due almost exclusively to gap time variability. Patients receiving 20 Gy EBRT completed their beam radiation over an average of 12 days (+/-1 day). Patients receiving 44 Gy did so over an average of 31 days (+/- 2 days). The median gap interval for patients receiving 20 Gy EBRT was 5 days (range: 1-40 days) versus 9 days (range: 0-15 days) for patients receiving 44 Gy EBRT. Urinary morbidity, measured by a change in the AUA score from baseline (DeltaAUA) was greater at 1-month postimplant in patients who had shorter gap intervals. The effect of gap time on AUA score changes was lost by 6 months. When looking at the treatment arms separately, the dependence on gap interval was limited to those patients receiving 44 Gy beam radiation. No patient has developed RTOG grade 3 rectal morbidity, and no patient has required invasive therapy for rectal bleeding. There was no relationship between gap interval and rectal morbidity at any time point. There was no relationship between beam doses and RTOG rectal morbidity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings reported here are suggestive that short gap times are safe.

Late normal tissue injury from permanent interstitial implants

PURPOSE

To develop a simple method of calculating biologically effective doses in high-dose regions of permanent interstitial implants.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The incomplete repair model is used to clarify the relationship between dose, D, and biologically effective dose (BED), for permanent interstitial implants. The relationship is used to ascertain the BED at high-dose regions that may occur in (125)I, (103)Pd, and (198)Au prostate implants.

RESULTS

The relationship between D and BED is nonlinear and is given by BED(D) = D + D(2)/D(lambda), where D(lambda) = [(t(lambda)/t(mu)) + 1](alpha/beta), t(lambda) and t(mu) are the half-lives of the isotope and of sublethal damage repair respectively, and alpha/beta is the alpha:beta ratio. Idealized geometrically identical (125)I, (103)Pd, and (198)Au prostate implants with minimum target dose (MTD) of 160 Gy, 120 Gy, and 64 Gy, respectively, are considered. The BED for (103)Pd and (198)Au will be less than the BED for (125)I, for doses up to about 2.5 times the MTD. For higher doses, the BED for (103)Pd may be significantly higher than for (125)I.

CONCLUSION

Permanent interstitial implants using short-lived isotopes may have regions with very high biologically effective doses.

Cell kinetics and repopulation parameters of irradiated xenograft tumours in SCID mice: comparison of two dose-fractionation regimens

The extent and mechanism(s) of repopulation were assessed in SiHa (human cervical squamous cell carcinoma) xenografts in SCID mice for two fractionated irradiation regimens. Mice in one arm of the study received 50 Gy in 20 fractions over 23 days with a 14 day split between 10 fraction, 5 day courses. The other tumours were treated with 50 Gy in 20 fractions over 10 consecutive days. Cell kinetics and tumour regrowth parameters were monitored during and after treatment by measuring tumour volume and analysing cellular DNA content and proliferation parameters with flow cytometry. Repopulation occurred rapidly, beginning during irradiation and largely attributable to an increased growth fraction and decreased potential doubling time, apparently triggered by increased cell loss. Cell cycle time, in contrast, remained relatively constant throughout. Extrapolation of these results to humans suggests that treatment times should be minimised whenever possible, since regrowth rates exceeded those predicted from pretreatment Tpot measurements.

Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate whether current fractionation and brachytherapy protraction schemes for the treatment of prostatic cancer with radiation are optimal, or could be improved.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed two mature data sets on radiotherapeutic tumor control for prostate cancer, one using EBRT and the other permanent seed implants, to extract the sensitivity to changes in fractionation of prostatic tumors. The standard linear-quadratic model was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

Prostatic cancers appear significantly more sensitive to changes in fractionation than most other cancers. The estimated alpha/beta value is 1.5 Gy [0.8, 2.2]. This result is not too surprising as there is a documented relationship between cellular proliferative status and sensitivity to changes in fractionation, and prostatic tumors contain exceptionally low proportions of proliferating cells.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy would be a highly appropriate modality for treating prostate cancer. Appropriately designed HDR brachytherapy regimens would be expected to be as efficacious as low dose rate, but with added advantages of logistic convenience and more reliable dose distributions. Similarly, external beam treatments for prostate cancer can be designed using larger doses per fraction; appropriately designed hypofractionation schemes would be expected to maintain current levels of tumor control and late sequelae, but with reduced acute morbidity, together with the logistic and financial advantages of fewer numbers of fractions.

[Radiotherapy of stage T1-T2 M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Analysis of the carcinologic results of a multicenter study of 610 patients. Groupe Radiothérapie de la Commission de Coopération Médicale Intercentres (CCMI)]

PURPOSE

Retrospective analysis of the results of radiotherapy in localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. Complications were excluded.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six-hundred-and-ten T1-T2 adenocarcinomas of the prostate were treated with continuous courses of external beam radiation therapy in 19 participating Institutes between January 1983 and January 1988. The mean follow-up was 10.4 years; the mean age of patients at the beginning of radiotherapy was 68.5 years.

RESULTS

A 10-year, local control had been achieved in 86% of T1-T2 (81.4% for T2). The 5- and 10-year metastatic relapse rates were 25.3% and 30% (29% and 38.1% for T2), respectively. At 10 years, 62.4% of T1-T2 were recurrence-free; overall survival rate was 45.8% and cause-specific survival rate was 70.5%; 29.9% of T1-T2 patients were alive and disease-free. T category (TNM), pathologic grade, pelvic lymph node status, local tumor control, and obstructive ureteral symptoms were correlated with survival. The influence of pelvic nodes radiation, dose, overall treatment time, previous endocrine treatment, and transuretral resection was not significant for disease-free survival (alive and disease-free) and other endpoints.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between the French series (1975-1982 and 1983-1988). The results of the literature are comparable to ours. As far as prognostic factors are concerned, this report provides evidence that the explainable variables which influence survival depend on the tumor and patient status.

An analysis of clinical and treatment related prognostic factors on outcome using biochemical control as an end-point in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience in treating patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with external beam irradiation (RT) to determine if previously analyzed clinical and treatment related prognostic factors affected outcome when biochemical control was used as an end-point to evaluate results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1 January 1987 and 31 December 1991, 470 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with external beam RT using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital. Biochemical control was defined as PSA nadir < or =1.5 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase. Prognostic factors, including the total number of days in treatment, the method of diagnosis, a history of any pretreatment transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and the type of boost were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months. No statistically significant difference in rates of biochemical control were noted for treatment time, overall time (date of biopsy to completion of RT), history of any pretreatment TURP, history of diagnosis by TURP, or boost techniques. Patients diagnosed by TURP had a significant improvement in the overall rate of biochemical control (P < 0.03) compared to transrectal/transperineal biopsy. The 5-year actuarial rates were 58 versus 39%, respectively. This improvement was not evident when pretreatment PSA, T stage, or Gleason score were controlled for. On multivariate analysis, no variable was associated with outcome. When analysis was limited to a more favorable group of patients (T1/T2 tumors, pretreatment PSA < or =20 ng/ml and Gleason score <7), none of these variables were significantly predictive of biochemical control when controlling for pretreatment PSA, T stage and Gleason score.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant effect of treatment time, overall time, pretreatment TURP, or boost technique was noted on outcome in patients treated with conventional external beam irradiation when biochemical control was used as the end-point to evaluate results.

A modelled comparison of the effects of using different ways to compensate for missed treatment days in radiotherapy

There is much evidence for the detrimental effect on tumour control of missed treatment days during radiotherapy, amounting for example to approximately a 1.6% absolute decrease in local control probability per day of treatment prolongation in the case of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Various methods to compensate for missed treatment days are compared quantitatively in this article, using the linear-quadratic formalism. The overall time and fraction size can be maintained by either treating on weekend days (the preferred way (Method 1a), although with unsocial hours and at extra cost) or using two fractions per day to "catch up' (Method 1b). The latter might incur a small loss of tolerance regarding late reactions, when intervals of 6-8 h are used rather than 24 h, and there may be logistical/scheduling difficulties with larger numbers of patients in some centres when using this method. A second type of strategy retains overall treatment time, and also one fraction per day, but the size of the dose per fraction is increased. For example, this may be done for the same number of "post-gap' days as gap days (Method 2). However, with this method, calculated isoeffect doses regarding late reactions indicate a probable decrease in tumour control rate (Method 2a). Otherwise, isoeffective doses regarding tumour control result in an increase in late reactions (Method 2b). In addition, this method is unsuitable for short regimens already using high doses per fraction. To reduce this problem, overall treatment time can also be retained by using fewer fractions, all of greater size in the case of planned gaps (statutory holidays), or larger remaining fractions after unplanned gaps (Method 2c). The problem also with this method is that equivalence for tumour control gives an increase in late reactions. The least satisfactory strategy (Method 3) is to accept the protraction caused by the missed treatment days, and give either the same prescribed number of (slightly larger) fractions or the planned treatment followed by one (or more) extra fraction to compensate for the gap. This would retain the expected local control rate, but there would be an increase in late reactions. An example of this, using average parameter values, is that a 3-day gap (necessitating four extra days to complete treatment with one fraction of 2.4 Gy) might maintain a 70% local control rate for glottic carcinoma, but severe reactions might rise from 1% to 4% and minor/moderate reactions from 37% to 50%. In this example, the inclusion of an extra weekend would increase the required extra dose and hence may further increase the morbidity rates. A final point is that the effect of treatment interruptions for an individual patient is expected to be greater than that for a group of patients because of interpatient heterogeneity tending to flatten dose-response curves. Calculations show that the above value of 1.6% loss of local control per day for a group of patients may reflect values for individual patients that range around a median value of as much as 5% per day, so stressing further the importance of gaps in treatment. It is concluded that, wherever possible, treatment days should not be missed. If they are missed, it is important to compensate for them, preferably by one of the first of the above methods (1a or 1b), in order to keep as close as possible to the original/standard prescription in terms of total dose, dose per fraction and overall time.

The absence of an adverse effect of prolongation of radiation treatment of primary rectal adenocarcinoma

Many reports have shown a deleterious effect from the prolongation of radiation treatment duration on local control of squamous cell carcinomas in a variety of sites. To study whether a similar effect was found in adenocarcinoma of the rectum, a retrospective review was performed of 353 patients treated by external beam radiation therapy for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum. At 4 years, the local control rate for mobile tumours was 25 percent; for fixed tumours it was 7 percent. By multiple Cox regression analysis, the only factor statistically significant for local control was tumour fixation (P=0.02). Neither treatment length (P=0.44), nor the presence of an interruption in treatment (P=0.41) was significant. The possible explanations for these observations are discussed.

Prostate specific antigen after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a reevaluation of long-term biochemical control and the kinetics of recurrence in patients treated at Stanford University

PURPOSE

We evaluated prostate specific antigen (PSA) evidence for control of prostatic cancer after irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 110 patients for whom more than 2 PSA measurements were obtained to establish trends and the initial measurement was done between April 1985 and January 1988.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients (38%) had stable, normal PSA levels with followup averaging 12.4 years (range 4.4 to 24.8). Increasing clinical stage or Gleason score correlated significantly with risk for PSA relapse, as did pretreatment PSA level. Short PSA doubling times were associated with distant metastasis rather than with local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that irradiation durably controlled 38% of prostatic cancers of various stages and grades and is unlikely to accelerate tumor growth.

Management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas with limb-sparing surgery and postoperative irradiation: do total dose, overall treatment time, and the surgery-radiotherapy interval impact on local control?

PURPOSE

To evaluate potential prognostic factors in the treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcomas that may influence local control, distant metastases, and overall survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-seven patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas were treated with curative intent by limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiation therapy at the Fox Chase Cancer Center or the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, between October 1970 and March 1991. Follow-up ranged from 4-218 months. The median external beam dose was 60.4 Gy. In 13 patients, interstitial brachytherapy was used as a component of treatment.

RESULTS

The 5-year local control rate for all patients was 87%. The 5-year local control rate for patients who received < or = 62.5 Gy was 78% compared to 95% for patients who received > 62.5 Gy had larger tumors (p = 0.008) and a higher percentage of Grade 3 tumors and positive margins than patients who received < or = 62.5 Gy. The 5-year local control rate for patients with negative or close margins was 100% vs. 56% in patients with positive margins (p = 0.002). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using the following variables as covariates: tumor dose, overall treatment time, interval from surgery to initiation of radiation therapy, margin status, grade, and tumor size. Total dose (p = 0.04) and margin status (p = 0.02) were found to significantly influence local control. Only tumor size significantly influenced distant metastasis (p = 0.01) or survival (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiation therapy doses > 62.5 Gy were noted to significantly improve local control in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas. This is the first analysis in the literature to demonstrate the independent influence of total dose on local control of extremity soft tissue sarcomas treated with adjuvant postoperative irradiation.

Influence of a sampling review process for radiation oncology quality assurance in cooperative group clinical trials--results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) analysis

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) designed a random sampling process and observed its influence upon radiotherapy review mechanisms in cooperative group clinical trials. The method of sampling cases for review was modeled from sampling techniques commonly used in pharmaceutical quality assurance programs, and applied to the initial (on-study) review of protocol cases. 'In control' (IC) status is defined for a given facility as the ability to meet minimum compliance standards. Upon achieving IC status, activation of the sampling process was linked to the rate of continued patient accrual for each participating institution in a given protocol. The sampling design specified that > or = 30% cases not in compliance would be detected with 80% power. A total of 458 cases was analyzed for initial review findings in four RTOG Phase III protocols. Initial review findings were compared with retrospective (final) review results. Of the 458 cases analyzed, 370 underwent initial review at on-study, while 88 did not require review as they were enrolled from institutions that had demonstrated protocol compliance. In the group that had both initial and final review, 345/370 (93%) were found to have followed the protocol or had a minor variation. Of the exempted cases, 79/88 (90%) were found to be per protocol or a minor variant. The sampling process proved itself to be cost-effective and resulted in a noticeable reduction in the workload, thus providing an improved approach to resource allocation for the group. Continued evaluation of the sampling mechanism is appropriate as study designs and participants vary over time, and as more data become available to study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A rationale for fractionation for slowly proliferating tumors such as prostatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The incidence of carcinoma of the prostate has recently begun to exceed that of carcinoma of the lung in males in the United States. Although survival and local tumor control after treatment are good for early stages, improvements are being sought for more locally advanced stages. Dose escalation might be of benefit and might be accomplished using "three-dimensional" conformal radiotherapy or hyperfractionation. Because carcinoma of the prostate is known to be a generally slowly growing tumor, there may be more scope for extreme hyperfractionation, even with prolongation to allow for the extra number of very small fractions. This article explores only the hyperfractionation approach, and only theoretically, to investigate when treatments might become too hyperfractionated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The major problem was what to assume for proliferation rates in human adenocarcinomas. A literature search yielded labeling indices (S-phase proportions) often averaging about 1%, but spreading up to 6% or more in individual cases. These data are reviewed, and three bands of rate of loss of local control were chosen for the subsequent calculations: 0.5%, 1%, and 2% loss of local control per week of prolongation. Calculations were done using the linear-quadratic model for a series of doses per fraction of 1.2, 1.0, 0.8, and 0.6 Gy, given twice a day (b.i.d.) in 7, 9, 12, and 17 weeks, respectively. They were compared with a "standard" 36 fractions of 2 Gy = 72 Gy in 7 weeks. Total doses for equal late effects were calculated assuming a late alpha/beta of 3 Gy; the tumor Biologically Effective Doses were calculated assuming tumor alpha/beta values of 30, 10, and 5 Gy. The possible increases of local tumor control were estimated assuming a gamma-37 slope of 2% (per percent increase in total tumor dose).

RESULTS

Graphs are presented of the estimated local control as a function of dose per fraction (and overall time), for advanced tumors (starting at 30% LC) and for less advanced tumors (starting at 70%). The largest increase is always for the change from 2 Gy once a day (q.d.) to 1.2 Gy b.i.d. Further changes of local control with hyperfractionation depend upon tumor proliferation rate and on the shape of the tumor cell survival curve. The largest gains are for the more advanced tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no great encouragement to proceed to more hyperfractionated and prolonged schedules than 1.2-1.0 Gy b.i.d. in 7-9 weeks. We await developments that might more reliably enable potential doubling time and cell survival curve shapes to be routinely determined for individual tumors, before further hyperfractionation might be considered. In the absence of tumor kinetic measurements, we might consider low grade tumors to be the ones to select for prolonged fractionation, whereas high grade tumors would be more suitable for 1.2 Gy b.i.d. with no prolongation, or for dose escalation using conventional fraction sizes and conformal radiotherapy.

Prostate-specific antigen and radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to: (a) define the prognostic significance of pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in localized prostate cancer treated with radiation; (b) define the prognostic usefulness of postradiation PSA levels; (c) evaluate the outcome of radiation using PSA as an endpoint.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Disease outcome in 707 patients with Stages T1 (205 men), T2 (256 men), T3 (239 men), and T4 (7 men), receiving definitive external radiation as sole therapy, was evaluated using univariate and multivariate techniques.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 31 months, 157 patients (22%) developed relapse or a rising PSA. Multivariate analysis revealed pretreatment PSA level to be the most significant prognostic factor, with lesser though significant contributions due to Gleason grade (2-6 vs. 7-10) and transurethral resection in T3/T4 disease. The following four prognostic groupings were defined: group I, PSA < or = 4 ng/ml, any grade; group II, 4 < PSA < or = 20, grades 2-6; group III, 4 < PSA < or = 20, grades 7-10; group IV, PSA > 20, any grade. Five-year actuarial relapse rates in these groups were: I, 12%; II, 34%; III, 40%; and IV, 81%. Posttreatment nadir PSA was an independent determinant of outcome and only patients with nadir values < 1 ng/ml fared well (5-year relapse rate 20%). Using rising PSA as an endpoint the 461 patients with T1/T2 disease had an actuarial freedom from disease rate of 70% at 5 years, which appeared to plateau, suggesting that many were cured. No plateau was evident for T3/T4 disease.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment serum PSA is the single most important predictor of disease outcome after radiation for local prostate cancer. Tumor grade has a lesser though significant prognostic role. Postirradiation nadir PSA value during the first year is a sensitive indicator of response to treatment. Only nadir values < 1 ng/ml are associated with a favorable outlook. A significant fraction of men with T1/T2 disease may be cured with radiation. There was no evidence for a cured fraction among patients with T3/T4 disease.

Radiotherapy and androgen ablation for clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The response of patients with clinical stages T1-4 prostate cancer to radiotherapy is variable. A particularly poor prognostic group has been found to be comprised of those with pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels above 30 ng/ml with any tumor grade, or PSA levels > 10 and < or = 30 with tumors grade 3 or 4. These patients have over an 80% actuarial risk of biochemical failure 3 years after definitive external beam radiotherapy. Thus, patients with these high-risk features require more aggressive therapy. During the last 3-4 years, the policy to treat such patients with radiotherapy and androgen ablation (XRT/HORM) was instituted. A retrospective comparison was made between high-risk patients treated with radiotherapy alone (XRT) vs. XRT/HORM.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1987 and 1991, there were 81 high-risk patients treated with XRT. There were 38 high-risk patients treated with XRT/HORM between 1990 and 1992. The median follow-up was 37 months for the XRT group and 22 months for the XRT/HORM group. No patient had clinical, radiographic, or pathologic evidence of lymph node involvement. The median dose to the prostate was 66 Gy for the XRT group and 68 Gy for the XRT/HORM group.

RESULTS

The distributions of several potential prognostic factors were analyzed. Significant differences between the groups were observed for tumor grade, pretreatment prostatic acid phosphatase, and age. The XRT/HORM group was composed of patients with worse features, including a greater proportion of patients with grade 4 tumors, more with abnormal acid phosphatase levels, and more under 60 years of age. The actuarial incidence of a rising PSA at 3 years for the XRT group was 81% vs. 15% for the XRT/HORM group (p < 0.0001). In addition, local relapse at 3 years was 34% for the XRT group and 15% for the XRT/HORM group (p < 0.02). There was no difference between the groups in terms of survival. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed using several disease end points, including a rising PSA, a rising PSA or disease relapse, any disease relapse, and local relapse, and the only prognostic factor of independent predictive value was treatment group, i.e., XRT vs. XRT/HORM.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on biochemical and disease relapse end points, definitive radiotherapy is insufficient treatment for high-risk prostate cancer patients. The addition of androgen ablation significantly reduces the recurrence rates, although longer follow-up is needed to determine if the combined treatment impacts significantly on survival.

Radiation therapy for T1 and T2 prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and disease outcome

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate disease outcome using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as an outcome measure in patients with T1 or T2 prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy in the PSA era.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcome for 461 patients with T1 (n = 205) or T2 (n = 256) prostate cancer followed for a median of 31 months after radiation therapy as the sole initial treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to delineate significant prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The freedom from relapse or rising PSA rate was 70% at 6 years and the survival rate was 83%. Although T stage, Gleason grade, serum prostatic acid phosphatase level, and serum PSA level were each significant determinants of outcome in univariate analysis, pretreatment PSA level was the only clearly independent covariate (P < 0.0001) in multivariate analysis. The 5-year actuarial freedom from relapse or from rising PSA levels is shown according to the pretreatment PSA level: 4 ng/mL or less (117 patients), 91%; more than 4 but 10 ng/mL or less (169 patients), 69%; more than 10 but 20 ng/mL or less (118 patients), 62%; and more than 20 ng/mL (57 patients), 38%. PSA doubling times in 75 patients with rising post-treatment profiles ranged from 1.3 to 78.2 months (mean, 14.4; median 11.3). Faster doubling times correlated significantly with adverse pretreatment prognostic factors (high-grade, high pretreatment PSA, and aneuploidy). To date, the survival rate of patients with rising PSA profiles was not depressed below the expected.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy is an acceptable modality for treating T1 or T2 disease and produces results comparable to those following radical prostatectomy when patients are stratified according to their pretreatment PSA value. The rapid PSA doubling times observed in patients with relapsing disease are more consistent with a "selective" rather than an "aggravation" mechanism.

Primary radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostatic cancer

Prostatic carcinoma is one of the leading causes of male cancer deaths. However, the routine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have not yet been established. Although the outcome of surgical and radiotherapeutical approaches has frequently been reported to be comparable, the profile of side effects is different. This could offer the basis for selecting the treatment of choice in individual cases. During the last decade the radiotherapeutical technique has markedly improved, in part due to the achievements in the field of computer assisted tomography planning and conformal technique; the outcome of side-effects has decreased with concurrent increase in the rate of local control. The prescribing, recording and reporting of irradiation have also recently developed, as well as the staging of the disease. Therefore we consider it timely to review progress in this subject and to emphasize the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostatic cancer.

Significance of overall treatment time for the development of radiation-induced intestinal complications. An experimental study in the rat

BACKGROUND

Late normal tissue reactions generally are believed to be independent of treatment time. However, previous studies suggest a relationship between acute mucosal injury and development of intestinal obstruction and enterocutaneous fistula formation. Thus, the pathogenesis of late intestinal complications may be complex, and mucosal cell proliferation during treatment may be important. This study assessed the influence of overall radiation treatment time on development of intestinal injury and complications after localized fractionated irradiation of rat ilium.

METHODS

Ninety-four male rats underwent orchiectomy, and a loop of small intestine was transposed to the scrotum. Orthovoltage irradiation was administered to the transposed, but functionally intact, intestine using 9 fractions of 5.6 Gy with interfraction intervals of 24, 48, or 72 hours. The animals were observed for complications and killed in groups 2 and 26 weeks after irradiation for assessment of injury. Incidence of intestinal complications and quantitative and semiquantitative histopathologic assessment of injury were used as endpoints.

RESULTS

Increasing total treatment time by extending interfraction intervals from 24 to 48 hours significantly reduced radiation injury and the incidence of intestinal complications. Differences in mucosal and fibrotic changes were most prominent. No significant differences were found between groups with interfraction intervals of 48 and 72 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall treatment time significantly influenced development of chronic radiation enteropathy. Thus, rapidly proliferating cells, as found in the intestinal mucosa, appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of intestinal complications. This probably represents consequential damage secondary to disruption of mucosal integrity.

Rate of relapse following treatment for localized prostate cancer: a critical analysis of retrospective reports

PURPOSE

Controversy exists over the optimal treatment for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Almost all of the treatment results are from non-randomized trials and interseries comparison is difficult since the apparent success of a treatment, as judged by the actuarial freedom from relapse and survival data, depends on patient selection criteria and post-treatment evaluation, in addition to the efficacy of the therapeutic intervention. In this report the calculation of a hazard function is used to estimate and compare the rate of relapse for the different treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical reports from major surgery and radiation oncology treatment institutions were analyzed. The actuarial recurrence data were used to calculate the annual rate of recurrence within each series.

RESULTS

For all but the lowest volume tumors, patients continue to be at risk of relapse for as long as these series have been followed. Despite the heterogeneity of patient populations, the recurrence rates by stage are similar for patients treated with surgery or irradiation. This result is consistent with pathologic data from prostatectomy specimens which indicate that for lesions > 12 cm3 (approx. 3 cm in diameter) there is high likelihood of extraprostatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcome for patients with localized prostate cancer may be more dependent on the inherent tumor biology than the particular type of treatment. Accordingly, the expectation and recommendation of a treatment must take into consideration the continued risk of relapse with either radiation therapy or surgery. There are, as yet, insufficient data regarding the impact of screening and earlier diagnosis on the curability of patients with localized prostate cancer.

Recent results of management of palpable clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty regarding if, when, and how localized prostate cancer should be managed.

METHODS

To examine evidence of a beneficial effect of aggressive treatment on metastatic failure and disease-specific mortality in clinically localized prostate cancer, the authors compiled data from the literature since 1980 regarding radical prostatectomy, external radiation therapy, and deferred treatment.

RESULTS

The weighted mean of reported disease-specific survival at 10 years was 93% for radical prostatectomy, 83% for deferred treatment, and 74% for external radiation therapy. To broaden the database we have also computed, from the recorded number of patients who died of prostate cancer and the number of person-years at risk, a calculated disease-specific survival at 10 years of 93% for radical prostatectomy, 83% for deferred treatment, and 62% for external radiation therapy. The data suggest a favorable treatment effect with regard to disease-specific mortality for radical prostatectomy, but not for external radiation therapy at 10 years of follow-up. This observation must be tempered by the absence of convincing randomized trials and by the possibility of selection biases in the reviewed studies.

CONCLUSIONS

As judged from our analysis, clinically localized prostate cancer often has a protracted course associated with a significant competing mortality and marginal benefit from radical prostatectomy at 10 years in terms of the endpoints used.

Effect of split-course radiotherapy on survival and local control in advanced localized prostatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

to analyze the effect of overall treatment time of radiotherapy on survival and local control in locally advanced prostatic cancer in a split-course treatment setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

168 patients with Stage C prostatic cancer treated during 1979-1989 by the split-course method where the overall treatment time is protracted. Treatment consisted of whole pelvis irradiation of 40 Gy in 4 weeks, followed by a planned 3-week interruption and an additional 26 Gy by the reduced field technique to a total dose of 66 Gy in 9 weeks and 30-33 fractions. The overall treatment time varied from 55 to 100 days. Thirty-eight percent (63) of the patients were treated primarily with radiotherapy, while the rest (105) had received androgen ablative therapy during 2 to 4.5 years before radiotherapy. To examine the effect of treatment time on local control, the patients were divided into three groups ( < or = 63 days, 64-70 days, and > 70 days) by treatment time.

RESULTS

the 5-year actuarial survival rates, calculated from the date of diagnosis, were 91% for the hormonally manipulated patients and 69% for the patients treated with radiotherapy alone. The 5-year actuarial local control rates, counted from the start of radiotherapy, were 84% for radiotherapy and 80% for the hormonally manipulated group. Overall, no significant effect of treatment time could be seen, either for radiotherapy alone or for the hormonally manipulated group. The results were similar when the material was further divided by T category and histologic grade.

CONCLUSIONS

no significant effect of overall treatment time (55 to 100 days) on survival or local control was found in either group. The survival time from diagnosis was longer in the hormonally pretreated group. Apparently, with adequate doses ( > or = 65 Gy) the overall treatment time becomes less important for local control of advanced prostatic cancer, even in a split-course treatment setting.