Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation to treat hypertension (RADIANCE-HTN SOLO): a multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial

Safety and efficacy of extravascular renal denervation using HyperQure™ renal denervation system in short-term swine model of hypertension

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of the HyperQure™ extravascular renal denervation (RDN) system in a swine model of mild hypertension. Ten female pigs were fed a 3% salt diet to induce hypertension and underwent either extravascular RDN using the HyperQure™ RDN system (n = 7) or a sham procedure (n = 3). Blood pressure (BP) was continuously monitored using implanted transmitters, and safety assessments were conducted via computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 28 days post-procedure. The primary endpoint was the change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at four weeks, while secondary endpoints included changes in diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and histological evaluation of renal nerve and artery integrity. At four weeks, SBP decreased by 11.8 ± 5.2 mmHg in the RDN group compared to an increase of 6.4 ± 4.2 mmHg in controls, resulting in a mean difference of 18.2 mmHg (p < .05). Similar improvements were observed in DBP and MAP, with mean differences of 15.4 and 16.2 mmHg, respectively (both p < .05). CTA revealed no significant renal artery or intraperitoneal organ injury. Histological analysis confirmed effective nerve ablation, as evidenced by reduced tyrosine hydroxylase staining, without intimal damage. No postoperative complications were observed during the 28-day study period. These findings demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the HyperQure™ extravascular RDN system in reducing BP, providing a promising alternative for patients with resistant hypertension or those ineligible for intravascular RDN. Further clinical trials are warranted to validate these results.

Endovascular renal denervation for the treatment of hypertension

Endovascular renal denervation (RDN) is a catheter-based, procedural therapy for the treatment of hypertension that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2023. Early studies suggest that endovascular RDN reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. However, BP response to RDN is highly variable, optimal patient selection remains uncertain, and the procedure's high cost remains a significant challenge. The purpose of this review is to comprehensively examine the literature regarding the mechanism by which endovascular RDN reduces BP and the safety and effectiveness of RDN, and to discuss key considerations for selecting appropriate patients for endovascular RDN. Relevant studies in the field were identified from PubMed using search terms including 'renal denervation' and 'renal denervation for hypertension.' In conclusion, clinical trials have demonstrated a statistically significant BP-lowering effect of endovascular RDN, which based on multiple trials with long-term follow-up, appears to persist over several years with low complication rates. More research is needed to understand which patients benefit most from endovascular RDN and to evaluate the long-term outcomes, including the impact of endovascular RDN on cardiovascular events.

The developments and emerging trends of Autonomic Nervous System Research in Arrhythmia: a bibliometric study from 2004 to 2024

The role of the autonomic nervous system in cardiovascular diseases has increasingly attracted the attention of researchers. This study aims to review research on the autonomic nervous system in arrhythmias from 2004 to 2024, with a focus on understanding the development trends in this field. Data for this study were sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection. We constructed and analyzed bibliometric visualizations related to publication trends, countries/regions, institutions, journals, research categories, themes, references, and keywords. Over the past two decades, academic output related to the autonomic nervous system's role in arrhythmias has grown, although global research distribution remains uneven. The United States leads in publication volume and is home to many high-output institutions, providing it with significant academic influence and fostering international collaboration. By summarizing high-citation literature, clustering keywords, and performing a "burst detection" analysis of keywords, we identified that the mechanisms and assessment methods for autonomic nervous system regulation are major research focuses. Recent hotspots include the psychopathology related to the autonomic nervous system and autonomic regulation therapies. As the biomedical field shifts toward precision medicine, future research trends are likely to focus on identifying precise biomarkers for assessing autonomic nervous system function and developing novel strategies to regulate it. These strategies may include correcting immune dysfunction, psychological interventions, and surgical treatments. This study suggests that ganglionated plexi ablation may represent the most transformative intervention strategy for the Autonomic Nervous System currently available, and highlights electrodermal activity as an evaluation index with considerable potential for widespread application.

Renal Denervation: A Review of Current Devices, Techniques, and Evidence

Hypertension is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in the United States, and its management remains a significant challenge for clinicians. Transcatheter renal denervation targeting sympathetic nervous system overactivity offers an additive benefit to medications for patients with uncontrolled hypertension as well as for patients who are not able or unwilling to be treated with medications. Two devices were recently approved for commercial use that employ radiofrequency ablative and ultrasound energy for renal denervation. Both devices have shown durable treatment effects up to 3 years with minimal device-related safety concerns.

Aorticorenal ganglion ablation for blood pressure lowering in canine models

Studies have shown that renal denervation (RDN) can lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with refractory hypertension, but issues such as renal sympathetic nerve reinnervation and suboptimal BP reduction remain unresolved. In this study, we identified the aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) in canines by observing ambulatory BP responses following electrical stimulation of the ARG. We injected cholera toxin subunit B combined with Alexa Fluor™ 555, a nerve tracer, into the identified ARG and confirmed its innervation of the renal artery and kidney by observing fluorescence in adjacent tissues. Twelve experimental canines were divided equally into an intervention group, which received ARG ablation using 95% ethanol, and a sham control group, which received normal saline. Our results demonstrated that ARG ablation significantly reduced systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, with minimal impact on heart rate. Additionally, ARG ablation lowered plasma and renal cortex norepinephrine levels, and reduced tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the renal cortex. No adverse events were observed during the 3-month follow-up period. These findings suggest that the ARG may serve as a novel target for RDN and could offer a therapeutic alternative for patients who do not respond to or experience elevated BP after RDN.

Abolition of Aorticorenal Ganglia Pacing Responses Improves Denervation Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) remains inconsistent despite developments in ablation technologies, due to the lack of an intraprocedural physiological end point. The aim of this study was to identify if aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) guided RDN using microwave (MW) catheter leads to more consistent denervation outcomes compared with empirical MW ablation.

METHODS

Pigs underwent sham procedure (n=8) or bilateral RDN using an in-house built open-irrigated MW catheter. Before denervation, ipsilateral ARG pacing was performed leading to renal artery vasoconstriction. MW ablation group (MW-group; n=7) received 1 ablation (100-120 W for 360 seconds) in the mid-main renal artery based on artery caliber. ARG-guided-MW ablation group (ARG-MW-group; n=7) was permitted an additional ablation more distally or at higher power until a vasoconstrictive response was abolished. Animals were euthanized at 4 to 5 weeks post-procedure.

RESULTS

ARG pacing caused an ipsilateral reduction in renal artery caliber from 4.67 to 4 mm; P=0.0006 in MW-group and 4.8 to 3.9 mm; P=0.001 in ARG-MW-group. Repeat ARG pacing at euthanasia led to a reduction in renal artery caliber in MW-group from 5.1 to 4.8 mm; P=0.006, but not in ARG-MW-group from 4.88 to 4.55 mm; P=0.08. There were no differences in ablation injury volumes between the groups. Compared with undenervated sham controls, ARG-MW-RDN versus MW-RDN caused median reductions in viable nerve area (antityrosine hydroxylase staining) at 4 to 5 weeks by 92.6% (interquartile range, 0.94-19.59%; P<0.0001) versus 55.02% (interquartile range, 15.87-75.11%; P=0.006) and median renal cortical norepinephrine content by 68.06% (interquartile range, 27.16-38.39%; P<0.0001) versus 25.25% (interquartile range, 56.97-157.7%; P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

ARG pacing serves as a physiological procedural end point to guide MW denervation to improve denervation outcomes.

Sympathetic Vasomotion Reflects Catheter-based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation

The field of renal denervation remains challenged by the inability to confirm successful ablation of the targeted renal sympathetic nerves. The availability of technology to measure regional blood flow in real time makes sympathetic control of the renal vasculature a logical endpoint to assess effective renal denervation, but autoregulatory mechanisms mask effects on mean renal blood flow. We hypothesized that renal sympathetic vasomotion, a novel marker of rhythmic sympathetic control, reflects successive rounds of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation. To test this, ten pigs underwent unilateral surgical renal denervation, recovered for at least seven days, and then underwent four successive rounds of catheter-based radiofrequency denervation of the contralateral kidney. Bilateral renal blood flow velocity and abdominal aortic pressure were measured before and after ablations to assess renal vasomotion. Prior to catheter-based denervation, the renal vasomotion profiles of the innervated and surgically denervated kidneys differed significantly (P < 0.005). Ablation of the largest renal branch artery reduced renal sympathetic vasomotion by 52%. Ablation of the remaining renal branch arteries reduced sympathetic vasomotion 95% from baseline and eliminated the statistical differences between surgically and catheter denervated kidneys. Two additional rounds of catheter denervation of the main renal artery did not consistently decrease renal sympathetic vasomotion magnitude any further. These results indicate that renal sympathetic vasomotion could provide intraprocedural feedback for interventionalists performing catheter-based renal denervation and thereby improve the efficacy, safety, and consistency of this antihypertensive intervention.

The road to renal denervation for hypertension and beyond (HF): two decades of failed, succeeded, and to be determined

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system has been attributed to the development of hypertension. Two established approaches for treating hypertension are pharmacotherapy and lifestyle changes. With an improved understanding of renal nerve anatomy and physiology, renal denervation has been proposed as an alternative treatment for hypertension. Specifically, it has been shown that the interruption of sympathetic nerves connecting the kidney and the sympathetic nervous system can reduce blood pressure. Here, we present a review on how renal denervation can help hypertension patients, specifically focusing on our novel understanding of renal nerve anatomy, denervation technique, and subsequent clinical trials, and how it may be used to treat other cardiovascular diseases like heart failure.

Clinical neurocardiology: defining the value of neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics - 2024 update

The intricate role of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in regulating cardiac physiology has long been recognized. Aberrant function of the ANS is central to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases. It stands to reason, therefore, that neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics hold great promise in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases in humans. A decade after the inaugural edition, this White Paper reviews the current state of understanding of human cardiac neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and pathophysiology in specific disease conditions, autonomic testing, risk stratification, and neuromodulatory strategies to mitigate the progression of cardiovascular diseases.

Predicting blood pressure response to renal denervation based on a new approach

BACKGROUND

Identifying predictors of blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN) is crucial for patient selection. According to Wilder's principle, baseline BP predicts BP change after any antihypertensive intervention. Thus, any observed BP change after RDN is the sum of the BP change depending on the baseline BP and the specific BP reduction due to RDN. Based on this concept, we propose a new definition of BP responders.

METHODS

In our center, 148 patients with uncontrolled hypertension underwent RDN, and 24-h ambulatory BP (ABP) was measured at baseline, and 6 months after the procedure. The decrease in 24-h systolic BP (SBP) correlated with baseline SBP ( P  = <0.001, r  = -0.374). We determined the RDN-specific effect by subtracting the predicted SBP decrease from the observed SBP decrease. The cohort was divided into RDN responders, neutral responders, and nonresponders.

RESULTS

Our study population had a mean age of 59 ± 10.4 years and was 74% male. The RDN-specific (residual) 24-h ABP decreased by -14.9 ± 6.3/-8.2 ± 3.8 mmHg (responder group), 1.0 ± 3.2/0.2 ± 1.9 mmHg (neutral group), and 14.2 ± 10.4/8.3 ± 3.9 mmHg (nonresponder group) 6 months after RDN. Responders had fewer antihypertensive medications ( P  = 0.018), higher baseline office heart rate (HR) ( P  = 0.019), higher 24-h ambulatory HR ( P  = 0.003), lower BMI ( P  < 0.038), and absence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) ( P  = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Our definition of BP responders to RDN separates baseline BP-related changes from RDN-specific changes. Positive predictors for BP response to RDN include low BMI, fewer antihypertensive medications, high baseline office HR, high 24-h ambulatory HR, and absence of T2D.

In these cases, I treat hypertension with renal ablation

Systemic arterial hypertension is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Despite therapeutic advancements, a significant proportion of hypertensive patients fail to achieve adequate blood pressure control. Renal denervation (RDN) is emerging as an innovative and minimally invasive procedure to treat hypertension by modulating the renal sympathetic nervous system. Recent clinical trials, including SYMPLICITY HTN-3, SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED, and RADIANCE-HTN SOLO, have shown variable results, influenced by patient selection and study design. The latest 2024 ESC guidelines on systemic arterial hypertension recommend RDN as a therapeutic option in selected cases, especially in patients with resistant hypertension not adequately controlled by pharmacological therapy. However, the response to this approach varies according to individual pathophysiology and the level of sympathetic activation. This article highlights how RDN, performed using ultrasound or radiofrequency technologies, may represent a breakthrough for difficult-to-treat patients, bridging current therapeutic gaps and reducing long-term cardiovascular risk. Finally, it emphasizes the importance of a multi-disciplinary assessment to maximize the benefits of the procedure.

Renal Denervation: A New Therapy for Resistant Hypertension

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved renal denervation to treat resistant hypertension. This procedure is a minimally invasive procedure that starts by placing a catheter in the renal artery. This catheter is used to send either radiofrequency heat or ultrasound waves to burn the superficial nerves surrounding the renal arteries while making certain no damage happens to the renal arteries themselves. This procedure is done after a renal angiogram to ensure patency of the renal artery. Each radiofrequency ablation will take 1-2 minutes, depending on the device used. The radiofrequency balloon generator requires one single application of the radiofrequency pulse. The radiofrequency generator that uses a catheter tube will need more than one pulse. The second approved option uses ultrasound to generate an electrical signal that is converted into ultrasound vibration, that occurs at the distal end of the catheter. This vibration heats the system around the nerves, disrupting the superficial nerves that communicate with the central nervous system. This will result in lowering the blood pressure. We will review the studies that led to FDA approval, and the current guidelines for use. The FDA now approves both devices.

The current state and future of renal denervation: A review

Renal denervation as an option for difficult to treat hypertension has been a concept for several decades, with recent U.S. FDA approval of new, minimally invasive devices. However, while renal denervation has the potential to improve hypertension management, several challenges require consideration prior to widespread adoption. The effect relative to sham control is modest, and generally similar to addition of a single blood pressure lowering medication. It is possible that with additional technique refinement greater effects may be possible. Key factors to consider beyond the direction, strengths, and limitations of the renal denervation technologies themselves, are an understanding of patient groups that derive greatest benefit and phenotypes or biomarkers that predict greater response. This review provides an update on these challenges in addition to the current state and future of renal denervation within the context of hypertension management and treatment.

Impact of expected blood pressure reduction on patient preferences for pharmaceutical and renal denervation treatment

BACKGROUND

Effective patient-centered care requires an adequate understanding of patient preferences for different therapeutic options. We modelled patient preference for blood pressure (BP) management by pharmaceutical or interventional treatments such as renal denervation in patients with different profiles of uncontrolled hypertension.

METHODS

Modeling was based on the findings from a previously conducted quantitative discrete choice experiment (DCE). The likelihood of selecting either an interventional treatment option or additional antihypertensive medication option was calculated for three patient profiles that represent the range of patients with hypertension commonly encountered in clinical practice: treatment-naive, patients with uncontrolled BP while on one to three antihypertensive medications, and patients with drug-resistant hypertension. Variables in the preference model were treatment attributes from the DCE study: expected reduction in office SBP with each treatment, duration of treatment effect, risk of reversible drug side effects from drugs, and risk of temporary pain and/or bruising or vascular injury from interventions. Values of the variables were derived from published clinical studies or expert opinion.

RESULTS

The model predicted that the likelihood of choosing an intervention over initiating pharmacotherapy was 17.2% for previously untreated patients, 23.7% for patients with moderate hypertension currently on pharmacotherapy, and 41.8% for patients with drug-resistant hypertension. The dominant variable driving preference in these models was the expected BP reduction. Patient preferences for intervention are greater when drug nonadherence or increased SBP reduction at 3 vs. 1 year are included in the model. Baseline BP, drug side effects, or risks of the procedure had little influence on decisions.

CONCLUSION

Modeling using patient preference weights predicts that a substantial minority of patients favor an interventional treatment such as renal denervation over initiation or escalation of medications. Awareness of a patient's interest in device-based versus pharmaceutical strategies should inform the shared decision-making process for hypertension treatment.

Renal denervation - radiofrequency vs. ultrasound: insights from a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomized sham controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multiple randomized trials have shown that renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) when compared with sham control but the antihypertensive efficacy of radiofrequency vs. ultrasound-based RDN is uncertain. We aimed to compare the outcomes of radiofrequency RDN (rRDN) and ultrasound RDN (uRDN), when compared with sham in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for randomized sham-controlled trials (RCTs) of rRDN or uRDN or for trials of rRDN vs. uRDN. Primary efficacy outcome was 24-h ambulatory SBP. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis was performed comparing the efficacy and safety against sham and against each other.

RESULTS

Among 13 RCTs that enrolled 2285 hypertensive patients, rRDN reduced 24-h ambulatory SBP [(MD = 2.34 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.72-3.95], office SBP (MD = 5.04 mmHg; 95% CI: 2.68-7.40)], and office DBP (MD = 2.95 mmHg; 95% CI: 1.68-4.22) when compared with sham. Similarly, uRDN reduced 24-h ambulatory SBP (MD = 4.74 mmHg; 95% CI: 2.80-6.67), day-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 5.40 mmHg; 95% CI: 3.68-7.13), night-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 3.84 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.02-7.67), and office SBP (3.98 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.78-7.19) when compared with sham. There was significantly greater reduction in 24-h ambulatory SBP (MD = 2.40 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.09-4.71), day-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 4.09 mmHg; 95% CI: 1.61-6.56), and night-time ambulatory SBP (MD = 5.76 mmHg; 95% CI: 0.48-11.0) with uRDN when compared with rRDN. For primary efficacy outcome, uRDN ranked #1, followed by rRDN (#2), and sham (#3).

CONCLUSION

In hypertensive patients, rRDN and uRDN significantly reduced 24-h ambulatory and office SBP when compared with sham control with significantly greater reduction in ambulatory BP with uRDN than with rRDN at 4 months (mean) of follow-up. A large-scale randomized head-to-head trial of rRDN or uRDN is warranted to evaluate if there are differences in efficacy.

Assessing the efficacy of renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension : Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) is an innovative procedure designed to regulate the renal sympathetic nervous system for the control of arterial hypertension (HTN). RDN has emerged as an alternative for patients with resistant HTN. However, the clinical efficacy of RDN remains incompletely elucidated.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of RDN with sham procedure or pharmacological treatment in patients with resistant HTN. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test I2 statistics. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled across trials. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The primary outcomes of interest were changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and serum creatinine.

RESULTS

Twenty-one RCTs comprising 3345 patients were included in this meta-analysis, whereby 2004 (59.91%) received renal denervation and 1341 (40.09%) received pharmacological treatment or sham procedure. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 48 months. Compared to control group, RDN significantly reduced SBP (MD -3.53 mm Hg; 95% CI -5.94 to -1.12; p = 0.004; I2 = 74%) and DBP (MD -1.48 mm Hg; 95% CI -2.56 to -0.40; p = 0.007; I2 = 51%). Regarding serum creatinine (MD -2.51; 95% CI -7.90 to 2.87; p = 0.36; I2 = 40%), there was no significant difference between RDN and control groups.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with resistant HTN, RDN was associated with a reduction in SBP and DBP compared to sham procedure or pharmacological treatment.

Sex-specific differences in the efficacy of renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension depending on visceral obesity and kidney function

Objective

To investigate the sex differences in the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with resistant hypertension (RHT) concerning the size of abdominal fat depots, changes in biomarkers of sympathetic activity, and renal function.

Materials and methods

24 men (56.5 ± 7.8 years) and 33 women (59.5 ± 8.4 years) with RHT were enrolled in the study and underwent RDN. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) [systolic/diastolic (SBP/DBP)], serum creatinine (with eGFR calculation), serum adipocytokines (leptin, adiponectin, resistin), serum metanephrines and normetanephrines were measured baseline and 12 months after RDN. The size of subcutaneous, visceral, and perirenal adipose tissue (SAT, VAT, and PRAT) was assessed using MRI.

Results

After RDN, BP decreased, leptin increased, and adiponectin, resistin, and metanephrine levels did not change in both sexes. There was a decrease in normetanephrine levels in women and a similar trend in men. In men, the eGFR did not change. In women, the eGFR remained unchanged only in those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n = 10) and decreased in the absence of CKD (n = 23) from 79.7 ± 14.1 to 72.1 ± 12.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.011). Men had larger visceral fat depots, and women had larger subcutaneous fat depots. After RDN, the size of adipose tissue in men remained unchanged, and in women, the PRAT thickness decreased from 2.36 ± 1.23 to 2.10 ± 1.17 cm (p = 0.002). Lowering BP in women was associated with increased leptin levels after RDN (r = -0.47 for SBP, r = -0.48 for DBP). Dependence of BP reduction on baseline eGFR was observed in men only [r = 0.44 for SBP, r = 0.48 for pulse pressure (PP)]. Additionally, in men, the decrease in SBP and PP depended on VAT areas (r = -0.44 and r = -0.58, respectively). In women, the SBP reduction showed an inverse correlation between baseline weight (r = -0.35) and waist circumference (r = -0.38).

Conclusions

The magnitude of the antihypertensive effect of RDN depends on signs of visceral obesity and, in men, also on the presence of CKD. Renoprotective effects of RDN in men are obtained regardless of the initial kidney function, while in women, it was observed only in individuals with CKD. Additional beneficial effects of RDN in women include a decrease in normetanephrine levels and a reduction in PRAT size.

Renal denervation in the setting of heart failure

Renal Denervation (RDN) has emerged over the last decade as a third pillar in the treatment of arterial hypertension, alongside pharmacotherapy and lifestyle modifications. Mechanistically, it reduces central sympathetic overactivation, a process also relevant to heart failure. In this mini-review, we summarize the development of RDN for heart failure, discuss the current evidence supporting its effects, and provide an outlook on future developments.

Ultrasound renal denervation in hypertensive patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is the leading noncommunicable disease case affecting 1.28 billion individuals worldwide, with most cases located in low- and middle-income countries. While there are numerous techniques for treating mild to moderate hypertension, properly controlling severe or resistant hypertension poses substantial challenges. Ultrasound-based renal denervation (uRDN) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological approach. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of uRDN in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

The literature search across PubMed, ScienceDirect, BMJ Journals, ProQuest, and Springer databases yielded 419 articles. A total of 395 articles were filtered, leading to 24 articles assessed for eligibility and overall analysis, which resulted in eight included studies for quantitative synthesis. Quality appraisal used RoB 2.0, while meta-analysis used RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

Our analysis results indicated significant improvements in 24-hour, daytime, and home ambulatory blood pressure measurements, favoring the uRDN over control. The mean difference (MD) for 24-hour measurements was -0.84 mmHg [95% CI -1.14, -0.55; p < 0.00001], for daytime measurements -1.27 mmHg [95% CI -1.59, -0.95; p < 0.00001], and for home measurements -1.98 mmHg [95% CI -2.32, -1.64; p < 0.00001], with moderate heterogeneity observed. Office ambulatory measurements also favored the uRDN with a significant MD of -1.51 mmHg [95% CI -1.91; -1.10; p < 0.00001]. Funnel plots revealed some outliers, indicating true heterogeneity among the studies.

CONCLUSION

uRDN was associated with a significant reduction (-2.32 to -0.10 mmHg) in blood pressure of hypertensive patients.

Renal denervation for hypertension

Innovative therapies for hypertension are desperately needed given the rising prevalence and falling rates of control of hypertension despite an abundance of available medical therapies. Procedural interventions lower blood pressure without depending on adherence to medications, and endovascular renal denervation (RDN) is the interventional procedure with the best evidence base for the treatment of hypertension. After nearly two decades of study, with major refinements to devices, technique and trial design, two different systems for RDN received approval from the FDA in late 2023 for the treatment of hypertension. These decisions were based on a portfolio of sham-controlled clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety of both radiofrequency and ultrasound RDN in treating patients across the spectrum of hypertension, including patients with mild disease taking no or one medication as well as those with moderate and truly resistant hypertension. In this Review, we begin by summarizing the background and scope of the global problem of hypertension control and explore the evolution and mechanism of RDN. We then detail early studies and randomized clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of RDN procedures, review international statements, and provide practical guidance on patient selection and implementation of RDN, including the crucial aspects of building a hypertension team and of involving patients in shared decision-making.

Novel approaches to define responders to interventional treatment in hypertension: insights from the SPYRAL HTN-OFF and HTN-ON MED trials

Multiple sham-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated significant reductions in both office and 24-h blood pressure (BP) following radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) in the uncontrolled hypertension population. Notably, the blood pressure response varies widely within individual participants, thus showing a clinical need to identify potential RDN "responders" prior to the procedure. Despite multiple analytic efforts, no single parameter, aside from baseline blood pressure, has been consistently associated with BP reduction following RDN. However, this failure may be due to limitations in empiric definitions of responders. Indeed, commonly applied responder definitions based on the difference between two point-in-time BP measurements are fraught due to visit-to-visit variability in office and 24-h blood pressure endpoints. Several factors should be considered to develop a more clinically useful operational definition of procedural response including relative changes in office and 24-h BP, consideration of the temporal response to RDN, as well as adjustment for baseline BP. The current evidence may provide incentives for future expert consensus to precisely define responders to hypertension treatments.

Renal nerves in physiology, pathophysiology and interoception

Sympathetic efferent renal nerves have key roles in the regulation of kidney function and blood pressure. Increased renal sympathetic nerve activity is thought to contribute to hypertension by promoting renal sodium retention, renin release and renal vasoconstriction. This hypothesis led to the development of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for the treatment of hypertension. Two RDN devices that ablate both efferent and afferent renal nerves received FDA approval for this indication in 2023. However, in animal models, selective ablation of afferent renal nerves resulted in comparable anti-hypertensive effects to ablation of efferent and afferent renal nerves and was associated with a reduction in sympathetic nerve activity. Selective afferent RDN also improved kidney function in a chronic kidney disease model. Notably, the beneficial effects of RDN extend beyond hypertension and chronic kidney disease to other clinical conditions that are associated with elevated sympathetic nerve activity, including heart failure and arrhythmia. These findings suggest that the kidney is an interoceptive organ, as increased renal sensory nerve activity modulates sympathetic activity to other organs. Future studies are needed to translate this knowledge into novel therapies for the treatment of hypertension and other cardiorenal diseases.

Medication Changes After Renal Denervation: Current Evidence and Patient Perspectives

Renal denervation (RDN) is recognized as an adjunct therapy for hypertension management with a favorable and consistent blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety profile. Alteration in medication burden is another noteworthy outcome of RDN for clinicians and patients. In this review, we summarized current clinical trials and patient perspectives, focusing on the use of antihypertensive medication (AHM) after RDN. The results of randomized controlled trials demonstrated that patients undergoing RDN exhibited lower blood pressure levels with a similar AHM burden or similar blood pressure levels with fewer AHMs than the sham control group. In studies with follow-ups of ≤6 months, AHM use increased or remained generally consistent in patients undergoing RDN, which may be attributed to the prespecified study process. In studies with follow-ups of >6 months, the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of RDN was consistent with a decreasing or similar AHM burden compared with baseline conditions, except for the 36-month results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED (Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications) trial. Huge gaps exist between current evidence on medication changes after RDN and patient expectations, which may be addressed through adequate communication in a shared decision-making process and further improvement of the RDN procedure. Moreover, novel evaluation methodologies for assessing medication burden changes, incorporating adherence to AHMs and modifications in drug classes, may be required to evaluate the impact of RDN on medication usage in the future.

Physicians' perception of guideline recommendations for the treatment of resistant hypertension by renal denervation: Resistant Hypertension Working Group, Argentine Hypertension Society

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the perceptions and knowledge of specialized Argentine physicians regarding renal denervation (RDN) as a treatment for resistant hypertension (R-HT).

METHOD

A survey was conducted among 206 physicians, mainly cardiologists and internists, to assess their awareness and perceptions of RDN. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman's Rho correlation.

RESULTS

The survey revealed that 83% of the responders are aware of RDN. Despite this high awareness, only 60% believe in its safety, while 33.2% are uncertain, and 6.8% consider it unsafe. Significant correlations were found between the awareness of RDN and perceptions of its efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights a gap between knowledge and confidence in RDN among specialized Argentine physicians. Continuous education and shared decision-making are crucial to improve the adoption of RDN in clinical practice. Long-term safety and efficacy data support RDN as a valuable tool for managing R-HT. Addressing safety concerns through targeted educational initiatives is essential.

Guidelines for the management of hypertension in CKD patients: where do we stand in 2024?

Until recently, major bodies producing guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) disagreed in some key issues. In June 2023, the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) published the new 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension a document that was endorsed by the European Renal Association. Several novel recommendations relevant to the management of hypertension in patients with CKD appeared in these guidelines, which have been updated to reflect the latest evidence-based practices in managing hypertension in CKD patients. Most of these are in general agreement with the previous 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines-some reflect different emphasis on some topics (i.e. detailed algorithms on antihypertensive agent use) while others reflect evolution of important evidence in recent years. The aim of the present review is to summarize and comment on key points and main areas of focus in patients with CKD, as well as to compare and highlight the main differences with the 2021 KDIGO Guidelines for the management of blood pressure in CKD.

Renal Artery Denervation for the Management of Hypertension: Current Trends and Future Direction

Renal artery denervation has re-emerged as a potential therapeutic option for patients with hypertension, especially those resistant to conventional pharmacotherapy. This comprehensive review explores the importance of careful patient selection, procedural techniques, clinical efficacy, safety considerations, and future directions of renal artery denervation in hypertension management. Drawing upon a wide range of available evidence, this review aims to provide a thorough understanding of the procedure and its role in contemporary hypertension treatment paradigms.

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Arterial Hypertension: 10-Year Real-World Follow-Up Data

This analysis of real-world data examines the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of renal denervation in hypertensive patients for up to 10 years. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent renal denervation (RDN) (single operator) for uncontrolled resistant hypertension. Efficacy was defined as the interindividual change of office (OBPM) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) at 1, 6, 12 months, 2-4 and 5-10 years after RDN. Medication changes, renal function, and device generation disparities were analyzed. Of these patients, 42 received RDN with a first-generation device, while 23 underwent the procedure with a second-generation device. Baseline demographics included a predominantly male cohort (57.6%) with an average age of 60.3 years. The mean number of medications at baseline was 4.3. OBPM at baseline was 169.0/87.4 mmHg, and ABPM at baseline was 153.4/88.4 mmHg. Post-procedure, significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) were observed in both OBPM and ABPM at 1 month (OBPM 147.9/82.8 mmHg; ABPM 141.3/83.0 mmHg [SBP, p < 0.001]), sustained up to 10 years (OBPM 153.1/84.3 mmHg; ABPM 138/80.1 mmHg [SBP, p < 0.001]). After 1 year around half of patients had a controlled OBPM and 24 h ABPM < 135/85 mmHg, which was associated with a higher number of ablation spots (31.5±14.8 vs. 15.5 ± 6.5, p = 0.002) and occurred more often when treated with a second-generation device (2 [12.5%] vs. 7 [77.8%], p = 0.002). Renal function displayed a minor physiological decline over 5-10 years. No major complication occurred. Renal denervation demonstrated sustained significant reductions in systolic OBPM and ABPM up to 10 years post-procedure. Controlled blood pressure at 1 year was associated with a higher number of mean ablated spots and the use of a second-generation device. The procedure exhibited a favorable safety profile, indicating its viability in managing hypertension without significant renal function compromise.

Echocardiographic findings following renal sympathetic denervation for treatment resistant hypertension, the ReShape CV-risk study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe and compare echocardiographic findings before renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) and 6 and 24 months after the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) were included in this non-randomised intervention study. RDN was performed by a single experienced operator using the Symplicity Catheter System. Echocardiographic measurements were performed at baseline, and after 6 and 24 months.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 21 patients with TRH, with a mean systolic office blood pressure (BP) of 163 mmHg and mean diastolic BP 109 mmHg. Mixed model analysis showed no significant change in left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) or left atrium volume index (LAVI) after the RDN procedure. Higher LVMI at baseline was significantly associated with greater reduction in LVMI (p < 0.001). Relative wall thickness (RWT) increased over time (0.48 mm after two years) regardless of change in BP. There was a small but significant reduction in LV end-diastolic (LVIDd) and end-systolic (LVIDs) diameters after RDN, with a mean reduction of 2.6 and 2.4 mm, respectively, after two years. Progression to concentric hypertrophy was observed only in in patients who did not achieve normal BP values, despite BP reduction after RDN.

CONCLUSION

There was no reduction of LV mass after RDN. We found a small statistically significant reduction in LVIDd and LVIDs, which together with increase in RWT can indicate progression towards concentric hypertrophy. BP reduction after RDN on its own does not reverse concentric remodelling if target BP is not achieved.

Short-term effects of denervation in the treatment of hypertension: A meta-analysis excluding drug interferences

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the short-term efficacy of denervation in treating hypertension with the exclusion of drug-interfering factors.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted across 8 databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, for articles on denervation in the treatment of medication-naïve hypertension published from inception to May 2024. All data were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Four studies, comprising a total of 752 subjects, were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicated that, compared to the sham-operated group, the denervation group showed a significant reduction in short-term 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure and office systolic blood pressure (OSBP) as well as office diastolic blood pressure (ODBP). No significant safety events were identified.

CONCLUSION

Denervation has the potential to reduce blood pressure in the short-term for patients with medication-naïve hypertension, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile. This offers hope for patients who are intolerant to drug therapy or unwilling to take lifelong medication. However, its long-term effects require further study. Future research should focus on expanding the sample size and prolonging the follow-up period to further solidify its role in the treatment of hypertension.

Effects of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Several sham-controlled trials have investigated the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) with mixed outcomes. We aimed to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of all randomized, sham-controlled trials investigating RDN with first- and second-generation devices in hypertension.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for eligible trials. Outcomes included both efficacy (24-hour and office systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) and safety (all-cause death, vascular complication, renal artery stenosis >70%, hypertensive crisis) of RDN. We performed a study-level, pairwise, random-effects meta-analysis of the summary data.

RESULTS

Ten trials comprising 2478 patients with hypertension while being either off or on treatment were included. Compared with sham, RDN reduced 24-hour and office systolic blood pressure by 4.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.1; P<0.00001) and 6.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.6 to 9.7; P<0.0001), respectively. The 24-hour and office diastolic blood pressure paralleled these findings (-2.6 mm Hg [95% CI, -3.6 to -1.5]; P<0.00001; -3.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -5.4 to -1.6]; P=0.0003). There was no difference in 24-hour and office systolic blood pressure reduction between trials with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication (P for interaction, 0.62 and 0.73, respectively). There was no relevant difference in vascular complications (odds ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.57 to 5.0]; P=0.34), renal artery stenosis (odds ratio, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.06 to 36.97]; P=0.80), hypertensive crisis (odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.38]; P=0.26), and all-cause death (odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI, 0.34 to 9.20]; P=0.50) between RDN and sham groups. Change of renal function based on estimated glomerular filtration rate was comparable between groups (P for interaction, 0.84). There was significant heterogeneity between trials.

CONCLUSIONS

RDN safely reduces ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure versus a sham procedure in the presence and absence of antihypertensive medications.

Long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in resistant hypertension: 8-year results from the ACHIEVE study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound renal sympathetic denervation (uRDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in the absence and presence of antihypertensive treatment at 2 months. Beyond 3 years, there is a lack of follow-up data. This study investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of uRDN.

METHODS

This prospective observational study recruited patients previously included in the international multicenter ACHIEVE study, with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥160 mmHg, 24 h ambulatory SBP ≥130 mmHg, ≥3 antihypertensive drugs and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≥45 ml/min/1.73m2 undergoing uRDN. The primary efficacy outcome was 24 h ambulatory SBP, adjusted for the number of defined daily dosages (DDD) of antihypertensive drugs. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects models and inverse probability weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 27 out of the initially enrolled 96 patients underwent prospective follow-up at a median of 8.2 [7.6-8.9] years. Mean age was 62.6±9.3 years (37.0% female). Preprocedural 24 h ambulatory BP was 151.9/84.1±11.5/11.1 mmHg and the median number of DDDs was 5.0 [4.3-7.0]. At 8 years after uRDN, the change in 24 h ambulatory SBP was -19.5 [95%CI -26.7,-12.4] mmHg (p<0.001). The 8-year change in the number of DDDs was -1.7 [-2.8,-0.6] (p = 0.003). The 8-year decline in eGFR was -8.9 [-13.2,-4.7] ml/min/1.73m2 (p<0.001). Clinical event data were available for all 96 patients (median follow-up 3.5 [1.0-8.0] years). Renal failure occurred in one patient and no cases of renal artery stenosis were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant BP reduction was observed up until 8 years following uRDN in parallel to a decrease in drug burden over time, in the absence of procedure-related adverse events.

The Paradise Renal Denervation System: An FDA-approved catheter-based treatment option for resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension is defined as office blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg with a mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure of >130/80 mm Hg in patients who are compliant with 3 or more antihypertensive medications. Those who persistently fail pharmaceutical therapy may benefit from interventional treatment, such as renal denervation. Sympathetic nervous activity in the kidney is a known contributor to increased blood pressure because it results in efferent and afferent arteriole vasoconstriction, reduced renal blood flow, increased sodium and water reabsorption, and the release of renin. The Recor Paradise Renal Denervation System is designed to target renal sympathetic nerves via ultrasound ablation. The RADIANCE trials have demonstrated that patients who underwent renal denervation had a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure as compared with those who underwent a sham procedure. Furthermore, the device was found to have a favorable safety profile, with minimal major adverse events. The Food and Drug Administration granted approval to Recor, and the Paradise system is expected to serve as an adjunctive therapy for patients with true-resistant hypertension.

Effects of renal denervation on the kidney: albuminuria, proteinuria, and renal function

Renal denervation has attracted attention as a novel antihypertensive treatment for hypertensive patients who are poorly controlled by medicine. Clinical studies have shown the antihypertensive effects of renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. However, renal denervation potentially has other beneficial effects, such as improving glucose metabolism and cardioprotection beyond its antihypertensive effects. In this mini-review article, we summarize and discuss the effects of renal denervation on proteinuria, albuminuria, and renal function based on the recent findings of clinical studies, and review the renoprotective effects of renal denervation.

Consensus statement on renal denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: 1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or 2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Renal denervation improves cardiac function independently of afterload and restores myocardial norepinephrine levels in a rodent heart failure model

Renal nerves play a critical role in cardiorenal interactions. Renal denervation (RDN) improved survival in some experimental heart failure (HF) models. It is not known whether these favorable effects are indirect, explainable by a decrease in vascular afterload, or diminished neurohumoral response in the kidneys, or whether RDN procedure per se has direct myocardial effects in the failing heart. To elucidate mechanisms how RDN affects failing heart, we studied load-independent indexes of ventricular function, gene markers of myocardial remodeling, and cardiac sympathetic signaling in HF, induced by chronic volume overload (aorto-caval fistula, ACF) of Ren2 transgenic rats. Volume overload by ACF led to left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and dysfunction, myocardial remodeling (upregulated Nppa, MYH 7/6 genes), increased renal and circulating norepinephrine (NE), reduced myocardial NE content, increased monoaminoxidase A (MAO-A), ROS production and decreased tyrosine hydroxylase (+) nerve staining. RDN in HF animals decreased congestion in the lungs and the liver, improved load-independent cardiac function (Ees, PRSW, Ees/Ea ratio), without affecting arterial elastance or LV pressure, reduced adverse myocardial remodeling (Myh 7/6, collagen I/III ratio), decreased myocardial MAO-A and inhibited renal neprilysin activity. RDN increased myocardial expression of acetylcholinesterase (Ache) and muscarinic receptors (Chrm2), decreased circulating and renal NE, but increased myocardial NE content, restoring so autonomic control of the heart. These changes likely explain improvements in survival after RDN in this model. The results suggest that RDN has remote, load-independent and favorable intrinsic myocardial effects in the failing heart. RDN therefore could be a useful therapeutic strategy in HF.

Real-world experience with ultrasound renal denervation utilizing home blood pressure monitoring: the Global Paradise System registry study design

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a major public health issue due to its association with cardiovascular disease risk. Despite the availability of effective antihypertensive drugs, rates of blood pressure (BP) control remain suboptimal. Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged as an effective non-pharmacological, device-based treatment option for patients with hypertension. The multicenter, single-arm, observational Global Paradise™ System (GPS) registry has been designed to examine the long-term safety and effectiveness of ultrasound RDN (uRDN) with the Paradise System in a large population of patients with hypertension.

METHODS

The study aims to enroll up to 3000 patients undergoing uRDN in routine clinical practice. Patients will be recruited over a 4-year period and followed for 5 years (at 3, 6, and 12 months after the uRDN procedure and annually thereafter). Standardized home BP measurements will be taken every 3 months with automatic upload to the cloud. Office and ambulatory BP and adverse events will be collected as per routine clinical practice. Quality-of-Life questionnaires will be used to capture patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational registry will provide real-world information on the safety and effectiveness of uRDN in a large population of patients treated during routine clinical practice, and also allow for a better understanding of responses in prespecified subgroups. The focus on home BP in this registry is expected to improve completeness of long-term follow-up and provide unique insights into BP over time.

Consensus statement on renal denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: (1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or (2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Does renal denervation require cardiovascular outcome-driven data?

Hypertension is a major driver of cardiovascular disease with a prevalence of 32-34% in adults worldwide. This poses a formidable unmet challenge for healthcare systems, highlighting the need for enhanced treatment strategies. Since 2017, eight major sham-controlled randomised controlled trials have examined the effectiveness and safety of renal denervation (RDN) as therapy for BP control. Although most trials demonstrated a reduction in systolic 24-hour/daytime ambulatory BP compared to control groups, open to discussion is whether major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-driven RDN trials are necessary or whether the proof of BP reduction as a surrogate for better cardiovascular outcomes is sufficient. We conducted an analysis of the statistical methods used in various trials to assess endpoint definitions and determine the necessity for MACE-driven outcome data. Such comprehensive analysis provides further evidence to confidently conclude that RDN significantly reduces blood pressure compared to sham controls. Importantly, this enables the interpolation of RDN trial endpoints with other studies that report on outcome data, such as pharmacological trials which demonstrate a significant reduction in MACE risk with a decrease in BP. Moreover, limitations associated with directly evaluating outcome data further support the use of BP as a surrogate endpoint. For example, conducting lengthier trials with larger numbers of participants to ensure robust statistical power presents a substantial challenge to evaluating outcome data. Thus, in light of the crucial need to tackle hypertension, there are notable advantages of considering BP as a surrogate for outcome data.

Effects of renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a latest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials

The efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after RDN in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDN on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 15 November 2023 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of RDN. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) with RDN versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were changes in 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP), office BP, and home BP. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From twelve trials, 2222 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo RDN (n = 1295) or a sham procedure (n = 927). At 2-6 months after treatment, RDN significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory SBP by 2.81 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.09, -1.53; p < 0.001) compared with the sham procedure. RDN also reduced daytime SBP by 3.17 mmHg (- 4.75, - 1.58; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.41 mmHg (- 4.69, - 2.13; p < 0.001), office SBP by 4.95 mmHg (- 6.37, - 3.54; p < 0.001), and home SBP by 4.64 mmHg (- 7.44, - 1.84; p = 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of BP reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or between with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that RDN significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension.

Effects of renal denervation on the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases

Renal denervation (RDN) is a neuromodulation therapy performed in patients with hypertension using an intraarterial catheter. Recent randomized sham-controlled trials have shown that RDN has significant antihypertensive effects that last for more than 3 years. Based on this evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved two devices, the ultrasound-based ReCor ParadiseTM RDN system and the radiofrequency-based Medtronic Symplicity SpyralTM RDN system, as adjunctive therapy for patients with refractory and uncontrolled hypertension. On the other hand, there have been no randomized sham-controlled prospective outcome trials on RDN, and the effects of RDN on cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke have not been elucidated. This mini-review summarizes the latest findings focusing on the effects of RDN on organ protection and physiological function and symptoms in both preclinical and clinical studies. Furthermore, the feasibility of using blood pressure as surrogate marker for cardiovascular outcomes is discussed in the context of relevant clinical studies on RDN. A comprehensive understanding of the beneficial effects of RDN on the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases with their underlying mechanisms will enhance physicians' ability to incorporate RDN into clinical strategies to prevent cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke. This mini-review focuses on the effects of RDN on organ protection and physiological function and symptoms in preclinical and clinical studies. RDN is expected to reduce the onset and progression of cardiovascular diseases including myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke in clinical practice. LV left ventricular, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, VO2max maximal oxygen uptake, VT ventricular tachycardia, VF ventricular fibrillation, 6MWD 6-min walk distance, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, NYHA New York Heart Association, BBB blood-brain barrier, BP blood pressure.

Differences in the effectiveness and safety of different renal denervation devices

Renal denervation (RDN) is a minimally invasive, endovascular catheter-based procedure using radiofrequency, ultrasound, or alcohol-mediated ablation to treat resistant hypertension. RDN gained popularity in 2009 when it was shown to have an antihypertensive effect. However, concerns about the efficacy of RDN were raised in the HTN-3 trial published in 2014, and the development of several RDN devices was then discontinued. In the process, new randomized controlled trials were conducted after the development of some of the RDN devices, the quality assurance of the procedure, changes in ablation points, and improvements in study design. In November 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a radiofrequency RDN device and an ultrasound RDN device. The results of a randomized controlled trial of an alcohol-mediated RDN device have been published, and future trends are being watched closely. In this mini-review, we summarize the differences in the antihypertensive effect and safety of the different RDN devices and the endpoints of the procedure in order to contribute to the further development of RDN devices Currently available renal denervation device. A multielectrode radiofrequency ablation (Spyral), (B) ultrasound denervation (Paraise), and (C) alcohol-mediated perivascular denervation (Peregrine). ASBP ambulatory systolic blood pressure, ADBP ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, OSBP office systolic blood pressure, ODBP office diastolic blood pressure. Analysis according to types of renal denervation device (radiofrequency, ultrasound, or alcohol-mediated device). P values for interaction were 0.578 (ambulatory SBP), 0.499 (ambulatory diastolic BP), 0.853 (office SBP), and 0.870 (office diastolic BP).

Indications for renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a neuromodulation therapy performed using an intraarterial catheter in patients with hypertension. Recent randomized sham-operated controlled trials have shown that RDN has significant antihypertensive effects in patients with resistant, uncontrolled, and/or drug-naïve hypertension. Based on available evidence, the European Society of Hypertension 2023 guidelines include a Class II recommendation for the use of RDN in individuals with resistant and uncontrolled hypertension. The US Food and Drug Administration approved two devices, the ultrasound-based ReCor ParadiseTM RDN system and the radiofrequency-based Medtronic Symplicity SpyralTM RDN system, as adjunctive therapy for patients with resistant and uncontrolled hypertension. The indications for RDN and incorporation of RDN into clinical practice will grow as clinical evidence accumulates. This mini review summarizes latest findings focusing on the safety and effectiveness of RDN for treating hypertension in the absence and presence of antihypertensive drugs, and discusses the indications for RDN. This mini review focuses on the safety and effectiveness of RDN for treating hypertension in the absence and presence of antihypertensive drugs. The indications for RDN and incorporation of RDN into clinical practice will grow as clinical evidence accumulates and should be reviewed and updated.

Catheter-based renal denervation in the treatment of arterial hypertension: An expert consensus statement on behalf of the French Society of Hypertension (SFHTA), French Society of Radiology (SFR), French Society of Interventional Cardiology (GACI), French Society of Cardiology (SFC), French Association of Private Cardiologists (CNCF), French Association of Hospital Cardiologists (CNCH), French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SFCTCV) and French Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SCVE)

Several high-quality, randomized, sham-controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency, ultrasound and alcohol catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for reducing blood pressure (BP). A French clinical consensus document has therefore been developed to propose guidance for the appropriate use of RDN in the management of hypertension along with a dedicated care pathway and management strategy. The French experts group concluded that RDN can serve as an adjunct therapy for patients with confirmed uncontrolled, resistant essential hypertension despite treatment with≥3 antihypertensive drugs, including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, a renin-angiotensin system blocker and a thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic at maximally tolerated doses. Patients should have (1) an estimated glomerular filtration rate of≥40mL/min/1.73m2; (2) an eligible renal artery anatomy on pre-RDN scans and (3) exclusion of secondary forms of hypertension. Additional indications might be considered for patients with difficult-to-control hypertension. Any indication of RDN should be validated by multidisciplinary hypertension teams consisting of both hypertension specialists and endovascular interventionalists in European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Excellence Centres or ESH-BP clinics. Patients should be informed about the benefit/risk ratio of RDN. Expertise in renal artery interventions and training in RDN techniques are needed for endovascular interventionalists conducting RDN procedures while centres offering RDN should have the necessary resources to manage potential complications effectively. Lastly, all patients undergoing RDN should have their data collected in a nationwide French registry to facilitate monitoring and evaluation of RDN outcomes, contributing to ongoing research and quality improvement efforts.

What are the ideal metrics for assessing the quality of long-term stabilized "perfect" 24-h BP control after renal denervation?

A significant number of individuals being treated for hypertension still have uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). In Japan, renal denervation (RDN) is being introduced into clinical practice as an adjunctive treatment for hypertension that is uncontrolled despite adequate lifestyle changes and maximal antihypertensive drug therapy. The pivotal SPYRAL ON-MED trial showed that there was a significant reduction in trough office and nighttime ambulatory BP values in the RDN group compared with sham control group, although 24-h and daytime BP values were not significantly different between the two groups. The trough office BP measurement (taken before morning antihypertensive dosing) is similar to guideline recommendations for taking morning home BP before taking the morning antihypertensive drug dose. Recent guidelines recommend the measurement of nighttime BP because nighttime BP is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular event risk than daytime BP. It is particularly important to assess nighttime BP in medicated individuals with hypertension because the up- or down-titration of antihypertensive drug dosing is primarily based on office and daytime BPs in clinical practice. This means that there may be significant risk relating to nocturnal hypertension during longer follow-up. Because RDN results in persistent, "always-on" 24-h BP-lowering effects, the best BP metrics to assess the potential benefit of RDN are nighttime BP (determined using home or ambulatory BP monitoring) and morning BP (determined using home BP monitoring or morning trough office BP measurement). The variability of office, home, and ambulatory BP values is another important metric to assess the quality of RDN-related BP lowering.

Impact of renal denervation on quality of life (How does renal denervation contribute to improving hypertension treatment affected by poor medication adherence?)

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved renal denervation (RDN) as a new treatment option for hypertension (HT) because it not only has antihypertensive effects but also improves the quality of blood pressure (BP) reduction. RDN is expected to be increasingly used in clinical practice in the future. This review summarizes the impact of RDN on quality of life (QOL). Although the treatment of HT aims to improve life prognosis, the use of antihypertensive agents can impair QOL because of adverse effects and lifestyle changes associated with long-term medication use. Consequently, poor adherence to antihypertensive agents is a common problem and may be the most important issue affecting patient QOL. In RDN trials in patients taking antihypertensive agents, approximately 40% of patients had poor adherence to the drugs. Poor adherence is often the cause of resistant hypertension. Therefore, RDN should be well suited to treating HT and improving QOL. Studies have shown that approximately 30% of HT patients prefer RDN to drug treatment. Patients who prefer RDN are typically male and younger and have high BP, poor adherence, and a history of adverse effects of antihypertensive agents. We hope that RDN will improve not only life prognosis but also QOL in HT patients because of its benefits for adherence. Furthermore, we expect that in the future, RDN will be used in other sympathetic nervous system-related diseases, such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and sleep apnea syndrome.

Comparing the Efficacy of Renal Artery Denervation in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The study aims to compare the outcomes of different renal denervation (RDN) procedures in the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension. We searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane for RCTs evaluating different procedures of RDN for hypertension. The outcomes of this study were systolic blood pressure (SBP) daytime, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) daytime, SBP nighttime, DBP nighttime, SBP 24-hour, DBP 24-hour, SBP home, DBP home, SBP office, and DBP office. We did a frequentist network meta-analysis of 38 published RCTs evaluating the efficacy of different renal artery denervation procedures for uncontrolled hypertension compared to sham procedures or standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment (SSAHT). Radiofrequency (RF) alone showed a statistically significant reduction in DBP (24 hours), DBP (daytime), and DBP (nighttime): standardized mean difference (SMD): -2.01 (95% CI: (-3.34; -0.68)), SMD: -4.36 (95% CI: (-8.28; -0.44)), and SMD: -3.50 (95% CI: (-6.23; -0.76)), respectively, and showed a statistically significant reduction in SBP (24 hours), SBP (daytime), and SBP (nighttime): SMD: -3.93 (95% CI: (-6.01; -1.84)), SMD: -5.88 (95% CI: (-9.91; -1.85)), and SMD: -5.79 (95% CI: (-10.0; -1.58)), respectively. RF added to SSAHT has statistical significance in the reduction of DBP (nighttime), SBP (daytime), SBP (home), and SBP (nighttime) with a SMD of -7.63 (95% CI: (-14.21; -1.06)), SMD of -10.56 (95% CI: (-21.03; -0.08)), SMD of -23.20 (95% CI: (-36.72; -9.26)), and SMD of -14.03 (95% CI: (-25.43; -2.63)), respectively. We found that renal denervation, especially by RF, when added to SSAHT may be a promising therapeutic option for patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, particularly in cases where medication alone fails to achieve adequate blood pressure control.

Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite the widespread availability of both pharmacological and lifestyle therapeutic options, blood pressure control rates across the globe are worsening. In fact, only 23% of individuals with high blood pressure in the United States achieve treatment goals. In 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration approved renal denervation, a catheter-based procedure that ablates the renal sympathetic nerves, as an adjunctive treatment for patients in whom lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive medications do not adequately control blood pressure. This approval followed the publication of multiple randomized clinical studies using rigorous trial designs, all incorporating renal angiogram as the sham control. Most but not all of the new generation of trials reached their primary end point, demonstrating modest efficacy of renal denervation in lowering blood pressure across a spectrum of hypertension, from mild to truly resistant. Individual patient responses vary, and further research is needed to identify those who may benefit most. The initial safety profile appears favorable, and multiple ongoing studies are assessing longer-term efficacy and safety. Multidisciplinary teams that include hypertension specialists and adequately trained proceduralists are crucial to ensure that referrals are made appropriately with full consideration of the potential risks and benefits. Incorporating patient preferences and engaging in shared decision-making conversations will help patients make the best decisions given their individual circumstances. Although further research is clearly needed, renal denervation presents a novel treatment strategy for patients with uncontrolled blood pressure.