Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:1291-1325. [PMID: 25978154 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000958]

Experience of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support-Assisted Brain Death Donation With Severe Hemodynamic Instability

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experience of extracorporeal life support (ECLS)-assisted maintenance of brain death donors with extremely unstable hemodynamics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 12 brain-dead donors who received ECLS in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2022 due to extremely unstable hemodynamics. The organ acquisition status was analyzed. The transplant outcome of the livers and kidneys procured from these donors on ECLS was also evaluated, who are currently considered as having extended criteria.

RESULTS

After ECLS, the hemodynamics of these 12 patients quickly stabilized and all completed apnea testing and reached the criteria for brain death. The 12 donors on ECLS contributed 36 organs: 1 heart, 2 lungs, 11 livers, and 22 kidneys. All liver and kidney transplant recipients survived within 1 year after transplantation. The 12-month graft survival rate for these 22 ECLS transplanted kidneys was 95%. Four (18.2%) kidney transplant recipients developed DGF. The average creatinine at discharge was 2.01 ± 0.70 mg/dL (1.14-3.67 mg/dL), which showed a downward trend in the first year after operation. The 12-month graft survival rate for these 11 ECLS transplanted livers was 100%. There was no incidence of primary nonfunction. The transaminase and bilirubin in the liver transplantation recipient group showed a downward trend, with an average total bilirubin of 2.23 ± 0.17 mg/dL (1.93-2.46 mg/dL) and an average alanine aminotransferase level of 46.55 ± 17.45 (33-89 units/L) at the time of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

ECLS can maintain the organ function of potential brain death donors with extremely unstable circulation and does not affect the functional recovery of the graft.

The Impact of Thyroid Hormones on Brain-Dead Organ Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The administration of thyroid hormones (TH) in brain-dead donors has been proposed as a strategy to improve organ viability for transplantation, addressing the neuroendocrine insufficiency caused by brain death. While evidence suggests potential benefits, such as hemodynamic stabilization and enhanced organ function, the impact of TH replacement on donor utilization rates and transplant outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing TH administration with placebo or standard-of-care. Mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model, and Heterogeneity was assessed using I2.

RESULTS

Six studies involving a total of 1,197 brain-dead organ donors were included. Of these, 601 received TH, while 597 were given either a placebo or standard-of-care treatment. Overall, the number of transplanted hearts (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.84-1.17; P = .92), lungs (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.65-1.75; p 0.80), and livers (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.78-1.28; P = .99) was similar between groups. Cardiac index showed no significant difference between groups (MD -0.05; 95% CI -0.28 to 0.19; P = .71), and similar trends were observed for other hemodynamic parameters, including heart rate (MD 5.11; 95% CI -1.47 to 11.69; P = .13), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (MD -0.02; 95% CI -1.54 to 1.50; P = .98), and central venous pressure (MD 0.76; 95% CI -0.63 to 2.14; P = .28), indicating that TH administration did not significantly alter these measures compared to placebo or standard-of-care treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that administering TH to brain-dead potential organ donors does not effectively increase the number of organ transplants and has no impact on hemodynamic parameters.

Association of emergency intensive care unit occupancy due to brain-dead organ donors with ambulance diversion

Our study aims to explore how intensive care unit (ICU) occupancy by brain-dead organ donors affects emergency ambulance diversions. In this retrospective, single-center study at an emergency ICU (EICU), brain-dead organ donors were managed until organ procurement. We classified each day between August 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023, as either an exposure day (any day with a brain-dead organ donor in the EICU from admission to organ procurement) or a control day (all other days). The study compared these days and used multiple logistic regression analysis to assess the impact of EICU occupancy by brain-dead organ donors on ambulance diversions. Over two years, 6,058 emergency patients were transported by ambulance, with 1327 admitted to the EICU, including 13 brain-dead organ donors. Brain-dead donors had longer EICU stays (17 vs. 2 days, P < 0.001). With 168 exposure and 562 control days, EICU occupancy was higher on exposure days (75% vs. 67%, P = 0.003), leading to more ambulance diversions. Logistic regression showed exposure days significantly increased ambulance diversions, with an odds ratio of 1.79 (95% CIs 1.10-2.88). This study shows that managing brain-dead organ donors in the EICU leads to longer stays and higher occupancy, resulting in more frequent ambulance diversions. These findings highlight the critical need for policies that optimize ICU resource allocation while maintaining the infrastructure necessary to support organ donation programs and ensuring continued care for brain-dead donors, who play an essential role in addressing the organ shortage crisis.

Use of a novel donor lung scoring system as a tool for increasing lung recovery for transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is a critical shortage of donor lungs for transplantation. We previously developed a parsimonious, highly discriminatory 9-variable Lung Donor (LUNDON) acceptability score. Here we assessed the utility of this score as a tool for improving lung recovery rates for transplantation.

METHODS

We examined all brain-dead donors between 2014 and 2020 from 3 US organ procurement organizations and validated the score's predictive performance. We examined the trajectory of donors with low (<40) and high (>60) initial LUNDON scores, their corresponding lung recovery rates, factors contributing to score improvement using multivariable regression models, and 1-year post-transplant recipient survival.

RESULTS

Overall lung recovery was 32.4% (1410 of 4351). Validation of the LUNDON score in our cohort revealed a C statistic of 0.904 and required intercept calibration. Low initial LUNDON donors that improved to a high final score had an increase in lung recovery rate from 29.3% (1100 of 3765) to 86.8% (441 of 508), associated with lower body mass index, management in a specialized donor care facility (SDCF), and more bronchoscopies. Donors with high initial and final LUNDON scores had a lung recovery rate of 85.2% (98 of 115), associated with shorter length of hospital stay. One-year survival was similar in recipients of low-to-high versus high-to-high LUNDON score donors (0.89 vs 0.84; P = .2).

CONCLUSIONS

The LUNDON score performs well as a predictor of lung recovery in a contemporary cohort but may require organ procurement organization-specific calibration. SDCF care, increasing use of bronchoscopy, and decreasing the time from brain death to organ procurement may improve lung utilization. The LUNDON score can be used to guide donor management to expand the donor pool.

Preoperative donor urinary UDP-Glc as an independent risk factor for delayed graft function

Background

Expanded criteria donors (ECD) have the potential to greatly increase the donor organ pool but pose a higher risk of delayed graft function (DGF) post-transplantation. Uridine diphosphate-glucose (UDP-Glc) plays a significant role in extracellular signaling related to tissue damage and retains stability for detection. Donor urinary UDP-Glc level may be an appropriate and effective biomarker for predicting DGF.

Methods

Recipients who underwent successful kidney transplantation, with corresponding collection of donor urine samples, between June 2023 and August 2024 were included. We measured preoperative donor urinary UDP-Glc levels and analyzed their correlation with graft recovery. The study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry (no. NCT06707272).

Results

Preoperative donor urinary UDP-Glc levels were different between immediated, slowed, and delayed graft function subgroups (7.23 vs. 9.04 vs. 10.13 ug/mL, p < 0.001). Donor urinary UDP-Glc level was an independent risk factor for DGF (odds ratio [OR] = 1.741, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.311-2.312, p < 0.001). Furthermore, donor urinary UDP-Glc showed a better predictive value for DGF (AUROC = 0.791, 95% CI: 0.707-0.875, p < 0.001), and combining donor urinary UDP-Glc and donor terminal serum creatinine improved the model predictive value for DGF (AUROC = 0.832, 95% CI: 0.756-0.908, Youden index = 0.56, sensitivity = 0.81, specificity = 0.75, PPV = 0.72, NPV = 0.83, p < 0.001). Additionally, the donor urinary UDP-Glc level was related to the recipient serum creatinine level at 1 month post-transplantation (rs = 0.475, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Donor urinary UDP-Glc level is an independent risk factor for DGF and can provide surgeons with a novel strategy to predict DGF earlier and more accurately without invasive procedures.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06707272 identifier.

Optimization of physiology in organ donors in the intensive care unit - what you need to know

ABSTRACT

Optimizing the physiology of organ donors is a critical component of preserving the option for organ donation and addressing the shortage of organs available for transplantation. In this article, we review common physiologic alterations seen in organ donors with a focus on brain-dead organ donors. These physiologic alterations and recommended interventions to optimize the physiology of the brain-dead organ donor are discussed by organ system, providing a framework for trauma surgeons and intensivists involved in the care of organ donors.

Ex vivo Coronary Angiography: Safety of Iopromide in Cold Preservation of Pig Hearts

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of intracoronary iopromide (Ultravist®, Germany) administration on the recovery of cardiac pump function and cardiomyocytes metabolism during ex vivo cold preservation of pig hearts in the early posttransplant period.

METHODS

Three-month-old mini pigs weighing 73 ± 2.8 kg were used as experimental models (n=12). Physiological parameters were obtained with the IntelliVue MP70 system (Philips, Netherlands). Blood samples were taken from the coronary sinus to evaluate myocardial ischemia markers - troponin I, creatine phosphokinase-MB, lactate dehydrogenase, and lactate - and apex biopsy was performed before and after the ischemia period according to the protocol. Myocardial samples were taken from the left ventricle and prepared according to the protocol either.

RESULTS

Twelve orthotopic heart transplantations were performed during the study. Sample size was divided into two groups with six each. Cardiac output was 5.11 (4.99; 5.41) l/min and 5.77 (4.97; 6.62) l/min (P-0.0009) after 120 minutes of cardiac activity in both groups. Change of lactate dehydrogenase, creatine phosphokinase-MB, and troponin I levels in the coronary sinus blood were significantly higher in the early reperfusion period. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (P>0.05). Myocardial oxygen consumption was considerably reduced during reperfusion but returned to baseline by 60 minutes of postischemia without significant differences between groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

We observed that intracoronary iopromide administration was safe during the ex vivo stage cold preservation phase of the study. Intracoronary iopromide administration did not affect cardiac pump function and cardiomyocytes metabolism in the early posttransplant period.

Perspectives and Tools in Liver Graft Assessment: A Transformative Era in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is a critical and evolving field in modern medicine, offering life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and other hepatic conditions. Despite its transformative potential, transplantation faces persistent challenges, including a global organ shortage, increasing liver disease prevalence, and significant waitlist mortality rates. Current donor evaluation practices often discard potentially viable livers, underscoring the need for refined graft assessment tools. This review explores advancements in graft evaluation and utilization aimed at expanding the donor pool and optimizing outcomes. Emerging technologies, such as imaging techniques, dynamic functional tests, and biomarkers, are increasingly critical for donor assessment, especially for marginal grafts. Machine learning and artificial intelligence, exemplified by tools like LiverColor, promise to revolutionize donor-recipient matching and liver viability predictions, while bioengineered liver grafts offer a future solution to the organ shortage. Advances in perfusion techniques are improving graft preservation and function, particularly for donation after circulatory death (DCD) grafts. While challenges remain-such as graft rejection, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and recurrence of liver disease-technological and procedural advancements are driving significant improvements in graft allocation, preservation, and post-transplant outcomes. This review highlights the transformative potential of integrating modern technologies and multidisciplinary approaches to expand the donor pool and improve equity and survival rates in liver transplantation.

Identifying Variation in Intraoperative Management of Brain-Dead Organ Donors and Opportunities for Improvement: A Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Analysis

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative events and clinical management of deceased organ donors after brain death are poorly characterized and may consequently vary between hospitals and organ procurement organization (OPO) regions. In a multicenter cohort, we sought to estimate the incidence of hypotension and anesthetic and nonanesthetic medication use during organ recovery procedures.

METHODS

We used data from electronic anesthetic records generated during organ recovery procedures from brain-dead adults across a Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) cohort of 14 US hospitals and 4 OPO regions (2014-2020). Hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure or MAP <60 mm Hg for at least 10 cumulative minutes was the primary outcome of interest. The associations between hypotension and age, sex, race, anesthesia time, OPOs, and OPO case volume were examined using multivariable mixed-effects Poisson regression analyses with robust standard error estimates. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to describe the variation between-MPOG centers and the OPO regions in the use of medications, time of the operation, and duration of the operation.

RESULTS

We examined 1338 brain-dead adult donors, with a mean age of 42± (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 60% (n = 801) were males and 67% (n = 891) non-Hispanic White. During the entire intraoperative monitoring period, 321 donors (24%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-26%) had hypotension for a median of 13.8% [quartile1-quartile 3: 9.4%-21%] of the monitoring period and a minimum of 10 minutes to a maximum of 96 minutes [(median: 17, quartile1-quartile 3: 12-24]). The probability having hypotension in donors 35 to 64 years and 65 years and older were approximately 30% less than in donors 18 to 34 years of age (adjusted relative risk ratios, aRR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.55-0.82, aRR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.94, respectively). Donors received intravenous heparin (96.4%, n = 1291), neuromuscular blockers (89.5%, n = 1198), vasoactive medications (82.7%, n = 1108), crystalloids (76.2%, n = 1020), halogenated anesthetic gases (63.5%, n = 850), diuretics (43.8%, n = 587), steroids (16.7%, n = 224), and opioids (23.2%, n = 310). The largest practice heterogeneity observed between the MPOG center and OPO regions was steroids (between-center ICCs = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62-0.75, between-region ICCs = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.27-0.63) and diuretics (between-center ICCs = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.36-0.6, between-region ICCs = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.22-0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite guidelines recommending maintenance of MAP >60 mm Hg in adult brain-dead organ donors, hypotension during recovery procedures was common. Future research is needed to clarify the relationship between intraoperative events with donation and transplantation outcomes and to identify best practices for the anesthetic management of brain-dead donors in the operating room.

Pediatric Organ Donation, Transplantation, and Updated Brain Death Criteria: An Overview for Pediatricians

Pediatricians follow patients longitudinally and hold a unique position to address multiple issues, medical and psychosocial, that affect organ donation and transplantation. They are wellpositioned to provide anticipatory guidance during well-child visits and during care for children with end-stage organ failure and can either assist these patients with ongoing medical management or refer these patients for organ transplantation assessment. A pediatrician's trusted relationship with families and patients allows for guidance on medical and ethical issues surrounding brain death, organ donation, and transplantation. A clear understanding of end-of-life care, criteria for the determination of neurologic and circulatory death, the process of organ donation, and posttransplant management is vital for pediatricians. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recognizes and supports the important role of the pediatrician in the global need for organ donation and transplantation awareness. This article, as well as the updated AAP policy on Pediatric Organ Donation and Transplantation and the revised American Academy of Neurology consensus statement for the determination of neurologic death for children and adults, provides guidance to help shape public opinion, public policy, and care of the pediatric organ donor and the transplant recipient.

Epidemiological Characteristics and Management of Multi-organ Donors in an Intensive Care Unit: An Eight-Year Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with brain death are the primary source of organs for transplantation worldwide. Recognizing patients with this diagnosis, providing proper care, and effectively managing them in an intensive care unit (ICU) has been shown to increase donation rates in leading countries. The increasing demand for organs compared to the available number for transplantation heightens the responsibility of caring for potential donors.

METHODS

An observational, cross-sectional, descriptive, and retrospective study was undertaken through the analysis of cases involving multiorgan donors diagnosed with brain death. This data was obtained from the coordination of donation and procurement at the Regional General Hospital 1 of the Mexican Institute of Social Security in Querétaro. The study encompassed the duration from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2023.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

A database was created in the Excel program and subsequently, the analysis of the variables identified was carried out in the IBM SPSS Statics 25 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Qualitative variables were analyzed using contingency tables, frequency tables, and statistical correlation tables. For quantitative variables, the analysis included averages, percentages, means, medians, modes, variances, and standard deviations.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients diagnosed with brain death were identified, of whom 56 became multiorgan donors. Thirty patients were excluded from donation, with the majority (19) due to family refusal. The primary age group was 10-20 years, accounting for 23.21% of cases. The mean age was 34.86 years. 71.43% of donors were male and 28.57% were female. The most frequent admission diagnosis was severe traumatic brain injury (46.43%). 56.6% of patients were admitted to the hospital with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 points. Brain death diagnosis was confirmed via angiography in 80.4% of cases. The average length of stay was 3.95 days. The average weight was 71.19 kg. The average height was 166 cm, and the mean BMI was 25.30. Forty patients had blood type O positive, accounting for 71.4%. A total of 255 organs and tissues were procured from 2016 to 2023: 103 kidneys, 97 corneas, 41 livers, six hearts, four skin and bone tissue derivatives, three pairs of lungs, and one heart valve. Hormone replacement therapy was not used in 55.4% of cases. Combined thyroid hormone and steroid regimen was used in nine patients (16.1%), and desmopressin was used in 12 patients (21.4%). During ICU stay, 69.6% of patients required norepinephrine to achieve perfusion goals.

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemiological profile characterizing the multiorgan donor at Regional Hospital 1 in Querétaro was typically male, with a mean age of 34.86 years, no comorbidities, presenting with severe traumatic brain injury upon arrival at the emergency department with a GCS score of 3 points. Norepinephrine was the most commonly used vasopressor, and the majority of patients did not meet hemodynamic criteria for initiating hormone replacement therapy.

Potential Association of Blood Transfusion in Deceased Donors With Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Donor blood transfusion may potentially affect transplant outcomes through an inflammatory response, recipient sensitization, or transmission of infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of donor blood transfusion with outcomes of liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2022, donor blood transfusion information was available for 113,017 adult recipients of LT in the United Network for Organ Sharing database and was classified into 4 levels of transfusion: no-transfusion (N = 68,130), transfusion of 1-5 units (N = 33,629), 6-10 units (N = 8067), and >10 units (N = 5329). Recipient survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox-hazard model.

RESULTS

Among this cohort, 40.8% of donors (N = 46,261) received blood transfusion during the index hospitalization. Compared to no-blood transfusion donors, blood transfusion donors were younger (median age 37 versus 46 y P < 0.001) and were more brain death donors (94.5% versus 92.1%, P < 0.001). An increased risk of rejection at 6-mo (transfusion 10.3% versus no-transfusion 9.9%, P = 0.055) and 1 y (transfusion 12.5% versus no-transfusion 11.9%, P = 0.0036) post-LT was noted in this cohort. Multivariable Cox-hazard model showed blood transfusion was associated with increased 1-y mortality (transfusion 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P = 0.007) and graft failure (transfusion 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.13, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor blood transfusion was associated with an increased risk of rejection at 6 mo and 1 y among LT recipients and worse post-transplant graft and overall survival. Additional information regarding donor blood transfusion, along with other known factors, may be considered when deciding the optimization of overall immune suppression in LT recipients to decrease the risk of delayed rejection.

Developing Guidance for Donor Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials: Initial Discussions From the Canada-United Kingdom 2022 Workshop

BACKGROUND

Donor interventions, including medications, protocols, and medical devices administered to donors, can enhance transplantable organ quality and quantity and maximize transplantation success. However, there is paucity of high-quality evidence about their effectiveness, in part because of ethical, practical, and regulatory challenges, and lack of guidance about conduct of donor intervention randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

With the vision to develop authoritative guidance for conduct of donor intervention RCTs, we convened a workshop of Canadian-United Kingdom experts in organ donation and transplantation ethics, research, and policy to identify stakeholders, explore unique challenges, and develop research agenda to inform future work in this promising field.

RESULTS

Donor intervention trials should consider perspectives of broad group of stakeholders including donors, transplant recipients, and their families; researchers in donation and transplantation; research ethics boards; and healthcare providers and administrators involved in donation and transplantation. Unique challenges include (1) research ethics (living versus deceased status of the donor at the time of intervention, intervention versus outcomes assessment in different individuals, harm-benefit analysis in donors versus recipients, consent, and impact on research bystanders); (2) outcome data standardization and linkage; and (3) regulatory and governance considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor intervention RCTs hold potential to benefit organ transplantation outcomes but face unique research ethics, outcome data, and regulatory challenges. By developing research agenda to address these challenges, our workshop was an important first step toward developing Canada-United Kingdom guidance for donor intervention RCTs that are poised to improve the quality and availability of transplantable organs.

Management of Potential Organ Donor: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Position Statement

This position statement is documented based on the input from all contributing coauthors from the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), following a comprehensive literature review and summary of current scientific evidence. Its objective is to provide the standard perspective for the management of potential organ/tissue donors after brain death (BD) in adults only, regardless of the availability of technology. This document should only be used for guidance only and is not a substitute for proper clinical decision making in particular circumstances of any case. Endorsement by the ISCCM does not imply that the statements given in the document are applicable in all or in a particular case; however, they may provide guidance for the users thus facilitating maximum organ availability from brain-dead patients. Thus, the care of potential brain-dead organ donors is "caring for multiple recipients."

How to cite this article

Zirpe K, Pandit R, Gurav S, Mani RK, Prabhakar H, Clerk A, et al. Management of Potential Organ Donor: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Position Statement. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S249-278.

Does the use of double hormone replacement therapy for trauma patient organ donors improve organ recovery for transplant

BACKGROUND

With an ongoing demand for transplantable organs, optimization of donor management protocols, specifically in trauma populations, is important for obtaining a high yield of viable organs per patient. Endocrine management of brain-dead potential organ donors (BPODs) is controversial, leading to heterogeneous clinical management approaches. Previous studies have shown that when levothyroxine was combined with other treatments, including steroids, vasopressin, and insulin, BPODs had better organ recovery and survival outcomes were increased for transplant recipients.

AIM

To determine if levothyroxine use in combination with steroids in BPODs increased the number of organs donated in trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult BPODs from a single level 1 trauma center over ten years was performed. Exclusion criteria included patients who were not solid organ donors, patients who were not declared brain dead (donation after circulatory death), and patients who did not receive steroids in their hospital course. Levothyroxine and steroid administration, the number of organs donated, the types of organs donated, and demographic information were recorded. Univariate analyses were performed with P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients met inclusion criteria, 69 (78%) of whom received levothyroxine and steroids (ST/LT group) vs 19 (22%) receiving steroids without levothyroxine (ST group). No differences were observed between the groups for gender, race, pertinent injury factors, age, or other hormone therapies used (P > 0.05). In the ST/LT group, 68.1% (n = 47) donated a high yield (3-5) of organ types per donor compared to 42.1% (n = 8) in the ST group (P = 0.038). There was no difference in the total number of organ types donated between the groups (P = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that combining levothyroxine and steroid administration increases high-yield organ donation per donor in BPODs in the trauma patient population. Limitations to this study include the retrospective design and the relatively small number of organ donors who met inclusion criteria. This study is unique in that it mitigates steroid administration as a confounding variable and focuses specifically on the adjunctive use of levothyroxine.

Advances in lung transplantation: 60 years on

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for advanced lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Over the last 60 years all aspects of lung transplantation have evolved significantly and exponential growth in transplant volume. This has been particularly evident over the last decade with a substantial increase in lung transplant numbers as a result of innovations in donor utilization procurement, including the use donation after circulatory death and ex-vivo lung perfusion organs. Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust, and therefore the donor pool is actually larger than previously thought. Parallel to this, lung transplant outcomes have continued to improve with improved acute management as well as microbiological and immunological insights and innovations. The management of lung transplant recipients continues to be complex and heavily dependent on a tertiary care multidisciplinary paradigm. Whilst long term outcomes continue to be limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction improvements in diagnostics, mechanistic understanding and evolutions in treatment paradigms have all contributed to a median survival that in some centres approaches 10 years. As ongoing studies build on developing novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment of transplant complications and improvements in donor utilization more individuals will have the opportunity to benefit from lung transplantation. As has always been the case, early referral for transplant consideration is important to achieve best results.

Pediatric donor heart utilization variability among organ procurement organizations

BACKGROUND

Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are responsible for the medical management of organ donors. Given the variability in pediatric donor heart utilization among OPOs, we examined factors that may explain this variability, including differences in donor medical management, organ quality, and candidate factors.

METHODS

The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database was queried for pediatric (<18 years) heart donors and candidates receiving pediatric donor heart offers from 2010 to 2019. OPOs were stratified by pediatric donor heart utilization rate, and the top and bottom quintiles were compared based on donor management strategies and outcomes. A machine learning algorithm, combining 11 OPO, donor, candidate, and offer variables, was used to determine factors most predictive of whether a heart offer is accepted.

RESULTS

There was no clinically significant difference between the top and bottom quintile OPOs in baseline donor characteristics, distance between donor and listing center, management strategies, or organ quality. Machine learning modeling suggested neither OPO donor management nor cardiac function is the primary driver of whether an organ is accepted. Instead, number of prior donor offer refusals and individual listing center receiving the offer were two of the most predictive variables of organ acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

OPO clinical practice variation does not seem to account for the discrepancy in pediatric donor heart utilization rates among OPOs. Listing center acceptance practice and prior number of donor refusals seem to be the important drivers of heart utilization and may at least partially account for the variation in OPO heart utilization rates given the regional association between OPOs and listing centers.

Management of potential cardiac donors

Heart transplantation (HTx) outcomes have improved with careful donor selection and management; nonetheless, donor shortages remain a major challenge. Optimizing donor management is crucial for improving donor utility rates and post-HTx outcomes. Brain death leads to various pathophysiological changes that can affect multiple organs, including the heart. Understanding these alterations and corresponding management strategies is key to optimizing the donor organ condition. This review assesses several aspects of these pathophysiological changes, including hemodynamic and endocrinological considerations, and emphasizes special consideration for potential cardiac donors, including serial echocardiographic evaluations for reversible cardiac dysfunction and coronary assessments for donors with risk factors.

Elective intensive care unit admissions for organ donation in patients with terminal brain glioma: Case report

Despite being eligible, only 26 patients with primary brain cancer became organ donors from 2009 to 2018 in Australia. We describe two patients with high grade gliomas who successfully donated their organs after obtaining first-person consent in the outpatient setting by careful multidisciplinary planning and an elective intensive care unit admission for organ donation. Barriers and facilitators were examined based on these experiences and suggestions for future practices are explored. The recommended practices include: 1. Systematic incorporation of organ donation into advance care planning. 2. Integrating organ donation organisation coordinators into advance care planning. 3. Standardization of donor care and clear communication and collaboration between treatment teams. 4. Support and involvement of the medical treatment decision maker. 5. Identification of clinical triggers for admission to hospital and intensive care unit. These two cases illustrate that with careful coordination and involvement from a multidisciplinary team, successful organ transplantation outcomes are possible.

Donor Evaluation Protocol for Live and Deceased Donors

Donor evaluation is a critical step before proceeding with liver transplantation (LT) in both deceased donor LT (DDLT) and living donor LT (LDLT). A good, healthy graft is necessary for the success of the transplantation. Other issues in selecting a donor include the transmission of infections and malignancies from the donor. Because of the scarcity of cadaver organs, an increasing number of extended-criteria donors, or 'marginal donors', are being utilized. LDLT also has potential risks to the donor, and donor safety needs to be kept in mind before proceeding with LT. The current review highlights the factors to be considered during donor evaluation for living and deceased donors before LT.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-based approach to refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A focus on organ donation, a secondary analysis of a Prague OHCA randomized study

BACKGROUND

Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a poor outcome. In patients, who cannot be rescued despite using advanced techniques like extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), organ donation may be considered. This study aims to evaluate, in refractory OHCA, how ECPR versus a standard-based approach allows organ donorship.

METHODS

The Prague OHCA trial randomized adults with a witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin to either an ECPR-based or standard approach. Patients who died of brain death or those who died of primary circulatory reasons and were not candidates for cardiac transplantation or durable ventricle assist device were evaluated as potential organ donors by a transplant center. In this post-hoc analysis, the effect on organ donation rates and one-year organ survival in recipients was examined.

RESULTS

Out of 256 enrolled patients, 75 (29%) died prehospitally or within 1 hour after admission and 107 (42%) during the hospital stay. From a total of 24 considered donors, 21 and 3 (p = 0.01) were recruited from the ECPR vs standard approach arm, respectively. Fifteen brain-dead and none cardiac-dead subjects were ultimately accepted, 13 from the ECPR and two from the standard strategy group. A total of 36 organs were harvested. The organs were successfully transplanted into 34 recipients. All transplanted organs were fully functional, and none of the recipients died due to graft failure within the one-year period post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

The ECPR-based approach in the refractory OHCA trial is associated with increased organ donorship and an excellent outcome of transplanted organs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666. Registered January 19, 2012.

Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND

An automated digital screening tool (DETECT) has been developed to aid in the early identification of patients who are at risk of developing brain death during critical care.

METHODS

This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years admitted to neurocritical care for primary or secondary acute brain injury. The DETECT screening tool searched routinely monitored patient data in the electronic medical records every 12 h for a combination of coma and absence of bilateral pupillary light reflexes. In parallel, daily neurological assessment was performed by expert neurointensivists in all patients blinded to the index test results. The primary target condition was the eventual diagnosis of brain death. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy along with their 95%-confidence intervals were calculated to assess the screening performance of DETECT.

RESULTS

During the 12-month study period, 414 patients underwent neurological assessment, with 8 (1.9%) confirmed cases of brain death. DETECT identified 54 positive patients and sent 281 notifications including 227 repeat notifications. The screening tool had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 63.1-100%) in identifying patients who eventually developed brain death, with no false negatives. The mean time from notification to confirmed diagnosis of brain death was 3.6 ± 3.2 days. Specificity was 88.7% (95% CI 85.2-91.6%), with 46 false positives. The overall accuracy of DETECT for confirmed brain death was 88.9% (95% CI 85.5-91.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that an automated digital screening tool that utilizes routinely monitored clinical data may aid in the early identification of patients at risk of developing brain death.

Intravenous Levothyroxine for Unstable Brain-Dead Heart Donors

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic instability and myocardial dysfunction are major factors preventing the transplantation of hearts from organ donors after brain death. Intravenous levothyroxine is widely used in donor care, on the basis of observational data suggesting that more organs may be transplanted from donors who receive hormonal supplementation.

METHODS

In this trial involving 15 organ-procurement organizations in the United States, we randomly assigned hemodynamically unstable potential heart donors within 24 hours after declaration of death according to neurologic criteria to open-label infusion of intravenous levothyroxine (30 μg per hour for a minimum of 12 hours) or saline placebo. The primary outcome was transplantation of the donor heart; graft survival at 30 days after transplantation was a prespecified recipient safety outcome. Secondary outcomes included weaning from vasopressor therapy, donor ejection fraction, and number of organs transplanted per donor.

RESULTS

Of the 852 brain-dead donors who underwent randomization, 838 were included in the primary analysis: 419 in the levothyroxine group and 419 in the saline group. Hearts were transplanted from 230 donors (54.9%) in the levothyroxine group and 223 (53.2%) in the saline group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.07; P = 0.57). Graft survival at 30 days occurred in 224 hearts (97.4%) transplanted from donors assigned to receive levothyroxine and 213 hearts (95.5%) transplanted from donors assigned to receive saline (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.3 to 6.0; P<0.001 for noninferiority at a margin of 6 percentage points). There were no substantial between-group differences in weaning from vasopressor therapy, ejection fraction on echocardiography, or organs transplanted per donor, but more cases of severe hypertension and tachycardia occurred in the levothyroxine group than in the saline group.

CONCLUSIONS

In hemodynamically unstable brain-dead potential heart donors, intravenous levothyroxine infusion did not result in significantly more hearts being transplanted than saline infusion. (Funded by Mid-America Transplant and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04415658.).

Lung Donor Selection and Management: An Updated Review

The shortage of donor lungs for transplantation is a major challenge, resulting in longer waitlist times for patients with a higher risk of waitlist mortality. It is crucial to continue promoting awareness about organ donation through legislation, public campaigns, and health care provider education. Only a small number of cadaveric donors meet the ideal criteria for lung donation, leaving many lungs unused. Donor lung utilization can be improved by carefully considering the extended-criteria donors, actively participating in donor management, and by utilizing the modalities to assess and manage the marginal lungs after retrieval from the donor. The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date review of donor selection, assessment of donor lungs, and donor lung management to enhance organ recovery rates for lung transplantation.

Potassium canrenoate in brain-dead organ donors: a randomised controlled clinical trial protocol (CANREO-PMO)

INTRODUCTION

Ischaemia/reperfusion injuries (IRIs) are associated with poorer survival of kidney grafts from expanded criteria donors. Preclinical studies have shown that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) prevent acute and chronic post-ischaemic renal dysfunction by limiting IRI. However, data concerning the safety of MRAs in brain-dead donor patients are scarce. We seek to investigate the tolerance of MRAs on the haemodynamics in this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

CANREO-PMO is a randomised, controlled, single-centre, double-blind study. Brain-dead organ donors hospitalised in intensive care are randomised 1:1 after consent to receive 200 mg potassium canrenoate or its matching placebo every 6 hours until organ procurement. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite endpoint that includes: (1) cardiocirculatory arrest, (2) the impossibility of kidney procurement, (3) the average hourly dose of norepinephrine/epinephrine between randomisation and departure to the operating room, and (4) the average hourly volume of crystalloids and/or colloids received. Thirty-six patients will be included. The secondary endpoints evaluated among the graft recipients are the: (1) vital status of the kidney graft recipients and serum creatinine level with estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) at 3 months after renal transplantation, (2) percentage of patients dependent on dialysis and/or with an estimated GFR <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 3 months, (3) vital status of the kidney graft recipients at 3 months, and (4) vital status of the kidney graft recipients and creatinine levels (in μmol/L), with the estimated GFR according to CKD-EPI (in mL/min/1.73 m2), at 1 year, 3 years and 10 years after transplantation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has full ethical approval (Comité de Protection des Personnes: CPP Ouest II-ANGERS, France), and the written consent of relatives will be obtained. Results will be reported at conferences, peer-reviewed publications and using social media channels.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04714710.

Circulating exosomes from brain death and cardiac death donors have distinct molecular and immunologic properties: A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Comparison of donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) lung tissue before transplantation have demonstrated activation of pro-inflammatory cytokine pathway in DBD donors. The molecular and immunological properties of circulating exosomes from DBD and DCD donors were not previously described.

METHODS

We collected plasma from 18 deceased donors (12 DBD and six DCD). Cytokines were analyzed by 30-Plex luminex Panels. Exosomes were analyzed for liver self-antigen (SAg), Transcription Factors and HLA class II (HLA-DR/DQ) using western blot. C57BL/6 animals were immunized with isolated exosomes to determine strength and magnitude of immune responses. Interferon (IFN)-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α producing cells were quantified by ELISPOT, specific antibodies to HLA class II antigens were measured by ELISA RESULTS: We demonstrate increased plasma levels of IFNγ, EGF, EOTAXIN, IP-10, MCP-1, RANTES, MIP-β, VEGF, and interleukins - 6/8 in DBD plasma versus DCD. MiRNA isolated from exosome of DBD donors demonstrated significant increase in miR-421, which has been reported to correlate with higher level of Interleukin-6. Higher levels of liver SAg Collagen III (p = .008), pro-inflammatory transcription factors (NF-κB, p < .05; HIF1α, p = .021), CIITA (p = .011), and HLA class II (HLA-DR, p = .0003 and HLA-DQ, p = .013) were detected in exosomes from DBD versus DCD plasma. The circulating exosomes isolated from DBD donors were immunogenic in mice and led to the development of Abs to HLA-DR/DQ.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides potential new mechanisms by which DBD organs release exosomes that can activate immune pathways leading to cytokine release and allo-immune response.

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Prognostic Relevance of Donor-Transmitted Coronary Artery Disease in Heart Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The reported prevalence of donor-transmitted coronary artery disease (TCAD) in heart transplantation (HT) is variable, and its prognostic impact remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to characterize TCAD in a contemporary multicentric cohort and to study its prognostic relevance.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients >18 years old who underwent HT in 11 Spanish centers from 2008 to 2018. Only patients with a coronary angiography (c-angio) within the first 3 months after HT were studied. Significant TCAD (s-TCAD) was defined as any stenosis ≥50% in epicardial coronary arteries, and nonsignificant TCAD (ns-TCAD) as stenosis <50%. Clinical outcomes were assessed by means of Cox regression and competing risks regression. Patients were followed-up for a median period of 6.3 years after c-angio.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 1,918 patients, 937 underwent c-angio. TCAD was found in 172 patients (18.3%): s-TCAD in 65 (6.9%) and ns-TCAD in 107 (11.4%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis did not show a statistically significant association between s-TCAD and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.89-2.35; P = 0.141); however, it was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.20-4.19; P = 0.011) and the combined event cardiovascular death or nonfatal MACE (adjusted HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.52-3.85; P < 0.001). No statistically significant impact of ns-TCAD on clinical outcomes was detected. The results were similar when reassessed by means of competing risks regression.

CONCLUSIONS

TCAD was not associated with reduced survival in patients alive and well enough to undergo post-HT angiography within the first 3 months; however, s-TCAD patients showed increased risk of cardiovascular death and MACE.

Models of Quality Management Systems Applied in Specialized Services for the Donation and Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues

BACKGROUND

Quality management tools and models are used to improve processes and products, including those related to organ and tissue donation and transplantation protocols. This study aims to map, discuss, and disseminate models/tools of quality management systems applied in health services, specializing in the donation and/or transplantation of human organs and tissues.

METHODS

This is an integrative literature review over the last 10 years, operationalized through searches carried out on the PubMed portal and the databases: SciVerse Scopus (SCOPUS), Scielo, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Nursing Database (BDENF), and the Virtual Health Library (BVS). The organization of search results in the databases and the election of articles compatible with the guiding question and the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study took place through the online and free application platform Rayyan.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy-eight records were found, of which, after careful analysis, 18 articles were considered relevant to the theme. We identified 17 quality management models and/or tools that emphasize using scientifically proven and/or validated techniques to reduce or eliminate the possibility of risks in the processes that permeate the stages of donation and transplantation of organs and tissues.

CONCLUSION

This review brought the possible tools used and published, which can be perceived, reproduced, and improved, through the role of the multidisciplinary team in specialized centers for the donation and transplantation of human organs and tissues, aiming to offer a process of continuous improvement management to deliver better products and services.

Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion

Some patients who have been diagnosed as "dead by neurologic criteria" continue to exhibit certain brain functions, most commonly, neuroendocrine functions. This preservation of neurologic function after the diagnosis of "brain death" or "brainstem death" is an ongoing source of controversy and concern in the medical, bioethics, and legal literatures. Most obviously, if some brain function persists, then it is not the case that all functions of the entire brain have ceased and hence, declaring such a patient to be "dead" would be a false positive, in any nation with so-called "whole brain death" laws. Furthermore, and perhaps more concerning, the preservation of any brain function necessarily entails the preservation of some amount of brain perfusion, thereby raising the concern as to whether additional areas of neural tissue may remain viable, including areas in the brainstem. These and other considerations cast significant doubt on the reliability of diagnosing either "brain death" or "brainstem death."

Attitudes That Might Impact upon Donation after Brain Death in Intensive Care Unit Settings: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Organ donation and transplantation can save or improve the quality of life of people worldwide. However, there are many challenges associated with organ donation, as the demand for organs greatly outstrips supply. Additionally, there are brain-dead patients who could be potential organ donors. It is thus important to determine the attitudes affecting organ donation and transplantation in intensive care unit settings.

AIM

this study aimed to identify attitudes that might affect organ donation and transplantation in intensive care unit settings.

METHODOLOGY

Five electronic databases (CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and EMBASE) were searched systematically. A systematic search strategy was formulated. The quality of each study was assessed using the MMAT quality appraisal tool.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies were included. The findings of this systematic review demonstrate that education, policy, and continuing professional development could help to address barriers to donation.

CONCLUSIONS

therefore, to influence organ donation and transplantation positively, the main themes evaluated in this systematic review provide an opportunity to influence organ donation and transplantation attitudes in intensive care unit settings.

Histological, Laboratorial, and Clinical Benefits of an Optimized Maintenance Strategy of a Potential Organ Donor-A Rabbit Experimental Model

INTRODUCTION

Most transplanted organs are obtained from brain-dead donors. Inflammation results in a higher rate of rejection. Objectives: The objective of this animal model of brain death (BD) was to evaluate the effect of the progressive institution of volume expansion, norepinephrine, and combined hormone therapy on clinical, laboratory, and histological aspects. Methods: Twenty rabbits were divided: A (control), B (induction of BD + infusion of crystalloid), C (BD + infusion of crystalloid and noradrenaline (NA)), and D (BD + infusion of crystalloid + vasopressin + levothyroxine + methylprednisolone + NA). The animals were monitored for four hours with consecutives analysis of vital signs and blood samples. The organs were evaluated by a pathologist. Results: In Group D, we observed fewer number and lesser volume of infusions (p = 0.032/0.014) when compared with groups B and C. Mean arterial pressure levels were higher in group D when compared with group B (p = 0.008). Group D had better glycemic control when compared with group C (p = 0.016). Sodium values were elevated in group B in relation to groups C and D (p = 0.021). In Group D, the organ perfusion was better. Conclusion: The optimized strategy of management of BD animals is associated with better hemodynamic, glycemic, and natremia control, besides reducing early signs of ischemia.

Collaborative Approach to Organ Donation in a Level II Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

Although a shortage of organ donors is a continuing global problem in health care, obtaining authorization for donation after an individual experiences a traumatic nonsurvivable event can be difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To improve organ donation practices at a level II trauma center.

METHODS

After reviewing trauma mortality cases and performance improvement metrics with their organ procurement organization's hospital liaison, leaders at the trauma center implemented a multidisciplinary performance improvement initiative to engage the facility's donation advisory committee, provide education for staff members, and increase program visibility to create a more donation-friendly culture for the facility.

RESULTS

The initiative led to an improved donation conversion rate and a greater number of organs procured. Continued education increased staff and provider awareness of organ donation, contributing to the positive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary initiative that includes continuing staff education can improve organ donation practices and program visibility, ultimately benefiting patients in need of organ transplantation.

Anesthetic Considerations of Organ Procurement After Brain and Cardiac Death: A Narrative Review

Organ donation procedures have become more frequent in the US as the need for transplants is increasing. Defining the anesthesiologist's role in organ donations after brain and cardiac death is important, as is understanding its ethics and practical physiologic and perioperative implications. Despite this, there are few papers specifically addressing the anesthetic management of organ donors. This review summarizes the preoperative, intraoperative, and postmortem considerations for the anesthesiologist involved in organ donation after either brain or cardiac death. A search of the published literature was performed using PubMed, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and Google Scholar in March of 2022 for articles addressing anesthetic considerations of organ procurement surgeries after brain and cardiac death. This review demonstrates that anesthesiologists play a significant role in the organ procurement process. Their role in the perioperative management of the donor may affect the outcomes of organ transplantation. The gap between the number of organs harvested and the number of patients awaiting organ transplantation remains high despite continued efforts to increase the number of available organs. Perioperative management of organ donors aims at counteracting the associated unique physiologic derangements and targets optimization of oxygenation of the organs intended for procurement. Optimizing care after death can help ensure the viability of organs and the best outcomes for recipients. As organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) becomes more frequent in the US, anesthesiologists should be aware of the DCD classifications of donors and emerging novel perfusion techniques.

A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating National Organ Donation and Transplantation Programs

Conceptual frameworks are valuable resources that can be used to guide the planning, evaluation, and development of healthcare services. However, there are currently no comprehensive frameworks focused on organ donation and transplantation that identify the critical factors underlying a successful national program. To address this knowledge gap, we developed a conceptual framework that takes into account all major domains of influence, including political and societal aspects as well as clinical implementation. The framework was initially constructed based on a targeted review of the relevant medical literature. Feedback provided by a panel of international experts was incorporated into the framework via an iterative process. The final framework features 16 essential domains that are critical for initiating and maintaining a successful program and improving the health of patients with organ failure. Of particular note, these domains are subject to three overarching health system principles: responsiveness, efficiency, and equity. This framework represents a first attempt to develop a whole-system view of the various factors that contribute to the success of a national program. These findings provide a useful tool that can be adapted to any jurisdiction and used to plan, evaluate, and improve organ donation and transplantation programs.

Guidelines for the Management of Adult Acute and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in the ICU: Neurology, Peri-Transplant Medicine, Infectious Disease, and Gastroenterology Considerations

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for adults with acute liver failure (ALF) or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) in the ICU.

DESIGN

The guideline panel comprised 27 members with expertise in aspects of care of the critically ill patient with liver failure or methodology. We adhered to the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures manual and conflict-of-interest policy. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the panel, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development.

INTERVENTIONS

In part 2 of this guideline, the panel was divided into four subgroups: neurology, peri-transplant, infectious diseases, and gastrointestinal groups. We developed and selected Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) questions according to importance to patients and practicing clinicians. For each PICO question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis where applicable. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence to decision framework to facilitate recommendations formulation as strong or conditional. We followed strict criteria to formulate best practice statements.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We report 28 recommendations (from 31 PICO questions) on the management ALF and ACLF in the ICU. Overall, five were strong recommendations, 21 were conditional recommendations, two were best-practice statements, and we were unable to issue a recommendation for five questions due to insufficient evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary, international experts formulated evidence-based recommendations for the management ALF and ACLF patients in the ICU, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on low quality and indirect evidence.

Organ Donation, the Non-Perfect Lung Donor, and Variability in Conversion to Transplant

Rates of lung donation have increased over the past several years. This has been accomplished through the utilization of donors with extended criteria, the creation of donor hospitals or centers, and the optimization of lungs through the implementation of donor management protocols. These measures have resulted in augmenting the pool of available donors thereby decreasing the wait time for lung transplantation candidates. Although transplant programs vary significantly in their acceptance rates of these organs, studies have not shown any difference in the incidence of primary graft dysfunction or overall mortality for the recipient when higher match-run sequence organs are accepted. Yet, the level of comfort in accepting these donors varies among transplant programs. This deviation in practice results in these organs going to lower-priority candidates thereby increasing the waitlist time of other recipients and ultimately has a deleterious effect on an institution's waitlist mortality.

Surgical Science and the Evolution of Critical Care Medicine

Surgical science has driven innovation and inquiry across adult and pediatric disciplines that provide critical care regardless of location. Surgically originated but broadly applicable knowledge has been globally shared within the pages Critical Care Medicine over the last 50 years.

The Future of Cardiothoracic Surgical Critical Care Medicine as a Medical Science: A Call to Action

Cardiothoracic surgical critical care medicine (CT-CCM) is a medical discipline centered on the perioperative care of diverse groups of patients. With an aging demographic and an increase in burden of chronic diseases the utilization of cardiothoracic surgical critical care units is likely to escalate in the coming decades. Given these projections, it is important to assess the state of cardiothoracic surgical intensive care, to develop goals and objectives for the future, and to identify knowledge gaps in need of scientific inquiry. This two-part review concentrates on CT-CCM as its own subspeciality of critical care and cardiothoracic surgery and provides aspirational goals for its practitioners and scientists. In part one, a list of guiding principles and a call-to-action agenda geared towards growth and promotion of CT-CCM are offered. In part two, an evaluation of selected scientific data is performed, identifying gaps in CT-CCM knowledge, and recommending direction to future scientific endeavors.

Evaluation of red blood cell transfusion threshold in the management of brain-dead organ donors

The disparity between the demand and supply of organs has necessitated an expansion of the criteria for organ donation. Consequently, numerous guidelines have been proposed for managing brain-dead organ donors (BDODs) to improve their organ function and the organ procurement rate. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the previously recommended threshold for red blood cell transfusion in BDODs. Medical records of BDODs were retrospectively reviewed from January 2012 to December 2021. We enrolled BDODs who stayed for more than 24 hours at an hospital organ procurement organization. We analyzed their organ function and the rate of organ procurement according to the hemoglobin concentration. A total of 111 BDODs were enrolled and divided into the following 2 groups: hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 10 g/dL (45.0 %) and Hb < 10 g/dL (55.0 %). There were no significant differences between the groups in the total bilirubin, creatinine, arterial blood lactate, and the rate of organ procurement. A correlation analysis did not reveal any association between the hemoglobin concentration and organ function of the BDODs. Hemoglobin concentration of 10 g/dL cannot be considered a threshold for red blood cell transfusion. Furthermore, organ function is not correlated with a hemoglobin concentration > 7 g/dL. Restrictive transfusion strategy is appropriate for BDOD management.

Differential donor management of pediatric vs adult organ donors and potential impact on pediatric lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite clinical progress over time, a shortage of suitable donor organs continues to limit solid organ transplantation around the world. Lungs are the organs most likely to be assessed as unsuitable during donor management among all transplantable organs. Although the number of lung transplants performed in children is limited, death on the wait list remains a barrier to transplant success for many potential transplant candidates. Optimizing organ donor management can yield additional organs for transplant candidates.

METHODOLOGY

We accessed the Donor Management Goal (DMG) Registry to evaluate the efficiency and efficacy of donor management in the procurement of lungs for transplantation. Further, we stratified donors by age and compared pediatric age cohorts to adult cohorts with respect to attainment of donor management target goals and successful pathway to transplantation. We utilized recipient data from the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) to put this data into context. The DMG bundle consists of nine physiologic parameters chosen as end-points guiding donor management for potential organ donors. The number of parameters fulfilled has been regarded as an indication of efficacy of donor management.

RESULTS

We noted a markedly lower number of organ donors in the pediatric age group compared to adults. On the other hand, the number of donors greatly exceeds the number of infants, children and adolescents who undergo lung transplantation. Organs transplanted per donor peaks in the adolescent age group. At initial donor referral, DMG bundle attainment is lower in all age groups and improves during donor management. With respect to oxygenation, there is less overall improvement in younger donors compared to older donors during donor management. When donors who yield lungs for transplantation are compared to those whose lungs were not transplanted, oxygenation improved more substantially during donor management. Furthermore, improved oxygenation correlated with the total number of organs transplanted per donor.

CONCLUSIONS

In the face of continued wait list mortality on the pediatric lung transplant wait list, the number of young donors may not be a limiting factor. We believe that this dataset provides evidence that management of young pediatric donors is not as consistent or efficient as the management of older donors, potentially limiting the number of life-saving organs for pediatric lung transplant candidates. Across all ages, optimizing donor lung management may increase the potential to transplant multiple other organs.

Exploring predisposing factors and pathogenesis contributing to injuries of donor lungs

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the only therapeutic strategy for patients with incurable lung diseases. However, its use has been severely limited by the narrow donor pool and potential concerns of inferior quality of donor lungs, which are more susceptible to external influence than other transplant organs. Multiple insults, including various causes of death and a series of perimortem events, may act together on donor lungs and eventually culminate in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after transplantation as well as other poor short-term outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the predisposing factors contributing to injuries to the donor lungs, specifically focusing on the pathogenesis of these injuries and their impact on post-transplant outcomes. Additionally, various maneuvers to mitigate donor lung injuries have been proposed.

EXPERT OPINION

The selection criteria for eligible donors vary and may be poor discriminators of lung injury. Not all transplanted lungs are in ideal condition. With the rapidly increasing waiting list for LTx, the trend of using marginal donors has become more apparent, underscoring the need to gain a deeper understanding of donor lung injuries and discover more donor resources.

Attitudes Toward Organ Donation in an Arab-Based Population

BACKGROUND

Commitment to organ donation may vary among willing younger and older adults. We aimed to understand attitudes toward organ donation among Arab adults.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of adults from 13 regions in Saudi Arabia between February 12, 2021, and March 14, 2021. We stratified the analyses by individuals' age (younger, 18 to 39 years old; older, ≥40 years old).

RESULTS

Of 4217 individuals contacted, 3120 respondents (1846 younger and 1274 older) completed the survey, with a response rate of 74%. We found that 54% of younger and 47% of older respondents expressed support for organ transplantation, and 49% of younger and 35% of older respondents wanted to donate their organs. However, only 4% of younger and 3% of older respondents had registered in the national donor database. Knowledge sources that most likely to influence attitudes toward organ donation for younger and older respondents, respectively, were physician/health care worker (58% and 55%), family member (29% and 26%), scientist/researcher (29% and 22%), and religious scholar (16% and 23%).

CONCLUSION

Though many younger and older adults express a willingness to donate, few are registered to be a donor. Our findings highlight the influential sources of knowledge that can be implemented in future interventions to increase commitment to organ donation.

Costs related to obtaining organs for transplantation: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The number of transplants in the world is growing, although there is a demand that exceeds supply. It is worth mentioning that the costs for obtaining organs are considered high. However, few studies have been developed on analyzing the costs of obtaining organs and tissues for transplants in order to support the decision-making of managers and health professionals.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the studies related to the cost of obtaining organs for transplants from a deceased donor.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library CINAHAL, Virtual Health Library (BVS), SCOPUS, Web of Science and EMBASE, using the following descriptors: Costs and cost analysis; Donor Selection; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue and Organ Harvesting; and Tissue Donors, in studies published until April 2021. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Checklist for Economic Assessments. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of the studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1731 studies were identified, of which 11 were analyzed. The cost of kidneys in US dollars (USD) ranged between USD $1672 and USD $25,058. Obtaining a liver ranged from USD $586 to USD $44,478. Heart procurement ranged from USD $633 to USD $24,264. The combined heart-lung transplant ranged from USD $860 to USD $23,203. Obtaining the pancreas ranged from USD $413 to USD $29,708.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost of obtaining organs for transplants from a deceased donor is substantial and varies widely across different studies. The overall cost of failures to obtain organs is currently unknown. Understanding organ procurement expenses can help clarify areas in which organ and tissue procurement can improve in cost and efficiency.