1
|
Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Renkamp CK, Lau HH, Neugebauer D, Niebuhr N, Buchele C, Schlüter F, Sandrini E, Hoeltgen L, Weykamp F, Regnery S, Liermann J, Meixner E, Zhang K, Sedlaczek O, Schlemmer HP, König L, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Prospective planning comparison of magnetic resonance-guided vs. internal target volume-based stereotactic body radiotherapy of hepatic metastases - Which patients do really benefit from an MR-linac? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2025; 52:100941. [PMID: 40124646 PMCID: PMC11926716 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2025] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objective To compare online MR-guided SBRT (MRgRT) of liver metastases with state-of-the-art ITV-based SBRT (ITV-SBRT) and assess which patients benefit most from MRgRT. Materials and methods In a prospective randomized trial (MAESTRO study, NCT05027711), patients were randomized to either gated and online adaptive MRgRT or ITV-SBRT if a biologically effective dose (BED10) of 100 Gy was feasible with ITV-SBRT. Otherwise, patients were treated with MRgRT. In this subgroup analysis of 20 patients, a dosimetric comparison of MRgRT and ITV-SBRT plans was performed. Tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. Results In 40 % of all patients, MRgRT enabled SBRT with less fractions and/or higher prescription BED10. Almost all target volume metrics were improved with MRgRT. MRgRT PTV D95% was significantly higher in the overall cohort (91.0 ± 22.9 Gy vs. 79.5 ± 27.2 Gy, p = 0.001), in uncritical (111.3 ± 6.2 Gy vs. 104.7 ± 4.1 Gy, p = 0.022) and in critical cases with limited healthy liver volume or nearby gastrointestinal organs at risk (74.1 ± 16.9 Gy vs. 58.5 ± 18.5 Gy, p = 0.041). Target volume V100% was also superior with MRgRT. Calculated 2-year tumor control probability was significantly superior with MRgRT overall (73.0 ± 6.2 % vs. 69.7 ± 7.9 %, p = 0.002), in uncritical cases (78.3 ± 1.4 % vs. 76.8 ± 1.0 %, p = 0.022) and in critical cases (68.5 ± 4.8 % vs. 63.8 ± 5.8 %, p = 0.041), without elevated normal tissue complication probability. Conclusion Dosimetrically, gated MRgRT was beneficial for virtually all the hepatic metastases analyzed in this study. Patients with metastases located critically near gastrointestinal OAR or with limited healthy liver volume should be allocated to centers providing MRgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C. Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hoi Hin Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Neugebauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Niebuhr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kevin Zhang
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Sedlaczek
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jouglar E, de Marzi L, Verrelle P, Créhange G, Ferrand R, Doz F, Prezado Y, Paoletti X. From pre-clinical studies to human treatment with proton-minibeam radiation therapy: adapted Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term evaluation (IDEAL) framework for innovation in radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2025; 52:100932. [PMID: 40124645 PMCID: PMC11928333 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 02/10/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025] Open
Abstract
The implementation and spread of new radiation therapy (RT) techniques are often rushed through before or without high-quality proof of a clinical benefit. The framework for phase 1, 2 and 3 trials, ideally designed for pharmaceutical evaluation, is not always appropriate for RT interventions. The IDEAL framework is a five-step process initially developed to enable the rapid implementation of surgical innovations while limiting risks for patients. IDEAL was subsequently adapted to RT. Proton-minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is an innovative RT approach, using an array of parallel thin beams resulting in an outstanding increase in the therapeutic ratio. Cumulative preclinical evidence showed pMBRT was superior to standard RT regarding brain tolerance and provided equivalent or better local control in several glioblastoma models. We decided to adapt IDEAL to pMBRT to accelerate the implementation of this promising new technique in clinical care and present here some examples of possible upcoming studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology - Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, Paris, France
- Paris-Saclay University, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology - Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Inserm U1288, Laboratoire d’Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), Orsay, France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR9187, Inserm U1196, Orsay, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology - Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Inserm U1288, Laboratoire d’Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), Orsay, France
| | - Regis Ferrand
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology - Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, Paris, France
| | - François Doz
- SIREDO Centre (Care, Innovation and Research in Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adults Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris and University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Paris-Saclay University, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Xavier Paoletti
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Biostatistic Unit, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu X, Yang D, Sheng Y, Wu QRJ, Wu Q. A machine learning toolkit assisted approach for IMRT fluence map optimization: feasibility and advantages. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2025; 11:035016. [PMID: 40203852 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/adcaca] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2025] [Accepted: 04/09/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025]
Abstract
Purpose. Traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications in treatment planning rely on complex model architectures and large, high-quality training datasets. However, they cannot fully replace the conventional optimization process. This study presents a novel application of ML in treatment planning where established ML/DL toolkits are directly applied to treatment plan optimization.Materials and Methods. A one-layer network was designed based on the dose deposition matrix and implemented in PyTorch's L-BFGS optimizer with GPU acceleration. The classical steepest descent optimizer was selected as a reference for comparison. Both optimizers utilized identical inputs and objective functions to ensure a fair comparison. DVH- and gEUD-based objectives were implemented in standard quadratic forms. Standard uniform and 1,000 random initializations were used to test optimizer's search ability under different starting conditions for prostate and head-and-neck cases.Results. The MLT-assisted framework demonstrated comparable or superior plan quality to classical optimization by achieving lower objective values, improved DVHs and capturing finer modulation details in fluence maps. For gEUD-based optimization, it effectively explored beam weight elevations that classical optimization could only reach with stricter convergence criteria and many more iterations. The quality differences primarily stemmed from convergence speed. The MLT-assisted framework required significantly fewer evaluations and iterations to achieve similar or better results. Optimization on random initial maps further demonstrated that it was more robust and less likely to be trapped. It does not require stricter convergence criteria or extended runs to reach high-quality optima, making it more efficient and reliable.Conclusion. This framework leverages ML toolkits in a novel way, enabling faster convergence, greater robustness and handling of complex constraints. As the first study of its kind, it establishes MLT-assisted optimization as a viable and effective alternative to classical methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Dongrong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Qing-Rong Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tronchin S, Forster J, Hickson K, Bezak E. Small-scale bone marrow dosimetry study for 225Ac. Phys Med 2025; 133:104966. [PMID: 40209546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 04/12/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted alpha therapy (TAT) with 225Ac-labelled radiopharmaceuticals is a growing therapeutic option for the treatment of various cancers. Due to the short range of alpha particles in tissue, the absorbed dose can be non-uniform on a microscopic scale. Therefore, understanding bone marrow toxicity in TAT requires small-scale dosimetry. METHOD We developed a voxelised trabecular bone model, based off µCT slices, with a voxel size of (37 × 37 × 37) µm3. A small-scale dosimetry study was performed to assess the marrow toxicity from uptake of unlabelled 225Ac in the trabecular bone. The Particle and Heavy Ion Transport Code System (PHITS) was used to simulate the decays and score the absorbed dose to each voxel from the alpha and beta emissions of the 225Ac decay chain. RESULTS For the alpha decays on the trabecular surface, 43 % of the marrow voxels were irradiated. The maximum voxel dose for the marrow was 1.1 Gy, and the mean non-zero voxel dose was 0.2 Gy (σ = 0.2 Gy). The beta-emissions from the trabecular surface irradiated all the marrow voxels, with a mean voxel dose of 3.9 mGy (σ = 1.7 mGy). CONCLUSION Our model demonstrated a non-uniform absorbed dose profile to the red marrow due to alpha emissions on the trabecular bone surface. The alpha emissions irradiated less than half of the marrow voxels,while the beta emissions irradiated all marrow voxels. This could potentially suggest a lower marrow toxicity from alpha-emitters compared to beta-emitters when skeletal metastases are present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Tronchin
- Department of Physics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Medical Physics & Radiation Safety, South Australia Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Jake Forster
- Department of Physics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Medical Physics & Radiation Safety, South Australia Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Kevin Hickson
- Medical Physics & Radiation Safety, South Australia Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Department of Physics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karimi A, Chegeni N, Mahmoudi F, Rezaeijo SM, Bagheri A. The impact of inherent dose heterogeneity of brachytherapy on calculating iso-effective dose-fractionation regimens for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Brachytherapy 2025:S1538-4721(25)00017-0. [PMID: 40180807 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Revised: 12/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Utilizing equivalent uniform biologically effective dose (EUBED) concept to calculate iso-effective dose-fractionation regimens in nonmelanoma skin cancer high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) to address dose heterogeneity and comparing it with the simple form of biologically effective dose (BED) formula. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two hypothetical HDR BT treatment plans were created for surface and interstitial techniques. Then iso-effective dose-fractionation regimens were calculated (with both EUBED and BED equations) to prescribe a total EQD210 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions with α/β = 10Gy) of 56, 60 and 65 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) over a range of five to fifteen fractions. Three different treatment schedules were considered: two and three fraction per week for surface BT and two times a day for interstitial BT. If the treatment duration exceeded 1 month (Tk = 28 days), tumor repopulation was taken into account. Other radiobiological parameters used were α/β = 10Gy, α = 0.3Gy-1, and Tp = 4 days. Finally, the dose per fraction calculated in the EUBED method was compared with the simple form of the BED formula. RESULTS The BED formula, compared to the EUBED equation, may lead to less than 5% overestimation in the calculated dose per fraction. This difference is more noticeable in surface BT compared to interstitial implants, especially when prescribing lower total doses, when the total treatment duration in surface BT approaches 28 days, and when using more fractionated interstitial BT treatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of this study, dose distribution inhomogeneity in nonmelanoma skin cancer HDR brachytherapy has minimal clinical impact on calculating iso-effective dose-fractionation regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arezoo Karimi
- Cancer Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Nahid Chegeni
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Farshid Mahmoudi
- School of Allied Medical Sciences, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Ali Bagheri
- Interventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cooke SA, Belderbos JSA, Stam B, Reymen B, Lambrecht M, Fredberg Persson G, Faivre-Finn C, Dieleman EMT, van Diessen J, de Ruysscher D, Sonke JJ. Esophageal Toxicity After Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase 2 Randomized ARTFORCE PET-Boost Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025:S0360-3016(25)00228-7. [PMID: 40156600 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2025] [Accepted: 03/01/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE We previously reported unexpected high rates of severe esophageal toxicity (ET) in patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer treated in the randomized ARTFORCE PET-Boost dose-escalation trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01024829). The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical factors and dose metrics associated with ET in patients treated within the trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients received 24 fractions of 3.0-5.4 Gy, planned isotoxically to the primary tumor as a whole (>4 cm) or to an 18F-FDG-PET defined subvolume within the primary tumor. Lymph nodes received 24 × 2.75Gy. Radiation therapy was combined with concurrent or sequential chemotherapy, or given alone. We evaluated the incidence and time to grade ≥ 3 (G ≥ 3) ET, and patient-reported symptoms. Follow-up time was estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses with Firth's penalization were performed to assess the associations between clinical variables, dose parameters, and the incidence of G ≥ 3 ET. RESULTS Median follow-up was 73.3 months. Of 107 patients randomized, 24(22.4%) experienced G ≥ 3 ET. There were 3 (2.8%) ET-related deaths, all esophageal fistulas. Median esophagus mean dose and D0.1% (EQD2) were 25.2 Gy (IQR, 18.9-33.2), and 69.5Gy (IQR, 66.4-75.4), respectively. G ≥ 3 ET occurred less frequently (19/54[35.2%] vs 5/53[9.4%]; P = .001) after a dose constraint for esophagus + 5 mm was introduced mid-trial (D0.1% < 70 Gy EQD2). Concurrent platinum-doublet chemotherapy, (compared with concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin or sequential/no chemotherapy) and higher esophageal doses, especially volume receiving >50 Gy, near maximum doses, and the equivalent uniform dose, were significantly associated with G ≥ 3 ET in multivariable regression. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent platinum-doublet chemotherapy, as well as high doses to the esophagus, was independently associated with risk of severe ET. Stricter dose constraints led to significant reduction in G ≥ 3 ET. Future dose-escalation studies should lower doses to the esophagus, especially when combined with concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia A Cooke
- Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - José S A Belderbos
- Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Stam
- Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Reymen
- Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Experimental Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Radiotherapy-Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Gasthuisberg, Belgium
| | - Gitte Fredberg Persson
- Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Edith M T Dieleman
- Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judi van Diessen
- Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang CJ, Ho YW, Lok KH, Lu YY, Zhu CR, Cheng HCY. Dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery using volumetric modulated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc therapy for multiple brain metastases. Sci Rep 2025; 15:9118. [PMID: 40097578 PMCID: PMC11914692 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93502-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
This paper presents a clinical comparison of the target dose, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and plan quality between volumetric modulated conformal arc therapy (VMAT) against dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) techniques to facilitate clinical decision-making in multiple brain metastases (MBM) treatment. A total of 11 cases having 33 lesions were recruited at the Union Oncology Centre, Union Hospital, Hong Kong SAR. With CT images available, all plans were optimized using both HyperArc (HA) and Brainlab Elements Multiple Brain Metastases (Elements MBM). Target coverage, normal tissue sparing, and dose distribution were compared pairwise between VMAT and DCAT. Results showed that the plans generated using both techniques achieved adequate target coverage to meet up with the oncologist's prescription. With similar levels of NTCP, the normal brain received low doses of radiation using both techniques and the risk of brain necrosis was kept equally low. This indicated that VMAT and DCAT produced similar high-quality treatment plans with low risks of brain necrosis. Meanwhile, VMAT showed better homogeneity which could potentially be more useful for large targets, while DCAT showed better target conformity especially for targets smaller than 1 cc. In general, both HA and Elements MBM demonstrated ability to generate high-quality clinical plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Jun Jiang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Yick-Wing Ho
- The Union Oncology Centre, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ka-Hei Lok
- The Union Oncology Centre, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yeow-Yuen Lu
- The Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chun-Ran Zhu
- The Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210028, Jiangsu, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stolz J, Rogal K, Bicher S, Winter J, Ahmed M, Raulefs S, Combs SE, Bartzsch SH, Schmid TE. The Combination of Temporal and Spatial Dose Fractionation in Microbeam Radiation Therapy. Biomedicines 2025; 13:678. [PMID: 40149654 PMCID: PMC11940479 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13030678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is an advanced preclinical approach in radiotherapy that utilizes spatially fractionated dose distributions by collimating x-rays into micrometer-wide, planar beams. While the benefits of temporal fractionation are well established and widely incorporated into conventional radiotherapy protocols, the interplay between MRT and temporal dose fractionation remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigate the effects of combining temporal and spatial dose fractionation by assessing clonogenic cell survival following temporally fractionated MRT with varying irradiation angles, compared to conventional broad-beam (BB) irradiation. Methods: A lung tumor cell line (A549) and a normal lung cell line (MRC-5) were irradiated with a total number of four fractions with a 24 h interval between each fraction. We compared a temporally fractionated BB regime to two temporally fractionated MRT schemes with either overlapping MRT fields or MRT fields with a 45° rotation per fraction. Subsequently, the clonogenic cell survival assay was used by analyzing the corresponding survival fractions (SFs). Results: The clonogenic survival of A549 tumor cells differed significantly between microbeam radiation therapy with rotation (MRT + R) and overlapping MRT. However, neither MRT + R nor overlapping MRT showed statistically significant differences compared to the broad-beam (BB) irradiation for A549. In contrast, the normal tissue cell line MRC-5 exhibited significantly higher clonogenic survival following both MRT + R and overlapping MRT compared to BB. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that combining temporal and spatial fractionation enhances normal tissue cell survival while maintaining equivalent tumor cell kill, potentially increasing the therapeutic index. Our findings support the feasibility of delivering temporally fractionated doses using different MRT modalities and provide clear evidence of the therapeutic benefits of temporally fractionated MRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Stolz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Kristina Rogal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Sandra Bicher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Johanna Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Mabroor Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Raulefs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan H. Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.S.); (S.R.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gondré M, Vallet V, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Dosimetric comparison of M6 CyberKnife plans optimized with Precision and RayStation 12A treatment planning systems. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2025; 26:e14585. [PMID: 39698880 PMCID: PMC11905244 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment planning for CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, USA) can be performed with Precision (Accuray, USA) or RayStation (RS) (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden) treatment planning systems (TPS). RaySearch recently released a new version of the CK module in RS 12A. The objective of the study was to compare plan quality between RS 12A and Precision. METHODS Fifty nine plans were optimized with both TPS and compared; 39 were for brain metastases and 20 were for vertebral metastases. To avoid bias in plan comparison, Precision plans were recomputed in RS with the dose algorithm and beam model of RS, and then compared to RS plans. The comparison was divided into 3 parts in order to reflect the potential of RS and the differences with Precision, in terms of technical aspects of delivery efficiency and dose distribution. We compared the dose to the target and to the organs at risk (OAR), the conformity index (CI), the gradient, as well as the number of monitor units (MU), and the number of beams and nodes. Finally, a global plan quality index (PQI) was calculated. RESULTS RS plans showed an equivalent target coverage for brain metastases but worse for vertebrae. OAR sparing was improved in RS but with a lower CI compared to Precision. Using an appropriate planning methodology in RS, plans with comparable quality to Precision could be obtained, but at the cost of a longer optimization time. The PQI obtained with RS was better than Precision, except for some brain cases. CONCLUSION RS is an adequate alternative for CK planning as it is possible to obtain plan quality comparable to Precision. However, the optimization time is longer compared to Precision and more attention must be paid to the choice of the initial conditions in terms of the number of beams and nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maude Gondré
- Institute of Radiation PhysicsLausanne University Hospital and Lausanne UniversityLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Véronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation PhysicsLausanne University Hospital and Lausanne UniversityLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Radio‐Oncology DepartmentLausanne University Hospital and Lausanne UniversityLausanneSwitzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation PhysicsLausanne University Hospital and Lausanne UniversityLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Raphael Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation PhysicsLausanne University Hospital and Lausanne UniversityLausanneSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu H, Jia Z, Li X, Li M, Lin H, Bian Y, Wang W, Zhang L, Li Y. Feasibility study of synchronously increasing dose of multi-shell structure to improve stereotactic ablation radiotherapy central dose of large volume locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors using cyberKnife. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2025; 11:025040. [PMID: 39928989 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/adb434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2025] [Indexed: 02/12/2025]
Abstract
Purpose. Increasing the central dose for large, locally advanced, drug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (LADR-GISTs) has consistently been a significant challenge. This study explores the feasibility of using multiple shell structures within the tumor to enhance the central ablation dose of large LADR-GIST by increasing the shell doses.Methods and Materials. This study involved five patients with large LADR-GIST who were treated with CyberKnife. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated as a multi-shell structure. Five dose escalation plans (SIB-SBRT) were created for each patient, varying the dose escalation ratios. The radiation doses for the center of the GTV (GTV center) in these plans ranged from 49 Gy to 70 Gy. Parameter evaluations were conducted comparing the SIB-SBRT plans with conventional SBRT plans (Con-SBRT), focusing on equivalent uniform dose (EUD), relative equivalent uniform dose (rEUD), dose volume parameters, conformal index (CI), new conformal index (nCI), gradient index (GI), and monitor unit (MU). The Friedman Test was employed to determine statistical differences (P< 0.05), followed by pairwise comparisons.Results. When the dose escalation ratios reached 25% of the prescribed dose, the average rEUD increased to 6.92, and the proportion of the GTV volume with Biologically Equivalent Dose (BED)> 100 Gy increased to 30.69%. At dose escalation ratios of 30% of the prescribed dose, the rEUD stabilized, but the radiation dose received by the bladder, colon, and duodenum significantly increased. Except for the SIB25-SBRT and SIB30-SBRT groups, no statistically significant differences were observed between the other SIB-SBRT groups and the Con-SBRT group across various evaluation metrics.Conclusions. The method of synchronously increasing the dose using a multi-shell structure is feasible for stereotactic ablation in the treatment of LADR-GISTs using CyberKnife. The results indicate that dose escalation ratios of 25% of the prescribed dose can provide a satisfactory ablation dose (BED > 100 Gy), covering 31% of the large tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Xu
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen Jia
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiongfei Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingzhu Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongyu Lin
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunfei Bian
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Lian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shao K, Du F, Qiu L, Zhang Y, Li Y, Ding J, Zhan W, Chen W. Comparative analysis of VMAT plans on Halcyon and infinity for lung cancer radiotherapy. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0318462. [PMID: 39933014 PMCID: PMC11813144 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective The dosimetric characteristics and treatment efficiency of VMAT plans using two linear accelerator platforms, Halcyon and Infinity, in conventional radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are compared to provide data for selecting clinical equipment. The study also explores potential confounding factors that may influence treatment outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the dosimetric characteristics and treatment efficiency of VMAT plans delivered using Halcyon and Infinity linear accelerator platforms in patients with NSCLC. A retrospective analysis was performed on 60 NSCLC patients receiving conventional fractionated radiotherapy with VMAT plans developed for both Halcyon and Infinity. These plans were optimized with RayStation 9A with identical dose constraints and optimization parameters. The groups were compared in terms of target dose coverage, normal tissue sparing, plan complexity, and treatment efficiency. The dosimetric parameters included D98%, D2%, and Dmean for both the CTV and PTV and dose distributions for organs at risk (OARs), including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord. Logistic regression was performed to account for potential confounding factors, such as PTV volume, tumor stage, and tumor location. Results The VMAT plans of both platforms met the clinical dosimetric requirements. Halcyon showed superior protection of normal tissues in low-dose areas (e.g., Lungs V5Gy and Heart V30Gy), whereas Infinity excelled in controlling hot spots and achieving rapid dose fall-off at the target margins. Furthermore, Halcyon has fewer plan monitoring units and lower complexity than Infinity and reduced treatment time by 24.0%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that PTV volume was a significant predictor for dose metric differences, while tumor stage and tumor location had variable effects depending on the dose metric, highlighting the need to account for these factors in clinical comparisons. Overall, there was no significant difference in target dose coverage or uniformity between the platforms; each demonstrated specific strengths in protecting different OARs and in treatment execution efficiency. Conclusion Halcyon and Infinity offer distinct advantages in radiotherapy for NSCLC. Halcyon provides better protection of normal tissues and performance in low-dose regions, whereas Infinity offers greater treatment efficiency and superior control in high-dose regions. The study also highlights that PTV volume is an important factor influencing dosimetric outcomes. In choosing optimal radiotherapy equipment in clinical practice, the study results suggest that treatment planning should leverage the unique technical features of different accelerators to achieve the best individualized outcomes. Future studies should increase the sample size and employ prospective research designs to confirm the clinical relevance of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kainan Shao
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fenglei Du
- Department of Radiation Physics, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lingyun Qiu
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yinghao Zhang
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yucheng Li
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jieni Ding
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wenming Zhan
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weijun Chen
- Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, HangZhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang W, Hong X, Wu W, Wang C, Johnson D, Gan GN, Lin Y, Gao H. Multi-collimator proton minibeam radiotherapy with joint dose and PVDR optimization. Med Phys 2025; 52:1182-1192. [PMID: 39607058 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical translation of proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) presents significant challenges, particularly in developing an optimal treatment planning technique. A uniform target dose is crucial for maximizing anti-tumor efficacy and facilitating the clinical acceptance of pMBRT. However, achieving a high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) in organs-at-risk (OAR) is essential for sparing normal tissue. This balance becomes particularly difficult when OARs are located distal to the beam entrance or require patient-specific collimators. PURPOSE This work proposes a novel pMBRT treatment planning method that can achieve high PVDR at OAR and uniform dose at target simultaneously, via multi-collimator pMBRT (MC-pMBRT) treatment planning method with joint dose and PVDR optimization (JDPO). METHODS MC-pMBRT utilizes a set of generic and premade multi-slit collimators with different center-to-center distances and does not need patient-specific collimators. The collimator selection per field is OAR-specific and tailored to maximize PVDR in OARs while preserving target dose uniformity. Then, the inverse optimization method JDPO is utilized to jointly optimize target dose uniformity, PVDR, and other dose-volume-histogram based dose objectives, which is solved by iterative convex relaxation optimization algorithm and alternating direction method of multipliers. RESULTS The need and efficacy of MC-pMBRT is demonstrated by comparing the single-collimator (SC) approach with the multi-collimator (MC) approach. While SC degraded either PVDR for OAR or dose uniformity for the target, MC provided a good balance of PVDR and target dose uniformity. The proposed JDPO method is validated in comparison with the dose-only optimization (DO) method for MC-pMBRT, in reference to the conventional (CONV) proton RT (no pMBRT). Compared to CONV, MC-pMBRT (DO and JDPO) preserved target dose uniformity and plan quality, while providing unique PVDR in OAR. Compared to DO, JDPO further improved PVDR via PVDR optimization during treatment planning. CONCLUSION A novel pMBRT treatment planning method called MC-pMBRT is proposed that utilizes a set of generic and premade collimators with joint dose and PVDR optimization algorithm to optimize OAR-specific PVDR and target dose uniformity simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Xue Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Daniel Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Gregory N Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kihara S, Ohira S, Kanayama N, Ikawa T, Inui S, Isono M, Nitta Y, Ueda Y, Nishio T, Konishi K. Effects of Institutional Experience on Plan Quality in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using HyperArc for Brain Metastases. In Vivo 2025; 39:210-217. [PMID: 39740907 PMCID: PMC11705131 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Revised: 09/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM HyperArc (HA) is an automated planning technique enabling single-isocenter brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT); however, dosimetric outcomes may be influenced by the planner's expertise. This study aimed to assess the impact of institutional experience on the plan quality of HA-SRT for both single and multiple brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients who underwent HA-SRT for single metastasis between 2020 and 2021 comprised the earlier group, while those treated between 2022 and 2024 constituted the later group. For multiple metastases, 40 patients who received HA-SRT from 2020-2024 were divided into earlier and later treatment groups. Dosimetric parameters including gross tumor volume (GTV) doses (D98% and Dmean), volumes of the normal brain (Brain-GTV V25Gy and V30Gy), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), and total monitor unit (MU) were compared. A linear regression model was used to evaluate the effects of planning target volume (PTV) on volumes of normal brain via interaction between PTV volume and treatment era group (earlier vs. later). RESULTS The later group exhibited significantly higher D98% and Dmean values for both single and multiple metastases, while V25Gy and V30Gy and GI mean values were comparable. Consequently, mean HI and total MU values increased significantly. Both single and multiple metastases showed significant interaction between PTV volume and treatment era group. CONCLUSION Enhanced dosimetric outcomes in the later group suggested that accumulated experience contributed to improve GTV and brain dose in HA SRT. Institutional experience is important to improve the plan quality for SRT even with automatic planning such as HA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayaka Kihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan;
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shingo Ohira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Radiological Science, Graduate School of Human Health Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shoki Inui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaru Isono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuya Nitta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ueda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Teiji Nishio
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhu C, Guyer G, Bertholet J, Mueller S, Loebner HA, Volken W, Arnold J, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK, Manser P. Dosimetric optimization for dynamic mixed beam arc therapy (DYMBARC). Med Phys 2025; 52:489-503. [PMID: 39460998 PMCID: PMC11700002 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-coplanarity and mixed beam modality could be combined to further enhance dosimetric treatment plan quality. We introduce dynamic mixed beam arc therapy (DYMBARC) as an innovative technique that combines non-coplanar photon and electron arcs, dynamic gantry and collimator rotations, and intensity modulation with photon multileaf collimator (MLC). However, finding favorable beam directions for DYMBARC is challenging due to the large solution space, machine component constraints, and optimization parameters, posing a highly non-convex optimization problem. PURPOSE To establish DYMBARC and solve the pathfinding challenge by employing direct aperture optimization (DAO) to determine the table angles and gantry angle ranges of photon and electron arcs for different clinically motivated cases. METHODS The method starts by generating a grid of beam directions based on user-defined resolutions along the gantry and table angle axes for each beam quality considered. Beam directions causing collisions or entering through the end of CT are excluded. For electrons, a fixed source-to-surface distance of 80 cm is used to reduce in-air scatter. Electron beam energies with insufficient range to reach the target or beam directions impinging on the table before reaching the patient are excluded. The remaining beam directions form the pathfinding solution space. Promising photon and electron MLC-defined apertures, with associated monitor unit (MU) weights, are iteratively added using a hybrid-DAO algorithm. This algorithm combines column generation to add apertures and simulated annealing to further refine aperture shapes and weights. Apertures are added until the requested number of paths are formed and the user-defined maximum total gantry angle range is reached. Paths are resampled to a finer gantry angle resolution and subject to DAO for simultaneous optimization of beam intensities along the photon/electron arcs. Subsequent final dose calculation and MU weight reoptimization result in a deliverable DYMBARC plan. DYMBARC plans are created for three clinically motivated cases (brain, breast, and pelvis) and compared to DYMBARC variants: colli-DTRT (dynamic collimator trajectory radiotherapy) using non-coplanar photon arcs; and Arc-MBRT (mixed beam radiotherapy) using photons and electrons but restricted to coplanar setup. Additionally, a manually defined volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) setup serves as a reference clinical technique. Dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, and dosimetric endpoints are evaluated. Dosimetric validation with radiochromic film measurements (gamma evaluation, 3% / 2 mm (global), 10% dose threshold) is performed on a TrueBeam system in developer mode for one case. RESULTS While maintaining similar target coverage and homogeneity, DYMBARC reduced mean doses to organs-at-risk compared to VMAT by an average of 3.2, 0.5, and 2.9 Gy for the brain, breast, and pelvis cases, respectively. Similar or smaller mean dose reductions were observed for Arc-MBRT or colli-DTRT, compared to VMAT. Electron contributions to the mean planning target volume dose ranged from 2% to 34% for DYMBARC and from 11% to 40% for Arc-MBRT. Measurement validation showed >99.7% gamma passing rate. CONCLUSIONS DYMBARC was successfully established using a dosimetrically optimized pathfinding approach, combining non-coplanarity with mixed beam modality. DYMBARC facilitated the determination of photon and electron contributions on a case-by-case basis, enhancing more personalized treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengchen Zhu
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Hannes A. Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | - Michael K. Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation OncologyInselspitalBern University Hospitaland University of BernBernSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huesa-Berral C, Terry JF, Kunz L, Bertolet A. Sequencing microsphere selective internal radiotherapy after external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: proof of concept of a synergistic combination. Br J Radiol 2025; 98:50-57. [PMID: 39418205 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to explore the synergistic effects of combining stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in that specific sequence for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in patients at high risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). METHODS We analysed a case of a patient with HCC who was treated with SBRT at our institution. A virtual 90Y dose distribution was added using our in-house MIDOS model to keep a minimum dose to the healthy liver tissue. BED and EUD metrics were calculated to harmonize the dose distributions of SBRT and SIRT. RESULTS Our radiation biology-based models suggest that the combination of SBRT and SIRT could maintain effective tumour control while reducing the dose to normal liver tissue. Specifically, an SBRT plan of 10 Gy×3 fractions combined with SIRT yielded comparable tumour control probability to an SBRT-only plan of 10 Gy×5 fractions. CONCLUSIONS The combination of SBRT and SIRT is a promising treatment strategy for HCC patients at high risk of RILD. While the LQ model and associated formalisms provide a useful starting point, further studies are needed to account for factors beyond these models. Nonetheless, the potential for significant dose reduction to normal tissue suggests that this combination therapy could offer substantial clinical benefits. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This article presents a proposal to combine SBRT and SIRT, in this specific order, for HCC, discussing its advantages. A framework for future research into optimizing combination therapy for HCC is provided, utilizing a novel HCC vascular model to simulate 90Y doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Huesa-Berral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Jack F Terry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Louis Kunz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Alejandro Bertolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Subramanian N, Čolić A, Santiago Franco M, Stolz J, Ahmed M, Bicher S, Winter J, Lindner R, Raulefs S, Combs SE, Bartzsch S, Schmid TE. Superior Anti-Tumor Response After Microbeam and Minibeam Radiation Therapy in a Lung Cancer Mouse Model. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:114. [PMID: 39796741 PMCID: PMC11719800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2024] [Revised: 12/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study aimed to compare the tumor growth delay between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and the spatially fractionated modalities of microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) and minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT). In addition, we also determined the influence of beam width and the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) on tumor regrowth. METHODS A549, a human non-small-cell lung cancer cell line, was implanted subcutaneously into the hind leg of female CD1-Foxn1nu mice. The animals were irradiated with sham, CRT, MRT, or MBRT. The spatially fractionated fields were created using two specially designed multislit collimators with a beam width of 50 μm and a center-to-center distance (CTC) of 400 μm for MRT and a beam width of 500 μm and 2000 μm CTC for MBRT. Additionally, the concept of the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) was chosen in our study. A dose of 20 Gy was applied to all groups with a PVDR of 20 for MBRT and MRT. Tumor growth was recorded until the tumors reached at least a volume that was at least three-fold of their initial value, and the growth delay was calculated. RESULTS We saw a significant reduction in tumor regrowth following all radiation modalities. A growth delay of 11.1 ± 8 days was observed for CRT compared to the sham, whereas MBRT showed a delay of 20.2 ± 7.3 days. The most pronounced delay was observed in mice irradiated with MRT PVDR 20, with 34.9 ± 26.3 days of delay. CONCLUSIONS The current study highlights the fact that MRT and MBRT modalities show a significant tumor growth delay in comparison to CRT at equivalent uniform doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narayani Subramanian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Aleksandra Čolić
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Marina Santiago Franco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Jessica Stolz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Mabroor Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Sandra Bicher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Johanna Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Rainer Lindner
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Susanne Raulefs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health and Klinikum rechts der Isar, University Hospital of the Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (N.S.); (A.Č.); (M.S.F.); (J.S.); (M.A.); (S.B.); (J.W.); (S.R.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, 85764 München, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mahmoudi F, Chegeni N, Bagheri A, Danyaei A, Razzaghi S, Arvandi S, Saki Malehi A, Arjmand B, Shamsi A, Mohiuddin M. Optimization of the Dose-Volume Effect Parameter "a" in EUD-Based TCP Models for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2025; 24:15330338251329103. [PMID: 40165476 PMCID: PMC11960152 DOI: 10.1177/15330338251329103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Revised: 02/08/2025] [Accepted: 03/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/02/2025] Open
Abstract
IntroductionRadiotherapy treatment plans traditionally rely on physical indices like Dose-volume histograms and spatial dose distributions. While these metrics assess dose delivery, they lack consideration for the biological effects on tumors and healthy tissues. To address this, radiobiological models like tumor control probability (TCP) and Normal tissue complications probability (NTCP) are increasingly incorporated to evaluate treatment efficacy and potential complications. This study aimed to assess the predictive power of radiobiological models for TCP in breast cancer radiotherapy and provide insights into the model selection and parameter optimization.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, two commonly used models, the Linear-Poisson and Equivalent uniform dose (EUD)-based models, were employed to calculate TCP for 30 patients. Different radiobiological parameter sets were investigated, including established sets from literature (G1 and G2) and set with an optimized "a" parameter derived from clinical trial data (a1 and a2). Model predictions were compared with clinical outcomes from the START trials.ResultsThe Linear-Poisson model with es lished parameter sets from the literature demonstrated good agreement with clinical data. The standard EUD-based model (a = -7.2) significantly underestimated TCP. While both models exhibited some level of independence from the specific parameter sets (G1 vs. G2), the EUD-based model was susceptible to the "a" parameter value. Optimization suggests a more accurate "a" value closer to -2.57 and -5.65.ConclusionThis study emphasizes the importance of clinically relevant radiobiological parameters for accurate TCP prediction and optimizing the "a" parameter in the EUD-based model based on clinical data (a1 and a2) improved its predictive accuracy significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshid Mahmoudi
- School of Allied Medical Sciences, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Nahid Chegeni
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Ali Bagheri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Amir Danyaei
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Samira Razzaghi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Shole Arvandi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Amal Saki Malehi
- Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Bahare Arjmand
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Azin Shamsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Majid Mohiuddin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1700 Lutheran, Park Ridge, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kut C, Quon H, Chen XS. Emerging Radiotherapy Technologies for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Challenges and Opportunities in the Era of Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4150. [PMID: 39766050 PMCID: PMC11674243 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2024] [Revised: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral component in the multidisciplinary management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Significant advances have been made toward optimizing tumor control and toxicity profiles of RT for HNSCC in the past two decades. The development of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy established the standard of care for most patients with locally advanced HNSCC around the turn of the century. More recently, selective dose escalation to the most radioresistant part of tumor and avoidance of the most critical substructures of organs at risk, often guided by functional imaging, allowed even further improvement in the therapeutic ratio of IMRT. Other highly conformal RT modalities, including intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being increasingly utilized, although there are gaps in our understanding of the normal tissue complication probabilities and their relative biological effectiveness. There is renewed interest in spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT), such as GRID and LATTICE radiotherapy, in both palliative and definitive settings. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with recurrent and metastatic HNSCC. Novel RT modalities, including IMPT, SBRT, and SFRT, have the potential to reduce lymphopenia and immune suppression, stimulate anti-tumor immunity, and synergize with ICIs. The next frontier in the treatment of HNSCC may lie in the exploration of combined modality treatment with new RT technologies and ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Kut
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.K.); (H.Q.)
| | - Harry Quon
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (C.K.); (H.Q.)
| | - Xuguang Scott Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cicone F, Gnesin S, Santo G, Stokke C, Bartolomei M, Cascini GL, Minniti G, Paganelli G, Verger A, Cremonesi M. Do we need dosimetry for the optimization of theranostics in CNS tumors? Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S242-S258. [PMID: 39351795 PMCID: PMC11631076 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical theranostic treatments have grown exponentially worldwide, and internal dosimetry has attracted attention and resources. Despite some similarities with chemotherapy, radiopharmaceutical treatments are essentially radiotherapy treatments, as the release of radiation into tissues is the determinant of the observed clinical effects. Therefore, absorbed dose calculations are key to explaining dose-effect correlations and individualizing radiopharmaceutical treatments. The present article introduces the basic principles of internal dosimetry and provides an overview of available loco-regional and systemic radiopharmaceutical treatments for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The specific characteristics of dosimetry as applied to these treatments are highlighted, along with their limitations and most relevant results. Dosimetry is performed with higher precision and better reproducibility than in the past, and dosimetric data should be systematically collected, as treatment planning and verification may help exploit the full potential of theranostic of CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giulia Santo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Caroline Stokke
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Diagnostic Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paganelli
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori,”Meldola, Italy
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, IADI, INSERM, UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dattoli Viegas AM, Carando D, Koivunoro H, Joensuu H, González SJ. Predicting radiotoxic effects after BNCT for brain cancer using a novel dose calculation model. Phys Med 2024; 128:104840. [PMID: 39520731 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/21/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The normal brain is an important dose-limiting organ for brain cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. This study aims to develop a model to calculate photon isoeffective doses (DIsoE) to normal brain that can explain the incidence of grade 2 or higher somnolence syndrome (SS⩾2) after Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT). METHODS A DIsoE model was constructed to find the reference photon dose that equals the Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) of the absorbed dose from BNCT. Limb paralysis rates from the rat spinal cord model exposed to conventional or BNCT irradiation were used to determine model parameters. NTCP expressions for both irradiations were constructed based on Lyman's model accordingly. DIsoE values were calculated for BNCT treatments performed in Finland and USA. An equivalent uniform dose (EUD) based on peak and average whole-brain doses and treatment fields was also introduced. Combining DIsoE and EUD models, a dose-response curve for SS⩾2 in BNCT patients was constructed and compared to conventional radiotherapy outcomes. RESULTS The DIsoE model reveals higher than expected photon-equivalent doses in the brain, indicating the need to modify standard dose calculation methods. Neither peak dose nor average whole-brain dose alone predicts SS⩾2 development. However, the dose-response curve derived from combining DIsoE and EUD models effectively explains the incidence of SS⩾2 after BNCT. CONCLUSIONS The introduced DIsoE and EUD models predict the incidence of somnolence syndrome after BNCT. The first dose-response relationship for SS⩾2 derived entirely from brain tumour patients treated with BNCT, consistent with photon radiotherapy responses, is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Mailén Dattoli Viegas
- División Física Computacional y Biofísica de las Radiaciones, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA), Av. General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2270, C1425FQD, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Daniel Carando
- Departamento de Matemática, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, and IMAS (UBA-CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Hanna Koivunoro
- Neutron Therapeutics, 1 Industrial Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts (01923), United States; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, P.O.B. 180, FIN-00029, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Heikki Joensuu
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, P.O.B. 180, FIN-00029, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Sara Josefina González
- División Física Computacional y Biofísica de las Radiaciones, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA), Av. General Paz 1499, B1650KNA, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2270, C1425FQD, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alzibdeh A, Abuhijlih R, Abuhijla F. Breast cancer radiobiology: The renaissance of whole breast radiation fractionation (Review). Mol Clin Oncol 2024; 21:97. [PMID: 39484288 PMCID: PMC11526245 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2024.2795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer radiotherapy has evolved significantly, driven by decades of research into fractionation schedules aimed at optimizing treatment efficacy and minimizing toxicity. Initial trials such as NSABP B-06 and EBCTCG meta-analyses established the benefits of adjuvant whole-breast irradiation in reducing local recurrence and improving survival rates. The linear-quadratic (LQ) model provided a framework to understand tissue response to radiation, highlighting the importance of the α/β ratio in determining fractionation sensitivity. The present scoping review aimed to identify and describe hypofractionation regimens for whole breast radiotherapy and evaluate dose differences using the LQ model across proposed α/β ratios. A comprehensive PubMed search for clinical trials published since 2010 on hypo-fractionated regimens was performed. Studies discussing α/β ratios for breast cancer have been also searched. Data on dose, fractions and α/β ratios were collected, and biologically effective dose (BED) and equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions were calculated. The coefficient of variation for BED varied with α/β ratios, showing the lowest variability for an α/β ratio of ~3 without tumor repopulation and increased with repopulation (BED-kT; k is a constant that depends on the repopulation rate of the tumor, and T is the total treatment time in days). Significant differences in BED variances were observed across α/β ratios (F-statistic 219.6, P<0.0001). START trials (P, A, and B) established α/β ratios of 3-4 Gy for breast cancer and normal tissues, confirming that hypofractionation is as effective as standard fractionation with potentially fewer late toxicities. Subsequent trials, such as FAST and FAST-Forward, demonstrated that ultra-hypofractionation is equivalent in tumor compared with conventional regimens. Further research is needed to gain a stronger understanding of radiobiological properties of breast cancer cells. Advances in radiotherapy technologies and the integration of biomarkers, radiomics and genomics are transforming treatment, moving towards precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulla Alzibdeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
| | - Ramiz Abuhijlih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
| | - Fawzi Abuhijla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang K, Jiang P, Wang J. Dosimetric evaluation of different cylinder diameters in three-dimensional vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:510. [PMID: 39585400 PMCID: PMC11588797 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05994-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the dosimetric, radiobiological, and toxicity differences between different cylinder diameters (d) in high-dose-rate three-dimensional computed-tomography-guided vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS From January 2019 to January 2024, postoperative EC patients treated with exclusive VBT using cylinders were classified by the cylinder diameter (d ≤ 2.6 cm: small-size; d ≥ 3.0 cm: large-size) and matched according to 1:2 propensity score matching. Vaginal clinical target volume (CTV) was a 3-mm expansion around the cylinder surface. Dosimetric parameters in equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) (α/β = 3 Gy) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) of vaginal_CTV and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated. Urinary, gastrointestinal, and vaginal toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS After matching, 132 patients (small-size: 44; large-size: 88) were analyzed. For vaginal_CTV, the small-size group had higher doses to 2%, 5%, 0.1 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc of the volume (D2, D5, D0.1 cc, D1cc, and D2cc) than the large-size group while lower doses to the 95%, 98%, and 100% volume (D95, D98, and D100). The D2cc and D5cc of bladder and all dosimetric parameters of rectum were smaller in the small-size group. The EUD of vaginal_CTV, bladder, and rectum showed no significant differences. No significant differences in toxicities were found within the median follow-up of 26.8 months. CONCLUSION Cylinders with smaller diameters produced more nonuniform dose distributions in the target and delivered lower doses to bladder and rectum than large-size cylinders. However, the dosimetric differences did not translate into significant differences of radiobiological parameters or outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiyue Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Ping Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Khan AZ, Scholl CM, Henry JG, Basran PS. A Comparative Study on Radiosensitivity of Canine Osteosarcoma Cell Lines Subjected to Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy. Radiat Res 2024; 202:745-751. [PMID: 39307531 DOI: 10.1667/rade-24-00168.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/09/2024]
Abstract
Canine appendicular osteosarcoma (OSCA) is a highly aggressive cancer, constituting 85% of all bone tumors in dogs, predominantly affecting larger breeds and exhibiting a high metastatic rate. This disease also shares many genomic similarities with human osteosarcomas, making it an ideal comparative model for treatment discovery. In this study, we characterized the radiobiological properties of several OSCA cell lines when subjected to spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) and chemotherapy. Specifically, we focused on lower (peak) doses from SFRT ranging from 1 to 10 Gy. These canine OSCA cell lines serve as useful models for osteosarcoma research that can be utilized to find translational treatments for both canine and human patients. This study reaffirms established clinical wisdom regarding the notoriously radioresistant profile of osteosarcomas but additionally offers compelling evidence supporting SFRT as a promising treatment option that could be used in conjunction with other cytotoxic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alizeh Z Khan
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Cheyanne M Scholl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Joshua G Henry
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Parminder S Basran
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Saldarriaga Vargas C, Andersson M, Bouvier-Capely C, Li WB, Madas B, Covens P, Struelens L, Strigari L. Heterogeneity of absorbed dose distribution in kidney tissues and dose-response modelling of nephrotoxicity in radiopharmaceutical therapy with beta-particle emitters: A review. Z Med Phys 2024; 34:491-509. [PMID: 37031068 PMCID: PMC11624361 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Absorbed dose heterogeneity in kidney tissues is an important issue in radiopharmaceutical therapy. The effect of absorbed dose heterogeneity in nephrotoxicity is, however, not fully understood yet, which hampers the implementation of treatment optimization by obscuring the interpretation of clinical response data and the selection of optimal treatment options. Although some dosimetry methods have been developed for kidney dosimetry to the level of microscopic renal substructures, the clinical assessment of the microscopic distribution of radiopharmaceuticals in kidney tissues currently remains a challenge. This restricts the anatomical resolution of clinical dosimetry, which hinders a thorough clinical investigation of the impact of absorbed dose heterogeneity. The potential of absorbed dose-response modelling to support individual treatment optimization in radiopharmaceutical therapy is recognized and gaining attraction. However, biophysical modelling is currently underexplored for the kidney, where particular modelling challenges arise from the convolution of a complex functional organization of renal tissues with the function-mediated dose distribution of radiopharmaceuticals. This article reviews and discusses the heterogeneity of absorbed dose distribution in kidney tissues and the absorbed dose-response modelling of nephrotoxicity in radiopharmaceutical therapy. The review focuses mainly on the peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with beta-particle emitting somatostatin analogues, for which the scientific literature reflects over two decades of clinical experience. Additionally, detailed research perspectives are proposed to address various identified challenges to progress in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarita Saldarriaga Vargas
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Calibrations, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium; In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Michelle Andersson
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Calibrations, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium; Medical Physics Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Céline Bouvier-Capely
- Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE/SESANE/LRSI, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Wei Bo Li
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Balázs Madas
- Environmental Physics Department, Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Peter Covens
- In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lara Struelens
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Calibrations, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chvetsov AV, Pugachev A. Biological effectiveness of uniform and nonuniform dose distributions in radiotherapy for tumors with intermediate oxygen levels. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2024; 10:065048. [PMID: 39419065 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad87f8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
Objective. We propose a criterion of biological effectiveness of nonuniform hypoxia-targeted dose distributions in heterogeneous hypoxic tumors based on equivalent uniform aerobic dose (EUAD). We demonstrate the utility of this criterion by applying it to the model problems in radiotherapy for tumors with different levels of oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) and different degrees of dose nonuniformity.Approach. The EUAD is defined as the uniform dose that, under well-oxygenated conditions, produces equal integrated survival of clonogenic cells in radiotherapy for heterogeneous hypoxic tumors with a non-uniform dose distribution. We define the dose nonuniformity effectiveness (DNE) in heterogeneous tumors as the ratio of the EUAD(DN) for a non-uniform distributionDNand the reference EUAD(DU) for the uniform dose distributionDUwith equal integral tumor dose. The DNE concept is illustrated in a radiotherapy model problem for non-small cell lung cancer treated with hypoxia targeted dose escalation. A two-level cell population tumor model was used to consider the hypoxic and oxygenated tumor cells.Results. Theoretical analysis of the DNE shows that the entire region of the OER can be separated in two regions by a threshold OERth: (1) OER > OERthwhere DNE > 1 indicating higher effectiveness of nonuniform dose distributions and (2) OER < OERthwhere DNE < 1 indicating higher effectiveness of uniform dose distributions. Our simulations show that the value of the threshold OERthin radiotherapy with conventional fractionation is significant in the range of about 1.2-1.6 depending on selected radiotherapy parameters. In general, the OERthincreases with reoxygenation rate, relative hypoxic volume and dose escalation factor. The threshold value of OERthis smaller of about 1.1 for hypofractionated radiotherapy.Significance. The analysis of dose distributions using the DNE shows that the uniform dose distributions may improve biological cell killing effect in heterogeneous tumors with intermediate oxygen levels compared to targeted nonuniform dose distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexei V Chvetsov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195-6043, United States of America
| | - Andrei Pugachev
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lai TY, Hu YW, Wang TH, Chen JP, Shiau CY, Huang PI, Lai IC, Liu YM, Huang CC, Tseng LM, Huang N, Liu CJ. Estimating the risk of major adverse cardiac events following radiotherapy for left breast cancer using a modified generalized Lyman normal-tissue complication probability model. Breast 2024; 77:103788. [PMID: 39181040 PMCID: PMC11386497 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We introduced an adapted Lyman normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, incorporating clinical risk factors and censored time-to-event data, to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) following left breast cancer radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical characteristics and MACE data of 1100 women with left-side breast cancer receiving postoperative RT from 2005 to 2017 were retrospectively collected. A modified generalized Lyman NTCP model based on the individual left ventricle (LV) equivalent uniform dose (EUD), accounting for clinical risk factors and censored data, was developed using maximum likelihood estimation. Subgroup analysis was performed for low-comorbidity and high-comorbidity groups. RESULTS Over a median follow-up 7.8 years, 64 patients experienced MACE, with higher mean LV dose in affected individuals (4.1 Gy vs. 2.9 Gy). The full model accounting for clinical factors identified D50 = 43.3 Gy, m = 0.59, and n = 0.78 as the best-fit parameters. The threshold dose causing a 50 % probability of MACE was lower in the high-comorbidity group (D50 = 30 Gy) compared to the low-comorbidity group (D50 = 45 Gy). Predictions indicated that restricting LV EUD below 5 Gy yielded a 10-year relative MACE risk less than 1.3 and 1.5 for high-comorbidity and low-comorbidity groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with comorbidities are more susceptible to cardiac events following breast RT. The proposed modified generalized Lyman model considers nondosimetric risk factors and addresses incomplete follow-up for late complications, offering comprehensive and individualized MACE risk estimates post-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Yu Lai
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Yu-Wen Hu
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Ti-Hao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C; Department of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C; Everfortune.AI, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Jui-Pin Chen
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Pin-I Huang
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - I-Chun Lai
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Yu-Ming Liu
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Chi-Cheng Huang
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center & Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Ling-Ming Tseng
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; Comprehensive Breast Health Center & Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Nicole Huang
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Chia-Jen Liu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C; Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang W, Traneus E, Lin Y, Chen RC, Gao H. A novel treatment planning method via scissor beams for uniform-target-dose proton GRID with peak-valley-dose-ratio optimization. Med Phys 2024; 51:7047-7056. [PMID: 39008781 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton spatially fractionated RT (SFRT) can potentially synergize the unique advantages of using proton Bragg peak and SFRT peak-valley dose ratio (PVDR) to reduce the radiation-induced damage for normal tissues. Uniform-target-dose (UTD) proton GRID is a proton SFRT modality that can be clinically desirable and conveniently adopted since its UTD resembles target dose distribution in conventional proton RT (CONV). However, UTD proton GRID is not used clinically, which is likely due to the lack of an effective treatment planning method. PURPOSE This work will develop a novel treatment planning method using scissor beams (SB) for UTD proton GRID, with the joint optimization of PVDR and dose objectives. METHODS The SB method for spatial dose modulation in normal tissues with UTD has two steps: (1) a primary beam (PB) is halved with interleaved beamlets, to generate spatial dose modulation in normal tissues; (2) a complementary beam (CB) is added to fill in previously valley-dose positions in the target to generate UTD, while the CB is angled slightly from the PB, to maintain spatial dose modulation in normal tissues. A treatment planning method with PVDR optimization via the joint total variation and L1 (TVL1) regularization is developed to jointly optimize PVDR and dose objectives. The plan optimization solution is obtained using an iterative convex relaxation algorithm. RESULTS The new methods SB and SB-TVL1 were validated in comparison with CONV. Compared to CONV of relatively homogeneous dose distribution, SB had modulated spatial dose pattern in normal tissues with UTD and comparable plan quality. Compared to SB, SB-TVL1 further maximized PVDR, with comparable dose-volume parameters. CONCLUSIONS A novel SB method is proposed that can generate modulated spatial dose pattern in normal tissues to achieve UTD proton GRID. A treatment planning method with PVDR optimization capability via TVL1 regularization is developed that can jointly optimize PVDR and dose objectives for proton GRID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| | | | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bhagyalakshmi AT, Ramasubramanian V. Impact of Number and Placement of High-dose Vertices on Equivalent Uniform Dose and Peak-to-valley Ratio for Lattice Radiotherapy. J Med Phys 2024; 49:493-501. [PMID: 39926149 PMCID: PMC11801099 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_97_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 08/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Aims This study evaluated the influence of high dose (HD) vertex numbers and its placement on equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) in lattice radiotherapy (LRT). Settings and Design One hundred and eighty-eight RapidArc (RA) plans were created for a cohort of 15 patients. Materials and Methods RA plans were created with zero to eight HD vertices to analyze their relationship with EUD. Eight lattices were systematically and optimally placed (by avoiding proximity to organs at risks [OARs]) to study the impact of vertex placement. Variations in PVDR were assessed using PVDR1 (mean dose to HD vertices by the difference of mean doses to planning target volume [PTV] and HD vertices) and PVDR2 (D10/D90 of PTV in composite plans) across 38 RA plans with HD vertex doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy. PVDR3 (product of PVDR1 and PVDR2) was evaluated for its variation with peak dose. Statistical Analysis Used Hypothesis testing between vertex placements was performed using a two-tailed Student's t-test. Results EUD values ranged from 32.88 Gy to 40.63 Gy. In addition, statistical analysis revealed significant associations (P = 0.0074) between the placement patterns of HD vertices, both in systematic and optimized arrangements. The PVDR and D10/D90 product values were 1.6, 1.8, 2.1, and 2.3 for peak doses of 9 Gy, 12 Gy, 15 Gy, and 18 Gy, respectively. Conclusions The addition of one HD vertex increased EUD, emphasizing the impact of individual vertex increments on outcomes. Systematic and optimized vertex placements enhance EUD, with optimized placement yielding better doses to PTV and OARs. PVDR3 offers superior dose reporting for LRT compared to PVDR1 and PVDR2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. T. Bhagyalakshmi
- School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American Oncology Institute at Baby Memorial Hospital, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gardner LL, Thompson SJ, O'Connor JD, McMahon SJ. Modelling radiobiology. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:18TR01. [PMID: 39159658 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad70f0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy has played an essential role in cancer treatment for over a century, and remains one of the best-studied methods of cancer treatment. Because of its close links with the physical sciences, it has been the subject of extensive quantitative mathematical modelling, but a complete understanding of the mechanisms of radiotherapy has remained elusive. In part this is because of the complexity and range of scales involved in radiotherapy-from physical radiation interactions occurring over nanometres to evolution of patient responses over months and years. This review presents the current status and ongoing research in modelling radiotherapy responses across these scales, including basic physical mechanisms of DNA damage, the immediate biological responses this triggers, and genetic- and patient-level determinants of response. Finally, some of the major challenges in this field and potential avenues for future improvements are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia L Gardner
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - Shannon J Thompson
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - John D O'Connor
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
- Ulster University School of Engineering, York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li C, Guo Y, Lin X, Feng X, Xu D, Yang R. Deep reinforcement learning in radiation therapy planning optimization: A comprehensive review. Phys Med 2024; 125:104498. [PMID: 39163802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The formulation and optimization of radiation therapy plans are complex and time-consuming processes that heavily rely on the expertise of medical physicists. Consequently, there is an urgent need for automated optimization methods. Recent advancements in reinforcement learning, particularly deep reinforcement learning (DRL), show great promise for automating radiotherapy planning. This review summarizes the current state of DRL applications in this field, evaluates their effectiveness, and identifies challenges and future directions. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus using keywords such as "deep reinforcement learning", "radiation therapy", and "treatment planning". The extracted data were synthesized for an overview and critical analysis. RESULTS The application of deep reinforcement learning in radiation therapy plan optimization can generally be divided into three categories: optimizing treatment planning parameters, directly optimizing machine parameters, and adaptive radiotherapy. From the perspective of disease sites, DRL has been applied to cervical cancer, prostate cancer, vestibular schwannoma, and lung cancer. Regarding types of radiation therapy, it has been used in HDRBT, IMRT, SBRT, VMAT, GK, and Cyberknife. CONCLUSIONS Deep reinforcement learning technology has played a significant role in advancing the automated optimization of radiation therapy plans. However, there is still a considerable gap before it can be widely applied in clinical settings due to three main reasons: inefficiency, limited methods for quality assessment, and poor interpretability. To address these challenges, significant research opportunities exist in the future, such as constructing evaluators, parallelized training, and exploring continuous action spaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Li
- Institute of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, PR China
| | - Yuqi Guo
- Institute of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, PR China
| | - Xinyan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China; School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Xuezhen Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China; School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China
| | - Dachuan Xu
- Institute of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, PR China.
| | - Ruijie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu IC, Hrinivich WT, Lee JN, Narang AK, Meyer J. Characterizing Compromised Target Coverage With Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Cureus 2024; 16:e66882. [PMID: 39280556 PMCID: PMC11398855 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Proximity of organs at risk (OAR) hinders radiation dose escalation for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. To address this limitation, there is interest in protracted-fractionation (PF: 15 to 25 fractions) courses employing moderate hypofractionation (MHF: 3-4 Gy/fraction). However, there persists underdosing where tumor interfaces with OAR. The significance of compromised tumor coverage and dose heterogeneity on tumor control remains unknown. Here, we report our initial planning experience with PF-MHF in pancreatic cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed radiation courses for locally advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer with a PF-MHF approach: 45 Gy in 25 fractions (1.8 Gy/fraction) to PTV with 75 Gy (3 Gy/fraction) as an integrated boost to the GTV. We reviewed dosimetric parameters for the GTV: percentage overlap with planning OAR volume (PRV-GTV overlap), D99.9%, D0.1cc, Dmean, V75Gy, and V60Gy. We also calculated the GTV's generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) value using two different a values (-5 and -15). Lastly, we reoptimized two plans with two approaches: increasing gEUD or relaxing the maximum dose constraint. Results A total of 26 plans were included in our analysis: 14 locally advanced and 12 locally recurrent pancreatic cancer cases. While the D0.1cc median value was 81.7 Gy, target volume coverage was relatively low (V75Gy median 71%). Median gEUD were 71 Gy (a = -5) and 62.8 Gy (a = -15) and inversely correlated with PRV-GTV overlap. On reoptimized plans, both approaches yielded similar results, but an increase in target coverage and gEUD were seen only when there was limited PRV-GTV overlap. Conclusion Although radiation dose can be escalated within the GTV, there continues to be low coverage by the prescription dose, especially with high PRV-GTV overlap. Relaxing the maximum dose constraint in planning allows for meaningful improvement in tumor coverage in limited PRV overlap scenarios. Continued refinement of the PF-MHF approach is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Chia Liu
- Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - William T Hrinivich
- Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Ji N Lee
- Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Amol K Narang
- Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Jeffrey Meyer
- Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sheikh K, Li H, Wright JL, Yanagihara TK, Halthore A. The Peaks and Valleys of Photon Versus Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:292-301. [PMID: 38880538 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Spatially-fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) delivers high doses to small areas of tumor while sparing adjacent tissue, including intervening disease. In this review, we explore the evolution of SFRT technological advances, contrasting approaches with photon and proton beam radiotherapy. We discuss unique dosimetric considerations and physical properties of SFRT, as well as review the preclinical literature that provides an emerging understanding of biological mechanisms. We emphasize crucial areas of future study and highlight clinical trials that are underway to assess SFRT's safety and efficacy, with a focus on immunotherapeutic synergies. The review concludes with practical considerations for SFRT's clinical application, advocating for strategies that leverage its unique dosimetric and biological properties for improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khadija Sheikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Proton Center, Washington, DC.
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Proton Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jean L Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Proton Center, Washington, DC
| | - Theodore K Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Aditya Halthore
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Proton Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Maier SH, Schönecker S, Anagnostatou V, Garny S, Nitschmann A, Fleischmann DF, Büttner M, Kaul D, Imhoff D, Fokas E, Seidel C, Hau P, Kölbl O, Popp I, Grosu AL, Haussmann J, Budach W, Celik E, Kahl KH, Hoffmann E, Tabatabai G, Paulsen F, Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Mansmann U, Corradini S, Belka C, Niyazi M, Bodensohn R. Dummy run for planning of isotoxic dose-escalated radiation therapy for glioblastoma used in the PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2024-01; AG-NRO-06). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100790. [PMID: 38765202 PMCID: PMC11101689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2024-01; AG-NRO-06; NCT05871021) is designed to determine whether a dose escalation with 75.0 Gy in 30 fractions can enhance the median overall survival (OS) in patients with methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor unmethylated glioblastoma compared to historical median OS rates, while being isotoxic to historical cohorts through the addition of concurrent bevacizumab (BEV). To ensure protocol-compliant irradiation planning with all study centers, a dummy run was planned and the plan quality was evaluated. Methods A suitable patient case was selected and the computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) contours were made available. Participants at the various intended study sites performed radiation planning according to the PRIDE clinical trial protocol. The treatment plans and dose grids were uploaded as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files to a cloud-based platform. Plan quality and protocol adherence were analyzed using a standardized checklist, scorecards and indices such as Dice Score (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). Results Median DSC was 0.89, 0.90, 0.88 for PTV60, PTV60ex (planning target volume receiving 60.0 Gy for the standard and the experimental plan, respectively) and PTV75 (PTV receiving 75.0 Gy in the experimental plan), respectively. Median HD values were 17.0 mm, 13.9 mm and 12.1 mm, respectively. These differences were also evident in the volumes: The PTV60 had a volume range of 219.1-391.3 cc (median: 261.9 cc) for the standard plans, while the PTV75 volumes for the experimental plans ranged from 71.5-142.7 cc (median: 92.3 cc). The structures with the largest deviations in Dice score were the pituitary gland (median 0.37, range 0.00-0.69) and the right lacrimal gland (median 0.59, range 0.42-0.78). Conclusions The deviations revealed the necessity of systematic trainings with appropriate feedback before the start of clinical trials in radiation oncology and the constant monitoring of protocol compliance throw-out the study. Trial registration NCT05871021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian H. Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Vasiliki Anagnostatou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel F. Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcel Büttner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- Department of Radiotherapy of Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy of Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Hau
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Kölbl
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ilinca Popp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Eren Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li H, Mayr NA, Griffin RJ, Zhang H, Pokhrel D, Grams M, Penagaricano J, Chang S, Spraker MB, Kavanaugh J, Lin L, Sheikh K, Mossahebi S, Simone CB, Roberge D, Snider JW, Sabouri P, Molineu A, Xiao Y, Benedict SH. Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:737-749. [PMID: 38110104 PMCID: PMC11162930 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials. RESULTS Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Nina A Mayr
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Robert J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Hualin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Damodar Pokhrel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jose Penagaricano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sha Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - James Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Khadija Sheikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - David Roberge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - James W Snider
- South Florida Proton Therapy Institute, 5280 Linton Blvd, Delray Beach, Florida
| | - Pouya Sabouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Andrea Molineu
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stanley H Benedict
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lam MGEH, Kappadath SC. The Need for a Practical Dosimetry Paradigm That Incorporates Dose Heterogeneity. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:919-921. [PMID: 38432473 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mahajan A, Stavinoha PL, Rongthong W, Brodin NP, McGovern SL, El Naqa I, Palmer JD, Vennarini S, Indelicato DJ, Aridgides P, Bowers DC, Kremer L, Ronckers C, Constine L, Avanzo M. Neurocognitive Effects and Necrosis in Childhood Cancer Survivors Treated With Radiation Therapy: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:401-416. [PMID: 33810950 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A PENTEC review of childhood cancer survivors who received brain radiation therapy (RT) was performed to develop models that aid in developing dose constraints for RT-associated central nervous system (CNS) morbidities. METHODS AND MATERIALS A comprehensive literature search, through the PENTEC initiative, was performed to identify published data pertaining to 6 specific CNS toxicities in children treated with brain RT. Treatment and outcome data on survivors were extracted and used to generate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. RESULTS The search identified investigations pertaining to 2 of the 6 predefined CNS outcomes: neurocognition and brain necrosis. For neurocognition, models for 2 post-RT outcomes were developed to (1) calculate the risk for a below-average intelligence quotient (IQ) (IQ <85) and (2) estimate the expected IQ value. The models suggest that there is a 5% risk of a subsequent IQ <85 when 10%, 20%, 50%, or 100% of the brain is irradiated to 35.7, 29.1, 22.2, or 18.1 Gy, respectively (all at 2 Gy/fraction and without methotrexate). Methotrexate (MTX) increased the risk for an IQ <85 similar to a generalized uniform brain dose of 5.9 Gy. The model for predicting expected IQ also includes the effect of dose, age, and MTX. Each of these factors has an independent, but probably cumulative effect on IQ. The necrosis model estimates a 5% risk of necrosis for children after 59.8 Gy or 63.6 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to any part of the brain if delivered as primary RT or reirradiation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This PENTEC comprehensive review establishes objective relationships between patient age, RT dose, RT volume, and MTX to subsequent risks of neurocognitive injury and necrosis. A lack of consistent RT data and outcome reporting in the published literature hindered investigation of the other predefined CNS morbidity endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Peter L Stavinoha
- Division of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Warissara Rongthong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - N Patrik Brodin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at Ohio State University, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sabina Vennarini
- Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Paul Aridgides
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Daniel C Bowers
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Leontien Kremer
- Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile Ronckers
- Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Medical University Brandenburg-Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Louis Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen ZJ, Li XA, Brenner DJ, Hellebust TP, Hoskin P, Joiner MC, Kirisits C, Nath R, Rivard MJ, Thomadsen BR, Zaider M. AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:3850-3923. [PMID: 38721942 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Jay Chen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Taran P Hellebust
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Center, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael C Joiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ravinder Nath
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bruce R Thomadsen
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Marco Zaider
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen M, Pang B, Zeng Y, Xu C, Chen J, Yang K, Chang Y, Yang Z. Evaluation of an automated clinical decision system with deep learning dose prediction and NTCP model for prostate cancer proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115056. [PMID: 38718814 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad48f6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Objective.To evaluate the feasibility of using a deep learning dose prediction approach to identify patients who could benefit most from proton therapy based on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model.Approach.Two 3D UNets were established to predict photon and proton doses. A dataset of 95 patients with localized prostate cancer was randomly partitioned into 55, 10, and 30 for training, validation, and testing, respectively. We selected NTCP models for late rectum bleeding and acute urinary urgency of grade 2 or higher to quantify the benefit of proton therapy. Propagated uncertainties of predicted ΔNTCPs resulting from the dose prediction errors were calculated. Patient selection accuracies for a single endpoint and a composite evaluation were assessed under different ΔNTCP thresholds.Main results.Our deep learning-based dose prediction technique can reduce the time spent on plan comparison from approximately 2 days to as little as 5 seconds. The expanded uncertainty of predicted ΔNTCPs for rectum and bladder endpoints propagated from the dose prediction error were 0.0042 and 0.0016, respectively, which is less than one-third of the acceptable tolerance. The averaged selection accuracies for rectum bleeding, urinary urgency, and composite evaluation were 90%, 93.5%, and 93.5%, respectively.Significance.Our study demonstrates that deep learning dose prediction and NTCP evaluation scheme could distinguish the NTCP differences between photon and proton treatment modalities. In addition, the dose prediction uncertainty does not significantly influence the decision accuracy of NTCP-based patient selection for proton therapy. Therefore, automated deep learning dose prediction and NTCP evaluation schemes can potentially be used to screen large patient populations and to avoid unnecessary delays in the start of prostate cancer radiotherapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Pang
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Yiling Zeng
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, People's Republic of China
| | - Kunyu Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Chang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiyong Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yoshimura T, Yamada R, Kinoshita R, Matsuura T, Kanehira T, Tamura H, Nishioka K, Yasuda K, Taguchi H, Katoh N, Kobashi K, Hashimoto T, Aoyama H. Probability of normal tissue complications for hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies using intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:369-378. [PMID: 38499489 PMCID: PMC11115445 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
This retrospective treatment-planning study was conducted to determine whether intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization (ro-IMPT) reduces the risk of acute hematologic toxicity (H-T) and acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity (GI-T) in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies when compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated X-ray (IMXT) and single-field optimization proton beam (SFO-PBT) therapies. All plans were created for 13 gynecologic-malignancy patients. The prescribed dose was 45 GyE in 25 fractions for 95% planning target volume in 3D-CRT, IMXT and SFO-PBT plans and for 99% clinical target volume (CTV) in ro-IMPT plans. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of each toxicity was used as an in silico surrogate marker. Median estimated NTCP values for acute H-T and acute and late GI-T were 0.20, 0.94 and 0.58 × 10-1 in 3D-CRT; 0.19, 0.65 and 0.24 × 10-1 in IMXT; 0.04, 0.74 and 0.19 × 10-1 in SFO-PBT; and 0.06, 0.66 and 0.15 × 10-1 in ro-IMPT, respectively. Compared with 3D-CRT and IMXT plans, the ro-IMPT plan demonstrated significant reduction in acute H-T and late GI-T. The risk of acute GI-T in ro-IMPT plan is equivalent with IMXT plan. The ro-IMPT plan demonstrated potential clinical benefits for reducing the risk of acute H-T and late GI-T in the treatment of gynecologic malignances by reducing the dose to the bone marrow and bowel bag while maintaining adequate dose coverage to the CTV. Our results indicated that ro-IMPT may reduce acute H-T and late GI-T risk with potentially improving outcomes for postoperative gynecologic-malignancy patients with concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Ryota Yamada
- Department of Radiation Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Rumiko Kinoshita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060–8638, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tamura
- Department of Radiation Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Keiji Kobashi
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Prezado Y, Grams M, Jouglar E, Martínez-Rovira I, Ortiz R, Seco J, Chang S. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10TR02. [PMID: 38648789 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, E-15706, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology, F-75005, Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, E-08193, Cerdanyola del Valle`s (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States of America
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sha Chang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, United States of America
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolin State University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chvetsov AV, Muzi M. Equivalent uniform aerobic dose in radiotherapy for hypoxic tumors. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10.1088/1361-6560/ad31c8. [PMID: 38457839 PMCID: PMC11197763 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad31c8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Equivalent uniform aerobic dose (EUAD) is proposed for comparison of integrated cell survival in tumors with different distributions of hypoxia and radiation dose.Approach.The EUAD assumes that for any non-uniform distributions of radiation dose and oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) within a tumor, there is a uniform distribution of radiation dose under hypothetical aerobic conditions with OER = 1 that produces equal integrated survival of clonogenic cells. This definition of EUAD has several advantages. First, the EUAD allows one to compare survival of clonogenic cells in tumors with intra-tumor and inter-tumor variation of radio sensitivity due to hypoxia because the cell survival is recomputed under the same benchmark oxygen level (OER = 1). Second, the EUAD for homogeneously oxygenated tumors is equal to the concept of equivalent uniform dose.Main results. We computed the EUAD using radiotherapy dose and the OER derived from the18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET (18F-FMISO PET) images of hypoxia in patients with glioblastoma, the most common and aggressive type of primary malignant brain tumor. The18F-FMISO PET images include a distribution of SUV (Standardized Uptake Value); therefore, the SUV is converted to partial oxygen pressure (pO2) and then to the OER. The prognostic value of EUAD in radiotherapy for hypoxic tumors is demonstrated using correlation between EUAD and overall survival (OS) in radiotherapy for glioblastoma. The correction to the EUAD for the absolute hypoxic volume that traceable to the tumor control probability improves the correlation with OS.Significance. While the analysis proposed in this research is based on the18F-FMISO PET images for glioblastoma, the EUAD is a universal radiobiological concept and is not associated with any specific cancer or any specific PET or MRI biomarker of hypoxia. Therefore, this research can be generalized to other cancers, for example stage III lung cancer, and to other hypoxia biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexei V Chvetsov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, United States of America
| | - Mark Muzi
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mody P, Huiskes M, Chaves-de-Plaza NF, Onderwater A, Lamsma R, Hildebrandt K, Hoekstra N, Astreinidou E, Staring M, Dankers F. Large-scale dose evaluation of deep learning organ contours in head-and-neck radiotherapy by leveraging existing plans. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100572. [PMID: 38633281 PMCID: PMC11021837 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Retrospective dose evaluation for organ-at-risk auto-contours has previously used small cohorts due to additional manual effort required for treatment planning on auto-contours. We aimed to do this at large scale, by a) proposing and assessing an automated plan optimization workflow that used existing clinical plan parameters and b) using it for head-and-neck auto-contour dose evaluation. Materials and methods Our automated workflow emulated our clinic's treatment planning protocol and reused existing clinical plan optimization parameters. This workflow recreated the original clinical plan (P OG ) with manual contours (P MC ) and evaluated the dose effect (P OG - P MC ) on 70 photon and 30 proton plans of head-and-neck patients. As a use-case, the same workflow (and parameters) created a plan using auto-contours (P AC ) of eight head-and-neck organs-at-risk from a commercial tool and evaluated their dose effect (P MC - P AC ). Results For plan recreation (P OG - P MC ), our workflow had a median impact of 1.0% and 1.5% across dose metrics of auto-contours, for photon and proton respectively. Computer time of automated planning was 25% (photon) and 42% (proton) of manual planning time. For auto-contour evaluation (P MC - P AC ), we noticed an impact of 2.0% and 2.6% for photon and proton radiotherapy. All evaluations had a median Δ NTCP (Normal Tissue Complication Probability) less than 0.3%. Conclusions The plan replication capability of our automated program provides a blueprint for other clinics to perform auto-contour dose evaluation with large patient cohorts. Finally, despite geometric differences, auto-contours had a minimal median dose impact, hence inspiring confidence in their utility and facilitating their clinical adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prerak Mody
- Division of Image Processing (LKEB), Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC consortium – Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Holland Proton Therapy Centre, Delft, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden and Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Merle Huiskes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas F. Chaves-de-Plaza
- HollandPTC consortium – Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Holland Proton Therapy Centre, Delft, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden and Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Group, EEMCS, TU Delft, Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
| | - Alice Onderwater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Rense Lamsma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Klaus Hildebrandt
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Group, EEMCS, TU Delft, Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Hoekstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Eleftheria Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Marius Staring
- Division of Image Processing (LKEB), Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Dankers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Iori F, Torelli N, Unkelbach J, Tanadini-Lang S, Christ SM, Guckenberger M. An in-silico planning study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for polymetastatic patients with more than ten extra-cranial lesions. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100567. [PMID: 38516028 PMCID: PMC10950805 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Limited data is available about the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for treating more than five extra-cranial metastases, and almost no data for treating more than ten. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of SBRT in this polymetatstatic setting. Materials and methods Consecutive metastatic melanoma patients with more than ten extra-cranial metastases and a maximum lesion diameter below 11 cm were selected from a single-center prospective registry for this in-silico planning study. For each patient, SBRT plans were generated to treat all metastases with a prescribed dose of 5x7Gy, and dose-limiting organs (OARs) were analyzed. A cell-kill based inverse planning approach was used to automatically determine the maximum deliverable dose to each lesion individually, while respecting all OARs constraints. Results A total of 23 polymetastatic patients with a medium of 17 metastases (range, 11-51) per patient were selected. SBRT plans with sufficient target coverage and respected OARs dose constraints were achieved in 16 out of 23 patients. In the remaining seven patients, the lungs V5Gy < 80 % and the liver D700 cm3 < 15Gy were most frequently the dose-limiting constraints. The cell-kill based planning approach allowed optimizing the dose administration depending on metastases total volume and location. Conclusion This retrospective planning study shows the feasibility of definitive SBRT for 70% of polymetastatic patients with more than ten extra-cranial lesions and proposes the cell-killing planning approach as an approach to individualize treatment planning in polymetastatic patients'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Iori
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nathan Torelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian M. Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chvetsov AV. Equivalent uniform RBE-weighted dose in eye plaque brachytherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:3093-3100. [PMID: 38353266 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brachytherapy for ocular melanoma is based on the application of eye plaques with different spatial dose nonuniformity, time-dependent dose rates and relative biological effectiveness (RBE). PURPOSE We propose a parameter called the equivalent uniform RBE-weighted dose (EUDRBE) that can be used for quantitative characterization of integrated cell survival in radiotherapy modalities with the variable RBE, dose nonuniformity and dose rate. The EUDRBE is applied to brachytherapy with 125I eye plaques designed by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). METHODS The EUDRBE is defined as the uniform dose distribution with RBE = 1 that causes equal cell survival for a given nonuniform dose distribution with the variable RBE > 1. The EUDRBE can be used for comparison of cell survival for nonuniform dose distributions with different RBE, because they are compared to the reference dose with RBE = 1. The EUDRBE is applied to brachytherapy with 125I COMS eye plaques that are characterized by a steep dose gradient in tumor base-apex direction, protracted irradiation during time intervals of 3-8 days, and variable dose-rate dependent RBE with a maximum of about 1.4. The simulations are based on dose of 85 Gy prescribed to the farthest intraocular extent of the tumor (tumor apex). To compute the EUDRBE in eye plaque brachytherapy and correct for protracted irradiation, the distributions of physical dose have been converted to non-uniform distributions of biologically effective dose (BED) to include the biological effects of sublethal cellular repair, Our radiobiological analysis considers the combined effects of different time-dependent dose rates, spatial dose non-uniformity, dose fractionation and different RBE and can be used to derive optimized dose regimens brachytherapy. RESULTS Our simulations show that the EUDRBE increases with the prescription depths and the maximum increase may achieve 6% for the tumor height of 12 mm. This effect stems from a steep dose gradient within the tumor that increases with the prescription depth. The simulations also show that the EUDRBE increase may achieve 12% with increasing the dose rate when implant duration decreases. The combined effect of dose nonuniformity and dose rate may change the EUDRBE up to 18% for the same dose prescription of 85 Gy to tumor apex. The absolute dose range of 48-61 Gy (RBE) for the EUDRBE computed using 4 or 5 fractions is comparable to the dose prescriptions used in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with megavoltage X-rays (RBE = 1) for different cancers. The tumor control probabilities in SBRT and eye plaque brachytherapy are very similar at the level of 80% or higher that support the hypothesis that the selected approximations for the EUDRBE are valid. CONCLUSIONS The computed range of the EUDRBE in 125I COMS eye plaque brachytherapy suggests that the selected models and hypotheses are acceptable. The EUDRBE can be useful for analysis of treatment outcomes and comparison of different dose regimens in eye plaque brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexei V Chvetsov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Saroj DK, Yadav S, Paliwal N, Haldar S, Shende RB, Gupta G, Yogi V. Radiobiological analysis of VMAT treatment plan with flattened and flattening filter free photon beam: an EUD and TCP based comparative study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:77-89. [PMID: 39165604 PMCID: PMC11333070 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.99100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological differences between 6MV flattened filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) using volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) technique for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. Materials and methods Fifteen patients with H&N carcinoma were selected and treated with VMAT with FF (VMATFF) treatment plan. Retrospectively, additional VMAT treatment plans were developed using FFF beams (VMATFFF). Radiobiological parameters, such as equivalent uniform dose (EUD), tumor cure probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), were calculated using Niemierko's model for both VMATFF and VMATFFF. Correlation between dosimetric and radiobiological data were analyzed and compared. Results The conformity index (CI) was 0.975 ± 0.014 (VMATFF) and 0.964 ± 0. 019 (VMATFFF) with p ≥ 0.05. Statistically, there was an insignificant difference in the planning target volume (PTV) results for TCP (%) values, with values of 81.20 ± 0.88% (VMATFF) and 81.01 ± 0.92 (%) (VMATFF). Similarly, there was an insignificant difference in the EUD (Gy) values, which were 71.53 ± 0.33 Gy (VMATFF) and 71.46 ± 0.34 Gy (VMATFFF). The NTCP values for the spinal cord, left parotid, and right parotid were 6.54 × 10-07%, 8.04%, and 7.69%, respectively, in the case of VMATFF. For VMATFFF, the corresponding NTCP values for the spinal cord, parotids left, and parotid right were 3.09 × 10-07%, 6.57%, and 6.73%, respectively. Conclusion The EUD and Mean Dose to PTV were strongly correlated for VMATFFF. An increased mean dose to the PTV and greater TCP were reported for the VMATFF, which can enhance the delivery of the therapeutic dose to the target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Kumar Saroj
- Department of Radiotherapy, BALCO Medical Center, A Unit of Vedanta medical Research Foundation, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
- Department of Physics, Rabindranath Tagore University, Raisen, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Suresh Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India
| | - Neetu Paliwal
- Department of Physics, Rabindranath Tagore University, Raisen, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Subhash Haldar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saroj Gupta Cancer Centre and Research Institute, Kolkata (West Bengal), India
| | - Ravindra B. Shende
- Department of Radiotherapy, BALCO Medical Center, A Unit of Vedanta medical Research Foundation, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Gaurav Gupta
- Department of Radiotherapy, BALCO Medical Center, A Unit of Vedanta medical Research Foundation, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Veenita Yogi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bodensohn R, Fleischmann DF, Maier SH, Anagnostatou V, Garny S, Nitschmann A, Büttner M, Mücke J, Schönecker S, Unger K, Hoffmann E, Paulsen F, Thorwarth D, Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Corradini S, Tabatabai G, Belka C, Niyazi M. Dosimetric feasibility analysis and presentation of an isotoxic dose-escalated radiation therapy concept for glioblastoma used in the PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2022-12). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100706. [PMID: 38116137 PMCID: PMC10726217 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2022-12; NCT05871021) is scheduled to start recruitment in October 2023. Its primary objective is to enhance median overall survival (OS), compared to historical median OS rates, in patients with methylguanine methlyltransferase (MGMT) promotor unmethylated glioblastoma by incorporating isotoxic dose escalation to 75 Gy in 30 fractions. To achieve isotoxicity and counteract the elevated risk of radiation necrosis (RN) associated with dose-escalated regimens, the addition of protective concurrent bevacizumab (BEV) serves as an innovative approach. The current study aims to assess the dosimetric feasibility of the proposed concept. Materials and methods A total of ten patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were included in this dosimetric analysis. Delineation of target volumes for the reference plans adhered to the ESTRO-EANO 2023 guideline. The experimental plans included an additional volume for the integrated boost. Additionally, the 60 Gy-volume was reduced by using a margin of 1.0 cm instead of 1.5 cm. To assess the risk of symptomatic RN, the Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) was calculated and compared between the reference and experimental plans. Results Median NTCP of the reference plan (NTCPref) and of the experimental plan (NTCPex) were 0.24 (range 0.11-0.29) and 0.42 (range 0.18-0.54), respectively. NTCPex was a median of 1.77 (range 1.60-1.99) times as high as the NTXPref. In a logarithmic comparison, the risk of RN is enhanced by a factor of median 2.00 (range 1.66-2.35). The defined constraints for the organs at risk were feasible. Conclusion When considering the potential protective effect of BEV, which we hypothesized might reduce the risk of RN by approximately two-fold, achieving isotoxicity with the proposed dose-escalated experimental plan for the PRIDE trial seems feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel F. Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian H. Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Vasiliki Anagnostatou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcel Büttner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Mücke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Kristian Unger
- Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich Germany
| | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Radonic S, Schneider U, Besserer J, Meier VS, Rohrer Bley C. Risk adaptive planning with biology-based constraints may lead to higher tumor control probability in tumors of the canine brain: A planning study. Phys Med 2024; 119:103317. [PMID: 38430675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Classical radiation protocols are guided by physical dose delivered homogeneously over the target. Protocols are chosen to keep normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) at an acceptable level. Organs at risk (OAR) adjacent to the target volume could lead to underdosage of the tumor and a decrease of tumor control probability (TCP). The intent of our study was to explore a biology-based dose escalation: by keeping NTCP for OAR constant, radiation dose was to be maximized, allowing to result in heterogeneous dose distributions. METHODS We used computed tomography datasets of 25 dogs with brain tumors, previously treated with 10x4 Gy (40 Gy to PTV D50). We generated 3 plans for each patient: A) original treatment plan with homogeneous dose distribution, B) heterogeneous dose distribution with strict adherence to the same NTCPs as in A), and C) heterogeneous dose distribution with adherence to NTCP <5%. For plan comparison, TCPs and TCP equivalent doses (homogenous target dose which results in the same TCP) were calculated. To enable the use of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) metric of the tumor target in plan optimization, the calculated TCP values were used to obtain the volume effect parameter a. RESULTS As intended, NTCPs for all OARs did not differ from plan A) to B). In plan C), however, NTCPs were significantly higher for brain (mean 2.5% (SD±1.9, 95%CI: 1.7,3.3), p<0.001), optic chiasm (mean 2.0% (SD±2.2, 95%CI: 1.0,2.8), p=0.010) compared to plan A), but no significant increase was found for the brainstem. For 24 of 25 of the evaluated patients, the heterogenous plans B) and C) led to an increase in target dose and projected increase in TCP compared to the homogenous plan A). Furthermore, the distribution of the projected individual TCP values as a function of the dose was found to be in good agreement with the population TCP model. CONCLUSION Our study is a first step towards risk-adaptive radiation dose optimization. This strategy utilizes a biologic objective function based on TCP and NTCP instead of an objective function based on physical dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Radonic
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Division of Radiation Oncology, Small Animal Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Uwe Schneider
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Radiotherapie Hirslanden AG, Rain 34, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Besserer
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Radiotherapie Hirslanden AG, Rain 34, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Valeria S Meier
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Division of Radiation Oncology, Small Animal Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carla Rohrer Bley
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Small Animal Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Matysiak WP, Landeweerd MC, Bannink A, van der Weide HL, Brouwer CL, Langendijk JA, Both S, Maduro JH. Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:892. [PMID: 38473254 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques: (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Witold P Matysiak
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Marieke C Landeweerd
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Agata Bannink
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hiska L van der Weide
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pursley J, Remillard K, Depauw N, Lee G, Grassberger C, Paganetti H, Efstathiou JA, Kamran SC. Radiation Therapy for Stage IIA/B Seminoma: Modeling Secondary Cancer Risk for Protons and VMAT versus 3D Photons. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:784. [PMID: 38398175 PMCID: PMC10886533 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment for stage IIA and select stage IIB seminomas. However, given the long life expectancy of seminoma patients, there are concerns about the risk of secondary cancers from RT. This study assessed differences in secondary cancer risk for stage II seminoma patients following proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) and photon VMAT, compared to 3D conformal photon RT. Ten seminoma patients, five with a IIA staging who received 30 GyRBE and five with a IIB staging who received 36 GyRBE, had three RT plans generated. Doses to organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated, and secondary cancer risks were calculated as the Excess Absolute Risk (EAR) and Lifetime Attributable Risk (LAR). PBS reduced the mean OAR dose by 60% on average compared to 3D, and reduced the EAR and LAR for all OAR, with the greatest reductions seen for the bowel, liver, and stomach. VMAT reduced high doses but increased the low-dose bath, leading to an increased EAR and LAR for some OAR. PBS provided superior dosimetric sparing of OAR compared to 3D and VMAT in stage II seminoma cases, with models demonstrating that this may reduce secondary cancer risk. Therefore, proton therapy shows the potential to reduce acute and late side effects of RT for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Kyla Remillard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Nicolas Depauw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Grace Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Jason A. Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| | - Sophia C. Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (S.C.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ye F, Xu L, Ren Y, Xia B, Chen X, Ma S, Deng Q, Li X. Predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer: a EUD-based machine learning approach for volumetric modulated arc therapy patients. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1343170. [PMID: 38357195 PMCID: PMC10864532 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1343170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to develop an optimal machine learning model that uses lung equivalent uniform dose (lung EUD to predict radiation pneumonitis (RP) occurrence in lung cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods We analyzed a cohort of 77 patients diagnosed with locally advanced squamous cell lung cancer (LASCLC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy with VMAT. Patients were categorized based on the onset of grade II or higher radiation pneumonitis (RP 2+). Dose volume histogram data, extracted from the treatment planning system, were used to compute the lung EUD values for both groups using a specialized numerical analysis code. We identified the parameter α, representing the most significant relative difference in lung EUD between the two groups. The predictive potential of variables for RP2+, including physical dose metrics, lung EUD, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) from the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model, and lung EUD-calibrated NTCP for affected and whole lung, underwent both univariate and multivariate analyses. Relevant variables were then employed as inputs for machine learning models: multiple logistic regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). Each model's performance was gauged using the area under the curve (AUC), determining the best-performing model. Results The optimal α-value for lung EUD was 0.3, maximizing the relative lung EUD difference between the RP 2+ and non-RP 2+ groups. A strong correlation coefficient of 0.929 (P< 0.01) was observed between lung EUD (α = 0.3) and physical dose metrics. When examining predictive capabilities, lung EUD-based NTCP for the affected lung (AUC: 0.862) and whole lung (AUC: 0.815) surpassed LKB-based NTCP for the respective lungs. The decision tree (DT) model using lung EUD-based predictors emerged as the superior model, achieving an AUC of 0.98 in both training and validation datasets. Discussions The likelihood of developing RP 2+ has shown a significant correlation with the advancements in RT technology. From traditional 3-D conformal RT, lung cancer treatment methodologies have transitioned to sophisticated techniques like static IMRT. Accurately deriving such a dose-effect relationship through NTCP modeling of RP incidence is statistically challenging due to the increased number of degrees-of-freedom. To the best of our knowledge, many studies have not clarified the rationale behind setting the α-value to 0.99 or 1, despite the closely aligned calculated lung EUD and lung mean dose MLD. Perfect independence among variables is rarely achievable in real-world scenarios. Four prominent machine learning algorithms were used to devise our prediction models. The inclusion of lung EUD-based factors substantially enhanced their predictive performance for RP 2+. Our results advocate for the decision tree model with lung EUD-based predictors as the optimal prediction tool for VMAT-treated lung cancer patients. Which could replace conventional dosimetric parameters, potentially simplifying complex neural network structures in prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengsong Ye
- Department of Tumor Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Lishui People’s Hospital, Lishui, China
| | - Lixia Xu
- Medical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yao Ren
- Medical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bing Xia
- Medical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xueqin Chen
- Medical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shenlin Ma
- Medical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qinghua Deng
- Medical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiadong Li
- Medical Imaging and Translational Medicine Laboratory, Hangzhou Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|