FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer

A bioengineered heterotypic stroma-cancer microenvironment model to study pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Interactions between neoplastic epithelial cells and components of a reactive stroma in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are of key significance behind the disease's dismal prognosis. Despite extensive published research in the importance of stroma-cancer interactions in other cancers and experimental evidence supporting the importance of the microenvironment in PDAC progression, a reproducible three-dimensional (3D) in vitro model for exploring stroma-cancer interplay and evaluating therapeutics in a physiologically relevant context has been lacking. We introduce a humanized microfluidic model of the PDAC microenvironment incorporating multicellularity, extracellular matrix (ECM) components, and a spatially defined 3D microarchitecture. Pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) isolated from clinically-evaluated human tissue specimens were co-cultured with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells as an accessible 3D construct that maintained important tissue features and disease behavior. Multiphoton excitation (MPE) and Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) imaging techniques were utilized to image the intrinsic signal of stromal collagen in human pancreatic tissues and live cell-collagen interactions within the optically-accessible microfluidic tissue model. We further evaluated the dose-response of the model with the anticancer agent paclitaxel. This bioengineered model of the PDAC stroma-cancer microenvironment provides a complementary platform to elucidate the complex stroma-cancer interrelationship and to evaluate the efficacy of potential therapeutics in a humanized system that closely recapitulates key PDAC microenvironment characteristics.

Harnessing immune responses in the tumor microenvironment: all signals needed

An agonist CD40 monoclonal antibody (CP-870,893), in combination with gemcitabine, is well tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The combination results in induction of cytokines, B cell activation, and clinical responses. These findings support testing of immunotherapies in combination with other established and targeted therapies.

Intensity of follow-up after pancreatic cancer resection

The prognosis of patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains dismal. Of the 15-20 % of patients who are candidates for potentially curative resection, 66-92 % will develop recurrent disease. Although guidelines for surveillance in the postoperative setting exist, they are not evidence based, and there is wide variability of strategies utilized. Current surveillance guidelines as suggested by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) include routine history and physical, measurement of serum cancer-associated antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels, and computed tomographic imaging at 3- to 6-month intervals for the first 2 years, and annually thereafter. However, the lack of prospective clinical data examining the efficacy of different surveillance strategies has led to a variability of the intensity of follow-up and a lack of consensus on its necessity and efficacy. Recent therapeutic advances may have the potential to significantly alter survival after recurrence, but a careful consideration of current surveillance strategies should be undertaken to optimize existing approaches in the face of high recurrence and low survival rates.

A multicenter phase II trial of gemcitabine and candesartan combination therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: GECA2

BACKGROUND

Our retrospective study and phase I trial of gemcitabine and candesartan combination therapy suggested the inhibition of renin-angiotensin system potentially has a role in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this multicenter phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and candesartan combination therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically or cytologically proven advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral candesartan at a dose of 16 mg in normotensive patients, and 8 mg initially in hypertensive patients, with dose escalation to 16 mg allowed, from days 1 to 28, repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Overall response rate and disease control rate were 11.4 % and 62.9 %. The median PFS and OS were 4.3 and 9.1 months with 1-year survival rate of 34.2 %. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving 16 mg compared with 8 mg of candesartan (4.6 vs. 3.5 months, p=0.031). Major severe toxicities were neutropenia (23 %), leukopenia (17 %) and thrombocytopenia (11 %). Grade 2 hypotension was observed in 3 patients (9 %) and candesartan was discontinued in 2 patients due to hypotension. Conclusions In this multicenter phase 2 trial, gemcitabine and candesartan combination therapy was tolerable but failed to demonstrate activity against advanced pancreatic cancer. (UMIN CTR: UMIN000005580).

Sequential gemcitabine and platinum versus first-line combination of gemcitabine and platinum for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of combinational versus sequential gemcitabine and platinum on prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Two hundred and three patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were selected. They were divided into GemP (first-line gemcitabine and platinum), Gem-then-P(sequential gemcitabine and platinum), Gem/other (first-line gemcitabine-based therapy without subsequent platinum),and Gem (first-line gemcitabine-based therapy without subsequent systemic therapy) groups. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. Cox regression model and propensity score matching were used for prognostic analyses.

RESULTS

The median survival was 12.5 months [95 %confidence interval (CI), 11.2-13.7] in the GemP group(N = 65), 8.3 months (95 % CI 5.0-11.7) in the Gem-then-P group (N = 35), 11.6 months (95 % CI 4.6–18.5) in the Gem/other group (N = 26), and 4.7 months (95 % C I3.3-6.0) in the Gem group (N = 77) (P<0.001). Considering the GemP and Gem-then-P groups, performance status, serum creatinine, and response to first-line treatment were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in the multivariate analysis. No specific factors were identified for predicting the choice between GemP and Gem-then-P.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line gemcitabine and platinum-based combinations were not superior to sequential gemcitabine and platinum for overall survival. The best sequence of chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer should be explored in future clinical trials.

Modest improvement in overall survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a trend analysis using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry from 1988 to 2008

OBJECTIVES

Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma often present with distant metastatic disease. We aimed to assess whether improvements in survival of clinical trials translated to a population-based level.

METHODS

The US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was queried. Adult patients with distant metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were included from 1988 to 2008. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves as well as multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In total, 32,452 patients were included. Mean age was 67.6 (SD: 11.7) years, and 15,341 (47.3%) were female. Median overall survival was 3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3-3 months), which increased from 2 (CI, 2-2) months in 1988 to 3 (CI, 3-4) months in 2008. After adjustment for multiple covariates, the hazard ratio (HR) decreased by 0.977 per year (CI, 0.975-0.980). In multivariable-adjusted survival analyses, tumor location in the pancreatic body/tail (HR, 1.10), male sex (HR, 1.09), increasing age (HR, 1.016), African American ethnicity (HR, 1.16), nonmarried civil status (HR, 1.18), and absence of radiotherapy (HR, 1.41) were associated with worse survival (P < 0.001 for all predictors).

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement in overall survival over the past 2 decades among patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma is modest and disappointing. More effective therapeutic strategies for advanced disease are desperately needed.

The addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine and cisplatin does not appear to improve median survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer

Metastatic pancreatic cancer carries a poor prognosis, with median survival on the order of several months. There is evidence that combining gemcitabine with either erlotinib or cisplatin may be superior to single agent gemcitabine in patients with good performance (PS 0-1). We retrospectively compared outcomes of patients treated with either the three drug regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and erlotinib (GCE) or the doublet of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in order to assess the potential benefit of erlotinib. We also evaluated the role of erlotinib among smokers and non-smokers. We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients who presented between 2006 and 2009 with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer initially treated at the M.D. Anderson cancer center with either GC or GCE. Information on tumor characteristics and overall survival time (OS) was collected by medical record review. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate OS. Log rank tests were used to compare OS between groups. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the ability of patient prognostic variables or treatment group to predict OS. A total of 71 patients were treated with GC, while 74 were treated with GCE. Cox analyses found no significant difference in overall survival (median 5.5 vs. 8.0 months, respectively, p-value=0.1). Small sampling numbers may have contributed to this result. One year survival was 23 % in the GCE group and 13 % in the GC group. Patients with poor performance status (PS=2-3) had worse survival as compared to patients with better performance status (PS=0-1, p=0.001). As in earlier studies, patients treated with more lines of therapy tended to have better survival (p <0.0001), and CA19-9 was found to be a significant predictor for OS (p=0.001). No statistical evidence of a survival difference was found between smokers and non-smokers in both treatment groups (p=0.72). In conclusion, though there was a trend towards improved survival with the addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine and cisplatin, this does not reach statistical significance.

Neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable and non-resectable pancreatic cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly becoming a valid treatment option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). In borderline resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy is employed to improve the probability of margin-clear resections. In non-metastatic, non-resectable pancreatic cancer, treatment primarily aims to induce disease control, but may achieve conversion to surgical resectability in some patients. Several treatment modalities including chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or the sequential use of both have been investigated in numerous, mostly small and non-randomized studies. Nevertheless, there is a consistent finding that neoadjuvant therapy can induce resectability in up to 30%-40% of LAPC patients. Once resection has been achieved, overall survival appears to be comparable to that observed for primarily resectable patients. Thus, patient selection evolves as an important aspect of neoadjuvant therapy; retrospective analyses identified induction chemotherapy as an appropriate tool to define LAPC patients who may benefit most from subsequent treatment with CRT. The clinical importance of induction chemotherapy may further increase once highly active protocols such as the FOLFIRINOX or the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen are introduced into novel multimodality treatment concepts.

Metformin and survival in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to determine the effect of metformin exposure on survival in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using The Health Improvement Network, a primary care electronic medical record database from the United Kingdom (2003-2010). The study cohort included all subjects with a diagnostic code for incident PAC and a preexisting diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Subjects were classified as exposed if they were prescribed metformin around the time of PAC diagnosis (between 6 months prior and 1 month after). A secondary analysis was performed only on exposed subjects without prior (ie, 6 months before PAC diagnosis) exposure to metformin. The primary outcome was overall survival. The analysis was performed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The study included 516 subjects with preexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus and PAC, 247 of which were exposed to metformin. In univariate and multivariable analysis, there was no difference in survival between those exposed and those unexposed to metformin in the primary analysis (hazards ratio, 1.11 [0.89-1.38], P = 0.367) or the secondary analysis (hazards ratio, 1.09 [0.80-1.47], P = 0.585).

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin use is not associated with improved survival in subjects with advanced PAC.

Cisplatin-modified de Gramont in second-line therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

In Belgium, combination chemotherapy of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin (CFL) according to the modified de Gramont schedule is the treatment of choice in second line for metastatic pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively analyzed survival data in 2 Belgian centers in a nonselected population.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and October 2011, 48 patients with histologically proven recurrent or unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who had received CFL as second-line treatment were identified. We retrospectively analyzed the following parameters: progression-free survival (PFS1 and PFS2) for each line (after the start of first and second line), overall survival (OS), and growth modulation index.

RESULTS

The median PFS1 was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-6.6). The median PFS2 was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2-5.2). The median OS was 12 months (95% CI, 9.3-14.7). Twenty-three percent of patients had a growth modulation index >1.33.

CONCLUSION

We show an OS of 12 months with gemcitabine in first-line and CFL in second-line therapy for pancreatic cancer. Sequential therapy with good OS and good quality of life may be preferred to strong upfront therapy in an incurable disease such as pancreatic cancer.

Successful Salvage Chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for Recurrent Mixed Acinar Cell Carcinoma and Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas in an Adolescent Patient

Pancreatic tumors are rare in children and adolescents. Here, we report the case of a 15-year-old boy who presented with a mixed acinar cell carcinoma/ductal adenocarcinoma with blastomatous components. He received multimodal treatment including various chemotherapy regimens and multistep surgery including liver transplantation. Introduction of FOLFIRINOX after relapse repeatedly achieved a durable metabolic and clinical response with good quality of life.

Cetuximab: still an option in the treatment of pancreatic cancer?

INTRODUCTION

In this review, we analyzed the current literature about cetuximab to clarify its role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Using single-agent gemcitabine has been the standard treatment for more than 15 years for advanced pancreatic cancer. The attempts at improving the results by combining it with several other drugs, such as fluorouracil, cisplatin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or pemetrexed produced no clear survival benefit. Recently, however, new combination chemotherapy regimens (e.g., FOLFIRINOX, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine) achieved a significant survival benefit compared to gemcitabine alone.

AREAS COVERED

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) transmembrane glycoprotein has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and it correlates with more advanced disease, poor survival, and the presence of metastases. Therefore, inhibition of the EGFR signaling pathway could be an attractive therapeutic target in this tumor. Although several combinations of EGFR inhibitors with chemotherapy demonstrate inhibition of tumor-induced angiogenesis, tumor cell apoptosis, and regression in xenograft models, these benefits remain to be confirmed.

EXPERT OPINION

The encouraging results from preclinical and early clinical studies with cetuximab in pancreatic cancer were not confirmed in a Phase III trial. Cetuximab failed to demonstrate improved patient outcome when paired with various chemotherapeutic regimens and/or other biological agents.

Pancreatic cancer clinical trials and accrual in the United States

PURPOSE

Pancreatic cancer clinical trials open in the United States and their accrual were examined to identify opportunities to accelerate progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Pancreatic cancer-specific clinical trials open in the United States in the years 2011 and 2012 were obtained from the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network database. Accrual information was obtained from trial sponsors.

RESULTS

The portfolio of pancreatic cancer clinical trials identified by type (adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine), phase, disease stage, and treatment approach is reported. More than half of trials for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma applied biologic insights to new therapeutic approaches, and 38% focused on optimization of radiation or chemotherapy delivery or regimens. In 2011, pancreatic cancer trials required total enrollment of 11,786 patients. Actual accrual to 93.2% of trials was 1,804 patients, an estimated 4.57% of the patients with pancreatic cancer alive in that year. The greatest need was for patients with resectable cancer. Trials open in 2011 enrolled an average of 15% of their total target accrual. Physician recommendations greatly influenced patients' decision to enroll or not enroll onto a clinical trial. Matching to a clinical trial within a 50-mile radius and identifying trials for recurrent/refractory disease were documented as challenges for patient accrual.

CONCLUSION

Overall trial enrollment indicates that pancreatic cancer trials open in 2011 would require 6.7 years on average to complete accrual. These results suggest that harmonizing patient supply and demand for clinical trials is required to accelerate progress toward improving survival in pancreatic cancer.

The role of the FOLFIRINOX regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer

In 2010, the FOLFIRINOX regimen (bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) emerged as a new option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and a good performance status. However, at that time, some doubts were raised regarding safety issues. Similarly, no data on FOLFIRINOX were published in patients with unresectable/locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This article presents the available experience with FOLFIRINOX outside clinical trials in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients. The safety of the regimen in patients with biliary stents and in previously treated patients is also described. FOLFIRINOX usage in clinical practice, including modification of the regimen (omission of bolus 5-fluorouracil; FOLFOXIRI regimen), is also presented. These data suggest that a phase III randomized study is warranted to further explore the role of FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Claudin 18.2 is a target for IMAB362 antibody in pancreatic neoplasms

The majority of pancreatic neoplasms are characterized by a generally lethal progress within a short period of time after primary diagnosis and the mortality of patients is expected to increase further. Due to lack of efficient screening programs and moderate response to treatments, novel compounds for treatment are needed. We investigated the CLDN18.2 expression in affected patients as in vitro feasibility study for a potential treatment with the novel antibody IMAB362. Therefore, we analyzed the expression of CLDN18.2 in normal pancreatic tissues (N = 24), primary lesions (N = 202), metastases (N = 84) and intra-individually matched samples (N = 48) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) and acinar cell carcinoma. A standardized method for evaluation by immunohistochemistry was developed. The specific staining was evaluated by two independent raters and analysis of staining intensities (range 0-3+) and relative proportions of tumor cells were performed. One hundred three (59.2%) samples of primary PDAC were found positive. The vast majority of positive samples were characterized to highly express CLDN18.2: 54.6% (N = 95) with staining intensities of ≥ 2+. NEN were positive in 20% of cases (all ≥ 2+). Metastases of pancreatic neoplasms were also frequently found positive with comparable high rates (69.4% of lymph node and 65.7% of liver metastases). The rate of CLDN18.2 positivity is high in pancreatic neoplasms whereby the expression is not limited to the primaries but is also maintained upon metastasis. Thus, a considerable number of patients with pancreatic neoplasms would be in principle eligible for a CLDN18.2-targeting approach.

Failure patterns in resected pancreas adenocarcinoma: lack of predicted benefit to SMAD4 expression

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether SMAD4 expression is associated with recurrence pattern after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

BACKGROUND

SMAD4 expression status has been reported to be associated with patterns of failure in PDA, but studies have not examined recurrence patterns after resection.

METHODS

A tissue microarray was constructed including 127 patients with resected PDA and either short-term (<12 months) or long-term (>30 months) survival. SMAD4 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and categorized as present or lost in tumor cells. Conventional pathologic features (lymph node metastases, positive resection margin, poor grade, and tumor size) were recorded, and disease-specific outcomes (eg, recurrence pattern and early cancer-specific mortality) were determined.

RESULTS

Loss of SMAD4 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma was identified in 40 of 127 patients (32%). SMAD4 loss occurred in 27% of patients who experienced isolated local recurrence, 33% of patients with a distant recurrence, 33% of patients who experienced local and distant site recurrences, and 25% of patients who were without evidence of recurrence (Fisher exact, P = 0.9). In a multivariate analysis, the presence of regional lymph node metastases was the only factor associated with the development of distant metastases (odds ratio = 4.7, P = 0.02). SMAD4 was neither associated with recurrence pattern (odds ratio = 0.9, P = 0.9) nor associated with early death (odds ratio = 0.5, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumor SMAD4 expression status was not a predictor of recurrence pattern in a large cohort of patients with resected PDA.

Propofol induces apoptosis and increases gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro by inhibition of nuclear factor-κB activity

AIM: To investigate the effect of propofol on human pancreatic cells and the molecular mechanism of propofol action.

METHODS: We used the human pancreatic cancer cell line MIAPaCa-2 for in vitro studies measuring growth inhibition and degree of apoptotic cell death induced by propofol alone, gemcitabine alone, or propofol followed by gemcitabine. All experiments were conducted in triplicate and carried out on three or more separate occasions. Data were means of the three or more independent experiments ± SE. Statistically significant differences were determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test and defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS: Pretreatment of cells with propofol for 24 h followed by gemcitabine resulted in 24%-75% growth inhibition compared with 6%-18% when gemcitabine was used alone. Overall growth inhibition was directly correlated with apoptotic cell death. We also showed that propofol potentiated gemcitabine-induced killing by downregulation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). In contrast, NF-κB was upregulated when pancreatic cancer cells were exposed to gemcitabine alone, suggesting a potential mechanism of acquired chemoresistance.

CONCLUSION: Inactivation of the NF-κB signaling pathway by propofol might abrogate gemcitabine-induced activation of NF-κB, resulting in chemosensitization of pancreatic tumors to gemcitabine.

Impact of tumour associated macrophages in pancreatic cancer

During cancer progression, bone marrow derived myeloid cells, including immature myeloid cells and macrophages, progressively accumulate at the primary tumour site where they contribute to the establishment of a tumour promoting microenvironment. A marked infiltration of macrophages into the stromal compartment and the generation of a desmoplastic stromal reaction is a particular characteristic of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and is thought to play a key role in disease progression and its response to therapy. Tumour associated macrophages (TAMs) foster PDA tumour progression by promoting angiogenesis, metastasis, and by suppressing an anti-tumourigenic immune response. Recent work also suggests that TAMs contribute to resistance to chemotherapy and to the emergence of cancer stem-like cells. Here we will review the current understanding of the biology and the pro-tumourigenic functions of TAMs in cancer and specifically in PDA, and highlight potential therapeutic strategies to target TAMs and to improve current therapies for pancreatic cancer.

Updated long-term outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with intraoperative radiotherapy at the Massachusetts General Hospital, 1978 to 2010

BACKGROUND

In the current study, the authors evaluated long-term outcomes, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT)-related toxicity, and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) among patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who received IORT as part of their treatment at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for 194 consecutive patients with unresectable LAPC who were treated with IORT at MGH between 1978 and 2010. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated at the univariate level by the log-rank test and at the multivariate level by the Cox proportional hazards model. Rates of disease progression and treatment toxicity were calculated.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 49%, 16%, and 6%, respectively. Six patients (3%) survived for > 5 years. The median OS was 12.0 months. Among 183 patients with known post-IORT disease status, the 2-year local progression-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 41% and 28%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, an IORT applicator diameter ≤ 8 cm (hazards ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.30-0.84 [P = .009]), a Charlson age-comorbidity index ≤ 3 (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.73 [P = .001]), and receipt of chemotherapy (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.66 [P < .001]) predicted improved OS. The median OS for patients with all 3 positive prognostic factors was 21.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-selected patients with LAPC with small tumors and low Charlson age-comorbidity indices can achieve good long-term survival outcomes with a treatment regimen that incorporates chemotherapy and IORT.

A retrospective study of S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with refractory pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy (SOX) in patients with refractory pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with advanced PC refractory to gemcitabine who were treated with oral S-1 (80 mg/m²) on days 1-14 and intravenous oxaliplatin (100 mg/m²) on day 1 every 3 weeks were studied retrospectively. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

Between March 2009 and October 2011, 30 patients were treated with SOX, with a median of two courses (range 1-8). The ORR and DCR were 10.0 and 50.0 %, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 3.4 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.3-5.3) and 5.0 months (95 % CI 3.4-7.4), respectively. The median PFS and OS were 5.6 and 9.1 months in patients receiving S-1 and oxaliplatin as a second-line treatment. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropenia (10.0 %), anemia (3.3 %), and diarrhea (6.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

SOX was well tolerated and moderately effective in patients with refractory PC.

Recent progress in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is currently one of the deadliest of the solid malignancies. However, surgery to resect neoplasms of the pancreas is safer and less invasive than ever, novel drug combinations have been shown to improve survival, advances in radiation therapy have resulted in less toxicity, and enormous strides have been made in the understanding of the fundamental genetics of pancreatic cancer. These advances provide hope but they also increase the complexity of caring for patients. It is clear that multidisciplinary care that provides comprehensive and coordinated evaluation and treatment is the most effective way to manage patients with pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic Cancer: Current Options for Diagnosis, Staging and Therapeutic Management

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by frequently delayed diagnosis and aggressive tumor growth which hampers most of the current treatment modalities. This review aims to summarize the available evidence about the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of resectable and non-resectable pancreatic cancer therapy.

SUMMARY

Embedded in the concept of multimodal therapy, surgery plays the central role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. With advantageous tumor characteristics and complete tumor resection as the most relevant positive prognostic factors, the detection of premalignant or early invasive lesions combined with safe and oncologic adequate surgery is the major therapeutic aim. Most pancreatic adenocarcinomas are locally advanced or metastatic when diagnosed and need to be treated by the combination of surgery and (radio)chemotherapy or by palliative chemotherapy.

Aspirin prolongs survival and reduces the number of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gemcitabine became the reference regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer after a randomized trial showed significant improvement in the median overall survival. Since then, the combination of gemcitabine with a variety of cytotoxic and targeted agents has generally shown no significant survival advantage as compared with gemcitabine alone. Only the addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine resulted in a significant but very small improvement in overall survival, coming along with a very uncomfortable rash in the patients. Therefore, new adjuvant agents with very low toxic levels are needed. In this study, we used a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer to evaluate the chemotherapeutic potential of aspirin as an adjuvant agent to gemcitabine.

METHODS

Drug treatment was initiated at the age of 3 months. LsL-Kras (G12D) ; Pdx1-Cre or LsL-Kras (G12D) ; LsL-Trp53 (R172H) ; Pdx1-Cre transgenic mice were randomly assigned to receive either mock treatment, gemcitabine, or a combination of gemcitabine and aspirin. All mice were treated until death. The effect of aspirin was evaluated by histopathological analyses and immunostaining.

RESULTS

Gemcitabine prolonged overall median survival of LsL-Kras (G12D) ; LsL-Trp53 (R172H) ; Pdx1-Cre mice by 31 days as compared to mock-treated animals (median survival, 190 vs. 159 days; p = 0.396). Addition of aspirin to gemcitabine even extended the survival for ten more days, leading to a prolonged survival by 41 days, reaching virtually statistical significance versus the control group (median survival, 200 vs. 159 days; p = 0.05). Furthermore, we found that administration of aspirin in combination with gemcitabine reduced the number of Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells significantly.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we identified aspirin as an effective adjuvant agent to gemcitabine in the treatment of PDAC. While fundamental differences in biology suggest the need for caution in equating mouse tumors with their human counterparts, mouse models nevertheless represent an important source of insight regarding human neoplasia. Further studies are necessary to confirm the hypothesis that aspirin might be an effective well-tolerated chemotherapeutic adjuvant agent for pancreatic cancer.

Minimally invasive ablation treatment for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive tumour with an extremely poor prognosis, which has not changed significantly during the last 30 years. Prolonged survival is achieved only by R0 resection with macroscopic tumour clearance. However, the majority of the cases are considered inoperable at diagnosis due to local spread or presence of metastatic disease. Chemoradiotherapy is not tolerated by all patients and still fails to prolong survival significantly; neoadjuvant treatment also has limited results on pain control or tumour downstaging. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use of ablation therapy for the treatment of nonresectable tumours in various organs. Ablation techniques are based on direct application of chemical, thermal, or electrical energy to a tumour, which leads to cellular necrosis. With ablation, tumour cytoreduction, local control, and relief from symptoms are obtained in the majority of the patients. Inoperable cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma have been treated by various ablation techniques in the last few years with promising results. The purpose of this review is to present the current status of local ablative therapies in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to investigate on the efficiency and the future trends.

Elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of survival after gastroenterostomy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence that the presence of an ongoing systemic inflammatory response, especially a high preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), is associated with a poor outcome for a variety of common solid tumors. However, few studies have investigated the clinical value of the NLR in patients undergoing gastroenterostomy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A total of 83 patients who had symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction due to advanced pancreatic cancer and underwent gastroenterostomy were analyzed. The prognostic significance of the NLR was analyzed. The relationship between the NLR value and postoperative outcome was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 9.4 months in patients with an NLR of <4, whereas it was 3.4 months in patients with an NLR of ≥4 (P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that an NLR of ≥4, the presence of liver metastases, daily pain, and lack of postoperative chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors. A higher NLR was associated with postoperative morbidity; 13 % of patients with an NLR of <4 and 36 % of those with an NLR of ≥4 (P = 0.012) developed morbidities. With regard to quality of life, 96 % of patients with an NLR of <4 and 36 % of patients with an NLR of ≥4 had adequate oral intake of solid food without any support with intravenous nutrition for at least 1 month after surgery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative NLR offers important prognostic information for patients who have gastric outlet obstruction due to advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

A phase I study of an agonist CD40 monoclonal antibody (CP-870,893) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This phase I study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacodynamics, immunologic correlatives, and antitumor activity of CP-870,893, an agonist CD40 antibody, when administered in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-two patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PDA were treated with 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine once weekly for three weeks with infusion of CP-870,893 at 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg on day three of each 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

CP-870,893 was well-tolerated; one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4, cerebrovascular accident) occurred at the 0.2 mg/kg dose level, which was estimated as the MTD. The most common adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (grade 1 to 2). CP-870,893 infusion triggered immune activation marked by an increase in inflammatory cytokines, an increase in B-cell expression of costimulatory molecules, and a transient depletion of B cells. Four patients achieved a partial response (PR). 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) showed more than 25% decrease in FDG uptake within primary pancreatic lesions in six of eight patients; however, responses observed in metastatic lesions were heterogeneous, with some lesions responding with complete loss of FDG uptake, whereas other lesions in the same patient failed to respond. Improved overall survival correlated with a decrease in FDG uptake in hepatic lesions (R = -0.929; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

CP-870,893 in combination with gemcitabine was well-tolerated and associated with antitumor activity in patients with PDA. Changes in FDG uptake detected on PET/CT imaging provide insight into therapeutic benefit. Phase II studies are warranted.

Does long-term survival in patients with pancreatic cancer really exist? Results from the CONKO-001 study

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival (LTS) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer is still uncommon, little data is available to identify long-term survivors. The CONKO-001 study, which established gemcitabine after resection as adjuvant therapy, may provide data to answer this question.

METHODS

CONKO-001 pts with an overall survival ≥5 years were compared to those who survived <5 years. Central re-evaluation of primary histology was performed. Univariate analysis with the χ(2) -test identified qualifying factors. Logistic regression was used to investigate the influence of these covariates on LTS.

RESULTS

Of the evaluable 354 CONKO-001 pts, 54 (15%) with an overall survival ≥5 years were identified. It was possible to obtain tumor specimens of 39 pts (72%). Histological re-evaluation confirmed adenocarcinoma in 38 pts, 1 showed a high-grade neuroendocrine tumor. Univariate analysis for all 53 LTS pts with adenocarcinoma compared to the remaining 300 non-LTS pts revealed as relevant active treatment, tumor grading, tumor size, lymph nodes. No significance could be demonstrated for resection margin, sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, CA 19-9 at study entry. In multivariate analysis, tumor grading, active treatment, tumor size, lymph node involvement were independent prognostic factors for LTS.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival can be achieved in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

A multinational phase 2 study of nanoliposomal irinotecan sucrosofate (PEP02, MM-398) for patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

PEP02, also known as MM-398, is a novel nanoliposomal irinotecan that has improved pharmacokinetics and tumour bio-distribution of the free drug. This phase 2 study evaluated PEP02 monotherapy as second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients who had metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Karnofsky performance status ≥70, and had progressed following gemcitabine-based therapy were eligible. Intravenous injection of PEP02 120 mg m(-2) was given every 3 weeks. Simon 2-stage design was used. The primary objective was 3-month survival rate (OS(3-month)).

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled. The most common severe adverse events included neutropenia, abdominal pain, asthenia, and diarrhoea. Three patients (7.5%) achieved an objective response, with an additional 17 (42.5%) demonstrating stable disease for a minimum of two cycles. Ten (31.3%) of 32 patients with an elevated baseline CA19-9 had a >50% biomarker decline. The study met its primary end point with an OS(3-month) of 75%, with median progression-free survival and overall survival of 2.4 and 5.2 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PEP02 demonstrates moderate antitumour activity with a manageable side effect profile for metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer patients. Given the limited treatment options available to this patient population, a phase 3 trial of PEP02 (MM-398), referred to as NAPOLI-1, is currently underway.

Prognostic factors in gemcitabine-cisplatin polychemotherapy regimens in pancreatic cancer: XPD-Lys751Gln polymorphism strikes back

The use of platinated agents in combination chemotherapy regimens for advanced pancreatic cancer is controversial owing to the lack of an outstanding impact on the outcome and a substantial increase in hematologic and extra-hematologic toxicities. Pharmacogenetic studies to identify patients who could benefit most from such therapies are urgently needed. The Xeroderma-Pigmentosum group-D polymorphism at codon-751 (XPD-Lys751Gln) emerged as the most significant independent predictor for death- and progression-risk in our previous study on functional polymorphisms in 122 advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with cisplatin-docetaxel-capecitabine-gemcitabine and cisplatin-epirubicin-capecitabine-gemcitabine (or EC-GemCap). To confirm the prognostic role of this variable, we further evaluated the correlation of XPD-Lys751Gln with outcome in another 125 patients treated with the same regimens, and 90 treated with gemcitabine monotherapy. Genotyping was successfully carried out in the vast majority of DNA samples. Genotype frequencies followed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and XPD-Lys751Gln was associated with differential progression-free and overall-survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed its prognostic significance in platinum-based regimens. In particular, XPD-Gln751Gln was significantly associated with risk of death (hazard ratio, HR = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.6, p = 0.011) and risk of progression (HR = 1.7, 95% CI, 1.1-2.5, p = 0.013). No correlation was observed in gemcitabine monotherapy-treated patients. The analysis of DNA damage using extra-long-PCR in lymphocytes supported the association of XPD-Gln751Gln with greater resistance to cisplatin-induced damage. The increasing evidence of XPD-Lys751Gln impact on the outcome of gemcitabine-cisplatin-based polychemotherapy leads to plan prospective studies to validate the role of this polymorphism as a new tool for optimization of the currently available treatments in pancreatic cancer.

The association between the expression of solute carrier transporters and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of fourteen anticancer drug-relevant solute carrier transporters (SLCs) in pancreatic cancer in the context of clinical-pathological characteristics and the KRAS mutation status of tumors.

METHODS

Tumors and non-neoplastic pancreatic tissues were obtained from 32 histologically verified patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The transcript profile of SLCs was assessed using quantitative real-time PCR. KRAS mutations in exon 2 were assessed by high-resolution melting analysis and confirmed by sequencing.

RESULTS

SLC22A3 and SLC22A18 were upregulated and SLC22A1, SLC22A2, SLC22A11, SLC28A1, SLC28A3 and SLC29A1 were downregulated when compared with non-neoplastic pancreatic tissues. Moreover, significantly lower levels of SLC22A1, SLC22A11 and SLC29A1 were found in tumors with angioinvasion. There was also a significantly higher transcript level of SLC28A1 in tumors with regional lymph nodes affected by metastasis. The study found that a high expression of SLC28A1 was significantly associated with poor overall survival in unselected patients. In contrast, a high expression of SLC22A3 or SLC29A3 was significantly associated with longer overall survival in patients treated with nucleoside analogs. Protein expression of SLC22A1, SLC22A3 and SLC29A3 in tumor tissues of patients with pancreatic carcinoma was observed by immunoblotting for the first time. Finally, SLC levels were not found to be associated with KRAS mutation status in exon 2.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a number of associations of transcript levels of SLCs with prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients.

Postresection surveillance for pancreatic cancer performance status, imaging, and serum markers

Approximately 15% of patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are candidates for potentially curative surgery. However, most patients who undergo such surgery will die from recurrent disease, most within the first few years, whereas nearly all succumb by 5 to 7 years from diagnosis. Currently, there is a lack of high-level evidence to guide consensus recommendations as to the optimal surveillance strategy after resection. There is considerable variability in clinical practice, ranging from frequent clinical follow-up, with serial Ca 19-9 measurement and routine computed tomographic imaging on a 3- to 6-monthly basis, to a practice of no routine serum or imaging follow-up after surgery. In most part, this divergence in practice reflects a lack of data to define optimal practice. The argument in favor of limited surveillance presumably stems from the relatively uniform poor outcomes after recurrence and the absence of evidence indicating that early detection of local, regional, or metastatic recurrence improves outcomes. However, recent advancements in the treatment of metastatic disease offer hope that earlier detection and initiation of treatment for recurrent disease may positively impact clinical outcomes and at least urges review of the topic. One advantage to the development of defined guidelines would be greater consistency in the setting of both routine clinical follow-up and follow-up after adjuvant therapy on trial.

Postresection chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Chemotherapy is proven to play a central role in the adjuvant management of pancreatic cancer. A number of studies have validated its small but significant survival benefit to patients following surgical resection, but many questions about the optimal adjuvant chemotherapeutic management of pancreatic cancer still persist. Currently, the benefits of both the chemotherapeutic agents gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil have been validated as adjuvant options, with a preference for gemcitabine emerging based on its greater tolerability. Methods to individualize the selection of an adjuvant agent based on an individual tumor's characteristics are being explored, and additional novel agents and regimens are actively being investigated. In the studies that established chemotherapy's adjuvant benefit, a controversy simultaneously developed as to the role of the concurrent use of adjuvant radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy, leading to the development of a conflicting consensus on how to adjuvantly manage pancreatic cancer patients. Chemotherapy given concurrently with radiation therapy has emerged as the preferred adjuvant approach in the United States, whereas chemotherapy alone is preferred in Europe. In addition to the debate over modality, a separate debate of treatment timing has emerged from studies of neoadjuvant therapy, which has demonstrated a survival benefit in the management of pancreatic cancer, but has not been directly compared with postsurgical adjuvant therapy. This review discusses the evidence for chemotherapy in the adjuvant management of pancreatic cancer, including both the choice of agent and value of concurrent radiation therapy, as well as future directions with novel agents and regimens, techniques of response prediction, and timing to postsurgical adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy.

Biomarkers in pancreatic cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. There has been minimal progress with regard to cancer-specific outcomes in recent decades. Although effective therapies will undoubtedly change the natural history of the disease, effective biomarkers are a promising tool that will likely have a positive impact and will undoubtedly have an important role in the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) in the future. At present, serum CA-19-9 (carbohydrate antigen 19-9) is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved biomarker for PDA, and it has utility as a prognostic marker and as a marker of disease recurrence. There has been a recent explosion in the pancreatic cancer biomarker field with more than 2000 biomarker studies implicating thousands of informative genes as candidate biomarkers. In this review, we summarize the literature on CA-19-9 in PDA and highlight the most promising investigational biomarkers. Distinctions are made between diagnostic biomarkers (detection of disease), prognostic biomarkers (provide information on prognosis and recurrence pattern), and predictive biomarkers (predict treatment response).

Surgical palliation of pancreatic cancer

The surgical palliation of pancreatic cancer remains an important component of the treatment of this disease. The introduction of a new aggressive and effective chemotherapy regimen (FOLFIRINOX), interdisciplinary palliative care, and minimally invasive approaches for providing palliation are all factors that expand the role of the surgeon in the care of patients with unresectable disease. Currently, the role of the surgeon in the palliation of pancreatic cancer is (1) to identify patients with incurable disease (either preoperatively or intraoperatively), (2) to determine the optimal palliative technique to optimize results and preserve resources, and (3) to perform palliation of symptoms with low morbidity and mortality. The 3 most common symptoms of pancreatic cancer requiring surgical palliation are obstructive jaundice, gastric outlet obstruction, and tumor-associated pain. It is important that the surgeon recognizes the full range of surgical and nonoperative techniques available and contributes to the decision making as to the most appropriate method for each individual patient.

Monoclonal antibodies and other targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer continues to be a challenging disease to treat because of its aggressive nature, advanced stage at the time of diagnosis, and limited treatment options that are available. Traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy provides modest benefit to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Recently, a FOLFIRINOX regimen revealed improved response in overall and progression-free survival over single-agent gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer, but there is still much needed advancement in the systemic treatment of pancreatic cancer. There is a growing interest in the development of novel agents, while our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma continues to expand. With identification of various molecular pathways in pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis, potential targets for drug development have been pursued with the use of monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule inhibitors. Although preclinical studies with multiple targeted therapies demonstrated encouraging results in pancreatic cancer, only erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, showed a marginal survival benefit in a phase III clinical trial, when combined with gemcitabine. As further signaling pathways and their importance in pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis are better understood, further clinical trials will need to be designed to study these targeted agents as single agents, in combination with other novel agents or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this review, we present the current knowledge on targeted therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its application in clinical practice.

Interventional radiology and the pancreatic cancer patient

Patients with pancreatic cancer have a dismal prognosis. This article reviews the role that interventional radiology can play in managing postoperative complications and in patient palliation, particularly with an obstructed biliary system. In addition, options for cytoreduction are discussed, including chemoembolization, radioembolization, and thermal ablation. The final option reviewed is irreversible electroporation, which is being explored as a technique to allow patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer to be converted to surgical candidates.

Identification of distinct phenotypes of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

A significant number of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma present as locally advanced disease. Optimal treatment remains controversial. We sought to analyze the clinical course of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) in order to identify potential distinct clinical phenotypes.

METHODS

Patients (pts) diagnosed with LAPC who survived >2 months were identified from institutional databases. Clinical details were collected. Sequential re-staging scans were reviewed. Progression-free survival (PFS), time from progression to death (TTD), and overall survival (OS) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2011, 40 pts were identified. Median age was 66 yrs (range, 43-74) and 60 % (n=24) were male. All pts received chemotherapy. Median OS was 11.3 months. Twenty patients (50 %) had local progression only (LP) and 16 (40 %) had metastatic progression (MP) at first documentation of progression, while four patients (10 %) had stable disease. PFS was 4.0 vs 5.6 months (hazard ratio (HR) 0.97; 95 % CI 0.49-1.93, p=0.94) for LP and MP, respectively. Three of the patients with LP (15 %) eventually developed metastatic disease after a median of 4.2 months (3.7-9.6). For MP patients, five had concurrent local progression. Sites of disease were lung (eight), peritoneum (five), liver (three), and bone (one). TTD for LP and MP was 5.6 vs 1.4 months (HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.28-1.39, p=0.24) and OS was 13.2 vs 8.0 months (HR 0.59; 95 % CI 0.28-1.25, p=0.017), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified two subgroups of LAPC with distinctive behavior, one local dominant progression with low predilection for metastases and another with rapid metastatic development and worse survival. Early recognition of these phenotypes might allow a more tailored treatment approach to improve outcome.

Increased B cell-activating factor promotes tumor invasion and metastasis in human pancreatic cancer

B cell-activating factor (BAFF) is a cytokine belonging to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily. It has been reported that BAFF is elevated in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and contributes to the malignant potential of blood cancers and solid tumors. In this study, clinical evidence of increased BAFF levels in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was obtained, and the roles and mechanisms of BAFF in PDAC were clarified in human tissues of PDAC and from in vitro data of PDAC cell lines. Serum levels of BAFF in patients with PDAC were significantly higher than in healthy subjects (p = 0.0121). Patients with UICC stage IV PDAC (T1-4, N0-1, M1) had significantly higher levels of serum BAFF compared to patients with PDAC (p = 0.0182). BAFF was remarkably expressed in infiltrating B lymphocytes surrounding pancreatic cancer in human pancreatic tissues, suggesting that BAFF may play a role in progression of pancreatic cancer. PDAC cell lines were cultured with human recombinant BAFF, and morphology and gene expression were analyzed; pancreatic cancer cells changed to a fibroblast-like morphology, and showed altered gene expression of E-cadherin, vimentin and Snail. These BAFF-induced changes reflect enhanced cell motility and invasion. BAFF-R-overexpressing cell clones confirmed the association between these BAFF-induced changes and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related genes. BAFF was elevated in patients with metastatic advanced PDAC and induced alterations in PDAC cells via regulation of EMT-related genes. Elucidation of the precise role and mechanism of control of BAFF may lead to new therapeutic approaches with the aim of improving pancreatic cancer survival.

Subtype-specific MEK-PI3 kinase feedback as a therapeutic target in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Mutations in the KRAS oncogene are dominant features in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Because KRAS itself is considered "undruggable," targeting pathways downstream of KRAS are being explored as a rational therapeutic strategy. We investigated the consequences of MAP-ERK kinase (MEK) inhibition in a large PDA cell line panel. Inhibition of MEK activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase in an EGF receptor (EGFR)-dependent fashion and combinations of MEK and EGFR inhibitors synergistically induced apoptosis. This combinatorial effect was observed in the epithelial but not mesenchymal subtype of PDA. RNA expression analysis revealed predictors of susceptibility to the combination, including E-cadherin, HER3, and the miR200-family of microRNAs, whereas expression of the transcription factor ZEB1 was associated with resistance to the drug combination. Knockdown of HER3 in epithelial-type and ZEB1 in mesenchymal-type PDA cell lines resulted in sensitization to the combination of MEK and EGFR inhibitors. Thus, our findings suggest a new, subtype-specific, and personalized therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer.

The winning formulation: the development of paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer

Paclitaxel has wide application in anticancer therapy but was never considered an efficacious agent in pancreatic cancer. A review of the experience with the Cremaphor formulation hinted at paclitaxel's activity in pancreatic cancer, but the early development was hampered by significant toxicities such as neutropenia and infection at clinically tolerable doses. However, such efficacy was confirmed in the recently completed phase III Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (MPACT), in which the addition of nab-paclitaxel to gemcitabine significantly improved the survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Several other Cremaphor-free formulations of paclitaxel had also been evaluated in pancreatic cancer, and the reasons for the success of the albumin nanoparticulate are examined here. In the era of biologic and molecularly targeted agents, the success of nab-paclitaxel in recalcitrant pancreatic cancer is a timely reminder of the importance and relevance of pharmacology and novel drug delivery technology in the development of anticancer drugs.

Loss of runt-related transcription factor 3 induces gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND & AIM

Runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) is a tumor suppressor gene that is expressed in gastric and other cancers including pancreatic cancer. However, the precise function of RUNX3 in pancreatic cancer has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of decreased RUNX3 expression in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This study included 36 patients with primary pancreatic cancer, who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. All patients were treated with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine after the surgery. The pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1, MIAPaCa-2, BxPC-3, SUIT-2, and KLM-1 were used for immunoblotting analysis of RUNX3 and multidrug resistance protein (MRP) expressions. Ectopic RUNX3 expression was achieved by cDNA transfection of the cells, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) against RUNX3 was used to knock down endogenous RUNX3. Cell growth in the presence of gemcitabine was assessed using the MTT assay.

RESULTS

Patients with RUNX3-positive and RUNX3-negative pancreatic cancer had a median survival of 1006 and 643 days, respectively. Exogenous RUNX3 expression reduced the expression of MRP1, MRP2, and MRP5 in endogenous RUNX3-negative cells, whereas RUNX3 siRNA increased the expressions of these genes in endogenous RUNX3-positive cells. Exogenous RUNX3 expression decreased gemcitabine IC50 in RUNX3-negative cells.

CONCLUSION

Loss of RUNX3 expression contributes to gemcitabine resistance by inducing MRP expression, thereby resulting in poor patient survival.

Epigenetic regulation of SOX9 by the NF-κB signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer stem cells

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. Pancreatic cancer can be localized, locally advanced, or metastatic. The median 1- and 5-year survival rates are 25% and 6%, respectively. Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation play a significant role during both normal human development and cancer progression. To investigate epigenetic regulation of genes in the tumor-initiating population of pancreatic cancer cells, which are also termed cancer stem cells (CSCs), we conducted epigenetic arrays in PANC1 and HPAC pancreatic cancer cell lines and compared the global DNA methylation status of CpG promoters in invasive cells, demonstrated to be CSCs, to their noninvasive counterparts, or non-CSCs. Our results suggested that the NF-κB pathway is one of the most activated pathways in pancreatic CSCs. In agreement with this, we determined that upon treatment with NF-κB pathway inhibitors, the stem cell-like properties of cells are significantly disrupted. Moreover, SOX9, demethylated in CSCs, is shown to play a crucial role in the invasion process. Additionally, we found a potential NF-κB binding site located in the SOX9 promoter and determined that the NF-κB subunit p65 positively regulates SOX9 expression by binding to its promoter directly. This interaction can be efficiently blocked by NF-κB inhibitors. Thus, our work establishes a link between the classic NF-κB signaling transduction pathway and the invasiveness of pancreatic CSCs, which may result in the identification of novel signals and molecules that function at an epigenetic level, and could potentially be targeted for pharmaceutical investigations and clinical trials.

Integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and RNA-interference analysis of genes in somatic copy number gains in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study used an integrated analysis of copy number, gene expression, and RNA interference screens for identification of putative driver genes harbored in somatic copy number gains in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Somatic copy number gain data on 60 PDAC genomes were extracted from public data sets to identify genomic loci that are recurrently gained. Array-based data from a panel of 29 human PDAC cell lines were used to quantify associations between copy number and gene expression for the set of genes found in somatic copy number gains. The most highly correlated genes were assessed in a compendium of pooled short hairpin RNA screens on 27 of the same human PDAC cell lines.

RESULTS

A catalog of 710 protein-coding and 46 RNA genes mapping to 20 recurrently gained genomic loci were identified. The gene set was further refined through stringent integration of copy number, gene expression, and RNA interference screening data to uncover 34 candidate driver genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the candidate genes from the integrative analysis, ECT2 was found to have significantly higher essentiality in specific PDAC cell lines with genomic gains at the 3q26.3 locus, which harbors this gene, suggesting that ECT2 may play an oncogenic role in the PDAC neoplastic process.

Second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials

BACKGROUND

There is currently no standard of care for the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this analysis was to compare the different therapeutic approaches in this setting.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic analysis of second-line studies in advanced pancreatic cancer that have progressed on or following gemcitabine and published or presented from 2000 to 2012.

RESULTS

Forty-four clinical trials (t) were identified; of which 34 met the inclusion criteria treating an aggregate total of 1503 patients (n). Patients who received treatments (t: 33; n: 1269) had a median overall survival (OS) of 6 months compared with 2.8 months for patients who received best supportive care only (t: 2; n: 234) (P = 0.013). The gemcitabine and platinum-based combination (t: 5; n: 154) provided a median progression-free survival and OS of 4 and 6 months compared with 1.6 and 5.3 for the rest of the regimens (t: 29; n: 1349) (P = 0.059 and 0.10, respectively) and 2.9 and 5.7 for the combination of 5-fluorouracil and platinum agents (t: 12; n: 450) (P = 0.60 and 0.22, respectively).

CONCLUSION(S)

Although not conclusive, these data showed that the advantage of second-line chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer is very limited and there is a need for more studies.