Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Patient-reported outcome instruments in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis

Patient-reported outcome instruments provide valuable insight into disease-related morbidity known only to the patient and complement more objective outcome tools in the clinical trial setting. They are of particular importance in systemic sclerosis owing to the challenges around defining disease activity, the episodic nature of many disease-specific manifestations and the paucity of validated objective surrogate outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Early clinical trials of systemic sclerosis often incorporated legacy patient-reported outcome instruments, but the last 20 years has witnessed the emergence of several scleroderma-specific instruments that are now being routinely used alongside other outcomes in systemic sclerosis clinical trials. More recently, the value of patient-reported outcomes has been highlighted by their prominence in the American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index for Systemic Sclerosis that has been utilized as the primary endpoint of recent clinical trials of early diffuse systemic sclerosis. This review considers the role and performance of the various patient-reported outcome instruments utilized in systemic sclerosis clinical trials, the current positioning of patient-reported outcome instruments within clinical trial endpoint models across the range of systemic sclerosis disease manifestations and, where applicable, we shall highlight areas for future research.

Combination therapy with bosentan and sildenafil for refractory digital ulcers and Raynaud's phenomenon in a 30-year-old woman with systemic sclerosis: Case report and literature review

Background

Systemic sclerosis is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by skin and organ fibrosis, and vasculopathy. Raynaud's phenomenon is almost universally present in systemic sclerosis and can be the most debilitating symptom. Raynaud's phenomenon may lead to the development of digital ulcers, potentially complicated by infection, tissue necrosis, and auto-amputation. Recommended treatments have variable efficacy.

Methods

We report the case of a 30-year-old woman with diffuse systemic sclerosis suffering from severe Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers with digital tissue necrosis who was treated with combination therapy of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor. In addition, we reviewed the literature on the topic.

Results

Previous therapy with calcium-channel blockers, intravenous iloprost, and bosentan had all failed to control symptoms. We added sildenafil in combination with bosentan and observed a rapid and sustained treatment effect. Raynaud's phenomenon severity, number of attacks, and attack duration decreased within 2 weeks of initiating treatment. Furthermore, this resulted in the healing of established digital ulcers.

Conclusion

Our case report suggests that combination therapy may be a feasible treatment for the most severely affected and refractory patients. In our literature review, we found one retrospective study and three additional cases with similarly encouraging results.

Low dose intravenous immunoglobulin in addition to cyclophosphamide in systemic sclerosis : Single centre experience

AIM

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare chronic disease characterized by pathologic collagen deposits in the skin and internal organs. Although it is considered to be an autoimmune disease, immunosuppressants have a limited effect on severe SSc. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have shown favorable effects in patients with SSc by suppressing the action of profibrotic cytokines, so they could have additional effect on standard treatment such as cyclophosphamide (CYC). This article presents the immunomodulatory effect of low-dose IVIG in addition to CYC in the treatment of severe SSc in this center during the last 9 years.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study analyzed the medical documentation of nine patients with SSc treated with low-dose IVIG (0.4 g/kg and month) together with intravenous CYC (600 mg/m² and month). The therapeutic effect on lung and skin manifestations was assessed.

RESULTS

Of the patients one had interstitial lung diseases (ILD), two had progressive skin diseases, and six had a combination of skin and lung involvement. The best results were achieved in skin changes, where complete healing of digital ulcers (DU) was recorded in every reported case. A decrease in the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) was noted in three patients and increased diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide in another three patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study suggest that IVIG may be an additional treatment option together with CYC for patients for whom other therapies have failed, but further studies on the exact role of IVIG in the treatment of severe SSc are required.

The Influence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Digestive and Extra-Intestinal Disorders

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a condition hallmarked by an increase in the concentration of colonic-type bacteria in the small bowel. Watery diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain and distension are the most common clinical manifestations. Additionally, malnutrition and vitamin (B12, D, A, and E) as well as minerals (iron and calcium) deficiency may be present. SIBO may mask or worsen the history of some diseases (celiac disease, irritable bowel disease), may be more common in some extra-intestinal disorders (scleroderma, obesity), or could even represent a pathogenetic link with some diseases, in which a perturbation of intestinal microbiota may be involved. On these bases, we performed a review to explore the multiple links between SIBO and digestive and extra-intestinal diseases.

Predictors of progression in systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic autoimmune disease affecting multiple organ systems, including the lungs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of death in SSc.

There are no valid biomarkers to predict the occurrence of SSc-ILD, although auto-antibodies against anti-topoisomerase I and several inflammatory markers are candidate biomarkers that need further evaluation. Chest auscultation, presence of shortness of breath and pulmonary function testing are important diagnostic tools, but lack sensitivity to detect early ILD. Baseline screening with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is therefore necessary to confirm an SSc-ILD diagnosis. Once diagnosed with SSc-ILD, patients' clinical courses are variable and difficult to predict, although certain patient characteristics and biomarkers are associated with disease progression. It is important to monitor patients with SSc-ILD for signs of disease progression, although there is no consensus about which diagnostic tools to use or how often monitoring should occur. In this article, we review methods used to define and predict disease progression in SSc-ILD.

There is no valid definition of SSc-ILD disease progression, but we suggest that either a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline of ≥10%, or a decline in FVC of 5–9% in association with a decline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide of ≥15% represents progression. An increase in the radiographic extent of ILD on HRCT imaging would also signify progression. A time period of 1–2 years is generally used for this definition, but a decline over a longer time period may also reflect clinically relevant disease progression.

Lung function tests and chest imaging help predict who has SSc-associated ILD and whether it will progress. In the absence of standardised methods for doctors, we recommend a strategy that combines both lung function tests and chest imaging.http://bit.ly/2uK9ZD2

Digital ulcers: should debridement be a standard of care in systemic sclerosis?

Digital ulcers are a serious, recurrent complication in patients with systemic sclerosis. They are often slow to heal and exquisitely painful. Local wound care, such as debridement of the wound bed, is an essential component in the management of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. However, digital ulcer debridement is not a standard of care, and there is substantial international variation in the use of this approach. In this Viewpoint, we discuss the assessment of the wound bed and different methods of debridement using the model of tissue management, infection and inflammation, moisture control, and wound edge or epidermal advancement, known as TIME. We highlight the challenges in standard practice and the need for research into local wound care for this type of ulceration, before suggesting a potential roadmap to develop a standardised approach to support ulcer debridement in systemic sclerosis. Debridement might be the missing component in optimising the management of digital ulcers and we propose that the approach should be rigorously investigated as a standard of care in this common complication of systemic sclerosis.

Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients in England with Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Retrospective Database Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) places a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. The objectives of this study were to describe clinical characteristics and assess healthcare resource utilization and costs of patients with SSc-ILD in England, compared with patients with non-pulmonary organ involvement related to SSc (SSc-OOI).

METHODS

This population-based retrospective study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics. Data were extracted from medical records dated January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2016. Patients with SSc were identified and placed in subgroups based on organ involvement: SSc-ILD, SSc-OOI, and both (SSc-ILD-OOI). Patients with SSc-ILD-OOI were included in both the SSc-ILD and SSc-OOI subgroups. All-cause healthcare costs, excluding medication costs, were calculated to 2016 British pounds sterling (£).

RESULTS

This study included 675 patients with SSc: 174 (26%) had neither ILD nor other organ involvement (OOI); 127 (19%) had SSc-ILD; 477 (71%) had SSc-OOI; 103 (15%) had SSc-ILD-OOI. Age-weighted median [interquartile range (IQR)] annual healthcare costs per patient were: £1496 (£664-£2817) in SSc only; £6375 (£3451-£15,041) in SSc-ILD; £4084 (£1454-£10,105) in SSc-OOI; £6632 (£4023-£17,009) in SSc-ILD-OOI. In multivariate analysis, older age at diagnosis, diagnosis of anemia, and number of comorbid diseases were associated with higher yearly healthcare costs.

CONCLUSION

The annual healthcare cost for patients with SSc-ILD is substantial, and higher than that of patients with SSc-OOI or SSc only. These results quantify the economic burden of SSc-ILD in a real-world setting, and highlight the need for treatment of this disease.

Management of systemic sclerosis: the first five years

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a risk-stratified and evidence-based management for subsets of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients in the first five years from disease onset.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiopulmonary disease remains the primary cause of mortality in SSc patients. Morbidity and mortality in SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension have improved with combination treatment, in either an upfront or sequential treatment pattern. Traditional therapies for interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have targeted those with clinically significant and progressive ILD with immunosuppression. New data suggest a possible paradigm shift, introducing immunosuppressive therapy to patients before they develop clinically significant or progressive ILD. The year 2019 saw the approval of the first FDA-approved therapy for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease, using an antifibrotic agent previously approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. To date, only autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant has demonstrated a mortality benefit for SSc-ILD, albeit in a narrow spectrum of SSc-ILD patients.

SUMMARY

SSc is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease typified by varying clinical trajectories. Its management may be stratified within the first five years by subclassifying patients based on factors that have important prognostic significance: skin distribution and autoantibody status.

Differing commissioning arrangements may contribute to geographic variation in clinical management of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (such as sildenafil) and endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, are effective for digital ulcer disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc-DU) and are endorsed in international treatment recommendations. Commissioning of high-cost drugs, such as bosentan, however, differs across devolved nations of the UK. We report a multicentre service evaluation project to examine 'real world' management of SSc-DU before and following the 2015 UK Scleroderma Study Group (UKSSG) guidance, across south-west (SW) England and Wales. Results showed that iloprost and sildenafil use for SSc-DU was higher in patients in Wales prior to 2015. Between 2015-2017, sildenafil use for SSc-DU increased in SW England while remaining stable in Wales. Bosentan use for SSc-DU after 2015 in SW England increased, while remaining stable and proportionately lower in Wales. These findings demonstrate that differing commissioning guidance across devolved nations of the UK seems to contribute to geographic variation in patient care.

[Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis : Position statement of the stem cell therapy working party of the German Society of Rheumatology]

There have been three randomized controlled trials on autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) that demonstrated significant superiority with respect to survival, improvement of cutaneous fibrosis, lung function and quality of life compared to standard treatment; however, these advantages must be carefully weighed against the transplantation-related risks. For this reason, an expert group from the stem cell therapy working party of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has now developed recommendations for the use of AHSCT in SSc. Based on the high-quality evidence, AHSCT is considered as the standard option for the treatment of selected SSc patients. Potential candidates for AHSCT are those with early, rapidly progressive, diffuse cutaneous SSc with visceral manifestations who have not yet developed severe damage to internal organs. A close cooperation between rheumatologists and transplantation centers is crucial for optimizing patient selection and treatment outcomes.

Nintedanib in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: A Japanese population analysis of the SENSCIS trial

OBJECTIVE

We examined the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) in the global Safety and Efficacy of Nintedanib in Systemic Sclerosis (SENSCIS) trial.

METHODS

Randomised patients received oral nintedanib 150 mg (N = 34) twice daily or placebo (N = 36) until the last patient reached 52 weeks of treatment (up to 100 weeks). Data were analysed using a subgroup analysis model with Japanese and non-Japanese patients as subgroup variables.

RESULTS

In Japanese patients, the adjusted annual rate of forced vital capacity (FVC) decline over 52 weeks was -86.2 mL/year (nintedanib) and -90.9 mL/year (placebo); treatment difference, 4.67 mL/year (95% confidence interval, -103.28, 112.63). Treatment effect heterogeneity between Japanese and non-Japanese patients was not detected (treatment-by-visit-by-subgroup interaction; p = .49). FVC decline was smaller for nintedanib versus placebo through 100 weeks in Japanese patients. The most commonly reported adverse events with nintedanib were gastrointestinal and liver disorder events; most were mild-to-moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

In both Japanese and non-Japanese patients with SSc-ILD, nintedanib slowed the progression of ILD, with no heterogeneity detected between the subgroups. The safety profile for nintedanib in Japanese patients was similar to that observed in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02597933).

Management of scleroderma renal crisis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) is a life-threatening manifestation in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is usually presented by an acute onset of severe hypertension together with an acute kidney injury. We can conceptualize SRC as a systemic syndrome with features that extend beyond the involvement of the kidney. The goal of this review is to inform clinicians about the risk factors for SRC in patients with SSc and to emphasize the importance of early identification and initiation of treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

For the past 3 decades, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) to treat SRC, has been rightfully synonymized with a good outcome, and has changed the trajectory of mortality in SRC. Despite this, SRC still figures in one of the top four causes of mortality in patients with SSc. There is a need for additional therapeutic agents to treat SRC that is refractory to ACE-I. There has been a recent interest in combining ACE-I with endothelin receptor blockers and agents targeting the complement component 5. There is no role for using ACE-I prophylactically in high-risk patients.

SUMMARY

Early diagnosis of SRC is the key, and early initiation of ACE-I is life-saving and associated with a better prognosis. We should consider renal transplantation in selected patients, especially those on long-term dialysis.

Distinctive association of peripheral immune cell phenotypes with capillaroscopic microvascular patterns in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The pathological changes in SSc include immune system dysregulation and microvascular damage. However, the association of immune cell phenotype heterogeneity and microvascular abnormalities is unclear. The aim of this study is to elucidate this association in SSc.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from 150 SSc patients were used for comprehensive flow cytometric analysis based on the Human Immunology Project. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify SSc patients into subgroups and their association with microvascular abnormalities, as assessed by nailfold videocapillaroscopy (i.e. 'early', 'active' and 'late' patterns), was analysed.

RESULTS

The proportions of activated CD4+ T cells, T cells re-expressing CD45RA, activated Th1 and Th17 cells and IgD-CD27- B cells were higher in SSc patients than in healthy individuals. Hierarchical cluster analysis stratified SSc patients into three groups: patients with few immune abnormalities (fewer abnormalities group), patients with high proportions of activated T and Treg cells (Treg-dominant group) and patients with high proportions of Tfh and plasmablasts (Tfh-dominant group). Age and disease duration were comparable among the groups. On the other hand, microvascular abnormalities, especially the 'late' nailfold videocapillaroscopy pattern, correlated with internal organ involvement. Among the groups stratified according to immune cell phenotype, the progression to the 'late' nailfold videocapillaroscopy pattern was more frequent in the Tfh-dominant group.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the presence of immunophenotypic abnormalities in SSc. Immunological abnormalities were not uniform but rather limited to subpopulations, particularly the Tfh-dominant group, where they were highly associated with microvascular abnormalities and organ involvement.

Efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease-a randomised controlled trial

To assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, pilot study. Subjects with SSc-ILD and forced vital capacity (FVC) between 50 and 80% of the predicted (%pred) value were randomised in 1:1 ratio to receive either pirfenidone (2400 mg/day) or placebo for 6 months. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with either stabilisation or improvement in FVC at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the absolute change in the %pred FVC, Mahler's dyspnoea index, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS) and serum levels of tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β). Thirty-four subjects with median (range) age of 41 (20-63) years (91.2% women) and median (range) %pred FVC of 65 (51-78) were enrolled. Stabilisation/improvement in FVC was seen in 16 (94.1%) and 13 (76.5%) subjects in the pirfenidone and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.33). The median (range) absolute change in %pred FVC was - 0.55 (- 9 to 7%) and 1.0 (- 42 to 11.5%) in the treatment and control groups, respectively (p = 0.51). The changes in 6MWD, dyspnoea scores, MRSS, and levels of TNF-α and TGF-β were not significantly different between groups. Common adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbances and skin rash. We failed to find a significant beneficial effect of pirfenidone over placebo in improving/stabilising FVC, exercise capacity, symptoms, or skin disease. Study is underpowered to provide conclusive evidence. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are required.

Metabolic Targets for Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases

There is a considerable unmet demand for safe and efficacious medications in the realm of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The fate of the immune cells is precisely governed by control of various metabolic processes such as mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, fatty acid synthesis, beta-oxidation, amino acid metabolism, and several others including the pentose phosphate pathway, which is a unique source of metabolites for cell proliferation and maintenance of a reducing environment. These pathways are tightly regulated by the cytokines, growth factors, availability of the nutrients and host-microbe interaction. Exploring the immunometabolic pathways that govern the fate of cells of the innate and adaptive immune system, during various stages of activation, proliferation, differentiation and effector response, is crucial for new development of new treatment targets. Identifying the pathway connections and key enzymes will help us to target the dysregulated inflammation in autoimmune diseases. The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is increasingly recognized as one of the key drivers of proinflammatory responses in autoimmune diseases. In this review, we provide an update on the current understanding of the metabolic signatures noted within different immune cells of many different autoimmune diseases with a focus on selecting pathways and specific metabolites as targets for treatment.

Inhibition of effector B cells by ibrutinib in systemic sclerosis

Objective

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disease with a significant morbidity and reduced survival of patients. Effective treatment and clinical control of the disease remain challenging. In particular, the development of pulmonary and cardiac fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension are severe complications responsible for excessive mortality. Currently available treatment strategies only alleviate symptoms and slow disease progression. Here, we investigated the therapeutic potential of ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor used in B cell malignancies, to alter B cell pathology in SSc in an in vitro model of autoimmunity.

Methods

PBMCs and sorted B cells of 24 patients with SSc were used for functional testing after stimulation with hypomethylated DNA fragments (CpG) to induce an innate immune response. The effects of ibrutinib on cytokine production, autoantibody release, and activation of the transcription factor NFκB were evaluated.

Results

Ibrutinib was able to reduce the production of the profibrotic hallmark cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α mainly from the effector B cell population in patients with SSc. Importantly, small doses of ibrutinib (0.1 μM) preserved the production of immunoregulatory IL-10 while effectively inhibiting hyperactivated, profibrotic effector B cells. In a flow cytometry analysis of phosphorylated NFκB, an important transcription factor in the induction of innate immune responses in B cells, significantly less activation was observed with ibrutinib treatment.

Conclusion

Our data could pave the avenue for a clinical application of ibrutinib for patients with SSc as a novel treatment option for the underlying pathogenetic immune imbalance contributing to disease onset and progression.

Drugs in phase I and phase II clinical trials for systemic sclerosis

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune connective tissue disease that is characterized by excessive collagen deposition, vascular dysfunction, and fibrosis of cutaneous and visceral organs. Current therapeutic options are limited and provide only modest benefit.Areas covered: This review summarizes investigational agents in recent Phase I and II clinical trials evaluated for the treatment of SSc with a focus on skin in patients with early diffuse disease and interstitial lung disease. We performed a search on Pubmed and https://clinicaltrials.gov with keywords systemic sclerosis, Phase I clinical trial, and Phase II clinical trial to identify relevant studies from 2015 to 2019.Expert opinion: Therapeutic interventions in SSc should be guided by the level of disease activity and the degree of organ involvement. While most novel agents have failed to meet the primary endpoints of reducing skin thickening as measured by the modified Rodnan skin score, some have shown promise in improving the Composite Response Index for Clinical Trials in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS), reducing lung function decline, or improving patient-reported outcomes. However, most of the current evidence is based on small or open-label clinical trials. Well-designed, large, randomized, Phase III clinical trials are necessary to define the roles of investigational agents in treating SSc.

Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare and complex immune-mediated connective tissue disease characterized by multi-organ fibrosis and dysfunction. Systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) is a leading cause of death in this population. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) can coexist with other forms of pulmonary hypertension in SSc, including pulmonary hypertension related to left heart disease, interstitial lung disease, chronic thromboembolism and pulmonary venous occlusive disease, which further complicates diagnosis and management. Available pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies target the nitric oxide, endothelin and prostacyclin pathways. These therapies have been studied in SSc-PAH in addition to idiopathic PAH, often with different treatment responses. In this article, we discuss the management as well as the treatment options for patients with SSc-PAH.

Treatment modalities and drug survival in a systemic sclerosis real-life patient cohort

BACKGROUND

European data indicate that systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related death rates are increasing, thus raising concerns about SSc's optimal management. Herein, we describe current treatment modalities and drug survival in a real-life SSc cohort.

METHODS

Details on immunosuppressive/antiproliferative (methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, rituximab, tocilizumab) and vasoactive agent [(endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), sildenafil, iloprost, and calcium channel blockers (CCB)] administration during the disease course (11.8 ± 8.4 years, mean + SD) of 497 consecutive patients examined between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively recorded. Drug survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Methotrexate was the most frequently administered immunosuppressive/antiproliferative agent (53% of patients), followed by cyclophosphamide (26%), mycophenolate (12%), and azathioprine (11%). Regarding vasoactive agents, CCB had been ever administered in 68%, ERAs in 38%, iloprost in 7%, and sildenafil in 7% of patients; 23% of patients with pulmonary fibrosis had never received immunosuppressive/antiproliferative agents, 33% of those with digital ulcers had never received ERAs, iloprost, or sildenafil, whereas 19% of all patients had never received either immunosuppressive/antiproliferative or other than CCB vasoactive agents. Survival rates of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate differed significantly, being 84/75%, 59/43%, and 74/63% at 12/24 months, respectively, with inefficacy being the most frequent discontinuation cause. Conversely, CCB, ERAs, and sildenafil had high and comparable retention rates of 97/91%, 88/86%, and 80/80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing therapeutic limitations indicate that more evidence-based treatment is warranted for successful management of SSc. Vasculopathy seems to be managed more rigorously, but the low retention rates of immunosuppressive/antiproliferative drugs suggest that effective and targeted disease-modifying agents are warranted.

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Status Quo and Future Perspectives for Targeted Therapy

The endothelin axis, recognized for its vasoconstrictive action, plays a central role in the pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Treatment with approved endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), such as bosentan, ambrisentan, or macitentan, slow down PAH progression and relieves symptoms. Several findings have indicated that endothelin is further involved in the pathogenesis of certain other diseases, making ERAs potentially beneficial in the treatment of various conditions. In addition to PAH, this review summarizes the use and perspectives of ERAs in cancer, renal disease, fibrotic disorders, systemic scleroderma, vasospasm, and pain management. Bosentan has proven to be effective in systemic sclerosis PAH and in decreasing the development of vasospasm-related digital ulcers. The selective ERA clazosentan has been shown to be effective in preventing cerebral vasospasm and delaying ischemic neurological deficits and new infarcts. Furthermore, in the SONAR (Study Of Diabetic Nephropathy With Atrasentan) trial, the selective ERA atrasentan reduced the risk of renal events in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. These data suggest atrasentan as a new therapy in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy and possibly other renal diseases. Preclinical studies regarding heart failure, cancer, and fibrotic diseases have demonstrated promising effects, but clinical trials have not yet produced measurable results. Nevertheless, the potential benefits of ERAs may not be fully realized.

Autoimmune diseases and immune-checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy: review of the literature and personalized risk-based prevention strategy

Patients with cancer and with preexisting active autoimmune diseases (ADs) have been excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials because of concerns for high susceptibility to the development of severe adverse events resulting from exacerbation of their preexisting ADs. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be safe and effective in this patient population. However, baseline corticosteroids and other nonselective immunosuppressants appear to negatively impact drug efficacy, whereas retrospective and case report data suggest that use of specific immunosuppressants may not have the same consequences. Therefore, we propose here a two-step strategy. First, to lower the risk of compromising ICI efficacy before their initiation, nonselective immunosuppressants could be replaced by specific selective immunosuppressant drugs following a short rotation phase. Subsequently, combining ICI with the selective immunosuppressant could prevent exacerbation of the AD. For the most common active ADs encountered in the context of cancer, we propose specific algorithms to optimize ICI therapy. These preventive strategies go beyond current practices and recommendations, and should be practiced in ICI-specialized clinics, as these require multidisciplinary teams with extensive knowledge in the field of clinical immunology and oncology. In addition, we challenge the exclusion from ICI therapy for patients with cancer and active ADs and propose the implementation of an international registry to study such novel strategies in a prospective fashion.

A patient-centered approach to the burden of symptoms in patients with scleroderma treated with Bosentan: A prospective single-center observational study

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare and complex autoimmune disease associated with poor vital and functional outcomes. The functional hindrance in patients derives from various disease-specific manifestations, including Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers (DUs). Bosentan is an endothelin receptor antagonist capable of preventing the appearance of new DUs in patients with scleroderma. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of Bosentan on the severity of Raynaud's phenomenon, DU-related symptoms and functional impairment during the first year of treatment. A prospective study that included adult patients with SSc admitted to the Rheumatology Department between January 2016 and January 2017 that were candidates for Bosentan therapy, was performed. All patients were asked to evaluate the burden of symptoms secondary to Raynaud's and DUs using a visual analogue scale (VAS), whereas functional hindrance was assessed via Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). The outcomes were assessed at baseline and every 3 months during 1 year of therapy. Among the 41 patients included initially, 2 participants discontinued the treatment after 1 month due to adverse events (elevation of liver enzymes). The study cohort exhibited a significant improvement in HAQ-DI, VAS-R and VAS-DU scores in response to Bosentan therapy over the 1-year follow-up period. Higher scores at baseline predicted a weaker treatment-related improvement, with the risk of a poor outcome being increased by 220% for VAS-R, 116% for VAS-DU, whereas no increase was observed for HAQ-DI. The post-treatment improvement in VAS-DU levels was associated with a better outcome for HAQ-DI (R=0.44; P=0.005). This association was not identified for VAS-R (R=0.24; P=0.137). Throughout the follow-up period, patients with dyspnea presented with significantly higher HAQ-DI scores compared with non-dyspneic patients. Bosentan therapy may indirectly influence functionality and quality of life in patients with scleroderma by reducing the burden of Raynaud's and DU-related symptoms. Nonetheless, patients with SSc with a decreased symptom burden at baseline exhibited improved outcomes.

The future of treatment in systemic sclerosis: can we design better trials?

Strides have been made in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis, with successful trials of combination therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension and of new drugs that slow the decline of lung function in interstitial lung disease. However, many trials in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis have been negative, including trials of tocilizumab, abatacept, and riociguat, despite improvements in skin scores and other endpoints that approached statistical significance. Trials of macitentan for digital ulcers in these patients have also been disappointing. Trials that do not meet their primary endpoint do not necessarily signify ineffective therapies, as there are many other possible reasons for negative trial results, including features of trial design, insufficient trial duration, or insufficient power to detect differences between groups. In this Series paper, I discuss some of these reasons and what the research community can learn from negative trials to inform future trial design going forward.

Treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: Lessons from clinical trials

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease remains a leading cause of mortality. Despite decades of clinical trials, the treatment effects of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs continue to be modest and there remains a great need for therapies that attenuate and hopefully ameliorate parenchymal lung disease. In this review, we highlight the key clinical trials that have shaped the management strategies employed by the authors, providing their strength of recommendation based on level of evidence. We also review lessons learned in more recent years, suggesting a benefit in targeting patients with subclinical interstitial lung disease with high risk for progression early in the disease course, as well as the benefit seen in a large clinical trial leading to the first Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. These lessons come in a context of heterogeneity of patient populations and response to therapy, as well as the inherent constraints of time-limited studies to detect meaningful outcomes for patients.

Electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with systemic sclerosis

SSc is an autoimmune disease characterized by microvascular damage, endothelial dysfunction and fibrosis of the skin and the internal organs. Cardiac manifestation in patients with SSc is one of the major organ involvements. Approximately 20% of SSc patients suffer from primary cardiovascular disease and another 20% may have secondary cardiac involvement. Although cardiac arrhythmias are mostly linked to myocardial fibrosis, atrioventricular conduction abnormalities are secondary to the fibrosis of the pulse conduction system. Despite the severe consequences of ventricular rhythm disturbances in patients with SSc, the exact role of electrocardiographic markers in the prediction of these arrhythmias has not yet been clearly elucidated. Therefore, the question is whether certain ECG parameters reflecting ventricular repolarization may help to recognize scleroderma patients with increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.

Characterizing Disease Manifestations and Treatment Patterns Among Adults with Systemic Sclerosis: A Retrospective Analysis of a US Healthcare Claims Population

INTRODUCTION

Real-world use of immunomodulating therapy (IMT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) was investigated for the first time in a descriptive, retrospective cohort analysis of claims made in a healthcare insurance database to characterize treatment patterns and their alignment with SSc disease manifestations.

METHODS

Treatment patterns and disease manifestations, symptoms, complications, and comorbidities were assessed in patients with SSc enrolled in a US healthcare claims database who received treatment between January 2006 and December 2013 and for whom data were available 6 months before and 12 months after SSc diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 7812 eligible patients, 6852 received treatments of interest for SSc and 2404 (30.8%) received IMT during the first year after SSc diagnosis. In the first year after diagnosis, the most common claims were for antibiotics (61.7%), opioids (50.6%), glucocorticoids (46.5%), and proton pump inhibitors (35.4%); the most common organs involved with complications among patients with SSc were lung (30.5%), heart (17.4%), and gastrointestinal tract (22.4%); the most common signs or symptoms were musculoskeletal (16.1%) and fatigue (10.5%); 1035 patients (15.1%) had infections and 14 (0.2%) had malignancies. Among patients who received IMT, 43.8% received at least hydroxychloroquine and 21.1% received at least methotrexate; 460 patients switched to a second IMT, 23.0% to at least methotrexate and 22.8% to at least mycophenolate mofetil. The most common comorbidities reported with first IMT were in lung (11.8%), overlap syndrome (8.4%), heart (5.3%), and gastrointestinal (6.8%) categories.

CONCLUSION

One-third of patients with SSc in the healthcare claims population received IMTs during the first year after diagnosis. However, patients who received IMTs had disease manifestations similar to those of the overall SSc healthcare claims population.

Randomised controlled trials in systemic sclerosis: patient selection and endpoints for next generation trials

The heterogeneity in the natural history of systemic sclerosis is a major issue in both clinical management and trial design and is dictated by the complex and multifactorial pathogenesis of the disease. Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disease and therefore many trials for the disease have targeted immune activation pathways; however, the phase 3 trials that have been positive have targeted pathways directly linked to tissue damage rather than systemic immune activation. On one hand, these results represent enormous progress that has led to the first approved drugs for this extremely challenging condition. On the other hand, they have revealed a possible selection bias in our current approach to trial design. In this Series paper, we describe randomised controlled trials from the past 4 years we believe to be most relevant to future strategies in systemic sclerosis. Based on advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of disease, we will also identify important points to consider in the design of the next generation of systemic sclerosis trials.

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune connective tissue disease, which is characterised by immune dysregulation and progressive fibrosis that typically affects the skin, with variable internal organ involvement. It is a rare condition that affects mostly young and middle-aged women, resulting in disproportionate morbidity and mortality. Currently, interstitial lung disease is the most common cause of death among patients with systemic sclerosis, with a prevalence of up to 30% and a 10-year mortality of up to 40%. Interstitial lung disease is more common among African Americans and in people with the diffuse cutaneous form of systemic sclerosis or anti-topoisomerase 1 antibodies. Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease most commonly presents with dyspnoea, cough, and a non-specific interstitial pneumonia pattern on CT scan, with a minority of cases fulfilling the criteria for usual interstitial pneumonia. The standard therapy has traditionally been combinations of immunosuppressants, particularly mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide. These immunosuppressants can be supplemented by targeted biological and antifibrotic therapies, whereas autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and lung transplantation are reserved for refractory cases.

Successful Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis with Anticentriole Antibody

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by skin sclerosis and multiple organ damages which may cause mortality and is usually accompanied with several specific autoantibodies, each of which is associated with characteristic complications. Among them, anticentriole antibody is recently reported to be highly associated with SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH). In general, several vasodilators are used as therapeutic drugs for SSc-PAH, whereas immunosuppressive therapies are not. Here, we report the case of a 62-year-old female with anticentriole antibody-positive SSc-PAH treated with immunosuppressants and vasodilators. She presented with two-year exertional dyspnea and was diagnosed with PAH and SSc owing to the centriole staining pattern and other symptoms without digital sclerosis. Oral vasodilators were initially administered but were not sufficiently effective on dyspnea. Immunosuppressants such as prednisolone and cyclophosphamide were started. Both of them improved mean pulmonary arterial pressure and 6-minute walk distance, and the anticentriole antibody also disappeared. In this case, SSc-PAH with anticentriole antibody was properly diagnosed and immunosuppressants and vasodilators improved the hemodynamics of PAH with anticentriole antibody and stably maintained it and, in addition, reduced the titer of anticentriole antibody. This indicates that anticentriole antibody might represent a good responsive group to therapies among subgroups of patients with SSc-PAH.

Systemic sclerosis - the dermatological perspective

Systemic scleroderma/systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an inflammatory connective tissue disease clinically characterized by two major subtypes: limited and diffuse SSc. While both conditions present with Raynaud's phenomenon (paroxysmal digital ischemia), diffuse SSc is associated with rapid disease progression and early - prognostically relevant - involvement of internal organs. Treatment is challenging. In addition to general lifestyle modifications, measures include treatments aimed at improving circulation as well as immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs. However, these agents are effective only in terms of slowing disease progression.

Treprostinil Hydrogel Iontophoresis in Systemic Sclerosis-Related Digital Skin Ulcers: A Safety Study

Digital skin ulcers are a severe complication of systemic sclerosis. The first-line treatment is intravenous iloprost, but it induces dose-limiting adverse effects. Local administration of treprostinil through skin iontophoresis may be a safe alternative. We conducted a 2-stage, randomized, placebo-controlled single-ascending-dose study in healthy volunteers and patients with systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcer. We further explored the effect of the procedure on skin blood flux. In a first group of healthy subjects, treprostinil and placebo iontophoresis were performed at 3 locations (ie, 6 skin sites): the sole of the foot, the leg, and the fingers. We used a 1-mg/mL hydrogel of treprostinil. We then randomly treated systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers in a 3:1 ratio of treprostinil or placebo. We used concentrations from 0.1 to 1 mg/mL. All adverse events were recorded and rated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), whereas skin microvascular blood flux was recorded with laser speckle contrast imaging. Among the 12 healthy volunteers, we observed 60 local adverse effects: burns, skin pain, erythema, and pruritus, graded 1 or 2 on the 5-point CTCAE scale. Treprostinil iontophoresis significantly increased skin blood flux on the leg (AUC_0-4 h at 88 460% ± 6436% versus 12 730% ± 3397% baseline flux.min respectively; P < .001) and on the sole of the foot (AUC_{0-3 h} at 20 124% ± 6119% versus 3142% ± 3036% baseline flux.min, respectively; P = .018) with a trend on the finger. Among 5 patients with systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcer, 2 resolutive local adverse effects were reported. Iontophoresis of treprostinil hydrogel was safe in systemic sclerosis patients with digital ulcer.

Involvement of the myeloid cell compartment in fibrogenesis and systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune fibrotic disease of unknown aetiology that is characterized by vascular changes in the skin and visceral organs. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation can improve skin and organ fibrosis in patients with progressive disease and a high risk of organ failure, indicating that cells originating in the bone marrow are important contributors to the pathogenesis of SSc. Animal studies also indicate a pivotal function of myeloid cells in the development of fibrosis leading to changes in the tissue architecture and dysfunction in multiple organs such as the heart, lungs, liver and kidney. In this Review, we summarize current knowledge about the function of myeloid cells in fibrogenesis that occurs in patients with SSc. Targeted therapies currently in clinical studies for SSc might affect myeloid cell-related pathways. Therefore, myeloid cells might be used as cellular biomarkers of disease through the application of high-dimensional techniques such as mass cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing.

Emerging targets of disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) has the highest cause-specific mortality of all the connective tissue diseases, and the aetiology of this complex and heterogeneous condition remains an enigma. Current disease-modifying therapies for SSc predominantly target inflammatory and vascular pathways but have variable and unpredictable clinical efficacy, and none is curative. Moreover, many of these therapies possess undesirable safety profiles and have no appreciable effect on long-term mortality. This Review describes the most promising of the existing therapeutic targets for SSc and places them in the context of our evolving understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease. As well as taking an in-depth look at the immune, inflammatory, vascular and fibrotic pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of SSc, this Review discusses emerging treatment targets and therapeutic strategies. The article concludes with an overview of important unanswered questions in SSc research that might inform the design of future studies of treatments aimed at modifying the course of this disease.

Systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis is a complex autoimmune connective tissue disease which carries a significant burden of disease-related morbidity including potentially life-threatening complications. Systemic sclerosis can affect all the major organs and therefore, although the disease is uncommon, many hospital-based specialists are involved in patient care. Vascular disease (e.g. Raynaud's phenomenon) is an almost universal symptom in patients with systemic sclerosis and is often the earliest manifestation of the disease. Systemic sclerosis not uncommonly can overlap with other rheumatological conditions (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis and myositis). During the past few decades there have been major advances in understanding the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis and these are driving advances in treatment. There are now a number of effective treatments to manage many of the different organ-based complications. Autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potential treatment option in highly selected patients. This review updates the clinician about epidemiology, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, the wide clinical spectrum of disease, and current and emerging treatments for systemic sclerosis.

Novel insights into dendritic cells in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe autoimmune fibrotic disease characterized by fibrosis, vasculopathy, and immune dysregulation. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells, specialized in pathogen sensing, with high capacity to shape the immune responses. The most recent technological advances have allowed the discovery of new DC subsets with potential implications in inflammatory conditions. Alterations of DC distribution in circulation and affected tissue as well as impaired DC function have been described in SSc patients, pointing towards a crucial role of these cells in SSc pathogenesis. In particular, recent studies have shown the importance of plasmacytoid DCs either by their high capacity to produce type I interferon or other inflammatory mediators implicated in SSc pathology, such as chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 4 (CXCL4). In-vivo models of SSc have been vital to clarify the implications of DCs in this disease, especially DCs depletion and specific gene knock-down studies. This review provides these new insights into the contribution of the different DCs subsets in the pathogenesis of SSc, as well as to the novel developments on DCs in in-vivo models of SSc and the potential use of DCs and their mediators as therapeutic targets.

Serotonin: A Potent Immune Cell Modulator in Autoimmune Diseases

Serotonin, also known as 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is a signaling mediator that regulates emotion, behavior, and cognition. Previous studies have focused more on the roles of 5-HT in the central nervous system (CNS). However, 5-HT also shares a strong relationship with the pathological cases of tumor, inflammation, and pathogen infection. 5-HT participates in tumor cell migration, metastatic dissemination, and angiogenesis. In addition, 5-HT affects immune regulation via different 5-HT receptors (5-HTRs) expressed immune cells, including both innate and adaptive immune system. Recently, drugs targeting at 5-HT signaling were tested to be beneficial in mouse models and clinical trials of multiple sclerosis (MS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Thus, it is reasonable to assume that 5-HT participates in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. However, the underlying mechanism by 5-HT modulates the development of autoimmune diseases has not been fully understood. Based on our previous studies and pertinent literature, we provide circumstantial evidence for an essential role of 5-HT, especially the regulation of 5-HT on immune cells in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, which may provide a new point cut for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Chronic inflammatory diseases, myocardial function and cardioprotection

The association between chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk is well documented and can be a most threatening complication in these patients. However, the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying increased CV risk remain elusive, especially in their cellular and biochemical pathways. Using animal models to understand mechanisms underlying cardiac involvement are limited. Additionally, treatments may influence cardiovascular events through different outcomes. Some drugs used to treat CIDs can negatively affect cardiac function by a direct toxicity, whereas others may protect the myocardium. In the present article, we focus on the cardiac manifestations and risk factors, the pathogenetic mechanisms, and the effect of treatments on myocardial function and cardioprotection for five common worldwide CIDs (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease). We also give recommendations in order to evaluate common targets between CID and CV disease (CVD) and to design therapies to alleviate CID-related CVD. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on Risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications in cardioprotection. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.23/issuetoc.

Current and Emerging Drug Therapies for Connective Tissue Disease-Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD)

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) can be associated with all connective tissue diseases and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The management of connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is challenging due substantial heterogeneity in disease behaviour and paucity of controlled clinical trials to guide treating clinicians. Not all patients require treatment, and the decision to treat needs to be individualised based on a patient's observed disease behaviour, baseline and longitudinal lung function measurements, extent of lung involvement on radiology and patient factors including age, co-morbidities and personal preference. If indicated, treatment of the CTD-ILD is largely with immunomodulation, with the aim to prevent progression of the ILD before further irreversible lung injury and disability occurs. Corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine are the most common immunosuppressive agents currently used to treat CTD-ILD, demonstrating stability of lung function in case series and a small number of randomised controlled trials in ILD associated with systemic sclerosis. Biological and non-biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and the anti-fibrotics nintedanib and pirfenidone, have revolutionised the treatment of connective tissue diseases and idiopathic ILD, respectively. Furthermore, anti-fibrotics have recently demonstrated safety and efficacy in ILD associated with systemic sclerosis. There remains a critical unmet need to clarify when and in whom to initiate treatment, and which agent(s) to utilise to achieve optimal outcomes for CTD-ILD patients whilst minimising harms through prospective multicentre trials. This review highlights the challenges faced when treating patients with CTD-ILD and summarises available evidence for current, emerging and novel therapies.

Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease Related to Connective Tissue Diseases. A Narrative Review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious pulmonary complications of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and it is characterized by a deep impact on morbidity and mortality. Due to the poor knowledge of CTD-ILD’s natural history and due to the difficulties related to design of randomized control trials, there is a lack of prospective data about the prevalence, follow-up, and therapeutic efficacy. For these reasons, the choice of therapy for CTD-ILD is currently very challenging and still largely based on experts’ opinion. Treatment is often based on steroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, but the recent publication of the encouraging results of the INBUILD trial has highlighted a possible effective and safe use of antifibrotic drugs as a new therapeutic option for these subjects. Aim of this review is to summarize the available data and recent advances about therapeutic strategies for ILD in the context of various CTD, such as systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease and undifferentiated connective tissue disease, and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features, focusing also on ongoing clinical trials.

The identification and management of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: evidence-based European consensus statements

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) carries a high mortality risk; expert guidance is required to aid early recognition and treatment. We aimed to develop the first expert consensus and define an algorithm for the identification and management of the condition through application of well established methods.

METHODS

Evidence-based consensus statements for systemic sclerosis-associated ILD management were established for six domains (ie, risk factors, screening, diagnosis and severity assessment, treatment initiation and options, disease progression, and treatment escalation) using a modified Delphi process based on a systematic literature analysis. A panel of 27 Europe-based pulmonologists, rheumatologists, and internists with expertise in systemic sclerosis-associated ILD participated in three rounds of online surveys, a face-to-face discussion, and a WebEx meeting, followed by two supplemental Delphi rounds, to establish consensus and define a management algorithm. Consensus was considered achieved if at least 80% of panellists indicated agreement or disagreement.

FINDINGS

Between July 1, 2018, and Aug 27, 2019, consensus agreement was reached for 52 primary statements and six supplemental statements across six domains of management, and an algorithm was defined for clinical practice use. The agreed statements most important for clinical use included: all patients with systemic sclerosis should be screened for systemic sclerosis-associated ILD using high-resolution CT; high-resolution CT is the primary tool for diagnosing ILD in systemic sclerosis; pulmonary function tests support screening and diagnosis; systemic sclerosis-associated ILD severity should be measured with more than one indicator; it is appropriate to treat all severe cases; no pharmacological treatment is an option for some patients; follow-up assessments enable identification of disease progression; progression pace, alongside disease severity, drives decisions to escalate treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Through a robust modified Delphi process developed by a diverse panel of experts, the first evidence-based consensus statements were established on guidance for the identification and medical management of systemic sclerosis-associated ILD.

FUNDING

An unrestricted grant from Boehringer Ingelheim International.

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis is a multi-organ autoimmune disease characterized by vasculopathy and fibrosis, and it is arguably the most devastating of the rheumatological diseases. The gastrointestinal tract is the most commonly involved internal organ in systemic sclerosis. Gastrointestinal tract involvement is reported in up to 90% of SSc patients, is the leading cause of morbidity, and is the third most common cause of mortality in this disease. Among all gastrointestinal tract manifestations, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is one manifestation that may be ameliorated and even eradicated with appropriate treatment, if recognized early. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth occurs with a prevalence of approximately 39% in systemic sclerosis and presents with a range of non-specific gastrointestinal tract symptoms, including diarrhea, flatulence, abdominal pain, bloating, and early satiety. These manifestations occur due to an alteration and overgrowth of small intestinal bacteria occurring in the setting of gastrointestinal tract dysmotility and slow transit time. The clinical diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is commonly based on the presence of characteristic clinical symptoms together with a positive hydrogen breath test and response to a therapeutic trial of oral antibiotics used sequentially. Almost two-thirds of systemic sclerosis patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth have an improvement in their gastrointestinal tract symptoms with rotating antibiotics. Untreated small intestinal bacterial overgrowth can lead to malnutrition, and thus an important aspect of treatment is the identification and treatment of any associated vitamin and mineral deficiencies. This article focuses on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, an important and understudied area in systemic sclerosis that remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for both patients and clinicians alike.

Ongoing clinical trials and treatment options for patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

SSc is a rare CTD that affects multiple organ systems, resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is seen in ∼80% of patients with SSc. Currently there is no approved disease-modifying treatment for ILD and few effective treatment options are available. CYC is included in treatment guidelines, but it has limited efficacy and is associated with toxicity. MMF is becoming the most commonly used medication in clinical practice in North America and the UK, but its use is not universal. Newer agents targeting the pathogenic mechanisms underlying SSc-ILD, including fibrotic and inflammatory pathways, lymphocytes, cell-cell and cell-extracellular membrane interactions, hold promise for better treatment outcomes, including improved lung function, patient-related outcomes and quality of life. Here we review ongoing trials of established and novel agents that are currently recruiting patients with SSc-ILD.

Raynaud's phenomenon

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is common, affecting approximately 5% of the population, and is important to the rheumatologist because it is often the presenting symptom of connective tissue disease, especially of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-spectrum disorders. RP therefore provides a window of opportunity for early diagnosis. When RP is associated with SSc it is particularly challenging to treat. This review begins with a discussion of some of the recent advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of RP: it is through increased understanding of the complex pathophysiology of RP that we are most likely to develop new therapies. The following questions are then addressed (with three clinical scenarios demonstrating key principles of assessment and management): 1. How can we predict underlying connective tissue disease in the patient presenting with Raynaud's? 2. How can we measure severity of Raynaud's? 3. What are the latest advances in treatment of connective tissue disease-related digital vasculopathy?

Systemic sclerosis: Advances towards stratified medicine

Epidemiological studies reporting demographic, clinical and serological factors predictive of various outcomes in systemic sclerosis (SSc) range from the prediction of mortality to the development and progression of disease manifestations. However, predicting the disease trajectory in the individual patient is a challenging but important step towards a stratified approach to disease management. Recent technological advances provide the opportunity for new subgroupings of disease based on risk stratification, through the systematic analysis of high-dimensional clinical data combined with genes, their transcription products and their corresponding translated proteins. In addition, these variables offer a rich vein of research to identify non-invasive biomarkers for predicting organ involvement and to assess disease activity and response to therapy. Selection of patients with a clinical phenotype or molecular signature relevant to the therapy under study combined with recent efforts to standardise outcome measures, show promise for improving clinical trial design and the identification of effective targeted therapies.

Abatacept in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis: Results of a Phase II Investigator-Initiated, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

T cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of early systemic sclerosis. This study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc).

METHODS

In this 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg or matching placebo, stratified by duration of dcSSc. Escape therapy was allowed at 6 months for worsening disease. The coprimary end points were change in the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) compared to baseline and safety over 12 months. Differences in longitudinal outcomes were assessed according to treatment using linear mixed models, with outcomes censored after initiation of escape therapy. Skin tissue obtained from participants at baseline was classified into intrinsic gene expression subsets.

RESULTS

Among 88 participants, the adjusted mean change in the MRSS at 12 months was -6.24 units for those receiving abatacept and -4.49 units for those receiving placebo, with an adjusted mean treatment difference of -1.75 units (P = 0.28). Outcomes for 2 secondary measures (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index and a composite measure) were clinically and statistically significantly better with abatacept. The proportion of subjects in whom escape therapy was needed was higher in the placebo group relative to the abatacept group (36% versus 16%). In the inflammatory and normal-like skin gene expression subsets, decline in the MRSS over 12 months was clinically and significantly greater in the abatacept group versus the placebo group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the abatacept group, adverse events occurred in 35 participants versus 40 participants in the placebo group, including 2 deaths and 1 death, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this phase II trial, abatacept was well-tolerated, but change in the MRSS was not statistically significant. Secondary outcome measures, including gene expression subsets, showed evidence in support of abatacept. These data should be confirmed in a phase III trial.