Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients

Update on recent clinical trials in congestive heart failure

Understanding of the pathophysiology of heart failure has advanced over the last decade, resulting in new therapeutic advances. Convincing data exist that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and adrenergic blockade are the most important therapies and have the capacity to improve survival and lower morbidity. Higher doses of both ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers appear to provide additional benefits. The aldosterone antagonist spironolactone, when used in severe heart failure, provides additional survival advantage when added to standard triple therapy. Angiotensin receptor blockers have not been shown to be superior to ACE inhibitors, and their role in heart failure treatment requires further investigation. No trial's data support the use of inotropic agents or calcium channel blockers in heart failure. A number of new therapeutic agents, including vasopressin antagonists and tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor antibody are in phase II and III clinical trials. If proved beneficial, they may provide new treatment options for patients with heart failure. Nevertheless, the current challenge is to increase the use of proven therapies, namely ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, to improve outcomes in the rapidly growing population of patients with congestive heart failure.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy for coronary heart disease

Medical therapy reduces myocardial infarction and death in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). In contrast, there is little evidence available to evaluate the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on hard endpoints in such patients. Four randomized, controlled trials have compared PCI with medical therapy. These studies have demonstrated that PCI results in an improvement in angina and exercise tolerance compared with medical therapy, but they also suggest that medical therapy may be preferable to PCI with respect to the risk of cardiac events. Interpretation of these studies has been limited by small sample size, exclusion of high-risk subjects, no or reduced use of stents, lack of a cost- effectiveness evaluation, and absence of risk factor intervention (except for Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment, which used aggressive low-density lipoprotein lowering with atorvastatin in the medical group only). The Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial will permit better definition of the role of PCI in the treatment of stable or recently stabilized patients with CHD.

Apoptosis in the vasculature: mechanisms and functional importance

Apoptotic death has now been recognized in a number of common and threatening vascular diseases, including atherosclerosis. Interest in apoptosis research relates to the fact that apoptosis, in contrast to oncosis, is a highly regulated process of cell death which raises the hope for the development of specific therapeutic strategies to alter disease progression. This review summarizes the mechanisms involved in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell survival/apoptosis, and the potential roles of apoptotic death in atherosclerosis and restenosis. The potential effects of modulation of apoptosis in these diseases are also discussed.

Endothelial function as a therapeutic target in coronary artery disease

In healthy individuals, endothelial cells regulate a host of functions including vasomotor tone, thrombosis/ fibrinolysis, and cell-cell interactions. The development of endothelial dysfunction may be a common pathway by which cardiovascular risk factors impact plaque formation, growth, and rupture. Many pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions known to decrease cardiovascular risk also improve endothelial function. For these reasons, some have suggested that improvement in endothelial function may be an important therapeutic target in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Cardiac complications of end-stage renal disease

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients receiving dialysis. This is attributed in part to the shared risk factors of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease. The risk factors for coronary artery disease include the classic cardiac risk factors of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking. Also in this population, hyperparathyroidism, hypoalbuminemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, elevated levels of apolipoprotein (a), and the type of dialysis membrane may play a role. Management begins with risk factor modification and medical therapy including aspirin, beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and lipid-lowering agents. Revascularization is often important, and coronary artery bypass grafting appears to be preferable to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. This is especially true for those with multivessel disease, impaired left ventricular function, severe symptoms, or ischemia. Congestive heart failure is another common problem in dialysis patients. The management includes correction of underlying abnormalities, optimal dialysis, and medical therapy. Data obtained from the general population indicate obvious benefits from ACE inhibitors and beta blockers, and these agents would be considered the therapies of choice. Erythropoetin is also an essential component of therapy, but the ideal hemoglobin concentration has yet to be determined. Peritoneal dialysis may be helpful in severe cases of heart failure. Pericarditis is seen in less than 10% of dialysis patients and is best diagnosed by clinical examination and echocardiography. Intensive dialysis is often the best initial therapy. Pericardiocentesis is reserved for the setting of pericardial tamponade, but a pericardial window is more definitive.

Late-onset heart failure as a mechanism for adverse long-term outcome in diabetic patients undergoing revascularization (a 13-year report from the Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center registry)

The adverse long-term prognosis following myocardial revascularization in diabetic patients has been ascribed to accelerated coronary disease, a higher incidence of late coronary restenosis after revascularization, and myocardial dysfunction. To examine the development of heart failure and its prognostic implications in diabetic patients, we analyzed the long-term (13-year) follow-up data of 363 patients-193 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties and 170 coronary artery bypass operations-revascularized in a single cardiovascular center from 1984 to 1986. Baseline characteristics (age, previous infarction, baseline ventricular function) were similar in the 80 diabetic and 283 nondiabetic patients; multivessel disease and hypertension were marginally more common in diabetics (p = NS). Cumulative incidence of hospitalization for heart failure was high in the diabetic cohort (25% vs 11%, p = 0.001), with a rapidly increasing incidence after 5 years. Survival after first hospitalization for heart failure was markedly reduced in diabetics (11 of 20 [55%] vs 25 of 31 [81%] at 3 years; p = 0.04), as was survival free of further hospitalization for heart failure (5 of 20 [25%] vs 20 of 30 [63%]; p <0.005). Long-term 13-year survival (43% vs 78%, p <0.0001) and survival free of heart failure (33% vs 71%, p <0.0001) were decreased in diabetics, especially those with reduced ventricular function at baseline (17% vs 42%, p = 0.07). Multivariate analysis showed diabetes to be the strongest independent predictor of decreased survival (odds ratio 3. 6, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 6.2; p <0.0001) and survival free of heart failure (odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 7. 1; p <0.0001) in patients undergoing revascularization. In summary, late-onset heart failure was frequent in diabetic patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting, and once present heralded an unrelenting progressive downhill clinical course.

Joint National Committee VI: individualized versus indiscriminate therapy for hypertension

The treatment of hypertension has progressed from a few nontoxic choices to the close to 60 individual drugs listed in the recommendations of the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI). Many combination drugs are also listed for use. The JNC documents have suggested initial therapy with diuretic or beta-blocker since 1993. Practitioners have followed these suggestions or not followed them on the basis of their personal bias. Since the 1997 JNC VI report, several studies that seem to support an individualistic approach to treatment have been reported. This is an exciting time in hypertension research. Clinicians who treat this common disorder will continue to line up as indiscriminate or individualistic prescribers, depending on their interpretation of the available data. We expect the hypertensive patient to be the winner of this increased attention.

Role of the sympathetic nervous system in human renovascular hypertension

The findings in humans as to whether elevated sympathetic nerve activity contributes to renovascular hypertension have been less consistent compared with the results obtained in experimental models of renovascular hypertension. Collectively, there are several lines of evidence to support the view that sympathetic nerve activity is elevated in patients with renovascular hypertension. It is uncertain, however, whether this adrenergic overactivity is specific for renovascular hypertension per se, or the cause of severe hypertension with target organ damage. Central or peripheral stimulation of sympathetic nerve activity by angiotensin II, or stimulation of central sympathetic outflow via afferent renal nerves of ischemic kidneys, are possible mechanisms to explain the elevated sympathetic nerve activity in renovascular hypertension. Therapy that diminishes the activity of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system seems rational and could perhaps also improve the poor prognosis for these patients.

Is there a preferred antihypertensive therapy for isolated systolic hypertension and reduced arterial compliance?

Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is the most common type of hypertension and the most difficult type to control with antihypertensive therapy. ISH, by definition, is wide pulse pressure hypertension resulting largely from excessive large artery stiffness and representing an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the older aged population. Two major intervention studies of ISH have shown significant benefit in reducing systolic blood pressure with active drug therapy, including thiazide diuretics and calcium receptor antagonists. The optimal treatment strategy is to maximize reduction in systolic blood pressure and to minimize reduction in diastolic blood pressure, thereby reducing pulse pressure. All classes of antihypertensive drugs reduce pulse pressure by means of lowering peripheral resistance, but certain drugs like nitrates, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and other drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin system have multiple actions that improve large artery stiffness and early wave reflection and are especially useful in treating ISH in the elderly.

Diastolic pressure, systolic pressure, or pulse pressure?

Diastolic pressure, systolic pressure, and pulse pressure have all been assigned the role of the best predictor of cardiovascular events during the 20th century. At the dawn of the new millennium, concepts that draw attention to vascular mechanics reconcile the seemingly conflicting results of epidemiologic studies, better define the hypertensive patient, evaluate more accurately the risk and set its markers, and ultimately optimize treatment through a logical approach that aims at the mechanism and not at the manifestation. Pulse wave analysis and measurement of arterial stiffness are valuable tools in the assessment and management of the hypertensive patient.

Effects of antihypertensive therapy on hypertensive vascular disease

Hypertension is associated with alterations in the structure, function, and mechanical properties of large and small arteries. Changes in the endothelium, smooth muscle cell, extracellular matrix, and possibly the adventitia, contribute to complications of hypertension. In large arteries, vascular hypertrophy is found, often with increased stiffness of media components. In small arteries, particularly in mild hypertension, rearrangement of smooth muscle cells around a smaller lumen without changes in media volume (eutrophic remodeling) occurs; in more severe hypertension, hypertrophic remodeling with increased vascular stiffness can be found. Vascular remodeling is accompanied by an increase in the extracellular matrix, particularly collagen deposition. Recent studies have demonstrated that vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction of small and large vessels may be normalized by treatment with some antihypertensive agents (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonists, and long-acting calcium channel blockers). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have now been shown to improve outcomes in hypertensive patients, an effect that may in part be related to the vascular protective effects reviewed here.

Physiology and pathophysiology of the adipose tissue renin-angiotensin system

The renin-angiotensin system has long been recognized as an important regulator of systemic blood pressure and renal electrolyte homeostasis, and local renin-angiotensin systems have also been implicated in pathological changes of organ structure and function by modulation of gene expression, growth, fibrosis, and inflammatory response. Recently, substantial data have been accumulated in support of the notion that adipose tissue, besides other endocrine functions, also hosts a local renin-angiotensin system. In the first part of this review, we describe the components of the adipose tissue renin-angiotensin system in human and rodent animal models with respect to regulation of angiotensinogen expression and secretion, formation of angiotensin peptides, and the existence of angiotensin II receptors. In the second part, we describe the role of the adipose tissue renin-angiotensin system in the process of adipogenic differentiation and in the regulation of body weight. We also detail the differential regulation of the adipose tissue renin-angiotensin system in obesity and hypertension and thereby also speculate on its possible role in the development of obesity-associated hypertension. Although some findings on the adipose tissue renin-angiotensin system appear to be confusing, its involvement in the physiology and pathophysiology of adipose tissue has been confirmed by several functional studies. Nevertheless, future studies with more carefully described phenotypes are necessary to conclude whether obesity (by stimulation of adipogenic differentiation) and hypertension are associated with changes of renin-angiotensin system activity in adipose tissue. If so, the physiological relevance of this system in animal models and humans may warrant further interest.

Combination of non-hypotensive doses of valsartan and enalapril improves survival of spontaneously hypertensive rats with endothelial dysfunction

There is increasing evidence to suggest endothelial dysfunction as a critical factor in vascular diseases. Genetically predisposed spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) treated with inhibitors of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, develop a severe hypertensive nephrosclerosis without the necessity for surgical reduction in renal mass, nephrectomy, renal infarction or nephrotoxic drugs. In these animals, endothelial dysfunction is considered a valid model for assessment of the efficacy of cardiovascular therapy. SHR were treated with either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or the angiotensin II (Ang II) AT(1)-receptor antagonist (AIIA) valsartan at sub-hypotensive doses and the effects on survival rates, cardiac and renal changes were monitored. Rats treated with valsartan, alone or in combination with enalapril, showed markedly higher survival rates (67-85%, respectively) than untreated animals (37%) or those treated with enalapril alone (55%). Valsartan at a dose which attenuated blood pressure increase led to even greater survival rates (95%). Despite these improved survival rates, at non-hypotensive doses the drugs had no effect on histological appearance, nor was kidney function improved. Plasma creatinine levels were reduced by valsartan, alone or in combination with enalapril, but proteinuria persisted with all treatments over the 12 weeks of the study. Aldosterone levels were significantly reduced by all treatments. The results suggest a beneficial role for endothelium in hypertension. Reduced renal perfusion pressure probably underlies the beneficial renal effects of high-dose valsartan.

Replacement of the transmembrane anchor in angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol tail affects activation of the B2 bradykinin receptor by ACE inhibitors

To investigate further the relationship of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to activation of the B(2) bradykinin (BK) receptor, we transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells to stably express the human receptor and either wild-type ACE (WT-ACE), an ACE construct with most of the cytosolic portion deleted (Cyt-del-ACE), or ACE with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor replacing the transmembrane and cytosolic domains (GPI-ACE). BK or its ACE-resistant analogue were the agonists. All activities (arachidonic acid release and calcium mobilization) were blocked by the B(2) antagonist HOE 140. B(2) was desensitized by repeated administration of BK but resensitized to agonist by ACE inhibitors in the cells expressing both B(2) and either WT-ACE or Cyt-del-ACE. In GPI-ACE expressing cells, the B(2) receptor was still activated by the agonists, but ACE inhibitors did not resensitize. Pretreatment with filipin returned the sensitivity to inhibitors. In immunocytochemistry, GPI-ACE showed patchy, uneven distribution on the plasma membrane that was restored by filipin. Thus, ACE inhibitors were inactive as long as GPI-ACE was sequestered in cholesterol-rich membrane domains. WT-ACE and B(2) receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells co-immunoprecipitated with antibody to receptor, suggesting an interaction on the cell membrane. ACE inhibitors augment BK effects on receptors indirectly only when enzyme and receptor molecules are sterically close, possibly forming a heterodimer.

Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data from individual patients. ACE-Inhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

We undertook a prospective systematic overview based on data from individual patients from five long-term randomised trials that assessed inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction or heart failure.

METHODS

Three of the trials enrolled patients within a week after acute myocardial infarction. Data were combined by use of the Peto-Yusuf method.

FINDINGS

Overall 12,763 patients were randomly assigned treatment or placebo and followed up for an average of 35 months. In the three post-infarction trials (n=5,966), mortality was lower with ACE inhibitors than with placebo (702/2995 [23.4%] vs 866/2971 [29.1%]; odds ratio 0.74 [95% CI 0.66-0-83]), as were the rates of readmission for heart failure (355 [11.9%] vs 460 [15.5%]; 0.73 [0.63-0.85]), reinfarction (324 [10.8%] vs 391 [13.2%]; 0.80 [0.69-0.94]), or the composite of these events (1049 [35.0%] vs 1244 [41.9%]; 0.75 [0.67-0.83]; all p<O.001). For all five trials the ACE inhibitor group had lower rates of death than the placebo group (1,467/6,391 [23.0%] vs 1,710/6,372 [26.8%]; 0.80 [0.74-0.87]) and lower rates of reinfarction (571 [8.9%] vs 703 [11.0%]; 0.79 [0.70-0.89]), readmission for heart failure (876 [13.7%] vs 1202 [18.9%]; 0.67 [0.61-0.74]), and the composite of these events (2161 [33.8%] vs 2610 [41.0%]; 0.72 [0.67-0.78]; all p<0.0001). The benefits were observed early after the start of therapy and persisted long term. The benefits of treatment on all outcomes were independent of age, sex, and baseline use of diuretics, aspirin, and beta-blockers. Although there was a trend towards greater reduction in risk of death or readmission for heart failure in patients with lower ejection fractions, benefit was apparent over the range examined.

Perspectives on cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Allograft arteriopathy, the slowly progressive, diffuse, atherosclerosis noted often after heart transplant, and also called chronic rejection, is the most common cause of late cardiac graft failure and patient death. The process is multifactorial, rooted in both immune and nonimmune factors that can be coupled to passenger atherosclerosis moved with the donor heart, as well as initially nondiseased endothelium. Great insight has emerged from experimental models and intravascular ultrasound study of patients, but treatments are still crude and produce less than optimal results. Nonetheless, it has been demonstrated that diltiazem, pravastatin, ganciclovir, newer immunosuppressive agents, and photophoresis may be helpful. In the future, better control of the allograft immunologic response will likely be the key to attenuating development of this form of atherosclerosis.

Large multicentre hypertension trials

The earlier large multicentre trials in hypertensive patients addressed questions of whether mild to moderate hypertension should be treated and whether similar approaches would be effective in elderly hypertensive patients or those with isolated systolic hypertension. The research focus of recent trials has now shifted to how rather than whether such patients should be treated. Trials such as the Hypertension Optimal Treatment study attempted to discern optimal targets for long-term blood pressure control. Although unsuccessful in this primary aim, they have established the safety of aggressive blood pressure lowering to diastolic targets of less than 80 mmHg as well as the safety and efficacy of a calcium entry blocker as a first line antihypertensive approach. The Captopril Prevention Project study and Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 trial focussed on whether there might be specific antiatherosclerotic advantages of the newer agents (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium entry blockers) over conventional therapy in comparison studies with beta blockers and diuretics. Similar efficacy for cardiovascular outcomes appears to be emerging for each of the major classes of drugs with the degree of blood pressure lowering of prime importance in cardiovascular disease prevention.

Renoprotective benefits of RAS inhibition: from ACEI to angiotensin II antagonists

In landmark clinical trials, pharmacological inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) attenuated the decline in renal function associated with chronic renal disease (CRD). Hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) attest to its central role in the pathogenesis of CRD. Angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonists (AT1RA) differ from ACEI in their effects on the RAS and on bradykinin metabolism. Elevations in bradykinin levels associated with ACEI and stimulation of angiotensin subtype 2 receptors resulting from AT1RA may produce therapeutic effects unique to each class of drug. Nevertheless, in animal models of CRD, ACEI and AT1RA exert equivalent renoprotection, implying that their renoprotective effects result primarily from inhibition of Ang II-mediated stimulation of angiotensin subtype 1 receptors. Clinical data comparing ACEI and AT1RA therapy in renal disease are limited to short-term studies, which indicate that AT1RAs have equivalent effects to ACEI on the major determinants of CRD progression, namely blood pressure and proteinuria. AT1RAs were well tolerated, with side-effect profiles similar to placebo. Taken together, available evidence suggests that AT1RAs will share the renoprotective properties of ACEI in human CRD. Nevertheless, the results of long-term clinical trials are required before AT1RA can be recommended as an alternative to ACEI in renoprotective therapy.

Oxidative stress in congestive heart failure

Heart failure is considered to be a complex clinical syndrome, with alterations in the multiple neurohumoral systems and subcellular cardiac sites that correlate with abnormal cardiac function. Strong evidence for the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of heart failure has been provided by studies on experimental animals as well as humans. This concept is gaining more acceptance due to the fact that during heart failure, changes in different neurohormones, cytokines, nitric oxide, and activated inflammatory cells are closely linked to oxidative stress at the cellular and molecular levels. The present article provides a simple description of oxygen free radicals as well as the antioxidant defense system. Evidence for the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of heart failure is reviewed in a concise manner.

Postmenopausal hypertension

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women and claims the lives of more than half a million women every year. Hypertension is one of the most prevalent and powerful contributors to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Hypertension affects more men than women until 55 years of age, but after age 55, the percentage of women is higher. Estrogen deficiency has been linked to the rapid increase in cardiovascular disease in women who have undergone natural or surgical menopause. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been shown to decrease the incidence of cardiovascular disease and, in some studies, to reduce blood pressure in postmenopausal women. However, little information is available on the effects of HRT on blood pressure in hypertensive postmenopausal patients. The cardioprotective effects of estrogens are not completely understood but may involve direct effects on blood vessels through modulation of endogenous vasoconstrictors and vasodilators and through reductions in serum lipoprotein and cholesterol levels. Experimental evidence suggests that estrogen increases the biological actions of nitric oxide and decreases the actions of angiotensin. After menopause, loss of the vascular protective effects of estrogens may unmask a population of women particularly prone to hypertension who would be at higher risk for cardiovascular disease.

Post-hospitalization management of high-risk coronary patients

The major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with coronary atherosclerosis is plaque rupture, which often results in one of the acute coronary syndromes: unstable angina, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), or Q-wave MI. Plaque rupture may be attributable to the thickness of the overlying fibrous cap; thinner plaques are more likely to rupture. It appears that the presence of inflammation is a significant contributor to rupture. Acute-phase treatments are highly efficacious, but secondary prevention, often overlooked, also is life-saving. Diet, exercise, and medications are the interventions available for secondary prevention. Four classes of medications--aspirin, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins)--are also used in this setting with a high degree of success in reducing mortality and morbidity. Numerous studies have demonstrated a 30-50% reduction in mortality with aspirin. The reduction in mortality achieved with beta blockers in studies of patients after myocardial infarction are 15-50%. ACE inhibitors significantly reduce the risk of death from myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease with or without myocardial infarction. Statins are beneficial even in patients whose cholesterol level is low to normal. Patients who were discharged on a statin showed a 50% reduction in mortality over those who did not receive statin therapy independent of lipid level. C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, is predictive of mortality, as are age and ejection fraction. Statins may be anti-inflammatory in addition to their lipid-lowering effect. Secondary-prevention strategies such as case management, electronic discharge prompting, better communication between referring physicians and cardiologists, and patient education may also have positive effects on after-discharge morbidity and mortality.