Impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability on the pattern of metastatic spread and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer

Mismatch repair status and BRAF mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS studies

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence and prognostic value of mismatch repair (MMR) status and its relation to BRAF mutation (BRAF(MT)) status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A pooled analysis of four phase III studies in first-line treatment of mCRC (CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS) was performed. Primary outcome parameter was the hazard ratio (HR) for median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to MMR and BRAF. For the pooled analysis, Cox regression analysis was performed on individual patient data.

RESULTS

The primary tumors of 3,063 patients were analyzed, of which 153 (5.0%) exhibited deficient MMR (dMMR) and 250 (8.2%) a BRAF(MT). BRAF(MT) was observed in 53 (34.6%) of patients with dMMR tumors compared with 197 (6.8%) of patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) tumors (P < 0.001). In the pooled dataset, median PFS and OS were significantly worse for patients with dMMR compared with pMMR tumors [HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-1.57 and HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.61, respectively), and for patients with BRAF(MT) compared with BRAF wild-type (BRAF(WT)) tumors (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.17-1.54 and HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.66-2.19, respectively). PFS and OS were significantly decreased for patients with BRAF(MT) within the group of patients with pMMR, but not for BRAF status within dMMR, or MMR status within BRAF(WT) or BRAF(MT).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of dMMR and BRAF(MT) in patients with mCRC is low and both biomarkers confer an inferior prognosis. Our data suggest that the poor prognosis of dMMR is driven by the BRAF(MT) status.

Targeting BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: clinical implications and emerging therapeutic strategies

Increasing knowledge of the underlying signaling pathways and molecular defects involved in colorectal cancer growth or progression enabled the discovery of several prognostic and predictive biomarkers, leading to the development of novel molecularly targeted therapies. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway plays a critical role in colorectal cancer progression. Mutations in BRAF, a principal effector of Ras in this signaling cascade, are found in 10 % of colorectal cancer and play a clear pathogenic role, particularly in patients with metastatic disease. Intense efforts have therefore focused on targeting BRAF as an oncogenic driver, with mixed early results. This article summarizes the molecular and clinical features of BRAF mutant colorectal cancer, the prognostic and predictive role of BRAFV600E mutation in colorectal cancer, initial clinical trial results in targeting BRAFV600E, and the more recent preclinical insights into potential mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibition that have now led to a number of rationale-driven combination therapeutic strategies.

Postoperative complications after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy affect long-term outcome of patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: a two-center study of 101 patients

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an effective but potentially morbid treatment for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases. The impact of treatment-related morbidity on long-term survival has been reported in various malignancies, but it has never been assessed in this clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of major postoperative complications on oncological outcomes after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases.

DESIGN

Two prospective databases were reviewed. Major complications were defined as grade 3 to 5 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The extent of peritoneal involvement was scored by the use of the Peritoneal Cancer Index.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in 2 high-volume peritoneal malignancy management centers.

PATIENTS

One hundred one consecutive patients with peritoneal metastases potentially amenable to macroscopically complete cytoreduction were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Peritonectomy procedures and multivisceral resections were used to remove all macroscopic tumor, and mitomycin-C plus cisplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was used to control microscopic residual disease.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were overall and disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

Mortality and major morbidity were 3.0%, and 23.8%. Median follow-up was 44.9 months (95% CI, 24.1-65.7). Five-year disease-specific survival was 14.3% for patients who experienced major complications and 52.3% for those who did not (p = 0.001). Five-year overall survival was 11.7% for patients who experienced major complications, and 58.8% for those who did not (p = 0.003). At multivariate analysis, major morbidity correlated to both worse overall and disease-specific survival, along with a Peritoneal Cancer Index >19, and suboptimal cytoreduction. Poor performance status correlated only to worse disease-specific survival, and liver metastases correlated to worse overall survival. Longer operative time (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.3-12.6; p = 0.01) and Peritoneal Cancer Index >19 (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.0; p = 0.02) were independent risk factors for major morbidity.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its observational design.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevention of major complications, by refining surgical technique and patient selection, is crucial because it affects oncologic outcome.

Progression-free survival remains poor over sequential lines of systemic therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

BRAF mutations occur in 5% to 10% of metastatic colorectal cancers and are biomarkers associated with a poor prognosis. However, the outcomes with standard chemotherapy over sequential lines of therapy in a large cohort of patients with BRAF-mutant tumors have not been described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center databases for patients with colorectal cancer and identified BRAF mutations between December 2003 and May 2012. Patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics, PFS, overall survival, and chemotherapeutic agents used. Survival was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among the 1567 patients tested for BRAF mutations at our institution, 127 (8.1%) had tumors with BRAF mutations. The 71 patients who presented with metastatic disease received a median of 2 lines of chemotherapy. For the first 3 lines of chemotherapy, median PFS was 6.3 months (n = 69 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-7.7 months), 2.5 months (n = 58 patients; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0 months), and 2.6 months (n = 31 patients; 95% CI, 1.0-4.2 months), respectively. Median PFS was not affected by the backbone chemotherapeutic agent in the first-line setting, whether oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based (6.4 months vs. 5.4 months, respectively; P = .99).

CONCLUSION

PFS is expectedly poor for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. Despite the ascertainment bias present (with testing preferentially performed in patients suitable for clinical trials in refractory disease), these data provide historic controls suitable for future study design and support the idea that novel therapeutic options are essential in this population.

Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer

NRAS mutations occur in 3-5% of colorectal cancer. Differently from KRAS and BRAF mutations, the role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been investigated to a lesser extent. A retrospective series suggested the role of NRAS mutations as predictors of resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in chemo-refractory patients with mCRC. In our study, KRAS codons 12, 13, 61 and BRAF codon 600 mutational status were evaluated in mCRCs referred to our Institution from 2009 to 2012. NRAS codons 12, 13 and 61 mutational status was analyzed in KRAS/BRAF wt patients. We collected pathological and clinical features in the overall population and outcome data in a subset of NRAS mutated chemo-refractory patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs in advanced lines. NRAS was mutated in 47/786 (6%) mCRCs. NRAS and KRAS mutated tumors did not show significant differences in terms of clinical and pathological characteristics, except for a lower prevalence of mucinous histology (p = 0.012) and lung metastases (p = 0.012) among NRAS mutated tumors. In the uni- and multivariate model, NRAS mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) compared to all wt patients (median OS 25.6 vs 42.7 months; univ: HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.39-3.86, p = 0.0013; multiv: HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.1.3-2.72, p = 0.013). None of the chemo-refractory NRAS mutated patients evaluable for response to anti-EGFRs achieved response. In conclusion, NRAS mutations have a relevant incidence in patients with mCRC and showed an association with specific clinical and pathological features. NRAS mutations affect mCRC patients' prognosis and predict lack of response to anti-EGFRs.

A mutant BRAF V600E-specific immunohistochemical assay: correlation with molecular mutation status and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer

The B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) V600E mutation is a well-established biomarker for poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and is a highly attractive drug target. A barrier to the development of new therapies targeting BRAF V600E in mCRC is the low prevalence of mutations (approximately 10 %) and the current need for access to sequencing-based technologies which are not routinely available outside of large cancer centres. Availability of a standardised immunohistochemistry (IHC) test, more suited to routine pathology practice, would provide much broader access to patient identification. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of a recently developed BRAF V600E IHC method as a prognostic biomarker in a large cohort of community-based CRC patients. Archival tumour samples from 505 patients with stage I–IV CRC were immunohistochemically tested with two antibodies, pBR1 for total BRAF and VE1 for BRAF V600E. Cases were assessed by two blinded pathologists, and results were compared to BRAF V600E mutation status determined using DNA sequencing. Discordant cases were retested with a BRAF V600E SNaPshot assay. BRAF mutation status was correlated with overall survival (OS) in stage IV CRC. By DNA sequencing and IHC, 505 and 477 patients were respectively evaluable. Out of 477 patients, 56 (11. 7 %) had BRAF V600E mutations detected by sequencing and 63 (13.2 %) by IHC. Using DNA sequencing results as the reference, sensitivity and specificity for IHC were 98.2 % (55/56) and 98.1 % (413/421), respectively. IHC had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.3 % (55/63) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8 % (413/414). Compared to DNA sequencing plus retesting of available discordant cases by SNaPshot assay, IHC using the VE1 antibody had a 100 % sensitivity (59/59), specificity (416/416), NPV (416/416) and PPV (59/59). Stage IV CRC patients with BRAF V600E protein detected by IHC exhibited a significantly shorter overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.20, 95 % CI 1.26–3.83, p = 0.005), consistent with other published series. Immunohistochemistry using the BRAF V600E VE1 antibody is an accurate diagnostic assay in CRC. The test provides a simple, clinically applicable method of testing for the BRAF V600E mutation in routine practice.

BRAF mutation predicts for poor outcomes after metastasectomy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

BRAF mutations occur in 5% to 11% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and have been associated with poor prognosis. The current study was undertaken to determine the clinicopathologic characteristics, PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha) mutation frequency, and outcomes after metastasectomy in patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC.

METHODS

Data from 1941 consecutive patients with mCRC who underwent KRAS/BRAF mutation testing between 2009 and 2012 at a single institution were identified to identify BRAF-mutant mCRC cases (92 cases). BRAF wild-type mCRC cases from 2011 (423 cases) served as a control group.

RESULTS

BRAF-mutated mCRC was found to be significantly associated with older age at diagnosis, female sex, right-sided location, poorly differentiated morphology, and mucinous histology compared with wild-type cases. BRAF-mutant cases more frequently progressed from stage III disease (32% vs 17%; P = .003) and among those patients with stage III disease, T4 disease was more common (48% vs 27%; P = .05). PIK3CA was found to be co-mutated in 5% of BRAF-mutant tumors versus 17% of KRAS-mutant tumors (P < .01) and 4% of BRAF/KRAS wild-type cases. Patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC presented more frequently with peritoneal involvement (26% vs 14%; P < 0.01) and less frequently with liver-limited metastases (41% vs 63%; P < .01). Patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC were less likely to undergo metastasectomy (41% vs 26% at 2 years from diagnosis of metastatic disease; P < .01) and were found to have lower overall survival (P < .01) after metastasectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF-mutant mCRC is associated with worse clinical outcome. Patients with BRAF-mutant tumors more commonly develop peritoneal metastases, less frequently present with disease limited to the liver, and have shorter survival after metastasectomy compared with patients with BRAF wild-type tumors.

BRAFV600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease with multiple underlying causative genetic mutations. The B-type Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) plays an important role in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade during CRC. The presence of BRAF^V600E mutation can determine the response of a tumor to chemotherapy. However, the association between the BRAF^V600E mutation and the clinicopathological features of CRC remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the effect of BRAF^V600E mutation on the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC.

Methods

We identified studies that examined the effect of BRAF^V600E mutation on CRC within the PubMed, ISI Science Citation Index, and Embase databases. The effect of BRAF^V600E on outcome parameters was estimated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each study using a fixed effects or random effects model.

Results

25 studies with a total of 11,955 CRC patients met inclusion criteria. The rate of BRAF^V600 was 10.8% (1288/11955). The BRAF^V600E mutation in CRC was associated with advanced TNM stage, poor differentiation, mucinous histology, microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). This mutation was also associated with female gender, older age, proximal colon, and mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that BRAF^V600E mutation was significantly correlated with adverse pathological features of CRC and distinct clinical characteristics. These data suggest that BRAF^V600E mutation could be used to supplement standard clinical and pathological staging for the better management of individual CRC patients, and could be considered as a poor prognostic marker for CRC.

Multicenter retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H)

BACKGROUND

The microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype, present in 15% of early colorectal cancer (CRC), confers good prognosis. MSI-H metastatic CRC is rare and its impact on outcomes is unknown. We describe survival outcomes and the impact of chemotherapy, metastatectomy, and BRAF V600E mutation status in the largest reported cohort of MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 55 MSI-H metastatic CRC patients from two institutions, Royal Melbourne Hospital (Australia) and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States), was conducted. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Median age was 67 years (20-90), 58% had poor differentiation, and 45% had stage IV disease at presentation. Median overall survival (OS) from metastatic disease was 15.4 months. Thirteen patients underwent R0/R1 metastatectomies, with median OS from metastatectomy 33.8 months. Thirty-one patients received first-line systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease with median OS from the start of chemotherapy 11.5 months. No statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or OS was seen between fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan based chemotherapy. BRAF V600E mutation was present in 14 of 47 patients (30%). BRAF V600E patients demonstrated significantly worse median OS; 10.1 versus 17.3 months, P = 0.03. In multivariate analyses, BRAF V600E mutants had worse OS (HR 4.04; P = 0.005), while patients undergoing metastatectomy (HR 0.11; P = <0.001) and patients who initially presented as stage IV disease had improved OS (HR 0.27; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MSI-H metastatic CRC do not appear to have improved outcomes. BRAF V600E mutation is a poor prognostic factor in MSI-H metastatic CRC.

Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancer worldwide and results from the accumulation of mutations and epimutations in colonic mucosa cells ultimately leading to cell proliferation and metastasis. Unfortunately, CRC prognosis is still poor and the search of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is highly desired to prevent CRC-related deaths. The present article aims to summarize the most recent findings concerning the use of either genetic or epigenetic (mainly related to DNA methylation) biomarkers for CRC diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment. Recent large-scale DNA methylation studies suggest that CRC can be divided into several subtypes according to the frequency of DNA methylation and those of mutations in key CRC genes, and that this is reflected by different prognostic outcomes. Increasing evidence suggests that the analysis of DNA methylation in blood or fecal specimens could represent a valuable non-invasive diagnostic tool for CRC. Moreover, a broad spectrum of studies indicates that the inter-individual response to chemotherapeutic treatments depends on both epigenetic modifications and genetic mutations occurring in colorectal cancer cells, thereby opening the way for a personalized medicine. Overall, combining genetic and epigenetic data might represent the most promising tool for a proper diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approach.

Tissue-based biomarkers predicting outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: a review

Although there have been recent advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, particularly with systemic chemotherapy, new biological agents and surgical metastasectomy, the disease remains difficult to treat. To personalise the management of mCRC and optimise patient outcomes, it is vital to acquire a deeper understanding of its natural history and mechanisms behind disease progression. This may be achieved by extensive study of tumour biomarkers: proteins or genetic alterations within neoplastic cells or their surrounding stroma that may be used to predict patient outcomes, disease trajectory and response to various therapies. The discovery of mutant Kirsten-RAS in determining patients who may be refractory to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments has reinvigorated and reiterated the importance of our attempts to individualise cancer care. While many biomarkers have been studied and shown promise in the setting of mCRC, they are, with the exception of K-ras testing not used currently in a clinical setting due to conflicting results, small patient samples and methodological variations. Larger, multi-centric studies with uniform methods of tumour marker study are required to effectively tailor systemic therapies and select appropriate candidates for surgical metastasectomy.

The evolution of our molecular understanding of colorectal cancer: what we are doing now, what the future holds, and how tumor profiling is just the beginning

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been extensively molecularly characterized in recent years. In addition to the understanding of biologic hallmarks of the disease, the ultimate goal of these studies was to provide tools that could allow us to differentiate subgroups of CRC with prognostic and predictive implications. So far, subtype classification has been largely driven by well-described features: (1) defective mismatch repair resulting in higher mutation rate; (2) cellular proliferation along with chromosomal instability and copy number aberrations; and (3) an invasive stromal phenotype mainly driven by TGF-β linked to epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Recent studies have outlined the complexity of CRC at the gene expression level, confirming how heterogeneous the disease is beyond currently validated parameters, namely KRAS, BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability. In fact, adopting an extended mutation profile upfront, which includes nonrecurrent KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA gene variants, likely improves outcomes. In this article, we review the current trends of translational research in CRC, summarize ongoing genomically driven clinical trials, and describe the challenges for defining a comprehensive, robust, and reproducible disease classification system that links molecular features to personalized medicine. We believe that identification of CRC subtypes based on integrative genomic analyses will provide a better guide for patient stratification and for rational design of drugs targeting specific pathways.

BRAF mutation is associated with distinct clinicopathological characteristics in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with multiple underlying genetic mutations resulting in different phenotypes. Mutation in the v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) proto-oncogene is an important event in the methylator pathway. There is no consensus, however, on the clinicopathological characteristics associated with BRAF mutation.

METHOD

A comprehensive search for published studies examining the effect of BRAF mutation on colorectal cancer was performed. Random effects methods were used to combine data.

RESULTS

Data were retrieved from 21 studies describing 9885 patients. BRAF associated colorectal cancer is associated with proximal tumour location (OR 5.222, 95% CI 3.801-7.174, P < 0.001), T4 tumours (OR 1.761, 95% CI 1.164-2.663, P = 0.007) and poor differentiation (OR 3.816, 95% CI 2.714-5.365, P < 0.001) and is negatively associated with male sex (OR 0.623, 95% CI 0.505-0.769, P < 0.001), age of diagnosis under 60 years (OR 0.453, 95% CI 0.280-0.733, P = 0.001) and rectal cancer (OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.122-0.422, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BRAF mutation appears to be associated with distinct, unfavourable clinicopathological characteristics in colorectal cancer.

Overexpression of miR-145 increases the sensitivity of vemurafenib in drug-resistant colo205 cell line

Vemurafenib is a selective and potent small molecule inhibitor of the V600 mutant form of the BRAF protein used in the treatment of melanoma and colorectal cancer. However, vemurafenib has less effect in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer due to the resistance of tumor cell to vemurafenib. To verify whether or not miR-145, a short RNA molecule of microRNA which has been supposed to be a tumor suppressor, is involved in this process, we established vemurafenib-resistant cell line colo205/V and found that the miR-145 expression was significantly downregulated in colo205/V cells compared to normal colo205 cells. Moreover, the overexpression of miR-145 could increase the sensitivity of colo205/V cells to vemurafenib both in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, miR-145 might be used as a therapeutic target in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation.

Difference in the recurrence rate between right- and left-sided colon cancer: a 17-year experience at a single institution

Purpose

The prognostic differences between right- and left-sided colon cancer are controversial. This study aimed to clarify the clinical difference between right- and left-sided colon cancer.

Methods

We enrolled 820 patients with stage I/II/III colon cancer who underwent radical surgery with curative intent. We explored the impact of the tumor location on the postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) rate using the univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Right-sided disease occurred in 399 of the 820 patients. The mean follow-up period was 55.8 ± 34.9 months. The pathological stage distribution was as follows: stage I 261 patients; stage II 283; and stage III 251. There were no significant differences in the five-year DFS of the overall populations (right 88.6 %; left 89.4 %; P = 0.231). The subgroup analyses demonstrated that patients with stage I right-sided colon cancer had a significantly better 5-year DFS rate than did those with left-sided disease (100 vs. 95.2 %, P = 0.034). There were no significant differences in the distributions of the first recurrent sites (P = 0.559).

Conclusions

The tumor location may contribute to postoperative tumor recurrence. However, these effects were inconsistent across tumor stages. Our results provide a better understanding of the prognostic disparity between tumor locations; this may improve patient consent and postoperative surveillance.

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

BRAF V600E mutation plays a negative prognostic role in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), leading to a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 4-6months with first-line conventional treatments. Our group recently reported in a retrospective exploratory analysis of a phase II trial that FOLFOXIRI (5-FU/LV+Oxaliplatin+Irinotecan) plus bevacizumab might allow to achieve remarkable results in terms of PFS and Overall Survival (OS) also in this poor-prognosis subgroup. The aim of this work was to prospectively validate our retrospective finding.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II trial was designed to detect an increase in 6month-Progression Free Rate (6m-PFR) from 45% to 80% in a population of BRAF mutant mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Secondary end-points were PFS, OS, response rate (RR) and the analysis of outcome parameters in the pooled population consisting of both retrospectively and prospectively included patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437618.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-fourteen potentially eligible mCRC patients were screened for BRAF mutational status. Fifteen BRAF mutant patients (7%) were included in the validation cohort. At a median follow up of 25.7months, 6m-PFR was 73%. Median PFS and OS were 9.2 and 24.1months, respectively. In the pooled population, at a median follow up of 40.4months, 6m-PFR was 84%. Median PFS and OS were 11.8 and 24.1months, respectively. Overall RR and disease control rate were 72% and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lacking randomised trials in this specific molecular subgroup, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab might be a reasonable option for the first-line treatment of BRAF mutant mCRC patients.

RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of RAS mutation status on survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) after preoperative modern chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

RAS mutation has been reported to be associated with aggressive tumor biology. However, the effect of RAS mutation on survival and patterns of recurrence after resection of CLM remains unclear.

METHODS

Somatic mutations were analyzed using mass spectroscopy in 193 patients who underwent single-regimen modern chemotherapy before resection of CLM. The relationship between RAS mutation status and survival outcomes was investigated.

RESULTS

Detected somatic mutations included RAS (KRAS/NRAS) in 34 (18%), PIK3CA in 13 (7%), and BRAF in 2 (1%) patients. At a median follow-up of 33 months, 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 81% in patients with wild-type versus 52.2% in patients with mutant RAS (P = 0.002); 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 33.5% with wild-type versus 13.5% with mutant RAS (P = 0.001). Liver and lung recurrences were observed in 89 and 83 patients, respectively. Patients with RAS mutation had a lower 3-year lung RFS rate (34.6% vs 59.3%, P < 0.001) but not a lower 3-year liver RFS rate (43.8% vs 50.2%, P = 0.181). In multivariate analyses, RAS mutation predicted worse OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.3, P = 0.002), overall RFS (HR = 1.9, P = 0.005), and lung RFS (HR = 2.0, P = 0.01), but not liver RFS (P = 0.181).

CONCLUSIONS

RAS mutation predicts early lung recurrence and worse survival after curative resection of CLM. This information may be used to individualize systemic and local tumor-directed therapies and follow-up strategies.

Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND

Molecular biomarkers offer the potential for refining prognostic determinants in patients undergoing cancer surgery. Among patients with colorectal cancer, KRAS and BRAF are important biomarkers, but their role in patients undergoing surgical therapy for liver metastases is unknown. In this study, the incidence and prognostic significance of KRAS and BRAF mutations were determined in patients undergoing surgical therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

KRAS and BRAF analysis was performed on 202 patients undergoing surgery for CRLM between 2003 and 2008. Tumor samples were analyzed for somatic mutations using sequencing analysis (KRAS, codon12/13, BRAF, V600E). The frequency of mutations was ascertained, and their impact on outcome was determined relative to other clinicopathologic factors.

RESULTS

KRAS gene mutations were detected in 58/202 patients (29%). In contrast, mutation in the BRAF gene was identified in very low frequency in this surgical cohort, found in only 4/202 (2%) patients. On multivariate analysis, KRAS mutation was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.26), as well as recurrence risk (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04-2.70). Although other clinicopathologic features, including tumor number, carcinoembryonic antigen, and primary stage were also associated with survival, KRAS status remained independently predictive of outcome. The low incidence of BRAF mutation limited assessment of its prognostic impact.

CONCLUSION

Whereas KRAS mutations were found in approximately one third of patients, BFAF mutations were found in only 2% of patients undergoing surgery for CRLM. KRAS status was an independent predictor of overall and recurrence-free survival. Molecular biomarkers such as KRAS may help to refine our prognostic assessment of patients undergoing surgical therapy for CRLM.

Single agent panitumumab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients following cetuximab-based regimens: Clinical outcome and biomarkers of efficacy

BACKGROUND

Few data are available outlining outcomes of panitumumab in advanced colorectal cancer patients benefiting from prior cetuximab-based regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer with clinical benefit from prior cetuximab-based regimens between May 2004 and October 2011 were reviewed at nine Italian Institutions. Inclusion key criteria included interruption of cetuximab for reasons other than progressive disease. Patients were classified according to prior regimens (0 or ≥1), prior response or stabilization, surgery of metastases, and Köhne prognostic score. At the time of subsequent progression, patients were treated with single agent panitumumab until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

RESULTS

Panitumumab obtained 67% disease control rate and 30% objective response rate, with median PFS of 4.2 and median OS of 9.6 mo. Patients with BRAF/NRAS/PI3KCA and KRAS (by mutant enriched technique) wild-type tumors had the best chance of response to panitumumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Single agent panitumumab provided significant clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients without acquired resistance to prior cetuximab-based regimens.

Associations between colorectal cancer molecular markers and pathways with clinicopathologic features in older women

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colorectal tumors have a large degree of molecular heterogeneity. Three integrated pathways of carcinogenesis (ie, traditional, alternate, and serrated) have been proposed, based on specific combinations of microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and mutations in BRAF and KRAS. We used resources from the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (n = 41,836) to associate markers of colorectal tumors, integrated pathways, and clinical and pathology characteristics, including survival times.

METHODS

We assessed archived specimens from 732 incident colorectal tumors and characterized them as microsatellite stable (MSS), MSI high or MSI low, CIMP high or CIMP low, CIMP negative, and positive or negative for BRAF and/or KRAS mutations. Informative marker data were collected from 563 tumors (77%), which were assigned to the following integrated pathways: traditional (MSS, CIMP negative, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation negative; n = 170), alternate (MSS, CIMP low, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation positive; n = 58), serrated (any MSI, CIMP high, BRAF mutation positive, and KRAS mutation negative; n = 142), or unassigned (n = 193). Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the associations of interest.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age (P = .03) and tumors' anatomic subsite (P = .0001) and grade (P = .0001) were significantly associated with integrated pathway assignment. Colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality was not associated with the traditional, alternate, or serrated pathways, but was associated with a subset of pathway-unassigned tumors (MSS or MSI low, CIMP negative, BRAF mutation negative, and KRAS mutation positive) (n = 96 cases; relative risk = 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.89, compared with the traditional pathway).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified clinical and pathology features associated with molecularly defined CRC subtypes. However, additional studies are needed to determine how these features might influence prognosis.

Somatic profiling of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway in tumors from patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy ± cetuximab

PURPOSE

To study the somatic molecular profile of the EGF receptor (EGFR) pathway in advanced colorectal cancer, its relationship to prognosis, the site of the primary and metastases, and response to cetuximab.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We used Sequenom and Pyrosequencing for high-throughput somatic profiling of the EGFR pathway in 1,976 tumors from patients with advanced colorectal cancer from the COIN trial (oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy ± cetuximab). Correlations between mutations, clinicopathologic, response, and survival data were carried out.

RESULTS

Sequenom and Pyrosequencing had 99.0% (9,961/10,063) genotype concordance. We identified 13 different KRAS mutations in 42.3% of advanced colorectal cancers, 2 BRAF mutations in 9.0%, 4 NRAS mutations in 3.6%, and 5 PIK3CA mutations in 12.7%. 4.2% of advanced colorectal cancers had microsatellite instability (MSI). KRAS and PIK3CA exon 9, but not exon 20, mutations cooccurred (P = 8.9 × 10(-4)) as did MSI and BRAF mutations (P = 5.3 × 10(-10)). KRAS mutations were associated with right colon cancers (P = 5.2 × 10(-5)) and BRAF mutations with right (P = 7.2 × 10(-5)) and transverse colon (P = 9.8 × 10(-6)) cancers. KRAS mutations were associated with lung-only metastases (P = 2.3 × 10(-4)), BRAF mutations with peritoneal (P = 9.2 × 10(-4)) and nodal-only (P = 3.7 × 10(-5)) metastases, and MSI (BRAF(WT)) with nodal-only metastases (P = 2.9 × 10(-4)). MSI (BRAF(WT)) was associated with worse survival (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.30-2.76, P = 8.5 × 10(-4)). No mutations, subsets of mutations, or MSI status were associated with response to cetuximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support a functional cooperation between KRAS and PIK3CA in colorectal tumorigenesis and link somatic profiles to the sites of metastases. MSI was associated with poor prognosis in advanced disease, and no individual somatic profile was associated with response to cetuximab in COIN.

Lack of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and TP53 mutations improves outcome of elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab, oxaliplatin and UFT

There is conflicting evidence on the predictive role of KRAS status when cetuximab is added to oxaliplatin-based regimens. This study investigated the impact of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA and TP53 status on outcome of elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients enrolled in TEGAFOX-E (cetuximab, oxaliplatin and oral uracil/ftorafur--UFT) phase II study. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and all were evaluable for safety and activity. Twenty-three specimens were analysed for KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3KCA and TP53 mutational status by means of polymerase chain reaction and correlated with objective response, progression-free survival and overall survival. An evident increase of response rate was noted in KRAS/NRAS wild-type cases (70 versus 33%, P = 0.198). KRAS/NRAS wild-type status showed an independent association with a longer progression-free survival (44 versus 9 weeks, P = 0.009). Considering the combined assessment of BRAF, KRAS/NRAS and TP53, a trend towards an increase of response rate was noted in patients without mutations (83 versus 33%, P = 0.063). Moreover, patients with all wild-type genes had significantly longer progression-free survival than patients with any mutation (48 versus 10 weeks, P = 0.007). As a single biomarker, only KRAS/NRAS proteins maintained an independent value for outcome prediction. Patients with KRAS/NRAS, BRAF and TP53 wild-type tumours could derive the maximal benefits from treatment with cetuximab, oxaliplatin and UFT.

Immunohistochemistry using the BRAF V600E mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1 is not a useful surrogate for genotyping in colorectal adenocarcinoma

AIMS

The presence of a BRAF mutation is a strong marker for poor prognosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and can be used as evidence of a sporadic mechanism of mismatch repair deficiency. BRAF mutation may also predict resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy. A BRAF V600E-specific antibody has recently become commercially available. The aim of this study was to determine whether immunohistochemistry can predict BRAF mutations in CRC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 52 genotyped CRC cases (17 BRAF mutant, 18 KRAS mutant, 17 BRAF/KRAS wild-type) with monoclonal antibody VE1. Cytoplasmic staining was observed in 71% of BRAF V600E mutant tumours (moderate or strong staining in 50% of these cases). Weak cytoplasmic staining was observed in 17% of KRAS mutant tumours and 35% of wild-type tumours. Non-specific nuclear staining was common. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry with VE1 for BRAF mutation were 71% and 74%, respectively; when only moderate or strong staining was considered to be positive, the specificity was 100%, but the sensitivity only 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemistry with VE1 is not a useful surrogate for genotyping in CRC. Although moderate or strong cytoplasmic staining is specific for BRAF V600E mutations, this antibody is insufficiently sensitive to serve as an effective screening tool.

A moving target: challenges in treating BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer

SUMMARY Biomarker-oriented clinical studies have shown mounting evidence for improved efficacy with targeted therapy. Unfortunately, single-agent BRAF inhibition has shown limited efficacy in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Multiple mechanisms for potential BRAF inhibitor resistance demonstrate the complex biology behind tumorigenesis in colorectal cancer and highlight the obstacles of acquired and intrinsic drug resistance in treating this disease. Biomarker-related strategies with potential predictive value for specific molecular anomalies offer the possibility for improved targeted agents and rational combinations. Synthetic lethality gene array has become a major focus in current research for developing such agents. Combination therapy based on molecular profiles may further enhance individualized patient care.

BRAF inhibitors in clinical oncology

Activating mutations of the BRAF oncogene are present in approximately 5-10% of all human malignancies and lead to constitutive activation of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. The introduction of BRAF inhibitors has greatly improved the short term prospects of some patients with these tumors, but the tumors tend to become resistant to therapy with time by activating alternative signaling pathways. Consequently, combination strategies with drugs that block not only the primary mutated BRAF kinase but also the alternative pathways implicated in development of resistance may represent a better strategy for improving survival in patients with tumors harboring BRAF mutations.

Molecular dissection of microsatellite instable colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer was one of the first solid tumors to be classified on the basis of molecular profiling. Microsatellite instability has allowed researchers to distinguish a specific subtype of colorectal cancer that has a clearly identified molecular origin (mismatch repair deficiency), arises on a hereditary and sporadic basis, is linked to a clear clinicopathologic profile, and has prognostic implications. Inconclusive predictive data along with a paucity of targeted drug development have prevented this molecular classification system from being implemented in the clinical setting. New high-throughput genomic data have validated it, thus stressing the fact that it is ready to be applied clinically.

SIGNIFICANCE

Application of a molecular classification of colorectal cancer in the clinical arena is an unmet promise. Recent results of large-scale genomic analyses have provided confirmation and further insights into the molecular biology of already known colorectal cancer subgroups. The quintessential example is the microsatellite instability subgroup, which has been well characterized during the past 2 decades. Future drug development and clinical research initiatives in colorectal oncology should consider these and other known cancer subgroups and start targeting these selected patient populations.

Resistance to BRAF inhibition in BRAF-mutant colon cancer can be overcome with PI3K inhibition or demethylating agents

PURPOSE

Vemurafenib, a selective inhibitor of BRAF(V600), has shown significant activity in BRAF(V600) melanoma but not in less than 10% of metastatic BRAF(V600) colorectal cancers (CRC), suggesting that studies of the unique hypermethylated phenotype and concurrent oncogenic activation of BRAF(mut) CRC may provide combinatorial strategies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted comparative proteomic analysis of BRAF(V600E) melanoma and CRC cell lines, followed by correlation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation and sensitivity to the vemurafenib analogue PLX4720. Pharmacologic inhibitors and siRNA were used in combination with PLX4720 to inhibit PI3K and methyltransferase in cell lines and murine models.

RESULTS

Compared with melanoma, CRC lines show higher levels of PI3K/AKT pathway activation. CRC cell lines with mutations in PTEN or PIK3CA were less sensitive to growth inhibition by PLX4720 (P = 0.03), and knockdown of PTEN expression in sensitive CRC cells reduced growth inhibition by the drug. Combined treatment of PLX4720 with PI3K inhibitors caused synergistic growth inhibition in BRAF-mutant CRC cells with both primary and secondary resistance. In addition, methyltransferase inhibition was synergistic with PLX4720 and decreased AKT activation. In vivo, PLX4720 combined with either inhibitors of AKT or methyltransferase showed greater tumor growth inhibition than PLX4720 alone. Clones with acquired resistance to PLX4720 in vitro showed PI3K/AKT activation with EGF receptor (EGFR) or KRAS amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway is a mechanism of both innate and acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors in BRAF(V600E) CRC and suggest combinatorial approaches to improve outcomes in this poor prognosis subset of patients.

The prognostic value of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mutation of BRAF is a predominant event in cancers with poor prognosis such as melanoma and colorectal cancer. BRAF mutation leads to a constitutive activation of mitogen activated protein kinase pathway which is essential for cell proliferation and tumor progression. Despite tremendous efforts made to target BRAF for cancer treatment, the correlation between BRAF mutation and patient survival is still a matter of controversy.

METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Clinical studies on the correlation between BRAF mutation and patient survival were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between June 2002 and December 2011. One hundred twenty relevant full text studies were categorized based on study design and cancer type. Publication bias was evaluated for each category and pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random or fixed effect meta-analysis based on the percentage of heterogeneity. Twenty six studies on colorectal cancer (11,773 patients) and four studies on melanoma (674 patients) were included in our final meta-analysis. The average prevalence of BRAF mutation was 9.6% in colorectal cancer, and 47.8% in melanoma reports. We found that BRAF mutation increases the risk of mortality in colorectal cancer patients for more than two times; HR = 2.25 (95% CI, 1.82-2.83). In addition, we revealed that BRAF mutation also increases the risk of mortality in melanoma patients by 1.7 times (95% CI, 1.37-2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

We revealed that BRAF mutation is an absolute risk factor for patient survival in colorectal cancer and melanoma.

Predictors of EGF receptor monoclonal antibody activity in metastatic colorectal cancer: current status

SUMMARY In the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, the cytostatic drugs 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, as well as the VEGF antibody bevacizumab, are applied without the use of predictive biomarkers. To date, KRAS mutational status is the only accepted predictive biomarker, limiting the use of the EGF receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. The different KRAS mutations on codons 12 and 13 represent a negative predictive biomarker with poor positive predictive power. The negative predictive value of KRAS mutations has been questioned by several retrospective analyses of clinical trials, hypothesizing variable efficacies of EGFR antibodies associated with the diverse range of mutations. While the BRAF mutation is associated with a negative prognosis, its predictive value in the context of EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy is not fully understood. The present review aims to outline possible clinical and molecular biomarkers of EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BRAF mutation status and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis according to patient and tumor characteristics

BACKGROUND

BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) are disproportionately observed in tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability (MSI) and are associated with other prognostic factors. The independent association between BRAF mutation status and CRC survival, however, remains unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated the association between the BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) mutation and survival in individuals with incident invasive CRC diagnosed between 1997 and 2007 in Western Washington State. Tumor specimens were tested for this BRAF mutation and MSI status. We used Cox regression to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between BRAF mutation status and disease-specific and overall survival. Stratified analyses were conducted by age, sex, tumor site, stage, and MSI status.

RESULTS

Among 1,980 cases tested, 12% were BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) mutation-positive (n = 247). BRAF-mutated CRC was associated with poorer disease-specific survival adjusting for age, sex, time from diagnosis to enrollment, stage, and MSI status (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.05-1.95). This association was limited to cases diagnosed at ages <50 (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.70-5.52) and was not evident in cases with MSI-high tumors (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.44-2.03). Associations with overall survival were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the prevalence of BRAF mutations in CRC differs by patient and tumor characteristics and suggest that the association between BRAF status and CRC survival may differ by some of these factors.

IMPACT

The presence of a BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) mutation is associated with significantly poorer prognosis after CRC diagnosis among subgroups of patients.

A systems biology approach to the global analysis of transcription factors in colorectal cancer

Background

Biological entities do not perform in isolation, and often, it is the nature and degree of interactions among numerous biological entities which ultimately determines any final outcome. Hence, experimental data on any single biological entity can be of limited value when considered only in isolation. To address this, we propose that augmenting individual entity data with the literature will not only better define the entity’s own significance but also uncover relationships with novel biological entities.

To test this notion, we developed a comprehensive text mining and computational methodology that focused on discovering new targets of one class of molecular entities, transcription factors (TF), within one particular disease, colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

We used 39 molecular entities known to be associated with CRC along with six colorectal cancer terms as the bait list, or list of search terms, for mining the biomedical literature to identify CRC-specific genes and proteins. Using the literature-mined data, we constructed a global TF interaction network for CRC. We then developed a multi-level, multi-parametric methodology to identify TFs to CRC.

Results

The small bait list, when augmented with literature-mined data, identified a large number of biological entities associated with CRC. The relative importance of these TF and their associated modules was identified using functional and topological features. Additional validation of these highly-ranked TF using the literature strengthened our findings. Some of the novel TF that we identified were: SLUG, RUNX1, IRF1, HIF1A, ATF-2, ABL1, ELK-1 and GATA-1. Some of these TFs are associated with functional modules in known pathways of CRC, including the Beta-catenin/development, immune response, transcription, and DNA damage pathways.

Conclusions

Our methodology of using text mining data and a multi-level, multi-parameter scoring technique was able to identify both known and novel TF that have roles in CRC. Starting with just one TF (SMAD3) in the bait list, the literature mining process identified an additional 116 CRC-associated TFs. Our network-based analysis showed that these TFs all belonged to any of 13 major functional groups that are known to play important roles in CRC. Among these identified TFs, we obtained a novel six-node module consisting of ATF2-P53-JNK1-ELK1-EPHB2-HIF1A, from which the novel JNK1-ELK1 association could potentially be a significant marker for CRC.

An initial watch and wait approach is a valid strategy for selected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A range of treatments are available for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). An initial period without active treatment, a 'watch and wait approach', is variably employed in routine practice; however, there is no data to support this approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected data regarding clinician treatment recommendations for patients with newly diagnosed mCRC in addition to subsequent treatment and outcomes. Follow-up and management was according to standard protocols.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-six patients (59.1% male, 40.9% female) with mCRC (January 2003-December 2010) were analysed; the median age was 67.9 years (range 26.2-95.5). Three hundred and seventy-seven patients (51.2%) received immediate chemotherapy. For 133 (18.1%), treatment was considered inappropriate. 34 patients (4.6%) declined therapy. For 192 (26.1%), a watch and wait policy was adopted and 168 (87.5%) of these received treatment, at a median of 3.7 months (range 2-35 months) from diagnosis. Compared with patients immediately treated, the number receiving all active chemotherapy agents (30.4 versus 39.3%) was similar and median survival (27 versus 17 months, P = 0.0008) was superior.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that a substantial minority of patients underwent an initial watch and wait approach. Ultimately, they received a similar treatment exposure to patients treated immediately and the survival outcomes were not compromised.

Colon cancer molecular subtypes identified by expression profiling and associated to stroma, mucinous type and different clinical behavior

Background

Colon cancer patients with the same stage show diverse clinical behavior due to tumor heterogeneity. We aimed to discover distinct classes of tumors based on microarray expression patterns, to analyze whether the molecular classification correlated with the histopathological stages or other clinical parameters and to study differences in the survival.

Methods

Hierarchical clustering was performed for class discovery in 88 colon tumors (stages I to IV). Pathways analysis and correlations between clinical parameters and our classification were analyzed. Tumor subtypes were validated using an external set of 78 patients. A 167 gene signature associated to the main subtype was generated using the 3-Nearest-Neighbor method. Coincidences with other prognostic predictors were assesed.

Results

Hierarchical clustering identified four robust tumor subtypes with biologically and clinically distinct behavior. Stromal components (p < 0.001), nuclear β-catenin (p = 0.021), mucinous histology (p = 0.001), microsatellite-instability (p = 0.039) and BRAF mutations (p < 0.001) were associated to this classification but it was independent of Dukes stages (p = 0.646). Molecular subtypes were established from stage I. High-stroma-subtype showed increased levels of genes and altered pathways distinctive of tumour-associated-stroma and components of the extracellular matrix in contrast to Low-stroma-subtype. Mucinous-subtype was reflected by the increased expression of trefoil factors and mucins as well as by a higher proportion of MSI and BRAF mutations. Tumor subtypes were validated using an external set of 78 patients. A 167 gene signature associated to the Low-stroma-subtype distinguished low risk patients from high risk patients in the external cohort (Dukes B and C:HR = 8.56(2.53-29.01); Dukes B,C and D:HR = 1.87(1.07-3.25)). Eight different reported survival gene signatures segregated our tumors into two groups the Low-stroma-subtype and the other tumor subtypes.

Conclusions

We have identified novel molecular subtypes in colon cancer with distinct biological and clinical behavior that are established from the initiation of the tumor. Tumor microenvironment is important for the classification and for the malignant power of the tumor. Differential gene sets and biological pathways characterize each tumor subtype reflecting underlying mechanisms of carcinogenesis that may be used for the selection of targeted therapeutic procedures. This classification may contribute to an improvement in the management of the patients with CRC and to a more comprehensive prognosis.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: beyond KRAS mutations

The advent of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), cetuximab and panitumumab has expanded the range of treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite these agents have paved the way to individualized therapy, our understanding why some patients respond to treatment whereas others do not remain poor. The realization that detection of positive EGFR expression by IHC does not reliably predict clinical outcome of EGFR-targeted treatment has led to an intense search for alternative predictive biomarkers. Data derived from multiple phase III trials have indicated that KRAS mutations can be considered a highly specific negative biomarker of benefit to anti-EGFR mAbs. Oncologists are now facing emerging issues in the treatment of metastatic CRC, including the identification of additional genetic determinants of primary resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy for further improving selection of patients, the explanation of rare cases of patients carrying KRAS-mutated tumours who have been reported to respond to cetuximab and panitumumab and the discovery of mechanisms of secondary resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy. Current data suggest that, together with KRAS mutations, the evaluation of EGFR gene copy number (GCN), BRAF, NRAS, PIK3CA mutations or loss of PTEN expression could also be useful for selecting patients with reduced chance to benefit from anti-EGFR mAbs. This review aims to provide an updated of the most recent data on predictive and prognostic biomarkers within the EGFR pathway, the challenges this emerging field presents and the future role of these molecular markers in CRC treatment.

Biomarker use in colorectal cancer therapy

Biomarkers reflective of the molecular and genetic heterogeneity in colorectal cancers now guide certain aspects of clinical management and offer great potential for enrichment, stratification, and identification of novel therapeutic targets in drug development. Using case-based examples, this article reviews biomarkers that have an established role in the clinical management of colorectal cancer: mismatch repair protein testing and KRAS and BRAF mutational analysis. A selection of biomarkers undergoing validation for future clinical application is presented, and the dynamic and challenging interface between biomarkers in research and clinical practice is discussed.