751
|
You J, Gao L, Shen Y, Guo W, Wang X, Wan Q, Wang X, Wu J, Zhang Q. Predictors and long-term prognosis of left ventricular aneurysm in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:1706-1716. [PMID: 33841961 PMCID: PMC8024850 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been the standard reperfusion strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the contemporary era. Meanwhile, the incidence and prognosis of left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) in AMI patients remain ambiguous. The aim of the current study is to identify the predictor and long-term prognosis of LVA in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 942 consecutive patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction who were treated by primary PCI. The baseline characteristics, procedural features, and one-year clinical outcomes were compared between the patients with and without LVA. The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, and ischemic stroke. Multiple logistic regression was applied to predict LVA formation and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the accuracy of the multivariate analysis model. RESULTS The general incidence of LVA was 15.92%. At one-year clinical follow-up, patients in the LVA group had significantly higher incidence of MACCEs (15.33% vs. 6.44%, P<0.01), mainly driven by an increased incidence of cardiac death (8.00% vs. 2.78%, P<0.01), target vessel revascularization (5.33% vs. 2.27%, P=0.03), and ischemic stroke (4.00% vs. 1.39%, P=0.03). Multivariate analysis found that longer symptom-to-balloon time (S2B) [odds ratio (OR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.21, P<0.01], higher initial and residual SYNTAX score (iSS, OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.14-1.24, P<0.01; rSS, OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.22-1.45, P<0.01), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.11-1.18, P<0.01), and persistent ST segment elevation (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.06-3.38, P=0.03) were independent predictors of LVA formation. CONCLUSIONS LVA is still common in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction in the contemporary PCI era, and the prognosis of these patients was significantly worse during the one-year clinical follow-up. Strategies of prompt reperfusion and complete revascularization may be helpful in preventing LVA formation and improving clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieyun You
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liming Gao
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunli Shen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xingxu Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Wan
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Wu
- Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
752
|
Gong FF, Vaitenas I, Malaisrie SC, Maganti K. Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 6:341-349. [PMID: 33295949 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction include left ventricular free-wall rupture, ventricular septal rupture, papillary muscle rupture, pseudoaneurysm, and true aneurysm. With the introduction of early reperfusion therapies, these complications now occur in fewer than 0.1% of patients following an acute myocardial infarction. However, mortality rates have not decreased in parallel, and mechanical complications remain an important determinant of outcomes after myocardial infarction. Early diagnosis and management are crucial to improving outcomes and require an understanding of the clinical findings that should raise suspicion of mechanical complications and the evolving surgical and percutaneous treatment options. Observations Mechanical complications most commonly occur within the first week after myocardial infarction. Cardiogenic shock or acute pulmonary edema are frequent presentations. Echocardiography is usually the first test used to identify the type, location, and hemodynamic consequences of the mechanical complication. Hemodynamic stabilization often requires a combination of medical therapy and mechanical circulatory support. Surgery is the definitive treatment, but the optimal timing remains unclear. Percutaneous therapies are emerging as an alternative treatment option for patients at prohibitive surgical risk. Conclusions and Relevance Mechanical complications present with acute and dramatic hemodynamic deterioration requiring rapid stabilization. Heart team involvement is required to determine appropriate management strategies for patients with mechanical complications after acute myocardial infarction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Fei Gong
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Inga Vaitenas
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - S Chris Malaisrie
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kameswari Maganti
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
753
|
Álvarez Avello JM, Hernández Pérez FJ, Iranzo Valero R, Esteban Martín C, Forteza Gil A, Segovia Cubero J. Abordaje contemporáneo del shock cardiogénico tras la cardiotomía: resultados desde la instauración de una unidad de atención especializada. Rev Esp Cardiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2020.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
754
|
Jeng EI, Ghannam AD, Ahmed MM. Pericardial release for early LVAD malalignment a less invasive approach. Clin Case Rep 2021; 9:1155-1157. [PMID: 33768800 PMCID: PMC7981669 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.3702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In a previously well-functioning LVAD, pericardial release via thoracotomy may improve inflow angle and correct malpositioning to ultimately restore LVAD function and patient hemodynamics. To prevent this, we recommend that implantations include a longitudinal pericardiotomy and anchoring sutures.
Collapse
|
755
|
Lauridsen MD, Josiassen J, Schmidt M, Butt JH, Østergaard L, Schou M, Kjærgaard J, Møller JE, Hassager C, Torp-Pedersen C, Gislason G, Køber L, Fosbøl EL. Prognosis of myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock according to preadmission out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2021; 162:135-142. [PMID: 33662522 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is highly prevalent among patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (MI-CS). We aimed to examine the prognostic importance of OHCA in patients with MI-CS. METHODS Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified first-time hospitalized MI-CS patients (2010-2015) by OHCA status. Cumulative incidence curves and adjusted Cox regression models were used to compare in-hospital mortality, and among hospital survivors we compared 5-year rates of heart failure hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS We identified 3107 MI-CS patients of whom 979 presented with OHCA (32%). OHCA patients were younger (median age: 65 vs. 74 years) and had less comorbidity. In-hospital mortality was 57% in those with OHCA compared with 67% in those without, but after adjustment the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.99 [95% CI: 0.87-1.11]. Hospital survivors consisted of 1375 MI-CS patients including 531 OHCA patients (39%). Five-year mortality was 22% for OHCA patients and 42% for patients without OHCA (adjusted HR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.70-0.1.17]). The HR for five-year cardiovascular mortality was 0.80 [95% CI: 0.62-0.98]. Lastly, 5-year rate of heart failure hospitalization was 17% for patients with OHCA compared with 34% in those without (HR: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.34-0.57]). CONCLUSION Among patients hospitalized with MI-CS, OHCA did not influence all-cause in-hospital or long-term mortality but was a marker for reduced long-term rates of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality. Future randomized studies are needed to improve prognosis of MI-CS, however, the importance of OHCA must be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie D Lauridsen
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Jakob Josiassen
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Schmidt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jawad H Butt
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lauge Østergaard
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Schou
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Jesper Kjærgaard
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob E Møller
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christian Hassager
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Torp-Pedersen
- Department of Cardiology and Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød and Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Gunnar Gislason
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark; The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Køber
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emil L Fosbøl
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
756
|
Sacco A, Tavazzi G, Morici N, Viola G, Meani P, Oliva FG, Pappalardo F. Arterial elastance modulation by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and low-output state. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2021; 22:231-232. [PMID: 32858629 DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000001088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Sacco
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, IRCCS, Pavia
| | - Nuccia Morici
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
| | - Giovanna Viola
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
| | - Paolo Meani
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
| | - Fabrizio G Oliva
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
| | | |
Collapse
|
757
|
Balthazar T, Vandenbriele C, Verbrugge FH, Den Uil C, Engström A, Janssens S, Rex S, Meyns B, Van Mieghem N, Price S, Adriaenssens T. Managing Patients With Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:1243-1256. [PMID: 33663742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The use of mechanical circulatory support for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock is rapidly increasing. Currently, there is only limited and conflicting evidence available regarding the role of the Impella (a microaxial, continuous-flow, short-term, left or right ventricular assist device) in cardiogenic shock; further randomized trials are needed. Patient selection, timing of implantation, and post-implantation management in the cardiac intensive care unit are crucial elements for success. Particular challenges at the bedside include the practical management of anticoagulation, evaluation of correct device position, and the approach to use in a patient with signs of insufficient hemodynamic support. Profound knowledge of these issues is required to enable the maximal potential of the device. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the short-term assist device and describes a practical approach to optimize care for patients supported with the device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Balthazar
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Christophe Vandenbriele
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Adult Intensive Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederik H Verbrugge
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Corstiaan Den Uil
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Engström
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Janssens
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steffen Rex
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Meyns
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susanna Price
- Department of Adult Intensive Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Adriaenssens
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
758
|
Schrage B, Becher PM, Goßling A, Savarese G, Dabboura S, Yan I, Beer B, Söffker G, Seiffert M, Kluge S, Kirchhof P, Blankenberg S, Westermann D. Temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support and mortality in cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail 2021; 8:1295-1303. [PMID: 33605565 PMCID: PMC8006704 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The management of cardiogenic shock remains a clinical challenge even in well‐developed healthcare systems, best illustrated by its high mortality despite numerous innovative proposals for management. The aim of this study was to describe temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support, and mortality in cardiogenic shock in Germany. Methods and results Data on all cardiogenic shock patients treated in German hospitals between 2005 and 2017 were obtained from the Federal Bureau of Statistics. The data set comprised 441 696 patients with cardiogenic shock, mean age 71 (±13.8) years, 171 383 (39%) female patients. Incidence rates increased from 33.1/100 000 population in 2005 (27 246 cases) to 51.7/100 000 population in 2017 (42 779 cases). Acute myocardial infarction was the most common cause of cardiogenic shock in 2005–07 (43 422 of 82 037 cases, 52.9%), but the proportion of cases caused by it decreased until 2014–17 (73 274 of 165 873 cases, 44.2%). Over time, intra‐aortic balloon pump (2005: 5104; 2017: 973 cases) was used less frequently, whereas use of extracorporeal‐membrane‐oxygenation (2007: 35; 2017: 2414 cases) and percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (2005: 27; 2017: 1323 cases) increased. Mortality remained high at around 60% without relevant temporal trends in patients without acute myocardial infarction and slightly decreased in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Conclusions In this large, nation‐wide study, annual incidence of cardiogenic shock was growing, its causes were changing, and mortality was high despite a shift towards use of novel mechanical circulatory support devices. This highlights the need to address the evidence gap in this field, in particular for cardiogenic shock caused by diseases other than acute myocardial infarction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Moritz Becher
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alina Goßling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Salim Dabboura
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabell Yan
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Gerold Söffker
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Seiffert
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
759
|
Tschöpe C, Spillmann F, Potapov E, Faragli A, Rapis K, Nelki V, Post H, Schmidt G, Alogna A. The "TIDE"-Algorithm for the Weaning of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Temporarily Mechanical Left Ventricular Support With Impella Devices. A Cardiovascular Physiology-Based Approach. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:563484. [PMID: 33681302 PMCID: PMC7933542 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.563484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often required to stabilize therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock patients. Left ventricular (LV) unloading by mechanical ventricular support (MVS) via percutaneous devices, such as with Impella® axial pumps, alone or in combination with extracorporeal life support (ECLS, ECMELLA approach), has emerged as a potential clinical breakthrough in the field. While the weaning from MCS is essentially based on the evaluation of circulatory stability of patients, weaning from MVS holds a higher complexity, being dependent on bi-ventricular function and its adaption to load. As a result of this, weaning from MVS is mostly performed in the absence of established algorithms. MVS via Impella is applied in several cardiogenic shock etiologies, such as acute myocardial infarction (support over days) or acute fulminant myocarditis (prolonged support over weeks, PROPELLA). The time point of weaning from Impella in these cohorts of patients remains unclear. We here propose a novel cardiovascular physiology-based weaning algorithm for MVS. Methods: The proposed algorithm is based on the experience gathered at our center undergoing an Impella weaning between 2017 and 2020. Before undertaking a weaning process, patients must had been ECMO-free, afebrile, and euvolemic, with hemodynamic stability guaranteed in the absence of any inotropic support. The algorithm consists of 4 steps according to the acronym TIDE: (i) Transthoracic echocardiography under full Impella-unloading; (ii) Impella rate reduction in single 8–24 h-steps according to patients hemodynamics (blood pressure, heart rate, and ScVO2), including a daily echocardiographic assessment at minimal flow (P2); (iii) Dobutamine stress-echocardiography; (iv) Right heart catheterization at rest and during Exercise-testing via handgrip. We here present clinical and hemodynamic data (including LV conductance data) from paradigmatic weaning protocols of awake patients admitted to our intensive care unit with cardiogenic shock. We discuss the clinical consequences of the TIDE algorithm, leading to either a bridge-to-recovery, or to a bridge-to-permanent LV assist device (LVAD) and/or transplantation. With this protocol we were able to wean 74.2% of the investigated patients successfully. 25.8% showed a permanent weaning failure and became LVAD candidates. Conclusions: The proposed novel cardiovascular physiology-based weaning algorithm is based on the characterization of the extent and sustainment of LV unloading reached during hospitalization in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing MVS with Impella in our center. Prospective studies are needed to validate the algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Tschöpe
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.,Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Spillmann
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.,Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany
| | - Evgenij Potapov
- Department of Heart Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin (DHZB), Berlin, Germany
| | - Alessandro Faragli
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin (DHZB), Berlin, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Rapis
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Nelki
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heiner Post
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology, Contilia Heart and Vessel Centre, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim, Mülheim, Germany
| | - Gunther Schmidt
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alessio Alogna
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.,Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
760
|
Gaisendrees C, Vollmer M, Walter SG, Djordjevic I, Eghbalzadeh K, Kaya S, Elderia A, Ivanov B, Gerfer S, Kuhn E, Sabashnikov A, Kahlert HA, Deppe AC, Kröner A, Mader N, Wahlers T. Management of out-of hospital cardiac arrest patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2021. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:179-188. [PMID: 33538204 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1886076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the last decade, eCPR programs have become more and more popular, at least amongst high-volume centers. Despite its rise in popularity and promising outcome, strategies concerning pre- and post-implantation of VA-ECMO remain at least debatable. Besides, integrating the appropriate set-up, managing anticoagulation, implementing LV-venting, and predicting neurological outcome play important roles in caring for thise highly selective patient-collective. We sought to present our institutional´s techniques for establishing an eCPR program and managing patients peri- and post implantation in eCPR-runs. AREAS COVERED This manuscript covers the majority of clinical concerns and parameters for establishing an eCPR program and its recent advantages. We will describe a safe way of cannulation, setting anticoagulation goals, strategies for LV-venting and ICU-treatment. Also included, an elaboration on neurological and cardiac prognostication. EXPERT OPINION We advocate ultrasound-guided cannula placement in eCPR patients. Also, we emphasize the importance of using stiffer wires and smaller arterial cannula sizes due to the different physiological parameters of OHCA patients. After cannulation, we aim for lower flow goals, the concept of 'partial VA-ECMO,' and lower anticoagulatory targets. LV-venting with Impella should remain an individual case to case decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gaisendrees
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Matias Vollmer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Sebastian G Walter
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Ilija Djordjevic
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Kaveh Eghbalzadeh
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Süreyya Kaya
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Ahmed Elderia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Borko Ivanov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Stephen Gerfer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Elmar Kuhn
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Anton Sabashnikov
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Heike A Kahlert
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Antje C Deppe
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Axel Kröner
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Navid Mader
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| | - Thorsten Wahlers
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, the City is Cologne (Köln), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
761
|
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Massive Pulmonary Embolism-Related Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:760-769. [PMID: 33590996 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Management of patients experiencing massive pulmonary embolism-related cardiac arrest is controversial. Venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for these patients. We performed a systematic review assessing survival and predictors of mortality in patients with massive PE-related cardiac arrest with venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation use. DATA SOURCES A literature search was started on February 16, 2020, and completed on March 16, 2020, using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Cinahl, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION We included all available literature that reported survival to discharge in patients managed with venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation for massive PE-related cardiac arrest. DATA EXTRACTION We extracted patient characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS About 301 patients were included in our systemic review from 77 selected articles (total screened, n = 1,115). About 183 out of 301 patients (61%) survived to discharge. Patients (n = 51) who received systemic thrombolysis prior to cannulation had similar survival compared with patients who did not (67% vs 61%, respectively; p = 0.48). There was no significant difference in risk of death if PE was the primary reason for admission or not (odds ratio, 1.62; p = 0.35) and if extracorporeal membranous oxygenation cannulation occurred in the emergency department versus other hospital locations (odds ratio, 2.52; p = 0.16). About 53 of 60 patients (88%) were neurologically intact at discharge or follow-up. Multivariate analysis demonstrated three-fold increase in the risk of death for patients greater than 65 years old (adjusted odds ratio, 3.08; p = 0.03) and six-fold increase if cannulation occurred during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (adjusted odds ratio, 5.67; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation has an emerging role in the management of massive PE-related cardiac arrest with 61% survival. Systemic thrombolysis preceding venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation did not confer a statistically significant increase in risk of death, yet age greater than 65 and cannulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were associated with a three- and six-fold risks of death, respectively.
Collapse
|
762
|
Gunn TM, Malyala RSR, Gurley JC, Keshavamurthy S. Extracorporeal Life Support and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. Interv Cardiol Clin 2021; 10:195-205. [PMID: 33745669 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation is increasing worldwide as more health care centers develop the necessary infrastructure, protocols, and technical expertise required to provide mobile extracorporeal life support with short notice. Strict adherence to patient selection guidelines in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, as well as in-hospital cardiac arrest, allows for improved survival with neurologically favorable outcomes in a larger patient population. This review discusses the preferred approaches, cannulation techniques, and available support devices ideal for the various clinical situations encountered during the treatment of cardiac arrest and refractory cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler M Gunn
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kentucky, 740 South Limestone, Suite A301, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Rajasekhar S R Malyala
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kentucky, 740 South Limestone, Suite A301, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - John C Gurley
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, 800 Rose Street, First Floor, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Suresh Keshavamurthy
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kentucky, 740 South Limestone, Suite A301, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
763
|
Veno-veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient with acute myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Asian J Surg 2021; 44:761-762. [PMID: 33622597 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
764
|
Wernly B, Karami M, Engström AE, Windecker S, Hunziker L, Lüscher TF, Henriques JP, Ferrari MW, Binnebößel S, Masyuk M, Niederseer D, Abel P, Fuernau G, Franz M, Kelm M, Busch MC, Felix SB, Thiele H, Lauten A, Jung C. Impella versus extracorporal life support in cardiogenic shock: a propensity score adjusted analysis. ESC Heart Fail 2021; 8:953-961. [PMID: 33560591 PMCID: PMC8006691 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS) is high. The role of specific mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems is unclear. We aimed to compare patients receiving Impella versus ECLS (extracorporal life support) with regard to baseline characteristics, feasibility, and outcomes in CS. Methods and results This is a retrospective cohort study including CS patients over 18 years with a complete follow‐up of the primary endpoint and available baseline lactate level, receiving haemodynamic support either by Impella 2.5 or ECLS from two European registries. The decision for device implementation was made at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary endpoint of this study was all‐cause mortality at 30 days. A propensity score for the use of Impella was calculated, and multivariable logistic regression was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR). In total, 149 patients were included, receiving either Impella (n = 73) or ECLS (n = 76) for CS. The feasibility of device implantation was high (87%) and similar (aOR: 3.14; 95% CI: 0.18–56.50; P = 0.41) with both systems. The rates of vascular injuries (aOR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.10–3.50; P = 0.56) and bleedings requiring transfusions (aOR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.09–2.10; P = 0.29) were similar in ECLS patients and Impella patients. The use of Impella or ECLS was not associated with increased odds of mortality (aOR: 4.19; 95% CI: 0.53–33.25; P = 0.17), after correction for propensity score and baseline lactate level. Baseline lactate level was independently associated with increased odds of 30 day mortality (per mmol/L increase; OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.14–1.45; P < 0.001). Conclusions In CS patients, the adjusted mortality rates of both ECLS and Impella were high and similar. The baseline lactate level was a potent predictor of mortality and could play a role in patient selection for therapy in future studies. In patients with profound CS, the type of device is likely to be less important compared with other parameters including non‐cardiac and neurological factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Wernly
- Clinic of Internal Medicine II, Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mina Karami
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie E Engström
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lukas Hunziker
- Department of Cardiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F Lüscher
- Imperial College, Research, Education & Development, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals London, London, UK
| | - Jose P Henriques
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Markus W Ferrari
- HSK, Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Helios-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Stephan Binnebößel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Maryna Masyuk
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - David Niederseer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Abel
- Division of Cardiology, Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Georg Fuernau
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II, University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Franz
- Department of Cardiology, Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Malte Kelm
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Mathias C Busch
- Division of Cardiology, Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Stephan B Felix
- Division of Cardiology, Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander Lauten
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Jung
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
765
|
Jäntti T, Tarvasmäki T, Harjola VP, Pulkki K, Turkia H, Sabell T, Tolppanen H, Jurkko R, Hongisto M, Kataja A, Sionis A, Silva-Cardoso J, Banaszewski M, DiSomma S, Mebazaa A, Haapio M, Lassus J. Predictive value of plasma proenkephalin and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in acute kidney injury and mortality in cardiogenic shock. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:25. [PMID: 33547528 PMCID: PMC7865050 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00814-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent form of organ injury in cardiogenic shock. However, data on AKI markers such as plasma proenkephalin (P-PENK) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (P-NGAL) in cardiogenic shock populations are lacking. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of P-PENK and P-NGAL to predict acute kidney injury and mortality in cardiogenic shock. RESULTS P-PENK and P-NGAL were measured at different time points between baseline and 48 h in 154 patients from the prospective CardShock study. The outcomes assessed were AKI defined by an increase in creatinine within 48 h and all-cause 90-day mortality. Mean age was 66 years and 26% were women. Baseline levels of P-PENK and P-NGAL (median [interquartile range]) were 99 (71-150) pmol/mL and 138 (84-214) ng/mL. P-PENK > 84.8 pmol/mL and P-NGAL > 104 ng/mL at baseline were identified as optimal cut-offs for AKI prediction and independently associated with AKI (adjusted HRs 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4.4, p = 0.03] and 2.8 [95% CI 1.2-6.5, p = 0.01], respectively). P-PENK and P-NGAL levels at baseline were also associated with 90-day mortality. For patients with oliguria < 0.5 mL/kg/h for > 6 h before study enrollment, 90-day mortality differed significantly between patients with low and high P-PENK/P-NGAL at baseline (5% vs. 68%, p < 0.001). However, the biomarkers provided best discrimination for mortality when measured at 24 h. Identified cut-offs of P-PENK24h > 105.7 pmol/L and P-NGAL24h > 151 ng/mL had unadjusted hazard ratios of 5.6 (95% CI 3.1-10.7, p < 0.001) and 5.2 (95% CI 2.8-9.8, p < 0.001) for 90-day mortality. The association remained significant despite adjustments with AKI and two risk scores for mortality in cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS High levels of P-PENK and P-NGAL at baseline were independently associated with AKI in cardiogenic shock patients. Furthermore, oliguria before study inclusion was associated with worse outcomes only if combined with high baseline levels of P-PENK or P-NGAL. High levels of both P-PENK and P-NGAL at 24 h were found to be strong and independent predictors of 90-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01374867 at www.clinicaltrials.gov , registered 16 Jun 2011-retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni Jäntti
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Tuukka Tarvasmäki
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Veli-Pekka Harjola
- Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kari Pulkki
- HUSLAB Diagnostic Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heidi Turkia
- HUSLAB Diagnostic Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuija Sabell
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Tolppanen
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Jurkko
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mari Hongisto
- Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anu Kataja
- Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Alessandro Sionis
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute IIB-SantPau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose Silva-Cardoso
- CINTESIS, Department of Cardiology, São João Hospital Center, and Porto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marek Banaszewski
- Intensive Cardiac Therapy Clinic, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Salvatore DiSomma
- Department of Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- INSERM U942, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôpital Lariboisière, APHP, University Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Mikko Haapio
- Nephrology, Department of Nephrology, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johan Lassus
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
766
|
Baloch K, Rehman Memon A, Ikhlaq U, Umair M, Ansari MI, Abubaker J, Salahuddin N. Assessing the Utility of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness in Cardiogenic Shock. Cureus 2021; 13:e13164. [PMID: 33692926 PMCID: PMC7938016 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preventing end-organ failure in patients with shock requires rapid and easily accessible measurements of fluid responsiveness. Unlike septic shock, not all patients in cardiogenic shock are preload responsive. We conducted this study to determine the discriminant power of changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), systolic blood pressure (SBP), inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index (IVC-CI), and venous to arterial carbon dioxide (Pv-aCO2) gap after a fluid challenge and compared it to increases in cardiac output. Methodology In a prospective, quasi-experimental design, mechanically ventilated patients in cardiogenic shock were assessed for fluid responsiveness by comparing improvement in cardiac output (velocity time integral) with changes in ETCO2, heart rate, SBP, Pv-aCO2 gap, IVC-CI after a fluid challenge (a crystalloid bolus or passive leg raise). Results Out of 60 patients, with mean age 61.3 ± 14.8 years, mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) score 14.82 ± 7.49, and median ejection fraction (EF) 25% (25-35), 36.7% (22) had non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 60% (36) were ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). ETCO2 was the best predictor of fluid responsiveness; area under the curve (AUC) 0.705 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.83), p=0.007, followed by reduction in Pv-aCO2 gap; AUC 0.598 (95% CI; 0.45-0.74), p= 0.202. Changes in SBP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), IVC-CI weren’t significant; 0.431 (p=0.367), 0.437 (p=0.410), 0.569 (p=0.367) respectively. The discriminant value identified for ETCO2 was more than equal to 2 mmHg, with sensitivity 58.6%, specificity 80.7%, positive predictive value 73.9% [95% CI; 56.5% to 86.1%], negative predictive value 69.7% [95% CI; 56.7% to 76.9%]. Conclusions Change in ETCO2 is a useful bedside test to predict fluid responsiveness in cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Komal Baloch
- Critical Care Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK
| | - Aziz Rehman Memon
- Critical Care Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK
| | - Urwah Ikhlaq
- Critical Care Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK
| | - Madiha Umair
- Critical Care Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK
| | - Muhammad Imran Ansari
- Critical Care Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK
| | - Jawed Abubaker
- Internal Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK
| | - Nawal Salahuddin
- Critical Care Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
767
|
Banning A, Adriaenssens T, Berry C, Bogaerts K, Erglis A, Distelmaier K, Guagliumi G, Haine S, Kastrati A, Massberg S, Orban M, Myrmel T, Vuylsteke A, Alfonso F, Van de Werf F, Verheugt F, Flather M, Sabaté M, Vrints C, Gershlick A. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock: rationale and design of the randomised, multicentre, open-label EURO SHOCK trial. EUROINTERVENTION 2021; 16:e1227-e1236. [PMID: 33106225 PMCID: PMC9725005 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-20-01076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Cardiogenic shock (CGS) occurs in 6-10% of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Mortality has fallen over time from 80% to approximately 50% consequent on acute revascularisation but has plateaued since the 1990s. Once established, patients with CGS develop adverse compensatory mechanisms that contribute to the downward spiral towards death, which becomes difficult to reverse. We aimed to test in a robust, prospective, randomised controlled trial whether early support with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides clinical benefit by improving mortality and morbidity. METHODS AND RESULTS The EURO SHOCK trial will test the benefit or otherwise of mechanical cardiac support using VA-ECMO, initiated early after acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CGS. The trial sets out to randomise 428 patients with CGS complicating ACS, following primary PCI (P-PCI), to either very early ECMO plus standard pharmacotherapy, or standard pharmacotherapy alone. It will be conducted in 39 European centres. The primary endpoint is 30-day all-cause mortality with key secondary endpoints: 1) 12-month all-cause mortality or admission for heart failure, 2) 12-month all-cause mortality, 3) 12-month admission for heart failure. Cost-effectiveness analysis (including quality of life measures) will be embedded. Mechanistic and hypothesis-generating substudies will be undertaken. CONCLUSIONS The EURO SHOCK trial will determine whether early initiation of VA-ECMO in patients presenting with ACS-CGS persisting after PCI improves mortality and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amerjeet Banning
- Department of Cardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Adriaenssens
- University Hospitals Leuven, and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Colin Berry
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences and Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kris Bogaerts
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, I-BioStat, and Universiteit Hasselt, I-BioStat, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andrejs Erglis
- Paula Stradina Kliniska Universitates Slimnica AS, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Riga, Latvia
| | - Klaus Distelmaier
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giulio Guagliumi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Steven Haine
- Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Cardiology and University of Antwerp, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Adnan Kastrati
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Department of Cardiology, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Massberg
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Truls Myrmel
- The Heart and Lung Clinic, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Alain Vuylsteke
- Royal Papworth Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Fernando Alfonso
- Cardiac Department, La Princesa University Hospital, IIS-IP, CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain
| | - Frans Van de Werf
- University Hospitals Leuven, and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Freek Verheugt
- Heartcenter, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcus Flather
- University of East Anglia and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Manel Sabaté
- Consorci Institut D’Investicacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christiaan Vrints
- Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Cardiology and University of Antwerp, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anthony Gershlick
- University of Leicester, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
768
|
Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, Hurley NC, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP, Berkowitz AP, Masoudi FA, Messenger JC, Parzynski CS, Ngufor CG, Girotra S, Amin AP, Shah ND, Desai NR. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2037748. [PMID: 33616664 PMCID: PMC7900859 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, including intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs), are used in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock despite limited evidence of their clinical benefit. OBJECTIVE To examine trends in the use of MCS devices among patients who underwent PCI for AMI with cardiogenic shock, hospital-level use variation, and factors associated with use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study used the CathPCI and Chest Pain-MI Registries of the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Patients who underwent PCI for AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, were identified from both registries. Data were analyzed from October 2018 to August 2020. EXPOSURES Therapies to provide hemodynamic support were categorized as intravascular microaxial LVAD, IABP, TandemHeart, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, LVAD, other devices, combined IABP and intravascular microaxial LVAD, combined IABP and other device (defined as TandemHeart, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, LVAD, or another MCS device), or medical therapy only. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Use of MCS devices overall and specific MCS devices, including intravascular microaxial LVAD, at both patient and hospital levels and variables associated with use. RESULTS Among the 28 304 patients included in the study, the mean (SD) age was 65.4 (12.6) years and 18 968 were men (67.0%). The overall MCS device use was constant from the fourth quarter of 2015 to the fourth quarter of 2017, although use of intravascular microaxial LVADs significantly increased (from 4.1% to 9.8%; P < .001), whereas use of IABPs significantly decreased (from 34.8% to 30.0%; P < .001). A significant hospital-level variation in MCS device use was found. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) proportion of patients who received MCS devices was 42% (30%-54%), and the median proportion of patients who received intravascular microaxial LVADs was 1% (0%-10%). In multivariable analyses, cardiac arrest at first medical contact or during hospitalization (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% CI, 1.58-2.09) and severe left main and/or proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.54) were patient characteristics that were associated with higher odds of receiving intravascular microaxial LVADs only compared with IABPs only. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that, among patients who underwent PCI for AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, overall use of MCS devices was constant, and a 2.5-fold increase in intravascular microaxial LVAD use was found along with a corresponding decrease in IABP use and a significant hospital-level variation in MCS device use. These trends were observed despite limited clinical trial evidence of improved outcomes associated with device use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanket S. Dhruva
- University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Joseph S. Ross
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Bobak J. Mortazavi
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station
- Center for Remote Health Technologies and Systems, Texas A&M University, College Station
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nathan C. Hurley
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station
| | - Harlan M. Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeptha P. Curtis
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alyssa P. Berkowitz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Frederick A. Masoudi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - John C. Messenger
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Craig S. Parzynski
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Che G. Ngufor
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Digital Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Saket Girotra
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City
- Center for Access & Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Amit P. Amin
- Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Nilay D. Shah
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Health Care Policy Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nihar R. Desai
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
769
|
Krishnamoorthy P, Vengrenyuk A, Wasielewski B, Barman N, Bander J, Sweeny J, Baber U, Dangas G, Gidwani U, Syros G, Singh M, Vengrenyuk Y, Ezenkwele U, Tamis-Holland J, Chu K, Warshaw A, Kukar A, Bai M, Darrow B, Garcia H, Oliver B, Sharma SK, Kini AS. Mobile application to optimize care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in a large healthcare system, STEMIcathAID: rationale and design. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. DIGITAL HEALTH 2021; 2:189-201. [PMID: 36712391 PMCID: PMC9707921 DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Aims Technological advancements have transformed healthcare. System delays in transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Our aim was to design and develop a secure mobile application, STEMIcathAID, streamlining communication, and coordination between the STEMI care teams to reduce ischaemia time and improve patient outcomes. Methods and results The app was designed for transfer of patients with STEMI to a cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) from an emergency department (ED) of either a PCI capable or a non-PCI capable hospital. When a suspected STEMI arrives to a non-PCI hospital ED, the ED physician uploads the electrocardiogram and relevant patient information. An instant notification is simultaneously sent to the on-call CCL attending and transfer centre. The attending reviews the information, makes a video call and decides to either accept or reject the transfer. If accepted, on-call CCL team members receive an immediate push notification and begin communicating with the ED team via a HIPAA compliant chat. The app provides live GPS tracking of the ambulance and frequent clinical status updates of the patient. In addition, it allows for screening of STEMI patients in cardiogenic shock. Prior to discharge, important data elements have to be entered to close the case. Conclusion We developed a novel mobile app to optimize care for STEMI patients and facilitate electronic extraction of relevant performance metrics to improve allocation of resources and reduction of costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parasuram Krishnamoorthy
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Andriy Vengrenyuk
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Brian Wasielewski
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nitin Barman
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bander
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Joseph Sweeny
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Usman Baber
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - George Dangas
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Umesh Gidwani
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Georgios Syros
- Department of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Queens, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Yuliya Vengrenyuk
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Ugo Ezenkwele
- Emergency Department, Mount Sinai Queens, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacqueline Tamis-Holland
- Department of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Morningside and Mount Sinai West, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenny Chu
- Information Technology Department, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abraham Warshaw
- Department of, Population Health Science and Policy, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Atul Kukar
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Matthew Bai
- Emergency Department, Mount Sinai Queens, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bruce Darrow
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA,Information Technology Department, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haydee Garcia
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Beth Oliver
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Samin K Sharma
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Annapoorna S Kini
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA,Corresponding author. Tel: +1 212 241 4181, Fax: +1 212 534 2845,
| |
Collapse
|
770
|
Blood Urea Nitrogen and In-Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Analysis of the MIMIC-III Database. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:5948636. [PMID: 33604376 PMCID: PMC7870297 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5948636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The association between blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and prognosis has been the focus of recent research. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the association between BUN and hospital mortality in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). This was a retrospective cohort study, in which data were obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III V1.4 database. Data from 697 patients with CS were analyzed. Logistic regression and subgroup analyses were used to assess the association between BUN and hospital mortality in patients with CS. The average age of the 697 participants was 71.14 years, and approximately 42.18% were men. In the multivariate logistic regression model, after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, cardiac arrhythmias, urine output, simplified acute physiology score II, sequential organ failure assessment, creatinine, anion gap, and heart rate, high BUN demonstrated strong associations with increased in-hospital mortality (per standard deviation increase: odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–1.92). A similar result was observed in BUN tertile groups (BUN 23–37 mg/dL versus 6–22 mg/dL: OR [95% CI], 1.42 [0.86–2.34]; BUN 38–165 mg/dL versus 6–22 mg/dL: OR [95% CI], 1.99 [1.10–3.62]; P trend 0.0272). Subgroup analysis did not reveal any significant interactions among various subgroups, and higher BUN was associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with CS.
Collapse
|
771
|
Jentzer JC, Ahmed AM, Vallabhajosyula S, Burstein B, Tabi M, Barsness GW, Murphy JG, Best PJ, Bell MR. Shock in the cardiac intensive care unit: Changes in epidemiology and prognosis over time. Am Heart J 2021; 232:94-104. [PMID: 33257304 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
There are few studies documenting the changing epidemiology and outcomes of shock in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. We sought to describe the changes in shock epidemiology and outcomes over time in a CICU population. METHODS We included 1859 unique patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic Rochester CICU from 2007 through 2018 with an admission diagnosis of shock. Temporal trends, including mortality, were assessed across 3-year periods. RESULTS Shock comprised 15.1% of CICU admissions during the study period, increasing from 8.8% of CICU admissions in 2007 to 21.6% in 2018 (P < .01 for trend). Mean age was 68 ± 14 years (38% females). Shock was cardiogenic in 65%, septic in 10% and mixed cardiogenic-septic in 15%. Concomitant diagnoses in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 17%, heart failure (HF) in 35% and both in 40%. There was no significant change in the prevalence of individual shock subtypes over time (P > .1). Among patients with CS, the prevalence of ACS decreased and the prevalence of HF increased over time (P < .01). Hospital mortality was highest among patients with mixed shock (39%; P = .05). Among patients with CS, hospital mortality was lower among those with HF compared to those without HF (31% vs. 40%, P < .01). Hospital mortality decreased over time among patients with shock (P < .01) and CS (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of shock in the CICU has increased over time, with a substantial prevalence of mixed CS. The etiology of CS has changed over the last decade with HF overtaking ACS as the most common cause of CS in the CICU.
Collapse
|
772
|
Scheeren TWL, Bakker J, Kaufmann T, Annane D, Asfar P, Boerma EC, Cecconi M, Chew MS, Cholley B, Cronhjort M, De Backer D, Dubin A, Dünser MW, Duranteau J, Gordon AC, Hajjar LA, Hamzaoui O, Hernandez G, Kanoore Edul V, Koster G, Landoni G, Leone M, Levy B, Martin C, Mebazaa A, Monnet X, Morelli A, Payen D, Pearse RM, Pinsky MR, Radermacher P, Reuter DA, Sakr Y, Sander M, Saugel B, Singer M, Squara P, Vieillard-Baron A, Vignon P, Vincent JL, van der Horst ICC, Vistisen ST, Teboul JL. Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:21. [PMID: 33512597 PMCID: PMC7846624 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00806-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment decisions on critically ill patients with circulatory shock lack consensus. In an international survey, we aimed to evaluate the indications, current practice, and therapeutic goals of inotrope therapy in the treatment of patients with circulatory shock. METHODS From November 2016 to April 2017, an anonymous web-based survey on the use of cardiovascular drugs was accessible to members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). A total of 14 questions focused on the profile of respondents, the triggering factors, first-line choice, dosing, timing, targets, additional treatment strategy, and suggested effect of inotropes. In addition, a group of 42 international ESICM experts was asked to formulate recommendations for the use of inotropes based on 11 questions. RESULTS A total of 839 physicians from 82 countries responded. Dobutamine was the first-line inotrope in critically ill patients with acute heart failure for 84% of respondents. Two-thirds of respondents (66%) stated to use inotropes when there were persistent clinical signs of hypoperfusion or persistent hyperlactatemia despite a supposed adequate use of fluids and vasopressors, with (44%) or without (22%) the context of low left ventricular ejection fraction. Nearly half (44%) of respondents stated an adequate cardiac output as target for inotropic treatment. The experts agreed on 11 strong recommendations, all of which were based on excellent (> 90%) or good (81-90%) agreement. Recommendations include the indications for inotropes (septic and cardiogenic shock), the choice of drugs (dobutamine, not dopamine), the triggers (low cardiac output and clinical signs of hypoperfusion) and targets (adequate cardiac output) and stopping criteria (adverse effects and clinical improvement). CONCLUSION Inotrope use in critically ill patients is quite heterogeneous as self-reported by individual caregivers. Eleven strong recommendations on the indications, choice, triggers and targets for the use of inotropes are given by international experts. Future studies should focus on consistent indications for inotrope use and implementation into a guideline for circulatory shock that encompasses individualized targets and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas W. L. Scheeren
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O.Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Bakker
- New York University Medical Center, New York, USA
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Thomas Kaufmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O.Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Djillali Annane
- School of Medicine Simone Veil, Raymond Poincaré Hospital (APHP), Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Versailles- University Paris Saclay, Garches, France
| | - Pierre Asfar
- Département de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation Et de Médecine Hyperbare, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers; and Institut MITOVASC, CNRS UMR 6215, INSERM U1083, Angers University, Angers, France
| | - E. Christiaan Boerma
- Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Department of Intensive Care, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Milan, Italy
| | - Michelle S. Chew
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bernard Cholley
- Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Maria Cronhjort
- Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel De Backer
- Department of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnaldo Dubin
- Cátedra de Farmacología Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata Y Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Otamendi, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martin W. Dünser
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Jacques Duranteau
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Anthony C. Gordon
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ludhmila A. Hajjar
- Department of Cardiopneumology, Instituto Do Coracao, Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital SirioLibanes, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Olfa Hamzaoui
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Glenn Hernandez
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Geert Koster
- Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Landoni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc Leone
- Aix Marseille Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Service D’Anesthésie Et de Réanimation CHU Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Bruno Levy
- Service de Réanimation Médicale Brabois Et Pôle Cardio-Médico-Chirurgical. CHRU Brabois, INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre les NancyNancy, 54500 France
| | - Claude Martin
- Aix Marseille Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Service D’Anesthésie Et de Réanimation CHU Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- Department of Anesthesia, Burn and Critical Care, APHP Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint Louis LariboisièreUniversité Paris DiderotU942 Inserm, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Monnet
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University Hospitals, Bicêtre hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- INSERM UMR_S 999, FHU SEPSIS, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Andrea Morelli
- Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Didier Payen
- University Paris 7 Denis Diderot; INSERM 1160 and Hôpital Lariboisière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Rupert M. Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ UK
| | - Michael R. Pinsky
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Peter Radermacher
- Institut Für Anästhesiologische Pathophysiologie Und Verfahrensentwicklung, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Daniel A. Reuter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Yasser Sakr
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uniklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Michael Sander
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Giessen, UKGM, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mervyn Singer
- Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pierre Squara
- ICU Department, Réanimation CERIC, Clinique Ambroise Paré, Neuilly, France
| | - Antoine Vieillard-Baron
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Hospital Ambroise Paré, intensive care unit, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
- INSERM U-1018, CESP, Team 5, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Villejuif, France
| | - Philippe Vignon
- Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, INSERM CIC-1435, Teaching Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
- University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- Université Libre de Bruxelles - Dept of Intensive Care, Erasme Univ Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iwan C. C. van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon T. Vistisen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jean-Louis Teboul
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University Hospitals, Bicêtre hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- INSERM UMR_S 999, FHU SEPSIS, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
773
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Ward
- Department of Emergency Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.,Department of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.,Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville TN
| | - Brahmajee K Nallamothu
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Internal Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI.,Michigan Integrated Center for Health Analytics and Medical Prediction Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI
| |
Collapse
|
774
|
Le Guyader A, Pernot M, Delmas C, Roze S, Fau I, Flecher E, Lebreton G. Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0 ® Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 13:53-63. [PMID: 33500641 PMCID: PMC7826059 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s278269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0®, a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the left ventricle, into clinical practice in patients with left ventricular CS in France. METHODS A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of Impella 5.0 with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) from the perspective of the French national healthcare insurer. Costs associated with Impella 5.0, plus complication-related costs for VA-ECMO or Impella 5.0 from 2019 were included and clinical input data relating to complication rates and time spent on device were sourced from published literature. Extensive scenario and one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the influence of uncertainty around key input parameters. RESULTS Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of Impella 5.0 was associated with cumulative savings of EUR 4.3 million. The results were driven by the lower risk of device-related complications associated with Impella 5.0. Savings were apparent from Year 1 onwards, with savings in excess of EUR 375,000 projected in Year 1 alone. On a per-patient level, in Year 1, estimated savings with the introduction of Impella 5.0 totaled EUR 616 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of the analysis were robust. CONCLUSION The Impella 5.0 device was associated with cumulative cost savings in excess of EUR 4 million over a 5-year period compared with current practice. Projected savings were driven by a lower rate of device-related complications with Impella 5.0 compared with VA-ECMO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Le Guyader
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Mathieu Pernot
- Department of Cardiology and Cardio‐Vascular Surgery, Haut-Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Clément Delmas
- Cardiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Erwan Flecher
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Guillaume Lebreton
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
775
|
Jentzer JC, Burstein B, Van Diepen S, Murphy J, Holmes DR, Bell MR, Barsness GW, Henry TD, Menon V, Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Baran DA. Defining Shock and Preshock for Mortality Risk Stratification in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients. Circ Heart Fail 2021; 14:e007678. [PMID: 33464952 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.120.007678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have defined preshock as isolated hypotension or isolated hypoperfusion, whereas shock has been variably defined as hypoperfusion with or without hypotension. We aimed to evaluate the mortality risk associated with hypotension and hypoperfusion at the time of admission in a cardiac intensive care unit population. METHODS We analyzed Mayo Clinic cardiac intensive care unit patients admitted between 2007 and 2015. Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg, and hypoperfusion as admission lactate >2 mmol/L, oliguria, or rising creatinine. Associations between hypotension and hypoperfusion with hospital mortality were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Among 10 004 patients with a median age of 69 years, 43.1% had acute coronary syndrome, and 46.1% had heart failure. Isolated hypotension was present in 16.7%, isolated hypoperfusion in 15.3%, and 8.7% had both hypotension and hypoperfusion. Stepwise increases in hospital mortality were observed with hypotension and hypoperfusion compared with neither hypotension nor hypoperfusion (3.3%; all P<0.001): isolated hypotension, 9.3% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.4-2.2]); isolated hypoperfusion, 17.2% (adjusted odds ratio, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.9-3.0]); both hypotension and hypoperfusion, 33.8% (adjusted odds ratio, 2.8 [95% CI, 2.1-3.6]). Adjusted hospital mortality in patients with isolated hypoperfusion was higher than in patients with isolated hypotension (P=0.02) and not significant different from patients with both hypotension and hypoperfusion (P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS Hypotension and hypoperfusion are both associated with increased mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients. Hospital mortality is higher with isolated hypoperfusion or concomitant hypotension and hypoperfusion (classic shock). We contend that preshock should refer to isolated hypotension without hypoperfusion, while patients with hypoperfusion can be considered to have shock, irrespective of blood pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., J.M., D.R.H., M.R.B., G.W.B., C.S.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.C.J., B.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Barry Burstein
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.C.J., B.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sean Van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton (S.v.D.)
| | - Joseph Murphy
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., J.M., D.R.H., M.R.B., G.W.B., C.S.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David R Holmes
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., J.M., D.R.H., M.R.B., G.W.B., C.S.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Malcolm R Bell
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., J.M., D.R.H., M.R.B., G.W.B., C.S.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gregory W Barsness
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., J.M., D.R.H., M.R.B., G.W.B., C.S.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Timothy D Henry
- The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at the Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, OH (T.D.H.)
| | - Venu Menon
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (V.M.)
| | - Charanjit S Rihal
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., J.M., D.R.H., M.R.B., G.W.B., C.S.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Srihari S Naidu
- Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla (S.S.N.)
| | - David A Baran
- Sentara Heart Hospital, Advanced Heart Failure Center and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia (D.A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
776
|
Moghaddam N, van Diepen S, So D, Lawler PR, Fordyce CB. Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail 2021; 8:988-998. [PMID: 33452763 PMCID: PMC8006679 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) portends high morbidity and mortality in the contemporary era. Despite advances in temporary mechanical circulatory supports (MCS), their routine use in CS to improve outcomes has not been established. Delays in diagnosis and timely delivery of care, disparities in accessing adjunct therapies such revascularization or MCS, and lack of a systematic approach to care of CS contribute to the poor outcomes observed in CS patients. There is growing interest for developing a standardized multidisciplinary team-based approach in the management of CS. Recent prospective studies have shown feasibility of CS teams in improving survival across a spectrum of CS presentations. Herein, we will review the rationale for CS teams focusing on evidence supporting its use in streamlining care, optimizing revascularization strategies, and patient identification and MCS selection. The proposed structure and flow of CS teams will be outlined. An in-depth analysis of four recent studies demonstrating improved outcomes with CS teams is presented. Finally, we will explore potential implementation hurdles and future directions in refining and widespread implementation of dedicated cross-specialty CS teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Moghaddam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Derek So
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick R Lawler
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher B Fordyce
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
777
|
Chow RS. Terms, Definitions, Nomenclature, and Routes of Fluid Administration. Front Vet Sci 2021; 7:591218. [PMID: 33521077 PMCID: PMC7844884 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.591218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluid therapy is administered to veterinary patients in order to improve hemodynamics, replace deficits, and maintain hydration. The gradual expansion of medical knowledge and research in this field has led to a proliferation of terms related to fluid products, fluid delivery and body fluid distribution. Consistency in the use of terminology enables precise and effective communication in clinical and research settings. This article provides an alphabetical glossary of important terms and common definitions in the human and veterinary literature. It also summarizes the common routes of fluid administration in small and large animal species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind S Chow
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
778
|
Ineffective Perfusion: An Ominous Sign No Matter How You Measure It. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 14:333-334. [PMID: 33454270 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
779
|
Loungani RS, Fudim M, Ranney D, Kochar A, Samsky MD, Bonadonna D, Itoh A, Takayama H, Takeda K, Wojdyla D, DeVore AD, Daneshmand M. Contemporary Use of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Insights from the Multicenter RESCUE Registry. J Card Fail 2021; 27:327-337. [PMID: 33347997 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as a life-saving therapy for patients with cardiovascular collapse, but identifying patients unlikely to benefit remains a challenge. METHODS AND RESULTS We created the RESCUE registry, a retrospective, observational registry of adult patients treated with VA-ECMO between January 2007 and June 2017 at 3 high-volume centers (Columbia University, Duke University, and Washington University) to describe short-term patient outcomes. In 723 patients treated with VA-ECMO, the most common indications for deployment were postcardiotomy shock (31%), cardiomyopathy (including acute heart failure) (26%), and myocardial infarction (17%). Patients frequently suffered in-hospital complications, including acute renal dysfunction (45%), major bleeding (41%), and infection (33%). Only 40% of patients (n = 290) survived to discharge, with a minority receiving durable cardiac support (left ventricular assist device [n = 48] or heart transplantation [n = 7]). Multivariable regression analysis identified risk factors for mortality on ECMO as older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.42) and female sex (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.02-2.02) and risk factors for mortality after decannulation as higher body mass index (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35) and major bleeding while on ECMO support (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.23-2.99). CONCLUSIONS Despite contemporary care at high-volume centers, patients treated with VA-ECMO continue to have significant in-hospital morbidity and mortality. The optimization of outcomes will require refinements in patient selection and improvement of care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul S Loungani
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Marat Fudim
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dave Ranney
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ajar Kochar
- Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marc D Samsky
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Desiree Bonadonna
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Akinobu Itoh
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Hiroo Takayama
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Koji Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Wojdyla
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Adam D DeVore
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mani Daneshmand
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
780
|
Carsetti A, Bignami E, Cortegiani A, Donadello K, Donati A, Foti G, Grasselli G, Romagnoli S, Antonelli M, DE Blasio E, Forfori F, Guarracino F, Scolletta S, Tritapepe L, Scudeller L, Cecconi M, Girardis M. Good clinical practice for the use of vasopressor and inotropic drugs in critically ill patients: state-of-the-art and expert consensus. Minerva Anestesiol 2021; 87:714-732. [PMID: 33432794 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.20.14866-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Vasopressors and inotropic agents are widely used in critical care. However, strong evidence supporting their use in critically ill patients is lacking in many clinical scenarios. Thus, the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) promoted a project aimed to provide indications for good clinical practice on the use of vasopressors and inotropes, and on the management of critically ill patients with shock. A panel of 16 experts in the field of intensive care medicine and hemodynamics has been established. Systematic review of the available literature was performed based on PICO questions. Basing on available evidence, the panel prepared a summary of evidence and then wrote the clinical questions. A modified semi-quantitative RAND/UCLA appropriateness method has been used to determine the appropriateness of specific clinical scenarios. The panel identified 29 clinical questions for the use of vasopressors and inotropes in patients with septic shock and cardiogenic shock. High level of agreement exists among the panel members about appropriateness of inotropes/vasopressors' use in patients with septic shock and cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Carsetti
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Ospedali Riuniti University Hospital, Ancona, Italy - .,Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy -
| | - Elena Bignami
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Andrea Cortegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, Section of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Paolo Giaccone Polyclinic Hospital, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Katia Donadello
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care B Unit, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Abele Donati
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Ospedali Riuniti University Hospital, Ancona, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Foti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giacomo Grasselli
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Emergency, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Romagnoli
- Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimo Antonelli
- Department of Anesthesiology Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Forfori
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Pisa Italy
| | - Fabio Guarracino
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Pisana University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sabino Scolletta
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Luigi Tritapepe
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigia Scudeller
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy and Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Girardis
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
781
|
Biancari F, Perrotti A, Ruggieri VG, Mariscalco G, Dalén M, Dell'Aquila AM, Jónsson K, Ragnarsson S, Di Perna D, Bounader K, Gatti G, Juvonen T, Alkhamees K, Yusuff H, Loforte A, Lechiancole A, Chocron S, Pol M, Spadaccio C, Pettinari M, De Keyzer D, Fiore A, Welp H. Five-year survival after post-cardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:595-601. [PMID: 33580776 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) after adult cardiac surgery is associated with satisfactory hospital survival. However, data on long-term survival of these critically ill patients are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS Between January 2010 and March 2018, 665 consecutive patients received VA-ECMO for PCS at 17 cardiac surgery centres and herein we evaluated their 5-year survival. The mean follow-up of this cohort was 1.7 ± 2.7 years (for hospital survivors, 4.6 ± 2.5 years). In this cohort, 240 (36.1%) patients survived to hospital discharge. Five-year survival of all patients was 27.7%. The PC-ECMO score was predictive of 5-year survival in these patients (0 point, 50.9%; 1 point, 44.9%; 2 points, 40.0%; 3 points, 34.7%; 4 points, 21.0%; 5 points, 17.6%; ≥6 points, 10.7%; P < 0.0001). Age was among factors independently associated with late survival, patients >70 years old having a remarkably poor 5-year survival (<60 years: 39.2%; 60-69 years: 29.9%; 70-79 years: 12.3%; ≥80 years: 13.0%, P < 0.0001). Implantation of a ventricular assist device or heart transplant was performed in 3.2% of patients and their 5-year survival was 42.9% (for heart transplant, 63.6%). CONCLUSION Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for PCS is associated with satisfactory 5-year survival in young patients without critical pre-ECMO conditions. The use of VA-ECMO for PCS in patients >70 years should be considered only after a judicious scrutiny of patient's life expectancy. Future studies should evaluate whether satisfactory mid-term survival of these patients translates into a good functional outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov-NCT03508505.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto Biancari
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 P.O. Box 340, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.,Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Andrea Perrotti
- Department of Thoracic and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - Vito G Ruggieri
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Giovanni Mariscalco
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Magnus Dalén
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Cardiac Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Angelo M Dell'Aquila
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Kristján Jónsson
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Dario Di Perna
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Karl Bounader
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Giuseppe Gatti
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti, Trieste, Italy
| | - Tatu Juvonen
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 P.O. Box 340, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.,Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Hakeem Yusuff
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Antonio Loforte
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Sidney Chocron
- Department of Thoracic and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - Marek Pol
- Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Matteo Pettinari
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Dieter De Keyzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Antonio Fiore
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris-Est University, Créteil, France
| | - Henryk Welp
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
782
|
Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz K, Montero S, Bañeras J, Wood A, Zeid A, De Rosa S, Guerra F, Tica O, Serrano F, Bohm A, Ahrens I, Gierlotka M, Masip J, Bonnefoy E, Lettino M, Kirchhof P, Sionis A. Current status and needs for changes in critical care training: the voice of the young cardiologists. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:94-101. [PMID: 33580774 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The implementation of the 2013 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Core Curriculum guidelines for acute cardiovascular care (acc) training among European countries is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the current status of acc training among cardiology trainees and young cardiologists (<40 years) from ESC countries. METHODS AND RESULTS The survey (March-July 2019) asked about details of cardiology training, self-confidence in acc technical and non-technical skills, access to training opportunities, and needs for further training in the field. Overall 614 young doctors, 31 (26-43) years old, 55% males were surveyed. Place and duration of acc training differed between countries and between centres in the same country. Although the majority of the respondents (91%) had completed their acc training, the average self-confidence to perform invasive procedures and to manage acc clinical scenarios was low-44% (27.3-70.4). The opportunities for simulation-based learning were scarce-18% (5.8-51.3), as it was previous leadership training (32%) and knowledge about key teamwork principles was poor (48%). The need for further acc training was high-81% (61.9-94.3). Male gender, higher level of training centres, professional qualifications of respondents, longer duration of acc/intensive care training, debriefings, and previous leadership training as well as knowledge about teamwork were related to higher self-confidence in all investigated aspects. CONCLUSIONS The current cardiology training program is burdened by deficits in acc technical/non-technical skills, substantial variability in programs across ESC countries, and a clear gender-related disparity in outcomes. The forthcoming ESC Core Curriculum for General Cardiology is expected to address these deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz
- Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzinskiego 1, 30-705 Krakow, Poland.,Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, UB9 6JH, London, UK
| | - Santiago Montero
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Plaça Cívica 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Bañeras
- Acute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Centre de Simulació Clínica Avançada VHISCA, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 119, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Wood
- University Hospital of Leicester, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK
| | - A Zeid
- El Maamoura Chest Hospital-Cardiology Department, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - S De Rosa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Catanzaro, 88100 Calabria, Italy
| | - F Guerra
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi", 60121 Ancona Italy
| | - O Tica
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medical Discipline, University of Oradea, 1st of December Square, no 10, Oradea, Bihor County, Romania
| | - F Serrano
- The European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis, CS 80179 Biot, France
| | - A Bohm
- Department of Acute Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 833 48 Bratislava 37, Slovakia
| | - I Ahrens
- Cardiology and Medical Intensive Care, Augustinerinnen Hospital, 50678 Cologne, Germany
| | - M Gierlotka
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, pl. Kopernika 11a 45-040 Opole, Poland
| | - J Masip
- Intensive Care Department, Consorci Sanitari Integral University of Barcelona, Barcelona, AVENIDA JOSEP MOLINS, 29 - 41 08906, Spain
| | - E Bonnefoy
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiologic Hospital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69002 Lyon, France
| | - M Lettino
- Cardiovascular Department, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST-Monza, Via Pegolesi 33 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - P Kirchhof
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.,University Heart and Vascular Center, UKE Hamburg, Martinistraße 52 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Sionis
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Carrer de Sant Quintí, 89, 08041, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
783
|
van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Potential growth in cardiogenic shock research though an international registry collaboration: the merits and challenges of a Hub-of-Spokes model. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:3-5. [PMID: 33580781 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David A Morrow
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
784
|
Jentzer JC, Schrage B, Holmes DR, Dabboura S, Anavekar NS, Kirchhof P, Barsness GW, Blankenberg S, Bell MR, Westermann D. Influence of age and shock severity on short-term survival in patients with cardiogenic shock. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:604-612. [PMID: 33580778 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with poor outcomes in older patients, but it remains unclear if this is due to higher shock severity. We sought to determine the associations between age and shock severity on mortality among patients with CS. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with a diagnosis of CS from Mayo Clinic (2007-15) and University Clinic Hamburg (2009-17) were subdivided by age. Shock severity was graded using the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) shock stages. Predictors of 30-day survival were determined using Cox proportional-hazards analysis. We included 1749 patients (934 from Mayo Clinic and 815 from University Clinic Hamburg), with a mean age of 67.6 ± 14.6 years, including 33.6% females. Acute coronary syndrome was the cause of CS in 54.0%. The distribution of SCAI shock stages was 24.1%; C, 28.0%; D, 33.2%; and E, 14.8%. Older patients had similar overall shock severity, more co-morbidities, worse kidney function, and decreased use of mechanical circulatory support compared to younger patients. Overall 30-day survival was 53.3% and progressively decreased as age or SCAI shock stage increased, with a clear gradient towards lower 30-day survival as a function of increasing age and SCAI shock stage. Progressively older age groups had incrementally lower adjusted 30-day survival than patients aged <50 years. CONCLUSION Older patients with CS have lower short-term survival, despite similar shock severity, with a high risk of death in older patients with more severe shock. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies for older CS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Interventional and General Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), University Heart Centre Hamburg, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David R Holmes
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Salim Dabboura
- Department of Interventional and General Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), University Heart Centre Hamburg, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nandan S Anavekar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Interventional and General Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), University Heart Centre Hamburg, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gregory W Barsness
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Interventional and General Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), University Heart Centre Hamburg, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Malcolm R Bell
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Interventional and General Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), University Heart Centre Hamburg, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
785
|
Waqar A, Lopez JJ. Neurological complications of coronary heart disease and their management. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2021; 177:57-63. [PMID: 33632457 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819814-8.00024-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
While risk factors for the development of neurovascular and coronary heart disease (CHD) are similar, it is important to consider neurologic complications of CHD separately, as many of these complications are a direct result of the underlying condition or procedures performed to treat atherosclerotic coronary disease. Stroke after myocardial infarction (MI) and acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) is not infrequent, occurring in 0.7%-2.5% of patients within 6 months of the coronary event. The etiology of these events can be frequently traced to the development of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation after large MI episodes. Often, however, these events are directly related to catheter-based procedures or anticoagulation strategies utilized to treat the ACS. Ischemic strokes outnumber hemorrhagic strokes in this population. While there is a modest evidence base for use of anticoagulation to treat LVT, catheterization-related ischemic stroke and anticoagulation-related hemorrhagic stroke are typically managed via standard approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneeq Waqar
- Division of Cardiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, United States; Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, United States
| | - John J Lopez
- Division of Cardiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, United States; Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
786
|
Utilization and extravasation of peripheral norepinephrine in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 2021; 39:55-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
787
|
Díaz Molina B, González Costello J, Barge-Caballero E. The shock code in Spain. The next quality leap in cardiological care is here. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2021; 74:5-7. [PMID: 33067155 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Díaz Molina
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca Avanzada y Trasplante Cardiaco, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
| | - José González Costello
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca y Trasplante Cardiaco, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Barge-Caballero
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardiaca, Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
788
|
Díaz Molina B, González Costello J, Barge-Caballero E. Código shock en España. El próximo salto de calidad en la asistencia cardiológica ya está aquí. Rev Esp Cardiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2020.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
789
|
Nakajima T, Tanaka Y, Fischer I, Kotkar K, Damiano RJ, Moon MR, Masood MF, Itoh A. Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiogenic Shock With Either a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device or an Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump. ASAIO J 2021; 67:25-31. [PMID: 33346989 PMCID: PMC7745888 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000001192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can result in complications due to increased left ventricular (LV) afterload. The percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are both considered to be effective means of LV unloading. This study describes the efficacy of LV unloading and related outcomes with PVAD or IABP during ECLS. From January 2010 to April 2018, all cardiogenic shock patients who underwent ECLS plus simultaneous PVAD or IABP were analyzed. Forty-nine patients received ECLS + PVAD, while 91 received ECLS + IABP. At 48 hours, mean pulmonary artery pressure was significantly reduced in both groups [34 mm Hg to 22, p < 0.01; 32 mm Hg to 21, p < 0.01; ECLS + PVAD and ECLS + IABP group, respectively]. The two groups had similar 30 day survival rates [19 patients (39%) vs. 35 (39%), p = 0.56]. The ECLS + PVAD group had higher incidences of bleeding at the insertion site [11 (22%) vs. 0, p < 0.01] and major hemolysis [9 (18%) vs. 0, p < 0.01]. Both groups had improvement in LV end-diastolic dimension (61 ± 12 mm to 54 ± 12, p = 0.03; 60 ± 12 mm to 47 ± 10, p < 0.01), and LV ejection fraction (16 ± 7% to 22 ± 10, p < 0.01; 22 ± 12% to 29 ± 15, p = 0.01). Both ECLS + PVAD and ECLS + IABP effectively reduced pulmonary artery pressure and improved LV function. Bleeding at the PVAD or IABP insertion site occurred more frequently in the ECLS + PVAD group than the ECLS + IABP group (p < 0.01). Nine patients (18%) in the ECLS + PVAD group experienced major hemolysis, while there was no hemolysis in the ECLS + IABP group (p < 0.01). Careful considerations are required before selecting an additional support to ECLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Nakajima
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Yuki Tanaka
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Irene Fischer
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kunal Kotkar
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ralph J. Damiano
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Marc R. Moon
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Muhammad F. Masood
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Akinobu Itoh
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
790
|
Hernández-Pérez FJ, Álvarez-Avelló JM, Forteza A, Gómez-Bueno M, González A, López-Ibor JV, Silva-Melchor L, Goicolea J, Martín CE, Iranzo R, Goirigolzarri-Artaza J, Escudier-Villa JM, Ortega-Marcos J, Oteo-Domínguez JF, Herrero-Cano Á, Moñivas V, Mingo-Santos S, Villar S, Jiménez-Blanco M, Coscia C, Serrano-Fiz S, Alonso-Pulpón L, Segovia-Cubero J. Resultados iniciales de un programa multidisciplinario de atención a pacientes en shock cardiogénico en red. Rev Esp Cardiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
791
|
Schwartz B, Jain P, Salama M, Kapur NK. The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2020; 19:151-164. [PMID: 33356662 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1863147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction and decompensated advanced heart failure remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular mechanical circulatory support devices including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (Impella and Tandemheart pumps), and veno-arterial extracorporeal oxygenation (VA-ECMO) are utilized for a broadening range of indications.Areas covered: This narrative review explores the specific devices, their distinctive hemodynamic profiles, and practical considerations. Furthermore, reviewed are the trials evaluating device outcomes which have generated significant controversy within the field of heart failure and shock. New applications and future directions are discussed.Expert opinion: Use of endovascular mechanical circulatory support has increased over the last decade, though evidence supporting their use is lacking. Development of large-scale prospective registries and clinical classification systems will facilitate patient enrollment and inform trial design. Furthermore, expansion of indications for these devices is revolutionizing how the field of heart failure and cardiogenic shock thinks about hemodynamic support. The ability to tailor therapy to a patient's specific hemodynamic profile appears to be the future of cardiogenic shock management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Schwartz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USATurkey
| | - Pankaj Jain
- The Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USATurkey
| | - Michael Salama
- The Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USATurkey
| | - Navin K Kapur
- The Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USATurkey
| |
Collapse
|
792
|
Hussain A, Via G, Melniker L, Goffi A, Tavazzi G, Neri L, Villen T, Hoppmann R, Mojoli F, Noble V, Zieleskiewicz L, Blanco P, Ma IWY, Wahab MA, Alsaawi A, Al Salamah M, Balik M, Barca D, Bendjelid K, Bouhemad B, Bravo-Figueroa P, Breitkreutz R, Calderon J, Connolly J, Copetti R, Corradi F, Dean AJ, Denault A, Govil D, Graci C, Ha YR, Hurtado L, Kameda T, Lanspa M, Laursen CB, Lee F, Liu R, Meineri M, Montorfano M, Nazerian P, Nelson BP, Neskovic AN, Nogue R, Osman A, Pazeli J, Pereira-Junior E, Petrovic T, Pivetta E, Poelaert J, Price S, Prosen G, Rodriguez S, Rola P, Royse C, Chen YT, Wells M, Wong A, Xiaoting W, Zhen W, Arabi Y. Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for COVID-19 (PoCUS4COVID): international expert consensus. Crit Care 2020; 24:702. [PMID: 33357240 PMCID: PMC7759024 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03369-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 has caused great devastation in the past year. Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) including lung ultrasound (LUS) and focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) as a clinical adjunct has played a significant role in triaging, diagnosis and medical management of COVID-19 patients. The expert panel from 27 countries and 6 continents with considerable experience of direct application of PoCUS on COVID-19 patients presents evidence-based consensus using GRADE methodology for the quality of evidence and an expedited, modified-Delphi process for the strength of expert consensus. The use of ultrasound is suggested in many clinical situations related to respiratory, cardiovascular and thromboembolic aspects of COVID-19, comparing well with other imaging modalities. The limitations due to insufficient data are highlighted as opportunities for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arif Hussain
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Gabriele Via
- Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Lawrence Melniker
- New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alberto Goffi
- Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Luca Neri
- Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Consultant, King Fahad Specialist Hospital - Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tomas Villen
- School of Medicine, Francisco de Vitoria University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Richard Hoppmann
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Francesco Mojoli
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Università Degli Studi Di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Vicki Noble
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Laurent Zieleskiewicz
- Service D'Anesthésie Réanimation Hôpital Nord, APHM, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
| | - Pablo Blanco
- Department of Teaching and Research, Hospital "Dr. Emilio Ferreyra", Necochea, Argentina
| | - Irene W Y Ma
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Mahathar Abd Wahab
- Emergency and Trauma Department, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, 50586, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Abdulmohsen Alsaawi
- King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majid Al Salamah
- College of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Martin Balik
- Dept of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| | - Diego Barca
- Médico Ecografista IADT, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Karim Bendjelid
- Intensive Care Division, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Belaid Bouhemad
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, C.H.U. Dijon and Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, LNC UMR866, 21000, Dijon, France
| | | | - Raoul Breitkreutz
- FOM University of Economy & Management, Frankfurt Campus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Juan Calderon
- Hospital General, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, De Zona 4 Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Jim Connolly
- Great North Trauma and Emergency Care Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Roberto Copetti
- Emergency Department, Latisana General Hospital, Latisana, Italy
| | - Francesco Corradi
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Young-Rock Ha
- Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Toru Kameda
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine and Department of Emergency Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Christian B Laursen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Francis Lee
- Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rachel Liu
- Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Miguel Montorfano
- Department of Ultrasound & Doppler Hospital de Emergencias "Dr. Clemente Alvarez", Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Peiman Nazerian
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italia
| | - Bret P Nelson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aleksandar N Neskovic
- Clinical Hospital Zemun, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Ramon Nogue
- Faculty of Medecine, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Adi Osman
- Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
| | - José Pazeli
- FAME - Medicine School of Barbacena - MG-Brasil, Barbacena, Brazil
| | | | | | - Emanuele Pivetta
- Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Jan Poelaert
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy VUB, Univ Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Gregor Prosen
- Emergency Department, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Colin Royse
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yale Tung Chen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mike Wells
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Wang Xiaoting
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wang Zhen
- The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Yaseen Arabi
- King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
793
|
Fagot J, Bouisset F, Bonello L, Biendel C, Lhermusier T, Porterie J, Roncalli J, Galinier M, Elbaz M, Lairez O, Delmas C. Early Evaluation of Patients on Axial Flow Pump Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock is Associated with Left Ventricular Recovery. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9124130. [PMID: 33371473 PMCID: PMC7767477 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9124130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated prognostic factors associated with refractory left ventricle (LV) failure leading to LV assist device (LVAD), heart transplant or death in patients on an axial flow pump support for cardiogenic shock (CS). Sixty-two CS patients with an Impella® CP or 5.0 implant were retrospectively enrolled, and clinical, biological, echocardiographic, coronarographic and management data were collected. They were compared according to the 30-day outcome. Patients were mainly male (n = 55, 89%), 58 ± 11 years old and most had no history of heart failure or coronary artery disease (70%). The main etiology of CS was acute coronary syndrome (n = 57, 92%). They presented with severe LV failure (LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 22 ± 9%), organ malperfusion (lactate 3.1 ± 2.1 mmol/L), and frequent use of inotropes, vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation (59, 66 and 30%, respectively). At 24 h, non-recovery was associated with higher total bilirubin (odds ratios (OR) 1.07 (1.00–1.14); p = 0.039), lower LVEF (OR 0.89 (0.81–0.96); p = 0.006) and the number of administrated amines (OR 4.31 (1.30–14.30); p = 0.016). Early evaluation in patients with CS with an axial flow pump implant may enable the identification of factors associated with an unlikely recovery and would call for early screening for LVAD or heart transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Fagot
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
- Cardiac Imaging Center, University Hospital of Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Bouisset
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
| | - Laurent Bonello
- Medical School, Toulouse III Paul Sabatier University, 31059 Toulouse, France;
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Nord, Aix-Marseille Univeristy, 13385 Marseille, France
- Association for Research and Studies in Cardiology (MARS Cardio), 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Caroline Biendel
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
| | - Thibaut Lhermusier
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
- Medical School, Toulouse III Paul Sabatier University, 31059 Toulouse, France;
| | - Jean Porterie
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France;
| | - Jerome Roncalli
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
- Medical School, Toulouse III Paul Sabatier University, 31059 Toulouse, France;
| | - Michel Galinier
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
- Medical School, Toulouse III Paul Sabatier University, 31059 Toulouse, France;
| | - Meyer Elbaz
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
- Medical School, Toulouse III Paul Sabatier University, 31059 Toulouse, France;
| | - Olivier Lairez
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
- Cardiac Imaging Center, University Hospital of Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France
- Medical School, Toulouse III Paul Sabatier University, 31059 Toulouse, France;
| | - Clément Delmas
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France; (J.F.); (F.B.); (C.B.); (T.L.); (J.R.); (M.G.); (M.E.); (O.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-561322426; Fax: +33-561322307
| |
Collapse
|
794
|
Guenther SPW, Hornung R, Joskowiak D, Vlachea P, Feil K, Orban M, Peterss S, Born F, Hausleiter J, Massberg S, Hagl C. Extracorporeal life support in therapy-refractory cardiocirculatory failure: looking beyond 30 days. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020; 32:607-615. [PMID: 33347585 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has emerged as a potentially life-saving treatment option in therapy-refractory cardiocirculatory failure, but longer-term outcome is poorly defined. Here, we present a comprehensive follow-up analysis covering all major organ systems. METHODS From February 2012 to December 2016, 180 patients were treated with ECLS for therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The 30-day survival was 43.9%, and 30-day survivors (n = 79) underwent follow-up analysis with the assessment of medium-term survival, quality of life, neuropsychological, cardiopulmonary and end-organ status. RESULTS After a median of 1.9 (1.1-3.6) years (182.4 patient years), 45 of the 79 patients (57.0%) were alive, 35.4% had died and 7.6% were lost to follow-up. Follow-up survival estimates were 78.0% at 1, 61.2% at 3 and 55.1% at 5 years. NYHA class at follow-up was ≤II for 83.3%. The median creatinine was 1.1 (1.0-1.4) mg/dl, and the median bilirubin was 0.8 (0.5-1.0) mg/dl. No patient required dialysis. Overall, 94.4% were free from moderate or severe disability, although 11.1% needed care. Full re-integration into social life was reported by 58.3%, and 39.4% were working. Quality of life was favourable for mental components, but a subset showed deficits in physical aspects. While age was the only peri-implantation parameter significantly predicting medium-term survival, adverse events and functional status at discharge or 30 days were strong predictors. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates positive medium-term outcome with high rates of independence in daily life and self-care but a subset of 10-20% suffered from sustained impairments. Our results indicate that peri-implantation parameters lack predictive power but downstream morbidity and functional status at discharge or 30 days can help identify patients at risk for poor recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina P W Guenther
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Roman Hornung
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Dominik Joskowiak
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Polyxeni Vlachea
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Feil
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Medical Department I, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Peterss
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Born
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Hausleiter
- Medical Department I, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Massberg
- Medical Department I, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany.,Munich Heart Alliance, German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Hagl
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany.,Munich Heart Alliance, German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
795
|
Abstract
The pulmonary artery catheter is a valuable tool available to the clinician for use in deciphering complex hemodynamic scenarios. Patients in shock, particularly those who are elderly or have premorbid conditions such as heart failure, may have atypical presentations. Additional hemodynamic data may help identify interventions that might seem counterintuitive, such as the use of vasoconstrictors in patients with low cardiac output. Interpretation of pulmonary artery hemodynamic data is a skill that should not be relegated to the past. This article reviews the use of a pulmonary artery catheter in mixed shock states. A case study is used to demonstrate how pulmonary artery catheter hemodynamic values can guide the care of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Thurman
- Paul Thurman is Nurse Scientist, Trauma and Critical Care, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Mary-land Medical Center, and Assistant Professor, Doctor of Nursing Practice Program, University of Maryland School of Nursing, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201
| |
Collapse
|
796
|
The Association of Increasing Hospice Use With Decreasing Hospital Mortality: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample. J Healthc Manag 2020; 65:107-120. [PMID: 32168186 DOI: 10.1097/jhm-d-18-00280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Usage of hospice services for patients facing life-limiting illness has steadily increased. In these services, hospitals discharge patients to various hospice settings, including the inpatient model, where a patient may remain in the discharging hospital to receive hospice services. In this discharge practice, the patient is considered a hospital survivor and subsequent hospice death. The purpose of the study was to determine if the decline of in-hospital mortality for six common high-volume admission diagnoses could be attributed in part to an increase in discharges to a hospice setting for end-of-life care. In this retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2007 to 2011, we identified patients ≥18 years for six acute and chronic diagnoses: heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, septic shock, and lung neoplasm (cancer). We categorized patients according to their hospital discharge disposition as hospice or in-hospital mortality. A total of 10,458,728 patients met our criteria, of which 2.72% were discharged to hospice and 6.38% died. Compared to patients who died in the hospital, hospice patients were older, had a shorter length of stay, and experienced more comorbidities. Hospice use was more common in Medicare patients, in nonteaching hospitals, and in the South. White individuals were more likely to be discharged to hospice compared to nonwhites. Among the six selected diagnoses over the 5-year period, hospice use rose as observed mortality decreased. Our findings suggest that variability among hospitals in hospice use will affect benchmarked hospital mortality comparisons and could inappropriately reward or penalize hospitals in their public reporting.
Collapse
|
797
|
Shiraishi Y, Kawana M, Nakata J, Sato N, Fukuda K, Kohsaka S. Time-sensitive approach in the management of acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2020; 8:204-221. [PMID: 33295126 PMCID: PMC7835610 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute heart failure (AHF) has become a global public health burden largely because of the associated high morbidity, mortality, and cost. The treatment options for AHF have remained relatively unchanged over the past decades. Historically, clinical congestion alone has been considered the main target for treatment of acute decompensation in patients with AHF; however, this is an oversimplification of the complex pathophysiology. Within the similar clinical presentation of congestion, significant differences in pathophysiological mechanisms exist between the fluid accumulation and redistribution. Tissue hypoperfusion is another vital characteristic of AHF and should be promptly treated with appropriate interventions. In addition, recent clinical trials of novel therapeutic strategies have shown that heart failure management is ‘time sensitive’ and suggested that treatment selection based on individual aetiologies, triggers, and risk factor profiles could lead to better outcomes. In this review, we aim to describe the specifics of the ‘time‐sensitive’ approach by the clinical phenotypes, for example, pulmonary/systemic congestion and tissue hypoperfusion, wherein patients are classified based on pathophysiological conditions. This mechanistic classification, in parallel with the comprehensive risk assessment, has become a cornerstone in the management of patients with AHF and thus supports effective decision making by clinicians. We will also highlight how therapeutic modalities should be individualized according to each clinical phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuyuki Shiraishi
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Masataka Kawana
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jun Nakata
- Division of Intensive and Cardiovascular Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kawaguchi Cardiovascular and Respiratory Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Keiichi Fukuda
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shun Kohsaka
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
798
|
Jentzer JC, Lawler PR, van Diepen S, Henry TD, Menon V, Baran DA, Džavík V, Barsness GW, Holmes DR, Kashani KB. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Associated With Increased Mortality Across the Spectrum of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020; 13:e006956. [PMID: 33280435 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) frequently occurs in patients with cardiogenic shock and may aggravate shock severity and organ failure. We sought to determine the association of SIRS with illness severity and survival across the spectrum of shock severity in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 8995 unique patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic CICU between 2007 and 2015. Patients with ≥2/4 SIRS criteria based on admission laboratory and vital sign data were considered to have SIRS. Patients were stratified by the 2019 Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock stages using admission data. The association between SIRS and mortality was evaluated across SCAI shock stage using logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models for hospital and 1-year mortality, respectively. RESULTS The study population had a mean age of 67.5±15.2 years, including 37.2% women. SIRS was present in 33.9% of patients upon CICU admission and was more prevalent in advanced SCAI shock stages. Patients with SIRS had higher illness severity, worse shock, and more organ failure, with an increased risk of mortality during hospitalization (16.8% versus 3.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.7-2.5]; P<0.001) and at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.3-1.6]; P<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, SIRS was associated with higher hospital and 1-year mortality among patients in SCAI shock stages A through D (all P<0.01) but not SCAI shock stage E. CONCLUSIONS One-third of CICU patients meet clinical criteria for SIRS at the time of admission, and these patients have higher illness severity and worse outcomes across the spectrum of SCAI shock stages. The presence of SIRS identified CICU patients at increased risk of short-term and long-term mortality. Further study is needed to determine whether systemic inflammation truly drives SIRS in this population and whether patients with SIRS respond differently to supportive therapies for shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., G.W.B., D.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.C.J., K.B.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Patrick R Lawler
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (P.R.L., V.D.).,Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Toronto, Canada (P.R.L.).,Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada (P.R.L.)
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Cardiology (S.v.D.), University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton.,Department of Medicine (S.v.D.), University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton
| | - Timothy D Henry
- The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at the Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, OH (T.D.H.)
| | - Venu Menon
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (V.M.)
| | - David A Baran
- Sentara Heart Hospital, Advanced Heart Failure Center and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk (D.A.B.)
| | - Vladimír Džavík
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (P.R.L., V.D.)
| | - Gregory W Barsness
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., G.W.B., D.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David R Holmes
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.J., G.W.B., D.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kianoush B Kashani
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (J.C.J., K.B.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine (K.B.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
799
|
Lim HS. The Physiologic Basis and Clinical Outcomes of Combined Impella and Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Cardiogenic Shock. Cardiol Ther 2020; 9:245-255. [PMID: 32424689 PMCID: PMC7584716 DOI: 10.1007/s40119-020-00175-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides effective hemodynamic support in cardiogenic shock, but in some cases may be complicated by left ventricular (LV) distension and pulmonary edema. The Impella, a catheter-mounted microaxial pump has been used to unload the LV. Recent studies have compared the clinical outcomes of VA-ECMO to the combination of Impella and VA-ECMO. The purpose of this review is threefold: firstly, to discuss the physiological effects of Impella support in addition to VA-ECMO, secondly to review published studies on the outcome of this combined support, and thirdly to provide a practical overview of the approach to combining Impella and VA-ECMO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoong Sern Lim
- University Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
800
|
de la Paz A, Orgel R, Hartsell SE, Pauley E, Katz JN. Getting cardiogenic shock patients to the right place-How initial intensive care unit triage decisions impact processes of care and outcomes. Am Heart J 2020; 230:66-70. [PMID: 33002482 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine how initial intensive care unit triage decisions impact processes of care and outcomes for emergency department patients hospitalized with cardiogenic shock. Individuals with cardiogenic shock were stratified based upon whether they were initially admitted to a cardiac versus noncardiovascular intensive care setting. Those initially triaged to a noncardiovascular intensive care unit were less likely to receive potentially life-saving interventions, including percutaneous coronary intervention and temporary mechanical circulatory support, and were more likely to see significant delays in these interventions if ultimately used. Additionally, admitting cardiogenic shock patients to noncardiovascular intensive care units may result in worse survival. These findings underscore the importance of appropriate identification and triage of emergency department patients with cardiogenic shock-a potentially critical contribution of contemporary cardiogenic shock teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew de la Paz
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ryan Orgel
- Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|