Open-label study of infliximab treatment for psoriatic arthritis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of reduction of inflammation

Psoriasis Arthritis

This article presents an overview of psoriatic arthritis, including the origin, genetic influence and immunologic factors involved in its evolution. The clinical features of psoriatic arthritis are also reviewed in this article, and a discussion of the diagnosis and treatment is included. We have highlighted the current psoriasis treatments, new biological therapies, and their use in practice. This paper reviews the efficacy of these agents, and the importance of their early appliance. The available published data on the efficacy of antimalarials, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, azathioprine and ciclosporin are described, as well as new data on leflunomide and other novel agents.

Treatment of inflammatory dermatoses by tumour necrosis factor antagonists

BACKGROUND

The treatment of inflammatory skin diseases is at present often empirical as causal therapeutic approaches, based on an incomplete knowledge of the immune pathogenesis, are mostly unavailable. The currently applied treatments can in fact lead to remission of the disease; however, under certain circumstances undesirable side-effects must be expected. On the basis of experience gained in cytokine modulation therapy of chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, the application of TNF-alpha inhibitors represents a novel, more specific, and effective therapeutic option for distinct chronic inflammatory diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The current status of the therapeutic effect of TNF-alpha blockers is discussed based on our own observations and a review of the current literature. Also discussed are potential undesirable side-effects and possible contraindications of this therapy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on recent findings, the use of TNF-alpha blockers seems to be promising in the treatment of therapy-resistant inflammatory dermatoses. At present, guidelines for indications and contraindications of anti-TNF-alpha treatment of inflammatory skin disorders are rare. Such guidelines are necessary to improve the efficacy of anticytokine treatment and the reduction of side-effects.

The Infliximab Multinational Psoriatic Arthritis Controlled Trial (IMPACT): results of radiographic analyses after 1 year

OBJECTIVE

Infliximab is effective in improving signs and symptoms of joint/skin involvement, functional status, and quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Using IMPACT trial data, we assessed the effect of infliximab (IFX) on structural damage in PsA.

METHODS

Patients with active PsA were randomly assigned to receive placebo (PBO/IFX) or infliximab 5 mg/kg (IFX/IFX) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14, with the primary endpoint at week 16. The PBO group received infliximab loading doses at weeks 16, 18, and 22. Thereafter, all patients received infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 50. Hand/feet radiographs were obtained at weeks 0 and 50. Total radiographic scores were determined using the PsA modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score. Projected annual rate of progression was calculated by dividing x ray score by disease duration (years).

RESULTS

As reported previously, 65% of infliximab treated patients versus 10% of PBO treated patients achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 (p<0.001). At week 50, 69% of patients achieved an ACR20 response. Radiographs (baseline and week 50) were available for 72/104 patients. At baseline, estimated mean annual rate of progression was 5.8 modified vdH-S points/year. Mean (median) changes from baseline to week 50 in the total modified vdH-S score were -1.95 (-0.50) for PBO/IFX and -1.52 (-0.50) for IFX/IFX patients (p = NS). At week 50, 85% and 84% of patients in the PBO/IFX and IFX/IFX groups had no worsening in the total modified vdH-S score.

CONCLUSION

Infliximab inhibits radiographic progression in patients with PsA through week 50.

Treatment of psoriatic arthritis with etanercept, a tumour necrosis factor antagonist

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic spondylarthritis that occurs in approximately 23% of plaque psoriasis sufferers. Traditional treatments for rheumatoid arthritis have been used as the first therapeutic approach to treat this inflammatory disease, which has both joint and skin manifestations. However, due to the inefficiency of current disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in stopping the progression of the joint disease, biologics have emerged as a hopeful alternative to PsA therapy. Etanercept was the first approved tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitor for reducing the signs and symptoms of PsA, as well as preventing the progression of the disease. Etanercept is a fully human, soluble, dimeric fusion protein that has the ability to bind to two molecules of TNF, thereby rendering them biologically inactive. Two clinical trials have demonstrated that etanercept is generally a safe, efficacious and well-tolerated biologic therapy for the treatment of PsA.

Anti-TNF alpha dans le traitement du rhumatisme psoriasique

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory and possibly destructive form of arthritis. As in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, the use of biological therapy in psoriatic arthritis is a therapeutic revolution: both articular and cutaneous efficacy have been shown, and some improvement is visible on radiography. The benefit-risk ratio will improve when we learn to identify more accurately the patients likely to benefit from these treatments.

Magnetic resonance imaging in psoriatic arthritis: a review of the literature

Psoriatic arthritis is a diverse condition that may be characterized by peripheral inflammatory arthritis, axial involvement, dactylitis and enthesitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows visualization of soft tissue, articular and entheseal lesions, and provides a unique picture of the disease process that cannot be gained using other imaging modalities. This review focuses on the literature on MRI in psoriatic arthritis published from 1996 to July 2005. The MRI features discussed include synovitis, tendonitis, dactylitis, bone oedema, bone erosions, soft tissue oedema, spondylitis/sacroiliitis and subclinical arthropathy. Comparisons have been drawn with the more extensive literature describing the MRI features of rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Bildgebende Verfahren in der Rheumatologie: Bildgebung bei der Psoriasisarthritis (PsA)

Conventional radiography is still the standard method of imaging in PsA since it displays many joints at the same time, thereby allowing different types of joint involvement to be recognized. Moreover, thanks to the high resolution of radiography, bony changes in a single joint are depicted in a brilliant way. Several features of psoriatic arthritis allow the distinction from rheumatoid arthritis, including the frequent involvement of the distal interphalangeal joints, asymmetry of joint involvement, axial involvement of finger joints, oligoarticular involvement; however, symmetric polyarthritis is also possible. At the level of the single joint, there are signs of severe destructive changes potentially leading to mutilation and at the same time signs of periostal bone proliferation and ankylosis may be present. Bony proliferation and/or osteolysis are not restricted to the joint region but can affect also the total phalanx with bone apposition or concentric osteolysis which may lead to a complete disappearance of phalanxes. For purposes of quantification of radiographic changes scoring methods are used that were originally developed for rheumatoid arthritis. So far, there is only one validated scoring method that was specifically designed for PsA and that takes into account both features of PsA, damage as well as proliferation of bone. In contrast to conventional radiography, MRI and sonography are able to visualize inflammatory processes within the soft tissue (joint capsules, tendon sheaths, tendon insertions, etc.), allowing an estimation of disease activity. Scintigraphy is nonspecific and can only be used to detect clinically silent inflammatory spots. The relatively frequent spinal (axial) involvement is similar to that seen in ankylosing spondylitis. However, unilateral sacroiliitis, asymmetry of syndesmophytes and development of parsyndesmophytes may distinguish PsA from ankylosing spondylitis. While conventional radiography demonstrates the bony consequences of inflammation in the spine, MRI also shows the active inflammatory changes in sacroiliacal joints and vertebrae.

Outcome-Parameter bei Psoriasisarthritis

The most important and most commonly occurring form of psoriasis is psoriasis vulgaris. In the specialism of rheumatology palmoplantar pustulosis is also important. The outcome is influenced mainly by how severe and how widespread the manifestations affecting the skin and nails are. All manifestations affecting the joints and occurring in association with psoriasis are subsumed under the term 'psoriatic arthritis' (PsA). Asymmetric oligoarthritis, enthesitis and inflammatory spinal manifestations are especially frequent. PsA is a rheumatic illness with widely varying clinical pictures, most patients having signs and symptoms resembling those of spondyloarthritides (SpA) and other features of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and/or of arthrosis/osteoarthritis (OA). Clinical features that are particularly typical of PsA are ray-wise joint involvement, dactylitis and osteodestructive and osteoproliferative joint destruction. Dactylitis, asymmetric joint involvement and enthesitis also occur in other SpA. It is becoming increasingly important to define outcome parameters for use in PsA against the backdrop of new forms of treatment. In the case of clinical outcome basic distinctions must be made between clinical signs and symptoms, function and structure. In PsA the sometimes significant manifestations affecting skin and nails must also be considered. The outcome parameters used thus far have varied very widely. The extent and intensity of involvement of the peripheral joints and insertions of tendons and of spinal involvement are particularly important in PsA. In addition, functional impairments, quality of life and parameters concerned with work must be considered. There are hardly any measuring instruments specific to PsA; many have been developed and used primarily for SpA or RA.

Anti-TNF-α agents in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a potentially debilitating disease that may affect small and large peripheral joints, entheses and the axial skeleton. The different clinical manifestations of PsA have been accounted for by various proposals of subdividing the patients into different subgroups. According to the predominant clinical symptoms, most patients can be classified as belonging to the spectrum of spondyloarthritides (SpA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The conventional therapeutic approach comprises non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic and intra-articular corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as sulfasalazine, methotrexate, ciclosporin and leflunomide. Similar to RA, recent trials in PsA have shown excellent results with the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, which have positive effects not only on joints, but also on the skin when affected by psoriasis, quality of life, function and slowing of disease progress, as evidenced radiologically. Anti-TNF therapy has been generally safe in clinical trials of PsA. Taken together, there has been definite recent progress in the treatment of PsA, especially for severely affected patients.

Infections associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a proinflammatory cytokine involved in a wide range of important physiologic processes. This cytokine has a pathologic role in some diseases, and TNF-alpha antagonists are effective in treating inflammatory conditions. Given the putative role of TNF-alpha in host defense against tuberculosis and other infections, the risk of infection with TNF-alpha antagonists is a concern. Therefore, we searched the literature for reports of tuberculosis and other infections associated with TNF-alpha-antagonist therapy. Although tuberculosis was rarely reported in randomized clinical comparisons of these antagonists, case reports and submissions to the MedWatch program of the United States Food and Drug Administration have been numerous. Most instances were associated with infliximab, but etanercept and adalimumab may also be associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis. Histoplasmosis, listeriosis, aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis, and candidiasis have been associated with TNF-alpha antagonists, but the causative relationship is not clear. Potential recipients of these drugs should be rigorously screened with skin testing, detailed questioning about recent travel and potential tuberculosis exposure, assessment for symptoms such as cough and weight loss, and chest radiography to minimize their risk of acquiring or reactivating tuberculosis. As with other immunosuppressant drugs, TNF-alpha antagonists should not be given to patients with active infection.

Diagnosis and treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic, heterogeneous disease whose pathogenesis is unknown, although genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors play major roles. Psoriatic arthritis can follow an aggressive clinical course, and differentiating it from other arthropathies is sometimes difficult. Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis is based on history, physical examination, the usual absence of rheumatoid factor, and characteristic radiographic features. At least 40% of patients with psoriatic arthritis develop radiographically detectable joint destruction; therefore, proper diagnosis and early treatment can have a significant impact on disease course and outcome. Understanding the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease has led to the use of several biologic agents that work by modulating T-cell signaling or by inhibiting key cytokines involved in inflammation, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF inhibitors have demonstrated excellent efficacy in resolving skin and joint disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis and have been shown to be safe agents in various inflammatory disorders. This article reviews the diagnostic and treatment challenges of psoriatic arthritis as they relate to pathogenesis and burden of disease.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should have acquired a more comprehensive knowledge of our current understanding of the classification, clinical presentation, etiology, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a clinical, genetic, and histopathologic perspective

The successful introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis has sharpened considerable interest in this chronic and frequently disabling disease. Unlike the situation in rheumatoid arthritis, where anti-TNF therapies were introduced after years of painstaking research which confirmed a key proinflammatory role for TNF, the evidence for TNF having a key role in psoriatic arthritis has lagged behind. In this paper, the emerging immunohistochemical, genetic, and clinical literature relating to TNF's role in skin and joint manifestations of this disease is reviewed and areas for future research are suggested.

Infliximab improves signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis: results of the IMPACT 2 trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate further in a phase III, double blind trial the efficacy of infliximab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as observed in the smaller IMPACT trial.

METHODS

200 patients with active PsA unresponsive to previous treatment were randomised to infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22. Patients with inadequate response entered early escape at week 16. The primary measure of clinical response was ACR20. Other measures included Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and dactylitis and enthesopathy assessments.

RESULTS

At week 14, 58% of patients receiving infliximab and 11% of those receiving placebo achieved an ACR20 response and 77% of infliximab patients and 27% of placebo patients achieved PsARC (both p<0.001). Among the 85% of patients with at least 3% body surface area psoriasis involvement at baseline, 53/83 (64%) patients receiving infliximab had at least 75% improvement in PASI compared with 2/87 (2%) patients receiving placebo at week 14 (p<0.001). These therapeutic effects were maintained through the last evaluation (week 24). Fewer infliximab patients than placebo patients had dactylitis at week 14 (18% v 30%; p = 0.025) and week 24 (12% v 34%; p<0.001). Fewer infliximab patients (22%) than placebo patients (34%) had active enthesopathy at week 14 (p = 0.016); corresponding figures at week 24 were 20% and 37% (p = 0.002). Infliximab was generally well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab 5 mg/kg through 24 weeks significantly improved active PsA, including dactylitis and enthesopathy, and associated psoriasis.

Anti-TNF agents for the treatment of spondyloarthropathies

For the treatment of spondyloarthropathies (SpA), therapeutic options using disease-modifying drugs are rather limited compared to other inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is especially true for the spinal symptoms of the spondyloarthropathies, of which ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the prototype. New TNF-alpha blockers have been proven highly effective in improving the spinal symptoms and extra-spinal manifestations of SpA. Convincing data in the form of placebo-controlled trials are already available for AS and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, limited data suggests that TNF-alpha blockers might be similarly effective in other spondylolarthropathies. Side effects, mainly infections and allergic reactions, occur similar to those observed in RA treatment. Currently, there is no reason to combine TNF-alpha blockers with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the treatment of AS and other SpA, as these DMARDs are not effective. Thus, TNF-alpha blockers seem to be a major breakthrough in the treatment of SpA. The patients who are primary candidates for such treatments are yet to be defined, particularly in light of the high costs and unknown long-term side effects involved. Furthermore, future studies need to show whether these biologicals not only suppress inflammation but also prevent long-term bony damage.

Treatment advances in psoriatic arthritis

Treatment of psoriatic arthritis, like the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, now commonly includes the use of inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor in addition to traditional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. This paper examines the most recent data from therapeutic trials in psoriatic arthritis, with particular emphasis on the effectiveness of the tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Recent data on potential future therapies is discussed as well, along with data on the mechanisms of current therapies that may have relevance for future treatment approaches.

Rheumatoid and psoriatic knee synovitis: clinical, grey scale, and power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the response to etanercept

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) blockade with etanercept in refractory knee joint synovitis (KJS) in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis, by local and systemic disease activity assessment and combined grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring.

METHODS

27 knees affected by rheumatoid KJS (n = 12) and psoriatic KJS (n = 8) were assessed before receiving treatment and at 3 and 12 months' follow up. Time dependent clinical changes in disease activity were monitored by C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), global health status (GHS), and Ritchie (RAI) and knee joint articular (KJAI) indices; synovial changes were monitored by ultrasonographic and power Doppler indices for grey scale synovial thickening and for distinct intrasynovial vessel power Doppler flow configurations (fluid/synovium interface (F/SI-PD) and pannus/cartilage interface (P/CI-PD)). Interobserver and intraobserver variability of grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonographic was evaluated. Response to treatment was assessed by analysis of variance for repeated measures on clinical and ultrasonographic variables.

RESULTS

Rapid (3 months) reduction in F/SI-PD flow (p<0.001), parallel to reductions of C reactive protein (p<0.05), ESR (p<0.001), KJAI (p<0.002), RAI, and GHS (p<0.001), was sustained at 12 months when it was accompanied by reduction in both synovial thickening and P/CI-PD flow (p<0.001). No differences (ANOVA) were noted at baseline or at 12 months in clinical and ultrasonographic variables between either the rheumatoid or the psoriatic KJS groups.

CONCLUSION

Grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography are reliable measures of long term change in rheumatoid and psoriatic KJS disease activity in response to anti-TNFalpha treatment with etanercept.

Role of biological agents in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

A new era in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders has begun with the clinical availability of anticytokine therapy. Biological agents that are currently available include 3 agents that decrease the activity of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept) and an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra), with many more in development. Those extraordinarily effective medications are an important addition to our therapeutic armamentarium, and, although originally developed for rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn disease, have been found to be efficacious in the treatment of seronegative spondyloarthropathies (psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis) and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Their role is currently being defined in other autoimmune disorders such as uveitis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, vasculitis, inflammatory myopathies, graft-versus-host disease, and Sjögren syndrome.

Psoriatic arthritis treatment: biological response modifiers

In recent years there has been a surge of interest in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders as a result of the development and application of targeted biological therapies. The elucidation of the overlapping cellular and cytokine immunopathology of such diverse conditions as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease, and psoriasis points to specific targets for bioengineered proteins or small molecules. Similar to clinical trials in RA, trials in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have shown excellent clinical results with the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockers, etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab in a variety of domains including the joints, quality of life, function, and slowing of disease progress as evidenced radiologically. In addition, these agents have shown benefit in domains more unique to PsA, such as the skin lesions of psoriasis, enthesitis, and dactylitis, pointing out the similar pathogenesis of the disease in the skin, the tendons, and the synovial membrane. This therapy has been generally safe and well tolerated in clinical trials of PsA. Other logical candidates for targeted therapy in development include other anti-TNF agents, costimulatory blockade agents that affect T cell function, blockers of other cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, 6, 12, 15, or 18, and B cell modulatory medicines. Also, it will be useful to learn more about the effects of combining traditional disease modifying drugs and the newer biologicals.

Psoriatic arthritis and imaging

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has historically been considered a milder rheumatic disease not yielding significant clinical damage. However, recent studies have shown that PsA can be deforming and debilitating and that joint damage can be severe. Traditionally, joint damage has been recorded using plain radiographs. Characteristic radiographic features of PsA include joint erosions, joint space narrowing, bony proliferation including periarticular and shaft periostitis, osteolysis including "pencil in cup" deformity and acro-osteolysis, ankylosis, spur formation, and spondylitis. New imaging modalities, including ultrasound, bone scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging may help in both diagnosis and follow up of patients with PsA. These new imaging techniques will with validation help detect early changes in the peripheral joints, the periarticular tissues, and the spinal structures in patients with PsA.

Immunopathology of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is characterised by several unique clinical features that differentiate it from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Attempts to identify immunopathological mechanisms, some shared with psoriasis, that underlie these differences from RA have been most challenging. Recent research studies, however, highlight novel findings in PsA at the molecular, cellular, and tissue levels that form the basis for a new understanding of this relatively common form of inflammatory arthritis. In particular, the availability of new, biological antitumour necrosis factor alpha therapies have allowed further insight into the immunopathology of psoriasis and PsA. This brief review focuses on immunohistological studies in psoriatic skin, PsA synovium, and bone to demonstrate how these data advance our knowledge of disease pathogenesis.

Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral joints in rheumatic diseases

The need for better methods than the conventional clinical, biochemical and radiographical examinations in the management of inflammatory joint diseases is evident, since these methods are not sensitive or specific to early pathologies and subtle changes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers improved sensitivity to early inflammatory and destructive changes in peripheral joints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and, even though less well documented, in other inflammatory joint diseases. Good evidence is available that MRI bone erosions represent true bone abnormalities and are predictors of radiographical outcome in RA. Similarly, there is solid evidence for MRI synovitis representing true synovial inflammation and being of considerable practical, clinical and radiological significance in RA. Describing the encouraging current knowledge regarding MRI for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis, this chapter discusses the potential for the use of MRI in the clinical management of patients with suspected and diagnosed inflammatory joint diseases, as well as research priorities and clinical situations where the use of MRI could be suggested.

Imaging in early arthritis

Imaging can play a vital role in the evaluation of patients with early arthritis. Various imaging methods can be utilized to aid with diagnosis, predict prognosis and follow disease progression and treatment response. Previously, conventional radiography was the principal method used to evaluate and follow bone damage in patients with inflammatory arthritis. More recently the use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography has gained wider acceptance and popularity due to the ability of these multiplanar techniques to image both bone changes and soft tissue abnormalities, including synovitis. This chapter discusses the current imaging modalities used in the evaluation of patients with early arthritis, as well as the use of imaging in establishing the extent of disease, in prognosis and in monitoring disease course. Current data on imaging of patients with early arthritis due to rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis is reviewed.

Using imaging biomarkers to accelerate drug development and clinical trials

There is increasing evidence that human medical imaging can help answer key questions that arise during the drug development process. Imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and positron emission tomography can offer significant insights into the bioactivity, pharmacokinetics and dosing of drugs, in addition to supporting registration applications. In this review, examples from oncology, neurology, psychiatry, infectious diseases and inflammatory diseases are used to illustrate the role imaging can play. We conclude with some remarks concerning new developments that will be required to significantly advance the field of pharmaco-imaging.

Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: Results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of infliximab therapy for the articular and dermatologic manifestations of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

One hundred four patients with PsA in whom prior therapy with at least 1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) had failed were recruited into this investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. During the initial blinded portion of the study, patients received infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14. After week 16, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 50, while patients initially randomized to infliximab continued to receive active treatment at the same dose through week 50. The primary efficacy outcome was achievement of the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20) at week 16. Additional predefined clinical efficacy assessments included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, the ACR50 and ACR70 criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, ratings of enthesitis and dactylitis, and the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria score.

RESULTS

The proportion of infliximab-treated patients who achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 (65%) was significantly higher than the proportion of placebo-treated patients who achieved this response (10%). In addition, 46% of infliximab-treated patients achieved an ACR50 response, and 29% achieved an ACR70 response; no placebo-treated patient achieved these end points. Among patients who had PASI scores of >/=2.5 at baseline, 68% of infliximab-treated patients achieved improvement of >/=75% in the PASI score at week 16 compared with none of the placebo-treated patients. Continued therapy with infliximab resulted in sustained improvement in articular and dermatologic manifestations of PsA through week 50. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg significantly improved the signs and symptoms of arthritis, psoriasis, dactylitis, and enthesitis in patients with active PsA that had been resistant to DMARD therapy. With continued infliximab treatment, benefits were sustained through 50 weeks. The benefit-to-risk ratio appeared favorable in this study population.

Regulation of myeloid cell function and major histocompatibility complex class II expression by tumor necrosis factor

OBJECTIVE

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-neutralizing agents are the most successful means of ameliorating systemic autoimmune inflammation. Neutralization of TNF, however, is often associated with the development of autoantibodies, particularly to nuclear antigens, and the mechanisms of this are unknown. We undertook this study to analyze the effect of TNF and its neutralization on the expression of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules and on the function of antigen-presenting myeloid cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Monocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood of RA patients before and after anti-TNF monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment and from the peripheral blood of controls by negative selection, differentiated in vitro to macrophages, and analyzed by flow cytometry for HLA-DR expression. T cell responses to activation by myeloid cells were assessed in proliferation assays, and messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of the class II transactivator (CIITA) were determined by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

HLA-DR expression was significantly reduced on myeloid cells from RA patients with active disease, but was increased to normal levels after anti-TNF mAb treatment. Concordantly, in vitro application of TNF to monocytes from healthy individuals reduced their ability to up-regulate HLA-DR during differentiation to macrophages and, importantly, inhibited their ability to stimulate T cells in mixed lymphocyte reactions. Molecular analysis revealed that the effect of TNF on HLA-DR expression was mediated via suppression of the transcription factor CIITA.

CONCLUSION

The data indicate that TNF decreases HLA-DR expression by reducing CIITA mRNA levels in myeloid cells, functionally resulting in a decreased capacity of myeloid cells to stimulate T cells. Concordantly, ameliorating disease activity in chronic inflammatory diseases by neutralizing TNF restores expression of HLA-DR on myeloid cells as well as the ability of myeloid cells to stimulate T cells. Thus, anti-TNF treatment might lead to augmented T cell activation by myeloid cells, thereby promoting immune responses to (auto)antigens and the development of antinuclear antibodies that are frequently associated with anti-TNF therapy.

Biology of tumor necrosis factor-alpha- implications for psoriasis

Numerous recent investigations have pointed to a key role of the proinflammatory, pleiotropic cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in host defense and inflammatory processes. TNF overexpression has been found in lesional skin and in the circulation of psoriatic patients, and it was suggested that TNF-alpha is crucial in this and other immune diseases. Several approaches to inhibit TNF-alpha activity have been developed. These include three different neutralizing antibodies to TNF-alpha as well as three different soluble TNF-alpha receptors with characteristic properties designed to bind the 17-KDa soluble trimeric TNF-alpha and the 26-KDa membrane-bound form of TNF-alpha. Clinical trials have demonstrated significant antipsoriatic effects, and it is likely that blocking TNF-alpha will become an important therapeutic option. The data available from these trials contribute to further understanding of the disease by demonstrating the major role of TNF-alpha. An in-depth understanding of the regulation of TNF gene expression, protein production, receptor expression, and signaling pathways may lead to further, potentially important novel therapeutic strategies and antipsoriatic active small molecules, suitable for oral application in the future. Here we review the current knowledge of TNF biology, the approaches to inhibit TNF activity, and their clinical and immunological effects in psoriasis. In addition, the host-defense effects and chronic TNF-blocking activity are discussed.

Psoriatic arthritis: prevalence, diagnosis, and review of therapy for the dermatologist

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis that is commonly associated with psoriasis. While traditionally viewed as being a benign disease, recent evidence indicates the potential for a significant amount of morbidity and disability, making early recognition and intervention important. Treatment includes both traditional immunomodulatory agents as well as the recently available biologic response modifiers.

Recent advances in the management of psoriatic arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of psoriatic arthritis is currently estimated at 7 to 42% of the population with active psoriasis, considered to affect 2 to 3% of the general population. Unmanaged psoriatic arthritis may result in progressive radiologic erosion, severe physical limitations, and disability. Newer trials in psoriatic arthritis therapy demonstrate ongoing ability to control disease symptoms and signs and the progression of the disease significantly.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recognition of the immunopathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis, as with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, prompts ongoing examination of the efficacy of several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. A new crop of biologics and pharmaceuticals with increased molecular specificity compared with traditional immunosuppressant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have been shown to be highly effective in inhibiting the symptoms and progression of psoriatic arthritis with less severe side effects.

SUMMARY

Therapies either recently approved or pending approval by the Food and Drug Administration for psoriatic arthritis management are safe and effective in the treatment of symptoms, significantly improve quality of life, and prevent long-term progression of the disease.

Safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor ? blockade in systemic lupus erythematosus: An open-label study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety of therapeutic tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) blockade in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in whom this proinflammatory cytokine is significantly increased and may be involved in the disease pathogenesis.

METHODS

In an open-label study, 6 patients with moderately active SLE (4 with nephritis and 3 with arthritis refractory to other therapies) were given 4 300-mg doses of infliximab, a chimeric anti-TNFalpha antibody, in addition to immunosuppression with azathioprine or methotrexate.

RESULTS

The only significant adverse events observed were urinary tract infection in 3 patients, 1 of which was accompanied by Escherichia coli bacteremia, and a prolonged febrile episode of putatively viral origin in 1 of them. These patients had similar infectious conditions in the past. In none of the patients was it necessary to terminate the treatment prematurely. Levels of antibodies to double-stranded DNA and cardiolipin increased in 4 patients each, but this was not associated with a decrease in serum complement levels, with vascular events, or with flares. In contrast, disease activity declined during therapy. All 3 patients with joint involvement experienced remission of arthritis, which relapsed 8-11 weeks after the last infliximab infusion. In the 4 patients with lupus nephritis, proteinuria decreased significantly within 1 week after initiation of therapy and was diminished by > or = 60% within 8 weeks, remaining at low levels until the end of the observation period (at least several months).

CONCLUSION

Infliximab did not lead to adverse events related to an increase in SLE activity, although autoantibodies to double-stranded DNA and cardiolipin increased, as expected. This finding, coupled with the clinical improvement in the inflammatory manifestations of the disease, indicates that further study in larger controlled trials is warranted.

Infliximab

Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that interferes with the actions of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Clinical trials of infliximab have demonstrated a rapid and substantial response in patents with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, substantiating the role of TNF-alpha in the immunopathogenesis of psoriatic disease. This review summarizes the current data regarding the use of infliximab in treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, as well as the safety data available from patients with other immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Practical issues such as patient selection, monitoring, cost, and potential combination therapies are also discussed.

Psoriasis and its treatment with infliximab-mediated tumor necrosis factor α blockade

The pathogenesis of psoriasis, a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease,involves increased concentrations and activity of several proinflammatory cytokines,including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Infliximab is a chimeric human-murine TNF-alpha antibody that selectively blocks the activity of TNF-alpha. In controlled clinical trials, infliximab treatment has produced rapid and sustained improvements in psoriasis lesions and psoriatic joint involvement, with a favorable short-term safety and tolerability profile. Treatment with infliximab may be associated with an increased risk of infection or infusion reaction: however, the side-effect profile of infliximab in patients with psoriasis remains to be fully characterized, and assessment of infliximab in this population is currently ongoing in phase 3 studies. Comprehensive evaluation in controlled trials may allow infliximab to take its place among the expanding group of biologic drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

Infliximab Therapy for Patients With Active and Refractory Spondyloarthropathies at the Dose of 3 mg/kg

BACKGROUND

: Infliximab at the dose of 5 mg/kg per infusion has been shown effective for the treatment of active spondyloarthropathies. It is not clear if the 5 mg/kg is required in most patients.

OBJECTIVE

: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of infliximab at the lower dose of 3 mg/kg in patients with active and refractory ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

: Thirty patients were enrolled in a 78-week, single-center, prospective, open-label pilot study, including 16 patients with severe and active AS and 14 patients with active and refractory PsA. Infliximab (3 mg/kg, in combination with a stable dose of methotrexate was administered intravenously at 0, 2 and 6 weeks, and q8 weeks thereafter (schedule-A) and the improvement of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; for AS patients) and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PDA; for PsA patients) was monitored at baseline and at every visit (primary variables). Patients who did not respond sufficiently at 14 weeks, as well as patients who relapsed at any time during follow-up, received infliximab every 4 weeks (treatment schedule-B). Three different statistical approaches (per-protocol, last observation carried forward and by intention-to-treat) were applied.

RESULTS

: Ten patients discontinued treatment for various reasons, including 3 (10.0%) because of allergic reactions. Twenty patients (66.7%, 9 with AS and 11 with PsA) had completed 78 weeks of treatment (schedule-A, 11 patients; schedule-B, 9 patients). Of these patients, 18 (90.0%) showed optimal response (improvement >/=50%), including 13 (65.0%) with improvement >/=70%. ASsessments in AS (ASAS) 50% was attained by 7/9 AS patients (77.8%). At 78 weeks of treatment, statistically significant improvement of indices of disease activity, function and quality of life was observed by all statistical approaches applied.

CONCLUSIONS

: Infliximab at 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks or, if needed, every 4 weeks appears to be an effective and rather safe treatment of patients with active and refractory AS and PsA after 78 weeks of treatment.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Current treatment options for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are limited. Leflunomide, an oral pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, is highly effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and small studies have suggested similar efficacy in PsA. We undertook this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with PsA and psoriasis.

METHODS

One hundred ninety patients with active PsA and psoriasis (at least 3% skin involvement) were randomized to receive leflunomide (100 mg/day loading dose for 3 days followed by 20 mg/day orally) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients classified as responders by the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC). Additional efficacy (joint and skin involvement), safety, and quality-of-life assessments were performed.

RESULTS

At 24 weeks, 56 of 95 leflunomide-treated patients (58.9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 48.4-68.9) and 27 of 91 placebo-treated patients (29.7% [95% CI 20.6-40.2]) were classified as responders by the PsARC (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in favor of leflunomide were also observed in the proportions of patients achieving modified American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria, improvement in the designated psoriasis target lesion, and mean changes from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores and quality-of-life assessments. Diarrhea and alanine aminotransferase increases occurred at higher rates in the leflunomide group. No cases of serious liver toxicity were observed.

CONCLUSION

Leflunomide is an effective treatment for PsA and psoriasis, providing a safe and convenient alternative to current therapies.

Early effects of tumour necrosis factor alpha blockade on skin and synovial tissue in patients with active psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) blockade using infliximab, a chimeric anti-TNFalpha antibody, is an effective treatment for both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the early effects of infliximab treatment on serial skin and synovial tissue biopsy samples.

METHODS

Twelve patients with both active psoriasis and PsA received a single infusion of either infliximab (3 mg/kg) (n = 6) or placebo (n = 6) intravenously. Synovial tissue and lesional skin biopsy specimens were obtained at baseline and 48 hours after treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to analyse the inflammatory infiltrate. In situ detection of apoptotic cells was performed by TUNEL assay and by immunohistochemical staining with anti-caspase-3 antibodies. Stained tissue sections were evaluated by digital image analysis.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in mean (SEM) T cell numbers was found in both lesional epidermis (baseline 37 (11) cells/mm, 48 hours 26 (11), p = 0.028) and synovial tissue (67 (56) cells/mm(2)v 32 (30), p = 0.043) after infliximab treatment, but not after placebo treatment (epidermis 18 (8) v 43 (20), NS; synovium 110 (62) v 46 (21), NS). Similarly, the number of macrophages in the synovial sublining was significantly reduced after anti-TNFalpha treatment (100 (73) v 10 (8), p = 0.043). The changes in cell numbers could not be explained by induction of apoptosis at the site of inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of anti-TNFalpha therapy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis may be explained by decreased cell infiltration in lesional skin and inflamed synovial tissue early after initiation of treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging of psoriatic arthritis: Insight from traditional and three-dimensional analysis

The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are the same and at the same time different from those seen in other inflammatory arthritides. Synovial hypertrophy is seen on MRI in all arthritides. However, the location and extent of bone marrow edema in PsA is different from those seen in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis. Progression studies in PsA are hard to justify. However, treatment monitoring studies have given insight into the pattern of progression of the MRI findings and information regarding the mechanism of the effect of the drugs used for treatment. Three-dimensional image analysis tools provide volumetric information and information regarding the spatial and temporal relationship between different MRI findings. The three-dimensional perfusion image analysis tool, which is used to evaluate the effect of antiangiogenic drugs in cancer treatment, can provide information regarding the disease mechanism when used in disease monitoring studies.

Treating psoriatic arthritis: how effective are TNF antagonists?

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a seronegative spondyloarthropathy that commonly appears after the onset of the characteristic cutaneous lesions. This complication affects about 40% of patients with moderate to severe cutaneous disease. Analysis of synovial fluid and tissue in patients with PsA demonstrates a profile of high levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) plus other cytokines similar to those seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the past, medical management of patients with this disease consisted of treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Patients with more severe disease have tried a number of different disease-modifying drugs including methotrexate, azathioprine, and gold salts. However, there is no evidence that these agents can arrest the progress of structural joint damage. Infliximab and etanercept are TNF antagonists that have demonstrated significant efficacy and safety in patients with RA. Clinical trials with these two agents in patients with PsA have shown significant improvement in the rheumatologic and cutaneous manifestations of the disease.

[Biologicals: a new therapeutic approach for inflammatory diseases]

The pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases is determined by a malfunction of the immune system. Up to now therapies have not been able to cure but to interfere in a more or less specific way with the immune function. The great increase of knowledge in immunology made it possible to develop new medications, which alter the immune system in a specific way. The advantage is the relative simple way of developing new medications by using monoclonal antibodies against specific antigens and testing the hypothesis in animal model and in small but clear phase II trials. Biologicals are similar or identical to human proteins and rarely have side effects, which exceed their interference with the immune system. Because of the clinical success of anti-TNF-therapies and the increased knowledge about immune mechanisms, biologicals are now used in various fields of medicine. This paper reviews data from biologicals that are either already approved or in an advanced stage of clinical testing.

Role of novel biological therapies in psoriatic arthritis: effects on joints and skin

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a partly debilitating disease that may affect small and large joints and the spine. Patients with PsA are divided into different subgroups according to joint involvement and their disease may be classified as part of the spectrum of spondyloarthritides or seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. Traditional treatment comprises nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic and intra-articular corticosteroids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as sulfasalazine, methotrexate and cyclosporin. On the basis of the very recent studies performed in the US and Germany, patients with severe disease can be treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Biologicals such as etanercept and infliximab have been used successfully to treat PsA. While etanercept is a 75kD TNF receptor fusion protein that binds to TNFalpha and TNFbeta, infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to TNFalpha both in its soluble form in the serum and on the cell membrane. Adalimumab is a fully humanised antibody recognising TNFalpha that has not been tested in PsA to date. Another biological agent, alefacept, is directed against the adhesion molecule lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)-2, which is known to interfere with T-cell activation. Alefacept has been shown to be efficacious in a limited number of patients with PsA. Taken together, there has been definite recent progress in the treatment of PsA. Severely affected patients may especially have substantial benefit from therapy with biologicals directed against TNFalpha and other targets.

Treatment of refractory psoriatic arthritis with infliximab: a 12 month observational study of 16 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of infliximab in patients with recalcitrant psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Patients with treatment resistant PsA and at least six actively inflamed joints, who had failed to respond to at least two disease modifying agents, were included. Infliximab (5 mg/kg) was given at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 6-8 weeks pending response. Clinical and laboratory measures included actively inflamed joint count (AJC), swollen joint count (SJC), psoriasis severity (PASI), HAQ, and SF-36. Response was defined as at least a 30% reduction in AJC and PASI. Differences from baseline were analysed using the signed rank test.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (12 male, 4 female), mean age 48 and disease duration 14 years, were included. At baseline the mean AJC was 22.5 and mean PASI 4.5. Eleven patients continued receiving methotrexate. The AJC did not show a statistically significant response. SJC improved significantly at week 54 (p = 0.01). The PASI improved significantly at weeks 14 (p = 0.001) and 30 (p = 0.002) and CRP was reduced significantly at week 30 (p = 0.02). The HAQ score improved at week 30 (p = 0.02). Six patients became positive for dsDNA without clinical features of a connective tissue disease. Six patients discontinued treatment owing to lack of efficacy (1) and toxicity (5). Other serious adverse events included: urticaria (3); thrombocytopenia (1); lower gastrointestinal bleeding (2); severe diarrhoea (2); serious infections (6). Raised transaminases, at least 1.5x normal, occurred in four patients.

CONCLUSION

In refractory PsA, infliximab led to a marked improvement in psoriasis but modest response in joint disease. Toxicity and rate of treatment termination was high.

[Biologicals in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthropathies]

The ongoing evaluation of the cytokine-cascade and the steadily growing knowledge about cytokine mediated processes seem to open striking therapeutical options in the fields of sepsis, autoimmune and chronic inflammatory joint or bowel diseases via modulation or inhibition of the cytokine-cascade. There is no doubt about the efficacy of the various anticytokine-treatments in the therapy of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A large number of preclinical and clinical studies forms the scientific basis for these almost widely established therapies. These so-called "biologicals" are fully accepted as disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, equal to or even more potent than the classical substances. On the one hand, these agents are acting as tumor necrosis factor-alpha-blockers, like a chimeric (human/mouse) monoclonal anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-antibody (Infliximab), a recombinant soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptor p75 fusion protein (Etanercept), and a fully humanized anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-antibody (Adalimumab); on the other hand a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (Anakinra) is used in clinical practice. Generally these drugs are very well tolerated; the most common adverse events are higher infection rates (including tuberculosis) and injection-site reactions for the subcutaneously administered agents. Of course one should be aware of the possibly elevated risk for malignancies although there is no evidence for that so far, but the observation time since launching of these drugs is considerably short. To conclude, involved physicians should use these new "tools" very carefully and critically, because long-term tolerance and safety is a matter of ongoing investigation and last but not least because of the growing importance of cost effectiveness when using such expensive medications. Above all initiation and monitoring of those therapies should be restricted to rheumatologists