Symptom perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease is dependent on spatiotemporal reflux characteristics

Acid-related oesophageal sensitivity, not dysmotility, differentiates subgroups of patients with non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease can experience reflux symptoms with similar frequency and severity as those with erosive reflux disease. Oesophageal motility and acid sensitivity are thought to influence symptom occurrence.

AIM

To compare the effect of infused hydrochloric acid on oesophageal physiology in patients with non-erosive reflux disease and erosive reflux disease.

METHODS

Twelve healthy controls and 39 patients with reflux disease [14 erosive reflux disease, 11 non-erosive reflux disease with normal (functional heartburn) and 14 non-erosive reflux disease with excess acid exposure] had hydrochloric acid and saline infused into distal and then proximal oesophagus. Oesophageal contraction amplitude, lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and pain intensity were documented at baseline and during each infusion.

RESULTS

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease had higher pain sensitivity to acid than those with erosive reflux disease and controls. Proximal acid infusion caused greater pain than distal in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Acid and saline sensitivity were more pronounced in patients with functional heartburn. Lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and oesophageal contraction amplitudes were lower in the erosive reflux disease and non-erosive reflux disease groups, but did not change during infusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease and, to a lesser extent, patients with erosive reflux disease, are sensitive to acid in the oesophagus, being more sensitive to proximal acid. Hypersensitivity is most marked in functional heartburn patients. This acid sensitivity is not associated with motility change.

The prevalence of and risk factors for erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease: a nationwide multicentre prospective study in Korea

BACKGROUND

Prospective nationwide multicentre studies that have evaluated endoscopic findings and reflux symptoms using a well-designed questionnaire are very rare.

AIM

To compare the prevalence rates of and risk factors for erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) in the Korean population.

METHODS

A gastroscopic examination was performed on 25 536 subjects who visited 40 Healthcare Centers for a health check-up. A gastro-oesophageal reflux questionnaire and multivariate analysis were used to determine the risk factors for erosive oesophagitis and NERD.

RESULTS

2019 (8%) and 996 subjects (4%) had erosive oesophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease, respectively; only 58% of subjects with erosive oesophagitis had reflux symptoms. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk factors for erosive oesophagitis and NERD differed, i.e. those of erosive oesophagitis were male, a Helicobacter pylori eradication history, alcohol, body mass index > or =25 and hiatal hernia. In contrast, the risk factors for NERD were female, age <40 and > or =60 vs. 40-59 years, body mass index <23 and a monthly income <$1000, glucose > or =126 mg/dL, smoking, a stooping posture at work and antibiotic usage.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence rates of erosive oesophagitis and NERD were 8% and 4%, respectively, in Korean health check-up subjects. The risk factors for erosive oesophagitis and NERD were found to differ, which indicates that their underlying pathogeneses are distinct.

Defective triggering of secondary peristalsis in patients with non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The pathophysiology of non-erosive reflux disease is poorly understood. Triggering of secondary peristalsis is impaired in patients with erosive esophagitis but data in patients with non-erosive reflux disease are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in esophageal motility between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and healthy subjects.

METHODS

Twenty patients with non-erosive reflux disease, with reflux symptoms occurring more than twice per week, and 20 healthy subjects of comparable age and sex underwent esophageal manometry. Primary peristalsis was tested with 10 swallows of a 5-mL water bolus. Secondary peristalsis was triggered by esophageal distention using a 20-mL air bolus, which was injected rapidly into the mid-esophagus. After 20 s, each stimulus was followed by a dry swallow to clear any residual air and then each stimulus was repeated five times.

RESULTS

Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure, pressure wave amplitude in the upper, middle and lower esophagus, wave velocity and the rates of successful primary peristalsis were similar in non-erosive reflux disease patients and controls. The rate of triggering of secondary peristalsis in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (median 20%, interquartile range 0-40%) was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than that in healthy subjects (90%, 70-100%). When secondary peristalsis occurred in patients with non-erosive reflux disease, however, there were no differences in the amplitude and velocity of secondary peristalsis between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Triggering of secondary peristalsis is defective in non-erosive reflux disease. This could lead to prolongation of the contact time between refluxed gastric acid and esophageal mucosa thereby leading to symptoms.

Effect of oesophagitis on proximal extent of gastro-oesophageal reflux

Proximal oesophageal acid reflux is increased in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) patients with oesophageal and extra-oesophageal symptoms, the latter particularly in presence of oesophagitis. This study was aimed to assess the proximal extent of reflux, both acid and weakly acidic, in GORD patients with and without oesophagitis and to characterize, using an animal model of GORD, the relationship between acute oesophagitis and proximal extent of reflux. Proximal extent of reflux was evaluated during 24-h pH-impedance monitoring in 17 oesophagitis, 27 non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients and 10 asymptomatic controls. In five adult cats, reflux events were simulated by intra-oesophageal retrograde injection of a radiopaque solution. Proximal extent of simulated reflux was fluoroscopically assessed before and after inducing acute oesophagitis. The percentage of proximal reflux was 11% in controls, 22% in NERD and 38% in oesophagitis patients (P < 0.05 vs NERD). Weakly acidic reflux showed higher proximal extent in oesophagitis than in NERD patients but it was less proximally propagated than acid reflux. In cats, proximal reflux was significantly increased during acute oesophagitis. Oesophagitis patients show higher proximal extent of reflux, acid and weakly acidic, when compared with NERD patients and controls. In the experimental model, acute oesophagitis favours proximal migration of simulated reflux.

Electrophysiological characterization of vagal afferents relevant to mucosal nociception in the rat upper oesophagus

Emerging evidence indicates a nociceptive role of vagal afferents. A distinct oesophageal innervation in the rat, with muscular and mucosal afferents travelling predominantly in the recurrent (RLN) and superior laryngeal nerve (SLN), respectively, enabled characterization of mucosal afferents with nociceptive properties, using novel isolated oesophagus-nerve preparations. SLN and RLN single-fibre recordings identified 55 and 14 units, respectively, with none conducting faster than 8.7 m s(-1). Mucosal response characteristics in the SLN distinguished mechanosensors (n = 13), mechanosensors with heat sensitivity (18) from those with cold sensitivity (19) and a mechanoinsensitive group (5). The mechanosensitive fibres, all slowly adapting, showed a unimodal distribution of mechanical thresholds (1.4-128 mN, peak approximately 5.7 mN). No difference in response characteristics of C and Adelta fibres was encountered. Mucosal proton stimulation (pH 5.4 for 3 min), mimicking gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), revealed in 31% of units a desensitizing response that peaked around 20 s and faded within 60 s. Cold stimulation (15 degrees C) was proportionally encoded but the response showed slow adaptation. In contrast, the noxious heat (48 degrees C) response showed no obvious adaptation with discharge rates reflecting the temperature's time course. Polymodal (69%) mucosal units, > 30% proton sensitive, were found in each fibre category and were considered nociceptors; they are tentatively attributed to vagal nerve endings type I, IV and V, previously morphologically described. All receptive fields were mapped and the distribution indicates that the posterior upper oesophagus may serve as a 'cutbank', detecting noxious matters, ingested or regurgitated, and triggering nocifensive reflexes such as bronchoconstriction in GORD.

Review article: acidity and volume of the refluxate in the genesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms

BACKGROUND

A number of mechanisms, other than acid reflux, may be responsible for the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To assess the importance of non-acid reflux mechanisms.

METHODS

This review is based on presentations and discussion at a workshop, where specialists in the field analysed data relating to these mechanisms.

RESULTS

Weakly acidic reflux, pH (4-7), detected with impedance-pHmetry is associated with regurgitation and atypical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. It is not clear whether pepsin and trypsin can elicit symptoms, but bile can elicit heartburn. The magnitude of reflux-induced oesophageal distension can be determined by high frequency ultrasonography and is not reduced by proton pump inhibition, suggesting that persisting symptoms 'on' a proton pump inhibitor may still be due to oesophageal distension by non-acidic reflux. Exaggerated longitudinal muscle contraction can induce non-acid-related heartburn. Preliminary studies showed a positive effect of baclofen, surgery or endoscopic procedures to reduce weakly acidic reflux.

CONCLUSION

Mechanisms other than acid reflux are involved in some of the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Controlled outcome studies are needed to clarify their roles and the indications for antireflux procedures in patients with persistent symptoms whilst 'on' a proton pump inhibitor.

Dilated intercellular spaces and acid reflux at the distal and proximal oesophagus in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Acid exposure of proximal oesophagus and dilated intercellular space diameters of oesophageal epithelium are relevant in the perception of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

AIM

To explain the relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, acid exposure and intercellular space diameter along the oesophageal epithelium and to assess time-related variability of intercellular space diameter.

METHODS

Thirty-three non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), six erosive oesophagitis patients and 12 asymptomatic controls underwent oesophageal manometry and 24-h dual-channel oesophageal pH-monitoring following endoscopy. Biopsies were taken 5 cm above the LES and 10 cm below the UES, at comparable levels, as pH sensors. A total of 100 intercellular space diameters per patient/control were measured blindly at transmission electron microscopy. In 15 patients, the investigation was repeated after 1 year.

RESULTS

In all NERD patients, acid exposure was higher at mid-proximal oesophagus (P < 0.01) and mean intercellular space diameters, at distal and mid-proximal oesophagus, was three- and twofold higher (1.5 and 0.82 micro m, respectively) compared with controls. Intra-patient intercellular space diameter values were stable over time, not overlapping with those of controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilation of intercellular space diameter occurs along the distal and proximal oesophageal epithelium in NERD patients and could be responsible for the enhanced perception of proximal acid reflux. This finding appears to be time-reproducible and to represent a sensitive, histopathological marker of NERD.

When are reflux episodes symptomatic?

Careful scrutiny of pH recordings and symptom diaries in patients having 24-hour pH-metry reveals that most reflux episodes are asymptomatic. Although this observation is well known and long recognized, the explanation for why one reflux episode leads to symptoms and others do not is incompletely understood. Forty-four patients with chronic typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms referred for ambulatory pH testing were studied. Antisecretory medication was stopped 2 weeks prior to the study. Two meals were taken during the study; one standardized (hamburger, fries, milk-shake) and one at the patient's discretion. A system onset marker noted the type, beginning and end of symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain). Age, sex, upright/supine position, nadir pH, time pH < 4, and relationship to meals were compared for symptomatic/asymptomatic reflux episodes. An acid reflux event was defined as a drop in pH < 4 lasting > 5 seconds. The pH catheter detected 1464 reflux episodes. Only 93 (6.3%) were symptomatic. Forty-six of the 93 (49.4%) were associated with heartburn, 38 (40.9%) with regurgitation, and nine (9.7%) with chest pain. Nadir pH was significantly lower in symptomatic episodes. Nearly 50% of symptomatic reflux episodes occurred after meals, especially after non-standardized compared to standardized meal. Symptomatic episodes tended to be longer in duration and to occur in the supine position, while age/sex made no difference. Six percent of the reflux episodes were temporally associated with typical GERD symptoms. This association seems to be influenced by the acidity of the refluxate. Nearly half of the symptomatic reflux episodes occurred after eating.

Assessment of dietary nutrients that influence perception of intra-oesophageal acid reflux events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms are most commonly reported postprandially, suggesting that some diet components are likely to induce symptoms more than others.

AIMS

To determine which of the various dietary nutrients is a strong predictive factor for symptom generation in association with an acid reflux event.

METHODS

Subjects with typical heartburn symptoms were evaluated by the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease Symptom Checklist, demographics questionnaire, upper endoscopy and pH testing. During the pH study, patients completed a detailed 24-h dietary intake record. This included time of meals, description of food components and the amount and type of food preparation.

RESULTS

Fifty gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients completed all stages of the study. A total of 112 (78%) symptoms were considered as sensed reflux event. Body mass index did not correlate with having perceived reflux. Patients who consumed more cholesterol, saturated fatty acids and had more percentage calories from fat were significantly more likely to experience a perceived reflux event. Regression analysis and beta-coefficient were specifically significant for cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Of all dietary nutrients, cholesterol enhances the most the perception of intra-oesophageal acid reflux events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux of liquids and gas during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations

Some transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) are accompanied by gastro-oesophageal reflux and others are not. We aimed to investigate what factors determine the occurrence and type of reflux during TLOSRs. In 12 healthy subjects prolonged high-resolution manometry was performed. Reflux was detected using pH-impedance monitoring. A total of 219 TLOSRs were detected; no differences were observed between the duration of TLOSRs with liquid-containing reflux (20.2 +/- 1.0 s), gas reflux (17.0 +/- 1.0 s) and no reflux (19.0 +/- 1.0 s). Trans-sphincteric pressure gradient was similar in TLOSRs with liquid reflux (1.6 +/- 0.1 kPa), gas reflux (1.5 +/- 0.1 kPa) and no reflux (1.7 +/- 0.3 kPa). Prevalence, duration and amplitude of oesophageal pre-contractions and sphincteric after-contractions were not different for TLOSRs with and without reflux. The total number of TLOSRs decreased significantly from 8.2 +/- 0.8 in the first to 5.7 +/- 0.5 in the second and 4.4 +/- 0.6 in the third 70-min recording period. The number of TLOSRs accompanied by liquid-containing reflux decreased from 4.7 +/- 0.9 to 3.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.6 +/- 0.4, while the numbers of TLOSRs with gas reflux remained unchanged (2.1 +/- 0.6-2.1 +/- 0.7-2.2 +/- 0.6). Besides, time after the meal, no differences were observed in the characteristics of TLOSRs with and without gastro-oesophageal reflux. We conclude that factors, other than TLOSR characteristics, are important of whether or not a TLOSR is reflux-related.

Rabeprazole test for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Results of a study in a primary care setting

AIM: To determine the diagnostic value of the rabeprazole test in patients seen by general practitioners.

METHODS: Eighty-three patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were enrolled by general practitioners in this multi-centre, randomized and double-blind study. All patients received either rabeprazole (20 mg bid) or a placebo for one week. The diagnosis of GERD was established on the presence of mucosal breaks at endoscopy and/or an abnormal esophageal 24-h pH test. The test was considered to be positive if patients reported at least a “clear improvement” of symptoms on a 7-point Likert scale.

RESULTS: The sensitivities of the test for rabeprazole and the placebo were 83% and 40%, respectively. The corresponding specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 45% and 67%, 71% and 71%, and 62% and 35%, respectively. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis confirmed that the best discriminatory cut-off corresponded to description of “clear improvement”.

CONCLUSION: The poor specificity of the proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) test does not support such an approach to establish a diagnosis of GERD in a primary care setting.

Effect of hiatal hernia on proximal oesophageal acid clearance in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients

BACKGROUND

Proximal acid reflux is common in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and is a determinant of symptoms. Patients with hiatal hernia complain of more symptoms than those without and are less responsive to proton-pump inhibitors.

AIM

To evaluate the role of hiatal hernia on spatiotemporal characteristics of acid reflux.

METHODS

Thirty seven consecutive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients underwent endoscopy, videofluoroscopy, manometry and multichannel 24-h pH test. Data were compared with those of 15 asymptomatic controls. Multivariate linear regression was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

At videofluoroscopy, hiatal hernia was found in 16 of 37 patients. The mean size of hiatal hernia was 3.4 cm. Patients showed significantly prolonged acid clearance time, both at proximal and distal oesophagus, compared with controls. Hiatal hernia patients showed a significantly delayed acid clearance, along the oesophageal body, compared with non-hiatal hernia patients. The prolonged acid exposure was maintained during upright and supine position. The presence of hiatal hernia significantly predicted acid clearance delay in the distal and proximal oesophagus [at 10 cm below upper oesophageal sphincter: Delta + 2.5 min (95% confidence interval: 0.4-4.5); P < 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of hiatal hernia is a strong predictor of more prolonged proximal oesophageal acid exposure and clearance. Hiatal hernia is likely to play a role in the pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, and should be taken into greater consideration in the treatment strategies of the disease.

Long-term experience of treating 185 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by anti-reflux surgery respecting the functional–morphological restoration of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

According to anatomical investigations the whole esophagus plays a crucial role as reflux barrier in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Morphologically, the spirally arranged muscle fibres present a tension-dependent "stretch closure" and in the event of any reduction of tension, as for example caused by an axial hiatus hernia, the organ may become inefficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life as the main success criterion after anti-reflux surgery based strictly on the restoration of functional morphology.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and December 2000, 185 patients with GERD were treated by surgery in accordance with functional-morphological principles. After dissecting the mediastinum, the gastroesophageal junction was displaced into the abdomen with consecutive retensioning the esophagus. The esophageal hiatus was reconstructed with non-absorbable single knot sutures and strengthened with alloplastic material. The application of a 180 degrees fundus cuff around the posterior esophageal circumference served as a "spacer" and also restored the angle of His. Preoperatively, all patients underwent endoscopy, pH metry and manometry. During postoperative follow-up, recurrence rate and quality of life were evaluated via a disease-specific scale.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 85% of the patients had an elevated DeMeester Score with a median of 81.4; 64% had reflux esophagitis and 37% had reduced lower esophageal sphincter pressure. All 185 operations were performed without conversion in a median operating time of 74 min. In one patient a lesion of the esophagus was treated during the operation; two patients had lesions of the splenic capsule which were also dealt with during the operation. Postoperatively, pleural effusions occurred in 15 patients and puncture was deemed necessary in one subject. Ninety-three percent were followed up for a median of 45 months and the recurrence rate was 2.3%. The quality of life index was 81.6+/-12.4 points preoperatively, and had significantly improved to 125.2+/-12.7 points in the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Through the functional-morphological concept of anti-reflux surgery comprising the restoration of the tension-dependent "stretch closure" of the esophagus, significant long-term improvement in quality of life with a low recurrence rate and perioperative morbidity can be achieved.

Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying, revisited

Total gastric emptying is delayed in 10% to 33% of adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but a strong correlation between duration of gastric emptying and severity of acid reflux or esophagitis has never been proved. Previous studies reported that patients with GERD might have exaggerated postprandial fundus relaxation with retention of food and triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). There is a positive correlation between postprandial fundus relaxation and number of TLESRs and also between proximal gastric emptying and esophageal acid exposure. However, new studies suggest that a high number of TLESRs and reflux events may occur even with accelerated gastric emptying, and prolonged gastric retention might be associated with less rather than more esophageal acid exposure. Using simultaneous gastric emptying and esophageal pH impedance we found that the rate of gastric emptying might determine the acidity and proximal extent of reflux: The slower the emptying, the higher the pH and proximal extent of the refluxate.

Relationship between the mechanism of gastro-oesophageal reflux and oesophageal acid exposure in patients with reflux disease

This study investigated the relationship between the oesophageal acid exposure time and the underlying manometric motor events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). In 31 patients, 3-hour oesophageal motility and pH were measured after a test meal. Ten patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory manometry and pH recording. In the 3-hour postprandial study, of 367 reflux episodes 79% was associated with a transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR), 14% with absent basal lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure and the remaining 7% with other mechanisms, representing 62, 28 and 10% of the acid exposure time, respectively. Acid reflux duration per motor mechanism was longer for absent basal LOS pressure than for TLOSR (189 +/- 23 s and 41 +/- 5 s, respectively, P < 0.001). In the 24-hour ambulatory study, the contribution of TLOSRs to reflux frequency vs acid exposure time were 65 vs 54% interprandially and 74 vs 53% after the meal. During the night, absence of basal LOS pressure accounted for 36% of reflux events representing 71% of acid exposure time. In conclusion, the duration of oesophageal acid exposure following a TLOSR is shorter than reflux during absent basal LOS pressure. TLOSRs are, the major contributor to oesophageal acid exposure during the day. At night, however, reflux during absent basal LOS pressure is the major contributor to acid exposure.

Gastric fullness, physical activity, and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVES

Proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux (PER) is relevant for symptoms in GERD patients. It has been suggested that PER is determined by the volume of the refluxate that, in turn, might depend on the degree of gastric fullness. Abdominal straining, during ambulation, increases the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux. We assessed the influence of gastric fullness and ambulation on proximal extent of reflux.

METHODS

PER was assessed in 37 patients with GERD undergoing ambulatory pH impedance monitoring. In 14 controls and 19 GERD patients, esophageal pH impedance and gastric emptying were also studied simultaneously in stationary conditions. We compared PER during fasting, early postprandial (before half emptying), and late postprandial periods in ambulatory and stationary conditions.

RESULTS

More reflux episodes reached the proximal esophagus in the postprandial period compared to fasting (60%+/-4 vs 29%+/-3, p<0.05). In stationary conditions, early postprandial reflux reached higher proximal extent than late postprandial reflux (15+/-3% vs 8+/-4%, p<0.05). The proportion of reflux events reaching the proximal esophagus was significantly higher in ambulatory than in stationary conditions (29+/-5% vs 15+/-3%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to fasting, reflux episodes occurring after the meals are more likely to reach higher proximal extent, particularly so during the early postprandial period. The highest proportion of postprandial proximal reflux occurred in ambulatory condition. These findings suggest that reducing meal volumes and early postprandial physical activity might contribute to decrease proximal extent of reflux and postprandial GERD symptoms.

Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure

OBJECTIVES

It has been demonstrated that dilation of intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium is a marker of tissue injury in GERD patients with a pathological esophageal acid exposure time. To evaluate the relationship among ultrastructural changes, acid esophageal exposure, and GERD symptoms, intercellular space diameters have been assessed in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients with/without abnormal acid exposure time.

METHODS

Following a pharmacological wash-out, 20 NERD patients underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring. Biopsies were taken at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter and intercellular space diameters were measured on transmission electron microscopy photomicrographs. Seven asymptomatic controls underwent the same protocol.

RESULTS

Acid exposure time was in the normal range in all controls and in 11 patients (NERD pH-negative); it was abnormal in 9 patients (NERD pH-positive). Mean intercellular space diameter in NERD pH-negative and in NERD pH-positive patients was three times greater than in controls (1.45 and 1.49 microm vs 0.45, p < 0.001). Mean values of maximum intercellular spaces in all NERD patients were greater, two-fold or more, than those in controls (p < 0.001). No difference in mean and maximal space diameters was observed between NERD pH-positive and pH-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilation of intercellular spaces is a feature of NERD patients, irrespective of esophageal acid exposure, and can be considered an objective, structural marker of GERD symptoms. Impaired esophageal mucosal resistance, even to small amounts of acid refluxate, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of NERD.

Effect of endoscopic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (Gatekeeper reflux repair system) on intraoesophageal dynamic characteristics of acid reflux

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Improvements in symptoms following endoscopic procedures for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) are seldom supported by normalisation of acid exposure time at the distal oesophagus. However, the distribution of gastric acid within the proximal oesophagus is a main determinant of symptom generation in GORD patients. In this study, our aim was to assess the effect of endoscopic insertion of hydrogel expandable prostheses into the oesophageal submucosa on spatiotemporal characteristics of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

METHODS

Oesophageal manometry and multichannel ambulatory 24 hour pH monitoring were carried out in nine patients before and six months after the endoscopic procedure. Dynamic characteristics of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients were also compared with those in 13 asymptomatic controls.

RESULTS

Acid exposure time (AET) at the distal oesophagus decreased from 11.7% (95% confidence interval 6.1-21.8) at baseline to 7.7% (3.7-11.6) at follow up (NS). Of the nine patients, distal AET normalised in three. AET at the middle (7.6% (2.9-12.3)) and proximal (2.4% (0.1-4.8)) oesophagus decreased significantly in all patients (2.4% (0.3-4.5), p <0.01; 1.2% (0.2-2.2), p<0.05 respectively). Proximal extent of acid events significantly decreased in all patients at follow up (37.3% v 9.5%), reaching values observed in asymptomatic controls. Median GORD health related quality of life scores significantly improved from 35.5 at baseline to 9.4.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of a significant improvement in traditional pH variables, endoscopic implant of hydrogel prostheses above the lower oesophageal sphincter significantly decreases proximal spread of acid reflux into oesophageal body. This effect would explain the improvement in symptoms in patients six months after therapy.

Therapeutic choices in reflux disease: defining the criteria for selecting a proton pump inhibitor

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, with symptoms affecting a substantial proportion of the US population on a daily basis. Heartburn and related symptoms arise from a number of pathophysiologic mechanisms, including dilated intercellular spaces, increased duration of acid reflux, greater proximal extent of reflux, and esophageal sensitivity. Chronic reflux may result in serious complications, such as esophageal erosions or ulceration, stricture, and Barrett esophagus. The goals of GERD therapy are to relieve patients' symptoms and prevent complications. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent the most effective treatment option for GERD, relieving symptoms, healing erosions, and maintaining a healed mucosa. Differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics among the PPIs may result in differences in intragastric pH holding time as well as the onset of symptom relief. Lansoprazole and esomeprazole produce similar degrees and onset of symptom relief, with both providing greater symptom relief as compared with omeprazole. Although manufactured as capsules containing enteric-coated granules, lansoprazole, omeprazole, and esomeprazole maintain their high level of pharmacologic efficacy when the capsule contents are emptied into soft foods or various liquids. Lansoprazole and pantoprazole also are manufactured as intravenous formulations, and lansoprazole is available as strawberry-flavored granules for oral suspension and as an orally disintegrating tablet. These alternative routes of administration are particularly beneficial in the management of acid-related disorders in infants, children, the elderly, and patients of all ages who have difficulty swallowing or are unable to swallow intact capsules or tablets and those in the critical care setting.

Acid, weakly acidic and non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux: differences, prevalence and clinical relevance

In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oesophageal symptoms and mucosal damage traditionally are related to acid-reflux episodes with pH lower than 4. Oesophageal or extra-oesophageal symptoms of GORD may also be associated with less acidic reflux (pH 4-7). New methodologies have evolved to complement pH monitoring for characterisation of less acidic gastro-oesophageal reflux. This review will focus on definition, detection, pathophysiology and symptom association of weakly acidic and non-acid reflux, in both adult and paediatric populations.

Pathophysiological characteristics of patients with non-erosive reflux disease differ from those of patients with functional heartburn

BACKGROUND

Patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn can be subdivided into non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn on the basis of abnormal and normal, respectively, oesophageal acid exposure. Different pathophysiological characteristics could explain the reportedly low efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in functional heartburn.

AIM

To assess if non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn are pathophysiologically distinguishable.

METHODS

Oesophageal manometry and pH-monitoring were performed in 145 patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn, in 72 patients with erosive reflux disease, in 58 patients with complicated reflux disease, and in 60 controls.

RESULTS

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (84 cases) and functional heartburn (61 cases) differed with regard to the prevalence of hiatal hernia (49% vs. 31%, P = 0.008), the mean lower oesophageal sphincter tone (18.5 vs. 28.4 mmHg, P < 0.05), and the number of upright diurnal acid refluxes lasting more than 5 min (3.6 vs. 0.37, P < 0.05). The results were very close in thenon-erosive reflux disease, erosive reflux disease and complicated reflux disease groups, whilst patients with functional heartburn were indistinguishable from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathophysiological characteristics typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are found in patients with non-erosive reflux disease but not in patients with functional heartburn. This could explain the reportedly low efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in functional heartburn and suggests considering different management strategies.

Review article: approaches to endoscopic-negative reflux disease: part of the GERD spectrum or a unique acid-related disorder?

Endoscopic-negative reflux disease (ENRD) is the most common presentation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-affecting up to 70% of these individuals. In the last three decades therapeutic studies have focused solely on the treatment of patients with erosive oesophagitis. However, more recent studies have shifted our attention to defining, understanding and treating those with ENRD. GERD has traditionally been approached as a spectrum with ENRD at the mild end and complicated GERD (i.e. patients with erosive oesophagitis, stricture and Barrett's oesophagus) being at the other end, suggesting that patients' disease may progress over time along the spectrum. Current data indicate that ENRD should be approached as a unique entity rather than a part of the GERD spectrum and that over time only a few patients with ENRD will develop GERD-related complications. Patients with ENRD are a heterogenous group of patients with different aetiologies for their heartburn symptoms, including motor events, reflux of acidic or nonacidic gastric contents, minute changes in intraesophageal pH (pH < 4), mucosal hypersensitivity, and emotional or psychological abnormalities. By dropping the spectrum concept, which emphasizes oesophageal mucosal injury, we can focus our attention on the specific mechanisms that lead to symptom generation in each of the three unique groups of GERD (ENRD, erosive oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus) and on the specific therapeutic modalities that benefit each of these individual groups. Acid suppressive therapy with proton pump inhibitors is highly effective in healing erosions and controlling symptoms in those with erosive oesophagitis. In those with ENRD the resolution or control of heartburn with proton pump inhibitor therapy is greater than that with placebo or H2 receptor antagonist, but not as consistent nor as impressive as the results observed in studies of patients with erosive oesophagitis. By considering the mechanisms involved in ENRD symptom generation, future studies that include high-dose proton pump inhibitors, promotility agents (alone or in combination with proton pump inhibitors), transient lower oesophageal sphincter reducers, or pain modulators (e.g. tricyclic antidepressant agents) may prove beneficial.

Intra-oesophageal distribution and perception of acid reflux in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease do not present with erosive oesophagitis and make up a heterogeneous group. Patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are less responsive than patients with oesophagitis to acid-suppressive therapy.

AIM

To assess the role of acid reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms.

METHODS

The spatio-temporal characteristics of reflux events were analysed and related to reflux perception in 45 patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and 20 patients with erosive oesophagitis.

RESULTS

Compared with healthy controls, all patients showed a higher intra-oesophageal proximal spread of acid, which was prominent in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (> 50% of events lasting for 1-2 min). Irrespective of mucosal injury, the risk of reflux perception was very high when acid reached proximal sensors (odds ratio, 7.6; 95% confidence interval, 4.6-12.5), being maximal in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with normal acid exposure time (odds ratio, 11; 95% confidence interval, 5.2-22.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are characterized by a significantly higher proportion of proximal acid refluxes and a higher sensitivity to short-lasting refluxes when compared with patients with oesophagitis. The highest proximal acid exposure and highest perception occurred in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease presenting with a normal pH-metric profile. The assessment of acid distribution and its perception in the oesophageal body can better identify reflux patients who should benefit from acid-suppressive treatment.

New developments in the pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD): implications for patient management

The spectrum of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has expanded; indeed the majority of individuals with symptomatic GERD do not have erosive reflux disease (ERD); this group has been referred to as nonerosive or negative-endoscopy reflux disease (NERD). There may be important differences between NERD and ERD in terms of pathophysiology and management. Thus, NERD patients appear relatively resistant to proton pump inhibitors and may not be good surgical candidates. The clinician caring for patients with GERD must therefore be aware of the full spectrum of GERD and of the pathophysiological and therapeutic implications of NERD. Recent twin studies have revealed that genetic factors play a role in GERD and form the basis for future studies on the role of inheritance in the various manifestations of GERD. Several recent investigations have reaffirmed the primacy of acid reflux in the pathogenesis of GERD and have also provided insights into the pathophysiology of postprandial heartburn. Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and hiatal hernias have emerged as major and interacting factors in the genesis of reflux events and in the potentiation of acid exposure; the former are attracting considerable attention as a potential therapeutic target. Nocturnal acid breakthrough, which has been implicated in the failure of some patients to respond to high doses of proton pump inhibitors, appears, on further examination, to be a gastric rather than an oesophageal phenomenon, and may not be of clinical or therapeutic importance.

Diagnosis of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of patients with differences in sensitivity to esophageal acid exposure, perception of pain, and physiological tissue involvement. The most difficult patients to understand are those who have a great symptom burden but no endoscopic evidence of esophageal mucosal involvement. These patients with symptomatic GERD (also called nonerosive reflux disease and endoscopy-negative reflux disease) present a diagnostic challenge. Diagnostic tests, like ambulatory pH monitoring, the acid perfusion test, and intraesophageal balloon distension, have limited reliability in patients with this form of GERD whose symptoms may exhibit poor correlation with acid exposure or mechanostimulation. The recent interest in a proton pump inhibitor therapeutic trial to identify the group of symptomatic GERD patients (having ruled out risk factors for more morbid conditions) who will respond to these agents has considerable appeal. It has been shown effective in about 75% of patients, and offers a simple approach to managing the difficult-to-diagnose patient even while further diagnostic procedures are carried out.

Assessment of relationship between acid reflux and heartburn using receiver operating characteristic curves

Arguments proposed in this article may explain why a subgroup of patients, having so-called "functional heartburn," does not respond to acid inhibition therapy [19,20]. It is highly likely that acid is not the cause of heartburn in this group of subjects. These conclusions are supported further by observations of Wiener et al [2] and Howard et al [21], who found that a subgroup of patients with high SI have a negative Bernstein test, which suggests that the presence of acid in the esophagus at the time of spontaneous heartburn may be coincidental and does not reflect a cause-and-effect relationship between the two. The motor events responsible for the occurrence of acid reflux (longitudinal muscle contraction of the esophagus [SEC] associated with transient LES relaxation) may be the cause of heartburn sensation.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--pathophysiological issues of clinical relevance

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a multifactorial disorder in which the pathophysiological mechanisms are variably combined in different patients. Motor dysfunction of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and, possibly, the proximal stomach is a major cause of the increase in the number of reflux episodes. Transient LOS relaxation is the main mechanism of reflux in many patients with endoscopically negative disease, whereas a hypotensive LOS becomes relevant only in patients with oesophagitis. Alterations in primary and secondary peristalsis contribute to the increased oesophageal acid exposure by delaying clearance. The presence of a hiatus hernia, especially when voluminous and/or non-reducible, increases the number of reflux episodes by mechanically weakening the oesophago-gastric junction, and impairs oesophageal clearance. Hypersensitivity to acid is often present and contributes to the clinical manifestations of the disease, whereas oesophageal hypersensitivity, both to chemical and mechanical stimuli, plays a predominant role in a subset of patients. Increased concentrations of noxious compounds in the oesophageal refluxate may contribute to the development of anatomical lesions, but this is still a matter for debate. The clinical relevance of Helicobacter pylori infection and of mucosal defensive factors still needs to be fully elucidated.

Prior sensitization of esophageal mucosa by acid reflux predisposes to reflux-induced chest pain

Esophageal acid exposure is believed to be a major source of unexplained chest pain; but, individual episodes of reflux in pH study are not consistently associated with chest pain. Our aim was to discover whether prior sensitization of esophageal mucosa by acid reflux predisposes to reflux-induced chest pain. Ambulatory pH studies of patients referred to our laboratory from January 1991 to November 1996 with noncardiac chest pain was reviewed. We compared the frequency of esophageal acid exposure in the 30 minutes preceding chest pain episodes with a positive symptom/reflux association (+SRA) to reflux with the frequency of acid exposure in the 30 minutes preceding those chest pain episodes that were not associated with reflux negative symptom/reflux association (-SRA). We analyzed the time esophageal pH <4, symptom index (SI) defined as percentage of chest pain episodes associated with reflux in the preceding 5 minutes, and amount of reflux in the 30 minutes preceding each chest pain episode. Of 104 patients, 52 had chest pain during their pH study, 10 had high SI (> or =50%), and 42 had low SI (<50%). Those with a high SI were significantly more likely to have an abnormal pH study (p = 0.015). Chest pain associated with reflux in proceeding 5 minutes (+SRA) was strongly associated (p < 0.002) with additional reflux episodes in the preceding 25-minute period. Chest pain related to reflux is associated with sensitization of the esophageal mucosa by prior reflux events.

Does the duration of gastroesophageal reflux disease and degree of acid reflux correlate with esophageal function? A retrospective analysis of 768 patients

To reconfirm that the duration of symptoms is not associated with esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal manometric data from 768 patients with GERD were retrospectively analyzed with relation to the duration of symptoms. GERD was defined by positive acid reflux test results monitored by ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Correlation of the duration of symptoms with esophageal body pressures, the presence of dysmotility determined by simultaneous waves, average resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and abdominal and overall lengths of the LES were statistically analyzed. The median duration of the symptoms was 60 months (range, 1-600). Duration of symptoms was not associated with contraction pressures of the esophageal body at 3 and 8 cm above the LES (r = -0.070 and -0.063, respectively). There was no correlation between LES pressures, LES lengths, or the percentage of simultaneous waves and duration of symptoms. Stricture formation is related to decreased distal esophageal function in GERD patients. In conclusion, the duration of GERD has little influence on esophageal body and LES function.

The usefulness of the likelihood ratio in the diagnosis of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Clinicians are familiar with the concepts of sensitivity and specificity to describe the accuracy of a diagnostic test. These measures do not always express the probability that a patient has a disease with a given test result as this will vary with the prevalence of the disorder in the population. The likelihood ratio is a more clinically relevant method of reporting accuracy, and the probability of having a disease after a positive or negative test can be calculated. The likelihood ratio can be applied to the clinical problem of dyspepsia management. This suggests that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) test and treat will detect and treat most peptic ulcers with only 0.5% of H. pylori-negative patients having peptic ulcer disease. Serology is possibly acceptable in populations with an H. pylori prevalence of approximately 50%. The urea breath tests are more appropriate in more extreme prevalence ranges. Once the prevalence of H. pylori falls below 10%, then the urea breath test becomes inaccurate, and screening and treatment may be less appropriate. The absolute probability of having peptic ulcer disease in a largely H. pylori-negative population will be very small, however, and the appropriateness of performing any investigation in these circumstances is debatable. Finally, likelihood ratios indicate that the clinical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is not straightforward. Traditionally, it is believed that patients with dominant heartburn are likely to have GERD. Likelihood ratios predict, however, that patients with these symptoms have a little over 50% chance of having GERD as defined by 24-h esophageal pH studies.

Esophageal sensitivity and symptom perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) experience a wide spectrum of symptoms, varying both in quality and severity. This review summarizes clinical observations of esophageal sensitivity and symptom perception in GERD patients. The Bernstein test, although lacking standardization, remains a useful tool in determining esophageal sensitivity to acid stimuli. Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring with symptom event marking and subsequent symptom-reflux correlation between acid reflux events and esophageal symptomatology now provides an alternative method for establishing esophageal acid sensitivity. The intraesophageal balloon distention test (IEBD) was developed to assess esophageal sensitivity to mechanical stimuli. Variants of each of these tests have been applied to the evaluation of uncomplicated GERD patients and patients with esophagitis and Barrett's metaplasia, who generally demonstrate less esophageal sensitivity than the former group. Studies using these methods have demonstrated increased esophageal sensitivity in patients with esophageal chest pain and have also identified a subset of patients with esophageal symptoms yet normal esophageal acid exposure, a condition referred to as "hypersensitive esophagus." The Bernstein test, 24-hour pH monitoring with symptom assessment, and IEBD have each contributed to our understanding of esophageal pain syndromes; it is hoped that future work in this area will lead to improved and more specific therapy for these patients.