Protection of chickens from Newcastle disease by vaccination with a linear plasmid DNA expressing the F protein of Newcastle disease virus

Immunization of animals: from DNA to the dinner plate

Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in polynucleotide vaccination also referred to as DNA vaccines or genetic immunization for inducing long-term immunity in various animals and humans. The main attraction of this technology is the possibility to induce a broad range of immune responses without the use of conventional adjuvants. To date, most of the studies (>500 reports) have focused on DNA vaccination in mice. The present report summarizes the limited number of trials that have used target animal species to not only test the immune responses but also correlate them to protection.

Nucleic acid immunization: concepts and techniques associated with third generation vaccines

A radical change in vaccine methodology arrived nine years ago with the advent of nucleic acid immunization. Aspects such as plasmid design, gene selection, the use of immunostimulatory complexes and clinical trials are discussed in this review. Furthermore, concepts and protocols involved in the construction, evaluation and immunization of a DNA vaccine have been examined as new strategies to enhance this technology continues to grow.

Protection of turkeys against Chlamydia psittaci challenge by gene gun-based DNA immunizations

Particle-mediated (Helios Gene Gun) transfer to the turkey epidermis of plasmid DNA expressing the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of an avian Chlamydia psittaci strain was evaluated for its ability to raise an immune response and protection against challenge with the homologous strain. In turkeys, the delivery of pcDNA1/MOMP coated onto 0.6 microm gold beads was the most efficient compared to immunisations using 1.0 or 1.6 microm gold beads. The delivery of as little as 1 microg pcDNA1/MOMP coated onto 0.6 microm gold beads was efficient. Immunisation with 1.0 microm gold beads required twice more (2 microg) DNA to achieve comparable results. The use of 2 microg DNA coated onto 1.6 microm gold beads had no effects. The gene gun delivery both primed T-helper and B-cell memory although recombinant MOMP-expressing cells did not induce high-titre antibody responses. The significance of gene gun-based DNA immunisation as a means of preventing severe clinical signs, lesions and chlamydia excretion in a turkey model of Chlamydia psittaci infection was demonstrated.

Potency of an experimental DNA vaccine against Aujeszky's disease in pigs

Intradermal vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding envelope glycoprotein C (gC) of pseudorabies virus (PrV) conferred protection of pigs against Aujeszky's disease when challenged with strain 75V19, but proved to be inadequate for protection against the highly virulent strain NIA-3. To improve the performance of the DNA vaccine, animals were vaccinated intradermally with a combination of plasmids expressing PrV glycoproteins gB, gC, gD, or gE under control of the major immediate-early promotor/enhancer of human cytomegalovirus. 12.5 microg per plasmid were used per immunization of 5-week old piglets which were injected three times at biweekly intervals. Five out of six animals survived a lethal challenge with strain NIA-3 without exhibiting central nervous signs, whereas all the control animals succumbed to the disease. This result shows the increased protection afforded by administration of the plasmid mixture over vaccination with a gC expressing plasmid alone. A comparative trial was performed using commercially available inactivated and modified-live vaccines and a mixture of plasmids expressing gB, gC, and gD. gE was omitted to conform with current eradication strategies based on gE-deleted vaccines. All six animals vaccinated with the live vaccine survived the lethal NIA-3 challenge without showing severe clinical signs. In contrast, five of six animals immunized with the inactivated vaccine died, as did two non-vaccinated controls. In this test, three of six animals vaccinated with the DNA vaccine survived without severe clinical signs, whereas three succumbed to the disease. Comparing weight reduction and virus excretion, the DNA vaccine also ranged between the inactivated and modified-live vaccines. Thus, administration of DNA constructs expressing different PrV glycoproteins was superior to an adjuvanted inactivated vaccine but less effective than an attenuated live vaccine in protection of pigs against PrV infection. Our data suggest a potential use of DNA vaccination in circumstances which do not allow administration of live attenuated vaccines.

DNA vaccines: technology and application as anti-parasite and anti-microbial agents

DNA vaccines have been termed The Third Generation of Vaccines. The recent successful immunization of experimental animals against a range of infectious agents and several tumour models of disease with plasmid DNA testifies to the powerful nature of this revolutionary approach in vaccinology. Among numerous advantages, a major attraction of DNA vaccines over conventional vaccines is that they are able to induce protective cytotoxic T-cell responses as well as helper T-cell and humoral immunity. Here we review the current state of nucleic acid vaccines and cover a wide range of topics including delivery mechanisms, uptake and expression of plasmid DNA, and the types of immune responses generated. Further, we discuss safety issues, and document the use of nucleic acid vaccines against viral, bacterial and parasitic diseases, and cancer. The early potential promise of DNA vaccination has been fully substantiated with recent, exciting developments including the movement from testing DNA vaccines in laboratory models to non-human primates and initial human clinical trials. These advances and the emerging voluminous literature on DNA vaccines highlight the rapid progress that has been made in the DNA immunization field. It will be of considerable interest to see whether the progress and optimism currently prevailing can be maintained, and whether the approach can indeed fulfil the medical and commerical promise anticipated.

DNA vaccines for viral diseases

DNA vaccines, with which the antigen is synthesized in vivo after direct introduction of its encoding sequences, offer a unique method of immunization that may overcome many of the deficits of traditional antigen-based vaccines. By virtue of the sustained in vivo antigen synthesis and the comprised stimulatory CpG motifs, plasmid DNA vaccines appear to induce strong and long-lasting humoral (antibodies) and cell-mediated (T-help, other cytokine functions and cytotoxic T cells) immune responses without the risk of infection and without boost. Other advantages over traditional antigen-containing vaccines are their low cost, the relative ease with which they are manufactured, their heat stability, the possibility of obtaining multivalent vaccines and the rapid development of new vaccines in response to new strains of pathogens. The antigen-encoding DNA may be in different forms and formulations, and may be introduced into cells of the body by numerous methods. To date, animal models have shown the possibility of producing effective prophylactic DNA vaccines against numerous viruses as well as other infectious pathogens. The strong cellular responses also open up the possibility of effective therapeutic DNA vaccines to treat chronic viral infections.

Out on the farm with DNA vaccines

DNA vaccination is a rapidly developing technology that offers new approaches for the prevention of disease. This technology may permit the production of new vaccines against diseases that have no current vaccine, as well as allowing the development of improved vaccines to replace existing products. We describe how DNA vaccination is being developed for use in commercial animal production, with an emphasis on viral diseases, and discuss the existing hurdles to its development and use.

DNA vaccination affords significant protection against feline immunodeficiency virus infection without inducing detectable antiviral antibodies

To test the potential of a multigene DNA vaccine against lentivirus infection, we generated a defective mutant provirus of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) with an in-frame deletion in pol (FIVDeltaRT). In a first experiment, FIVDeltaRT DNA was administered intramuscularly to 10 animals, half of which also received feline gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) DNA. The DNA was administered in four 100-microg doses at 0, 10, and 23 weeks. Immunization with FIVDeltaRT elicited cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses to FIV Gag and Env in the absence of a serological response. After challenge with homologous virus at week 26, all 10 of the control animals became seropositive and viremic but 4 of the 10 vaccinates remained seronegative and virus free. Furthermore, quantitative virus isolation and quantitative PCR analysis of viral DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed significantly lower virus loads in the FIVDeltaRT vaccinates than in the controls. Immunization with FIVDeltaRT in conjunction with IFN-gamma gave the highest proportion of protected cats, with only two of five vaccinates showing evidence of infection following challenge. In a second experiment involving two groups (FIVDeltaRT plus IFN-gamma and IFN-gamma alone), the immunization schedule was reduced to 0, 4, and 8 weeks. Once again, CTL responses were seen prior to challenge in the absence of detectable antibodies. Two of five cats receiving the proviral DNA vaccine were protected against infection, with an overall reduction in virus load compared to the five infected controls. These findings demonstrate that DNA vaccination can elicit protection against lentivirus infection in the absence of a serological response and suggest the need to reconsider efficacy criteria for lentivirus vaccines.

Genetic vaccines: strategies for optimization

Vaccination with attenuated or killed microbes, purified or recombinant subunit proteins and synthetic peptides is often hampered by toxicity, the presence of infectious agents, weak immune responses and prohibiting costs, especially in the developing world. Such problems may be circumvented by genetic immunization which has recently emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional vaccines. Numerous studies have already shown that immunization of experimental animals with plasmid DNA encoding antigens from a wide spectrum of bacteria, viruses, protozoa and cancers leads to protective humoral and cell-mediated immunity. This review deals with the background and progress made so far with DNA vaccines and their theoretical and practical advantages as well as potential risks, discusses proposed mechanisms of DNA transfection of cells and induction of immune responses to the produced vaccine antigen, and evaluates strategies for the control and optimization of such responses.

Coadministration of DNA encoding interleukin-6 and hemagglutinin confers protection from influenza virus challenge in mice

This study was conducted to investigate whether Accell gene gun coadministration of DNA encoding human interleukin-6 (IL-6) would enhance protective immune responses in mice to an equine influenza A virus hemagglutinin (HA) DNA vaccine. Mice that received HA DNA alone exhibited accelerated clearance of homologous challenge virus but were not protected from infection. In contrast, mice that received both HA and IL-6 DNA had no detectable virus in their lungs after challenge. These results strongly support the use of IL-6 as a cytokine adjuvant in DNA vaccination.

Analysis of plasmid DNA from a pharmaceutical perspective

The advent of gene therapy and polynucleotide-based vaccines has resulted in the use of plasmid DNA as a drug substance. Although biologically (cell or animal) based assays must currently be employed to establish the identity and potency of such drugs, we argue that in the future, a combination of microchip-based mutation detection devices combined with an array of chromatographic, electrophoretic, hydrodynamic, and spectroscopic methods can be employed to rigorously establish these properties. We review a variety of such methods in this context and also consider the issue of the chemical stability of plasmids. Extensive comparison is made to protein-based pharmaceuticals with the unique importance of polynucleotide sequence emphasized in comparison to protein tertiary structure.

DNA vaccination against virus infection and enhancement of antiviral immunity following consecutive immunization with DNA and viral vectors

Recent demonstrations of the immunogenicity of antigens encoded in DNA plasmids following delivery by various routes have heralded a new era in vaccine development. In this article, we review progress in DNA-based antiviral immunoprophylaxis. Preclinical studies have already established the immunogenicity of DNA plasmids encoding protective antigens from a wide variety of viral pathogens and work published in recent months has raised real prospects of broadly protective DNA vaccination against infections with influenza virus and HIV. We also describe a consecutive immunization protocol consisting of a priming dose of vaccine antigen encoded in DNA plasmids followed by a booster with the same antigen encoded in recombinant fowlpox virus vectors. We have used this strategy to generate protective antiviral cell-mediated immunity and sustained, high-level antibody responses both systemically and at mucosae, and to elucidate immunological mechanisms underlying the development of immunity to antigens delivered in DNA vectors.

Immunogenicity and efficacy of baculovirus-expressed and DNA-based equine influenza virus hemagglutinin vaccines in mice

Two fundamentally different approaches to vaccination of BALB/c mice with the hemagglutinin (HA) of A/Equine/Kentucky/1/81 (H3N8) (Eq/KY) were evaluated, that is, administration of HA protein vs administration of HA-encoding DNA. Each vaccine was tested for its immunogenicity and ability to provide protection from homologous virus challenge. HA protein was synthesized in vitro by infection of Sf21 insect cells with a recombinant baculovirus. Intranasal administration of this vaccine induced virus-specific antibodies, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), but did not induce virus neutralizing (VN) antibodies. This route of administration provided partial protection from virus challenge, but interestingly, this protection was completely abrogated, rather than enhanced, by co-administration of 10 micrograms of cholera holotoxin. As a second approach, mice were directly vaccinated in vivo by Accell gene gun delivery of plasmid DNA encoding the Eq/KY HA gene. This approach induced VN antibodies as well as virus-specific ELISA antibodies. When two doses of DNA vaccine were administered 3 weeks apart, mice were not protected from challenge, although they cleared the infection more rapidly than control mice. However, when the second DNA vaccination was delayed until 9 weeks after the first, 9 out of 10 vaccinated mice were completely protected. These results indicate that the time between initial and booster DNA vaccinations may be an important variable in determining DNA vaccination efficacy.