Lignocaine selectively reduces C fibre-evoked neuronal activity in rat spinal cord in vitro by decreasing N-methyl-D-aspartate and neurokinin receptor-mediated post-synaptic depolarizations; implications for the development of novel centrally acting analgesics

The Interaction Effect of Perioperative Cotreatment with Dextromethorphan and Intravenous Lidocaine on Pain Relief and Recovery of Bowel Function After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Both dextromethorphan (DM) and IV lidocaine improve postoperative pain relief. In the present study, we evaluated the interaction of DM and IV lidocaine on pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). One-hundred ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for LC were randomized into four equal groups to receive either: (a) chlorpheniramine maleate (CPM) intramuscular injection (IM) 20 mg and IV normal saline (N/S) (group C); (b) DM 40 mg IM and IV N/S (group DM); (c) CPM 20 mg IM and IV lidocaine 3 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1) (group L); or (d) DM 40 mg IM and IV lidocaine (group DM+L). All treatments were administered 30 min before skin incision. Analgesic effects were evaluated using visual analog scale pain scores at rest and during coughing, time to meperidine request, total meperidine consumption, and the time to first passage of flatus after surgery. Patients of the DM+L group exhibited the best pain relief and fastest recovery of bowel function among groups. Patients in the DM and L groups had significantly better pain relief than those in the C group. The results showed an additional effect on pain relief and a synergistic effect on recovery of bowel function when DM was combined with IV lidocaine after LC.

Multiple phases of relief from experimental mechanical allodynia by systemic lidocaine: responses to early and late infusions

Systemic lidocaine can relieve various forms of neuropathic pain that develop after nerve injury. Mechanical allodynia, defined by a significant drop in paw withdrawal threshold force following spinal nerve ligation (L5-L6) in rats, can be reversed by one 30min lidocaine infusion at a constant plasma concentration as low as 1-2 microg/ml, an effect that is still present when the rats are tested days and weeks afterwards. In this study, we resolved the detailed time course of reversal of ipsilateral and contralateral allodynia in rats with spinal nerve ligation by a single systemic infusion of lidocaine, to 4 microg/ml, given either 2 days after ligation (POD2) or 7 days after ligation (POD7). Male Sprague-Dawley rats were examined for 21 days after undergoing sham operation or spinal nerve ligation to produce allodynia, which was quantified by a lower force of von Frey hairs at the plantar hind paw just required to produce paw withdrawal (paw withdrawal threshold, PWT). Six experimental protocols were followed: rats were infused with lidocaine on POD2 (L2) or on POD7 (L7), or with saline on POD2 (S2) or on POD7 (S7), and sham operated rats were infused with lidocaine on POD2 or on POD7. PWTs were measured during the last 5min of a single 30min lidocaine infusion; at 30, 60, 90, 120, 240 and 360min, and 24, 48 and 72h after beginning infusion, and then every 1-3 days up to 21 days. Three distinct sequential phases of ipsilateral relief were apparent in both L2 and L7 groups: (1) an acute elevation of PWT during the infusion, returning to the pre-infusion allodynic level within 30-60min after infusion; (2) a second, transient elevation of PWT within the next 360min; (3) a sustained elevation of PWT developing slowly over 24h after infusion and maintained over the next 21 days. A significant, although weaker contralateral allodynia developed more slowly (>POD8) than the ipsilateral condition, and could be delayed for more than 2 weeks by lidocaine infusion on POD2 but for only 1 week by the same treatment on POD7. None of the sham operated animals had any allodynic signs and no saline infusions elevated PWT in ligated, allodynic rats. These results of separate phases imply that there are mechanistic differences between the acute relief and the sustained relief of allodynia after a single infusion of lidocaine, and may present an experimental paradigm for investigating the advantages of earlier rather than late therapeutic intervention.

Experimental incision-induced pain in human skin: effects of systemic lidocaine on flare formation and hyperalgesia

In order to try to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of post-operative pain, this study was designed to psychophysically determine physiological and pharmacological characteristics of experimental pain induced by a 4-mm-long incision through the skin, fascia and muscle in the volar forearm of humans. In experiment 1, the subjects (n=8) were administered lidocaine systemically (a bolus injection of 2mg/kg for a period of 5 min followed by an intravenous infusion of 2mg/kg/h for another 40 min), and then the incision was made. In experiment 2, cumulative doses of lidocaine (0.5-2mg/kg) were systemically injected in the subjects (n=8) 30 min after the incision had been made, when primary and secondary hyperalgesia had fully developed. Spontaneous pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Primary hyperalgesia was defined as mechanical pain thresholds to von Frey hair stimuli (from 7 to 151 mN) in the injured area. The area of secondary hyperalgesia to punctate mechanical stimuli was assessed using a rigid von Frey hair (151 mN). Flare formation was assessed in the first experiment using a laser doppler imager (LDI). Pain perception was maximal when the incision was made and then rapidly disappeared within 30 min after the incision had been made. Primary hyperalgesia was apparent at 15 min after the incision had been made and remained for 2 days. The incision resulted in a relatively large area of flare formation immediately after the incision had been made. The area of flare began to shrink within 15 min and was limited to a small area around the injured area at 30 min after incision. Secondary hyperalgesia was apparent at 30 min after incision and persisted for 3h after incision and then gradually disappeared over the next 3h. In experiment 1, pre-traumatic treatment with systemic lidocaine suppressed primary hyperalgesia only during the first 1h after the incision had been made. The lidocaine suppressed the development of flare formation without affecting the pain rating when the incision was made. The development of secondary hyperalgesia continued to be suppressed after completion of the lidocaine infusion. In experiment 2, post-traumatic treatment with lidocaine temporarily suppressed primary as well as secondary hyperalgesia that had fully developed; however, the primary and secondary hyperalgesia again became apparent after completion of the lidocaine administration. These findings suggest that pre-traumatic treatment with lidocaine reduces the excessive inputs from the injured peripheral nerves, thus suppressing development of flare formation and secondary hyperalgesia through peripheral and central mechanisms, respectively. Pre-traumatic treatment with lidocaine would temporarily stabilize the sensitized nerves in the injured area, but the nerves would be sensitized after completion of the administration. Post-traumatic treatment with lidocaine reduced primary and secondary hyperalgesia that had fully developed. However, the finding that the suppressive effect of lidocaine on secondary hyperalgesia was temporary suggests that the development and maintenance of secondary hyperalgesia are caused by different mechanisms.

Continuous lidocaine infusion for the relief of refractory malignant pain in a terminally ill pediatric cancer patient

Despite aggressive pain management with opiates, debilitating pain still occurs in a subset of children with terminal cancer. A 5-year-old girl with metastatic retinoblastoma, profound opiate tolerance, and refractory pain was treated. Continuous lidocaine infusion was initiated at a dose of 35 microg/kg per minute and increased over 4 days to 50 microg/kg per minute, at which point the patient was discharged for continued end-of-life comfort care. The patient had excellent pain relief without the associated lethargy of high-dose opiates. No complicating neuroexcitatory symptoms or cardiac conduction abnormalities were experienced. Intravenous lidocaine may be an effective alternative to opioids in the treatment of refractory malignant pain in the pediatric patient with terminal cancer.

Continual systemic infusion of lidocaine provides analgesia in an animal model of neuropathic pain

We examined whether continual constant-rate infusion of lidocaine would provide analgesia during the initial post-injury phase in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into control and ligated groups and infused with saline or lidocaine (0.15, 0.33, 0.67, and 1.3mg/kg/h) via subcutaneously implanted Alzet((R)) osmotic minipumps. Thermal withdrawal latencies were obtained prior (Day 0) and 3 days after loose sciatic ligation and pump implantation surgery. Ligated animals receiving lidocaine at 0.67 or 1.3mg/kg/h exhibited no change in withdrawal latency on Day 3 after surgery, indicating that lidocaine at these doses prevented the development of thermal hyperalgesia as a sign of neuropathic pain. In contrast, ligated animals treated with saline or lidocaine at 0.15 or 0.33mg/kg/h exhibited hyperalgesia on Day 3 after surgery, indicating that these lower doses of lidocaine failed to provide analgesia. Control animals treated with saline or any of the lidocaine doses exhibited no change in withdrawal latencies between Day 0 and Day 3. In a separate group of ligated animals, lidocaine infusion (0.67mg/kg/h) that was started 24h after sciatic ligation surgery reversed the already present thermal hyperalgesia. Average plasma lidocaine concentrations were 0.11, 0.36, and 0.45microg/ml for animals receiving 0.33, 0.67 and 1.3mg/kg/h of lidocaine, respectively. These results suggest that continual systemic infusion of lidocaine prevents or reverses the development of neuropathic pain following chronic constriction injury. These results add to the increasing body of evidence supporting the therapeutic value of preemptive and post-operative lidocaine administration for the relief of neuropathic pain.

Dextromethorphan reduces immediate and late postoperative analgesic requirements and improves patients' subjective scorings after epidural lidocaine and general anesthesia

Central N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors modulate postoperative pain. We compared the effects of preincision oral dextromethorphan (DM), an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, on postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine demand and on subjective variables in 80 patients undergoing lower-body procedures who were randomly assigned to epidural lidocaine (LA; 16 mL, 1.6%) or general anesthesia (GA). The patients were premedicated 90 min before surgery with placebo or DM 90 mg (20 patients per group) in a double-blinded manner. Postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine administration started when subjective pain intensity was > or =4 of 10 (visual analog scale) and lasted 2 h. Observation continued up to 3 days, during which patients could use diclofenac. LA-DM and GA-DM patients required 45%-50% less morphine and diclofenac compared with their placebo counterparts (P < 0.001). However, GA-DM patients made twice as many attempts to self-administer morphine as LA-DM patients (P = 0.005). Eight LA-DM versus two GA-DM patients (P < 0.01) used no morphine or diclofenac. All DM patients experienced significantly (P < 0.001) less pain, were less sedated, and felt better than their placebo counterparts; however, compared with placebo, DM improved subjective scorings in the GA patients more significantly (P < 0.05) than in the LA patients. We conclude that oral DM 90 mg in patients undergoing surgery under LA or GA reduces morphine and diclofenac use by approximately 50% in the immediate and late postoperative period compared with placebo. Subjectively scored levels of pain, sedation, and well-being were better as well.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Bloqueio anestésico do nervo occipital maior na profilaxia da migrânea

Na fisiopatologia da enxaqueca muitas estruturas estão envolvidas, sendo que o nervo trigêmeo pode ser considerado a estrutura principal. Com o objetivo de determinar a influência do nervo occipital maior (NOM) sobre o comportamento da enxaqueca, estudamos 37 pacientes que apresentavam crises de enxaqueca. Utilizando-se de um estudo duplo cego "cruzado" os pacientes foram submetidos a infiltração do NOM com bupivacaína 0,5% (BP) e soro fisiológicos 0,9% (SF), os efeitos clínicos após os bloqueios anestésicos foram avaliados: subjetivamente através da escala visual analítica para dor e objetivamente determinou-se os limiares de percepção dolorosa. A comparação entre os dois grupos (BP-SF) e (SF-BP) mostrou que: o número e a duração das crises em todos os momentos do estudo não mudaram; a intensidade das crises no grupo (BP-SF) foi menor somente depois da segunda infiltração (P=0,020), em todos os outros momentos não se observaram alterações significativas. Concluímos que o bloqueio anestésico com BP sobre o NOM não altera o número e a duração das crises de migrânea, porém promove uma redução média na intensidade das crises 60 dias após a sua infiltração. Os resultados mostrados sugerem que o NOM participa ativamente sobre a modulação nociceptiva durante as crises de enxaqueca sem aura.

Combined pre-incisional oral dextromethorphan and epidural lidocaine for postoperative pain reduction and morphine sparing: a randomised double-blind study on day-surgery patients

The reduction in acute pain perception following dextromethorphan has previously been investigated in patients undergoing general anaesthesia. This random and double-blind study examined the effects of pre-incisional oral dextromethorphan on postoperative pain and intravenous patient-controlled morphine demand in 60 day-surgery patients undergoing lower body surgery under lidocaine (1.6%-16 ml) epidural anaesthesia after receiving placebo, 60 or 90 mg dextromethorphan, 90 min pre-operatively. Postoperative pain was scored on a visual analogue scale from 1 to 10. In-hospital observation continued for 6 h and for 3 days at home; diclofenac was available throughout. Dextromethorphan-treated patients reported significantly (p < 0.05) less pain and sedation, and felt better. Patients who received dextromethorphan 90 mg had significantly (p < 0.05) lower heart and respiratory rates than those who received 60 mg. Medicated patients required half the morphine and diclofenac of placebo patients: 38% of patients who received 90 mg and 21% who received dextromethorphan 60 mg used no morphine or diclofenac whatsoever, a previously unreported finding.

Antinociceptive interaction between spinal clonidine and lidocaine in the rat formalin test: an isobolographic analysis

Clinical and basic science studies suggest that spinal alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonists and local anesthetics produce analgesia, but interaction between alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonists and local anesthetics in the persistent pain model has not been examined. In the present study, using isobolographic analysis, we investigated the antinociceptive interaction of intrathecal clonidine and lidocaine in the rat formalin test. Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with chronic lumbar intrathecal catheters, and were tested for paw flinch by formalin injection. Biphasic painful behavior was counted. Intrathecal clonidine (3-12 nmol) was administered 15 min before formalin, and intrathecal lidocaine (375-1850 nmol) was administered 5 min before formalin. To examine the interaction of intrathecal clonidine and lidocaine, an isobolographic design was used. Spinal administration of clonidine produced dose-dependent suppression of the biphasic responses in the formalin test. Spinal lidocaine resulted in dose-dependent transient motor dysfunction and the motor dysfunction recovered to normal at 10-15 min after administration. Spinal lidocaine produced dose-dependent suppression of phase-2 activity in the formalin test. Isobolographic analysis showed that the combination of intrathecal clonidine and lidocaine synergistically reduced Phase-2 activity. We conclude that intrathecal clonidine synergistically interacts with lidocaine in reducing the nociceptive response in the formalin test.

IMPLICATIONS

Preformalin administration of intrathecal clonidine and lidocaine dose-dependently produced antinociception in the formalin test. The combination of clonidine and lidocaine, synergistically produced suppression of nociceptive response in the persistent pain model.

Effect of pre- or post-traumatically applied i.v. lidocaine on primary and secondary hyperalgesia after experimental heat trauma in humans

Hyperalgesia on intradermal capsaicin application can be attenuated by systemic application of local anesthetics. We tested whether low doses of local anesthetics applied pre- or post-traumatically can reduce heat trauma-induced primary and secondary hyperalgesia in humans. Six healthy volunteers consented to the randomized, double-blind, and cross-over designed study. In each subject, a first-degree burn injury was induced three times (corresponding to a pre-traumatic, post-traumatic and control group) at an interval of at least 3 weeks. Heat was applied by a computer-controlled Peltier thermode (47 degrees C, 5 min). In the pre-traumatic group, lidocaine infusion was commenced 30 min prior to heat trauma, and in the post-traumatic group immediately after heat trauma for a total infusion time of 60 min each. Volunteers rated pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) between threshold and tolerance maximum (0-100% VAS). Primary hyperalgesia was quantified by determining mechanical (von Frey hairs) and thermal (Peltier thermode) pain thresholds. Secondary hyperalgesia was quantified by determining the area in which normally unpleasant von Frey hairs evoked pain or tenderness. Baseline thermal and mechanical pain thresholds did not differ between groups. Heat application always resulted in a first-degree burn injury including both primary and secondary hyperalgesia. The former remained by and large stable for about 4 h whereas the latter continuously increased within the first 2 h. Lidocaine did not affect primary hyperalgesia, irrespective of pre- or post-traumatic application, but substantially reduced the development of secondary hyperalgesia on pre-traumatic, and for tendency on post-traumatic infusion (treatment groups did not differ significantly). Burn injury-induced erythema was smallest in the pre-traumatic group and largest in the control group; however, the level of significance was not reached. Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were always higher than 1.5 microg/ml 30 min after bolus application of lidocaine and reached a peak of 2-3 microg/ml after about 1 h. Thus, local anesthetics at concentrations that do not block nerve conduction substantially affect ongoing central changes in pain processing that are induced by a real tissue trauma. A significant preemptive effect could not be demonstrated. The anti-hyperalgesic effect of lidocaine is likely based on action of central (spinal) sites, but peripheral sites may also be addressed.

The effect of systemic lidocaine on pain and secondary hyperalgesia associated with the heat/capsaicin sensitization model in healthy volunteers

Although effective in neuropathic pain, the efficacy of systemic lidocaine in non-neuropathic pain remains uncertain. We investigated the analgesic effect of systemic lidocaine on the heat/capsaicin sensitization model of experimental pain in 24 volunteers. Sensitization was produced by heating the skin to 45 degrees C for 5 min, followed by a 30-min application of 0.075% capsaicin cream, and maintained by periodically reheating the sensitized skin. Subjects received IV lidocaine (bolus 2 mg/kg, then infusion 3 mg. kg. h), or saline for 85 min. Areas of secondary hyperalgesia, heat pain detection thresholds, and painfulness of stimulation with 45 degrees C for 1 min (long thermal stimulation) were quantified. Systemic lidocaine reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia to brush, but not to von Frey hair stimulation. Lidocaine did not alter heat pain detection thresholds or painfulness of long thermal stimulation in normal skin. We conclude that, at infusion rates in the low- to mid-antiarrhythmic range, lidocaine has no effect on acute nociceptive pain but does have a limited and selective effect on secondary hyperalgesia.

IMPLICATIONS

The efficacy of systemic lidocaine in nonneuropathic pain remains uncertain. This study investigates the effect of systemic lidocaine on experimental-induced hyperalgesia in 25 volunteers. Hyperalgesia was induced by using an experimental pain model that uses heat and capsaicin in combination. Systemic lidocaine showed a selective effect on secondary hyperalgesia.

Effect of lidocaine on harmaline-induced tremors in the rat

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of lidocaine on harmaline-induced tremors in the rat. Four groups of Wistar rats weighing 45-50 g were injected with harmaline (50 mg/kg i.p.) for inducing experimental tremors. The rats in group 1 served as control, whereas the animals in groups 2, 3, and 4 were also given lidocaine i.p. at doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg, respectively, 10 min after the onset of tremors (therapeutic study). In a separate four groups of animals intraperitoneal lidocaine injection was given 10 min before harmaline (prophylactic study) in the same dose regimen as mentioned above. The latency of onset, intensity, and duration of tremor and electromyographic responses were recorded. Lidocaine dose dependently attenuated harmaline-induced tremors in rats. The latency period was increased, and duration and intensity of harmaline-induced tremors was reduced by lidocaine. Our electromyography (EMG) study also revealed a decrease in the amplitude of harmaline-induced tremors in lidocaine-treated rats. In conclusion, the results of this study clearly suggest beneficial effects of lidocaine in harmaline-induced tremors.

Isobolographic analysis of interaction between spinal endomorphin-1, a newly isolated endogenous opioid peptide, and lidocaine in the rat formalin test

Endomorphin-1, a newly isolated endogenous opioid ligand, has a potential affinity with mu-opioid receptor. We investigated antinociception of intrathecal endomorphin-1 and lidocaine in the rat formalin test and examined the interaction between the two agents using isobolographic analysis. Intrathecal endomorphin-1 caused dose-dependent suppression of the formalin-induced biphasic behavioral response. Intrathecal lidocaine produced dose-dependent inhibition of phase-2 behavioral response. Isobolographic analysis confirmed that combination of intrathecal endomorphin-1 and lidocaine, given at a fixed dose ratio, produced synergistic suppression of phase-2 behavioral response. These data demonstrate that spinal endomorphin-1 synergistically interacts with local anesthetic lidocaine in producing antinociception in the formalin test.

Multiple ionic mechanisms mediate inhibition of rat motoneurones by inhalation anaesthetics

1. We studied the effects of inhalation anaesthetics on the membrane properties of hypoglossal motoneurones in a neonatal rat brainstem slice preparation. 2. In current clamp, halothane caused a membrane hyperpolarization that was invariably associated with decreased input resistance; in voltage clamp, halothane induced an outward current and increased input conductance. Qualitatively similar results were obtained with isoflurane and sevoflurane. 3. The halothane current reversed near the predicted K+ equilibrium potential (EK) and was reduced in elevated extracellular K+ and in the presence of Ba2+ (2 mM). Moreover, the Ba2+-sensitive component of halothane current was linear and reversed near EK. The halothane current was not sensitive to glibenclamide or thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). Therefore, the halothane current was mediated, in part, by activation of a Ba2+-sensitive K+ current distinct from the ATP- and neurotransmitter-sensitive K+ currents in hypoglossal motoneurones. 4. Halothane also inhibited Ih, a hyperpolarization-activated cationic current; this was primarily due to a decrease in the absolute amount of current, although halothane also caused a small, but statistically significant, shift in the voltage dependence of Ih activation. Extracellular Cs+ (3 mM) blocked Ih and a component of halothane-sensitive current with properties reminiscent of Ih. 5. A small component of halothane current, resistant to Ba2+ and Cs+, was observed in TTX-containing solutions at potentials depolarized to approximately -70 mV. Partial Na+ substitution by N-methyl-D-glucamine completely abolished this residual current, indicating that halothane also inhibited a TTX-resistant Na+ current active near rest potentials. 6. Thus, halothane activates a Ba2+-sensitive, relatively voltage-independent K+ current and inhibits both Ih and a TTX-insensitive persistent Na+ current in hypoglossal motoneurones. These effects of halothane decrease motoneuronal excitability and may contribute to the immobilization that accompanies inhalation anaesthesia.

Lidocaine concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid after systemic bolus administration in humans

Preclinical studies suggest that systemic lidocaine acts at the level of the spinal dorsal horn to inhibit hyperalgesia resulting from nerve injury, yet no clinical data are available to support this view. Therefore, we sought to characterize the time course of lidocaine in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after an IV bolus injection of lidocaine 2 mg/kg in patients scheduled for surgery involving spinal anesthesia. Sixty-five patients were randomly allocated to one of five study groups (n = 13 per group) receiving IV lidocaine before CSF/ plasma sampling at 5, 10, 15, 30, or 60 min. Gas chromatographic analysis of these samples revealed a fast but transient peak (5-15 min) in lidocaine plasma levels (1.7+/-0.16 microg/mL), which declined rapidly thereafter. Only small concentrations of IV lidocaine were found in the CSF (6%- 8% of plasma concentration), but this fraction remained stable from 15 min until termination of the experiment. No statistical correlation was observed between plasma and CSF lidocaine levels. These data suggest that because of the prolonged availability of lidocaine at the spinal dorsal horn level, systemic administration of lidocaine suppresses central sensitization within the spinal cord after nerve injury in humans.

IMPLICATIONS

Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of lidocaine after its systemic bolus delivery in humans indicate that the spinal cord may be the major site of antinociceptive action by this route of drug administration.

Sevoflurane suppresses behavioral response in the rat formalin test: combination with intrathecal lidocaine produced profound suppression of the response

We investigated the effects of intrathecal (i.t.) lidocaine, inhalation sevoflurane, and a combination of i.t. lidocaine and sevoflurane on the formalin test in rats. Group 1 (control) received i.t. saline 10 microl. Groups 2 and 3 received i.t. lidocaine 200 microg and 400 microg, respectively. Groups 4-6 received 1.2%, 2.4% and 3.6% sevoflurane, respectively. Interaction of drugs was analyzed using a dose addition model. Group 7 received i.t. lidocaine 200 microg and 1.2% sevoflurane. The biphasic behavioral activity of the hindpaw of rats was observed. This study showed that i.t. lidocaine or inhalation sevoflurane before formalin injection, significantly suppressed the behavioral activity of the hindpaw of rats, and that this suppression was significantly potentiated by the co-administration of i.t. lidocaine and inhalation sevoflurane.

The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 reduces capsaicin-induced c-fos expression within rat trigeminal nucleus caudalis

The effect of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist (5R, 10S)-(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclo-hepten-5,10-i mine hydrogen maleate (MK-801) was examined on c-fos-like immunoreactivity (c-fos-LI) in urethane-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats using a polyclonal antibody. C-fos, an indicator of neuronal activation, was assessed within the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC), area postrema. lateral reticular and solitary tract nuclei 2 h after intracisternal injection of capsaicin. C-fos-positive cells were counted at three representative levels corresponding to obex, -2.05 mm and -6.45 mm in 18 tissue sections (50 microm). A weighted average was obtained reflecting total brainstem expression within lamina I, II of TNC using a recently validated method. Capsaicin (0.1, 1, 5, 10 and 15 nmol) caused a dose-dependent labeling of cells in lamina I, II at obex similar to that previously reported after intracisternal blood or carrageenin administration in rats and guinea pigs. MK-801 (0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg) administered i.p. 30 min before capsaicin (5 nmol in 100 microl artificial CSF) reduced significantly and dose-dependently (12%, 36% and 47%, respectively) the c-fos-LI cells in TNC at each level from rostral to caudal but not in solitary tract, area postrema and lateral reticular nuclei, and for unexplained reasons, increased c-fos-LI within the inferior olive. These results suggest that NMDA receptors provide a potential therapeutic target for cephalic pain (e.g. migraine) due to trigeminovascular activation from meningeal afferents.

Dissociation of microglial activation and neuropathic pain behaviors following peripheral nerve injury in the rat

Peripheral nerve injury commonly leads to neuropathic pain states fostered, in part, by neuroimmunologic events. We used two models of neuropathic pain (L5 spinal nerve cryoneurolysis (SPCN) and chronic constriction injury (CCI)) to assess the role of spinal glial activation responses in producing pain behaviors. Scoring of glial responses subjectively encompassed changes in cell morphology, cell density and intensity of immunoreactivity with specific activation markers (OX-42 and anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for microglia and astrocytes, respectively). Glial responses were compared with tactile sensitivity (mechanical allodynia) at 1, 3 or 10 days following SPCN and with thermal hyperalgesia at 10 days in the CCI group. Neuropathic pain behaviors preceded and did not closely correlate with microglial responses in either model. Perineural application of bupivacaine prior to SPCN prevented spinal microglial responses but not pain behaviors. Spinal astrocytic responses to SPCN were early, robust and not altered by bupivacaine. The current findings support the use of bupivacaine as a tool to suppress microglial activation and challenge the putative role of microglia in initiating or potentiating pain behaviors which result from nerve injury.

The effects of Na+ channel blockers on somatosensory processing by rat dorsal horn neurones

Two voltage-activated Na+ channel blockers, lamotrigine and flunarizine were applied ionophoretically to extracellularly recorded dorsal horn neurones to assess effects on activation by noxious (mustard oil) and innocuous (brush) stimuli. Lamotrigine and flunarizine caused significantly greater reductions in mustard oil-evoked activity (> 50% in both cases) than in brush-evoked activity (13 +/- 7% and 29 +/- 6%; p < 6%; +/- 0.005 and p < 0.05 respectively) at equivalent ionophoretic currents. Similar results were observed when lamotrigine was administered i.v. Thus, the activation of dorsal horn neurones by nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferent inputs can be differentiated by the blockade of a lamotrigine/flunarizine-sensitive Na+ channel, at a spinal site.

Complex regional pain syndromes: including "reflex sympathetic dystrophy" and "causalgia"

"Reflex sympathetic dystrophy" and "causalgia" are now classified by the International Association for the Study of Pain as Complex Regional Pain Syndromes I and II. Sympathetically maintained pain is a frequent but variable component of these syndromes, as the sympathetic and somatosensory pathways are no longer functionally distinct. Pain is the cardinal feature of CRPS, but the constellation of symptoms and signs may also include sensory changes, autonomic dysfunction, trophic changes, motor impairment and psychological changes. Diagnosis is based on the clinical picture, with additional information regarding the presence of sympathetically maintained pain or autonomic dysfunction being provided by carefully performed and interpreted supplemental tests. Clinical experience supports early intervention with sympatholytic procedures (pharmacological or nerve block techniques), but further scientific data is required to confirm the appropriate timing and relative efficacy of different procedures. Patients with recurrent or refractory symptoms are best managed in a multi-disciplinary pain clinic as more invasive and intensive treatment will be required to minimize ongoing pain and disability.