Conservative surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy in the management of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: clinical and radiobiological results

[Soft tissue sarcomas: clinical practice guidelines]

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a rare heterogeneous group of tumours that include a wide variety of histological subtypes, which require a multidisciplinary and, frequently specialized and complex management. Despite advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, there are no consensus multidisciplinary recommendations about its diagnosis and treatment in our country. The objective of these guidelines is to provide practical therapeutic recommendations that may contribute to improve the therapeutic results of this disease in our environment. With this purpose, the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS) held a meeting with a multidisciplinary group of experts for the study and management of sarcomas. The results of this meeting are compiled in this document, in which recommendations on diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of soft tissue sarcomas are included. In summary, these guidelines aim to facilitate the identification and management of STS for clinical practice in Spain.

Radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the proximal lower extremity

Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is a histopathologically diverse group of tumors accounting for approximately 10,000 new malignancies in the US each year. The proximal lower extremity is the most common site for STS, accounting for approximately one-third of all cases. Coordinated multimodality management in the form of surgery and radiation is often critical to local control, limb preservation, and functional outcome. Based on a review of currently available Medline literature and professional experience, this paper provides an overview of the treatment of STS of the lower extremity with a particular focus on the modern role of radiotherapy.

Guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

These guidelines were drawn up following a consensus meeting of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group and are intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. The guidelines published by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) were used as the basis for discussion and adapted according to UK clinical practice and local requirements. Note was also taken of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) improving outcomes guidance (IOG) for people with sarcoma and existing technology appraisals. The guidelines are not intended to challenge NICE guidance but discrepancies may exist where current guidance does not reflect an international standard of care owing to the ever-evolving nature of cancer treatment. It is acknowledged that these guidelines will require updating on a regular basis. An appendix lists the key recommendations which are summarised below. Any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a diagnostic centre and managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Surgical excision followed by post operative radiotherapy is the standard management of high grade limb sarcomas although occasionally amputation remains the only option. Pre-operative treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy should be considered for patients with borderline resectable tumours. Isolated limb perfusion may permit limb salvage in some cases where amputation is the only other option. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not routinely recommended but may be considered in certain specific situations. Regular follow up is recommended to assess local control and the development of metastatic disease. Single agent doxorubicin is the standard first line therapy for metastatic disease. Ifosfamide is an alternative if anthracyclines are contraindicated. Combination therapy may be considered in individual patients. Second line agents include ifosfamide, dacarbazine, trabectedin and the combination of gemcitabine + docetaxel. Surgical resection of local recurrence and pulmonary metastases should be considered in individual patients. There is specific guidance on the management of retroperitoneal and uterine sarcomas.

[Surgical treatment of musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcomas]

Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas requires an individual plan which considers interdisciplinary recommendations and the various clinical situations. Anatomical region, histological grading and typing, and tumor size necessitate adjusted methods of reconstruction. The biopsy should be performed at the institution where the patient is treated. In general surgical resection of the tumor will be the treatment of choice. Adjuvant therapies are applied according to anatomical region and size and grading of the tumor. Surgery alone is recommended only in small (<5 cm), superficial, low-grade sarcomas. Sarcomas larger than 5 cm in diameter should be treated by surgery and radiotherapy, achieving excellent results, although in high-grade sarcomas more than 50% of patients still will experience metastatic disease. In case of locally recurrent disease, surgical revision with tumor-free resection margins followed by radiotherapy should be the aim. This applies even for patients who had had radiotherapy after the first excision. In this case brachytherapy is a good modality of tissue-sparing treatment.

Preliminary results from a prospective study using limited margin radiotherapy in pediatric and young adult patients with high-grade nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of limited margin radiotherapy in the local control of pediatric and young adult patients with high-grade nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pediatric patients with high-grade NRSTS requiring radiation were treated on an institutional review board approved prospective institutional study of conformal/intensity-modulated/interstitial brachytherapy using a 2-cm anatomically constrained margin.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (median age, 15.3 years; range, 2-22 years) received adjuvant (27 patients) or definitive (5 patients) irradiation. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 3.7% for patients undergoing irradiation after surgical resection. Four patients experienced local failure; the mean dose to the volume of recurrence was >or=97% of the prescribed dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of limited margin radiotherapy using external beam or brachytherapy provides a high rate of local tumor control without marginal failure. Further follow-up is required to determine whether normal tissue effects are minimized using this approach.

Primary tumor necrosis predicts distant control in locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Various neoadjuvant approaches have been evaluated for the treatment of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas. This retrospective study describes a uniquely modified version of the Eilber regimen developed at the University of Chicago.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We treated 34 patients (28 Stage III and 6 Stage IV) with locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas of an extremity between 1995 and 2008. All patients received preoperative therapy including ifosfamide (2.5 g/m2 per day for 5 days) with concurrent radiation (28 Gy in 3.5-Gy daily fractions), sandwiched between various chemotherapy regimens. Postoperatively, 47% received further adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Most tumors (94%) were Grade 3, and all were T2b, with a median size of 10.3 cm. Wide excision was performed in 29 patients (85%), and 5 required amputation. Of the resected tumor specimens, 50% exhibited high (> or =90%) treatment-induced necrosis and 11.8% had a complete pathologic response. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. The 5-year survival rate was 42.3% for all patients and 45.2% for Stage III patients. For limb-preservation patients, the 5-year local control rate was 89.0% and reoperation was required for wound complications in 17.2%. The 5-year freedom-from-distant metastasis rate was 53.4% (Stage IV patients excluded), and freedom from distant metastasis was superior if treatment-induced tumor necrosis was 90% or greater (84.6% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This well-tolerated concurrent chemoradiotherapy approach yields excellent rates of limb preservation and local control. The resulting treatment-induced necrosis rates are predictive of subsequent metastatic risk, and this information may provide an opportunity to guide postoperative systemic therapies.

Pain as a symptom of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: clinical significance and future therapeutic directions

Tumors arising from the supporting cells of peripheral nerve sheaths are relatively uncommon neoplasms, and as such many clinicians are unfamiliar with the details of their presentation, diagnosis and management. Further, little is known regarding the pathogenesis of these tumors, how they cause symptoms, and how to treat these symptoms. One classic symptom of peripheral nerve tumors is pain, however there has been little formal discussion regarding the significance of pain in this setting. Here we present a brief review of the clinical significance of pain, its relevance in pre-operative planning for the treatment of these tumors, and what is known regarding the molecular mechanisms of pain generation by these tumors.

[Late outcome of 89 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas treated by surgery and three different radiotherapy schedules]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of patients treated for soft tissue sarcoma using three different post-operative radiotherapy schedules.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1990 and 2003, 89 patients (median age 50.8 years) presenting with soft tissue sarcoma (located to the limbs for 66 of them) underwent post-conservative-surgery radiotherapy. Pathology was liposarcoma in 35 cases and 54 others tumors. Tumors grades (FNCLCC classification) were 1, 2, 3 or unknown in 29, 32, 19 and 9 cases, respectively. Surgery was considered as complete in 68 patients. Irradiation was normofractionated (NF) in 62 cases, hyperfractionated (BF) in 19 cases and hypofractionated (HF) in 8 cases. For all the patients, median delivered dose was 61 Gy [34-76 Gy].

RESULTS

Median follow-up of alive patients was 73,8 months [3-184]. Five-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rates were 85.5 and 71.2% respectively. According to multifactorial analysis, favourable prognostic factors were for local control, complete surgery (P=0.0075) and for overall survival, complete surgery (P=0.0267), grade 1 tumor (P=0.012) and absence of distant recurrence (P=0.0488). There was no statistical evidence of difference for the five-year LC and OS rates between the patients who received NF, BF or HF. There were few complications and there were comparable in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective serie showed similar results for all the schedules. There is no evidence to recommend bifractionation. Hypofractionation should be used only in selected patients with poor performans status.

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy in the Curative Treatment of Adult Patients With Sarcoma: The Paul Scherrer Institute Experience

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of spot scanning proton beam therapy (PT) in the curative treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 13 STS patients treated with PT between July 1998 and May 2005 in our institutional database. Tumor histology varied with the most common histologic subtypes including liposarcoma and peripheral nerve sheet tumor. All tumors were located in vicinity of critical structures, such as the spinal cord, optic apparatus, bowel, kidney, or bowel. Of the patients, 6 and 5 patients received PT either as adjuvant therapy for non-R0 resection or for recurrence, respectively. Two patients received radical PT for unresectable disease. The median prescribed dose was 69.4 CGE (CGE = proton Gy x 1.1)-Gy (range, 50.4-76.0) at 1.8 to 2 CGE-Gy (median, 1.9) per fraction. Pre-PT anthracycline-based chemotherapy was delivered to 3 patients only. No patient has been lost to follow-up (median 48.1 months, range, 19.1-100.7 months).

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients, all but 2 patients were alive. Local recurrence developed in 3 (23%) patients. The administered dose to these patients was < or =60 Gy-CGE. Distant control was achieved in all but 2 patients (lung metastasis), 1 of whom presented with a concomitant local recurrence. The 4-year local control and metastasis-free survival rates were 74.1% and 84.6%, respectively. Late grade > or =2 toxicity was observed in only 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Spot scanning PT is an effective and safe treatment for patient with STS in critical locations. The observed toxicity rate was acceptable.

[Epithelioid sarcoma: a retrospective study of conservative treatment with initial surgery and radiotherapy]

INTRODUCTION

Epithelioid sarcoma is a rare type of soft tissue sarcomas with a high risk of recurrence both local and distant. The place of surgical conservative treatment and the role of radiation therapy remain controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A serie of 9 consecutive patients treated with initial conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (median dose of 52.8 Gy) from 1987 to 2006 in the same institution was analyzed.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 40 months (range 15-153 months), the rate of local, nodal and distant relapse is respectively 56%, 11% and 33%. The rate of death is 44.5%. No imputation has been performed.

CONCLUSION

Even with a high rate of local relapse observed, a conservative treatment doesn't seem to influence badly the overall survival (55.5% alive at 40 months). Indeed the rate of distant relapse and death are comparable with those found in the literature. Moreover relapse occurred almost within the irradiated volumes. An improvement of dose could be also discussed.

Management of locally recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma after prior surgery and radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome and treatment toxicity after wide local re-excision (WLE), with or without additional radiation therapy, for patients with isolated first local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcoma arising within a previously irradiated field.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 62 consecutive patients. All patients underwent prior resection and external beam radiation. For recurrent disease, 25 patients were treated with WLE alone, and 37 patients were treated with WLE and additional radiation (45- 64 Gy). In 33 patients, the radiation was delivered via an afterloaded brachytherapy, single-plane implant.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease specific and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 65% and 73%, respectively. Local control (LC) at 5 years was 51%, and on multivariate analysis, a positive surgical resection margin (p< 0.001) was associated with a lower rate of LC. Reirradiation was not associated with improved LC; however complications requiring outpatient or surgical management were more common in patients who had undergone reirradiation (80% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Amputation was also more common in the subgroup of patients who underwent extremity reirradiation (35% with radiation vs. 11% without, p = 0.05), although only one amputation was performed to resolve a treatment complication.

CONCLUSION

Conservative surgery alone results in LC in a minority of patients who have failed locally after previous excision and external beam radiation. Although selection biases and small patient numbers confound the analysis, local treatment intensification with additional radiation does not clearly improve outcome after surgical excision alone, and is associated with an increase in complications.

Approche conservatrice et fonctionnelle dans les sarcomes des tissus mous des membres : place de la radiothérapie

Recent publications have permitted to quantify the benefit of radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the limbs. The aim of this review is to focus on aspects of radiotherapy witch influence local control and functional outcome for early and late normal tissue damage. The evaluation of late effects is performed according to Soma-Lent (Subjective-Objective-Management-Analytic-Late Effects of Normal Tissues) classification. About complications, neurological complications are probably under estimated and are related to total dose of radiation therapy.

High incidence of metastatic disease in primary high grade and large extremity soft tissue sarcomas treated without chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The risk of metastasis and the survival in patients with primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas is worse when tumour size is large and the grade of malignancy is high. Such tumours may receive chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RTX) for optimising local control. Irradiation can either be applied preoperatively or after tumour resection. The question arises if the kind of RTX in the absence of chemotherapy influences the outcome concerning local control, metastatic disease, survival and complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of 233 patients with a primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated between 1990 - 2000 with a mean follow-up of 35.8 (4-120) months in our institute. 41 patients had high grade, deep and large tumours (>8 cm), an AJCC stage III (no evidence of metastasis prior to treatment) and were treated with limb salvage surgery and irradiation but stayed without additional chemotherapy. Two groups of patients were compared: the first group received postoperative RTX after tumour resection (n = 33); the second group was treated with preoperative RTX (n = 8). Both groups did not differ concerning clinical parameters. We analysed primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

56% (23/41) of the population developed metastatic disease, 24% (10/41) local recurrence. The risk of metastasis was higher in the group with preoperative irradiation (p = 0.046). The overall (p = 0.0248) and relapse free survival (p = 0.104) were worse in this group. The delay to tumour resection amounted 8 weeks on average in the preoperative group. Local control was not different (p = 0.38) in both study groups. Wound infections and other combined therapy related complications were equally distributed (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Without chemotherapy there remains a high risk of metastasis in AJCC grade 3 patients. In high risk patients treated without chemotherapy the elapsed time to tumour resection after preoperative radiation might contribute to the development of metastasis. This outcome may support the thesis that a combination of RTX and offensive multimodal treatment protocols is advantageous in such a subset of patients.

Intraoperative electron radiotherapy for extremity sarcomas does not increase acute or late morbidity

Intraoperative electron radiotherapy is used to treat surgical sites that potentially harbor occult tumor immediately after limb-sparing surgical resection of extremity soft tissue sarcomas. It is unknown whether single-fraction, high-dose intraoperative electron radiotherapy at the time of surgery increases wound morbidity when combined with preoperative or postoperative external beam radiotherapy. In a retrospective study, we evaluated whether intraoperative electron radiotherapy increased 90-day and late (> 90 days) wound complication rates by comparing patients who had adult extremity soft tissue sarcomas treated by limb-sparing surgery and preoperative (n = 14) or postoperative (n = 13) external beam radiotherapy. The median followup was 36 months. Seven (26%) patients had wound complications occurring within 90 days postoperatively and completion of radiotherapy. Late wound complication rates were similar. Two patients in each of the external beam radiotherapy groups required late subtotal limb amputations for prolonged wound complications. Our findings suggest intraoperative electron radiotherapy during limb-sparing surgery allows radiation dose escalation without increased 90-day or late-wound complication rates when combined with preoperative or postoperative external beam radiotherapy for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Study, Level II (retrospective study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

SURGICAL MARGIN AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL IN SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA

BACKGROUND

The goal of surgeons treating soft tissue sarcoma is to gain local control, to avoid risk of local recurrence and to avoid compromise of the patient's potential survival. The aim of the investigation was to assess the significance of the extent of surgical margin on the chance of death, metastasis and local recurrence.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-nine patients who presented with soft tissue sarcoma without metastatic disease were analysed.

RESULTS

The extent of the surgical margin was not clinically or statistically significant in the development of metastatic disease. The presence of a contaminated surgical margin led to a significantly higher rate of local recurrence (as did a narrow surgical margin less than 1 mm). A margin greater than 1 mm allowed a satisfactory outcome in terms of low local recurrence rates. In terms of overall survival, the failure to achieve a wide surgical margin (wide contaminated margin) led to an increased relative death rate. However, when the margin was not contaminated (even if the margin was very close, less than 1 mm), the overall survival rate was similar across all groups. Patients who had radical resections did poorly; they generally belonged to a group in which palliative surgery was carried out, and they showed very high relative metastasis and death rates.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides statistically significant evidence that increasing the width of resection improves local control and overall survival.

Place et techniques de radiothérapie dans le traitement des sarcomes des tissus mous de l'adulte

In soft tissue sarcoma, surgical resection remains the cornerstone of therapy for localized disease. Quality of margins is very important to evaluate. In case of marginal or incomplete resection, a new enlarged surgical resection should always be discussed before administration of any adjuvant treatments. Many retrospective studies and 2 randomized studies (one of adjuvant brachytherapy and one of external beam radiotherapy) have shown that adjuvant radiotherapy after complete surgery reduces significantly the risk of local recurrence in extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Combination of surgery and pre- or postoperative radiotherapy has therefore become the standard treatment with a local recurrence rate <or=25% and very few amputations. A recent randomized study has compared pre-op to postoperative radiotherapy. The results in terms of local control are similar in both arms (93 and 92% at 5 years) but the risk of early complications is higher in the preoperative arm and the risk of late sequela is higher in the postoperative arm. Surgical resection without radiotherapy may be considered after discussion at best within a multidisciplinary meeting, if surgical margins are considered satisfactory, in superficial, small tumours and low-grade. In retroperitoneal sarcomas, adjuvant radiotherapy is not a standard. It may decrease the risk of local recurrence but at the price of an increased gastro-intestinal toxicity. A randomized trial is warranted. Because of its rarity, and the risk of recurrence both local and metastatic, treatment should preferentially be discussed with a multimodality specialized approach.

Late treatment–related complications in 214 patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcoma treated by surgery and postoperative radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

We assessed the occurrence of long-bone fracture and other side effects in a group of 214 consecutive patients who underwent radical excision for soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb followed by postoperative irradiation.

METHODS

Two hundred fourteen patients underwent postoperative irradiation after radical excision of soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb; 156 (73%) received postoperative brachytherapy (BRT) plus external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and 58 (27%) underwent postoperative EBRT only. All patients were followed-up for a median time of 4.5 years (range 3 months to 10 years).

RESULTS

Seven patients developed bone fracture, which is considered severe morbidity; time between surgery and occurrence of fracture ranged between 10 and 72 months (average 31). Severe sclerosis with impairment of limb function was diagnosed in 5 and peripheral nerve damage in 3 patients. Wound complications were detected in 8 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, no statistically significant correlation between bone fracture and clinical features or "technical" parameters was found, but all of the patients who experienced bone fracture (7 of 7) were postmenopausal women >55 years old.

[Emergent treatment of a malignant peripheral epineurial tumour]

BACKGROUND

Malignant peripheral epineurial tumours are a group of tumours that derive histomorphologically from peripheral nerve sheaths. They occur sporadically, with an incidence of approximately 0.001%, and very rarely require emergency operation.

PATIENT AND PROCEDURE

An athletic 19-year-old man presented to an orthopaedic outpatient clinic with lumboischialgia and weakness of the third and fourth left toes. A 12 x 10 x 8-cm paravertebral/retroperitoneal tumour was diagnosed by CT, and the patient was referred to our clinic. For classification, CT-assisted puncture of the tumour was carried out. A haemorrhage into the tumour resulted from the puncture, with consequently lower Hb level and progressive peripheral sensomotoric deficits demanding emergency surgery on a weekend. On this occasion, the tumour was resected together with the L5 and S1 nerve roots through cooperation between the general surgical and neurosurgical departments and was classified as a malignant peripheral epineurial tumour in the rapid stage. Due to the spinal R2 resection, after-loading probes were inserted and the tumour bed was clip-marked. Percutaneous radiotherapy and brachytherapy followed postoperatively. Shortly afterwards, relaparotomy had to be performed due to an adhesive ileus, from which the patient recovered quickly. Chemotherapy was carried out due to a G2 tumour classification. The patient is currently undergoing rehabilitation, during which the peripheral neurological deficits are improving gradually.

CONCLUSION

This rare case of a malignant peripheral epineurial tumour with acute symptoms demonstrates the ability of hospitals with maximum care facilities to maintain services even in times of financial cuts in health care services.

Results of radiation therapy for unresected soft-tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

Definitive radiotherapy is uncommonly used in the management of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of radiotherapy for unresected STSs treated in a single institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1970 and 2001, 112 patients with STSs underwent radiotherapy for gross disease. Locations of the tumor were 43% in the extremities, 26% retroperitoneal, 24% in the head and neck, and 7% in the truncal wall. Histologic grades were 11% G1 and 89% G2 to G3. Median size of tumor at radiotherapy was 8 cm (range, 1-30 cm). Median radiation dose was 64 Gy (range, 25-87.5 Gy). Twenty percent of patients received chemotherapy. Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated in univariate (log-rank) and then multivariate (Cox model) analysis to determine prognostic factors for STS.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for patients is 139 months (range, 30-365 months). The 5-year actuarial LC, DFS, and OS were 45%, 24%, and 35%, respectively. Tumor size at radiotherapy and radiation dose influenced LC, DFS, and OS in univariate analysis. LC at 5 years was 51%, 45%, and 9% for tumors less than 5 cm, 5 to 10 cm, and greater than 10 cm, respectively. Patients who received doses of less than 63 Gy had 5-year LC, DFS, and OS rates of 22%, 10%, and 14%, respectively, compared with 5-year LC, DFS, and OS rates of 60%, 36%, and 52%, respectively, for patients who received doses of 63 Gy or more. AJCC stage was related to the OS and DFS without statistically significant influence on LC. Use of chemotherapy, histologic grade, age, and location did not influence results. In multivariate analysis, LC was related to total dose (p = 0.02), T size at radiotherapy (p = 0.003), and AJCC stage (p = 0.04); DFS was related to total dose (p = 0.007), T size at radiotherapy (p = 0.01), and AJCC stage (p < 0.0001); and OS was related to AJCC stage (p = 0.0001) and total dose (p = 0.002), but not to T size, at radiotherapy. Major radiotherapy complications were noted in 14% of patients; 27% of patients who received doses of 68 Gy or more had these complications compared with 8% of patients treated with doses of less than 68 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive radiotherapy for STS should be considered in clinical situations where no acceptable surgical option is available. Higher radiation doses yield superior tumor control and survival. A rise in complications occurs in patients who receive doses of 68 Gy or more, which provides a therapeutic window for benefit in these patients.

[Adjuvant radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: analysis of local control according to volume and dose]

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrospectively the anatomical definition of target volumes in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the limbs and to study the radiation dose in the local control and toxicity.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Seventy-seven patients were consecutively treated for primary soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity with limb sparing surgery and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the same institution. The median follow up was 56 months (17-89 months).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (67%) had clear microscopic surgical margin (R0 resection), 23 (30%) had histologically positive microscopic margin (R1 resection), 2 had a macroscopic residual disease (R2 resection). An anatomical definition of target volumes has been realised. The mean dose was 50 Gy in 25 or 28 fractions; 23 patients received a boost restricted to the tumor bed: 13 with EBRT, 10 with brachytherapy (BRT). Thirty-four patients had an adjuvant chemotherapy. The overall 5 year local relapse rate was 10%. Seven local relapses were described, five of the high-grade tumours, and five in patients with positive margin. In univariate analysis, quality of surgery shows a significant effect for local control. By using LENT-SOMA scale for late toxicity, a significant difference was found for neurological complications for patients receiving a boost.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the series validate the concept of anatomical definition of the initial target volume. A boost should be realised for positive margin tumors and may be for high-grade tumors. Neurological toxicity must be considered for the evaluation of the prescribed dose.

Results of radiation therapy performed after unplanned surgery (without re-excision) for soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

For soft tissue sarcomas (STS), some patients undergo an "unplanned surgery," non-oncologic resection for presumed benign tumor. The treatment of choice, in such cases, is re-excision combined (if indicated) with radiation. However, there are clinical situations when treatment by radiation alone is recommended. Here results of such an approach are assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients irradiated after unplanned surgery between 1970 and 1997 were identified from the MGH institutional database. Surgical margins were inevaluable in 50 (64%) and 28 (36%) had positive margins. Tumor characteristics: location, lower extremity (63%), upper extremity (27%), other (10%); median tumor size, 5 cm; grade-G1 (19%), G2 (49%), G3 (32%); AJCC stage (2002)-I (19%), II (54%), III (27%). Median radiation dose given was 66 Gy (range: 51-88).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 10 years, estimated local control rate was 88% and 86% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Distant control rate was 80% at 5 and 10 years. Depth in the relation to the fascia, tumor size, and AJCC stage significantly influenced local recurrence- and distant metastasis-free survival. Ten major radiotherapy complications occurred from 1 to 21 years after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite convincing data about the necessity for re-excision after unplanned surgery for STS, these results demonstrate that radiation therapy alone can be an effective alternate for those patients in whom functional or medical considerations preclude further surgery. The risk for potential radiation therapy complications, however, must also be considered in the treatment decision.

Operative management of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a reappraisal of an institutional experience

OBJECTIVE

To review our recent experience with primary retroperitoneal sarcomas, determine prognostic factors for disease recurrence and patient survival, and compare them to our previous results.

BACKGROUND

Medical therapies have shown little efficacy in the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas, making total surgical extirpation the best chance for patient cure.

METHODS

The case histories of all patients operated upon for retroperitoneal sarcomas between January 1983 and December 1995 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients underwent attempted surgical resection of a primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. There were 54 (56%) men and 43 (44%) women, with a mean age of 59 years. Seventy-six (78%) patients underwent gross total resection, 13 (14%) had residual disease, and 8 (8%) underwent biopsy only with an actuarial 1-year survival of 88%, 51%, and 47%, respectively (P = 0.001). The actuarial 5- and 10-year survivals for patients who underwent gross total resection were 51% and 36%, respectively. Thirty-three patients (43%) developed locoregional recurrence, and 20 patients (26%) developed distant metastases at a median time of 12 months. The cumulative probability at 5 years was 44% for locoregional recurrence and 29% for distant metastases. On univariate analysis, factors associated with improved survival were complete resection of the tumor (P = 0.001), nonmetastatic disease at presentation (P = 0.01), low-grade tumors (P = 0.02), liposarcomas (P = 0.003), and no disease recurrence (P = 0.0001). Contrary to previous reports, the histologic subtype (P = 0.04) was the only significant factor predicting survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with our earlier experience, the rates of complete resection and overall survival have improved. Local control continues to be a significant problem in the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Because new surgical options for this problem are limited, further outcome improvement requires novel adjuvant therapies.

Significance of dose in postoperative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

For soft tissue sarcoma, adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy improves the local control rate over surgery alone. However, the issue of a dose-control relationship is controversial and was addressed in this study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 775 consecutive patients who received postoperative external beam radiotherapy and used univariate and multivariate analysis to determine whether a dose-control relationship exists for the whole group and for specific high-risk subgroups.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 12.3 years, overall local control rates were 82%, 80%, and 79% at 5, 10, and 15 years. Factors adverse for local control were positive resection margins; tumor location in the head and neck and deep trunk; presentation with locally recurrent disease; patient age >64 years; histopathologic subtype of malignant fibrous histiocytoma, neurogenic sarcoma or epithelioid sarcoma; and tumor size >10 cm. In multivariate analysis, radiation dose > or = 64 Gy vs. <64 Gy independently correlated with improved local control. Significant interactions were noted between increased effectiveness of a higher dose and presentation with locally recurrent disease, with head and neck and deep trunk tumor sites, and with positive or uncertain resection margins such that local control was specifically improved under these circumstances with doses on the order of 64-68 Gy compared with doses on the order of 60 Gy. Higher dose, however, did not completely abrogate the adverse effect of positive margins.

CONCLUSION

After gross total resection, soft tissue sarcoma with features predictive of a higher than average local recurrence rate benefited from doses of 64-68 Gy compared with 60 Gy.

Prognostic factors for patients with localized soft-tissue sarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy: an analysis of 1225 patients

BACKGROUND

Prognostic factors for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma who are treated with conservative surgery and radiation are documented poorly.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic features and disease outcome for 1225 patients with localized sarcoma who were treated with conservative surgery and radiation were reviewed retrospectively. Actuarial univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to determine significant prognostic factors for local control, metastatic recurrence, and disease specific survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of surviving patients was 9.5 years. The respective local control rates at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years were 83%, 80%, and 79%. Factors predictive of local recurrence were positive or uncertain resection margins; tumors located in the head and neck and the deep trunk; presentation with local recurrence; patient age > 64 years; malignant fibrous histiocytoma, neurogenic sarcoma. or epithelioid sarcoma histopathology; tumor measuring > 10 cm in greatest dimension; and high pathologic grade. Freedom from metastasis at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years was 71%, 68%, and 66%, respectively. Factors that were predictive of metastatic recurrence were high tumor grade; large tumor size (> 5 cm); and leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, or epithelioid sarcoma. The respective disease specific survival rates at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years were 73%, 68%, and 65%. Adverse factors for disease specific survival were high tumor grade; large tumor size (> 5 cm); tumors located in the head and neck and deep trunk; rhabdomyosarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, or clear cell sarcoma; patient age > 64 years; and positive or uncertain resection margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft-tissue sarcoma comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastatic recurrence, lymph node recurrence, disease free survival, and disease specific survival are different, and optimal treatment strategies need to take this complexity into account.

Radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma

Sarcomas are relatively uncommon tumors of mesenchymal origin. They may arise anywhere within the musculoskeletal system and are typically classified by clinical behavior into benign, borderline, or malignant. This article focuses primarily on the role of radiation for malignant soft tissue sarcoma and selected borderline tumors.

Radiation therapy for low-grade soft tissue sarcoma

One hundred eight patients with low-grade soft tissue sarcoma treated at the authors' institution from 1984 to 1999 were reviewed retrospectively. Low-grade sarcomas were defined as those designated as Grade I of III or Grade I or II of IV. Patients who presented with recurrent tumors or who had multiple procedures at outside institutions were excluded. The patient's gender, age at diagnosis, histologic diagnosis, site and depth of primary involvement, and specimen size at resection were noted. Involvement of periosteum, bone, and neurovascular structures also was recorded. The decision to use radiation therapy was made case-by-case. Indications for preoperative radiation therapy included tumor adjacent to the neurovascular bundle or bone where a marginal surgical margin was anticipated. Indications for postoperative radiation therapy included followup resection of an unsuspected malignancy. Patients were evaluated according to treatment rendered. Sixty-six patients were treated with surgery alone, whereas 42 patients had excision of the tumor in conjunction with radiation therapy. The overall local control rate was 97.2% (105 of 108). There were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence, wound complication, fibrosis, or survival between the two groups. Patients treated with radiation therapy had an increased incidence of postoperative lymphedema. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival rates were approximately 90% for both groups.

Cirurgia conservadora, radioterapia externa e reforço de dose com braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose: uma nova perspectiva no tratamento de sarcomas de partes moles do adulto

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a influência no controle local de pacientes adultos e portadores de sarcoma de partes moles em extremidades e submetidos a cirurgia conservadora do membro, com braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose (BATD) como reforço para a radioterapia externa (RT). MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 16 pacientes tratados, de 1993 até 1999. A RT foi utilizada com finalidade pré ou pós-operatória (30--55 Gy) e BATD com dose de 18--36 Gy (fx 3--6 Gy BID). Com base no modelo linear quadrático calculou-se a dose efetiva biológica ("biological effective dose" - BED) para o tumor e comparou-se seu valor a dados da literatura internacional, que utiliza tratamentos com RT e braquiterapia de baixa taxa de dose (BBTD). RESULTADOS: Os valores médios e medianos da BED para os sarcomas de partes moles foram de 78,5 Gy7 e 80 Gy7. A análise univariada mostrou que a BED para o tumor, quando utilizada BATD, era semelhante ao valor de 83 Gy7 quando utilizada BBTD (p = 0,008). As taxas de controle local, sobrevida livre de doença e sobrevida global atuarial em cinco anos foram de 83,2%, 75% e 93,7%, respectivamente. CONCLUSÕES: A BATD, quando utilizada como método complementar no reforço de dose da RT no tratamento conservador dos sarcomas de partes moles, apresenta taxas de controle local equiparáveis às da literatura internacional; no entanto, estudos com número maior de pacientes e período maior de seguimento são ainda necessários para determinar o verdadeiro potencial da BATD em substituir a BBTD.

Brachytherapy for locally recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma

Radiation is used to reduce potential risk of local recurrence from microscopic residual disease after surgical resection. Brachytherapy is a clinically established means of providing radiation for soft-tissue sarcomas that recur after surgical resection alone or surgical resection and radiation. Although the total dose of radiation that is prescribed is approximately the same for patients undergoing external beam radiation or brachytherapy, the radiobiologic characteristics of brachytherapy, based on the inverse-square law, provide higher doses of radiation to the surgical bed. This provides a theoretical advantage for the use of brachytherapy as compared with external beam radiation among patients with recurrence after surgical resection. When soft-tissue sarcomas recur in a previously irradiated area, further external beam radiation generally is not possible; therefore, brachytherapy allows a radiotherapeutic alternative in an attempt to reduce the risk of further local recurrence. Recommendations for patient selection, the total dose of radiation, and the radiation dose-rate are outlined. Standard grading systems for response, symptoms, and severity of complications should be used.

Júnior CG, Novaes PER, Pereira AJ, Pellizzon ACA. Braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose associada a radioterapia externa no tratamento de angiossarcoma extenso do couro cabeludo: relato de caso

Os autores apresentam um caso de extenso angiossarcoma do couro cabeludo submetido a radioterapia exclusiva, pela associação de roentgenterapia de ortovoltagem e braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose utilizando um molde. Descrevem os aspectos clínicos, técnicos e a evolução terapêutica. Destacam as particularidades e a utilidade da braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose, nesta situação em particular, e fazem uma análise comparativa das dificuldades e limitações caso a braquiterapia de baixa taxa de dose fosse empregada. Concluem ser a braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose uma opção útil, prática e segura para as lesões neoplásicas superficiais do escalpe, podendo ser considerada uma alternativa ao tratamento com elétrons.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) for locally advanced primary or recurrent high-risk adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of adults: long-term results of a phase II study

In this phase II study, activity and safety of neoadjuvant regional hyperthermia (RHT) combined with chemotherapy was investigated in 59 patients with primary advanced or recurrent high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients received four EIA cycles consisting of etoposide, ifosfamide and doxorubicin combined with RHT followed by surgical resection and adjuvant treatment. The overall objective response (OR) rate was 17%, with one complete (2%) and eight partial (15%) responses. In addition, 13 minor responses (25%) were seen. At time of surgery, complete necrosis (pCR) occurred in 6 patients and >75% necrosis (favourable histological response (FHR)) in 12 patients. At the completion of protocol treatment, 36 patients were rendered disease-free which was significantly associated with the initial radiographic and/or pathological tumour response (P=0.004). Treatment-related toxicity was acceptable overall. At a medium follow-up of 82 months, local treatment failure occurred in 33 patients, median overall survival (OS) was 52 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 49% (95% confidence interval (CI): 36-61%). OS which did not differ for extremity versus non-extremity STS (P=0.21) was better for patients responding to EIA combined with RHT (P<0.01).

Low-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy combined with external beam irradiation in the conservative treatment of soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

Conservative treatment of soft tissue sarcomas most often implies combination of surgical resection and irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate low-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy, delivered as a boost, in the local control of primary tumors, with special concern about treatment complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1986 and 1995, 112 patients underwent intraoperative implant. This report focuses on the group of 58 patients with primary sarcomas treated by combination of conservative surgery, intraoperative brachytherapy, and external irradiation. Most of the tumors were located in the lower limbs (46/58-79%). Median size of the tumor was 10 cm, most of the lesions being T2-T3 (51/58-88%), Grade 2 or 3 (48/58-83%). The mean brachytherapy dose was 20 Gy and external beam irradiation dose 45 Gy. In 36/58 cases, iridium wires had to be placed on contact with neurovascular structures.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 54 months, the 5-year actuarial survival was 64.9%, with a 5-year actuarial local control of 89%. Of the 6 patients with local relapse, 3 were salvaged. Acute side effects, essentially wound healing problems, occurred in 20/58 patients, late side effects in 16/58 patients (7 neuropathies G2 to G4). No amputation was required. The only significant factor correlated with early side effects was the location of the tumor in the lower limb (p = 0.003), and with late side effects the vicinity of the tumor with neurovascular structures (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy allows early delivery of a boost dose in a reduced volume of tissue, precisely mapped by the intraoperative procedure. Combined with external beam irradiation, it is a safe and efficient treatment technique leading to high local control rates and limited functional impairment.

The treatment of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas with preoperative thermoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

To explore the use of a novel program of preoperative radiation and hyperthermia in the management of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were adults over 18 with Grade 2 or 3 STS, surgically resectable without a local excision prior to referral to Duke University Medical Center and without distant metastases. Patients were staged generally with CT and/or MR imaging. The diagnosis was established with fine needle aspiration or incisional biopsy. Patients were then treated with 5000 to 5040 cGy, 180-200 cGy per fraction. Chemotherapy was usually not employed. Generally two hyperthermia treatments per week were given with a planned thermal dose of 10-100 CEM 43 degrees T90. Invasive thermometry and thermal mapping were done in all patients. Surgical resection was planned 4-6 weeks after the completion of radiation and hyperthermia.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were treated on study between 1984 and 1996. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 155 months (median 32). All tumors were high-grade in nature, 44 greater than 10 cm in size (maximum tumor diameter), 43 5-10 cm in size, 10 less than 5 cm. Seventy-eight of the 97 tumors were located in an extremity. Of the 97 patients, 48 remain alive and continually free of disease following initial therapy. Of the remaining 49 patients, 44 have relapsed (34 dead, 10 living with disease), 3 have died secondary to complications of therapy, and 2 have died of unrelated causes. Ten-year actuarial overall survival, cause-specific survival, and relapse-free survival are 50, 47, and 47% respectively. The predominant pattern of failure has been distant metastases with only 2 patients developing local failure alone. Ten-year actuarial local control for extremity tumors is 94%, 63% for the 19 patients with tumors at sites other than the extremity. Of the 78 patients with extremity lesions, 63 have had limb preservation and remain locally controlled. Overall 38 patients experienced 57 major complications. There were 3 deaths, one due to adriamycin cardiomyopathy and two secondary to wound infections. Four patients required amputation secondary to postoperative wound healing problems. Complications directly attributable to hyperthermia occurred in 15 patients with 11 instances of second- or third-degree burns and two instances of subcutaneous fat necrosis. The hyperthermia complications were generally not severe and either healed readily or were excised at the time of surgical resection of the primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

For these aggressive high-grade soft tissue sarcomas, this treatment program of preoperative thermoradiotherapy provided excellent local regional control for extremity lesions (95%) and satisfactory local regional control (63%) of nonextremity sarcomas, but did not appear to influence the rate of distant metastases or survival. Complications were frequent but apart from the direct thermal burns, not too different from those reported for preoperative radiotherapy alone. More effective adjuvant systemic therapy is necessary to impact favorably on survival.

The local management of soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors arising from the connective tissues. STS can arise at any anatomic site, can demonstrate varied behavior and prognosis, and therefore present a formidable challenge in management. The local treatment of STS demands technical complexity in the application of diagnostic tools, including pathology and imaging, as well as treatment approaches, including surgical ablation and reconstruction, radiotherapy, and, in defined cases, chemotherapy. The understanding of the management of these lesions is profoundly dependent on the multidisciplinary setting, where experience has been gained and skills are available to increase the likelihood of a successful result. Several proven options are available for optimal local management, and the choice of approach depends on the prevailing practice and resource profile of the treating center. With modern approaches, the local control rate can be expected to be at least 90% for extremity lesions, which constitute the most common STS. The experience in other anatomic sites is less favorable as a result of a combination of late diagnosis, technically difficult access sites, and possibly less familiarity with these less common presentations. The disappointing results make it all the more important for patients to be referred to a multidisciplinary setting with experience in sarcoma management to maximize the chance of successful local outcome.

Contemporary radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma

This review will detail the role of radiotherapy in the management of soft tissue sarcoma. Particular emphasis will be given to its role as an adjuvant to surgical excision for local curative management. The addition of radiotherapy permits a tissue-conserving operation to be performed, which has functional and cosmetic advantages yet produces local control equivalent to more radical surgery alone. The review will consider the historical evolution of treatment up through recent and contemporary practice. The principles of use will be outlined using available evidence and, where this is lacking, it will be acknowledged with suggestions for improvement. Finally, a brief overview of some technical issues about radiotherapy will be provided.

[Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and the trunk by conservative surgery and postoperative irradiation. Apropos of a series of 96 patients]

AIM OF STUDY

Retrospective study of a series of 96 patients presenting with soft tissues sarcoma. Homogeneous treatment between 1980-1992 with conservative surgery and post operative irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Median age of the 96 patients was 58 years. Tumor site was: upper limb 20, lower limb 46, trunk 30. In 35 cases largest diameter of the tumor was 5 cm or less (T1). All patients were M0. The most frequent pathological sub type was: malignant histiocytofibroma 28, liposarcoma 28. A gross complete surgery was performed in 89 cases. Radiotherapy was performed with cobalt or x 18 MV photons. The dose delivered was 50 Gy with a boost of 10 Gy. No adjuvant chemotherapy was given.

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 68 months. Local relapse was seen in 19 patients, six were salvaged by surgery, a limb amputation rates were necessary in 4 cases. The 5 and 10 year-overall survival was 70% and 64%. There was no severe radiation toxicity requiring surgery. A good function of the limb was preserved in all cases.

CONCLUSION

These results are in agreement with those of the literature and justify a conservative approach for these soft tissues sarcomas.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: analysis of treatment outcome

PURPOSE

To analyze the results of therapy for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) and to identify prognostic factors of survival, and of local and distant control of disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1975 through 1993, 134 MPNSTs were diagnosed and treated at our institution. Tumor sites included extremities in 36 (27%) cases and non-extremities in 98 (73%). Median follow-up for survivors was 53 months (range: 7-280). There were 14 tumors of histologic grade I disease (10%), 43 of grade II disease (32%), 43 of grade III disease (32%), and 32 of grade IV (24%). Seventy-three patients (54%) underwent radiation therapy (RT) as part of their initial treatment of the primary tumor, including 14 (10%) who had brachytherapy and 16 (12%) who had intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) as part of their radiation course.

RESULTS

The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 52% and 34%, respectively. Local and distant failure rates at 5 years were both 49%. On univariate analysis, prognostic factors significantly related to survival (log-rank: p < 0.05) included tumor size, location of disease, history of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), history of prior irradiation, surgical margin status, use of IOERT or brachytherapy, disease stage, histologic grade and tumor subtype, as well as mitotic rate and the presence or absence of necrosis. On multivariate analysis, only history of prior irradiation (p = 0.023), and surgical margin status (p = 0.0044) remained significant. For local control of disease, univariate analysis showed location of disease, surgical margin status, history of NF-1, history of prior irradiation, mitotic rate, radiation dose > or = 60 Gy, and use of IOERT or brachytherapy to be significant prognostic factors. On multivariate analysis, only surgical margin status (p = 0.0024), RT dose (p = 0.021), and use of IOERT or brachytherapy (p = 0.016) remained significant. For distant control of disease, significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis included tumor size, stage, tumor grade, mitotic rate, presence or absence of necrosis, and histologic subtype. On multivariate analysis, tumor size (p = 0.0065), grade (p = 0.036), and histologic subtype (p = 0.001) remained significant. Patients with perineurial MPNSTs had a much lower rate of distant metastasis and a better overall survival as compared with other histologic subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Management of patients with MPNST involves a multi-modality approach. The goal of surgery is complete resection with negative margins. Adjuvant irradiation to doses > or = 60 Gy and the inclusion of IOERT or brachytherapy are associated with improved local control of disease.

Does a radiation dose-response relation exist concerning survival of patients who have soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities? Radiation dose-response relation for soft-tissue sarcomas

This study analyzes a single-institution experience by evaluating the impact on survival of increasing total dose of adjunctive irradiation in patients who had extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (ESTS). A retrospective review of the tumor registry at a university medical center from January 1984 through December 1992 yielded a total of 59 surgical patients of ESTS. With follow-up ranging from 30 to 135 months (median, 65 months), the 2-, 5-, and 8-year overall and disease-free survival for all patients was 86%, 71%, 58% and 76%, 70%, 56%, respectively. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that total radiation dose (p = 0.02), American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (p = 0.04), and tumor size (p = 0.006) were all significant prognostic factors of overall survival; however, only tumor size was predictive of disease-free survival (p = 0.02). When the effect of tumor size and disease stage were controlled in the Cox model, a dose-response curve between increasing total radiation dose and improved overall patient survival was indicated. This study demonstrates the significance of tumor size on predicting both overall and disease-free survival in patients who have soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity. It also suggests, however, that a radiation dose-response relation may exist for overall survival. Future investigations should consider evaluating the minimal total radiation dose needed to optimize patient survival after limb-sparing surgery.