Evolution of condensin and cohesin complexes driven by replacement of Kite by Hawk proteins

Dissecting DNA Compaction by the Bacterial Condensin MukB

Condensins in bacteria are one of the most important factors involved in the organization of long threads of DNA into compact chromosomes. The organization of DNA by condensins is vital to many DNA transactions including DNA repair and chromosome segregation. Although some of the activities of condensins are well studied, the mechanism of the overall process executed by condensins, DNA compaction, remains unclear. Here, we describe some of the methods used routinely in our laboratory to understand the mechanism of DNA compaction by Escherichia coli condensin MukB.

Loop formation by SMC complexes: turning heads, bending elbows, and fixed anchors

From the dynamic interphase genome to compacted mitotic chromosomes, DNA is organized by the conserved SMC complexes cohesin and condensin. The picture is emerging that these complexes structure the genome through a shared basic principle that involves the formation and processive enlargement of chromatin loops. This appears to be an asymmetric process, in which the complex anchors at the base of a loop and then enlarges the loop in a one-sided manner. We discuss the latest insights into how ATPase-driven conformational changes within these complexes may enlarge loops, and consider how asymmetric DNA reeling can bring together genomic elements in a symmetric manner.

A Graph-Based Approach for Detecting Sequence Homology in Highly Diverged Repeat Protein Families

Reconstructing evolutionary relationships in repeat proteins is notoriously difficult due to the high degree of sequence divergence that typically occurs between duplicated repeats. This is complicated further by the fact that proteins with a large number of similar repeats are more likely to produce significant local sequence alignments than proteins with fewer copies of the repeat motif. Furthermore, biologically correct sequence alignments are sometimes impossible to achieve in cases where insertion or translocation events disrupt the order of repeats in one of the sequences being aligned. Combined, these attributes make traditional phylogenetic methods for studying protein families unreliable for repeat proteins, due to the dependence of such methods on accurate sequence alignment.We present here a practical solution to this problem, making use of graph clustering combined with the open-source software package HH-suite, which enables highly sensitive detection of sequence relationships. Carrying out multiple rounds of homology searches via alignment of profile hidden Markov models, large sets of related proteins are generated. By representing the relationships between proteins in these sets as graphs, subsequent clustering with the Markov cluster algorithm enables robust detection of repeat protein subfamilies.

Cohesin occupancy and composition at enhancers and promoters are linked to DNA replication origin proximity in Drosophila

Cohesin consists of the SMC1-SMC3-Rad21 tripartite ring and the SA protein that interacts with Rad21. The Nipped-B protein loads cohesin topologically around chromosomes to mediate sister chromatid cohesion and facilitate long-range control of gene transcription. It is largely unknown how Nipped-B and cohesin associate specifically with gene promoters and transcriptional enhancers, or how sister chromatid cohesion is established. Here, we use genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation in Drosophila cells to show that SA and the Fs(1)h (BRD4) BET domain protein help recruit Nipped-B and cohesin to enhancers and DNA replication origins, whereas the MED30 subunit of the Mediator complex directs Nipped-B and Vtd in Drosophila (also known as Rad21) to promoters. All enhancers and their neighboring promoters are close to DNA replication origins and bind SA with proportional levels of cohesin subunits. Most promoters are far from origins and lack SA but bind Nipped-B and Rad21 with subproportional amounts of SMC1, indicating that they bind cohesin rings only part of the time. Genetic data show that Nipped-B and Rad21 function together with Fs(1)h to facilitate Drosophila development. These findings show that Nipped-B and cohesin are differentially targeted to enhancers and promoters, and suggest models for how SA and DNA replication help establish sister chromatid cohesion and facilitate enhancer-promoter communication. They indicate that SA is not an obligatory cohesin subunit but a factor that controls cohesin location on chromosomes.

A folded conformation of MukBEF and cohesin

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC)-kleisin complexes organize chromosomal DNAs in all domains of life, with key roles in chromosome segregation, DNA repair and regulation of gene expression. They function through the entrapment and active translocation of DNA, but the underlying conformational changes are largely unclear. Using structural biology, mass spectrometry and cross-linking, we investigated the architecture of two evolutionarily distant SMC-kleisin complexes: MukBEF from Escherichia coli, and cohesin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that both contain a dynamic coiled-coil discontinuity, the elbow, near the middle of their arms that permits a folded conformation. Bending at the elbow brings into proximity the hinge dimerization domain and the head-kleisin module, situated at opposite ends of the arms. Our findings favour SMC activity models that include a large conformational change in the arms, such as a relative movement between DNA contact sites during DNA loading and translocation.

A Protocol for Assaying the ATPase Activity of Recombinant Cohesin Holocomplexes

Cohesin and other members of the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC)-kleisin family such as condensin and Smc5-6, as well as central players in genome function and structure such as topoisomerases, DNA and RNA polymerases, and DNA repair enzymes contain nucleotide binding domains (NBD) which bind and eventually cleave ATP. The released energy is harnessed in various ways by these enzymes in order to fulfill their essential functions. However, unlike other enzymes, Smc-kleisin complexes-well sized, elongated and multisubunit in nature-have only recently been purified as holocomplexes. This progress offers both the opportunity and the challenge to determine in detail the potency of the ATPase activity of these large protein assemblies-typically exceeding 0.5 MDa in molecular weight-and examine its mechanistic features. We describe here in further detail a combined comprehensive protocol which we have successfully employed before for assaying the ATPase activity of recombinant budding yeast cohesin holocomplexes. We believe that with small and appropriate modifications the methods described here should be applicable to other ATPase complexes.

Multicomponent Yeast Two-Hybrid System: Applications to Study Protein-Protein Interactions in SMC Complexes

Analysis of protein-protein interactions (PPI) is key for the understanding of most protein assemblies including structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes. SMC complexes are composed of SMC proteins, kleisin, and kleisin-interacting subunits. These subunits interact in specific ways to constitute and regulate the closed structure of the complexes. Specifically, kleisin molecules bridge the SMC dimers and the kleisin-interacting subunits modulate stability of the bridge. Here we describe a multicomponent version of a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) method and its application for analysis of the bridging role of the Nse4 kleisin in the SMC5/6 complex. Using this technique, we also show a stabilizing effect of KITE (kleisin-interacting tandem winged-helix element) proteins on SMC5/6.

SMC5/6: Multifunctional Player in Replication

The genome replication process is challenged at many levels. Replication must proceed through different problematic sites and obstacles, some of which can pause or even reverse the replication fork (RF). In addition, replication of DNA within chromosomes must deal with their topological constraints and spatial organization. One of the most important factors organizing DNA into higher-order structures are Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC) complexes. In prokaryotes, SMC complexes ensure proper chromosomal partitioning during replication. In eukaryotes, cohesin and SMC5/6 complexes assist in replication. Interestingly, the SMC5/6 complexes seem to be involved in replication in many ways. They stabilize stalled RFs, restrain RF regression, participate in the restart of collapsed RFs, and buffer topological constraints during RF progression. In this (mini) review, I present an overview of these replication-related functions of SMC5/6.

Are SMC Complexes Loop Extruding Factors? Linking Theory With Fact

The extreme length of chromosomal DNA requires organizing mechanisms to both promote functional genetic interactions and ensure faithful chromosome segregation when cells divide. Microscopy and genome-wide contact frequency analyses indicate that intra-chromosomal looping of DNA is a primary pathway of chromosomal organization during all stages of the cell cycle. DNA loop extrusion has emerged as a unifying model for how chromosome loops are formed in cis in different genomic contexts and cell cycle stages. The highly conserved family of SMC complexes have been found to be required for DNA cis-looping and have been suggested to be the enzymatic core of loop extruding machines. Here, the current body of evidence available for the in vivo and in vitro action of SMC complexes is discussed and compared to the predictions made by the loop extrusion model. How SMC complexes may differentially act on chromatin to generate DNA loops and how they could work to generate the dynamic and functionally appropriate organization of DNA in cells is explored.

A tethered-inchworm model of SMC DNA translocation

The DNA loop extrusion model is a provocative new concept explaining the formation of chromatin loops that revolutionizes understanding of genome organization. Central to this model is the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein family, which is now thought to function as a DNA motor. In this Perspective, we review and reinterpret the current knowledge of SMC structure and function and propose a novel mechanism for SMC motor activity.

Roles of NIPBL in maintenance of genome stability

A cohesin-loading factor (NIPBL) is one of important regulatory factors in the maintenance of 3D genome organization and function, by interacting with a large number of factors, e.g. cohesion, CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) or cohesin complex component. The present article overviews the critical and regulatory roles of NIBPL in cohesion loading on chromotin and in gene expression and transcriptional signaling. We explore molecular mechanisms by which NIPBL recruits endogenous histone deacetylase (HDAC) to induce histone deacetylation and influence multi-dimensions of genome, through which NIPBL "hop" movement in chromatin regulates gene expression and alters genome folding. NIPBL regulates the process of CTCF and cohesion into chromatin loops and topologically associated domains, binding of cohesion and H3K4mes3 through interaction among promoters and enhancers. HP1 recruits NIPBL to DNA damage site through RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitylation pathway. NIPBL contributes to regulation of genome-controlled gene expression through the influence of cohesin in chromosome structure. NIPBL interacts with cohesin and then increases transcriptional activities of REC8 promoter, leading to up-regulation of gene expression. NIPBL movement among chromosomal loops regulates gene expression through dynamic alterations of genome organization. Thus, we expect a new and deep insight to understand dynamics of chromosome and explore potential strategies of therapiesc on basis of NIPBL.

Structural basis for Scc3-dependent cohesin recruitment to chromatin

The cohesin ring complex is required for numerous chromosomal transactions including sister chromatid cohesion, DNA damage repair and transcriptional regulation. How cohesin engages its chromatin substrate has remained an unresolved question. We show here, by determining a crystal structure of the budding yeast cohesin HEAT-repeat subunit Scc3 bound to a fragment of the Scc1 kleisin subunit and DNA, that Scc3 and Scc1 form a composite DNA interaction module. The Scc3-Scc1 subcomplex engages double-stranded DNA through a conserved, positively charged surface. We demonstrate that this conserved domain is required for DNA binding by Scc3-Scc1 in vitro, as well as for the enrichment of cohesin on chromosomes and for cell viability. These findings suggest that the Scc3-Scc1 DNA-binding interface plays a central role in the recruitment of cohesin complexes to chromosomes and therefore for cohesin to faithfully execute its functions during cell division.

Scc2 Is a Potent Activator of Cohesin's ATPase that Promotes Loading by Binding Scc1 without Pds5

Cohesin organizes DNA into chromatids, regulates enhancer-promoter interactions, and confers sister chromatid cohesion. Its association with chromosomes is regulated by hook-shaped HEAT repeat proteins that bind Scc1, namely Scc3, Pds5, and Scc2. Unlike Pds5, Scc2 is not a stable cohesin constituent but, as shown here, transiently replaces Pds5. Scc1 mutations that compromise its interaction with Scc2 adversely affect cohesin's ATPase activity and loading. Moreover, Scc2 mutations that alter how the ATPase responds to DNA abolish loading despite cohesin's initial association with loading sites. Lastly, Scc2 mutations that permit loading in the absence of Scc4 increase Scc2's association with chromosomal cohesin and reduce that of Pds5. We suggest that cohesin switches between two states: one with Pds5 bound that is unable to hydrolyze ATP efficiently but is capable of release from chromosomes and another in which Scc2 replaces Pds5 and stimulates ATP hydrolysis necessary for loading and translocation from loading sites.

Establishing and dissolving cohesion during the vertebrate cell cycle

Replicated chromatids are held together from the time they emerge from the replication fork until their separation in anaphase. This process, known as cohesion, promotes faithful DNA repair by homologous recombination in interphase and ensures accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis. Identification of cohesin thirty years ago solved a long-standing question about the nature of the linkage keeping together the sister chromatids. Cohesin is an evolutionarily conserved complex composed of a heterodimer of the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) family of ATPases, Smc1 and Smc3, the kleisin subunit Rad21 and a Huntingtin/EF3/PP2A/Tor1 (HEAT) repeat domain-containing subunit named SA/STAG. In addition to mediating cohesion, cohesin plays a major role in genome organization. Cohesin functions rely on the ability of the complex to entrap DNA topologically and in a dynamic manner. Establishment of cohesion during S phase requires coordination with the DNA replication machinery and restricts the dynamic behaviour of at least a fraction of cohesin. Dissolution of cohesion in subsequent mitosis is regulated by multiple mechanisms that ensure that daughter cells receive the correct number of intact chromosomes. We here review recent progress on our understanding of how these processes are regulated in somatic vertebrate cells.

SMC Complexes: Universal DNA Looping Machines with Distinct Regulators

What drives the formation of chromatin loops has been a long-standing question in chromosome biology. Recent work provides major insight into the basic principles behind loop formation. Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes, that are conserved from bacteria to humans, are key to this process. The SMC family includes condensin and cohesin, which structure chromosomes to enable mitosis and long-range gene regulation. We discuss novel insights into the mechanism of loop formation and the implications for how these complexes ultimately shape chromosomes. A picture is emerging in which these complexes form small loops that they then processively enlarge. It appears that SMC complexes act by family-wide basic principles, with complex-specific levels of control.

The Cohesin Ring Uses Its Hinge to Organize DNA Using Non-topological as well as Topological Mechanisms

As predicted by the notion that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by entrapment of sister DNAs inside cohesin rings, there is perfect correlation between co-entrapment of circular minichromosomes and sister chromatid cohesion. In most cells where cohesin loads without conferring cohesion, it does so by entrapment of individual DNAs. However, cohesin with a hinge domain whose positively charged lumen is neutralized loads and moves along chromatin despite failing to entrap DNAs. Thus, cohesin engages chromatin in non-topological, as well as topological, manners. Since hinge mutations, but not Smc-kleisin fusions, abolish entrapment, DNAs may enter cohesin rings through hinge opening. Mutation of three highly conserved lysine residues inside the Smc1 moiety of Smc1/3 hinges abolishes all loading without affecting cohesin's recruitment to CEN loading sites or its ability to hydrolyze ATP. We suggest that loading and translocation are mediated by conformational changes in cohesin's hinge driven by cycles of ATP hydrolysis.

Chromosome Biology: The Smc-Kleisin Enzymology Finally Comes of Age

Cohesin and condensin are Smc-kleisin complexes responsible for shaping our chromosomes. Despite extensive genetic and genomic information available on their function, their biochemistry has been hard to study. Two recent studies finally bring exciting new insights into their enzymology.

The biology and polymer physics underlying large-scale chromosome organization

Chromosome large-scale organization is a beautiful example of the interplay between physics and biology. DNA molecules are polymers and thus belong to the class of molecules for which physicists have developed models and formulated testable hypotheses to understand their arrangement and dynamic properties in solution, based on the principles of polymer physics. Biologists documented and discovered the biochemical basis for the structure, function and dynamic spatial organization of chromosomes in cells. The underlying principles of chromosome organization have recently been revealed in unprecedented detail using high-resolution chromosome capture technology that can simultaneously detect chromosome contact sites throughout the genome. These independent lines of investigation have now converged on a model in which DNA loops, generated by the loop extrusion mechanism, are the basic organizational and functional units of the chromosome.

Brca2, Pds5 and Wapl differentially control cohesin chromosome association and function

The cohesin complex topologically encircles chromosomes and mediates sister chromatid cohesion to ensure accurate chromosome segregation upon cell division. Cohesin also participates in DNA repair and gene transcription. The Nipped-B-Mau2 protein complex loads cohesin onto chromosomes and the Pds5-Wapl complex removes cohesin. Pds5 is also essential for sister chromatid cohesion, indicating that it has functions beyond cohesin removal. The Brca2 DNA repair protein interacts with Pds5, but the roles of this complex beyond DNA repair are unknown. Here we show that Brca2 opposes Pds5 function in sister chromatid cohesion by assaying precocious sister chromatid separation in metaphase spreads of cultured cells depleted for these proteins. By genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation we find that Pds5 facilitates SA cohesin subunit association with DNA replication origins and that Brca2 inhibits SA binding, mirroring their effects on sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin binding is maximal at replication origins and extends outward to occupy active genes and regulatory sequences. Pds5 and Wapl, but not Brca2, limit the distance that cohesin extends from origins, thereby determining which active genes, enhancers and silencers bind cohesin. Using RNA-seq we find that Brca2, Pds5 and Wapl influence the expression of most genes sensitive to Nipped-B and cohesin, largely in the same direction. These findings demonstrate that Brca2 regulates sister chromatid cohesion and gene expression in addition to its canonical role in DNA repair and expand the known functions of accessory proteins in cohesin's diverse functions.

Chromosome Biology: The Sight of DNA, at Last!

Chromosomes are shaped by the combined function of the condensin and cohesin Smc-kleisin complexes. After more than two decades of research in this field, a new study finally sheds light on how these machines might interact with their DNA substrates.

MukB ATPases are regulated independently by the N- and C-terminal domains of MukF kleisin

The Escherichia coli SMC complex, MukBEF, acts in chromosome segregation. MukBEF shares the distinctive architecture of other SMC complexes, with one prominent difference; unlike other kleisins, MukF forms dimers through its N-terminal domain. We show that a 4-helix bundle adjacent to the MukF dimerisation domain interacts functionally with the MukB coiled-coiled ‘neck’ adjacent to the ATPase head. We propose that this interaction leads to an asymmetric tripartite complex, as in other SMC complexes. Since MukF dimerisation is preserved during this interaction, MukF directs the formation of dimer of dimer MukBEF complexes, observed previously in vivo. The MukF N- and C-terminal domains stimulate MukB ATPase independently and additively. We demonstrate that impairment of the MukF interaction with MukB in vivo leads to ATP hydrolysis-dependent release of MukBEF complexes from chromosomes.

Most DNA in a cell is arranged in structures called chromosomes. From bacteria to humans, chromosomes have to be compacted and highly organized to allow the cells to maintain and use their genetic information. In all organisms, large ring-shaped protein complexes play a crucial role in managing chromosomes. They transport and organize DNA thanks to reactions whose precise mechanism remains unknown. In bacteria, MukB and a type of kleisin called MukF are two examples of molecules involved in chromosome management.

Two MukBs join at one end to form a hinge; at the other end, each MukB protein has a neck and a head. The two heads are linked by the kleisin to form a large protein ring, which can open to capture DNA. The MukB heads can trigger a biochemical reaction that creates the energy essential to trap and release DNA during DNA transport.

Here, Zawadzka et al. study how the different components of the MukB-kleisin complex interact with each other to undergo the biochemical reactions that lead to DNA transport. The experiments show that the kleisin joins two MukB heads by attaching the base of one to the neck of the other, asymmetrically closing the ring. The separate interactions of different regions of the kleisin to the head and neck of MukB independently activate the two MukB heads, thereby controlling essential steps in the reactions with DNA. Two MukB-kleisin ring complexes are joined to each other because of a tight interaction between the two kleisin molecules. This leads Zawadzka et al. to suggest that DNA is sequentially grabbed and released from these two rings during DNA transport, similar to how a climbing rope is attached and released through carabiners.

Cells cannot survive or be healthy without their chromosomes being accurately managed. It is still unclear how molecules such as MukBs and kleinsins drive this process. A better picture of their structure and interactions is an essential first step to understand these mechanisms.

DNA entry, exit and second DNA capture by cohesin: insights from biochemical experiments

Cohesin is a ring-shaped, multi-subunit ATPase assembly that is fundamental to the spatiotemporal organization of chromosomes. The ring establishes a variety of chromosomal structures including sister chromatid cohesion and chromatin loops. At the core of the ring is a pair of highly conserved SMC (Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes) proteins, which are closed by the flexible kleisin subunit. In common with other essential SMC complexes including condensin and the SMC5-6 complex, cohesin encircles DNA inside its cavity, with the aid of HEAT (Huntingtin, elongation factor 3, protein phosphatase 2A and TOR) repeat auxiliary proteins. Through this topological embrace, cohesin is thought to establish a series of intra- and interchromosomal interactions by tethering more than one DNA molecule. Recent progress in biochemical reconstitution of cohesin provides molecular insights into how this ring complex topologically binds and mediates DNA-DNA interactions. Here, I review these studies and discuss how cohesin mediates such chromosome interactions.

Structural Basis for a Safety-Belt Mechanism That Anchors Condensin to Chromosomes

Condensin protein complexes coordinate the formation of mitotic chromosomes and thereby ensure the successful segregation of replicated genomes. Insights into how condensin complexes bind to chromosomes and alter their topology are essential for understanding the molecular principles behind the large-scale chromatin rearrangements that take place during cell divisions. Here, we identify a direct DNA-binding site in the eukaryotic condensin complex, which is formed by its Ycg1^Cnd3 HEAT-repeat and Brn1^Cnd2 kleisin subunits. DNA co-crystal structures reveal a conserved, positively charged groove that accommodates the DNA double helix. A peptide loop of the kleisin subunit encircles the bound DNA and, like a safety belt, prevents its dissociation. Firm closure of the kleisin loop around DNA is essential for the association of condensin complexes with chromosomes and their DNA-stimulated ATPase activity. Our data suggest a sophisticated molecular basis for anchoring condensin complexes to chromosomes that enables the formation of large-sized chromatin loops.

Scc2/Nipbl hops between chromosomal cohesin rings after loading

The cohesin complex mediates DNA-DNA interactions both between (sister chromatid cohesion) and within chromosomes (DNA looping). It has been suggested that intra-chromosome loops are generated by extrusion of DNAs through the lumen of cohesin's ring. Scc2 (Nipbl) stimulates cohesin's ABC-like ATPase and is essential for loading cohesin onto chromosomes. However, it is possible that the stimulation of cohesin's ATPase by Scc2 also has a post-loading function, for example driving loop extrusion. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and single-molecule tracking in human cells, we show that Scc2 binds dynamically to chromatin, principally through an association with cohesin. Scc2's movement within chromatin is consistent with a 'stop-and-go' or 'hopping' motion. We suggest that a low diffusion coefficient, a low stoichiometry relative to cohesin, and a high affinity for chromosomal cohesin enables Scc2 to move rapidly from one chromosomal cohesin complex to another, performing a function distinct from loading.

Shaping chromosomes by DNA capture and release: gating the SMC rings

SMC proteins organize chromosomes to coordinate essential nuclear processes such as gene expression and DNA recombination as well as to segregate chromosomes during cell division. SMC mediated DNA bridging keeps sister chromatids aligned for much of the cell cycle, while the active extrusion of DNA loops by SMC presumably compacts chromosomes. Chromosome superstructure is thus given by the number of DNA linkages and the size of chromosomal DNA loops, which in turn depend on the dynamics of SMC loading and unloading. The latter is regulated by the intrinsic SMC ATPase activity, multiple external factors and post-translational modification. Here, I highlight recent advances in our understanding of DNA capture and release by SMC-with a focus on cohesin.

Tuned SMC Arms Drive Chromosomal Loading of Prokaryotic Condensin

SMC proteins support vital cellular processes in all domains of life by organizing chromosomal DNA. They are composed of ATPase “head” and “hinge“ dimerization domains and a connecting coiled-coil “arm.” Binding to a kleisin subunit creates a closed tripartite ring, whose ∼47-nm-long SMC arms act as barrier for DNA entrapment. Here, we uncover another, more active function of the bacterial Smc arm. Using high-throughput genetic engineering, we resized the arm in the range of 6–60 nm and found that it was functional only in specific length regimes following a periodic pattern. Natural SMC sequences reflect these length constraints. Mutants with improper arm length or peptide insertions in the arm efficiently target chromosomal loading sites and hydrolyze ATP but fail to use ATP hydrolysis for relocation onto flanking DNA. We propose that SMC arms implement force transmission upon nucleotide hydrolysis to mediate DNA capture or loop extrusion.

•

Short and long but not intermediate-length Smc coiled-coil arms are functional

•

Smc complexes with improper arms accumulate at chromosomal loading sites

•

Smc arms are functional units linking ATP hydrolysis to an essential DNA transaction

•

Pro- and eukaryotic SMC sequences reflect similar periodic length constraints