Itraconazole greatly increases plasma concentrations and effects of felodipine

Drug interactions in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipient: what every transplanter needs to know

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients can result in either increases in serum concentrations of medications, which may lead to enhanced toxicity; or reduced serum concentrations, which can lead to treatment failure and the emergence of post transplant complications. The use of drugs that have a narrow therapeutic index, such as cyclosporine/tacrolimus (calcineurin inhibitors), increases the significance of these interactions when they occur. This report will review the clinical data evaluating the drug interactions of relevance to HSCT clinical practice, focusing on the pharmacokinetic interactions, and provides recommendations for managing these interactions to avoid both toxicity and treatment failure.

Common Fungal Infections of the Feet in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Superficial fungal infections of the foot (tinea pedis and onychomycosis) are common among elderly patients. Although most authorities believe that patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased predisposition to dermatophytic infections, some controversies still remain. Because these infections disrupt the skin integrity and provide an avenue for bacterial superinfection, elderly diabetic patients with dermatophytic infection should be promptly treated with an antifungal agent. For most dermatophytic infections of the foot, topical agents are usually effective and less expensive than oral agents. Laboratory diagnosis of fungal infection prior to institution of therapy is recommended. Proper technique for obtaining the specimen is important to ensure a higher chance of isolating the infecting fungus. Commonly used anti-dermatophytic agents that are also active against the yeasts include the imidazoles, the allylamines-benzylamines and the hydroxypyridones, which are also effective against most of the moulds. Oral therapy for tinea pedis, although not well studied, should be limited to patients with more extensive infections, such as vesicobullous and moccasin type, resistant infections or chronic infections. In addition, oral agents should also be considered in diabetic and immunosuppressed patients. On the other hand, treatment of onychomycosis of the foot usually requires systemic therapy. Griseofulvin is the least effective agent when compared with the newer agents. Terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole have been shown to have acceptable cure rates. More recently, topical treatment of the nail with 8% ciclopirox nail lacquer, bifonazole with urea and amorolfine have been reported to be successful. Over the past decade, fungal foot infections of the skin and nail are more effectively treated with the introduction of numerous topical and oral agents.

Interactions between antiretroviral drugs and drugs used for the therapy of the metabolic complications encountered during HIV infection

Treatment of HIV infection with potent combination antiretroviral therapy has resulted in major improvement in overall survival, immune function and the incidence of opportunistic infections. However, HIV infection and treatment has been associated with the development of metabolic complications, including hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lipodystrophy and osteopenia. Safe pharmacological treatment of these complications requires an understanding of the drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and the drugs used in the treatment of metabolic complications. Since formal studies of most of these interactions have not been performed, predictions must be based on our understanding of the metabolism of these agents. All HIV protease inhibitors are metabolised by and inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Ritonavir is the most potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. Ritonavir and nelfinavir also induce a host of CYP isoforms as well as some conjugating enzymes. The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor delavirdine potently inhibits CYP3A4, whereas nevirapine and efavirenz are inducers of CYP3A4. Drug interaction studies have been performed with HIV protease inhibitors and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Coadministration of ritonavir plus saquinavir to HIV-seronegative volunteers resulted in increased exposure to simvastatin acid by 3059%. Atorvastatin exposure increased by 347%, but exposure to active atorvastatin increased by only 79%. Conversely, pravastatin exposure decreased by 50%. Similar results have been obtained with combinations of simvastatin and atorvastatin with other HIV protease inhibitors. Thus, the lactone prodrugs simvastatin and lovastatin should not be used with HIV protease inhibitors. Atorvastatin may be used with caution. Although there are no formal studies available, calcium channel antagonists and repaglinide may have significant interactions and toxicity when used with HIV protease inhibitors because of their metabolism by CYP3A4. Sulfonylurea drugs utilise mainly CYP2C9 for metabolism, and this isoenzyme may be induced by ritonavir and nelfinavir with a resulting decrease in efficacy of the sulfonylurea. Losartan may have increased effect when coadministered with ritonavir and nelfinavir because of the induction of CYP2C9 and the expected increase in formation of the active metabolite, E-3174. Overall, well-designed drug-drug interaction studies at steady state are needed to determine whether antiretroviral drugs may be safely coadministered with many of the drugs used in the treatment of the metabolic complications of HIV infection.

Antifungal therapy--state of the art at the beginning of the 21st century

The most relevant information on the present state of the art of antifungal chemotherapy is reviewed in this chapter. For dermatomycoses a variety of topical antifungals are available, and safe and efficacious systemic treatment, especially with the fungicidal drug terbinafine, is possible. The duration of treatment can be drastically reduced. Substantial progress in the armamentarium of drugs for invasive fungal infections has been made, and a new class of antifungals, echinocandins, is now in clinical use. The following drugs in oral and/or intravenous formulations are available: the broad spectrum polyene amphotericin B with its new "clothes"; the sterol biosynthesis inhibitors fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole; the glucan synthase inhibitor caspofungin; and the combination partner flucytosine. New therapy schedules have been studied; combination therapy has found a significant place in the treatment of severely compromised patients, and the field of prevention and empiric therapy is fast moving. Guidelines exist nowadays for the treatment of various fungal diseases and maintenance therapy. New approaches interfering with host defenses or pathogenicity of fungal cells are being investigated, and molecular biologists are looking for new targets studying the genomics of pathogenic fungi.

The Intestinal First-pass Metabolism of Substrates of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotei—Quantitative Analysis Based on Information from the Literature

It is suggested that the bioavailability of CYP3A4 substrates might be low due to first-pass metabolism in the small intestine, and it is possible that P-glycoprotein (P-gp) may influence first-pass metabolism in a co-operative manner. We have collected information of the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A4 substrates to evaluate the fraction absorbed (Fa), intestinal availability (Fg) and hepatic availability (Fh) and have investigated the intestinal first-pass metabolism and the effect of P-gp on this. The pharmacokinetic data involved ten compounds metabolized by CYP3A4 in humans, with and without an inhibitor or inducer. FaFg, which is the product of Fa and Fg, and Fh were calculated using three liver blood flow rates (17.1, 21.4, 25.5 mL/min/kg) in consideration of variations in the liver flow rate. Co-administration with an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and treatment of an inducer of CYP3A4 caused an increase and decrease in the FaFg of CYP3A4 substrates, regardless of the liver blood flow, indicating that CYP3A4 substrates exhibit a first-pass effect in their metabolism. This holds true regardless of whether the compounds are P-gp substrates or not. No relationship was observed between FaFg and Fh, regardless of the hepatic blood flow rate and the P-gp substrates. The FaFg of both P-gp and non P-gp substrates decreased as the hepatic intrinsic clearance increased. FaFg was markedly reduced when the hepatic intrinsic clearance was more than 100 mL/min/kg. This in vivo intrinsic clearance corresponds to an in vitro intrinsic clearance of 78 muL/min/mg human hepatic microsomal protein, equivalent to a half-life of 8.9 min for the substrate in a commonly used metabolic stability test with human microsomes (1 mgMs protein/mL). This phenomenon was not observed in substrates of CYP isoforms other than CYP3A4. In conclusion, it is suggested that CYP3A4 substrates which have a hepatic intrinsic clearance of 100 mL/min/kg exhibit a low bioavailability due to intestinal first-pass metabolism, regardless of whether they are substrates of P-gp or not.

Itraconazole versus terbinafine in the management of onychomycosis: an overview

Ever since the introduction of itraconazole and terbinafine in the management of onychomycosis, there has been a revival of interest in the latter. In order to comprehend the intricate emerging scenario, an endeavor has been made to form a distinct outline in the shape of an overview on several of their facets. The review, therefore, envisages forming and facilitating instant decision-making.

Cabergoline plasma concentration is increased during concomitant treatment with itraconazole

We report on 2 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease who experienced marked improvement in symptoms following the addition of itraconazole to current cabergoline treatment. Plasma levels of cabergoline were analyzed in one of the patients and increased to approximately 300% during treatment with itraconazole, which paralleled major clinical improvement.

The mucosa of the small intestine: how clinically relevant as an organ of drug metabolism?

The intestinal mucosa is capable of metabolising drugs via phase I and II reactions. Increasingly, as a result of in vitro and in vivo (animal and human) data, the intestinal mucosa is being implicated as a major metabolic organ for some drugs. This has been supported by clinical studies of orally administered drugs (well-known examples include cyclosporin, midazolam, nifedipine and tacrolimus) where intestinal drug metabolism has significantly reduced oral bioavailability. This review discusses the intestinal properties and processes that contribute to drug metabolism. An understanding of the interplay between the processes controlling absorption, metabolism and P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux from the intestinal mucosa into the intestinal lumen facilitates determination of the extent of the intestinal contribution to first-pass metabolism. The clinical relevance of intestinal metabolism, however, depends on the relative importance of the metabolic pathway involved, the therapeutic index of the drug and the inherent inter- and intra-individual variability. This variability can stem from genetic (metabolising enzyme polymorphisms) and/or non-genetic (including concomitant drug and food intake, route of administration) sources. An overwhelming proportion of clinically relevant drug interactions where the intestine has been implicated as a major contributor to first-pass metabolism involve drugs that undergo cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated biotransformation and are substrates for the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein. Much work is yet to be done in characterising the clinical impact of other enzyme systems on drug therapy. In order to achieve this, the first-pass contributions of the intestine and liver must be successfully decoupled.

Pharmacokinetic aspects of treating infections in the intensive care unit: focus on drug interactions

Pharmacokinetic interactions involving anti-infective drugs may be important in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although some interactions involve absorption or distribution, the most clinically relevant interactions during anti-infective treatment involve the elimination phase. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 are the major isoforms responsible for oxidative metabolism of drugs. Macrolides (especially troleandomycin and erythromycin versus CYP3A4), fluoroquinolones (especially enoxacin, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin versus CYP1A2) and azole antifungals (especially fluconazole versus CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and ketoconazole and itraconazole versus CYP3A4) are all inhibitors of CYP-mediated metabolism and may therefore be responsible for toxicity of other coadministered drugs by decreasing their clearance. On the other hand, rifampicin is a nonspecific inducer of CYP-mediated metabolism (especially of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) and may therefore cause therapeutic failure of other coadministered drugs by increasing their clearance. Drugs frequently used in the ICU that are at risk of clinically relevant pharrmacokinetic interactions with anti-infective agents include some benzodiazepines (especially midazolam and triazolam), immunosuppressive agents (cyclosporin, tacrolimus), antiasthmatic agents (theophylline), opioid analgesics (alfentanil), anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine), calcium antagonists (verapamil, nifedipine, felodipine) and anticoagulants (warfarin). Some lipophilic anti-infective agents inhibit (clarithromycin, itraconazole) or induce (rifampicin) the transmembrane transporter P-glycoprotein, which promotes excretion from renal tubular and intestinal cells. This results in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the clearance of P-glycoprotein substrates at the renal level and an increase or decrease, respectively, of their oral bioavailability at the intestinal level. Hydrophilic anti-infective agents are often eliminated unchanged by renal glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, and are therefore involved in competition for excretion. Beta-lactams are known to compete with other drugs for renal tubular secretion mediated by the organic anion transport system, but this is frequently not of major concern, given their wide therapeutic index. However, there is a risk of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity with some cephalosporins and carbapenems. Therapeutic failure with these hydrophilic compounds may be due to haemodynamically active coadministered drugs, such as dopamine, dobutamine and furosemide, which increase their renal clearance by means of enhanced cardiac output and/or renal blood flow. Therefore, coadministration of some drugs should be avoided, or at least careful therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed when available. Monitoring may be especially helpful when there is some coexisting pathophysiological condition affecting drug disposition, for example malabsorption or marked instability of the systemic circulation or of renal or hepatic function.

Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Alternaria infectoria in a renal transplant recipient

We report on a case of phaeohyphomycosis caused by Alternaria infectoria in a renal transplant recipient with pulmonary infiltrates and multiple skin lesions. Diagnosis was based on microscopy and culture of the skin lesions. Treatment consisted of a combination of surgical excision and systemic antifungal therapy, first with itraconazole and subsequently with liposomal amphotericin B, for 39 days. At a 20-month follow-up visit, no recurrence of the skin lesions or the pulmonary infiltrates had occurred.

Cardiovascular drug-drug interactions

The drug-drug interactions discussed in this article have either documented or suspected clinical relevance for patients with cardiovascular disease and the clinician involved in the care of these patients. Oftentimes, drug-drug interactions are difficult, if not impossible, to predict because of the high degree of interpatient variability in drug disposition. Certain drug-drug interactions, however, may be avoided through knowledge and sound clinical judgment. Every clinician should maintain a working knowledge of reported drug-drug interactions and an understanding of basic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles to help predict and minimize the incidence and severity of drug-drug interactions.

Drug interactions with cisapride: clinical implications

Cisapride, a prokinetic agent, has been used for the treatment of a number of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in adults and children. Since 1993, 341 cases of ventricular arrhythmias, including 80 deaths, have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Marketing of the drug has now been discontinued in the US; however, it is still available under a limited-access protocol. Knowledge of the risk factors for cisapride-associated arrhythmias will be essential for its continued use in those patients who meet the eligibility criteria. This review summarises the published literature on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of cisapride with concomitantly administered drugs, providing clinicians with practical recommendations for avoiding these potentially fatal events. Pharmacokinetic interactions with cisapride involve inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the primary mode of elimination of cisapride, thereby increasing plasma concentrations of the drug. The macrolide antibacterials clarithromycin, erythromycin and troleandomycin are inhibitors of CYP3A4 and should not be used in conjunction with cisapride. Azithromycin is an alternative. Similarly, azole antifungal agents such as fluconazole, itraconazole and ketoconazole are CYP3A4 inhibitors and their concomitant use with cisapride should be avoided. Of the antidepressants nefazodone and fluvoxamine should be avoided with cisapride. Data with fluoxetine is controversial, we favour the avoidance of its use. Citalopram, paroxetine and sertraline are alternatives. The HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir inhibit CYP3A4. Clinical experience with cisapride is lacking but avoidance with all protease inhibitors is recommended, although saquinavir is thought to have clinically insignificant effects on CYP3A4. Delavirdine is also a CYP3A4 inhibitor and should be avoided with cisapride. We also recommend avoiding coadministration of cisapride with amiodarone, cimetidine (alternatives are famotidine, nizatidine, ranitidine or one of the proton pump inhibitors), diltiazem and verapamil (the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are alternatives), grapefruit juice, isoniazid, metronidazole, quinine, quinupristin/dalfopristin and zileuton (montelukast is an alternative). Pharmacodynamic interactions with cisapride involve drugs that have the potential to have additive effects on the QT interval. We do not recommend use of cisapride with class Ia and III antiarrhythmic drugs or with adenosine, bepridil, cyclobenzaprine, droperidol, haloperidol, nifedipine (immediate release), phenothiazine antipsychotics, tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants or vasopressin. Vigilance is advised if anthracyclines, cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), enflurane, halothane, isoflurane, pentamidine or probucol are used with cisapride. In addition, uncorrected electrolyte disturbances induced by diuretics may increase the risk of torsade de pointes. Patients receiving cisapride should be promptly treated for electrolyte disturbances.

Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance

This article reviews the metabolic pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with the systemic antifungal agents: the azoles ketoconazole, miconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, the allylamine terbinafine and the sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole. The majority of these interactions are metabolic and are caused by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated hepatic and/or small intestinal metabolism of coadministered drugs. Human liver microsomal studies in vitro, clinical case reports and controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies in patients or healthy volunteers are reviewed. A brief overview of the CYP system and the contrasting effects of the antifungal agents on the different human drug-metabolising CYP isoforms is followed by discussion of the role of P-glycoprotein in presystemic extraction and the modulation of its function by the antifungal agents. Methods used for in vitro drug interaction studies and in vitro-in vivo scaling are then discussed, with specific emphasis on the azole antifungals. Ketoconazole and itraconazole are potent inhibitors of the major drug-metabolising CYP isoform in humans, CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs with CYP3A substrates such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus, alprazolam, triazolam, midazolam, nifedipine, felodipine, simvastatin, lovastatin, vincristine, terfenadine or astemizole can result in clinically significant drug interactions, some of which can be life-threatening. The interactions of ketoconazole with cyclosporin and tacrolimus have been applied for therapeutic purposes to allow a lower dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant and a reduced risk of fungal infections. The potency of fluconazole as a CYP3A4 inhibitor is much lower. Thus, clinical interactions of CYP3A substrates with this azole derivative are of lesser magnitude, and are generally observed only with fluconazole dosages of > or =200 mg/day. Fluconazole, miconazole and sulfamethoxazole are potent inhibitors of CYP2C9. Coadministration of phenytoin, warfarin, sulfamethoxazole and losartan with fluconazole results in clinically significant drug interactions. Fluconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C19 in vitro, although the clinical significance of this has not been investigated. No clinically significant drug interactions have been predicted or documented between the azoles and drugs that are primarily metabolised by CYP1A2, 2D6 or 2E1. Terbinafine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 and may cause clinically significant interactions with coadministered substrates of this isoform, such as nortriptyline, desipramine, perphenazine, metoprolol, encainide and propafenone. On the basis of the existing in vitro and in vivo data, drug interactions of terbinafine with substrates of other CYP isoforms are unlikely.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic consequences and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition

Drug interactions occur when the efficacy or toxicity of a medication is changed by administration of another substance. Pharmacokinetic interactions often occur as a result of a change in drug metabolism. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 oxidises a broad spectrum of drugs by a number of metabolic processes. The location of CYP3A4 in the small bowel and liver permits an effect on both presystemic and systemic drug disposition. Some interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors may also involve inhibition of P-glycoprotein. Clinically important CYP3A4 inhibitors include itraconazole, ketoconazole, clarithromycin, erythromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir and grapefruit juice. Torsades de pointes, a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia associated with QT prolongation, can occur when these inhibitors are coadministered with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride or pimozide. Rhabdomyolysis has been associated with the coadministration of some 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ('statins') and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Symptomatic hypotension may occur when CYP3A4 inhibitors are given with some dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, as well with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil. Excessive sedation can result from concomitant administration of benzodiazepine (midazolam, triazolam, alprazolam or diazepam) or nonbenzodiazepine (zopiclone and buspirone) hypnosedatives with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Ataxia can occur with carbamazepine, and ergotism with ergotamine, following the addition of a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Beneficial drug interactions can occur. Administration of a CYP3A4 inhibitor with cyclosporin may allow reduction of the dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant. Certain HIV protease inhibitors, e.g. saquinavir, have low oral bioavailability that can be profoundly increased by the addition of ritonavir. The clinical importance of any drug interaction depends on factors that are drug-, patient- and administration-related. Generally, a doubling or more in plasma drug concentration has the potential for enhanced adverse or beneficial drug response. Less pronounced pharmacokinetic interactions may still be clinically important for drugs with a steep concentration-response relationship or narrow therapeutic index. In most cases, the extent of drug interaction varies markedly among individuals; this is likely to be dependent on interindividual differences in CYP3A4 tissue content, pre-existing medical conditions and, possibly, age. Interactions may occur under single dose conditions or only at steady state. The pharmacodynamic consequences may or may not closely follow pharmacokinetic changes. Drug interactions may be most apparent when patients are stabilised on the affected drug and the CYP3A4 inhibitor is then added to the regimen. Temporal relationships between the administration of the drug and CYP3A4 inhibitor may be important in determining the extent of the interaction.

Drug interactions with itraconazole, fluconazole, and terbinafine and their management

A drug interaction develops when the effect of a drug is increased or decreased or when a new effect is produced by the prior, concurrent, or subsequent administration of the other. Before prescribing a drug, it is important to obtain a thorough drug history of the prescription and nonprescription medications taken by the patient. The nonprescription medications may include items such as nutritional supplements and herbal medications. The risk of side effects is an inevitable consequence of drug use. The frequency of adverse reactions is increased in those patients receiving multiple medications. Drug interactions reported in animal or in vitro studies may not necessarily develop in humans. When drug interactions are observed with a particular agent, it cannot be automatically assumed that all closely related drugs will necessarily produce the same interaction. However, caution is advised until sufficient experience accrues. The prescriber should not overestimate or underestimate the potential for a given drug interaction on the basis of personal experience alone. Drug interactions will not necessarily occur in every patient who is given a particular combination of drugs known to produce an interaction. For a clinically significant drug interaction to be manifest, several other factors may be relevant other than just using the two drugs. In many instances drug interactions can be predicted and therefore avoided if the pharmacodynamic effects, the pharmacokinetic properties, and the mechanisms of action of the 2 drugs in question are known. In the case of contraindicated drugs, it may be possible to use an alternative agent.

Itraconazole decreases the clearance and enhances the effects of intravenously administered methylprednisolone in healthy volunteers

A possible interaction of itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, with intravenously administered methylprednisolone, was examined. In this double-blind, randomized, two-phase cross-over study, 9 healthy volunteers received either 200 mg itraconazole or matched placebo orally once a day for 4 days. On day 4, a dose of 16 mg methylprednisolone as sodium succinate was administered intravenously. Plasma concentrations of methylprednisolone, cortisol, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole were determined up to 24 hr. Itraconazole increased the total area under the plasma methylprednisolone concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity) 2.6-fold) (P<0.001), while the AUC (12-24) of methylprednisolone was increased 12.2-fold (P<0.001). The systemic clearance of methylprednisolone during the itraconazole phase was 40% of that during the placebo phase (P<0.01). The volume of distribution of methylprednisolone was not affected by itraconazole. The mean elimination half-life of methylprednisolone was increased from 2.1+/-0.3 hr to 4.8+/-0.8 hr (P<0.001) by itraconazole. The mean morning plasma cortisol concentration during the itraconazole phase, measured 24 hr after the administration of methylprednisolone, was only about 9% of that during the placebo phase (11.0+/-9.0 ng/ml versus 117+/-49.2 ng/ml; P<0.001). In conclusion, itraconazole decreases the clearance and increases the elimination half-life of intravenously administered methylprednisolone, resulting in greatly increased exposure to methylprednisolone during the night time and in enhanced adrenal suppression. Care should be taken when itraconazole or other potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 are used concomitantly with methylprednisolone.

The metabolism of antihistamines and drug interactions: the role of cytochrome P450 enzymes

The non-sedating antihistamines show a diversity of fates in the body and the parent drugs and metabolites may differ in their biological properties. Clinically significant interactions with inhibitors of cytochrome P450 have been reported primarily for terfenadine, which has the potential for cardiac toxicity, and is metabolized to fexofenadine, an antihistamine without cardiac effects. Astemizole shares many of these characteristics and important safety-related interactions are likely. Loratadine undergoes extensive metabolism so that pharmacokinetic interactions could occur, but they would be of little clinical importance because of the lack of cardiac activity of the parent drug and its metabolites. Ebastine also undergoes pharmacokinetic interactions, the significance of which is dependent on clarification of the extent of any relevant cardiotoxicity of both ebastine and its metabolite. Interactions would not be clinically important for cetirizine and fexofenadine which do not show cardiac effects and are eliminated with little metabolism.

Drug interactions and anti-infective therapies

Drug interactions are an important and often underappreciated cause of adverse clinical outcomes. This review considers the mechanisms for several clinically important drug interactions that involve the major classes of anti-infective agents. This approach is intended to complement the use of text-based references and computer databases so that physicians and pharmacists can avoid prescribing and dispensing drugs that have adverse interactions.

Optimisation of itraconazole therapy using target drug concentrations

Itraconazole is a new triazole compound with a broad spectrum of activity against a number of fungal pathogens, including Aspergillus species. The drug is being used increasingly as prophylaxis in patients with immunodepression. Itraconazole is highly lipophilic and only ionised at low pH. The absolute availability of capsules in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions is about 55% and is increased after a meal. Itraconazole is 99.8% bound to human plasma proteins and its apparent volume of distribution is about 11 L/kg. The drug is extensively metabolised by the liver. Among the metabolites, hydroxy-itraconazole is of particular interest because its antifungal activity measured in vitro is similar to that of the parent drug and its plasma concentration is 2 to 3 times higher than that of itraconazole. Mean total itraconazole blood clearance determined in healthy volunteers following a single intravenous infusion was 39.6 L/h. After a single oral dose, the terminal elimination half-life of itraconazole is about 24 hours. The drug exhibits a dose-dependent pharmacokinetic behaviour. Renal failure does not affect the pharmacokinetic properties of itraconazole; however, little is known about the effects of hepatic insufficiency. In immunocompromised patients the absorption of itraconazole is affected by gastrointestinal disorders caused by diseases and cytotoxic chemotherapy. The pharmacokinetics of itraconazole may be significantly altered when the drug is coadministered with certain other agents. Itraconazole is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and, thus, can also considerably change the pharmacokinetics of other drugs. Such changes may have clinically relevant consequences. Itraconazole appears to be well tolerated. Gastrointestinal disturbances and dizziness are the most frequently reported adverse effects. Clinical studies in patients with haemotological malignancies suggest that plasma concentrations [measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)] > or = 250 micrograms/L itraconazole, or 750 to 1000 micrograms/L for itraconazole plus hydroxy-itraconazole, are required for effective prophylactic antifungal activity. It seems that a curative effect may be enhanced by ensuring that itraconazole plasma concentrations exceed 500 micrograms/L. The marked intra- and inter-patient variability in the pharmacokinetics of the drug, and the fact that it is impossible to predict steady-state plasma concentrations from the initial dosage are major factors obscuring any clear relationship between dose and plasma concentrations and clinical efficacy. Thus, in patients with life-threatening fungal infections treated with itraconazole drug, plasma concentrations should be regularly monitored to ensure sufficient drug exposure for antifungal activity.

Plasma concentrations and effects of oral methylprednisolone are considerably increased by itraconazole

BACKGROUND

Methylprednisolone is a widely used glucocorticoid. In this study, a possible interaction of itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, with orally administered methylprednisolone was examined.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, 2-phase crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once a day for 4 days. On day 4, each subject ingested a dose of 16 mg methylprednisolone. Plasma concentrations of methylprednisolone, cortisol, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole were determined by HPLC up to 24 hours.

RESULTS

Itraconazole increased the total area under the plasma methylprednisolone concentration-time curve 3.9-fold compared with placebo (1968 +/- 470 ng.hr/mL versus 520 +/- 125 ng.hr/mL [mean +/- SD]; P < .001). The peak plasma concentration of methylprednisolone was increased 1.9-fold (221 +/- 49 ng/mL versus 118 +/- 25 ng/mL; P < .001), and its elimination half-life was increased 2.4-fold (4.4 +/- 0.7 hours versus 1.9 +/- 0.3 hours; P < .001) by itraconazole. The mean plasma cortisol concentration during the itraconazole phase, measured 24 hours after ingestion of methylprednisolone, was only about 13% of that during the placebo phase (18 +/- 23 ng/mL versus 139 +/- 60 ng/mL; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole considerably increases plasma concentrations and effects of oral methylprednisolone, probably by inhibiting its CYP3A4-mediated metabolism. Care should be taken if itraconazole or other potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 are used concomitantly with oral methylprednisolone, particularly during long-term use.

Update on drug interactions with azole antifungal agents

OBJECTIVE

To review and update the incidence, mechanism, and clinical relevance of drug interactions with itraconazole, ketoconazole, and fluconazole.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified by MEDLINE search (from January 1990 to May 1997) using the name of each antifungal and the term "interaction" as MeSH headings. Abstracts were identified by literature citation and by review of Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy from 1995 to 1996.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled, double-blind studies were emphasized; however, uncontrolled studies and case reports were also included. In vitro data were selected from literature review and citations.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were evaluated with respect to study design, clinical relevance, magnitude of interaction, and recommendations provided.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The incidence of fungal infections and consequent azole antifungal usage continues to increase. By virtue of their antifungal mechanism (i.e., inhibition of cytochrome P450 fungal enzyme systems), azoles have been investigated and implicated in several drug interactions. The magnitude of interactions can vary from trivial to potentially fatal, and also vary with specific azole and interactant.

CONCLUSIONS

The azole antifungal agents represent a commonly used class of agents with a broad range of potential interactions. Recent data have increased our understanding of drug--drug interactions with azoles. Pharmacists are in a unique position to identify these interactions and to intervene to decrease their morbidity and improve patient care.

Itraconazole decreases renal clearance of digoxin

Itraconazole strongly interacts with some drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4, for example, felodipine and lovastatin, by inhibiting their metabolism. A concomitant use of itraconazole increases the serum concentrations of digoxin, although digoxin is excreted mainly unchanged in urine. To reveal the mechanism of the itraconazole-digoxin interaction, the effect of itraconazole on the serum concentrations and urinary excretion of digoxin was studied. Ten healthy volunteers in a double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover study received either 200 mg itraconazole or placebo orally once a day for 5 days. On day 3, each volunteer ingested a single 0.5-mg oral dose of digoxin. The serum concentrations of digoxin and its excretion into urine as well as plasma concentrations of itraconazole were determined up to 72 hours after dosing. The mean area under the serum digoxin concentration-time curve, AUC(0-72), was approximately 50% higher (P < 0.001) during the itraconazole phase than during the placebo phase. In addition, the renal clearance of digoxin decreased about 20% (P < 0.01) by itraconazole. The increases in digoxin Cmax and T(1/2) by itraconazole were not statistically significant. The decreased renal clearance of digoxin during the itraconazole phase partially explains increased concentrations of digoxin during their concomitant use and may be caused by the inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated digoxin secretion in the renal tubular cells.

Itraconazole increases plasma concentrations of quinidine

BACKGROUND

Quinidine is eliminated mainly by CYP3A4-mediated metabolism. Itraconazole interacts with some but not all of the substrates of CYP3A4; it is therefore important to study the possible interaction of itraconazole with quinidine.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover study design was used with nine healthy volunteers. Itraconazole (200 mg) or placebo was ingested once a day for 4 days. A single 100 mg oral dose of quinidine sulfate was ingested on day 4. Plasma concentrations of quinidine, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole, as well as cumulative excretion of quinidine into urine, were determined up to 24 hours. The ECG, heart rate, and blood pressure were also recorded up to 24 hours.

RESULTS

On average the peak plasma concentration of quinidine increased to 1.6-fold (p < 0.05), and the area under the concentration-time curve of quinidine increased to 2.4-fold (p < 0.01) by itraconazole. The elimination half-life of quinidine was prolonged 1.6-fold (p < 0.001), and the area under the 3-hydroxyquinidine/quinidine ratio-time curve decreased to one-fifth (p < 0.001) by itraconazole. The renal clearance of quinidine decreased 50% (p < 0.001) by itraconazole, whereas the creatinine clearance was unaffected. The QTc interval correlated with the concentrations of quinidine during both itraconazole and placebo phases (r2 = 0.71 and r2 = 0.79, respectively; p < 0.01), although only minor changes between the phases were observed in other pharmacodynamic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole increases plasma concentrations of oral quinidine, probably by inhibiting the CYP3A4 isozyme during the first-pass and elimination phases of quinidine. The decreased renal clearance of quinidine might be the result of the inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated tubular secretion of quinidine by itraconazole. The concentrations of quinidine should be closely monitored if itraconazole or some other potent CYP3A inhibitors are used with quinidine.