Safe liver resection following chemotherapy for colorectal metastases is a matter of timing

Noninvasive diagnosis of chemotherapy induced liver injury by LiMAx test--two case reports and a review of the literature

Background

Chemotherapy-induced liver injury is a well-known phenomenon after neoadjuvant therapy of liver metastasis and contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Still there is no suitable test available to reliably determine functional impairment and hepatic regeneration after chemotherapy.

Case presentation

We report two cases of caucasian patients who underwent repeated liver function assessments using LiMAx (maximum liver function capacity), Indocyanine plasma disappearance rate and biochemical liver function parameters in the course of adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Both patients yielded a decrease from their initial liver function determined by LiMAx. Liver regeneration assessed functional recovery within 4 weeks in case of mild functional impairment after cessation of chemotherapy or within 8 weeks in case of major functional deterioration. Indocyanine plasma disappearance rate and biochemical parameters remained stable or without a clear trend in case of minor functional impairment. This is the first report using a dynamic liver function test to evaluate the impact and recovery from chemotherapy associated liver injury.

Conclusions

The LiMAx test might be a sensitive tool to diagnose mild functional impairment after chemotherapy when standard liver function tests have remained within normal ranges and might be capable to assess the course of regeneration after chemotherapy. This could be useful to optimize individual chemotherapy-free interval before liver surgery can be carried out safely.

Fatty acid synthase-positive hepatocytes and subsequent steatosis in rat livers by irinotecan

Using a rat model, we investigated factors contributing to the pathogenesis of irinotecan-associated fatty liver disease. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered 200 mg/kg irinotecan by intraperitoneal injection on days 1–4, but not on days 5–7. This schedule was repeated 3 times. Rats were sacrificed 4, 18 and 25 days after the last injection, and liver steatosis was evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, microarray analysis and immunohistochemistry. Panacinar intrahepatocyte vacuoles were absent on days 4 and 25, but present on day 18, and this alteration was more prominent around the bile ducts than the central veins. Microarray analysis showed that the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of cholesterol and fatty acids was upregulated on day 4. Immunohistochemistry detected fatty acid synthase (Fasn)-strongly positive hepatocytes as well as the activation of liver progenitor cells on day 4, whereas intracellular vacuoles were evident in carbonic anhydrase 3 (CA3)-positive hepatocytes on day 18. Thus, irinotecan-induced liver steatosis was preceded by Fasn-strongly-positive hepatocytes and liver progenitor cell activation. The magnitude of the decrease in the number of Fasn-strongly positive hepatocytes between days 4 and 18 was similar to that of the increase in the number of CA3-positive hepatocytes accompanying vacuoles.

Unresolved issues and controversies surrounding the management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Ideally, tumors that might cause morbidity and mortality should be treated, preferably early, with proven, convincing, and effective therapy to prevent tumor progression or recurrence, while maintaining a favorable risk-benefit profile for the individual patient. For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), this diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic precision is currently impossible. Despite significant improvements in diagnostic procedures, a sizable number of patients with CRC have liver metastases either at presentation or will subsequently develop it. And in many parts of the world, most cancer-related deaths are still due to metastases that are resistant to conventional therapy. Metastases to the liver occur in more than 50% of patients with CRC and represent the major determinant of outcome following curative treatment of the primary tumor. Liver resection offers the best chance of cure for metastases confined to the liver. However, due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials, its timing is controversial and a hotly debated topic. This article reviews some of the main controversies surrounding the surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).

Tumour biology of colorectal liver metastasis is a more important factor in survival than surgical margin clearance in the era of modern chemotherapy regimens

BACKGROUND

The aim of the authors was to reassess the impact of a positive surgical margin (R1) after a liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) on survival in the era of modern chemotherapy, through their own experience and a literature review.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: R1 or R0 resection with no local treatment modalities, extra-hepatic metastases or other cancer.

RESULTS

Among 337 patients operated between 2000 and 2010, 273 patients were eligible (214 R0/59 R1). The mean follow-up was 43 ± 29 months. Compared with a R0 resection, a R1 resection offered a lower 5-year overall (39.1% versus 54.2%, P = 0.010), disease-free (15.2% versus 31.1%, P = 0.021) and progression-free (i.e. time to the first non-curable recurrence; 33.1% versus 47.3%, P = 0.033) survival rates. Metastases in the R1 group were more numerous, larger and more frequently synchronous. Independent factors of poor survival were: number, size and short-time interval of CLM occurrence, N status, rectal primary, absence of adjuvant chemotherapy, but not a R1 resection. With the more-systematic administration of chemotherapy since 2005, the intergroup difference in progression-free survival disappeared (P = 0.264).

CONCLUSION

A R1 resection had no prognostic value per se but reflected a more severe disease. The recent change in the prognostic value of a R1 resection may be linked to the beneficial effect of chemotherapy.

Anesthesia for hepatobiliary surgery

Hepatobiliary surgery outcomes have significantly improved since the early 1970s. Surgical and anesthetic advances related to patient selection, alternative surgical management options, and reduction of operative blood loss have been important. Postoperative analgesic regimens are being modified to include intrathecal opiates and to embrace enhanced recovery regimens.

Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis: the New EPOC randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Surgery for colorectal liver metastases results in an overall survival of about 40% at 5 years. Progression-free survival is increased with the addition of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy. The addition of cetuximab to these chemotherapy regimens results in an overall survival advantage in patients with advanced disease who have the KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumour genotype. We aimed to assess the benefit of addition of cetuximab to standard chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis.

METHODS

Patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type resectable or suboptimally resectable colorectal liver metastases were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive chemotherapy with or without cetuximab before and after liver resection. Randomisation was done using minimisation with factors of surgical centre, poor prognostic tumour (one or more of: ≥ 4 metastases, N2 disease, or poor differentiation of primary tumour), and previous adjuvant treatment with oxaliplatin. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) intravenously over 2 h and fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m(2) intravenously over 5 min, followed by a 46 h infusion of fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2) repeated every 2 weeks (regimen one) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) intravenously over 2 h and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 repeated every 3 weeks (regimen two). Patients who had received adjuvant oxaliplatin could receive irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 min with fluorouracil instead of oxaliplatin (regimen three). Cetuximab was given as an intravenous dose of 500 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks with regimen one and three or a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by a weekly infusion of 250 mg/m(2) with regimen two. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. This is an interim analysis, up to Nov 1, 2012, when the trial was closed, having met protocol-defined futility criteria. This trial is registered, ISRCTN22944367.

FINDINGS

128 KRAS exon 2 wild-type patients were randomised to chemotherapy alone and 129 to chemotherapy with cetuximab between Feb 26, 2007, and Nov 1, 2012. 117 patients in the chemotherapy alone group and 119 in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group were included in the primary analysis. The median follow-up was 21.1 months (95% CI 12.6-33.8) in the chemotherapy alone group and 19.8 months (12.2-28.7) in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group. With an overall median follow-up of 20.7 months (95% CI 17.9-25.6) and 123 (58%) of 212 required events observed, progression-free survival was significantly shorter in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group than in the chemotherapy alone group (14.1 months [95% CI 11.8-15.9] vs 20.5 months [95% CI 16.8-26.7], hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.04-2.12, p=0.030). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were low neutrophil count (15 [11%] preoperatively in the chemotherapy alone group vs six [4%] in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group; four [4%] vs eight [8%] postoperatively), embolic events (six [4%] vs eight [6%] preoperatively; two [2%] vs three [3%] postoperatively), peripheral neuropathy (six [4%] vs one [1%] preoperatively; two [2%] vs four [4%] postoperatively), nausea or vomiting (four [3%] vs six [4%] preoperatively; four [4%] vs two [2%] postoperatively), and skin rash (two [1%] vs 21 [15%] preoperatively; 0 vs eight [8%] postoperatively). There were three deaths in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group (one interstitial lung disease and pulmonary embolism, one bronchopneumonia, and one pulmonary embolism) and one in the chemotherapy alone group (heart failure) that might have been treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy and surgery for operable colorectal liver metastases in KRAS exon 2 wild-type patients results in shorter progression-free survival. Translational investigations to explore the molecular basis for this unexpected interaction are needed but at present the use of cetuximab in this setting cannot be recommended.

Current management of colorectal liver metastases

SUMMARY 

Colorectal cancer is common worldwide and is predicted to become more so in the coming years. The liver is the most common site of metastasis and management is increasingly complex. A multidisciplinary team approach to management is essential, and is associated with better outcomes. Patients with irresectable liver metastases can still benefit from the involvement of a liver specialist, as high secondary resection rates can be achieved with combination chemotherapy, incorporating novel biological therapies and liver-directed local and locoregional treatments. The application of an enhanced recovery model to perioperative care, alongside improvements in the assessment of patient fitness for surgery, should help to mitigate the challenges presented by an older population with increased comorbidity undergoing increasingly complex treatment.

Conversion chemotherapy followed by hepatic resection in colorectal cancer with initially unresectable liver-limited metastases

The best management choice in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver-only metastases should be represented by conversion chemotherapy aiming to reduce liver cancer deposits, thereby permitting curative surgery. Forty-eight consecutive stage IV colorectal cancer patients were treated with different chemotherapeutic regimens including biological drugs. Objective responses to chemotherapy were seen in 27 patients (56.2%; 95% CI 42.1-70.2%). Four patients (8.3%) showed complete response, 23 patients (47.9%) partial and 13 patients (27.1%) stable response. Eight patients (16.7%) progressed. The conversion rate was 35.4% (95% CI 21.8-48.9%) with 17 patients suitable for liver resection. Four complete responder patients refused surgery. The remaining 13 patients underwent curative hepatic resection (resection rate 27.1%; 95% CI 14.5-39.6%). The likelihood of a successful conversion chemotherapy appeared significantly related to the best response and to the K-Ras status. Wild-type K-Ras patients undergoing cetuximab therapy showed the best conversion rate. The four-year survival rate was significantly enhanced in converted compared to non-converted patients (57.1 and 0%, respectively), and in resected compared to non-resected patients (53.3 and 10.1%, respectively). Synchronous metastases and no conversion were shown to be the only covariates independently associated with a poorer long-term outcome. The possibility of curative liver surgery significantly prolongs outcome for colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver-limited metastases. Prospective randomized trials are required to define the conversion rates with biological drugs.

Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy effects on liver parenchyma in resected pediatric malignancies

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases in adults is responsible for chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI), characterized by steatosis, steatohepatitis, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. These alterations cause delayed operation to reduce the risk of hemorrhage, portal hypertension, and hepatic failure. Children with hepatic malignancies usually receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively whether the CALI occurs in this pediatric population. This study evaluated patients referred since 1996 for hepatic malignancies who received hepatectomy after chemotherapy. Liver resection material was reviewed, in order to investigate the presence of morphological changes compatible with the CALI in the peritumoral hepatic tissue. Twelve patients were recruited. All patients satisfied the inclusion criteria except one who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eleven children underwent surgery 1 month after the last chemotherapy cycle. All are alive disease-free. Histological examination of specimen revealed only mild changes such as diffuse swelling of hepatocytes and focal, mild portal inflammation. Severe hepatic changes such as steatosis, necrosis, or fibrosis were not identified. CALI-related morphological changes were not found in our patients. The absence of the CALI could be attributed to the younger age of patients (possible different response to stress) and/or to the different chemotherapy schedules compared to those in use for adults patients.

Limiting factors for liver regeneration after a major hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy before resection of colorectal metastases in the liver is extensively used and has been shown to induce histopathological changes in the liver parenchyma, although little is known about the effect of chemotherapy on liver regeneration. The aim of this study was to determine if pre-operative chemotherapy influences the regenerated liver volume after a major liver resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 74 patients subjected to a major liver resection for colorectal metastases. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they had been treated with chemotherapy less than 3 months before surgery or not. Liver volumes were measured before and 1 year after resection.

RESULTS

Pre-operative chemotherapy reduced volumetric liver regeneration (83 ± 2% versus 91 ± 2%; P = 0.007) as compared with patients without chemotherapy. There was a linear correlation between regenerated volume and time interval between the end of chemotherapy to resection (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases negatively affects volume regeneration after a partial hepatectomy. The time interval between chemotherapy and surgery determines the impact of these affects.

Liver injury induced by anticancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy

Cytotoxic chemotherapy prolongs survival of patients with advanced and metastatic tumors. This is, however, a double-edged sword with many adverse effects. Since the liver has a rich blood supply and plays an active role in the metabolism of medications, it is not surprising that there can be hepatic injury related to chemotherapy. In addition, radioembolization may affect the parenchyma of normal and cirrhotic livers. We review chemotherapy-associated liver injury in patients with colorectal liver metastases, including downsizing chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We discuss the mechanism of the hepatic injury, secondary to reactive oxygen species, and the spectrum of hepatic injury including, steatosis, steatohepatitis, hepatic sinusoidal injury and highlight the pharmacogenomics of such liver insults. Methods for reducing and treating the hepatotoxicity are discussed for specific agents including tamxifen and the newly introduced targeted antibodies.

What is the optimal neo-adjuvant treatment for liver metastasis?

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the Western population and has a 5-year overall survival of 5-10% when metastatic. Approximately 30% of the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have limited disease apparently isolated to the liver and, if this can be resected, the 5-year overall survival is improved to 30-60%. Therefore, it is important to identify patients who have both resectable disease and those with initially unresectable tumors who can potentially be downsized with chemotherapy to allow resection. First-line doublet chemotherapy regimens lead to response rates of 50-60%, triplet chemotherapy regimens may result in a response rate of up to 70%, and biological agents may add to responses or induce morphologic changes that facilitate disease resection. Surgical advances in recent years have also increased resectability rates and have challenged prior rules of resectability. Local therapies including ablation and radiation, often performed in conjunction with resection, may further aid in control of disease. The aim of this article is to focus on the role of neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on postoperative liver regeneration following hepatic resection as estimated by liver volume

Background

In order to analyze postoperative liver regeneration following hepatic resection after chemotherapy, we retrospectively investigated the differences in liver regeneration by comparing changes of residual liver volume in three groups: a living liver donor group and two groups of patients with colorectal liver metastases who did and did not undergo preoperative chemotherapy.

Methods

This study included 32 patients who had at least segmental anatomical hepatic resection. Residual liver volume, early postoperative liver volume, and late postoperative liver volume were calculated to study the changes over time. From the histopathological analysis of chemotherapy-induced liver disorders, the effect on liver regeneration according to the histopathology of noncancerous liver tissue was also compared between the two colorectal cancer groups using Kleiner’s score for steatohepatitis grading {Hepatology, 41(6):1313–1321, 2005} and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) grading for sinusoidal obstructions {Ann Oncol, 15(3):460–466, 2004}.

Results

Assuming a preoperative liver volume of 100%, mean late postoperative liver volumes in the three groups (the living liver donor group and the colorectal cancer groups with or without chemotherapy) were 91.1%, 80.8%, and 81.3%, respectively, with about the same rate of liver regeneration among the three groups. Histopathological analysis revealed no correlation between either the Kleiner’s scores or the SOS grading and liver regeneration.

Conclusions

As estimated by liver volume, the level of liver regeneration was the same in normal livers, tumor-bearing livers, and post-chemotherapy tumor-bearing livers. Liver regeneration was not adversely affected by the extent to which steatosis or sinusoidal dilatation was induced in noncancerous tissue by chemotherapy in patients scheduled for surgery.

Systemic cytotoxic and biological therapies of colorectal liver metastases: expert consensus statement

Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has undergone significant development in the past 15 years. Therapy regimens consisting of combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated greater efficacy and contributed to a significant survival improvement. As the majority of patients who undergo resection for liver-only CRLM are at risk of disease recurrence and cancer-related death, combining resection with systemic therapy appears sensible. However, trial-based evidence is sparse to support this concept. Peri-operative FOLFOX has demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit in a single Phase III trial; the safety of chemotherapy and subsequent operations was acceptable and only a few patients showed initial progression. Chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI), including sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and steatohepatitis, has been observed after cytotoxic therapy, and should have implications for chemotherapy plans prior to hepatectomy. In general, pre-operative chemotherapy should not extend beyond 3 months. For patients with unresectable liver-only CRLM, a response to chemotherapy could establish resectability and should be considered an initial treatment goal. In patients with unresectable CRLM, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing combinations represent the standard options, although single-agent choices may be appropriate for individual patients. The addition of bevacizumab carries the potential for a greater response and possibly for reduced CALI risks. In tumours without K-ras mutations, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents are also reasonable choices for a greater response and improved survival outcomes. It is crucial that all systemic CRLM treatment decisions include proper definitions of treatment goals and endpoints, and are derived based on appropriate multidisciplinary considerations for other potentially applicable local or regional modalities.

Systemic cytotoxic and biological therapies of colorectal liver metastases: expert consensus statement

Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has undergone significant development in the past 15 years. Therapy regimens consisting of combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated greater efficacy and contributed to a significant survival improvement. As the majority of patients who undergo resection for liver-only CRLM are at risk of disease recurrence and cancer-related death, combining resection with systemic therapy appears sensible. However, trial-based evidence is sparse to support this concept. Peri-operative FOLFOX has demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit in a single Phase III trial; the safety of chemotherapy and subsequent operations was acceptable and only a few patients showed initial progression. Chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI), including sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and steatohepatitis, has been observed after cytotoxic therapy, and should have implications for chemotherapy plans prior to hepatectomy. In general, pre-operative chemotherapy should not extend beyond 3 months. For patients with unresectable liver-only CRLM, a response to chemotherapy could establish resectability and should be considered an initial treatment goal. In patients with unresectable CRLM, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing combinations represent the standard options, although single-agent choices may be appropriate for individual patients. The addition of bevacizumab carries the potential for a greater response and possibly for reduced CALI risks. In tumours without K-ras mutations, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents are also reasonable choices for a greater response and improved survival outcomes. It is crucial that all systemic CRLM treatment decisions include proper definitions of treatment goals and endpoints, and are derived based on appropriate multidisciplinary considerations for other potentially applicable local or regional modalities.

Chemotherapy-associated liver injury in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-associated liver injury is a major cause for concern when treating patients with colorectal liver metastases. The aim of this review was to determine the pathological effect of specific chemotherapy regimens on the hepatic parenchyma as well as on surgical morbidity, mortality and overall survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature and a meta-analysis were performed. For each of the variables under consideration, the effects of different chemotherapy regimens were determined by calculation of relative risks by a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Hepatic parenchymal injury is regimen specific, with oxaliplatin-based regimens being associated with grade 2 or greater sinusoidal injury (number needed to harm 8; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 6.4-13.6), whereas irinotecan-based regimens associated with steatohepatitis (number needed to harm 12; 95 % CI 7.8-26). The use of bevacizumab alongside FOLFOX reduces the risk of grade 2 or greater sinusoidal injury (relative risk 0.34; 95 % CI 0.15-0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy before resection of colorectal liver metastases is associated with an increased risk of regimen-specific liver injury. This liver injury may have implications for the functional reserve of the liver for patients undergoing major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Resection of colorectal liver metastases in the elderly: does age matter?

AIM

Despite the incidence of colorectal cancer increasing with age the proportion of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases decreases dramatically in the elderly. Is this referral or selection bias justified?

METHOD

A prospective database of resection for colorectal liver metastases at a single centre was retrospectively analysed to compare the outcome in patients aged ≥75 years (group E) with those aged <75 years (group Y). Data were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method with Cox regression modelling.

RESULTS

Of 1443 resections, 151 (10.5%) in group E were compared with 1292 (89.5%) in group Y. The two groups were matched apart from higher American Society of Anesthesiology scores (P=0.001) and less use of chemotherapy (P=0.01) in the elderly. Perioperative morbidity and 90-day mortality were higher in the elderly compared with the younger group (32.5%vs 21.2%, P=0.02, and 7.3%vs 1.3%, P=0.001). In the last 5 years, mortality in the elderly improved and was no longer significantly different from that of the younger patients [n=2/76 (2.6%) vs n=9/559 (1.6%); P=0.063]. The 5-year survival was similar in groups E and Y for cancer-specific (41.4%vs 41.6%, P=0.917), overall (37.0%vs 38.2%) and median (44.1 months vs 43.6 months, P=0.697) survival respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the elderly liver resection for metastatic disease can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity with as good a prospect of survival as for younger patients.

Right hepatectomy with extra-hepatic vascular division prior to transection: intention-to-treat analysis of a standardized policy

BACKGROUND

Right hepatectomy (RH) is the most common type of major hepatectomy and can be achieved without portal triad clamping (PTC) in non-cirrhotic liver. The present study reviews our standardized policy of performing RH without systematic PTC.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one consecutive RH were performed in non-cirrhotic patients, with division of the right afferent and efferent blood vessels prior to transection, without systematically using PTC. Prospectively collected data were analysed, focusing on the following endpoints: need for salvage PTC, ischaemic time, blood loss and post-operative outcome.

RESULTS

Extra-hepatic division of the right hepatic vessels was feasible in all patients, but was ineffective in 48 patients (26.5%) who required salvage PTC during transection. In those patients, the median ischaemic time was 20 min. The median blood loss was 500 ml (50-3000). Six patients (3.3%) experienced post-operative liver failure. Overall morbidity, severe morbidity and mortality were 42%, 12.1% and 1.6%, respectively, with peri-operative transfusion rate (16.6%) being the only factor associated with morbidity.

DISCUSSION

By performing RH with extra-hepatic vascular division prior to transection, PTC can be safely avoided in the majority of patients.

Combined portal vein embolization and preoperative chemotherapy prior to liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases

OBJECTIVE

Compare perioperative course and long-term mortality after liver resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases between patients who had preoperative treatment with portal vein embolization (PVE) and chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing liver resection for CRC metastases following preoperative chemotherapy treatment, 17 patients who had received preoperative PVE (group A) were compared with 17 matched controls who had no PVE (group B). Perioperative course and long-term mortality were compared between groups A and B and between group A and the entire group of 75 cases with preoperative chemotherapy (group C).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics for the matched groups A and B were similar. Group C included less major resections. Median intraoperative bleeding was 1600 ml in group A, 1200 ml in group B, and 1000 ml in group C (p < 0.05 vs. group A). Median postoperative stay was comparable in all groups (8-9 days). Operation time was 542 min in group A and 464 min in group B (p < 0.01). Mortality after 30 days and 1, 2, and 5 years was similar in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative outcome and long-term survival did not differ when comparing liver resection for CRC liver metastases preceded by PVE and chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, except for the operation time. The study supports the safety of this "aggressive" combination approach in patients in need of tumor "downstaging" by chemotherapy and PVE to increase the remnant liver volume.

Effect of bevacizumab added preoperatively to oxaliplatin on liver injury and complications after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy (CTx) before resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may cause hepatic injury and postoperative complications. To ascertain whether adding bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, to oxaliplatin-based CTx has an influence on liver injury and postoperative complications.

METHODS

Patients with CRLM who received neoadjuvant CTx and underwent resection between 2003 and 2008 were analyzed whether or not they received bevacizumab added to oxaliplatin-based CTx.

RESULTS

The total study group existed of 104 patients: 53 patients received oxaliplatin-based CTx and 51 patients received oxaliplatin-based CTx and bevacizumab. The overall complication rate (29%) was not significantly different between the two groups. The bevacizumab group exhibited less moderate sinusoidal dilatation (8% vs. 28%, P = 0.01). No difference in complication rate was found between patients given fewer than six cycles of oxaliplatin-based CTx and those given six or more cycles, or between patients with a short (<5 weeks) interval between the last dose of oxaliplatin and resection and those in which the interval was longer.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab added to oxaliplatin-based CTx may protect against moderate sinusoidal dilatation without significantly influencing morbidity. Neither duration of oxaliplatin-based CTx nor the time interval between cessation of oxaliplatin-based CTx and surgery were associated with postoperative complications.

What is a safe future liver remnant size in patients undergoing major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases and treated by intensive preoperative chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

A multidisciplinary approach involving preoperative chemotherapy has become common practice in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The definition of a safe future liver remnant (FLR) volume based on preoperative clinical data in these patients is lacking. Our aim was to identify predictors of postoperative morbidities in patients undergoing major hepatectomy after intensive preoperative chemotherapy for CLM.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and August 2010, a total of 101 consecutive patients with CLM underwent major hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy (≥6 cycles of oxaliplatin or irinotecan regimen with or without targeted therapies). The FLR ratio was calculated by two formulas: actual FLR (aFLR) ratio, and standardized FLR (sFLR) ratio. Predictors of postoperative overall morbidity, sepsis, and liver failure were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (57.4%) had 95 postoperative complications. Sepsis and postoperative liver failure occurred in 23 (22.8%) and 16 patients (15.8%), respectively. On univariate analysis, small aFLR ratio was significantly associated with all complications, and sFLR ratio was associated with sepsis and liver failure. In receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff of aFLR ratio in predicting overall morbidity, sepsis, and liver failure was 44.8, 43.1, and 37.7%, respectively, and that of sFLR ratio in predicting sepsis and liver failure was 43.6 and 48.5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, these aFLR and sFLR ratio cutoffs were independent predictors of all complications and of sepsis and liver failure, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a cutoff FLR ratio for safe postoperative outcome after major hepatectomy in CLM patients receiving six or more cycles of preoperative chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery for colorectal liver metastases

Liver resection is associated with prolonged survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. At diagnosis, 15-20% of patients have resectable colorectal liver metastases whereas other patients have too advanced disease to enable surgical treatment and receive chemotherapy. In patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases, disease relapse occurs in up to 70%. Therefore, a combined approach including preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy or both has been tested to improve outcome after surgery. In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, chemotherapy is initially the sole treatment option. The considerable improvement of the efficacy of anticancer agents has contributed to increase the response rate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. In case of major response to chemotherapy, surgery with curative intent can be offered to patients with initially unresectable liver metastases.

The value of pre-operative magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the assessment of steatohepatitis in patients with colorectal liver metastasis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to liver surgery for colorectal metastases can cause marked steatosis (≥ 33%) and steatohepatitis defined by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) as adverse effects on liver parenchyma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the steatosis level prior to liver resection using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) and to compare it with digital quantification of steatosis (DQS) and "classical" histopathology.

METHODS

(1)H MRS at 3T evaluated steatosis in 35 patients with colorectal liver metastasis, planned for liver resection. Non-tumorous liver parenchyma samples were obtained after surgery for classical histopathology and DQS utilising automated software for quantification of histopathological slides using image processing.

RESULTS

Classical histopathology defined marked steatosis in nine patients. Histopathology was less reliable than DQS (interclass correlation coefficient - ICC 0.771) or (1)H MRS (ICC 0.722) in steatosis estimation. (1)H MRS showed very similar steatosis levels and high reliability compared to DQS (ICC 0.955). Steatohepatitis was observed in seven patients (NAS ≥ 4) and (1)H MRS was able to predict it with 100% sensitivity and 89% specificity at threshold 10.9%, without knowing lobular inflammation or hepatocyte ballooning. BMI was significantly higher in the groups with marked steatosis and steatohepatitis. Standard blood tests or chemotherapy had no predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

(1)H MRS is a reliable non-invasive tool for steatosis assessment, and interestingly, it was able to predict steatohepatitis defined by NAS ≥ 4 in patients planned for liver resection of colorectal metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Bevacizumab-associated fistula formation in postoperative colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) routinely include bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). We have identified a correlation between bevacizumab and fistula formation after resection of advanced CRC.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing treatment with bevacizumab for metastatic CRC after 2005 were identified and reviewed. Of 222 consecutive patients, 9 patients treated with bevacizumab subsequently developed fistulas. These patients' charts were reviewed with attention to diagnosis, timing of operation relative to bevacizumab therapy, location of fistula, and fistula treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 9 identified patients (9 of 222, 4.1%), 6 had rectal cancer, 2 had colon cancer, and 1 had synchronous CRC. Fistulas were most commonly anal or perineal (6 of 9, 66.7%) and colovesicular (3 of 9, 33%). On average, bevacizumab was initiated 23.6 months after the initial operation; complications occurred 3.9 months after starting bevacizumab. Nearly uniformly, cessation of bevacizumab led to fistula healing; however, 3 patients (33%) required fecal diversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab is the most common antiangiogenesis agent used for treatment of metastatic CRC. Previous adverse events associated with bevacizumab treatment include venous thromboembolism, poor wound healing, and spontaneous bowel perforation. In this report, late postoperative development of fistulas occurred relatively soon after initiation of bevacizumab and usually spontaneously resolved with cessation of bevacizumab treatment. Based on the timing of fistula development relative to operation and initiation of bevacizumab, fistulas are likely secondary to bevacizumab therapy rather than postsurgical complications. Bevacizumab-induced fistulas occur in a small, but significant proportion of CRC patients and must be recognized early.

Multidisciplinary approach of colorectal liver metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in Spain. Fifty percent of patients will develop colorectal liver metastases (CLM) during the course of the disease. Less than 20% of patients with CLM are initially resectable and for them 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) is about 20-25%, with a high recurrence rate. CLM is a heterogeneous disease. From a clinical point of view, four main groups can be differentiated: initially resectable, not optimally resectable, unresectable that could be resectable and unresectable that never will be likely to be resected. Treatment of CLM must be established, always, in a multidisciplinary team discussion with an analysis of prognostic factors and resectability. For patients with resectable CLM, the EORTC trial 364 demonstrated that chemotherapy plus surgery is better than surgery alone. Consequently most patients should be treated with perioperative chemotherapy based on oxaliplatin, and if resection has been done without chemotherapy, they should receive adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection. Based on oncological factors, the 5-year survival rate after resection of CLM ranges from 60% to only 14% with a poor score. If a patient has more than one of the poor prognostic factors he should probably be referred for preoperative (induction) chemotherapy. Only a minority of patients with CLM are amenable to surgery; therefore, efforts have been made to increase the percentage of patients who could be candidates for resection. Studies, mostly retrospective, have confirmed the ability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (conversion chemotherapy) to render some metastases resectable. The regimens we must use depend on the KRAS mutational status and the toxicity profiles of drugs in the context of each patient. In k-ras mutated tumours we can use bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy or concomitant administration of the three active agents (FOLFOXIRI) in suitable patients. In k-ras wild-type patients, the combination of cetuximab and FOLFIRI-FOLFOX improved response rates and resection rate in phase III-II trials. With a lower level of evidence, panitumumab is an alternative combined with FOLFOX. Bevacizumab is also an alternative as it does not depend on KRAS status. Radiotherapy is becoming an alternative in selected patients, where surgery is not an alternative. For the majority of patients, who will never be resectable, the continuum of care with chemotherapy will be the paradigm for their management.

Curative strategies for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a review

Colorectal cancer is a very common malignancy and frequently manifests with liver metastases, often without other systemic disease. Margin-negative (R0) resection of limited metastatic disease, in conjunction with systemic antineoplastic agents, is the primary treatment strategy, leading to long survival times for appropriately selected patients. There is debate over whether the primary tumor and secondaries should be removed at the same time or in a staged manner. Chemotherapy is effective in converting some unresectable liver metastases into resectable disease, with a correspondingly better survival outcome. However, the ideal chemotherapy with or without biological agents and when it should be administered in the course of treatment are uncertain. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially resectable liver metastases is controversial. Local delivery of chemotherapy, with and without surgery, can lead to longer disease-free survival times, but it is not routinely used with curative intent. This review focuses on methods to maximize the disease-free survival interval using chemotherapy, surgery, and local methods.

Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the intraoperative and postoperative course of liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is a possibly curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. Preoperative chemotherapy may make initially irresectable tumors resectable. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative course and short-term mortality after liver resection for CRC metastases between patients who were and were not treated with preoperative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone liver resection for CRC metastases were included. A total of 97 patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy (group A) were compared with 136 who were not (group B). Intraoperative bleeding, operating time, complications, duration of stay, and mortality were compared using Pearson's χ(2) test, Fisher's exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

Mean intraoperative bleeding, duration of stay, and operating time were not significantly different. Complications occurred in 62.9% and 63.2% in groups A and B, respectively. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were zero in group A, comparable to 1.5% in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in the perioperative course or postoperative mortality when comparing CRC patients with or without chemotherapy prior to liver resection. Consequently, this study suggests that preoperative chemotherapy before liver resection for CRC metastases does not negatively influence perioperative outcome and can therefore be applied if "downstaging" is indicated.

Safety of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases in the era of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The relationship between neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to hepatectomy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases and post-operative morbidity still has to be clarified.

METHODS

Data from 242 patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases, judged resectable at first observation, were reviewed and their clinical outcome was related to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (125 patients). Selection biases were outlined and properly handled by means of propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

Post-operative death was 1.2% and morbidity 40.9%. Pre-operative chemotherapy was only apparently related to higher morbidity (P = 0.021): multivariate analysis identified extension of hepatectomy and intra-operative blood loss as independent prognostic variables (P < 0.05). Patients receiving and not receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly different for several covariates, including extension of hepatectomy (P = 0.049). After propensity score adjustment, 94 patients were identified as having similar covariate distribution (standardized differences <|0.1|) except for neo-adjuvant treatment (47 patients for each group). In this matched sample, mortality was similar and post-operative complications were only slightly higher (hazard ratio = 1.38) in treated patients. A significantly higher need for fluid replacement was only observed in patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy showed a limited role in determining post-operative morbidity after hepatic resection and did not modify mortality.

Feasibility study of two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and early outcomes of 2-stage liver resection for bilobar metastases.

METHODS

Data from 39 consecutive patients undergoing 2-stage hepatectomy between 2004 and 2010 were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

The median age was 59 years (range, 33-79 years), and the ratio of men to women was 1.8:1. Metastases were colorectal carcinoma (n = 33), neuroendocrine tumors (n = 3), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), ocular melanoma (n = 1), and salivary gland carcinoma (n = 1). Perioperative chemotherapy was given to 32 patients (82%). Twenty-nine patients (74%) underwent portal venous embolization. Radiofrequency ablation was used in 8 patients (21%). Twenty-seven patients (69%) successfully completed clearance. For the 1st and 2nd stages, the median lengths of stay were 11 days (range, 6-53 days) and 13 days (range, 6-44 days), and morbidity rates were 23% and 56%. Liver insufficiency occurred in 2 (5%) and 6 (22%) patients. Overall mortality was 2.6%. For colorectal metastases, median survival in successes versus failures was 24 versus 10 months (P = .03), and 3-year survival was 30% versus 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage hepatectomy is feasible, with 69% of patients achieving clearance with low mortality. Morbidity is significant, particularly transient hepatic insufficiency.

Colorectal chemotherapy-associated liver injury

The increasing use of more effective chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer has raised awareness of the potential liver injuries induced by systemic drugs, such as fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Chemotherapy-associated liver injuries can be revealed by histopathologic examination of nontumoral liver tissue. There are two broad categories of chemotherapy-induced liver injury: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and sinusoidal injury. Many reports suggest that liver injuries may increase morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases, while some researchers have opposing views. This review describes the main types of chemotherapy-related liver injury and current controversy over this topic.

The management of solitary colorectal liver metastases

Surgical resection of solitary colorectal liver metastases is associated with long-term survival. Radiofrequency ablation used as the primary treatment option of solitary resectable colorectal liver metastases is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence that generally leads to worse survival compared to resection. In contrast with treatment of other hepatic malignancies, radiofrequency ablation is not equivalent to resection for colorectal liver metastases and should not be used as an alternative but limited to inoperable patients. Although overall survival rate after resection can be up to 71% at 5 years, the majority of patients develop recurrence. Preoperative chemotherapy contributes to decrease the risk of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases. In patients with advanced solitary colorectal liver metastasis initially non suitable for resection, chemotherapy and portal vein embolization contribute to increase the number of surgical candidates whereas radiofrequency is rarely an option.

Treatment advances in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer

Over the last several decades advances in the management and treatment of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed a disease with a dismal prognosis to one with a potential for cure in some patients. Advances have been made through coordinated management of patients by surgeons, medical oncologists, radiologists, and other health care professionals coupled with advances in treatment options. Although these advances have clearly impacted patient outcomes, it is clear that the benefit of traditional surgical approaches and the use of cytoxic chemotherapy are reaching a plateau. Continued research to develop new and more active therapies, including targeted or biologic agents, is needed. This review discusses the advances made in management of patients with liver-limited metastatic disease.

Liver resection for advanced or aggressive colorectal cancer metastases in the era of effective chemotherapy: a review

Liver surgery has been known to cure metastatic colorectal cancer in a small proportion of patients. However, advances in procedural technique and chemotherapy now allow more patients to have safe, potentially curative surgery. Here we review surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases using an expert multidisciplinary approach. With multidisciplinary management of patients with effective chemotherapy that can downstage metastases, more patients with previously inoperable disease can benefit from surgery. Portal vein embolization results in hypertrophy of the future liver remnant; on occasions, combining embolization with staged liver resection permits potentially curative surgery for patients previously unable to survive resection. However, increasing use of chemotherapy has raised awareness of potential hepatotoxicity and other deleterious effects of cytotoxic agents. Prolonged prehepatectomy chemotherapy therefore can reduce resectability even using a 2-stage procedure. Suitable timing of surgery for unresectable liver metastases during chemotherapy is critical. Because of advances in chemotherapy, colorectal cancer, like ovarian cancer, can now show survival benefit from maximum surgical debulking. Benefit from such maximum hepatic debulking surgery for metastatic colorectal disease is uncertain, but likely. Surgery in isolation may be approaching technical limits, but is now likely to help more patients because of the success of complementary strategies, particularly newer chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Expert individualized multidisciplinary treatment planning and problem-solving is essential.

Liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases involving the caudate lobe

BACKGROUND

Up to 5 per cent of liver resections for colorectal cancer metastases involve the caudate lobe, with cancer-involved resection margins of over 50 per cent being reported following caudate lobe resection.

METHODS

Outcomes of consecutive liver resections for colorectal metastases involving the caudate lobe between 1996 and 2009 were reviewed retrospectively, and compared with those after liver surgery without caudate resection.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent caudate and 432 non-caudate liver resection. Caudate resection was commonly performed as part of extended resection. There were no differences in operative complications (24 versus 21·1 per cent; P = 0·727) or blood loss (median 300 versus 250 ml; P = 0·234). The operating time was longer for caudate resection (median 283 versus 227 min; P = 0·024). Tumour size was larger in the caudate group (median 40 versus 27 mm; P = 0·018). Resection margins were smaller when the caudate lobe was involved by tumour, than in resections including tumour-free caudate or non-caudate resection; however, there was no difference in the proportion of completely excised tumours between caudate and non-caudate resections (96 versus 96·1 per cent; P = 0·990). One-year overall survival rates were 90 and 89·3 per cent respectively (P = 0·960), with 1-year recurrence-free survival rates of 62 and 71·2 per cent (P = 0·340).

CONCLUSION

Caudate lobe surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases does not increase the incidence of resection margin involvement, although when the caudate lobe contains metastases the margins are significantly closer than in other resections.

Recent advances in the curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Liver resection provides the basis for curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), achieving 5-year survival rates as high as 58%. Use of this approach is limited by the number of patients whose CLM are resectable at the time of initial presentation and the risk of early recurrence after surgery, justifying development of modern perioperative chemotherapy regimens. Chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity led to development of standardized treatment strategies that balance the duration and timing of preoperative chemotherapy to minimize postoperative morbidity. The current challenge in the effort to offer curative treatment for CLM is selection of patients who will most benefit from an aggressive surgical approach. New end points of preoperative chemotherapy such as pathologic response and new radiologic response criteria have been evaluated as predictive factors for survival after liver resection and provide useful support in selecting patients for surgery.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peri-operative versus post-operative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to hepatectomy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases is currently a matter of debate. The aim of the present study was to analyse life-expectancy, quality adjusted life-expectancy and cost-effectiveness of the two chemotherapeutic strategies.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was developed, on the basis of parameters derived from an extensive literature search of the last ten years, to compare outcomes of peri-operative versus post-operative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Life-expectancy observed for peri-operative chemotherapy was 54.56months and 52.62months with post-operative chemotherapy only; the quality-adjusted life-expectancy with peri-operative chemotherapy was 39.33 quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs) and 37.84 QALMs with post-operative chemotherapy. Peri-operative chemotherapy results in an increase in total costs of 1180€ over ten years and in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 791.9€/QALM. The model was more sensitive to the expected 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cost of hepatic resection: with respect to an expected 3-year RFS⩽25% the peri-operative approach was more cost-effective than post-operative strategy but differences in average cost-effectiveness were small. The relationship between ICER and cost of hepatic resection was inverse because the higher the cost of hepatic resection, the higher the cost saving due to patients becoming unresectable during neo-adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of resectable colorectal liver metastases, the addition of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy could be cost-effective because it makes it possible to avoid hepatic resection in patients who do not respond to the neo-adjuvant approach; however, the life-expectancy of the two strategies is very similar.

Integration of biologic agents with cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer death in the developed world. Metastatic disease eventually develops in nearly 50% of patients with CRC. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment in metastatic CRC (mCRC); however the majority of patients remain incurable with current therapeutic options. Progress made in the field of surgery, locoregional treatment for low-volume metastatic disease, and systemic chemotherapy has created new treatment paradigms and improved survival in mCRC. Development of new cytotoxic drugs and the advent of targeted agents over the past decade have seen the median overall survival (OS) for mCRC increase from 9 months to > 2 years. Data from trials integrating targeted therapies appear to indicate that not all have efficacy as single agents and the choice of chemotherapy used in combination with these agents may impact results. Ongoing research is leading to identification of new biomarkers of response, further defining the subpopulations who achieve greatest benefit. Hence optimizing treatment for this group of patients has become increasingly complex, requiring a multidisciplinary approach not only to identify those who are curable with resectable disease but also to determine when it is best to incorporate targeted drugs, with which chemotherapy, and in whom. Currently bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab are the only approved biologic agents for use in mCRC. In this article we discuss the evidence supporting the use of biologic agents with chemotherapy and suggested strategies for their integration into the treatment armamentarium of mCRC.

Dietary glycine protects from chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity

Hepatotoxic side effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases increase perioperative morbidity and mortality. Glycine protects liver from injury in various animal models. Thus, this study was designed to assess its effect on liver after chemotherapy. Sprague-Dawley rats (200-220 g) were fed a synthetic diet containing 5% glycine for 5 days. Subsequently, chemotherapy (FOLFIRI: irinotecan, folinic acid and fluorouracil, or FOLFOX: oxaliplatin, folinic acid and fluorouracil) was administered at standard doses. Transaminases, histology, immunohistochemistry and in vivo microscopy were used to index liver injury, to monitor intrahepatic microperfusion and activation of Kupffer cells. Glycine significantly decreased transaminases after chemotherapy to 25-50% of control values (p < 0.05). Microvesicular steatosis was significantly reduced from 18.5 ± 3.4 and 57.1 ± 8.6% in controls to 9.5 ± 1.8 and 37.7 ± 4.4% after FOLFIRI and FOLFOX, respectively. Furthermore, phagocytosis of latex beads was reduced by about 50%, while leukocyte adherence in central and midzonal subacinar zones decreased to 60-80% after glycine (p < 0.05). Glycine significantly reduced expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase after chemotherapy, while hepatic microcirculation was increased (p < 0.05). This study shows for the first time that glycine reduces chemotherapy-induced liver injury. The underlying mechanisms most likely include Kupffer cells and an improved intrahepatic microperfusion.

The timing of chemotherapy and surgery for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Combining surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with colorectal hepatic metastases is increasingly becoming the standard of care. However, controversy remains regarding the juxtapositioning of chemotherapy and surgery, the duration of chemotherapy, and particularly, the use of preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with initially resectable metastases. The arguments for and against the different approaches presented are based on the data published in the medical literature and on the data presented at the most recent major oncology meetings, coupled with the personal experience of the authors. For patients with liver metastases that are resectable at presentation, perioperative chemotherapy has become the standard treatment in many institutions, with the recommendation that surgery is performed after a maximum of 6 cycles of systemic therapy. In the case of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases receiving preoperative systemic therapy, patients should be carefully monitored and surgery performed as soon as the metastases become resectable. All patients should, where possible, be treated by a multidisciplinary team. Going forward, it needs to be established whether more intensive treatment (ie, perioperative versus postoperative systemic therapy) is merited for the treatment of patients with initially resectable disease, and what the precise contribution of new therapeutic agents in these settings is, based on new prospective randomized trial data.

Arguments against toxic effects of chemotherapy on liver injury and regeneration in an experimental model of partial hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

New chemotherapy regimens are increasingly used in metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver before surgery. Some clinical observations have suggested that chemotherapy may affect liver regeneration.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate liver damage and liver regeneration after chemotherapy treatment in a model of partial hepatectomy.

METHODS

C57BL/6 mice were repeatedly treated with intraperitoneal injections of either saline or different chemotherapy regimens including the drugs 5-fluorouracyl (5-FU), irinotecan, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and combined treatments with 5-FU/irinotecan, 5-FU/oxaliplatin. A 70% partial hepatectomy was performed 1 week after the last injection. Ki-67 and PCNA immunohistochemistry were performed to assess liver regeneration, serum liver enzymes and histology analysis to evaluate injury.

RESULTS

A variety of chemotherapeutic agents used at maximum tolerated doses compatible with survival affected body weight and blood cell levels. However, these regimens did not affect liver injury before and after hepatectomy nor did they impair liver regeneration. Liver histology showed no steatosis, fibrosis or inflammation before hepatectomy. We therefore tested whether chemotherapy in presence of diet-induced steatosis may trigger injury. Even under these conditions, we did not observe histological signs of inflammation or sinusoidal injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver injury and liver regeneration are not impaired after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin and gemcitabine in non-tumoural liver parenchyma. In addition, combined treatments disclose no adverse effects on liver regeneration. Chemotherapy alone induces no histological alterations even in the presence of steatosis.