Expression of mRNAs encoding for two different olfactory receptors in a subset of olfactory receptor neurons

3-phosphoinositides modulate cyclic nucleotide signaling in olfactory receptor neurons

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent phosphoinositide signaling has been implicated in diverse cellular systems coupled to receptors for many different ligands, but the extent to which it functions in sensory transduction is yet to be determined. We now report that blocking PI3K activity increases odorant-evoked, cyclic nucleotide-dependent elevation of [Ca(2+)](i) in acutely dissociated rat olfactory receptor neurons and does so in an odorant-specific manner. These findings imply that 3-phosphoinositide signaling acts in vertebrate olfactory transduction to inhibit cyclic nucleotide-dependent excitation of the cells and that the interaction of the two signaling pathways is important in odorant coding, indicating that 3-phosphoinositide signaling can play a role in sensory transduction.

Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers

Spatial activation patterns within the olfactory bulb are believed to contribute to the neural representation of odorants. In this study, we attempted to predict the perceptions of odorants from their evoked patterns of neural activity in the olfactory bulb. We first describe the glomerular activation patterns evoked by pairs of odorant enantiomers based on the uptake of [(14)C]2-deoxyglucose in the olfactory bulb glomerular layer. Using a standardized data matrix enabling the systematic comparison of these spatial odorant representations, we hypothesized that the degree of similarity among these representations would predict their perceptual similarity. The two enantiomers of carvone evoked overlapping but significantly distinct regions of glomerular activity; however, the activity patterns evoked by the enantiomers of limonene and of terpinen-4-ol were not statistically different from one another. Commensurate with these data, rats spontaneously discriminated between the enantiomers of carvone, but not between the enantiomers of limonene or terpinen-4-ol, in an olfactory habituation task designed to probe differences in olfactory perception.

The human repertoire of odorant receptor genes and pseudogenes

The nose of Homo sapiens is a sophisticated chemical sensor. It is able to smell almost any type of volatile molecule, often at extraordinarily low concentrations, and can make fine perceptual discriminations between structurally related molecules. The diversity of odor recognition is mediated by odorant receptor (OR) genes, discovered in 1991 by Buck & Axel. OR genes form the largest gene families in mammalian genomes. A decade after their discovery, advances in the sequencing of the human genome have provided a first draft of the human OR repertoire: It consists of approximately 1000 sequences, residing in multiple clusters spread throughout the genome, with more than half being pseudogenes. Allelic variants are beginning to be recognized and may provide an opportunity for genotype-phenotype correlations. Here, I review the current knowledge of the human OR repertoire and summarize the limited information available regarding putative pheromone and taste receptors in humans.

Odorant feature detection: activity mapping of structure response relationships in the zebrafish olfactory bulb

The structural determinants of an odor molecule necessary and/or sufficient for interaction with the cognate olfactory receptor(s) are not known. Olfactory receptor neurons expressing the same olfactory receptor converge in the olfactory bulb. Thus, optical imaging of neuronal activity in the olfactory bulb can visualize at once the contributions by all the different olfactory receptors responsive to a particular odorant. We have used this technique to derive estimates about the structural requirements and minimal number of different zebrafish olfactory receptors that respond to a series of naturally occurring amino acids and some structurally related compounds. We report that the alpha-carboxyl group, the alpha-amino group, and l-conformation of the amino acid are all required for activation of amino acid-responsive receptors. Increasing carbon chain length recruits successively more receptors. With increasing concentrations, the activity patterns induced by a homolog series of amino acids became more similar to each other. At intermediate concentrations patterns were unique across substances and across concentrations. The introduction of a terminal amino group (charged) both recruits additional receptors and prevents binding to some of the receptors that were responsive to the unsubstituted analog. In contrast, the introduction of a beta-hydroxyl group (polar) excluded the odorants from some of the receptors that are capable of binding the unsubstituted analog. Cross-adaptation experiments independently confirmed these results. Thus, odorant detection requires several different receptors even for relatively simple odorants such as amino acids, and individual receptors require the presence of some molecular features, the absence of others, and tolerate still other molecular features.

Representation of odorants by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb

To visualize odorant representations by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb, we loaded receptor neurons with calcium-sensitive dye and imaged odorant-evoked responses from their axon terminals. Fluorescence increases reflected activation of receptor neuron populations converging onto individual glomeruli. We report several findings. First, five glomeruli were identifiable across animals based on their location and odorant responsiveness; all five showed complex response specificities. Second, maps of input were chemotopically organized at near-threshold concentrations but, at moderate concentrations, involved many widely distributed glomeruli. Third, the dynamic range of input to a glomerulus was greater than that reported for individual receptor neurons. Finally, odorant activation slopes could differ across glomeruli, and for different odorants activating the same glomerulus. These results imply a high degree of complexity in odorant representations at the level of olfactory bulb input.

How smell develops

The mouse's sense of smell is built of approximately 1000 input channels. Each of these consists of a population of olfactory sensory neurons that express the same odorant receptor gene and project their axons to the same targets (glomeruli) in the olfactory bulb. A neuron must choose to express a singular receptor gene from a repertoire of approximately 1000 genes, and its axon must be wired to the corresponding glomerulus, from an array of approximately 1800 glomeruli. Genetic experiments have shown that the expressed odorant receptor specifies axonal choice of the innervated glomerulus, but it is not the only determinant. The mechanisms of odorant receptor gene choice and axonal wiring are central to the functional organization of the mammalian olfactory system. Although principles have emerged, our understanding of these processes is still limited.

A psychophysical study of the relationship between temporal processing in odor mixtures and transduction pathways

Depending on the odorant, transduction during the olfactory reception process is reported to be mediated by the second messengers cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP) or inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP(3)). The present study with humans investigates the relationship between temporal processing in mixtures and the type of transduction process used. The most common outcomes were reciprocal temporal interactions which were primarily dependent on odorant concentration and independent of the type of transduction process. The results are consistent with the bulk of evidence that each receptor neuron commonly has only one type of receptor.

Molecular bases of odor discrimination: Reconstitution of olfactory receptors that recognize overlapping sets of odorants

The vertebrate olfactory system discriminates a wide variety of odorants by relaying coded information from olfactory sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium to olfactory cortical areas of the brain. Recent studies have shown that the first step in odor discrimination is mediated by approximately 1000 distinct olfactory receptors, which comprise the largest family of G-protein-coupled receptors. In the present study, we used Ca(2+) imaging and single-cell reverse transcription-PCR techniques to identify mouse olfactory neurons responding to an odorant and subsequently to clone a receptor gene from the responsive cell. The functionally cloned receptors were expressed in heterologous systems, demonstrating that structurally related olfactory receptors recognized overlapping sets of odorants with distinct affinities and specificities. Our results provide direct evidence for the existence of a receptor code in which the identities of different odorants are specified by distinct combinations of odorant receptors that possess unique molecular receptive ranges. We further demonstrate that the receptor code for an odorant changes with odorant concentration. Finally, we show that odorant receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells couple to stimulatory G-proteins such as Galphaolf, resulting in odorant-dependent increases in cAMP. Odor discrimination is thus determined by differences in the receptive ranges of the odorant receptors that together encode specific odorant molecules.

Neurobiology of fish olfaction: a review

The last decade saw important advances in our understanding of the olfactory system function. In some animals, we now have the basic knowledge necessary to investigate coding mechanisms employed in olfaction. So far, studies of the fish olfactory system have focused on odor detection and the early processing of olfactory information in the olfactory bulb. How this information is integrated in the forebrain is unknown. Here, we first describe the anatomy of the fish olfactory system. The problems faced when describing the anatomy of the terminal nerve complex and nucleus olfactoretinalis are highlighted. Olfactory sensory neurons are randomly distributed over the entire olfactory epithelium, a unique feature of the olfactory sense. These primary olfactory neurons converge upon their second-order targets in segregated areas of the olfactory bulb. Exchange of information occurs in the glomeruli and glomerular plexus, where primary neurons synapse on mitral cell dendrites. The spatial distribution of glomerular activity induced by odorants of different classes shows that distinct neuron populations of the olfactory bulb encode information related to different odorant groups. In most cases, these neuron populations synchronize their alternating sequences of firing and silence when stimulated by primary input. Synchronized oscillations of these second-order neurons could contain important coding information, or represent a mechanism by which learning is facilitated. Alternatively, oscillations could be solely used to shape the olfactory bulb response. The nature of the olfactory information that reaches the forebrain and decoding of this information by the central nervous system are discussed.

Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna

Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna is examined by a functional analysis of individual olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in vivo. Sixteen distinct classes of ORNs, each with a unique response spectrum to a panel of 47 diverse odors, are identified by extracellular recordings. ORNs exhibit multiple modes of response dynamics: an individual neuron can show either excitatory or inhibitory responses, and can exhibit different modes of termination kinetics, when stimulated with different odors. The 16 ORN classes are combined in stereotyped configurations within seven functional types of basiconic sensilla. One sensillum type contains four ORNs and the others contain two neurons, combined according to a strict pairing rule. We provide a functional map of ORNs, showing that each ORN class is restricted to a particular spatial domain on the antennal surface.

Onset of odorant receptor gene expression during olfactory sensory neuron regeneration

Individual olfactory sensory neurons are thought to express only one odorant receptor gene from a repertoire of hundreds to thousands of genes. How do these sensory neurons choose just one specific odorant receptor to express during their differentiation? As an initial attempt toward understanding the process of odorant receptor gene regulation, we studied when odorant receptor expression is activated during sensory neuron regeneration. We find that receptor gene expression is activated in postmitotic neurons and can occur in the absence of the olfactory bulb. These results suggest that receptor expression is restricted to the terminal stages of olfactory neuron differentiation, and sensory neurons do not simply inherit the odorant receptor that is already expressed in mitotic precursor cells. Our results also support a model in which odorant receptor gene expression occurs independent of the olfactory bulb.

Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons

In contrast to rapid progress in the molecular biology of olfaction, there are few physiological data to characterize the odor response properties of different populations of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and their spatial distributions across the epithelium, which is essential for understanding the coding mechanisms underlying odor discrimination and recognition. We have tested the hypothesis that the ORNs are arranged in a functional mosaic, using an intact epithelial preparation from the mouse, in which odor responses of many ORNs in situ can be monitored simultaneously with calcium imaging techniques. ORNs responding to a given odor were widely distributed across epithelium and intermingled with ORNs responding to other odors. Tight clusters of ORNs responding to the same odor were observed. For a given odor, more ORNs were recruited when the concentration was increased. ORNs were able to distinguish between pairs of enantiomers by showing distinct but somewhat overlapping patterns. The results provide evidence regarding the response spectra of ORNs in situ, supporting the combinatorial coding of odor quality and intensity by different ORN subsets.