Outcomes of surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries using nerve grafting and nerve transfers

Lithium enhances axonal regeneration in peripheral nerve by inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase 3β activation

Brachial plexus injury often involves traumatic root avulsion resulting in permanent paralysis of the innervated muscles. The lack of sufficient regeneration from spinal motoneurons to the peripheral nerve (PN) is considered to be one of the major causes of the unsatisfactory outcome of various surgical interventions for repair of the devastating injury. The present study was undertaken to investigate potential inhibitory signals which influence axonal regeneration after root avulsion injury. The results of the study showed that root avulsion triggered GSK-3β activation in the injured motoneurons and remaining axons in the ventral funiculus. Systemic application of a clinical dose of lithium suppressed activated GSK-3β in the lesioned spinal cord to the normal level and induced extensive axonal regeneration into replanted ventral roots. Our study suggests that GSK-3β activity is involved in negative regulation for axonal elongation and regeneration and lithium, the specific GSK-3β inhibitor, enhances motoneuron regeneration from CNS to PNS.

Evaluation and management of brachial plexus birth palsy

Brachial plexus birth palsy can result in permanent lifelong deficits and unfortunately continues to be relatively common despite advancements in obstetric care. The diagnosis can be made shortly after birth by physical examination, noting a lack of movement in the affected upper extremity. Treatment begins with passive range-of-motion exercises to maintain flexibility and tactile stimulation to provide sensory reeducation. Primary surgery consists of microsurgical nerve surgery, whereas secondary surgery consists of alternative microsurgical procedures, tendon transfers, or osteotomies, all of which improve outcomes in the short term. However, the long-term outcomes of current treatment recommendations remain unknown.

The medial cord to musculocutaneous (MCMc) nerve transfer: a new method to reanimate elbow flexion after C5-C6-C7-(C8) avulsive injuries of the brachial plexus--technique and results

The aim of this paper is to report on our ample experience with the medial cord to musculocutaneous (MCMc) nerve transfer. The MCMc technique is a new type of neurotization which is able to reanimate the elbow flexion in multilevel avulsive injuries of the brachial plexus provided that at least the T1 root is intact. A series of 180 consecutive patients, divided into four classes according to the quality of hand function, is available for a long-term follow-up after brachial plexus surgery. The patients enrolled for the study have in common a brachial plexus palsy showing multiple cervical root avulsive injuries at two (C5-C6), three (C5-C6-C7) and four (C5-C6-C7-C8) levels. The reinnervation of the musculocutaneous nerve is obtained via an end-to-end transfer from two donor fascicles located in the medial cord. The selected fascicles are those directed principally to the flexor carpi radialis, ulnaris and, to a lesser degree, the flexor digitorum profundus. Under normal anatomic conditions, they are located in the medial cord, and their site corresponds to the inverted V-shaped bifurcation between the internal contribution of the median nerve and the ulnar nerve. The technique has no failure and no complications when the hand shows a normal wrist and finger flexion and a normal intrinsic function. In case of suboptimal conditions of the hand, the technique has proved technically more challenging, but still with 67% satisfactory results. In the four-root avulsive injuries, however, this method shows its limitations and an alternative strategy should be preferred when possible. EMG analysis shows a reinnervation in both the biceps and the brachialis muscles, explaining the high quality of the observed results. Moreover, this technique theoretically offers the possibility of a "second attempt" at a more distal level in case of failure of the first surgery. This procedure is quick, safe, extremely effective and easily feasible by an experienced plexus surgeon. The ideal candidate is a patient harbouring a C5-C6 avulsive injury of the upper brachial plexus with a normally functioning hand.

Comparative study of phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after global brachial plexus injury

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfer is a valuable surgical technique in peripheral nerve reconstruction, especially in brachial plexus injuries. Phrenic nerve transfer for elbow flexion was proved to be one of the optimal procedures in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries in the study of Gu et al.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 33 patients treated with phrenic nerve transfer for elbow flexion in posttraumatic global root avulsion brachial plexus injury was carried out. All the 33 patients were confirmed to have global root avulsion brachial plexus injury by preoperative and intraoperative electromyography (EMG), physical examination and especially by intraoperative exploration. There were two types of phrenic nerve transfers: type1 - the phrenic nerve to anterolateral bundle of anterior division of upper trunk (14 patients); type 2 - the phrenic nerve via nerve graft to anterolateral bundle of musculocutaneous nerve (19 patients). Motor function and EMG evaluation were performed at least 3 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The efficiency of motor function in type 1 was 86%, while it was 84% in type 2. The two groups were not statistically different in terms of Medical Research Council (MRC) grade (p=1.000) and EMG results (p=1.000). There were seven patients with more than 4 month's delay of surgery, among whom only three patients regained biceps power to M3 strength or above (43%). A total of 26 patients had reconstruction done within 4 months, among whom 25 patients recovered to M3 strength or above (96%). There was a statistically significant difference of motor function between the delay of surgery within 4 months and more than 4 months (p=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury had no significant difference for biceps reinnervation according to MRC grading and EMG. A delay of the surgery after the 4 months might imply a bad prognosis for the recovery of the function.

A literature review of intercostal-to-musculocutaneous-nerve transfers in brachial plexus injury patients: Does body mass index influence results in Eastern versus Western countries?

Background:

A wide range of results have appeared in the literature for intercostal nerve transfers in brachial plexus patients. Oriental countries generally have a lower body mass index (BMI) than their occidental counterparts. We analyzed published series of intercostal nerve transfers for elbow reinnervation to determine if a difference in outcomes exists between Eastern and Western series that could be inversely related to BMI.

Methods:

A PubMed search was conducted. Inclusion criteria were: (1) time from trauma to surgery <12 months, (2) minimum follow-up one year, (3) intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer the only surgical procedure performed to reestablish elbow flexion, and (4) males comprising more than 75% of cases. Two groups were created: Series from western countries, including America, Europe, and Africa; and series from Asia. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess for the degree of correlation between percent responders and mean national BMI.

Results:

A total of 26 series were included, 14 from western countries and 12 from Eastern countries, encompassing a total of 274 and 432 surgical cases, respectively. The two groups were almost identical in mean age, but quite different in mean national BMI (26.3 vs. 22.5) and in the percentage of patients who achieved at least a Medical Research Council (MRC) level 3 (59.5% vs. 79.3%). Time from trauma to surgery was slightly shorter in Eastern (3.4 months) versus Western countries (5.0 months).

Conclusions:

The percentage of responders to intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer was inversely correlated with the mean national BMI among male residents of the country where the series was performed.

Use of intercostal nerves for different target neurotization in brachial plexus reconstruction

Intercostal nerve transfer is a valuable procedure in devastating plexopathies. Intercostal nerves are a very good choice for elbow flexion or extension and shoulder abduction when the intraplexus donor nerves are not available. The best results are obtained in obstetric brachial plexus palsy patients, when direct nerve transfer is performed within six months from the injury. Unlike the adult posttraumatic patients after median and ulnar nerve neurotization with intercostal nerves, almost all obstetric brachial plexus palsy patients achieve protective sensation in the hand and some of them achieve active wrist and finger flexion. Use in combination with proper muscles, intercostal nerve transfer can yield adequate power to the paretic upper limb. Reinnervation of native muscles (i.e., latissimus dorsi) should always be sought as they can successfully be transferred later on for further functional restoration.

Shoulder abduction and external rotation restoration with nerve transfer

INTRODUCTION

In upper brachial plexus palsy patients, loss of shoulder function and elbow flexion is obvious as the result of paralysed muscles innervated by the suprascapular, axillary and musculocutaneus nerve. Shoulder stabilisation, restoration of abduction and external rotation are important as more distal functions will be affected by the shoulder situation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2011, eleven patients with upper type brachial plexus palsy were operated on with triceps nerve branch transfer to anterior axillary nerve branch and spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder abduction and external rotation restoration. Nine patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. All patients were men with ages ranged from 21 to 35 years (average, 27.4 years). The interval between injury and surgery ranged from 4 to 11 months (average, 7.2 months). Atrophy of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus and deltoid muscle and subluxation at the glenohumeral joint was obvious in all patients preoperatively. During the pre-op examination all patients had at least muscle grading 4 on the triceps muscle.

RESULTS

The mean post-operative value of shoulder abduction was 112.2° (range: 60-170°) while preoperatively none of the patients was able for abduction (p<0.001). The mean post-operative value of shoulder external rotation was 66° (range: 35-110°) while preoperatively none of them was able for external rotation (p<0.001). Postoperative values of shoulder abduction were significantly better that those of external rotation (p=0.0004). The postoperative average muscle grading for shoulder abduction according the MRC scale was 3.6±0.5 and for the shoulder external rotation was 3.2±0.4.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined nerve transfer by using the spinal accessory nerve for suprascapular nerve neurotisation and one of the triceps nerve branches for axillary nerve and teres minor branch neurotisation is an excellent choice for shoulder abduction and external rotation restoration.

What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?

Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressively. Looking back over the last 20 years, it can be seen that the entire approach, from diagnosis to treatment, has changed significantly. Some concepts have become better established, while others have been introduced; thus, it can be said that currently, something can always be offered in terms of functional recovery, regardless of the degree of injury. Advances in microsurgical techniques have enabled improved results after neurolysis and have made it possible to perform neurotization, which has undoubtedly become the greatest differential in treating brachial plexus injuries. Improvements in imaging devices and electrical studies have allowed quick decisions that are reflected in better surgical outcomes. In this review, we intend to show the many developments in brachial plexus surgery that have significantly changed the results and have provided hope to the victims of this serious injury.

A systematic review of nerve transfer and nerve repair for the treatment of adult upper brachial plexus injury

Nerve reconstruction for upper brachial plexus injury consists of nerve repair and/or transfer. Current literature lacks evidence supporting a preferred surgical treatment for adults with such injury involving shoulder and elbow function. We systematically reviewed the literature published from January 1990 to February 2011 using multiple databases to search the following: brachial plexus and graft, repair, reconstruction, nerve transfer, neurotization. Of 1360 articles initially identified, 33 were included in analysis, with 23 nerve transfer (399 patients), 6 nerve repair (99 patients), and 4 nerve transfer + proximal repair (117 patients) citations (mean preoperative interval, 6 ± 1.9 months). For shoulder abduction, no significant difference was found in the rates ratio (comparative probabilities of event occurrence) among the 3 methods to achieve a Medical Research Council (MRC) scale score of 3 or higher or a score of 4 or higher. For elbow flexion, the rates ratio for nerve transfer vs nerve repair to achieve an MRC scale score of 3 was 1.46 (P = .03); for nerve transfer vs nerve transfer + proximal repair to achieve an MRC scale score of 3 was 1.45 (P = .02) and an MRC scale score of 4 was 1.47 (P = .05). Therefore, for elbow flexion recovery, nerve transfer is somewhat more effective than nerve repair; however, no particular reconstruction strategy was found to be superior to recover shoulder abduction. When considering nerve reconstruction strategies, our findings do not support the sole use of nerve transfer in upper brachial plexus injury without operative exploration to provide a clear understanding of the pathoanatomy. Supraclavicular brachial plexus exploration plays an important role in developing individual surgical strategies, and nerve repair (when donor stumps are available) should remain the standard for treatment of upper brachial plexus injury except in isolated cases solely lacking elbow flexion.

Outcome after transfer of intercostal nerves to the nerve of triceps long head in 25 adult patients with total brachial plexus root avulsion injury

OBJECT

The intercostal nerves (ICNs) have been used to repair the triceps branch in some organizations in the world, but the reported results differ significantly. The effect of this procedure requires evaluation. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the outcome of ICN transfer to the nerve of the long head of the triceps muscle and to determine the factors affecting the outcome of this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in 25 patients with global root avulsion brachial plexus injuries who underwent ICN transfer. The nerves of the long head of the triceps were the recipient nerves in all patients. The ICNs were used in 2 different ways: 2 ICNs were used as donor nerves in 18 patients, and 3 ICNs were used in 7 patients. The mean follow-up period was 5.6 years.

RESULTS

The effective rate of motor recovery in the 25 patients was 56% for the function of the long head of the triceps. There was no significant difference in functional recovery between the patients with 2 or 3 ICN transfers. The outcome of this procedure was not altered if combined with phrenic nerve transfer to the biceps branch. Patients in whom surgery was delayed 6 months or less achieved better results.

CONCLUSIONS

The transfer of ICNs to the nerve of long head of the triceps is an effective procedure for treating global brachial plexus avulsion injuries, even if combined with phrenic nerve transfer to the biceps branch. Two ICNs appear to be sufficient for donation. The earlier the surgery is performed, the better are the results achieved.

Long-term observation of respiratory function after unilateral phrenic nerve and multiple intercostal nerve transfer for avulsed brachial plexus injury

BACKGROUND

Phrenic nerve transfer (PNT) or multiple intercostal nerve transfer (MIT) alone are reported to have no significant impact on pulmonary function in the short or medium term, but it has rarely been reported whether the combination of PNT-MIT could influence respiratory function in the long term.

OBJECTIVE

Respiratory function was evaluated after PNT and PNT-MIT 7 to 19 years (mean, 10 years) postoperatively.

METHODS

Twenty-three adult patients with brachial plexus avulsion injuries who underwent PNT-MIT were compared with 19 corresponding patients who underwent PNT. Pulmonary function testings, phrenic nerve conduction study, and chest fluoroscopy were performed. In the PNT-MIT group, further investigation was performed on the effect of the number of transferred intercostal nerves and the timing of MIT.

RESULTS

In the PNT-MIT group, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, and total lung capacity were 73.69%, 72.04%, and 74.81% of predicted values without significant differences from the PNT group. Diaphragmatic paralysis permanently existed with 1 to 1.5 intercostal spaces (ICSs) elevation and near 1 ICS reduced excursion. There was no statistical difference between the PNT and PNT-MIT groups. Furthermore, 3 and 4 intercostal nerves transferred resulted in no further decrease in pulmonary function test results than 2 intercostal nerves. No significant difference was found when PNT and MIT were performed at the same stage or with an interval.

CONCLUSION

PNT-MIT did not result in additional impairment in respiratory function in adult patients compared with PNT alone. It is safe to transfer 2 to 4 intercostal nerves at 1 to 2 months delay after PNT.

Simultaneous intercostal nerve transfers to deltoid and triceps muscle through the posterior approach

PURPOSE

This study reports the results of restoring the deltoid and triceps functions in patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion injuries by simultaneously transferring 4 intercostal nerves to the anterior axillary nerve and the nerve to the long head of the triceps through the posterior approach.

METHODS

Nine patients with C5, C6, and C7 root avulsion injuries underwent spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve combined with transfer of the third and fourth intercostal nerves to the anterior axillary nerve for shoulder reconstruction. Simultaneous transfer of the fifth and sixth intercostal nerves to the radial nerve branch of the triceps was done to restore elbow extension.

RESULTS

For shoulder function, 8 patients had M4 recovery and 1 patient had M2 recovery. Average shoulder abduction and external rotation were 69° and 42°, respectively. For elbow extension, 3 patients achieved M3 recovery, 5 patients had M2 recovery, and 1 patient had M1 recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of 2 muscles with intercostal nerves is possible when both muscles act synergistically, such as shoulder abduction and elbow extension. Two intercostal nerves are adequate to transfer for deltoid reconstruction but not enough for elbow extension against gravity.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis

BACKGROUND

In treating patients with brachial plexus injury, there are no comparative data on the outcomes of nerve grafts or nerve transfers for isolated upper trunk or C5-C6-C7 root injuries. The purpose of our study was to compare, with systematic review, the outcomes for modern intraplexal nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function with autogenous nerve grafting for upper brachial plexus traumatic injuries.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies in which patients had surgery for traumatic upper brachial plexus palsy within one year of injury and with a minimum follow-up of twelve months. Strength and shoulder and elbow motion were assessed as outcome measures. The Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare outcomes, with an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred and forty-seven (83%) and 286 (96%) of 299 patients with nerve transfers achieved elbow flexion strength of grade M4 or greater and M3 or greater, respectively, compared with thirty-two (56%) and forty-seven (82%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). Forty (74%) of fifty-four patients with dual nerve transfers for shoulder function had shoulder abduction strength of grade M4 or greater compared with twenty (35%) of fifty-seven patients with nerve transfer to a single nerve and thirteen (46%) of twenty-eight patients with nerve grafts (p < 0.05). The average shoulder abduction and external rotation was 122° (range, 45° to 170°) and 108° (range, 60° to 140°) after dual nerve transfers and 50° (range, 0° to 100°) and 45° (range, 0° to 140°) in patients with nerve transfers to a single nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with demonstrated complete traumatic upper brachial plexus injuries of C5-C6, the pooled international data strongly favors dual nerve transfer over traditional nerve grafting for restoration of improved shoulder and elbow function. These data may be helpful to surgeons considering intraoperative options, particularly in cases in which the native nerve root or trunk may appear less than optimal, or when long nerve grafts are contemplated.

Fascicular Topography of the Suprascapular Nerve in the C5 Root and Upper Trunk of the Brachial Plexus: A Microanatomic Study From a Nerve Surgeon's Perspective

BACKGROUND:

In patients with supraclavicular injuries of the brachial plexus, the suprascapular nerve (SSN) is frequently reconstructed with a sural nerve graft coapted to C5. As the C5 cross-sectional diameter exceeds the graft diameter, inadequate positioning of the graft is possible.

OBJECTIVE:

To identify a specific area within the C5 proximal stump that contains the SSN axons and to determine how this area could be localized by the nerve surgeon, we conducted a microanatomic study of the intraplexal topography of the SSN.

METHODS:

The right-sided C5 and C6 roots, the upper trunk with its divisions, and the SSN of 20 adult nonfixed cadavers were removed and fixed. The position and area occupied by the SSN fibers inside C5 were assessed and registered under magnification.

RESULTS:

The SSN was monofascicular in all specimens and derived its fibers mainly from C5. Small contributions from C6 were found in 12 specimens (60%). The mean transverse area of C5 occupied by SSN fibers was 28.23%. In 16 specimens (80%), the SSN fibers were localized in the ventral (mainly the rostroventral) quadrants of C5, a cross-sectional area between 9 o'clock and 3 o'clock from the surgeon's intraoperative perspective.

CONCLUSION:

In reconstruction of the SSN with a sural nerve graft, coaptation should be performed in the rostroventral quadrant of C5 cross-sectional area (between 9 and 12 o'clock from the nerve surgeon's point of view in a right-sided brachial plexus exploration). This will minimize axonal misrouting and may improve outcome.

Complications of intercostal nerve transfer for brachial plexus reconstruction

PURPOSE

Although numerous publications discuss outcomes of intercostal nerve transfer for brachial plexus injury, few publications have addressed factors associated with intercostal nerve viability or the impact perioperative nerve transfer complications have on postoperative nerve function. The purposes of this study were to report the results of perioperative intercostal nerve transfer complications and to determine whether chest wall trauma is associated with damaged or nonviable intercostal nerves.

METHODS

All patients who underwent intercostal nerve transfer as part of a brachial plexus reconstruction procedure as a result of injury were identified. A total of 459 nerves in 153 patients were transferred between 1989 and 2007. Most nerves were transferred for use in biceps innervation, free-functioning gracilis muscle innervation, or a combination of the two. Patient demographics, trauma mechanism, associated injuries, intraoperative nerve viability, and perioperative complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

Complications occurred in 23 of 153 patients. The most common complication was pleural tear during nerve elevation, occurring in 14 of 153 patients. Superficial wound infection occurred in 3 patients, whereas symptomatic pleural effusion, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and seroma formation each occurred in 2 patients. The rate of complications increased with the number of intercostal nerves transferred. Nerves were harvested from previously fractured rib levels in 50 patients. Rib fractures were not associated with an increased risk of overall complications but were associated with an increased risk of lack of nerve viability. In patients with rib fractures, intraoperative nerve stimulation revealed 148 of 161 nerves to be functional; these were subsequently transferred. In patients with preoperative ipsilateral phrenic nerve palsy, the risk of increased complications was marginally significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachial plexus reconstruction using intercostal nerves can be challenging, especially if there is antecedent chest wall trauma. Complications were associated with increasing numbers of intercostal nerves transferred. Ipsilateral rib fracture was adversely associated with intercostal nerve viability; it was not significantly associated with complication risk and should not be considered a contraindication to transfer. Preoperative phrenic nerve palsy was marginally associated with the likelihood of complications but not postoperative respiratory dysfunction when associated with intercostal nerve transfer.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Novel strategies in brachial plexus repair after traumatic avulsion

Clinical trials in spinal cord injury (SCI) can be affected by many confounding variables including spontaneous recovery, variation in the lesion type and extend. However, the clinical need and the paucity of effective therapies has spawned a large number of animal studies and clinical trials for SCI. In this review, we suggest that brachial plexus avulsion injury, a longitudinal spinal cord lesion, is a simpler model to test methods of spinal cord repair. We explore reconstructive techniques currently explored for the repair of brachial plexus avulsion and focus on the use of olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation as an adjunct treatment in brachial plexus repair.

Optimal time point for neuronal generation of transplanted neural progenitor cells in injured spinal cord following root avulsion

Root avulsion of the brachial plexus results in a progressive and pronounced loss of motoneurons. Cell replacement strategies have therapeutic potential in the treatment of motoneuron degenerative neurological disorders. Here, we transplanted spinal cord-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs) into the cervical ventral horn of adult rats immediately, 2 weeks, or 6 weeks after root avulsion to determine an optimal time scale for the survival and differentiation of grafted cells. We showed that grafted NPCs survived robustly at all three time points and there was no statistical difference in survival rate. Interestingly, however, transplantation at 2 weeks postavulsion significantly increased the neuronal differentiation of transplanted NPCs compared to transplantation immediately or at 6 weeks postavulsion. Moreover, only NPCs transplanted at 2 weeks postavulsion were able to differentiate into choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive neurons. Specific ELISAs and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) demonstrated that expression levels of BDNF and GDNF were significantly upregulated in the ventral cord at 2 weeks postavulsion compared to immediately or at 6 weeks postavulsion. Our study suggests that the cervical ventral horn at 2 weeks postavulsion both supports neuronal differentiation and induces region-specific neuronal generation possibly because of its higher expression of BDNF and GDNF.

Results after delayed axillary nerve reconstruction with interposition of sural nerve grafts

HYPOTHESIS

Satisfactory results after repair of isolated axillary nerve lesions using sural nerve autografts have been reported, but a delay between injury and surgical repair exceeding 6 months was one of the most important negative predictors of functional outcome. From our experience, we hypothesize that good results can be obtained even after a delay exceeding 6 months and we opted in this study to assess the value of delayed axillary nerve reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated clinical outcome and donor-site morbidity in 12 patients (mean age, 37; range, 19-66 years) who underwent axillary nerve repair with sural nerve graft with an average 11.25-month a delay between trauma and surgery (range, 8-20 months). Follow-up examination at least 24 months after treatment included assessment of shoulder range of motion, deltoid muscle strength in near full extension, deltoid extension lag, and sensibility. Constant Score, subjective shoulder value, and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were also assessed.

RESULTS

All patients showed an improved deltoid function of at least M3. Postoperative extension lag, as the most specific sign of isolated deltoid function, improved from 57.5 degrees to 14.2 degrees. All stated that they would have identical elective surgery again. Relevant donor-site morbidity was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that even delayed axillary nerve grafting may lead to satisfactory functional results with a low morbidity and should therefore be done in selected patients.

Shoulder reanimation in posttraumatic brachial plexus paralysis

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic brachial plexus paralysis invariably involves the upper roots leading to paralysis of the shoulder region musculature. Early neurotisation of the suprascapular and the axillary nerve should be one of the priorities in plexus reconstruction in order to reanimate the shoulder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1998 to 2007, 78 patients with posttraumatic brachial plexus palsy were operated in our department. Forty-three patients presented with supraclavicular lesions with involvement of C5 and C6 roots in all cases. Reconstruction of the shoulder function was achieved with neurotisation of the suprascapular nerve in 41 patients. Extraplexus donors were utilised in 34 patients, while intraplexus donors via nerve grafts in 7 patients. Neurotisation of the axillary nerve was performed in 25 patients, utilising intraplexus donors in 16 patients, extraplexus donors in 4, and combination of intraplexus and extraplexus donors in 5 patients.

RESULTS

Suprascapular nerve neurotisation gave good or excellent results (supraspinatus>M3+ or shoulder abduction>40 degrees) in 35 patients. Intraplexus donors regained good or excellent function in 5 out of 6 patients (83%), while extraplexus neurotisations achieved good or excellent function of the supraspinatus in 30 out of 34 patients (88%). Axillary nerve neurotisation offered good or excellent results (deltoid>M3+ or shoulder abduction>60 degrees) in 14 patients (58%). Direct neurotisation of the axillary nerve via the motor branch for the long head of the triceps gave shoulder abduction of >110 degrees, as well as external rotation of >30 degrees in 3 out of 5 patients. Combined neurotisation of suprascapular and axillary nerves gave the best outcome achieving shoulder abduction of >60 degrees as well as external rotation of >30 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder reanimation should be one of the first priorities in brachial plexus reconstruction. Early neurotisation of the suprascapular, and if possible the axillary nerve offers the best outcome.

Current concepts in the management of brachial plexus birth palsy

Brachial plexus birth palsy, although rare, may result in substantial and chronic impairment. Physiotherapy, microsurgical nerve reconstruction, secondary joint corrections, and muscle transpositions are employed to help the child maximize function in the affected upper extremity. Many present controversies regarding natural history, microsurgical treatment, and secondary shoulder reconstructive surgery remain unresolved in infants with brachial plexus birth palsies. Recent literature has enhanced our understanding of the pathoanatomy and natural history of the injury as well as the surgical indications, expected outcomes, and complications; this literature has led to improved care of these patients. Based on the present evidence, recommendations for both microsurgery and shoulder reconstruction with tendon transfer and arthroscopic and open reductions are presented.

Modern surgical management of peripheral nerve gap

The management of peripheral nerve injury requires a thorough understanding of the complex physiology of nerve regeneration. The ability to perform surgery under magnification has improved our understanding of the anatomy of the peripheral nerves. However, the level of functional improvement that can be expected following peripheral nerve injury has plateaued. Advancements in the field of tissue engineering have led to an exciting complement of commercially available products that can be used to bridge peripheral nerve gaps. However, the quest for enhanced options is ongoing. This article provides a review of the current treatment options available following peripheral nerve injury, a summary of the published studies using commercially available nerve conduits and nerve allografts in humans and the emerging hopes for the next generation of nerve conduits with the advancement of nanotechnology.

PHRENIC NERVE TRANSFER IN THE RESTORATION OF ELBOW FLEXION IN BRACHIAL PLEXUS AVULSION INJURIES

OBJECTIVE

Phrenic nerve transfer has been used for treating lesions of the brachial plexus since 1970. Although, today, surgeons are more experienced with the technique, there are still widespread concerns about its effects on pulmonary function. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this procedure.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with complete palsy of the upper limb were submitted to phrenic nerve transfer as part of a strategy for surgical reconstruction of their plexuses. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and 2 patients were followed for less than 2 years. Of the remaining 10 patients, 9 (90%) were male. The lesions affected both sides equally. The mean age of the patients was 24.8 years (range, 14–43 years), and the mean interval from injury to surgery was 6 months (range, 3–9 months). The phrenic nerve was always transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve, and a nerve graft (mean length, 8 cm; range, 4.5–12 cm) was necessary in all cases.

RESULTS

There was no major complication related to the surgery. Seven patients (70%) recovered functional level biceps strength (Medical Research Council grade ≥3). All of the patients exhibited a transient decrease in pulmonary function tests, but without clinical respiratory problems.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our small series and data from the literature, we conclude that phrenic nerve transfer in well-selected patients is a safe and effective procedure for recovering biceps function.

Neural progenitor cells enhance the survival and axonal regeneration of injured motoneurons after transplantation into the avulsed ventral horn of adult rats

In the present study, we transplanted E13.5 spinal cord-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs) into the acutely avulsed ventral horn of adult rats. The results showed that NPCs survived and integrated nicely within the host ventral horn at 6 weeks post-grafting. Although the majority of grafted NPCs differentiated into astrocytes and only a small proportion into neuronal cells, interestingly, grafted NPCs in the avulsed ventral horn significantly enhanced the survival of injured motoneurons and promoted their regeneration into a peripheral nerve (PN) graft, as revealed by retrograde FluoroGold (FG) labeling. Specific ELISAs, Western blotting, and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) demonstrated that NPCs produced nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and glial cell line-derived neutrophilic factor (GDNF), both in vitro and after transplantation in vivo. These results indicate that NPCs have beneficial effects on the survival and axonal regeneration of avulsion-injured motoneurons after transplantation. Such beneficial effects are possibly due to their inherent ability to secrete various trophic factors after transplantation in vivo.

Surgical outcomes following nerve transfers in upper brachial plexus injuries

BACKGROUND

Brachial plexus injuries represent devastating injuries with a poor prognosis. Neurolysis, nerve repair, nerve grafts, nerve transfer, functioning free-muscle transfer and pedicle muscle transfer are the main surgical procedures for treating these injuries. Among these, nerve transfer or neurotization is mainly indicated in root avulsion injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed the results of various neurotization techniques in 20 patients (age group 20-41 years, mean 25.7 years) in terms of denervation time, recovery time and functional results. The inclusion criteria for the study included irreparable injuries to the upper roots of brachial plexus (C5, C6 and C7 roots in various combinations), surgery within 10 months of injury and a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. The average denervation period was 4.2 months. Shoulder functions were restored by transfer of spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve (19 patients), and phrenic nerve to suprascapular nerve (1 patient). In 11 patients, axillary nerve was also neurotized using different donors - radial nerve branch to the long head triceps (7 patients), intercostal nerves (2 patients), and phrenic nerve with nerve graft (2 patients). Elbow flexion was restored by transfer of ulnar nerve motor fascicle to the motor branch of biceps (4 patients), both ulnar and median nerve motor fascicles to the biceps and brachialis motor nerves (10 patients), spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous nerve with an intervening sural nerve graft (1 patient), intercostal nerves (3rd, 4th and 5th) to musculocutaneous nerve (4 patients) and phrenic nerve to musculocutaneous nerve with an intervening graft (1 patient).

RESULTS

Motor and sensory recovery was assessed according to Medical Research Council (MRC) Scoring system. In shoulder abduction, five patients scored M4 and three patients M3+. Fair results were obtained in remaining 12 patients. The achieved abduction averaged 95 degrees (range, 50 - 170 degrees). Eight patients scored M4 power in elbow flexion and assessed as excellent results. Good results (M3+) were obtained in seven patients. Five patients had fair results (M2+ to M3).

Severe chronic morbidity following childbirth

Three special, chronic morbidities of childbirth are reviewed with the most up-to-date knowledge in this article. Firstly, obstetric fistulas secondary to prolonged obstructed labour are still prevalent tragedies in underdeveloped countries. The damage is not only physical but psychosexual and social. The surgical skill and technology required to prevent and to treat obstetric fistulas are simple, but culture-social antagonism, geographic distance, political instability and financial constraint have to be overcome before effective management can take place. Congenital brachial plexus palsy is associated with shoulder dystocia and macrosomia, and both excessive exogenous traction and strong endogenous pushing forces contribute to its occurrence. As shoulder dystocia and macrosomia are not easily predictable, regular training and drill is essential to ensure proper management of shoulder dystocia. Most of the babies with brachial palsy will recover in 3 months but a minority of patients will suffer a more severe degree of damage, requiring early micro-neurosurgical intervention. Finally, although birth asphyxia is not the major cause of cerebral palsy, brain injury resulting from acute intrapartum hypoxic-ischemic insult is potentially alleviated by early neonatal hypothermic therapy. Both clinical and radiological assessments are essential in selecting suitable candidates for this innovative neuroprotective strategy.

Functional outcome of nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in upper brachial plexus injury

Background

Purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer (XI-SSN) done for restoration of shoulder function and partial transfer of ulnar nerve to the motor branch to the biceps muscle for the recovery of elbow flexion (Oberlin transfer).

Methods

This is a prospective study involving 15 consecutive cases of upper plexus injury seen between January 2004 and December 2005. The average age of patients was 35.6 yrs (15–52 yrs). The injury-surgery interval was between 2–6 months. All underwent XI-SSN and Oberlin nerve transfer. The coaptation was done close to the biceps muscle to ensure early recovery. The average follow up was 15 months (range 12–36 months). The functional outcome was assessed by measuring range of movements and also on the grading scale proposed by Narakas for shoulder function and Waikakul for elbow function.

Results

Good/Excellent results were seen in 13/15 patients with respect to elbow function and 8/15 for shoulder function. The time required for the first sign of clinical reinnervation of biceps was 3 months 9 days (range 1 month 25 days to 4 months) and for the recovery of antigravity elbow flexion was 5 months (range 3 1/2 months to 8 months). 13 had M4 and two M3 power. On evaluating shoulder function 8/15 regained active abduction, five had M3 and three M4 shoulder abduction. The average range of abduction in these eight patients was 66 degrees (range 45–90). Eight had recovered active external rotation, average 44 degrees (range 15–95). The motor recovery of external rotation was M3 in 5 and M4 in 3. 7/15 had no active abduction/external rotation, but they felt that their shoulder was more stable. Comparable results were observed in both below and above 40 age groups and those with injury to surgery interval less than 3 or 3–6 months.

Conclusion

Transfer of ulnar nerve fascicle to the motor branch of biceps close to the muscle consistently results in early and good recovery of elbow flexion. Shoulder abduction and external rotation show modest but useful recovery and about half can be expected to have active movements. Two patients in early fifties also achieved good results and hence this procedure should be offered to this age group also. Surgery done earlier to 6 months gives consistently good results.

Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy

Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy, one of the most complex peripheral nerve injuries, presents as an injury during the neonatal period. The majority of the children recover with either no deficit or a minor functional deficit, but it is almost certain that some will not regain adequate limb function. These few cases must be managed in an optimal way. Considerable medical and legal debate has surrounded the etiologic factors of this traumatic lesion, and obstetricians are often considered responsible for the injury. According to recent studies, spontaneous endogenous forces may contribute substantially to this type of neonatal trauma. All obstetric circumstances that predispose to brachial plexus damage and that could be anticipated should be assessed. Correct diagnosis is necessary for the accurate estimation of prognosis and treatment. The most important aspect of therapy is timely recognition and referral, to prevent the various possible sequelae affecting the shoulder, elbow, or forearm. Since the early 1990s, research has increased the understanding of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. Further research is needed, focused on developing strategies to predict brachial injury. This review focuses on emerging data relating to obstetrical brachial plexus palsy and discusses the present controversies regarding natural history, prognosis, and treatment in infants with brachial plexus birth palsies.

Reactive changes in dorsal roots and dorsal root ganglia after C7 dorsal rhizotomy and ventral root avulsion/replantation in rabbits

Current surgical treatment of spinal root injuries aims at reconnecting ventral roots to the spinal cord while severed dorsal roots are generally left untreated. Reactive changes in dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) and in injured dorsal roots after such complex lesions have not been analysed in detail. We studied dorsal root remnants and lesioned DRGs 6 months after C7 dorsal rhizotomy, ventral root avulsion and immediate ventral root replantation in adult rabbits. Replanted ventral roots were fixed to the spinal cord with fibrin glue only or with glue containing ciliary neurotrophic factor and/or brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Varying degrees of degeneration were observed in the deafferented dorsal spinal cord in all experimental groups. In cases with well-preserved morphology, small myelinated axons extended into central tissue protrusions at the dorsal root entry zone, suggesting sprouting of spinal neuron processes into the central dorsal root remnant. In lesioned DRGs, the density of neurons and myelinated axons was not significantly altered, but a slight decrease in the relative frequency of large neurons and an increase of small myelinated axons was noted (significant for axons). Unexpectedly, differences in the degree of these changes were found between control and neurotrophic factor-treated animals. Central axons of DRG neurons formed dorsal root stumps of considerable length which were attached to fibrous tissue surrounding the replanted ventral root. In cases where gaps were apparent in dorsal root sheaths, a subgroup of dorsal root axons entered this fibrous tissue. Continuity of sensory axons with the spinal cord was never observed. Some axons coursed ventrally in the direction of the spinal nerve. Although the animal model does not fully represent the situation in human plexus injuries, the present findings provide a basis for devising further experimental approaches in the treatment of combined motor/sensory root lesions.

Heterotopic nerve transfers: recent trends with expanding indication

There has been increasing enthusiasm for heterotopic nerve transfers for brachial plexus palsy as well as peripheral mononeural dysfunction. The concept of nerve transfer surgery is not new; the first publications on the topic date back to the early 1900s. A wide variety of potential donor nerves are available including the intercostal nerves, the spinal accessory nerve, the phrenic nerve, the ipsilateral medial pectoral nerve, partial ulnar nerve, partial median nerve, thoracodorsal nerve, radial nerve to the triceps, and the ipsilateral C7 or the contralateral C7 nerve roots. Treatment strategies include avoidance of interposed nerve grafting, isolated motor recipient nerve, early transfer, neurorrhaphy close to target motor end plates, and similar diameter between donor nerve and recipient nerves.

Nerve transfer to deltoid muscle using the intercostal nerves through the posterior approach: an anatomic study and two case reports

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of restoring the deltoid function in patients with C5 through C7 root avulsion injuries by transferring 2 intercostal nerves to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve through a posterior approach. The preliminary results of the clinical application of this procedure also are reported.

METHODS

The study was performed on 10 fresh cadavers. The lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerves from the costochondral junction to the midaxillary line were recorded. The distance from the pivot point at the midaxillary line to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve was recorded as the tunnel length. All histomorphometric measurements of the axon number were recorded. Based on the anatomic study, the fourth and fifth intercostal nerves were transferred directly to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve in 2 patients.

RESULTS

The average distances from the costochondral junction of the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerves to the pivot points were 12, 15, and 16 cm, respectively. The average tunnel distances of the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerves were 11, 13, and 15 cm, respectively. The average numbers of myelinated nerve fibers of the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerves were 742, 830, and 1,353, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up evaluation the preliminary clinical results showed that the deltoid recovered against resistance (M4). The range of motion for shoulder abduction and external rotation were both 95 degrees in the first case and 105 degrees and 95 degrees , respectively, in the second case. Useful functional recovery was achieved and classified as a good result in both patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This anatomic study with 2 case reports supports the idea that transfer of 2 intercostal nerves to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve through the posterior approach could be an alternative method for reconstruction of the deltoid muscle in C5 through C7 root avulsion injuries.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Restoration of shoulder function with nerve transfers in traumatic brachial plexus palsy patients

Shoulder stabilization is of utmost importance in upper extremity reanimation following paralysis from devastating injuries. Although secondary procedures such as tendon and muscle transfers have been used, they never achieve a functional recovery comparable to that following successful reinnervation of the supraspinatus, deltoid, teres minor, and infraspinatus muscles. Early restoration of suprascapular and axillary nerve function through timely brachial plexus reconstruction offers a good opportunity to restore shoulder-joint stability, adequate shoulder abduction, and external rotation function. Overall, in our series, 79% of patients achieved good and excellent shoulder abduction (muscle grade, +3 or more), and 55% of patients achieved good or excellent shoulder external rotation after reinnervation of the suprascapular nerve. The best results were seen when direct neurotization of the suprascapular nerve from the distal spinal accessory nerve or neurotization by the C5 root was carried out. Concomitant neurotization of the axillary nerve yields improved outcomes in shoulder abduction and external rotation function.

Combined nerve transfers for C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion injury

PURPOSE

To report the results of combined nerve transfer in C5 and C6 brachial plexus avulsion injury.

METHODS

Fifteen patients had nerve transfers: spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve, a part of the ulnar nerve to the biceps motor branch, and the nerve to the long head of the triceps to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. Patients were evaluated with regard to elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and shoulder external rotation.

RESULTS

All patients had recovered full elbow flexion: 13 scored M4 and 2 scored M3. Thirteen of the 15 patients obtained good results. The weight the patients could lift ranged from 0 to 7 kg. All patients had recovery of the deltoid function: 13 scored M4 and 2 scored M3. All 15 patients achieved useful functional recovery. Ten patients experienced excellent recoveries and 5 were classified as having good results. The mean shoulder abduction was 115 degrees . Shoulder external rotation strength was scored as M4 in 9 patients, M3 in 4 patients, and M2 in 2 patients. The range of motion of external rotation that was measured from full internal rotation averaged 97 degrees . No clinical donor nerve deficits were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend combined nerve transfers for C5 and C6 avulsion root injuries. These nerve transfers have the advantage of a quick recovery time as a result of the short regeneration distance without nerve graft.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV.

Suprascapular Nerve Reconstruction in 118 Cases of Adult Posttraumatic Brachial Plexus

BACKGROUND

Shoulder stabilization is of utmost importance in upper extremity reanimation following paralysis from devastating brachial plexus injuries. The purpose of this report is to present the authors' experience with suprascapular nerve reconstruction in 118 cases of adult brachial plexus lesions. Outcomes were analyzed in relation to various factors, including patient age, denervation time, donor nerve used, and functional restoration achieved in the supraspinatus versus the infraspinatus muscles.

METHODS

The medical records of 118 adult patients operated on by a single surgeon between 1978 and 2002 who had suprascapular nerve reconstruction were reviewed; 102 patients had adequate follow-up. Direct neurotization of the suprascapular nerve was carried out in 78 patients, while in 40 patients, interposition nerve grafts were used. In 80 patients, the distal spinal accessory was used as the motor donor nerve for suprascapular nerve neurotization, while in 10 patients, other extraplexus motor donors were used. In 28 patients, intraplexus motor donors were used to reinnervate the suprascapular nerve.

RESULTS

Results were good or excellent in 79 percent of the patients for the supraspinatus muscle and in 55 percent for the infraspinatus. There was a statistically significant difference between direct spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve neurotization and accessory to suprascapular via a nerve graft. Early surgery and less than 6 months of denervation time yielded significantly better results than late surgery and more than 6 months of delay in the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Suprascapular nerve neurotization is a high priority in upper limb reanimation for restoration of glenohumeral joint stability, shoulder abduction, and external rotation. Concomitant neurotization of the axillary nerve yields improved outcomes in shoulder abduction function. The best results are seen when direct neurotization of the suprascapular nerve is performed within 6 months from the injury.

Effects of root replantation and neurotrophic factor treatment on long-term motoneuron survival and axonal regeneration after C7 spinal root avulsion

In order to determine the effect of nerve root replantation on motoneuron survival and regeneration, we have avulsed and replanted C7 ventral rootlets in adult rabbits under various conditions. Intraspinal alterations and exact positions of ventrolateral replantations were studied in each animal, and the effects of BDNF and/or CNTF administration during replantation investigated in different experimental groups. Six months after lesion, about 70% of motoneurons were lost on the lesioned sides in the C7 segment, without significant differences between groups. Retrograde fluorescent tracing and histological analysis documented that many axons had regrown through the original ventral exit zones or had exited the spinal cord at the lateral replantation site. However, many laterally exiting axons had not grown out directly from the ventral horn through the lateral white matter but had elongated vertically before leaving the spinal cord. The mean axonal diameter was significantly higher in regenerated axons that had exited through the original ventral exit zones in comparison with axons which had grown out laterally. Application of BDNF and/or CNTF did not show any effects on the pathways of regeneration into the replanted root. The results indicate that motoneuron survival cannot be significantly improved by a single dose of neurotrophic factors applied to a ventrolateral replantation site. However, a significant number of myelinating axons are found in replanted roots, and regeneration may be more efficient when outgrowth through the original ventral exit zone is supported.

Update on management of pediatric brachial plexus palsy

This manuscript will review the literature and focus on the present controversies regarding natural history, microsurgical treatment, and secondary shoulder reconstructive surgery in infants with brachial plexus birth palsies. Surgical indications, expected outcomes and complications will be addressed. The controversy regarding microsurgery timing in extra-foraminal ruptures will be addressed in detail. The developments in assessment and care of glenohumeral deformity with magnetic resonance imaging scans, arthroscopic and open reductions, and tendon transfers about the shoulder will be discussed. Recommendations for microsurgery and shoulder reconstruction will be based on the present evidence from the literature.

Repair of brachial plexus lesions by end-to-side side-to-side grafting neurorrhaphy: experience based on 11 cases

Eleven brachial plexus lesions were repaired using end-to-side side-to-side grafting neurorrhaphy in root ruptures, in phrenic and spinal accessory nerve neurotizations, in contralateral C7 neurotization, and in neurotization using intact interplexus roots or cords. The main aim was to approximate donor and recipient nerves and promote regeneration through them. Another indication was to augment the recipient nerve, when it had been neurotized or grafted to donors of dubious integrity, when it was not completely denervated, when it had been neurotized to a nerve with a suboptimal number of fibers, when it had been neurotized to distant donors delaying its regeneration, and when it had been neurotized to a donor supplying many recipients. In interplexus neurotization, the main indication was to preserve the integrity of the interplexus donors, as they were not sacrificeable. The principles of end-to-side neurorrhaphy were followed. The epineurium was removed. Axonal sprouting was induced by longitudinally slitting and partially transecting the donor and recipient nerves, by increasing the contact area between both of them and the nerve grafts, and by embedding the grafts into the split predegenerated injured nerve segments. Agonistic donors were used for root ruptures and for phrenic and spinal accessory neurotization, but not for contralateral C7 or interplexus neurotization. Single-donor single-recipient neurotization was successfully followed in phrenic neurotization of the suprascapular (3 cases) and axillary (1 case) nerves, spinal accessory neurotization of the suprascapular nerve (1 case), and dorsal part of contralateral C7 neurotization of the axillary nerve (2 cases). Apart from this, recipient augmentation necessitated many donor to single-recipient neurotizations. This was successfully performed using phrenic-interplexus root to suprascapular transfers (2 cases), phrenic-contralateral C7 to suprascapular transfer (1 case), and spinal accessory-interplexus root to musculocutaneous transfer (1 case). Both recipient augmentation and increasing the contact area between grafts and recipients necessitated single or multiple donor to many recipient neurotizations. This was applied in root ruptures (3 cases), with results comparable to those obtained in classical nerve-grafting techniques. It was also applied in ventral C7 transfer to the lateral or medial cords (3 cases) with functional recovery occurring in the biceps and pronator teres muscles, but not in dorsal C7 transfer to the axillary and radial nerves (3 cases) with functional recovery occurring in the deltoid and triceps muscles, and in whole C7 transfer to C5, 6, 7, 8T1 roots with functional recovery occurring in the deltoid (M4), biceps (M4), pronator teres (M4), and triceps (M3) (3 cases), and less so in the flexor carpi ulnaris and FDP (M3) (1 case) and the extensor digitorum longus (M3) (1 case). Contralateral C7 transfer to the lateral and posterior cords (4 cases) was followed by cocontractions that took 1 year to improve and that involved the rotator cuff, deltoid, biceps, and pronator teres (all agonists). Functional recovery in the triceps muscle was less than in the above muscles. Contralateral C7 transfer to C5-7 (1 case) was followed by cocontractions that took 1 year to resolve and that occurred between the deltoid, biceps, and flexor digitorum profundus. Interplexus root neurotization was done only in conjunction with other neurotization techniques, and so its role is difficult to judge. Though the same applies to regenerated lateral cord transfer to the posterior cord (2 cases), the successful results obtained from medial cord neurotization to the axillary, musculocutaneous, and radial nerves (1 case), and from ulnar and median nerve neurotization to the radial nerve (1 case), show that neurotization at the interplexus cord level may play a role in brachial plexus regeneration and may even be used to neurotize nerves and muscles distal to the elbow. The timing of repair was within 6 months after injury, except for 2 cases. In the first case, contralateral C7 transfer was successfully performed more than 1 year after injury. The second case was an obstetric palsy operated upon at age 8. Deterioration in motor power of the donor muscles that improved in 6 months was observed in 2 cases of interplexus neurotization at the cord level, because of looping the sural nerve grafts tightly around the donor nerves. Deterioration in donor-muscle motor power as a consequence of end-to-side neurorrhaphy was noted in the obstetric palsy case, when the flexor carpi radialis (donor) became grade 3 instead of grade 4. This was associated with cocontractions between it and the extensors. It took nearly 1 year to improve.

Update on management of pediatric brachial plexus palsy

This manuscript will review the literature and focus on the present controversies regarding the natural history, microsurgical treatment, and secondary shoulder reconstructive surgery in infants with brachial plexus birth palsies. Surgical indications, expected outcomes, and complications will be addressed. The controversy regarding the timing of microsurgery in extraforaminal ruptures will be addressed in detail. The developments in assessment and care of glenohumeral deformity with magnetic resonance imaging scans, arthroscopic and open reductions, and tendon transfers about the shoulder will be discussed. Recommendations for microsurgery and shoulder reconstruction will be based on the present evidence from the literature.

Protein abnormality in denervated skeletal muscles from patients with brachial injury

A proteomic analysis was performed to compare protein expression between normal sternocleidomastoid muscle and denervated muscle. Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) of muscle proteins showed that 26 proteins among about 800 spots in 2-DE gel displayed a decrease and 6 proteins an increase in expression in muscles with denervation atrophy compared to normal controls; the identified proteins that were abnormally expressed could be generally grouped together as metabolic proteins, chaperone proteins, and contractile-apparatus proteins. The significance of these altered proteins is discussed. In particular, the decrease in hD54 may reduce the activity of transmembrane signaling in atrophied muscle, while the disregulation of DnaJC 1 showed a possible role of molecular chaperones in the functional recovery of atrophied muscles.

Evaluation of suprascapular nerve neurotization after nerve graft or transfer in the treatment of brachial plexus traction lesions

OBJECT

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the restoration of shoulder function by means of suprascapular nerve neurotization in adult patients with proximal C-5 and C-6 lesions due to a severe brachial plexus traction injury. The primary goal of brachial plexus reconstructive surgery was to restore biceps muscle function and, secondarily, to reanimate shoulder function.

METHODS

Suprascapular nerve neurotization was performed by grafting the C-5 nerve in 24 patients and by accessory or hypoglossal nerve transfer in 29 patients. Additional neurotization involving the axillary nerve was performed in 18 patients. Postoperative needle electromyography studies of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and deltoid muscles showed signs of reinnervation in most patients; however, active glenohumeral shoulder function recovery was poor. In nine (17%) of 53 patients supraspinatus muscle strength was Medical Research Council (MRC) Grade 3 or 4 and in four patients (8%) infraspinatus muscle power was MRC Grade 3 or 4. In 18 patients in whom deltoid muscle reinnervation was attempted, MRC Grade 3 or 4 function was demonstrated in two (11%). In the overall group, eight patients (15%) exhibited glenohumeral abduction with a mean of 44 +/- 17 degrees (standard deviation [SD]; median 45 degrees) and four patients (8%) exhibited glenohumeral exorotation with a mean of 48 +/- 24 degrees (SD; median 53 degrees). In only three patients (6%) were both functions regained.

CONCLUSIONS

The reanimation of shoulder function in patients with proximal C-5 and C-6 brachial plexus traction injuries following suprascapular nerve neurotization is disappointingly low.