A double-blind trial of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. Effects on ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Adjunctive therapy after reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction

The current era has witnessed dramatic improvement in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, due in large part to the more widespread use of thrombolytic therapy aimed at quickly restoring perfusion in the infarct-related artery. This review addresses the role of adjunctive pharmacologic therapy in the thrombolytic era, recognizing that much of the available clinical trial data supporting the role of adjunctive pharmacologic treatment strategies was conducted in patient populations not widely exposed to reperfusion therapy. This review, therefore, explores the data supporting the incremental benefit of therapy with beta blockers, nitrates, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or magnesium in addition to thrombolytic therapy. Heparin and aspirin will not be discussed.

Relation of mortality to failure to prescribe beta blockers acutely in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation following acute myocardial infarction (from the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion trial [VALIANT] Registry)

Sustained ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure are well-recognized complications after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and have been associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality. The use of and outcomes associated with acute beta-blocker therapy in patients with AMI complicated by sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and heart failure were investigated. Of 5,391 patients in the VALIANT Registry, sustained VT/VF occurred in 306 (5.7%), with an in-hospital mortality rate of 20.3%. Multivariable logistic regression identified sustained VT/VF as a major predictor of in-hospital death (relative risk 4.18, 95% confidence interval 2.91 to 5.93). Of those with sustained VT/VF, 55.2% were treated with intravenous or oral beta blockade in the first 24 hours. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, propensity for acute beta-blocker use, and the interaction between Killip classification and beta-blocker therapy, beta-blocker therapy within 24 hours was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in patients with sustained VT/VF (relative risk 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.75, p = 0.013) without evidence of worsening heart failure. Patients with sustained VT/VF were less likely to receive beta blockers within 24 hours (p = 0.001). In conclusion, sustained VT/VF was common after AMI. In patients with sustained VT/VF, beta-blocker therapy in the first 24 hours after AMI was associated with decreased early mortality without worsening heart failure. Unfortunately, beta blockers were underused acutely in patients with sustained VT/VF.

Role of drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy, broadly defined, is the mainstay of treatment and prevention of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), which can lead to sudden death. This article evaluates the evidence for and appropriate use of class I antiarrhythmic drugs, class III antiarrhythmic drugs, beta-blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, statins, angiotensin enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, aldosterone blockers, and digoxin for antiarrhythmic benefits in patients who have a propensity for VT/VF and therefore are at risk of sudden death.

β-Blockers for the treatment of cardiac arrest from ventricular fibrillation?

More than 160,000 people suffer sudden cardiac death each year in the US. It is estimated that ventricular fibrillation (VF) is the initial rhythm in approximately 30% of these cases. Ventricular fibrillation that does not respond to the first few defibrillation attempts is associated with mortality rates of up to 97%. Currently, no pharmacological intervention has been shown to increase long-term survival in patients with shock-refractory VF. The purpose of this review article is to evaluate whether beta-blocker administration during the resuscitation of cardiac arrest from VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) improves outcome. We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for human clinical trials, animal experimental trials, review articles, case reports and abstracts published between 1966 and September 2006. No human prospective randomized controlled trial has studied the effects of beta-blocker administration during VF directly. Prospective trials of anti-arrhythmics with beta-blocking properties have been published, as well as several case reports/case series and experimental animal studies. The evidence thus far suggests that beta-blockade during resuscitation from VF may be associated with increasing rates of resuscitation, greater post-resuscitation survival, and improved post-resuscitation myocardial function. These positive effects on outcome may be mediated by a decrease in the oxygen requirements of the fibrillating heart, thus improving the overall balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand during resuscitation. While no significant detrimental effects directly related to low dose beta-blockade during VF have been reported in the studies reviewed, concerns relating to possible loss of myocardial contractility and hypotension remain. To this day, high quality human trials are lacking. Preliminary human studies are needed to assess the effects of beta-blockers in the treatment of cardiac arrest from ventricular fibrillation or pulseless VT further.

Prehospital evaluation and treatment of a presumed acute coronary syndrome: what are the options?

The earlier infarct-limiting therapy is started the better is the outcome among patients suffering from a threatened myocardial infarction. The introduction of a prehospital electrocardiogram has improved triage of patients with acute chest pain. With regard to medication, fibrinolytic agents have the best documentation. Their use when frequently followed by a percutaneous coronary intervention at a later stage may be a good alternative among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Other treatments of potential value in the prehospital setting are oxygen, narcotic analgesics, nitrates, aspirin, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, glycoprotein IIB, IIIA blockers, clopidogrel and beta-blockers. We need further studies, however, for most of these treatments including cost-benefit analysis, analysis of various logistic aspects and safety in order to confirm their value.

Sustained ventricular tachycardia as a marker of inadequate myocardial perfusion during the acute phase of myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) complicating the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI) is a quite rare event but with short-term unfavorable prognosis. The clinical characteristics as well as the therapeutic implications have not yet been well defined.

HYPOTHESIS

This paper attempts to prove that VT may be considered a marker of inadequate myocardial perfusion after thrombolysis.

METHODS

To assess the clinic-electroangiographic characteristics and prognosis of patients with VT occurring within the first 4 days of an AMI, a case-control study was carried out in 23 patients from a total of 1,100 patients (1.9%) hospitalized with AMI between March 1993 and July 1997. These patients were compared with a control group of 131 patients hospitalized consecutively. A statistical analysis was made using the chi-square test, t-test, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were no differences among groups with regard to age, gender, and area of necrosis. Average time for the onset of VT was 26 h (range 0-92 h). Sixteen patients underwent coronary angiography: 4 patients had left main coronary artery disease, 2 had single-vessel disease, 8 had lesions in two vessels, and 2 had triple-vessel disease. Univariate analysis showed that patients with VT had a higher incidence of creatine phosphokinase (CPK)-MB peak > 300 UI/l (61 vs. 30%; p<0.001), more frequent occurrence of previous AMI (48 vs. 17%; p<0.001), and acute intraventricular conduction disorders (26 vs. 4%; p<0.001). Furthermore, these patients suffered ischemia previous to VT more frequently (65 vs. 11%; p<0.0001), and had a greater mortality rate than that in the control group (35 vs. 4%; p<0.0001). In the multivariant analysis, the variables related to the occurrence of VT were CPK-MB peak > 300 IU/l (OR 5.9; 95% CI 1.6-21), acute intraventricular conduction disorders (OR 9.02; 95% CI 1.7-48), and ischemia immediately prior to VT (odds ratio [OR] 19.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-73).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular tachycardia may be considered a marker of inadequate myocardial perfusion after thrombolysis; therefore, a more aggressive revascularization treatment in these patients would be advisable. The profile of patients with AMI, hospitalized in the coronary care unit, who will likely suffer from VT is previous AMI, CPK-MB peak > 300, acute intraventricular conduction disorders, Killip > I, and ischemia previous to VT.

Beta-blocker use in elderly ED patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Despite the effectiveness of early beta-blocker (BB) use in reducing mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), they remain underutilized in the emergency department (ED) management of AMI. The elderly, with higher AMI mortality, and women, may be particularly vulnerable to underutilization of BB.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of age and gender on BB use in AMI in the ED.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all ST-elevation AMI (STEMI) ED patients presenting to a community hospital ED from 2001 to 2003. Any contraindication to BB use (hypotension, bradycardia, AV block, active bronchospasm, and active congestive heart failure) was determined. Chi-square analysis was used to determine differences by gender and age.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-five patients with STEMI were identified. Thirty-eight percent were women and 71% were over 60 years of age. Of the 270 (70%) who did not receive BB, 141 (52%) had contraindications to BB use. The total BB eligible group was 244 (63%). Of patients without contraindications to BB, 53% did not receive BB in the ED. By gender, 83 (54%) males and 46 (51%) females did not receive BB (P=.669). By age, 96 subjects (59%) over age 60 and 33 subjects (41%) under age 60 did not receive BB (P=.011).

CONCLUSION

Despite convincing evidence of effectiveness, BB remain underutilized in ED management of AMI, especially in the elderly. There does not appear to be a gender difference in BB use. Education programs should be directed towards emergency physicians regarding BB use in AMI, especially in elderly ED patients.

Beta blockers as anti-arrhythmic agents

Although beta-adrenergic blocking agents are not always considered anti-arrhythmic drugs, the results of several recent trials have suggested an anti-arrhythmic mechanism for at least part of their mortality benefit in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. We review background experimental and clinical evidence for the anti-arrhythmic actions of beta-blockers and then review the results of published beta-blocker heart failure trials. A majority of trials showed improvement in overall survival as well as reduction in sudden death and ventricular arrhythmias with beta-blocker treatment. Although different effects were seen with different specific agents, these trials overall support a clinically significant anti-arrhythmic effect of several beta-blockers.

Anemia is an independent risk for mortality after acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Anemia and diabetes are risk factors for short-term mortality following an acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Anemia is more prevalent in patients with diabetes. We performed a retrospective study to assess the impact of the combination of diabetes and anemia on post-myocardial infarction outcomes.

METHODS

Data relating to all consecutive patients hospitalized with AMI was obtained from a population-based disease-specific registry. Patients were divided into 4 groups: diabetes and anemia (group A, n = 716), diabetes and no anemia (group B, n = 1894), no diabetes and anemia (group C, n = 869), and no diabetes and no anemia (group D, n = 3987). Mortality at 30 days and 31 days to 36 months were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

30-day mortality was 32.3% in group A, 16.1% in group B, 21.5% in group C, 6.6% in group D (all p < 0.001). 31-day to 36-month mortality was 47.6% in group A, 20.8% in group B, 34.3% in group C, and 10.4% in group D (all p < 0.001). Diabetes and anemia remained independent risk factors for mortality with odds ratios of 1.61 (1.41-1.85, p < 0.001) and 1.59 (1.38-1.85, p < 0.001) respectively at 36 months. Cardiovascular death from 31-days to 36-months was 43.7% of deaths in group A, 54.1% in group B, 47.0% in group C, 50.8% group D (A vs B, p < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with both diabetes and anemia have a significantly higher mortality than those with either diabetes or anemia alone. Cardiovascular death remained the most likely cause of mortality in all groups.

Clinical predictors and prognostic significance of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

AIMS

Insufficient data exists regarding predictors of electrical storms (ES) and clinical outcome in patients treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The purpose of this study was to delineate a subgroup of patients likely to experience ES and to determine the impact of ES on mortality in ICD recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of 307 ICD-treated patients were retrospectively analysed. ES was defined as two or more ventricular tachyarrhythmias within 24 h leading to an immediate electrical therapy (antitachycardia pacing and/or shock), separated by a period of sinus rhythm. Clinical characteristics and survival of 123 patients experiencing a total of 294 episodes of ES (median 2 ES/patient, range 1-9), were compared with those of 184 ES-free patients during a median follow-up of 826 days (inter-quartile 1141 days). Median actuarial duration for the first ES occurrence after ICD implant was 1417 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 1061-2363] with a median follow-up of 816 days (7-4642 days) in ES-free patients. Univariate analysis identified older age, depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ventricular tachycardia (VT) as index arrhythmia, chronic renal failure and absence of lipid-lowering drugs as variables significantly associated with an increased risk of ES. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed an independent predictive value for chronic renal failure [hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, 95% CI 0.95-2.51, P=0.052], VT (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.44-3.37, P=0.0003), and LVEF (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, P=0.027). In contrast, diabetics (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.90, P=0.022) were less affected by ES. There was no difference in survival between both groups.

CONCLUSION

ES is frequent but does not increase mortality in ICD's recipients. Patients with severe systolic dysfunction, chronic renal failure and VT as initial arrhythmia are likely to experience ES. Diabetics are less affected by ES.

Effect of beta-blocker therapy on mortality rates and future myocardial infarction rates in patients with coronary artery disease but no history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure

Beta-blocker therapy has been shown to benefit patients who have coronary artery disease and present with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and/or congestive heart failure (HF). However, whether beta-blocker therapy provides a similar benefit in patients who have coronary artery disease but not AMI or HF is unknown. A population of 4,304 patients who did not have HF but did have angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease (>/=1 stenosis of >/=70%) without AMI at hospital presentation was evaluated. Baseline demographics, cardiac risk factors, clinical presentation, therapeutic procedures, and discharge medications were recorded. Patients were followed for a mean of 3.0 +/- 1.9 years (range 1 month to 6.9 years) for outcomes of all-cause death or AMI. Patients' average age was 65 +/- 11 years and 77% were men. Overall, 10% died and 5% had a nonfatal AMI. Discharge beta-blocker prescription was associated with an increased event-free AMI survival rate for all-cause death (no beta blocker 88.3%, beta blocker 94.5%, p <0.001) and death/AMI (no beta blocker 83.4%, beta blocker 89.2%, p <0.001) but not non-fatal AMI (no beta blocker 93.6%, beta blocker 94.1%, p = 0.60). After adjustment for 16 covariates, including statin prescription, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescription, and type of baseline therapy, the effect of beta blockers on the combination end point of death/AMI was eliminated. However, the effect of beta blockers on death remained (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.93, p = 0.02). Thus, beta blockers are clearly indicated for most patients who have HF or AMI, and our results suggest that patients who have coronary artery disease without these conditions have approximately the same protective benefit against death. No effect was observed on longitudinal incidence of AMI or the combination of death/nonfatal MI.

Antiarrhythmic drugs

Both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Numerous antiarrhythmics have been developed in an attempt to decrease the frequency of these arrhythmias, hoping to improve survival and improve quality of life. Antiarrhythmic agents are a diverse group of drugs that affect various cardiac ionic channels and block specific arrhythmias. However, despite the suppression of these potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmias, only the beta blockers have been shown to reduce sudden arrhythmic death, especially in patients with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure. Some antiarrhythmic agents can also worsen the index arrhythmia and caution must be used especially in the compromised patient. A simple guideline is as follows: For conversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter to sinus rhythm, in the absence of structural heart disease, intravenous ibutilide or oral propafenone or flecainide are good choices. For maintenance of sinus rhythm, propafenone or flecainide are logical choices. In the presence of structural heart disease, amiodarone, dofetilide, or dl sotalol are preferred. In heart failure, dofetilide or amiodarone are the logical choices. The role of antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular arrhythmias is questionable and may be contraindicated, except for the use of beta blockers. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is often used in patients at high risk. At times, the addition of an antiarrhythmic agent such as amiodarone may be justified.

Cost-effectiveness of differing perioperative beta-blockade strategies in vascular surgery patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incremental value of different strategies of both oral and intravenous beta-blockade during the perioperative period in high-risk vascular patients in reducing costs and improving outcomes.

DESIGN

Decision analytic model incorporating costs from provider's perspective

INTERVENTIONS

Five perioperative strategies in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: (1). no routine beta-blockade, (2). preoperative oral bisoprolol for 7 days followed by perioperative intravenous metoprolol and oral bisoprolol based on preoperative titration, (3). immediate preoperative atenolol with postoperative intravenous then oral atenolol, (4). intraoperative esmolol and postoperative intravenous then oral atenolol, and (5). intraoperative and 18 hours of postoperative esmolol then atenolol.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative death was associated with a net increase of US dollars 21909 in charges to Medicare, whereas sustaining a perioperative myocardial infarction was associated with a net increase in charges of US dollars 15000. There is a net hospital saving of US dollars 500 using a strategy of titration of an oral beta-blocker medication for a minimum of 7 days, with a net increase in efficacy of 0.0304. All of the strategies involving acute perioperative blockade were associated with a net cost savings and increase in efficacy, although less than the strategy involving preoperative oral titration.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative beta-blockade is both cost effective as well as efficacious from a short-term provider perspective. The optimal strategy of treatment for patients who do not present to surgery already on beta-blockers requires further study, although all strategies save money even accounting for pharmaceutical costs.

Beta-blocker use in the emergency department in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty

Our objectives were to evaluate the frequency of beta-blocker administration in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) where angioplasty is the primary treatment, and to investigate emergency physician's (EPs) attitudes toward beta-blockers. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who presented with symptoms and electrocardiogram (EKG) criteria consistent with AMI in the defined study period. Charts were reviewed for beta-blocker administration and other treatments. A survey was subsequently distributed to all EPs to determine self-reported reasons for withholding beta-blockers. There were 91 patients identified. Of those who did not have contraindications, 99% (89/90) received aspirin, 97% (88/91) received heparin, 94% (84/89) received nitrates, but only 28% (19/68) received beta-blockers. Ninety-six percent of beta-blocker-eligible patients received them as inpatients. Eighty-six percent (44/52) of EPs completed the survey. Physicians felt strongly about avoiding beta-blockers in patients with asthma exacerbation, severe congestive heart failure, and high degree AV block. Bradycardia was the most frequent reason for withholding beta-blockers. In this series of patients presenting with AMI, beta-blockers were greatly underutilized. The self-reported reasons of EPs for withholding beta-blocker therapy did not explain why 72% (49/68) of patients without contraindications did not receive beta-blockers.

Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs as antifibrillatory agents

Beta-Adrenergic blockade is associated with a significant reduction in mortality in most patients with structural heart disease. Clinical trial data involving patients after myocardial infarction or with congestive heart failure demonstrate that a reduction in sudden death accounts for much of the observed mortality reduction. Beta-adrenergic blockade inhibits the proarrhythmic effects of both neural and humoral sympathetic stimulation and inhibits the vagal withdrawal that accompanies ischemia. Although it does not have a dramatic effect on spontaneous ectopy or inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, experimental and clinical data suggest that it inhibits the development of ventricular fibrillation by several mechanisms.

Heart rate variability--a therapeutic target?

Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is a powerful and independent predictor of an adverse prognosis in patients with heart disease and in the general population. The HRV is largely determined by vagally mediated beat to beat variability, conventionally known as respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Thus, HRV is primarily an indicator of cardiac vagal control. It is still unclear whether the relationship between measures of cardiac vagal control and mortality is causative or mere association. Possible mechanisms by which cardiac vagal activity might beneficially influence prognosis include a decrease in myocardial oxygen demand, a reduction in sympathetic activity and a decreased susceptibility of the ventricular myocardium to lethal arrhythmia. In animals, augmentation of cardiac vagal control by nerve stimulation or by drugs is associated with a reduction in sudden death in susceptible models. In humans a number of drugs which have been shown to reduce mortality and sudden death in large randomised trials can also be demonstrated to increase HRV. As a result of this evidence, it has been suggested that the effect of drugs or other therapeutic manoeuvres on HRV might be used to predict clinical efficacy. The use of HRV as a therapeutic target is discussed in this review.

Aerobic exercise conditioning: a nonpharmacological antiarrhythmic intervention

Sudden, unexpected cardiac death due to ventricular fibrillation is the leading cause of death in most industrially developed countries. Yet, despite the enormity of this problem, the development of safe and effective antiarrhythmic therapies has proven to be an elusive goal. In fact, many initially promising antiarrhythmic medications were subsequently found to increase rather than to decrease cardiac mortality. It is now known that cardiac disease alters cardiac autonomic balance and that the patients with the greatest changes in this cardiac neural regulation (i.e., decreased parasympathetic coupled with increased sympathetic activity) are also the patients at the greatest risk for sudden death. A growing body of experimental and epidemiological data demonstrates that aerobic exercise conditioning can dramatically reduce cardiac mortality, even in patients with preexisting cardiac disease. Conversely, the lack of exercise is strongly associated with an increased incidence of many chronic debilitating diseases, including coronary heart disease. Because it is well established that aerobic exercise conditioning can alter autonomic balance (increasing parasympathetic tone and decreasing sympathetic activity), a prudently designed exercise program could prove to be an effective and nonpharmacological way to enhance cardiac electrical stability, thereby protecting against sudden cardiac death.

Intensive home-based exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation increases exercise capacity and heart rate variability

BACKGROUND

Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is a risk factor for cardiac death. Animal studies have shown increased HRV and reduced mortality after physical training. We evaluated the change in exercise capacity and HRV in cardiac rehabilitation patients, randomised to routine or home-based intensive training. The design was prospective, stratified randomisation with pre-specified subgroup analysis.

METHODS

Maximal bicycle exercise test and 24-h Holter were performed 1 (baseline), 4 and 12 months after myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary artery by-pass surgery (CABG). Patients were randomised to physical training either two (N) or six (I) times per week for 3 months Sixty-two patients (43 MI and 19 CABG patients) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Exercise capacity increased significantly more after 3 months of training in group I (mean (S.E.)); 29.0 (3.4) vs. 7.2 (2.6) watts, P<0.001). One year later the difference in exercise capacity remained (26.5 (3.3) vs. 11.8 (3.8) watts, P<0.001). Global HRV measurements SDNN and SDANN increased significantly more in group I after training (17.1 (5.6) vs. 1.7 (3.7) and 16.2 (4.9) vs. 2.8 (3.1) ms, P<0.05) and 1 year later the differences were still significant. Subgroup analysis showed more pronounced HRV response in CABG than MI patients.

CONCLUSION

Intensive exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation increases exercise capacity and global HRV, which could be of prognostic significance.

Circadian variation of heart rate variability and the rate of autonomic change in the morning hours in healthy subjects and angina patients

BACKGROUND

Incidence of sudden cardiac death peaks during the early morning hours when there is a rapid withdrawal of vagal and an increase of sympathetic tone. The rate of autonomic change could be of prognostic importance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 65 patients with angina pectoris, free from other diseases and drug free, were Holter monitored for 24 h. A total of 30 patients were also monitored on isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN) and on metoprolol respectively. A total of 33 age-matched healthy subjects served as controls. Spectral components of heart rate variability (HRV) were analysed hourly, with special reference to the rapid changes of autonomic tone during the night and early morning hours. Circadian variation was assessed in two ways: (1) Mean HRV day (8 a.m.-8 p.m.) and night (0-5 a.m.) were compared. (2) For the morning/night hours (0-10 a.m.), individual hourly values for max. and min. HRV, the difference max.-min. (gradient), the rate of change per hour between max. and min. (velocity) and the largest difference between two consecutive hours (max. velocity) were recorded and the mean value for the group calculated.

RESULTS

During the night/morning hours, healthy controls demonstrated faster HF max. velocity (P=0.002) and higher HF gradient (P=0.011) than angina patients. Metoprolol and IS-5-MN increased the HF gradient (P=0.008 and P=0.003, respectively), and metoprolol tended to increase the max. velocity (P=0.02). Metoprolol substantially decreased the LF/HF gradient (P=0.001), velocity (P=0.008) and max. velocity (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Rapid vagal withdrawal seemed to be a sign of a healthy autonomic nervous system in the control group but was significantly slower in angina patients. IS-5-MN and metoprolol tended to normalise vagal withdrawal and metoprolol slowed down the rapid increase in sympathetic predominance in the morning in patients.

Etiology and management of sustained ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to a variety of underlying cardiovascular problems pose a therapeutic challenge to the clinician. The initial presentation may be as sudden cardiac death, which underlies its public health problem. The underlying conditions predisposing to this arrhythmia include ischemic heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmiogenic right ventricle dysplasia and certain postoperative states including corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot and valve replacement. Other causes include prolonged QT syndrome, idiopathic right and left ventricle tachycardia and bundle branch re-entry tachycardia. Ischaemic heart disease is the most common cause of ventricular tachycardia and therapy has evolved considerably over the past two decades. The development of and refinements in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) have introduced a new dimension in therapeutic options and markedly improved survival in these patients. Insights in the dichotomy between arrhythmia suppression and total mortality have reoriented drug therapy with a decrease in the use of sodium channel blockers. beta-blockers have emerged as antiarrhythmic drugs in their own right and their synergistic effects with amiodarone have strengthened the antiarrhythmic drug arm. The role of these drugs in patients with hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia, especially in relatively preserved ventricles needs to be explored. Catheter ablation techniques have provided curative therapy in patients with idiopathic and bundle branch reentry tachycardia. Further advances in radiofrequency ablation, including use of newer mapping techniques, promise a greater role for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia in the future. A hybrid approach consisting of drugs, catheter ablation and/ or ICD may provide effective therapeutic approach in some situations. Further innovations and technologic developments promise a further reorientation in therapy towards identification and treatment of the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate.

Drug therapy of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Is there still a role?

This article provides a review of the risks faced by patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the absence of a reversible or transient cause so that the goals of therapy can be clearly defined. The therapeutic approaches that have been proposed to achieve these goals are outlined and evidence comparing these various approaches to therapy is then summarized in order to propose an algorithm for the optimal use of antiarrhythmic drug therapies as primary therapy for selected VT/VF patients. Options for the ancillary uses of antiarrhythmic drug therapies in ICD patients are considered.

Out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: coronary angiographic determinants

OBJECTIVES

The study intended to compare the acute coronary anatomy of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) versus patients with AMI without this complication.

BACKGROUND

More than half of the deaths associated with AMI occur out of the hospital and within 1 h of symptom onset. The angiographic determinants of out-of-hospital VF in patients with AMI have not been investigated in detail.

METHODS

Acute coronary angiographic findings of 72 consecutive patients with AMI complicated by out-of-hospital VF were compared with findings from 144 matched patients with AMI without this complication.

RESULTS

Patients with an acute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) or left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) had a higher risk for out-of-hospital VF compared with patients with an acute occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval, respectively, 4.82 [2.35 to 9.92] and 4.92 [2.34 to 10.39]). With regard to extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), the location of the culprit lesion in the coronary arteries (proximal vs. mid or distal), the flow in the infarct related artery (IRA), the presence or absence of collaterals to the IRA and chronic occlusions, there were no differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute myocardial infarction due to occlusion in the left coronary artery (LCA) is associated with greater risk for out-of-hospital VF compared to the RCA. The location of occlusion within LCA (LAD, LCx, proximal or distal), amount of myocardium at risk for necrosis and extent of CAD are not related to out-of-hospital VF.

Beta-blockers and amiodarone for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death remains a major public health care problem, generally occurring in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Beta-blockers, already of proven benefit for patients after myocardial infarction, have recently been shown to improve functional status and mortality outcomes in patients with heart failure. Amiodarone, a potent antiarrhythmic drug, was recently studied in a number of randomized clinical trials involving patients with heart failure and patients after myocardial infarction. Routine use of amiodarone cannot be recommended in these patient groups, but serious adverse outcomes were not observed. When antiarrhythmic drug therapy is required, amiodarone is the drug of choice for patients with structural heart disease.

Long-term effect of endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy on heart rate variability and QT dispersion in severe angina pectoris

We evaluated short and long-term effects on QT dispersion and autonomic balance after endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy (ETS). Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic balance of the heart. QT dispersion is a marker of cardiac electrical instability in patients with ischemic heart disease. Holter recordings for 24 h and a twelve-lead ECG were made prior to, 1 month, 1 year and 2 years after ETS. HRV was analysed in time domain and spectral analysis was performed during controlled respiration in supine position and during head up tilt. Dispersion of QT time and QTc were calculated. Of 88 patients, 62 (60) were eligible for HRV (QT-dispersion) analysis after 1 month, 39 (38) patients after 1 year and 23 (24) patients after 2 years. The HRV analysis showed a significant change of indices reflecting sympatho-vagal balance indicating significantly reduced sympathetic (LF) and increased vagal (HF, rMSSD) tone. These changes still persisted after 2 years. Global HRV increased over time with significant elevation of SDANN after 2 years. QT dispersion was significantly reduced 1 month after surgery and the dispersion was further diminished 2 years later.

CONCLUSION

ETS changed HRV and QT dispersion which could imply reduced risk for malignant arrhythmias and death after ETS.

Differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy. Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Study Group

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in clinical practice.

METHODS

In all, 5,906 patients with AMI were registered by the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) study. Of these, 491 (8.3%) patients were treated with primary angioplasty and 2,817 (47.7%) with intravenous thrombolysis.

RESULTS

There were only minor differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Prehospital delay time (median) was longer in the angioplasty group than in the thrombolysis group (161 vs. 120, p = 0.001), as was door-to-treatment time (88 vs. 30 min; p = 0.001). Patients treated with primary angioplasty more often had contraindications for thrombolytic therapy (12.9 vs. 6%, p = 0.001) and received beta blockers (65 vs. 58.1%, p = 0.004), heparin (98.2 vs. 91.6%, p = 0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (64.8 vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and "optimal" concomitant medication (56.4 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.001) more often. Univariate analysis showed a significant lower incidence of heart failure (5.3 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.001), postinfarct angina (7.3 vs. 16.4%, p = 0.001), in-hospital death (7.9 vs. 11.7%, p = 0.015) and the combined end point (21.6 vs. 40.3%, p = 0.001) in these patients. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed optimal concomitant medication [odds ratio (OR) = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.98) and the type of revascularization (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73) to be associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of the combined end point. Similar results were obtained in all predefined subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, patients treated with primary angioplasty are more often treated with beta blockers and ACE inhibitors than patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Thus, the selection of patients and the type of revascularization contributes to the reduction in mortality, overt heart failure, and postinfarct angina in these patients.

Potential risk of beta-blockade withdrawal in congestive heart failure due to abrupt autonomic changes

Beta-Blockers reduce mortality in patients with congestive heart failure and a proposed mechanism has been changes of autonomic tone. Heart rate variability is a non-invasive tool to estimate cardiac autonomic tone. The aim was to study changes of heart rate variability in patients with congestive heart failure on placebo, on the beta1-selective antagonist metoprolol or 24 h after metoprolol withdrawal. Forty-five patients with congestive heart failure were studied with Holter recordings. Heart rate variability measurements were performed before, after 6-12 months of treatment with 150 mg metoprolol/placebo, or 24 h after discontinued metoprolol. After treatment, patients on beta-blockade had a significantly longer mean RR interval and changes of heart rate variability, suggesting elevated vagal tone. Patients monitored in the rebound phase of beta-blocker withdrawal had a significant vagal reduction to the level of the placebo group. There was also a nonsignificant trend towards increased sympathetic tone (LF/HF over 24 h), compared with the beta-blockade group. Heart rate variability indicates an elevated vagal tone during treatment with metoprolol but beta-blockade withdrawal shifts the autonomic balance towards lower vagal and higher sympathetic tone within 24 h. These results could imply a potential risk when abruptly discontinuing beta-blockade medication in these patients.

A comparison of metoprolol and morphine in the treatment of chest pain in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction--the MEMO study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the analgesic effect of metoprolol and morphine in patients with chest pain due to suspected or definite acute myocardial infarction after initial treatment with intravenous metoprolol.

DESIGN

All patients, regardless of age, admitted to the coronary care unit at Uddevalla Central Hospital due to suspected acute myocardial infarction were evaluated for inclusion in the MEMO study (metoprolol-morphine). The effects on chest pain and side-effects of the two treatments were followed during 24 h. Pain was assessed by a numerical rating scale.

RESULTS

A total of 265 patients were randomized in this prospective double-blind study and 59% developed a confirmed acute myocardial infarction. In both treatment groups, there were rapid reductions of pain intensity. However, in the patient group treated with morphine, there was a more pronounced pain relief during the first 80 min after start of double-blind treatment. The side-effects were few and were those expected from each therapeutic regimen. During the first 24 h, nausea requiring anti-emetics was more common in the morphine-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

In suspected acute myocardial infarction, if chest pain persists after intravenous beta-adrenergic blockade treatment, standard doses of an opioid analgesic such as morphine will offer better pain relief than increased dosages of metoprolol.

Sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: incidence and outcomes. The GUSTO Investigators

BACKGROUND

Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) occur in up to 20% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and have been associated with a poor prognosis. The relationships among the type of arrhythmia (VT versus VF or both), time of VT/VF occurrence, use of thrombolytic agents, and eventual outcome are unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the GUSTO-I study, we examined variables associated with the occurrence of VT/VF and its impact on mortality. Of the 40 895 patients with ventricular arrhythmia data, 4188 (10.2%) had sustained VT, VF, or both. Older age, systemic hypertension, previous MI, Killip class, anterior infarct, and depressed ejection fraction were associated with a higher risk of sustained VT and VF (P<0.001). In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were higher among patients with sustained VT/VF than among patients without sustained ventricular arrhythmias (P<0.001). Both early (<2 days) and late (>2 days) occurrences of sustained VT and VF were associated with a higher risk of later mortality (P<0. 001). In addition, patients with both VT and VF had worse outcomes than those with either VT or VF alone (P<0.001). Among patients who survived hospitalization, no significant difference was found in 30-day mortality between the VT/VF and no VT/VF groups. However, after 1 year, the mortality rate was significantly higher in the VT alone and VT/VF groups (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of thrombolytic therapy, both early and late occurrences of sustained VT or VF continue to have a negative impact on patient outcome; patients with both VT and VF had the worst outcome; and among patients who survived hospitalization, the 1-year mortality rate was significantly higher in those who experienced VT alone or VT and VF.

Importance of beta blockade in the therapy of serious ventricular arrhythmias

Beta blockers have traditionally been considered relatively poor antiarrhythmic agents for patients with ventricular arrhythmias. This view is based on the observations that beta blockers are less effective in suppressing spontaneous ventricular ectopy or inducible ventricular arrhythmias than are the class I and class III agents. However, there are convincing data that beta blockers can have a clinically important antiarrhythmic effect and prevent arrhythmic and sudden death. Beta blockers have multiple potential effects that can contribute to a therapeutic antiarrhythmic action, including an antiadrenergic/vagomimetic effect, a decrease in ventricular fibrillation threshold, and prevention of a catecholamine reversal of concomitant class I/III antiarrhythmic drug effects. Postinfarction trials, recent congestive heart failure studies, and observations in patients who are at risk for sustained ventricular arrhythmias all suggest a potent antiarrhythmic effect of beta blockade.

The sympathetic nervous system in chronic heart failure

The sympathetic nervous system plays a pivotal role in the natural history of chronic heart failure (CHF). There is early activation of cardiac adrenergic drive, which is followed by an increasing magnitude of generalized sympathetic activation, with worsening heart failure. The adverse consequences predominate over the short-term compensatory effects and are mediated through downregulation of beta-receptor function and harmful biological effects on the cardiomyocyte. beta-blockers exert a beneficial effect on the natural history of CHF by attenuating the negative biological effects, restoring homogeneity of contractile/relaxant mechanisms, and reducing the risk of myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias. After pioneering work conducted over 20 years ago, numerous studies have shown the beneficial effects of beta-blockade on left ventricular function, and survival, morbidity, and mortality rates in CHF. Large-scale trials are underway to determine the overall benefits of beta-blockade in heart failure.

Effect of beta-blocker therapy in patients with coronary artery disease in New York Heart Association classes II and III. The Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study Group

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of beta-blocker treatment on a large cohort of patients with coronary artery disease in functional classes II and III according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. Among 11,575 patients with coronary artery disease screened for participation, but not included in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study, 3,225 (28%) were in NYHA classes II and III. In the latter group of patients we compared the prognosis of 1,109 (34%) treated with beta blockers with 2,116 counterparts not receiving beta-blocker therapy. After a mean follow-up of 4 years, all-cause and cardiac mortality rates were significantly lower among beta-blocker users, 9% and 5%, respectively, than among beta-blocker nonusers, 17% and 11%, respectively (p <0.01 for both). After multivariate adjustment, treatment with beta blockers was associated with a lower all-cause mortality risk (hazards ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 0.78), and a lower cardiac mortality risk (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.83) than was no treatment with a beta blocker. Lower total mortality risk was noted among patients in NYHA class II (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.82) and in NYHA class III (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.87) as well as in patients with (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.81) or without (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.09) a previous myocardial infarction. We conclude that beta-blocker therapy in coronary patients in NYHA classes II or III is safe and associated with a lower risk for all-cause and cardiac mortality.

Effect of a 'vagomimetic' atropine dose on canine cardiac vagal tone and susceptibility to sudden cardiac death

We manipulated the level of cardiac vagal tone in dogs with healed myocardial infarctions during exercise plus acute ischemia, to explore vagal involvement in the pathophysiology of sudden cardiac death. We occluded the circumflex coronary artery during the last minute of treadmill exercise in 32 dogs with healed anterior myocardial infarctions. Twenty-one dogs experienced ventricular fibrillation (susceptible) and 11 did not (resistant). On a subsequent day, we gave intravenous low-dose atropine to susceptible dogs to increase their levels of cardiac vagal tone, as estimated by moving polynomial time-series analysis of R-R interval variability (0.24-1.04 Hz). We also measured vagal responses to coronary occlusion at rest, before and after low-dose atropine. In susceptible dogs, atropine increased the average vagal tone index at rest (atropine: 7.3 +/- 0.4 versus control: 6.6 +/- 0.5 ln ms2, P < 0.01) and during maximum exercise (atropine: 2.5 +/- 0.4 versus control: 1.6 +/- 0.3 ln ms2, P < 0.01), but failed to prevent ventricular fibrillation actually decreased from 63 +/- 3 to 42 +/- 2s (P < 0.01), and R-R interval shortening elicited by coronary occlusion increased (atropine: delta -144 +/- 64 versus control: delta -55 +/- 32 ms, P < 0.01). In resting susceptible dogs, atropine significantly increased preocclusion indexes of vagal tone (atropine: 7.8 +/- 0.3 versus control: 6.9 +/- 0.4 ln ms2, P < 0.01), but did not prevent large reductions of vagal tone during ischemia (atropine: delta -4.4 +/- 0.6 versus control: delta -3.8 +/- 0.4 ln ms2, P > 0.05). We conclude that increases of resting vagal tone after low-dose atropine in dogs with healed anterior myocardial infarctions do not protect against sudden cardiac death. Quite the contrary, vagal tone is withdrawn more completely during ischemia, and the time to ventricular fibrillation during exercise plus ischemia is shortened.

Can antiarrhythmic drugs survive survival trials?

Sudden cardiac death due to arrhythmic events is the major cause of mortality among early post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients, accounting for > 250,000 deaths annually in the United States alone. Antiarrhythmic drugs can be used in such patients as well as in those who have not had a recent MI but are at high risk for sudden cardiac death (e.g., those with ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, or who have survived cardiac arrest). Most antiarrhythmic drugs available, however, have limitations arising from their toxic and proarrhythmic potential. Thus, research and development of new agents and treatment modalities are desirable. This article seeks to enumerate the lessons of past clinical trials with these agents and to provide guidelines for future trials. That a variety of antiarrhythmic drugs have been associated with an increased mortality has been a disturbing observation. It is therefore imperative that candidates for antiarrhythmic therapy be selected appropriately. We recommend that future clinical trials use stringent criteria for the identification of patients at "high risk" for arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death, and limit recruitment to such patients. Traditional markers, such as the increased frequency and complexity of ventricular premature beats, and low left ventricular ejection fraction, have not been successful in identifying these high-risk patients. However, decreased heart rate variability and cardiac late potentials recorded on a signal-over-aged electrocardiogram appear to be more specific markers of post-MI arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death and may, in conjunction with the traditional markers, be used to improve selection of trial populations. Since the risk of sudden cardiac death diminishes with time after MI, it is also recommended that the temporal window of treatment with antiarrhythmic agents be limited to 1 year post-MI. It is also important to define clearly the endpoints of efficacy evaluations. A short-term reduction on markers like ventricular ectopic beats, for example, does not translate into a long-term decrease in arrhythmia-related mortality. Therefore, a reduction in overall mortality is the only meaningful endpoint to define the true risk-benefit ratio. To limit exposure to the potentially adverse effects of these agents, target populations for prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs should be limited to recent post-MI patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death due to arrhythmia. Avoiding exposure of low-risk patients to antiarrhythmic drugs is equally imperative. "Low risk" of all-cause mortality includes the group of post-MI patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction >36%. Risk must be continuously evaluated in the setting of other pharmacologic (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, aspirin, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ["statins"], and others) and/or nonpharmacologic interventions (coronary artery bypass graft, angioplasty, implantable cardioverter/defibrillator). There is also a need to improve noninvasive techniques for identifying patients in the high-risk category-at present, the presence of ventricular premature beats and a left ventricular ejection fraction <36% is considered somewhat predictive of sudden cardiac death. Thus, patients with a recent MI and moderately low left ventricular ejection fraction (< or = 36% but not <20%) may be considered for antiarrhythmic therapy. A subset analysis of patients with low heart rate variability can provide valuable additional information. It is important to note that although all-cause mortality is a valid endpoint for such trials, stratification by specific cause of mortality is desirable.

Effects of beta blockade on sudden cardiac death during acute myocardial infarction and the postinfarction period

About half of all deaths after myocardial infarction (MI) are sudden cardiac deaths. Most of these are thought to be due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). A number of interventions and many different antiarrhythmic agents have been investigated, but so far only beta-blocker therapy has been found to produce significant reductions in the risk of sudden cardiac death after MI. Reductions in total mortality and sudden cardiac death were first reported in 1981 in 3 placebo-controlled studies, the Norwegian Timolol Study, the American Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT), and the Göteborg Metoprolol Trial. A few years later, two very large trials, the Metoprolol in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MIAMI) study and the First International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-1), which included 6,000 and 16,000 patients, respectively, showed that beta-blocker therapy could reduce mortality within the first 2 weeks after onset of MI. Data from 24 postinfarction studies with long-term follow-up show an average 20% mortality reduction over 2 years. Pooled results of 28 short-term, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in which beta blockers were given intravenously shortly after onset of MI indicate an average 13% mortality reduction within 2 weeks. In the 16 studies in which the sudden cardiac death rate was reported, the beneficial effect of beta blockade was even more marked: a 34% average reduction of risk. Not all studies with beta blockers, however, have demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of sudden cardiac death. Such an effect has been clearly demonstrated only for the more lipophilic beta blockers (timolol, metoprolol, and propranolol). Two of these lipophilic beta blockers, metoprolol and propranolol, have also been shown to prevent VF after MI in clinical studies. Based on observations from animal experiments, it has been proposed that beta blockers with a high degree of lipophilicity penetrate the brain and thereby maintain high vagal tone during stress. A combination of direct anti-ischemic effects due to beta1 blockade and preservation of vagal tone appears to prevent VF in these animal models. Further clinical studies are needed to explore this hypothesis.

Beta2-adrenergic receptor antagonists protect against ventricular fibrillation: in vivo and in vitro evidence for enhanced sensitivity to beta2-adrenergic stimulation in animals susceptible to sudden death

BACKGROUND

The ventricular myocardium contains functional beta2-adrenergic receptors that when activated increase intracellular Ca2+ transients. Because elevated Ca2+ has been implicated in the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF), it is possible that the activation of these receptors may also provoke malignant arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To test this hypothesis, a 2-minute occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery was made during the last minute of exercise in 28 dogs with healed anterior myocardial infarctions: 17 had VF (susceptible) and 11 did not (resistant). On a subsequent day, this test was repeated after administration of the beta2-adrenergic receptor antagonist ICI 118,551 (0.2 mg/kg). This drug did not alter the hemodynamic response to the coronary occlusion, yet it prevented VF in 10 of 11 animals tested (P<.001). However, heart rate was reduced in 6 animals. Therefore, the ICI 118,551 exercise-plus-ischemia test was repeated with heart rate held constant by ventricular pacing (n=3). ICI 118,551 still prevented VF when heart rate was maintained. Next, the effects of increasing doses of the beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist zinterol on Ca2+ transient amplitudes were examined in ventricular myocytes. Zinterol elicited significantly greater increases in Ca2+ transient amplitudes at all doses tested (10(-9) to 10(-6) mol/L) in myocytes prepared from susceptible versus resistant animals. The cardiomyocyte response to isoproterenol (10(-7) mol/L) in the presence or absence of the selective beta1- (CGP-20712A, 300 nmol/L) or beta2- (ICI 118,551, 100 nmol/L) adrenergic receptor antagonist was also examined. Isoproterenol elicited larger Ca2+ transient increases in the susceptible myocytes, which were eliminated by ICI but not by CGP.

CONCLUSIONS

When considered together, these data demonstrate that canine myocytes contain functional beta2-adrenergic receptors that are activated to a greater extent in the susceptible animals. The resulting cytosolic Ca2+ transient increases may lead to afterpotentials that ultimately trigger VF in these animals.

Heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction in patients treated with atenolol and metoprolol

Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomous activity that influences the heart. It has been shown that HRV is depressed during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and that it recovers with time. Beta-blockers reduce mortality after AMI and changes in sympathico-vagal activity have been suggested to be of importance. Under certain animal experimental conditions, metoprolol has been reported to increase vagal tone more than atenolol, which could have clinical implications. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of atenolol and metoprolol treatments on HRV during 6 weeks after AMI and to follow the post MI changes in HRV in patients on betablockers.

METHODS

In an open, randomised cross-over study, 28 patients were randomised to 3+3 weeks' treatment with atenolol or metoprolol starting 2-5 days after AMI. Twenty-four hour Holter recordings were made before randomisation and after 3 and 6 weeks. HRV was analysed as HR, SDRR, SDANN, SD, rMSSD and pNN50 in the time domain and as coefficient of component variance (CCV) of HF and LF, and as LF/HF ratio in the frequency domain.

RESULTS

The average daily dose in our study population was 106 mg of metoprolol and 54 mg of atenolol. There were trends toward lower heart rates daytime, lower LF/HF ratio daytime and higher rMSSD on atenolol compared to metoprolol. In the total group of 28 patients we found during the first 3 weeks, a significant increase of SDNN, SDANN (p<0.0001) and LF/HF ratio daytime and CCV-HF night-time (p<0.01). All differences and trends were unchanged between 3 and 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of more increased vagal tone with metoprolol compared to atenolol as has been suggested from animal models. In patients also on chronic treatment with beta blockers, an increase of HRV was seen during the first weeks post MI.

Effect of endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy on heart rate variability in severe angina pectoris

Endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy (ETS) is a recently developed technique to divide sympathetic nerves. ETS has been shown to improve symptoms and reduce ischemia in patients with severe angina pectoris. Low heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with ischemic heart disease carries an adverse prognosis. HRV reflects autonomic response of the heart and a shift in the sympathovagal balance towards parasympathetic dominance could be a marker of improved prognosis. HRV might also be used as an indicator of surgical success in sympathetic heart denervation. Heart rate was recorded in 57 patients before and after ETS. Registration was recorded during controlled respiration in the supine position and at tilt test over 10 minutes and spectral analysis was performed. Twenty-four hour Holter recordings were analyzed in the time domain. During the controlled setting, the high-frequency (HF) component (0.15 to 0.40 Hz) increased significantly whereas the low-frequency (LF) component (0.04 to 0.15 Hz) did not change significantly. The LF/HF ratio at tilt test was reduced from 1.3 to 0.8 (p <0.01). The time-domain analysis showed a significant increase of the mean RR interval (923 to 1,006 ms, p <0.001) and indexes reflecting parasympathetic tone also increased significantly (the root-mean square of difference measured from 24.3 to 29.5 ms, p <0.001 and the proportion of adjacent RR intervals >50% measured from 5.5% to 8.2%, p <0.01), whereas measurements reflecting global HRV did not change. In addition to relief of symptoms and reduced ischemia in severe angina pectoris, ETS caused a shift of sympathovagal balance toward parasympathetic tone. This might explain the anti-ischemic effect and have prognostic implications.

Primary angioplasty versus thrombolysis in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. ALKK Study Group

This study investigates the hypothesis if primary angioplasty is superior to intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Small prospective randomized studies did not demonstrate a significant benefit regarding total mortality. A total of 14,980 patients with AMI were registered by "The 60-Minutes Myocardial Infarction Project," a prospective multicenter observational study: 210 of these patients were treated with primary angioplasty. A matched pair analysis comparing 1 primary angioplasty patient with 3 intravenous thrombolysis patients could be performed in 156 primary angioplasty patients. Criteria for matching were age, sex, location of AMI, systolic blood pressure, previous AMI, and prehospital delay. Patients with a bundle branch block or requiring resuscitation were excluded from analysis. Because of matching, both groups showed similar baseline characteristics. Patients with primary angioplasty had more relative contraindications for thrombolysis (ulcers: 10.3% vs 2.3%, recent intramuscular injections: 6.4% vs 1.6%, recent surgical interventions: 5.1% vs 1.1%, central punctures: 9% vs 3.9%). There was a tendency toward less combined adverse events in the primary angioplasty group (3.2% vs 5.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21 to 1.44). In-hospital mortality rates in the primary angioplasty group and thrombolysis group were 4.3% and 10.3%, respectively (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.92). The difference in mortality could already be demonstrated within the first 48 hours with 1.9% versus 5.3% deaths (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.11 to 1.14). Thus this study indicates a superiority of primary angioplasty in comparison to intravenous thrombolysis in AMI even in a clinical routine setting, with a reduction of hospital mortality of about 60%.

Parenteral antiarrhythmics for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias

The acute management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias often includes the use of parenteral antiarrhythmics. There are a number of agents currently available for this purpose. They are used to suppress inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation, they terminate spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia, and prevent ventricular fibrillation in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction. Serious adverse reactions include proarrhythmia, hypotension, severe bradyarrhythmias, and precipitation of congestive heart failure. A comparative evaluation of intravenous antiarrhythmics is difficult due to inherent differences in the choice of agents for study, protocol design, patient population, defined endpoint, and serum drug levels. Likewise, the reported adverse reaction rates vary from 0.4% to 75%. To understand the difficulties in clinical decision-making in this problem area, particularly drug selection, we present here a review of pertinent clinical trials evaluating parenteral drug efficacy and adverse effects.

Use of beta-adrenoceptor blockers in patients with congestive heart failure

The beneficial effect of chronic beta-blockade in patients with congestive heart failure has been repeatedly shown since its introduction into treatment for this condition in 1975. Still this kind of therapy remains controversial, it is sometimes regarded as a therapeutic paradox, and its use is mainly limited to specialist centers. Various favorable effects of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart disease have been demonstrated, the principal among them being reduction in energy requirements and ischemia, antiarrhythmogenic effect, improvement of diastolic function, protection of myocytes against catecholamine overload, centrally mediated increase in vagal tone, upregulation of beta-adrenergic receptors, and possible blockade of autoantibodies against beta 1-receptors. Although most of the studies used metoprolol, these effects may be relevant to certain other beta-blockers. Despite very solid pathophysiological and pharmacological rationales for the use of beta-blockade, a major obstacle for a general acceptance of this therapeutic concept is the striking contrast between hemodynamic changes during the acute effect and long-term treatment. When titrated carefully from very low doses and used with a true commitment to long-term treatment, beta-blockers have been shown to prevent further deterioration of heart failure and to improve hemodynamics, exercise tolerance, quality of life, and prognosis.