Tracking changes in frailty throughout later life: results from a 17-year longitudinal study in the Netherlands

The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: cohort update 2019 and additional data collections

The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) is a prospective cohort study of older adults in the Netherlands, initially based on a nationally representative sample of people aged 55-84 years. The study has been ongoing since 1992, and focuses on the determinants, trajectories and consequences of physical, cognitive, emotional and social functioning. Strengths of the LASA study include its multidisciplinary character, the availability of over 25 years of follow-up, and the cohort-sequential design that allows investigations of longitudinal changes, cohort differences and time trends in functioning. The findings from LASA have been reported in over 600 publications so far (see www.lasa-vu.nl). This article provides an update of the design of the LASA study and its methods, on the basis of recent developments. We describe additional data collections, such as additional nine-monthly measurements in-between the regular three-yearly waves that have been conducted among the oldest old during 2016-2019, and the inclusion of a cohort of older Turkish and Moroccan migrants.

Frailty Status Predicts All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Community Dwelling Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between frailty status and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study with an 11-year follow up.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Data from the Survey on Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) were used. In the analysis, we included data from 11 European countries. We included men and women older than 50 years residing in Europe. Overall, 24,634 participants were analyzed with a mean age of 64.2 (9.8), 53.6% female, where 14.7% and 6.9% were found to be prefrail or frail, respectively, at the baseline.

METHODS

Frailty status was calculated using the SHARE-Frailty Instrument, categorizing the participants as robust, prefrail, and frail. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate the risk of all-cause and cause-specific (stroke, heart attack, other cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory illness, infectious, and digestive and other) mortality.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, and after adjusting for sex, age, education, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, and number of comorbidities, frailty was associated with a higher risk of all-cause (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.90-2.48) and mortality due to stroke (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.37-3.10), heart attack (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.19-2.34), other cardiovascular disease (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.87-4.12), cancer (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.63-2.73), respiratory disease (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.66-4.60), infectious diseases (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.03-3.11), and digestive and other causes (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.51-2.71). Prefrailty was associated with a higher risk of all-cause (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.31-1.63), heart attack (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.72), other cardiovascular disease (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.46-2.81), respiratory disease (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.09-2.65), and digestive and other causes (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18-1.91) mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Baseline prefrailty and frailty are associated with increased all-cause and cause-specific mortality over an 11-year follow up. Public health policy should include preventive programs aimed at older adults to prevent frailty and reduce mortality.

Fluctuations in frailty among older adults

BACKGROUND

frailty fluctuations, that is, within-person up and down deviations from individual long-term frailty index trajectories represent a hitherto both conceptually and empirically untapped facet of frailty among older adults.

OBJECTIVE

to assess the size of frailty fluctuations in old age and their association with frailty levels, frailty growth as well as sex and socio-economic position.

METHODS

a total of 18,704 biannual observations from 4,514 community-dwelling older adults (65+) in 10 European countries over 12 years from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) were analysed. A frailty index was constructed based on 50 items. Long-term frailty trajectories and fluctuations were modelled simultaneously using Bayesian mixed-effects location-scale regression models.

RESULTS

frailty index fluctuations were non-negligible among older adults, amounting to 0.04/0.05 FI or 2.0/2.5 health deficits on average. 30% of fluctuations were between 0.04 and 0.1 FI (2 and 5 health deficits) and 8% were larger than 0.1 FI (5 health deficits). Fluctuations increased with age and frailty levels, and were higher among women, those with low socio-economic position (education) and individuals who died during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

frailty index fluctuations refer to instabilities in an older person's health status and represent a hitherto untapped but relevant aspect of vulnerability in old age. Future analysis of frailty fluctuations should be based on a larger number of repeated observations with shorter time intervals.

Longitudinal studies of ageing: from insights to impacts: commentary to accompany themed collection on longitudinal studies

'Time is the best diagnostician': who has not thought this? In clinical practice, presentations are often subtle and decisions made in the face of a 'snapshot.' Crystal balls do not exist; yet, insights from longitudinal studies can help to recognise emerging pictures and anticipate typical trajectories. In the multifactorial, biopsychosocial world of geriatrics, the determinants of those trajectories, and hence opportunities to modify them, can be better understood through careful longitudinal disentangling of the wider determinants of health, and this can be done at multiple levels of analysis, from molecules to society. With this collection and commentary, we highlight the approaches, scope and impacts of a selection of longitudinal studies of ageing published in Age and Ageing within the past 10 years. Longitudinal studies can illuminate disease mechanisms, how declines in multiple domains of intrinsic capacity interact, how losses in one domain may influence the path of another, and in turn, how these changes translate to functional disability, or not. Observing trajectories of geriatric syndromes can suggest opportunities for optimisation and prevention in clinical practice and policy. With global opportunities for harmonising data, longitudinal studies are already offering the opportunity for cross-national comparisons and for developing hypotheses about the relative contributions of time, place and society in the trajectories of frailty, disability and quality of life. We also include studies which show how research-based longitudinal data can be synthesised or be linked to administrative datasets. We hope you find this collection as interesting and encouraging as we have.

Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management

OBJECTIVE

The task force of the International Conference of Frailty and Sarcopenia Research (ICFSR) developed these clinical practice guidelines to overview the current evidence-base and to provide recommendations for the identification and management of frailty in older adults.

METHODS

These recommendations were formed using the GRADE approach, which ranked the strength and certainty (quality) of the supporting evidence behind each recommendation. Where the evidence-base was limited or of low quality, Consensus Based Recommendations (CBRs) were formulated. The recommendations focus on the clinical and practical aspects of care for older people with frailty, and promote person-centred care. Recommendations for Screening and Assessment: The task force recommends that health practitioners case identify/screen all older adults for frailty using a validated instrument suitable for the specific setting or context (strong recommendation). Ideally, the screening instrument should exclude disability as part of the screening process. For individuals screened as positive for frailty, a more comprehensive clinical assessment should be performed to identify signs and underlying mechanisms of frailty (strong recommendation). Recommendations for Management: A comprehensive care plan for frailty should address polypharmacy (whether rational or nonrational), the management of sarcopenia, the treatable causes of weight loss, and the causes of exhaustion (depression, anaemia, hypotension, hypothyroidism, and B12 deficiency) (strong recommendation). All persons with frailty should receive social support as needed to address unmet needs and encourage adherence to a comprehensive care plan (strong recommendation). First-line therapy for the management of frailty should include a multi-component physical activity programme with a resistance-based training component (strong recommendation). Protein/caloric supplementation is recommended when weight loss or undernutrition are present (conditional recommendation). No recommendation was given for systematic additional therapies such as cognitive therapy, problem-solving therapy, vitamin D supplementation, and hormone-based treatment. Pharmacological treatment as presently available is not recommended therapy for the treatment of frailty.