1
|
Martin FE, Hilton JA, Martin FC, Nath R, Partridge JSL, Dhesi JK. The functional trajectories of older women having surgery for gynaeoncology cancer: A single site prospective observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101678. [PMID: 38113756 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Population aging longevity and advances in robotic surgery suggest that increasing numbers of older women having gynaeoncological surgery is likely. Postoperative morbidity and mortality are more common in older than younger women with the age-associated characteristics of multimorbidity and frailty being generally predictive of worse outcome. Priorities that inform treatment decisions change during the life course: older patients often place greater' value on quality-of-life-years gained than on life expectancy following cancer treatments. However, data on post-operative cognition, frailty, or functional independence is sparse and not routinely collected. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and trajectory of functional change of older women in the 12 months following gynaeoncological surgery and to explore the associations between them. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prospective observational cohort study recruited consecutive women aged 65 or over scheduled for major gynaeoncologic surgery between July 2017 and April 2019. Baseline data on cancer stage, multimorbidity, and geriatric syndromes including cognition, frailty, and functional abilities were collected using standardised tools. Delirium and post-operative morbidity were recorded. Post hospital assessments were collected at 3-, 6-, and 12-months. RESULTS Overall, of 103 eligible participants assessed pre-operatively, most (77, 70%) remained independent in personal care at all assessments from discharge to 12 months. Functional trajectories varied widely over the 12 months but overall there was no significant decline or improvement for the 85 survivors. Eleven experienced a clinically significant decline in function at six months. This was associated with baseline low mood (P < 0.05), albeit with small numbers (6 of 11). Cognitive impairment and frailty were associated with lower baseline function but not with subsequent functional decline. DISCUSSION There was no clear clinical profile to identify the minority of older adults who experienced a clinically significant decline six months after surgery and for most, the decline was transient. This may be helpful in enabling informed patient consent. Assessment for geriatric syndromes and frailty may improve individual care but our findings do not indicate criteria for segmenting the patient population for selective attention. Future work should focus on causal pathways to potentially avoidable decline in those patients where this is not determined by the cancer itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fionna E Martin
- Perioperative medicine for Older People undergoing Surgery office, C/O Older Person's Assessment Unit, Ground Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - James A Hilton
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Rd, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Rahul Nath
- Department of Gynaeoncology, 12th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Judith S L Partridge
- Perioperative medicine for Older People undergoing Surgery office, C/O Older Person's Assessment Unit, Ground Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK; Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Jugdeep K Dhesi
- Perioperative medicine for Older People undergoing Surgery office, C/O Older Person's Assessment Unit, Ground Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK; Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK; Research Dept of Targeted Intervention & Interventional Science, University College London - Bloomsbury campus, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sieber C, Petrovic M, Masud T, Benetos A, Martin FC, Maggi S, Strandberg TE. A European perspective on the challenges of healthcare for older adults. Eur Geriatr Med 2024; 15:1-2. [PMID: 38194051 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00913-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Cornel Sieber
- Kantonsspital Winterthur, Klinischer Bereich A, Brauerstrasse 15, Postfach 834, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tahir Masud
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, UK
| | - Athanase Benetos
- Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital of Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | | | - Timo E Strandberg
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital HUS, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fougère B, Morley JE, Arai H, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, Cherubini A, Dong B, Martin FC, Flicker L, Merchant RA, Rodriguez Mañas L, Woo J, Vellas B. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Precision Medicine: The Future Management of Geriatric Conditions. J Nutr Health Aging 2023; 27:1292-1295. [PMID: 38242610 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-018-1045-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Fougère
- Tours University Hospital - Division of Geriatric medicine, Bretonneau Hospital, Building B1A Level 4, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours cedex 9, France; Inserm UMR1027, Toulouse University III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
| | - J E Morley
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - H Arai
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - J M Bauer
- Center for Geriatric Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Bernabei
- Department of Geriatrics, Neurosciences and Orthopedics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - A Cherubini
- Geriatria, Accettazione Geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani (IRCCS-INRCA), Ancona, Italy
| | - B Dong
- Department of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - F C Martin
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, Kings College, London, UK
| | - L Flicker
- Geriatric Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - R A Merchant
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - J Woo
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - B Vellas
- Inserm UMR1027, Toulouse University III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Gérontopôle, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Almilaji O, Ayis S, Goubar A, Beaupre L, Cameron ID, Milton-Cole R, Gregson CL, Johansen A, Kristensen MT, Magaziner J, Martin FC, Sackley C, Sadler E, Smith TO, Sobolev B, Sheehan KJ. Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery - analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility. Physiotherapy 2023; 120:47-59. [PMID: 37369161 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the association between physiotherapy access after hip fracture and discharge home, readmission, survival, and mobility recovery. METHODS A 2017 Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Sprint Audit was linked to hospital records for 5383 patients. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between physiotherapy access in the first postoperative week and discharge home, 30-day readmission post-discharge, 30-day survival and 120-days mobility recovery post-admission adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Hospital Frailty Risk Score and prefracture mobility/residence. RESULTS Overall, 73% were female and 40% had high frailty risk. Patients who received ≥2 hours of physiotherapy (versus less) had 3% (95% Confidence Interval: 0-6%), 4% (2-6%), and 6% (1-11%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 3% (0-6%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of exercise (versus mobilisation alone) had 6% (1-12%), 3% (0-7%), and 11% (3-18%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 6% (2-10%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of 6-7 days physiotherapy (versus 0-2 days) had 8% (5-11%) higher adjusted probability of survival. For patients with dementia, improved probability of survival, discharge home, readmission and indoor mobility recovery were observed with greater physiotherapy access. CONCLUSION Greater access to physiotherapy was associated with a higher probability of positive outcomes. For every 100 patients, greater access could equate to an additional eight patients surviving to 30-days and six avoiding 30-day readmission. The findings suggest a potential benefit in terms of home discharge and outdoor mobility recovery. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orouba Almilaji
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Health Service Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Salma Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Aicha Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lauren Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Alberta,Canada
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District and Faculty of Medicine and Health,University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Rhian Milton-Cole
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Celia L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Antony Johansen
- Cardiff Trauma Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Morten Tange Kristensen
- Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jay Magaziner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK & Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Euan Sadler
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Toby O Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Boris Sobolev
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Katie J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin FC. The concept of frailty in the end of disease era. Eur Geriatr Med 2023; 14:769-772. [PMID: 37389737 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00827-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
|
6
|
Blain H, Annweiler C, Berrut G, Becker C, Bernard PL, Bousquet J, Dargent-Molina P, Friocourt P, Martin FC, Masud T, Petrovic M, Puisieux F, Robiaud JB, Ryg J, Van der Velde N, Montero-Odasso M, Rolland Y. [Synthesis in French of the 2022 global recommendations for the management and prevention of falls in the elderly]. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil 2023; 21:149-160. [PMID: 37519073 DOI: 10.1684/pnv.2023.1108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults, have negative effects on functional independence and quality of life and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health related costs. OBJECTIVE To synthesize evidence-based and expert consensus-based 2022 world guidelines for the management and prevention of falls in older adults. These recommendations consider a person-centred approach that includes the preferences of the patient, caregivers and other stakeholders, gaps in previous guidelines, recent developments in e-health and both local context and resources. RECOMMENDATIONS All older adults should be advised on falls prevention and physical activity. Opportunistic case finding for falls risk is recommended for communitydwelling older adults. An algorithm is proposed to stratify falls risk and interventions for persons at low, moderate or high risk. Those considered at high risk should be offered a comprehensive multifactorial falls risk assessment with a view to co-design and implement personalised multidomain interventions. Other recommendations cover details of assessment and intervention components and combinations, and recommendations for specific settings and populations. CONCLUSIONS The core set of recommendations provided will require flexible implementation strategies that consider both local context and resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert Blain
- Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, MUSE University, Montpellier, France
| | - Cédric Annweiler
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Centre on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France; Univ Angers, UPRES EA 4638, University of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Gilles Berrut
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, pôle hospitalo-universitaire de gérontologie clinique, Nantes, France
| | - Clemens Becker
- Department of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Jean Bousquet
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany, MASK-air, Montpellier, France
| | - Patricia Dargent-Molina
- Université de Paris, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Inserm, Inrae, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Friocourt
- Pôle autonomie, neurologie et prise en charge du vieillissement, centre hospitalier, Blois, France
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, The British Geriatrics Society, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Tahir Masud
- Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Section of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - François Puisieux
- Pôle de gérontologie, hôpital gériatrique Les Bateliers, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Robiaud
- Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, MUSE University, Montpellier, France
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, Geriatric Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Nathalie Van der Velde
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manuel Montero-Odasso
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yves Rolland
- Gerontopôle of Toulouse, Institute on Aging, Toulouse University Hospital, CHU Toulouse, Cité de la Santé, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France, Cerpop Centre d'épidémiologie et de recherche en santé des populations UPS/Inserm UMR 1295, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sunkersing D, Martin FC, Sullivan P, Bell D. Care and support networks of community-dwelling frail individuals in North West London: a comparison of patient and healthcare workers' perceptions. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:953. [PMID: 36494627 PMCID: PMC9737751 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03561-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that successful assessment and care for frail individuals requires integrated and collaborative care and support across and within settings. Understanding the care and support networks of a frail individual could therefore prove useful in understanding need and designing support. This study explored the care and support networks of community-dwelling older people accessing a falls prevention service as a marker of likely frailty, by describing and comparing the individuals' networks as perceived by themselves and as perceived by healthcare providers involved in their care. METHODS A convenience sample of 16 patients and 16 associated healthcare professionals were recruited from a community-based NHS 'Falls Group' programme within North-West London. Individual (i.e., one on one) semi-structured interviews were conducted to establish an individual's perceived network. Principles of quantitative social network analysis (SNA) helped identify the structural characteristics of the networks; qualitative SNA and a thematic analysis aided data interpretation. RESULTS All reported care and support networks showed a high contribution level from family and friends and healthcare professionals. In patient-reported networks, 'contribution level' was often related to the 'frequency' and 'helpfulness' of interaction. In healthcare professional reported networks, the reported frequency of interaction as detailed in patient records was used to ascertain 'contribution level'. CONCLUSION This study emphasises the importance of the role of informal carers and friends along with healthcare professionals in the care of individuals living with frailty. There was congruence in the makeup of 'patient' and 'provider' reported networks, but more prominence of helper/carers in patients' reports. These findings also highlight the multidisciplinary makeup of a care and support network, which could be targeted by healthcare professionals to support the care of frail individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sunkersing
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP UK
| | - Finbarr C. Martin
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764King’s College London (Population Health Sciences), London, UK
| | - Paul Sullivan
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP UK
| | - Derek Bell
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stevens E, Clarke SG, Harrington J, Manthorpe J, Martin FC, Sackley C, McKevitt C, Marshall IJ, Wyatt D, Wolfe C. The provision of person-centred care for care home residents with stroke: An ethnographic study. Health Soc Care Community 2022; 30:e5186-e5195. [PMID: 35869786 PMCID: PMC10084099 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Care home residents with stroke have higher levels of disability and poorer access to health services than those living in their own homes. We undertook observations and semi-structured interviews (n = 28 participants) with managers, staff, residents who had experienced a stroke and their relatives in four homes in London, England, in 2018/2019. Thematic analysis revealed that residents' needs regarding valued activity and stroke-specific care and rehabilitation were not always being met. This resulted from an interplay of factors: staff's lack of recognition of stroke and its effects; gaps in skills; time pressures; and the prioritisation of residents' safety. To improve residential care provision and residents' quality of life, care commissioners, regulators and providers may need to re-examine how care homes balance safety and limits on staff time against residents' valued activity, alongside improving access to specialist healthcare treatment and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Stevens
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Stephanie G. Clarke
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- University Hospitals BirminghamDepartment of PhysiotherapyBirminghamUK
| | - Jean Harrington
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Health & Social Care Workforce, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Finbarr C. Martin
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Christopher McKevitt
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South LondonLondonUK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Iain J. Marshall
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South LondonLondonUK
| | - David Wyatt
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Charles Wolfe
- School of Life Course & Population SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South LondonLondonUK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Martin FC, Petrovic M, Tan MP, Ryg J, Aguilar-Navarro S, Alexander NB, Becker C, Blain H, Bourke R, Cameron ID, Camicioli R, Clemson L, Close J, Delbaere K, Duan L, Duque G, Dyer SM, Freiberger E, Ganz DA, Gómez F, Hausdorff JM, Hogan DB, Hunter SMW, Jauregui JR, Kamkar N, Kenny RA, Lamb SE, Latham NK, Lipsitz LA, Liu-Ambrose T, Logan P, Lord SR, Mallet L, Marsh D, Milisen K, Moctezuma-Gallegos R, Morris ME, Nieuwboer A, Perracini MR, Pieruccini-Faria F, Pighills A, Said C, Sejdic E, Sherrington C, Skelton DA, Dsouza S, Speechley M, Stark S, Todd C, Troen BR, van der Cammen T, Verghese J, Vlaeyen E, Watt JA, Masud T. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing 2022; 51:afac205. [PMID: 36178003 PMCID: PMC9523684 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 111.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults, have negative effects on functional independence and quality of life and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health related costs. Current guidelines are inconsistent, with no up-to-date, globally applicable ones present. OBJECTIVES to create a set of evidence- and expert consensus-based falls prevention and management recommendations applicable to older adults for use by healthcare and other professionals that consider: (i) a person-centred approach that includes the perspectives of older adults with lived experience, caregivers and other stakeholders; (ii) gaps in previous guidelines; (iii) recent developments in e-health and (iv) implementation across locations with limited access to resources such as low- and middle-income countries. METHODS a steering committee and a worldwide multidisciplinary group of experts and stakeholders, including older adults, were assembled. Geriatrics and gerontological societies were represented. Using a modified Delphi process, recommendations from 11 topic-specific working groups (WGs), 10 ad-hoc WGs and a WG dealing with the perspectives of older adults were reviewed and refined. The final recommendations were determined by voting. RECOMMENDATIONS all older adults should be advised on falls prevention and physical activity. Opportunistic case finding for falls risk is recommended for community-dwelling older adults. Those considered at high risk should be offered a comprehensive multifactorial falls risk assessment with a view to co-design and implement personalised multidomain interventions. Other recommendations cover details of assessment and intervention components and combinations, and recommendations for specific settings and populations. CONCLUSIONS the core set of recommendations provided will require flexible implementation strategies that consider both local context and resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Montero-Odasso
- Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Nathalie van der Velde
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Section of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maw Pin Tan
- Centre for Innovation in Medical Engineering (CIME), Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Geriatric Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sara Aguilar-Navarro
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Neil B Alexander
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan; Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System Geriatrics Research Education Clinical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Clemens Becker
- Department of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Hubert Blain
- Department of Geriatrics, Montpellier University hospital and MUSE, Montpellier, France
| | - Robbie Bourke
- Department of Medical Gerontology Trinity College Dublin and Mercers Institute for Successful Ageing, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District and Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney. Department of Medicine (Neurology) and Neuroscience and Mental Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard Camicioli
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lindy Clemson
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Close
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kim Delbaere
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Leilei Duan
- National Centre for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Gustavo Duque
- Research Institute of the McGill University HealthCentre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzanne M Dyer
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ellen Freiberger
- Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - David A Ganz
- Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fernando Gómez
- Research Group on Geriatrics and Gerontology, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Collaborative Center, University Caldas, Manizales, Colombia
| | - Jeffrey M Hausdorff
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David B Hogan
- Brenda Strafford Centre on Aging, O’BrienInstitute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Susan M W Hunter
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Elborn College, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jose R Jauregui
- Ageing Biology Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nellie Kamkar
- Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rose-Anne Kenny
- Department of Medical Gerontology Trinity College Dublin and Mercers Institute for Successful Ageing, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Mireille Gillings Professor of Health Innovation, Medical School Building, Exeter, England, UK
| | | | - Lewis A Lipsitz
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Teresa Liu-Ambrose
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Center for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Pip Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, UK
| | - Stephen R Lord
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Mallet
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, McGill University Health Center, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Marsh
- University College London, London, England, UK
| | - Koen Milisen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rogelio Moctezuma-Gallegos
- Geriatric Medicine & Neurology Fellowship, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”. Mexico City, Mexico
- Geriatric Medicine Program, Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences. Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Meg E Morris
- Healthscope and Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Australia
| | - Alice Nieuwboer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Monica R Perracini
- Master’s and Doctoral programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo (UNICID), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Frederico Pieruccini-Faria
- Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alison Pighills
- Mackay Institute of Research and Innovation, Mackay Hospital and Health Service, Mackay, QLD, Australia
| | - Catherine Said
- Western Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Ervin Sejdic
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Catherine Sherrington
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dawn A Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Sabestina Dsouza
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Mark Speechley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
- Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Susan Stark
- Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chris Todd
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Bruce R Troen
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo; Research Service, Veterans Affairs Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Tischa van der Cammen
- Department of Human-Centred Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joe Verghese
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Vlaeyen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jennifer A Watt
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tahir Masud
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, The British Geriatrics Society, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lambe K, Guerra S, Salazar de Pablo G, Ayis S, Cameron ID, Foster NE, Godfrey E, Gregson CL, Martin FC, Sackley C, Walsh N, Sheehan KJ. Effect of inpatient rehabilitation treatment ingredients on functioning, quality of life, length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality among older adults with unplanned admission: an overview review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:501. [PMID: 35689181 PMCID: PMC9188066 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03169-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To synthesise the evidence for the effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation treatment ingredients (versus any comparison) on functioning, quality of life, length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality among older adults with an unplanned hospital admission. METHODS A systematic search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, PEDro, BASE, and OpenGrey for published and unpublished systematic reviews of inpatient rehabilitation interventions for older adults following an unplanned admission to hospital from database inception to December 2020. Duplicate screening for eligibility, quality assessment, and data extraction including extraction of treatment components and their respective ingredients employing the Treatment Theory framework. Random effects meta-analyses were completed overall and by treatment ingredient. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the inconsistency-value (I2). RESULTS Systematic reviews (n = 12) of moderate to low quality, including 44 non-overlapping relevant RCTs were included. When incorporated in a rehabilitation intervention, there was a large effect of endurance exercise, early intervention and shaping knowledge on walking endurance after the inpatient stay versus comparison. Early intervention, repeated practice activities, goals and planning, increased medical care and/or discharge planning increased the likelihood of discharge home versus comparison. The evidence for activities of daily living (ADL) was conflicting. Rehabilitation interventions were not effective for functional mobility, strength, or quality of life, or reduce length of stay or mortality. Therefore, we did not explore the potential role of treatment ingredients for these outcomes. CONCLUSION Benefits observed were often for subgroups of the older adult population e.g., endurance exercise was effective for endurance in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and early intervention was effective for endurance for those with hip fracture. Future research should determine whether the effectiveness of these treatment ingredients observed in subgroups, are generalisable to older adults more broadly. There is a need for more transparent reporting of intervention components and ingredients according to established frameworks to enable future synthesis and/or replication. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO Registration CRD42018114323 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Lambe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - S Guerra
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - G Salazar de Pablo
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - I D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - N E Foster
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - E Godfrey
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - C Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - N Walsh
- Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - K J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Geohagen O, Hamer L, Lowton A, Guerra S, Milton-Cole R, Ellery P, Martin FC, Lamb SE, Sackley C, Sheehan KJ. The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions including outdoor mobility on older adults' physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6612691. [PMID: 35737601 PMCID: PMC9220027 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions which incorporate outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Design MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro and OpenGrey were searched systematically from inception to June 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of community-based rehabilitation incorporating outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and/or falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Duplicate screening, selection, extraction and appraisal were completed. Results were reported descriptively and with random-effects meta-analyses stratified by population (proactive [community-dwelling], reactive [illness/injury]). Results A total of 29 RCTs with 7,076 participants were identified (66% high bias for at least one domain). The outdoor mobility component was predominantly a walking programme with behaviour change. Rehabilitation for reactive populations increased physical activity (seven RCTs, 587 participants. Hedge’s g 1.32, 95% CI: 0.31, 2.32), endurance (four RCTs, 392 participants. Hedges g 0.24; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.44) and outdoor mobility (two RCTs with 663 participants. Go out as much as wanted, likelihood of a journey) at intervention end versus usual care. Where reported, effects were preserved at follow-up. One RCT indicated a benefit of rehabilitation for proactive populations on moderate-to-vigorous activity and outdoor mobility. No effect was noted for falls-related self-efficacy, or other outcomes following rehabilitation for proactive populations. Conclusion Reactive rehabilitation for older adults may include walking programmes with behaviour change techniques. Future research should address the potential benefit of a walking programme for proactive populations and address mobility-related anxiety as a barrier to outdoor mobility for both proactive and reactive populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olyvia Geohagen
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | - Lydia Hamer
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | - Alexandra Lowton
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | - Stefanny Guerra
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | - Rhian Milton-Cole
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | | | - Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | - Sallie E Lamb
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Katie J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goubar A, Ayis S, Beaupre L, Cameron ID, Milton-Cole R, Gregson CL, Johansen A, Kristensen MT, Magaziner J, Martin FC, Sackley C, Sadler E, Smith TO, Sobolev B, Sheehan KJ. The impact of the frequency, duration and type of physiotherapy on discharge after hip fracture surgery: a secondary analysis of UK national linked audit data. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:839-850. [PMID: 34748023 PMCID: PMC8930962 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06195-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Additional physiotherapy in the first postoperative week was associated with fewer days to discharge after hip fracture surgery. A 7-day physiotherapy service in the first postoperative week should be considered as a new key performance indicator in evaluating the quality of care for patients admitted with a hip fracture. INTRODUCTION To examine the association between physiotherapy in the first week after hip fracture surgery and discharge from acute hospital. METHODS We linked data from the UK Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Sprint Audit to hospital records for 5395 patients with hip fracture in May and June 2017. We estimated the association between the number of days patients received physiotherapy in the first postoperative week; its overall duration (< 2 h, ≥ 2 h; 30-min increment) and type (mobilisation alone, mobilisation and exercise) and the cumulative probability of discharge from acute hospital over 30 days, using proportional odds regression adjusted for confounders and the competing risk of death. RESULTS The crude and adjusted odds ratios of discharge were 1.24 (95% CI 1.19-1.30) and 1.26 (95% CI 1.19-1.33) for an additional day of physiotherapy, 1.34 (95% CI 1.18-1.52) and 1.33 (95% CI 1.12-1.57) for ≥ 2 versus < 2 h physiotherapy, and 1.11 (95% CI 1.08-1.15) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.15) for an additional 30-min of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy type was not associated with discharge. CONCLUSION We report an association between physiotherapy and discharge after hip fracture. An average UK hospital admitting 375 patients annually may save 456 bed-days if current provision increased so all patients with hip fracture received physiotherapy on 6-7 days in the first postoperative week. A 7-day physiotherapy service totalling at least 2 h in the first postoperative week may be considered a key performance indicator of acute care quality after hip fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - L Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - I D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District and Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Milton-Cole
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - A Johansen
- Cardiff Trauma Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - M T Kristensen
- Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Magaziner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Sadler
- Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - T O Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - B Sobolev
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - K J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Volkmer B, Sadler E, Lambe K, Martin FC, Ayis S, Beaupre L, Cameron ID, Gregson CL, Johansen A, Kristensen MT, Magaziner J, Sackley C, Smith TO, Sobolev B. 660 PHYSIOTHERAPISTS PERCEPTIONS OF MECHANISMS FOR OBSERVED VARIATION IN PRACTICE DURING EARLY POSTOPERATIVE PHASE AFTER HIP FRACTURE. Age Ageing 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac037.660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To explore physiotherapists’ perceptions of mechanisms to explain observed variation in early postoperative practice after hip fracture surgery demonstrated in a national audit.
Methods
A qualitative semi-structured interview study of 21 physiotherapists working on orthopaedic wards at 7 hospitals with different durations of physiotherapy during a recent audit. Thematic analysis of interviews drawing on Normalisation Process Theory to aid interpretation of findings.
Results
Four themes were identified: achieving protocolised and personalised care; patient and carer engagement; multidisciplinary team engagement across the care continuum; and strategies for service improvement. Most expressed variation from protocol was legitimate when driven by what is deemed clinically appropriate for a given patient. This tailored approach was deemed essential to optimise patient and carer engagement. Participants reported inconsistent degrees of engagement from the multidisciplinary team attributing this to competing workload priorities, interpreting ‘postoperative physiotherapy’ as a single professional activity rather than a care delivery approach, plus lack of integration between hospital and community care. All participants recognised changes needed at both structural and process levels to improve their services.
Conclusion
Physiotherapists highlighted an inherent conflict between their intention to deliver protocolised care while allowing for an individual patient-tailored approach. This conflict has implications for how audit results should be interpreted, how future clinical guidelines are written, and how physiotherapists are trained. Physiotherapists also described additional factors explaining variation in practice which may be addressed through increased engagement of the multidisciplinary team and resources for additional staffing and advanced clinical roles.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, Ayis S. Discharge after hip fracture surgery in relation to mobilisation timing by patient characteristics: linked secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:694. [PMID: 34911474 PMCID: PMC8672496 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02624-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early mobilisation leads to a two-fold increase in the adjusted odds of discharge by 30-days compared to late mobilisation. Whether this association varies by patient characteristics identified as reasons for delayed mobilisation is unknown. Methods Audit data was linked to hospitalisation records for 133,319 patients 60 years or older surgically treated for hip fracture in England or Wales between 2014 and 2016. Adjusted proportional odds regression models tested whether the cumulative incidences of discharge differed between those mobilised early and those mobilised late for subgroups defined by dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation, and prefracture residence, accounting for the competing risk of death. Results Overall, 34,253 patients presented with dementia, 9818 with delirium, and 10,123 with hypotension. Prefracture, 100,983 were ambulant outdoors, 30,834 were ambulant indoors only, 107,144 were admitted from home, and 23,588 from residential care. 1502 had incomplete data for ambulation and 2587 for prefracture residence. 10, 8, 8, 12, and 12% fewer patients with dementia, delirium, hypotension, ambulant indoors only prefracture, or admitted from residential care mobilised early when compared to those who presented without dementia, delirium, hypotension, with outdoor ambulation prefracture, or admitted from home. The adjusted odds ratios of discharge by 30-days postoperatively among those who mobilised early compared with those who mobilised late were 1.71 (95% CI 1.62–1.81) for those with dementia, 2.06 (95% CI 1.98–2.15) without dementia, 1.56 (95% CI 1.41–1.73) with delirium, 2.00 (95% CI 1.93–2.07) without delirium, 1.83 (95% CI, 1.66–2.02) with hypotension, 1.95 (95% CI, 1.89–2.02) without hypotension, 2.00 (95% CI 1.92–2.08) with outdoor ambulation prefracture, 1.80 (95% CI 1.70–1.91) with indoor ambulation only prefracture, 2.30 (95% CI 2.19–2.41) admitted from home, and 1.64 (95% CI 1.51–1.77) admitted from residential care, accounting for the competing risk of death. Conclusion Irrespective of dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation or residence, early compared to late mobilisation increased the likelihood of hospital discharge by 30-days postoperatively. However, fewer patients with dementia, delirium, or hypotension, poorer prefracture ambulation, or from residential care mobilised early. There is a need reduce this care gap by ensuring sufficient resource to enable all patients to benefit from early mobilisation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02624-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, 2nd Floor Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
| | - Aicha Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, 2nd Floor Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, 2nd Floor Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Guy's and St. Thomas's National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Potter
- Guy's and St. Thomas's National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth D Jones
- Guy's and St. Thomas's National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, 2nd Floor Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Salma Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, 2nd Floor Addison House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van Haastregt JCM, Everink IHJ, Schols JMGA, Grund S, Gordon AL, Poot EP, Martin FC, O'Neill D, Petrovic M, Bachmann S, van Balen R, van Dam van Isselt L, Dockery F, Holstege MS, Landi F, Pérez LM, Roquer E, Smalbrugge M, Achterberg WP. Management of post-acute COVID-19 patients in geriatric rehabilitation: EuGMS guidance. Eur Geriatr Med 2021; 13:291-304. [PMID: 34800286 PMCID: PMC8605452 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00575-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Aim To describe a guidance on the management of post-acute COVID 19 patients in geriatric rehabilitation. Findings This guidance addresses general requirements for post-acute COVID-19 geriatric rehabilitation and critical aspects for quality assurance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the guidance describes relevant care processes and procedures divided in five topics: patient selection; admission; treatment; discharge; and follow-up and monitoring. Message This guidance is designed to provide support to care professionals involved in the geriatric rehabilitation treatment of post-acute COVID-19 patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00575-4. Purpose To describe a guidance on the management of post-acute COVID 19 patients in geriatric rehabilitation. Methods The guidance is based on guidelines for post-acute COVID-19 geriatric rehabilitation developed in the Netherlands, updated with recent insights from literature, related guidance from other countries and disciplines, and combined with experiences from experts in countries participating in the Geriatric Rehabilitation Special Interest Group of the European Geriatric Medicine Society. Results This guidance for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation is divided into a section addressing general recommendations for geriatric rehabilitation and a section addressing specific processes and procedures. The Sect. “General recommendations for geriatric rehabilitation” addresses: (1) general requirements for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation and (2) critical aspects for quality assurance during COVID-19 pandemic. The Sect. “Specific processes and procedures”, addresses the following topics: (1) patient selection; (2) admission; (3) treatment; (4) discharge; and (5) follow-up and monitoring. Conclusion Providing tailored geriatric rehabilitation treatment to post-acute COVID-19 patients is a challenge for which the guidance is designed to provide support. There is a strong need for additional evidence on COVID-19 geriatric rehabilitation including developing an understanding of risk profiles of older patients living with frailty to develop individualised treatment regimes. The present guidance will be regularly updated based on additional evidence from practice and research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00575-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolanda C M van Haastregt
- Department of Health Services Research and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Irma H J Everink
- Department of Health Services Research and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos M G A Schols
- Department of Health Services Research and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Grund
- Center for Geriatric Medicine, Agaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg, Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adam L Gordon
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK
| | - Else P Poot
- Verenso Dutch Association of Elderly Care Physicians, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Desmond O'Neill
- Trinity College Dublin Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stefan Bachmann
- Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Kliniken Valens, Valens, Switzerland.,Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Romke van Balen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frances Dockery
- Department of Geriatrics and Stroke Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marije S Holstege
- Department of Research GRZPLUS, Omring and Zorgcirkel, Hoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Landi
- Geriatric Internal Medicine Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura M Pérez
- Clinical Head of Outpatient Clinic and Geriatric Home Care, Intermediate Care Hospital Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Group on Aging, Frailty and Transitions in Barcelona (RE-FiT BCN), Vall d'Hebrón Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Roquer
- Geriatric Service, University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain
| | - Martin Smalbrugge
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilco P Achterberg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Chair of the Guidance Committee Post COVID-19 Geriatric Rehabilitation, Verenso Dutch Association of Elderly Care Physicians, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Volkmer B, Sadler E, Lambe K, Martin FC, Ayis S, Beaupre L, Cameron ID, Gregson CL, Johansen A, Kristensen MT, Magaziner J, Sackley C, Smith TO, Sobolev B, Sheehan KJ. Orthopaedic physiotherapists' perceptions of mechanisms for observed variation in the implementation of physiotherapy practices in the early postoperative phase after hip fracture: a UK qualitative study. Age Ageing 2021; 50:1961-1970. [PMID: 34185833 PMCID: PMC8675437 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to explore physiotherapists' perceptions of mechanisms to explain observed variation in early postoperative practice after hip fracture surgery demonstrated in a national audit. METHODS a qualitative semi-structured interview study of 21 physiotherapists working on orthopaedic wards at seven hospitals with different durations of physiotherapy during a recent audit. Thematic analysis of interviews drawing on Normalisation Process Theory to aid interpretation of findings. RESULTS four themes were identified: achieving protocolised and personalised care; patient and carer engagement; multidisciplinary team engagement across the care continuum and strategies for service improvement. Most expressed variation from protocol was legitimate when driven by what is deemed clinically appropriate for a given patient. This tailored approach was deemed essential to optimise patient and carer engagement. Participants reported inconsistent degrees of engagement from the multidisciplinary team attributing this to competing workload priorities, interpreting 'postoperative physiotherapy' as a single professional activity rather than a care delivery approach, plus lack of integration between hospital and community care. All participants recognised changes needed at both structural and process levels to improve their services. CONCLUSION physiotherapists highlighted an inherent conflict between their intention to deliver protocolised care and allowing for an individual patient-tailored approach. This conflict has implications for how audit results should be interpreted, how future clinical guidelines are written and how physiotherapists are trained. Physiotherapists also described additional factors explaining variation in practice, which may be addressed through increased engagement of the multidisciplinary team and resources for additional staffing and advanced clinical roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittannia Volkmer
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population
and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Euan Sadler
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life
Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Lambe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population
and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population
and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Salma Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population
and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lauren Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation
Medicine University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of
Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Celia L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translation Health Sciences,
Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Antony Johansen
- Cardiff Trauma Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff,
UK
| | - Morten Tange Kristensen
- PMR-C, Departments of Physiotherapy & Orthopaedic Surgery,
Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, and Department of Clinical Medicine,
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jay Magaziner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population
and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Toby O Smith
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health
Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Boris Sobolev
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Katie J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population
and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clery A, Martin FC, Redmond P, Marshall I, McKevitt C, Sackley C, Manthorpe J, Wolfe C, Wang Y. Survival and outcomes for stroke survivors living in care homes: a prospective cohort study. Age Ageing 2021; 50:2079-2087. [PMID: 34240106 PMCID: PMC8581388 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stroke survivors living in care homes require high levels of support with everyday living. The aims of this study were to describe the survival, health status and care received by stroke survivors living in care homes at 1-year post-stroke, compared with those in their own homes. Methods A total of 3,548 stroke survivors with a first ever stroke between 1998 and 2017 in the South London Stroke Register were identified for survival analysis. A total of 2,272 were included in the 1-year follow-up analysis. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier plots were used to describe survival, stratified into four 5-year cohorts. Health status, medications and rehabilitation received at 1-year post-stroke were compared using descriptive statistics. Results Over the 20-year period, survival improved for stroke survivors discharged to their own home (P < 0.001) but not for those discharged to care homes (P = 0.75). Care home residents were highly disabled (median Barthel index: 6/20, interquartile range: 2–10). Rates of secondary stroke prevention medications at 1-year follow-up increased over time for care home residents, including antiplatelets from 12.3 to 38.1%, although still lower than for those in their own homes (56.3%). Speech and language problems were common in the care home population (40.0%), but only 16% had received speech and language therapy. Conclusions Rates of secondary stroke prevention prescribing increased over 20 years but remained lower in care home residents. The lower levels of rehabilitation received by stroke survivors in care homes, despite their higher levels of disability, suggest a gap in care and urgent need for restorative and/or preventative rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Clery
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Patrick Redmond
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Iain Marshall
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher McKevitt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- National Institute for Health Research Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Charles Wolfe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London, London, UK
| | - Yanzhong Wang
- Address correspondence to: Yanzhong Wang, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, 4th Floor, Addison House, Guy’s Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK. Tel: (+44) 20 7848 8223. Email
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Alexander NB, Becker C, Blain H, Camicioli R, Close J, Duan L, Duque G, Ganz DA, Gómez F, Hausdorff JM, Hogan DB, Jauregui JR, Kenny RA, Lipsitz LA, Logan PA, Lord SR, Mallet L, Marsh DR, Martin FC, Milisen K, Nieuwboer A, Petrovic M, Ryg J, Sejdic E, Sherrington C, Skelton DA, Speechley M, Tan MP, Todd C, van der Cammen T, Verghese J, Kamkar N, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Masud T. New horizons in falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing 2021; 50:1499-1507. [PMID: 34038522 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults, have negative effects both on quality of life and functional independence and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health care costs. Current clinical approaches and advice from falls guidelines vary substantially between countries and settings, warranting a standardised approach. At the first World Congress on Falls and Postural Instability in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in December 2019, a worldwide task force of experts in falls in older adults, committed to achieving a global consensus on updating clinical practice guidelines for falls prevention and management by incorporating current and emerging evidence in falls research. Moreover, the importance of taking a person-centred approach and including perspectives from patients, caregivers and other stakeholders was recognised as important components of this endeavour. Finally, the need to specifically include recent developments in e-health was acknowledged, as well as the importance of addressing differences between settings and including developing countries. METHODS a steering committee was assembled and 10 working Groups were created to provide preliminary evidence-based recommendations. A cross-cutting theme on patient's perspective was also created. In addition, a worldwide multidisciplinary group of experts and stakeholders, to review the proposed recommendations and to participate in a Delphi process to achieve consensus for the final recommendations, was brought together. CONCLUSION in this New Horizons article, the global challenges in falls prevention are depicted, the goals of the worldwide task force are summarised and the conceptual framework for development of a global falls prevention and management guideline is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Montero-Odasso
- Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Nathalie van der Velde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neil B Alexander
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan; Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System Geriatrics Research Education Clinical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Clemens Becker
- Unit Digital Geriatric Medicine, Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hubert Blain
- Department of Geriatrics, Montpellier University Hospital and MUSE, Montpellier, France
| | - Richard Camicioli
- Department of Medicine (Neurology) and Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Close
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leilei Duan
- National Centre for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Gustavo Duque
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David A Ganz
- Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Fernando Gómez
- Research Group on Geriatrics and Gerontology, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics Collaborative Center, University de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia
| | - Jeffrey M Hausdorff
- Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David B Hogan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jose R Jauregui
- Ageing Biology Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rose Anne Kenny
- Department of Medical Gerontology, Mercers Institute for Ageing, St James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Lewis A Lipsitz
- Hinda and Arthus Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, and Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pip A Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stephen R Lord
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Mallet
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, and Department of Pharmacy, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Finbarr C Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, UK
| | - Koen Milisen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alice Nieuwboer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Section of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Geriatric Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ervin Sejdic
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Cathie Sherrington
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dawn A Skelton
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark Speechley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
- Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario London, ON, Canada
| | - Maw Pin Tan
- Centre for Innovation in Medical Engineering (CIME), Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Chris Todd
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Tischa van der Cammen
- Department of Human-Centered Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Joe Verghese
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nellie Kamkar
- Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Yanina Sarquis-Adamson
- Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tahir Masud
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Geriatric Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Partridge JSL, Healey A, Modarai B, Harari D, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimisation prior to elective arterial vascular surgery: a health economic analysis. Age Ageing 2021; 50:1770-1777. [PMID: 34120179 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND increasing numbers of older people are undergoing vascular surgery. Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimisation (CGA) reduces postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Establishing CGA-based perioperative services requires health economic evaluation prior to implementation. Through a modelling-based economic evaluation, using data from a single site clinical trial, this study evaluates whether CGA is a cost-effective alternative to standard preoperative assessment for older patients undergoing elective arterial surgery. METHODS an economic evaluation, using decision-analytic modelling, comparing preoperative CGA and optimisation with standard preoperative care, was undertaken in older patients undergoing elective arterial surgery. The incremental net health benefit of CGA, expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness. RESULTS CGA is a cost-effective substitute for standard preoperative care in elective arterial surgery across a range of cost-effectiveness threshold values. An incremental net benefit of 0.58 QALYs at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £30k, 0.60 QALYs at a threshold of £20k and 0.63 QALYs at a threshold of £13k was observed. Mean total pre- and postoperative health care utilisation costs were estimated to be £1,165 lower for CGA patients largely accounted for by reduced postoperative bed day utilisation. CONCLUSION this study demonstrates a likely health economic benefit in addition to the previously described clinical benefit of employing CGA methodology in the preoperative setting in older patients undergoing arterial surgery. Further evaluation should examine whether CGA-based perioperative services can be effectively implemented and achieve the same clinical and health economic outcomes at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith S L Partridge
- Department of Ageing and Health, Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Healey
- Centre for Implementation Science and King's Health Economics, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Bijan Modarai
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Rayne Institute, King's College London, London, UK
- Academic department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Danielle Harari
- Department of Ageing and Health, Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jugdeep K Dhesi
- Department of Ageing and Health, Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Research Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goubar A, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, Ayis S, Sheehan KJ. The 30-day survival and recovery after hip fracture by timing of mobilization and dementia : a UK database study. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:1317-1324. [PMID: 34192935 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b7.bjj-2020-2349.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study to compare 30-day survival and recovery of mobility between patients mobilized early (on the day of, or day after surgery for a hip fracture) and patients mobilized late (two days or more after surgery), and to determine whether the presence of dementia influences the association between the timing of mobilization, 30-day survival, and recovery. METHODS Analysis of the National Hip Fracture Database and hospital records for 126,897 patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent surgery for a hip fracture in England and Wales between 2014 and 2016. Using logistic regression, we adjusted for covariates with a propensity score to estimate the association between the timing of mobilization, survival, and recovery of walking ability. RESULTS A total of 99,667 patients (79%) mobilized early. Among those mobilized early compared to those mobilized late, the weighted odds ratio of survival was 1.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.05), of recovering outdoor ambulation was 1.25 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.51), and of recovering indoor ambulation was 1.53 (95% CI 1.32 to 1.78) by 30 days. The weighted probabilities of survival at 30 days post-admission were 95.9% (95% CI 95.7% to 96.0%) for those who mobilized early and 92.4% (95% CI 92.0% to 92.8%) for those who mobilized late. The weighted probabilities of regaining the ability to walk outdoors were 9.7% (95% CI 9.2% to 10.2%) and indoors 81.2% (95% CI 80.0% to 82.4%), for those who mobilized early, and 7.9% (95% CI 6.6% to 9.2%) and 73.8% (95% CI 71.3% to 76.2%), respectively, for those who mobilized late. Patients with dementia were less likely to mobilize early despite observed associations with survival and ambulation recovery for those with and without dementia. CONCLUSION Early mobilization is associated with survival and recovery for patients (with and without dementia) after hip fracture. Early mobilization should be incorporated as a measured indicator of quality. Reasons for failure to mobilize early should also be recorded to inform quality improvement initiatives. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1317-1324.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aicha Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, London, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, London, UK.,Guy's and St. Thomas's National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Potter
- Guy's and St. Thomas's National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth D Jones
- Guy's and St. Thomas's National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, London, UK
| | - Salma Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, London, UK
| | - Katie J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Devi R, Chadborn NH, Meyer J, Banerjee J, Goodman C, Dening T, Gladman JRF, Hinsliff-Smith K, Long A, Usman A, Housley G, Lewis S, Glover M, Gage H, Logan PA, Martin FC, Gordon AL. How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation. Age Ageing 2021; 50:1371-1381. [PMID: 33596305 PMCID: PMC8522714 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. METHODS A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement. RESULTS QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload. CONCLUSIONS These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Devi
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds,
Leeds, UK
| | - Neil H Chadborn
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands
(ARC-EM), UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- School of Health Sciences, City University of
London, London, UK
| | - Jay Banerjee
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust,
University of Leicester, Leicester, and Loughborough University,
Loughborough, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- School of Health and Social Work, University of
Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration – East of England
(ARC-EoE), UK
| | - Tom Dening
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
| | - John R F Gladman
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands
(ARC-EM), UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre,
Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Annabelle Long
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
| | - Adeela Usman
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
| | - Gemma Housley
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust,
Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah Lewis
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew Glover
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of
Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Heather Gage
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of
Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Philippa A Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands
(ARC-EM), UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre,
Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham CityCare Partnership, NHS Provider
Service, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Adam L Gordon
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham,
Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands
(ARC-EM), UK
- School of Health Sciences, City University of
London, London, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre,
Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, Ayis S. 500 30-DAY SURVIVAL AND RECOVERY AFTER HIP FRACTURE BY MOBILISATION TIMING AND DEMENTIA: A UK DATABASE STUDY. Age Ageing 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab118.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
To compare 30-day survival and recovery of prefracture ambulation between patients mobilised early (on the day of or day after surgery) and patients mobilised late (2 days of more after surgery) in England and Wales. To determine whether the presence of dementia influences the association between mobilisation timing and 30-day survival and recovery.
Methods
Secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database linked to hospitalisation records for 126,897 patients 60 years or older who underwent surgery for nonpathological first hip fracture in England or Wales between 2014 and 2016. We used logistic regression to regress survival and ambulation recovery at 30-days with respect to mobilisation timing, overall and by dementia, with adjustment for confounding using a propensity score for mobilisation treatment with respect to confounders.
Results
Overall, 99,667 (79%) patients mobilised early. Among those who mobilised early compared to those who mobilised late, the weighted odds ratio of survival was 1.92 (95% CI 1.80–2.05), of recovering outdoor ambulation was 1.25 (95% CI 1.03–1.51), and of recovering indoor ambulation was 1.53 (95% CI 1.32–1.78) by 30 days. Early compared with late mobilisation led to a 3.8% increase in the weighted probability of survival, 22.8% increase in weighted probability of recovering outdoor ambulation and 10.0% increase in the weighted probability of recovering indoor ambulation, by 30-days. Patients with dementia were less likely to mobilise early but increases in survival and ambulation recovery were observed both for those with and without dementia.
Conclusion
Early mobilisation led to increase probability of survival and recovery for patients (with and without dementia) after hip fracture. Early mobilisation should be incorporated as a measured indicator of quality internationally. Reasons for failure to mobilise early should also be captured to inform quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - A Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - C Potter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - G D Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - C Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - S Ayis
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’s National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, Ayis S. 501 DISCHARGE AFTER HIP FRACTURE SURGERY IN RELATION TO MOBILISATION TIMING BY PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: A NATIONAL DATABASE STUDY. Age Ageing 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab118.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Early mobilisation leads to a two-fold increase in the odds of discharge by 30-days compared to late mobilisation. Whether this association varies by identified reasons for delayed mobilisation is unknown.
Methods
Audit data linked to hospitalisation records for patients 60 years or older surgically treated for hip fracture in England/Wales 2014–2016. Adjusted proportional odds regression models tested whether the cumulative incidences of discharge differed for early compared with late mobilisation across subgroups defined by dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation and residence, accounting for competing risk of death.
Results
Overall, 34,253 patients presented with dementia, 9,818 with delirium, and 10,123 with hypotension. Prefracture, 100,983 were ambulant outdoors, 30,834 were ambulant indoors only, 107,144 were admitted from home, and 23,588 from residential care. 10%, 8%, 8%, 12%, and 12% fewer patients with dementia, delirium, hypotension, ambulant indoors only prefracture, or from residential care mobilised early compared to those without dementia, delirium, hypotension, with outdoor ambulation prefracture, or from home. Adjusted odds ratios of discharge by 30-days for early compared with late mobilisation were 1.71 (95% CI 1.62–1.81) for those with dementia, 2.06 (95% CI 1.98–2.15) without dementia, 1.56 (95% CI 1.41–1.73) with delirium, 2.00 (95% CI 1.93–2.07) without delirium, 1.83 (95% CI, 1.66–2.02) with hypotension, 1.95 (95% CI, 1.89–2.02) without hypotension, 2.00 (95% CI 1.92–2.08) with outdoor ambulation prefracture, 1.80 (95% CI 1.70–1.91) with indoor ambulation only prefracture, 2.30 (95% CI 2.19–2.41) from home, and 1.64 (95% CI 1.51–1.77) from residential care.
Conclusion
Irrespective of dementia, delirium, hypotension, prefracture ambulation or residence, early compared to late mobilisation increased the likelihood of discharge by 30-days. Fewer patients with these conditions, poorer prefracture ambulation, or from residential care mobilised early. There is a need reduce this care gap by ensuring sufficient resource to enable all patients to benefit from early mobilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - A Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - C Potter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - G D Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - C Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - S Ayis
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’s National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bousquet J, Agache I, Blain H, Jutel M, Ventura MT, Worm M, Del Giacco S, Benetos A, Bilo MB, Czarlewski W, Abdul Latiff AH, Al-Ahmad M, Angier E, Annesi-Maesano I, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Bachert C, Barbaud A, Bedbrook A, Bennoor KS, Berghea EC, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bonini S, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Brockow K, Brussino L, Camargos P, Canonica GW, Cardona V, Carreiro-Martins P, Carriazo A, Casale T, Caubet JC, Cecchi L, Cherubini A, Christoff G, Chu DK, Cruz AA, Dokic D, El-Gamal Y, Ebisawa M, Eberlein B, Farrell J, Fernandez-Rivas M, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Gao Y, Gavazzi G, Gawlik R, Gelincik A, Gemicioğlu B, Gotua M, Guérin O, Haahtela T, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Hoffmann HJ, Hofmann M, Hrubisko M, lenaIllario M, Irani C, Ispayeva Z, Ivancevich JC, Julge K, Kaidashev I, Khaitov M, Knol E, Kraxner H, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Lauerma A, Le LT, Le Moing V, Levin M, Louis R, Lourenco O, Mahler V, Martin FC, Matucci A, Milenkovic B, Miot S, Montella E, Morais-Almeida M, Mortz CG, Mullol J, Namazova-Baranova L, Neffen H, Nekam K, Niedoszytko M, Odemyr M, O'Hehir RE, Okamoto Y, Ollert M, Palomares O, Papadopoulos NG, Panzner P, Passalacqua G, Patella V, Petrovic M, Pfaar O, Pham-Thi N, Plavec D, Popov TA, Recto MT, Regateiro FS, Reynes J, Roller-Winsberger RE, Rolland Y, Romano A, Rondon C, Rottem M, Rouadi PW, Salles N, Samolinski B, Santos AF, Serpa FS, Sastre J, Schols JMGA, Scichilone N, Sediva A, Shamji MH, Sheikh A, Skypala I, Smolinska S, Sokolowska M, Sousa-Pinto B, Sova M, Stelmach R, Sturm G, Suppli Ulrik C, Todo-Bom AM, Toppila-Salmi S, Tsiligianni I, Torres M, Untersmayr E, Urrutia Pereira M, Valiulis A, Vitte J, Vultaggio A, Wallace D, Walusiak-Skorupa J, Wang DY, Waserman S, Yorgancioglu A, Yusuf OM, Zernotti M, Zidarn M, Chivato T, Akdis CA, Zuberbier T, Klimek L. Management of anaphylaxis due to COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly. Allergy 2021; 76:2952-2964. [PMID: 33811358 PMCID: PMC8251336 DOI: 10.1111/all.14838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Older adults, especially men and/or those with diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, are prone to severe COVID‐19. In some countries, older adults, particularly those residing in nursing homes, have been prioritized to receive COVID‐19 vaccines due to high risk of death. In very rare instances, the COVID‐19 vaccines can induce anaphylaxis, and the management of anaphylaxis in older people should be considered carefully. An ARIA‐EAACI‐EuGMS (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and European Geriatric Medicine Society) Working Group has proposed some recommendations for older adults receiving the COVID‐19 vaccines. Anaphylaxis to COVID‐19 vaccines is extremely rare (from 1 per 100,000 to 5 per million injections). Symptoms are similar in younger and older adults but they tend to be more severe in the older patients. Adrenaline is the mainstay treatment and should be readily available. A flowchart is proposed to manage anaphylaxis in the older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany.,University Hospital Montpellier, France.,MACVIA-France, Montpellier, France
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Hubert Blain
- Department of Geriatrics, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, and ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Maria Teresa Ventura
- University of Bari Medical School, Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology, Bari, Italy
| | - Margitta Worm
- Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefano Del Giacco
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health and Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital "Duilio Casula", University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Athanasios Benetos
- Department of Geriatrics, CHRU de Nancy and Inserm DCAC, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - M Beatrice Bilo
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche - Allergy Unit - Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Amir Hamzah Abdul Latiff
- Allergy & Immunology Centre, Pantai Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Universiti Putra Malaysia Teaching Hospital,, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University and Department of Allergy, Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Kuwait
| | - Elizabeth Angier
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Isabella Annesi-Maesano
- Institut Desbrest d'Epidémiologie et Santé Publique (IDESP), INSERM et Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, ENT Dept, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Sun Yat-sen University, International Airway Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital Guangzou, China.,Division of ENT Diseases, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm and Department of ENT Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annick Barbaud
- Division of Service de Dermatologie et Allergologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France & Division of Equipe PEPITES, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Anna Bedbrook
- Allergy & Immunology Centre, Pantai Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Universiti Putra Malaysia Teaching Hospital,, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kazi S Bennoor
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Institute of Diseases of the Chest and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Elena Camelia Berghea
- Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, and Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children MS Curie, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense, Denmark
| | - Sergio Bonini
- Institute of Translational Pharmacology, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney and Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Sydney Local Health District, Glebe, NSW, Australia
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luisa Brussino
- Department of Medical Sciences, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Torino & Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Paulo Camargos
- Federal University of Minas Gerais, Medical School, Department of Pediatrics, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Asthma, & Allergy Clinic-Humanitas University & Research Hospital, IRCCS-Milano, Italy
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d'Hebron & ARADyAL research network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Carreiro-Martins
- Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Hospital de Dona Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal; CEDOC, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Carriazo
- Regional Ministry of Health of Andalusia, Seville, Spain
| | - Thomas Casale
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fl, USA
| | - Jean-Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lorenzo Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Antonio Cherubini
- Geriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alvaro A Cruz
- Fundação ProAR, Federal University of Bahia and GARD/WHO Planning Group, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Dejan Dokic
- University Clinic of Pulmology and Allergy, Medical Faculty Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - Yehia El-Gamal
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Unit, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, NHO Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Bernadette Eberlein
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - John Farrell
- LANUA International Healthcare Consultancy, Down, UK
| | | | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Centers, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherland, and EUFOREA, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joao A Fonseca
- CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal ; Allergy Unit, CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Yadong Gao
- Department of Allergology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Gaëtan Gavazzi
- Service Gériatrie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, GREPI (TIMC-IMAG, CNRS 5525), Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Radolslaw Gawlik
- Dept of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clin Immunology, Silesian University of Medicine, Katowice, Poland
| | - Asli Gelincik
- Division of Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bilun Gemicioğlu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maia Gotua
- Center of Allergy and Immunology, Georgian Association of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hans Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maja Hofmann
- Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Hrubisko
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Oncology Institute of St Elisabeth, Heydukova, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Madda lenaIllario
- Federico II University & Hospital, Department of Public Health and Research and Development Unit Naples, Italy
| | - Carla Irani
- Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, St Joseph University, Hotel Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Zhanat Ispayeva
- President of Kazakhstan Association of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Allergology and clinical immunology of the Kazakh National Medical University, Kazakhstan
| | | | - Kaja Julge
- Tartu University Institute of Clinical Medicine, Children's Clinic, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Igor Kaidashev
- Ukrainina Medical Stomatological Academy, Poltava, Ukraine
| | - Musa Khaitov
- National Research Center, Institute of Immunology, Federal Medicobiological Agency, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Edward Knol
- Departments of Immunology and Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Kraxner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Violeta Kvedariene
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases and Allergology, faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Antti Lauerma
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University, Meilahdentie Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lan Tt Le
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hochiminh City, Vietnam
| | - Vincent Le Moing
- Department of Infectiology, Montpellier University Hospital, France
| | - Michael Levin
- Division Paediatric Allergology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Renaud Louis
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, CHU Sart-Tilman, and GIGA I3 research group, Liege, Belgium
| | - Olga Lourenco
- Faculty of Health Sciences and CICS - UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | | | - Finbarr C Martin
- Emeritus Geriatrician and Professor of Medical Gerontology Population Health Sciences I, King's College London, UK
| | - Andrea Matucci
- Immunoallergology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Branislava Milenkovic
- Clinic for Pulmonary Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbian Association for Asthma and COPD, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Stéphanie Miot
- Department of Geriatrics, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Emma Montella
- Federico II University & Hospital, Department of Public Health and Research and Development Unit, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Charlotte G Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic; Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona,, Spain
| | - Leyla Namazova-Baranova
- Pediatrics and Child Health Research Institute, Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Hugo Neffen
- Director of Center of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Diseases, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Kristof Nekam
- Hospital of the Hospitaller Brothers in Buda, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marek Niedoszytko
- Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Allergology, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Mikaëla Odemyr
- EFA European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robyn E O'Hehir
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Dept of Otorhinolaryngology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg & Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis,, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Oscar Palomares
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Athens General Children's Hospital "P&A Kyriakou, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Petr Panzner
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Gianni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Policlino San Martino -University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Patella
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Agency of Health ASL Salerno, "Santa Maria della Speranza" Hospital, Battipaglia Salerno, Italy
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Section of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nhân Pham-Thi
- Ecole polytechnique Palaiseau, IRBA (Institut de Recherche bio-Médicale des Armées), Bretigny, France
| | - Davor Plavec
- Children's Hospital Srebrnjak, Zagreb, School of Medicine, University J.J. Strossmayer, Osijek, Croatia
| | - Todor A Popov
- University Hospital 'Sv Ivan Rilski'", Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Frederico S Regateiro
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra and Institute of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, and ICBR - Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, CIBB, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Jacques Reynes
- Department of Infectiology, Montpellier University Hospital, France
| | | | - Yves Rolland
- Gérontopôle de Toulouse, INSERM 1027, Toulouse, France
| | - Antonino Romano
- Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy; bFondazione Mediterranea GB Morgagni, Catania, Italy
| | - Carmen Rondon
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, & Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomedica de Malaga-IBIMA and ARADyAL, Malaga, Spain
| | - Menachem Rottem
- Division of Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Philip W Rouadi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and Ear University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nathalie Salles
- Société Française de Gériatrie et Gérontologie, Paris, France
| | - Boleslaw Samolinski
- Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London and Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London,and Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital Guy'sand St Thomas' Hospital, London, Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, London, UK
| | - Faradiba Sarquis Serpa
- Asthma Reference Center - School of Medicine of Santa Casa de Misericórdia of Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, CIBERES, Faculty of Medicine, Autonoma University of Madrid, Spain
| | - Jos M G A Schols
- Department of Health Services Research and Department of Family Medicine Caphri - Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastrich, Netherlands
| | | | - Anna Sediva
- Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Imperial College London, and Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Isabel Skypala
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sylwia Smolinska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, & "ALL-MED" Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Milena Sokolowska
- Christine Kühne - Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal ; Allergy Unit, CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal
| | - Milan Sova
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Rafael Stelmach
- Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital da Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gunter Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria Outpatient Allergy Clinic Reumannplatz, Vienna, Austria
| | - Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ana Maria Todo-Bom
- Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Sanna Toppila-Salmi
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Health Planning Unit, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece and International Primary Care Respiratory Group IPCRG, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Maria Torres
- Allergy Unit, Málaga Regional University Hospital-IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Eva Untersmayr
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Arunas Valiulis
- Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine & Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania; European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP/UEMS-SP), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joana Vitte
- Aix-Marseille University, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, Marseille& IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille and IDESP, INSERM, University of Montpellier,, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa
- Department of Occupational Diseases and Environmental Health, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland
| | - De-Yun Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Susan Waserman
- Department of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arzu Yorgancioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Osman M Yusuf
- The Allergy and Asthma Institute, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Universidad Nacional de Villa Maria, Villa Maria, Argentina
| | - Mihaela Zidarn
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Tomas Chivato
- School of Medicine, University CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, and Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Penfold RS, Zazzara MB, Roberts AL, Lee KA, Dooley H, Sudre CH, Welch C, Bowyer RCE, Visconti A, Mangino M, Freidin MB, El-Sayed Moustafa JS, Small K, Murray B, Modat M, Wolf J, Ourselin S, Martin FC, Steves CJ, Ni Lochlainn M. 144 Probable Delirium is A Presenting Symptom of COVID-19 in Frail, Older Adults: A Study of Hospitalised and Community-Based Cohorts. Age Ageing 2021. [PMCID: PMC7989598 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab030.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
COVID-19 exhibits a more severe disease course in older adults with frailty. Awareness of atypical presentations is critical to facilitate early disease identification. This study aimed to assess how frailty affects presenting symptoms of COVID-19 in older adults.
Methods
Observational study of two distinct cohorts: (i) Hospitalised patients aged 65 and over; unscheduled admission to a large London teaching hospital between March 1st, 2020-May 5th, 2020; COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swab (n = 322); (ii) Community-based adults aged 65 and over enrolled in the COVID Symptom Study mobile application between March 24th (application launch)-May 8th, 2020; self-report or report-by-proxy data; reported test-positive for COVID-19 (n = 535). Multivariable logistic regression analysis performed on age-matched samples of both cohorts to determine associations between frailty and symptoms of COVID-19 including delirium, fever and cough.
Results
Hospital cohort: there was a significantly higher prevalence of delirium amongst the frail sample, with no difference in fever or cough. Of those presenting with delirium, 10/53 (18.9%) presented with delirium as the only documented symptom. Community-based cohort: there was a significantly higher prevalence of probable delirium in the frail sample, and also of fatigue and shortness of breath. Of those reporting probable delirium, 28/84 (33%) did not report fever or cough.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates a higher prevalence of delirium as a presenting symptom of COVID-19 infection in older adults with frailty compared to their age-matched non-frail counterparts. Clinicians should suspect COVID-19 in frail older adults presenting with delirium. Early detection facilitates infection control measures to mitigate against catastrophic spread and preventable hospitalisations and deaths amongst this population. Our findings emphasise the need for systematic frailty assessment for all acutely ill older patients in both hospital and community settings, as well as systematic evaluation of any change in mental status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S Penfold
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - M B Zazzara
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - A L Roberts
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - K A Lee
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - H Dooley
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - C H Sudre
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Westminster Bridge Road, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - C Welch
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT
| | - R C E Bowyer
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - A Visconti
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - M Mangino
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - M B Freidin
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - J S El-Sayed Moustafa
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - K Small
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - B Murray
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Westminster Bridge Road, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - M Modat
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Westminster Bridge Road, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - J Wolf
- Zoe Global Limited, 164 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7RW, UK
| | - S Ourselin
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, Westminster Bridge Road, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - C J Steves
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| | - M Ni Lochlainn
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Goubar A, Almilaji O, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, Ayis S, Sheehan KJ. 34 Discharge After Hip Fracture Surgery by Mobilisation Timing: Secondary Analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database. Age Ageing 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab029.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To maximise the benefits of hip fracture surgery the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Clinical Guideline recommends mobilisation on the day after hip fracture surgery based a low to moderate quality trial with a small sample size. There is a need to generate additional evidence to support early mobilisation as a new UK Best Practice Tariff (BPT).
Objective
To determine whether mobilisation timing was associated with the cumulative incidence of hospital discharge by 30-days after hip fracture surgery, accounting for potential confounders and the competing risk of in-hospital death.
Method
We examined data for 135,105 patients 60 years or older who underwent surgery for nonpathological first hip fracture between January 2014 and December 2016 in any hospital in England or Wales. We tested whether the cumulative incidences of discharge differed between those mobilised early (within 36 hours of surgery) and those mobilised late accounting for potential confounders and the competing risk of in-hospital death.
Results
106,722 (79%) of patients first mobilised early. The average rate of discharge was 60.1 (95% CI 59.8–60.5) per 1,000 patient days, varying from 65.2 (95% CI 64.8–65.6) among those who mobilised early to 44.5 (95% CI 43.9–45.1) among those who mobilised late, accounting for the competing risk of death. By 30-days postoperatively, the crude and adjusted odds ratios of discharge were 2.26 (95% CI 2.2–2.32) and 1.93 (95% CI 1.86–1.99) respectively among those who first mobilised early compared to those who mobilised late, accounting for the competing risk of death.
Conclusion
Early mobilisation led to a near two fold increase in the adjusted odds of discharge by 30-days postoperatively. We recommend inclusion of mobilisation within 36 hours of surgery as a new UK BPT to help reduce delays to mobilisation currently experienced by one-fifth of patients surgically treated for hip fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - O Almilaji
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’s National Health Service Foundation Trust
| | - C Potter
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’s National Health Service Foundation Trust
| | - G D Jones
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’s National Health Service Foundation Trust
| | - C Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - S Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - K J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sheehan KJ, Goubar A, Almilaji O, Martin FC, Potter C, Jones GD, Sackley C, Ayis S. Discharge after hip fracture surgery by mobilisation timing: secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database. Age Ageing 2021; 50:415-422. [PMID: 33098414 PMCID: PMC7936027 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine whether mobilisation timing was associated with the cumulative incidence of hospital discharge by 30 days after hip fracture surgery, accounting for potential confounders and the competing risk of in-hospital death. Method We examined data for 135,105 patients 60 years or older who underwent surgery for nonpathological first hip fracture between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016 in any hospital in England or Wales. We tested whether the cumulative incidences of discharge differed between those mobilised early (within 36 h of surgery) and those mobilised late, accounting for potential confounders and the competing risk of in-hospital death. Results A total of 106,722 (79%) of patients first mobilised early. The average rate of discharge was 39.2 (95% CI 38.9–39.5) per 1,000 patient days, varying from 43.1 (95% CI 42.8–43.5) among those who mobilised early to 27.0 (95% CI 26.6–27.5) among those who mobilised late, accounting for the competing risk of death. By 30-day postoperatively, the crude and adjusted odds ratios of discharge were 2.36 (95% CI 2.29–2.43) and 2.08 (95% CI 2.00–2.16), respectively, among those who first mobilised early compared with those who mobilised late, accounting for the competing risk of death. Conclusion Early mobilisation led to a 2-fold increase in the adjusted odds of discharge by 30-day postoperatively. We recommend inclusion of mobilisation within 36 h of surgery as a new UK Best Practice Tariff to help reduce delays to mobilisation currently experienced by one-fifth of patients surgically treated for hip fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie J Sheehan
- Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Aicha Goubar
- Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Orouba Almilaji
- Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust London, London, UK
| | - Chris Potter
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust London, London, UK
| | - Gareth D Jones
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Salma Ayis
- Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Martin FC, Stevenson JM. Challenges of medication-related harm in older adults: not always in plain sight. Pol Arch Intern Med 2021; 131:3-4. [PMID: 33522216 DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Finbarr C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Jennifer M Stevenson
- linical Pharmacy and Medicines Use Group, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zazzara MB, Penfold RS, Roberts AL, Lee KA, Dooley H, Sudre CH, Welch C, Bowyer RCE, Visconti A, Mangino M, Freidin MB, El-Sayed Moustafa JS, Small KS, Murray B, Modat M, Graham MS, Wolf J, Ourselin S, Martin FC, Steves CJ, Lochlainn MN. Probable delirium is a presenting symptom of COVID-19 in frail, older adults: a cohort study of 322 hospitalised and 535 community-based older adults. Age Ageing 2021; 50:40-48. [PMID: 32986799 PMCID: PMC7543251 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty, increased vulnerability to physiological stressors, is associated with adverse outcomes. COVID-19 exhibits a more severe disease course in older, comorbid adults. Awareness of atypical presentations is critical to facilitate early identification. OBJECTIVE To assess how frailty affects presenting COVID-19 symptoms in older adults. DESIGN Observational cohort study of hospitalised older patients and self-report data for community-based older adults. SETTING Admissions to St Thomas' Hospital, London with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Community-based data for older adults using the COVID Symptom Study mobile application. SUBJECTS Hospital cohort: patients aged 65 and over (n = 322); unscheduled hospital admission between 1 March 2020 and 5 May 2020; COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swab. Community-based cohort: participants aged 65 and over enrolled in the COVID Symptom Study (n = 535); reported test-positive for COVID-19 from 24 March (application launch) to 8 May 2020. METHODS Multivariable logistic regression analysis performed on age-matched samples from hospital and community-based cohorts to ascertain association of frailty with symptoms of confirmed COVID-19. RESULTS Hospital cohort: significantly higher prevalence of probable delirium in the frail sample, with no difference in fever or cough. Community-based cohort: significantly higher prevalence of possible delirium in frailer, older adults and fatigue and shortness of breath. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study demonstrating higher prevalence of probable delirium as a COVID-19 symptom in older adults with frailty compared to other older adults. This emphasises need for systematic frailty assessment and screening for delirium in acutely ill older patients in hospital and community settings. Clinicians should suspect COVID-19 in frail adults with delirium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Beatrice Zazzara
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Gerontology, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Rose S Penfold
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Amy L Roberts
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Karla A Lee
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Hannah Dooley
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Carole H Sudre
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - Carly Welch
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruth C E Bowyer
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Alessia Visconti
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Massimo Mangino
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Foundation Trust, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Maxim B Freidin
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Julia S El-Sayed Moustafa
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Kerrin S Small
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Benjamin Murray
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - Marc Modat
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - Mark S Graham
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, SE17EH, London, UK
| | | | - Sebastien Ourselin
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, SE17EH, London, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, SE17EH London, UK
| | - Claire J Steves
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Mary Ni Lochlainn
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sheehan KJ, Fitzgerald L, Lambe K, Martin FC, Lamb SE, Sackley C. Effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions incorporating outdoor mobility on ambulatory ability and falls-related self-efficacy after hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:99. [PMID: 34148132 PMCID: PMC8214580 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00963-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED There is limited evidence from 11 randomised controlled trials on the effect of rehabilitation interventions which incorporate outdoor mobility on ambulatory ability and/or self-efficacy after hip fracture. Outdoor mobility should be central (not peripheral) to future intervention studies targeting improvements in ambulatory ability. PURPOSE Determine the extent to which outdoor mobility is incorporated into rehabilitation interventions after hip fracture. Synthesise the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions on ambulatory ability and falls-related self-efficacy. METHODS Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, PEDro and OpenGrey for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of community-based rehabilitation interventions incorporating outdoor mobility after hip fracture from database inception to January 2021. Exclusion of protocols, pilot/feasibility studies, secondary analyses of RCTs, nonrandomised and non-English language studies. Duplicate screening for eligibility, risk of bias, and data extraction sample. Random effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity with inconsistency-value (I2). RESULTS RCTs (n = 11) provided limited detail on target or achieved outdoor mobility intervention components. There was conflicting evidence from 2 RCTs for the effect on outdoor walking ability at 1-3 months (risk difference 0.19; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.21, 0.58; I2 = 92%), no effect on walking endurance at intervention end (standardised mean difference 0.05; 95% CI: - 0.26, 0.35; I2 = 36%); and suggestive (CI crosses null) of a small effect on self-efficacy at 1-3 months (standardised mean difference 0.25; 95% CI: - 0.29, 0.78; I2 = 87%) compared with routine care/sham intervention. CONCLUSION It was not possible to attribute any benefit observed to an outdoor mobility intervention component due to poor reporting of target or achieved outdoor mobility and/or quality of the underlying evidence. Given the low proportion of patients recovering outdoor mobility after hip fracture, future research on interventions with outdoor mobility as a central component is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration: CRD42021236541.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie J. Sheehan
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Fitzgerald
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Lambe
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Finbarr C. Martin
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Sallie E. Lamb
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Catherine Sackley
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, Anker SD, Aprahamian I, Arai H, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Bernabei R, Cadore EL, Cesari M, Chen LK, de Souto Barreto P, Duque G, Ferrucci L, Fielding RA, García-Hermoso A, Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, Harridge SDR, Kirk B, Kritchevsky S, Landi F, Lazarus N, Martin FC, Marzetti E, Pahor M, Ramírez-Vélez R, Rodriguez-Mañas L, Rolland Y, Ruiz JG, Theou O, Villareal DT, Waters DL, Won Won C, Woo J, Vellas B, Fiatarone Singh M. International Exercise Recommendations in Older Adults (ICFSR): Expert Consensus Guidelines. J Nutr Health Aging 2021; 25:824-853. [PMID: 34409961 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-021-1665-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 106.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The human ageing process is universal, ubiquitous and inevitable. Every physiological function is being continuously diminished. There is a range between two distinct phenotypes of ageing, shaped by patterns of living - experiences and behaviours, and in particular by the presence or absence of physical activity (PA) and structured exercise (i.e., a sedentary lifestyle). Ageing and a sedentary lifestyle are associated with declines in muscle function and cardiorespiratory fitness, resulting in an impaired capacity to perform daily activities and maintain independent functioning. However, in the presence of adequate exercise/PA these changes in muscular and aerobic capacity with age are substantially attenuated. Additionally, both structured exercise and overall PA play important roles as preventive strategies for many chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, osteoporosis, and obesity; improvement of mobility, mental health, and quality of life; and reduction in mortality, among other benefits. Notably, exercise intervention programmes improve the hallmarks of frailty (low body mass, strength, mobility, PA level, energy) and cognition, thus optimising functional capacity during ageing. In these pathological conditions exercise is used as a therapeutic agent and follows the precepts of identifying the cause of a disease and then using an agent in an evidence-based dose to eliminate or moderate the disease. Prescription of PA/structured exercise should therefore be based on the intended outcome (e.g., primary prevention, improvement in fitness or functional status or disease treatment), and individualised, adjusted and controlled like any other medical treatment. In addition, in line with other therapeutic agents, exercise shows a dose-response effect and can be individualised using different modalities, volumes and/or intensities as appropriate to the health state or medical condition. Importantly, exercise therapy is often directed at several physiological systems simultaneously, rather than targeted to a single outcome as is generally the case with pharmacological approaches to disease management. There are diseases for which exercise is an alternative to pharmacological treatment (such as depression), thus contributing to the goal of deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMS). There are other conditions where no effective drug therapy is currently available (such as sarcopenia or dementia), where it may serve a primary role in prevention and treatment. Therefore, this consensus statement provides an evidence-based rationale for using exercise and PA for health promotion and disease prevention and treatment in older adults. Exercise prescription is discussed in terms of the specific modalities and doses that have been studied in randomised controlled trials for their effectiveness in attenuating physiological changes of ageing, disease prevention, and/or improvement of older adults with chronic disease and disability. Recommendations are proposed to bridge gaps in the current literature and to optimise the use of exercise/PA both as a preventative medicine and as a therapeutic agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Izquierdo
- Mikel Izquierdo, PhD, Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Av. De Barañain s/n 31008 Pamplona (Navarra) Spain, Tel + 34 948 417876
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Blain H, Rolland Y, Schols JMGA, Cherubini A, Miot S, O'Neill D, Martin FC, Guérin O, Gavazzi G, Bousquet J, Petrovic M, Gordon AL, Benetos A. August 2020 Interim EuGMS guidance to prepare European Long-Term Care Facilities for COVID-19. Eur Geriatr Med 2020; 11:899-913. [PMID: 33141405 PMCID: PMC7608456 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-020-00405-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) is launching a second interim guidance whose aim is to prevent the entrance and spread of COVID-19 into long-term care facilities (LTCFs). METHODS The EuGMS gathered experts to propose a guide of measures to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks in LTCFs. It is based on the specific features of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in LTCFs, residents' needs, and on experiences conducted in the field. RESULTS Asymptomatic COVID-19 residents and staff members contribute substantially to the dissemination of COVID-19 infection in LTCFs. An infection prevention and control focal point should be set up in every LTCF for (1) supervising infection prevention and control measures aimed at keeping COVID-19 out of LTCFs, (2) RT-PCR testing of residents, staff members, and visitors with COVID-19 symptoms, even atypical, and (3) isolating subjects either infected or in contact with infected subjects. When a first LCTF resident or staff member is infected, a facility-wide RT-PCR test-retest strategy should be implemented for detecting all SARS-CoV-2 carriers. Testing should continue until no new COVID-19 cases are identified. The isolation of residents should be limited as much as possible and associated with measures aiming at limiting its negative effects on their mental and somatic health status. CONCLUSIONS An early recognition of symptoms compatible with COVID-19 may help to diagnose COVID-19 residents and staff more promptly. Subsequently, an earlier testing for SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic and asymptomatic LTCF staff and residents will enable the implementation of appropriate infection prevention and control. The negative effects of social isolation in residents should be limited as much as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert Blain
- Department of Geriatrics, Centre Antonin Balmes, Pôle de Gérontologie du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier University, 39 avenue Charles Flahault, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
| | - Yves Rolland
- INSERM 1027, Toulouse University, Toulouse, France
| | - Jos M G A Schols
- Department of Health Services Research and Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI-Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Antonio Cherubini
- Geriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
| | - Stéphanie Miot
- Department of Geriatrics, Centre Antonin Balmes, Pôle de Gérontologie du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier University, 39 avenue Charles Flahault, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
- CESP, INSERM U1178, Centre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Santé des Populations, Paris, France
| | - Desmond O'Neill
- Trinity College Dublin Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Population Health Sciences I King's College London, London, England
| | - Olivier Guérin
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, CHU Nice, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Gaëtan Gavazzi
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospital of Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
- GREPI TIMC-IMAG CNRS UMR5525, University of Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Berlin, Germany
- MACVIA-France, Montpellier, France
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam L Gordon
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK
| | - Athanase Benetos
- Department of Geriatrics, CHRU de Nancy and Inserm DCAC, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gordon AL, Goodman C, Achterberg W, Barker RO, Burns E, Hanratty B, Martin FC, Meyer J, O’Neill D, Schols J, Spilsbury K. Commentary: COVID in care homes-challenges and dilemmas in healthcare delivery. Age Ageing 2020; 49:701-705. [PMID: 32402088 PMCID: PMC7239229 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected care home residents internationally, with 19-72% of COVID-19 deaths occurring in care homes. COVID-19 presents atypically in care home residents and up to 56% of residents may test positive whilst pre-symptomatic. In this article, we provide a commentary on challenges and dilemmas identified in the response to COVID-19 for care homes and their residents. We highlight the low sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction testing and the difficulties this poses for blanket screening and isolation of residents. We discuss quarantine of residents and the potential harms associated with this. Personal protective equipment supply for care homes during the pandemic has been suboptimal and we suggest that better integration of procurement and supply is required. Advance care planning has been challenged by the pandemic and there is a need to for healthcare staff to provide support to care homes with this. Finally, we discuss measures to implement augmented care in care homes, including treatment with oxygen and subcutaneous fluids, and the frameworks which will be required if these are to be sustainable. All of these challenges must be met by healthcare, social care and government agencies if care home residents and staff are to be physically and psychologically supported during this time of crisis for care homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Gordon
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care (CRIPACC), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England (ARC-EoE), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Robert O Barker
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle, UK
| | | | | | - Desmond O’Neill
- Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jos Schols
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
O'Neill D, Briggs R, Holmerová I, Samuelsson O, Gordon AL, Martin FC. COVID-19 highlights the need for universal adoption of standards of medical care for physicians in nursing homes in Europe. Eur Geriatr Med 2020; 11:645-650. [PMID: 32557250 PMCID: PMC7298916 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-020-00347-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The nursing home sector has seen a disproportionately high number of deaths as part of the COVID-19 pandemic. This reflects, in part, the frailty and vulnerability of older people living in care homes but has also, in part, been a consequence of the failure to include care homes in the systematic planning of a response to COVID, as well as a measure of neglect of standards and quality improvement in the sector. In response, the EUGMS published a set of medical standards of care developed in consultation with experts across its member national societies in 2015. The standards consisted of seven core principles of medical care for physicians working in nursing homes as a first step in developing a programme of clinical, academic and policy engagement in improving medical care for older people who are living and frequently also dying as residents in nursing homes. The gravity of the concerns arising for nursing home care from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as emerging insights on care improvement in nursing homes indicate that an update of these medical standards is timely. This was performed by the writing group from the original 2015 guidelines and is intended as an interim measure pending a more formal review incorporating a systematic review of emerging literature and a Delphi process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desmond O'Neill
- Centre for Ageing, Neuroscience and the Humanities, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, D24 NR0A, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | - Adam L Gordon
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Martin FC. Care homes after covid-19: the government needs a plan. BMJ 2020; 369:m2101. [PMID: 32461246 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Finbarr C Martin
- Population Health Sciences, King's College London, Addison House, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Roller-Wirnsberger R, Lindner S, Liew A, O'Caoimh R, Koula ML, Moody D, Espinosa JM, van Durme T, Dimitrov P, Benjak T, Nicolaidou E, Hammar T, Vanhecke E, Junius-Walker U, Csizmadia P, Galluzzo L, Macijauskienė J, Salem M, Rietman L, Ranhoff AH, Targowski T, de Arriaga MT, Bozdog E, Gabrovec B, Hendry A, Martin FC, Rodriguez-Mañas L. European Collaborative and Interprofessional Capability Framework for Prevention and Management of Frailty-a consensus process supported by the Joint Action for Frailty Prevention (ADVANTAGE) and the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS). Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:561-570. [PMID: 31970670 PMCID: PMC7170812 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01455-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interprofessional collaborative practice (ICP) is currently recommended for the delivery of high-quality integrated care for older people. Frailty prevention and management are key elements to be tackled on a multi-professional level. AIM This study aims to develop a consensus-based European multi-professional capability framework for frailty prevention and management. METHODS Using a modified Delphi technique, a consensus-based framework of knowledge, skills and attitudes for all professions involved in the care pathway of older people was developed within two consultation rounds. The template for the process was derived from competency frameworks collected in a comprehensive approach from EU-funded projects of the European Commission (EC) supported best practice models for health workforce development. RESULTS The agreed framework consists of 25 items structured in 4 domains of capabilities. Content covers the understanding about frailty, skills for screening and assessment as well as management procedures for every profession involved. The majority of items focused on interprofessional collaboration, communication and person-centred care planning. DISCUSSION This framework facilitates clarification of professionals' roles and standardizes procedures for cross-sectional care processes. Despite a lack of evidence for educational interventions, health workforce development remains an important aspect of quality assurance in health care systems. CONCLUSIONS The multi-professional capability framework for frailty prevention and management incorporated interprofessional collaborative practice, consistent with current recommendations by the World Health Organization, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies and the European Commission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Roller-Wirnsberger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
- European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS), Genoa, Italy.
| | - Sonja Lindner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Aaron Liew
- Health Service Executive of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ronan O'Caoimh
- Health Service Executive of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Dawn Moody
- National Health Services Orkney, Orkney, Scotland
| | | | - Thérèse van Durme
- Catholic University of Louvain, Institute of Health and Society, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Plamen Dimitrov
- National Center of Public Health and Analyses, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | | | - Teija Hammar
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eliane Vanhecke
- Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity, General Directorate for Health, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Mohamed Salem
- San Vincent De Paule Long Term Care Facility, Marsa, Malta
| | - Liset Rietman
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tomasz Targowski
- National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Anne Hendry
- National Health Service Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Clery A, Bhalla A, Bisquera A, Skolarus LE, Marshall I, McKevitt C, Rudd A, Sackley C, Martin FC, Manthorpe J, Wolfe C, Wang Y. Long-Term Trends in Stroke Survivors Discharged to Care Homes: The South London Stroke Register. Stroke 2020; 51:179-185. [PMID: 31690255 PMCID: PMC6924949 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.119.026618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background and Purpose- Care homes provide care to many stroke survivors, yet little is known about changes in care home use over time. We aim to determine trends in discharge to care homes, to explore the characteristics of stroke survivors over time (1995-2018), and to identify the associations between these characteristics and discharge to care homes poststroke. Methods- Using data from the South London Stroke Register between 1995 and 2018, we estimated the proportions discharged to care homes and their characteristics over time, assessed by tests for trends. Multivariable logistic regression models were built to assess the associations between their characteristics and discharge destination. Results- Of 4172 stroke survivors, 484 (12%) were discharged to care homes. This proportion has decreased from 24% in 1995 to 2000 to 5% in 2013 to 2018. The mean age of those discharged to care homes has increased over time, from 73 to 75 (P<0.001). Among stroke survivors discharged to a care home, the proportion with a prestroke Barthel Index <15 has also increased over time from 7% to 21% (P=0.027), while the proportion with a 7-day poststroke Barthel Index <15 remains largely unchanged over time (93% in 1995-2000, 90% in 2013-2018). The characteristics most strongly associated with discharge to care homes were (odds ratio [95% CI]) age (1.05 [1.04-1.07] per year), stroke subtype (hemorrhagic; 0.64 [0.43-0.95]), stroke severity (Glasgow Coma Scale score, <13; 1.67 [1.19-2.35]), failed swallow test at admission (1.65 [1.20-2.25]), 7-day poststroke Barthel Index <15 (3.58 [2.20-6.03]), and a longer hospital stay (1.02 [1.02-1.03] per day). Conclusions- Over >20 years, there has been an 80% reduction in the proportion of stroke survivors discharged to care homes, influenced by changes in the demographics, disability, and stroke care in the underlying stroke population. In those moving to care homes, the level of poststroke disability remains high, requiring continued attention and investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Clery
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Ajay Bhalla
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (A. Bhalla, A.R.)
| | - Alessandra Bisquera
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Lesli E. Skolarus
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (L.E.S.)
| | - Iain Marshall
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher McKevitt
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Rudd
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (A. Bhalla, A.R.)
| | - Catherine Sackley
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Finbarr C. Martin
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- National Institute for Health Research Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom (J.M.)
| | - Charles Wolfe
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (C.W., Y.W.)
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London, United Kingdom (C.W., Y.W.)
| | - Yanzhong Wang
- From the Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences (A.C., A. Bhalla, A.B., L.E.S., I.M., C.M., A.R., C.S., F.C.M., C.W., Y.W.), King’s College London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (C.W., Y.W.)
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London, United Kingdom (C.W., Y.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stevenson JM, Davies JG, Martin FC. Medication-related harm: a geriatric syndrome. Age Ageing 2019; 49:7-11. [PMID: 31665207 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm recognises medication-related harm (MRH) as a global public health issue. Increased life-expectancy coupled with multimorbidity and polypharmacy leads to an increased incidence of MRH, especially in older adults: at a cost of approximately £400 million to the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Harm from medicines has long been recognised by geriatricians, and strategies have been developed to mitigate harm. In general, these have focused on the challenges of polypharmacy and appropriateness of medicines, but impact on the quality of life, clinical and economic outcomes has been variable and often disappointing. The problem of MRH in older adults will continue to grow unless a new approach is adopted. Emerging evidence suggests that we need to take a broader approach as described in our conceptual model, where well-recognised physiological changes are incorporated, as well as other rarely considered psychosocial issues that influences MRH. Parallels may be drawn between this approach and the management of geriatric syndromes. We propose there must be a greater emphasis on MRH, and it, of itself, should be considered as a geriatric syndrome, to bring the spotlight onto the problem and to send a clear signal from geriatric experts that this is an important issue that needs to be addressed using a co-ordinated and tailored approach across health and social care boundaries. This requires a more proactive approach to monitor and review the medicines of older adults in response to their changing need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Stevenson
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King’s College London
- Pharmacy Department, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, Woo J, Romero-Ortuno R, Walston JD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet 2019; 394:1376-1386. [PMID: 31609229 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31785-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 621] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Frailty is a complex age-related clinical condition characterised by a decline in physiological capacity across several organ systems, with a resultant increased susceptibility to stressors. Because of the heterogeneity of frailty in clinical presentation, it is important to have effective strategies for the delivery of care that range across the continuum of frailty severity. In clinical practice, we should do what works, starting with frailty screening, case identification, and management of frailty. This process is unarguably difficult given the absence of an adequate evidence base for individual and health-system interventions to manage frailty. We advocate change towards individually tailored interventions that preserve an individual's independence, physical function, and cognition. This change can be addressed by promoting the recognition of frailty, furthering advancements in evidence-based treatment options, and identifying cost-effective care delivery strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsa Dent
- Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | | | - Howard Bergman
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean Woo
- Department of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Roman Romero-Ortuno
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology and Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland; Mercer's Institute for Successful Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jeremy D Walston
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Partridge JSL, Crichton S, Biswell E, Harari D, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. Measuring the distress related to delirium in older surgical patients and their relatives. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 34:1070-1077. [PMID: 30945343 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Delirium is a common postoperative complication with implications on morbidity and mortality. Less is known about the psychological impact of delirium in patients and relatives. This study aimed to quantitatively describe distress related to postoperative delirium in older surgical patients and their relatives using the distress thermometer, examine the association between degree of distress and features of delirium on the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS), and examine the association between recall of delirium and features of delirium on the DRS. METHODS This prospective study recruited postoperative patients and their relatives following delirium. The distress thermometer was used to examine the degree of distress pertaining to delirium and was conducted during the hospitalization on resolution of delirium and then at 12-month follow-up. Associations between delirium-related distress in patient and relative participants and severity and features of delirium (DRS) were examined. RESULTS One hundred two patients and 49 relatives were recruited. Median scores on the distress thermometer in patients who recalled delirium were 8/10. Relatives also showed distress (median distress thermometer score of 8/10). Associations were observed between severity and phenotypic features of delirium (delusions, labile affect, and agitation). Distress persisted at 12 months in patients and relatives. CONCLUSION Distress related to postoperative delirium can be measured using a distress thermometer. Alongside approaches to reduce delirium incidence, interventions to minimize distress from postoperative delirium should be sought. Such interventions should be developed through robust research and if effective administered to patients, relatives, or carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith S L Partridge
- Department of Health and Ageing, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Older Persons Assessment Unit, Ground Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Biswell
- Department of Health and Ageing, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Older Persons Assessment Unit, Ground Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Danielle Harari
- Department of Health and Ageing, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Older Persons Assessment Unit, Ground Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jugdeep K Dhesi
- Department of Health and Ageing, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Older Persons Assessment Unit, Ground Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sheehan KJ, Fitzgerald L, Hatherley S, Potter C, Ayis S, Martin FC, Gregson CL, Cameron ID, Beaupre LA, Wyatt D, Milton-Cole R, DiGiorgio S, Sackley C. Inequity in rehabilitation interventions after hip fracture: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2019; 48:489-497. [PMID: 31220202 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to determine the extent to which equity factors contributed to eligibility criteria of trials of rehabilitation interventions after hip fracture. We define equity factors as those that stratify healthcare opportunities and outcomes. DESIGN systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, PEDro, Open Grey, BASE and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials of rehabilitation interventions after hip fracture published between 1 January 2008 and 30 May 2018. Trials not published in English, secondary prevention or new models of service delivery (e.g. orthogeriatric care pathway) were excluded. Duplicate screening for eligibility, risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool) and data extraction (Cochrane's PROGRESS-Plus framework). RESULTS twenty-three published, eight protocol, four registered ongoing randomised controlled trials (4,449 participants) were identified. A total of 69 equity factors contributed to eligibility criteria of the 35 trials. For more than 50% of trials, potential participants were excluded based on residency in a nursing home, cognitive impairment, mobility/functional impairment, minimum age and/or non-surgical candidacy. Where reported, this equated to the exclusion of 2,383 out of 8,736 (27.3%) potential participants based on equity factors. Residency in a nursing home and cognitive impairment were the main drivers of these exclusions. CONCLUSION the generalisability of trial results to the underlying population of frail older adults is limited. Yet, this is the evidence base underpinning current service design. Future trials should include participants with cognitive impairment and those admitted from nursing homes. For those excluded, an evidence-informed reasoning for the exclusion should be explicitly stated. PROSPERO CRD42018085930.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| | - L Fitzgerald
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| | - S Hatherley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| | - C Potter
- Department of Physiotherapy, Guy’s and St. Thomas’s National Health Service Foundation Trust, UK
| | - S Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| | - C L Gregson
- Translational Health Sciences, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK
| | - I D Cameron
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - L A Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy and Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, Canada
| | - D Wyatt
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, UK
| | - R Milton-Cole
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| | - S DiGiorgio
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| | - C Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Martin FC, Romero Ortuño R. Longitudinal studies of ageing: from insights to impacts: commentary to accompany themed collection on longitudinal studies. Age Ageing 2019; 48:481-485. [PMID: 31008499 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
'Time is the best diagnostician': who has not thought this? In clinical practice, presentations are often subtle and decisions made in the face of a 'snapshot.' Crystal balls do not exist; yet, insights from longitudinal studies can help to recognise emerging pictures and anticipate typical trajectories. In the multifactorial, biopsychosocial world of geriatrics, the determinants of those trajectories, and hence opportunities to modify them, can be better understood through careful longitudinal disentangling of the wider determinants of health, and this can be done at multiple levels of analysis, from molecules to society. With this collection and commentary, we highlight the approaches, scope and impacts of a selection of longitudinal studies of ageing published in Age and Ageing within the past 10 years. Longitudinal studies can illuminate disease mechanisms, how declines in multiple domains of intrinsic capacity interact, how losses in one domain may influence the path of another, and in turn, how these changes translate to functional disability, or not. Observing trajectories of geriatric syndromes can suggest opportunities for optimisation and prevention in clinical practice and policy. With global opportunities for harmonising data, longitudinal studies are already offering the opportunity for cross-national comparisons and for developing hypotheses about the relative contributions of time, place and society in the trajectories of frailty, disability and quality of life. We also include studies which show how research-based longitudinal data can be synthesised or be linked to administrative datasets. We hope you find this collection as interesting and encouraging as we have.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbarr C Martin
- Emeritus Professor of Medical Gerontology, King’s College London and Emeritus Consultant Geriatrician, Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Román Romero Ortuño
- Associate Professor in Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin and Consultant Physician, St James’s Hospital, Dublin
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
van Oppen JD, Thompson D, Tite M, Griffiths S, Martin FC, Conroy S. The Acute Frailty Network: experiences from a whole-systems quality improvement collaborative for acutely ill older patients in the English NHS. Eur Geriatr Med 2019; 10:559-565. [DOI: 10.1007/s41999-019-00177-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
44
|
Sheehan KJ, Smith TO, Martin FC, Johansen A, Drummond A, Beaupre L, Magaziner J, Whitney J, Hommel A, Cameron ID, Price I, Sackley C. Conceptual Framework for an Episode of Rehabilitative Care After Surgical Repair of Hip Fracture. Phys Ther 2019; 99:276-285. [PMID: 30690532 PMCID: PMC8055063 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Researchers face a challenge when evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation after a surgical procedure for hip fracture. Reported outcomes of rehabilitation will vary depending on the end point of the episode of care. Evaluation at an inappropriate end point might suggest a lack of effectiveness leading to the underuse of rehabilitation that could improve outcomes. The purpose of this article is to describe a conceptual framework for a continuum-care episode of rehabilitation after a surgical procedure for hip fracture. Definitions are proposed for the index event, end point, and service scope of the episode. Challenges in defining the episode of care and operationalizing the episode, and next steps for researchers are discussed. The episode described is intended to apply to all patients eligible for entry to rehabilitation after hip fracture and includes most functional recovery end points. This framework will provide a guide for rehabilitation researchers when designing and interpreting evaluations of the effectiveness of rehabilitation after hip fracture. Evaluation of all potential care episodes facilitates transparency in reporting of outcomes, enabling researchers to determine the true effectiveness of rehabilitation after a surgical procedure for hip fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom,Please address all correspondence to Dr Sheehan at:
| | - Toby O Smith
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Antony Johansen
- Trauma Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Avril Drummond
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy and Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jay Magaziner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Julie Whitney
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London
| | - Ami Hommel
- Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Iona Price
- Royal College of Physicians Patient and Carer Network, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Parker SG, Downes T, Godfrey M, Matthews R, Martin FC. Age and Ageing to introduce a new category of paper: healthcare improvement science. Age Ageing 2019; 48:178-184. [PMID: 30395169 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Age and Ageing is now inviting papers on healthcare improvement for older people. In this article we outline the nature and scope of healthcare improvement and reference improvement models and the tools and methods of improvement science. We emphasise the issues of sustainability, including scale and spread; evaluation - including associated ethical consideration and the involvement of patients and the public in healthcare improvement and associated research. Throughout we refer to resources the authors have found useful in their own work, and provide a bibliography of sources and web-links which will provide essential guidance and support for potential contributors to this new category of submission to Age and Ageing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Parker
- Newcastle Institute for Ageing, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - T Downes
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals - Geriatric Department Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Godfrey
- Leeds University, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds, UK
| | - R Matthews
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Northwest London, UK
| | - F C Martin
- St Thomas' Hospital - Lambeth Palace Road, London, UK
- King's College London School of Medical Education Division of Health and Social Care, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sunkersing D, Martin FC, Reed J, Woringer M, Bell D. What do care home managers believe constitutes an 'assessment for frailty' of care home residents in North-West London? A survey. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:62. [PMID: 30823874 PMCID: PMC6397475 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1083-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Frail individuals are at risk of significant clinical deterioration if their frailty is not identified and managed appropriately. Research suggests that any interaction between an older person and a health or social care professional should include an assessment for frailty. Many older care home residents are frail when admitted, but we have little knowledge of whether or how this is assessed. The aim of this paper is to understand and establish the characteristics of the reported ‘assessments for frailty’ used in care homes with nursing (nursing homes) across North-West London. This will help understand what an ‘assessment for frailty’ of care home residents mean in practice in North-West London. Methods Telephone contact was made with every Care Quality Commission (CQC) (independent regulator of health and adult social care in England) regulated nursing home across North-West London [n = 87]. An online survey was sent to all that expressed interest [n = 73]. The survey was developed through conversations with healthcare professionals, based on literature and tested with academics and clinicians. Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analyses. Results 24/73 nursing homes completed the survey (33%). Differences in the characteristics of reported ‘assessments for frailty’ across nursing homes were evident. Variation in high level domains assessed (physical, social, mental and environmental) was observed. Nurses were the most common professional group completing assessments for frailty, with documentation and storage being predominantly paper based. A statistically significant difference between the number of assessments used in corporate chain owned nursing homes (3.9) versus independently owned nursing homes (2.1) was observed (U = 21, p = .005). Conclusions Great variation existed in the characteristics of reported ‘assessments for frailty’ in nursing homes. Our study suggests that not all physical, social, mental and environmental domains of frailty are routinely assessed: it appears that frailty is still primarily viewed only in terms of physical health. The consequences of this could be severe for patients, staff and healthcare settings. Research illustrates that frailty is a broad, multifactorial health state and, as such, an overall ‘assessment for frailty’ should reflect this. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1083-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sunkersing
- NIHR CLAHRC North West London, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK. .,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, W6 8RP, London, UK.
| | | | - Julie Reed
- NIHR CLAHRC North West London, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, W6 8RP, London, UK
| | - Maria Woringer
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, W6 8RP, London, UK
| | - Derek Bell
- NIHR CLAHRC North West London, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, W6 8RP, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Woodhouse L, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Fried LP, Woo J, Aprahamian I, Sanford A, Lundy J, Landi F, Beilby J, Martin FC, Bauer JM, Ferrucci L, Merchant RA, Dong B, Arai H, Hoogendijk EO, Won CW, Abbatecola A, Cederholm T, Strandberg T, Gutiérrez Robledo LM, Flicker L, Bhasin S, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Guralnik JM, Muscedere J, Pahor M, Ruiz J, Negm AM, Reginster JY, Waters DL, Vellas B. Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management. J Nutr Health Aging 2019; 23:771-787. [PMID: 31641726 PMCID: PMC6800406 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 401] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The task force of the International Conference of Frailty and Sarcopenia Research (ICFSR) developed these clinical practice guidelines to overview the current evidence-base and to provide recommendations for the identification and management of frailty in older adults. METHODS These recommendations were formed using the GRADE approach, which ranked the strength and certainty (quality) of the supporting evidence behind each recommendation. Where the evidence-base was limited or of low quality, Consensus Based Recommendations (CBRs) were formulated. The recommendations focus on the clinical and practical aspects of care for older people with frailty, and promote person-centred care. Recommendations for Screening and Assessment: The task force recommends that health practitioners case identify/screen all older adults for frailty using a validated instrument suitable for the specific setting or context (strong recommendation). Ideally, the screening instrument should exclude disability as part of the screening process. For individuals screened as positive for frailty, a more comprehensive clinical assessment should be performed to identify signs and underlying mechanisms of frailty (strong recommendation). Recommendations for Management: A comprehensive care plan for frailty should address polypharmacy (whether rational or nonrational), the management of sarcopenia, the treatable causes of weight loss, and the causes of exhaustion (depression, anaemia, hypotension, hypothyroidism, and B12 deficiency) (strong recommendation). All persons with frailty should receive social support as needed to address unmet needs and encourage adherence to a comprehensive care plan (strong recommendation). First-line therapy for the management of frailty should include a multi-component physical activity programme with a resistance-based training component (strong recommendation). Protein/caloric supplementation is recommended when weight loss or undernutrition are present (conditional recommendation). No recommendation was given for systematic additional therapies such as cognitive therapy, problem-solving therapy, vitamin D supplementation, and hormone-based treatment. Pharmacological treatment as presently available is not recommended therapy for the treatment of frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Dent
- E. Dent, Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, Australia,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gordon AL, Goodman C, Davies SL, Dening T, Gage H, Meyer J, Schneider J, Bell B, Jordan J, Martin FC, Iliffe S, Bowman C, Gladman JRF, Victor C, Mayrhofer A, Handley M, Zubair M. Optimal healthcare delivery to care homes in the UK: a realist evaluation of what supports effective working to improve healthcare outcomes. Age Ageing 2018; 47:595-603. [PMID: 29315370 PMCID: PMC6014229 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afx195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION care home residents have high healthcare needs not fully met by prevailing healthcare models. This study explored how healthcare configuration influences resource use. METHODS a realist evaluation using qualitative and quantitative data from case studies of three UK health and social care economies selected for differing patterns of healthcare delivery to care homes. Four homes per area (12 in total) were recruited. A total of 239 residents were followed for 12 months to record resource-use. Overall, 181 participants completed 116 interviews and 13 focus groups including residents, relatives, care home staff, community nurses, allied health professionals and General Practitioners. RESULTS context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified explaining what supported effective working between healthcare services and care home staff: (i) investment in care home-specific work that legitimises and values work with care homes; (ii) relational working which over time builds trust between practitioners; (iii) care which 'wraps around' care homes; and (iv) access to specialist care for older people with dementia. Resource use was similar between sites despite differing approaches to healthcare. There was greater utilisation of GP resource where this was specifically commissioned but no difference in costs between sites. CONCLUSION activities generating opportunities and an interest in healthcare and care home staff working together are integral to optimal healthcare provision in care homes. Outcomes are likely to be better where: focus and activities legitimise ongoing contact between healthcare staff and care homes at an institutional level; link with a wider system of healthcare; and provide access to dementia-specific expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Gordon
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
- Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Sue L Davies
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Tom Dening
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heather Gage
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Justine Schneider
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Brian Bell
- Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jake Jordan
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Centre for Ageing Population Studies, University College, London, UK
| | - Clive Bowman
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - John R F Gladman
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christina Victor
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Mayrhofer
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Melanie Handley
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Maria Zubair
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cesari M, Araujo de Carvalho I, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan J, Cooper C, Martin FC, Reginster JY, Vellas B, Beard JR. Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2018; 73:1653-1660. [DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gly011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 219] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Cesari
- Gérontopôle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, France
- Université de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, France
- Geriatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università di Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Cyrus Cooper
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Finbarr C Martin
- Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jean-Yves Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liege, Belgium
| | - Bruno Vellas
- Gérontopôle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, France
- Université de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, France
| | - John R Beard
- Department of Ageing and Life Course, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Arai H, Kritchevsky SB, Guralnik J, Bauer JM, Pahor M, Clark BC, Cesari M, Ruiz J, Sieber CC, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Waters DL, Visvanathan R, Landi F, Villareal DT, Fielding R, Won CW, Theou O, Martin FC, Dong B, Woo J, Flicker L, Ferrucci L, Merchant RA, Cao L, Cederholm T, Ribeiro SML, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Anker SD, Lundy J, Gutiérrez Robledo LM, Bautmans I, Aprahamian I, Schols JMGA, Izquierdo M, Vellas B. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sarcopenia (ICFSR): Screening, Diagnosis and Management. J Nutr Health Aging 2018; 22:1148-1161. [PMID: 30498820 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-018-1139-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 447] [Impact Index Per Article: 74.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Sarcopenia, defined as an age-associated loss of skeletal muscle function and muscle mass, occurs in approximately 6 - 22 % of older adults. This paper presents evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for screening, diagnosis and management of sarcopenia from the task force of the International Conference on Sarcopenia and Frailty Research (ICSFR). METHODS To develop the guidelines, we drew upon the best available evidence from two systematic reviews paired with consensus statements by international working groups on sarcopenia. Eight topics were selected for the recommendations: (i) defining sarcopenia; (ii) screening and diagnosis; (iii) physical activity prescription; (iv) protein supplementation; (v) vitamin D supplementation; (vi) anabolic hormone prescription; (vii) medications under development; and (viii) research. The ICSFR task force evaluated the evidence behind each topic including the quality of evidence, the benefit-harm balance of treatment, patient preferences/values, and cost-effectiveness. Recommendations were graded as either strong or conditional (weak) as per the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Consensus was achieved via one face-to-face workshop and a modified Delphi process. RECOMMENDATIONS We make a conditional recommendation for the use of an internationally accepted measurement tool for the diagnosis of sarcopenia including the EWGSOP and FNIH definitions, and advocate for rapid screening using gait speed or the SARC-F. To treat sarcopenia, we strongly recommend the prescription of resistance-based physical activity, and conditionally recommend protein supplementation/a protein-rich diet. No recommendation is given for Vitamin D supplementation or for anabolic hormone prescription. There is a lack of robust evidence to assess the strength of other treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Dent
- Dr. Elsa Dent, , Torrens University Australia, Wakefield Street, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|