Prospective evidence of the superiority of a sonography-based algorithm in the assessment of blunt abdominal injury

An Evidence-Based Approach for Integrating Bedside Ultrasound Into Routine Practice in the Assessment of Undifferentiated Shock

Undifferentiated hypotension remains a central diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in emergency and critical care medicine. Increasingly, bedside ultrasound conducted by intensivists and emergency medicine providers is assuming a central role in diagnosis and resuscitation of hypotension. This review discusses sample algorithms for the bedside ultrasonographic assessment of undifferentiated shock and outlines an evidence-based framework for the intensivist seeking to incorporate bedside ultrasound into daily clinical practice. The literature regarding specific applications including cardiac, thoracic, pulmonary, and vascular assessment is briefly reviewed, as is the evidence pertaining to effective implementation, training, credentialing, and ongoing quality assurance.

Can emergency medical services personnel identify pneumothorax on focused ultrasound examinations?

Background

Ultrasound is of proven accuracy in the diagnosis of pneumothorax. In certain locations, pre-hospital providers are adopting its use for the management of critically ill patients.

Objectives

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of emergency medical service (EMS) providers in identifying pneumothorax on ultrasound examinations.

Methods

This was an educational study evaluating 33 EMS providers. Each subject went through a brief didactic session covering the use of ultrasound in diagnosis of pneumothorax. They were then given an examination consisting of 20 individual ultrasound real-time video cases depicting either a pneumothorax or normal lung sliding. Sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for recognition of pneumothorax.

Results

The 33 study participants were able to identify pneumothorax with a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 77–86%), specificity of 94% (95% CI 90–96%), positive predictive value of 93% (95% CI 89–95%), and negative predictive value of 84% (95% CI 80–87%).

Conclusions

Emergency medical service providers were able to identify pneumothorax at a relatively high rate. Real-time scanning by the study subjects might lead to even better results.

Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures

Bleeding pelvic fractures that result in haemodynamic instability have a reported mortality rate as high as 40%. Because of the extreme force needed to disrupt the pelvic ring, associated injuries are common and mortality is usually from uncontrolled haemorrhage from extra-pelvic sources. Identifying and controlling all sources of bleeding is a complex challenge and is best managed by a multi-disciplinary team, which include trauma surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons and interventional radiologists. Once the pelvis is identified as the major source of haemorrhage, component therapy reconstituting whole blood should be used and the pelvic region wrapped circumferentially with a sheet or pelvic binder. Patients at risk for arterial bleeding who continue to show haemodynamic instability despite resuscitative efforts should undergo immediate arteriography and embolisation of bleeding pelvic vessels. If this is unavailable or delayed, or the patient has other injuries (i.e., head, chest, intra-abdominal, long bone), external fixation and pelvic packing, performed concomitantly with other life-saving procedures, may be used to further reduce pelvic venous bleeding. If however, the patient remains haemodynamically labile without apparent source of blood loss, transcatheter angiographic embolisation should be attempted to locate and stop pelvic arterial bleeding. Institutional practice guidelines have been shown to reduce mortality and should be developed by all centres treating pelvic fractures.

Clinician performed resuscitative ultrasonography for the initial evaluation and resuscitation of trauma

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries worldwide. Recent studies suggest that many deaths are preventable if injuries are recognized and treated in an expeditious manner - the so called 'golden hour' of trauma. Ultrasound revolutionized the care of the trauma patient with the introduction of the FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) examination; a rapid assessment of the hemodynamically unstable patient to identify the presence of peritoneal and/or pericardial fluid. Since that time the use of ultrasound has expanded to include a rapid assessment of almost every facet of the trauma patient. As a result, ultrasound is not only viewed as a diagnostic test, but actually as an extension of the physical exam.

METHODS

A review of the medical literature was performed and articles pertaining to ultrasound-assisted assessment of the trauma patient were obtained. The literature selected was based on the preference and clinical expertise of authors.

DISCUSSION

In this review we explore the benefits and pitfalls of applying resuscitative ultrasound to every aspect of the initial assessment of the critically injured trauma patient.

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma in the emergency department for blunt abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is a diagnostic challenge to the emergency physician (EP). The introduction of bedside ultrasound provides another diagnostic tool for the EP to detect intra-abdominal injuries.

AIMS

To evaluate the performance of EP in a local emergency department in Hong Kong to perform the 'focused abdominal sonography for trauma' (FAST) in BAT patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including all the trauma team cases in a 36-month period in the emergency department of a public hospital in Hong Kong. The results of FAST scans were analyzed and compared with CT scans when the FAST was positive or followed by a period of clinical observation when the FAST was negative. Descriptive statistics and sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

There was a total of 273 cases, and FAST scans were performed in 242 cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 99%, respectively. The negative predictive value was 0.98, while the positive predictive value was 0.94. The overall accuracy was 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the EP in using FAST scans in BAT patients was encouraging. The high specificity (99%), positive predictive value (0.98), and likelihood ratio for positive tests (86) make it a good 'rule in' tool for BAT patients. The high negative predictive value also makes the FAST scan a useful screening tool. However, ultrasound examination is operator dependent, and FAST scan has its own limitations. For negative FAST scan cases, we recommend a period of monitoring, serial FAST scans, or further investigations, such as CT scan or peritoneal lavage.

The utility of focused assessment with sonography for trauma as a triage tool in multiple-casualty incidents during the second Lebanon war

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) as a triage tool in multiple-casualty incidents (MCIs) for a single international conflict.

METHODS

The charts of 849 casualties that arrived at our level 1 trauma referral center were reviewed. Casualties were initially triaged according to the Injury Severity Score at the emergency department gate. Two-hundred eighty-one physically injured patients, 215 soldiers (76.5%) and 66 civilians (23.5%), were admitted. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma was performed in 102 casualties suspected to have an abdominal injury. Sixty-eight underwent computed tomography (CT); 12 underwent laparotomy; and 28 were kept under clinical observation alone. We compared FAST results against CT, laparotomy, and clinical observation records.

RESULTS

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma results were positive in 17 casualties and negative in 85. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FAST were 75%, 97.6%, 88.2%, 94.1%, and 93.1%, respectively. A strong correlation between FAST and CT results, laparotomy, and clinical observation was obtained (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In a setting of a war conflict-related MCI, FAST enabled immediate triage of casualties to laparotomy, CT, or clinical observation. Because of its moderate sensitivity, a negative FAST result with strong clinical suspicion demands further evaluation, especially in an MCI.

Abdominal ultrasound is an unreliable modality for the detection of hemoperitoneum in patients with pelvic fracture

BACKGROUND

Detection of hemoperitoneum in patients with pelvic fracture and hemodynamic instability is important to determine the need for laparotomy versus pelvic angiography. The use of ultrasound (FAST [Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma]) for the evaluation of hemoperitoneum after blunt abdominal trauma has become widespread. However, its sensitivity and specificity in patients with pelvic fracture remain poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of FAST for the detection of hemoperitoneum in patients with pelvic fracture and an increased risk for hemorrhage.

METHODS

The medical records for all admissions to our Level I trauma center from November 2003 to February 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were presence of pelvic fracture with at least one of the following risk factors for hemorrhage: age > or =55, hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg), or unstable fracture pattern. Emergency department FAST results were recorded. Surgery residents trained and certified in ultrasonography in the acute setting performed all FAST examinations and an in house attending surgeon reviewed them. Presence of hemoperitoneum was confirmed by laparotomy or abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan.

RESULTS

There were 146 patients who met entry criteria, 126 of who had a FAST examination performed. A total of 104 patients underwent a confirmatory evaluation of their abdomen with either operative exploration (n = 20) or CT scan (n = 84). Eight patients underwent diagnostic peritoneal lavage before CT confirmation and were excluded. Ninety-six patients constituted the study group. Nineteen patients presented in hemorrhagic shock. There were 11 true-positive, 52 true-negative, 2 false-positive, and 31 false-negative results. Sensitivity and specificity were 26% and 96%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 85% and 63%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A FAST examination with negative result does not aid in determining the need for laparotomy versus pelvic angiography in patients with pelvic fracture at risk for hemorrhage. These patients should undergo additional confirmatory evaluation to exclude intraperitoneal hemorrhage.

Clinician-performed focused sonography for the resuscitation of trauma

Traumatic death remains pandemic. The majority of preventable deaths occur early and are due to injuries or physiologic derangements in the airway, thoracoabdominal cavities, or brain. Ultrasound is a noninvasive and portable imaging modality that spans a spectrum between the physical examination and diagnostic imaging. It allows trained examiners to immediately confirm important syndromes and answer clinical questions. Newer technologies greatly increase the fidelity, accessibility, ease of use, and informatic manipulation of the results. The early bedside use of focused ultrasound as the initial imaging modality used to detect hemoperitoneum and hemopericardium in the resuscitation of the injured patient has become an accepted standard of care. Widespread dissemination of basic ultrasound skills and technology to facilitate this brings ultrasound to many resuscitative and critical care areas. Although not as widely appreciated, the focused use of ultrasound may also have a role in detecting hemothoraces and pneumothoraces, guiding airway management, and detecting increased intracranial pressure. Intensivists generally utilize a treating philosophy that requires the real-time integration of many divergent sources of information regarding their patients' anatomy and physiology. They are therefore positioned to take advantage of focused resuscitative ultrasound, which offers immediate diagnostic information in the early care of the critically injured.

Introduction of a treatment algorithm can improve the early management of emergency patients in the resuscitation room

INTRODUCTION

Successful management of emergency patients with multiple trauma in the hospital resuscitation room depends on the immediate diagnosis and rapid treatment of the most life-threatening injuries. In order to reduce the time spent in the resuscitation room, an in-hospital algorithm was developed in an interdisciplinary team approach with respect to local structures. The aim of the study was to analyse whether this algorithm affects the interval between hospital admission and the completion of diagnostic procedures and the start of life-saving interventions. Moreover, in-hospital mortality was investigated before and after the algorithm was introduced.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, all consecutive trauma patients in the resuscitation room were investigated before (group I, 01/04-10/04) and after (group II, 01/05-11/05) introduction of the algorithm. The times between hospital admission and the end of the diagnostic procedures (ultrasound [sono], chest X-ray [CF], and cranial computed tomography [CCT]), and between hospital admission and the start of life-saving interventions were registered and in-hospital mortality analysed.

RESULTS

In the study period, 170 patients in group I and 199 patients in group II were investigated. Injury severity score (ISS) were comparable between the two groups. The intervals between admission and completion of diagnostic procedures were significantly lower after the algorithm was introduced (mean+/-S.D.): sono (11 +/- 10 min versus 7 +/- 6 min, p < 0.05), CF (21 +/- 12 min versus 12 +/- 9 min, p < 0.01), and CCT (55 +/- 27 min versus 32 +/- 14 min, p < 0.01). Moreover, the interval to the start of life-saving interventions was significantly shorter (126 +/- 90 min versus 51 +/- 20 min, p < 0.01). After introducing the algorithm, in-hospital mortality was reduced significantly from 33.3% to 16.7% (p < 0.05) in the most severely injured patients (ISS>or=25).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of an algorithm for early management of emergency patients significantly reduced the time spent in the resuscitation room. The periods to completion of sono, CF, and CCT, respectively, and the start of life-saving interventions were significantly shorter after introduction of the algorithm. Moreover, introduction of the algorithm reduced mortality in the most severely injured patients. Although further investigations are needed to evaluate the effects of the Heidelberg treatment algorithm in terms of outcome and mortality, the time reduction in the resuscitation room seems to be beneficial.

What is the role of chest X-ray in the initial assessment of stable trauma patients?

BACKGROUND

The Advanced Trauma Life Support course advocates the liberal use of chest X-ray (CXR) during the initial evaluation of trauma patients. We reviewed CXR performed in the trauma resuscitation room (TR) to determine its usefulness.

METHODS

A retrospective, registry-based review was conducted and included 1,000 consecutive trauma patients who underwent CXR in the TR at a Level I trauma center during a 7-month period.

RESULTS

Patients receiving CXR comprised 91.5% of all patients evaluated in the TR during the study period. CXR followed by chest computed tomography (CCT) was performed in 820 (82.0%) patients. Subsequent CCT identified missed findings in 235 (35.6%) of the 660 patients with an initial negative CXR who went on to receive CCT. CXR alone was performed in 127 (26.1%) of the 487 patients who were stable, not intubated, and had a normal chest physical examination (CPE). Seven patients (5.5%) in this group had potentially significant findings but none required intervention beyond physiotherapy or antibiotics. Three hundred and sixty (73.9%) of the 487 patients who were hemodynamically stable with a normal CPE underwent both CXR and CCT. Fifty-four patients (15%) in this group had findings of significance, and two (0.6%) required intervention. One patient received bilateral chest tubes for large pre-existing pleural effusions found on CXR and CCT; another patient undergoing general anesthesia required a chest tube for a pneumothorax found only on CCT.

CONCLUSION

In stable trauma patients with a normal CPE, CXR appears to be unnecessary in their initial evaluation. CXR should be relegated to a role similar to cervical spine and pelvis radiographs in the initial evaluation of hemodynamically stable trauma patients with a normal physical examination, and should be limited to use only for clear clinical indications.

Evaluation of the abdomen in the critically ill patient: opening the black box

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Evaluation of the abdomen in critically ill patients can be challenging. This article reviews the available data and proposes evidence-based guidelines for evaluation of the abdomen in the critically ill patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

The critically ill are often clinically unevaluable due to distracting injuries, respiratory failure, obtundation, or other conditions. Even when patients can be examined, the clinical exam can be unreliable and misleading. Critically ill patients who are sufficiently stable to undergo imaging benefit from computerized tomography unless biliary sepsis is suspected, when ultrasound is preferred. There is an important role for endoscopy and angiography in the setting of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, as well as magnetic resonance imaging for mesenteric ischemia. Critically ill patients who are too unstable for imaging may require bedside laparoscopy or diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Abdominal compartment syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the unstable critically ill patient. Empiric laparotomy may still need to be employed in diagnosis and management of unstable patients.

SUMMARY

Timely and accurate diagnosis of life-threatening intraabdominal pathology is essential to care for critically ill patients. A multitude of laboratory, radiologic, and interventional modalities are available to evaluate the abdomen in the critically ill.

Accuracy of Trauma Ultrasound in Major Pelvic Injury

BACKGROUND

Trauma ultrasound (US) utilizing the focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is often performed to detect traumatic free peritoneal fluid (FPF). Yet its accuracy is unclear in certain trauma subgroups such as those with major pelvic fractures whose emergent diagnostic and therapeutic needs are unique. We hypothesized that in patients with major pelvic injury (MPI) trauma ultrasound would perform with lower accuracy than has previously been reported.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of adult trauma patients with pelvic fractures seen at an urban Level I emergency department and trauma center. Patients were identified from the institutional trauma registry and ultrasound database from 1999 to 2003. All patients aged >16 years with MPI (Tile classification A2, all type B and C pelvic fractures, and type C acetabular fractures determined by a blinded orthopedic traumatologist) and who had a trauma US performed during the initial emergency department evaluation were included. All ultrasounds were performed by emergency physicians or surgeons using the four-quadrant FAST evaluation. Results of US were compared with one of three reference standards: abdominal/pelvic computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal tap, or exploratory laparotomy. Two-by-two tables were constructed for diagnostic indices.

RESULTS

In all, 96 patients were eligible; 9 were excluded for indeterminate ultrasound results. Of the remaining 87 patients, the pelvic fracture types were distributed as follows: 9% type A2, 72% type B, 16% type C, and 3% type C acetabular fractures. Overall US sensitivity for detection of FPF was 80.8%, specificity was 86.9%, positive predictive value was 72.4%, and negative predictive value was 91.4%. Categorization of sensitivity according to pelvic ring fracture type is as follows: type A2 fractures: sensitivity and specificity, 75.0%; type B fractures: sensitivity, 73.3%, specificity, 85.1%; and type C fractures (pelvis and acetabulum): sensitivity and specificity, 100%. Of the true-positive US results, blood was the FPF in 16 of 21 (76%) and urine from intraperitoneal bladder rupture in 4 in 21 (19%) patients.

CONCLUSION

US in the initial evaluation of traumatic peritoneal fluid in major pelvic injury patients has lower sensitivity and specificity than previously reported for blunt trauma patients. Additionally, uroperitoneum comprises a substantial proportion of traumatic free peritoneal fluid in patients with MPI.

[Medical imaging in the management of abdominal trauma]

There is a marked trend toward nonoperative management of abdominal trauma. This has been possible thanks to the advances in imaging and interventional techniques. Computed tomography (CT), angiography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can guide the nonoperative management of abdominal trauma.

FAST ultrasound as an adjunct to triage using the START mass casualty triage system: a preliminary descriptive system

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the FAST examination might be a useful adjunct to simple triage and rapid treatment (START) in the secondary triage of mass-casualty victims already classified as delayed (Yellow).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all adult trauma patients evaluated by the trauma surgery service at a level 1 trauma center between January 1 and December 31, 2003. Patients were retrospectively triaged to one of three START categories: immediate (Red), delayed (Yellow), or expectant (Black). The FAST results were obtained from the medical records.

RESULTS

FAST results were available for 359 patients, of which 27 were classified as positive. Twenty (6.9%) of 286 patients retrospectively triaged as delayed (Yellow) had positive FAST studies. Of these, six underwent operative intervention within 24 hours of arrival. A total of 232 patients had both FAST and computed tomography (CT) studies performed, of which 19 FAST studies were inconclusive. In the remaining 213 patients, six of 27 had falsely positive studies, while 24 of 186 had falsely negative studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Portable ultrasound technology might have identified 20 delayed (Yellow) patients with evidence of hemoperitoneum, thereby expediting evacuation to definitive care. However, only 30% of these patients subsequently underwent an operative intervention within 24 hours of arrival. Both over- and undertriage were significant problems. As such, the current study does not support the routine use of FAST ultrasound as a secondary triage tool.

Prospective Study to Evaluate the Influence of FAST on Trauma Patient Management

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have concentrated on the accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST), but evaluation of whether FAST changes subsequent management has not been fully assessed.

METHODS

This prospective study compared 419 trauma admissions in two groups, FAST and no-FAST, for demographics, time of resuscitation, and action after resuscitation. The 194 patients undergoing FAST had their management plan specified before, and confirmed after, FAST was performed to assess for change in management. To ensure scan consistency and to minimize bias, criteria were established to define an adequate FAST.

RESULTS

FAST was performed in 194 patients (46%), assessing for free fluid. Management was changed in 59 cases (32.8%) after FAST. Laparotomy was prevented in 1 patient, computed tomography was prevented in 23 patients, and diagnostic peritoneal lavage was prevented in 15 patients. Computed tomography rates were reduced from 47% to 34% and diagnostic peritoneal lavage rates were reduced from 9% to 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

FAST plays a key role in trauma, changing subsequent management in an appreciable number of patients.

Usefulness of hand-held ultrasound devices in out-of-hospital diagnosis performed by emergency physicians

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of ultrasonographic examinations as a diagnostic tool for emergency physicians in out-of-hospital settings.

METHODS

Prospective study performed in a French teaching hospital. Eight emergency physicians given ultrasound training for out-of-hospital diagnosis of pleural, peritoneal, or pericardial effusion; deep venous thrombosis; and arterial flow interruption. After clinical examination, a probability of diagnosis ("clinical score") was assigned on visual analog scale from 0 (absent lesion) to 10 (present lesion). Clinical score between 3 and 7 was considered as clinically doubtful. After ultrasound examination, a second probability ("ultrasound score") was similarly determined. Potential usefulness of ultrasound examination was evaluated by calculating the absolute difference between clinical and ultrasound scores. Patients were followed up to determine final diagnosis: present or absent lesion. "Ultrasound usefulness score" (USS) was determined attributing a positive (when ultrasonography increased diagnostic accuracy) or a negative (when ultrasonography decreased diagnostic accuracy) value to the absolute difference between clinical and ultrasound scores.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine patients were included and 302 ultrasound examinations performed. Median duration of examination was 6 minutes (5-10 minutes). The suspected lesion was found in 45 cases (17%). Mean USS was +2 (0-4). Ultrasonographic examination improved diagnostic accuracy (ie, positive USS) in 181 (67%) cases, decreased it (ie, negative USS) in 22 (8%) cases, and was not contributive (ie, USS was 0) in 67 (25%) cases. When initial diagnosis was uncertain (n = 115), diagnostic performance reached +4 (3-5) and ultrasonographic examination improved diagnostic accuracy in 103 (90%) cases.

CONCLUSION

Out-of-hospital ultrasonography increased diagnostic accuracy in out-of-hospital settings.

Facing the new threats of terrorism: radiologists' perspectives based on experience in Israel

On September 11, 2001, the world changed. The vicious giant of terrorism that was dormant until that date had arisen. After the horrific mass-casualty terror attack on the United States, any and all forms of assault seem possible. Owing to the complexity of injuries encountered in terror attack victims, fast and accurate imaging plays an essential role in triage and identification of abnormalities associated with injuries. The radiologist becomes a crucial part of the first-line team of doctors treating these patients. Knowledge that the best available treatment is given to terror attack victims can enhance the strength and endurance of society against terror. On the basis of the authors' experience with terror events in Israel, the steps involved in imaging of terror attack patients include conventional radiography, focused abdominal sonography in trauma, computed tomography, and angiography, with the judicious use of supplemental imaging.

Diagnostic accuracy of surgeon-performed focused abdominal sonography (FAST) in blunt paediatric trauma

AIM

To study the diagnostic accuracy and clinical efficacy of surgeon-performed focused abdominal sonography (FAST) in paediatric blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This was a prospective, single blinded study conducted at The Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney (CHW). All patients with BAT that justified a trauma call activated on presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) had a FAST performed by the Trauma Fellow. The attending surgical team was blinded to the result of the FAST. An independent radiologist reviewed the FAST pictures, and the findings were compared with computerised tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), laparotomy and the clinical outcome of the patient. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients (39 M; 26 F) were enrolled in the study between February 2002 and January 2003. The age ranged between 4 months and 16 years. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 6 (range 1-38). FAST was performed in a mean time of 3 min. Inter-rater agreement was 96%. FAST was positive in nine as confirmed by a CT scan of the abdomen. Three patients underwent laparotomy, two for bowel injuries and one for a Grade III liver laceration. Of the remaining 76, 19 had a CT, which showed evidence of intra-abdominal injury in seven patients. There were two false negative studies resulting in a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 100%, negative predictive value of 97%, positive predictive value of 100% and an accuracy of 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon-performed FAST for BAT was safe and accurate with a high specificity. It would seem a potentially valuable tool in the evaluation of paediatric blunt trauma victims for free fluid within the peritoneal cavity.

Sonography as the primary screening method in evaluating blunt abdominal trauma

PURPOSE

The radiological evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma can be done with either ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) with strategies varying considerably among institutions. We evaluated the efficacy of our current strategy in which US is used at our hospital as the primary screening tool for patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all patients admitted to our hospital with possible blunt abdominal trauma who underwent abdominal US, abdominal CT and/or a laparotomy during the initial trauma assessment from 1998 until 2002 (n = 1149).

RESULTS

Nine-hundred sixty-one of the 1149 patients had a negative US, of which 922 were true negative, resulting in a negative predictive value of 96%. A CT of the abdomen was performed in 7%. In 1.7% there was delayed diagnosis with no significant additional morbidity. Fourteen of the 103 laparotomies (14%) were non-therapeutic; in 5 of these cases the patients underwent non-therapeutic laparotomy despite the performance of a CT. Seven were emergency operations.

CONCLUSIONS

In our practice, the use of US for the evaluation of acute blunt abdominal trauma is adequate, with a high negative predictive value, a small number of delayed diagnoses, and an acceptable rate of non-therapeutic laparotomies.

Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography is regarded as the tool of choice for early diagnostic investigations in patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma. Although its sensitivity is too low for definite exclusion of abdominal organ injury, proponents of ultrasound argue that ultrasound-based clinical pathways enhance the speed of primary trauma assessment, reduce the number of computed tomography scans and cut costs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficiency and effectiveness of trauma algorithms that include ultrasound examinations in patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CCMED, publishers' databases, controlled trials registers and the Internet. Bibliographies of identified articles and congress abstracts were handsearched. Trials were obtained from the Cochrane Injuries Group's trials register. Authors were contacted for further information and individual patient data.

PARTICIPANTS

patients with blunt torso, abdominal or multiple trauma undergoing diagnostic investigations for abdominal organ injury.

INTERVENTIONS

diagnostic algorithms comprising emergency ultrasonography (US).

CONTROLS

diagnostic algorithms without US ultrasound examinations (e.g. primary computed tomography [CT] or diagnostic peritoneal lavage [DPL]).

OUTCOME MEASURES

mortality, use of CT and DPL, cost-effectiveness, laparotomy and negative laparotomy rates, delayed diagnoses, and quality of life.

STUDIES

randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials (qRCTs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Where possible, data were pooled and relative risks (RRs), risk differences (RDs) and weighted mean differences, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated by fixed- or random-effects modelling, as appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two RCTs with US in the experimental arm and another with US in the control group. We also considered two qRCTs. Overall, trials were of moderate methodological quality. Few authors responded to our written inquiries seeking to resolve controversial issues and to obtain individual patient data. We were able to pool data from two trials comprising 1037 patients for primary endpoint analysis (i.e. mortality). The relative risk in favour of the no-US arm was 1.4 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.08). Because of a lack of details, the meaning of this observation remains unclear. There was a marginal benefit with US-based pathways in reducing CT scans (random-effects RD -0.46; 95% CI -1.00 to 0.13), offset by trials of higher methodological rigour. No differences were observed in DPL and laparotomy rates.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from RCTs to justify promotion of ultrasound-based clinical pathways in diagnosing patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma.

Is Pneumoperitoneum Harmful During Intra-Abdominal Hemorrhage in Rats?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgical interventions are being used in trauma patients for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, but there are limited studies on this subject. The effect of pneumoperitoneum during intra-abdominal hemorrhage has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic, respiratory, and renal effects of pneumoperitoneum in the splenic injury/ hemorrhagic shock model in rats.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study, 80 anesthetized Wistar male rats (294.5 +/- 31.2 g) were randomized into 2 main groups: nontraumatized (group A) and traumatized (group B). After initial preparation and monitoring, each group was divided according to the degree of pneumoperitoneum. The nontraumatized subgroups were A1, sham-operated; A2, 4-8 mm Hg; A3, 9-13 mm Hg; and A4, 14-18 mm Hg. The traumatized subgroups were B1, splenic injury without pneumoperitoneum; B2, B3, and B4, splenic injury with pneumoperitoneum at 4-8 mm Hg, 9-13 mm Hg, and 14-18 mm Hg, respectively. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate were monitored continuously. Blood samples were obtained for hemoglobin, hematocrit, arterial blood gases, and biochemical analyses. Twenty-four hour urine output was collected.

RESULTS

In group B4, pH, pCO2, and HCO3 levels were lower than in all other groups, while pCO2 and base deficit levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Both blood and urine analysis results showed that 24-hour urine output and the glomerular filtration rate of groups A4 and B4 were significantly lower (P < 0.05), while urinary osmolarity and fractional sodium excretion levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

High-pressure pneumoperitoneum in splenically traumatized rats amplifies acidosis, decreases urine output, decreases glomerular filtration rate, and increases urinary osmolarity and fractional sodium excretion significantly.

Blunt splenic injury: usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with a transient response to fluid resuscitation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury in whom there is a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human subject committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Angiography was performed in patients with contrast material extravasation and/or splenic injury of grade III or higher (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria) at computed tomography (CT). TAE was performed when angiograms showed disruption of terminal splenic branches or arterial extravasation. Among 104 patients with splenic injury, the 15 patients (10 male, five female; mean age, 36.2 years) with a transient response to fluid resuscitation were the subjects of this study. A post hoc analysis was performed for CT grades, angiographic findings, associated injuries, and hemodynamic status in the subjects.

RESULTS

Among 15 patients with a transient response, two had grade III, 11 had grade IV, and two had grade V injuries at CT. Six patients had associated injuries that required TAE. TAE of the spleen and associated injuries was successfully performed in all patients. The mean systolic blood pressure and shock index at the start of TAE were 84.2 mm Hg +/- 9.2 (standard deviation) and 1.46 +/- 0.30, respectively, and those at the completion of TAE were 132.1 mm Hg +/- 18.7 and 0.77 +/- 0.21, respectively (P < .001). The fluid infusion rate within 24 hours after the completion of TAE (132.1 mL/h +/- 71.1) was lower than that from the completion of the initial fluid resuscitation until the completion of TAE (1230.6 mL/h +/- 264.8) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

TAE for blunt splenic injury can be performed successfully even in hemodynamically unstable patients with a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation.

Prospective evaluation of non-radiologist performed emergency abdominal ultrasound for haemoperitoneum

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate non-radiologist performed emergency ultrasound for the detection of haemoperitoneum after abdominal trauma in a British accident and emergency department.

METHODS

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) was performed during the primary survey on adult patients triaged to the resuscitation room with suspected abdominal injury over a 12 month period. All investigations were performed by one of three non-radiologists trained in FAST. The ultrasound findings were compared against the investigation of choice of the attending surgeon/accident and emergency physician. The patients were followed up for clinically significant events until hospital discharge or death.

RESULTS

One hundred patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma, were evaluated by FAST. Nine true positive scans were detected and confirmed by computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or laparotomy. There was one false positive in this group, giving a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 99%, and positive predictive value of 90%. Ten patients with penetrating injuries were evaluated with a sensitivity and specificity for FAST of 33% and 86% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency torso ultrasound for the detection of haemoperitoneum can be successfully performed by trained non-radiologists within a British accident and emergency system. It is an accurate and rapid investigation for blunt trauma, but the results should be interpreted with caution in penetrating injury.

Hollow visceral injury after blunt lower thoracic and abdominal trauma

The early diagnosis of hollow viscous injury after blunt abdominal trauma remains a challenge for physicians in the Emergency Department, although the early diagnosis of hollow viscous injury decreases morbidity and mortality. After a description of two cases of hollow viscous injury after blunt abdominal trauma, a literature review is performed concerning the indications and limitations of diagnostic imaging modalities. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma, computed tomography scan and diagnostic peritoneal lavage are described. On the basis of the review a proposal for maximal diagnostic accuracy is made.

Massive haemorrhage from hepatic laceration with diaphragmatic laceration: a potential limitation of the FAST examination: case report

This report describes the case of a multitrauma patient who had life-threatening intraabdominal hemorrhage with a diaphragmatic laceration. This hemorrhage remained undetected by serial focus assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination. The potential for intraabdominal blood to move through a diaphragmatic laceration to the pleural space may limit the development of hemoperitoneum, rendering the FAST examination misleading or producing a false-negative result. The use of the FAST examination is discussed along with its advantages and limitations.

Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in blunt trauma patients with out-of-hospital or emergency department hypotension

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We determine the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography for detecting hemoperitoneum in blunt trauma patients with out-of-hospital or emergency department (ED) hypotension.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of all blunt trauma patients hospitalized at a Level I trauma center. Patients were included if they were older than 6 years and had out-of-hospital or ED hypotension (systolic blood pressure < or =90 mm Hg) and underwent ED ultrasonography. The initial interpretation of the abdominal ultrasonography was recorded, including the presence or absence of intraperitoneal fluid and the specific location of such fluid. Presence or absence of intra-abdominal injury was determined by abdominal computed tomography scan, laparotomy, or clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-seven patients with a mean age of 36.0+/-17.5 years were enrolled. One hundred forty-eight (33%) patients had intra-abdominal injuries, and 116 (78%) of these patients had hemoperitoneum. Abdominal ultrasonography had the following test performance for detecting patients with intra-abdominal injury and hemoperitoneum: sensitivity 92/116 (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71% to 86%), specificity 316/331 (95%; 95% CI 93% to 97%), positive predictive value 92/107 (86%; 95% CI 78% to 92%), and negative predictive value 316/340 (93%; 95% CI 90% to 95%). The positive likelihood ratio was 15.8, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.22. One hundred five (91%) of the 116 patients with intra-abdominal injuries and hemoperitoneum underwent a therapeutic laparotomy. Abdominal ultrasonography demonstrated intraperitoneal fluid in 87 (sensitivity 83%; 95% CI 74% to 90%) of these 105 patients.

CONCLUSION

Of patients with out-of-hospital or ED hypotension, abdominal ultrasonography identifies most patients with hemoperitoneum and intra-abdominal injuries. Hypotensive patients with negative abdominal ultrasonography results, however, must be further evaluated for sources of their hypotension, including additional abdominal evaluation, once they are hemodynamically stabilized.

Bedside echocardiography in chest trauma

Bedside US has an established role in the evaluation of chest trauma patients. Transthoracic echocardiography and TEE can be used to obtain critical information at the bedside for many emergent conditions, including the immediate detection of hemopericardium and acute aortic injury. More recent work has demonstrated that US also can be used to detect hemothoraces and pneumothoraces with accuracy. These diagnostic techniques can improve patient outcome and are within the scope of practice of emergency physicians and trauma surgeons. Physicians caring for trauma patients should be familiar with these techniques.

The Usefulness of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Patients With Blunt Polytrauma Showing Transient Response to Fluid Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether nonsurgical management using transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is safe for patients with blunt multiple trauma who transiently respond to the initial fluid resuscitation.

METHODS

Contrast computed tomography was performed for patients with blunt abdominal injuries, excluding those who did not respond to initial fluid resuscitation. Angiography was performed for patients with injuries showing contrast extravasation or solid organ injury classified, according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, as grade 3 or higher on computed tomography. Transcatheter arterial embolization was performed when angiography showed arterial extravasation. The protocol was abandoned for any patients who became profoundly hypotensive (with systolic blood pressure 60 mm Hg or lower) during computed tomography or angiography.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and December 2002, 269 patients with blunt abdominal injuries underwent TAE immediately after admission. Of these patients, 41 had injuries in at least two regions and underwent TAE for these regions. Among them, 22 patients were hemodynamically stable or showed rapid response to fluid resuscitation. The nonsurgical treatment was successful in all these cases. The remaining 19 patients (Injury Severity Score, 37.3 +/- 8.2), who showed a transient response, were the subjects of this study. Of these patients, 15 underwent TAE for injuries in two regions (13 pelvic fractures, 7 splenic injuries, 6 hepatic injuries, 3 facial bleeding, and 1 renal injury), and 4 patients underwent TAE for injuries in three regions (4 had splenic injuries, 3 hepatic injuries, 2 renal injuries, 2 pelvic fractures, and 1 facial bleeding). For all these patients, TAE was successfully performed. Before TAE, the systolic blood pressure was 79.9 +/- 8.4 mm Hg, and the shock index was 1.45 +/- 0.25 mm Hg. After TAE, the corresponding values were 120.6 +/- 19.3 mm Hg and 0.87 +/- 0.16 mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.001). The rate of fluid administration required after TAE (214.2 +/- 139.3 mL/hour) was significantly less than that required before TAE (1244.2 +/- 347.1 mL/hour; range, 632-1,728 mL/hour) (p < 0.001). The deaths of two patients were classified as nonpreventable on the basis of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and their respective probabilities of survival were determined to be 0.13 and 0.03.

CONCLUSION

Nonsurgical management using TAE can be performed safely even for patients with blunt multiple trauma who are in hemorrhagic hypotension if their hemodynamics are improved by resuscitation with 2 L of fluid.

Predictors of Death in Patients with Life-Threatening Pelvic Hemorrhage after Successful Transcatheter Arterial Embolization

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of death in patients with pelvic fracture whose pelvic arterial hemorrhage is controlled successfully by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE).

METHODS

From January 1996 to December 2000, 61 patients with a pelvic fracture who had pelvic arterial hemorrhage were treated at our Level I trauma center according to a protocol that assigns a high priority to diagnostic and therapeutic angiography within the algorithm. Angiography is performed before laparotomy in patients with hemoperitoneum, who can be stabilized by fluid resuscitation, and otherwise afterward. External fixation was performed immediately after TAE in the angiography suite. Predictors of outcome were determined retrospectively by univariate and multivariate analysis using anatomic and physiologic parameters.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients survived and 13 died. TAE successfully controlled pelvic arterial hemorrhage in all patients. Predictors of death included posterior pelvic arterial injury and an elevated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (odds ratio, 15.6 and 23.9, respectively). Need for fluid requirements to achieve hemodynamic stability were higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors. Outcome did not correlate with the type of fracture or the Injury Severity Score.

CONCLUSION

Application of angiography as a therapeutic intervention in patients with pelvic arterial bleeding may reduce the need for surgery, thereby avoiding or minimizing this additional trauma.

Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in weightlessness: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examines for fluid in gravitationally dependent regions. There is no prior experience with this technique in weightlessness, such as on the International Space Station, where sonography is currently the only diagnostic imaging tool.

STUDY DESIGN

A ground-based (1 g) porcine model for sonography was developed. We examined both the feasibility and the comparative performance of the FAST examination in parabolic flight. Sonographic detection and fluid behavior were evaluated in four animals during alternating weightlessness (0 g) and hypergravity (1.8 g) periods. During flight, boluses of fluid were incrementally introduced into the peritoneal cavity. Standardized sonographic windows were recorded. Postflight, the video recordings were divided into 169 20-second segments for subsequent interpretation by 12 blinded ultrasonography experts. Reviewers first decided whether a video segment was of sufficient diagnostic quality to analyze (determinate). Determinate segments were then analyzed as containing or not containing fluid. A probit regression model compared the probability of a positive fluid diagnosis to actual fluid levels (0 to 500 mL) under both 0-g and 1.8-g conditions.

RESULTS

The in-flight sonographers found real-time scanning and interpretation technically similar to that of terrestrial conditions, as long as restraint was maintained. On blinded review, 80% of the recorded ultrasound segments were considered determinate. The best sensitivity for diagnosis in 0 g was found to be from the subhepatic space, with probability of a positive fluid diagnosis ranging from 9% (no fluid) to 51% (500 mL fluid).

CONCLUSIONS

The FAST examination is technically feasible in weightlessness, and merits operational consideration for clinical contingencies in space.

Blunt abdominal trauma: should US be used to detect both free fluid and organ injuries?

PURPOSE

To evaluate abdominal ultrasonography (US) for indirect (with free fluid analysis only) and direct (with free fluid and parenchymal analysis) detection of organ injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, with findings at computed tomography (CT) and/or surgery as the standard of diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Abdominal US was performed at hospital admission in consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The presence of free peritoneal fluid and organ injury were recorded and compared with results of abdominal CT in all hemodynamically stable patients. When US results were considered false-negative for free fluid or organ injury compared with CT results, repeat US was performed within 6 hours. Admission and second US results were compared with CT and/or surgical results to determine sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of US with regard to the presence of free intraperitoneal fluid and/or organ injury.

RESULTS

Two hundred five hemodynamically stable patients underwent abdominal US and CT. CT revealed free fluid in 83 patients and organ injury in 99. Thirty-one (31%) of 99 patients with organ injury did not have free fluid at CT. Three (10%) of the 31 patients required surgery or angiographic embolization. The sensitivity of admission US was 93% (77 of 83 cases) for the diagnosis of free fluid, 41% (39 of 99) for directly demonstrating organ injury, and 72% (71 of 99) for suggesting organ injury by means of both free fluid and organ analysis. At second US, these sensitivities were 96% (80 of 83 cases), 55% (54 of 99) and 84% (83 of 99), respectively.

CONCLUSION

US is highly sensitive for the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid but not sensitive for the identification of organ injuries. In hemodynamically stable patients, the value of US is mainly limited by the large percentage of organ injuries that are not associated with free fluid.

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma patients by clinicians: Initial experience and results

OBJECTIVES

To describe the establishment of a service to provide bedside focused assessment sonography in trauma and to evaluate the service to date.

SETTING

Emergency department of an urban trauma centre.

METHODS

A prospective study of trauma patients who received a focused assessment sonography in trauma examination performed by a clinician managing the trauma in the emergency department. Accuracy was determined by comparing the scan interpretation with abdomino-pelvic computerized tomography, laparotomy or postmortem examination.

RESULTS

The study period ran from 1 January 2000 to 11 September 2001 inclusive (20 months). One hundred and forty patients were included, with a final diagnosis established by computerized tomography (n = 124) and/or laparotomy (n = 18). There were 26 true-positives, 101 true-negatives, two false-positives and 11 false-negatives. Ten of the false-negative studies were performed by clinicians who had not reached accreditation. The sensitivity of focused assessment sonography in trauma was 70%, specificity 98% and diagnostic accuracy 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have described the implementation of a clinician-based focused assessment sonography in trauma service within the emergency department with the support of radiology/ultrasound and trauma service. Processes for credentialling, quality assurance and training need to be in place. Significant issues exist with the length of time it takes clinicians to reach accreditation, in order that a critical mass of clinicians exists to provide a consistent service. The credentialling process should mandate a minimum number of supervised examinations.

Emergency ultrasound credentialling for focused assessment sonography in trauma and abdominal aortic aneurysm: A practical approach for Australasia

OBJECTIVE

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma and emergency ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm are now practiced widely by non-radiologists in emergency departments worldwide. Various credentialling programs have been proposed for novice sonographers; however, their feasibility has been questioned. We adopted the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) credentialling process for emergency ultrasound to determine whether it is feasible for emergency physicians in the Australasian environment.

METHODS

Three full-time emergency medicine specialists and a post-Fellowship Examination trainee at Auckland Hospital undertook the credentialling process.

RESULTS

All four participants had sufficient scans to complete the process after 16 months. Accuracy for focused assessment with sonography for trauma, 90% (95% CI 83-95%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm, 99% (95% CI 90-100%), is similar to that previously reported.

CONCLUSION

The ACEM credentialling process for focused assessment with sonography for trauma and abdominal aortic aneurysm is practical and achievable for emergency medicine specialists working in the Emergency Department at Auckland Hospital. Further studies are necessary to determine whether this holds true for other major trauma centres in Australasia.

The efficacy and limitations of transarterial embolization for severe hepatic injury

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) for severe blunt hepatic injury has been reported. We performed a prospective study evaluating the efficacy and the limitation of TAE from January 1996 to December 2000.

METHODS

All patients with blunt abdominal injury who could be stabilized by fluid resuscitation underwent computed tomographic (CT) scan examinations. Patients with CT scan evidence of hepatic injury were classified into five grades according to CT scan findings on the basis of the injury scale of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (Mirvis classification). All patients with CT scan grade 3 to 5 injury underwent angiography. When angiography showed extravasation of contrast medium extending from hepatic arterial branches, TAE was performed.

RESULTS

Of 612 patients with blunt abdominal trauma, 51 had CT scan grade 3 to 5 injury. Thirty-seven of these patients had a CT scan grade 3 injury and 18 underwent TAE. One of 19 patients who did not undergo TAE developed a delayed hemorrhage on day 6 and required a laparotomy. All 13 patients with a CT scan grade 4 injury had angiographic findings of the extravasation. TAE was successful in 11 patients and unsuccessful in 2. Five patients with a CT scan grade 4 injury required laparotomy. One developed a delayed hemorrhage on day 4. The remaining four patients had a major venous injury (a right lobectomy was performed in two with inferior vena cava injury, and a gauze packing in two with hepatic venous injury). One patient with a CT scan grade 5 injury underwent immediate laparotomy after TAE. Laparotomy revealed inferior vena cava injury and a right lobectomy was performed. Only two patients who underwent a lobectomy died of an uncontrollable hemorrhage. All CT scans of patients with hepatic venous or inferior vena cava injury showed a large low-density area (> or = 10 cm) with involvement of these vessels. The volumes of fluid resuscitation needed from admission until TAE ranged from 2,109 to 2,638 mL/h.

CONCLUSION

It was considered that the combination of the presence of a CT scan grade 4 or 5 lesion and the fluid requirements of more than 2,000 mL/h to maintain normotension indicated the absolute necessity of surgery. We felt that these patients were not candidates for TAE, and should undergo immediate laparotomy.

The role of interventional radiology in the management of blunt renal injury: a practical protocol

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a protocol designed to minimize the need for surgery in the management of severe blunt renal injury.

METHODS

Forty-six of 752 trauma patients had evidence of renal injury on computed tomographic (CT) scan. Two patients required emergency laparotomy, and the remaining 44 patients were classified by CT scan grade using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification system. Patients with CT scan grade 3 or over underwent renal angiography.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients had a high-grade injury on CT scan (> or =3). Eight had angiographic evidence of extravasation from renal arterial branches and underwent transarterial embolization. One patient with a grade 5 injury had extravasation from a main renal vein and underwent immediate laparotomy. This was the only patient who required surgery for renal injury.

CONCLUSION

Surgery can be avoided in most cases of blunt renal injury. Hemodynamic instability and injury to main renal veins remain indications for surgical exploration.

Crohn's disease in a patient with acute spinal cord injury: a case report of diagnostic challenges in the rehabilitation setting

Diagnosis of the abdominal emergency in tetraplegic and high paraplegic patients remains challenging. Classic peritoneal signs, such as a rigid abdomen, rebounding, guarding, and Murphy's sign may be absent, whereas subtle physical, laboratory, or radiologic abnormalities may be the only evidence for an acute abdomen. Our report describes the course of a 70-year-old man with C5 American Spinal Injury Association class A tetraplegia who developed a perforated cecum secondary to Crohn's disease. We review the visceral and somatic sensory pathways for abdominal pain with emphasis on the challenges in assessing the acute abdomen in a patient with spinal cord injury (SCI). Recommendations for the assessment of the acute abdomen in an individual with SCI will be provided. This is the first reported case of Crohn's disease in an individual with an acute SCI. It shows the importance of maintaining high clinical suspicion for unexpected intraabdominal processes that may lead to significant morbidity and mortality if left undiagnosed.

Evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for the management of unstable patients with pelvic fractures

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the evolution of the authors' clinical pathway for the treatment of hemodynamically compromised patients with pelvic fractures was associated with improved patient outcome.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Hemodynamically compromised patients with pelvic fractures present a complex challenge. The multidisciplinary trauma team must control hemorrhage, restore hemodynamics, and rapidly identify and treat associated life-threatening injuries. The authors developed a clinical pathway consisting of five primary elements: immediate trauma attending surgeon's presence in the emergency department, early simultaneous transfusion of blood and coagulation factors, prompt diagnosis and management of associated life-threatening injuries, stabilization of the pelvic girdle, and timely insinuation of pelvic angiography and embolization. The addition of two orthopedic pelvic fracture specialists led to a revision of the pathway, emphasizing immediate emergency department presence of the orthopedic trauma attending to provide joint decision making with the trauma surgeon, closing the pelvic volume in the emergency department, and using alternatives to traditional external fixation devices.

METHODS

Using trauma registry and blood bank records, the authors identified pelvic fracture patients receiving blood transfusions in the emergency department. They analyzed patients treated before versus after the May 1998 revision of the clinical pathway.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of patients in the late period had blood pressure less than 90 mmHg (52% vs. 35%). In the late period, diagnostic peritoneal lavage was phased out in favor of torso ultrasound as a primary triage tool, and pelvic binding and C-clamp application largely replaced traditional external fixation devices. The overall death rate decreased from 31% in the early period to 15% in the later period, as did the rate of deaths from exsanguination (9% to 1%), multiple organ failure (12% to 1%), and death within 24 hours (16% to 5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway, coordinating the resources of a level 1 trauma center and directed by joint decision making between trauma surgeons and orthopedic traumatologists, has resulted in improved patient survival. The primary benefits appear to be in reducing early deaths from exsanguination and late deaths from multiple organ failure.

Utilization of FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) in 1999: Results of a Survey of North American Trauma Centers

Although much has been written about FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) in the last decade little is known about its present clinical utilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and characterize the contemporary utilization of FAST at trauma centers in the United States and Canada. In 1999 trauma directors or their delegates at Level I regional trauma centers in the United States and Canada were surveyed either by fax or phone regarding the present utilization and the future of FAST at their center. The overall survey response rate was 91 per cent with 96 of 105 centers completing the survey. Of the 96 centers surveyed 78 were in the United States and 18 were in Canada. Of the 78 U.S. centers surveyed 62 (79%) routinely use FAST, and it is done by surgeons in 39 per cent, surgeons and emergency departments in 21 per cent, emergency departments in 5 per cent, and radiologists in 35 per cent. Most centers (79%) thought that it sped up their workups, and 89 per cent said it was an advance in patient care. FAST is used in penetrating injury at 58 per cent of centers, and some centers use FAST to assess organ injury. The utilization of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and CT has markedly decreased at many centers. Almost all respondents thought that FAST should be a component of surgery resident training. The utilization of FAST is significantly less in Canada than in the United States ( P < 0.05). Our conclusions are the following. FAST has become routinely used at the majority of the U.S. centers surveyed. FAST is performed by clinicians at 65 per cent of the trauma centers surveyed. The utilization of CT and diagnostic peritoneal lavage has changed. Many centers have broadened the scope of FAST to include the assessment of organ, pediatric, and penetrating injury.

Sonographic assessment of traumatic injury. Future developments

In all its forms and applications, sonography plays a significant role in the management of injured patients, from the emergency department to beyond hospital discharge. The use of new and existing sonographic technology will increase because sonographic imaging and measurements are generally less invasive; are inexpensive; use no ionizing radiation; and are portable, repeatable, and, in many instances, as accurate as the so-called "contemporary gold standards." The training and credentialing of physicians in sonography is in evolution and will be an increasingly important issue with more widespread use and broader applications. The future of sonography in trauma care in the next millennium is bright, and surgeons and surgical residents are encouraged to gain proficiency and learn about this new surgical frontier as it evolves.