Risk for Overall Infection with Anti-TNF and Anti-integrin Agents Used in IBD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Towards the Oral Treatment of Ileo-Colonic Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Infliximab Tablets: Development and Validation of the Production Process

Infliximab (IFX) is an intravenously administered monoclonal antibody antagonizing the effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) systemically and is efficacious in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, studies suggest that the anti-inflammatory effects result from local immunomodulation in the inflamed regions. Furthermore, topical inhibition of TNF in IBD ameliorates inflammation. We therefore hypothesized that orally administered IFX targeted to the ileo-colonic region in IBD may be an efficacious new treatment option. This study describes the development and validation of the production process of ileo-colonic-targeted 5 mg IFX tablets (ColoPulse-IFX) intended for the oral treatment of IBD by means of producing three consecutive validation batches (VAL1, VAL2, and VAL3, respectively). UV-VIS spectroscopy, HPLC-SEC analysis (content, fragments, aggregates), fluorescence spectroscopy (tertiary protein structure), and ELISA (potency) showed no noticeable deviations of IFX compounded to ColoPulse-IFX compared to fresh IFX stock. The average ± SD (n = 10) IFX content of VAL1, VAL2, and VAL3 was 96 ± 2%, 97 ± 3%, and 96 ± 2%, respectively, and complied with the European Pharmacopeia (Ph. Eur.) requirements for Content Uniformity. The average ± SD (n = 3) ColoPulse-IFX potency was 105 ± 4%, 96 ± 4%, and 97 ± 5%, respectively, compared to fresh IFX stock. The IFX release profile from the tablet core was complete (≥85%) after 10 min in simulated ileum medium. The in vitro coating performance of ColoPulse-IFX showed that the formulation was targeted to the simulated ileo-colonic region. Stability data showed that ColoPulse-IFX was stable for up to 6 months stored at 25 °C/60% RH. Based on these results, the production process can be considered validated and its application is discussed in light of the rationale and available evidence for the topical treatment of IBD with IFX.

Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications

The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40^th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.

Relevant Infections in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Their Relationship With Immunosuppressive Therapy and Their Effects on Disease Mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is controversy as to whether the risk of relevant infection in IBD is related to immunosuppressants or the disease itself. The aims of this study were to evaluate: [1] the life-long prevalence and types of relevant infections in patients with IBD related to immunosuppressive treatment, and [2] the relationship of both infection and patient comorbidity to mortality.

METHODS

Observational multicentre retrospective study of IBD patients that presented a relevant infection. For each case, four periods of infection exposure were analysed: P1: pre-IBD diagnosis, P2: from IBD diagnosis to immunosuppressant initiation, P3: during immunosuppressant therapy, and P4: after treatment withdrawal.

RESULTS

The life-long prevalence of relevant infection in the total cohort of patients [6914] was 3%, and 5% in immunosuppressed patients [4202]. 366 relevant infections were found in 212 patients [P1: 9, P2: 17, P3: 334, and P4: 6]. Differences between periods were significant [p < 0.0001]. The most frequent types of infection were respiratory, intestinal and urinary. The most frequent opportunistic infections were tuberculosis [prevalence: 2.6/1000] and herpes zoster [prevalence: 3.9/1000]. Herpes zoster infection was associated with thiopurines alone or in combination with anti-TNF in 75% of the cases, whereas tuberculosis was associated with anti-TNF in 94% of patients. The overall mortality was 4.2%. Infection-related mortality was 2.8% and it was not influenced by comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant infections in IBD patients are rare and appear to be related to immunosuppression. Relevant infection is a major cause of death in IBD.

Higher adalimumab serum levels do not increase the risk of adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background: The relationship between serum adalimumab concentrations and adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unknown. We aimed to determine whether patients with IBD using adalimumab are at increased risk of adverse events if they have higher adalimumab serum levels compared to those with lower adalimumab levels. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 191 IBD patients with at least one serum adalimumab level measurement available. The cohort was divided using a cutoff level of 10 mcg/mL. The primary outcome was the rate of overall adverse events between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of infections, dermatologic reactions, injection-site reactions and other adverse events in both groups. Rates of discontinuation of adalimumab due to adverse events were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between adalimumab levels and adverse events. Results: A total of 41 adverse events were reported in 191 patients in the overall cohort. Among 86 patients with higher adalimumab levels, 22 adverse events were reported, vs. 19 adverse events among 105 patients with lower adalimumab levels (25.6% vs. 18.1%, p = .21). Analysis according to adalimumab level tertiles also did not show significant differences in the rates of adverse events. A multivariate forward selection model also did not find higher odds of an adverse event in IBD patients with higher adalimumab levels compared to lower levels (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.77-3.08). Conclusions: There does not appear to be a relationship between adalimumab exposure and risk of adverse events in IBD patients.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor α antagonists and vedolizumab in elderly IBD patients: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The older patient group with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is particularly vulnerable to consequences of disease and therapy-related side effects but little is known about the best treatment options in this population.

AIM

To compare safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor α antagonist (anti-TNF) or vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with IBD >60 years of age.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating anti-TNF or VDZ therapy ≥60 years of age at three study sites. We examined occurrence of infection or malignancy within 1 year after therapy as our primary outcome. Our efficacy outcomes included clinical remission at 3, 6 and 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for relevant confounders estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The study included 131 anti-TNF and 103 VDZ initiated patients (age range 60-88 years). Approximately half had CD. At 1 year, there were no significant differences in safety profile between the two therapeutic classes. Infections were observed in 20% of anti-TNF-treated and 17% of VDZ-treated patients (P = 0.54). Pneumonia was the most common infection in both groups. While more anti-TNF-treated CD patients were in remission at 3 months compared to VDZ (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.18-6.76), this difference was not maintained at 6 and 12 months suggesting similar efficacy of both classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Both anti-TNF and VDZ therapy were similarly effective and safe in elderly IBD patients.

Review article: managing the adverse events caused by anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Biological therapy is currently widely used to treat IBD. Infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab are currently licensed anti-TNF therapies. Biosimilar anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies are increasingly used. Anti-TNF therapies are widely used and their adverse effects are well characterised, and may cause significant morbidity and mortality in a small proportion of exposed patients. Gastroenterologists need to understand the mechanisms for these effects, recognise these swiftly and manage such events appropriately.

AIM

To cover the range of potential adverse reactions as a result of biologic therapy and specifically management of these events.

METHODS

A Medline and Pubmed search was undertaken. Search terms included were "anti-TNF," "infliximab" or "adalimumab" or "golimumab" combined with the keywords "ulcerative colitis" or "Crohn's disease" or "inflammatory bowel disease" and then narrowed to articles containing the keywords "complications," "side effects" or "adverse events" or "safety profile." International guidelines were also reviewed where relevant.

RESULTS

Adverse events discussed in this review include infusion reactions, blood disorders and infections (including bacterial, viral, fungal and opportunistic infections) as well as autoimmune, dermatological disorders, cardiac and neurological conditions. Malignancies including solid organ, haematological and those linked to viral disease are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF therapy has wide-ranging effects on the immune system resulting in a spectrum of potential adverse events in a small proportion of patients. Research advances are improving the understanding, recognition and management of these adverse events.

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology.

METHODS

Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS

All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.

Immune rebalancing by oral immunotherapy: A novel method for getting the immune system back on track

Immune modulating treatments are often associated with immune suppression or an opposing anti-inflammatory paradigm. As such, there is a risk of exposing patients to infections and malignancies. Contrarily, eliciting only mild immune modulation can be insufficient for alleviating immune-mediated damage. Oral immunotherapy is a novel approach that uses the inherent ability of the gut immune system to generate signals that specifically suppress inflammation at affected sites, without inducing generalized immune suppression. Oral immunotherapy is being developed as a method to rebalance systemic immunity and restore balance, getting it back on track, rather than pushing the immune response too much or too little in opposing directions. Here, I review recent preclinical and clinical data examining the technique and describe its primary advantages.

Appropriateness of Combination Therapy for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: One Size Still Does Not Fit All

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and α₄β₇ integrin are effective when given as monotherapy in inducing and/or maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), but data from RCTs are less clear on whether concomitant immunomodulator (IM) therapy confers additional benefit. In CD, RCT data are mixed,^1,2 as are results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, showing no benefit overall,³ minimal benefit with individual agents,⁴ and comparative benefit over some monotherapies but not others.⁵ For example, concomitant azathioprine with infliximab is more effective than either drug alone in patients with CD naive to both drugs,² but whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy with infliximab in nonnaive patients, or with other approved biologic drugs in any population, remains unknown. In UC, RCTs have shown that the benefit may be limited to specific populations,⁶ whereas systematic reviews suggest no benefit at all.⁷.

Effector T Helper Cell Subsets in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The gastrointestinal tract is a site of high immune challenge, as it must maintain a delicate balance between tolerating luminal contents and generating an immune response toward pathogens. CD4⁺ T cells are key in mediating the host protective and homeostatic responses. Yet, CD4⁺ T cells are also known to be the main drivers of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when this balance is perturbed. Many subsets of CD4⁺ T cells have been identified as players in perpetuating chronic intestinal inflammation. Over the last few decades, understanding of how each subset of Th cells plays a role has dramatically increased. Simultaneously, this has allowed development of therapeutic innovation targeting specific molecules rather than broad immunosuppressive agents. Here, we review the emerging evidence of how each subset functions in promoting and sustaining the chronic inflammation that characterizes IBD.

Fungal infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite reports of fungal infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their clinical and microbiological characteristics remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to examine all available evidence regarding fungal infections in patients with IBD.

METHODS

Systematic search of PubMed (through 27 May 2017) for studies providing data on clinical, microbiological, treatment and outcome data of fungal infections in patients with IBD. The primary study outcome was to record the most common fungal species in patients with IBD. Secondary outcomes were classified into 3 categories: (i) characteristics of fungal infections; (ii) data on IBD and (iii) treatment and outcomes of fungal infections in patients with IBD.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with data on 1524 patients were included in final analysis. The most common fungal infections in patients with IBD were caused by Candida species (903 infections); the most commonly reported site of Candida infection was the gastrointestinal tract. Available evidence shows that most fungal infections occur within 12 months of IBD treatment and within 6 months when anti-TNFa agents are used.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review thoroughly describes fungal infections in patients with IBD and provides important information for the early detection and management of these infections.

Safety of biological therapies in ulcerative colitis: An umbrella review of meta-analyses

Biological agents have proven clinical efficacy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Their adverse effects have also been studied in a substantial number of primary studies and meta-analyses. Given the large volume of information that has been published, the aim of this umbrella review was to effectively summarize the accumulated evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the safety of biological therapies for UC into one accessible and usable document. Pubmed and Scopus databases were systematically searched through November 2017 to identify meta-analyses of RCTs that have investigated potential harms of biological agents (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, and vedolizumab) in patients with UC. Ten eligible meta-analyses were included. The body of available evidence supports the safety of biologic therapies in UC. Further research is needed to clarify the risk of any infection with biologics, for elderly and high-risk groups, for longer-term effects, and for head-to-head comparisons between the different biologics.

Biologic-Induced Infections in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The TNF-α Antagonists

Objective: To review the mechanism and association of infectious risk among the tumor-necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists used in inflammatory bowel disease. Data Sources: A PubMed literature search was performed using the following search terms: infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, inflammatory bowel disease, crohn’s, ulcerative colitis, adverse effects, adverse events, safety, and infection. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Meta-analyses and cohort studies with outcomes pertaining to quantitative infectious risk were reviewed. Case reports and case series describing association between TNF-α inhibitors and infection were also reviewed. Data Synthesis: A total of 7 recent meta-analyses of randomized trials demonstrate inconclusive association of infection with TNF-α antagonists. Registry data suggest that medications carry an independent risk of opportunistic infections. Risk factors for infection include older age, malnutrition, diabetes, and possibly combination therapy. Reported infections vary widely but include intracellular and granulomatous bacteria, viruses, and fungi. Conclusion: TNF-α antagonists are associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infection, although this risk has not been demonstrated conclusively in randomized controlled trials. Knowledge of concomitant risk factors, mechanism of infectious risk, and available treatment options can improve patient care in the clinical setting.

Cost of Ulcerative Colitis in Quebec, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with significant health care utilization and costs. We assessed UC direct medical costs in Quebec, Canada, in 2 time periods (1998-2004 and 2005-2011) and determined changes over time.

METHODS

Because the introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor α may have influenced the UC cost, we used the Quebec health services administrative databases and the same inclusion criteria to create 2 separate UC cohorts, before (1998-2004) and after (2005-2011) anti-tumor necrosis factor α introduction.

RESULTS

The postcohort included 801 patients and the precohort 716 patients. Overall, cohorts were predominately women and were comparable in terms of patient's demographics and comorbidities. Corticosteroid use, emergency department visits and hospitalizations for colectomies, and other gastrointestinal disorders were fewer in the postcohort versus precohort. The median daily cost (interquartile range) was $16.96 ($6.80-$48.16) for the postcohort and $18.65 ($7.82-$53.31) for the precohort. In generalized linear models with log link and gamma distribution, the adjusted daily cost ratios (95% confidence interval) in the postcohort versus precohort was 0.75 (0.67-0.85). Older age at inclusion, low income, lower socioeconomic status, and previous use of gastroprotective agents, antidepressants, and sulfasalazine, methotrexate, or cyclosporine were associated with increased costs. Women and those who visited a gastroenterologist in the previous year incurred lower costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean UC daily cost decreased from 2005 to 2011 as compared to 1998 to 2004 because of a decrease in rates of colectomy and other gastrointestinal hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons for these changes.