PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assay Concordance in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PD1/PD-L1 Axis in Uro-oncology

The immune system is important to control tumor development and progression in humans. However, tumor cells and cells of the tumor microenvironment can induce immune escape mechanisms including activation of immune checkpoints such as PD-1/PD-L1. Based on this knowledge, new immune therapies, including PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibition, have been developed and are already recommended as a standard treatment in metastatic bladder and kidney cancer patients. In addition to its role as a therapeutic target, PD-L1 seems to be a prognostic parameter although data are controversial. Only little is known about signaling pathways inducing PD-L1 expression in tumor cells on one hand and about its functional role for tumor cells itself. However, the understanding of the complex biological function of PD-L1 will improve therapeutic options in urological malignancies. This review is giving an overview of the current knowledge concerning the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in urological tumors including bladder, kidney, prostate, testicular and penile cancer.

Status of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) by Immunohistochemistry and Scoring Algorithms

The detection of the Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein by immunohistochemistry is currently the only approved test predictive of response to drugs targeting the PD1/PDL1 axis. The role of this test is debated since several reagents have been used as companion diagnostics for different drugs on diverse immunostaining platforms. In addition, different scoring systems for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry have been applied in the registration studies regarding single drugs. This review deals with the various issues that are related to the immunohistochemical test for PD-L1. We discuss currently unsolved problems such as the advantages and the flaws of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry; the choice of the best reagents and the best scoring system. Finally, we review the current experiences on the role of immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 in clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Increased PD-L1 expression in high-grade bladder cancer with squamous cell differentiation in Bulgarian and French patients' samples

Urothelial carcinomas (UC) of the bladder are biologically and clinically heterogeneous and the most common malignancy of the urinary tract in developed countries worldwide, where several checkpoint targets as programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein (PD-1) have received the most attention in the treatment of bladder cancer. However, the clinicopathological impact of this biomarker has not yet been established enough.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in UCs of the bladder in Bulgarian and French patients' samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Urothelial bladder carcinomas cases from 2016-2020 were retrospectively were analyzed. The cohort included 105 cases: 42 (40%) low grade and 63 (60%) high grade. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for PD-L1 expression was performed using an anti-PD-L1 primary antibody clone 22C3pharmDx only to 73/105 cases.

RESULTS

Approximately 21/73 cases (28.8%) of urothelial bladder carcinomas demonstrated positive PD-L1 expression, and in 52/73 cases (71.2%) were negative. Positive PD-L1 expression was associated with high grade and high pathologic stage (p < 0.001). We found that PD-L1 was expressed in a significant percentage in UC with squamous differentiation (40%), followed by classic UC (30%). An association between histological grading systems of bladder UC (WHO1973 and WHO 2016) and the TNM-staging system, estimated by Pearson correlation coefficients (r = 0.590 and r = 0.583, respectively, p < 0.001) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that PD-L1 expression is increased in patients with muscle-invasive UC, and PD-L1 might be a new biomarker that correlates with the pathological stage of urothelial bladder cancer and might predict recurrence-free survival.

Phase II study of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced cervical cancer

Background

There are limited treatment options for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab remains the mainstay of advanced treatment. Pembrolizumab is Food and Drug Agency approved for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive cervical cancer with a modest response rate. This is the first study to report the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

We report the results from a phase II, open-label, multicenter study (NCT02921269). Patients with advanced cervical cancer were treated with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenous every 3 weeks and atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenous every 3 weeks. The primary objective was to measure the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

In the total evaluable population (n=10), zero patients achieved an objective response as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1, resulting in a confirmed ORR of 0%. Of note, there were two patients who achieved an unconfirmed PR. The DCR by RECIST V.1.1 was 60% (0% complete response, 0% partial response, 60% stable disease). Median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 6) and median OS was 8.9 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 21.9). Safety results were generally consistent with the known safety profile of both drugs, notably with two high-grade neurologic events.

Conclusions

The combination of bevacizumab and atezolizumab did not meet the predefined efficacy endpoint, as addition of bevacizumab to PD-L1 blockade did not appear to enhance the ORR in cervical cancer.

TUBB3 Is Associated with High-Grade Histology, Poor Prognosis, p53 Expression, and Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

βIII-Tubulin, encoded by the TUBB3 gene, is a microtubule protein. Several studies have shown that overexpression of TUBB3 is linked to poor prognosis and is involved in taxane resistance in some cancers.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the expression and function of TUBB3 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

METHODS

The expression of TUBB3 was determined using immuno-histochemistry in ccRCC specimens. The effects of TUBB3 knockdown on cell growth and invasion were evaluated in RCC cell lines. We analyzed the interaction between TUBB3, p53, cancer stem cell markers, and PD-L1.

RESULTS

In 137 cases of ccRCC, immunohistochemistry showed that 28 (20%) of the ccRCC cases were positive for TUBB3. High TUBB3 expression was significantly correlated with high nuclear grade, high T stage, and N stage. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high expression of TUBB3 was associated with poor overall survival after nephrectomy. In silico analysis also showed that high TUBB3 expression was correlated with overall survival. Knockdown of TUBB3 suppressed cell growth and invasion in 786-O and Caki-1 cells. High TUBB3 expression was associated with CD44, CD133, PD-L1, and p53 in ccRCC. We generated p53 knockout cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Western blotting revealed that p53 knockout upregulated the expression of TUBB3.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that TUBB3 may play an oncogenic role and could be a potential therapeutic target in ccRCC.

Comparative analysis of programmed cell death ligand 1 assays in renal cell carcinoma

AIMS

The importance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has emerged in clinical trials of PD-L1 target therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study compares PD-L1 assays in RCC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two US Food and Drug Administration-approved PD-L1 assays (22C3 and SP142) and one research-use only antibody (E1L3N) were used in a retrospective cohort of 591 patients with RCC. PD-L1 positivity on tumour cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) and combined positive score (CPS) were evaluated. With the 22C3, SP142 and E1L3N assays, positive PD-L1 expression on TCs ≥1% was observed in 24 (4.1%), 12 (2.0%) and 16 (2.7%) cases and on ICs ≥1% was observed in 132 (22.3%), 120 (20.3%) and 65 (11.0%) cases, respectively. PD-L1 expression scores among the three assays showed moderate-high positive correlation (ρ = 0.599-0.835, P < 0.001). Assays appeared similar, although staining in ICs was comparatively less frequent with E1L3N. 22C3 showed frequent positivity in TCs. PD-L1 expression on TCs was associated with papillary type 2 RCC (P < 0.001). IC infiltration and PD-L1 expression on ICs were predominantly found in clear cell and papillary type 1 RCC (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 target therapy may be beneficial for patients with papillary type 2 RCC, even if they are categorised as a heterogeneous group. PD-L1 assays should be carefully selected, and accurate histological subtyping of RCC is needed prior to decisions on PD-L1 testing, because of the different PD-L1 expression observed among varying RCC subtypes.

Relapse-Free Survival and PD-L1 Expression in First High- and Low-Grade Relapsed Luminal, Basal and Double-Negative P53-Mutant Non-Muscular Invasive Bladder Cancer Depending on Previous Chemo- and Immunotherapy

The goal of this study was to assess how PD-L1 expression in tissue specimens of patients with main molecular subtypes of NMIBC (luminal, basal and double-negative p53-mutant) associates with relapsed-free survival in dependence on the tumor grade and prior treatment of primary bladder cancer. PD-L1 expressions on the membrane of neoplastic and CD8+ immune cells were assessed in tumor specimens (n = 240) of primary and relapsed luminal, basal and double-negative p53-mutant NMIBC. Association between relapse-free survival and PD-L1 expression was estimated for high- and low-grade relapsed NMIBC according to previous treatment and their molecular profile, using the Kaplan-Meier method, and assessed by using the log-rank test. Potential confounders were adjusted by Cox regression models. In a group of patients who underwent only TUR without intravesical therapy, there were significant differences in relapse time between high- and low-grade tumors in basal and luminal molecular subtypes; for basal relapsed carcinoma, RFS was shorter in cases where tumors were less malignant. Both intravesical mitomycin and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy significantly extended the time of recurrence of low-grade luminal and basal bladder malignancies with no intergroup differences in double-negative NMIBC. PD-L1 expression status was associated with RFS for luminal relapsed NMIBCs in the group without previous frontline intervention, and with RFS in the group of patients with luminal relapsed bladder cancer previously utilized BCG. Obtained results may be considered as a promising approach for further clinical implementation.

Clinicopathological implications of the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and programmed death ligand 1 in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

Combined anti-VEGF/anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy synergistically improves treatment outcomes in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) compared with anti-PD-L1 or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy. Here, we analyzed the expression of VEGF and PD-L1 (SP142) in a retrospective cohort of 513 patients with clear-cell (cc) RCC. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with a positive threshold value of ≥1%. Positive staining for PD-L1 on ICs and TCs was found in 115 (22.4%) and 7 (1.4%) cases, respectively. Moderate or strong staining for VEGF on TCs was found in 217 (42.3%) patients. PD-L1 expression on ICs and TCs was positively associated with VEGF expression on TCs. Both VEGF and PD-L1 (IC) positivity (VEGF/PD-L1 [IC]: +/+) was observed in 65 (12.7%) cases. Patients in this subgroup exhibited more aggressive clinicopathologic features, including older age, higher World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, angiolymphatic invasion, tumor necrosis, and sarcomatoid differentiation (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that expression of VEGF and PD-L1 on ICs was positively correlated with tumor recurrence (P < 0.001), whereas expression of PD-L1 on TCs was not (P = 0.554). Tumors with positivity for both antibodies (VEGF/PD-L1 [IC]: +/+) exhibited the worst recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001), and double positivity independently predicted tumor recurrence in ccRCC. The present study provides comprehensive and basic information about VEGF and PD-L1 expression for new combined therapy in primary ccRCC.

PD-L1 Expression in Urothelial Carcinoma With Predominant or Pure Variant Histology: Concordance Among 3 Commonly Used and Commercially Available Antibodies

The introduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has transformed the management of advanced bladder cancer (BC). Despite its limitations, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry may serve as a predictive biomarker of anti-PD-L1/PD1 therapy. While urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients with predominant or pure variant histology (UCV) account for up to one-third of advanced cases, to date, most ICB BC studies have excluded patients with such histologies. To assess the potential utility of ICB in patients with UCV, we analyzed PD-L1 expression in UCV and compared 3 commonly used and commercially available PD-L1 antibodies. Full sections from 84 UCV cases were stained with clones SP263, 22C3, and SP142, all of which are considered predictive assays to identify UC patients who are more likely to respond to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors durvalumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, respectively. Expression on tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) was assessed. Staining extent and characteristics were evaluated, and concordance among the 3 clones was determined at various cutoff points as used in previous studies in BC. We found that PD-L1 was expressed in a significant percentage of UCV cases at different cutoff points (cutoff 1% TC: 37% to 54%, cutoff 5% TC: 23% to 37%), with the highest expression in UC with squamous differentiation. These figures are equal to or higher than those for classic/pure UC (4% to 30%). The results suggest that patients with UCV may benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and argue against the exclusion of UC with predominant or pure variant histology from clinical ICB studies. The highest expression in both TC and IC was observed with clone SP263, followed by 22C3 and SP142, and all clones showed strong agreement in a pairwise comparison, both in TC and IC (R-values: 0.780 to 0.901), which indicates that all 3 clones are potentially useful in the evaluation of PD-L1 expression in UCV.

Multicentric Analytical and Inter-observer Comparability of Four Clinically Developed Programmed Death-ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Assays in Advanced Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested increased clinical benefit with inhibition of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 in patients with PD-L1-positive locally advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined the analytical and inter-observer comparability of PD-L1-positivity across 4 clinically developed immunohistochemistry assays in clear-cell RCC (CCRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomly selected archived, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded nephrectomy specimens from 201 patients with locally advanced CCRCC were screened using VENTANA SP142. From these, 30 cases were selected based on their tumor-infiltrating immune cell (IC) PD-L1 status (PD-L1-IC-positivity of < 1%, 1%-5%, or > 5%; 10 cases each). These cases were stained for PD-L1 using VENTANA SP142 and SP263, and DAKO 22C3 and 28-8, and scored for PD-L1 expression on IC and tumor cells (TC) by trained readers at 5 sites.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean percentages of PD-L1-IC-positivity and PD-L1-TC-positivity varied from 4.0% to 4.9% and from 1.3% to 10.7%, respectively, between assays. Inter-assay differences in PD-L1-IC-positivity were small and non-significant (P = .1938 to .9963); for PD-L1-TC-positivity, significant differences were observed between VENTANA SP142 and the other assays (P ≤ .0001) and between VENTANA SP263 and DAKO 28-8 (P = .0248). Intra-class correlation values showed moderate-to-high inter-reader agreement for each assay for PD-L1-IC-positivity and for 3 assays for PD-L1-TC-positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first multicenter analytical comparison study of PD-L1 assays in CCRCC, PD-L1-positivity could be assessed reproducibly using all 4 assays for IC and for 3 of the 4 assays for TC.

PD-L1 expression in bladder primary in situ urothelial carcinoma: evaluation in BCG-unresponsive patients and BCG responders

Carcinoma in situ (CIS) is believed to be a precursor of muscle-invasive carcinomas that may arise from these flat high-grade, superficial urothelial lesions. CIS accounts for approximately 10% of all bladder tumors. Therapeutic options for urothelial CIS are limited, and in order to inhibit disease progression and recurrence, current guidelines recommend transurethral resection (TURBT) followed by intravesical administration of Bacillus of Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Approximately 30-40% of patients fail the BCG therapy with recurrence and progression of disease. In the present study, we examined the expression of PD-L1 both in neoplastic epithelial cells and in stromal inflammatory cells in patients with diagnosis of CIS primary responders and not responders to BCG therapy, in order to verify if the PD-L1 expression could identify patients resistant to BCG treatment. Moreover, we analyzed on the same cases the immunoreactivities of anti-PD-L1 MoAbs such as SP263, C23, and SP142. Our results have showed that PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and in immune cell compartment is higher in BCG-unresponsive group than in BCG responders, but only the PD-L1 22C3 expression in tumor cells seems to be associated with recurrence of disease (p = 0.035; OR 0.1204; CI 95% from 0.0147 to 1.023). Hence, our data suggest that the PD-L1 22C3 expression could help to identify CIS that fail the BCG therapy, supporting the hypothesis that enhanced levels of intratumoral PD-L1 22C3 expressed by the tumor cells may explain the failure of BCG immunotherapy.

Targeting the Immune system and Epigenetic Landscape of Urological Tumors

In the last years, we have witnessed remarkable advances in targeted therapies for cancer patients. There is a growing effort to either replace or reduce the dose of unspecific, systemic (chemo)therapies, given the associated short- and long-term side effects, by introducing more specific targeted therapies as single or combination agents. Due to the well-known implications of the immune system and epigenetic landscape in modulating cancer development, both have been explored as potential targets in several malignancies, including those affecting the genitourinary tract. As the immune system function is also epigenetically regulated, there is rationale for combining both strategies. However, this is still rather underexplored, namely in urological tumors. We aim to briefly review the use of immune therapies in prostate, kidney, bladder, and testicular cancer, and further describe studies providing supporting evidence on their combination with epigenetic-based therapies.

PD-L1 Testing in Gastric Cancer by the Combined Positive Score of the 22C3 PharmDx and SP263 Assay with Clinically Relevant Cut-offs

Purpose

We provide a comparison between 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assay, for evaluating programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Materials and Methods

The PD-L1 immunohistochemistry by 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assays was performed in the center of the tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) in 379 GC tissues using tissue microarrays and interpreted as combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS). Of the total samples, 55 samples were independently reviewed by five pathologists.

Results

The two assays showed a high correlation in both the CPS and TPS. At a CPS ≥ 1 cut-off, 219 (57.8%) and 231 (60.9%) GCs were positive for PD-L1 with the 22C3 and SP263 assays, and at ≥ 10 cut-off, 37 (9.8%) and 36 (9.5%) GCs were positive, respectively. The overall percent agreement (OPA) was greater than 90% with CPS ≥ 1 and ≥ 10 cut-offs, and TPS ≥ 1% and ≥ 10% cut-offs. There was higher OPA between the two assays with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (99.2%) than ≥ 1 (94.7%). The percent agreement between the CT and IM was higher with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (92.9%) than ≥ 1 (77.6%). Patient with positive expression at CPS ≥ 5 cut-off had a significantly better outcomes in both assays. Interobserver variability among five pathologists was higher than the assay variability.

Conclusion

Two assays for PD-L1 expression in GC showed high agreement. These results provide guidance for selecting eligible patients with GC for pembrolizumab treatment.

PD-L1 CPS Scoring Accuracy in Small Biopsies and Aspirate Cell Blocks from Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

To evaluate the performance characteristics of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) combined positive scoring (CPS) in core biopsies and aspirate cell blocks from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSqCCa). PD-L1 IHC using the SP263 antibody was performed on 20 paired cases which consisted of a small biopsy and an excisional specimen. The scores were compared at both the 1% and 20% cutpoints. Using the CPS result obtained from the resected specimen or excisional biopsy as the gold standard, PD-L1 IHC performed on the core biopsy or cell block identified 4 of 6 positive cases (66%) at the 20% cutpoint and 12 of 17 (70%) positive patients at the 1% cutpoint. False positive cases were uncommon at both cutpoints. CPS scoring should be used with caution in small biopsies from patients with HNSqCCa. A negative result should prompt consideration of an excisional biopsy and repeat testing.

PD-L1 assessment in urothelial carcinoma: a practical approach

Five programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are currently approved for treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper urinary tract. Due to restrictions by the FDA and EMA first-line treatment with Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab in platinum-ineligible patients requires immunohistochemical PD-L1 testing. In the second-line setting all drugs are approved without PD-L1 testing. Used PD-L1 assays in clinical trials include the 28-8 pharmDx (Nivolumab), the 22C3 pharmDx (Pembrolizumab), Ventana SP142 (Atezolizumab), and the Ventana PD-L1 SP263 assays (Durvalumab). Differences in antibodies, needed platforms and testing algorithms have raised questions about interchangeability and comparability among these assays and their diagnostic use. We provide a practical review about the current recommendations, used assays and algorithms of PD-L1 testing in urothelial carcinoma to help oncologists, urologists and pathologists to understand analytical features, differences in antibody assays, differences in scoring algorithms and comparability of various PD-L1 assays. We reviewed and summarized published studies from the last four years (2016-2019) on PD-L1 testing in bladder cancer and present a condensed practical guideline including pre-analytical, analytical and test-specific issues.

Detailed Characterization of Immune Cell Infiltrate and Expression of Immune Checkpoint Molecules PD-L1/CTLA-4 and MMR Proteins in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors Disclose Novel Disease Biomarkers

Background: The immune infiltrate plays an important part in testicular germ cell tumors, but it remains scarcely studied. We aimed at thoroughly characterizing the immune infiltrate and expression of immune checkpoints PD-L1/CTLA-4 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in these neoplasms, seeking for associations with patient outcome. Methods: A total of 162 consecutively diagnosed patients (2005-2018) were included. Immunostaining for PD-L1, CTLA-4 and MMR proteins was independently assessed both in immune cells (ICs) and tumor cells (TCs) of primary tumors and metastases, and characterization of IC populations was pursued. Results: PD-L1 and CTLA-4 positivity in ICs was frequent (85.5% and 96.3%). Patients with absent PD-L1 positive ICs exhibited significantly worse relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 4.481, 95% CI 1.366-14.697, p = 0.013), both in univariable and multivariable analysis. Lower CD20 and CD3 IC infiltration in seminomas associated with higher disease stage (p = 0.0216, p = 0.0291). CTLA-4 TC intensity was significantly higher in yolk sac tumor, choriocarcinoma and teratoma, while PD-L1 TC positivity was significantly more frequent in choriocarcinoma. Both PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immunoexpression in ICs of metastatic samples was frequent (100% and 88.2%). MMR proteins were differentially expressed among the different tumor subtypes. Conclusions: Immune infiltrate/checkpoints associate with patients' outcome, constituting novel (potentially targetable) disease biomarkers.

Concordance among four commercially available, validated programmed cell death ligand-1 assays in urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Antibodies targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint have shown promising clinical activity in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Expression of PD-L1 in UC tumors has been investigated using different antibody clones, staining protocols, and scoring algorithms. The aim was to establish the extent of concordance among PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays.

METHODS

Tumor biopsy samples (N = 335) were assessed using four commercially available PD-L1 assays: VENTANA SP263, VENTANA SP142, PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx, and PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. PD-L1 analytical staining and classification concordance, including agreement between clinically relevant scoring algorithms, were investigated using overall/positive/negative percentage agreement (OPA/PPA/NPA).

RESULTS

Good analytical correlation was observed among the VENTANA SP263, PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx, and PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assays for tumor cell (TC) and immune cell (IC) PD-L1 staining with Spearman rank coefficients of 0.92-0.93 for TCs and 0.88-0.91 for ICs. However, concordance (preset criterion: ≥85%) between patient PD-L1 status when applying the TC or ICICArea ≥ 25% (VENTANA SP263) cutoff was only achieved for PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx versus VENTANA SP263 (OPA 92.2%, PPA 86.4%, NPA 95.4%). Differences were observed between patient populations with UC tumors classified as PD-L1 high versus PD-L1 low/negative using combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, CPS ≥10, IC ≥5%, and TC/IC ≥25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The VENTANA SP263 and PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assays are analytically similar in UC. When the different PD-L1 assays were combined with their specified clinical scoring algorithms, differences were seen in patient classification driven by substantial differences in scoring approaches.

Multicentric analytical comparability study of programmed death-ligand 1 expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells and tumor cells in urothelial bladder cancer using four clinically developed immunohistochemistry assays

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells (TC) or tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) correlated in several studies with PD-L1/programmed death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. Since June 2018, a positive PD-L1 status is required for atezolizumab or pembrolizumab treatment of patients with advanced or metastasized urothelial bladder cancer, who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing therapy. We examined technical comparability and inter-reader agreement of four clinically developed PD-L1 assays in locally advanced disease. Archived, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from 30 patients (73.3% cystectomies, 26.7% transurethral resections) were stained by PD-L1 immunohistochemistry using VENTANA SP142, VENTANA SP263, DAKO 22C3, and DAKO 28-8 at two sites per manufacturers’ protocols and scored blinded at five sites for PD-L1 expression on IC (% per tumor area) and TC (%). Small, non-significant inter-assay differences were observed for IC. For TC, SP142 showed significantly lower staining percentages. Pairwise comparisons revealed − 0.3 to 1.6% differences in adjusted means between assays for IC, and for TC, − 10.5 to − 7.8% (SP142 versus others) and − 1.9 to 2.7% (other comparisons). Inter-reader and inter-assay agreement was moderate to high for both IC and TC. Allocation to binary cutoffs (1%, 5%, 10%) showed substantial to high Kappa agreement scores (0.440–0.923) for IC and TC between assays for each reader. This first multicenter study, with five independent readers blinded with respect to the assay used, suggests that all four currently clinically relevant assays are analytically similar for evaluation of PD-L1-stained IC and three (SP263, 22C3, and 28-8) for PD-L1-stained TC. Inter-observer agreement for trained readers in scoring of both IC and TC positivity was generally high.

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in parathyroid tumors

INTRODUCTION

PD-L1 is associated with prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in patients with malignancies. In previous studies, PD-L1 expression was detected in many endocrine tumors. However, the PD-L1 expression status in parathyroid tumors is unknown.

METHODS

We included 26 parathyroid carcinoma and 37 adenoma samples, as well as the corresponding patient information. PD-L1 was stained using the FDA-approved PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx and Ventana PD-L1 (SP263) assays, and staining was assessed by the estimated percentages of positive tumor cells and immune cells, respectively.

RESULTS

We classified the PD-L1 expression in the parathyroid tumors into four groups: (0) <1%, (1) 1-4%, (2) 5-9% and (3) ≥10% positive. With the SP263 clone, 37 (carcinoma:adenoma = 18:19) samples scored 0, 13 (carcinoma:adenoma = 4:9) scored 1, 7 (carcinoma:adenoma = 1:6) scored 2 and 6 (carcinoma:adenoma = 3:3) scored 3. However, in the series of cases using the 22C3 clone, 45 (carcinoma:adenoma = 20:25) samples scored 0, 10 (carcinoma: adenoma = 3:7) scored 1, 5 (carcinoma:adenoma = 1:4) scored 2, and 3 (carcinoma:adenoma = 2:1) scored 3. Concerning tumor-infiltrating immune cells, 57 samples were negative and six were positive with SP263, and 59 were negative and four were positive with 22C3. Moreover, PD-L1 expression was negatively correlated with the Ki-67 index and mitotic rate in parathyroid tumors depending on the different clones. However, the results indicated only moderate consistency between the SP263 and 22C3 clones in parathyroid tumors.

CONCLUSION

We found deficient PD-L1 expression in the majority of parathyroid tumors. However, the PD-L1 expression score in parathyroid tumors depended greatly on the antibody clone used.

Combined assessment of peritumoral Th1/Th2 polarization and peripheral immunity as a new biomarker in the prediction of BCG response in patients with high-risk NMIBC

Intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) remains the most effective treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), unfortunately there is no validated biomarker to predict clinical outcome. Here we tried to explore the possibility that a combination of the density of peritumoral infiltrating cells (Th1, Th2 and PD-L1) and the composition of peripheral immune cells (neutrophil and lymphocyte counts) could generate a more reliable prognostic biomarker. Twenty-two patients with high-risk NMIBC treated with BCG (10 BCG nonresponders and 12 BCG responders) were selected. BCG responders had significantly lower level of peritumoral T-bet⁺ cells with an associated higher GATA-3⁺/T-bet⁺ ratio (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, respectively). Furthermore, the immune polarization in tissue (GATA-3⁺/T-bet⁺ ratio) adjusted for the systemic inflammation (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) showed a significantly higher association with the BCG response (p = 0.004). A survival analysis demonstrated prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with a lower T-bet⁺/Lymphocyte ratio and higher GTR/NLR (p = 0.01). No association was observed between peritumoral PD-L1⁺ expression and the BCG response. In conclusion, alterations in overall immune function, both local and systemic, may influence the therapeutic response to BCG, therefore a combined analysis of tumoral (Th2/Th1 ratio) and peripheral (NLR) immune composition prior to treatment may be a promising approach to predict the BCG response in high-risk NMIBC patients.

Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1 and Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Are Expressed in Conjunctival Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Therapeutic Implications

PURPOSE

Novel cancer immunotherapies, called immune checkpoint inhibitors, have demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Tissue expression of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PD-L2) has been shown to predict tumor response to these drugs. We examine the expression of prognostic immune biomarkers, PD-L1 and PD-L2, in invasive ocular surface squamous neoplasia.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Eighteen cases of ocular surface or ocular adnexal invasive squamous cell carcinomas were identified in pathology case files of the Massachusetts General Hospital/Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and at the Wills Eye Hospital accessioned between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2017. Immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1, PD-L2, CD8, and p16 was performed and graded in a standardized fashion.

RESULTS

PD-L1 and PD-L2 were expressed on tumor cells to varying degrees, and also on some stromal cells and endothelial cells. Stromal and endothelial cell expression was also seen in control conjunctival specimens. Tumor expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 was present on the cell membranes. All 18 (100%) of the tumors expressed PD-L1: 7 (39%) expressed a high level, 3 (17%) expressed a medium level, and 8 (44%) expressed a low level. Only 9 (50%) tumors expressed PD-L2 and it was at a low level. The expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells correlated with the presence of CD8-positive cytotoxic T lymphocytes among tumor cells (P < .01) and with the presence of CD8-positive cells in the surrounding stroma (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of ocular invasive conjunctival squamous carcinomas express high levels of PD-L1 and CD8 and therefore may respond therapeutically to immune checkpoint inhibition.

Concordance of PD-L1 expression in matched urothelial bladder cancer specimens

AIMS

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has predictive value for response to immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment in urothelial cancer patients. The consistency of PD-L1 expression among different specimen types, however, is unknown. The aim of this study is to compare PD-L1 expression in matched transurethral resections of the bladder (TURB), cystectomy specimens and lymph node metastases of urothelial cancer patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed PD-L1 (SP142) immunohistochemistry on whole tissue slides of 115 urothelial carcinoma patients who had undergone TURB, followed by radical cystectomy and/or pelvic lymph node dissection. The PD-L1 assay was positive if PD-L1 expression in immune cells occupied ≥5% of the tumour area. PD-L1 was positive in 15 of 97 (15.5%) TURB, 17 of 98 (17.3%) cystectomies and nine of 49 (18.4%) lymph node metastases. Agreement of PD-L1 assay outcome between cystectomy and TURB (kappa = 0.34; P = 0.002) and cystectomy and lymph node metastasis (kappa = 0.35; P = 0.034) was fair; there was no agreement between TURB and lymph node metastasis (kappa = 0.045; P = 0.82). Discordance of PD-L1 outcome in matched TURB and cystectomy specimens occurred more frequently after neoadjuvant therapy (53.3% versus 25.4%; P = 0.03), and was not associated with other clinicopathological parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Urothelial bladder cancer patients showed fair agreement of PD-L1 assay outcome in cystectomies and matched TURB or lymph node specimens. PD-L1 expression was discordant more often after neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, immune-checkpoint inhibitor studies should take into account specimen type and neoadjuvant therapy in assessing the predictive value of PD-L1 expression.

Reproducibility of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry interpretation across various types of genitourinary and head/neck carcinomas, antibody clones, and tissue types

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by tumor cells is a mechanism for down-regulation of antitumor T-cell responses and is a target for immunotherapy in various cancers. PD-L1 status as a predictor of treatment response has led to the development of multiple platforms with different reference cutoffs. We studied 128 cases of genitourinary and head/neck carcinomas, aiming to assess the frequency of PD-L1 positivity, interobserver reliability of PD-L1 interpretation, and the concordance of PD-L1 scoring between small samples from tissue microarray and whole sections using SP263 and SP142 clones. No prostatic carcinoma (0/21) was PD-L1 positive compared with 15% to 24% PD-L1 positivity in urothelial carcinoma (UC), hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HP-SCC), and high-grade salivary gland carcinoma. There was substantial interobserver agreement in determining overall PD-L1 positivity in UC and HP-SCC using SP263 (κ = 0.702) and SP142 (κ = 0.757) antibodies. Subgroup analysis for both antibodies showed excellent agreement in UC (κ = 0.812 and 0.827) and moderate agreement in HP-SCC (κ = 0.469 and 0.591). Moderate to substantial agreement between tissue microarray and whole sections was achieved using SP263 (overall, κ = 0.573; UC, κ = 0.424; and HP-SCC, κ = 0.667) and SP142 (UC, κ = 0.493). PD-L1 interpretation in genitourinary and head/neck carcinomas is reliable and reproducible among pathologists and across different tissue preparations. Tumor PD-L1 staining heterogeneity may lead to discrepant PD-L1 results between small biopsies and large sections from surgical resection in a subset of tumors (19% of UC and 15% of HP-SCC). Retesting in such cases may be required to determine patient suitability for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.