Mechanism for specificity by HMG-1 in enhanceosome assembly

The DNA architectural protein HMGB1 facilitates RTA-mediated viral gene expression in gamma-2 herpesviruses

Replication and transcription activator (RTA), an immediate-early gene product of gamma-2 herpesviruses including Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) and murine gamma herpesvirus 68 (MHV-68), plays a critical role in controlling the viral life cycle. RTA acts as a strong transcription activator for several downstream genes of KSHV and MHV-68 through direct DNA binding, as well as via indirect mechanisms. HMGB1 (also called HMG-1) protein is a highly conserved nonhistone chromatin protein with the ability to bind and bend DNA. HMGB1 protein promoted RTA binding to different RTA target sites in vitro, with greater enhancement to low-affinity sites than to high-affinity sites. Box A or box B and homologues of HMGB1 also enhanced RTA binding to DNA. Transient transfection of HMGB1 stimulated RTA transactivation of RTA-responsive promoters from KSHV and MHV-68. Furthermore, MHV-68 viral gene expression, as well as viral replication, was significantly reduced in HMGB1-deficient cells than in the wild type. This abated viral gene expression was partially restored by HMGB1 transfection into HMGB1(-/-) cells. These results suggest an important function of the DNA architectural protein, HMGB1, in RTA-mediated gene expression, as well as viral replication in gamma-2 herpesviruses.

Changes in gene expression associated with acclimation to constant temperatures and fluctuating daily temperatures in an annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus

Eurythermal ectotherms commonly thrive in environments that expose them to large variations in temperature on daily and seasonal bases. The roles played by alterations in gene expression in enabling eurytherms to adjust to these two temporally distinct patterns of thermal stress are poorly understood. We used cDNA microarray analysis to examine changes in gene expression in a eurythermal fish, Austrofundulus limnaeus, subjected to long-term acclimation to constant temperatures of 20, 26 and 37°C and to environmentally realistic daily fluctuations in temperature between 20°C and 37°C. Our data reveal major differences between the transcriptional responses in the liver made during acclimation to constant temperatures and in response to daily temperature fluctuations. Control of cell growth and proliferation appears to be an important part of the response to change in temperature, based on large-scale changes in mRNA transcript levels for several key regulators of these pathways. However, cell growth and proliferation appear to be regulated by different genes in constant versus fluctuating temperature regimes. The gene expression response of molecular chaperones is also different between constant and fluctuating temperatures. Small heat shock proteins appear to play an important role in response to fluctuating temperatures whereas larger molecular mass chaperones such as Hsp70 and Hsp90 respond more strongly to chronic high temperatures. A number of transcripts that encode for enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of nitrogen-containing organic osmolytes have gene expression patterns that indicate a possible role for these `chemical chaperones' during acclimation to chronic high temperatures and daily temperature cycling. Genes important for the maintenance of membrane integrity are highly responsive to temperature change. Changes in fatty acid saturation may be important in long-term acclimation and in response to fluctuating temperatures; however cholesterol metabolism may be most critical for short-term acclimation to fluctuating temperatures. The variable effect of temperature on the expression of genes with daily rhythms of expression indicates that there is a complex interaction between the temperature cycle and daily rhythmicity in gene expression. A number of new hypotheses concerning temperature acclimation in fish have been generated as a result of this study. The most notable of these hypotheses is the possibility that the high mobility group b1 (HMGB1) protein, which plays key roles in the assembly of transcription initiation and enhanceosome complexes, may act as a compensatory modulator of transcription in response to temperature, and thus as a global gene expression temperature sensor. This study illustrates the utility of cDNA microarray approaches in both hypothesis-driven and `discovery-based' investigations of environmental effects on organisms.

The role of the C-terminal extension (CTE) of the estrogen receptor alpha and beta DNA binding domain in DNA binding and interaction with HMGB

HMGB-1/-2 are coregulatory proteins that facilitate the DNA binding and transcriptional activity of steroid receptor members of the nuclear receptor family of transcription factors. We investigated the influence and mechanism of action of HMGB-1/-2 (formerly known as HMG-1/-2) on estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and ERbeta. Both ER subtypes were responsive to HMGB-1/-2 with respect to enhancement of receptor DNA binding affinity and transcriptional activity in cells. Responsiveness to HMGB-1/-2 was dependent on the C-terminal extension (CTE) region of the ER DNA binding domain (DBD) and correlated with a direct protein interaction between HMGB-1/-2 and the CTE. Thus the previously reported higher DNA binding affinity and transcription activity of ERalpha as compared with ERbeta is not due to a lack of ERbeta interaction with HMGB-1/-2. Using chimeric receptor DBDs, the higher intrinsic DNA binding affinity of ERalpha than ERbeta was shown to be due to a unique property of the ERalpha CTE, independent of HMGB-1/-2. The CTE of both ER subtypes was also shown to be required for interaction with ERE half-sites. These studies reveal the importance of the CTE and HMGB-1/-2 for ERalpha and ERbeta interaction with their cognate target DNAs.

Identification of a TAL1 target gene reveals a positive role for the LIM domain-binding protein Ldb1 in erythroid gene expression and differentiation

The TAL1 (or SCL) gene, originally identified from its involvement by a recurrent chromosomal translocation, encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor essential for erythropoiesis. Although presumed to regulate transcription, its target genes are largely unknown. We show here that a nuclear complex containing TAL1, its DNA-binding partner E47, zinc finger transcription factor GATA-1, LIM domain protein LMO2, and LIM domain-binding protein Ldb1 transactivates the protein 4.2 (P4.2) gene through two E box GATA elements in its proximal promoter. Binding of this complex to DNA was dependent on the integrity of both E box and GATA sites and was demonstrated to occur on the P4.2 promoter in cells. Maximal transcription in transiently transfected cells required both E box GATA elements and expression of all five components of the complex. This complex was shown, in addition, to be capable of linking in solution double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the two P4.2 E box GATA elements. This DNA-linking activity required Ldb1 and increased with dimethyl sulfoxide-induced differentiation of murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells. In contrast, enforced expression in MEL cells of dimerization-defective mutant Ldb1, as well as wild-type Ldb1, significantly decreased E box GATA DNA-binding activities, P4.2 promoter activity, and accumulation of P4.2 and beta-globin mRNAs. These studies define a physiologic target for a TAL1- and GATA-1-containing ternary complex and reveal a positive role for Ldb1 in erythroid gene expression and differentiation.

TFIIA abrogates the effects of inhibition by HMGB1 but not E1A during the early stages of assembly of the transcriptional preinitiation complex

Successful assembly of the transcriptional preinitiation complex (PIC) is prerequisite to transcriptional initiation. At each stage of PIC assembly, regulation may occur as repressors and activators compete with and influence the incorporation of general transcription factors (GTFs). Both TFIIA and HMGB1 bind individually to the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to increase the rate of binding and to stabilize TBP binding to the TATA element. The competitive binding between these two cofactors for TBP/TATA was examined to show that TFIIA binds preferentially to TBP and inhibits HMGB1 binding. TFIIA can also readily dissociate HMGB1 from the preestablished HMGB1/TBP/TATA complex. This suggests that TFIIA and HMGB1 may bind to the same or overlapping sites on TBP and/or compete for similar DNA sites that are 5' to the TATA element. In addition, EMSA studies show that adenovirus E1A(13S) oncoprotein is unable to disrupt either the preestablished TFIIA/TBP/TATA or TFIIA/TFIIB/TBP/TATA complexes, but does inhibit complex formation when all transcription factors were simultaneously added. The inhibitory effect of E1A(13S) on the assembly of the PIC is overcome when excess TBP is added back in the reaction, while addition of either excess TFIIA or TFIIB were ineffective. This shows that the main target for E1A(13S) is free TBP and emphasizes the primary competition between E1A and the TATA-element for unbound TBP. This may be the principal point, if not the only point, at which E1A can target TBP to exert its inhibitory effect. This work, coupled with previous findings in our laboratory, indicates that TFIIA is much more effective than TFIIB in reversing the inhibitory effect of HMGB1 binding in the early stages of PIC assembly, which is consistent with the in vitro transcription results.

The role of intercalating residues in chromosomal high-mobility-group protein DNA binding, bending and specificity

Ubiquitous high-mobility-group (HMGB) chromosomal proteins bind DNA in a non-sequence- specific fashion to promote chromatin function and gene regulation. Minor groove DNA binding of the HMG domain induces substantial DNA bending toward the major groove, and several interfacial residues contribute by DNA intercalation. The role of the intercalating residues in DNA binding, bending and specificity was systematically examined for a series of mutant Drosophila HMGB (HMG-D) proteins. The primary intercalating residue of HMG-D, Met13, is required both for high-affinity DNA binding and normal DNA bending. Leu9 and Tyr12 directly interact with Met13 and are required for HMG domain stability in addition to linear DNA binding and bending, which is an important function for these residues. In contrast, DNA binding and bending is retained in truncations of intercalating residues Val32 and Thr33 to alanine, but DNA bending is decreased for the glycine substitutions. Furthermore, substitution of the intercalating residues with those predicted to be involved in the specificity of the HMG domain transcription factors results in increased DNA affinity and decreased DNA bending without increased specificity. These studies reveal the importance of residues that buttress intercalating residues and suggest that features of the HMG domain other than a few base-specific hydrogen bonds distinguish the sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific HMG domain functions.

HMGB proteins and gene expression

High mobility group (HMG) proteins are chromatin proteins endowed with 'architectural' capabilities. HMGA proteins are moderately sequence-specific, and help build enhanceosomes by interacting with partner proteins and binding stably to the minor groove of DNA; their acetylation/deacetylation signal enhanceosome assembly or disassembly. HMGBs are much more dynamic proteins: they have no sequence specificity, and help transcription factors and other nuclear proteins bind to their cognate sites by bending the DNA molecule. However, HMGBs are rarely retained within the complex. Similarly, HMGBs interact with nucleosomes and promote their sliding, but remain bound only for fractions of a second. We argue that HMGBs fluidize chromatin - an action that appears opposite to that of histone H1.

Priming the nucleosome: a role for HMGB proteins?

The high-mobility-group B (HMGB) chromosomal proteins are characterized by the HMG box, a DNA-binding domain that both introduces a tight bend into DNA and binds preferentially to a variety of distorted DNA structures. The HMGB proteins seem to act primarily as architectural facilitators in the manipulation of nucleoprotein complexes; for example, in the assembly of complexes involved in recombination and transcription. Recent genetic and biochemical evidence suggests that these proteins can facilitate nucleosome remodelling. One mechanism by which HMGB proteins could prime the nucleosome for migration is to loosen the wrapped DNA and so enhance accessibility to chromatin-remodelling complexes and possibly also to transcription factors. By constraining a tight loop of untwisted DNA at the edge of a nucleosome, an HMGB protein could induce movements in the contacts between certain core histones that would result in an overall change in nucleosome structure.

The S. cerevisiae architectural HMGB protein NHP6A complexed with DNA: DNA and protein conformational changes upon binding

NHP6A is a non-sequence-specific DNA-binding protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae which belongs to the HMGB protein family. Previously, we have solved the structure of NHP6A in the absence of DNA and modeled its interaction with DNA. Here, we present the refined solution structures of the NHP6A-DNA complex as well as the free 15bp DNA. Both the free and bound forms of the protein adopt the typical L-shaped HMGB domain fold. The DNA in the complex undergoes significant structural rearrangement from its free form while the protein shows smaller but significant conformational changes in the complex. Structural and mutational analysis as well as comparison of the complex with the free DNA provides insight into the factors that contribute to binding site selection and DNA deformations in the complex. Further insight into the amino acid determinants of DNA binding by HMGB domain proteins is given by a correlation study of NHP6A and 32 other HMGB domains belonging to both the DNA-sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific families of HMGB proteins. The resulting correlations can be rationalized by comparison of solved structures of HMGB proteins.

Specificity of the stimulatory interaction between chromosomal HMGB proteins and the transcription factor Dof2 and its negative regulation by protein kinase CK2-mediated phosphorylation

The high mobility group (HMG) proteins of the HMGB family are chromatin-associated proteins that can contribute to transcriptional control by interaction with certain transcription factors. Using the transcription factor Dof2 and five different maize HMGB proteins, we have examined the specificity of the HMGB-transcription factor interaction. The HMG-box DNA binding domain of HMGB1 is sufficient for the interaction with Dof2. Although all tested HMGB proteins can interact with Dof2, the various HMGB proteins stimulate the binding of Dof2 to its DNA target site with different efficiencies. The HMGB5 protein is clearly the most potent facilitator of Dof2 DNA binding. Maximal stimulation of the DNA binding by the HMGB proteins requires association of HMGB and Dof2 prior to DNA binding. HMGB5 and Dof2 form a ternary complex with the DNA, but within the protein-DNA complex the interaction of HMGB5 and Dof2 is different from that in solution, as in contrast to the proteins in solution, they cannot be cross-linked with glutaraldehyde when bound to DNA. Phosphorylation of HMGB1 by protein kinase CK2 abolishes the interaction with Dof2 and the stimulation of Dof2 DNA binding. These findings indicate that transcription factors may recruit certain members of the HMGB family as assistant factors.

The DNA architectural protein HMGB1 displays two distinct modes of action that promote enhanceosome assembly

HMGB1 (also called HMG-1) is a DNA-bending protein that augments the affinity of diverse regulatory proteins for their DNA sites. Previous studies have argued for a specific interaction between HMGB1 and target proteins, which leads to cooperative binding of the complex to DNA. Here we propose a different model that emerged from studying how HMGB1 stimulates enhanceosome formation by the Epstein-Barr viral activator Rta on a target gene, BHLF-1. HMGB1 stimulates binding of individual Rta dimers to multiple sites in the enhancer. DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and immobilized template assays failed to reveal stable binding of HMGB1 within the complex. Furthermore, mutational analysis failed to identify a specific HMGB1 target sequence. The effect of HMGB1 on Rta could be reproduced by individual HMG domains, yeast HMO1, or bacterial HU. These results, combined with the effects of single-amino-acid substitutions within the DNA-binding surface of HMGB1 domain A, argue for a mechanism whereby DNA-binding and bending by HMGB1 stimulate Rta-DNA complex formation in the absence of direct interaction with Rta or a specific HMGB1 target sequence. The data contrast with our analysis of HMGB1 action on another BHLF-1 regulatory protein called ZEBRA. We discuss the two distinct modes of HMGB1 action on a single regulatory region and propose how HMGB1 can function in diverse contexts.

A core-BRAF35 complex containing histone deacetylase mediates repression of neuronal-specific genes

BRAF35, a structural DNA-binding protein, initially was identified as a component of a large BRCA2-containing complex. Biochemical analysis revealed the presence of a smaller core-BRAF35 complex devoid of BRCA2. Here we report the isolation of a six-subunit core-BRAF35 complex with the capacity to deacetylate histones, termed the BRAF-histone deacetylase complex (BHC), from human cells. BHC contains polypeptides reminiscent of the chromatin-remodeling complexes SWI/SNF and NuRD (nucleosome remodeling and deacetylating). Similar to NuRD, BHC contains an Mi2-like subunit, BHC80, and a PHD zinc-finger subunit as well as histone deacetylases 1/2 and an MTA-like subunit, the transcriptional corepressor CoREST. We show that BHC mediates repression of neuron-specific genes through the cis-regulatory element known as the repressor element 1 or neural restrictive silencer (RE1/NRS). Chromatin-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate the recruitment of BHC by the neuronal repressor REST. Expression of BRAF35 containing a single point mutation in the HMG domain of the protein abrogated REST-mediated transcriptional repression. These results demonstrate a role for core-BRAF35-containing complex in the regulation of neuron-specific genes through modulation of the chromatin structure.

Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: an overview

The biological action of androgens is mediated through the androgen receptor (AR). Androgen-bound AR functions as a transcription factor to regulate genes involved in an array of physiological processes, most notably male sexual differentiation and maturation, and the maintenance of spermatogenesis. The transcriptional activity of AR is affected by coregulators that influence a number of functional properties of AR, including ligand selectivity and DNA binding capacity. As the promoter of target genes, coregulators participate in DNA modification, either directly through modification of histones or indirectly by the recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes, as well as functioning in the recruitment of the basal transcriptional machinery. Aberrant coregulator activity due to mutation or altered expression levels may be a contributing factor in the progression of diseases related to AR activity, such as prostate cancer. AR demonstrates distinct differences in its interaction with coregulators from other steroid receptors due to differences in the functional interaction between AR domains, possibly resulting in alterations in the dynamic interactions between coregulator complexes.

HMGB1 interacts with many apparently unrelated proteins by recognizing short amino acid sequences

The chromatin high mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) is a very abundant and conserved protein that is structured into two HMG box domains plus a highly acidic C-terminal domain. From the ability to bind DNA nonspecifically and to interact with various proteins, several functions in DNA-related processes have been assigned to HMGB1. Nevertheless, its functional role remains the subject of controversy. Using a phage display approach we have shown that HMGB1 can recognize several peptide motifs. A computer search of the protein data bases found peptide homologies with proteins already known to interact with HMGB1, like p53, and have allowed us to identify new potential candidates. Among them, transcriptional activators like the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP K), repressors like methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2), and co-repressors like the retinoblastoma susceptibility protein (pRb) and Groucho-related gene proteins 1 (Grg1) and 5 (Grg5) can be found. A detailed analysis of the interaction of Grg1 with HMGB1 confirmed that the binding region contained the sequence homologous to one of the peptides identified. Our results have led us to propose that HMGB1 may play a central role in the stabilization and/or assembly of several multifunctional complexes through protein-protein interactions.

Dynamics of reporter gene stimulation by HMG box proteins

Overcoming local DNA rigidity is required to perform three-dimensional DNA-protein configuration at promoter regions. The abundant architectural nonhistone chromosomal HMG box proteins are nonsequence-specific; however, they have been established to specifically recognize distorted DNA. Using transient transfection to overexpress two different members of the HMGB-1/2 family of DNA architectural factors, we demonstrate that these proteins provide a general enhancement in reporter gene expression irrespective of the promoter being considered. Evidences are also provided indicating that stimulation may not be achieved by recruitment of the proteins by regulatory factors or as a consequence of major chromatin unfolding as previously suggested. Interestingly, the influence of the HMG box proteins under study was overridden when the promoters were either induced or stimulated by Trichostatin A (TSA) but recovered upon extended induction period. These results also support the concept that the architectural role of these proteins can contribute to the preinitiation complex assembly required for basal transcription, but to a much lesser extent to the poised promoter scaffolding characteristic of activated transcription.

HMGB1 and HMGB2 cell-specifically down-regulate the p53- and p73-dependent sequence-specific transactivation from the human Bax gene promoter

The recently cloned gene p73 is a close homologue of p53, which is a crucial tumor suppressor gene for preventing the malignant transformation of cells by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Previous reports have shown that architectural DNA-bending/looping chromosomal proteins HMGB1 and HMGB2 (formerly known as HMG1 and HMG2), which function in a number of biological processes including transcription and DNA repair, interact in vitro with p53 and stimulate p53 binding to DNA containing p53 consensus sites. Here, we report that HMGB1 physically interacts with two splicing variants of p73, alpha and beta (pull-down assay), and enhances binding of p73 to specific cognate DNA sites (gel-shift assay). Both HMG box domains of HMGB1, A and B, interact with p73alpha. Association of HMGB1 with p73, like the demonstrated ability of HMGB1 to stimulate p73 binding to different p53-responsive elements, requires the oligomerization region and/or region between DNA-binding domain and oligomerization domain of p73 (residues 312-381). Transient transfections revealed that ectopically expressed or endogenous HMGB1 and HMGB2 (antisense strategy) significantly inhibit in vivo both p73alpha/beta- and p53-dependent transactivation from the Bax gene promoter (and much less from Mdm2 and p21(waf1) promoters) in p53-deficient SAOS-2 cells. In contrast, HMGB1 and HGMB2 stimulate p73- or p53-dependent transactivation in p53-deficient H1299 cells, irrespective of the promoter used. Our results suggest that ubiquitously expressed HMGB1 and HMGB2 have potential to cell- and promoter-specifically down- or up-regulate in vivo transcriptional activity of different members of the p53 family. A possible mechanism of HMGB1-mediated modulation of p73- and p53-dependent transactivation is discussed.

Fine structure and activity of discrete RAG-HMG complexes on V(D)J recombination signals

Two lymphoid cell-specific proteins, RAG-1 and RAG-2, initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA breaks at recombination signal sequences (RSSs). Although the RAG proteins themselves bind and cleave DNA substrates containing either a 12-RSS or a 23-RSS, DNA-bending proteins HMG-1 and HMG-2 are known to promote these processes, particularly with 23-RSS substrates. Using in-gel cleavage assays and DNA footprinting techniques, I analyzed the catalytic activity and protein-DNA contacts in discrete 12-RSS and 23-RSS complexes containing the RAG proteins and either HMG-1 or HMG-2. I found that both the cleavage activity and the pattern of protein-DNA contacts in RAG-HMG complexes assembled on 12-RSS substrates closely resembled those obtained from analogous 12-RSS complexes lacking HMG protein. In contrast, 23-RSS complexes containing both RAG proteins and either HMG-1 or HMG-2 exhibited enhanced cleavage activity and displayed an altered distribution of cleavage products compared to 23-RSS complexes containing only RAG-1 and RAG-2. Moreover, HMG-dependent heptamer contacts in 23-RSS complexes were observed. The protein-DNA contacts in RAG-RSS-HMG complexes assembled on 12-RSS or 23-RSS substrates were strikingly similar at comparable positions, suggesting that the RAG proteins mediate HMG-dependent heptamer contacts in 23-RSS complexes. Results of ethylation interference experiments suggest that the HMG protein is positioned 5' of the nonamer in 23-RSS complexes, interacting largely with the side of the duplex opposite the one contacting the RAG proteins. Thus, HMG protein plays the dual role of bringing critical elements of the 23-RSS heptamer into the same phase as the 12-RSS to promote RAG binding and assisting in the catalysis of 23-RSS cleavage.

Comparative analysis of the influence of the high-mobility group box 1 protein on DNA binding and transcriptional activation by the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors

We performed a comparative analysis of the effect of high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) on DNA binding by the DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors. The affinity of the DBDs of the different receptors for the tyrosine aminotransferase glucocorticoid response element, a classical high-affinity binding element, was augmented up to 7-fold by HMGB1. We found no major differences in the effects of HMGB1 on DNA binding between the different steroid hormone receptors. In transient transfection assays, however, HMGB1 significantly enhances the activity of the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors but not the androgen or mineralocorticoid receptor. We also investigated the effect of HMGB1 on the binding of the androgen receptor DBD to a subclass of directly repeated response elements that is recognized exclusively by the androgen receptor and not by the glucocorticoid, progesterone or mineralocorticoid receptor. Surprisingly, a deletion of 26 amino acid residues from the C-terminal extension of the androgen receptor DBD does not influence DNA binding but destroys its sensitivity to HMGB1. Deletion of the corresponding fragment in the DBDs of the glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptor destroyed their DNA binding. This 26-residue fragment is therefore essential for the influence of HMGB1 on DNA recognition by all steroid hormone receptors that were tested. However, it is dispensable for DNA binding by the androgen receptor.

The binding interaction of HMG-1 with the TATA-binding protein/TATA complex

High mobility protein-1 (HMG-1) has been shown to regulate transcription by RNA polymerase II. In the context that it acts as a transcriptional repressor, it binds to the TATA-binding protein (TBP) to form the HMG-1/TBP/TATA complex, which is proposed to inhibit the assembly of the preinitiation complex. By using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we show that the acidic C-terminal domain of HMG-1 and the N terminus of human TBP are the domains that are essential for the formation of a stable HMG-1/TBP/TATA complex. HMG-1 binding increases the affinity of TBP for the TATA element by 20-fold, which is reflected in a significant stimulation of the rate of TBP binding, with little effect on the dissociation rate constant. In support of the binding target of HMG-1 being the N terminus of hTBP, the N-terminal polypeptide of human TBP competes with and inhibits HMG-1/TBP/TATA complex formation. Deletion of segments of the N terminus of human TBP was used to map the region(s) where HMG-1 binds. These findings indicate that interaction of HMG-1 with the Q-tract (amino acids 55-95) in hTBP is primarily responsible for stable complex formation. In addition, HMG-1 and the monoclonal antibody, 1C2, specific to the Q-tract, compete for the same site. Furthermore, calf thymus HMG-1 forms a stable complex with the TBP/TATA complex that contains TBP from either human or Drosophila but not yeast. This is again consistent with the importance of the Q-tract for this stable interaction and shows that the interaction extends over many species but does not include yeast TBP.

Extracellular processing of amphoterin generates a peptide active on erythroleukaemia cell differentiation

The release of amphoterin by murine erythroleukaemia cells exposed to the chemical inducer hexamethylenebisacetamide represents an essential step for the process of their terminal differentiation. Once exported in the culture medium, amphoterin undergoes limited proteolysis, catalysed by a serine proteinase also secreted by stimulated cells. The isolated proteinase is responsible for degradation of amphoterin, with the production of a 10-amino-acid-residue fragment, specifically retaining the cell-differentiation-stimulating activity of the native protein molecule. This peptide does not express other properties of amphoterin, such as protein kinase C-stimulating activity or systemic toxicity. These findings define a selective mechanism accounting for extracellular amphoterin functional maturation.

High-mobility-group proteins NHP6A and NHP6B participate in activation of the RNA polymerase III SNR6 gene

Transcription of yeast class III genes involves the formation of a transcription initiation complex that comprises RNA polymerase III (Pol III) and the general transcription factors TFIIIB and TFIIIC. Using a genetic screen for positive regulators able to compensate for a deficiency in a promoter element of the SNR6 gene, we isolated the NHP6A and NHP6B genes. Here we show that the high-mobility-group proteins NHP6A and NHP6B are required for the efficient transcription of the SNR6 gene both in vivo and in vitro. The transcripts of wild-type and promoter-defective SNR6 genes decreased or became undetectable in an nhp6ADelta nhp6BDelta double-mutant strain, and the protection over the TATA box of the wild-type SNR6 gene was lost in nhp6ADelta nhp6BDelta cells at 37 degrees C. In vitro, NHP6B specifically stimulated the transcription of SNR6 templates up to fivefold in transcription assays using either cell nuclear extracts from nhp6ADelta nhp6BDelta cells or reconstituted transcription systems. Finally, NHP6B activated SNR6 transcription in a TFIIIC-independent assay. These results indicate that besides the general transcription factors TFIIIB and TFIIIC, additional auxillary factors are required for the optimal transcription of at least some specific Pol III genes.

Enhanceosomes

Gene-specific transcriptional regulation in higher eukaryotes is mediated by complex cis-acting control elements that specify the location, timing and magnitude of the response. During the past five years, an argument has been made that in several cases specificity in gene transcription is achieved by the assembly of higher-order three-dimensional transcription factor/enhancer DNA complexes, termed enhanceosomes. The inherent co-operativity in enhanceosome assembly and the embedded synergy in transcription ensure that a specific gene would be selected for activation only if all the enhanceosome components are present in the same nucleus. Enhanceosomes activate transcription by recruiting chromatin-modifying activities and basal transcription factors to the nearby promoters.

HMG1 and 2, and related 'architectural' DNA-binding proteins

The HMG-box proteins, one of the three classes of high mobility group (HMG) chromosomal proteins, bend DNA and bind preferentially to distorted DNA structures. The proteins appear to act primarily as architectural facilitators in the assembly of nucleoprotein complexes; for example, in effecting recombination and in the initiation of transcription. HMG-box proteins might be targeted to particular DNA sites in chromatin by either protein-protein interactions or recognition of specific DNA structures.

Nhp6, an HMG1 protein, functions in SNR6 transcription by RNA polymerase III in S. cerevisiae

Nhp6A and Nhp6B are HMG1-like proteins required for the growth of S. cerevisiae at elevated temperatures. We show that the conditional lethality of an nhp6 strain results from defective transcription of SNR6 (U6 snRNA) by RNA polymerase III. Overexpression of U6 snRNA or Brf1, a limiting component of TFIIIB, and an activating mutation (PCF1-1) in TFIIIC were each found to suppress the nhp6 growth defect. Additionally, U6 snRNA levels, which are reduced over 10-fold in nhp6 cells at 37 degrees C, were restored by Brf1 overexpression and by PCF1-1. Nhp6A protein specifically enhanced TFIIIC-dependent, but not TATA box-dependent, SNR6 transcription in vitro by facilitating TFIIIC binding to the SNR6 promoter. Thus, Nhp6 has a direct role in transcription complex assembly at SNR6.