Evaluation of the measurement of refractive error by the PowerRefractor: a remote, continuous and binocular measurement system of oculomotor function

Dynamic measurement of accommodation and pupil size using the portable Grand Seiko FR-5000 autorefractor

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of the portable Grand Seiko FR-5000 autorefractor to allow objective, continuous, open-field measurement of accommodation and pupil size for the investigation of the visual response to real-world environments and changes in the optical components of the eye.

METHODS

The FR-5000 projects a pair of infrared horizontal and vertical lines on either side of fixation, analyzing the separation of the bars in the reflected image. The measurement bars were turned on permanently and the video output of the FR-5000 fed into a PC for real-time analysis. The calibration between infrared bar separation and the refractive error was assessed over a range of 10.0 D with a model eye. Tolerance to longitudinal instrument head shift was investigated over a +/-15 mm range and to eye alignment away from the visual axis over eccentricities up to 25.0 degrees . The minimum pupil size for measurement was determined with a model eye.

RESULTS

The separation of the measurement bars changed linearly (r2 = 0.99), allowing continuous online analysis of the refractive state at 60 Hz temporal and approximately 0.01 D system resolution with pupils >2 mm. The pupil edge could be analyzed on the diagonal axes at the same rate with a system resolution of approximately 0.05 mm. The measurement of accommodation and pupil size were affected by eccentricity of viewing and instrument focusing inaccuracies.

CONCLUSIONS

The small size of the instrument together with its resolution and temporal properties and ability to measure through a 2 mm pupil make it useful for the measurement of dynamic accommodation and pupil responses in confined environments, although good eye alignment is important.

Validation of the PowerRefractor for measuring human infant refraction

PURPOSE

Eccentric photorefraction provides an opportunity to gather rapid and remote estimates of refraction and gaze position from infants. The technique has the potential for extensive use in vision screenings and studies of visual development. The goal of this study was to assess the refraction calibration of the PowerRefractor (Multichannel Systems) for use with uncyclopleged infants.

METHODS

The defocus measurements from the instrument were compared with the results of simultaneous retinoscopy in one analysis and with known amounts of defocus induced with trial lenses in another. Data were collected from infants 1 to 6 months of age and adults.

RESULTS

The PowerRefractor typically read < 1 D of myopia when the retinoscopy reflex was judged to be neutral at the same working distance in both infants and adults. The slopes of both infant and adult validation functions (trial lens power vs. measurement of induced defocus) were close to 1 over a 4D range. The infant slopes were significantly greater than those of the adults, however.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the instrument is capable of detecting large amounts of defocus but needs individual calibration for detailed studies of accommodative accuracy and absolute levels of defocus, as has been recommended previously for adult subjects.

Repeatability (test-retest variability) of refractive error measurement in clinical settings

PURPOSE

To estimate the repeatability of refractive error measurement (REM) in a clinical environment in cataractous, pseudophakic and healthy eyes.

METHODS

The refractive error of patients referred for cataract surgery or consultation measured by ophthalmic professionals was re-examined and the measurement results were compared. A total of 99 eyes from 99 persons (41 cataractous, 36 pseudophakic and 22 healthy eyes) with visual acuity (VA) of 0.3-1.3 (logMAR 0.52 to - 0.11) were included. The differences between measurements 1 and 2 were calculated as 3-dimensional vector values and spherical equivalents (SEs) and expressed as the coefficient of repeatability (CR). The mean time interval between the first and second examinations was 45 days.

RESULTS

The CRs for all eyes for vertical (V), torsional (T) and horizontal (H) vectors were 0.74 D, 0.34 D and 0.93 D, respectively. The CR of SE for all eyes was 0.74 D. Eyes with lower VA (0.3-0.45) had larger variability in vector and SE values but the differences between VA groups were not statistically significant. The difference in the mean defocus equivalent (DE) between measurements 1 and 2 was, however, significantly greater in the group with lower VA. In all VA groups the mean difference vector was very close to the zero vector, which means that there was no systematic difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeatability of refractive error measurements in clinical settings has a certain degree of variability. In this series, the variability in eyes with better VA was not great and was in accordance with earlier findings in healthy eyes. Eyes with lower VA had greater variability due to greater tolerance to defocus. Thus, conclusions concerning changes in the refractive state and the need to make changes in the refractive correction of eyes with poorer vision should be made with caution.

Objective real-time measurement of instrument myopia in microscopists under different viewing conditions

While instrument myopia is known to occur when microscopes are used, little is known about the accommodation response during microscopy, or about the factors which may alter the magnitude of instrument myopia. In addition, there has been no real-time objective measurement of instrument myopia during the microscopy task. Twenty inexperienced subjects and 10 experienced microscopists (average work experience of 4.8 years (SD 3.2 yr)) with mean age of 24.1 years (SD 2.9 yr) and 31.2 years (SD 2.9 yr) respectively were recruited to the study. Instrument myopia was measured using an infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor) under different viewing conditions and microscope settings (with different forms of refractive error correction, changes in target quality, changes in eyepiece power settings, changes in magnification and changes in illumination of the target). Instrument myopia was greater in inexperienced (1.98 D (SD 0.91 D)) than in experienced (1.38 D (SD 0.75 D)) microscope users. There was no statistically significant change in the level of instrument myopia under the different viewing conditions or different microscope settings, and there were large individual variations. Other factors may play more of a role in determining the degree of instrument myopia during microscopy than the task variables altered here.

An objective technique to measure the depth-of-focus in free space

BACKGROUND

Determining the depth-of-focus (DOF) objectively in free space is important, as this provides information regarding the range of clear vision under more natural viewing conditions in which target blur, size, and proximal information, as well as other monocular depth cues, are present.

METHODS

The DOF was assessed objectively in free space in young adults [n=20, ages 24.9+/-3.1years: myopes (n=14), emmetropes (n=5), hyperope (n=1)] by monitoring accommodation continuously using the commercially available Power Refractor II (PR II) under monocular viewing conditions. A high-contrast target ( approximately 83%) subtending a mean visual angle of 2.3 deg was placed on an optical bench at 25 cm (4 D) along the line-of-sight of the viewing right eye and was displaced slowly ( approximately 0.1-0.15 D/s) proximally and distally. This target provided blur, size, and proximal information, and other depth cues, as normally found in free space. The first consistent change in steady-state accommodative baseline level reflected one edge of the DOF. The mean dioptric difference between these distal and proximal endpoints was averaged, and this represented the total objective DOF.

RESULTS

The group mean total objective DOF (n=20) was +/-0.61+/-0.09 D, with a range from +/-0.46 D to +/-0.81 D. Repeatability was excellent.

CONCLUSION

A technique was developed and tested to measure the DOF in free space objectively. Further development of this technique will allow the assessment of blur perception under more complex natural viewing conditions simulating the everyday environment.

Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error

We assessed the extent to which different accommodative functions are correlated and whether accommodative functions predict the refractive error or the progression of myopia over a 12 month period in 64 young adults (30 myopes and 34 non-myopes). The functions were: amplitude of accommodation; monocular and binocular accommodative facility (6 m and 40 cm); monocular and binocular accommodative response to target distance; AC/A and CA/C ratios, tonic accommodation (dark focus and pinhole), accommodative hysteresis, and nearwork-induced transient myopia. Within groups of related accommodative functions (such as facility measures or open-loop measures) measurements on individuals were generally significantly correlated, however correlations between functions from different groups were generally not significant. Although accommodative amplitude and pinhole (open loop) accommodation were significantly different in myopes than in non-myopes, these functions were unrelated to myopia progression. Facility of accommodation and accommodative lag was independent predictors of myopia progression.

Assessment of objective and subjective eccentric refraction

PURPOSE

When performing perimetry, refracting subjects with central visual field loss, and in emmetropization studies, it is important to accurately measure peripheral refractive errors. Traditional methods for foveal refraction often give uncertain results in eccentric angles as a result of the large aberrations and the reduced retinal function. The aim of this study is therefore to compare and evaluate four methods for eccentric refraction.

METHODS

Four eccentric methods were tested on 50 healthy subjects: one novel subjective procedure, optimizing the detection contrast sensitivity with different trial lenses, and three objective ones: photorefraction with a PowerRefractor, wavefront measurements with a Hartmann-Shack sensor, and retinoscopy. The peripheral refractive error in the horizontal nasal visual field of the right eye was measured in 20 degrees and 30 degrees.

RESULTS

In general, the eccentric refraction methods compared reasonably well. However, the following differences were noted. Retinoscopy showed a significant difference from the other methods in the axis of astigmatism. In 30 degree eccentric angle, it was not possible to measure 15 of the subjects with the PowerRefractor and the instrument also tended to underestimate high myopia (<-6 D). The Hartmann-Shack sensor showed a myopic shift of approximately 0.5 D in both eccentricities. The subjective method had a relatively larger spread.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that it is possible to assess the eccentric refraction with all methods. However, the Hartmann-Shack technique was found to be the most useful method. The agreement between the objective methods and the subjective eccentric refraction shows that detection contrast sensitivity in the periphery is affected by relatively small amounts of defocus.

Measurement of refractive error and accommodation with the photorefractor PowerRef II

The infrared photorefractor PowerRef II (PR II; PlusoptiX AG, Nurnberg, Germany) uses the principle of eccentric photorefraction. In eight subjects the mean non-cycloplegic refraction measured with the 'Full Scan' mode of the PR II at a far viewing distance (0.2 D) was significantly more hypermetropic by 0.6 D compared with subjective refraction. The mean accommodation differed by about this same amount between the PR II and the Canon R1 at three different viewing distances (3, 2 and 1 D). The PR II refraction at the 1 m reference distance was 0.25 D more hypermetropic compared with the subjective refraction at far (5 m); these measures were moderately correlated (r = 0.7). To determine temporal changes, the 'Dynamic Scan' mode was used over a 2-min period: the mean intraindividual standard deviation was 0.32 mm for pupil diameter and 0.29 D for accommodation, while the absolute measurement error of the 'Dynamic Scan' was found to be <0.12 D for the accommodation data. Interindividual reliabilities were satisfactory. However, the PR II did not provide a continuous stream of data and the specified sampling frequency of 25 Hz was rarely realized.

Myopia: precedents for research in the twenty-first century

The myopic eye is generally considered to be a vulnerable eye and, at levels greater than 6 D, one that is especially susceptible to a range of ocular pathologies. There is concern therefore that the prevalence of myopia in young adolescent eyes has increased substantially over recent decades and is now approaching 10-25% and 60-80%, respectively, in industrialized societies of the West and East. Whereas it is clear that the major structural correlate of myopia is longitudinal elongation of the posterior vitreous chamber, other potential correlates include profiles of lenticular and corneal power, the relationship between longitudinal and transverse vitreous chamber dimensions and ocular volume. The most potent predictors for juvenile-onset myopia continue to be a refractive error </=+0.50 D at 5 years of age and family history. Significant and continuing progress is being made on the genetic characteristics of high myopia with at least four chromosomes currently identified. Twin studies and genetic modelling have computed a heritability index of at least 80% across the whole ametropic continuum. The high index does not, however, preclude an environmental precursor, sustained near work with high cognitive demand being the most likely. The significance of associations between accommodation, oculomotor dysfunction and human myopia is equivocal despite animal models that have demonstrated that sustained hyperopic defocus can induce vitreous chamber growth. Recent optical and pharmaceutical approaches to the reduction of myopia progression in children are likely precedents for future research, for example progressive addition spectacle lens trials and the use of the topical M1 muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine.