Metabolism and urinary excretion of 5-amino salicylic acid in healthy volunteers when given intravenously or released for absorption at different sites in the gastrointestinal tract

Review article: new drug formulations, chemical entities and therapeutic approaches for the management of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for ulcerative colitis (UC) are expanding with the development of novel drug formulations and dosing regimens and new chemical entities. Although the goals of medical therapy for UC remain unchanged, that is to induce and to maintain remission, focus has also centred on improving patient compliance, modifying the natural course of disease and healing the mucosa.

AIM

To examine novel formulations, new chemical entities and novel therapeutic approaches to the management of UC.

METHODS

Searches for all studies related to UC treatment in Medline and abstracts from major national and international meetings published in the last 10 years.

RESULTS

5-Aminosalicylic acids (5-ASA) remain the standard first-line treatment for patients with mild to moderately active UC. New formulations with altered delivery, and new dosing regimens have demonstrated possible improvements in efficacy compared with historically available preparations and dosing patterns. Once-daily dosing, micropellet formulations,and high-dose tablets offer enhanced efficacy and improved compliance. 5-ASA is now recognized as a ligand for peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and it has a role as a chemo-preventive agent in long-standing UC. New colonic release corticosteroid formulations help to limit systemic toxicity; turmeric, tacrolimus and infliximab have shown promising results. New anti-inflammatory targeted therapies include an anti-CD3 antibody, selective integrin blockers, anti-IL-2 antibody and PPAR-gamma agonists.

CONCLUSION

The evolution of novel oral 5-ASA formulations and dosage regimens,and recent development of new molecules have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium of UC.

Oral 5-ASA therapy in ulcerative colitis: what are the implications of the new formulations?

5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the standard first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. A variety of 5-ASA delivery systems are available and in development, including both oral and rectal formulations; all of which aim to deliver the active drug to the colon while minimizing systemic absorption. Because the efficacy of most oral 5-ASA therapies is broadly similar, the appropriate selection of a given formulation often relies on other factors. This article explores the differences between oral 5-ASA formulations in terms of their delivery system, reviews the available data on oral 5-ASA treatment efficacy and tolerability, and examines the rationale for changing from one 5-ASA formulation to another if a patient does not respond to, or worsens on, their existing agent.

Review article: increasing the dose of oral mesalazine therapy for active ulcerative colitis does not improve remission rates

BACKGROUND

Oral mesalazine (mesalamine, 5-aminosalicylic acid) formulations are effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. All formulations contain the same active drug but differ with regard to mechanisms to deliver the drug to the colon. Patients who fail to respond to initial therapy are often administered higher doses of the same formulation.

AIM

To review published trials of oral mesalazine formulations in treating active ulcerative colitis and to examine the effect of dose escalation on remission rates.

RESULTS

Increasing the doses of oral mesalazine formulations does not result in higher remission rates, although increasing the doses of some formulations has been effective in increasing symptomatic improvement and/or response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Because oral mesalazine formulations do not demonstrate a significant dose response with regard to induction of remission of active ulcerative colitis, simple dose escalation may not be the most effective course for patients who fail to respond to initial mesalazine treatment.

Once-daily MMX mesalamine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

First-line therapies in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis are sulfasalazine or one of the mesalamine derivatives. Mesalamine is popular given its safety profile and reasonable efficacy in many patients. However, compliance is poor with regimens demanding large number of pills dosed multiple times a day and non-compliance has been correlated with disease relapse. Mesalamine requires direct contact with the inflamed colonic mucosa. To avoid proximal absorption, a variety of delivery systems has been utilized to time the release of active mesalamine to the areas affected by colitis. The most common mesalamine release mechanisms include azo-bond prodrug carriers, pH-dependent dissolution, and moisture-sensitive product dispersion. Novel technology has resulted in the development and FDA-approval of a multi-matrix release (MMX) mesalamine. Pharmacodynamic studies suggest a reliable drug delivery system with homogenous release throughout the entire colon. By incorporating the largest amount of mesalamine (1.2 g) per pill, this new product dramatically decreases the number of pills needed to attain a therapeutic daily dosage, and is the first agent approved at once-daily dosing. These factors are expected to increase patient compliance with prescribed mesalamine dosing, and in turn decrease relapse rates of active ulcerative colitis.

Emergency department management of the salicylate-poisoned patient

Salicylate toxicity continues to be encountered commonly in emergency medicine. This article portrays the signs and symptoms of salicylate toxicity, reviews the erratic absorption and elimination kinetics, describes the devastating physiologic effects of overdose, and illustrates the potentially subtle manifestations of chronic aspirin toxicity.

Systematic review: the potential influence of mesalazine formulation on maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of pH 6-/pH 7-dependent and controlled-release mesalazines in maintaining medically and surgically induced Crohn's disease remission.

METHODS

A systematic search identified 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The rate of symptomatic relapse (Crohn's disease activity index >150, or an increase in baseline by at least 60-100 points) was extracted from each randomized controlled trial. Pooled odds ratios (OR), the number needed to treat (NNT), and percentage therapeutic benefit (absolute risk reduction) were calculated.

RESULTS

Treatment with pH 7-dependent mesalazine significantly reduced the risk of relapse in patients with either surgically [OR 0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.65; P = 0.0032] or medically induced remission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.17-0.85; P = 0.0113). However, treatment with controlled-release mesalazine and pH 6-dependent mesalazine failed to show any significant advantage over placebo. The NNT to maintain surgically or medically induced remission was lowest for pH 7-dependent mesalazine (NNT = 4 and 5, respectively; NNT = 15 and 16 for controlled-release mesalazine and NNT = 11 and 23 for pH 6-dependent mesalazine). Therapeutic benefit was highest for pH 7-dependent mesalazine (surgical = 30.6%, medical = 22.8%). This compared with 6.9% (surgical) and 6.4% (medical) for controlled-release mesalazine, and 9.8% and 4.4%, respectively, for pH 6-dependent mesalazine.

CONCLUSION

Further trials of pH 7-dependent mesalazine formulations are warranted in the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

The risks and the benefits of mesalazine as a treatment for ulcerative colitis

Mesalazine is a 5-aminosalicylic acid compound that is the primary treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. In both oral and topical formulations it has demonstrated efficacy in both induction of active colitis and maintenance of remission, regardless of the extent of inflammation. In addition, there is indirect evidence of a role in the chemoprophylaxis of colorectal cancer in these patients. Mesalazine is generally well tolerated by patients, although serious adverse effects have been reported. In particular, worsening of colitis, interstitial pneumonitis and nephritis are of concern to clinicians. Fortunately these reactions are mostly reversible with cessation of therapy.

Drug insight: aminosalicylates for the treatment of IBD

Sulfasalazine and mesalazine (also known as mesalamine; 5-aminosalicylic acid) preparations have for many years been used for the treatment of IBD (i.e. ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease), for both active disease and the control of remission. It has also been suggested that mesalazine is a chemoprophylactic agent that protects against the development of colorectal cancer. This Review focuses on the latest clinical evidence for the use of these aminosalicylates for the treatment of IBD, and concludes that sulfasalazine and mesalazine are useful for the treatment of both active and quiescent ulcerative colitis, whereas they have no clinical effect on either active or inactive Crohn's disease. Furthermore, evidence is lacking that mesalazine per se is a chemoprophylactic agent.

A novel dissolution method relevant to intestinal release behaviour and its application in the evaluation of modified release mesalazine products

Mesalazine (5-ASA) is a compound being used in the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Considering the fact that 5-ASA is locally active and that the location of inflammation in IBD may vary, it is recognized that the release profile of 5-ASA drugs is the dominant factor for adequate local bioavailability. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that systemic absorption of 5-ASA (mainly in the upper intestinal segments) increases the risk of side effects. These facts relate to the conclusion that a method determining the dissolution profile under biorelevant conditions is a valuable tool for evaluation and comparison of 5-ASA-products. We tested several commercially available products (Salofalk tablets, Salofalk granules, Asacol tablets, Pentasa tablets and granules) in a gastro-intestinal simulation system (GISS). The GISS is based on the pharmacopeial dissolution test. The release profiles of all products are in agreement with their technological concepts. The percentage of the dose released in the simulated colon is small in all products. The GISS is a robust system able to discriminate between products which apply different modified-release technologies. Colon-selectivity of modified-release 5-ASA products might further be improved. The commercially available 5-ASA containing oral dosage forms exhibit different release profiles, which suggests that the optimal product may differ per patient.

Review article: evolutionary advances in the delivery of aminosalicylates for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic and debilitating disease that involves inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Current therapies aim to reduce the symptom burden of ulcerative colitis and maintain disease quiescence. The standard first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis is 5-aminosalicylate therapy, which is available in oral and rectal (topical) formulations. While current 5-aminosalicylate formulations are effective in the majority of patients, they are associated with a number of limitations including inconvenient dosing regimens and poor patient acceptability, which may lead to non-compliance with prescribed therapy. A variety of improved delivery mechanisms have been developed in an effort to overcome these limitations. Micropellet formulations and high-dose tablets appear to offer comparable efficacy and tolerability to conventional formulations, although any benefit in terms of long-term patient compliance remains to be proven. Novel methods of delivery, such as those using a combination of hydrophilic and lipophilic matrices, designed to provide once-daily dosing in a high-strength tablet, may offer a significant improvement in the therapy of active and quiescent ulcerative colitis. This review examines the limitations of current 5-aminosalicylate formulations and reports on the evolution of novel oral formulations designed to overcome these limitations, maximize patient compliance during both induction and maintenance of quiescence, and optimize overall clinical outcomes.

Use of mesalazine in diverticular disease

Diverticular disease includes a spectrum of conditions sharing the underlying pathology of acquired diverticula of the colon: symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, recurrent symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, and complicated diverticular disease. Goals of therapy in diverticular disease should be to improve symptoms and to prevent recurrent attacks in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, and to prevent the complications of disease such as diverticulitis. Inflammation seems to play a key role in all forms of the disease. This is the rationale for the use of anti-inflammatory drugs such as mesalazine. Inflammation in such diseases seems to be generated by a heightened production of proinflammatory cytokines, reduced anti-inflammatory cytokines, and enhanced intramucosal synthesis of nitric oxide. The mechanisms of action of mesalazine are not yet well understood. It is an anti-inflammatory drug that inhibits factors of the inflammatory cascade (such as cyclooxygenase) and free radicals, and has an intrinsic antioxidant effect. Some recent studies confirm the efficacy of mesalazine in diverticular disease both in relief of symptoms in symptomatic uncomplicated forms and in prevention of recurrence of symptoms and main complications.

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The newer 5-ASA preparations were intended to avoid the adverse effects of SASP while maintaining its therapeutic benefits. The efficacy and safety of 5-ASA preparations have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials that have often lacked sufficient statistical power to arrive at definitive conclusions. Previously, it was found that newer 5-ASA drugs in doses of at least 2 g/day, were more effective than placebo but no more effective than SASP in inducing remission in ulcerative colitis. This updated review includes more recent studies and evaluates the effectiveness, dose-responsiveness, and safety of 5-ASA preparations in terms of more precise outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy, dose-responsiveness and safety of the newer release formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (SASP) for the induction of remission in active ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A computer-assisted literature search for relevant studies (1981-2005) was performed using MEDLINE, BIOS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane IBD/FBD group specialized trials register and the Science Citation Index, followed by a manual search of reference lists from previously retrieved articles, review articles, symposia proceedings, and abstracts from major gastrointestinal conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were accepted for analysis if they were randomized, double-blinded, and controlled clinical trials of parallel design, with treatment durations of a minimum of four weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Based on an intention to treat principle, the outcomes of interest in the treatment of active disease were the failure to induce global/clinical remission, global/clinical improvement, endoscopic remission, or endoscopic improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

5-ASA was superior to placebo with regard to all measured outcome variables. For the failure to induce global/clinical improvement or remission, the pooled Peto odds ratio was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.53). A dose-response trend for 5-ASA was also observed. When 5-ASA was compared to SASP, the pooled Peto odds ratio was 0.83 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.13) for the failure to induce global/clinical improvement or remission, and 0.66 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.04) for the failure to induce endoscopic improvement. SASP was not as well tolerated as 5-ASA.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The newer 5-ASA preparations were superior to placebo and tended towards therapeutic benefit over SASP. However, considering their relative costs, a clinical advantage to using the newer 5-ASA preparations in place of SASP appears unlikely. This review updates the existing review of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis which was published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006).

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The newer 5-ASA preparations were intended to avoid the adverse effects of SASP while maintaining its therapeutic benefits. The efficacy and safety of 5-ASA preparations have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials that have often lacked sufficient statistical power to arrive at definitive conclusions. Previously, it was found that newer 5-ASA drugs were more effective than placebo but no more effective than SASP in inducing remission in ulcerative colitis. This updated review includes more recent studies and evaluates the effectiveness, dose-responsiveness, and safety of 5-ASA preparations in terms of more precise outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy, dose-responsiveness and safety of the newer release formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (SASP) in the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A computer-assisted literature search for relevant studies (1981-2005) was performed using MEDLINE, BIOS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane IBD/FBD Group Specialized Trials Register, and the Science Citation Index, followed by a manual search of reference lists from previously retrieved articles, review articles, symposia proceedings, and abstracts from major gastrointestinal conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were accepted for analysis if they were prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo- or SASP-controlled clinical trials of parallel design with treatment duration of at least six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Based on an intention to treat principle, the primary outcome was the failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients experiencing adverse events, the number of patients withdrawn due to adverse events, and exclusions or withdrawals after entry into the study (not due to relapse). All data were analyzed using the Peto odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

The Peto odds ratio for the failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission (withdrawals and relapses) for 5-ASA versus placebo was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.62) with an NNT of 6. These values were also calculated for the trials in which SASP and 5-ASA were compared, revealing an odds ratio of 1.29 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.57), with a negative NNT value (-19), suggesting a higher degree of therapeutic effectiveness for SASP.SASP and 5-ASA had similar adverse event profiles, with odds ratios of 1.16(0.62 to 2.16), and 1.31(0.86 to 1.99), respectively. The NNH values were determined to be 171 and 78 respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The newer 5-ASA preparations were superior to placebo in maintenance therapy. However, the newer preparations had a statistically significant therapeutic inferiority relative to SASP. This review updates the existing review of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis which was published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006).

A multi-scale stochastic drug release model for polymer-coated targeted drug delivery systems

A multi-scale mathematical model for drug release of oral targeted drug delivery systems was developed and applied to a commercially available delayed release tablet (Asacol) that delivers 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) to the colon. Underlying physical and biochemical principles governing the involved processes (diffusion and dissolution) were employed to develop the mathematical description. Finite element formulation was used to numerically solve the model equations. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to predict macro-scale transport properties of the drug and the biologic fluid. The effect of pH variability in the gastrointestinal tract environment on the dissolution of the polymeric enteric coating was investigated using the Monte Carlo method. The direct coupling method employed (MD) predicted a sufficiently accurate diffusion coefficient (5.7x10(-6) cm2 s-1) of the drug molecules in reasonable (3 h) computation times. The model was validated using experimental data from in vitro dissolution experiments and provided accurate prediction of the drug release from the delivery system (root mean square error of 5%). The amount of drug entering the systemic circulation, computed from the predicted drug release in varying pH environments in the small bowel, was 15-24%. This range was in good agreement with clinical in vivo data (13-36%) obtained from literature. This research shows that in silico experiments using mechanistic models and stochastic approaches can be used for drug design and optimization and as a decision making tool for physicians.

Site-specific delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs in the gastrointestinal tract: an in-vitro release model

Mesalazine and budesonide are anti-inflammatory drugs that are used to induce and maintain remission of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Both drug substances are intended to act locally at the inflamed sites of the gastrointestinal tract. The therapeutic objective for per oral treatment with these drugs is to achieve a high concentration of the active drug at the sites of inflammation while minimizing systemic absorption. The aim of this study was to develop a test system able to reflect the changing environment that a dosage form incorporating the anti-inflammatory agent is exposed to as it moves through the gastrointestinal tract. The USP dissolution apparatus 3 was used for all experiments. Compendial, as well as biorelevant, media were used to simulate passage through the gastrointestinal tract under various physiological conditions. Different dosage forms of mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA) and budesonide available on the German market were tested. Although all dosage forms were indicated for the same therapeutic objectives, each of the dosage forms exhibited a characteristic release pattern under in-vitro conditions simulating a passage through the fasted-state gastrointestinal tract. Results from this test series indicate that, in the case of various dosage forms of mesalazine and budesonide used for the therapy of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, release patterns as the dosage form moves through the gastrointestinal tract may vary widely. As the various phenotypes of IBD have different requirements in terms of pattern of distribution of the inflamed sites, and because other aspects of gastrointestinal physiology vary within the patient population, the test methods and approach described here should be very useful in designing therapy tailored to the needs of each individual patient.

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of medically-induced remission in Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Prevention of relapses is a major issue in the management of Crohn's disease. Corticosteroids, the mainstay of treatment of acute exacerbations are not effective in the maintenance of remission and its chronic use is limited by numerous adverse events. A number of randomised controlled trials comparing various 5-ASA agents with either placebo or other drugs have had conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of oral 5-ASA agents for the maintenance of medically-induced remission in Crohn's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1984-January 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004) and the IBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register. We hand-searched the articles cited in each publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials which compared oral 5-ASA agents with either placebo or sulphasalazine, with treatment durations of at least 6 months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality of each study were independently performed by two reviewers. Any disagreement among reviewers was resolved by consensus. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of relapse as defined by the primary studies. Odds ratios of relapse rates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

5-ASA VERSUS PLACEBO. In the main analysis, we used as the denominator the total number of patients randomised. We assumed that participants who dropped out of the study, and on whom there was no post withdrawal information, had relapsed during the study period. Using the fixed effects model, the odds ratio for 6 studies where participants were followed up for 12 months was 1.00 (95%CI, 0.80 to 1.24). Using the random effects model in a sensitivity analysis had little effect on the results with an OR of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.33). For the seventh study where follow up was for 24 months, the odds ratio was 0.98; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.90. In further sensitivity analyses, we analysed only participants who completed the study and ignored the dropouts. The odds ratio (fixed effects model) for the 6 studies where follow up was for 12 months was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.96), but using the random effects model, the OR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.02). The OR for the seventh study where follow up was for 24 months (Gendre 1993a), was 0.86; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.78. 5-ASA VERSUS SULPHASALAZINE. We did not find any study that satisfied the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence in this review to suggest that 5-ASA preparations are superior to placebo for the maintenance of medically-induced remission in patients with Crohn's disease. Therefore it appears that additional randomised trials of this regime are not justified.

Mesalamine delivery systems: do they really make much difference?

Sulfasalazine's role as the first-line of therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has led to the development of other "designer" aminosalicylates, which eliminate the sulfa-moiety, and attempt to target the topically active mesalamine to the inflamed bowel. Olsalazine sodium and balsalazide disodium utilize the same azo-bond structure as sulfasalazine, requiring release of active mesalamine by colonic bacteria, and thus targeting these agents to the colon. Other mesalamine delivery systems use pH-dependant- or moisture-release to liberate the active mesalamine in both the large and small bowel. Direct application of mesalamine via enema or suppository is also effective in patients with distal colitis. The pharmacology and thus the undesirable drug absorption rates differ between drugs, although the clinical importance of these characteristics is debatable. Differences in release-systems, the impact of the fed and fasting state, and unique patient intolerances to individual agents demand an understanding of each of these products, and their application to patient therapy.

Advances in Colonic Drug Delivery

Targeting drugs and delivery systems to the colonic region of the gastrointestinal tract has received considerable interest in recent years. Scientific endeavour in this area has been driven by the need to better treat local disorders of the colon such as inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease), irritable bowel syndrome and carcinoma. The colon is also receiving significant attention as a portal for the entry of drugs into the systemic circulation. A variety of delivery strategies and systems have been proposed for colonic targeting. These generally rely on the exploitation of one or more of the following gastrointestinal features for their functionality: pH, transit time, pressure or microflora. Coated systems that utilise the pH differential in the gastrointestinal tract and prodrugs that rely on colonic bacteria for release have been commercialised. Both approaches have their own inherent limitations. Many systems in development have progressed no further than the bench, while others are expensive or complex to manufacture, or lack the desired site-specificity. The universal polysaccharide systems appear to be the most promising because of their practicality and exploitation of the most distinctive property of the colon, abundant microflora.

Mesalamine derivatives in the treatment of Crohn's disease

The role of the aminosalicylates for induction therapy of mild moderate ulcerative colitis and as maintenance treatment has been substantiated by a large series of controlled clinical trials and confirmatory meta-analyses. Both sulfasalazine and newer derivatives are effective in preventing relapses. It remains to be determined whether certain high-risk groups of patients may benefit from higher doses of mesalamine induction or maintenance therapy. Mesalamine derivatives are also of benefit in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Sulfasalazine is likely not effective in the maintenance of Crohn's disease, although other mesalamine formulations continue to show some prophylactic activity after mesalamine induced remissions and for patients with disease of the ileum who have undergone surgical resection.

Combined scintigraphic and pharmacokinetic investigation of enteric-coated mesalazine micropellets in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

There is a growing clinical trend to increase the daily dose of mesalazine, which leads to significant compliance issues associated with multiple dosings of current preparations.

AIM

To examine the gastrointestinal performance and systemic exposure of a 1.5 g sachet (micropellets) mesalazine formulation, compared with three enteric-coated tablets (500 mg each, Claversal).

METHODS

A randomized, two-way, cross-over pharmacoscintigraphic (scintigraphy plus pharmacokinetics) study and a two-way, cross-over, pharmacokinetic-only study were performed in 24 healthy volunteers (12 subjects per investigation).

RESULTS

The relative bioavailability of mesalazine was 92% comparing micropellets with Claversal tablets, and the cumulative urine excretion was c. 26% for both preparations, suggesting comparable systemic exposure for the two types of preparation. In the majority of subjects, drug release from the micropellet formulation occurred predominantly in the terminal ileum and ascending colon. The Claversal tablets disintegrated in comparable intestinal sites, albeit at slightly later time points than the micropellets, principally due to slower gastric emptying for the single-unit formulation.

CONCLUSION

The 1.5 g micropellet formulation offers comparable delivery properties to the marketed tablets, but with greater convenience of dosing.

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The newer 5-ASA preparations were intended to avoid the adverse effects of SASP while maintaining its therapeutic benefits. The efficacy and safety of 5-ASA preparations have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials that have often lacked sufficient statistical power to arrive at definitive conclusions. Previously, it was found that newer 5-ASA drugs in doses of at least 2g/day, were more effective than placebo but no more effective than SASP in inducing remission in ulcerative colitis. This updated review includes more recent studies and evaluates the effectiveness, dose-responsiveness, and safety of 5-ASA preparations in terms of more precise outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy, dose-responsiveness and safety of the newer release formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (SASP) for the induction of remission in active ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A computer-assisted literature search for relevant studies (1981-2003) was performed using MEDLINE, BIOS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane IBD group specialized trials register and the Science Citation Index, followed by a manual search of reference lists from previously retrieved articles, review articles, symposia proceedings, and abstracts from major gastrointestinal conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were accepted for analysis if they were randomized, double-blinded, and controlled clinical trials of parallel design, with treatment durations of a minimum of four weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Based on an intention to treat principle, the outcomes of interest in the treatment of active disease were the failure to induce global/clinical remission, global/clinical improvement, endoscopic remission, or endoscopic improvement.

MAIN RESULTS

5-ASA was superior to placebo with regard to all measured outcome variables. For the failure to induce global/clinical improvement or remission, the pooled Peto odds ratio was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.76). A dose-response trend for 5-ASA was also observed. When 5-ASA was compared to SASP, the pooled Peto odds ratio was 0.87 (CI, 0.63 to 1.21) for the failure to induce global/clinical improvement or remission, and 0.66 (CI, 0.42 to 1.04) for the failure to induce endoscopic improvement. SASP was not as well tolerated as 5-ASA.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The newer 5-ASA preparations were superior to placebo and tended towards therapeutic benefit over SASP. However, considering their relative costs, a clinical advantage to using the newer 5-ASA preparations in place of SASP appears unlikely. This review updates the existing review of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis which was published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2003).

Systematic review: the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral mesalazine formulations and mesalazine pro-drugs used in the management of ulcerative colitis

AIM

: To quantify through systematic review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the oral delayed release and sustained release mesalazine (5-aminosalicylate, 5ASA) formulations (Asacol, Salofalk, Mesasal, Claversal, Pentasa) and pro-drugs (sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) used in the management of ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

: Selected articles had: (1) adult healthy volunteers or patients with ulcerative colitis and (2) quantification of pharmacokinetic data to include, at a minimum, urinary excretion of total 5ASA [5ASA plus N-Acetyl-5ASA (N-Ac-5ASA)].

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

: Pharmacokinetic data (Tmax, Cmax, AUC, urinary excretion, faecal excretion) of 5ASA, its major metabolite N-Acetyl-5ASA, total 5ASA, and the parent pro-drug compounds was extracted.

MAIN RESULTS

: The summary results for urinary excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 11-33% or median 22%; olsalazine mean 14-31% or median 16-27%; balsalazide mean 12-35% or median 20%; Asacol mean 10-35% or median 18-40%; Pentasa mean 15-53% or median 23-34%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 27-56% or median 31-44%. The summary results for faecal excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 23-75% or median 38%; olsalazine mean 47-50% or median 17-36%; balsalazide mean 46% or median 22%; Asacol mean 40-64% or median 20-56%; Pentasa mean 12-51% or median 39-59%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 37-44% or median 23-35%.

CONCLUSIONS

: The systemic exposure to 5ASA, as measured by urinary excretion of total 5ASA, and the faecal excretion of total 5ASA is comparable for all oral mesalazine formulations and pro-drugs. Thus, selection of a mesalazine therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis should be based on other factors such as efficacy, dose-response, toxicity of the parent compound and its metabolites, compliance issues related to dose forms and dosing schedules, and costs.

Colonic delivery of 4-aminosalicylic acid using amylose-ethylcellulose-coated hydroxypropylmethylcellulose capsules

BACKGROUND

4-Aminosalicylic acid has the potential for use in the treatment of diseases of the colon.

AIM

To assess the feasibility of delivering 4-aminosalicylic acid directly to the colon using a hydroxypropylmethylcellulose capsule coated with a mixture of amylose, a polysaccharide metabolized by bacterial enzymes in the colon, and ethylcellulose.

METHODS

Seven healthy male volunteers received, on three separate occasions, an uncoated or amylose-ethylcellulose-coated hydroxypropylmethylcellulose capsule containing 4-aminosalicylic acid Na (550 mg), or an intravenous injection of 4-aminosalicylic acid Na (135 mg). The capsules were radiolabelled with 99mTc to allow their positions in the gastrointestinal tract to be followed using a gamma camera. Plasma and urine samples were collected and assayed for 4-aminosalicylic acid and metabolite concentrations.

RESULTS

The uncoated capsules broke down within 10 min in the stomach, allowing rapid and complete absorption of the drug. The coated capsules remained intact in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and had a median gastric emptying time of 61 min (interquartile range, 77 min) and a median colon arrival time of 363 min (interquartile range, 185 min). For the coated capsules, only the metabolite was detected in the plasma and/or urine after the capsules had reached the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

The specific coating protected the drug until the capsule reached the colon, where 4-aminosalicylic acid was slowly released and absorbed. Thus, such a formulation has the potential for use in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

This review describes the pharmacokinetics of the major drugs used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. This information can be helpful for the selection of a particular agent and offers guidance for effective and well tolerated regimens. The corticosteroids have a short elimination half-life (t1/2beta) of 1.5 to 4 hours, but their biological half-lives are much longer (12 to 36 hours). Most are moderate or high clearance drugs that are hepatically eliminated, primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated metabolism. Prednisone and budesonide undergo presystemic elimination. Any disease state or comedication affecting CYP3A4 activity should be taken into account when prescribing corticosteroids. Depending on the preparation used, 10 to 50% of an oral or rectal dose of mesalazine is absorbed. Rapid acetylation in the intestinal wall and liver (t1/2beta 0.5 to 2 hours) and transport probably by P-glycoprotein affect mucosal concentrations of mesalazine, which apparently determine clinical response. Any clinical condition influencing the release and topical availability of mesalazine might modify its therapeutic potential. Metronidazole has high (approximately 90%) oral bioavailability, with hepatic elimination characterised by a t1/2beta of 6 to 10 hours and a total clearance of about 4 L/h/kg. Ciprofloxacin is largely excreted unchanged both renally (about 45% of dose) and extrarenally (25%), with a relatively short t1/2beta (3.5 to 7 hours). Thus, renal function affects the systemic availability of ciprofloxacin. Both mercaptopurine and its prodrug azathioprine are metabolised to active compounds (6-thioguanine nucleotides; 6-TGN) by hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase and to inactive metabolites by the polymorphically expressed thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and xanthine oxidase. Patients with low TPMT activity have a higher risk of developing haemopoietic toxicity. Both mercaptopurine and azathioprine have a short t1/2beta (1 to 2 hours), but the t1/2beta of 6-TGN ranges from 3 to 13 days. Therapeutic response seems to be related to 6-TGN concentration. Almost complete bioavailability has been observed after intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of methotrexate, which is predominantly (85%) excreted as unchanged drug with a t1/2beta of up to 50 hours. Thus, renal function is the major determinant for disposition of methotrexate. Cyclosporin is slowly and incompletely absorbed. It is extensively metabolised by CYP3A4/5 in the liver and intestine (median t1/2beta and clearance 7.9 hours and 0.46 L/h/kg, respectively), and inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A4 can modify response and toxicity. Infliximab is predominantly distributed to the vascular compartment and eliminated with a t1/2beta between 10 and 14 days. No accumulation was observed when it was administered at intervals of 4 or 8 weeks. Methotrexate may reduce the clearance of infliximab from serum.

Evaluation of renal function following treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

A number of cases of nephrotoxicity have been reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease taking oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA).

AIM

To evaluate the effects of 9 months of therapy with mesalazine or olsalazine on renal function in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission.

METHODS

Forty patients with ulcerative colitis in complete remission for 6 months were randomized to either olsalazine (n=20) or mesalazine (n=20 for nine months). Thirty-six of the 40 patients were on prior salicylate therapy. Disease activity was the measure ofclinical efficacy and was assessed by the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI). Laboratory efficacy measurements included glomerular filtration rate (GFR), microalbuminuria, urinary gluthathione S-transferase (GST) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Safety analysis consisted of documentation of adverse events and laboratory values.

RESULTS

There was no significant reduction in the GFR overall on therapy. The levels of GFR adjusted for baseline were similar in the two treatment groups after 3, 6 and 9 months. A significantly higher percentage of mesalazine-treated patients experienced drug related adverse events, all of a minor nature. The incidence of adverse events causing early withdrawal was similar in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with mesalazine or olsalazine for 9 months had no significant impact on GFR.

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The newer 5-ASA preparations were intended to avoid the adverse effects of SASP while maintaining its therapeutic benefits. The efficacy and safety of 5-ASA preparations have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials that have often lacked sufficient statistical power to arrive at definitive conclusions. Previously, it was found that newer 5-ASA drugs were more effective than placebo but no more effective than SASP in inducing remission in ulcerative colitis. This updated review includes more recent studies and evaluates the effectiveness, dose-responsiveness, and safety of 5-ASA preparations in terms of more precise outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy, dose-responsiveness and safety of the newer release formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (SASP) in the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A computer-assisted literature search for relevant studies (1981-2002) was performed using MEDLINE, BIOS, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Trials Register, and the Science Citation Index, followed by a manual search of reference lists from previously retrieved articles, review articles, symposia proceedings, and abstracts from major gastrointestinal conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were accepted for analysis if they were prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo- or SASP-controlled clinical trials of parallel design with treatment duration of at least six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Based on an intention to treat principle, the primary outcome was the failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients experiencing adverse events, the number of patients withdrawn due to adverse events, and exclusions or withdrawals after entry into the study (not due to relapse). All data were analyzed using the Peto odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

The Peto odds ratio for the failure to maintain clinical or endoscopic remission (withdrawals and relapses) for 5-ASA versus placebo was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.62) with an NNT of 6. These values were also calculated for the trials in which SASP and 5-ASA were compared, revealing an odds ratio of 1.29 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.57), with a negative NNT value (-19), suggesting a higher degree of therapeutic effectiveness for SASP. SASP and 5-ASA had similar adverse event profiles, with odds ratios of 1.16(0.62 to 2.16), and 1.31(0.86 to 1.99), respectively. The NNH values were determined to be 171 and 78 respectively.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The newer 5-ASA preparations were superior to placebo in maintenance therapy. However, the newer preparations had a statistically significant therapeutic inferiority relative to SASP. This review updates the existing review of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis which was published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2002).

Voltammetric studies of 2-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]benzoic acid as a novel prodrug of 5-aminosalicylic acid

The electrochemical properties of a colon-targeted prodrug of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), 2-hydroxy-5-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]benzoic acid (SPSA), were investigated in aqueous solutions at glassy carbon electrodes using cyclic voltammetry and controlled potential electrolysis. The influence of the pH and experimental time domain on the reaction pathway has been studied. The electrochemical reduction of SPSA is identified as an ECE process always leading to the cleavage of azo bond. In an acidic media SPSA is reduced in a 4e(-)/4H(+) process yielding 5-ASA and sulfanilic acid. In neutral and weakly basic media SPSA is reduced in 2e(-)/2H(+) process resulting in the hydrazo intermediate that is stable enough to enable its reoxidation back to SPSA in the time scale of the cyclic voltammetry.

Anti-inflammatory effects of 5-aminosalicylic acid conjugates with chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid on carrageenan-induced colitis in guinea-pigs

Two epimeric bile acid conjugates, 5-aminosalicylic acid-chenodeoxycholic acid (5-ASA-CDCA) and 5-aminosalicylic acid-ursodeoxycholic acid (5-ASA-UDCA), were synthesized to deliver 5-ASA to the large intestine by oral administration. The movement of the conjugates down the gastrointestinal tract and the anti-inflammatory effects on ulcerative colitis were investigated by administering the conjugates to guinea-pigs with an inflammatory bowel disease induced by 2% degraded carrageenan solution. The conjugates were protected from deconjugation in stomach and small intestine and reached the caecum and the colon, where 5-ASA was more easily liberated from 5-ASA-CDCA than from 5-ASA-UDCA. The conjugates at doses equivalent to 50 or 150 mg kg(-1) 5-ASA were orally administered once a day for 4 weeks from the 15th day after starting carrageenan treatment. The body weights and the bleeding scores of occult blood in faeces were measured during the experiment. The number of ulcers in the caecum and the colon were counted after killing the guinea-pigs at the end of the experiment. Rapid onset of efficacy was shown by a significant reduction in bleeding scores within a week after administration of the conjugates. Treatment with the lower dose of 5-ASA-CDCA showed a recovery of body weight and a significantly decreased number of ulcers in the caecum, and the ulcers in the colon had completely disappeared bythe end of the experiment. There was a good correlation found between the number of ulcers in the caecum and the bleeding scores of occult blood in faeces. The findings indicate that both conjugates were sufficiently delivered to the large intestine without deconjugation and that the lower dose of 5-ASA-CDCA is enough for treatment of ulcerative colitis in colonic inflammatory bowel diseases.

Olsalazine is not superior to placebo in maintaining remission of inactive Crohn's colitis and ileocolitis: a double blind, parallel, randomised, multicentre study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The benefit of 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease is controversial. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the prophylactic properties of olsalazine in comparison with placebo for maintenance of remission in quiescent Crohn's colitis and/or ileocolitis.

METHODS

In this randomised, double blind, parallel group study of olsalazine versus placebo, 328 patients with quiescent Crohn's colitis and/or ileocolitis were recruited. Treatment consisted of olsalazine 2.0 g daily or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point of efficacy was relapse, as defined by the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) and by clinical relapse. Laboratory and clinical disease activity indicators were also measured. Safety analysis consisted of documentation of adverse events and laboratory values.

RESULTS

No differences in the frequency of termination due to relapse or time to termination due to relapse were noted between the two treatment groups (olsalazine 48.5% v placebo 45%) for either colitis or ileocolitis. The failure rate, defined as not completing the study, was significantly higher in olsalazine treated patients compared with placebo treated patients for the overall population (colitis and/or ileocolitis: olsalazine 65.4% v 53.9%; p=0.038). Similar failure rates were seen for patients with colitis. A significantly higher percentage of olsalazine treated patients experienced adverse gastrointestinal events. Drug attributed adverse events were reported more frequently in the olsalazine treated group with gastrointestinal symptoms being causally related to olsalazine treatment (olsalazine 40.7% v placebo 26.9%; p=0.010). Back pain was reported significantly more often by the placebo treated group. However, serious medical events did not differ between the two groups. Adverse events led to more early withdrawals in the olsalazine treated group than in the placebo treated group; thus average time in the study for patients in the olsalazine treatment group was significantly shorter than that of patients in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with olsalazine were more likely to terminate their participation in the trial than those taking placebo. This difference was not related to relapse of disease, as measured by CDAI and clinical measures, but rather was due to the development of intolerable adverse medical events of a non-serious nature related to the gastrointestinal tract. The gastrointestinal related events in the olsalazine treated group may be due to the difference in gastrointestinal status at baseline which favoured the placebo treatment group.

Intestinal luminal pH in inflammatory bowel disease: possible determinants and implications for therapy with aminosalicylates and other drugs

Measurements of luminal pH in the normal gastrointestinal tract have shown a progressive increase in pH from the duodenum to the terminal ileum, a decrease in the caecum, and then a slow rise along the colon to the rectum. Some data in patients with ulcerative colitis suggest a substantial reduction below normal values in the right colon, while limited results in Crohn's disease have been contradictory. Determinants of luminal pH in the colon include mucosal bicarbonate and lactate production, bacterial fermentation of carbohydrates and mucosal absorption of short chain fatty acids, and possibly intestinal transit. Alterations in these factors, as a result of mucosal disease and changes in diet, are likely to explain abnormal pH measurements in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is conceivable that reduced intracolonic pH in active ulcerative colitis impairs bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid from pH dependent release formulations (Asacol, Salofalk) and those requiring cleavage by bacterial azo reductase (sulphasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide), but further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to confirm this possibility. Reports that balsalazide and olsalazine may be more efficacious in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis, respectively, than Asacol suggest that low pH may be a more critical factor in patients taking directly pH dependent release than azo bonded preparations. Reduced intracolonic pH also needs to be considered in the development of pH dependent colonic release formulations of budesonide and azathioprine for use in ulcerative and Crohn's colitis. This paper reviews methods for measuring gut pH, its changes in IBD, and how these may influence current and future therapies.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of slow release mesalazine

Slow release oral mesalazine (Pentasa) contains microgranules covered by a semipermeable ethylcellulose membrane. The microgranules continuously release their content from duodenum to ileum in a pH- and time-dependent way. About 75% of the microgranules pass into the colon, where further release is slower. This release pattern does not appear to be affected by food, diarrhoea or the simultaneous use of H2 antagonists. Rectal forms of mesalazine deliver active drug directly to the rectum and left colon. Plasma concentrations of mesalazine and its metabolite acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid after oral or local administration are the result of systemic absorption and hepatic metabolism by N-acetyltransferase. Most studies report maximal plasma concentrations of less than 1 mg/L after oral administration of slow release mesalazine, much lower than those observed after uncoated mesalazine but generally higher than after azo-bound drugs such as sulfasalazine. Urinary recovery is an indicator of absorption and metabolism, and is lower after rectal administration (10 to 30%) than after oral administration (30 to 40%). Faecal recovery after oral administration of slow or delayed release mesalazine is lower than with azo-bound drugs. Mesalazine acts locally after absorption by colonic and ileal mucosa. Mean steady-state concentrations of 25.7+/-2.2 microg/kg wet weight are found in ileocolonic biopsy specimens from patients with irritable bowel syndrome treated for 1 week with slow release mesalazine 1.5 g/day. Intramucosal concentrations after slow release mesalazine differ little between healthy individuals and patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Although significant differences are found between the various aminosalicylates in release patterns and the resulting pharmacokinetic parameters, no differences in therapeutic effects have been found in comparative studies. High doses of oral mesalazine (2 to 4 g/day) are more effective than lower doses in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis. High doses (4 g/day) are also effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease, predominantly in patients with ileitis. In contrast, no dose ranging effects were demonstrated with local treatment forms: mesalazine 1g enema seems sufficient for patients with distal colitis. Higher serum concentrations and urinary recoveries after the administration of slow or delayed release mesalazine compared with azo-bound drugs suggest a higher risk for renal adverse effects, although the reported occurrence is extremely low. Although preliminary data support an association between mucosal concentrations of mesalazine and its clinical activity, further studies are needed to correlate the effects of this drug with its pharmacokinetic parameters.

Mono- and biphasic plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from a 500 mg suppository in healthy male volunteers controlled by the time of defecation before dosing

This study was based on data from a bioequivalence study (n=24) of two different formulations of suppositories containing 500 mg mesalazine (formulation I and II), with a similar dissolution profile in phosphate buffer pH 6.8. There was a large intra- and intersubject variability in the plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from both suppositories. The aim of the investigation was to identify the parameters that caused the observed large variations in release and absorption of mesalazine in the rectum. Plasma mesalazine and acetylmesalazine, and urine acetylmesalazine concentrations were determined according to validated methods involving HPLC analysis with coulometric detection. Lower limit of quantitation values were respectively 10.4 and 19.4 ng mL(-1) in plasma and 0.96 microg mL(-1) in urine. The time of defecation before and after insertion was recorded. There was a clear distinction between subjects who showed monophasic mesalazine release/absorption and those who showed biphasic and more extended release/absorption. With formulation I there was a correlation between time of defecation before dosing and the type of absorption, monophasic and biphasic absorbers showed a significant difference in the time of defecation, e.g. 9.7+/-5.6 h vs 18.8+/-11.9 h (P = 0.0218). The impact of time of defecation before dosing was non-significant with formulation II, 16.7+/-7.2 h vs 15.1+/-4.2 h (P = 0.67). The impact of the time elapsed between administration and time of defecation after the insertion of the suppository was not significant for the type of release/absorption. The plasma concentration-time curves of the metabolite ran parallel to that of the parent drug, the more parent drug was released/absorbed, the more was acetylated (P = 0.0013) and excreted into the urine (P = 0.0004). After absorption the compound was metabolized into acetylmesalazine, and renally excreted (12-13% of the dose). Monophasic release/ absorption resulted in 7.1% metabolite with I and 10.3% with II (P = 0.0004), while biphasic release/absorption gave 16.8% metabolite with I and 15.5% with II. The renal clearance of the metabolite acetylmesalazine was independent of the observed defecation patterns (300 mL min(-1), P > 0.8), stool composition, and type of absorption.

Systemic levels of free 5-aminosalicylic acid depend on the nature of the 5-aminosalicyclic acid derivative and not on disease activity or extent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Several new derivatives of sulphasalazine that make use of its active moiety, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), have been introduced for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In rats short term intravenous administration of 5-ASA has been associated with nephrotoxicity. A number of cases of nephrotoxicity have been reported recently in IBD patients taking oral maintenance treatment with 5-ASA compounds.

OBJECTIVE

To study the urinary and serum levels of acetylated 5-ASA (Ac-5-ASA) and the unacetylated 5-ASA (5-ASA) in patients with IBD maintained on sulphasalazine, olsalazine and mesalazine (pH dependent release form). We also sought correlation between levels of 5-ASA, clinical disease activity and extent of disease.

METHODS

We studied 79 patients (male, n = 30; female, n = 49) with established IBD [ulcerative colitis (UC), n = 48; Crohn's disease (CD), n = 31], 72 maintained on 5-ASA compounds (sulphasalazine = 27; olsalazine = 28; mesalazine = 17) and 7 patients were receiving no medication. Urinary and serum analysis of 5-ASA was performed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Clinical disease activity was quantified using simple index of Harvey and Bradshaw.

RESULTS

Patients receiving mesalazine had significantly higher levels of serum free 5-ASA compared to those who were receiving olsalazine and sulphasalazine (mesalazine mean +/- SEM; range; 2.84 +/- 1.21 (0.00-16.00) vs olsalazine 0.45 +/- 0.18 (0.00-16.20); mumol/L; p < 0.04; sulphasalazine 0.37 +/- 0.25 (0.00-3.74); p < 0.03). Similarly levels of urinary free 5-ASA were significantly higher in patients maintained on mesalazine compared to those on olsalazine or sulphasalazine (mesalazine 219 +/- 80.43 (0.00-1050) vs olsalazine 33.3 +/- 17.23 (0.00-317) mumol/L; p < 0.01; and sulphasalazine 15 +/- 8.86 (0.00-192); p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in the levels of urinary free 5-ASA between olsalazine and sulphasalazine. No significant difference was observed in the levels of free-5-ASA in UC patients with left sided disease and those with extensive disease. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in the levels of serum and urinary 5-ASA in CD patients with ileo-colic disease and colonic disease. Urinary and serum free-5-ASA did not correlate with the clinical disease activity.

CONCLUSION

Systemic absorption of 5-ASA from sulphasalazine and olsalazine is relatively low. However, pH-dependent mesalazine formulations may release their contents rapidly in the small intestine and proximal colon resulting in higher plasma and urinary concentrations of free 5-ASA. The effects of free 5-ASA on renal function in the human require further evaluation.

[Pharmacokinetic data for different 5-aminosalicylic acid and budesonide preparations]

Different orally and rectally applicable forms of 5-ASA and budesonide have been developed to achieve sufficient high concentrations of the active moieties at the site of inflammation (small and/or large bowel) and to limit the systemic action of the drugs. This concept of drug targeting could be accomplished by both special galenic formulations and by utilizing the pharmacokinetic properties of the agents especially their high intestinal and hepatic presystemic elimination. Thus, 5-ASA and budesonide represent drugs of first choice in the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. This review describes the various pharmacokinetic and (patho)physiologic factors and their impact on drug delivery and biological availability of the different 5-ASA and budesonide preparations.

Mesalazine release from a pH dependent formulation: effects of omeprazole and lactulose co-administration

AIMS

Delayed-release formulations of mesalazine often rely on the gastrointestinal luminal pH profile to deliver 5-aminosalicylic acid (5ASA) to the colon. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of luminal pH on mesalazine release.

METHODS

We studied the effect of co-administration of omeprazole and lactulose on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of Eudragit S-coated mesalazine in healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

No significant changes in urinary or faecal levels of 5ASA or its main metabolite, N-acetyl 5ASA, were apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that co-administration of omeprazole and lactulose does not impair the release of delayed-release mesalazine.

Olsalazine versus mesalazine in the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of olsalazine sodium with enteric-coated mesalazine in inducing endoscopic remission in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive either olsalazine sodium, 3 g/day (n = 88), or mesalazine, 3 g/day (n = 80), for up to 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the patients treated with olsalazine sodium, 52.2% achieved endoscopic remission, compared with 48.8% of patients treated with mesalazine. This difference was not significant (P = 0.67). There was a nonsignificant trend for patients with left-sided colitis or a more severe endoscopic grade to achieve remission if they were treated with olsalazine sodium than if they were treated with mesalazine. Both treatments were comparable with respect to clinical activity index and an investigator's global assessment. Seventy patients reported one or more adverse events; adverse events were seen in 45% of olsalazine sodium-treated patients and in 36% of mesalazine-treated patients. Eleven patients treated with olsalazine sodium and nine patients treated with mesalazine withdrew from the study because of adverse events. One patient treated with olsalazine sodium compared with two treated with mesalazine stopped treatment because of diarrhoea. Serious adverse events occurred in three patients treated with olsalazine sodium and in four treated with mesalazine.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic effectiveness and tolerance to the treatment did not differ between olsalazine sodium, 3 g/day, and mesalazine, 3 g/day, in inducing endoscopic remission in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis within 12 weeks of treatment.

[Significance of galenic preparations for luminal release of 5-aminosalicylic acid in human small intestinal lumen]

BACKGROUND

Sufficient intraluminal concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) within inflamed regions of the intestine are required for therapeutic efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease. Various oral delayed release preparations have been developed to ensure that 5-ASA is set free in those parts of the gut, which are most frequently affected. However, resulting intraluminal concentrations within the small bowel are unknown. Therefore, we determined and compared 5-ASA release within different segments of the small bowel from an Eudragit L coated 5-ASA preparation (Salofalk) and from an ethylcellulose coated microsphere preparation (Pentasa).

METHODS

Twelve healthy subjects were intubated with an oro-ileal multilumen-tube for marker perfusion, duodenal, jejunal and ileal aspiration of chyme and intestinal manometry. Each subject received 500 mg 5-ASA (Salofalk, n = 6, or Pentasa, n = 6) together with a semiliquid test meal. Intestinal aspirates, blood and urine samples were obtained in regular intervals for 7 to 10 hours and were analysed for 5-ASA and its main metabolite acetyl-5-ASA by HPLC.

RESULTS

With Salofalk, gastric emptying of 5-ASA did not take place in the digestive, but in the subsequent interdigestive period. Luminal delivery of 5-ASA and acetyl-5-ASA increased from the duodenum (3% of dose) to the ileum (30% of dose). 10% of the dose administered were excreted in urine and about 90% reached the colon unreleased or solubilised. By contrast, with Pentasa, 5-ASA was delivered to the duodenum together with the test meal and released continuously throughout the small intestine (about 20% of dose solubilised at each intestinal site). Only 3.5% of the dose administered were excreted in urine. Deliver of 5-ASA to the colon was equal to Salofalk.

CONCLUSIONS

From both preparations, considerable amounts of 5-ASA are released during small intestinal transit thus explaining therapeutic efficacy in small intestinal Crohn's disease. Because of specific release patterns, Salofalk may be of use especially in terminal ileal disease, where as patients with extensive small intestinal disease including the proximal small intestine might benefit from Pentasa.

Delivery and fate of oral mesalamine microgranules within the human small intestine

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Oral use of mesalamine in inflammatory bowel disease requires slow-release preparations to prevent premature absorption and inactivation. Resulting luminal concentrations within the human small intestine are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine human intestinal delivery patterns of mesalamine from a microgranule preparation (Pentasa; Ferring Arzeimittel, Kiel, Germany) effective in Crohn's disease with small bowel involvement.

METHODS

A multilumen tube for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal aspiration and marker perfusion was placed in 6 normal subjects. Levels of luminal, plasma, and urinary mesalamine and its main metabolite, acetyl mesalamine, were measured for 7 hours after ingestion of mesalamine (500 mg) with a labeled meal.

RESULTS

Gastric emptying of mesalamine paralleled the meal, and its release occurred throughout the small intestine (cumulative, 20% of dose). For 4 hours, mean luminal mesalamine and acetyl mesalamine concentrations were 52 and 38 micrograms/mL (duodenum), 59 and 82 micrograms/mL (jejunum), and 64 and 104 micrograms/mL (ileum). Cumulative colonic delivery was 82% (7% dissolved, 75% in microgranules), and urinary excretion was 3.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the major part of continuous-release mesalamine is delivered to the colon, large proportions are liberated and available at high concentrations within the small intestinal lumen, thus explaining its therapeutic efficacy in small intestinal Crohn's disease.

Mesalazine induced interstitial nephritis

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) has structural similarities to both phenacetin and aspirin, which are known to cause 'analgesic nephropathy'. Because of the increasing use of 5-ASA, this paper draws attention to two cases of severe interstitial nephritis resulting from 5-ASA and emphasises the importance of monitoring renal functions of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases who are receiving 5-ASA preparations.

Salicylates for ulcerative colitis--their mode of action

Delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colon by sulphasalazine, other azo-bonded compounds and controlled-release preparations is introduced in the context of metabolism by epithelial cells and therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis. Potential modes of action are then reviewed, including actions on luminal bacteria, epithelial cell surface receptors, cellular events (such as nitric oxide release or butyrate oxidation), electrolyte transport and epithelial permeability. Evidence for an influence of salicylates on circulating and lamina propria inflammatory cells is presented, as well as actions on adhesion molecules, chemotactic peptides and inflammatory mediators, such as eicosanoids, platelet-activating factor, cytokines or reactive oxygen metabolites. The precise mechanism will remain uncertain as long as the aetiology of ulcerative colitis is unknown, but a pluripotential mode of action of salicylates is an advantage when influencing the network of events that constitute chronic inflammation.

Comparative bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid from a controlled release preparation and an azo-bond preparation

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalazine) from the different 5-ASA-containing drugs is important for rational therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases.

METHODS

The local and systemic bioavailability of 5-ASA from a controlled release 5-ASA preparation (Pentasa--2, 4 or 6 g/day) was investigated and compared with the azo-bond 5-ASA preparation olsalazine (Dipentum--2 g/day) in 13 healthy volunteers during steady state conditions.

RESULTS

The therapeutically relevant parameter of 5-ASA at the rectal level, expressed as the mean concentration in faecal water, showed a significant trend towards higher concentrations with increasing Pentasa dose: 9.2 mmol/L, 19.0 mmol/L and 24.4 mmol/L, respectively. The concentration of olsalazine 2 g/day was 16.0 mmol/L. The concentration of the metabolite N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid (Ac-5-ASA) did not rise with increasing Pentasa dose, indicating saturable presystemic acetylating capacity of 5-ASA. Total urinary excretion of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA, as a percentage of the daily ingested 5-ASA dose, remained constant on the three Pentasa doses, but there was a significant increase in the 5-ASA fraction. Mean steady state plasma concentrations of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were significantly higher on Pentasa 4 g/day and 6 g/day than on 2 g/day. Values on Pentasa 2 g/day were comparable with those on olsalazine 2 g/day.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed that 5-ASA is released from Pentasa in a predictable manner, the amount released increasing with dose. Olsalazine is an excellent generator of 5-ASA in the colon.

Salicylates for inflammatory bowel disease

Targeted delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the small intestine and colon by controlled-release or azo-bonded compounds potentially offers treatment for ileal Crohn's disease as well as ulcerative colitis. The pharmacokinetics of sulphasalazine and aminosalicylate derivatives have been discussed and potential modes of action reviewed. These include actions on epithelial cell-surface receptors, cellular events and barrier function. Evidence for an influence of salicylates on circulating and tissue inflammatory cells is presented, as well as actions on adhesion molecules, chemotactic peptides, eicosanoids, cytokines and reactive oxygen metabolites. The precise mechanism remains unknown, but a pluripotential mode of action is an advantage when influencing the network of events that constitutes chronic inflammation. Controlled clinical trials of salicylates in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease have been reviewed. Their main role remains as maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis, but relatively high doses of controlled-release preparations benefit patients with ileal Crohn's disease, following resection, or those who have recently relapsed. Finally, issues of clinical relevance have been addressed, including the choice of salicylate and safety, indications for initiating therapy, dose and duration of treatment, role in managing refractory colitis and future developments.