Comparison of myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac troponin I in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain

Outcome of low-risk patients discharged home after a normal cardiac troponin I

Patients with symptoms suggestive of, but at low risk for, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who have a negative electrocardiogram (EKG) and a single normal troponin I at 6-9 h after symptom onset are frequently discharged from our Emergency Department (ED). We sought to determine their rate of adverse cardiac events at 30 days (ACE-30), defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI), by chart review, telephone interview, or county death records. Of 663 patients, data were available for 588 (89%). Mean age was 48 years; 59% were male. There were 390 patients (66%) who complained of chest pain. Previous coronary artery disease (CAD) was reported in 145 patients (25%). Two patients (0.34%) had ACE-30, both with non-ST elevation MI. There were no cases of cardiac death. None of the patients died in Hennepin County within 30 days. At our institution, low-risk patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS who are discharged home after a normal cTnI drawn 6-9 h after symptom onset have a very low incidence of cardiac events at 30 days.

Missed acute cardiac ischemia in the ED: limitations of diagnostic testing

Correctly identifying and appropriately triaging patients who present to the ED with the broad range of symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia (ACI: unstable angina pectoris [UAP] and acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) remains one of the greatest challenges in EM. Although a number of diagnostic technologies have been described to aid in this triage process, each of these tests or technologies has limitations. We report a case series in which either the use of adjuncts with unknown performance or tests with known but not considered limitations could have contributed to the failure to appropriately triage and treat patients with ACI. Each case illustrates different aspects of this clinical challenge. One case illustrates the hazards of reliance on a single set of negative cardiac biomarkers. The limitations of a negative exercise electrocardiographic stress test (ETT) are illustrated in the second case. Finally, the limitations of a negative coronary angiogram, the "gold standard" test for symptomatic coronary artery disease, are discussed. We review the literature on technologies to aid in the evaluation of patients who present to the ED with symptoms suggestive of ACI.

Acute coronary syndromes: initial evaluation and risk stratification

Chest pain, the second most frequent presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED), often poses a challenge to the physicians dealing with these patients owing to the wide spectrum of presentation of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A majority of the patients presenting with chest pain are usually admitted to the hospital for further evaluation and management. Despite the availability of modern-day tools for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), about 5% of patients with AMI are missed in the ED with subsequent associated morbidity and mortality and legal consequences. Several centers have adapted critical pathways derived from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of patients presenting with ACS. We now have some evidence suggesting adherence to the critical pathways derived from ACC/AHA guidelines will optimize the quality of patient care and probably result in better patient outcomes. This article reviews initial evaluation and the importance of risk stratification of the patients presenting with chest pain using the currently available clinical and diagnostic tools. Critical pathways derived from the ACC/AHA guidelines for various presentations of ACS are also reviewed.

Acute chest pain — identification of patients at low risk for coronary events. The impact of symptoms, medical history and risk factors

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of patients with acute chest pain remains challenging, as it implies the risk of fatal misdiagnosis. It is well recognized that typical angina does not specifically identify patients at high risk. We investigated the predictive value of characteristics atypical for myocardial ischemia for exclusion of acute or subacute coronary events, focusing on patients' symptoms, medical history and risk factors.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 1288 consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain at a non-trauma emergency department. Patients' symptoms, history and risk factors were evaluated using seven predefined criteria and assigned as typical or atypical for ischemic coronary chest pain. Positive predictive value (PPV) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to predict or exclude acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiovascular death, percutaneous coronary interventions, bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction) within six months.

RESULTS

AMI occurred in 168 patients (13%), and 6-months MACE (including AMI) overall in 240 patients (19%). Presence of four or more criteria typical for myocardial ischemia was associated with a PPV of 0.21 (0.17 to 0.25) for predicting AMI and 0.30 (0.25 to 0.35) for 6-months MACE. Presence of four or more criteria atypical for coronary ischemia was associated with a PPV of 0.94 (0.91 to 0.96) for excluding AMI and 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96) for excluding 6-months MACE. In 165 of 476 patients under 40 years of age (35%), four or more atypical criteria excluded AMI and 6-months MACE with PPVs of 0.98 (0.96 to 1.0).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of criteria atypical for myocardial ischemia with acute chest pain may help to identify candidates for early discharge, whereas typical characteristics have very little diagnostic value.

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence

This review summarises the evidence for the role of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. It is the product of a consensus conference organised by the British Cardiac Society, the British Nuclear Cardiology Society and the British Nuclear Medicine Society and is endorsed by the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Radiologists. It was used to inform the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence in their appraisal of MPS in patients with chest pain and myocardial infarction. MPS is a well-established, non-invasive imaging technique with a large body of evidence to support its effectiveness in the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. It is more accurate than the exercise ECG in detecting myocardial ischaemia and it is the single most powerful technique for predicting future coronary events. The high diagnostic accuracy of MPS allows reliable risk stratification and guides the selection of patients for further interventions, such as revascularisation. This in turn allows more appropriate utilisation of resources, with the potential for both improved clinical outcomes and greater cost-effectiveness. Evidence from modelling and observational studies supports the enhanced cost-effectiveness associated with MPS use. In patients presenting with stable or acute chest pain, strategies of investigation involving MPS are more cost-effective than those not using the technique. MPS also has particular advantages over alternative techniques in the management of a number of patient subgroups, including women, the elderly and those with diabetes, and its use will have a favourable impact on cost-effectiveness in these groups. MPS is already an integral part of many clinical guidelines for the investigation and management of angina and myocardial infarction. However, the technique is underutilised in the UK, as judged by the inappropriately long waiting times and by comparison with the numbers of revascularisations and coronary angiograms performed. Furthermore, MPS activity levels in this country fall far short of those in comparable European countries, with about half as many scans being undertaken per year. Currently, the number of MPS studies performed annually in the UK is 1,200/million population/year. We estimate the real need to be 4,000/million/year. The current average waiting time is 20 weeks and we recommend that clinically appropriate upper limits of waiting time are 6 weeks for routine studies and 1 week for urgent studies.

Diagnostic Use of T2-Weighted Inversion-Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Coronary Syndromes Compared With 99mTc-Pyrophosphate, 123I-BMIPP and 201TlCl Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

The incidence of missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department could be reduced by a new imaging modality. In the present study, the clinical significance of (99m)Tc-pyrophosphate (PYP), (123)I-beta-methyl-p-iodephenyl-pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP), (201)TlCl scintigraphy (imaging) and T2-weighted inversion-recovery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of culprit lesion in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) was compared.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study group comprised 18 patients with ACS: 12 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (11 males; mean age, 63+/-11 years) and 6 patients with unstable angina (UA) (3 males, mean age, 67+/-5 years). Of the 12 patients with AMI, 10 underwent (201)TlCl and PYP single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies as a dual-energy acquisition ((201)TlCl/PYP) and 8 underwent (201)TlCl SPECT within 1 week of the BMIPP study. All 18 patients underwent BMIPP SPECT and MRI. The MRI pulse sequence was black blood turbo short-inversion-time inversion recovery (STIR) (breath-hold T2-weighted studies). The T2-weighted inversion-recovery MRI showed higher sensitivity and negative predictive value than PYP and (201)TlCl, and higher specificity and positive predictive value than BMIPP and (201)TlCl. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for PYP, BMIPP, (201)TlCl and MRI was 0.787, 0.725, 0.731 and 0.878, respectively. The difference between the areas of MRI and BMIPP was significant (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Accurate detection of culprit lesion is improved by using MRI rather than BMIPP, particularly for patients with ACS.

Sensitivity of acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging for identifying patients with myocardial infarction based on a troponin definition

BACKGROUND

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is often used to identify low-risk chest pain patients who have myocardial infarction (MI). A recent recommendation is that patients with increased troponin levels be diagnosed as having MI. The sensitivity and characteristics of patients who have elevated troponin levels who also underwent early MPI are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients considered at low risk for MI underwent rest gated tomographic MPI and serial marker assessment as part of a standard chest pain evaluation protocol. Patients with cardiac troponin I (cTnI) elevations were analyzed further for this study. MPI results were considered positive if there was a perfusion defect in association with abnormal wall motion or thickening. Short-axis images were divided into 17 segments and graded on a 4-point scale (0, normal; 3, high-grade or absent perfusion), and a summed rest score was derived. Of the 319 patients who had MPI and cTnI elevations, 78 had negative MPI results (sensitivity, 75%). Patients with negative MPI results had lower peak creatine kinase (CK)-MB values (15 +/- 25 ng/mL vs 45 +/- 78 ng/mL, P <.0001) and higher ejection fractions (56% +/- 15% vs 47% +/- 13%, P <.0001) and were less likely to have significant disease (55% vs 72%, P =.04) than those with positive MPI results. Increasing summed rest score was associated with larger MIs as estimated by peak CK and CK-MB values.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with negative MPI results have smaller MIs and less extensive coronary disease. MPI and cTnI offer complementary data for assessing patients with possible MI.

Implementation of myocardial perfusion imaging in the early triage of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes

The risk of overlooking an underlying acute coronary syndrome remains an important challenge in patients complaining of chest pain but who have a non-diagnostic ECG (CP). Indeed, myocardial scintigraphy associated with exercise testing (exercise SPET) represents a valuable tool for excluding coronary artery disease (CAD) especially in patients with CP and delayed presentation to the emergency department. We sought to implement diagnoses of CAD in the early triage of CP patients by exercise gated SPET and compare diagnoses with outcomes. A total of 306 consecutive patients presenting with CP were found to be free of CAD at first line work-up including clinical evaluation, markers of myocardial injury and echocardiogram. These patients were studied initially with exercise SPET, and those with perfusion defects underwent angiography, while those with normal scans were discharged and followed up. Patients with positive scans (34%, n=105) had documented coronary stenoses in 43% (n=45); patients with negative scans (66%, n=201) had evidence of non-fatal coronary events at 6 months in 1.5% (n=3). When imaging was analysed with gating by the presence of transmural perfusion defects associated with wall motion abnormalities (n=86), only one patient, among 19 excluded, was recognized as having coronary stenosis by angiography (SPET vs gated SPET: negative predictive value 98.5% and 98%, respectively, P=NS; diagnostic accuracy 79% and 85%, respectively; P< or =0.03). Therefore, implementation of myocardial perfusion imaging in the early triage of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes was effectively obtained by early exercise gated SPET, especially in patients with transmural myocardial perfusion defects associated with wall motion abnormalities.

Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging on clinical management and the utilization of hospital resources in suspected acute coronary syndromes

Recent advances in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes has raised awareness in the community that prompt presentation for chest pain may be life saving. Each year in the United States, more than 6 million people present to the hospital with an acute chest pain, making this the most common presenting chief complaint second only to abdominal pain. Most patients presenting with chest discomfort have a non-ischaemic electrocardiogram on presentation. However, these patients are routinely admitted to hospital due to diagnostic uncertainty for occult myocardial infarction or ischaemia. As an approach to this dilemma, many hospitals have created protocols as a means of facilitating the identification of infarction and ischaemia and the safe and effective triage of patients with a chief complaint of chest pain. Myocardial perfusion imaging at rest has been shown to be highly sensitive for the detection of acute myocardial infarction, and can be supplemented with provocative testing after infarction has been excluded. Diagnostic strategies that utilize myocardial perfusion imaging for the evaluation of acute chest pain have successfully improved the triage of these patients by avoiding inadvertent discharge of patients with myocardial infarctions, and reducing unnecessary hospital admissions and overall cost and expenditure.

Imaging in the evaluation of the patient with suspected acute coronary syndrome

Patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain have a common problem. Definitive diagnosis at presentation is difficult due to limitations of the initial evaluation, and, thus, the majority of patients are admitted. Recognition of these limitations has driven the investigation of alternative evaluation techniques and protocols to attempt to improve diagnostic sensitivity without increasing overall costs. Acute myocardial perfusion imaging has been a highly valuable technique for risk stratification of intermediate to low-risk patients with chest pain. However, for a variety of reasons, it has not been widely embraced. In the past few years, alternative techniques have been investigated for use in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in the acute setting. Coronary calcium scoring and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging show promise as new tools in the armamentarium for acute coronary syndromes. The challenge now lays in developing a strategy that uses these and future techniques most appropriately to support optimal medical decision making.

Myocardial perfusion imaging versus biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes

The assessment and appropriate clinical management of patients with acute chest pain and non-diagnostic electrocardiograms remain a continuing clinical problem. Accordingly, there is considerable interest in evaluating new strategies to improve early diagnostic accuracy in patients with possible acute myocardial ischaemia. Cardiac troponins (T and I) and acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging have similar sensitivities for detecting acute myocardial infarction. Whereas cardiac markers require 6-12 h to become positive, acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging immediately reflects the status of regional myocardial blood flow at the time of radiopharmaceutical injection. The measurement of cardiac troponins is particularly useful in the diagnosis and estimation of the degree of myocardial injury in those patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease and myocardial necrosis and for prognostication of adverse cardiac events in those patients with unstable angina. In contrast, the most appropriate use of acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging is in the setting of patients with acute ischaemic symptoms, non-diagnostic electrocardiogram and a low likelihood of myocardial necrosis, in which early imaging will assist in effective triage decisions.

A comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient: a cost comparison study

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive, risk-based triage system, composed of multiple critical pathways, with the use of early myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in low-risk patients. We found previously that a chest pain evaluation system that uses MPI in low-risk patients was safe and effective, but the cost-effectiveness of this approach was not studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared two groups. The Acute Cardiac Team (ACT) group (n = 874) was assigned prospectively to 1 of 4 risk levels by emergency department (ED) physicians. Level 1, 2, and 3 patients were admitted; level 4 patients were evaluated in the ED. Level 3 and 4 patients underwent ED MPI. The control group (n = 713) represented consecutive patients evaluated in the prior year according to standard care and assigned retrospectively to an ACT level based on the presenting electrocardiographic and clinical data. Record and hospital administrative data were assessed for clinical variables, outcomes, lengths of stay, and all expenses incurred within 30 days of the index visit. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, including age, sex, myocardial infarction prevalence, and 30-day revascularization rates within each level or between the two groups. Mean costs per encounter were reduced for the ACT patients for each level, which was significant when all patients were compared ($5,030 +/- $7,081 vs $6,044 +/- $10,432, P =.02). Use of MPI in the low-risk patients was associated with reduced costs (level 3, $4,958 +/- $4,948 vs $5,051 +/- $7,036; level 4, $1,529 +/- $2,664 vs $1,794 +/- $6,854) and was associated with a significantly lower angiography rate and shorter length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a comprehensive strategy for chest pain evaluation and triage reduced overall costs for patients with chest pain on presentation. Acute MPI in the ED setting did not increase net cost.

Use of radionuclide imaging in acute coronary syndromes

The triage of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain is a diagnostic challenge. Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging has been shown to have favorable diagnostic and prognostic value in this setting, with an excellent early sensitivity to detect acute myocardial infarction (MI) not achieved by other testing modalities. A normal resting perfusion imaging study has been shown to have a negative predictive value of over 99% to exclude MI. Observational and randomized trials of both rest and stress imaging in the ED evaluation of patients with chest pain have demonstrated reductions in unnecessary hospitalizations and cost savings compared with routine care. Perfusion imaging has also been used in risk stratification after MI, and for measurement of infarct size to evaluate reperfusion therapies. Novel "hot spot" imaging radiopharmaceuticals that visualize infarction or ischemia are currently undergoing evaluation and hold promise for future imaging of acute coronary syndromes.

The Erlanger chest pain evaluation protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We determine the overall use of a 6-step accelerated chest pain protocol to identify and exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to confirm previous findings of the use of serial 12-lead ECG monitoring (SECG) in conjunction with 2-hour delta serum marker measurements to identify and exclude acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted over a 1-year period from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999, in 2,074 consecutive patients with chest pain who underwent our accelerated evaluation protocol, which includes 2-hour delta serum marker determinations in conjunction with automated SECG for the early identification and exclusion of AMI and selective nuclear stress testing for identification and exclusion of ACS. In patients not undergoing emergency reperfusion therapy, physician judgment was used to determine patient disposition at the completion of the 2-hour evaluation period: admit for ACS, discharge or admit for non-ACS condition, or immediate emergency department nuclear stress scan for possible ACS. A positive protocol was defined as a positive result in 1 or more of the 6 incremental steps in our chest pain evaluation protocol: (1) initial ECG diagnostic of acute injury or reciprocal injury; (2) baseline creatine kinase (CK)-MB level of 10 ng/mL or greater and index of 5% or greater or cardiac troponin I level of 2 ng/mL or greater; (3) new/evolving injury or new/evolving ischemia on SECG; (4) increase in CK-MB level of +1.5 ng/mL or greater or cardiac troponin I level of +0.2 ng/mL or greater in 2 hours; (5) clinical diagnosis of ACS despite a negative 2-hour evaluation; and (6) reversible perfusion defect on stress scan compared with on resting scan. All patients were followed up for 30-day ACS, which was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary arteriography revealing stenosis of major coronary artery of 70% or greater not amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting, life-threatening complication, or cardiac death within 30 days of ED presentation.

RESULTS

Discharge diagnosis in the 2,074 study patients consisted of 179 (8.6%) patients with AMI, 26 (1.3%) patients with recent AMI (decreasing curve of CK-MB), and 327 (15.8%) patients with 30-day ACS. At 2 hours, sensitivity and specificity for MI (AMI or recent AMI) of SECG plus delta serum marker measurements was 93.2% and 93.9%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 15.3; negative likelihood ratio 0.07). At the completion of the full ED evaluation protocol (positive result in >or=1 of the 6 incremental steps), sensitivity and specificity for 30-day ACS was 99.1% and 87.4%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 7.9; negative likelihood ratio 0.01).

CONCLUSION

An accelerated chest pain evaluation strategy consisting of SECG, 2-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing in conjunction with physician judgment identifies and excludes MI and 30-day ACS during the initial evaluation of patients with chest pain.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary chest pain unit for the assessment of coronary syndromes and risk stratification in the Florence area

BACKGROUND

In patients seen at the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP), noninvasive diagnostic strategies may differentiate patients at high or intermediate risk from those at low-risk for cardiovascular events and optimize the use of high-cost resources. However, in welfare healthcare systems, the feasibility, accuracy, and potential benefits of such management strategy need further investigation.

METHODS

A total of 13,762 consecutive patients with CP were screened, and their conditions were defined as high, intermediate, and low risk for short-term cardiovascular events. Patients at high and intermediate risk were admitted. Patients at low risk were discharged from the ED if first line (<6 hours, including electrocardiogram, troponins, and serum cardiac markers) or second line short-term evaluation (<24 hours, including echocardiogram, rest or stress 99m-Tc myocardial scintigraphy, exercise tolerance test, or stress-echocardiography) had negative results. Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) were admitted. Patients without evidence of cardiovascular disease underwent screening for psychiatric and gastroesophageal disorders. Inhospital mortality rate was assessed in all patients.

RESULTS

Among patients at high and intermediate risk (n = 9335), 2420 patients had acute myocardial infarction (26%, 10.6% mortality rate), 3764 had unstable angina (40%, 1.1% mortality rate), 129 had aortic dissection (1.4%, 23.3% mortality rate), and 408 had pulmonary embolism (4%, 27.6% mortality rate). The remaining 2614 had chronic coronary heart disease in the context of multiple pathology (n = 2256) or pleural or pericardial diseases (n = 358). Among patients at low risk (n = 4427), 2672 were discharged at <6 hours (60%, 0.2% incidence rate of nonfatal CAD at 6 months) and 870 patients were discharged at <24 hours (20%, no CAD at follow-up). The remaining 885 patients were recognized as having CAD (20%, 1.1% inhospital mortality rate). Finally, half of the patients without CAD had active gastroesophageal or anxiety disorders.

CONCLUSION

An effective screening program with an observation area inside the ED (1) could be implemented in a public healthcare environment and contribute significantly to the reduction of admissions, (2) could optimize the management of patients at high and intermediate risk and succeed in recognizing CAD in 20% of patients at low risk, and (3) could allow screening for alternative causes of CP in patients without evidence of CAD.

Rapid assessment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute chest pain: troponins, inflammatory markers, or perfusion imaging?

BACKGROUND

Perfusion imaging during or soon after pain has been shown to provide diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with suspected angina. Measurement of troponin I (TnI) and troponin T (TnT) provides similar information but only several hours after onset of pain. The role of inflammatory markers in this setting is less clear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively studied 80 nonconsecutive patients using gated technetium 99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (MIBI), TnT, TnI, C-reactive protein, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Of these patients, 50 (63%) had abnormal MIBI, 13 (17%) had elevated TnT, 17 (21%) had elevated TnI, and C-reactive protein, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha were raised in 46 (58%), 14 (18%), and 29 (37%), respectively. Myocardial infarction was the presenting event in 13 patients (16%), and 23 (34%) of those without index myocardial infarction sustained a cardiovascular event during follow-up. MIBI, TnT, TnI, and electrocardiogram all had similar negative predictive values for index myocardial infarction (97%, 97%, 95%, and 97%, respectively). However, only MIBI had a high negative predictive value for the prediction of subsequent events during follow-up (86%). TnT and MIBI were the only independent predictors of all events. Inflammatory markers provided no useful additional prognostic information.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TnT and MIBI is the best model for early prediction of cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain.

Chest pain unit management of patients at low and not low-risk for coronary artery disease in the emergency department. A 5-year experience in the Florence area

In this study, we screened a total of 6723 consecutive patients with chest pain and ECG non-diagnostic for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on presentation to the emergency department (ED). The aim of the study was to avoid missed AMI, improve safe early discharge and reduce inappropriate coronary care unit (CCU) admission. Chest pain patients were triaged using a clinical chest pain score and managed in a chest pain unit (CPU). Patients with a low clinical chest pain score were considered at very 'low-risk' for cardiovascular events and discharged from the ED; patients with a high chest pain score were submitted to CPU management. Observation and titration of serum markers of myocardial injury were obtained up to 6 hours. Rest or stress myocardial scintigraphy (SPECT) was performed in patients > 40 years or with > or = 2 major coronary risk factors. Exercise Tolerance Test (ETT) or Stress-Echocardiogram (stress-Echo) were performed in younger patients or with < 2 coronary risk factor, or unable to exercise, respectively We discharged directly from the ED the majority of patients (4454; 66%): in this group there was only a 0.2% final diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) at follow-up. The remaining 34% of patients, with non-diagnostic or normal ECG, were managed in the CPU. In this group, 1487 patients (representing 22% of the overall study group) were found positive for CAD, two-thirds because of delayed ECG or serum markers of myocardial injury, and one-third by Echo, SPECT or ETT. In conclusion, CPU based management allowed 22% early detection of myocardial ischaemia and 78% early discharge from the ED avoiding inappropriate CCU admission and optimizing the use of urgent angiography.

Myocardial perfusion imaging in evaluation of undiagnosed acute chest pain

Myocardial perfusion imaging is a relatively new technique in the emergency department management of acute chest pain. With improved sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional methods of risk stratification, an abnormal scan rapidly identifies individuals with acute perfusion abnormalities and allows the appropriate utilization of limited resources. Conversely, a normal scan allows prompt hospital discharge and is associated with excellent outcomes both in the short and medium terms. Acute chest pain myocardial perfusion imaging has been demonstrated to alter patient management and disposition and its routine use results in decreased costs in the intermediate risk population.

Selective dual nuclear scanning in low-risk patients with chest pain to reliably identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the use in routine clinical practice of selective dual nuclear cardiac scanning (rest and stress) in low-risk patients with chest pain for identifying and excluding acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) during the initial emergency department evaluation.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted over 13 months in 1,775 low-risk patients with chest pain who had intermediate- and high-risk ACSs ruled out by means of our 2-hour protocol, which consists of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring in conjunction with baseline and 2-hour creatine kinase (CK) MB and troponin I (cTnI) measurements. At the completion of the 2-hour evaluation period, low-risk patients were stratified by means of physician judgment into 1 of 2 categories: category III, possible ACS; and category IV, probable non-ACS chest pain. Level III patients underwent immediate dual nuclear scanning (rest thallium and stress sestamibi scanning), and level IV patients were discharged directly from the ED unless another serious non-ACS medical condition was thought to exist. Rest and stress scans were interpreted by a board-certified radiologist contemporaneous with patient evaluation. All patients were followed up for 30-day ACS, which was defined as acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary arteriography revealing stenosis of the major coronary artery of 70% or greater not amenable to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/coronary artery bypass grafting, life-threatening complication, or cardiac death within 30 days of ED presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 2,206 ED patients with chest pain were evaluated for ACS during the study period. Four hundred thirty-one patients were excluded for having 1 or more of the following findings: initial ECG diagnostic of injury; baseline CK-MB level, cTnI level, or both diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction; 2-hour DeltaCK-MB level of +1.5 ng/mL or greater; 2-hour DeltacTnI level of +0.2 ng/mL or greater; injury or new or evolving ischemia on serial 12-lead ECG monitoring; or clinical diagnosis of ACS. Of the 1,775 study patients, 805 (45.4%) underwent immediate dual nuclear scanning. A positive stress nuclear scan result was more sensitive (97.3% versus 71.2%, P <.0001) and specific (87.7% versus 72.6%, P <.0001) for 30-day ACS than a positive resting nuclear scan result. The protocol of selective dual nuclear scanning (ie, patients who did not undergo dual nuclear scanning were counted as having a negative test result) had a sensitivity and specificity for 30-day ACS of 93.4% and 94.7%, respectively (positive likelihood ratio 17.6; negative likelihood ratio 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Stress nuclear scanning is more sensitive and specific than resting nuclear scanning for identification of ACS in low-risk patients with chest pain. A strategy of using selective dual nuclear scanning once high- and intermediate-risk ACS has been ruled out with our 2-hour evaluation both reliably identifies and reliably excludes 30-day ACS.

Evaluation of the Emergency Department chest pain patient

Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with chest pain are common and often present diagnostic difficulties. Because of the limitations of the initial evaluation, the majority of patients are admitted, although many are later found to have noncardiac causes for their symptoms. Recognition of these limitations has driven the investigation of newer evaluation techniques and protocols in an attempt to improve diagnostic sensitivity without increasing overall costs. These have included modifications of the standard ECG, and use of newer myocardial markers such as mass assays for CK-MB and troponin T and I. Use of acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging has also been shown to be a highly valuable technique for risk stratification of the intermediate- to low-risk chest pain patient.

Combination of Goldman risk and initial cardiac troponin I for emergency department chest pain patient risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Accurate identification of low-risk emergency department (ED) chest pain patients who may be safe for discharge has not been well defined. Goldman criteria have reliably risk-stratified patients but have not identified any subset safe for ED release. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) values have also been shown to risk-stratify patients but have not identified a subset safe for ED release.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that ED chest pain patients with a Goldman risk of < or =4% and a single negative cTnI (< or =0.3 ng/mL) at the time of ED presentation would be safe for discharge [<1% risk for death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), revascularization].

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed in which consecutive ED chest pain patients were enrolled from July 1999 to November 2000. Data collected included patient demographics, medical and cardiac history, electrocardiogram, and creatine kinase-MB and cTnI. Goldman risk stratification score was calculated while patients were still in the ED. Hospital course was followed daily. Telephone follow-up occurred at 30 days. The main outcome was death, AMI, or revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/stents/coronary artery bypass grafting) within 30 days.

RESULTS

Of 2,322 patients evaluated, 998 had both a Goldman risk < or =4% and a cTnI < or =0.3 ng/mL. During the initial hospitalization, 37 patients met the composite endpoint (3.7%): 6 deaths (0.7%), 17 AMIs (1.7%), 18 revascularizations (1.8%). Between the time of hospital discharge and 30-day follow-up, 15 patients met the composite endpoint: 4 deaths (0.4%), 6 AMIs (0.6%), and 5 revascularizations (0.5%). Overall, 49 patients met the composite endpoint (4.9%; 95% CI = 3.6% to 6.2%): 10 deaths (1.0%; 95% CI = 0.4% to 1.6%); 23 AMIs (2.3%; 95% CI = 1.4% to 3.2%), and 23 revascularizations (2.3%; 95% CI = 1.4% to 3.2%) within 30 days of presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of two risk stratification modalities for ED chest pain patients (Goldman risk < or =4% and cTnI < or =0.3 ng/mL) did not identify a subgroup of chest pain patients at <1% risk for death, AMI, or revascularization within 30 days.

Accuracy of biomarkers to diagnose acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate quantitatively the evidence on the diagnostic performance of presentation and serial biochemical markers for emergency department diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia (ACI), including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable angina.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the English-language literature published between 1966 and December 1998. We examined the diagnostic performance of creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, and troponin I and T testing. Diagnostic performance was assessed by using estimates of test sensitivity and specificity and was summarized by summary receiver-operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Only 4 studies were found that evaluated all patients with ACI; 73 were found that focused only on a diagnosis of AMI. To diagnose ACI, presentation biomarker tests had sensitivities of 16% to 19% and specificities of 96% to 100%; serial biomarker tests had sensitivities of 31% to 45% and specificities of 95% to 98%. Considering only the diagnosis of AMI, presentation biomarker tests had summary sensitivities of 37% to 49% and summary specificities of 87% to 97%; serial biomarker tests had summary sensitivities of 79% to 93% and summary specificities of 85% to 96%. Variation of test sensitivity was best explained by test timing. Longer symptom duration or time between serial tests yielded higher sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The limited evidence available to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for ACI suggests that biomarkers have very low sensitivity to diagnose ACI. Thus, biomarkers alone will greatly underdiagnose ACI and will be inadequate to make triage decisions. For AMI diagnosis alone, multiple testing of individual biomarkers over time substantially improves sensitivity, while retaining high specificity, at the expense of additional time. Further high-quality studies are needed on the clinical effect of using biomarkers for patients with ACI in the ED and on optimal timing of serial testing and in combination with other tests.

Identification of chest pain patients appropriate for an emergency department observation unit

There are no perfect tests or algorithms to exclude ACI. Because acute coronary occlusion often occurs in patients with low-grade coronary stenosis, the diagnostic goal of a chest pain diagnostic protocol is not to identify patients with CAD, but rather to identify patients who may be safely discharged home without the development of complications such as MI, unstable angina, death, shock, or CHF over the next 1 to 6 months. There is an advantage to evaluating patients at the time of their symptoms. Patients who have a small plaque that is ruptured, leading to intracoronary thrombosis and ischemia, will manifest ischemia on diagnostic testing that could missed in routine outpatient testing when their plaque were stable. The diagnosis and risk stratification of acute coronary ischemia in the ED depends on a careful history and interpretation of the ECG. Multiple regression models using readily available data (e.g., history, physical examination, and ECG) provide the best tools for risk stratification. If one is deciding how to select patients for an EDOU chest pain evaluation, diagnostic tools that have previously been tested and validated in this setting are preferable. These include the Multicenter Chest Pain Study derived tools (i.e., Goldman, Lee), the ACI and ACI-TIPI tools, and sestamibi risk stratification tools. This is not to say that other tools may not play a role at individual institutions. It is probably better to select a consistent approach and evaluate its performance, rather than to allow random variation to dictate practice. The future direction probably will involve standardization of the ED chest pain population. This allows outcome and cost-effectiveness comparative research of various strategies for patients with normal or nondiagnostic ECGs and normal biomarkers. Although this approach allows more precise stratification, the risk will never be zero, meaning that there will never be a substitute for good clinical judgment and close follow-up care.

Cardiac markers protocols in a chest pain observation unit

The use of cardiac markers to identify high-risk patients in the observation unit is undeniable. As the literature reviewed here reveals, the history and ECG miss a significant portion of patients with acute cardiac ischemia. It appears that acute MI and some high-risk "unstable angina" observation unit patients can be identified within 6 hours of hospital presentation using a combination of cardiac markers. Testing these patients soon after symptom onset or on arrival in the ED for myoglobin, CK-MB subforms, or CK-MB delta appears to provide the best diagnostic usefulness. For testing later in the clinical course, CK-MB troponin I, or troponin T are of clear diagnostic and prognostic value. The markers currently used are unable to identify the significant subset of patients with "non-AMI" coronary syndromes, however. These patients require further testing with appropriate noninvasive or invasive diagnostic studies.

Cardiac troponin I elevation in acute pulmonary embolism is associated with right ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and diagnostic utility of cardiac troponin I to identify patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular overload resulting from elevated pulmonary resistance is a common finding in major pulmonary embolism. However, biochemical markers to assess the degree of RV dysfunction have not been evaluated so far.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind study we included 36 study patients diagnosed as having acute pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

Among the whole study population, 14 patients (39%) had positive troponin I tests. Ten of 16 patients (62.5%) with RV dilatation had increased serum troponin I levels, while only 4 of 14 patients (28.6%) with elevated troponin I values had a normal RV diameter as assessed by echocardiography, indicating that positive troponin I tests were significantly associated with RV dilatation (p = 0.009). Patients with positive troponin I tests had significantly more segmental defects in ventilation/perfusion lung scans than patients with normal serum troponin I (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that more than one-third of patients clinically diagnosed as having pulmonary embolism presented with elevated serum troponin I concentrations. Troponin I tests helped to identify patients with RV dilatation who had significantly more segmental defects in lung scans. Thus, troponin I assays are useful to detect minor myocardial damage in pulmonary embolism.

Pretest probability assessment for selective rest sestamibi scans in stable chest pain patients

The objective of this study was to determine whether pretest probability assessments permit more selective testing of chest pain patients with technetium-99m sestamibi scanning. Pretest probabilities of cardiac ischemia were measured both objectively (Acute Cardiac Ischemia Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument [ACI-TIPI]) and subjectively (physician's estimate of the probability of unstable angina). Two groups were defined: patients whose postsestamibi scan led to a "downgrade" of the intensity of monitoring and those that resulted in no change in monitoring intensity. Sixty-five patients met study criteria; 25 had a disposition downgrade and 40 had no change. Pretest ACI-TIPI scores were similar in the two groups (29% +/- 18% versus 27% +/- 11%, mean +/- standard deviation; P = .95) as were the physician's assessment of unstable angina (39% +/- 22% versus 40% +/- 24%; P = .75). Objective or subjective pretest probabilities are not significantly different in patients who are likely to have their disposition altered by sestamibi scanning.

Evaluation of the emergency department chest pain patient

Patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are a common and perplexing problem. Because of the limitations of the initial evaluation, most patients are admitted, although many are found to have noncardiac causes of their symptoms. Recognition of these limitations has driven the investigation of newer evaluation techniques and protocols in an attempt to improve diagnostic sensitivity without increasing overall costs. These have included modifications of the standard electrocardiogram and use of newer myocardial markers of necrosis, such as mass assays for CK-MB as well as troponin T and troponin I. Use of acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging also has been shown to be a highly valuable technique for risk stratification of the intermediate- to low-risk chest pain patient.

Evaluation of chest pain suspicious for acute coronary syndrome: use of an accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain evaluation unit

Management of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a continuing challenge. A low threshold for admission has been traditional because of concern for patient welfare and the litigation potential associated with the inadvertent discharge of patients with ischemic events. Because of this approach, < 30% of patients admitted for chest pain ultimately are found to have an acute coronary syndrome. To reduce unnecessary admissions, maintain patient safety, and enhance cost-effectiveness, innovative strategies have been applied to the management of patients with chest pain. It is now recognized that a low-risk group can be identified by the clinical presentation and initial electrocardiogram. Chest-pain centers have been developed to provide further risk stratification and systematic management of these patients. We employ an accelerated diagnostic protocol based on immediate exercise treadmill testing to evaluate low-risk patients. Moderate-risk patients are assessed over a 6-hour observation period with serial electrocardiograms and evaluation of cardiac-injury markers. Patients with positive evaluations are admitted. Those with negative results undergo either exercise echocardiography or rest myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing technetium-99m sestamibi. Patients with positive functional tests are admitted. Those with negative studies are discharged with outpatient follow-up. These strategies have provided a safe and accurate means of patient disposition from the emergency department with the potential for vital cost savings.

An economic analysis of an aggressive diagnostic strategy with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and early exercise stress testing in emergency department patients who present with chest pain but nondiagnostic electrocardiograms: results from a randomized trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Conventional emergency department testing strategies for patients with chest pain often do not provide unequivocal diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. This study was conducted to determine whether the routine use of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging at rest and early exercise stress testing to assess intermediate-risk patients with chest pain and no ECG evidence of acute ischemia will lead to earlier discharges, more discriminate use of coronary angiography, and an overall reduction in average costs of care with no adverse clinical outcomes.

METHODS

All patients in this study had technetium 99m tetrofosmin SPECT imaging at rest and were randomly assigned to either a conventional (results of the imaging test blinded to the physician) or perfusion imaging-guided (results of the imaging test unblinded to the physician) strategy. Patients in the conventional arm were treated at their physician's discretion. Patients in the perfusion imaging-guided arm were treated according to a predefined protocol based on SPECT imaging test results: coronary angiography after a positive scan result and exercise treadmill testing after a negative scan result. Study endpoints consisted of total in-hospital costs and length of stay. Hospital costs were calculated using hospital department-specific Medicare cost/charge ratios. Length of stay was calculated as total hospital room days billed (regular and intensive care).

RESULTS

We enrolled 46 patients, 9 with acute myocardial infarctions. Patients randomly assigned to the perfusion imaging-guided arm had $1,843 (95% confidence interval [CI] $431 to $6,171) lower median in-hospital costs and 2.0-day (95% CI 1.0 to 3.0 days) shorter median lengths of stay but similar rates of in-hospital and 30-day follow up events as patients in the conventional arm.

CONCLUSION

An ED chest pain diagnostic strategy incorporating acute resting (99m)Tc tetrofosmin SPECT imaging and early exercise stress testing may lead to reduced in-hospital costs and decreased length of stay for patients with acute chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs.

Emergency department triage strategies for acute chest pain using creatine kinase-MB and troponin I assays: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of acute chest pain is highly variable.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of strategies using cardiac markers and noninvasive tests for myocardial ischemia.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Prospective data from 1066 patients with chest pain and from the published literature.

TARGET POPULATION

Patients admitted with acute chest pain.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

INTERVENTIONS

Creatine kinase (CK)-MB mass assay alone; CK-MB mass assay followed by cardiac troponin I assay if the CK-MB value is normal; CK-MB mass assay followed by troponin I assay if the CK-MB value is normal and electrocardiography shows ischemic changes; both CK-MB mass and troponin I assays; and troponin I assay alone. These strategies were evaluated alone or in combination with early exercise testing.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Lifetime cost, life expectancy (in years), and incremental cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

For patients 55 to 64 years of age, measurement of CK-MB mass followed by exercise testing in appropriate patients was the most competitive strategy ($43000 per year of life saved). Measurement of CK-MB mass followed by troponin I measurement had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $47400 per year of life saved for patients 65 to 74 years of age; it was also the most cost-effective strategy when early exercise testing could not be performed, CK-MB values were normal, and ischemic changes were seen on electrocardiography.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Results were influenced by age, probability of myocardial infarction, and medical costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of CK-MB mass plus early exercise testing is a cost-effective initial strategy for younger patients and those with a low to moderate probability of myocardial infarction. Troponin I measurement can be a cost-effective second test in higher-risk subsets of patients if the CK-MB level is normal and early exercise testing is not an option.

Cardiological applications of nuclear medicine

Cardiovascular mortality is falling in most industrialised nations. Primarily responsible for this encouraging trend are preventive measures such as risk-factor modification but improved medical and surgical management have helped too. Clinical decision making in the patient with coronary heart disease demands techniques that not only describe coronary anatomy but also provide functional indices for early detection and to monitor the severity and extent of disease. Nuclear medicine methods can characterise non-invasively myocardial function, perfusion, and metabolism. Novel radiopharmaceuticals, improvements in imaging equipment, and extensive validation have contributed to the growing clinical acceptance of these techniques and to their cost-effective integration in the workup of patients with cardiovascular disease.