Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Can utilization of the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference improve patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock? A narrative review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition with high mortality, characterized by reduced cardiac output (CO) and tissue hypoperfusion, despite advancements in treatment. Traditional hemodynamic markers like CO measurements, monitoring of mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂) and lactate levels have limitations, particularly in detecting microcirculatory dysfunction. The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference (V-A PCO₂ gap, also known as P(V-A)CO2 and delta PCO2 or ∆PCO2) has been established as a sensitive marker of tissue perfusion and CO adequacy in septic shock but lacks extensive exploration in CS. This narrative review evaluates the possible uses of V-A PCO₂ gap in contemporary management of CS. Based on the available literature, it elucidates how the V-A PCO2 gap may offer valuable insight into tissue perfusion and CO adequacy in patients with CS. Elevated V-A PCO₂ gaps may reflect impaired clearance of CO₂ due to reduced CO and tissue hypoxia, serving as a reliable early indicator of circulatory failure. Integrating V-A PCO₂ gap monitoring into contemporary hemodynamic assessments holds potential to improve clinical decision-making, enabling more timely interventions and better stratification of patients at risk of deterioration. The sparse evidence suggests an association between elevated V-A PCO₂ gaps and poor outcomes in cardiac patients, including increased mortality and prolonged ventilation needs. Further research is needed to validate the use of this marker in CS and explore its potential to enhance treatment protocols by providing a more nuanced understanding of tissue-level perfusion, especially when macrocirculatory function appears normalized.

Safety and efficacy of up to 60 h of iv istaroxime in pre-cardiogenic shock patients: Design of the SEISMiC trial

AIMS

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates, posing a challenge for clinicians. Interventions to improve tissue perfusion and blood pressure are crucial to prevent further deterioration. Unfortunately, current inotropes, which act through adrenergic receptor stimulation, are associated with malignant arrhythmias and poorer outcomes. Due to its unique mechanism of action, istaroxime should improve haemodynamics without adrenergic overactivation. The SEISMiC study is designed to examine the safety and efficacy (haemodynamic effect) of istaroxime administrated in pre-CS patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The SEISMiC study is a multinational, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study with two parts (A and B). The study enrols patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (pre-CS, not related to myocardial ischaemia) with persistent hypotension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) 70-100 mmHg for at least 2 h] and clinically confirmed congestion, NT-proBNP ≥1400 pg/mL, and LVEF≤40%. Subjects must not have taken intravenous (iv) vasopressors, inotropes or digoxin in the past 6 h. Eligible patients are randomized to receive IV infusion of istaroxime (different doses and regimens in Parts A and B) or placebo for up to 60 h. Central haemodynamics, ECG Holter monitoring, cardiac ultrasound and biomarkers are recorded at predefined time points during the trial. The study's primary efficacy endpoint is the SBP area under the curve from baseline curve from baseline to 6 and 24 h in the combined SEISMiC Parts A and B population. Key secondary efficacy endpoints include haemodynamic, laboratory and clinical measures in SEISMiC B alone in the combined SEISMiC A and B studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results will contribute to our understanding of the role of istaroxime in pre-CS patients and potentially provide insight into the drug's haemodynamic effects and safety in this population.

Current Concepts in Fluid Resuscitation and Vasopressor Use in Cirrhosis

Critically ill patients with cirrhosis and liver failure do not uncommonly have hypotension due to multifactorial reasons, which include a hyperdynamic state with increased cardiac index (CI), low systemic vascular resistance (SVR) due to portal hypertension, following the use of beta-blocker or diuretic therapy, and severe sepsis. These changes are mediated by microvascular alterations in the liver, systemic inflammation, activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and vasodilatation due to endothelial dysfunction. Haemodynamic assessment includes measuring inferior vena cava indices, cardiac output (CO), and SVR using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), arterial waveform analysis, pulmonary artery pressures, and lactate clearance to guide fluid resuscitation. Fluid responsiveness reflects the ability of fluid bolus to increase the CO and is assessed effectively by POCUS, passive leg raises manoeuvre, and dynamic tests such as pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients. Albumin has pleiotropic benefits through anti-inflammatory properties besides its standard action on oncotic pressure and volume expansion in patients with cirrhosis but has the potential for precipitating pulmonary oedema. In conclusion, fluid therapy in critically ill patients with liver disease is a complex and dynamic process that requires individualized management protocols to optimize patient outcomes.

Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

METHODS

Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients.

RESULTS

The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02985008.

Survivorship After Cardiogenic Shock

Advances in critical care therapies for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), including temporary mechanical circulatory support and multidisciplinary shock teams, have led to improved survival to hospital discharge, ranging from 60% to 70%. After their index hospitalization, however, survivors of CS may continue to face cardiac as well as extracardiac sequelae of these therapies and complications for years to come. Most studies in CS have focused primarily on survival, with limited data on long-term recovery measures among survivors. In other forms of critical illness, research indicates that many intensive care unit survivors experience impairments in multiple domains, such as cognitive function, physical ability, and mental health. These impairments, collectively referred to as Post-Intensive Care Syndrome, in turn impact survivors' quality of life and future prognosis. This review identifies unique aspects of CS-related survivorship, highlights lessons learned from other forms of critical illness, and outlines future research directions to determine specific strategies to enhance recovery and survivorship after CS.

Tailored Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock: Case-Based Management Choices

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex, multisystem disorder precipitated by hypoperfusion from cardiac dysfunction. Our current approach to defining and treating CS encompasses all patients under 1 umbrella regardless of phenotype. This has created challenges for clinical trials and patient care owing to the heterogeneity of the patient population with CS. The Society of Coronary Angiography and Interventions shock classification has created a universal language for CS that has been rapidly adopted by researchers and clinicians. Its latest iteration established the 3-axis model incorporating shock severity, risk modifiers, and phenotypes. Phenotypes of CS have unique hemodynamic profiles that require nuanced adjustment approaches. In this study, we discuss representative cases including acute myocardial infarction, acute-on-chronic heart failure, fulminant myocarditis, and right ventricular failure. For each phenotype, specific hemodynamic parameters may help confirm appropriate diagnosis and direct to therapeutic targets signaling stability and recovery. The underlying pathophysiology of each phenotype can also help predict the extent of stabilization with pharmacologic interventions or the need to escalate to mechanical circulatory support. In conclusion, this tailored approach to CS, rather than a 1-size-fits-all approach, could help improve outcomes.

Impact of pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains one of the most common causes for cardiogenic shock (CS), with high inpatient mortality (40-50 %). Studies have reported the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in decompensated heart failure, but contemporary data on their use to guide management of AMI-CS and in different SCAI stages of CS are lacking. We investigated the association of PACs and clinical outcomes in AMI-CS. In this retrospective study from a large healthcare system (MedStar Health, 10 hospitals) from 2014 to 2021, patients were grouped according to presentation as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and on the basis of SCAI classification. In-hospital mortality was assessed among patients with and without PACs using propensity-matched analysis. A total of 2585 patients were included, of whom 797 had STEMI and 1788 had NSTEMI. Overall, 517 patients underwent PAC placement; PAC utilization rates were 19.7 % in the STEMI group and 20.4 % in the NSTEMI group. Overall, among patients with AMI-CS, we observed that in-hospital mortality was higher in patients who did not receive PACs during hospitalization (35.9 % vs 25.9 %, p < 0.001). After propensity-matching 484 patients in the PAC group to 484 in the no-PAC group, the no-PAC group still showed higher mortality (34.9 % vs 26.7 %, p = 0.005). Utilization of MCS devices was higher in patients with PAC. In conclusion, our results suggest an advantage in utilizing PACs in AMI-CS patients to identify early CS stages and offer appropriate therapies. Therefore, PACs should be routinely used in for this population.

Tailored Approach to Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: Strategies to Facilitate Patient Mobilization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses a tailored approach to managing cardiogenic shock and temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). We also outline specific mobilization strategies for patients with different tMCS devices and configurations, which can be enabled by this tailored approach to cardiogenic shock management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Safe and effective mobilization of patients with cardiogenic shock receiving tMCS can be accomplished. Appropriate patient selection, tailored device management, and dynamic multidisciplinary approaches to mobilization are critical to success. Cardiogenic shock is a heterogeneous condition characterized by end-organ dysfunction due to hypoperfusion and low cardiac output. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is an increasingly valuable tool in managing these patients, with various devices and configurations available. Critically ill patients receiving tMCS are at risk for complications and deconditioning associated with prolonged bed rest, making it essential to implement strategies that promote mobility when feasible. We advocate for a tailored approach to the selection and management of tMCS in patients with cardiogenic shock. This approach focuses on the early identification of patients who may benefit from tMCS before further deterioration, alongside the selection of devices that provide ventricular-specific support and facilitate upper-body cannulation to enhance mobilization while also considering patients' potential exit strategies from tMCS. Understanding this approach is vital to appropriately facilitating safe and effective mobilization.

Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury for Critically Ill Cardiogenic Shock Patients with Machine Learning Algorithms

Background

The aim of this study was to use five machine learning approaches and logistic regression to design and validate the acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction model for critically ill individuals with cardiogenic shock (CS).

Methods

All patients who diagnosed with CS from the MIMIC-IV database, the eICU database, and Zhongnan hospital of Wuhan university were included in this study. Clinical information, including demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, critical illness scores and laboratory tests was retrospectively collected. Five machine learning algorithms (LightGBM, decision tree, XGBoost, random forest, and ensemble model) and one conventional logistic regression were applied for the prediction of AKI in critically ill individuals with CS. ROC curves were generated via python software to assess the overall performance of machine learning algorithms and the SHAP analysis was adopted to reveal the impact of prediction for each feature.

Results

The ensemble model exhibited the best predictive ability (AUC:0.91, 95% CI, 0.88-0.94), followed by random forest (AUC:0.90, 95% CI, 0.86-0.94) and XGBoost (AUC:0.89, 95% CI, 0.84-0.92). While the logistic regression model obtained the worst predictive performance (AUC:0.62, 95% CI, 0.56-0.68). When validated the prediction models with eICU database, the ensemble model exhibited the best predictive ability (AUC:0.92, 95% CI, 0.89-0.96), while the logistic model obtained the worst predictive performance (AUC:0.61, 95% CI, 0.56-0.67). Finally, we verified the prediction models using the data from our hospital and ensemble model still exhibited the best predictive ability (AUC:0.74, 95% CI, 0.62-0.86), while the decision tree model obtained the worst predictive performance (AUC:0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.70).

Conclusion

Machine learning algorithms could be utilized for the AKI prediction among critically ill CS patients, and exhibit superior predictive performance compared to the conventional logistic regression analysis.

Strategies to Improve Clinical Outcomes of Women with Cardiogenic Shock

Women with cardiogenic shock have a higher risk of mortality compared with men. There is an increasing need to identify existing barriers to care and formulate tailored strategies to improve outcomes in women.

Predicting survival after Impella implantation in patients with cardiogenic shock: The J-PVAD risk score

AIMS

Impella has become a new option for mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS); however, prognostic models for patients after Impella are lacking. We aimed to identify the factors that predict in-hospital mortality in patients with CS requiring Impella and develop a new risk prediction model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We utilized the J-PVAD registry, which includes all cases where Impella was implanted in Japan. Two-thirds of the patients in the J-PVAD registry were randomly assigned to the derivation cohort (n = 1701), and the other third was assigned to the validation cohort (n = 850). A backward stepwise logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. In the derivation cohort, 956 patients were discharged alive, and 745 patients (43.8%) died during hospitalization. Among 29 candidate variables, 12 were independently associated with in-hospital mortality and were applied as components of the risk model, including age, sex, body mass index, fulminant myocarditis aetiology, cardiac arrest in hospital, baseline veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, mean arterial pressure, lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, creatinine, and albumin levels. The comparison of predicted and observed in-hospital mortality according to the 7th quantiles using the J-PVAD risk score showed good calibration. The area under the curve for the J-PVAD risk score was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.78). In the validation cohort, the J-PVAD risk score showed good calibration and discrimination ability.

CONCLUSIONS

The J-PVAD risk score can be calculated using variables easily obtained in routine clinical practice. It helps the accurate stratification of mortality risk and facilitates clinical decision-making.

Safety and utility of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is an increasingly utilized therapeutic option in AMI-CS, studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of different forms of MCS have yielded conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different forms of MCS.

METHODS

A database search was performed for studies reporting on the association of different forms of MCS with clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS. The primary efficacy endpoints were short term (≤30 days) and long term (>30 days) all-cause mortality. Secondary efficacy endpoints included recurrent AMI, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, device-related limb complications, moderate to severe bleeding events, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA).

RESULTS

2752 patients with AMI-CS met inclusion criteria. Results were available comparing ECMO to other MCS or medical therapy alone, comparing IABP to medical therapy alone, and comparing pLVAD to IABP. Use of ECMO was not associated with lower risk of 30-day or long-term mortality compared to pVAD or standard medical therapy with or without IABP placement but was associated with higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to pVAD. IABP use was not associated with a lower risk of 30 day or long-term mortality but was associated with higher risk of recurrent AMI and moderate to severe bleeding compared to medical therapy. Compared to IABP, pVAD use was associated with lower risk of CV mortality but not recurrent AMI. pVAD was associated with a higher risk of device-related limb complications and moderate to severe bleeding compared to IABP use.

CONCLUSION

Use of ECMO or IABP in patients with AMI-CS is not associated with significant improvement in mortality. pVAD is associated with a lower risk of CV mortality. All MCS types are associated with increased risk of complications. Additional high-quality studies are needed to determine the optimal MCS therapy for patients with AMI-CS.

Mixed Cardiogenic-Vasodilatory Shock: Current Insights and Future Directions

This state-of-the-art review describes the potential etiologies, pathophysiology, and management of mixed shock in the context of a proposed novel classification system. Cardiogenic-vasodilatory shock occurs when cardiogenic shock is complicated by inappropriate vasodilation, impairing compensatory mechanisms, and contributing to worsening shock. Vasodilatory-cardiogenic shock occurs when vasodilatory shock is complicated by myocardial dysfunction, resulting in low cardiac output. Primary mixed shock occurs when a systemic insult triggers both myocardial dysfunction and vasoplegia. Regardless of the etiology of mixed shock, the hemodynamic profile can be similar, and outcomes tend to be poor. Identification and treatment of both the initial and complicating disease processes is essential along with invasive hemodynamic monitoring given the evolving nature of mixed shock states. Hemodynamic support typically involves a combination of inotropes and vasopressors, with few data available to guide the use of mechanical circulatory support. Consensus definitions and novel treatment strategies are needed for this dangerous condition.

The uses of right heart catheterization in cardio-pulmonary disease: State-of-the-art

The right heart catheterization (RHC) remains an important diagnostic tool for a spectrum of cardiovascular disease processes including pulmonary hypertension (PH), shock, valvular heart disease, and unexplained dyspnea. While it gained widespread utilization after its introduction, the role of the RHC has evolved to provide valuable information for the management of advanced therapies in heart failure (HF) and cardiogenic shock (CS) to name a few. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview on the indications, utilization, complications, interpretation, and calculations associated with RHC.

Influence of Right and Left Bundle Branch Block in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest

OBJECTIVES

The study investigates the prognostic impact of right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) compared with no bundle branch block (BBB). In patients with heart failure, existence of RBBB and LBBB has influence on prognosis.

DESIGN

Prospective registry-study.

SETTING

ICU of a tertiary academic hospital in Germany.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with CS.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Consecutive patients with CS were included. The prognostic impact of RBBB and LBBB on 30-day all-cause mortality was tested within the entire cohort and in the subgroup of CS patients with cardiac arrest at admission. The final study cohort comprised 248 patients. Patients with RBBB showed the highest 30-day all-cause mortality followed by LBBB and no BBB (72.5% vs. 52.9% vs. 50.0%; log-rank p = 0.015). These findings were consistent even after solely including CS patients with cardiac arrest (90.0% vs. 73.3% vs. 62.2%; log-rank p = 0.008). After adjustment for lactate, norepinephrine, troponin I, Acute Physiology Score, Society of Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions shock stage, and heart rate in a multivariable Cox regression analysis, RBBB still revealed a negative impact on 30-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.807; 95% CI, 1.107-2.947; p = 0.018), whereas LBBB was not associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. In this multivariable Cox regression model lactate (HR, 1.065; 95% CI, 1.018-1.115; p = 0.006), troponin I (HR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.001-1.005; p = 0.001), and Acute Physiology Score (HR, 1.033; 95% CI, 1.001-1.066; p = 0.041) were as well associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. Finally, no association of RBBB was found with the incidence of liver or severe renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the Acute Physiology Score, lactate, and troponin levels, RBBB was associated with an increased 30-day all-cause mortality in consecutive CS patients with and without cardiac arrest, whereas LBBB showed no prognostic impact.

Timing of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with cardiogenic shock

AIMS

The optimal timing for implementing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock (CS) remains indeterminate. This study aims to evaluate patient characteristics and outcome associated with the time interval between CS onset and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) implementation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, patients with CS treated with MCS at 15 tertiary care centres in three countries were enrolled. Patients treated with MCS were stratified into early (<2 h), intermediate (2-12 h) and delayed (≥12-24 h) MCS implantation by using the time interval between CS onset and MCS device implementation. Adjusted logistic and Cox regression models were fitted to assess the association between timing of MCS implementation, patient characteristics and 30-day mortality. A total of 330 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO and/or microaxial flow pump were included in this study; 20.9% received early, 55.8% intermediate, and 23.3% delayed MCS. Although crude 30-day mortality was slightly lower in patients with early MCS (58.1% vs. 64.7% vs. 64.3%), adjusted analyses showed no significant association between timing of MCS implantation and 30-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] for early vs. intermediate MCS: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.46, p = 0.74; HR for early vs. delayed MCS: 1.29, 95% CI 0.78-2.13, p = 0.33). Moreover, the incidence of complications, related and unrelated to MCS, did not differ significantly among groups.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory study of patients with CS treated with MCS, the timing of device implantation within 24 h after CS onset was not associated with mortality. This supports a restrictive MCS approach, reserving its application for patients experiencing CS deterioration despite conventional therapy.

High Circulating Dipeptidyl Peptidase 3 Predicts Mortality and Need for Organ Support in Cardiogenic Shock: An Ancillary Analysis of the ACCOST-HH Trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is burdened with high mortality. Efforts to improve outcome are hampered by the difficulty of individual risk stratification and the lack of targetable pathways. Previous studies demonstrated that elevated circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (cDPP3) is an early predictor of short-term outcome in CS, mostly of ischemic origin. Our objective was to investigate the association between cDPP3 and short-term outcomes in a diverse population of patients with CS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

cDPP3 was measured at baseline and after 72 hours in the AdreCizumab against plaCebO in SubjecTs witH cardiogenic sHock (ACCOST-HH) trial. The association of cDPP3 with 30-day mortality and need for organ support was assessed. Median cDPP3 concentration at baseline was 43.2 ng/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2-74.0 ng/mL) and 77 of the 150 patients (52%) had high cDPP3 over the predefined cutoff of 40 ng/mL. Elevated cDPP3 was associated with higher 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.9), fewer days alive without cardiovascular support (aHR, 3 days [95% CI, 0-24 days] vs aHR, 21 days [95% CI, 5-26 days]; P < .0001) and a greater need for renal replacement therapy (56% vs 22%; P < .0001) and mechanical ventilation (90 vs 74%; P = .04). Patients with a sustained high cDPP3 had a poor prognosis (reference group). In contrast, patients with an initially high but decreasing cDPP3 at 72 hours had markedly lower 30-day mortality (aHR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.084-0.34), comparable with patients with a sustained low cDPP3 (aHR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.41). The need for organ support was markedly decreased in subpopulations with sustained low or decreasing cDPP3.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirms the prognostic value of cDPP3 in a contemporary population of patients with CS.

[Translated article] Safe administration of noradrenaline by the peripheral route: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To review and analyse the available literature on peripheral administration of noradrenaline (NA) with the aim of providing recommendations to ensure correct use and patient safety.

METHODS

Systematic review on the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Science Direct, using the following search terms: ("Noradrenaline" [Mesh]) AND ("Norepinephrine" [Mesh]) AND ("Vasopressors" [Mesh]) AND ("Peripheral infusions" [Mesh]) OR ("Extravasations" [Mesh]). A total of 1040 articles were identified. Animal studies and studies written in languages other than English were excluded. Finally, 83 articles were included.

RESULTS

NA can be administered peripherally. The risk of extravasation should be taken into account, with phentolamine being the first pharmacological line of treatment. It has also been related to the appearance of thrombophlebitis, cellulitis, tissue necrosis, limb ischaemia, and gangrene, although its incidence seems to be low. The use of peripheral NA in children seems to be carried out without obvious complications. The use of standard concentrations is suggested to reduce the risk of errors. It is recommended to use 0.9% saline as the default diluent for peripheral NA.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral infusions of NA could be a safe and beneficial option in early resuscitation provided that a number of guidelines are followed that reduce the likelihood of complications associated with this route.

Safe administration of noradrenaline by the peripheral route: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To review and analyze the available literature on peripheral administration of noradrenaline (NA) with the aim of providing recommendations to ensure correct use and patient safety.

METHODS

Systematic review on the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS and Science Direct, using the following search terms: ("Noradrenaline" [Mesh]) AND ("Norepinephrine" [Mesh]) AND ("Vasopressors" [Mesh]) AND ("Peripheral infusions" [Mesh]) OR ("Extravasations" [Mesh]). A total of 1,040 articles were identified. Animal studies and studies written in languages other than English were excluded. Finally, 83 articles were included.

RESULTS

NA can be administered peripherally. The risk of extravasation should be taken into account, with phentolamine being the first pharmacological line of treatment. It has also been related to the appearance of thrombophlebitis, cellulitis, tissue necrosis, limb ischemia and gangrene, although its incidence seems to be low. The use of peripheral NA in children seems to be carried out without obvious complications. The use of standard concentrations is suggested to reduce the risk of errors. It is recommended to use 0.9% saline as the default diluent for peripheral NA.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral infusions of NA could be a safe and beneficial option in early resuscitation provided that a number of guidelines are followed that reduce the likelihood of complications associated with this route.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia compared to severe community-acquired Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in Reunion Island: A retrospective study

Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) has emerged in the last decades as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in tropical and subtropical regions. We previously conducted the first investigation on this topic in France with a case series of severe CAP-Ab in Reunion Island over an eight-year period. In the present work, we aim to highlight the specific aspects of CAP-Ab by comparing our case series with an historical cohort (PAC_RUN), obtained by retrospective chart review (2016-2021) of severe community-acquired pneumonia cases on Reunion Island, in which CAP-Ab was ruled out. During the study period, eight CAP-Ab cases were identified, giving an incidence of 0.1 cases per 100,000 people/year, and an incidence of 16.5 cases per 100,000 people/year for non-Ab-related CAP (n = 761). By comparing with non-Ab-related CAP, patients had more excessive alcohol use (75% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.005) and lower body mass index (21 vs. 24 kg/m2, p = 0.004). Six cases (75%) of CAP-Ab occurred during the rainy season (p = 0.06). Mortality was higher (62.5% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.02) and time to death was shorter (median 2 days vs. 7, p = 0.009) in the CAP-Ab group. Bacteraemic pneumonia was strongly associated with CAP-Ab (62.5% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.004). Significant differences were found in the need for renal replacement therapy (75% vs. 17.2%, p < 0.001), catecholamine use (100% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.01) and use of invasive mechanical ventilation (100% vs. 62.7%, p = 0.03). Also, in the proportion of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (62.5% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.02), septic shock (100% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001), and cardiogenic shock (87.5% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001). Compared to severe non-Ab-related CAP, severe CAP-Ab is characterised by higher mortality, associated with a high frequency of multiple organ failure. Excessive alcohol consumption and malnutrition seem to be risk factors. To improve outcomes, broader spectrum antibiotic therapy must be immediately proposed when CAP-Ab is suspected.

Emerging Modalities for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening medical condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment. The use of standardized CS criteria, such as the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions criteria, can categorize patients and guide therapeutic strategies. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become valuable tools in the treatment of CS, as they can provide cardiovascular support as a bridge to recovery, cardiac surgery, or advanced therapies such as cardiac transplant or durable ventricular assist devices. The use of MCS should be tailored to each individual patient, focused on a stepwise escalation of circulatory support to support both end-organ perfusion and myocardial recovery. As newer MCS devices reduce myocardial oxygen demand without increasing ischemia, the possibility of recovery is optimized. In this review, we discuss the different modalities of MCS focusing on the mechanism of support and the advantages and disadvantages of each device.

Clinical outcomes following shock team implementation for cardiogenic shock: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock is a critical cardiac condition characterized by low cardiac output leading to end-organ hypoperfusion and associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. It can manifest following acute myocardial infarction or acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure. Despite advancements, mortality rates remain elevated, prompting interest in multidisciplinary approaches to improve outcomes. This manuscript presents a review focused on the concept of a cardiogenic shock team and its potential impact on patient management and outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed on March 19, 2023, covering PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We included primary studies (prospective and retrospective) only and evaluated their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023440354).

RESULTS

Six relevant studies with 2066 cardiogenic shock patients were included, of which 1071 were managed by shock teams and 995 received standard care. Findings from the reviewed studies indicated the favorable outcomes associated with implementing cardiogenic shock teams. Patients managed by these teams exhibited higher 30-day and in-hospital survival rates compared to those without team intervention. The implementation of cardiogenic shock teams was linked to reduced in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality rates. Additionally, shock team involvement was associated with shorter door-to-balloon times.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that cardiogenic shock teams play a crucial role in improving patient outcomes through earlier detection and timely interventions. Despite challenges in team implementation, their potential to reduce mortality and improve efficiency in patient care warrants further research and greater integration of multidisciplinary strategies into clinical practice.

Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: Inotropes, Vasopressors and Machines

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant mortality. Advances in pharmacological therapies and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have markedly improved the therapeutic approach to CS, though treatment efficacy and safety vary. The recent DanGer shock trial showed a significant reduction in 6-month mortality for CS patients due to acute myocardial infarction. Future randomised trials should evaluate a phenotype-guided pharmaco-MCS approach to the management of CS. This paper summarises contemporary pharmacological and MCS treatments for patients with CS.

The prognostic impact of stress hyperglycemia ratio on mortality in cardiogenic shock: a MIMIC-IV database analysis

BACKGROUND

The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has been established as a predictor of unfavorable outcomes across various diseases. However, its relationship with prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between SHR and outcomes in CS patients.

METHODS

A total of 904 CS patients with their first ICU admission were included in this study, utilizing data from the American Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality at 30 days and 360 days. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the tertiles of the SHR.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 67.62 years, with 67.3% of participants being men. During the follow-up period, 221 patients (24.4%) died within 30 days, and 360 patients (39.8%) died within 360 days. The 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 16.9%, 22.3%, and 34.2% in the T1, T2, and T3 groups, respectively (p < 0.001), while the 360-day all-cause mortality rates were 34.9%, 39.0%, and 45.6%, respectively (p = 0.015). Compared with patients in T1, those in T3 exhibited a significantly higher risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR = 2.140, 95% CI: 1.522-3.008, p < 0.001) and 360-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.495, 95% CI: 1.157-1.931, p = 0.002). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses demonstrated an approximately linear relationship between SHR and 360-day all-cause mortality (p for overall = 0.011; p for nonlinearity = 0.099). However, a nonlinear association was observed between SHR and 30-day all-cause mortality (p for overall < 0.001; p for nonlinearity = 0.030), with the risk increasing significantly when SHR exceeded 1.176. Subgroup analyses revealed that the effect of SHR was consistent across most subgroups except in patients with and without acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In patients with AMI, SHR was associated with a significantly elevated risk of mortality, whereas no significant association was observed in patients without AMI. For 30-day all-cause mortality, the HR was 1.059 (95% CI: 1.040-1.078) in patients with AMI and 1.002 (95% CI: 0.966-1.040) in those without AMI (p for interaction = 0.007). For 360-day all-cause mortality, the HR was 1.043 (95% CI: 1.026-1.061) in patients with AMI and 0.984 (95% CI: 0.955-1.014) in those without AMI (p for interaction < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Elevated SHR was significantly associated with increased 30-day and 360-day all-cause mortality in patients with CS, particularly in those with CS complicated by AMI. SHR may serve as a valuable marker for risk stratification and guiding subsequent interventions in CS patients. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Acute kidney injury and in-hospital outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients without chronic kidney disease: insights from the national inpatient sample

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) complicates transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), leading to higher mortality. The incidence and effects of AKI on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR without chronic kidney disease (CKD) are unclear. We aimed to determine the association between AKI and in-hospital outcomes in patients with TAVR using propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

Using International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision codes, we queried the National Inpatient Sample for TAVR performed between 2016 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to perioperative AKI development. Patients with CKD or on permanent hemodialysis at baseline were excluded. We conducted 1:1 PSM to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between AKI and in-hospital outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of our inferences.

RESULTS

Of 47,372 unweighted patient admissions for TAVR, 1617 (3.41%) had a concomitant diagnosis of AKI. The incidence of AKI decreased from 4.82 to 3.18% from 2016 to 2021 (P-trend < 0.01). Before PSM, patients with AKI had a significantly higher rate of in-hospital mortality compared with those without AKI (6.12% vs. 0.48%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 8.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.32-11.68). Using the PSM algorithm, 1579 well-matched patients were included in each group. After PSM, an association was observed between patients with TAVR and concomitant AKI and a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (6.21% vs. 1.08%, respectively; OR 5.96; 95% CI 3.54-10.04). In subgroup analyses stratified according to age (≤ 80 and > 80 years), sex (male/female), and hypertension status, consistent associations were observed between AKI and the risk of in-hospital mortality. AKI patients were at higher risk for acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.35-2.34), major bleeding (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.13-2.33), blood transfusion (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.28-2.11), and cardiogenic shock (OR 3.73, 95% CI 2.77-5.01). No significant betweengroup differences were observed in stroke (P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

AKI was a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing TAVR without CKD and was associated with higher post-procedure complication rates.

Closed-Loop Automated Control System of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Cardiogenic Shock

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) benefits patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) but can increase left ventricular afterload and exacerbate pulmonary edema. Adding a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to VA-ECMO can optimize the hemodynamics. Because managing VA-ECMO and LVAD simultaneously is complex and labor-intensive, we developed a closed-loop automated control system for VA-ECMO and LVAD. Based on the circulatory equilibrium framework, this system automatically adjusts VA-ECMO and LVAD flows and cardiovascular drug and fluid dosages to achieve target arterial pressure (AP, 70 mm Hg), left atrial pressure (PLA, 14 mm Hg), and total systemic flow (Ftotal, 120-140 ml/min/kg). In seven anesthetized dogs with CS, VA-ECMO significantly increased AP and PLA from 24 (23-27) to 71 (63-77) mm Hg and 20.1 (16.3-22.1) to 43.0 (25.7-51.4) mm Hg, respectively. Upon system activation, PLA was promptly reduced. At 60 min postactivation, the system-controlled AP to 69 (65-74) mm Hg, PLA to 12.5 (12.0-13.4) mm Hg, and Ftotal to 117 (114-132) ml/min/kg while adjusting VA-ECMO flow to 59 (12-60) ml/min/kg, LVAD flow to 68 (54-78) ml/min/kg, and cardiovascular drug and fluid dosages. This system automatically optimizes VA-ECMO and LVAD hemodynamics, making it an attractive tool for rescuing patients with CS.

The use of pulmonary artery catheter and clinical outcomes in older adults with cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Evidence is lacking regarding the benefits of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) for cardiogenic shock (CS).

METHODS

We analyzed the data on Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65-99 admitted with CS from 2016 to 2020 to compare outcomes of patients monitored with versus without PAC. We implemented propensity score matching weight (PSMW) analysis with hospital fixed effects (effectively comparing outcomes within the same hospital) and quasi-experimental instrumental variable (IV) analysis (accounting for potential unmeasured confounders) with the probability of using PAC for CS in the previous year as the instrument.

RESULTS

We included 4668 and 78,502 patients admitted with CS, monitored with and without PAC, respectively. We found no evidence that the use of PAC was associated with mortality either in PSMW (adjusted absolute risk difference [aRD], +0.5-percentage-points [pp]; 95 % confidence interval [CI], -1.1 to +2.1) or IV (aRD, -2.5 pp.; 95 % CI, -8.2 to +3.2) analyses. While consistent associations were not observed between the use of PAC and major bleeding and sepsis, the use of PAC was associated with a higher risk of all-bleeding (PSMW: aRD, +1.5 pp.; 95 % CI, +0.1 to +2.9; IV: +13.3 pp.; 95 % CI, +7.7 to +18.8) and longer LOS (PSMW: adjusted mean difference, +1.6 days; 95 % CI, +1.1 to +2.0; IV: +6.9 days; +4.9 to +9.0).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that the use of PAC was associated with lower mortality in patients with CS. While high-quality randomized trials are needed, providers should be careful about appropriate settings and indications of the use of PAC for the management of CS.

Impact of the obesity paradox on 28-day mortality in elderly patients critically ill with cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that the obesity paradox exists in cardiovascular disease (CVD), giving patients a survival advantage, but controversy remains as to whether it applies to patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), especially in the elderly. We therefore aimed to determine whether obesity affects 28-day prognosis in elderly patients with CS.

METHODS

We used clinical data from the Medical Information Market in Critical Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Critical patients with CS were categorized into two groups based on age; age < 65 years and ≥ 65 years were classified as young adult patients and elderly patients, respectively. Patients were then categorized into two subgroups based on their body mass index (BMI), one with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and the other with a BMI < 30 kg/m2. The primary outcome was a 28-day prognosis. Secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation status, length of hospitalization, and length of ICU stay.

RESULTS

1827 patients from the MIMIC-IV ICU database were analyzed, of which 571 patients were < 65 years old and 1256 patients were ≥ 65 years old. According to multifactorial logistic analysis, BMI > 30 kg/m2 was not a 28-day risk factor for death in elderly patients critically ill with CS (Overweight OR 1.28, P = 0.221; Obesity OR 1.15, P = 0.709; Severe obesity OR 1.46, P = 0.521; using normal weight as a reference). In contrast, underweight was a risk factor (OR 2.42, P = 0.039). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that in the older age group, 28-day survival was significantly higher in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 compared to those with BMI < 30 kg/m2 [261 (66.75%) vs. 522 (60.35%), P = 0.024].

CONCLUSION

Underweight affects the 28-day prognosis of critically ill elderly patients with CS. In contrast, overweight and or obesity do not appear to have a significant impact on the prognosis of these patients.

The microcirculation in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by inadequate cardiac output, leading to end-organ hypoperfusion and associated mortality rates ranging between 40 and 50%. The critical role of microcirculatory impairments in the progression of organ failure during shock has been highlighted in several studies. Traditional therapies have often focused on stabilizing macrocirculation, neglecting microcirculatory dysfunction, which can result in persistent tissue hypoxia and poor outcomes. This review highlights the importance of assessing microcirculation in cardiogenic shock, including parameters such as skin perfusion, sublingual microcirculation, and lactate dynamics. Integrating microcirculatory assessments into clinical practice remains challenging due to the complexity of the methods and limited therapeutic options targeting microvascular perfusion. While advances in microcirculation-guided therapies hold promise for improving outcomes in cardiogenic shock, further research is needed to establish effective protocols.

Cardiogenic shock in general intensive care unit: a nationwide prospective analysis of epidemiology and outcome

AIMS

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening disease burdened by a mortality up to 50%. The epidemiology has changed with non-ischaemic aetiologies being predominant, although data were mainly derived from patients admitted to dedicated acute cardiac care. We report the epidemiology and outcome of patients with CS admitted to general intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective multicentric epidemiological study including 314 general ICU adhering to the GiViTI nationwide registry from 2011 to 2018, excluding cardiac arrest. The primary endpoint of the study was mortality. The association between clinical factors and mortality was evaluated using a logistic regression model. The odds ratios (ORs) of the covariates quantify their association with mortality during hospitalization. A total of 11 052 patients admitted to general ICU {incidence 2.17%; median age 72 [interquartile range (66-81)], 38.7% were women} with CS were included. Forty-seven per cent of patients had more than three organ insufficiency at the time of admission. The most common CS aetiologies were left heart failure (LHF, 5247-47.5%); acute myocardial infarction (3612-32.6%); right heart failure (RHF, 515-4.6%); and biventricular failure (532-4.8%). A total of 85.5% were mechanically ventilated during the ICU hospitalization. The overall ICU mortality was 44.8%, increasing to 53.4% during the hospitalization in the index hospital and to 54.3% at the latest hospital. Right heart failure-cardiogenic shock patients exhibited the highest mortality risk [OR: 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.94-1.50); P < 0.001], followed by biventricular CS [OR 1.04, 95% CI (0.82-1.32)]. Respiratory failure [OR 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.19)], coagulation disorder [1.17 (95% CI 1.1-1.24)], renal dysfunction [OR 1.55 (95% CI 1.50-1.61)], and neurological alteration [OR 1.45 (95% CI 1.39-1.50)] were associated with worsen outcome along with severe hypotension [systolic blood pressure < 70 mmHg-OR 2.35, 95% CI (2.06-2.67)], increasing age [OR 2.21 95% CI (2.01-2.42)], and longer ICU stay prior to admission (two-fold increase for each 4.7 days).

CONCLUSION

In the general ICU, the aetiology of CS, excluding cardiac arrest, remains characterized mostly by LHF with RHF-CS burdened by higher mortality. Multiorgan failure at admission and longer hospital stay before ICU admission predispose to worsen outcome.

Managing Arrhythmias in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights Into Milrinone and Dobutamine Therapy

Shock is a state of inadequate perfusion that affects vital organs. Cardiogenic shock (CS) predisposes patients to various arrhythmias. The adverse effect depends on intervention and pharmacogenomics. This narrative review sheds light on treatment strategies for arrhythmias caused by milrinone and dobutamine when managing CS. Dobutamine, through beta-1 agonism, and milrinone, by phosphodiesterase-3 inhibition, increase cardiac contractility by enhancing the availability of calcium to the myocardium. Dobutamine is also a beta-2 agonist, and milrinone is a phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor; both result in peripheral vasodilation, leading to their use preferentially in patients with CS with normotensive blood pressure. To narrow down relevant literature, various electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, were searched. The review revealed limited evidence favoring either milrinone or dobutamine as the preferred inotropic agent for managing CS, but it did reveal that though hospital stays using dobutamine were shorter, mortality from its induced arrhythmias led to an increase in all-cause mortality rates. Both proarrhythmic agents triggered ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, some requiring cardioversion while others are non-sustained and managed medically or symptomatically. Though neither agent has a specific reversal agent, the effect of dobutamine was seen to be successfully aborted using intravenous ultrashort half-life beta-blockers (such as esmolol). The findings accentuated the critical need for a tailored approach to managing these iatrogenic arrhythmias, emphasizing clinical vigilance and individualized patient care.

Cardiogenic Shock: Focus on Non-Cardiac Biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the evolving multifaceted nature of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the context of non-cardiac biomarkers that may improve CS management and risk stratification.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are increasing data highlighting the role of lactate, glucose, and other markers of inflammation and end-organ dysfunction in CS. These biomarkers provide a more comprehensive understanding of the concurrent hemo-metabolic and cellular disturbances observed in CS and offer insights beyond standard structural and functional cardiac assessments. Non-cardiac biomarkers both refine the diagnostic accuracy and improve the prognostic assessments in CS. Further studies revolving around novel biomarkers are warranted to support more targeted and effective therapeutic and management interventions in these high-risk patients.

The CMLA score: A novel tool for early prediction of renal replacement therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Early identification of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients at risk for renal replacement therapy (RRT) is crucial for improving clinical outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model using readily available clinical variables.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 4,133 CS patients from the MIMIC and eICU-CRD databases. Patients from MIMIC databases were randomly divided into 80 % training and 20 % validation cohorts, while those from eICU-CRD constituted the test cohort. Feature selection involved univariate logistic regression (LR), LASSO, and Boruta methods. Prediction models for RRT were developed using stepwise selection by LR and five machine learning (ML) algorithms (naive bayes, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, extreme gradient boosting) in the training cohort. Model performance was evaluated in both validation and test cohorts. A nomogram was constructed based on LR model. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

The incidence of RRT was approximately 13 % across all cohorts. Ten variables were selected: age, anion gap, chloride, bun, creatinine, potassium, ast, lactate, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and mechanical ventilation. Compared with ML models, the LR model showed superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.731 in the validation cohort and 0.714 in the test cohort. Four variables that best predicted the need for RRT (age, lactate, mechanical ventilation, and creatinine) were used to generate the CMLA nomogram risk score. The CMLA model showed better predictive accuracy for RRT in the test cohort compared to the previous CALL-K model (AUC: 0.731 vs. 0.699, DeLong test P < 0.05). Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the CMLA model also had good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.323) and clinical utility in the test cohort. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated significantly higher 28-day mortality in the high-risk CMLA group.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinically applicable nomogram with four key variables was developed to predict RRT risk in CS patients. It demonstrated good performance, promising enhanced clinical decision-making.

A profile of the impella 5.5 for the clinical management of cardiogenic shock and a review of the current indications for use and future directions

INTRODUCTION

The Impella 5.5 device is a surgically inserted, trans-valvular, microaxial flow device capable of providing 5.5 L/min of continuous, antegrade flow from the left ventricle (LV) to the aorta. The ability of the Impella 5.5 to fully pressure and volume unload the dysfunctional LV while allowing for mobilization and rehabilitation has rapidly expanded its use. Clinical use scenarios include escalation of support for acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS), transition from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to mobile support, bridge to transplantation or durable MCS in acute decompensated heart failure, or perioperative use in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS).

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a profile of the Impella 5.5 device, summarizes the current literature surrounding clinical applications, reviews active and upcoming clinical trials, and projects future applications for the device through an expert review.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of the Impella 5.5 has allowed for monitoring of left-heart recovery, optimizing right ventricular function, and rehabilitating patients to meet bridging endpoints. The 2018 heart transplant allocation system modifications have expanded the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) on the transplant waitlist, increasing the number of patients transplanted on support. With increased safety and durability, an expanding frontier is used in perioperative support for PCCS in high-risk cardiac surgery.

Impacts of Hospital Volume and Patient-Hospital Distances on Outcomes of Older Adults Receiving Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Devices for Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist devices (pVADs) have the potential to reduce mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). However, the association between the distribution of pVAD-performing centers and outcomes of CS has not been explored.

METHODS

This observational study included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 years treated with pVAD for CS from 2016 to 2020. It examined the associations between patient outcomes and 2 exposure variables: hospitals' procedure volumes of pVAD and patient-hospital distances (in quintiles [Qn]). We developed Cox proportional hazards regression for 180-day mortality and heart failure readmission rates, and multivariable logistic regression for in-hospital outcomes, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, concomitant treatments, and hospital characteristics, including CS volume, teaching status, and the ability to perform extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

RESULTS

A total of 6637 patients with CS underwent pVAD at 1041 hospitals, with the annualized hospital volume ranging widely from 0.3 to 55.6 cases/year. Patients treated at higher-volume centers experienced lower 180-day mortality compared with those treated at lower-volume centers (Qn1=reference; Qn2: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.79-0.97]; Qn3: aHR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.79-0.98]; Qn4: aHR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78-0.99]; Qn5: aHR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]; P for trend, 0.026), while we found no evidence that patient-hospital distances were associated with mortality (Qn1=reference; Qn2: aHR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.89-1.09]; Qn3: aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.85-1.04]; Qn4: aHR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92-1.11]; Qn5: aHR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.01]; P for trend, 0.160). We found no evidence that the hospital volume and patient-hospital distances were associated with in-hospital bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, or renal replacement therapy initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital volume was more strongly associated with mortality than patient-hospital distances, suggesting that rational distribution of pVAD-performing centers while ensuring adequate procedure volumes may optimize patient mortality.

Acute Decompensated Valvular Disease in the Intensive Care Unit

Acute decompensated valvular disease encompasses a group of complex and challenging conditions, which are often the primary reason for admission to the cardiac intensive care unit and can also complicate the management of other primary cardiac disorders. Critically ill patients with valvular disease also present unique diagnostic and management challenges. Historically, medical and percutaneous interventional therapies have been limited and surgery was the only definitive treatment; however, surgical risk can at times be prohibitive. High-quality evidence to direct management of acute valvular disorders in this population is lacking and societal guidelines largely do not address treatment options for critically ill patients with decompensated valvular disease. In this review, we discuss the clinical presentation and epidemiology of commonly encountered valvular diseases in the modern cardiac intensive care unit, highlight key pathophysiology, detail gaps in evidence, describe the pivotal role of multidisciplinary Heart Teams, and provide guidance for management.

Inflammatory and Hemolytic Responses of Microaxial Flow Pump Temporary Ventricular Assist Devices via Axillary Access in Cardiogenic Shock

Background and Objectives: The use of temporary left ventricular assist devices (tLVADs) for patients suffering from cardiogenic shock (CS) is becoming more common. This study examines the indications and outcomes of microaxial flow pumps (Impella®, Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) when cannulated through the axillary artery in patients with severe CS, with a particular focus on acute phase reactions and hemolytic responses. Materials and Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort involved patients who received microaxial Impella implantation via the axillary artery from 2020 to 2022 (n = 47). Results: Among the patients, 66% (N = 31 cases) were treated with the Impella 5.5, 25.5% (N = 12 cases) with the Impella 5.0, and 8.5% (N = 4 cases) with the Impella CP. Additionally, 28% were managed using the ECMELLA concept. The mean length of time for Impella support was 8 days. The overall 30-day survival rate was 78%, with no significant differences observed between the ECMELLA group and the various Impella types. At 30 days post-therapy, 47% of survivors no longer required mechanical support, while 26% were upgraded to a durable LVAD. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were significantly lower in patients receiving Impella 5.5 (n = 17 vs. 12) immediately following implantation (p = 0.03) compared with those with smaller devices. Haptoglobin levels were significantly higher in the Impella 5.5 group (n = 17 vs. 11, p = 0.02), with overall lower rates of hemolysis (45.1%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The mortality rate in critical CS appears reduced with axillary artery implantation of Impella devices relative to existing literature. A full-flow microaxial pump (Impella 5.5) seems advantageous regarding systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and acute hemolysis, indicated by lower IL-6 and higher haptoglobin levels, compared with smaller Impella devices. A tailored escalation/de-escalation concept using axillary access for different mAFP types appears feasible and safe.

Imaging in acute percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in adults: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) of the ESC, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (EuroELSO)

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in cardiogenic shock patients has increased during the last decades with most management strategies relying on observational studies and expert opinion, including hemodynamic monitoring, device selection, and timing of support institution/duration. In this context, imaging has a pivotal role throughout the patient pathway, from identification to initiation, monitoring, and weaning. This manuscript summarizes the consensus of an expert panel from the European Society of Cardiology Association for Acute CardioVascular Care, the European Association of CardioVascular Imaging, and the European Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, providing the rationale for and practical guidance of imaging to tMCS based on existing evidence and consensus on best current practice.

Cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is a complex syndrome defined by systemic hypoperfusion and inadequate cardiac output arising from a wide array of underlying causes. Although the understanding of cardiogenic shock epidemiology, specific subphenotypes, haemodynamics, and cardiogenic shock severity staging has evolved, few therapeutic interventions have shown survival benefit. Results from seminal randomised controlled trials support early revascularisation of the culprit vessel in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and provide evidence of improved survival with the use of temporary circulatory support in selected patients. However, numerous questions remain unanswered, including optimal pharmacotherapy regimens, the role of mechanical circulatory support devices, management of secondary organ dysfunction, and best supportive care. This Review summarises current definitions, pathophysiological principles, and management approaches in cardiogenic shock, and highlights key knowledge gaps to advance individualised shock therapy and the evidence-based ethical use of modern technology and resources in cardiogenic shock.

Comparison of the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in super-old and old aged patients in an advanced aging society

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines strongly recommend the application of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction; however, information on its efficacy in super-old patients aged >90 years is inadequate. We compared the efficacy of primary PCI and its clinical outcomes in super-old patients with those of old patients in a super-aging society.

METHODS

Shimane Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Registry was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients with ACS who visited all PCI centers in Shimane Prefecture between January and December 2020 were enrolled. Patients were classified into four age categories: non-old (<65 years), pre-old (65-<75 years), old (75-<90 years), and super-old (≥90 years). Primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, recurrent ACS, any stroke, and hospitalization for worsening heart failure.

RESULTS

In total, 454 patients were enrolled: 99 non-old, 124 pre-old, 181 old, and 50 super-old. The application rate of primary PCI decreased with increased age, with 89 % in old age and 78 % in super-old age (p = 0.042). In-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in super-old age than in old age (22 % vs. 8 %, p = 0.010), particularly in shock cases (67 % vs. 31 %, p = 0.040); no difference was observed between the two groups in non-shock cases (8 % vs. 4 %, p = 0.259) or in cases that received primary PCI (10 % vs. 6 %, p = 0.232). Landmark analysis revealed that MACE after 30th day did not differ between super-old and old age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the advanced aging society of Shimane Prefecture, more than half of patients with ACS were aged ≥75 years, with super-old patients aged ≥90 years accounting for 11 % of all patients. In-hospital mortality rate among super-old age patients was lower among those who underwent primary PCI. The prognosis for super-old age patients who were discharged alive was similar to that of old age patients.

Sex-specific prediction of cardiogenic shock after acute coronary syndromes: the SEX-SHOCK score

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the primary cause of in-hospital death after acute coronary syndromes (ACS), with its plateauing mortality rates approaching 50%. To test novel interventions, personalized risk prediction is essential. The ORBI (Observatoire Régional Breton sur l'Infarctus) score represents the first-of-its-kind risk score to predict in-hospital CS in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its sex-specific performance remains unknown, and refined risk prediction strategies are warranted.

METHODS

This multinational study included a total of 53 537 ACS patients without CS on admission undergoing PCI. Following sex-specific evaluation of ORBI, regression and machine-learning models were used for variable selection and risk prediction. By combining best-performing models with highest-ranked predictors, SEX-SHOCK was developed, and internally and externally validated.

RESULTS

The ORBI score showed lower discriminative performance for the prediction of CS in females than males in Swiss (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.76-0.81] vs. 0.81 [0.79-0.83]; P =.048) and French ACS patients (0.77 [0.74-0.81] vs. 0.84 [0.81-0.86]; P = .002). The newly developed SEX-SHOCK score, now incorporating ST-segment elevation, creatinine, C-reactive protein, and left ventricular ejection fraction, outperformed ORBI in both sexes (females: 0.81 [0.78-0.83]; males: 0.83 [0.82-0.85]; P < .001), which prevailed following internal and external validation in RICO (females: 0.82 [0.79-0.85]; males: 0.88 [0.86-0.89]; P < .001) and SPUM-ACS (females: 0.83 [0.77-0.90], P = .004; males: 0.83 [0.80-0.87], P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ORBI score showed modest sex-specific performance. The novel SEX-SHOCK score provides superior performance in females and males across the entire spectrum of ACS, thus providing a basis for future interventional trials and contemporary ACS management.

Levosimendan, a Promising Pharmacotherapy in Cardiogenic Shock: A Comprehensive Review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition with high mortality rate, as the current management of CS presents significant challenges. Exploration of more effective therapies is necessitated. This review article comprehensively examines the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in the management of CS. By synthesising evidence from numerous studies, a comparison of levosimendan over traditional inotropic agents, such as enoximone, dobutamine, dopamine and norepinephrine, is highlighted. The unique mechanism of action of levosimendan enhances myocardial contractility without increasing oxygen demand, offering a promising alternative for patients with CS. This review also delves into comparative studies that demonstrate the superiority of levosimendan in improving survival rates, haemodynamic parameters, and reducing the incidence of CS complications. Safety profiles and adverse effects are critically assessed to provide a balanced view of the therapeutic window provided by levosimendan. The review concludes that levosimendan is a valuable addition to the therapeutic strategy against CS, with the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Pragmatic approach to temporary mechanical circulatory support in acute right ventricular failure

Acute right ventricular failure (RVF) is prevalent in multiple disease states and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Right-sided temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are used to unload RV congestion and increase cardiac output in cardiogenic shock (CS) with hemodynamically significant RVF. Several RV-tMCS device platforms are available; however consensus is lacking on patient selection, timing of escalation to RV-tMCS, device management, and device weaning. The purposes of this review are to 1) describe the current state of tMCS device therapies for acute RVF with CS, 2) discuss principles of escalation to RV-tMCS device therapy, 3) examine important aspects of clinical management for patients supported by RV-tMCS devices including volume management, anticoagulation, and positive pressure ventilation, and 4) provide a framework for RV-tMCS weaning.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Valvular Cardiogenic Shock

Background

The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who develop cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to primary valvular dysfunction (valvular cardiogenic shock [VCS]) remain unclear.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to describe the cohort of patients with VCS and understand their outcomes compared to other forms of CS.

Methods

All patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic cardiac intensive care unit between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, with a diagnosis of CS were retrospectively identified. Characteristics and outcomes for shock patients with VCS were compared to those without VCS.

Results

A total of 2,754 patients were admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit with CS, of which 442 (16%) had VCS. The median age of patients with VCS was higher than those with non-VCS (70 years vs 64 years, P < 0.001) and were more likely females (40.3% vs 32.1%, P = 0.001). VCS was predominantly due to native valve dysfunction as compared to prosthetic valve dysfunction (71% vs 29%, P < 0.001), with the aortic valve noted to be the most common valve affected. Patients with VCS had higher 1-year (44% vs 37%, P < 0.001) and 30-day all-cause mortality (28% vs 20%, P < 0.001) compared to those without VCS. When compared to percutaneous intervention and medical therapy alone, surgical intervention in VCS was associated with the best short- and long-term outcomes (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

VCS is associated with poor short and long outcomes. Native valvular dysfunction and aortic valve involvement account for the majority of patients with VCS. Definitive surgical therapy and expanding the role of percutaneous therapies may be pivotal in improving clinical outcomes in this high-risk cohort.

Management of cardiogenic shock: state-of-the-art

The management of cardiogenic shock is an ongoing challenge. Despite all efforts and tremendous use of resources, mortality remains high. Whilst reversing the underlying cause, restoring/maintaining organ perfusion and function are cornerstones of management. The presence of comorbidities and preexisting organ dysfunction increases management complexity, aiming to integrate the needs of vital organs in each individual patient. This review provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary literature regarding the definition and classification of cardiogenic shock, its pathophysiology, diagnosis, laboratory evaluation, and monitoring. Further, we distill the latest evidence in pharmacologic therapy and the use of mechanical circulatory support including recently published randomized-controlled trials as well as future directions of research, integrating this within an international group of authors to provide a global perspective. Finally, we explore the need for individualization, especially in the face of neutral randomized trials which may be related to a dilution of a potential benefit of an intervention (i.e., average effect) in this heterogeneous clinical syndrome, including the use of novel biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and machine learning approaches to identify specific endotypes of cardiogenic shock (i.e., subclasses with distinct underlying biological/molecular mechanisms) to support a more personalized medicine beyond the syndromic approach of cardiogenic shock.