Recurrent venous thromboembolism and abnormal uterine bleeding with anticoagulant and hormone therapy use

Rivaroxaban in acute venous thromboembolism: UK prescribing experience

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban was reported as effective as traditional therapies for the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with fewer major bleeding complications in the seminal Einstein program and is now a recommended option for the treatment of VTE around the world.

OBJECTIVE

To report the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in daily care for the management of acute VTE in the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS/METHOD

The FIRST registry is a UK-only, multicenter, noninterventional, observational VTE study (NCT02248610). Consecutive patients diagnosed with acute VTE, managed with rivaroxaban, were recruited and followed for up to 5 years. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent symptomatic objectively diagnosed recurrent VTE, major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1262 participants were recruited between 2014 and 2018. Participants were heterogeneous, with age range 18 to 95 years, weight 35 to 234 kg, and maximum body mass index 64.4 kg/m2. The median duration of treatment exposure was 135 days (interquartile range [IQR], 84-307) and overall follow-up 497 days (IQR, 175-991). There were seven episodes of symptomatic VTE recurrence, 0.6%, (0.74/100 patient-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-1.28). There were 79 of 1239 (6.4%), 8.66 of 100 patient-years (95% CI, 6.90-10.73) first episodes of major or CRNMB, which were most frequently reported by women aged <50 years as abnormal vaginal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban is an effective and safe single drug modality for the treatment of VTE in daily practice in the United Kingdom. Data to determine the optimal anticoagulation therapy for women of childbearing age are needed.

Second consensus document on diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: updated document elaborated by the ESC Working Group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and the ESC Working Group on pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function

This consensus document is proposed to clinicians to provide the whole spectrum of deep vein thrombosis management as an update to the 2017 consensus document. New data guiding clinicians in indicating extended anticoagulation, management of patients with cancer, and prevention and management of post-thrombotic syndrome are presented. More data on benefit and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants are highlighted, along with the arrival of new antidotes for severe bleeding management.

Menstruation, anticoagulation, and contraception: VTE and uterine bleeding

Abnormal or excessive menstrual bleeding affects one-third of reproductive-aged women. This number increases to 70% among women on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). While there is some variation in frequency of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) with different DOAC options, all menstruating individuals should receive counseling about the risk of HMB at the time of DOAC initiation. Management options include progestin-only therapies such as the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and etonogestrel subdermal implant or the progestin-only pill. Combined hormonal contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate are associated with increased rates of thrombosis in nonanticoagulated women but may be continued, or even initiated, so long as therapeutic anticoagulation is ongoing. Procedural therapies, such as endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, or hysterectomy, are considerations for women who have completed childbearing and for whom more conservative measures are objectionable or ineffective. Given the high rates of HMB in women on DOACs, management strategies should be discussed even before heavy bleeding is diagnosed, particularly in women who experienced HMB prior to DOAC initiation. As iron deficiency with or without anemia is a common complication of HMB, complete blood count and ferritin levels should be monitored periodically, and iron deficiency should be treated with oral or intravenous iron supplementation.

Risk of Severe Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Associated with Rivaroxaban Compared with Apixaban, Dabigatran and Warfarin

INTRODUCTION

There have been reports of clinically relevant uterine bleeding events among women of reproductive age exposed to rivaroxaban.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of severe abnormal uterine bleeding (SAUB) resulting in transfusion or surgical intervention among women on rivaroxaban versus apixaban, dabigatran and warfarin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the FDA's Sentinel System (10/2010-09/2015) among females aged 18+ years with venous thromboembolism (VTE), or atrial flutter/fibrillation (AF) who newly initiated a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC; rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) or warfarin. We followed women from dispensing date until the earliest of transfusion or surgery following vaginal bleeding, disenrollment, exposure or study end date, or recorded death. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression via propensity score stratification. Four pairwise comparisons were conducted for each intervention.

RESULTS

Overall, there was an increased risk of surgical intervention with rivaroxaban when compared with dabigatran (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03-1.38), apixaban (1.23; 1.04-1.47), and warfarin (1.34; 1.22-1.47). No difference in risk for surgical intervention was observed for dabigatran-apixaban comparisons. Increased risk of transfusion was observed for rivaroxaban compared with dabigatran (1.49; 1.03-2.17) only. For patients with no gynecological history, rivaroxaban was associated with risk of surgical intervention compared with dabigatran (1.22; 1.05-1.42), apixaban (1.25; 1.04-1.49), and warfarin (1.36; 1.23-1.50).

CONCLUSION

Our study found increased SAUB risk with rivaroxaban use compared with other DOACs or warfarin. Increased risk with rivaroxaban was present among women without underlying gynecological conditions. Women on anticoagulant therapy should be aware of a risk of SAUB.

Concomitant use of combined hormonal contraceptives and antifibrinolytic agents for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding: A practice pattern survey

INTRODUCTION

Concomitant antifibrinolytic agents and combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) have been anecdotally used to manage refractory heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Yet, there remains uncertainty among clinicians regarding the safety of this therapeutic option as concomitant CHC is listed as a contraindication to tranexamic acid use in the United States.

AIM

To describe current treatment practices and physician-reported safety and effectiveness of concomitant antifibrinolytics and CHCs.

METHODS

We surveyed clinician members of the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society and the Foundation of Women and Girls with Blood Disorders using a web-based survey. We also shared the survey link on Twitter.

RESULTS

Of the 224 respondents who completed the survey, 214 treated women of reproductive age with HMB. Of the 214 respondents, 138 (64%) had treated at least 1 woman with concomitant antifibrinolytic agents and CHCs in the past 12 months. Over half of these respondents (n = 77, 57%) reported that at least 50% of women had resolution of refractory HMB. One respondent reported an arterial or venous thrombotic event that occurred in 1 woman.

CONCLUSION

We found that the use of concomitant CHCs and antifibrinolytic agent for refractory HMB is prevalent, appears to be efficacious and is relatively safe. Further research is warranted.

[Hormonal contraception and venous thromboembolism]

The use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) is a well-established risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The VTE risk depends on the specific combination of oestrogen and gestagen components. Progestin-only contraceptives with the exception of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate are not associated with a significant VTE risk and can therefore be offered to women with known thrombophilia or a prior VTE. The recent German S3 guideline "Contraception" advises to carefully assess individual VTE risk factors before prescribing CHC. According to recent data there is no evidence suggesting that VTE risk is increased during oral anticoagulation. To reduce the risk of vaginal bleeding complication and the risk of unplanned pregnancy, the use of CHC can be continued under anticoagulation treatment provided that the patient is switched to an oestrogen-free contraception no later than six weeks before the end of anticoagulation. The risk of recurrence is low in women with hormone-associated VTE. Anticoagulation is therefore in general discontinued after 3-6 months. Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular heparin is recommended for women with prior hormone-associated VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Which patients are at high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism)?

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE, or deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) is associated with mortality and long-term morbidity. The circumstances in which an index VTE event occurred are crucial when personalized VTE recurrence risk is assessed. Patients who experience a VTE event in the setting of a transient major risk factor (such as surgery associated with general anesthesia for >30 minutes) are predicted to have a low VTE recurrence risk following discontinuation of anticoagulation, and limited-duration anticoagulation is generally recommended. In contrast, those patients whose VTE event occurred in the absence of risk factors or who have persistent risk factors have a higher VTE recurrence risk. Here, we review the literature surrounding VTE recurrence risk in a range of clinical conditions. We describe gender-specific risks, including VTE recurrence risk following hormone- and pregnancy-associated VTE events. Finally, we discuss how the competing impacts of VTE recurrence and bleeding have shaped international guideline recommendations.

Reproductive issues in women on direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are replacing warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists for a wide range of indications. Advantages of DOAC therapy are fewer food and drug interactions and fixed dosing without routine laboratory monitoring, making DOACs the perfect choice especially for younger patients, in whom the main indication for anticoagulation is prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although DOACs are safer and much more convenient than other anticoagulant alternatives, their profile may have drawbacks, especially for younger female patients in whom reproductive issues need special considerations. These may include the issue of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during anticoagulant therapy, the embryotoxicity risk from inadvertent DOAC exposure during pregnancy, and the prevention or planning of pregnancies during DOAC therapy. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence in this increasingly important field of women's health.

Which Hormones and Contraception for Women with APS? Exogenous Hormone Use in Women with APS

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Use of exogenous estrogen carries significant risk for patients with prothrombotic disorders including those with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This review summarizes current knowledge of contraceptive and other hormone therapies for aPL-positive and APS women and highlights knowledge gaps to guide future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies support very low risk for most progestin-only contraceptives in patients with increased thrombotic risk, but suggest increased VTE risk with depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Highest efficacy contraceptives are intrauterine devices and subdermal implants, and these are recommended for women with aPL/APS. Progestin-only pills are effective and low risk. Perimenopausal symptoms may be treated with nonhormone therapies in aPL/APS patients: vasomotor symptoms can improve with nonhormonal medications and cognitive behavioral therapy, and genitourinary symptoms often improve with intravaginal estrogen that has limited systemic absorption.

Management of anticoagulation associated reproductive tract bleeding in adolescent and young adult females - Results of a multinational survey

INTRODUCTION

Reproductive tract bleeding (RTB) is an important outcome in menstruating females on anticoagulant therapy (AC). The diagnosis and management of AC-RTB in adolescent and young adult (AYA) females is unknown.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to survey the contemporary patterns of diagnosis and management of AC-RTB in AYA females.

METHODS

SurveyMonkey® questions were sent to members of 1) Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis Hemostasis Subcommittee and Women's Health Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and 2) Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society. Results are reported using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Response rate was 33% (251 out of 753). AC-RTB was infrequently reported. Menstrual history was not routinely reviewed prior to initiation of AC. Respondents indicated a differential risk of AC-RTB, most frequently with Rivaroxaban. Respondents continued hormonal therapy (HT) if an AYA female was on it at the start of AC. When AC-RTB occurred, management strategies were variable with initiation of HT or antifibrinolytic therapy being the most frequent. The timing of AC-RTB after the thrombotic event influenced the respondents' choice of therapy. Differences were seen in the management strategies between US and non-US participants, with more US respondents initiating HT while more non-US respondents modifying the AC regimen. Respondents uniformly reported complications with AC-RTB and with its treatment.

CONCLUSION

This survey highlights the need to review menstrual history at the start of and during AC and for future research into choosing the optimal AC in AYA females. The results can inform the design of future studies.

Comparative Risk Assessment of Severe Uterine Bleeding Following Exposure to Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Network Study Across Four Observational Databases in the USA

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic therapies are associated with an increased bleeding risk. Abnormal uterine bleeding data have been reported in clinical trials of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but data are limited for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

Using real-world data from four US healthcare databases (October 2010 to December 2018), we compared the occurrence of severe uterine bleeding among women newly exposed to rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and warfarin stratified by indication.

METHODS

To reduce potential confounding, patients in comparative cohorts were matched on propensity scores. Treatment effect estimates were generated using Cox proportional hazard models for each indication, in each database, and only for pairwise comparisons that met a priori study diagnostics. If estimates were homogeneous (I2 < 40%), a meta-analysis across databases was performed and pooled hazard ratios reported.

RESULTS

Data from 363,919 women newly exposed to a direct oral anticoagulant or warfarin with a prior diagnosis of AF (60.8%) or VTE (39.2%) were analyzed. Overall incidence of severe uterine bleeding was low in the populations exposed to direct oral anticoagulants, although relatively higher in the younger VTE population vs the AF population (unadjusted incidence rates: 2.8-33.7 vs 1.9-10.0 events/1000 person-years). In the propensity score-matched AF population, a suggestive, moderately increased risk of severe uterine bleeding was observed for rivaroxaban relative to warfarin [hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals from 0.83 (0.27-2.48) to 2.84 (1.32-6.23) across databases with significant heterogeneity], apixaban [pooled hazard ratio 1.45 (0.91-2.28)], and dabigatran [2.12 (1.01-4.43)], which were sensitive to the time-at-risk period. In the propensity score-matched VTE population, a consistent increased risk of severe uterine bleeding was observed for rivaroxaban relative to warfarin [2.03 (1.19-3.27)] and apixaban [2.25 (1.45-3.41)], which were insensitive to the time-at-risk period.

CONCLUSIONS

For women who need antithrombotic therapy, personalized management strategies with careful evaluation of benefits and risks are required. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT04394234; registered in May 2020.

Oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy: How strong a risk factor for venous thromboembolism?

Exogenous hormone therapies, such as combined oral contraceptives (COC) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT), cause blood hypercoagulability and are a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). There is controversy on how strong this "provoking" risk factor is, and how other risk factors may synergise VTE risk. We aim to review the latest literature on the risk of initial and recurrent VTE with COC and HRT use to provide guidance for decision-making about duration of anticoagulation, and guide future research efforts.

How I treat unexplained arterial thrombosis

Most arterial thrombotic events have a clear atherosclerotic or cardioembolic etiology, but hematologists are frequently asked to assist in the diagnosis and management of a patient with a nonatherosclerotic and noncardioembolic arterial event, referred to here as an unexplained arterial thrombosis. Because there is an assorted list of factors that can precipitate an arterial event, we present a systematic diagnostic approach to ensure consideration of not only primary hypercoagulable disorders, but also pro-thrombotic medications or substances, vascular and anatomic abnormalities, and undiagnosed systemic disorders, such as malignancy and autoimmune diseases. We also review existing literature of the role of hypercoagulable disorders in arterial thrombosis and discuss our approach to thrombophilia workup in patients after an unexplained arterial event. We conclude with 3 representative cases to both illustrate the application of the outlined diagnostic schema and discuss common management considerations, specifically the selection of anticoagulation vs antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention.

Anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism: A pooled analysis and additional results of the XALIA and XALIA-LEA noninterventional studies

BACKGROUND

The XALIA and XALIA-LEA prospective, noninterventional studies investigated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in routine clinical practice across global regions.

OBJECTIVES

This pooled analysis combined their data to determine the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in both treatment groups and addressed specific bleeding patterns in a broad range of patients.

METHODS

Patients with objectively confirmed VTE and an indication for ≥3 months' anticoagulation treatment received rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulation (eg, initial treatment with heparin/fondaparinux, followed by a vitamin K antagonist [VKA]). Treatment choice, dose, management, and duration were at the physician's discretion. Primary outcomes (major bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality) were compared between the two treatment groups. Propensity score stratification, and matching were used to reduce bias due to confounding variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 7129 patients were enrolled from 36 countries; 6445 and 2714 patients were included in the propensity score-stratified and -matched analyses, respectively. Major bleeding and incidences of recurrent VTE were similar between treatment groups; all-cause mortality was lower with rivaroxaban than with standard anticoagulation. The incidences of genitourinary bleeding were higher with rivaroxaban than with standard anticoagulation therapy (46 and 23 events in the matched analysis, respectively). VKA management in real-world practice was suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

XALIA and XALIA-LEA show similar safety and effectiveness profiles of rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulation for VTE treatment in routine practice in many parts of the world. The observations are consistent with results from the phase III EINSTEIN randomized controlled trials.

Heavy menstrual bleeding in women on anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism: Comparison of high- and low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban may induce heavy menstrual bleeding. It is unknown if this effect is dose related or if rivaroxaban is associated with more menstrual bleeding than aspirin.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate and compare menstrual patterns and actions taken among women receiving aspirin and two doses of rivaroxaban.

METHODS

The EINSTEIN-CHOICE trial compared once-daily rivaroxaban 20 mg, rivaroxaban 10 mg, and aspirin 100 mg for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulant therapy. In 362 women with menstrual cycles, menstrual flow duration and intensity assessed at days 30, 90, 180, and 360 were compared with those before starting anticoagulant therapy.

RESULTS

Menstrual flow duration increased in 12%-18% of the 134 women given 20-mg rivaroxaban, in 6% to 12% of 120 women given 10-mg rivaroxaban, and in 9% to 12% of 108 women given aspirin. Corresponding increases in flow intensity were 19% to 24%, 14% to 21%, and 13% to 20%. The odds ratios (ORs) for increased menstrual flow duration were 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-2.96) for rivaroxaban 20 mg versus aspirin, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.33-1.81) for rivaroxaban 10 mg versus aspirin, and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.26-1.25) for rivaroxaban 10 mg versus 20 mg. The ORs for increased menstrual flow intensity were 1.41 (95% CI, 0.67-2.99), 1.07 (95% CI, 0.49-2.34), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.37- 1.57), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no statistically significant differences in menstrual hemorrhage patterns between women treated with 10 or 20 mg of rivaroxaban and aspirin. Compared with 10-mg rivaroxaban or aspirin, 20-mg rivaroxaban showed numerically more often increased menstrual flow duration and intensity.

Heavy menstrual bleeding on direct factor Xa inhibitors: Rationale and design of the MEDEA study

BACKGROUND

In premenopausal women, treatment with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Treatment with the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran appears to be associated with a reduced risk of HMB compared with VKA. These findings come from small observational studies or post hoc analyses of trials in which HMB was not a primary outcome. Use of tranexamic acid during the menstrual period may be effective in patients with HMB, but prospective data regarding efficacy and safety in patients on anticoagulant treatment are lacking.

RATIONALE AND DESIGN

A direct comparison of a factor Xa inhibitor and a thrombin inhibitor with HMB as primary outcome, as well as an evaluation of the effects of adding tranexamic acid in women with anticoagulant-associated HMB is highly relevant for clinical practice. The MEDEA study is a randomized, open-label, pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate management strategies in premenopausal women with HMB associated with factor Xa inhibitor therapy.

OUTCOMES

Women using factor Xa inhibitors with proven HMB, as assessed by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score of >150, will be randomized to one of three study arms: (i) switch to dabigatran; (ii) continue factor Xa inhibitor with addition of tranexamic acid during the menstrual period; or (iii) continue factor Xa inhibitor without intervention. The primary outcome is the difference in PBAC score before and after randomization. Here, we present the rationale and highlight several unique features in the design of the study.

Heavy menstrual bleeding in women on oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Although heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a known complication of anticoagulant therapy, rates of HMB in users of the direct oral anticoagulants (OACs) apixaban and rivaroxaban are largely unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of menstruating women prescribed rivaroxaban, apixaban and warfarin over a six-year period (2012-2018). The primary outcome was HMB requiring medical or surgical intervention. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression to evaluate associations between OAC type, age, history of HMB, and the primary outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 195 women of reproductive-age with a new therapeutic OAC prescription (62 on rivaroxaban, 54 on apixaban, 79 on warfarin). A minority (26/195, 13.3%) had a documented history of HMB, including 9 rivaroxaban users, 7 apixaban users and 10 warfarin users but most women (117/195, 60%) had no menstrual history documented. One third of subjects (64/195) required treatment for HMB within 6 months of starting OAC therapy. After controlling for a history of HMB, rivaroxaban users were 1.4 times more likely to require treatment as compared to users of other OACs.

DISCUSSION

We found an association between rates of HMB necessitating medical or surgical intervention and rivaroxaban use. We also found that the majority of women did not have a documented menstrual history, suggesting that many providers do not inquire about menstrual bleeding when starting OAC therapy. Menstruating women, particularly those with a history of HMB, may be at increased risk for HMB necessitating medical treatment depending on the type of OAC used.

Management of heavy menstrual bleeding on anticoagulation

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common complication of anticoagulation, affecting ∼70% of menstruating women receiving oral anticoagulants. The risk of HMB is lower with apixaban and/or dabigatran than with rivaroxaban. HMB can result in iron deficiency with or without anemia, increased need for medical interventions, decreased quality of life, and missed school/work. Mainstays of treatment include hormone therapies such as the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, subdermal implant, and other progesterone-based therapies, which can result in decreased blood loss and, in some cases, amenorrhea. Combined hormone therapies can be used while patients continue receiving anticoagulation and are also highly effective for decreasing menstrual blood loss. Rarely, procedure-based interventions such as endometrial ablation may be required. Patients should be evaluated for iron deficiency and anemia and offered supportive therapies as needed. Abbreviating the course of anticoagulation or skipping doses can increase the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism by as much as fivefold, but switching oral anticoagulants may be considered. Awareness of HMB and careful history taking at each visit are crucial to avoid a missed diagnosis.

Which patients are at high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism)?

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE, or deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) is associated with mortality and long-term morbidity. The circumstances in which an index VTE event occurred are crucial when personalized VTE recurrence risk is assessed. Patients who experience a VTE event in the setting of a transient major risk factor (such as surgery associated with general anesthesia for >30 minutes) are predicted to have a low VTE recurrence risk following discontinuation of anticoagulation, and limited-duration anticoagulation is generally recommended. In contrast, those patients whose VTE event occurred in the absence of risk factors or who have persistent risk factors have a higher VTE recurrence risk. Here, we review the literature surrounding VTE recurrence risk in a range of clinical conditions. We describe gender-specific risks, including VTE recurrence risk following hormone- and pregnancy-associated VTE events. Finally, we discuss how the competing impacts of VTE recurrence and bleeding have shaped international guideline recommendations.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Inherited Thrombophilia and Venous Thromboembolism: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus heparin/vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with inherited thrombophilia.

Methods and Results

We enrolled consecutive patients with acute VTE and inherited thrombophilia treated with DOACs (cases) or heparin/vitamin K antagonists (controls), matched for age, sex, ethnicity, and thrombophilia type. End points were VTE recurrence and bleeding complications; residual vein thrombosis and post‐thrombotic syndrome; VTE recurrence after anticoagulant discontinuation. Two hundred fifty‐five cases (age 52.4±17.3 years, Female 44.3%, severe thrombophilia 33.1%) and 322 controls (age 49.7±18.1 years, Female 50.3%, severe thrombophilia 35.1%) were included. The cumulative incidence of VTE recurrence during anticoagulation was 1.09% in cases versus 1.83%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 (95% CI, 0.16–2.77). The cumulative incidence of bleeding was 10.2% in cases versus 4.97%, HR 2.24 (95% CI 1.10–4.58). No major bleedings occurred in cases (versus 3 in controls). No significant differences regarding residual vein thrombosis and post‐thrombotic syndrome. After anticoagulant discontinuation, DOACs yielded a significantly lower 2‐year VTE recurrence risk versus traditional anticoagulants (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47–0.82]).

Conclusions

DOACs and heparin/vitamin K antagonists showed a similar efficacy in treating VTE in patients with thrombophilia. Although major bleeding episodes were recorded solely with heparin/vitamin K antagonists, we noted an overall increased bleeding rate with DOACs. The use of DOACs was associated with a lower 2‐year risk of VTE recurrence after anticoagulant discontinuation.

Bleeding with Apixaban and Dalteparin in Patients with Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Results from the Caravaggio Study

BACKGROUND

 Direct oral anticoagulants are recommended for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), but an increased bleeding risk in patients with gastrointestinal cancer was reported. The Caravaggio study compared apixaban and dalteparin for the treatment of patients with CAT. Here we describe sites of bleeding, associated cancer sites, clinical presentation, and course of major bleeding in patients included in the Caravaggio study.

METHODS

 The Caravaggio study was a multinational, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study. Bleeding events and the severity of major bleedings were adjudicated by a committee unaware of treatment allocation using predefined criteria; for the purpose of this analysis, data were analyzed in the safety population.

RESULTS

 Major bleeding occurred in 22 of 576 patients on apixaban (3.8%) and in 23 of 579 patients on dalteparin (4.0%). The sites of major bleeding and their distribution according to the type of cancer were similar between the two treatment groups. Major bleeding occurred in nine patients with gastrointestinal cancer in each treatment group. The clinical presentation of major bleeding was severe or fatal in 6 patients on apixaban and in 5 patients on dalteparin, while the clinical course was severe in 5 patients on apixaban and in 7 patients on dalteparin.

CONCLUSION

 Apixaban is a safe alternative to LMWH for the treatment in patients with CAT. No excess in gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in patients who received apixaban, including those with gastrointestinal cancer.

Evaluation of the incidence of bleeding in patients prescribed rivaroxaban for the treatment and prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in UK secondary care: an observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short-term (12 weeks) safety and utilisation of rivaroxaban prescribed to new-user adult patients for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and for the prevention of recurrent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in a secondary care setting in England and Wales.

DESIGN

An observational cohort study using the technique of Specialist Cohort Event Monitoring.

SETTING

The Rivaroxaban Observational Safety Evaluation study was conducted across 87 participating National Health Service secondary care trusts in England and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

1532 patients treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism from September 2013 to January 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Non-interventional postauthorisation safety study of rivaroxaban. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Risk of major bleeding in gastrointestinal, intracranial, and urogenital sites and (2) risk of all major and clinically relevant non-major bleeds.

RESULTS

Of a total of 4846 patients enrolled in the study from September 2013 to January 2016, 1532 were treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism. The median age of the deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism cohort was 63 years, and 54.6% were men. The risk of major bleeding within the gastrointestinal, urogenital and intracranial primary sites was 0.7% (n=11), 0.3% (n=5) and 0.1% (n=1), respectively. The risk of major bleeding in all sites was 1.5% (n=23) at a rate of 8.3 events per 100 patient-years.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of the primary outcome risk of major bleeding in gastrointestinal, intracranial and urogenital sites, the risk estimates in the population using rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism were low (<1%) and consistent with the risk estimated from clinical trial data and in routine clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT01871194); ENCePP Registry (EUPAS3979).

Contraceptive Challenges in Women With Common Medical Conditions

Women have the opportunity to meet personal contraceptive goals with convenient, highly reliable, and easily reversible methods. Long-acting reversible contraception represents an increasingly popular option for most women throughout the reproductive lifespan. Nonetheless, many women and their health care providers are challenged by coexisting medical issues. We aim to help clinicians individualize contraception and use shared decision-making to enhance patient satisfaction and continuation with their method.

How I assess and manage the risk of bleeding in patients treated for venous thromboembolism

For patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), prediction of bleeding is relevant throughout the course of treatment, although the means and goal of this prediction differ between the subsequent stages of treatment: treatment initiation, hospital discharge, 3-month follow-up, and long-term follow-up. Even in the absence of fully established risk prediction schemes and outcome studies using a prediction scheme for treatment decisions, the present evidence supports screening for and targeting of modifiable risk factors for major bleeding, as well as the application of decision rules to identify patients at low risk of bleeding complications, in whom long-term anticoagulant treatment is likely safe. Moving forward, prediction tools need to be incorporated in well-designed randomized controlled trials aiming to establish optimal treatment duration in patients at high risk of recurrent VTE. Moreover, the benefit of their longitudinal assessment rather than application as stand-alone baseline assessments should be studied, because changes in bleeding risk over time likely constitute the best predictor of major bleeding. We provide the state-of-the-art of assessing and managing bleeding risk in patients with acute VTE and highlight a practical approach for daily practice illustrated by 2 case scenarios.

Management of anticoagulant-refractory thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

Lifelong anticoagulation with warfarin or alternative vitamin K antagonist is the standard anticoagulant treatment for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. Anticoagulant-refractory thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome can be broadly defined as breakthrough thrombosis while on standard oral anticoagulation treatment and its management is a major challenge given the serious nature of the thrombotic disease observed, which has become refractory to oral anticoagulation. The factors (genetic and cellular) that cause anticoagulant-refractory thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome are now better understood. However, efforts to use this greater understanding have not yet transformed the capacity to treat it successfully in many patients. In this Viewpoint, we review the factors that are likely to be contributing to the cause of this syndrome and consider how they might be modified or inhibited. We also discuss management, including general strategies to minimise thrombotic risk, intensification of anticoagulation, addition of an antiplatelet agent, adjunctive treatment for thrombosis, immunomodulatory therapy, complement inhibition, vascular options, and future potential therapeutic targets.

Cerebral venous thrombosis in women of childbearing age: diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis during a future pregnancy

Sex-specific risk factors for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in women include oral contraceptives, pregnancy, puerperium, and hormone replacement therapy. The acute treatment of CVT is anticoagulation using therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparin, which is also the preferred treatment in the post-acute phase in pregnancy and during breastfeeding. In patients with imminent brain herniation decompressive surgery is probably life-saving. A medical history of CVT alone is not a contraindication for future pregnancies. The optimal dosage of low molecular weight heparin as thrombosis prophylaxis during future pregnancies after a history of venous thrombosis including CVT is the topic of an ongoing trial.

Estrogen and thrombosis: A bench to bedside review

Estrogen, in the clinical setting is used primarily for contraception and hormone replacement therapy. It has been well established that estrogen increases the risk of both arterial and venous thrombosis. While estrogen is known to induce a prothrombotic milieu through various effects on the hemostatic pathways, the exact molecular mechanism leading to those effects is not known. The most common clinical presentation of estrogen-related thrombosis is venous thromboembolism (VTE) of the deep veins of the legs or pulmonary vessels, usually within the first few months of use. Estrogen has also been associated with increased risk of "unusual site" thromboses, as well as arterial thrombosis. Women at high-risk of thrombosis need careful evaluation and counseling for contraception, pregnancy, menopausal hormonal therapy and other estrogen-related conditions or treatments in order to lower the risk of thromboses. We review the most recent evidence on management of high-estrogen states in women at high-risk of thrombosis, as well as emerging data on unique populations such as transgender women. More studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology of hormone-related thrombosis, as well as more comprehensive techniques to stratify risks for thrombosis so as to enable tailoring of recommendations for each individual.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists Are Effective in Long-term Treatment of Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Anticoagulant Therapy: Report of 3 Cases and Review of the Literature

Purpose of Review

To evaluate the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) on anticoagulant therapy.

Recent Findings

Prospective observational case series (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3) at University-affiliated teaching hospital. From January 2002 through December 2019, three premenopausal women on warfarin therapy were identified from our clinical practice. After clinical assessment, including Papanicolaou smear, endometrial biopsy, and pelvic sonography, a GnRHa was used to treat their AUB. Two women were receiving warfarin therapy (5–7 mg/day) for previous venous thromboembolism and one for mechanical heart valve replacement associated with Marfan’s syndrome. All patients had additional comorbid conditions and were at high risk for traditional medical or surgical therapies. After treatment with GnRHa, all women reported menstrual reduction at 3 months and remained amenorrheic for 2 to 11 years, two of whom reached menopause.

Summary

In properly assessed and selected premenopausal women with AUB receiving anticoagulant therapy and at high risk for traditional therapies, long-term GnRHa was an effective treatment in 3 patients.

Descriptive study of the general practitioners' perception of direct oral anticoagulants and the risk of genital bleeding in women of childbearing age

AIM OF THE STUDY AND PATIENTS

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) tend to replace antivitamins K (VKA). The incidence of major and minor hemorrhages is higher in women, a difference potentially linked to genital hemorrhages. The objective is to assess the practices and perception of general practitioners of the use of oral anticoagulant therapy in women of childbearing age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive, observational, transversal and monocentric study. An 11-items questionnaire was sent to 900 randomized general practitioners, assessing the type of patient, the type of anticoagulant prescribed, the management of genital bleeding, and the assessment of the quality of life of anticoagulated patients.

RESULTS

DOA were the most prescribed anticoagulants. Genital hemorrhage was the second leading cause of minor hemorrhage. Most doctors (60.6%) believed they were due to VKAs. 25% reported an alteration in the quality of life of patients following these genital hemorrhages and 47.5% addressed this subject in consultation.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that, according to the general practitioners interviewed, genital hemorrhage is more frequent on VKA than on DOA in women of reproductive age, which is contradictory with the data in the literature. The probably taboo subject is rarely mentioned in consultation and is responsible for a deterioration in the quality of life in these young patients. No recommendation exists on the management of this type of genital hemorrhage in these women. An algorithm is proposed for their management.

Acute treatment of venous thromboembolism

All patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) should receive anticoagulant treatment in the absence of absolute contraindications. Initial anticoagulant treatment is crucial for reducing mortality, preventing early recurrences, and improving long-term outcome. Treatment and patient disposition should be tailored to the severity of clinical presentation, to comorbidities, and to the potential to receive appropriate care in the outpatient setting. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used in fixed doses without laboratory monitoring are the agents of choice for the treatment of acute VTE in the majority of patients. In comparison with conventional anticoagulation (parenteral anticoagulants followed by vitamin K antagonists), these agents showed improved safety (relative risk [RR] of major bleeding, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.83) with a similar risk of recurrence (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.06). Vitamin K antagonists or low molecular weight heparins are still alternatives to DOACs for the treatment of VTE in specific patient categories such as those with severe renal failure or antiphospholipid syndrome, or cancer, respectively. In addition to therapeutic anticoagulation, probably less than 10% of patients require reperfusion by thrombolysis or interventional treatments; those patients are hemodynamically unstable with acute pulmonary embolism, and a minority of them have proximal limb-threatening deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The choice of treatment should be driven by the combination of evidence from clinical trials and by local expertise. The majority of patients with acute DVT and a proportion of selected hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism can be safely managed as outpatients.

The risk and prevention of venous thromboembolism in the pregnant traveller

BACKGROUND

The average risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in long haul travellers is approximately 2.8 per 1000 travellers, which is increased in the presence of other VTE risk factors. In pregnant long-haul travellers, little is known in terms of the absolute risk of VTE in these women and, therefore, there is limited consensus on appropriate thromboprophylaxis in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

This review will provide guidance to allow practitioners to safely minimize the risk of travel-related VTE in pregnant women. The suggestions provided are based on limited data, extrapolated risk estimates of VTE in pregnant travellers and recommendations from published guidelines.

RESULTS

We found that the absolute VTE risk per flight appears to be <1% for the average pregnant or postpartum traveller. In pregnant travellers with a prior history of VTE, a potent thrombophilia or strong antepartum risk factors (e.g. combination of obesity and immobility), the risk of VTE with travel appears to be >1%. Postpartum, the risk of VTE with travel may be >1% for women with thrombophilias (particularly in those with a family history) and other transient risk factors and in women with a prior VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, we recommend simple measures be taken by all pregnant travellers, such as frequent ambulation, hydration and calf exercises. In those at an intermediate risk, we suggest a consideration of 20-30 mmHg compression stockings. In the highest risk group, we suggest careful consideration for low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis. If there are specific concerns, we advise consultation with a thrombosis expert at the nearest local centre.

Comprehensive Outpatient Management of Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Can Primary Care Do This? A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The evidence for outpatient management of hemodynamically stable, low-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) is mounting. Guidance in identifying patients who are eligible for outpatient (ambulatory) care is available in the literature and society guidelines. Less is known about who can identify patients eligible for outpatient management and in what clinical practice settings.

OBJECTIVE

To answer the question, "Can primary care do this?" (provide comprehensive outpatient management of low-risk PE).

METHODS

We undertook a narrative review of the literature on the outpatient management of acute PE focusing on site of care. We searched the English-language literature in PubMed and Embase from January 1, 1950, through July 15, 2019.

RESULTS

We identified 26 eligible studies. We found no studies that evaluated comprehensive PE management in a primary care clinic or general practice setting. In 19 studies, the site-of-care decision making occurred in the Emergency Department (or after a short period of supplemental observation) and in 7 studies the decision occurred in a specialty clinic. We discuss the components of care involved in the diagnosis, outpatient eligibility assessment, treatment, and follow-up of ambulatory patients with acute PE.

DISCUSSION

We see no formal reason why a trained primary care physician could not provide comprehensive care for select patients with low-risk PE. Leading obstacles include lack of ready access to advanced pulmonary imaging and the time constraints of a busy outpatient clinic.

CONCLUSION

Until studies establish safe parameters of such a practice, the question "Can primary care do this?" must remain open.

Optimal management of hormonal contraceptives after an episode of venous thromboembolism

Optimal management of hormonal contraception in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) requires an individualized approach considering its potential benefits and complications during and after anticoagulant treatment. Potential benefits include prevention of pregnancy and mitigation of menstrual bleeding that is often worsened after start of anticoagulation therapy. Current evidence suggests that patients may opt for a continuation of (all forms of) hormonal contraception during anticoagulant treatment, provided that they are adequately informed by the treating physicians. Combined oral contraceptives should be stopped before anticoagulant therapy may be discontinued, preferably after the second last menstrual cycle of the intended anticoagulant treatment period. If hormonal contraceptive treatment needs to be initiated in patients with a history of VTE, oral prostagen-only therapy or intra-uterine devices are to be preferred: this may be independent of the anticoagulation status and in light of a negligible risk of (recurrent) VTE associated with their use.

DOACS in women: pros and cons

The recent approval of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for long-term anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism resulted in a rapid implementation of these new drugs into daily care. Although DOAC dosing is similar for women and men and, overall, results in comparable outcomes, sex specific issues need to be considered. This review will discuss DOAC topics specifically related to women's health, including the risks and benefits of DOAC treatment for women, the issue of abnormal uterine bleeding from DOAC and the risk and management of DOAC exposure in pregnancy.

The current place of direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention/treatment of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE; includes deep venous thrombosis, DVT, and pulmonary embolism, PE) represents the third most common acute cardiovascular syndrome. Contemporary VTE management comprises primary prevention in high-risk patients, treatment of established VTE, and prevention of its recurrence (secondary prevention). Anticoagulants are the basis of VTE pharmacological prophylaxis and treatment. For several decades, parenteral (heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins, LMWHs) and oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists, VKAs) have been the cornerstone of VTE prevention/treatment. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) markedly improved the management of VTE by overcoming many disadvantages of conventional anticoagulants. For primary VTE prevention in patients after total hip/knee arthroplasty, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran are preferred over LMWHs, due to comparable efficacy and safety, but favourable acceptability (avoided everyday injections). In other high-risk populations (other surgical patients, acutely ill medical patients), LMWHs are still the recommended option. Betrixaban is currently the only DOAC approved for VTE prophylaxis in medically ill patients during and after hospitalization. For acute VTE treatment and secondary prevention, DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran) are recommended as the first-line therapy in the general population. DOACs proved to be similarly effective but safer than VKAs. In some specific populations, DOACs also seem to be advantageous over conventional treatment (patients with renal impairment, elderly, long-term secondary prevention in cancer patients). Currently, there is no data from randomized head-to-head comparative studies between the DOAC classes or representatives so the choice is made mainly according to patient characteristics and pharmacokinetic properties of the drug.

​Challenge in managing abnormal uterine bleeding in a patient on novel oral anticoagulant therapy

This is a case report of a 48-year-old woman who presented with heavy per vaginal bleeding to the emergency department after being commenced on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism. She had significant bleeding which initially required resuscitation and stabilisation. Her symptoms were ultimately managed by changing her anticoagulation agent to therapeutic low molecular weight heparin with Clexane^© the agent of choice. This case study highlights the complexity of managing these patients as well as highlighting the need for ongoing research into DOACs in this area.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 206: Use of Hormonal Contraception in Women With Coexisting Medical Conditions

Although numerous studies have addressed the safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraceptive use in healthy women, data regarding women with underlying medical conditions or other special circumstances are limited. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria (USMEC) for Contraceptive Use, 2016 (), which has been endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, is a published guideline based on the best available evidence and expert opinion to help health care providers better care for women with chronic medical problems who need contraception. The goal of this Practice Bulletin is to explain how to use the USMEC rating system in clinical practice and to specifically discuss the rationale behind the ratings for various medical conditions. Contraception for women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (); the use of emergency contraception in women with medical coexisting medical conditions, including obesity, (); and the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on bone health () are addressed in other documents from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

The current manuscript is the second update of the original Practical Guide, published in 2013 [Heidbuchel et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013;15:625-651; Heidbuchel et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015;17:1467-1507]. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternative for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and have emerged as the preferred choice, particularly in patients newly started on anticoagulation. Both physicians and patients are becoming more accustomed to the use of these drugs in clinical practice. However, many unresolved questions on how to optimally use these agents in specific clinical situations remain. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) set out to coordinate a unified way of informing physicians on the use of the different NOACs. A writing group identified 20 topics of concrete clinical scenarios for which practical answers were formulated, based on available evidence. The 20 topics are as follows i.e., (1) Eligibility for NOACs; (2) Practical start-up and follow-up scheme for patients on NOACs; (3) Ensuring adherence to prescribed oral anticoagulant intake; (4) Switching between anticoagulant regimens; (5) Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of NOACs; (6) NOACs in patients with chronic kidney or advanced liver disease; (7) How to measure the anticoagulant effect of NOACs; (8) NOAC plasma level measurement: rare indications, precautions, and potential pitfalls; (9) How to deal with dosing errors; (10) What to do if there is a (suspected) overdose without bleeding, or a clotting test is indicating a potential risk of bleeding; (11) Management of bleeding under NOAC therapy; (12) Patients undergoing a planned invasive procedure, surgery or ablation; (13) Patients requiring an urgent surgical intervention; (14) Patients with AF and coronary artery disease; (15) Avoiding confusion with NOAC dosing across indications; (16) Cardioversion in a NOAC-treated patient; (17) AF patients presenting with acute stroke while on NOACs; (18) NOACs in special situations; (19) Anticoagulation in AF patients with a malignancy; and (20) Optimizing dose adjustments of VKA. Additional information and downloads of the text and anticoagulation cards in different languages can be found on an EHRA website (www.NOACforAF.eu).

Medical Eligibility for Contraception in Women at Increased Risk

BACKGROUND

Most women of child-bearing age want a safe method of contraception. Numerous methods are available, with different modes of application. In situations involving particular risks, the selection of the right method poses a special challenge.

METHODS

Contraceptive methods for use in various situations with increased risk are presented in the light of a selective review of the literature, including the relevant current guidelines.

RESULTS

The current recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) can be used to determine whether any particular contraceptive method is applicable. In particular, the use of combined hormonal contraceptives may be contraindicated in the presence of certain risk factors, especially when there is an elevated risk of thromboembolism. Situations of increased risk include a genetic predisposition to thrombophilia, diabetes mellitus, age over 35, and nicotine abuse. Careful attention to the choice of an appropriate contraceptive agent is also necessary for women with hypertension, hepatic tumors, headache (including migraine), and epilepsy. For such patients, good alternatives include the use of a gestagen (=progesterone) single-agent preparation, an intrauterine device, or a pessary.

CONCLUSION

Meticulous history-taking and clinical examination are important components of contraceptive counseling that enable the identification of all potential risk factors. In situations of increased risk, decisions must be taken individually. Depending on the nature of the patient's underlying illness, interdisciplinary collaboration may be advisable. Even in situations of increased risk, an appropriated risk-benefit analysis should make it possible to find a suitable contraceptive method for any woman who needs one.

Transgender patients and the role of the coagulation clinician

The medical care of transgender patients relies on the use of sex hormones to develop and maintain the physical characteristics consistent with gender identity as the first step in transitioning. Hormonal therapy is usually continued indefinitely, even following gender-affirming surgeries. The use of hormonal treatments is associated with a multitude of positive effects as well as complications and side effects. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major concern. Transgender patients are often referred to coagulation specialists for advice regarding an individual patient's risk for VTE, especially if there is a personal or family history of VTE. Coagulation specialists need to be familiar with endocrine therapy including the goals of treatment and the VTE risks associated with currently used hormone regimens. We will review common referral questions and the available data and their limitations for the use of hormonal therapy in transgender patients focusing on the risk of VTE.

Sex matters: Practice 5P's when treating young women with venous thromboembolism

Sex matters when it comes to venous thromboembolism (VTE). We defined 5P's - period, pill, prognosis, pregnancy, and postthrombotic syndrome - that should be discussed with young women with VTE. Menstrual blood loss (Period) can be aggravated by anticoagulant therapy. This seems particularly true for direct oral anticoagulants. Abnormal uterine bleeding can be managed by hormonal therapy, tranexamic acid, or modification of treatment. The use of combined oral contraceptives (Pill) is a risk factor for VTE. The magnitude of the risk depends on progestagen types and estrogen doses used. In women using therapeutic anticoagulation, concomitant hormonal therapy does not increase the risk of recurrent VTE. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and low-dose progestin-only pills do not increase the risk of VTE. In young women VTE is often provoked by transient hormonal risk factors that affects prognosis. Sex is incorporated as predictor in recurrent VTE risk assessment models. However, current guidelines do not propose using these to guide treatment duration. Pregnancy increases the risk of VTE by 4-fold to 5-fold. Thrombophilia and obstetric risk factors further increase the risk of pregnancy-related VTE. In women with a history of VTE, the risk of recurrence during pregnancy or post partum appears to be influenced by risk factors present during the first VTE. In most women with a history of VTE, antepartum and postpartum thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is indicated. Women generally are affected by VTE at a younger age then men, and they have to deal with long-term complications (Post-thrombotic syndrome) of deep vein thrombosis early in life.

No. 329-Canadian Contraception Consensus Part 4 of 4 Chapter 9: Combined Hormonal Contraception

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines for health care providers on the use of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and on the promotion of healthy sexuality.

OUTCOMES

Overall efficacy of cited contraceptive methods, assessing reduction in pregnancy rate, safety, and side effects; the effect of cited contraceptive methods on sexual health and general well-being; and the availability of cited contraceptive methods in Canada.

EVIDENCE

Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for articles in English on subjects related to contraception, sexuality, and sexual health from January 1994 to December 2015 in order to update the Canadian Contraception Consensus published February-April 2004. Relevant Canadian government publications and position papers from appropriate health and family planning organizations were also reviewed.

VALUES

The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations for practice are ranked according to the method described in this report.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Rivaroxaban and the EINSTEIN clinical trial programme

: Rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, is widely used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients. The approval of rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and the extended secondary prevention of recurrent VTE is based on the results of the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE trials, and the EINSTEIN EXT and EINSTEIN CHOICE trials, respectively. This review provides an updated overview of these completed EINSTEIN studies in adult patients, including results of subanalyses in patients at high risk of recurrent VTE, and discusses the emerging data from the EINSTEIN Junior programme, which is evaluating the use of rivaroxaban for the treatment of paediatric VTE. In the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE trials, rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once daily thereafter) was shown to be an effective and safe alternative to standard anticoagulation for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in a broad range of adult patients. These results are supported by increasing amounts of real-world data from patients treated with rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice worldwide. In the EINSTEIN EXT and EINSTEIN CHOICE trials, rivaroxaban was superior to placebo and acetylsalicylic acid, respectively, for the extended treatment of VTE - physicians can now choose between two doses of rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily or 10 mg once daily) for the extended prevention of recurrent VTE, based on a patient's risk of recurrence, bleeding and personal preferences.

Rivaroxaban for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism

Until recently, heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the cornerstones for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This situation changed with the introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants, which are now replacing low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee arthroplasty and VKAs for VTE treatment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, was the first direct oral anticoagulant licensed for VTE prevention and treatment. This paper provides the rationale for factor Xa as a target for anticoagulants, describes the development of rivaroxaban, reviews its pharmacological profile, discusses the clinical trials with rivaroxaban for VTE prevention and treatment and highlights areas of uncertainty.