Idazoxan and response to typical neuroleptics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Comparison with the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine

Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs

The treatment of schizophrenia has evolved over the past half century primarily in the context of antipsychotic drug development. Although there has been significant progress resulting in the availability and use of numerous medications, these reflect three basic classes of medications (conventional (typical), atypical and dopamine partial agonist antipsychotics) all of which, despite working by varying mechanisms of actions, act principally on dopamine systems. Many of the second-generation (atypical and dopamine partial agonist) antipsychotics are believed to offer advantages over first-generation agents in the treatment for schizophrenia. However, the pharmacological properties that confer the different therapeutic effects of the new generation of antipsychotic drugs have remained elusive, and certain side effects can still impact patient health and quality of life. Moreover, the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs is limited prompting the clinical use of adjunctive pharmacy to augment the effects of treatment. In addition, the search for novel and nondopaminergic antipsychotic drugs has not been successful to date, though numerous development strategies continue to be pursued, guided by various pathophysiologic hypotheses. This article provides a brief review and critique of the current therapeutic armamentarium for treating schizophrenia and drug development strategies and theories of mechanisms of action of antipsychotics, and focuses on novel targets for therapeutic agents for future drug development.

Receptor mechanisms in the treatment of schizophrenia

There remain many limitations to the treatment of schizophrenia. In addition to the poor response of negative and cognitive symptoms to antipsychotics, and the substantial proportion of poor- or non-responders, there are a variety of unpleasant and restricting side-effects of these drugs. The introduction of several 'atypical' drugs, with diminished propensity to cause extrapyramidal motor effects (EPS), has greatly improved the tolerability of antipsychotic treatments. The pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics is varied and, although dopamine D2 receptor antagonism is common to all antipsychotics, the mechanisms of a typicality are complex and not fully understood. Thus, antagonism at 5-HT2 and/or other receptors, weak dopamine receptor affinity and, most recently, partial agonism at dopamine D2 receptors, have been variously implicated. However, because EPS have diminished with improvements in drug treatment, drug-induced weight gain has emerged as a major concern, and the pharmacological basis of this problem, involving effects at 5-HT2c and perhaps other receptors, is yielding to investigation. Some drugs, notably the D2 partial agonists, can provide antipsychotic effects without the emergence of several of the seproblematic side-effects, which bodes well for future treatment.

Alpha-adrenoceptor modulation hypothesis of antipsychotic atypicality

Although all currently used antipsychotic drugs act as dopamine (DA) D2 receptor antagonists, clozapine, the prototype for atypical antipsychotics, shows superior efficacy, especially regarding negative and cognitive symptoms, in spite of a significantly reduced central D2 receptor occupancy compared with typical (conventional) antipsychotic drugs. Clozapine, as well as several other atypicals, displays significant affinities also for several other neurotransmitter receptors, including other dopaminergic receptors, alpha-adrenergic receptors and different serotonergic and cholinergic receptors, which in several ways may contribute to the clinical effectiveness of the drugs. Preclinical and clinical results suggest a dysregulated mesocorticolimbic DA system in schizophrenia, with an impaired prefrontal DA projection, which may relate to negative and cognitive symptoms, concomitant with an overactive or overreactive striatal DA projection, with bearing on psychotic (positive) symptomatology. Available data suggest that blockage of alpha1-adrenoceptors by antipsychotics may contribute to suppress positive symptoms, especially in acute schizophrenia, whereas alpha2-adrenoceptor blockage, a prominent effect of clozapine and, to some extent, risperidone but not other antipsychotics, may rather be involved in relief of negative and cognitive symptoms. Whereas alpha1-adrenoceptor blockage may act by suppressing, at the presynaptic level, striatal hyperdopaminergia, alpha2-adrenoceptor blockage may act by augmenting and improving prefrontal dopaminergic functioning. Thus, the prominent alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor blocking effects of clozapine may generally serve to stabilize dysregulated central dopaminergic systems in schizophrenia, allowing for improved efficacy in spite of a reduced central D2 receptor occupancy compared with typical antipsychotic drugs.

Pharmacogenomics of psychiatric drug treatment

It is the goal of pharmacogenomics in psychiatry to establish predictive relationships between polymorphisms of candidate genes and therapeutic response to drug treatment. Polymorphisms of candidate genes related to drug mechanisms and pathophysiology of illness and defined clinical phenotype are the foundations for pharmacogenomic studies. Pharmacogenomic studies of antipsychotic response have focused on polymorphisms of genes for dopamine and serotonin receptors with most positive results reported for polymorphisms of genes of the 5HT2a and 5HT2c serotonin receptor subtypes. Although the goal of establishing individualized medicine predicated on an individual patient's genetic code has yet to be achieved, the fundamentals are now in place for second-generation investigation and more application to health care.

Generalization of clozapine as compared to other antipsychotic agents to a discriminative stimulus elicited by the serotonin (5-HT)2A antagonist, MDL100,907

Employing a two-lever, food-reinforced FR10 procedure, rats were trained to recognize a discriminative stimulus (DS) elicited by the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist and potential antipsychotic agent, MDL100,907 (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.). In generalization tests, by analogy to MDL100,907 itself (Effective Dose(50) (ED(50)), 0.002 mg/kg, s.c.), the 'atypical' antipsychotic, clozapine, which displays high affinity for 5-HT(2A) as compared to D(2) receptors, dose-dependently and fully generalized to MDL100,907 (ED(50), 0.2 mg/kg, s.c.). S16924 (0.05 mg/kg, s.c.), S18327 (0.09 mg/kg, s.c.), quetiapine (1.8 mg/kg, s.c.), risperidone (0.02 mg/kg, s.c.) and ziprasidone (0.01 mg/kg, s.c.), antipsychotics which possess-like clozapine-marked affinity for 5-HT(2A) versus D(2) receptors, also generalized to MDL100,907. In distinction, raclopride, an antipsychotic which selectively interacts with D(2) versus 5-HT(2A) receptors, did not display significant generalization. Interestingly, haloperidol, which shows only modest affinity for 5-HT(2A) versus D(2) sites, generalized to MDL100,907 (ED(50), 0.02 mg/kg, s.c.). In light of the antagonist properties of haloperidol, clozapine and all other antipsychotics tested (except raclopride) at alpha(1)-adrenoceptors (ARs), the selective alpha(1)-AR antagonists, prazosin and WB4101, were examined. Both dose-dependently and fully generalized to MDL100,907 (ED(50)s, 0.07 and 0.11 mg/kg, s.c., respectively). At doses showing pronounced generalization to MDL100,907, the only drugs which significantly suppressed response rates were haloperidol and, weakly, quetiapine. Raclopride also markedly decreased response rates. In conclusion, the antipsychotic agents, clozapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, S16924, S18327, quetiapine and haloperidol, all generalized to a DS elicited by MDL100,907. While D(2) receptors are not implicated in their actions, in addition to antagonist properties at 5-HT(2A) receptors, blockade of alpha(1)-ARs and other, as yet unidentified, mechanisms may be involved. These data underpin interest in MDL100,907 as a potential antipsychotic agent.

alpha2C-Adrenoceptor blockade by clozapine and other antipsychotic drugs

The noradrenergic system may play a role in antipsychotic modulation of schizophrenia symptoms. Therefore, the antagonistic potencies of the antipsychotics clozapine, chlorpromazine, risperidone, olanzapine, haloperidol, quetiapine, ziprasidone, iloperidone and aripiprazole were quantified using cell lines expressing the recombinant human alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor, alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor, or dopamine D(2L) receptor. The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists, yohimbine and idazoxan, were also tested. Alterations in cAMP were measured as changes in luminescence. In the alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor cell line, the agonist 5-bromo-6-(2-imidazolin-2-ylamino)quinoxaline (UK14,304) induced a concentration-dependent increase in luminescence. In cell lines expressing alpha(2C) and D(2L) receptors, agonists induced a concentration-dependent reduction in luminescence. Yohimbine and idazoxan were the most potent alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor antagonists, yohimbine and iloperidone were the most potent alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor antagonists, and haloperidol and olanzapine were the most potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists. Clozapine had the highest alpha(2C)/D(2) selectivity, and iloperidone the highest alpha(2C)/alpha(2A) ratio. It is hypothesised that alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor blockade contributes to improvement of cognitive function.

Receptor profile of P88-8991 and P95-12113, metabolites of the novel antipsychotic iloperidone

Iloperidone is a novel atypical antipsychotic compound currently under clinical development for the treatment of psychotic disorders. In radioligand binding studies, iloperidone binds with high affinity to serotonin (5-HT) 5-HT2A and noradrenaline alpha1 and alpha2C receptors [Neuropsychopharmacology (2001) 25, 904-914]. The human metabolism of iloperidone generates two major metabolites, P88-8991 and P95-12113. The aim of this study was to compare the receptor affinity profile of P88-8991 and P95-12113 with that of the parent compound. The receptor affinity profile of P88-8991 is comparable to that of iloperidone. This metabolite binds to the following monoamine receptors (pKi values in nM): serotonin 5-HT2A receptors (9.56), adrenergic alpha1 (8.08) and alpha2C (7.79) receptors, and D2A receptors (7.80). Lower affinity is seen for other dopamine, serotonin, alpha2-adrenergic and histamine H1 receptors. In contrast, P95-12113 shows affinity for 5-HT2A receptors (pKi 8.15; which is 60-fold lower than that of iloperidone), adrenergic alpha1 (7.67), alpha2C (7.32) and alpha2B (7.08) receptors. Given this affinity profile, and the observation that P95-12113 does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, it is unlikely that this metabolite contributes to the therapeutic effect of iloperidone in patients with schizophrenia. However, the comparable receptor binding profile of P88-8991 indicates that it is likely to contribute to the clinical profile of iloperidone.

Reboxetine add on therapy to haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia: a preliminary double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study

The negative symptoms of schizophrenia remain a major clinical challenge. Reboxetine is an antidepressant whose major mechanism of action is as a noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor. This study was a 6-week randomized placebo-controlled trial of reboxetine or placebo add on to haloperidol 5 mg in the treatment of 30 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia. The trial failed to demonstrate any significant difference between the placebo and reboxetine groups on any of the outcome measures. This trial does not suggest that increased noradreneregic drive mediated by reuptake inhibition in patients taking dopamine antagonists is of therapeutic value in schizophrenia.

Association analysis of polymorphism in the promoter region of the alpha2a-adrenoceptor gene with schizophrenia and clozapine response

There exists considerable evidence implicating the alpha (alpha) adrenergic system in the superior therapeutic effects of clozapine for the treatment of schizophrenia, as also its associated adverse hypersalivation side effect. It would seem plausible for variants of the adrenoceptors to be associated with the clozapine response. The present study tested the hypothesis that a biallelic polymorphism in the promoter region of the alpha2a-adrenoceptor gene confers susceptibility to schizophrenia, and is associated with a clozapine-induced (favorable) therapeutic response and/or a clozapine-induced hypersalivation. Ninety-seven treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale before and after clozapine treatment. The results of clozapine treatment demonstrated that the alpha2a-adrenoceptor gene variants did not play a major role in the susceptibility, hypersalivation adverse effect or clozapine response of patients with schizophrenia. The polymorphism of the alpha2a-adrenoceptor gene investigated is not likely to play a major role in the pathogenesis of schizophrenic disorders or clozapine response, although the hypothesis that these genes are implicated in the cognitive deficit and polydipsia associated with schizophrenic disorders may, however, still warrant further study.

Efficacy of mirtazapine add on therapy to haloperidol in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study

The negative symptoms of schizophrenia remain a major clinical challenge. Mirtazapine is an antidepressant with antagonist properties at 5-HT2A, 5-HT3 and alpha 2 receptors as well as indirect 5-HT1a agonist effects. Many of these pharmacological actions have clinical or preclinical evidence of efficacy in schizophrenia. This study was a 6-week randomized placebo-controlled trial of mirtzepine or placebo add on to haloperidol 5 mg in the treatment of 30 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia. The primary finding of the trial was a 42% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative symptom scores in the mirtazapine group compared to placebo at the end of 6 weeks (mirtazapine 13.9, SD 1.56; placebo 23.9, SD 1.56; P = 0.000, F = 20.31, d.f. = 1). The PANNS total scores, Clinical Global Impression severity and improvement scales in addition showed superiority of mirtazapine over placebo. There was no difference between the groups on the Hamilton depression scale at endpoint, suggesting that the improvement in negative symptoms was not an artifact of mood improvement. These results suggest a potential role for mirtazapine in the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been known to be involved in the mediation of complex behavioral responses. Considerable research efforts are directed towards refining the knowledge about the function of this brain area and the role it plays in cognitive performance and behavioral output. In the first part, this review provides, from a pharmacological perspective, an overview of anatomical, electrophysiological and neurochemical aspects of the function of the PFC, with an emphasis on the mesocortical dopamine system. Anatomy of the mesocortical system, basic physiological and pharmacological properties of neurotransmission within the PFC, and interactions between dopamine and glutamate as well as other transmitters within the mesocorticolimbic circuit are included. The coverage of these data is largely restricted to what is relevant for the second part of the review which focuses on behavioral studies that have examined the role of the PFC in a variety of phenomena, behaviors and paradigms. These include reward and addiction, locomotor activity and sensitization, learning, cognition, and schizophrenia. Although the focus of this review is on the mesocortical dopamine system, given the intricate interactions of dopamine with other transmitter systems within the PFC and the importance of the PFC as a source of glutamate in subcortical areas, these aspects are also covered in some detail where appropriate. Naturally, a topic as complex as this cannot be covered comprehensively in its entirety. Therefore this review is largely limited to data derived from studies using rats, and it is also specifically restricted to data concerning the medial PFC (mPFC). Since in several fields of research the findings concerning the function or role of the mPFC are relatively inconsistent, the question is addressed whether these inconsistencies might, at least in part, be related to the anatomical and functional heterogeneity of this brain area.

No influence of adrenergic receptor polymorphisms on schizophrenia and antipsychotic response

The adrenergic system plays an important role in psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia. Antagonism of the adrenergic receptor subtypes alpha1A and alpha2A has been found to have an antipsychotic effect. Genetic mutations in these receptors could be related to the alterations in the adrenergic system observed in psychiatric patients and to failure to respond to drug antagonism. We have studied one polymorphism in the alpha1A-adrenergic receptor (Arg492Cys) and two polymorphisms in the promoter region of the alpha2A-adrenergic receptor (-1291-C/G and -261-G/A) in a sample of clozapine-treated schizophrenic patients and controls. No clear differences were observed between the different groups suggesting that these polymorphisms did not play an important role in the aetiology of the disorder or in determining antipsychotic response.

Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with conventional antipsychotics has limitations: 25-33% of patients have illnesses that are treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug, which is claimed to have superior efficacy and to cause fewer motor adverse effects than typical drugs for people with treatment-resistant illnesses. Clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, which necessitates mandatory weekly blood monitoring at least during the first months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of clozapine for schizophrenia in comparison to typical antipsychotic drugs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Publications in all languages were searched from the following databases: Biological Abstracts (1982-1999), The Cochrane Library CENTRAL (Issue 2, 1999), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Specialised Register (1999), EMbase (1980-1999), ISI Citation Index, LILACS (1982-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), and PsycLIT (1974-1999). Reference list screening of included papers was performed. Authors of recent trials and the manufacturer of clozapine contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with typical antipsychotic drugs were included by independent assessment by at least two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by at least two reviewers. Authors of trials published since 1980 were contacted for additional and missing data. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of homogeneous dichotomous data were calculated with the Peto method. A random effects model was used for heterogeneous dichotomous data. Where possible the numbers needed to treat (NNT) or needed to harm (NNH) were also calculated. Weighted or standardised means were calculated for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Currently the review includes 31 studies, 26 of which are less than 13 weeks in duration. These studies include 2589 participants, most of whom were men (74%). The average age was 38 years. There was no difference in the effects of clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs for broad outcomes such as mortality, ability to work or suitability for discharge at end of the study. Clinical improvement was seen more frequently in those taking clozapine (random effects OR 0.4 CI 0.2-0.6, NNT 6) both in the short and the long term. Also, in the short term, participants on clozapine had fewer relapses than those on typical antipsychotic drugs (OR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.8, NNT 20 CI 17-38), and this may be true for long-term treatment as well. Symptom assessment scales showed a greater reduction of symptoms in clozapine-treated patients. Clozapine treatment was more acceptable than low-potency antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine (OR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.9) but did not differ from acceptability of high-potency neuroleptics such as haloperidol (random effects OR 0.8 CI 0.4-1.5). Clozapine was more acceptable in long-term treatment than conventional antipsychotic drugs (random effects OR 0.4 CI 0.2-0.7, NNT 6 CI 3-111). Patients were more satisfied with clozapine treatment (OR 0.5 CI 0.3-0.8, NNT 12 CI 7-37), but they experienced more hypersalivation, temperature increase, and drowsiness than those given conventional neuroleptics. However, clozapine patients experience fewer motor side effects and less dry mouth. The clinical efficacy of clozapine was more pronounced in participants resistant to typical neuroleptics in terms of clinical improvement (random effects OR 0.2 CI 0.1-0.5, NNT 5 CI 4-7) and symptom reduction. Thirty-two percent of treatment resistant people had a clinical improvement with clozapine treatment.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review confirms that clozapine is convincingly more effective than typical antipsychotic drugs in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, producing clinically meaningful improvements and postponing relapse. Patients were more satisfied with clozapine treatment than with typical neuroleptic treatment. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED

Enhanced cortical dopamine output and antipsychotic-like effects of raclopride by alpha2 adrenoceptor blockade

Clozapine exerts superior clinical efficacy and markedly enhances cortical dopamine output compared with classical antipsychotic drugs. Here the alpha2 adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan was administered to rats alone or in combination with the D2/3 dopamine receptor antagonist raclopride. Dopamine efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex and conditioned avoidance responding were analyzed. Idazoxan selectively potentiated the cortical output of dopamine and augmented the suppression of conditioned avoidance responding induced by raclopride. These results challenge basic assumptions underlying the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia and provide insight into clozapine's mode of action.

The antipsychotic drug risperidone interacts with auto- and hetero-receptors regulating serotonin output in the rat frontal cortex

We have previously shown that the antipsychotic drug risperidone enhances serotonin (5-HT) output in the rat frontal cortex (FC), but the precise underlying mechanism has not been revealed. Consequently, the present study using in vivo microdialysis was undertaken to (i) characterize the effects of alpha2D, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor stimulation or blockade on 5-HT efflux in the FC given the purported regulatory role of these sites on 5-HT release, and (ii) to investigate the ability of risperidone to interfere with these receptors in order to examine their putative role in the facilitatory action or risperidone on cortical 5-HT output. Cortical perfusion with risperidone or the alpha2A/D, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonists idazoxan, isamoltane or GR 127,935, respectively, dose-dependently increased 5-HT efflux in the FC. Conversely, agonists at these receptors, i.e. clonidine, CP 93,129 or CP 135,807, respectively, decreased extracellular 5-HT concentrations. The agonist-induced decreases in 5-HT efflux were antagonized by coadministration of respective receptor antagonists. Risperidone attenuated the decrease in cortical 5-HT efflux elicited by clonidine or CP 135,807 but failed to affect the decrease elicited by CP 93,129. The present in vivo biochemical data indicate that the output of 5-HT in the FC is negatively regulated via alpha2D, 5-HT1B and tentatively also via 5-HT1D receptors located in the nerve terminal area. Moreover, the results indicate that risperidone acts as an antagonist at alpha2D and possibly 5-HT1D receptors in vivo, two properties which most likely contribute to its stimulatory effect on cortical 5-HT efflux. The facilitatory effect of risperidone on cortical serotonergic neurotransmission may be of significance for its therapeutic effect in schizophrenia, particularly when associated with affective symptomatology and/or intense anxiety. The effect may also contribute to alleviate signs of cortical dysfunction such as impaired cognition.

Risperidone-induced increase of plasma norepinephrine is not correlated with symptom improvement in chronic schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown an increase in plasma levels of norepinephrine (NE) after clozapine treatment of schizophrenia. This effect has been suggested to relate to improvement in symptoms.

METHODS

To test whether other novel antipsychotic drugs have such an effect, the present experiment examined schizophrenic symptoms and plasma levels of NE before and after 5 weeks of treatment with risperidone or haloperidol.

RESULTS

Risperidone, but not haloperidol, significantly increased plasma NE; however, there was no correlation of this effect with clinical improvement on any symptom scale.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding suggests that risperidone shares similar properties with clozapine in enhancing peripheral NE, but that these changes in plasma NE may not be a consistent indicator of atypical antipsychotic drug efficacy.

Idazoxan preferentially increases dopamine output in the rat medial prefrontal cortex at the nerve terminal level

The effects of the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan on extracellular concentrations of dopamine in major dopaminergic terminal regions in the brain were investigated by means of microdialysis in freely moving rats. Systemic administration of idazoxan markedly increased dopamine output in the medial prefrontal cortex, whereas it failed to affect dopamine efflux in the striatum or in the nucleus accumbens. Local perfusion of idazoxan via reversed dialysis markedly enhanced dopamine efflux in cortical but not subcortical areas, in which dopamine output was but little affected. Infusion of idazoxan into the ventral tegmental area did not alter the dopamine efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex. Moreover, the increase in cortical dopamine efflux induced by systemic administration of idazoxan was unaffected by tetrodotoxin perfusion of the ventral tegmental area. These data show that the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan preferentially increases basal dopamine output in the medial prefrontal cortex through a local mechanism, an effect which appears largely independent of dopaminergic neuronal activity. An enhanced output of cortical dopamine may contribute to the purported augmentation by alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists of the therapeutic effects of both antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs.

A comparative review of new antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

To review the preclinical and clinical properties of various established and putative antipsychotic medications, namely clozapine, risperidone, amisulpride, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, and ziprasidone.

METHODS

This paper proposes a decision algorithm for comparing drugs used for psychotic disorders, based on biochemical profile, experimental pharmacology, postiron emission tomography (PET) scan results, and clinical efficacy on positive, negative, anxious, depressive, and cognitive symptoms. This "quotient" aims to compare the different available drugs, regardless of their development and registration status.

RESULTS

Antipsychotic drugs have been classified in many ways, mainly according to their chemical structure, clinical effects, receptor affinity, or side effects. Preclinical data have indicated that these drugs might be effective antipsychotic agents, causing fewer extrapyramidal side effects than most of the previously marketed drugs. However, the biological basis for the putative superiority of these drugs in treating psychosis has yet to be ascertained.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most antipsychotics have been shown to be at least equivalent to haloperidol on positive symptoms, they must be studied further to establish their absolute and relative efficacy on positive symptoms, negative and primary negative symptoms, cognition, psychotic anxiety, psychotic depression, suicidality, and quality of life. These drugs should be valuable in treating schizophrenia, but their merit in the long-term management of patients with schizophrenia still needs to be confirmed.

Toward a rational pharmacotherapy of comorbid substance abuse in schizophrenic patients

The prevalence of substance abuse is elevated among schizophrenic patients. When free of illicit substances and sober, substance-abusing schizophrenic patients may have a better prognosis than other frequently hospitalized schizophrenic patients. However, the cost of substance abuse is great in terms of rehospitalization, homelessness, risk of other medical illness, disruption of social and vocational function, exacerbation of symptoms, suicide, and increased health care expenses. Important recent developments in medications for reducing substance abuse in nonschizophrenic populations make it timely to consider factors that might contribute to substance abuse among schizophrenic patients. This review will focus on substances most frequently abused by schizophrenic patients: nicotine, alcohol, cannabis, and psychostimulants. It concentrates on two conceptual foci: "self-medication hypotheses" and "comorbid addiction vulnerability hypotheses". The relationship between these hypotheses and possible pharmacotherapeutic approaches for substance-abusing schizophrenic patients will be considered.

Variants in the alpha2A AR adrenergic receptor gene in psychiatric patients

In various studies of psychiatric patients, alterations in adrenergic receptor (AR) expression or function have been suggested. Herein, the alpha2A AR gene was screened in 206 patients with schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, alcohol dependence, or cocaine dependence. The entire coding region was examined for single base pair changes, using restriction endonuclease fingerprinting (REF), a screening method that can detect virtually 100% of mutations in 2-kb DNA segments. In the approximately 600 kb of screened sequence, six novel nucleotide changes were identified. The changes resulted in four missense changes (A25G, N251K, R368L, and K370N), and a sequence in the 3' untranslated region. In addition, a silent change (G363G) was found at high frequency in Asians and Native Americans. Of the four missense changes, two found in patients with alcohol/drug dependence occur in highly conserved amino acids, suggesting that these are of likely functional significance. As the alpha2A ARs are widely distributed both pre- and postsynaptically, and as many pharmacological agents with multiple effects target these receptors, the novel missense changes described herein may be candidates for involvement in alcohol/drug dependence, in other clinical disorders or traits, or in differential response to pharmacotherapy.

Antipsychotic drug affinities at alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes in post-mortem human brain

Although there is substantial interest in the possible role of alpha2-adrenoceptors in the antipsychotic efficacy of clozapine, there has so far been no systematic investigation of antipsychotic drug affinities for alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes in the human brain. We have assessed the ability of three classical and four 'atypical' antipsychotic drugs to displace binding of [3H]RX821002 to alpha2-adrenoceptors in human post-mortem brain tissue. All seven drugs displaced radioligand from an apparent single site in the frontal cortex, consistent with the sole presence of the alpha2A-subtype in this region. In the caudate nucleus, all drugs except risperidone differentiated two sites, of which one was equivalent to the cortical alpha2A-subtype and the second, accounting for approximately two-thirds of specific radioligand binding, showed higher affinity for the antipsychotics. This second site, on the basis of prazosin's relatively high affinity, is consistent with an alpha2B-adrenoceptor identity. The new antipsychotic quetiapine showed the greatest selectivity for this receptor site; both quetiapine and clozapine had affinities for the alpha2B site which were greater than their affinities for human D2 dopamine receptors. The possible role of this site in the mechanisms underlying aspects of antipsychotic drug atypicality is discussed.

Elevation of extracellular cortical noradrenaline may contribute to the antidepressant activity of zotepine: an in vivo microdialysis study in freely moving rats

The antipsychotic, zotepine, as well as possessing affinity for dopamine D1- and D2-1ike receptors, has high affinity for the noradrenaline (NA) transporter and inhibits [3H]NA uptake by rat frontal cortex synaptosomes, in vitro. The present studies investigated the effects of zotepine on extracellular NA in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats using in vivo microdialysis. Removal of calcium from the perfusate reduced extracellular NA by 70.5% and prevented the 50 mM KCl-stimulated increase in NA levels. Zotepine (0.5-1.5 mg kg(-1) i.p.), evoked biphasic, dose-dependent rises in extracellular NA with maximal increases observed at 60 min (+ 171.0%) and 240 min (+ 211.5%) post-treatment. The increases in NA levels were sustained for up to 100 min post-dosing. Clozapine (10.0 mg kg(-1) i.p.), resulted in a smaller, transient increase in NA levels (+ 72.0%) which lasted for 20 min post-treatment. Neither ziprasidone (3.0 mg kg(-1) i.p.) nor olanzapine (1.0 mg kg(-1) i.p.) influenced extracellular NA. Systemic treatment with the antidepressant desipramine (0.3 mg kg(-1) i.p.) resulted in a prolonged elevation of NA levels over 240 min (maximal increase of + 354.3%), whilst local infusion of nisoxetine (1-100 microM) through the dialysis probe increased NA levels in a concentration-dependent manner (up to 587.8% of control values). These data suggest that the inhibition of NA uptake by zotepine and its subsequent prolonged elevation of extracellular cortical NA may underlie the reported antidepressant properties of zotepine in schizophrenic patients.

Modulation of central serotonergic neurotransmission by risperidone: underlying mechanism(s) and significance of action

1. The effects of risperidone on brain 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) neuronal activity were investigated using microdialysis in the frontal cortex (FC) or the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) as well as single cell recording in the DRN. 2. Systemic administration of risperidone (0.6 and 2.0 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently increased 5-HT output in both the FC and the DRN. 3. Local cortical administration of both risperidone or idazoxan enhanced the 5-HT efflux in the FC, whereas local raphe administration of risperidone but not idazoxan increased the output of 5-HT in the DRN. 4. Systemic administration of risperidone (200 micrograms/kg, i.v.) or the selective alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (400 micrograms/kg, i.v.) decreased, whereas selective alpha 2 adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (20 micrograms/kg, i.v.) increased the 5-HT cell firing in the DRN. 5. Pretreatment with the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (5.0 micrograms/kg, i.v.) effectively antagonized the inhibition of 5-HT cells induced by risperidone, but failed to prevent the prazosin-induced decrease in 5-HT cell firing in the DRN. 6. The inhibitory effect of risperidone on 5-HT cell firing in the DRN was significantly attenuated in rats pretreated with the 5-HT depletor PCPA (p-chlorophenylalanine; 300 mg/kg/day i.p. for 3 consecutive days) in comparison with drug naive animals. 7. Consequently, the risperidone-induced increase in 5-HT output in the FC may be related to its alpha 2 adrenoceptor antagonistic action, an effect probably executed at the nerve terminal level, whereas the reduction in 5-HT cell firing by risperidone appears to be associated with increased availability of 5-HT in the somatodendritic region of the neurones leading to an enhanced 5-HT1A autoreceptor activation and, in turn, to inhibition of cell firing.

Receptor mechanisms of antipsychotic drug atypicality

Recent advances in antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia have offered several new compounds which avoid many of the limitations of the classical antipsychotics. These so-called ‘atypical’ antipsychotics have fewer extrapyramidal side effects, greater efficacy against negative symptoms and greater efficacy in otherwise treatment-resistant patients. However, the mechanism of action of these atypical antipsychotics is still unclear. The several receptors currently implicated in the pharmacological profile of these atypical antipsychotics include subtypes of those for dopamine, serotonin, noradrenaline, and acetylcholine among others. The current hypotheses for possible mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotics are discussed along with the experimental correlates of antipsychotic efficacy in animal models.

Risperidone inhibits 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neuronal activity in the dorsal raphe nucleus by local release of 5-hydroxytryptamine

1. The effects of risperidone on brain 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) neuronal functions were investigated and compared with other antipsychotic drugs and selective receptor antagonists by use of single cell recording and microdialysis in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). 2. Administration of risperidone (25-400 micrograms kg-1, i.v.) dose-dependently decreased 5-HT cell firing in the DRN, similar to the antipsychotic drug clozapine (0.25-4.0 mg kg-1, i.v.), the putative antipsychotic drug amperozide (0.5-8.0 mg kg-1, i.v.) and the selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (50-400 micrograms kg-1, i.v.). 3. The selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (10-80 micrograms kg-1, i.v.), in contrast, increased the firing rate of 5-HT neurones in the DRN, whereas the D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonists raclopride (25-200 micrograms kg-1, i.v.) and MDL 100,907 (50-400 micrograms kg-1, i.v.), respectively, were without effect. Thus, the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonistic action of the antipsychotic drugs might, at least partly, cause the decrease in DRN 5-HT cell firing. 4. Pretreatment with the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (5.0 micrograms kg-1, i.v.), a drug previously shown to antagonize effectively the inhibition of 5-HT cells induced by risperidone, failed to prevent the prazosin-induced decrease in 5-HT cell firing. This finding argues against the notion that alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism is the sole mechanism underlying the inhibitory effect of risperidone on the DRN cells. 5. The inhibitory effect of risperidone on 5-HT cell firing in the DRN was significantly attenuated in rats pretreated with the 5-HT depletor PCPA (p-chlorophenylalanine; 300 mg kg-1, i.p., day-1 for 3 consecutive days) in comparison with drug naive animals. 6. Administration of risperidone (2.0 mg kg-1, s.c.) significantly enhanced 5-HT output in the DRN. 7. Consequently, the reduction in 5-HT cell firing by risperidone appears to be related to increased availability of 5-HT in the somatodendritic region of the neurones leading to an enhanced 5-HT1A autoreceptor activation and, in turn, to inhibition of firing, and is probably only to a minor extent caused by its alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonistic action.

What is an atypical antipsychotic?

This is an exciting time for research into the drug treatment of schizophrenia. Modern techniques in imaging and molecular biology have contributed to our understanding of the receptor mechanisms of antipsychotic drug action. Several new antipsychotics are, or will shortly be, available and each of these new drugs promise improvements over classical antipsychotics. This review will discuss the concept of atypicality in antipsychotic drugs, and will describe some of the models for identification of improved antipsychotic action. The various receptor mechanisms proposed to underlie atypical antipsychotic action, several of which have featured in recent debates in this journal, will be considered in the light of the pharmacology of some of the newly-emerging antipsychotic drugs.

Responses to alpha 2-adrenoceptor blockade by idazoxan in healthy male and female volunteers

Seven male and five female volunteers underwent double-blind infusions of the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (100 and 200 micrograms/mg) and placebo in random order. Blood pressure, plasma norepinephrine, growth hormone and subjective responses were measured. The higher dose of idazoxan produced increases in blood pressure, norepinephrine and growth hormone and slight increases in anxiety. Both subject age and sex appeared to influence the magnitude of responses.

Noradrenergic mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex

There is growing evidence that noradrenergic inputs to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) play an important role in regulating its function. This paper reviews the pharmacological control of noradrenaline (NA) release in this region, with particular reference to our studies using brain microdialysis, and also describes how NA levels are modulated by antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs. The suggestion that atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine and risperidone may produce clinical benefits by their ability to increase NA release is discussed. Finally, a new class of drugs, which show selectivity for imidazoline receptors is described. These compounds are shown to similarly increase extracellular NA in the PFC. Their potential utility as clinical treatments is discussed.