What threshold for adjuvant therapy in older breast cancer patients?

Breast cancer in the elderly

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and most breast cancers are not attributable to risk factors other than female gender and increased age. However, despite its increasing prevalence in the geriatric population, prospective clinical trials for older cancer patients do not exist and most data come from retrospective studies or subanalyses from general population studies. As a result physician's, patient's and family members' fear predominates and elderly patients do not receive the appropriate treatment when compared with younger ones. Treatment is offered according to biological age alone and life expectancy, comorbidity and functional status are not considered when deciding treatment strategy. Surgery is often denied to patients older than 70 years of age, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are omitted due to the fear of toxicity and hormonal therapy, even though it represents a great tool as adjuvant therapy, it is associated with significant morbidity when chosen as primary treatment. Palliation of symptoms remains the main goal for metastatic disease but for the rest of the patients improving disease-free survival in the early stages should guide therapy no matter chronological age.

Breast cancer in the elderly: retrospective study on diagnosis and treatment according to national guidelines

We set out to investigate the level of accordance of diagnosis and treatment of elderly breast cancer patients with national guidelines and to study predictors of deviation. Data on patient and tumor variables were collected from charts of 166 patients aged 70 years and older, diagnosed at our hospital in 2002-2004. Diagnostic work-up and treatment were compared with guidelines and reasons for deviation were recorded; 122 (74%) patients were diagnosed and treated in accordance with guidelines. Diagnosis was incomplete in 19 patients (11%). Surgery, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy were withheld in 19 (11%), 11 (7%), and 9 (5%) patients, respectively. Guideline deviation was motivated in 18 patients (11%) (comorbidity n=11, patients' preferences n=5, age n=2), unmotivated in 18 (11%), and undeliberate in 8 (5%). Our study demonstrates that deviation from guidelines in elderly breast cancer patients mainly occurs due to a deliberate adjustment to patient's comorbidity and preference.

Improving compliance and persistence to adjuvant tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor therapy

Better compliance and persistence with therapy are associated with improved patient outcomes. As more and more patients survive breast cancer, compliance with adjuvant therapy becomes increasingly important. In clinical trials, compliance with adjuvant endocrine therapy among women with breast cancer is usually high. Retrospective analyses of databases and medical records from clinical practice, insurance databases of prescription refills, and survey data show a significant decrease in persistence after 12 months of therapy. With ongoing therapy, a further decline in persistence of up to 50% has been reported. A consistent methodology is needed to measure patient behavior and identify patients who are not adhering to therapy. Promising strategies for enhancing adherence to treatment in clinical practice include improving access to health care, increasing patient satisfaction, managing side effects, patient education, and better communication between the patient and health care provider. Positive relationships between patients and their health care providers, and frequent monitoring and feedback, may be most effective. While the lack of conformity across studies in measuring makes cross-study comparisons difficult, this review evaluates the available data regarding compliance and persistence with adjuvant endocrine therapies for breast cancer (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors) and presents strategies for improving adherence.

Treating elderly patients with hormone sensitive breast cancer: what do the data show?

Elderly patients with breast cancer frequently present with one or more comorbid conditions in addition to their cancer, and this can complicate clinicians' treatment decisions. Declining estrogen levels increase the risk for conditions such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis in the elderly. Evidence from clinical trials suggests that the elderly are frequently underrepresented; this may be due to an inherent reluctance among physicians to prescribe the latest, most effective therapies and/or recommend elderly patients for participation in clinical trials. Nonetheless, there is evidence that breast cancer in the elderly is generally more indolent than in younger patients, with a low proliferative and invasive capacity and a high degree of hormone responsiveness, making elderly patients ideal candidates for adjuvant endocrine therapies. The aromatase inhibitors, including anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, have proven to be well tolerated and superior alternatives to tamoxifen for post-menopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, whether used upfront or sequentially with adjuvant tamoxifen. Although the elderly have also been underrepresented in clinical trials of the aromatase inhibitors, evidence from the major trials has not shown any decrement in efficacy or major safety concerns when these drugs are used in older populations. While recently published data from MA.17 and the Breast International Group 1-98 showed letrozole to be effective irrespective of age, clinicians should carefully consider underlying comorbidities when prescribing adjuvant endocrine treatments to elderly patients with breast cancer.

Vulnerable and frail elderly: an approach to the management of the main tumour types

In dealing with older cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, some form of geriatric evaluation is needed to distinguish those which can be treated as adults from those - the vulnerable ones - who need a modified approach and also from those who are frail or too sick to receive an active treatment. Only scarce data are available to guide treatment of vulnerable or frail patients, the neglected majority of older cancer patients. In most of these cases they receive an adapted approach which does not derive from the results of clinical trials, but from an enlightened empiricism. In this article we summarise and discuss available data for management of the main tumour types in frail and vulnerable patients, and call for further research in this field.

Diagnosing and Treating Breast Cancer in Elderly Women: A Call for Improved Understanding

Breast cancer is the most common nondermatological malignancy in women, and the incidence increases with age until the eighth decade. Breast cancer pathology and biology appear to be different in elderly patients than in younger ones, and therefore treatment recommendations cannot be generalized from one group to the other. Most elderly women can tolerate breast cancer surgery without significant complications and should be offered a definitive surgical procedure. Improved mechanisms to predict which patients will tolerate and benefit from various therapies are under development. Because most breast cancers in the elderly are hormone responsive, hormonal therapy remains the mainstay of systemic treatment in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. Chemotherapy can be used in elderly women, but treatment decisions must be individualized based upon risk-benefit analyses. Elder-specific studies are underway to identify the most-efficacious and best-tolerated therapies for breast cancer in this population. Primary care physicians must be aware of these issues to provide adequate counseling and care to these patients.

New Criteria for Selecting Elderly Patients for Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment Studies

About 50% of breast cancers occur in women aged 65 years and older, and both the incidence and prevalence of breast cancer among older women are expected to increase in the future. Aging implies a reduction in life expectancy and tolerance to treatments that should be considered in elderly patients with early breast cancer. In fact, treatment options often carry short-term risks and toxicities that might be tempered by long-term survival gains. The choice of adjuvant treatment for elderly patients should be based on the same criteria that are currently used for younger patients: endocrine responsiveness and assessment of risk of relapse. Adjuvant endocrine therapy should be considered for women with endocrine-responsive disease, regardless of age. The value of adjuvant chemotherapy is controversial. Older women are frequently undertreated with adjuvant chemotherapy and are underrepresented in clinical trials. In particular, no convincing data are available on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in endocrine nonresponsive tumors, partly because most of the time these tumors represent a relatively small subset in adjuvant studies focusing on the elderly population. Several phase III trials are currently ongoing in elderly patients with early breast cancer to evaluate different options of adjuvant treatments. Only one trial, coordinated by the International Breast Cancer Study Group, is investigating the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for postmenopausal women of advanced age with endocrine nonresponsive early breast cancer. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Cytotoxic therapy for the elderly with metastatic breast cancer: A review on safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy

As the incidence of invasive breast cancer, mainly developing at older age, is rising, the absolute number of elderly developing metastatic disease is also increasing. In view of improved life expectancy, sociocultural changes and better supportive measures for chemotherapy-induced toxicity, there is an increasing request for the administration of chemotherapy in elderly. At the moment, medical oncologists are still reluctant to use chemotherapy in elderly partly because of concern about increased toxicity and poor tolerability of this patient cohort, and the inability to appropriately select elderly that may benefit from chemotherapy. The question is whether this attitude remains justified. In this review, the current status of clinical research in the area of metastatic breast cancer regarding toxicity and activity of chemotherapy in older breast cancer patients is discussed. Further, data on pharmacokinetics are emphasised as age-related physiologic changes may affect these features with consequences for toxicity and decision-making. Moreover, data on assessment tools trying to characterise the 'functional age' are reviewed. In general, the literature data are scarce and hampered by major limitations, while pharmacokinetic data indicate that a different approach in older breast cancer patients does not always seem justified. To increase our knowledge aiming at optimisation of cancer treatment in elderly, there is a clear necessity for prospective, well-designed studies with emphasis on the particular requirements of older patients and incorporation of pharmacokinetic and -dynamic evaluation of cytotoxic agents used in this specific group. As in other research areas, maximal progress will be achieved by joined efforts of co-operative research groups.

A practical approach to geriatric assessment in oncology

More than half of new cancers are diagnosed in elderly patients, but data from randomized clinical trials do not represent the elderly population. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can contribute valuable information to oncologists for risk stratification of elderly cancer patients. Functional impairments, frailty markers, cognitive impairments, and physical disabilities increase the risk for adverse outcomes during cancer treatment. Evidence is accumulating that selected elderly cancer patients benefit from CGA and geriatric interventions. However, perceived barriers to CGA include time, familiarity, cost, and lack of a well-defined procedure to interpret and apply the information. We present a model for rapid selection of elderly who would benefit from CGA using screening tools such as the Vulnerable Elders-13 Survey. We also define important geriatric functional risk factors, including mobility limitation, frailty, and dementia, and demonstrate how brief screening tests can make use of data realistically available to clinical oncologists to determine a stage of aging. Summary tables and a decision tree demonstrate how these data can be compiled to determine the risk for toxicities and to anticipate ancillary support needs.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer

PURPOSE

During the last decade, oncologists and geriatricians have begun to work together to integrate the principles of geriatrics into oncology care. The increasing use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is one example of this effort. A CGA includes an evaluation of an older individual's functional status, comorbid medical conditions, cognition, nutritional status, psychological state, and social support; and a review of the patient's medications. This article discusses recent advances on the use of a CGA in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

In this article, we provide an update on the studies that address the domains of a geriatric assessment applied to the oncology patient, review the results of the first studies evaluating the use of a CGA in developing interventions to improve the care of older adults with cancer, and discuss future research directions.

RESULTS

The evidence from recent studies demonstrates that a CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in older patients with cancer. Accumulating data show the benefits of incorporating a CGA in the evaluation of older patients with cancer. Prospective trials evaluating the utility of a CGA to guide interventions to improve the quality of cancer care in older adults are justified.

CONCLUSION

Growing evidence demonstrates that the variables examined in a CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in older patients with cancer, and uncover problems relevant to cancer care that would otherwise go unrecognized.

Breast cancer in elderly women: a different reality? Results from the NORA study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age, and the disease affects many older women; however, attitudes about prevention and treatment of breast cancer vary based on the patient's age. Older women have less access to clinical trials and fewer opportunities for treatment with innovative therapies. The National Oncological Research observatory on Adjuvant therapy in breast cancer (NORA) study was a cohort study designed to obtain information about adjuvant strategies for treatment of breast cancer after surgery, patterns of recurrence, and possible correlations between cancer-related events and biological factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This report describes patient characteristics, disease status, and local and systemic adjuvant treatments in a population of breast cancer patients aged >or=65 years. The NORA study consecutively enrolled >3500 patients from 2000 through 2002 at 77 Italian hospitals; of these, 1085 were aged >or=65 years. Data on patient characteristics, cancer presentation, and treatments were analyzed to identify possible relationships between these factors and age.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that age is significantly related to later diagnosis and different patterns of treatment. Choice of adjuvant systemic treatment was primarily related to hormone receptor status and tumor stage but was strongly influenced by the patient's age; there was a proportional relationship between endocrine treatment and increasing age. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil as well as anthracyclines were widely used, but the use of taxanes was limited to a very small percentage of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the NORA study may help to change attitudes that currently exclude a significant proportion of breast cancer patients from secondary prevention policies, more active treatment strategies, and clinical research trials based on age.

Breast Cancer in the Elderly

Screening and adjuvant postoperative therapies have increased survival among women with breast cancer. These tools are seldom applied in elderly patients, although the usually reported incidence of breast cancer is close to 50% in women 65 years or older, reaching 47% after 70 years in the updated Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Elderly breast cancer patients, even if in good medical health, were frequently excluded from adjuvant clinical trials. Women age 70 years who are fit actually have a median life expectancy of 15.5 years, ie, half of them will live much longer and will remain exposed for enough time to the potentially preventable risks of a relapse and specific death. In the last few years, a new concern about this issue has developed. Treatment now faces two major end points, as in younger women: to improve disease-free survival in the early stages, and to palliate symptoms in advanced disease. However, in both settings, the absolute benefit of treatment is critical because protecting quality of life and all its related aspects (especially functional status and independence), is crucial in older persons who have more limited life expectancy. Furthermore, the new hormonal compounds (aromatase inhibitors) and chemotherapeutic drugs (capecitabine, liposomal doxorubicin), are potentially less toxic than and equally as effective as older more established therapies. These new treatments bring new challenges including higher cost, and defining their benefit in elderly breast cancer must include an analysis of the cost/benefit ratio. These issues emphasize the urgent need to develop and support clinical trials for this older population of breast cancer patients both in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, a move that will take us from a prejudiced, age-based medicine to an evidence-based medicine.

Future of geriatric oncology

Approximately 50% of cancers occur in patients aged 70 years and older in developed countries and, as the population ages, this proportion will increase. As older patients have a very variable health status, the need for proper integration of an oncologic and a geriatric approach has become increasingly clear. The last two decades have seen the development of geriatric oncology programs and research, which are reviewed here. An increasing amount of data support the view that a geriatric assessment identifies many problems in older people with cancer, adds prognostic information and may improve the prognosis of these patients. The near future will probably deliver the following: operationalization of geriatric assessment into assessment and decision tools, as well as multidisciplinary interventions in oncology; cooperation of aging and cancer research in the understanding of cancer biology, aging physiology and pharmacology of anticancer drugs; improved clinical study designs; development of geriatric oncology programs and screening tools accessible to the private practitioner; globalization of the problem of aging and cancer as vaccinations and increased standard of living improve life expectancy in developing countries. Geriatric oncology is a very young branch of oncology and geriatrics. However, as the older population grows worldwide, and the incidence of cancer increases with age, it is very much here to stay and develop. In this article, we will review progress made over the last two decades and the form that its development may take over the decade to come.

Chemotherapy in the elderly

People over the age of 65 years constitute the fastest-growing segment of the US population. Within the next 30 years, this group will comprise over 20% of the total population. Importantly, 50% of all cancers and 70% of cancer mortality occur in this age group. Choosing the correct chemotherapy regimen and dose for the older patient can be extremely difficult due to physiological changes that occur with aging, as well as other comorbidities associated with this age group. Treatment decisions need to be based on a patient’s individual performance, functional status, life expectancy, and their wishes and opinions. Although there are no accepted algorithms to guide management decisions in elderly cancer patients, data are becoming available that will help guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population.

Critical review of the management of early-stage breast cancer in elderly women

The treatment of elderly women (> or =70 years) with early-stage breast cancer is an emerging clinical problem in the setting of an ageing population. There is a lack of clinical trial evidence to formulate clinical guidelines for management because of the small number of elderly women included in previous clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. This often results in elderly patients being denied standard management based on age alone. The often-complex interaction between age, comorbid conditions and function complicate the planning and outcomes of surgery and can have an effect on the delivery of postoperative adjuvant therapy. A comprehensive assessment of the elderly patient is essential to determine overall prognosis and morbidity risk from treatments; however, a simple comorbidity scale for use in routine clinical practice remains elusive. Thus, treatment decisions should be tailored to the individual to ensure that therapies are not unduly withheld and are appropriate for the patient's overall condition. The assessment of the elderly patient with breast cancer requires the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. The evidence for efficacy, safety and potential risks of surgery and adjuvant therapies (including radiotherapy, hormone therapy and chemotherapy) in the elderly population is discussed in this review and the role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is outlined.

The use of radiation in the elderly

Despite the fact that breast cancer is predominantly a disease of postmenopausal women, there have been no uniform recommendations for both locoregional and systemic therapy for women over 70. Until recently, older women have been excluded from clinical trials. This study is the first randomized trial that addresses the use of radiation therapy following lumpectomy in a favorable cohort of elderly women.

Radiation therapy for older cancer patients

Cancer is the leading cause of death among the elderly. With the dramatic increase in life expectancy, treatment approach of older cancer patients poses major challenges. There is no consensus on treatment guidelines for elderly cancer patients with significant variability among physicians due to concerns for toxicity. The issue is further complicated by a lack of quality data on age-related issues of cancer management. This review highlights important factors relevant to treatment decision making in older cancer patients with special emphasis on radiation therapy for lung, prostate and breast cancer. The potential benefits of recent innovations and emerging radiotherapeutic technologies and their application to elderly cancer patients is also presented.

Postmastectomy Radiation and Survival in Older Women With Breast Cancer

Purpose

Clinical trials indicate that postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) improves survival for women age younger than 70 years with high-risk breast cancer. However, for women age 70 years or older, the benefits of PMRT are unknown. As recent evidence suggests that certain adjuvant treatments appropriate for younger women may only be marginally beneficial for older women, we sought to determine whether PMRT improves survival for older women with breast cancer.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare data spanning 1992 to 1999, we identified 11,594 women age 70 years or older treated with mastectomy for invasive breast cancer. A proportional hazards model adjusted for clinical-pathologic covariates tested whether PMRT was associated with improved overall survival for low-risk (T1/2 N0), intermediate-risk (T1/2 N1), and high-risk (T3/4 and/or N2/3) patients.

Results

A total of 502 (7%) of 7,416 low-risk, 242 (11%) of 2,145 intermediate-risk, and 785 (38%) of 2,053 high-risk patients received PMRT. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. For low- and intermediate-risk patients, PMRT was not associated with survival. For high-risk patients, PMRT was associated with a significant improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97; P = .02). Five-year adjusted survival was 50% for patients not treated with PMRT or chemotherapy, 56% for patients treated with PMRT only, 57% for patients treated with chemotherapy only, and 59% for patients treated with both PMRT and chemotherapy.

Conclusion

PMRT is associated with improved survival for older women with high-risk breast cancer. Randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to confirm this finding and define optimal treatment strategies for this patient group.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in the elderly: whom to treat, what regimen?

As the elderly population continues to grow, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment in the elderly is becoming an increasingly important issue for the practicing oncologist. Decisions regarding adjuvant treatment involve a careful assessment of the risk for recurrent disease and side effects from treatment, balancing these risks against the beneficial effects of treatment. In this review, we discuss methods for assessing the elderly patient in terms of life expectancy, comorbid disease, and functional capacity. This assessment can then be used to help identify appropriate candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. Tools for estimating the risk for relapse and mortality and the reduction in these risks with various forms of treatment are useful for clarifying treatment options. Elderly patients have been underrepresented in clinical trials, and patients are often given less intense and possibly inferior standard treatment as a function of age. Ongoing clinical trials targeting the elderly patient may help answer questions about the relative risks and benefits of adjuvant treatment in this age group. Recent data show that most fit elderly patients derive a benefit from standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens that is equal to that of younger patients.

Do age and ethnicity predict breast cancer treatment received? A cross-sectional urban population based study. Breast cancer treatment: age and ethnicity

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment patterns of women aged 55 years or older with newly diagnosed breast cancer and to examine the association between age and ethnicity/race on treatment selection.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey between January 1 and June 30, 2001 of 401 women was performed of Hispanic, black and non-Hispanic white women in Los Angeles County, aged 55 years or older with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Regression analysis examined the association between: (a) age and treatment selection and (b) ethnicity/race and treatment selection, adjusting for the effect of possible confounders.

RESULTS

In this study of urban breast cancer patients (64.1% response rate), blacks were less likely to receive hormone (OR=0.36) or chemotherapy therapy (OR=0.50) while older patients were less likely to receive lymph node dissection after lumpectomy (OR=0.48) and chemotherapy (OR=0.22).

CONCLUSION

Although there are racial and age disparities in breast cancer treatment, other factors such as education, income status, insurance plan, functional status, and comorbidity also play an important role.

Insight into the treatment of cancer in older patients: Developments in the last decade

In the last decades there has been an increased interest in the treatment of elderly cancer patients and a change in attitude of both clinicians and their patients has occurred. Drugs are now available that might be considered "elderly-friendly" and the enormous advances in surgical procedures and supportive treatments over the recent years have enabled adverse effects to be minimized. A Geriatric Assessment is increasingly used as a tool to define those patients who are more suitable for aggressive chemotherapy or, on the contrary, palliative treatment. For almost all cancers, older patients are better treated today than they were in the past, even though we are still far from optimal management. Despite the perceived barriers to including elderly patients in clinical trials, there are few data to support excluding them. We must not permit increased age in cancer patients to continue to be an important and independent risk factor for receiving inadequate care.

Impact of Her-2 Neu Overexpression on Outcome of Elderly Women Treated With Wide Local Excision and Breast Irradiation for Early Stage Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of Her-2 neu status in elderly patients managed with breast conservation strategy for stage I-II breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted an IRB approved retrospective review of 153 women age 70 and older with stage I-II breast cancer, managed with wide local excision and breast radiation between January 1997 and December 2002. The subset of 106 patients had a known Her-2 neu status and was analyzed for primary patient and tumor characteristics. These characteristics were correlated with cause specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and combined nodal and distant failure (NDF). Her-2 neu positivity was confirmed with FISH HercepTestTM. Statistical tests included Cox regression, contingency table and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 55 months and patient's median age was 76. Twenty two percent of patients were Her-2 neu positive and 78% were Her-2 neu negative. Her-2 neu positivity was significantly associated with high histologic grade (P = 0.008), T2 stage (P = 0.001) and positive axillary lymph nodes (P = 0.02) among 73 patients who had surgical assessment of axilla. Overall, only 15 patients (14%) received chemotherapy. There were no recurrences in the breast. Her-2 neu positivity predicted for NDF and CSS on multivariate analysis. Projected 5-year freedom from NDF was 70% for Her-2 neu positive and 97% for Her-2 neu negative patients (P < 0.01, log-rank). CSS was 86% for Her-2 neu positive and 98% for Her-2 neu negative patients (P < 0.01, log-rank). OS was no different between Her-2 neu positive and Her-2 neu negative patients (80% versus 85%, P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Her-2 neu amplification predicts development of NDF and negatively influences CSS, but not local control or OS in elderly patients treated with breast conservation. Similar to the trend in younger patients, Her-2 neu positivity may be used in the future to consider more aggressive treatment strategies in elderly patients.

Therapy Insight: therapeutic challenges in the treatment of elderly cancer patients

People over the age of 65 years constitute the fastest-growing segment of the US population. Within the next 30 years, this group will comprise over 20% of the total population. Importantly, 50% of all cancers and 70% of cancer mortality occur in this age group. Choosing the correct chemotherapy regimen and dose for the older patient can be extremely difficult because of physiological changes that occur with aging, as well as other comorbidities associated with this age group. Treatment decisions need to be based on a patient's individual performance, functional status and life expectancy. Although there are no accepted algorithms to guide management decisions in elderly cancer patients, data are becoming available that will help guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population.

Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)

BACKGROUND

Several studies have evaluated the clinical effectiveness of endocrine therapy alone in women aged 70 years or over and who are fit for surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and review the evidence from randomised trials comparing primary endocrine therapy (endocrine therapy alone) to surgery, with or without adjuvant endocrine therapy, in the management of women aged 70 years or over with operable breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register was searched on 21st August 2003 using the codes for "early breast cancer", "endocrine therapy", "psychosocial" or "surgery". Details of the search strategy applied to create the register and the procedure used to code references are described in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group module on The Cochrane Library.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing primary endocrine therapy with surgery, with or without adjuvant endocrine therapy, in the management of women aged 70 years or over with early breast cancer and who are fit for surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data from published trials were extracted by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios were derived for time-to-event outcomes, where possible, and a fixed-effect model was used for meta-analysis. Toxicity and quality-of-life data were extracted, where present. Where outcome data were not available, trialists were contacted and unpublished data requested.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven eligible trials were identified of which six had published time-to-event data and one was published only in abstract form with no usable data. The quality of the allocation concealment was adequate in three studies and unclear in the remainder. In each case the endocrine therapy used was tamoxifen.Data, based on an estimated 869 deaths in 1571 women, were unable to show a statistically significant difference in favour of either surgery or primary endocrine therapy in respect of overall survival. However, there was a statistically significant difference in terms of progression-free survival, which favoured surgery with or without endocrine therapy.The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival were: 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.30, P value 0.9) for surgery alone versus primary endocrine therapy; 0.86 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.00, P value 0.06) for surgery plus endocrine therapy versus primary endocrine therapy. The HRs for progression-free survival were: 0.55 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.77, P value 0.0006) for surgery alone versus primary endocrine therapy; 0.65 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.81, P value 0.0001) for surgery plus endocrine therapy versus primary endocrine therapy (each comparison based on only one trial). Tamoxifen-related adverse effects included hot flushes, skin rash, vaginal discharge, indigestion, breast pain, sleepiness, headache, vertigo, itching, hair loss, cystitis, acute thrombophlebitis, nausea, and indigestion. Surgery-related adverse effects included paresthesia on the ipsilateral arm and lateral thoracic wall in those who had axillary clearance. One study suggested that those undergoing surgery suffered more psychosocial morbidity at three months postsurgery, although this difference had disappeared by two years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Primary endocrine therapy should only be offered to women with oestrogen receptor (ER) positive tumours who are unfit for or who refuse surgery. In a cohort of women with significant co-morbid disease and ER-positive tumours it is possible that primary endocrine therapy may be a superior option to surgery. Trials are needed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors as primary therapy for an infirm older population with ER-positive tumours.

Chemotherapy and Cardiotoxicity in Older Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy, especially with anthracyclines, is known to cause acute and chronic cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients. We studied the cardiac effects of chemotherapy in a population-based sample of breast cancer patients aged ≥ 65 years with long-term follow-up.

Patients and Methods

In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we analyzed treatments and outcomes among women ≥ 65 years of age who were diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1999. Propensity scores were used to control for baseline heart disease (HD) and other known predictors of chemotherapy, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of cardiomyopathy (CM), congestive heart failure (CHF), and HD after chemotherapy.

Results

Of 31,748 women with stage I to III breast cancer, 5,575 (18%) received chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was associated with younger age, fewer comorbidities, hormone receptor negativity, multiple primary tumors, and advanced disease. Patients who received chemotherapy were less likely than other patients to have pre-existing HD (45% v 55%, respectively; P < .001). The hazard ratios for CM, CHF, and HD for patients treated with doxorubicin (DOX) compared with patients who received no chemotherapy were 2.48 (95% CI, 2.10 to 2.93), 1.38 (95% CI, 1.25 to 1.52), and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.26 to 1.44), respectively. The relative risk of cardiotoxicity among patients who received DOX compared with untreated patients remained elevated 5 years after diagnosis.

Conclusion

When baseline HD was taken into account, chemotherapy, especially with anthracyclines, was associated with a substantially increased risk of CM. As the number of long-term survivors grows, identifying and minimizing the late effects of treatment will become increasingly important.

Special issues related to breast cancer adjuvant therapy in older women

Increasing age remains the major risk factor for breast cancer and more than half of all breast cancers in North America and the European Union occur in women 65 years and older. Anticipated life expectancy, co-morbidity, and functional status must all be considered when offering systemic adjuvant treatment to older women. Tamoxifen significantly decreases the risk of recurrence and improves survival in all women with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer, including women 70 years and older. More recently, aromatase inhibitors have been shown to be even more effective than tamoxifen in reducing breast cancer recurrence in postmenopausal women, and are an appropriate choice for initial endocrine therapy in older women. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in postmenopausal women, but adds little to endocrine therapy in the majority of women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive tumors. Chemotherapy should be considered for patients with high-risk node-negative, hormone receptor-negative tumors and those with node-positive tumors. Co-morbidity and its effect on survival should be factored into all chemotherapy decisions. Older women are frequently under-treated and are still under-represented in clinical trials; sometimes this represents good clinical judgment, but age bias alone can result in under-treatment and higher breast cancer-related mortality or state-of-the-art trials not being offered to older, but otherwise eligible, patients. Physician education and more clinical trials designed for older women are needed.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer: where are we?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer in elderly patients is a major health concern that will only increase in the future. For early-stage breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy may be indicated in this patient group following adequate local treatment and before possible hormone therapy. This review summarizes the current knowledge and provides guidelines for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most data are extracted from large multicenter trials with upper age limits of 65 or 70 years. Only one multicenter randomized study investigated the potential benefit of an adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen added to endocrine treatment after the age of 65 years. Retrospective analyses from international group databases show the same potential absolute benefit derived from adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly compared with younger patients, however. This benefit must be weighed against life expectancy and tolerability of chemotherapy.

SUMMARY

Limited confidence of medical oncologists with cytotoxic chemotherapy administration to the elderly and a lack of both prospective studies and shared guidelines for decision making in this subpopulation are the main factors responsible for the limited use of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer. Fortunately this contrasts with an increasing awareness among clinicians, who should learn to integrate absolute benefit, life expectancy, and tolerance of chemotherapy in their clinical decisions. Discrimination on the basis of older age alone is no longer acceptable.

Update in Medical Oncology for Older Patients

Breast cancer is a disease of older women, and its incidence continues to rise with the growth and aging of the U.S. population. Elderly women have frequently been under-treated and have been poorly represented in clinical breast cancer trials. We reviewed the literature on early breast cancer in older women. We present current information on the tumor biology of elderly women and the role of surgical therapy and adjuvant treatment with hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, biologic agents, and radiation therapy in its management. Lastly, we discuss the importance of clinical trials in the elderly and future directions for therapy.

Patterns of toxicity in older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively determine the relationship of age to toxicity from adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We identified 1,405 consecutive patients age 65 or older with primary invasive breast cancer who were seen at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from January 1998 to December 2000. Patients selected from this cohort for analysis were aged 65 or older at diagnosis; received their follow-up care at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; had stage I, II, or III breast cancer; and received adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil), an anthracycline-based regimen (AC [doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide], or AC-T [AC and paclitaxel or docetaxel]). Exclusion criteria included prior chemotherapy or previous breast cancer.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 70 (range 65--79). Comorbidity measured by the Charlson comorbidity index was low: score 0 (83%), 1 (12%), 2 (5%); with stages: I(18%), IIA (41%), IIB (27%), IIIA (8%), IIIB (6%), T1Nx (1%). Patients receiving an anthracycline-based regimen were more likely to experience grade 3 or 4 toxicity (p=0. 01), require hospitalization (p<0.001), and/or develop febrile neutropenia (p<0.001). Treatment delays due to myelosuppression occurred more frequently in patients receiving CMF (p<0.001). The type of chemotherapy regimen (anthracycline compared to CMF) was a better predictor for toxicity than increased age or comorbidity score.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of older patients with breast cancer, the risk for toxicity from adjuvant chemotherapy depended more on the type of regimen (anthracycline vs. CMF) than the patient's chronological age.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients (≥70 years) with early high-risk breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 260 patients

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women is currently perceived as one of the priorities in breast cancer (BC) research and, to date, we lack practical guidelines in this age group. Therefore we performed a retrospective analysis of the actual use of adjuvant chemotherapy according to each negative prognostic factor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Charts of all consecutive elderly patients aged 70 years or more with operable BC referred to our institution between 1999 and 2003 were reviewed for tumour stage and treatment, and compared with an equal cohort of younger randomly selected postmenopausal patients (control group).

RESULTS

A total of 260 elderly patients (mean age 75.6 years, age range 70-97 years) with histological diagnosis of early BC were eligible. Conserving surgery was performed in 54.6% of patients, nodal dissection in 84.6% and sentinel node biopsy in 5.8%. Tumour size was pT2-pT3 in 45.4% of patients; grading was G3 in 27.3%, hormonal status was negative (HR-) in 16.9% and lymph nodes were involved N+ in 36.1%. Of 188 patients presenting one or more risk factors (pT2-3, G3, N+, HR-), 48.4% were not proposed for adjuvant chemotherapy (compared with 7.2% in the control group), 39.8% of those with nodal involvement (compared with 4.3% of controls, P <0.0001) and 22.7% of those who were HR- (compared with 0.0% of controls, P=0.0002). Considering only patients receiving non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 20 elderly patients (25.9%) were unable to complete the planned number of cycles (compared with 4.7% of controls, P=0.0002). The 2-year disease-free survival was significantly decreased in N+ HR- patients compared with the remaining elderly patients (49.9% compared with 90.9%, P=0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly BC patients receive much less adjuvant chemotherapy, according to each prognostic factor. N+ HR- disease probably represents the most reasonable indication. As the toxicity of the CMF regimen frequently caused interruption of treatment, alternative regimens should be assessed in this age class.

Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy

Older women have unfortunately been underrepresented in breast cancer clinical trials, with the majority of studies being restricted to patients younger than 70 years. Elderly patients are an inhomogeneous group and frequently suffer from comorbidities and/or impaired organ functions. These facts may often lead to death from causes other than cancer, thus nullifying any possible benefit of adjuvant treatment; furthermore, they render extrapolation of standard treatment recommendations to the elderly potentially hazardous, particularly with respect to chemotherapy. Specific clinical trials are therefore needed to investigate adjuvant treatments tailored for the heterogeneous older population.

Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status

CONTEXT

Optimal ages of breast cancer screening cessation remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate screening policies based on age and quartiles of life expectancy (LE).

DESIGN AND POPULATION

We used a stochastic model with proxies of age-dependent biology to evaluate the incremental U.S. societal costs and benefits of biennial screening from age 50 until age 70, 79, or lifetime.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discounted incremental costs per life years saved (LYS).

RESULTS

Lifetime screening is expensive (151,434 dollars per LYS) if women have treatment and survival comparable to clinical trials (idealized); stopping at age 79 costs 82,063 dollars per LYS. This latter result corresponds to costs associated with an LE of 9.5 years at age 79, a value expected for 75% of 79-year-olds, about 50% of 80-year-olds, and 25% of 85-year-olds. Using actual treatment and survival patterns, screening benefits are greater, and lifetime screening of all women might be considered (114,905 dollars per LYS), especially for women in the top 25% of LE for their age (50,643 dollars per LYS, life expectancy of approximately 7 years at age 90).

CONCLUSIONS

If all women receive idealized treatment, the benefits of mammography beyond age 79 are too low relative to their costs to justify continued screening. However, if treatment is not ideal, extending screening beyond age 79 could be considered, especially for women in the top 25% of life expectancy for their age.

Breast cancer treatment in older women

This article presents the author's current approaches to the management of breast cancer in older women, with emphasis on clinical and surgical treatment of the disease in this population. There are controversies surrounding the management of breast cancer in this population regarding adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy and surgical options. We endeavor to address these issues in the article.

Palliative Care Needs of Cancer Patients in U.S. Nursing Homes

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, nursing homes are the place of care for older Americans with cancer. Yet, few studies has characterized the quality of care for this growing population.

OBJECTIVE

Characterize the scope and quality of cancer care in U.S. nursing homes.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the national repository of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Nursing home residents noted to have cancer diagnosis on the MDS.

RESULTS

Of the 190,769 New Hampshire residents (8.8%) with a cancer diagnosis, 1 in 4 had weight loss (23.4%), received intravenous medications (27.7%), or used oxygen (25.4%). Overall, 45.3% had a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, with state variations ranging from 17.8% (New Jersey) to 70.5% (Wisconsin). More than 1 in 10 (12.0%) were defined as terminally ill, although only 29.3% of these received hospice services. Among patients with pain, half of those who survived to a second assessment had persistent, severe pain (51.3%), which also varied by state, ranging from 43.3% (Iowa) to 65.8% (Nevada). Active treatment was rare; less than 5% received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, 15.5% had parenteral and/or tube feedings for nutrition. Approximately, 1 in 10 New Hampshire residents had advanced cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest important opportunities to improve the quality of cancer care for older adults.

How do we manage breast cancer in the elderly patients? A survey among members of the British Association of Surgical Oncologists (BASO)

AIMS

To frame the attitude and perception of breast surgeons in the UK toward the increasing number of older breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A 15-item questionnaire was designed to inquire on the definition of elderly, clinical management, age-related differences in surgical treatment, interaction with geriatricians, operative risk assessment, and surveyed identification/descriptive data. The questionnaire was sent to all 350 ABS associates (Association of Breast Surgery) at the British Association of Surgical Oncology (BASO).

RESULTS

A 150 questionnaires were returned (compliance 43%) providing the largest sample of breast surgical specialist overview on this topic. The major part of the surveyed (44%) stated age does not stand as the most relevant factor on its own in identifying a patient as "elderly", nor in offering surgical management (98%) and in dealing with the axilla (75%). The surveyed are aware of the burden of this epidemiological problem and would rather finalise the decision-making process based on multiple factors. This is to tailor the most appropriate treatment aiming to improving quality of life (42%) and quality adjusted survival (40%). Although most breast surgeons are inclined to discuss their onco-geriatric patients with geriatricians on a regular (32%) or occasional (42%) basis, no geriatric assessment is routinely utilised (82%) and the operative risk is predicted with ASA (45%). These figures confirm the surveyed breast surgeons in the UK are not biased by an ageistic approach, and aim to achieve a global well-being to the older patients with breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey confirms our lack of knowledge in the management of elderly patients affected by breast cancer. Taken into account the limitations of a survey, we are pleased to confirm the performance of the largest part of breast surgeons at BASO is not biased by an ageist mentality.

Compliance and toxicity of adjuvant CMF in elderly breast cancer patients: a single-center experience

Background

Few data are available on compliance and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy when indicated in elderly breast cancer patients; CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) can be reasonably considered the most widely accepted standard of treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed compliance and safety of adjuvant CMF in patients older than 60. The treatment was indicated if patients had no severe comorbidity, a high-risk of recurrence, and were younger than 75. Toxicity was coded by NCI-CTC. Toxicity and compliance were compared between two age subgroups (<65, ≥ 65) by Fisher exact test and exact Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results

From March 1991 to March 2002, 180 patients were identified, 100 older than 60 and younger than 65, and 80 aged 65 or older. Febrile neutropenia was more frequent among older patients (p = 0.05). Leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, cardiac toxicity and thrombophlebitis tended to be more frequent or severe among elderlies, while mucositis tended to be more evident among younger patients, all not significantly. Almost one half (47%) of the older patients receiving concomitant radiotherapy experienced grade 3–4 haematological toxicity. Compliance was similar in the two groups, with 6 cycles administered in 86% and 79%, day-8 chemotherapy omitted at least once in 36% and 39%, dose reduction in 27% and 38%, prolonged treatment duration (≥ 29 weeks) in 10% and 11% and need of G-CSF in 9% and 18%, among younger and older patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Our data show that, in a highly selected population of patients 65 or more years old, CMF is as feasible as in patients older than 60 and younger than 65, but with a relevant burden of toxicity. We suggest that prospective trials in elderly patients testing less toxic treatment schemes are mandatory before indicating adjuvant chemotherapy to all elderly patients with significant risk of breast cancer recurrence.

Breast cancer treatment guidelines in older women

PURPOSE

To determine patterns and predictors of concordance with institutional treatment guidelines among older women with breast cancer.

METHODS

The study population included 1,568 patients aged 55 years and older who were treated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between July 1997 and January 2002 for stage I to IIIA invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer. Concordance with institutional guidelines was determined for definitive surgical therapy, radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, radiation therapy after mastectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy use, and adjuvant hormonal therapy use. The following variables were considered as possible modifiers of concordance: patient age, marital status, race, educational level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, comorbidity score, clinical stage, hormone receptor status, HER2-neu status, tumor grade, pathologic tumor size, lymphatic invasion, and number of lymph nodes involved. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine the independent effect of each variable on guideline concordance.

RESULTS

Older women were less likely to receive treatment in concordance with guidelines for definitive surgical therapy (P < .001), postlumpectomy radiation (P = .03), adjuvant chemotherapy (P < .001), and adjuvant hormonal therapy (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, age > or = 75 years predicted a deviation from guidelines for definitive surgical therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy. Nonwhite race was associated with decreased likelihood of adjuvant radiation therapy after breast conservation.

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for comorbidity score, race, marital status, educational status, clinical stage, and tumor characteristics, increasing patient age was independently associated with decreased guideline concordance for definitive surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy. Future research should focus on delineating the possible reasons for guideline discordance.

Management issues for elderly patients with breast cancer

Fifty percent of breast cancers occur after the age of 65 years and 25% occur after the age of 75 years. Encountering a breast cancer in an older woman is frequent. After years of dearth of data specific to the elderly, some evidence is beginning to accumulate concerning breast cancer in the older woman. Recent data from mammography studies confirm its effective in women with 10 years or more of life expectancy (perhaps even 5 years). Epidemiologic and randomized studies demonstrate that a proper surgery and adjuvant treatment can decrease relapse and improve survival in patients older than 80 years. Radiation therapy studies show a decrease in local relapse even in patients older than 70 years. Adjuvant hormonal therapy has essentially the same effectiveness as in younger women. Chemotherapy has a role in patients older than 70 years. Consensus statements, such as the St. Gallen consensus, have dropped the age limit of 70 years from their recommendations. Comorbidity and life expectancy should be taken into account for proper selection of adjuvant treatment. The treatment of metastatic breast cancer has evolved significantly with the introduction of aromatase inhibitors, new chemotherapeutic agents, and targeted biologic agents. New chemotherapeutic agents are as effective as single agents compared to older and more toxic drug combinations. The cumulative result of the introduction of these new agents, at a population level, is a 7.5-month increase in the median survival time of patients with metastatic breast cancer over the past decade.

Breast cancer in elderly women

Although the number of elderly patients with breast cancer is increasing, knowledge about possible differences in the biology and clinical outcomes of breast cancer according to age is limited. Retrospectively were followed: diagnosis, surgical treatment, stage of disease, histology, and survival of breast cancer treated women at the Surgical and Oncological Clinic in Nis between 1985 and 1990. Patients were divided in two groups: study (=65 years) and control (<65 years). The study involved 2196 women (862 study group; 1334 control group). Ductal carcinoma was the most frequently observed histological type (70.3% versus 61.92%). The majority of our patients presented with early-stage disease (69.02% versus 60.20%). Estrogen receptor positive tumors occurred in 67.88% of elderly patients versus 28.42% of young cases, and negative axillary lymph nodes were observed in 45.78 and 34.40% of patients in the elderly and young group, respectively. Modified radical mastectomy was selected by a large proportion of patients in both groups. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were more frequently performed in the younger group (P < 1 x 10(-8)). There is no significant difference in disease-specific survival by age. In our population the presentation, surgical treatment, and survival from breast cancer is similar in older and younger women.

Characteristics and outcome of 1755 operable breast cancers in women over 70 years of age

From 1981 to 1995, 1755 patients aged 70 years or over who had nonmetastatic unilateral breast carcinoma received curative local or regional treatment in our institute. Median follow-up was 8 years. The median age of these patients was 75 years (range: 70-94), and 86% were under 81 years of age. Tumors were classed as T3-4 in 24% of them; 18% had N1b/N2 tumors, and in 12% grade 3 disease was present. Only 19% were both ER and PR negative. The S phase fraction was <5% in 79% of patients. In 1046 patients (60%) modified radical mastectomy was performed, while 20% underwent lumpectomy and in 20% radiotherapy was the only treatment administered. Adjuvant endocrine therapy was given in 463 (26%) cases, and only 3% of patients received chemotherapy. The median overall survival time was 121 months. The overall cancer-related death rate was 49%. The 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 64%, and the 10-year local relapse rate was 14%. Prognostic factors determined on univariate analysis were tumor size, clinical nodal status (ER and PR), and grade. No significant difference in outcome was observed between mastectomy and conservative treatment. Parameters for which correlations with DFS were found on multivariate analysis were clinical nodal status (P < 0.0001), tumor size (P < 0.0001), ER (P < 0.0001), and PR (P = 0.04). Breast cancer in elderly women is frequently hormone-dependent (81%) with a low proliferation index. Prognostic factors are the same as in younger postmenopausal patients. More than 50% of these patients died from a cause other than their breast cancer.

Adjuvant Therapy in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer

The elderly population has been neglected by the traditional approach to clinical breast cancer research. Elderly women have been underrepresented in breast cancer clinical trials, with the majority of studies being restricted to patients aged < 70 years. Elderly patients frequently have comorbidities and/or impaired organ function. These facts may often lead to death from causes other than cancer, thus nullifying any possible benefit of adjuvant treatment; furthermore, they render extrapolation of standard treatment recommendations to the elderly potentially hazardous, particularly with respect to chemotherapy. Therefore, specific clinical trials are needed to investigate adjuvant treatments tailored for the heterogeneous older population.

Supportive care of the older cancer patient

Aging is associated with decreased functional reserve of multiple organ systems and with changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodinamics of drugs. Older individuals express enhanced susceptibility to the complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy, especially to myleotoxicity, mucositis, cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity. The management of older individuals with chemotherapy involves then prevention of these complications. General precautions include proper patient selection, based on the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), dose adjustment for agents that are renally excreted to the patient creatinine clearance and maintenance of hemoglobin levels > or =12 g/dl. Filgrastim and pegfilgrastim proved effective in reducing by 50-75% the risk of neutropenic fever in older individuals treated with CHOP and CHOP-like chemotherapy and should be used for the prophilaxis of infections. When feasible, the oral agent capecitabine, should be used in lieu of intravenous fluorinated pyrimidines, to prevent mucositis. In patients at risk of cardiomyopathy from anthracyclines, dexrazoxane or liposomal compounds may be indicated. When toxicity is properly prevented, cytotoxic chemotherapy may be as effective in older individuals as it is in the younger ones.