Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group (MetaGIST). Comparison of two doses of imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1,640 patients

Integrating a Comprehensive Cancer Genome Profiling into Clinical Practice: A Blueprint in an Italian Referral Center

The implementation of cancer molecular characterization in clinical practice has improved prognostic re-definition, extending the eligibility to a continuously increasing number of targeted treatments. Broad molecular profiling technologies better than organ-based approaches are believed to serve such dynamic purposes. We here present the workflow our institution adopted to run a comprehensive cancer genome profiling in clinical practice. This article describes the workflow designed to make a comprehensive cancer genome profiling program feasible and sustainable in a large-volume referral hospital.

Effect of skeletal muscle loss during neoadjuvant imatinib therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced GIST

BACKGROUND

Currently, the effect of skeletal muscle loss during neoadjuvant imatinib therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (LA-GIST) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the relationship between changes in skeletal muscle and postoperative complications, survival and tumor response in patients with LA-GIST during neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pre- and post-treatment computed tomography images of 57 GIST patients who underwent radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib from January 2013 to March 2019. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured at the L3 vertebral level in all patients. A cut-off value (SMI < 52.3 cm²/m² and < 38.6 cm²/m² for men and women, respectively) published in a previous study was used to define sarcopenia. Based on gender, we defined ΔSMI (%)/250 days above 9.69% for men and ΔSMI (%)/250 days above 7.63% for women as significant muscle loss (SML). Factors associated with postoperative complications and tumor response were analyzed using logistic regression, and predictors affecting patient prognosis were analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients, sarcopenia was present before and after neoadjuvant therapy in 20 (35.09%) and 28 (49.12%) patients, respectively. It was not associated with immediate or long-term clinical outcomes. However, patients with SML during neoadjuvant therapy had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (60.00% vs. 25.00%, p = 0.008), worse pathological regression (44.00% vs. 75.00%, p = 0.017) and worse 3-year survival (Male, 68.75% vs. 95.45%, p = 0.027; Female, 66.67% vs. 100.00%, p = 0.046) than patients without SML.

CONCLUSION

The development of SML during neoadjuvant therapy in LA-GIST patients, rather than pre- and post-treatment sarcopenia, is a major prognostic factor for the long-term prognosis and is also associated with recent postoperative complication rates and pathological regression.

Systemic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Current Standards and Emerging Challenges

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), though rare, is the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. KIT or PDGFRα mutation plays as an oncogenic driver in the majority of GISTs. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for localized disease. The discovery of imatinib with promising anti-tumor effect and successive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), including second-line sunitinib and third-line regorafenib, revolutionized the management of advanced and metastatic GIST over the past two decades. Recently, ripretinib and avapritinib were approved for the fourth line setting and for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST in first-line setting, respectively. Despite multi-line TKIs exerted ability of disease control, drug resistance remained an obstacle for preventing rapid disease progression. Experimental TKIs or novel therapeutic targets may further improve treatment efficacy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1) and anti-CTL-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) showed moderate response in early phase trials composed of heavily pretreated patients. KIT/PDGFRα wild-type GISTs are generally less sensitive to imatinib and late-line TKIs. Recent studies demonstrated that targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling may be a potential target for the wild-type GISTs.

Complete response of advanced rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib treatment: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who achieve a complete response (CR) with imatinib therapy have rarely been reported in the literature. Moreover, no treatment guidelines have been established for rectal GIST patients with CR after imatinib treatment, warranting further studies.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 51-year-old man presented to our outpatient clinic in October 2013 with complaints of difficulty to defecate and a change in stool characteristics. During digital rectal examination, a mass was palpated within 5 cm from the anal verge. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a 8.1 × 7.2-cm rectal mass with significant enhancement during the arterial phase.

DIAGNOSES

A diagnosis of GIST was established after conducting needle biopsy and immunohistochemistry staining.

INTERVENTIONS

Imatinib therapy (400 mg/d, oral administration) was immediately started. When the patient achieved clinical CR (cCR), the oncologist recommended the patient to continue imatinib treatment.

OUTCOMES

At 7 months after imatinib administration, the patient achieved cCR. As suggested by the oncologist, the patient continued to receive imatinib treatment after cCR. After 13 months, the patient spontaneously stopped imatinib. Finally, tumor recurrence was observed 7 months later.

LESSONS

Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for advanced rectal GIST patients who achieve cCR after imatinib treatment. Close follow-up and continuous imatinib treatment are indicated in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Ripretinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an overview of current evidence and drug approval

Over the past 20 years, the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has acted as an important model in the advancement of molecularly targeted therapies for solid tumors. The success of imatinib has established it as a lasting therapy in the management of early-stage and advanced disease in the first-line setting. Imatinib resistance inevitably develops, resulting in the need for further lines of therapy. Ripretinib is an orally administered switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor, specifically developed to target both primary and secondary KIT and PDGFRα resistance mutations. Herein, the authors discuss the molecular rationale, the preclinical evidence and the clinical use of ripretinib in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the advanced stages of disease.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Large-Scale, Multi-Institutional, Observational Study in China

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate clinicopathologic features and prognosis of post-complete resection in patients with PDGFRA-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and even to establish a relapse-free survival (RFS) prognostic model for this subgroup.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from patients with primary PDGFRA-mutant GIST who underwent complete resection (2005-2019) at 16 large-scale medical centers in China. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression models were performed to build the prediction model, in which the potential predictors were available in routine clinical practice and using the risk score functions. The prediction model was cross-validated by calibration histogram and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

A total of 280 patients with PDGFRA-mutant (172 D842V-mutant and 108 non-D842V-mutant) GIST after complete resection were enrolled. Most tumors originated in the stomach (89.6%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 95.9%, 91.2%, and 89.5%, respectively. The RFS of the non-D842V-mutant group was superior to that of the D842V group (P = 0.033). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that D842V mutation (P = 0.017), non-gastric tumor (P < 0.001), and Ki-67 > 5% (P = 0.005) were the independent variables influencing the prognosis of patients with PDGFRA-mutant GIST. The scoring model showed the predicted and actual cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year follow-up relapse rates fit well.

CONCLUSIONS

PDGFRA-mutant GIST mostly originated in the stomach and had a favorable prognosis after surgery. Non-D842V-mutant patients might have better prognoses than D842V-mutant patients. The prognostic model demonstrated favorable prediction accuracy, suggesting its clinical utility.

Identification of Novel Imatinib-Resistant Genes in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are common ICC precursor sarcomas, which are considered to be a potential malignant mesenchymal tumor driven by specific KIT or PDGFRA signals in the gastrointestinal tract. The standard treatment for GIST without metastasis is surgical resection. GIST with metastasis is usually treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) only but cannot be cured. The TKI imatinib is the main drug of GIST drug therapy. In adjuvant therapy, the duration of imatinib adjuvant therapy is 3 years. It has been proved that imatinib can improve the overall survival time (OS). However, many GIST patients develop drug resistance due to the long-term use of imatinib. We were forced to look for new strategies to treat GIST. The purpose of the current academic work is to study the drug-resistant genes of imatinib and their potential mechanisms. A total of 897 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found between imatinib-sensitive cell line GIST882 and imatinib-resistant cell line GIST430 by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). After analyzing the DEGs, 10 top genes were selected (NDN, FABP4, COL4A1, COLEC11, MEG3, EPHA3, EDN3, LMO3, RGS4, and CRISP2). These genes were analyzed by RT-PCR, and it was confirmed that the expression trend of FABP4, COL4A1, and RGS4 in different imatinib-resistant cell lines was in accord with the GEO database. It is suggested that these genes may play a potential role in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of imatinib resistance in GIST.

The GIST of Advances in Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal origin and a compelling clinical and biologic model for the rational development of molecularly targeted agents. This is because the majority of GISTs are driven by gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases. Specific GIST mutations circumscribe well-defined molecular subgroups that must be determined during the diagnostic work-up to guide clinical management, including therapeutic decisions. Surgery is the cornerstone treatment in localized disease and can also be clinically relevant in the metastatic setting. The correct combination and sequence of targeted agents and surgical procedures improves outcomes for patients with GIST and should be discussed individually within multidisciplinary expert teams. All currently approved agents for the treatment of GIST are based on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT and PDGFRA oncogenic activation. Although first-line imatinib achieves remarkable prolonged disease control, the benefit of subsequent lines of treatment is more modest. Novel therapeutic strategies focus on overcoming the heterogeneity of KIT or PDGFRA secondary mutations and providing more potent inhibition of specific challenging mutations. This article reviews the current understanding and treatment of GIST, with an emphasis on recent advances.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Over the past 20 years, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has evolved into an increasingly complex clinical entity with ever more challenges. While surgical resection is the gold standard, advancements in genetic testing, therapeutic options, immunotherapy, and management of metastatic disease necessitate a comprehensive, multimodal approach for these tumors. This chapter highlights the importance of genomic testing of GIST, the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for localized disease, surgical principles for GIST, as well as current and new approaches for addressing metastatic disease.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Systematic Review

Background: The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has dramatically improved the clinical effectiveness of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and this systematic review was conducted aiming at the cost-effectiveness analysis of TKIs in GIST.

Methods: A thorough literature search of online databases was performed, using appropriate terms such as “gastrointestinal stromal tumor or GIST,” “cost-effectiveness,” and “economic evaluation.” Data extraction was conducted independently by two authors, and completeness of reporting and quality of the evaluation were assessed. The systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA statement.

Results: Published between 2005 and 2020, 15 articles were incorporated into the systematic review. For advanced GIST, imatinib followed by sunitinib was considered cost-effective, and regorafenib was cost-effective compared with imatinib re-challenge therapy in the third-line treatment. For resectable GIST, 3-year adjuvant imatinib therapy represented a cost-effective treatment option. The precision medicine-assisted imatinib treatment was cost-effective compared with empirical treatment.

Conclusion: Although identified studies varied in predicted costs and quality-adjusted life years, there was general agreement in study conclusions. More cost-effectiveness analysis should be conducted regarding more TKIs that have been approved for the treatment of GIST.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO: CRD42021225253.

Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients with GIST Harboring Exon 9 KIT Mutations: Results from a Multi-institutional European Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The effect of high-dose imatinib (800 mg/day) on survival in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected KIT exon 9-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is not established. Here, the association of dose and other clinicopathologic variables with survival was evaluated in a large multi-institutional European cohort.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Data from 185 patients were retrospectively collected in 23 European GIST reference centers. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to account for confounders. Univariate and multivariate unweighted and weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were estimated for relapse-free survival (RFS), modified-RFS (mRFS) and imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS). Univariate Cox models were estimated for overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 185 patients, 131 (70.8%) received a starting dose of 400 mg/d and the remaining 54 (29.2%) a dose of 800 mg/d. Baseline characteristics were partially unbalanced, suggesting a potential selection bias. PSM and IPTW analyses showed no advantage of imatinib 800 mg/d. In the weighted multivariate Cox models, high-dose imatinib was not associated with the survival outcomes [RFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.94; mRFS: HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92-3.10; IFFS: HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.79-2.28]. The variables consistently associated with worse survival outcomes were high mitotic index and nongastric tumor location.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective series of patients with KIT exon 9-mutated GIST treated with adjuvant imatinib, a daily dose of 800 mg versus 400 mg did not show better results in terms of survival outcomes. Prospective evaluation of the more appropriate adjuvant treatment in this setting is warranted.

GIST presenting as refractory iron-deficiency anaemia in paediatric patient

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are very rare gastrointestinal (GI) mesenchymal tumours affecting only 0.02 children/million/year below the age of 14 years. We reported a 9-year-old girl presented to emergency department with pallor and haemoglobin of 50 g/L. Extensive workup for anaemia suggested iron-deficiency anaemia secondary to GI loss. Ultimately after blood transfusion of packed cells, she was discharged with a haemoglobin of 92 g/L with iron supplementation. Upper endoscopy showed incidental antral nodularity with biopsy proven helicobacter gastritis and an isolate 3-4 cm suspicious mass in the lesser curvature. Abdomen imaging confirmed the gastric mass in addition to two lesions, one retroperitoneal and one paraspinal. She undergone open laparotomy with complete surgical resection of the gastric and retroperitoneal masses with histological confirmation of GIST and paraganglioma. This case emphasises the importance of proper examination of the stomach at endoscopy and to illustrate that although anaemia is common in paediatric age group it may be reflect serious medical condition even in normal looking child.

Naples prognostic score, a novel prognostic score for patients with high- and intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours after surgical resection

BACKGROUND

A novel multidimensional inflammatory and nutritional assessment system named the Naples prognostic score could serve as an independent prognostic indicator. However, its significance in patients with high- and intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed this retrospective cohort study based on a prospectively collected database of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) between March 2010 and December 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the prognostic scoring systems. Differences in the areas under the curve were further compared.

RESULTS

A total of 405 patients with regular follow-up were included and analysed in this study. Significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival were observed between the groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NPS was a significant predictor of poor progression-free survival (1 vs 0, HR = 4.622, P = 0.001; 2 vs 0, HR = 12.770, P < 0.001) and overall survival (2 vs 0, HR = 5.535, P = 0.002). Furthermore, time-dependent AUC analyses showed that the NPS was more accurate than other haematologic prognostic systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that the NPS could independently predict disease progression and survival among patients with high- and intermediate-risk GISTs. The NPS might be regarded and applied as one of the most convenient and effective preoperative risk stratification tools in the future, which should be validated by large-scale multicentre prospective cohort studies.

The Management of Unresectable, Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumours. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the management of advanced GIST. Imatinib was the first TKI to gain approval as management for patients with advanced GIST, establishing a new standard of care. Since then, as a result of several trials including the GRID and INVICTUS studies, we now have five lines of approved targeted therapy, including imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib and avapritinib for the treatment of unresectable, advanced GISTs. In this review, the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) provide an overview of the key trials that have changed clinical practice, discuss the molecular drivers of GISTs, the importance of molecular testing and directing therapy according to molecular targets, as well as future strategies in the management of advanced GISTs.

Recent Advancements in the Treatment of Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: In Era of Imatinib

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract, with an annual incidence of 10–15 cases per million. However, rectal GIST has a low incidence, accounting for approximately 0.1% of all rectal tumors. The treatment of rectal GISTs is still controversial and the relative unified guidelines and consensus opinions are inadequate. Treatment is based primarily on the clinical experience of the physician. The widespread application of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy allows diversification of treatment, especially in the choice of surgical methods. Herein, we reviewed the most recent literature and summarized the new progress in rectal tumor treatment, with the aim of providing patients with more systematic and individualized therapeutic strategies.

Current treatment strategies and future perspectives for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that originate from the gastrointestinal tract, mostly from the stomach. GISTs are derived from the myenteric interstitial cells of Cajal and are caused by several mutations in the c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes. Clinically, GISTs are detected by endoscopic and imaging findings and are diagnosed by immunostaining. Surgery is the first line of treatment, and if the tumor is relatively small, minimally invasive surgery such as laparoscopy is performed. In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy has been administered to patients with GISTs that are suspected of having a large size or infiltration to other organs. Postoperative adjuvant imatinib is the standard therapy for high-risk GISTs. It is important to assess the risk of recurrence after GIST resection. However, the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use will vary by the mutation of c-kit genes and the site of mutation. Furthermore, information regarding gene mutation is indispensable when considering the treatment policy for recurrent GISTs. This article reviews the clinicopathological characteristics of GISTs along with the minimally invasive and multidisciplinary treatment options available for these tumors. The future perspectives for diagnostic and treatment approaches for these tumors have also been discussed.

KIT Exon 9-Mutated Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Biology and Treatment

BACKGROUND

The majority of gastroinstestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) harbour oncogenic mutations in the gene encoding for the tyrosine kinase KIT. The most common mutations are found in exon 11, followed by mutations in exon 9. The latter mutations are associated more frequently with GISTs in extra-gastric locations and with a more aggressive clinical behaviour.

SUMMARY

Here, we review the unique and often poorly recognised molecular, biological and clinical characteristics that differentiate KIT exon 9-mutant GISTs from other GIST subtypes. In particular, KIT exon 9 mutations are associated to KIT mutants with retained sensitivity to stimulation by stem cell factor and localisation to the cell membrane. Moreover, KIT exon 9-mutant GISTs display significant activation of KIT-independent oncogenic pathways. These characteristics may explain the limited activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib in the adjuvant setting in KIT exon 9-mutant GISTs, as well as their lower sensitivity to standard dose imatinib in the advanced setting. In contranst, the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib displays better activity in KIT-exon 9 mutant GISTs compared to others. Key Messages. KIT exon 9-mutant GISTs represent a subtype of GIST disctinct from others GISTs, including the more common KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs. A better understanding of the molecular biology and clinical behaviour of KIT exon 9-mutant GISTs may help identify more improved treatment options.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Surgical resection for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis update

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the clinical benefits of adding surgical resection in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). This protocol outlines the planned scope and methods for a systematic review and meta-analysis update that will compare the clinical outcomes of surgical resection combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with TKI treatment alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic GISTs.

METHODS

This review will update a previously published systematic review by our team. This protocol is presented in accordance with the PRISMA-P guideline. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be systematically searched and supplemented by a secondary screening of the references of all included studies. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) in this review update. The outcomes evaluated will be overall survival and progression-free survival. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies, extract data from the included studies, and assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data extracted from RCTs and NRS will be analysed and reported separately. Preplanned subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses are detailed within this protocol. The strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using GRADE.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis update will provide a current assessment of the evidence for the role of surgery in patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced GISTs. These findings will be used by the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) GIST guideline recommendations on surgical treatment for recurrent or metastatic advanced GIST patients in China.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This protocol was prospectively registered in the Open Science Framework Registry ( https://osf.io/xus7m ).

Oncological Outcome After Diagnostic Biopsies in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether the route of preoperative biopsy influences oncological outcome in GIST patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative biopsies are widely used for diagnosing GIST. Little is known about the risk of tumor seeding after different routes of biopsy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of a primary GIST between 1996 and 2014 were identified from 2 databases from 2 tertiary referral centers. Survival data were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Possible confounders were identified using Cox regression analysis. The primary endpoint was local recurrence free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoint was DSS.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients were included, with a median age of 62 years (range 17-86) and a median follow-up time of 53 months (range 1-204). From these patients, 42 patients did not have a biopsy (18%), 70 underwent a transcutaneous biopsy (31%), and 116 a transluminal biopsy (51%). A total of 42 patients (19.0%) had a local and/or distant recurrence. From the 70 patients with a transcutaneous biopsy, only 1 patient developed a needle tract recurrence (1.4%). Local RFS and DSS were both significantly shorter in the transcutaneous biopsy group on univariate analysis compared to the other groups; however, in multivariate analysis the route of biopsy did not influence local RFS (P = 0.128) or DSS (P = 0.096).

CONCLUSIONS

Transluminal or transcutaneous biopsies for diagnosing GIST do not significantly alter the risk of local recurrent disease or DSS in multivariate Cox regressions. The risk of needle tract seeding after transcutaneous biopsy was low.

[Surgical and interdisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors]

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The treatment of GISTs has been revolutionized since imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors were introduced for the treatment of GISTs, which inhibit the tyrosine kinases c‑KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) alpha. Even after the introduction of this targeted treatment GISTs can only be cured by surgical resection. With interdisciplinary multimodal treatment the prognosis of metastasized GIST can now be further improved by surgical resection of the primary tumor and the metastases, potentially leading to a cure. Neoadjuvant therapy can reduce the extent of surgical resection and hereby enable organ preservation and reduce surgical morbidity. To evaluate molecular and clinical predictors and to offer an optimal therapeutic plan, patients with GISTs and certainly patients with advanced GISTs should be evaluated by interdisciplinary sarcoma boards.

Whole-exome sequencing for high-risk primary prostatic extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report

The low incidence rates of prostatic extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST), combined with the lack of published guidelines on its treatment, often results in its misdiagnosis and challenges in the treatment of patients, even in cases with high-risk factors. The present case study reported a 65-years-old Chinese male patient, who presented with intermittent hematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms for three months. The colonoscopy results revealed no gastrointestinal lesions; however, a core biopsy diagnosed an EGIST, which subsequently underwent radical prostatocystotomy, standard pelvic lymph node resection, and bricker ileal conduit diversion. The postoperative pathological results suggested a high-risk primary prostatic EGIST, according to the aggressive behavior of the GIST. The immunohistochemistry results revealed the positive expression of CD117, DOG1, CD34, androgen receptor AR, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a 2% Ki-67 index and a positive surgical margin. The whole exome sequencing (WES) results revealed that the patient harbored a single nucleotide mutation in 121 genes and copy number variations in 601 genes, including a defect in c-Kit (in-frame deletion in p.Q556-V560; fold, 17.5%). By compiling the data obtained from the ConsensusPathDB and the drug-gene interaction databases and expert opinions, the patient was prescribed with the personalized drugs (400 mg per day imatinib mesylate and 50 mg per day bicalutamide, which were stopped when the PSA levels remained stable below 0.01 ng/ml) for 18 months follow-up and there were no signs of recurrence. In conclusion, WES identified multiple genomic alterations and the underlying genetic defect in the rare case enabled the evaluation of the prognosis and the decision of potential drug candidates. The underlying mechanism of the substantial genetic variations in the primary prostatic EGIST, as well as the malignant behaviors of the tumor, remain to be investigated.

Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours in Oman: A multi-centre study

Objectives

This study aimed to report the clinicopathological features, management and long-term outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) in Oman.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on patients treated for GIST between January 2003 and December 2017 at three tertiary referral centres in Muscat, Oman. All patients with confirmed histopathological diagnoses of GIST and followed-up at the centres during this period were included. Relevant information was retrieved from hospital records until April 2019.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included in the study. The median age was 55.5 years and 56.8% were female. The most common primary site of disease was the stomach (63.6%) followed by the jejunum/ileum (18.2%). Two patients (4.5%) had c-Kit-negative, discovered on GIST-1-positive disease. A total of 24 patients (54.5%) presented with localised disease and eight (33.3%) were classified as being at high risk of relapse. Patients with metastatic disease received imatinib in a palliative setting, whereas those with completely resected disease in the intermediate and high-risk groups were treated with adjuvant imatinib. Of the six patients (13.6%) with progressive metastatic disease, of which four had mutations on exon 11 and one on exon 9, while one had wild-type disease. Overall, rates of progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) at 100 months were 77.4% and 80.4%, respectively. Rates of OS for patients with localised and metastatic disease were 89.9% and 80.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

The presenting features and outcomes of patients with GISTs in Oman were comparable to those reported in the regional and international literature.

Starting Imatinib at 400 mg Daily in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Harboring KIT Exon 9 Mutations: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Retrospective analyses suggest that patients with advanced KIT exon 9-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) receiving imatinib 800 mg (rather than 400 mg) daily have better outcomes. In the adjuvant setting, the question of the optimal dose of imatinib remains unsettled.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to retrospectively assess the activity of imatinib 400 mg in both the adjuvant and the advanced settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a multicenter study of patients with KIT exon 9-mutated GIST starting imatinib at 400 mg daily. We examined the relapse-free survival (RFS) among high-risk patients either receiving or not receiving adjuvant imatinib. In patients with advanced disease, progression-free survival (PFS, progression under imatinib 400 mg), time to imatinib failure (TIF, progression under imatinib 400, then 800 mg upon first progression), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the post-operative setting (n = 37), 20 patients received adjuvant imatinib. Median RFS in high-risk patients receiving adjuvant imatinib (n = 14) was not reached (95% CI 17.5-46.6) versus 13.6 months (95% CI 4.7-13.6) for those who did not (p = 0.37), after a median follow-up of 58 months. RFS at 36 months was 63% (30.3-96.6) versus 40% (95% CI 0-82.9), p = 0.2. In advanced disease (n = 28), median PFS, TIF and OS were 12.7 months (95% CI 6.1-18.2), 21.0 months (95% CI 17.4-28.1) and 47.0 months (95% CI 33.5-69.2), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis and the small number of patients, the benefit of adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily in high-risk patients appeared relevant. Patients with advanced disease receiving imatinib 400 mg with subsequent dose escalation had a TIF similar to that observed with an initial dose of 800 mg. Intra-patient dose escalation in this setting might be an option.

An updated review of the treatment landscape for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Before the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the overall survival of patients with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) was 10 to 20 months because of the lack of approved therapies. In the last 20 years, a treatment algorithm for patients with advanced GISTs, which includes imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib as first‐, second‐, and third‐line therapies, respectively, has been established. Recently, 2 new TKIs have been approved: ripretinib for fourth‐line therapy and avapritinib as first‐line therapy in patients harboring platelet‐derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) exon 18 D842V mutations. Additionally, there are several experimental therapies under investigation that could advance individualized patient care. All of these therapies have varying efficacies and safety profiles that warrant an updated treatment landscape review. This review article summarizes the efficacy and safety data currently available for conventional TKIs along with recently approved and experimental therapies.

With evolving treatment options and effective toxicity management, patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors are living longer than ever before. Recently approved targeted therapies and the investigation of experimental treatment options have the potential to alter the current treatment algorithm and encourage personalized patient care.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) have an incidence of ~1.2 per 10⁵ individuals per year in most countries. Around 80% of GIST have varying molecular changes, predominantly mutually exclusive activating KIT or PDGFRA mutations, but other, rare subtypes also exist. Localized GIST are curable, and surgery is their standard treatment. Risk factors for relapse are tumour size, mitotic index, non-gastric site and tumour rupture. Patients with GIST with KIT or PDGFRA mutations sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib that are at high risk of relapse have improved survival with adjuvant imatinib treatment. In advanced disease, median overall survival has improved from 18 months to >70 months since the introduction of TKIs. The role of surgery in the advanced setting remains unclear. Resistance to TKIs arise mainly from subclonal selection of cells with resistance mutations in KIT or PDGFRA when they are the primary drivers. Advanced resistant GIST respond to second-line sunitinib and third-line regorafenib, as well as to the new broad-spectrum TKI ripretinib. Rare molecular forms of GIST with alterations involving NF1, SDH genes, BRAF or NTRK genes generally show primary resistance to standard TKIs, but some respond to specific inhibitors of the activated genes. Despite major advances, many questions in both advanced and localized disease remain unanswered.

Type and Gene Location of KIT Mutations Predict Progression-Free Survival to First-Line Imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Look into the Exon

Simple Summary

Although effective in the majority of patients, the progression-free survival (PFS) to imatinib treatment can vary widely in effectiveness. Based on the known predictive role of tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGRA) tumor genotypes, the differential clinical response to first-line imatinib treatment might be related to the different types and gene locations of the mutations. In our study, metastatic patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)-carrying KIT exon 11 deletion or a deletion/insertion involving codons 557/558 showed significantly shorter PFS to imatinib compared with those with deletion in codons other than 557/558 and patients with exon 11 duplication, insertion or single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Conversely, the latter subgroup showed the longest PFS first-line to imatinib. These results highlight the predictive role of pathogenic variant (PV) type and codon location in GIST, and can support stratification via mutational status in future clinical trials.

Abstract

In previous studies on localized GISTs, KIT exon 11 deletions and mutations involving codons 557/558 showed an adverse prognostic influence on recurrence-free survival. In the metastatic setting, there are limited data on how mutation type and codon location might contribute to progression-free survival (PFS) variability to first-line imatinib treatment. We analyzed the type and gene location of KIT and PDGFRA mutations for 206 patients from a GIST System database prospectively collected at an Italian reference center between January 2005 and September 2020. By describing the mutational landscape, we focused on clinicopathological characteristics according to the critical mutations and investigated the predictive role of type and gene location of the KIT exon 11 mutations in metastatic patients treated with first-line imatinib. Our data showed a predictive impact of KIT exon 11 pathogenic variant on PFS to imatinib treatment: patients with deletion or insertion/deletion (delins) in 557/558 codons had a shorter PFS (median PFS: 24 months) compared to the patients with a deletion in other codons, or duplication/insertion/SNV (median PFS: 43 and 49 months, respectively) (p < 0.001). These results reached an independent value in the multivariate model, which showed that the absence of exon 11 deletions or delins 557/558, the female gender, primitive tumor diameter (≤5 cm) and polymorphonuclear leucocytosis (>7.5 109/L) were significant prognostic factors for longer PFS. Analysis of the predictive role of PDGFRA PVs showed no significant results. Our results also confirm the aggressive biology of 557/558 deletions/delins in the metastatic setting and allow for prediction at the baseline which GIST patients would develop resistance to first-line imatinib treatment earlier.

Outcome of 1000 Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Treated by Surgery in the Pre- and Post-imatinib Eras

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the results of surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in the pre and post-imatinib eras at a single institution and to identify current prognostic clinicopathologic factors.

BACKGROUND

Imatinib has radically changed the management of GIST, yet the magnitude of impact on outcome across the spectrum of GIST presentation and relevance of historical prognostic factors are not well defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1000 patients who underwent surgery for GIST at our institution from 1982 to 2016. Patients were stratified by presentation status as primary tumor only (PRIM), primary with synchronous metastasis (PRIM + MET), or metachronous recurrence/metastases (MET), and also imatinib era (before and after it became available). Cox proportional-hazard models and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to model and estimate overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

OS was longer in the imatinib era compared with the pre-imatinib era in each presentation group, including in Miettinen high-risk primary tumors. Among PRIM patients from the pre-imatinib era, tumor site, size, and mitotic rate were independently associated with OS and RFS on multivariate analysis. PRIM patients in the imatinib era who received imatinib (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) had higher risk tumors, but after adjusting for treatment, only size >10 cm remained independently prognostic of RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-7.40, P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 3.37, 95% CI 1.60-7.13, P = 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated in the imatinib era had prolonged OS across all presentations. In the imatinib era, among site, size, and mitotic rate, high-risk features were associated with treatment with the drug, but only size >10 cm correlated with outcome. Imatinib should still be prescribed for patients with high-risk features.

Pretreatment Tumor DNA Sequencing of KIT and PDGFRA in Endosonography-Guided Biopsies Optimizes the Preoperative Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy increases the chance of organ-preserving, radical resection in selected patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate systematic, immediate DNA sequencing of KIT and PDGFRA in pretreatment GIST tissue to guide neoadjuvant TKI therapy and optimize preoperative tumor response.

METHODS

All patients who were candidates for neoadjuvant therapy of a suspected GIST [the study cohort (SC)] were prospectively included from January 2014 to March 2018. Patients were subjected to pretreatment endosonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) or transabdominal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (TUS-NB), followed by immediate tumor DNA sequencing (< 2 weeks). A historic (2006-2013) reference cohort (RC) underwent work-up without sequencing before neoadjuvant imatinib (n = 42). The rate of optimal neoadjuvant therapy (Therapy_OPTIMAL) was calculated, and the induced tumor size reduction (Tumor Regression_MAX, %) was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scan.

RESULTS

The success rate of pretreatment tumor DNA sequencing in the SC (n = 81) was 77/81 (95%) [EUS-FNB 71/74 (96%); TUS-NB 6/7 (86%)], with mutations localized in KIT (n = 58), PDGFRA (n = 18), or neither gene, wild type (n = 5). In patients with a final indication for neoadjuvant therapy, the Therapy_OPTIMAL was higher in the SC compared with the RC [61/63 (97%) versus 33/42 (79%), p = 0.006], leading to a significantly higher Tumor Regression_MAX in patients treated with TKI (27% vs. 19%, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment endosonography-guided biopsy sampling followed by immediate tumor DNA sequencing of KIT and PDGFRA is highly accurate and valuable in guiding neoadjuvant TKI therapy in GIST. This approach minimizes maltreatment with inappropriate regimens and leads to improved tumor size reduction before surgery.

Ripretinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: the long-awaited step forward

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) represents a paradigm for clinically effective targeted inhibition of oncogenic driver mutations in cancer. Five drugs are currently positioned as the standard of care for the treatment of advanced or metastatic GIST patients. This is the result of continuous, deep understanding of KIT and PDGFRA GIST oncogenic drivers as well as the resistance mechanisms associated to tumor progression. However, the complexity of GIST molecular heterogeneity is an evolving field, and critical questions remain open. Specifically, the clinical benefit of approved and/or investigated targeted agents is strikingly modest at advanced stages of the disease when compared with the activity of first-line imatinib. Ripretinib is a novel switch-pocket inhibitor with broad activity against KIT and PDGFRA oncoproteins and has recently demonstrated antitumoral activity across phase I to phase III clinical trials. Therefore, ripretinib has emerged as a new standard of care for advanced, multi-resistant GIST patients. Based on this data, the Food and Drug Administration has granted in 2020 the approval of ripretinib for GIST patients after progression to imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib. This, in turn, constitutes a major breakthrough in sarcoma drug development, as there have not been new treatment approvals in GIST for nearly a decade. Herein, we provide a critical review on the preclinical and clinical development of ripretinib in GIST. Furthermore, we seek to assess the biological and clinical impact of this new standard of care on the course of the disease, aiming to provide an insight on future treatments strategies for the next coming years.

The management of metastatic GIST: current standard and investigational therapeutics

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. The majority of GISTs harbor gain of function mutations in either KIT or PDGFRα. Determination of the GIST molecular subtype upon diagnosis is important because this information informs therapeutic decisions in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. The management of GIST was revolutionized by the introduction of imatinib, a KIT inhibitor, which has become the standard first line treatment for metastatic GIST. However, despite a clinical benefit rate of 80%, the majority of patients with GIST experience disease progression after 2-3 years of imatinib therapy. Second and third line options include sunitinib and regorafenib, respectively, and yield low response rates and limited clinical benefit. There have been recent FDA approvals for GIST including ripretinib in the fourth-line setting and avapritinib for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST. This article aims to review the optimal treatment approach for the management of patients with advanced GIST. It examines the standard treatment options available but also explores the novel treatment approaches in the setting of imatinib refractory GIST.

Individualized Management of Blood Concentration in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor, and surgical resection is the first choice for the treatment of the disease, but since the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib (IM), the prognosis of the disease has undergone revolutionary changes. According to the current version of the guidelines, most GIST patients receive a fixed dose without taking into account their own individual differences, resulting in a wide difference in blood concentration, adverse reactions and prognosis. With more studies on the relationship between blood drug concentrations and prognosis, the concept of individualized therapy has been paid more attention by researchers. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has also been made available for the research field of GIST targeted therapy. How to reduce the incidence of drug resistance and adverse reactions in patients with GISTs has become the focus of the current research. This article reviews the common monitoring methods and timing of TKIs blood concentration, the reasonable range of blood drug concentration, the toxic or adverse effects caused by high blood drug concentration, some possible factors affecting blood drug concentration and recent research progress, in order to discuss and summarize the treatment strategy of individual blood drug concentration, improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the adverse effects as much as possible.

Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in daily clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Molecular analysis of KIT and PDGFRA is critical for tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment selection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and hence recommended by international guidelines. We performed a nationwide study into the application of predictive mutation testing in GIST patients and its impact on targeted treatment decisions in clinical practice.

METHODS

Real-world clinical and pathology information was obtained from GIST patients with initial diagnosis in 2017-2018 through database linkage between the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry.

RESULTS

Predictive mutation analysis was performed in 89% of the patients with high risk or metastatic disease. Molecular testing rates were higher for patients treated in expertise centers (96%) compared to non-expertise centers (75%, P < 0.01). Imatinib therapy was applied in 81% of the patients with high risk or metastatic disease without patient's refusal or adverse characteristics, e.g., comorbidities or resistance mutations. Mutation analysis that was performed in 97% of these imatinib-treated cases, did not guarantee mutation-tailored treatment: 2% of these patients had the PDGFRA p.D842V resistance mutation and 7% initiated imatinib therapy at the normal instead of high dose despite of having a KIT exon 9 mutation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, nationwide real-world data show that over 81% of the eligible high risk or metastatic disease patients receive targeted therapy, which was tailored to the mutation status as recommended in guidelines in 88% of cases. Therefore, still 27% of these GIST patients misses out on mutation-tailored treatment. The reasons for suboptimal uptake of testing and treatment require further study.

Deciding on the duration of adjuvant therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Introduction: The benefit of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib mesylate in metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) leads to improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Clinical trials of adjuvant imatinib have provided data on the utility in management of primary GIST. There still remains uncertainty regarding the optimal duration of therapy.Areas covered: Here, we review the literature on the pivotal clinical trials evaluating adjuvant imatinib: ACOSOG Z9000/Z9001, EORTC 62024, Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII, and PERSIST-5. The data from these studies that were analyzed included the patient population, length of therapy, and outcomes.Expert opinion: Clinical trial data demonstrate that adjuvant imatinib delays recurrence and appears to improve survival when taken for 3 years in high-risk patients; treatment for 5 years has been found to be safe, although difficult for patients to maintain adherence. These studies all incorporated slightly different patient populations based upon eligibility criteria for risk of recurrence, but support the use in patients with intermediate to high risk of disease recurrence. Data from these studies does not support treating those with low risk of recurrence or imatinib-insensitive mutations.

Systemic therapy of advanced/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an update on progress beyond imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib

Introduction: Discovery of oncogenic mutations in the KIT and PDGFRA tyrosine kinase receptor was a crucial step for the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Since then, GIST became a model for the development of molecular-targeted therapy, which led to dramatically improved median overall survival of advanced GIST. Still, further progress is needed after third-line or for TKI resistant mutations. Areas covered: In this review, after a brief introduction on imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib, an overview of TKIs that was evaluated beyond these drugs is provided, with a main focus on the novel approved TKIs. Expert opinion: Combination therapies have thus far not fulfilled their promise in GIST, nor did immunotherapy. Increased understanding of GIST and advances in the development of molecular-targeted drugs led to the introduction of ripretinib and avapritinib. Furthermore, NTRK inhibitors became available for ultrarare NTRK fusions. Solutions for NF1 and BRAF mutated and SDH-deficient GIST are still to be awaited. This all underlines the need for adequate molecular profiling of high-risk GISTs before treatment is started. Possibly by using circulating tumor DNA in the future, targeting resistance mutations with specific drugs along the course of the disease would be easier, avoiding multiple tumor biopsies.

Tyrosine Kinase Receptors in Oncology

Tyrosine kinase receptors (TKR) comprise more than 60 molecules that play an essential role in the molecular pathways, leading to cell survival and differentiation. Consequently, genetic alterations of TKRs may lead to tumorigenesis and, therefore, cancer development. The discovery and improvement of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) against TKRs have entailed an important step in the knowledge-expansion of tumor physiopathology as well as an improvement in the cancer treatment based on molecular alterations over many tumor types. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive review of the different families of TKRs and their role in the expansion of tumor cells and how TKIs can stop these pathways to tumorigenesis, in combination or not with other therapies. The increasing growth of this landscape is driving us to strengthen the development of precision oncology with clinical trials based on molecular-based therapy over a histology-based one, with promising preliminary results.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor – An Overview

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors but are most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. They are commonly seen in the stomach (60%) and small intestine (30%). GISTs are likely derived from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their stem cell precursors. They are best characterized by computerized tomography and have a specific staining pattern on immunohistochemistry, i.e., C-Kit and DOG-1. The treatment of GIST is based on the risk assessment for relapse, and patients with localized GIST require resection with or without adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM). Advanced unresectable tumors are usually treated with IM, with a number of further options available for patients post progression on IM. There is an increasing emphasis on identifying C-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha mutations in all patients with GIST, as these are driver mutations with current and future therapeutic implications.

Diagnosis and management of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion sarcomas: expert recommendations from the World Sarcoma Network

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with mesenchymal lineage differentiation. The discovery of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions as tissue-agnostic oncogenic drivers has led to new personalized therapies for a subset of patients with sarcoma in the form of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors. NTRK gene rearrangements and fusion transcripts can be detected with different molecular pathology techniques, while TRK protein expression can be demonstrated with immunohistochemistry. The rarity and diagnostic complexity of NTRK gene fusions raise a number of questions and challenges for clinicians. To address these challenges, the World Sarcoma Network convened two meetings of expert adult oncologists and pathologists and subsequently developed this article to provide practical guidance on the management of patients with sarcoma harboring NTRK gene fusions. We propose a diagnostic strategy that considers disease stage and histologic and molecular subtypes to facilitate routine testing for TRK expression and subsequent testing for NTRK gene fusions.

Non-Coding RNAs, a Novel Paradigm for the Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal malignancies found in the gastrointestinal tract. At a molecular level, most GISTs are characterized by gain-of-function mutations in V-Kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 Feline Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KIT) and Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (PDGFRA), leading to constitutive activated signaling through these receptor tyrosine kinases, which drive GIST pathogenesis. In addition to surgery, treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib forms the mainstay of GIST treatment, particularly in the advanced setting. Nevertheless, the majority of GISTs develop imatinib resistance. Biomarkers that indicate metastasis, drug resistance and disease progression early on could be of great clinical value. Likewise, novel treatment strategies that overcome resistance mechanisms are equally needed. Non-coding RNAs, particularly microRNAs, can be employed as diagnostic, prognostic or predictive biomarkers and have therapeutic potential. Here we review which non-coding RNAs are deregulated in GISTs, whether they can be linked to specific clinicopathological features and discuss how they can be used to improve the clinical management of GISTs.

Mutational Testing in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Targeted treatment has become a major modality in cancer management. Such cancer drugs are generally designed to treat tumors with certain genetic/genomic makeups. Mutational testing prior to prescribing targeted therapy is crucial in identifying who can receive clinical benefit from specific cancer drugs. Over the last two decades, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have evolved from histogenetically obscure to being identified as distinct gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors with well-defined clinical and molecular characteristics, for which multiple lines of targeted therapies are available. Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) strongly recommends mutational testing for optimal management of GIST, many GIST patients still have neither a mutation test performed or any mutation-guided cancer management. Here, we review the mutation-guided landscape of GIST, mutational testing methods, and the recent development of new therapies targeting GIST with specific mutations.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Genetic Testing and Tailored First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

IMPORTANCE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is frequently driven by oncogenic KIT variations. Imatinib targeting of KIT marked a new era in GIST treatment and ushered in precision oncological treatment for all solid malignant neoplasms. However, studies on the molecular biological traits of GIST have found that tumors respond differentially to imatinib dosage based on the KIT exon with variation. Despite this knowledge, few patients undergo genetic testing at diagnosis, and empirical imatinib therapy remains routine. Barriers to genetic profiling include concerns about the cost and utility of testing.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether targeted gene testing (TGT) is a cost-effective diagnostic for patients with metastatic GIST from the US payer perspective.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This economic evaluation developed a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of TGT and tailored first-line therapy compared with empirical imatinib therapy among patients with a new diagnosis of metastatic GIST. The main health outcome, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs were obtained from the literature, and transitional probabilities were modeled from disease progression and survival estimates from randomized clinical trials of patients with metastatic GIST. Data analyses were conducted October 2019 to January 2020.

EXPOSURE

TGT and tailored first-line therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was QALYs and cost. Cost-effectiveness was defined using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio less than $100 000/QALY considered cost-effective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model stability.

RESULTS

Therapy directed by TGT was associated with an increase of 0.10 QALYs at a cost of $9513 compared with the empirical imatinib approach, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $92 100. These findings were sensitive to the costs of TGT, drugs, and health utility model inputs. Therapy directed by TGT remained cost-effective for genetic testing costs up to $3730. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that TGT-directed therapy was considered cost-effective 70% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that using genetic testing to match treatment of KIT variations to imatinib dosing is a cost-effective approach compared with empirical imatinib.

The analysis of 3-year adjuvant therapy with imatinib in patients with high-risk molecular profiled gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated in routine practice

INTRODUCTION

The real-world data on adjuvant imatinib therapy in high-risk primary GIST are scarce.

METHODS

We have analysed the data of 107 consecutive patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) after resection treated with adjuvant imatinib (for planned 3 years with initial dose 400 mg daily, started not later than 4 months after operation) in 6 oncological centres in 2013-2018. All patients were required to have high risk of recurrence (at least 50% according to NCCN/AFIP criteria), known mutational status to exclude PDGFRA D842V mutants and KIT/PDGFRA-wild type cases from therapy without any further selection. Median follow-up time was 27 months.

RESULTS

The most common primary localization of GIST was small bowel (63 patients; 59%), followed by the stomach (40 patients; 37%). The majority of GIST cases harboured exon 11 KIT mutations (88 cases, 82%), 11 cases had exon 9 KIT mutations (10%), 8 had other KIT/PDGFRA mutations potentially sensitive to imatinib. Forty patients (37%) finished 3-year adjuvant imatinib therapy as planned, 48 (45%) still continue therapy, 5 (4.5%) patients had finished adjuvant therapy prematurely due to toxicity, 6 (6%) due to disease progression on treatment and 8 (7.5%) due to other reasons. The disease relapse was detected in 19 patients, of them in 5 cases in exon 9 KIT mutants (45%), and 14 cases in patients with exon 11 KIT mutations (11%) [p < 0.01]. Estimated 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate is 78%.

CONCLUSIONS

The early results of adjuvant therapy with imatinib in routine practice outside clinical trials in high-risk mutation-driven GIST patients only confirm high efficacy of this therapy with better tolerability than in clinical trials. We found overrepresentation of exon 9 KIT mutants and ruptured tumors in a group of patients with disease relapse.

Treatment of gastrointestinal tumor (GIST) of the rectum requiring abdominoperineal resection following neoadjuvant imatinib: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of the rectum can reduce, but may not eliminate, risk of surgical morbidity from permanent bowel diversion. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies in rectal GIST patients requiring abdominoperineal resection following neoadjuvant imatinib.

Methods

We developed a Markov model using a healthcare payers' perspective to estimate costs in 2017 Singapore dollars (SGD) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for upfront abdominoperineal resection (UAPR) versus continued imatinib until progression (CIUP) following 1 year of neoadjuvant imatinib. Transition probabilities and utilities were obtained from published data, and costs were estimated using data from the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to probe model uncertainty. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below SGD 50,000 per QALY gained was considered cost-effective.

Results

In the base case, UAPR dominates CIUP being both more effective (8.66 QALYS vs 5.43 QALYs) and less expensive (SGD 312,627 vs SGD 339,011). These estimates were most sensitive to 2 variables, utility of abdominoperineal resection and annual recurrence probability post-abdominoperineal resection. However, simultaneously varying the values of these variables to maximally favor CIUP did not render it the more cost effective strategy at willingness to pay (WTP) of SGD 50,000. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, UAPR had probability of being cost-effective compared with CIUP greater than 95%, reaching 100% at WTP SGD 10,000.

Conclusion

UAPR is more effective and less costly than CIUP for patients with rectal GIST requiring abdominoperineal resection following neoadjuvant imatinib, and is the strategy of choice in this setting.