Conditioned medium from a rat ureteric bud cell line in combination with bFGF induces complete differentiation of isolated metanephric mesenchyme

Galectin-3 modulates ureteric bud branching in organ culture of the developing mouse kidney

Galectin-3 is a mammalian beta-galactoside-specific lectin with functions in cell growth, adhesion, and neoplastic transformation. On the basis of expression patterns in humans, it is proposed that galectin-3 modulates fetal collecting duct growth. This article provides evidence that galectin-3 can modulate branching morphogenesis of the mouse ureteric bud/collecting duct lineage. With the use of immunohistochemistry, galectin-3 was not detected in early metanephrogenesis but was upregulated later in fetal kidney maturation when the protein was prominent in basal domains of medullary collecting ducts. Addition of galectin-3 to embryonic days 11 and 12 whole metanephric cultures inhibited ureteric bud branching, whereas galectin-1 did not perturb morphogenesis, nor did a galectin-3 mutant lacking wild-type high-affinity binding to extended oligosaccharides. Exogenous galectin-3 retarded conversion of renal mesenchyme to nephrons in whole metanephric explants but did not affect nephron induction by spinal cord in isolated renal mesenchymes. Finally, addition of a blocking antiserum to galectin-3 caused dilation and distortion of developing epithelia in embryonic day 12 metanephroi cultured for 1 wk. The upregulation of galectin-3 protein during kidney maturation, predominantly at sites where it could mediate cell/matrix interactions, seems to modulate growth of the ureteric tree.

Secreted Molecules in Metanephric Induction

Abstract. Nearly 50 yr ago, Clifford Grobstein made the observation that the ureteric bud induced the nephrogenic mesenchyme to undergo tubulogenesis. Since that discovery, scientists have attempted to characterize the molecular nature of the inducer. To date, no single molecule that is both necessary and sufficient for nephric induction has been identified. Because of recent insights regarding the role of several secreted molecules in tubulogenesis, it has become necessary to revise the classic model of metanephric induction. The studies of the classic ureteric inducer performed to date have most likely been characterizations of a mesenchyme-specific inducer, Wnt-4, and its role in tubulogenesis. Ureteric induction most likely involves a series of distinct events that provide proliferative, survival, and condensation signals to the mesenchyme, integrating the growth of the ureteric system with tubulogenesis.

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition in the developing metanephric kidney: gene expression study by differential display

The developing metanephric kidney is a convenient model to study molecular events associated with epithelial cell differentiation. To determine the genes involved in the defining event of this process, namely, the conversion of metanephric mesenchyme to the epithelium of the nephron, we applied differential display (DD) techniques. Explants of rat metanephric mesenchymes were induced to condense ex vivo with fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) or to form tubules with FGF2 and conditioned medium (CM) from a cell line (RUB1) of ureteric bud, the renal inductive tissue. Three time points (6, 24, and 72 h) were chosen to track the dynamics of gene expression during morphogenesis. Seventy-two up- or down-regulated mRNAs were identified, including 36 novel sequences and those of cell cycle regulatory proteins (TGF-beta2, Cyclin D1, p57Kip2), transcription factors (beta-catenin, Sox11, DP1), signaling proteins (SH3-domain binding protein, G-protein-coupled receptor, Ser-Thr protein kinase), cell adhesion molecules (syndecan-4, integrin-beta1), and also gene33, H19, SM20, IGFBP5, MAMA receptor, lectin, keratin, beta-tubulin, calreticulin, GRP78, ERp72, MnSoD, thioredoxin, and others. Some have previously been associated with kidney development and serve as good controls for expected changes, while most have not been linked with kidney epithelial cell differentiation. Using thin sections of embryonic kidney and labeled antisense RNA probes, we applied RNA hybridization to confirm the results of DD and related the expression of these genes to specific cell lineages of the developing kidney. These results provide a window into the events that mediate this critical differentiation process and suggest that a limited number of interrelated events direct the epithelial conversion of metanephric mesenchyme. genesis 27:22-31, 2000. Published 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Kidney morphogenesis: cellular and molecular regulation

Development of an organ is directed by cell and tissue interactions and these also occur during the formation of functional kidney. During vertebrate development inductive signalling between mesenchyme and epithelium controls the organogenesis of all three kinds of kidneys: pronephros, mesonephros and metanephros. In higher animals the metanephros differentiates into the permanent kidney and in this review we will mainly concentrate on its development. Molecular interactions currently known to function during nephrogenesis have primarily been based on the use of knockout techniques. These studies have highlighted the role for transcription factors, signalling molecules, growth factors and their receptors and also for extracellular matrix components in kidney development. Finally in this review we will represent our own model for kidney development according to the knowledge of the genes involved in the development of the functional excretory organ, kidney.

The role of homeobox genes in kidney development

Homeodomain-containing transcription factors are essential for a variety of processes in vertebrate development, including organogenesis. They have been shown to regulate cell proliferation, pattern segmental identity and determine cell fate decisions during embryogenesis. During nephrogenesis, homeobox genes play an important role at multiple developmental stages, from the early events in intermediate mesoderm to terminal differentiation of glomerular and tubular epithelia. Increasingly sophisticated genetic approaches will probably reveal additional functions for this class of transcription factors in the developing kidney and lead to the identification of critical downstream target genes.

Mesenchymal to epithelial conversion in rat metanephros is induced by LIF

Inductive signals cause conversion of mesenchyme into epithelia during the formation of many organs. Yet a century of study has not revealed the inducing molecules. Using a standard model of induction, we found that ureteric bud cells secrete factors that convert kidney mesenchyme to epithelia that, remarkably, then form nephrons. Purification and sequencing of one such factor identified it as leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). LIF acted on epithelial precursors that we identified by the expression of Pax2 and Wnt4. Other IL-6 type cytokines acted like LIF, and deletion of their shared receptor reduced nephron development. In situ, the ureteric bud expressed LIF, and metanephric mesenchyme expressed its receptors. The data suggest that IL-6 cytokines are candidate regulators of mesenchymal to epithelial conversion during kidney development.

Embryonic renal epithelia: induction, nephrogenesis, and cell differentiation

Embryonic metanephroi, differentiating into the adult kidney, have come to be a generally accepted model system for organogenesis. Nephrogenesis implies a highly controlled series of morphogenetic and differentiation events that starts with reciprocal inductive interactions between two different primordial tissues and leads, in one of two mainstream processes, to the formation of mesenchymal condensations and aggregates. These go through the intricate process of mesenchyme-to-epithelium transition by which epithelial cell polarization is initiated, and they continue to differentiate into the highly specialized epithelial cell populations of the nephron. Each step along the developmental metanephrogenic pathway is initiated and organized by signaling molecules that are locally secreted polypeptides encoded by different gene families and regulated by transcription factors. Nephrogenesis proceeds from the deep to the outer cortex, and it is directed by a second, entirely different developmental process, the ductal branching of the ureteric bud-derived collecting tubule. Both systems, the nephrogenic (mesenchymal) and the ductogenic (ureteric), undergo a repeat series of inductive signaling that serves to organize the architecture and differentiated cell functions in a cascade of developmental gene programs. The aim of this review is to present a coherent picture of principles and mechanisms in embryonic renal epithelia.

Molecular regulation of nephron endowment

Recent data suggests that the number of nephrons in normal adult human kidneys ranges from approximately 300,000 to more than 1 million. There is increasing evidence that reduced nephron number, either inherited or acquired, is associated with the development of essential hypertension, chronic renal failure, renal disease in transitional indigenous populations, and possibly the long-term success of renal allografts. Three processes ultimately govern the number of nephrons formed during the development of the permanent kidney (metanephros): branching of the ureteric duct in the metanephric mesenchyme; condensation of mesenchymal cells at the tips of the ureteric branches; and conversion of the mesenchymal condensates into epithelium. This epithelium then grows and differentiates to form nephrons. In recent years, we have learned a great deal about the molecular regulation of these three central processes and hence the molecular regulation of nephron endowment. Data has come from studies on cell lines, isolated ureteric duct epithelial cells, isolated metanephric mesenchyme, and whole metanephric organ culture, as well as from studies of heterozygous and homozygous null mutant mice. With accurate and precise methods now available for estimating the total number of nephrons in kidneys, more advances in our understanding of the molecular regulation of nephron endowment can be expected in the near future.

Cell lineages in the embryonic kidney: their inductive interactions and signalling molecules

The first signalling genes acting in the inductive interactions in the kidney have now been identified. Differentiation of the permanent kidney or the metanephros is critically dependent on inductive signalling between the nephrogenic mesenchyme and ureteric bud epithelium. Further inductive interactions occur between developing nephrons, interstitial stroma, endothelial cells and neurones. Glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor is a signal for the ureteric bud initiation and branching, and Wnt4 is an autocrine epithelializing signal at the pretubular stage of nephron formation. The signals for renal angiogenesis and innervation are less well defined, but seem to include vascular endothelial growth factor and neurotrophins, at least. The ureteric-bud-derived signal for induction of the nephrogenic mesenchyme (to bring the cells to the condensate stage) is not yet known, but fibroblast growth factor 2 is a good candidate. None of the signalling genes identified from the embryonic kidney is specific to the organ, which raises some general questions. How do the organs develop from similar rudiments to various patterns with different cell types and functions? Does the information for organ-specific differentiation pathways retain in the epithelial or mesenchymal compartment? The present, rather fragmentary molecular data would favour the view that similar molecules acting in different combinations and developmental sequences, rather than few organ-specific master genes, could be responsible for the divergence of patterning.Key words: inductive tissue interaction, metanephros, apoptosis, signalling molecule, cell lineage, morphogenesis.

Architectural patterns in branching morphogenesis in the kidney

During kidney development, several discrete steps generate its three-dimensional pattern including specific branch types, regional differential growth of stems, the specific axes of growth and temporal progression of the pattern. The ureteric bud undergoes three different types of branching. In the first, terminal bifid type, a lateral branch arises and immediately bifurcates to form two terminal branches whose tips induce the formation of nephrons. After 15 such divisions (in humans) of this specifically renal type of branching, several nephrons are induced whose connecting tubules fuse and elongate to form the arcades. Finally, the last generations undergo strictly lateral branching to form the cortical system. The stems of these branches elongate in a highly regulated pattern. The molecular basis of these processes is unknown and we briefly review their potential mediators. Differential growth in three different axes of the kidney (cortico-medullary, dorsoventral and rostro-caudal) generate the characteristic shape of the kidney. Rapid advances in molecular genetics highlight the need for development of specific assays for each of these discrete steps, a prerequisite for identification of the involved pathways. The identification of molecules that control branching (the ultimate determinant of the number of nephrons) has acquired new urgency with the recent suggestion that a reduced nephron number predisposes humans to hypertension and to progression of renal failure.

Regulation of BMP7 expression during kidney development

Members of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) family exhibit overlapping and dynamic expression patterns throughout embryogenesis. However, little is known about the upstream regulators of these important signaling molecules. There is some evidence that BMP signaling may be autoregulative as demonstrated for BMP4 during tooth development. Analysis of BMP7 expression during kidney development, in conjunction with studies analyzing the effect of recombinant BMP7 on isolated kidney mesenchyme, suggest that a similar mechanism may operate for BMP7. We have generated a beta-gal-expressing reporter allele at the BMP7 locus to closely monitor expression of BMP7 during embryonic kidney development. In contrast to other studies, our analysis of BMP7/lacZ homozygous mutant embryos, shows that BMP7 expression is not subject to autoregulation in any tissue. In addition, we have used this reporter allele to analyze the expression of BMP7 in response to several known survival factors (EGF, bFGF) and inducers of metanephric mesenchyme, including the ureteric bud, spinal cord and LiCl. These studies show that treatment of isolated mesenchyme with EGF or bFGF allows survival of the mesenchyme but neither factor is sufficient to maintain BMP7 expression in this population of cells. Rather, BMP7 expression in the mesenchyme is contingent on an inductive signal. Thus, the reporter allele provides a convenient marker for the induced mesenchyme. Interestingly LiCl has been shown to activate the Wnt signaling pathway, suggesting that BMP7 expression in the mesenchyme is regulated by a Wnt signal. Treatment of whole kidneys with sodium chlorate to disrupt proteoglycan synthesis results in the loss of BMP7 expression in the mesenchyme whereas expression in the epithelial components of the kidney are unaffected. Heterologous recombinations of ureteric bud with either limb or lung mesenchyme demonstrate that expression of BMP7 is maintained in this epithelial structure. Taken together, these data indicate that BMP7 expression in the epithelial components of the kidney is not dependent on cell-cell or cell-ECM interactions with the metanephric mesenchyme. By contrast, BMP7 expression in the metanephric mesenchyme is dependent on proteoglycans and possibly Wnt signaling.

The development of the kidney

This chapter describes the earlier stages of development of the vertebrate metanephric kidney. It focuses on the mouse and descriptive morphology is used for considering both molecular mechanisms, underpinning kidney morphogenesis and differentiation, and the ways in which these processes can go awry and lead to congenital kidney disorders—particularly in humans. The mature kidney is a fairly complex organ attached to an arterial input vessel and two output vessels, the vein and the ureter. Inside, the artery and vein are connected by a complex network of capillaries that invade a large number of glomeruli, the proximal entrance to nephrons, which are filtration units that link to an arborized collecting-duct system that drains into the ureter. The ability of the kidney and isolated metanephrogenic mesenchyme, to develop in culture means that the developing tissues can be subjected to a wide variety of experimental procedures designed to investigate their molecular and cellular properties and to test hypotheses about developmental mechanisms.

The tip-top branching ureter

Organ rudiments with their epithelial bud and adjacent mesenchyme look much the same at their initial stage of differentiation. The subsequent branching of the epithelial anlagen determines the final pattern of the organs, but the mesenchyme provides essential signals for epithelial differentiation. Glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has recently been shown to regulate ureteric branching morphogenesis and is thereby the first defined signalling molecule in the embryonic metanephric kidney. GDNF is expressed by the mesenchyme, binds to the tip of the ureteric bud and functions in both bud induction and bud orientation. The active receptor complex for GDNF includes the receptor tyrosine kinase Ret and a novel class of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked receptors, called GDNF family receptor alpha s.

Ureteric bud cells secrete multiple factors, including bFGF, which rescue renal progenitors from apoptosis

Kidney development requires reciprocal interactions between the ureteric bud and the metanephrogenic mesenchyme. Whereas survival of mesenchyme and development of nephrons from mesenchymal cells depends on signals from the invading ureteric bud, growth of the ureteric bud depends on signals from the mesenchyme. This codependency makes it difficult to identify molecules expressed by the ureteric bud that regulate mesenchymal growth. To determine how the ureteric bud signals the mesenchyme, we previously isolated ureteric bud cell lines (UB cells). These cells secrete soluble factors which rescue the mesenchyme from apoptosis. We now report that four heparin binding factors mediate this growth activity. One of these is basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which is synthesized by the ureteric bud when penetrating the mesenchyme. bFGF rescues three types of progenitors found in the mesenchyme: precursors of tubular epithelia, precursors of capillaries, and cells that regulate growth of the ureteric bud. These data suggest that the ureteric bud regulates the number of epithelia and vascular precursors that generate nephrons by secreting bFGF and other soluble factors.

Signalling networks regulating dental development

There has been rapid progress recently in the identification of signalling pathways regulating tooth development. It has become apparent that signalling networks involved in Drosophila development and development of mammalian organs such as the limb are also used in tooth development. Teeth are epithelial appendages formed in the oral region of vertebrates and their early developmental anatomy resembles that of other appendages, such as hairs and glands. The neural crest origin of tooth mesenchyme has been confirmed and recent evidence suggests that specific combinations of homeobox genes expressed in the neural crest cells may regulate the types of teeth and their patterning. Signalling molecules in the Shh, FGF, BMP and Wnt families appear to regulate the early steps of tooth morphogenesis and some transcription factors associated with these pathways have been shown to be necessary for tooth development. Several of the conserved signals are also transiently expressed in the enamel knots in the dental epithelium. The enamel knots are associated with the characteristic epithelial folding morphogenesis which is responsible for the development of tooth shape and it is currently believed that the enamel knots function as signalling centres regulating tooth shape development. The developing tooth has proven to be an excellent model in studies of the molecular basis of patterning and morphogenesis of organs and it can be expected that continuing studies will rapidly increase the understanding of these mechanisms.