The Arabidopsis nectary is an ABC-independent floral structure

Activation of CRABS CLAW in the Nectaries and Carpels of Arabidopsis

CRABS CLAW (CRC), a member of the YABBY gene family, is required for nectary and carpel development. To further understand CRC regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana, we performed phylogenetic footprinting analyses of 5' upstream regions of CRC orthologs from three Brassicaceae species, including Arabidopsis. Phylogenetic footprinting efficiently identified functionally important regulatory regions (modules), indicating that CRC expression is regulated by a combination of positive and negative regulatory elements in the modules. Within the conserved modules, we identified putative binding sites of LEAFY and MADS box proteins, and functional in vivo analyses revealed their importance for CRC expression. Both expression and genetic studies demonstrate that potential binding sites for MADS box proteins within the conserved regions are functionally significant for the transcriptional regulation of CRC in nectaries. We propose that in wild-type flowers, a combination of floral homeotic gene activities, specifically the B class genes APETALA3 and PISTILLATA and the C class gene AGAMOUS act redundantly with each other and in combination with SEPALLATA genes to activate CRC in the nectaries and carpels. In the absence of B and C class gene activities, other genes such as SHATTERPROOF1/2 can substitute if they are ectopically expressed, as in an A class mutant background (apetala2). These MADS box proteins may provide general floral factors that must work in conjunction with specific factors in the activation of CRC in the nectaries and carpels.

Functional characterization of SEPALLATA3 and AGAMOUS orthologues in silver birch

The development of flowers is regulated by a complex network of transcriptional activators and repressors, many of which belong to the MADS box gene family. In this study, we describe two MADS box genes of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth), BpMADS1 and BpMADS6, which are similar to SEPALLATA3 and AGAMOUS in Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively. In situ hybridization showed that BpMADS1 was expressed in the inflorescence meristem at a very early stage, but not later. Both genes were expressed in developing carpels, ovules and stamens but not in tepals or scales. Ectopic expression of BpMADS1 in Arabidopsis resulted in a reduced number of floral organs or whole whorls and in petaloid or carpelloid sepals, a phenotype reminiscent of that of fil mutants. 35S::BpMADS6 caused very early flowering in Arabidopsis. In tobacco, both 35S::BpMADS1 and 35S::BpMADS6 accelerated flowering and, in addition, 35S::BpMADS6 caused changes in sepals and petals. In some transgenic birch plants, 35S::BpMADS1 antisense resulted in the development of both male and female organs in the axil of a single bract and in a change of some inflorescences into vegetative shoots. In two plants, either 35S::BpMADS6 sense or antisense constructs resulted in an increase in the number of tepals and in complete lack of stamens in some male inflorescences. These results suggest that BpMADS1 participates both in inflorescence and in flower formation and BpMADS6 participates in flower formation and that they are functional homologues to SEPALLATA3 and AGAMOUS, respectively.

High-resolution boundary analysis during Arabidopsis thaliana flower development

We report a comparative analysis of cell proliferation patterns during Arabidopsis flower development. Cell division was evaluated by a direct method, i.e. the 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation/immunodetection procedure. BrdU patterns in wild-type plants were correlated with the expression profiles of both several cell cycle genes involved in the control of the G(1)/S transition and cell cycle-related repressor genes, MSI4 and MSI5, encoding WD-repeat proteins. To evaluate how proliferation patterns arise with respect to boundaries and vice versa, the expression of a boundary gene, CUP SHAPED COTYLEDON (CUC)2, was determined. Combining these approaches, we demonstrate that boundaries between inflorescence and floral meristems and between floral whorls are narrow bands of non-dividing cells. In addition, we show that negative and positive regulators of cell proliferation are simultaneously and continuously expressed in dividing meristematic domains, being excluded from boundary cells. Finally, BrdU incorporation and CUC2 in situ hybridisation patterns were analysed in two mutant backgrounds, agamous (ag)-1 and superman (sup)-1, in order to assess changes in boundary establishment and different levels of indeterminacy under conditions of altered proliferation at the floral meristem centre.

Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape

Leaf initiation at the shoot apical meristem involves a balance between cell proliferation and commitment to make primordia. Several genes, such as CLAVATA1, CLAVATA3, WUSCHEL, KNOTTED1, and PHANTASTICA, play key roles in these processes. When expressed in the leaf primordium, however, these 'meristem' genes can profoundly affect leaf shape and size, possibly by regulating hormone gradients and transport. The KNOTTED1-like genes are involved in regulating changes in hormonal levels. Recent studies have elaborated on the role that hormones, such as auxin, play in releasing biophysical constraints on leaf initiation and growth. Final leaf form is elaborated by a coordination of these hormonally regulated processes, cell division and cellular differentiation.

Elements regulatingAGAMOUSexpression are conserved betweenArabidopsis thaliana,Brassica napus, andLinum usitatissimum

To investigate the functional conservation of cis regulatory elements controlling AGAMOUS (AG) expression, we placed the promoter region of AG from Arabidopsis thaliana into a close relative, Brassica napus, and a distantly related species, Linum usitatissimum, and analyzed the subsequent expression patterns in each species. Spatially, the expression patterns in all three species were marginally similar, in that expression was confined primarily to the reproductive organs and nectarium. Within organs however, tissue-specific expression patterns were not conserved between species. Unlike Arabidopsis, the transgenic AG cis elements did not express in the ovules of B. napus and L. usitatissimum. Temporally, the pattern of AG cis-element expression in B. napus was identical to that of Arabidopsis during early development; however, the AG cis elements did not express at all during early flower development in L. usitatissimum. These results suggest that although regulatory factors controlling the generalized local expression of AG have been conserved between these species, those controlling temporal and tissue-specific expression have not.Key words: AGAMOUS, cis elements, regulation, Arabidopsis, Brassica napus, Linum usitatissimum.

Stomatal development in Arabidopsis

Stomata consist of two guard cells around a pore and act as turgor-operated valves for gas exchange. Arabidopsis stomata develop from one or more asymmetric divisions followed by the symmetric division of the guard mother cell. Stomatal number is partly a function of the availability of smaller epidermal cells that are competent to divide asymmetrically. Stomata are spaced apart from each other by at least one neighbor cell. Pattern generation may involve cell-cell signaling that transmits spatial cues used to orient specific classes of asymmetric divisions. TOO MANY MOUTHS may function in receiving or transducing these cues to orient asymmetric divisions. TMM also is a negative or positive regulator of entry into the stomatal pathway, with the direction of the response dependent on organ and location. STOMATAL DENSITY AND DISTRIBUTION1 is a negative regulator of stomatal formation throughout the shoot and encodes a processing protease that may function in intercellular communication. FOUR LIPS apparently controls the number symmetric divisions at the guard mother cell stage. In some organs, such as the hypocotyl, the placement of stomata may be coordinated with internal features and involves genes that also regulate root hair and trichome formation. Other mutations affect guard cell morphogenesis, cytokinesis, and stomatal number in response to carbon dioxide concentration. The molecular analysis of stomatal development promises advances in understanding intercellular signaling, the control of the plane and polarity of asymmetric division, the specification of cell fate, and the regulation of cell differentiation and shape.