The aPKC-PAR-6-PAR-3 cell polarity complex localizes to the centrosome attracting body, a macroscopic cortical structure responsible for asymmetric divisions in the early ascidian embryo

The PAR proteins: fundamental players in animal cell polarization

The par genes were discovered in genetic screens for regulators of cytoplasmic partitioning in the early embryo of C. elegans, and encode six different proteins required for asymmetric cell division by the worm zygote. Some of the PAR proteins are localized asymmetrically and form physical complexes with one another. Strikingly, the PAR proteins have been found to regulate cell polarization in many different contexts in diverse animals, suggesting they form part of an ancient and fundamental mechanism for cell polarization. Although the picture of how the PAR proteins function remains incomplete, cell biology and biochemistry are beginning to explain how PAR proteins polarize cells.

Postplasmic/PEM RNAs: a class of localized maternal mRNAs with multiple roles in cell polarity and development in ascidian embryos

Ascidian is a good model to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for mRNA localization with the discovery of a large family of localized maternal mRNAs, called postplasmic/PEM RNAs, which includes more than 40 members in three different ascidian species (Halocynthia roretzi, Ciona intestinalis, and C. savignyi). Among these mRNAs, two types (Type I and Type II) have been identified and show two different localization patterns from fertilization to the eight-cell stage. At the eight-cell stage, both types concentrate to a macromolecular cortical structure called CAB (for Centrosome Attracting Body) in the posterior-vegetal B4.1 blastomeres. The CAB is responsible for unequal cleavages and the partitioning of postplasmic/PEM RNAs at the posterior pole of embryos during cleavage stages. It has also been suggested that the CAB region could contain putative germ granules. In this review, we discuss recent data obtained on the distribution of Type I postplasmic/PEM RNAs from oogenesis to late development, in relation to their localization and translational control. We have first regrouped localization patterns for Type I and Type II into a comparative diagram and included all important definitions in the field. We also have made an exhaustive classification of their embryonic expression profiles (Type I or Type II), and analyzed their functions after knockdown and/or overexpression experiments and the role of the 3'-untranslated region (3'UTR) controlling both their localization and translation. Finally, we propose a speculative model integrating recent data, and we also discuss the relationship between postplasmic/PEM RNAs, posterior specification, and germ cell formation in ascidians.

Localized PEM mRNA and protein are involved in cleavage-plane orientation and unequal cell divisions in ascidians

BACKGROUND

Orientation and positioning of the cell division plane are essential for generation of invariant cleavage patterns and for unequal cell divisions during development. Precise control of the division plane is important for appropriate partitioning of localized factors, spatial arrangement of cells for proper intercellular interactions, and size control of daughter cells. Ascidian embryos show complex but invariant cleavage patterns mainly due to three rounds of unequal cleavage at the posterior pole.

RESULTS

The ascidian embryo is an emerging model for studies of developmental and cellular processes. The maternal Posterior End Mark (PEM) mRNA is localized within the egg and embryo to the posterior region. PEM is a novel protein that has no known domain. Immunostaining showed that the protein is also present in the posterior cortex and the in centrosome-attracting body (CAB) and that the localization is extraction-resistant. Here we show that PEM of Halocynthia roretzi is required for correct orientation of early-cleavage planes and subsequent unequal cell divisions because it repeatedly pulls a centrosome toward the posterior cortex and the CAB, respectively, where PEM mRNA and protein are localized. When PEM activity is suppressed, formation of the microtubule bundle linking the centrosome and the posterior cortex did not occur. PEM possibly plays a role in anchoring microtubule ends to the cortex. In our model of orientation of the early-cleavage planes, we also amend the allocation of the conventional animal-vegetal axis in ascidian embryos, and discuss how the newly proposed A-V axis provides the rationale for various developmental events and the fate map of this animal.

CONCLUSIONS

The complex cleavage pattern in ascidian embryos can be explained by a simple rule of centrosome attraction mediated by localized PEM activity. PEM is the first gene identified in ascidians that is required for multiple spindle-positioning events.

Asymmetric Cell Division: A CAB Driver for Spindle Movements

To divide asymmetrically, a cell must position the mitotic spindle relative to localized cell fate determinants. Recent work in the early ascidian embryo reveals the function of a single factor that coordinates this act to control cleavage pattern and cell fate determination.

From oocyte to 16-cell stage: Cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations that pattern the ascidian embryo

The dorsoventral and anteroposterior axes of the ascidian embryo are defined before first cleavage by means of a series of reorganizations that reposition cytoplasmic and cortical domains established during oogenesis. These domains situated in the periphery of the oocyte contain developmental determinants and a population of maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs. One of these RNAs (macho-1) is a determinant for the muscle cells of the tadpole embryo. Oocytes acquire a primary animal-vegetal (a-v) axis during meiotic maturation, when a subcortical mitochondria-rich domain (myoplasm) and a domain rich in cortical endoplasmic reticulum (cER) and maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs (cER-mRNA domain) become polarized and asymmetrically enriched in the vegetal hemisphere. Fertilization at metaphase of meiosis I initiates a series of dramatic cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations of the zygote, which occur in two major phases. The first major phase depends on sperm entry which triggers a calcium wave leading in turn to an actomyosin-driven contraction wave. The contraction concentrates the cER-mRNA domain and myoplasm in and around a vegetal/contraction pole. The precise localization of the vegetal/contraction pole depends on both the a-v axis and the location of sperm entry and prefigures the future site of gastrulation and dorsal side of the embryo. The second major phase of reorganization occurs between meiosis completion and first cleavage. Sperm aster microtubules and then cortical microfilaments cause the cER-mRNA domain and myoplasm to reposition toward the posterior of the zygote. The location of the posterior pole depends on the localization of the sperm centrosome/aster attained during the first major phase of reorganization. Both cER-mRNA and myoplasm domains localized in the posterior region are partitioned equally between the first two blastomeres and then asymmetrically over the next two cleavages. At the eight-cell stage the cER-mRNA domain compacts and gives rise to a macroscopic cortical structure called the Centrosome Attracting Body (CAB). The CAB is responsible for a series of unequal divisions in posterior-vegetal blastomeres, and the postplasmic/PEM RNAs it contains are involved in patterning the posterior region of the embryo. In this review, we discuss these multiple events and phases of reorganizations in detail and their relationship to physiological, cell cycle, and cytoskeletal events. We also examine the role of the reorganizations in localizing determinants, postplasmic/PEM RNAs, and PAR polarity proteins in the cortex. Finally, we summarize some of the remaining questions concerning polarization of the ascidian embryo and provide comparisons to a few other species. A large collection of films illustrating the reorganizations can be consulted by clicking on "Film archive: ascidian eggs and embryos" at http://biodev.obs-vlfr.fr/recherche/biomarcell/.

The role of mitochondrial function in the oocyte and embryo

Mitochondria have long been known to be the powerhouses of the cell but they also contribute to redox and Ca2+ homeostasis, provide intermediary metabolites and store proapoptotic factors. Mitochondria have a unique behavior during development. They are maternally transmitted with little (if any) paternal contribution, and they originate from a restricted founder population, which is amplified during oogenesis. Then, having established the full complement of mitochondria in the fully grown oocyte, there is no further increase of the mitochondrial population during early development. The localization of mitochondria in the egg during maturation and their segregation to blastomeres in the cleaving embryo are strictly regulated. Gradients in the distribution of mitochondria present in the egg have the potential to give rise to blastomeres receiving different numbers of mitochondria. Such maternally inherited differences in mitochondrial distribution are thought to play roles in defining the long-term viability of the blastomere in some cases and embryonic axes and patterning in others. Mitochondria may also regulate development by a number of other means, including modulating Ca2+ signaling, and the production of ATP, reactive oxygen species, and intermediary metabolites. If the participation of mitochondria in the regulation of sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations is now well established, the role of other properties of mitochondrial function during development remain largely unexplored probably due to the difficulty of accessing the mitochondrial compartment in an embryo. Maintaining a functional complement of maternally derived mitochondria is vital for the early embryo. Mitochondrial dysfunction may not only compromise developmental processes but also trigger apoptosis in the embryo. This dual role for mitochondria (to maintain life or to commit to cell death) may well represent a quality control system in the early embryo that will determine whether the embryo proceeds further into development or is quickly eliminated.

Dynamic redistribution of vasa homolog and exclusion of somatic cell determinants during germ cell specification in Ciona intestinalis

Ascidian embryos sequester a specific cytoplasm, called the postplasm, at the posterior pole, where many maternal RNAs and proteins accumulate. Although the postplasm is thought to act as the germ plasm, it is also highly enriched in several factors essential for somatic cell development, and how the postplasm components regulate both germ and somatic cell differentiation remains elusive. Using a vasa homolog, CiVH, and other postplasmic components as markers, we found that the postplasm-containing blastomeres, the B7.6 cells, undergo an asymmetric cell division during gastrulation to produce two distinct daughter cells: B8.11 and B8.12. Most of the postplasmic components segregate only into the B8.11 cells, which never coalesce into the gonad. By contrast, the maternal CiVH RNA and protein are specifically distributed into the B8.12 cells, which divide further and are incorporated into the gonad in juveniles. In the B8.12 cells, CiVH production is upregulated from the maternal RNA source, resulting in the formation of perinuclear CiVH granules, which may be the nuage, a hallmark of germ cells in many animal species. We propose that the redistribution of specific maternal molecules into the B8.12 cells is essential for germ-cell specification in ascidians.

Cellular morphogenesis in ascidians: how to shape a simple tadpole

Ascidians are invertebrate chordates that form tadpole larvae with a surprisingly small number of cells. Recently, the emergence of powerful molecular tools to study cell fate determination in ascidians has been complemented by studies, often at cellular resolution, of morphogenetic processes. These studies point to a complex interplay among mechanisms that control cell fate and polarity and those that govern cell shape change and morphogenesis. The relative simplicity and stereotypy of ascidian development suggests that it will be possible to understand, and possibly to mathematically model, this dynamic coupling between cell fate and shape change.