51
|
Bharadwaj R, Peter CJ, Jiang Y, Roussos P, Vogel-Ciernia A, Shen EY, Mitchell AC, Mao W, Whittle C, Dincer A, Jakovcevski M, Pothula V, Rasmussen TP, Giakoumaki SG, Bitsios P, Sherif A, Gardner PD, Ernst P, Ghose S, Sklar P, Haroutunian V, Tamminga C, Myers RH, Futai K, Wood MA, Akbarian S. Conserved higher-order chromatin regulates NMDA receptor gene expression and cognition. Neuron 2014; 84:997-1008. [PMID: 25467983 PMCID: PMC4258154 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Three-dimensional chromosomal conformations regulate transcription by moving enhancers and regulatory elements into spatial proximity with target genes. Here we describe activity-regulated long-range loopings bypassing up to 0.5 Mb of linear genome to modulate NMDA glutamate receptor GRIN2B expression in human and mouse prefrontal cortex. Distal intronic and 3' intergenic loop formations competed with repressor elements to access promoter-proximal sequences, and facilitated expression via a "cargo" of AP-1 and NRF-1 transcription factors and TALE-based transcriptional activators. Neuronal deletion or overexpression of Kmt2a/Mll1 H3K4- and Kmt1e/Setdb1 H3K9-methyltransferase was associated with higher-order chromatin changes at distal regulatory Grin2b sequences and impairments in working memory. Genetic polymorphisms and isogenic deletions of loop-bound sequences conferred liability for cognitive performance and decreased GRIN2B expression. Dynamic regulation of chromosomal conformations emerges as a novel layer for transcriptional mechanisms impacting neuronal signaling and cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Bharadwaj
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Cyril J Peter
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Yan Jiang
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Panos Roussos
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Institute for Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York, NY 10468, USA
| | - Annie Vogel-Ciernia
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Erica Y Shen
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Amanda C Mitchell
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Wenjie Mao
- Brudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01604, USA
| | - Catheryne Whittle
- Brudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01604, USA
| | - Aslihan Dincer
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | | | - Venu Pothula
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Theodore P Rasmussen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and U.Conn Stem Cell Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| | - Stella G Giakoumaki
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Crete, 71003 Iraklion, Greece; Department of Psychology, University of Crete, 71003 Iraklion, Greece
| | - Panos Bitsios
- Computational Medicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, 71003 Iraklion, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of Crete, 71003 Iraklion, Greece
| | - Ajfar Sherif
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Paul D Gardner
- Brudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01604, USA
| | - Patricia Ernst
- Department of Genetics and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Subroto Ghose
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Pamela Sklar
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Institute for Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Vahram Haroutunian
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York, NY 10468, USA
| | - Carol Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Richard H Myers
- Department of Neurology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Kensuke Futai
- Brudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01604, USA
| | - Marcelo A Wood
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Schahram Akbarian
- Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Schoborg T, Labrador M. Expanding the roles of chromatin insulators in nuclear architecture, chromatin organization and genome function. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014; 71:4089-113. [PMID: 25012699 PMCID: PMC11113341 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1672-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2014] [Revised: 05/31/2014] [Accepted: 06/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Of the numerous classes of elements involved in modulating eukaryotic chromosome structure and function, chromatin insulators arguably remain the most poorly understood in their contribution to these processes in vivo. Indeed, our view of chromatin insulators has evolved dramatically since their chromatin boundary and enhancer blocking properties were elucidated roughly a quarter of a century ago as a result of recent genome-wide, high-throughput methods better suited to probing the role of these elements in their native genomic contexts. The overall theme that has emerged from these studies is that chromatin insulators function as general facilitators of higher-order chromatin loop structures that exert both physical and functional constraints on the genome. In this review, we summarize the result of recent work that supports this idea as well as a number of other studies linking these elements to a diverse array of nuclear processes, suggesting that chromatin insulators exert master control over genome organization and behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Schoborg
- Department of Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, M407 Walters Life Sciences, 1414 Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
- Present Address: Laboratory of Molecular Machines and Tissue Architecture, Cell Biology and Physiology Center, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 50 South Dr Rm 2122, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
| | - Mariano Labrador
- Department of Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, M407 Walters Life Sciences, 1414 Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Lopez-Atalaya JP, Barco A. Can changes in histone acetylation contribute to memory formation? Trends Genet 2014; 30:529-39. [PMID: 25269450 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Revised: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/05/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Neuronal histone acetylation has been postulated to be a mnemonic substrate and a target for memory enhancers and neuropsychiatric drugs. Here we critically evaluate this view and examine the apparent conflict between the proposed instructive role for histone acetylation in memory-related transcription and the insights derived from genomic and genetic studies in other systems. We next discuss the suitability of activity-dependent neuronal histone acetylation as a mnemonic substrate and debate alternative interpretations of current evidence. We believe that further progress in our understanding of the role of histone acetylation and other epigenetic modifications in neuronal plasticity, memory, and neuropsychiatric disorders requires a clear discrimination between cause and effect so that novel epigenetics-related processes can be distinguished from classical transcriptional mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose P Lopez-Atalaya
- Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Av. Santiago Ramón y Cajal s/n. Sant Joan d'Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain
| | - Angel Barco
- Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Av. Santiago Ramón y Cajal s/n. Sant Joan d'Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Repetitive elements dynamics in cell identity programming, maintenance and disease. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2014; 31:67-73. [PMID: 25240822 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Revised: 09/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The days of 'junk DNA' seem to be over. The rapid progress of genomics technologies has been unveiling unexpected mechanisms by which repetitive DNA and in particular transposable elements (TEs) have evolved, becoming key issues in understanding genome structure and function. Indeed, rather than 'parasites', recent findings strongly suggest that TEs may have a positive function by contributing to tissue specific transcriptional programs, in particular as enhancer-like elements and/or modules for regulation of higher order chromatin structure. Further, it appears that during development and aging genomes experience several waves of TEs activation, and this contributes to individual genome shaping during lifetime. Interestingly, TEs activity is major target of epigenomic regulation. These findings are shedding new light on the genome-phenotype relationship and set the premises to help to explain complex disease manifestation, as consequence of TEs activity deregulation.
Collapse
|
55
|
Cohen AL, Jia S. Noncoding RNAs and the borders of heterochromatin. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA 2014; 5:835-47. [PMID: 25044367 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2014] [Revised: 04/30/2014] [Accepted: 05/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes contain long stretches of repetitive DNA sequences, which are the preferred sites for the assembly of heterochromatin structures. The formation of heterochromatin results in highly condensed chromosomal domains that limit the accessibility of DNA to the transcription and recombination machinery to maintain genome stability. Heterochromatin has the tendency to spread, and the formation of boundaries that block heterochromatin spreading is required to maintain stable gene expression patterns. Recent work has suggested that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are involved in regulating boundary formation in addition to their well-established roles in chromatin regulation. Here, we present a review of our current understanding of the involvement of ncRNA at the boundaries of heterochromatin, highlighting their mechanisms of action in different settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison L Cohen
- Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
The neuronal activity-driven transcriptome. Mol Neurobiol 2014; 51:1071-88. [PMID: 24935719 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-014-8772-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Accepted: 06/01/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Activity-driven transcription is a key event associated with long-lasting forms of neuronal plasticity. Despite the efforts to investigate the regulatory mechanisms that control this complex process and the important advances in the knowledge of the function of many activity-induced genes in neurons, as well as the specific contribution of activity-regulated transcription factors, our understanding of how activity-driven transcription operates at the systems biology level is still very limited. This review focuses on the research of neuronal activity-driven transcription from an "omics" perspective. We will discuss the different high-throughput approaches undertaken to characterize the gene programs downstream of specific activity-regulated transcription factors, including CREB, SRF, MeCP2, Fos, Npas4, and others, and the interplay between epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms underlying neuronal plasticity changes. Although basic questions remain unanswered and important challenges still lie ahead, the refinement of genome-wide techniques for investigating the neuronal transcriptome and epigenome promises great advances.
Collapse
|
57
|
Sheikh BN. Crafting the brain - role of histone acetyltransferases in neural development and disease. Cell Tissue Res 2014; 356:553-73. [PMID: 24788822 DOI: 10.1007/s00441-014-1835-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2013] [Accepted: 01/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The human brain is a highly specialized organ containing nearly 170 billion cells with specific functions. Development of the brain requires adequate proliferation, proper cell migration, differentiation and maturation of progenitors. This is in turn dependent on spatial and temporal coordination of gene transcription, which requires the integration of both cell intrinsic and environmental factors. Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) are one family of proteins that modulate expression levels of genes in a space- and time-dependent manner. HATs and their molecular complexes are able to integrate multiple molecular inputs and mediate transcriptional levels by acetylating histone proteins. In mammals, 19 HATs have been described and are separated into five families (p300/CBP, MYST, GNAT, NCOA and transcription-related HATs). During embryogenesis, individual HATs are expressed or activated at specific times and locations to coordinate proper development. Not surprisingly, mutations in HATs lead to severe developmental abnormalities in the nervous system and increased neurodegeneration. This review focuses on our current understanding of HATs and their biological roles during neural development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilal N Sheikh
- Division of Development and Cancer, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, 3052, Victoria, Australia,
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Abstract
Recent data support the view that epigenetic processes play a role in memory consolidation and help to transmit acquired memories even across generations in a Lamarckian manner. Drugs that target the epigenetic machinery were found to enhance memory function in rodents and ameliorate disease phenotypes in models for brain diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Chorea Huntington, Depression or Schizophrenia. In this review, I will give an overview on the current knowledge of epigenetic processes in memory function and brain disease with a focus on Morbus Alzheimer as the most common neurodegenerative disease. I will address the question whether an epigenetic therapy could indeed be a suitable therapeutic avenue to treat brain diseases and discuss the necessary steps that should help to take neuroepigenetic research to the next level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Alexander JM, Lomvardas S. Nuclear architecture as an epigenetic regulator of neural development and function. Neuroscience 2014; 264:39-50. [PMID: 24486963 PMCID: PMC4006947 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 01/11/2014] [Accepted: 01/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The nervous system of higher organisms is characterized by an enormous diversity of cell types that function in concert to carry out a myriad of neuronal functions. Differences in connectivity, and subsequent physiology of the connected neurons, are a result of differences in transcriptional programs. The extraordinary complexity of the nervous system requires an equally complex regulatory system. It is well established that transcription factor combinations and the organization of cis-regulatory sequences control commitment to differentiation programs and preserve a nuclear plasticity required for neuronal functions. However, an additional level of regulation is provided by epigenetic controls. Among various epigenetic processes, nuclear organization and the control of genome architecture emerge as an efficient and powerful form of gene regulation that meets the unique needs of the post-mitotic neuron. Here, we present an outline of how nuclear architecture affects transcription and provide examples from the recent literature where these principles are used by the nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Alexander
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - S Lomvardas
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Wilczynski GM. Significance of higher-order chromatin architecture for neuronal function and dysfunction. Neuropharmacology 2014; 80:28-33. [PMID: 24456745 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 01/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/09/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Recent studies in neurons indicate that the large-scale chromatin architectural framework, including chromosome territories or lamina-associated chromatin, undergoes dynamic changes that represent an emergent level of regulation of neuronal gene-expression. This phenomenon has been implicated in neuronal differentiation, long-term potentiation, seizures, and disorders of neural plasticity such as Rett syndrome and epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grzegorz M Wilczynski
- Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pasteura 3, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Abstract
This review highlights recent discoveries that have shaped the emerging viewpoints in the field of epigenetic influences in the central nervous system (CNS), focusing on the following questions: (i) How is the CNS shaped during development when precursor cells transition into morphologically and molecularly distinct cell types, and is this event driven by epigenetic alterations?; ii) How do epigenetic pathways control CNS function?; (iii) What happens to "epigenetic memory" during aging processes, and do these alterations cause CNS dysfunction?; (iv) Can one restore normal CNS function by manipulating the epigenome using pharmacologic agents, and will this ameliorate aging-related neurodegeneration? These and other still unanswered questions remain critical to understanding the impact of multifaceted epigenetic machinery on the age-related dysfunction of CNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Qiang Zhao
- />Buck Institute for Research on Aging, 8001 Redwood Boulevard, Novato, CA 94945-1400 USA
- />Department of Plastic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - I. King Jordan
- />School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA USA
- />PanAmerican Bioinformatics Institute, Santa Marta, Magdalena Colombia
| | - Victoria V. Lunyak
- />Buck Institute for Research on Aging, 8001 Redwood Boulevard, Novato, CA 94945-1400 USA
| |
Collapse
|