51
|
Colangelo NW, Azzam EI. The Importance and Clinical Implications of FLASH Ultra-High Dose-Rate Studies for Proton and Heavy Ion Radiotherapy. Radiat Res 2019; 193:1-4. [PMID: 31657670 DOI: 10.1667/rr15537.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The goal of radiation therapy is to provide the highest probability of tumor control while minimizing normal tissue toxicity. Recently, it has been discovered that ultra-high dose rates of ionizing radiation may preferentially spare normal tissue over tumor tissue. This effect, referred to as FLASH radiotherapy, has been observed in various animal models as well as, more recently, in a human patient. This effect may be related to the cell sparing found in vitro at ultra-high dose rates of photons and electrons dating back to the 1960s. Conditions representative of physiologic oxygen were found to be essential for this process to occur. However, there is no conclusive data on whether this effect occurs with protons, as all results to date have been in cells irradiated at ambient oxygen conditions. There have been no ultra-high dose-rate experiments with heavy ions, which would be relevant to the implementation of FLASH to carbon-ion therapy. These basic science results are critical in guiding this rapidly advancing field, since clinical particle therapy machines capable of FLASH dose rates have already been promoted for protons. To help ensure FLASH radiotherapy is reliable and maximally effective, the radiobiology must keep ahead of the clinical implementation to help guide it. In this context, in vitro and in vivo proton and heavy ion experiments involving FLASH dose rates need to be performed to evaluate not only short-term consequences, but also sequelae related to long-term health risks. Critical to these future studies is consideration of relevant oxygen tensions at the time of irradiation, as well as appropriate in silico modeling to assist in understanding the initial physicochemical events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas W Colangelo
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Jersey Medical School, Department of Radiology, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Edouard I Azzam
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Jersey Medical School, Department of Radiology, Newark, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Karsch L, Beyreuther E, Eger Passos D, Pawelke J, Löck S. Analysing Tumour Growth Delay Data from Animal Irradiation Experiments with Deviations from the Prescribed Dose. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11091281. [PMID: 31480456 PMCID: PMC6769440 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of new radiotherapy technologies is a long-term process, which requires proof of the general concept. However, clinical requirements with respect to beam quality and controlled dose delivery may not yet be fulfilled. Exemplarily, the necessary radiobiological experiments with laser-accelerated electrons are challenged by fluctuating beam intensities. Based on tumour-growth data and dose values obtained in an in vivo trial comparing the biological efficacy of laser-driven and conventional clinical Linac electrons, different statistical approaches for analysis were compared. In addition to the classical averaging per dose point, which excludes animals with high dose deviations, multivariable linear regression, Cox regression and a Monte-Carlo-based approach were tested as alternatives that include all animals in statistical analysis. The four methods were compared based on experimental and simulated data. All applied statistical approaches revealed a comparable radiobiological efficacy of laser-driven and conventional Linac electrons, confirming the experimental conclusion. In the simulation study, significant differences in dose response were detected by all methods except for the conventional method, which showed the lowest power. Thereby, the alternative statistical approaches may allow for reducing the total number of required animals in future pre-clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonhard Karsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Doreen Eger Passos
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Asavei T, Bobeica M, Nastasa V, Manda G, Naftanaila F, Bratu O, Mischianu D, Cernaianu MO, Ghenuche P, Savu D, Stutman D, Tanaka KA, Radu M, Doria D, Vasos PR. Laser-driven radiation: Biomarkers for molecular imaging of high dose-rate effects. Med Phys 2019; 46:e726-e734. [PMID: 31357243 PMCID: PMC6899889 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently developed short‐pulsed laser sources garner high dose‐rate beams such as energetic ions and electrons, x rays, and gamma rays. The biological effects of laser‐generated ion beams observed in recent studies are different from those triggered by radiation generated using classical accelerators or sources, and this difference can be used to develop new strategies for cancer radiotherapy. High‐power lasers can now deliver particles in doses of up to several Gy within nanoseconds. The fast interaction of laser‐generated particles with cells alters cell viability via distinct molecular pathways compared to traditional, prolonged radiation exposure. The emerging consensus of recent literature is that the differences are due to the timescales on which reactive molecules are generated and persist, in various forms. Suitable molecular markers have to be adopted to monitor radiation effects, addressing relevant endogenous molecules that are accessible for investigation by noninvasive procedures and enable translation to clinical imaging. High sensitivity has to be attained for imaging molecular biomarkers in cells and in vivo to follow radiation‐induced functional changes. Signal‐enhanced MRI biomarkers enriched with stable magnetic nuclear isotopes can be used to monitor radiation effects, as demonstrated recently by the use of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) for biomolecular observations in vivo. In this context, nanoparticles can also be used as radiation enhancers or biomarker carriers. The radiobiology‐relevant features of high dose‐rate secondary radiation generated using high‐power lasers and the importance of noninvasive biomarkers for real‐time monitoring the biological effects of radiation early on during radiation pulse sequences are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodor Asavei
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Mariana Bobeica
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Viorel Nastasa
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.,National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Gina Manda
- Cellular and Molecular Medicine Department, "Victor Babes" National Institute of Pathology, 99-101 Splaiul Independentei, Bucharest, 050096, Romania
| | - Florin Naftanaila
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Dr Carol Davila Central Mil University Emergency Hospital, 88th Mircea Vulcanescu Str, Bucharest, Romania.,Amethyst Radiotherapy Clinic, Dr Odaii 42, Otopeni, Romania
| | - Ovidiu Bratu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Dr Carol Davila Central Mil University Emergency Hospital, 88th Mircea Vulcanescu Str, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dan Mischianu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Dr Carol Davila Central Mil University Emergency Hospital, 88th Mircea Vulcanescu Str, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihail O Cernaianu
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Petru Ghenuche
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Diana Savu
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Dan Stutman
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.,National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.,Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, USA
| | - Kazuo A Tanaka
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Mihai Radu
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - Domenico Doria
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.,Centre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, United Kingdom
| | - Paul R Vasos
- Extreme Light Infrastructure - Nuclear Physics ELI-NP, "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului Street, RO-077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.,Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), 36-46 B-dul M. Kogalniceanu, RO-050107, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Simulation of a radiobiology facility for the Centre for the Clinical Application of Particles. Phys Med 2019; 65:21-28. [PMID: 31430582 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The Centre for the Clinical Application of Particles' Laser-hybrid Accelerator for Radiobiological Applications (LhARA) facility is being studied and requires simulation of novel accelerator components (such as the Gabor lens capture system), detector simulation and simulation of the ion beam interaction with cells. The first stage of LhARA will provide protons up to 15 MeV for in vitro studies. The second stage of LhARA will use a fixed-field accelerator to increase the energy of the particles to allow in vivo studies with protons and in vitro studies with heavier ions. BDSIM, a Geant4 based accelerator simulation tool, has been used to perform particle tracking simulations to verify the beam optics design done by BeamOptics and these show good agreement. Design parameters were defined based on an EPOCH simulation of the laser source and a series of mono-energetic input beams were generated from this by BDSIM. The tracking results show the large angular spread of the input beam (0.2 rad) can be transported with a transmission of almost 100% whilst keeping divergence at the end station very low (<0.1 mrad). The legacy of LhARA will be the demonstration of technologies that could drive a step-change in the provision of proton and light ion therapy (i.e. a laser source coupled to a Gabor lens capture and a fixed-field accelerator), and a system capable of delivering a comprehensive set of experimental data that can be used to enhance the clinical application of proton and light ion therapy.
Collapse
|
55
|
Vitti ET, Parsons JL. The Radiobiological Effects of Proton Beam Therapy: Impact on DNA Damage and Repair. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11070946. [PMID: 31284432 PMCID: PMC6679138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers significant benefit over conventional (photon) radiotherapy for the treatment of a number of different human cancers, largely due to the physical characteristics. In particular, the low entrance dose and maximum energy deposition in depth at a well-defined region, the Bragg peak, can spare irradiation of proximal healthy tissues and organs at risk when compared to conventional radiotherapy using high-energy photons. However, there are still biological uncertainties reflected in the relative biological effectiveness that varies along the track of the proton beam as a consequence of the increases in linear energy transfer (LET). Furthermore, the spectrum of DNA damage induced by protons, particularly the generation of complex DNA damage (CDD) at high-LET regions of the distal edge of the Bragg peak, and the specific DNA repair pathways dependent on their repair are not entirely understood. This knowledge is essential in understanding the biological impact of protons on tumor cells, and ultimately in devising optimal therapeutic strategies employing PBT for greater clinical impact and patient benefit. Here, we provide an up-to-date review on the radiobiological effects of PBT versus photon radiotherapy in cells, particularly in the context of DNA damage. We also review the DNA repair pathways that are essential in the cellular response to PBT, with a specific focus on the signaling and processing of CDD induced by high-LET protons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Terpsi Vitti
- Cancer Research Centre, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 9TA, UK
| | - Jason L Parsons
- Cancer Research Centre, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 9TA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Beyreuther E, Brand M, Hans S, Hideghéty K, Karsch L, Leßmann E, Schürer M, Szabó ER, Pawelke J. Feasibility of proton FLASH effect tested by zebrafish embryo irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2019; 139:46-50. [PMID: 31266652 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Motivated by first animal trials showing the normal tissue protecting effect of electron and photon Flash irradiation, i.e. at mean dose rates of 100 Gy/s and higher, relative to conventional beam delivery over minutes the feasibility of proton Flash should be assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS A setup and beam parameter settings for the treatment of zebrafish embryo with proton Flash and proton beams of conventional dose rate were established at the University Proton Therapy Dresden. Zebrafish embryos were treated with graded doses and the differential effect on embryonic survival and the induction of morphological malformations was followed for up to four days after irradiation. RESULTS Beam parameters for the realization of proton Flash were set and tested with respect to controlled dose delivery to biological samples. Analyzing the dose dependent embryonic survival and the rate of spinal curvature as one type of developmental abnormality, no significant influence of proton dose rate was revealed. For the rate of pericardial edema as acute radiation effect, a significant difference (p < 0.05) between proton Flash and protons delivered at conventional dose rate of 5 Gy/min was observed for one dose point only. CONCLUSION The feasibility of Flash proton irradiation was successfully shown, whereas more experiments are required to confirm the presence or absence of a protecting effect and to figure out the limits and requirements for the Flash effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Beyreuther
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.
| | - Michael Brand
- Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengeneering (CMCB), DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Hans
- Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengeneering (CMCB), DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Katalin Hideghéty
- Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-HU Nonprofit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary
| | - Leonhard Karsch
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Leßmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Germany
| | | | - Emília Rita Szabó
- Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-HU Nonprofit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Bozhenko VK, Ivanov AV, Kulinich TM, Smirnov VP, Shishkin AM, Solodky VA. Comparison of Biological Effects of γ-Radiation of Low and Ultra-High Dose Rate on Lymphocytes and Cultured Human Malignant Lymphoma Cells. Bull Exp Biol Med 2019; 166:785-787. [PMID: 31028581 DOI: 10.1007/s10517-019-04440-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
We studied the effect of low and high-dose rate photon radiation on activation of cell death by apoptosis and necrosis in malignant cell lines of lymphocytic origin Raji and Jurkat (human B and T-cell lymphomas) and normal human lymphocytes from healthy volunteers. It was shown that photon radiation with ultra-high dose rate induced significantly higher levels of "early" apoptosis and lower levels of necrosis compared to γ-radiation with dose rate used for radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V K Bozhenko
- Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
| | - A V Ivanov
- Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - T M Kulinich
- Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - V P Smirnov
- Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - A M Shishkin
- Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - V A Solodky
- Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Comparison of Proton and Photon Beam Irradiation in Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury Using a Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20081894. [PMID: 30999572 PMCID: PMC6514697 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20081894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
When radiotherapy is applied to the abdomen or pelvis, normal tissue toxicity in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is considered a major dose-limiting factor. Proton beam therapy has a specific advantage in terms of reduced doses to normal tissues. This study investigated the fundamental differences between proton- and X-ray-induced intestinal injuries in mouse models. C57BL/6J mice were irradiated with 6-MV X-rays or 230-MeV protons and were sacrificed after 84 h. The number of surviving crypts per circumference of the jejunum was identified using Hematoxylin and Eosin staining. Diverse intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations and apoptotic cells were analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay, respectively. The crypt microcolony assay revealed a radiation-dose-dependent decrease in the number of regenerative crypts in the mouse jejunum; proton irradiation was more effective than X-ray irradiation with a relative biological effectiveness of 1.14. The jejunum is the most sensitive to radiations, followed by the ileum and the colon. Both types of radiation therapy decreased the number of radiosensitive, active cycling ISC populations. However, a higher number of radioresistant, reserve ISC populations and Paneth cells were eradicated by proton irradiation than X-ray irradiation, as shown in the IHC analyses. The TUNEL assay revealed that proton irradiation was more effective in enhancing apoptotic cell death than X-ray irradiation. This study conducted a detailed analysis on the effects of proton irradiation versus X-ray irradiation on intestinal crypt regeneration in mouse models. Our findings revealed that proton irradiation has a direct effect on ISC populations, which may result in an increase in the risk of GI toxicity during proton beam therapy.
Collapse
|
59
|
Buonanno M, Grilj V, Brenner DJ. Biological effects in normal cells exposed to FLASH dose rate protons. Radiother Oncol 2019; 139:51-55. [PMID: 30850209 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy outcomes are limited by toxicity in the healthy tissues surrounding the irradiated tumor. Recent pre-clinical studies have shown that irradiations with electrons or photons delivered at so called FLASH dose rates (i.e. >40 Gy/s) dramatically reduce adverse side effects in the normal tissues while being equally efficient for tumor control as irradiations at conventional dose rates (3-5 cGy/s). In the case of protons however, FLASH effects have not been investigated partially because of the limited availability of facilities that can achieve such high dose rates. METHODS Using a novel irradiation platform, we measured acute and long-term biological effects in normal human lung fibroblasts (IMR90) exposed to therapeutically relevant doses of 4.5 MeV protons (LET = 10 keV/µm) delivered at dose rates spanning four orders of magnitude. Endpoints included clonogenic cell survival, γH2AX foci formation, induction of premature senescence (β-gal), and the expression of the pro-inflammatory marker TGFβ. RESULTS Proton dose rate had no influence on the cell survival, but for the highest dose rate used (i.e. 1000 Gy/s) foci formation saturated beyond 10 Gy. In the progeny of irradiated cells, an increase in dose (20 Gy vs. 10 Gy) and dose rate (1000 Gy/s vs. 0.05 Gy/s) positively affected the number of senescence cells and the expression of TGFβ1. CONCLUSIONS In normal lung fibroblasts proton dose rate had little impact on acute effects, but significantly influenced the expression of long-term biological responses in vitro. Compared to conventional dose rates, protons delivered at FLASH dose rates mitigated such delayed detrimental effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Buonanno
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility (RARAF), New York, United States.
| | - Veljko Grilj
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility (RARAF), New York, United States.
| | - David J Brenner
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility (RARAF), New York, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Paganetti H, Blakely E, Carabe-Fernandez A, Carlson DJ, Das IJ, Dong L, Grosshans D, Held KD, Mohan R, Moiseenko V, Niemierko A, Stewart RD, Willers H. Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys 2019; 46:e53-e78. [PMID: 30661238 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The biological effectiveness of proton beams relative to photon beams in radiation therapy has been taken to be 1.1 throughout the history of proton therapy. While potentially appropriate as an average value, actual relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values may differ. This Task Group report outlines the basic concepts of RBE as well as the biophysical interpretation and mathematical concepts. The current knowledge on RBE variations is reviewed and discussed in the context of the current clinical use of RBE and the clinical relevance of RBE variations (with respect to physical as well as biological parameters). The following task group aims were designed to guide the current clinical practice: Assess whether the current clinical practice of using a constant RBE for protons should be revised or maintained. Identifying sites and treatment strategies where variable RBE might be utilized for a clinical benefit. Assess the potential clinical consequences of delivering biologically weighted proton doses based on variable RBE and/or LET models implemented in treatment planning systems. Recommend experiments needed to improve our current understanding of the relationships among in vitro, in vivo, and clinical RBE, and the research required to develop models. Develop recommendations to minimize the effects of uncertainties associated with proton RBE for well-defined tumor types and critical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | - David J Carlson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- New York University Langone Medical Center & Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn D Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert D Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Paganetti H. Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities. Int J Part Ther 2018; 5:2-14. [PMID: 30370315 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00011.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy treatments are prescribed using a biological effectiveness relative to photon therapy of 1.1, that is, proton beams are considered to be 10% more biologically effective. Debate is ongoing as to whether this practice needs to be revised. This short review summarizes current knowledge on relative biological effectiveness variations and uncertainties in vitro and in vivo. Clinical relevance is discussed and strategies toward biologically guided treatment planning are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Monte Carlo GEANT4-based application for in vivo RBE study using small animals at LNS-INFN preclinical hadrontherapy facility. Phys Med 2018; 54:173-178. [PMID: 30037452 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Preclinical studies represent an important step towards a deep understanding of the biological response to ionizing radiations. The effectiveness of proton therapy is higher than photons and, for clinical purposes, a fixed value of 1.1 is used for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons considered 1.1. Recent in vitro studies have reported that the RBE along the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) is not constant and, in particular, the RBE value increases on the distal part of SOBP. The present work has been carried-out in the perspective of a preclinical hadrontherapy facility at LNS-INFN and was focused on the experimental preparation of an in vivo study concerning the RBE variation along the SOBP. The main purpose of this work was to determine, using GEANT4-based Monte Carlo simulations, the best configuration for small animal treatments. The developed GEANT4 application simulates the proton-therapy beam line of LNS-INFN (CATANA facility) and allows to import the DICOM-CT images as targets. The RBE will be evaluated using a deterministic radiation damage like myelopathy as end-point. In fact, the dose at which the 50% of animals will show the myelopathy is supposed to be LET-dependent. In this work, we studied different treatment configurations in order to choose the best two that maximize the LET difference reducing as much as possible the dose released to healthy tissue. The results will be useful to plan hadrontherapy treatments for preclinical in vivo studies and, in particular, for the future in vivo RBE studies.
Collapse
|
63
|
Relative Biological Effectiveness Uncertainties and Implications for Beam Arrangements and Dose Constraints in Proton Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:256-263. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
64
|
Toward A variable RBE for proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:68-75. [PMID: 29910006 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In the clinic, proton beam therapy (PBT) is based on the use of a generic relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 compared to photons in human cancers and normal tissues. However, the experimental basis for this RBE lacks any significant number of representative tumor models and clinically relevant endpoints for dose-limiting organs at risk. It is now increasingly appreciated that much of the variations of treatment responses in cancers are due to inter-tumoral genomic heterogeneity. Indeed, recently it has been shown that defects in certain DNA repair pathways, which are found in subsets of many cancers, are associated with a RBE increase in vitro. However, there currently exist little in vivo or clinical data that confirm the existence of similarly increased RBE values in human cancers. Furthermore, evidence for variable RBE values for normal tissue toxicity has been sparse and conflicting to date. If we could predict variable RBE values in patients, we would be able to optimally use and personalize PBT. For example, predictive tumor biomarkers may facilitate selection of patients with proton-sensitive cancers previously ineligible for PBT. Dose de-escalation may be possible to reduce normal tissue toxicity, especially in pediatric patients. Knowledge of increased tumor RBE may allow us to develop biologically optimized therapies to enhance local control while RBE biomarkers for normal tissues could lead to a better understanding and prevention of unusual PBT-associated toxicity. Here, we will review experimental data on the repair of proton damage to DNA that impact both RBE values and biophysical modeling to predict RBE variations. Experimental approaches for studying proton sensitivity in vitro and in vivo will be reviewed as well and recent clinical findings discussed. Ultimately, therapeutically exploiting the understudied biological advantages of protons and developing approaches to limit treatment toxicity should fundamentally impact the clinical use of PBT.
Collapse
|
65
|
Lühr A, von Neubeck C, Pawelke J, Seidlitz A, Peitzsch C, Bentzen SM, Bortfeld T, Debus J, Deutsch E, Langendijk JA, Loeffler JS, Mohan R, Scholz M, Sørensen BS, Weber DC, Baumann M, Krause M. "Radiobiology of Proton Therapy": Results of an international expert workshop. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:56-67. [PMID: 29861141 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The physical properties of proton beams offer the potential to reduce toxicity in tumor-adjacent normal tissues. Toward this end, the number of proton radiotherapy facilities has steeply increased over the last 10-15 years to currently around 70 operational centers worldwide. However, taking full advantage of the opportunities offered by proton radiation for clinical radiotherapy requires a better understanding of the radiobiological effects of protons alone or combined with drugs or immunotherapy on normal tissues and tumors. This report summarizes the main results of the international expert workshop "Radiobiology of Proton Therapy" that was held in November 2016 in Dresden. It addresses the major topics (1) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton beam therapy, (2) interaction of proton radiobiology with radiation physics in current treatment planning, (3) biological effects in proton therapy combined with systemic treatments, and (4) testing biological effects of protons in clinical trials. Finally, important research avenues for improvement of proton radiotherapy based on radiobiological knowledge are identified. The clinical distribution of radiobiological effectiveness of protons alone or in combination with systemic chemo- or immunotherapies as well as patient stratification based on biomarker expressions are key to reach the full potential of proton beam therapy. Dedicated preclinical experiments, innovative clinical trial designs, and large high-quality data repositories will be most important to achieve this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Lühr
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Seidlitz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Claudia Peitzsch
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health and the Maryland Proton Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Physics Division, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Heidelberg German Consortium for Translational Oncology (DKTK), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INSERM, 1030 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Medecine du Kremlin Bicetre Paris Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jay S Loeffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Michael Scholz
- GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Department of Biophysics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Brita S Sørensen
- Dept. Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Michael Baumann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
Vyšín L, Burian T, Ukraintsev E, Davídková M, Grisham ME, Heinbuch S, Rocca JJ, Juha L. Dose-Rate Effects in Breaking DNA Strands by Short Pulses of Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation. Radiat Res 2018; 189:466-476. [PMID: 29505347 DOI: 10.1667/rr14825.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we examined dose-rate effects on strand break formation in plasmid DNA induced by pulsed extreme ultraviolet (XUV) radiation. Dose delivered to the target molecule was controlled by attenuating the incident photon flux using aluminum filters as well as by changing the DNA/buffer-salt ratio in the irradiated sample. Irradiated samples were examined using agarose gel electrophoresis. Yields of single- and double-strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs) were determined as a function of the incident photon fluence. In addition, electrophoresis also revealed DNA cross-linking. Damaged DNA was inspected by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM). Both SSB and DSB yields decreased with dose rate increase. Quantum yields of SSBs at the highest photon fluence were comparable to yields of DSBs found after synchrotron irradiation. The average SSB/DSB ratio decreased only slightly at elevated dose rates. In conclusion, complex and/or clustered damages other than cross-links do not appear to be induced under the radiation conditions applied in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luděk Vyšín
- a Institute of Physics.,e Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Burian
- a Institute of Physics.,c Institute of Plasma Physics.,d J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Michael E Grisham
- f Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Scott Heinbuch
- f Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Jorge J Rocca
- f Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Libor Juha
- a Institute of Physics.,c Institute of Plasma Physics
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Karsch L, Beyreuther E, Enghardt W, Gotz M, Masood U, Schramm U, Zeil K, Pawelke J. Towards ion beam therapy based on laser plasma accelerators. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1359-1366. [PMID: 28828925 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1355111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Only few ten radiotherapy facilities worldwide provide ion beams, in spite of their physical advantage of better achievable tumor conformity of the dose compared to conventional photon beams. Since, mainly the large size and high costs hinder their wider spread, great efforts are ongoing to develop more compact ion therapy facilities. One promising approach for smaller facilities is the acceleration of ions on micrometre scale by high intensity lasers. Laser accelerators deliver pulsed beams with a low pulse repetition rate, but a high number of ions per pulse, broad energy spectra and high divergences. A clinical use of a laser based ion beam facility requires not only a laser accelerator providing beams of therapeutic quality, but also new approaches for beam transport, dosimetric control and tumor conformal dose delivery procedure together with the knowledge of the radiobiological effectiveness of laser-driven beams. Over the last decade research was mainly focused on protons and progress was achieved in all important challenges. Although currently the maximum proton energy is not yet high enough for patient irradiation, suggestions and solutions have been reported for compact beam transport and dose delivery procedures, respectively, as well as for precise dosimetric control. Radiobiological in vitro and in vivo studies show no indications of an altered biological effectiveness of laser-driven beams. Laser based facilities will hardly improve the availability of ion beams for patient treatment in the next decade. Nevertheless, there are possibilities for a need of laser based therapy facilities in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonhard Karsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Enghardt
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | - Malte Gotz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Umar Masood
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schramm
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karl Zeil
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Babayan N, Hovhannisyan G, Grigoryan B, Grigoryan R, Sarkisyan N, Tsakanova G, Haroutiunian S, Aroutiounian R. Dose-rate effect of ultrashort electron beam radiation on DNA damage and repair in vitro. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2017; 58:894-897. [PMID: 28992052 PMCID: PMC5737585 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Laser-generated electron beams are distinguished from conventional accelerated particles by ultrashort beam pulses in the femtoseconds to picoseconds duration range, and their application may elucidate primary radiobiological effects. The aim of the present study was to determine the dose-rate effect of laser-generated ultrashort pulses of 4 MeV electron beam radiation on DNA damage and repair in human cells. The dose rate was increased via changing the pulse repetition frequency, without increasing the electron energy. The human chronic myeloid leukemia K-562 cell line was used to estimate the DNA damage and repair after irradiation, via the comet assay. A distribution analysis of the DNA damage was performed. The same mean level of initial DNA damages was observed at low (3.6 Gy/min) and high (36 Gy/min) dose-rate irradiation. In the case of low-dose-rate irradiation, the detected DNA damages were completely repairable, whereas the high-dose-rate irradiation demonstrated a lower level of reparability. The distribution analysis of initial DNA damages after high-dose-rate irradiation revealed a shift towards higher amounts of damage and a broadening in distribution. Thus, increasing the dose rate via changing the pulse frequency of ultrafast electrons leads to an increase in the complexity of DNA damages, with a consequent decrease in their reparability. Since the application of an ultrashort pulsed electron beam permits us to describe the primary radiobiological effects, it can be assumed that the observed dose-rate effect on DNA damage/repair is mainly caused by primary lesions appearing at the moment of irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelly Babayan
- Yerevan State University, Alex Manoogian 1, 0025 Yerevan, Armenia
- Institute of Molecular Biology of NAS, Hasratyan 7, 0014 Yerevan, Armenia
- Corresponding author. Institute of Molecular Biology of NAS, Hasratyan 7, 0014 Yerevan, Armenia. Tel: +37491-572573; Fax: +37410-282061;
| | | | - Bagrat Grigoryan
- CANDLE Synchrotron Research Institute, Acharyan 31, 0040, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Ruzanna Grigoryan
- Institute of Molecular Biology of NAS, Hasratyan 7, 0014 Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Natalia Sarkisyan
- Institute of Molecular Biology of NAS, Hasratyan 7, 0014 Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Gohar Tsakanova
- Institute of Molecular Biology of NAS, Hasratyan 7, 0014 Yerevan, Armenia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
69
|
Schüler E, Trovati S, King G, Lartey F, Rafat M, Villegas M, Praxel AJ, Loo BW, Maxim PG. Experimental Platform for Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Irradiation of Small Animals Using a Clinical Linear Accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:195-203. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Revised: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
70
|
Wang L, Wang X, Li Y, Han S, Zhu J, Wang X, Molkentine DP, Blanchard P, Yang Y, Zhang R, Sahoo N, Gillin M, Zhu XR, Zhang X, Myers JN, Frank SJ. Human papillomavirus status and the relative biological effectiveness of proton radiotherapy in head and neck cancer cells. Head Neck 2016; 39:708-715. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Xiaochun Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Yuting Li
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Shichao Han
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Jinming Zhu
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Xiaofang Wang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - David P. Molkentine
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Yining Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Ruiping Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Michael Gillin
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Jeffrey N. Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Ford E, Emery R, Huff D, Narayanan M, Schwartz J, Cao N, Meyer J, Rengan R, Zeng J, Sandison G, Laramore G, Mayr N. An image-guided precision proton radiation platform for preclinicalin vivoresearch. Phys Med Biol 2016; 62:43-58. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
72
|
Laschinsky L, Karsch L, Leßmann E, Oppelt M, Pawelke J, Richter C, Schürer M, Beyreuther E. Radiobiological influence of megavoltage electron pulses of ultra-high pulse dose rate on normal tissue cells. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2016; 55:381-91. [PMID: 27193178 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0652-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Regarding the long-term goal to develop and establish laser-based particle accelerators for a future radiotherapeutic treatment of cancer, the radiobiological consequences of the characteristic short intense particle pulses with ultra-high peak dose rate, but low repetition rate of laser-driven beams have to be investigated. This work presents in vitro experiments performed at the radiation source ELBE (Electron Linac for beams with high Brilliance and low Emittance). This accelerator delivered 20-MeV electron pulses with ultra-high pulse dose rate of 10(10) Gy/min either at the low pulse frequency analogue to previous cell experiments with laser-driven electrons or at high frequency for minimizing the prolonged dose delivery and to perform comparison irradiation with a quasi-continuous electron beam analogue to a clinically used linear accelerator. The influence of the different electron beam pulse structures on the radiobiological response of the normal tissue cell line 184A1 and two primary fibroblasts was investigated regarding clonogenic survival and the number of DNA double-strand breaks that remain 24 h after irradiation. Thereby, no considerable differences in radiation response were revealed both for biological endpoints and for all probed cell cultures. These results provide evidence that the radiobiological effectiveness of the pulsed electron beams is not affected by the ultra-high pulse dose rates alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Laschinsky
- OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, P.O. Box 510119, 01314, Dresden, Germany
- Menarini - Von Heyden GmbH, Leipziger Straße 7 - 13, 01097, Dresden, Germany
| | - Leonhard Karsch
- OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Leßmann
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, P.O. Box 510119, 01314, Dresden, Germany
| | - Melanie Oppelt
- OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, P.O. Box 510119, 01314, Dresden, Germany
- Quintiles GmbH, Hugenottenallee 167, 63263, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, P.O. Box 510119, 01314, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, P.O. Box 510119, 01314, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Schürer
- OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, P.O. Box 510119, 01314, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Vyšín L, Pachnerová Brabcová K, Štěpán V, Moretto-Capelle P, Bugler B, Legube G, Cafarelli P, Casta R, Champeaux JP, Sence M, Vlk M, Wagner R, Štursa J, Zach V, Incerti S, Juha L, Davídková M. Proton-induced direct and indirect damage of plasmid DNA. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2015; 54:343-352. [PMID: 26007308 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-015-0605-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Clustered DNA damage induced by 10, 20 and 30 MeV protons in pBR322 plasmid DNA was investigated. Besides determination of strand breaks, additional lesions were detected using base excision repair enzymes. The plasmid was irradiated in dry form, where indirect radiation effects were almost fully suppressed, and in water solution containing only minimal residual radical scavenger. Simultaneous irradiation of the plasmid DNA in the dry form and in the solution demonstrated the contribution of the indirect effect as prevalent. The damage composition slightly differed when comparing the results for liquid and dry samples. The obtained data were also subjected to analysis concerning different methodological approaches, particularly the influence of irradiation geometry, models used for calculation of strand break yields and interpretation of the strand breaks detected with the enzymes. It was shown that these parameters strongly affect the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luděk Vyšín
- Institute of Physics CAS, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 21, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
74
|
Schmid TE, Friedland W, Greubel C, Girst S, Reindl J, Siebenwirth C, Ilicic K, Schmid E, Multhoff G, Schmitt E, Kundrát P, Dollinger G. Sub-micrometer 20MeV protons or 45MeV lithium spot irradiation enhances yields of dicentric chromosomes due to clustering of DNA double-strand breaks. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS 2015; 793:30-40. [PMID: 26520370 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 07/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
In conventional experiments on biological effects of radiation types of diverse quality, micrometer-scale double-strand break (DSB) clustering is inherently interlinked with clustering of energy deposition events on nanometer scale relevant for DSB induction. Due to this limitation, the role of the micrometer and nanometer scales in diverse biological endpoints cannot be fully separated. To address this issue, hybrid human-hamster AL cells have been irradiated with 45MeV (60keV/μm) lithium ions or 20MeV (2.6keV/μm) protons quasi-homogeneously distributed or focused to 0.5×1μm(2) spots on regular matrix patterns (point distances up to 10.6×10.6μm), with pre-defined particle numbers per spot to provide the same mean dose of 1.7Gy. The yields of dicentrics and their distribution among cells have been scored. In parallel, track-structure based simulations of DSB induction and chromosome aberration formation with PARTRAC have been performed. The results show that the sub-micrometer beam focusing does not enhance DSB yields, but significantly affects the DSB distribution within the nucleus and increases the chance to form DSB pairs in close proximity, which may lead to increased yields of chromosome aberrations. Indeed, the experiments show that focusing 20 lithium ions or 451 protons per spot on a 10.6μm grid induces two or three times more dicentrics, respectively, than a quasi-homogenous irradiation. The simulations reproduce the data in part, but in part suggest more complex behavior such as saturation or overkill not seen in the experiments. The direct experimental demonstration that sub-micrometer clustering of DSB plays a critical role in the induction of dicentrics improves the knowledge on the mechanisms by which these lethal lesions arise, and indicates how the assumptions of the biophysical model could be improved. It also provides a better understanding of the increased biological effectiveness of high-LET radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany.
| | - W Friedland
- Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - C Greubel
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - S Girst
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - J Reindl
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - C Siebenwirth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany; Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - K Ilicic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - E Schmid
- Department for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Germany
| | - G Multhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - E Schmitt
- Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - P Kundrát
- Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - G Dollinger
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Oppelt M, Baumann M, Bergmann R, Beyreuther E, Brüchner K, Hartmann J, Karsch L, Krause M, Laschinsky L, Leßmann E, Nicolai M, Reuter M, Richter C, Sävert A, Schnell M, Schürer M, Woithe J, Kaluza M, Pawelke J. Comparison study of in vivo dose response to laser-driven versus conventional electron beam. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2015; 54:155-166. [PMID: 25600561 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0582-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 12/20/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The long-term goal to integrate laser-based particle accelerators into radiotherapy clinics not only requires technological development of high-intensity lasers and new techniques for beam detection and dose delivery, but also characterization of the biological consequences of this new particle beam quality, i.e. ultra-short, ultra-intense pulses. In the present work, we describe successful in vivo experiments with laser-driven electron pulses by utilization of a small tumour model on the mouse ear for the human squamous cell carcinoma model FaDu. The already established in vitro irradiation technology at the laser system JETI was further enhanced for 3D tumour irradiation in vivo in terms of beam transport, beam monitoring, dose delivery and dosimetry in order to precisely apply a prescribed dose to each tumour in full-scale radiobiological experiments. Tumour growth delay was determined after irradiation with doses of 3 and 6 Gy by laser-accelerated electrons. Reference irradiation was performed with continuous electron beams at a clinical linear accelerator in order to both validate the dedicated dosimetry employed for laser-accelerated JETI electrons and above all review the biological results. No significant difference in radiation-induced tumour growth delay was revealed for the two investigated electron beams. These data provide evidence that the ultra-high dose rate generated by laser acceleration does not impact the biological effectiveness of the particles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Oppelt
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
76
|
Paganetti H. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59:R419-72. [PMID: 25361443 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/r419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 657] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy treatments are based on a proton RBE (relative biological effectiveness) relative to high-energy photons of 1.1. The use of this generic, spatially invariant RBE within tumors and normal tissues disregards the evidence that proton RBE varies with linear energy transfer (LET), physiological and biological factors, and clinical endpoint. Based on the available experimental data from published literature, this review analyzes relationships of RBE with dose, biological endpoint and physical properties of proton beams. The review distinguishes between endpoints relevant for tumor control probability and those potentially relevant for normal tissue complication. Numerous endpoints and experiments on sub-cellular damage and repair effects are discussed. Despite the large amount of data, considerable uncertainties in proton RBE values remain. As an average RBE for cell survival in the center of a typical spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), the data support a value of ~1.15 at 2 Gy/fraction. The proton RBE increases with increasing LETd and thus with depth in an SOBP from ~1.1 in the entrance region, to ~1.15 in the center, ~1.35 at the distal edge and ~1.7 in the distal fall-off (when averaged over all cell lines, which may not be clinically representative). For small modulation widths the values could be increased. Furthermore, there is a trend of an increase in RBE as (α/β)x decreases. In most cases the RBE also increases with decreasing dose, specifically for systems with low (α/β)x. Data on RBE for endpoints other than clonogenic cell survival are too diverse to allow general statements other than that the RBE is, on average, in line with a value of ~1.1. This review can serve as a source for defining input parameters for applying or refining biophysical models and to identify endpoints where additional radiobiological data are needed in order to reduce the uncertainties to clinically acceptable levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 30 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|