Development of Specific, Irreversible Inhibitors for a Receptor Tyrosine Kinase EphB3

Erythropoietin-producing human hepatocellular carcinoma (Eph) receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) regulate a variety of dynamic cellular events, including cell protrusion, migration, proliferation, and cell-fate determination. Small-molecule inhibitors of Eph kinases are valuable tools for dissecting the physiological and pathological roles of Eph. However, there is a lack of small-molecule inhibitors that are selective for individual Eph isoforms due to the high homology within the family. Herein, we report the development of the first potent and specific inhibitors of a single Eph isoform, EphB3. Through structural bioinformatic analysis, we identified a cysteine in the hinge region of the EphB3 kinase domain, a feature that is not shared with any other human kinases. We synthesized and characterized a series of electrophilic quinazolines to target this unique, reactive feature in EphB3. Some of the electrophilic quinazolines selectively and potently inhibited EphB3 both in vitro and in cells. Cocrystal structures of EphB3 in complex with two quinazolines confirmed the covalent linkage between the protein and the inhibitors. A "clickable" version of an optimized inhibitor was created and employed to verify specific target engagement in the whole proteome and to probe the extent and kinetics of target engagement of existing EphB3 inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the autophosphorylation of EphB3 within the juxtamembrane region occurs in trans using a specific inhibitor. These exquisitely specific inhibitors will facilitate the dissection of EphB3's role in various biological processes and disease contribution.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of gefitinib predict efficacy and toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

PURPOSE

The relationship between plasma concentration and antitumor activity of gefitinib was assessed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Plasma trough levels of gefitinib were measured on days 2 (D2) and 8 (D8) by high-performance liquid chromatography in 31 patients. Plasma concentrations of gefitinib were also measured 10 h after the first administration in 21 of these patients to calculate the elimination half-life of gefitinib.

RESULTS

The median trough levels were: 197 ng/ml 10 h from the first administration of gefitinib; 113 ng/ml on D2; and 358 ng/ml on D8. The median D8/D2 ratio was 2.709, and the median elimination half-life was 15.7 h. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 273 days, and the median overall survival (OS) was 933 days. A high D8/D2 ratio was significantly correlated with better PFS, though the plasma trough levels on D2 and D8 were not significantly related to PFS. The elimination half-life was not a significant factor for PFS, but it was significantly correlated with high-grade adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly correlated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

A high D8/D2 ratio, but not elimination half-life, might be a predictor of better PFS in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib. On the other hand, long elimination half-life was related to high-grade adverse events in these patients. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN000001066.

Safety of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

The development of EGFR TKI and the subsequent identification of activating EGFR mutations have dramatically changed how NSCLC is treated. With its recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, gefitinib adds to the list of recommended first-line treatments for lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations, which hitherto includes erlotinib and afatinib.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the pharmacological property, clinical efficacy, and safety of gefitinib in major clinical trials and post-marketing studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Gefitinib is a well-tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC. The most common adverse events are skin reaction and diarrhea, both of which are generally mild, noncumulative, and manageable. Other side effects such as interstitial lung disease and liver toxicity are less common but can be serious. Which EGFR TKI is the preferred first-line treatment is a matter of debate. Gefitinib and erlotinib have comparable efficacy, whereas afatinib may exert superior clinical activity over gefitinib. In terms of the most common toxicities of skin reaction and diarrhea, gefitinib may be the most tolerable of the three. Hence, despite being the earliest EGFR TKI developed, gefitinib continues to be one of the first-line treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, especially when skin and gastrointestinal toxicity is a concern.

New multi-component solid forms of anti-cancer drug Erlotinib: role of auxiliary interactions in determining a preferred conformation

Erlotinib is a BCS (biopharmaceutical classification system) class II drug used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. There is an urgent need to obtain new solid forms of higher solubility to improve the bioavailability of the API (active pharmaceutical ingredient). In this context, cocrystals with urea, succinic acid, and glutaric acid and salts with maleic acid, adipic acid, and saccharin were prepared via wet granulation and solution crystallizations. Crystal structures of the free base (Z' = 2), cocrystals of erlotinib-urea (1:1), erlotinib-succinic acid monohydrate (1:1:1), erlotinib-glutaric acid monohydrate (1:1:1) and salts of erlotinib-adipic acid adipate (1:0.5:0.5) are determined and their hydrogen-bonding patterns are analyzed. Self recognition via the (amine) N-H...N (pyridine) hydrogen bond between the API molecules is replaced by several heterosynthons such as acid-pyridine, amide-pyridine and carboxylate-pyridinium in the new binary systems. Auxiliary interactions play an important role in determining the conformation of the API in the crystal. FT-IR spectroscopy is used to distinguish between the salts and cocrystals in the new multi-component systems. The new solid forms are characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to confirm their unique phase identity.

Effects of polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and ABC transporters and side effects induced by gefitinib on the pharmacokinetics of the gefitinib metabolite, O-desmethyl gefitinib

We investigated the effects of polymorphisms in CYP2D6, ABCB1, and ABCG2 and the side effects induced by gefitinib on the pharmacokinetics of O-desmethyl gefitinib, the active metabolite of gefitinib. On day 14 after beginning therapy with gefitinib, plasma concentrations of gefitinib and O-desmethyl gefitinib were measured. Patients were grouped into three groups according to their combination of CYP2D6 alleles: homozygous extensive metabolisers (EMs; *1/*1, *1/*2, and *2/*2; n = 13), heterozygous EMs (*1/*5, *2/*5, *1/*10, and *2/*10; n = 18), and intermediate metabolisers (IMs; *5/*10 and *10/*10; n = 5). The median AUC0-24 of O-desmethyl gefitinib in CYP2D6 IMs was 1460 ng h/mL, whereas that in homozygous EMs was 12,523 ng h/mL (P = 0.021 in univariate analysis). The median AUC ratio of O-desmethyl gefitinib to gefitinib differed among homozygous EMs, heterozygous EMs, and IMs at a ratio of 1.41:0.86:0.24 (P = 0.030). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the AUC0-24 of O-desmethyl gefitinib between ABCB1 and ABCG2 genotypes. In a multivariate analysis, CYP2D6 homozygous EMs (P = 0.012) were predictive for a higher AUC0-24 of O-desmethyl gefitinib. The side effects of diarrhoea, skin rash, and hepatotoxicity induced by gefitinib were unrelated to the AUC0-24 of O-desmethyl gefitinib. CYP2D6 polymorphisms were associated with the formation of O-desmethyl gefitinib from gefitinib. In CYP2D6 homozygous EMs, the plasma concentrations of O-desmethyl gefitinib were higher over 24 h after taking gefitinib than those of the parent compound; however, side effects induced by gefitinib were unrelated to O-desmethyl gefitinib exposure.

Development of Solid Self-Emulsifying Formulation for Improving the Oral Bioavailability of Erlotinib

To improve the solubility and oral bioavailability of erlotinib, a poorly water-soluble anticancer drug, solid self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) was developed using solid inert carriers such as dextran 40 and Aerosil® 200 (colloidal silica). The preliminary solubility of erlotinib in various oils, surfactants, and co-surfactants was determined. Labrafil M2125CS, Labrasol, and Transcutol HP were chosen as the oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant, respectively, for preparation of the SEDDS formulations. The ternary phase diagram was evaluated to show the self-emulsifying area. The formulations were optimized using the droplet size and polydispersity index (PDI) of the resultant emulsions. Then, the optimized formulation containing 5% Labrafil M2125CS, 65% Labrasol, and 30% Transcutol was spray dried with dextran or Aerosil® and characterized for surface morphology, crystallinity, and pharmacokinetics in rats. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) exhibited the amorphous form or molecular dispersion of erlotinib in the formulations. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the optimized formulations showed that the maximum concentration (C max) and area under the curve (AUC) of erlotinib were significantly increased, compared to erlotinib powder (p < 0.05). Thus, this SEDDS could be a promising method for enhancing the oral bioavailability of erlotinib.

Pharmacokinetic Properties of Anticancer Agents for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Tumors: Update of the Literature

Despite significant improvement in outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors over the past 10 years, patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors continue to have a poor prognosis. A primary reason for this is the inability of many chemotherapeutic drugs to penetrate into the brain and brain tumors at concentrations high enough to exert an antitumor effect because of unique barriers and efflux transporters. Several studies have been published recently examining the central nervous system pharmacokinetics of various anticancer drugs in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. To summarize recent advances in the field, this review critically presents studies published within the last 9 years examining brain and cerebrospinal fluid penetration of clinically available anticancer agents for patients with central nervous system tumors.

Pharmacokinetics of Selected Anticancer Drugs in Elderly Cancer Patients: Focus on Breast Cancer

Background: Elderly patients receiving anticancer drugs may have an increased risk to develop treatment-related toxicities compared to their younger peers. However, a potential pharmacokinetic (PK) basis for this increased risk has not consistently been established yet. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically review the influence of age on the PK of anticancer agents frequently administered to elderly breast cancer patients. Methods: A literature search was performed using the PubMed electronic database, Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and available drug approval reviews, as published by EMA and FDA. Publications that describe age-related PK profiles of selected anticancer drugs against breast cancer, excluding endocrine compounds, were selected and included. Results: This review presents an overview of the available data that describe the influence of increasing age on the PK of selected anticancer drugs used for the treatment of breast cancer. Conclusions: Selected published data revealed differences in the effect and magnitude of increasing age on the PK of several anticancer drugs. There may be clinically-relevant, age-related PK differences for anthracyclines and platina agents. In the majority of cases, age is not a good surrogate marker for anticancer drug PK, and the physiological state of the individual patient may better be approached by looking at organ function, Charlson Comorbidity Score or geriatric functional assessment.

Relationship Among Gefitinib Exposure, Polymorphisms of Its Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters, and Side Effects in Japanese Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The present study investigated the effects of patients' genetic variations in the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib at steady-state. We analyzed 31 Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had been treated with gefitinib. We focused on common polymorphisms within important gefitinib exposure genes, including cytochromes P450 (CYPs) CYP3A4*1G, CYP3A5 (*3), and CYP2D6 (*5 and *10) and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) ABCG2 (421C>A) and ABCB1 (1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, and 3435C>T).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen days after beginning 250 mg of gefitinib therapy, when the patients were in steady-state, blood samples were collected just before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after oral gefitinib administration. The plasma concentrations of gefitinib were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The median area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) and trough plasma concentration (C0) of gefitinib was 10,086 ng · h/mL (range, 3247-24,726 ng · h/mL) and 334 ng/mL (range, 77.9-813 ng/mL), respectively. No significant differences were found in the AUC0-24 or C0 for gefitinib or in the frequency of diarrhea, skin rash or hepatotoxicity among the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, ABCG2 (421C>A), and ABCB1 (1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, and 3435C>T) genotype groups. However, the AUC0-24 and C0 levels of gefitinib in the patients with diarrhea or hepatotoxicity were significantly greater than in those without (diarrhea: AUC0-24, 14,246 vs. 8918 ng · h/mL, P = .006; C0: 421 vs. 261 ng/mL, P = .002; hepatotoxicity: AUC0-24, 12,967 vs. 8473 ng · h/mL, P = .024; C0: 420 vs. 248 ng/mL, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

The side effects from gefitinib were related to exposure but not genetic polymorphism. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring after beginning gefitinib therapy rather than the analysis of polymorphism before initiating therapy might be beneficial.

Population pharmacokinetics of HM781-36 (poziotinib), pan-human EGF receptor (HER) inhibitor, and its two metabolites in patients with advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for HM781-36 (poziotinib) and its metabolites in cancer patients.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from three phase I studies in which fifty-two patients received oral HM781-36B tablets (0.5-32 mg) once daily for 2 weeks, and another 20 patients received oral HM781-36B tablets (12, 16, 18, 24 mg) in fasting (12 patients) or fed (eight patients) state once daily for 4 weeks. Nonlinear mixed effect modeling was employed to develop the population pharmacokinetic model.

RESULTS

HM781-36 PK was ascribed to a two-compartment model and HM781-36-M1/-M2 PK to one-compartment model. HM781-36 oral absorption was characterized by first-order input (absorption rate constant: 1.45 ± 0.23 h⁻¹). The central volume of distribution (185 ± 12.7 L) was influenced significantly by body weight. The absorption rate constant was influenced by food. The typical HM781-36 apparent clearance was 34.5 L/h (29.4 %CV), with an apparent peripheral volume of distribution of 164 L (53.5 %CV). Other covariates did not significantly further explain the PKs of HM781-36.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model suggests that HM781-36 PKs are consistent across most solid tumor types, and that the absorption process of HM781-36 is affected by the fed state before dosing. HM781-36 PKs are not complicated by patient factors, other than body weight.

Selective inhibition of human solute carrier transporters by multikinase inhibitors

Solute carrier (SLC) transporters regulate the cellular influx and disposition of endogenous and xenobiotic compounds, including anticancer agents such as the multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Recent evidence suggests that MKIs may also inhibit SLC-dependent transport of coadministered drugs, although present information on the relative susceptibilities of multiple SLC transporters is limited. This study evaluated 18 MKI drugs and metabolites as inhibitors of prototypic substrate uptake by 13 SLC transporters that were overexpressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) 1A2, 1B3, and 2B1, organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3), and organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) were inhibited by most MKIs, whereas substrate uptake by OATP1B1, OAT1, 2, and 4, OCT2 and 3, and organic zwitterion/cation transporter 1 (OCTN1) was less susceptible to inhibition; OCTN2 was also inhibited by cediranib. In further studies, IC50 values were determined for the most effective MKIs, and erlotinib and cediranib were found to be potent competitive inhibitors of OATP2B1 (Ki = 41 nM) and OATP1A2 (Ki = 33 nM), respectively. From predictive approaches, several MKI-SLC interactions were found to be of potential in vivo significance.

A limited sampling strategy for estimation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of gefitinib

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a limited sampling strategy (LSS) to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of gefitinib using data from 18 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

On day 14 after beginning daily therapy with 250 mg of gefitinib, plasma samples were collected just before (C(0h), 24 hours after the 13th administration) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours (C(nh)) after gefitinib administration and were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The predicted AUC from 0 to 24 hours (AUC₀₋₂₄) from the single time point of C(12h) showed the highest correlation with the measured AUC₀₋₂₄ of gefitinib (AUC₀₋₂₄ = 20.0 · C(12h) + 1348.0; r² = 0.9623; P , 0.0001). The 95% confidence intervals of the slopes and intercepts of the formulae obtained by bootstrap analysis indicated acceptable accuracy and robustness in the prediction of AUC₀₋₂₄ using C(0h), C(1h), C(12h), and C(1h) + C(12h). The median AUC₀₋₂₄ and C(0h) of gefitinib in patients with diarrhea (n = 8) were higher than those without diarrhea (n = 10) (15,043 versus 8918 ng·h·mL⁻¹, respectively, P = 0.0164 and 542 versus 261 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.0263). The area under the receiver operator curve was 0.813, giving the best sensitivity (75%) and specificity (90%) at a C(0h) threshold of 398 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the C(12h) single time point is recommended for the gefitinib AUC₀₋₂₄ predictive equation; however, total estimation of the AUC₀₋₂₄ of gefitinib at the single point of C(0h) was also precise. C(0h) monitoring of gefitinib might be beneficial during gefitinib therapy, because of a high variability in gefitinib exposure among patients taking 250 mg. Further examination of the correlation between clinical evaluation and the gefitinib exposure is necessary.

Gastric Acid suppression is associated with decreased erlotinib efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Erlotinib is a key therapy for advanced NSCLC. Concurrent AS therapy with TKIs might reduce TKI plasma levels. Because of gastroesophageal reflux disease prevalence, this retrospective analysis was undertaken to determine if coadministering erlotinib with AS therapy affected NSCLC outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of advanced NSCLC patients who received erlotinib from 2007 to 2012 at a large, centralized, cancer institution were retrospectively reviewed. Pertinent demographic data were collected and concomitant AS treatment was defined as AS prescription dates overlapping with ≥ 20% of erlotinib treatment duration. Records of patients who received erlotinib for ≥ 1 week were analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients (n = 544) were identified and 507 had adequate data for review. The median age was 64 years and 272 were female. Adenocarcinoma (n = 318; 64%) and squamous (n = 106; 21%) were predominant subtypes; 124 patients received concomitant AS therapy. In this unselected population, median PFS and OS in AS versus no AS groups were 1.4 versus 2.3 months (P < .001) and 12.9 versus 16.8 months (P = .003), respectively. Factoring sex, subtype, and performance status in multivariate Cox proportional hazards ratios for PFS and OS between AS and no AS groups were 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-2.25) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.11-1.69), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This large population-based study suggests erlotinib efficacy might be linked with gastric pH and OS could be adversely affected. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating a possible negative clinical effect of coadministration of erlotinib with AS therapy. Further prospective investigation is warranted.

A review of the management of elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are elderly but evidence to guide appropriate treatment decisions for this age group is generally scant. Careful evaluation of the elderly should be undertaken to ensure that treatment appropriate for the stage of the tumour is guided by patient characteristics and not by age. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) remains the preferred option, but briefer tools may be appropriate to select patients for further evaluation. The predicted outcome should be used to guide management decisions together with a reappraisal of polypharmacy. Patient expectations should also be taken into account. Management recommendations are generally similar to those of general guidelines for the NSCLC population, although the risks of surgery and toxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are often increased in the elderly compared with younger patients; therefore, patients should be closely scrutinised and subjected to a CGA to ensure suitability of the planned treatment. If surgery is indicated, then lobectomy is generally the preferred option, although limited resection may be more feasible for some. Radiotherapy with curative intent is an alternative, with stereotactic body radiotherapy the most likely preferred modality. Adjuvant chemotherapy is also an appropriate approach, whereas adjuvant radiotherapy is generally not recommended. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy should be considered for elderly patients with inoperable locally advanced disease and chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Efforts should also be made to increase participation of elderly patients with NSCLC in clinical trials, thereby enhancing evidence-based treatment decisions for this majority group. This will require overcoming barriers relating to trial design and to physician and patient awareness and attitudes.

In vitro assessment of time-dependent inhibitory effects on CYP2C8 and CYP3A activity by fourteen protein kinase inhibitors

Previous studies have shown that several protein kinase inhibitors are time-dependent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. We screened 14 kinase inhibitors for time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP3A. Amodiaquine N-deethylation and midazolam 1'-hydroxylation were used as marker reactions for CYP2C8 and CYP3A activity, respectively. A screening, IC50 shift, and mechanism-based inhibition were assessed with human liver microsomes. In the screening, bosutinib isomer 1, crizotinib, dasatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, lestaurtinib, nilotinib, pazopanib, saracatinib, sorafenib, and sunitinib exhibited an increased inhibition of CYP3A after a 30-min preincubation with NADPH, as compared with no preincubation. Axitinib and vandetanib tested negative for time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A and CYP2C8, and bosutinib was the only inhibitor causing time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8. The inhibitory mechanism by bosutinib was consistent with weak mechanism-based inhibition, and its inactivation variables, inhibitor concentration that supports half-maximal rate of inactivation (KI) and maximal inactivation rate (kinact), were 54.8 µM and 0.018 1/min. As several of the tested inhibitors were reported to cause mechanism-based inactivation of CYP3A4 during the progress of this work, detailed experiments with these were not completed. However, lestaurtinib and saracatinib were identified as mechanism-based inhibitors of CYP3A. The KI and kinact of lestaurtinib and saracatinib were 30.7 µM and 0.040 1/min, and 12.6 µM and 0.096 1/min, respectively. Inhibition of CYP2C8 by bosutinib was predicted to have no clinical relevance, whereas therapeutic lestaurtinib and saracatinib concentrations were predicted to increase the plasma exposure to CYP3A-dependent substrates by ≥2.7-fold. The liability of kinase inhibitors to affect CYP enzymes by time-dependent inhibition may have long-lasting consequences and result in clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

Erlotinib in African Americans with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study with genetic and pharmacokinetic analyses

Prospective studies on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in African Americans with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not previously been performed. In this phase II randomized study, 55 African Americans with NSCLC received 150 mg/day erlotinib or a body weight-adjusted dose with subsequent escalations to the maximum-allowable dose, 200 mg/day, to achieve rash. Erlotinib and OSI-420 exposures were lower than those observed in previous studies, consistent with CYP3A pharmacogenetics implying higher metabolic activity. Tumor genetics showed only two EGFR mutations, EGFR amplification in 17/47 samples, eight KRAS mutations, and five EML4-ALK translocations. Although absence of rash was associated with shorter time to progression (TTP), disease-control rate, TTP, and 1-year survival were not different between the two dose groups, indicating the dose-to-rash strategy failed to increase clinical benefit. Low incidence of toxicity and low erlotinib exposure suggest standardized and maximum-allowable dosing may be suboptimal in African Americans.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring

The treatment of many malignancies has been improved in recent years by the introduction of molecular targeted therapies. These drugs interact preferentially with specific targets that are mutated and/or overexpressed in malignant cells. A group of such targets are the tyrosine kinases, against which a number of inhibitors (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs) have been developed. Imatinib, a TKI with targets that include the breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (bcr-abl) fusion protein kinase and mast/stem cell growth factor receptor kinase (c-Kit), was the first clinically successful drug of this type and revolutionized the treatment and prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. This success paved the way for the development of other TKIs for the treatment of a range of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. To date, 14 TKIs have been approved for clinical use and many more are under investigation. All these agents are given orally and are substrates of a range of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes. In addition, some TKIs are capable of inhibiting their own transporters and metabolizing enzymes, making their disposition and metabolism at steady-state unpredictable. A given dose can therefore give rise to markedly different plasma concentrations in different patients, favoring the selection of resistant clones in the case of subtherapeutic exposure, and increasing the risk of toxicity if dosage is excessive. The aim of this review was to summarize current knowledge of the clinical pharmacokinetics and known adverse effects of the TKIs that are available for clinical use and to provide practical guidance on the implications of these data in patient management, in particular with respect to therapeutic drug monitoring.

Uptake carriers and oncology drug safety

Members of the solute carrier (SLC) family of transporters are responsible for the cellular influx of a broad range of endogenous compounds and xenobiotics in multiple tissues. Many of these transporters are highly expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidney and are considered to be of particular importance in governing drug absorption, elimination, and cellular sensitivity of specific organs to a wide variety of oncology drugs. Although the majority of studies on the interaction of oncology drugs with SLC have been restricted to the use of exploratory in vitro model systems, emerging evidence suggests that several SLCs, including OCT2 and OATP1B1, contribute to clinically important phenotypes associated with those agents. Recent literature has indicated that modulation of SLC activity may result in drug-drug interactions, and genetic polymorphisms in SLC genes have been described that can affect the handling of substrates. Alteration of SLC function by either of these mechanisms has been demonstrated to contribute to interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics and toxicity associated with several oncology drugs. In this report, we provide an update on this rapidly emerging field.

Gefitinib

Gefitinib (Iressa®) is a selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor, a growth factor that plays a pivotal role in the control of cell growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Gefitinib is clinically used for the treatment of chemoresistant non-small cell lung cancer patients. Gefitinib is freely soluble in dimethylsulphoxide but slightly soluble in methanol and ethanol. Several methods of gefitinib synthesis are included in this review. UV spectroscopy of gefitinib showed a λmax of approximately 331nm, whereas IR spectroscopy principal peaks were observed at 3400cm(-1) (NH), 2956cm(-1) (CH2, CH, alkyl), 1625cm(-1) (CC, CN), 1500cm(-1) (HCCH, aryl), 1110cm(-1) (CO), 1028cm(-1) (CF). In addition, different analytical methods for determination of gefitinib are also described in this review. Pharmacokinetically, after oral administration, gefitinib is slowly absorbed with bioavailability of approximately 60% in human. Gefitinib is metabolized extensively in the liver into five metabolites by cytochrome P450s, primarily by CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A5 and CYP2D6. Gefitinib is eliminated mainly hepatically with total plasma clearance of 595mL/min after intravenous administration. Most of the adverse effects associated with gefitinib therapy are mild to moderate in severity and are usually reversible and manageable with appropriate intervention, such as diarrhea, dry skin, rash, nausea, and vomiting.

Drug interactions with solid tumour-targeted therapies

Drug interactions are an on-going concern in the treatment of cancer, especially when targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, are being used. The emergence of elderly patients and/or patients with both cancer and other chronic co-morbidities leads to polypharmacy. Therefore, the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) becomes a clinically relevant issue, all the more so as TKIs and mTOR inhibitors are essentially metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzymes. These DDIs can result in variability in anticancer drug exposure, thus favouring the selection of resistant cellular clones or the occurrence of toxicity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of DDIs that involve targeted therapies approved by the FDA for the treatment of solid tumours for more than 3 years (sorafenib, sunitinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, lapatinib, everolimus, temsirolimus) and medicinal herb or drugs. This review also provides some guidelines to help oncologists and pharmacists in their clinical practice.

Moving towards molecular-guided treatments: erlotinib and clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Erlotinib is an orally administered small-molecule inhibitor of EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase that is approved for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic cancer. Erlotinib was first approved for the treatment of unselected NSCLC patients with advanced disease after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen, and it was subsequently demonstrated to also confer a significant clinical benefit as maintenance therapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. In all clinical studies, erlotinib treatment was associated with a good safety profile. Activating mutations in the EGFR gene have emerged as the strongest predictive marker of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib and gefitinib, independently of other clinical and molecular features. Results from recently published, randomized Phase III trials showed that first-line erlotinib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with favorable tolerability, compared with standard chemotherapy. EGFR mutation testing is a crucial factor in the decision-making process regarding the most appropriate initial treatment option for patients. Specific molecular alterations in crucial genes have been discovered and associated with resistance to erlotinib, limiting its efficacy. New targeted agents and combined-treatment strategies are now under evaluation in clinical trials of NSCLC patients following progression to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Contribution of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 to the disposition of sorafenib and sorafenib-glucuronide

PURPOSE

Many tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) undergo extensive hepatic metabolism, but mechanisms of their hepatocellular uptake remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that liver uptake of TKIs is mediated by the solute carriers OATP1B1 and OATP1B3.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Transport of crizotinib, dasatinib, gefitinib, imatinib, nilotinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, vandetanib, and vemurafenib was studied in vitro using artificial membranes (PAMPA) and HEK293 cell lines stably transfected with OATP1B1, OATP1B3, or the ortholog mouse transporter, Oatp1b2. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted with Oatp1b2-knockout mice and humanized OATP1B1- or OATP1B3-transgenic mice.

RESULTS

All 10 TKIs were identified as substrates of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, or both. Transport of sorafenib was investigated further, as its diffusion was particularly low in the PAMPA assay (<4%) than other TKIs that were transported by both OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. Whereas Oatp1b2 deficiency in vivo had minimal influence on parent and active metabolite N-oxide drug exposure, plasma levels of the glucuronic acid metabolite of sorafenib (sorafenib-glucuronide) were increased more than 8-fold in Oatp1b2-knockout mice. This finding was unrelated to possible changes in intrinsic metabolic capacity for sorafenib-glucuronide formation in hepatic or intestinal microsomes ex vivo. Ensuing experiments revealed that sorafenib-glucuronide was itself a transported substrate of Oatp1b2 (17.5-fold vs. control), OATP1B1 (10.6-fold), and OATP1B3 (6.4-fold), and introduction of the human transporters in Oatp1b2-knockout mice provided partial restoration of function.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings signify a unique role for OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in the elimination of sorafenib-glucuronide and suggest a role for these transporters in the in vivo handling of glucuronic acid conjugates of drugs.

NABTT 0502: a phase II and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib and sorafenib for patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND

The signal transduction pathways of epidermal growth factor receptor and Ras are both important in the growth of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We hypothesized that inhibition of both pathways would improve the survival time of patients with recurrent GBM.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent/progressive GBM with 0-2 prior chemotherapy regimens received erlotinib 150 mg once daily and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily until progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed during cycle 1.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 5.7 months. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 14%. Toxicity was manageable. Clearance of erlotinib was markedly enhanced by sorafenib.

CONCLUSION

The study did not meet its objective of a 30% increase in overall survival time compared with historical controls. Erlotinib and sorafenib have significant pharmacokinetic interactions that may negatively impact the efficacy of the combination regimen.

EGFR-targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: focus on EGFR oncogenic mutation

The two essential requirements for pathologic specimens in the era of personalized therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) are accurate subtyping as adenocarcinoma (ADC) versus squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) and suitability for EGFR molecular testing, as well as for testing of other oncogenes such as EML4-ALK and KRAS. Actually, the value of EGFR expressed in patients with NSCLC in predicting a benefit in terms of survival from treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapy is still in debate, while there is a convincing evidence on the predictive role of the EGFR mutational status with regard to the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).This is a literature overview on the state-of-the-art of EGFR oncogenic mutation in NSCLC. It is designed to highlight the preclinical rationale driving the molecular footprint assessment, the progressive development of a specific pharmacological treatment and the best method to identify those NSCLC who would most likely benefit from treatment with EGFR-targeted therapy. This is supported by the belief that a rationale for the prioritization of specific regimens based on patient-tailored therapy could be closer than commonly expected.

Simple methodology for the therapeutic drug monitoring of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors dasatinib and imatinib

A simple HPLC method has been developed to measure imatinib and N-desmethylimatinib (norimatinib) in plasma or serum at concentrations attained during therapy. Adaptation of this method to LC-MS/MS also allows dasatinib assay. A small sample volume (100 μL HPLC-UV, 50 μL LC-MS/MS) is required and analysis time is <5 min in each case. Detection was by UV (270 nm) or selective reaction monitoring (two transitions per analyte) tandem mass spectrometry. Assay calibration was linear (0.05-10 mg/L imatinib, 0.01-2.0 mg/L norimatinib and 1-200 µg/L dasatinib), with acceptable accuracy (86-114%) and precision (<14% RSD) for both methods. A comparison between whole blood and plasma confirmed that plasma is the preferred sample for imatinib and norimatinib assay. For dasatinib, although whole blood concentrations were slightly higher, plasma is still the preferred sample. Despite considerable variation in the (median, range) plasma imatinib and norimatinib concentrations in patient samples [1.66 (0.02-4.96) and 0.32 (0.01-0.99) mg/L, respectively, N = 104], plasma imatinib was >1 mg/L (suggested target for response) in all but one sample from patients achieving complete molecular response. As to dasatinib, the median (range) plasma dasatinib concentration was 13 (2-143) µg/L (N = 33). More observations are needed to properly assess the potential role of therapeutic drug monitoring in guiding treatment with dasatinib.

Thorsheim H, Lockman J, Gril B, Hua E, Palmieri D, Polli JW, Castellino S, Rubin SD, Lockman PR, Steeg PS, Smith QR. Lapatinib distribution in HER2 overexpressing experimental brain metastases of breast cancer

PURPOSE

Lapatinib, a small molecule EGFR/HER2 inhibitor, partially inhibits the outgrowth of HER2+ brain metastases in preclinical models and in a subset of CNS lesions in clinical trials of HER2+ breast cancer. We investigated the ability of lapatinib to reach therapeutic concentrations in the CNS following (14)C-lapatinib administration (100 mg/kg p.o. or 10 mg/kg, i.v.) to mice with MDA-MD-231-BR-HER2 brain metastases of breast cancer.

METHODS

Drug concentrations were determined at differing times after administration by quantitative autoradiography and chromatography.

RESULTS

(14)C-Lapatinib concentration varied among brain metastases and correlated with altered blood-tumor barrier permeability. On average, brain metastasis concentration was 7-9-fold greater than surrounding brain tissue at 2 and 12 h after oral administration. However, average lapatinib concentration in brain metastases was still only 10-20% of those in peripheral metastases. Only in a subset of brain lesions (17%) did lapatinib concentration approach that of systemic metastases. No evidence was found of lapatinib resistance in tumor cells cultured ex vivo from treated brains.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show that lapatinib distribution to brain metastases of breast cancer is partially restricted and blood-tumor barrier permeability is a key component of lapatinib therapeutic efficacy which varies between tumors.

Phase I study of lapatinib plus vinorelbine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2

Background:

To determine the recommended doses of lapatinib (LPT) combined with vinorelbine (VNR) in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer pretreated with trastuzumab.

Methods:

In this phase I study, women were treated with oral daily LPT and i.v. VNR infused on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels (DL) of LPT (mg)/VNR (mg m⁻²) ranged from 750/20 to 1250/30. The primary end point was feasibility based on maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and maximum administered dose (MAD). Pharmacokinetic interactions were investigated.

Results:

Of 33 patients included, 29 were evaluable. Two DLT occurred at DL4 (1000/25) meeting the MAD criteria. Despite an additional intermediate DL3′ (1250/22.5), MTD was reached at DL3 (1000/22.5). Grade 3–4 neutropenia was the most common toxicity (34% and 38% of patients, respectively). Other significant toxicities included grade 3–4 diarrhoea (3% each), and grade 3 asthenia (10%). Although not statistically significant, LPT (at 1000 or 1250 mg) decreased the VNR clearance by 30–40% compared with DL1.

Conclusion:

The MTD LPT 1000 mg/VNR 22.5 mg m⁻² (DL3) is recommended for additional development. Pharmacokinetic interactions might increase the exposure to VNR and consequently alter the hematological tolerance.

Successful erlotinib treatment for a patient with gefitinib-related hepatotoxicity and lung adenocarcinoma refractory to intermittently administered gefitinib

A 73-year-old Japanese man was histologically diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma harboring an exon 19 deletion in the epidermal growth factor receptor. The patient was treated with gefitinib for 6 weeks until he developed substantially elevated hepatic enzyme levels that resulted in the discontinuation of gefitinib. Gefitinib was reintroduced with an intermittent treatment schedule after the transaminase levels normalized, but the patient's enzyme levels rose again, and the cancer progressed. Gefitinib was eventually replaced with erlotinib. There was stable disease for 7 weeks without any signs of liver toxicity. Thus, erlotinib may be a beneficial and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with gefitinib-related hepatotoxicity.

SMAC mimetic (JP1201) sensitizes non-small cell lung cancers to multiple chemotherapy agents in an IAP-dependent but TNF-α-independent manner

Inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAP) are key regulators of apoptosis and are inhibited by the second mitocondrial activator of caspases (SMAC). Previously, a small subset of TNF-α-expressing non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) was found to be sensitive to SMAC mimetics alone. In this study, we determined if a SMAC mimetic (JP1201) could sensitize nonresponsive NSCLC cell lines to standard chemotherapy. We found that JP1201 sensitized NSCLCs to doxorubicin, erlotinib, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, vinorelbine, and the combination of carboplatin with paclitaxel in a synergistic manner at clinically achievable drug concentrations. Sensitization did not occur with platinum alone. Furthermore, sensitization was specific for tumor compared with normal lung epithelial cells, increased in NSCLCs harvested after chemotherapy treatment, and did not induce TNF-α secretion. Sensitization also was enhanced in vivo with increased tumor inhibition and increased survival of mice carrying xenografts. These effects were accompanied by caspase 3, 4, and 9 activation, indicating that both mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptotic pathways are activated by the combination of vinorelbine and JP1201. Chemotherapies that induce cell death through the mitochondrial pathway required only inhibition of X-linked IAP (XIAP) for sensitization, whereas chemotherapies that induce cell death through multiple apoptotic pathways required inhibition of cIAP1, cIAP2, and XIAP. Therefore, the data suggest that IAP-targeted therapy using a SMAC mimetic provides a new therapeutic strategy for synergistic sensitization of NSCLCs to standard chemotherapy agents, which seems to occur independently of TNF-α secretion.