Serum B-cell maturation antigen: a novel biomarker to predict outcomes for multiple myeloma patients

Advances in the molecular characterization of multiple myeloma and mechanism of therapeutic resistance

Recent insight in the genomic landscape of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and its precursor conditions, monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS), and smoldering myeloma have allowed the identification of patients with precursor conditions with a high risk of progression. These cases with "progressor" MGUS/SMM have a higher average mutation burden, have higher rates of mutations in specific genes such as MAPK, DNA repair, MYC, DIS3, and are enriched for specific mutational signatures when compared to non-progressors and are comparable to those found in NDMM. The highly preserved clonal heterogeneity seen upon progression of SMM, combined with the importance of these early variables, suggests that the identification of progressors based on these findings could complement and enhance the currently available clinical models based on tumor burden. Mechanisms leading to relapse/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are of clinical interest given worse overall survival in this population. An Increased mutational burden is seen in patients with RRMM when compared to NDMM, however, there is evidence of branching evolution with many of these mutations being present at the subclonal level. Likewise, alterations in proteins associated with proteosome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drugs activity could partially explain clinical resistance to these agents. Evidence of chromosomal events leading to copy number changes is seen, with the presence of TP53 deletion, mutation, or a combination of both being present in many cases. Additional chromosomal events such as 1q gain and amplification may also interact and lead to resistance.

Bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma treatment: A journey in progress

The incorporation of novel agents and monoclonal antibody-based therapies into the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved long-term patient survival. However, the disease is still largely incurable, with high-risk patients suffering shorter survival times, partly due to weakened immune systems. Bispecific molecules, including bispecific antibodies (BisAbs) and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), encourage immune cells to lyse MM cells by simultaneously binding antigens on MM cells and immune effector cells, bringing those cells into close proximity. BisAbs that target B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and GPRC5D have shown impressive clinical activity, and the results of early-phase clinical trials targeting FcRH5 in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) are also promising. Furthermore, the safety profile of these agents is favorable, including mainly low-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS). These off-the-shelf bispecific molecules will likely become an essential part of the MM treatment paradigm. Here, we summarize and highlight various bispecific immunotherapies under development in MM treatment, as well as the utility of combining them with current standard-of-care treatments and new strategies. With the advancement of novel combination treatment approaches, these bispecific molecules may lead the way to a cure for MM.

Monitoring of Soluble Forms of BAFF System (BAFF, APRIL, sR-BAFF, sTACI and sBCMA) in Kidney Transplantation

BAFF system plays an essential role in B cells homeostasis and tolerance, although it has widely not been tested in transplantation with doubtful results. The main purpose was to study the BAFF soluble forms and their correlation with acute rejection (AR) and donor-specific antibodies production. Serum levels of BAFF, APRIL, and soluble forms of their receptors were analyzed in renal recipients with and without acute rejection (AR/NAR) appearance. All molecules were evaluated at pre- and post-transplantation. sTACI showed a significant correlation with BAFF and sR-BAFF levels, and sBCMA also showed a positive correlation with sAPRIL levels. A significant increase in sAPRIL levels in patients suffering AR was also found, and ROC curves analysis showed an AUC = 0.724, a concentration of 6.05 ng/ml (sensitivity: 66.7%; specificity: 73.3%), the best cutoff point for predicting AR. In the post-transplant dynamics of sAPRIL levels in the longitudinal cohort, we observed a significant decrease at 3 and 6 month post-transplantation compared to pretransplantation status. We also observed that recipients with high pre-transplant levels of sAPRIL generated antibodies earlier than those with lower sAPRIL levels, although their long-term post-transplantation was not different. Our results show that elevated serum levels of APRIL may be helpful as a biomarker for the diagnosis of AR, although the longitudinal study shows that it is not helpful as a prognostic biomarker.

Nonclinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Translational Model of RO7297089, A Novel Anti-BCMA/CD16A Bispecific Tetravalent Antibody for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

RO7297089, an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)/CD16A bispecific tetravalent antibody, is being developed as a multiple myeloma (MM) therapeutic. This study characterized nonclinical pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), soluble BCMA (sBCMA), and soluble CD16 (sCD16) changes following administration of RO7297089 to support clinical trials. Unbound and total RO7297089 concentrations were measured in cynomolgus monkeys. RO7297089 exhibited a bi-phasic systemic concentration-time profile, similar to a typical human immunoglobulin 1 antibody. Target engagement by RO7297089 led to a robust increase (~100-fold) in total systemic sBCMA levels and relatively mild increase (~2-fold) in total sCD16 levels. To describe the relationship of nonclinical PK/PD data, we developed a target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) model that includes the systemic target engagement of membrane BCMA (mBCMA), sBCMA, membrane CD16 (mCD16), and sCD16. We then used this model to simulate the PK/PD relationship of RO7297089 in MM patients by translating relevant PK parameters and target levels, based on the literature and newly generated data such as baseline sCD16A levels. Our model suggested that the impact of TMDD on RO7297089 exposure may be more significant in MM patients due to significantly higher expression levels of both mBCMA and sBCMA compared to healthy cynomolgus monkeys. Based on model simulations, we propose more frequent dosing of RO7297089 compared to regular monthly frequency in the clinic at the beginning of treatment to ensure sustained target engagement. This study demonstrates a translational research strategy for collecting relevant nonclinical data, establishing a TMDD model, and using simulations from this model to inform clinical dose regimens.

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel: The second anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapeutic armamentarium of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (also known as cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on the surface of cancer cells in B cell malignancies, such as multiple myeloma (MM). It is a second-generation CAR that is outfitted with an ectodomain comprising two BCMA-binding single chain variable fragment (ScFv) domains, a transmembrane domain, and an endodomain possessing CD3ζ and 4-1BB. Cilta-cel is an autologous, gene-edited CAR T-cell that is prepared by collecting and modifying the recipient’s T-cells to create a patient personalized treatment in the laboratory to be infused back. This CAR T-cell product exceptionally entails CARs with two BCMA-targeting single-domain antibodies that detect two epitopes of BCMA expressed on the malignant cells of MM. Cilta-cel is the current addition to the treatment armamentarium of relapsed or refractory (r/r) MM after its approval by the FDA on February 28, 2022, based on the results of the Phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study. It was the second approved anti-BCMA CAR T-cell product after idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) to treat myeloma patients. It induces early, deep, and long-lasting responses with a tolerable safety profile in r/r MM. Cilta-cel-treated myeloma patients may potentially experience adverse effects ranging from mild to life-threatening, but they are mostly manageable toxicities. Besides, it has a consistent safety profile upon a longer follow-up of patients. Cilta-cel generally outperforms ide cel in terms of efficacy in MM, but shows comparable adverse events. This review highlights the current updates on cilta-cel efficacy, adverse events, comparison with ide-cel, and its future direction in the treatment of MM.

Race for the Cure: From the Oldest to the Newest Monoclonal Antibodies for Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Multiple myeloma is characterized by a wide clinical heterogeneity due to an intricate network of interactions between bone marrow-resident clonal plasma cells and the microenvironment. Over the last years, dramatic improvement in the understanding of these pathways led to the introduction of novel drugs with immune-mediated mechanisms of action. Some of these compounds, such as the anti-cd38 daratumumab and isatuximab, the anti-slamf-7 elotuzumab, and the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab-mafodotin, have been tested in large clinical trials and have now fully entered the real-life management. The bispecific T-cell engagers are under investigation with promising results, and other satisfactory data is expected from the application of nanotechnologies. The perfect timing to introduce these drugs in the sequence of treatment and their adverse events represent new challenges to be addressed, and further experience is required to improve their use.

γ-secretase inhibitors augment efficacy of BCMA-targeting bispecific antibodies against multiple myeloma cells without impairing T-cell activation and differentiation

We here defined the impacts of γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) on T-cell-dependent BCMA-specific multiple myeloma (MM) cell lysis and immunomodulatory effects induced by bispecific antibodies (BisAbs). GSIs-induced membrane BCMA (mBCMA) accumulation reached near maximum within 4 h and sustained over 42h-study period on MM cell lines and patient MM cells. GSIs, i.e., 2 nM LY-411575 or 1 μM DAPT, robustly increased mBCMA densities on CD138+ but not CD3+ patient cells, concomitantly with minimum soluble/shed BCMA (sBCMA) in 1 day-culture supernatants. In ex vivo MM-T-cell co-cultures, GSIs overcame sBCMA-inhibited MM cell lysis and further enhanced autologous patient MM cell lysis induced by BCMAxCD3 BisAbs, accompanied by significantly enhanced cytolytic markers (CD107a, IFNγ, IL2, and TNFα) in patient T cells. In longer 7 day-co-cultures, LY-411575 minimally affected BCMAxCD3 BisAb (PL33)-induced transient expression of checkpoint (PD1, TIGIT, TIM3, LAG3) and co-stimulatory (41BB, CD28) proteins, as well as time-dependent increases in % effector memory/central memory subsets and CD8/CD4 ratios in patient T cells. Importantly, LY41157 rapidly cleared sBCMA from circulation of MM-bearing NSG mice reconstituted with human T cells and significantly enhanced anti-MM efficacy of PL33 with prolonged host survival. Taken together, these results further support ongoing combination BCMA-targeting immunotherapies with GSI clinical studies to improve patient outcome.

Role of Anti-B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in the Management of Multiple Myeloma

Simple Summary

Multiple myeloma is the most prevalent hematological cancer, and further treatments for this disease are required. Despite progress in the development of treatment regimens, multiple myeloma is still an incurable disease because of its poor response to therapy and high rate of resistance to treatment. However, anti-BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) has shown promise in the treatment of multiple myeloma, and it may have the potential to be a new first-line treatment for patients. Thus, in this review, we objectively discussed the treatment potential of anti-BCMA, its mechanisms, and its future clinical implications for multiple myeloma patients.

Abstract

Over the past few decades, treatment options have become more advanced for multiple myeloma (MM), one of the most prevalent hematological cancers; however, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease due to its poor response to therapy and high rates of resistance, which cause relapsed/refractory or multiple myeloma. Researchers have described anti-BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) as a promising treatment regimen that targets the BCMA biomarker in the affected plasma cells. BCMA is a protein that is specifically expressed in plasma-cell neoplasms by using several mechanisms, such as CAR T cells (Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells), antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific T-cell engagers, thus allowing for a rapid response in the treatment of resistant or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Anti-BCMA treatment is novel and specific in its mechanisms of action, with noninferior complete responses, higher overall survival rates, and fewer reported adverse events compared to other currently available treatment of MM. In this review, we compared anti-BCMA mechanisms with those of previously available therapies, such as those using immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors, and discussed the advantages of using anti-BCMA as a potential first-line treatment for multiple myeloma patients.

Leveraging a physiologically-based quantitative translational modeling platform for designing B cell maturation antigen-targeting bispecific T cell engagers for treatment of multiple myeloma

Bispecific T cell engagers (TCEs) are an emerging anti-cancer modality that redirects cytotoxic T cells to tumor cells expressing tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), thereby forming immune synapses to exert anti-tumor effects. Designing pharmacokinetically acceptable TCEs and optimizing their size presents a considerable protein engineering challenge, particularly given the complexity of intercellular bridging between T cells and tumor cells. Therefore, a physiologically-relevant and clinically-verified computational modeling framework is of crucial importance to understand the protein engineering trade-offs. In this study, we developed a quantitative, physiologically-based computational framework to predict immune synapse formation for a variety of molecular formats of TCEs in tumor tissues. Our model incorporates a molecular size-dependent biodistribution using the two-pore theory, extravasation of T cells and hematologic cancer cells, mechanistic bispecific intercellular binding of TCEs, and competitive inhibitory interactions by shed targets. The biodistribution of TCEs was verified by positron emission tomography imaging of [89Zr]AMG211 (a carcinoembryonic antigen-targeting TCE) in patients. Parameter sensitivity analyses indicated that immune synapse formation was highly sensitive to TAA expression, degree of target shedding, and binding selectivity to tumor cell surface TAAs over shed targets. Notably, the model suggested a “sweet spot” for TCEs’ CD3 binding affinity, which balanced the trapping of TCEs in T-cell-rich organs. The final model simulations indicated that the number of immune synapses is similar (~55/tumor cell) between two distinct clinical stage B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting TCEs, PF-06863135 in an IgG format and AMG420 in a BiTE format, at their respective efficacious doses in multiple myeloma patients. This result demonstrates the applicability of the developed computational modeling framework to molecular design optimization and clinical benchmarking for TCEs, thus suggesting that this framework can be applied to other targets to provide a quantitative means to facilitate model-informed best-in-class TCE discovery and development.

Targeting the Microenvironment for Treating Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant, incurable disease characterized by the expansion of monoclonal terminally differentiated plasma cells in the bone marrow. MM is consistently preceded by an asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and in the absence of myeloma defining events followed by a stage termed smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), which finally progresses to active myeloma if signs of organ damage are present. The reciprocal interaction between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in the development of MM and the establishment of a tumor-promoting stroma facilitates tumor growth and myeloma progression. Since myeloma cells depend on signals from the bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) for their survival, therapeutic interventions targeting the BMME are a novel and successful strategy for myeloma care. Here, we describe the complex interplay between myeloma cells and the cellular components of the BMME that is essential for MM development and progression. Finally, we present BMME modifying treatment options such as anti-CD38 based therapies, immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), CAR T-cell therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates which have significantly improved the long-term outcome of myeloma patients, and thus represent novel therapeutic standards.

Preclinical Efficacy of BCMA-Directed CAR T Cells Incorporating a Novel D Domain Antigen Recognition Domain

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have shown compelling clinical activity and manageable safety in subjects with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Prior reported CAR T cells have mostly used antibody fragments such as humanized or murine single-chain variable fragments or camelid heavy-chain antibody fragments as the antigen recognition motif. Herein, we describe the generation and preclinical evaluation of ddBCMA CAR, which uses a novel BCMA binding domain discovered from our D domain phage display libraries and incorporates a 4-1BB costimulatory motif and CD3-zeta T-cell activation domain. Preclinical in vitro studies of ddBCMA CAR T cells cocultured with BCMA-positive cell lines showed highly potent, dose-dependent measures of cytotoxicity, cytokine production, T-cell degranulation, and T-cell proliferation. In each assay, ddBCMA CAR performed as well as the BCMA-directed scFv-based C11D5.3 CAR. Furthermore, ddBCMA CAR T cells demonstrated in vivo tumor suppression in three disseminated BCMA-expressing tumor models in NSG-immunocompromised mice. On the basis of these promising preclinical data, CART-ddBCMA is being studied in a first-in-human phase I clinical study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, efficacy, and duration of effect for patients with RRMM (NCT04155749).

Serum B-Cell Maturation Antigen is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a cell membrane receptor expressed on mature B lymphocytes with elevated serum levels found among patients with B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Serum BCMA (sBCMA) levels were measured in 331 untreated, newly diagnosed CLL patients using an ELISA with a polyclonal anti-BCMA antibody. Elevated sBCMA was found among patients with CLL compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls and those with more active CLL based on prognostic factors. The relationships between sBCMA, time to first treatment (TTFT), overall survival (OS) and multiple prognostic factors were compared using Mann Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The median sBCMA level in the CLL cohort (48.6 ng/mL) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to age- and sex-matched healthy subjects (n = 100; 37.8 ng/mL). sBCMA correlated with TTFT (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-4.2, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.0, p < 0.001). Multiple models were utilized to test the predictive effects of sBCMA, sex, CLL-IPI and IPS-E on TTFT and OS. The addition of sBCMA to CLL-IPI and IPS-E improved their prognostic ability to predict TTFT and OS. Thus, serum BCMA is a new promising prognostic biomarker for CLL.

CD229 (Ly9) a Novel Biomarker for B-Cell Malignancies and Multiple Myeloma

CD229 (Ly9) homophilic receptor, which belongs to the SLAM family of cell-surface molecules, is predominantly expressed on B and T cells. It acts as a signaling molecule, regulating lymphocyte homoeostasis and activation. Studies of CD229 function indicate that this receptor functions as a regulator of the development of marginal-zone B cells and other innate-like T and B lymphocytes. The expression on leukemias and lymphomas remains poorly understood due to the lack of CD229 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for immunohistochemistry application (IHC). In this study, we used a new mAb against the cytoplasmic region of CD229 to study the expression of CD229 on normal tissues and B-cell malignancies, including multiple myeloma (MM), using tissue microarrays. We showed CD229 to be restricted to hematopoietic cells. It was strongly expressed in all cases of MM and in most marginal-zone lymphomas (MZL). Moderate CD229 expression was also found in chronic lymphocyte leukemia (CLL), follicular (FL), classic mantle-cell (MCL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Given the high expression on myeloma cells, we also analyzed for the presence of soluble CD229 in the sera of these patients. Serum levels of soluble CD229 (sCD229) at the time of diagnosis in MM patients could be useful as a prognostic biomarker. In conclusion, our results indicate that CD229 represents not only a useful biomarker but also an attractive therapeutic target.

BCMA-Targeted Biologic Therapies: The Next Standard of Care in Multiple Myeloma Therapy

With recent advances in myeloma therapy, patients can achieve long-term remissions, but eventually relapses will occur. Triple-class refractory myeloma (disease that is refractory to an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) and penta-refractory myeloma (disease that is refractory to two proteasome inhibitors, two immunomodulatory agents, and an anti-CD38 antibody) are associated with a particularly poor prognosis, and novel treatments are desperately needed for these patients. Targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is ubiquitously expressed on plasma cells, has emerged as a well-tolerated and highly efficacious strategy in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma. Several mechanisms of targeting BCMA are currently under investigation, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, all with unique side effect profiles. Early phase clinical trials showed unprecedented response rates in highly refractory myeloma patients, leading to the recent approvals of some of these agents. Still, many questions remain with regard to this target, including how best to target it, how to treat patients who have progressed on a BCMA-targeting therapy, and whether response rates will deepen if these agents are used in earlier lines of therapy. In this review, we examine the rationale for targeting BCMA and summarize the data for several agents across multiple classes of BCMA-targeting therapeutics, paying special attention to the diverse mechanisms and unique challenges of each therapeutic class.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma

Although treatment outcomes of multiple myeloma patients have improved significantly during the last two decades, myeloma is still an incurable disease. There are newly emerging immunotherapies to treat multiple myeloma including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugate, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Impressive response rate and clinical efficacy in heavily pretreated myeloma patients led to the FDA approval of the first myeloma CAR-T therapy in March 2021. Among many different targets for myeloma CAR-T therapies, B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) has been the most successful target so far, but other targets which can be used either for single-target or dual-target CAR-T's are actively being explored. Clinical efficacy and safety of current myeloma CAR-T therapies will be presented here. Potential mechanisms leading to resistance include clearance of CAR-T cells, antigenic escape, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Novel strategies to enhance myeloma CAR-T will also be described. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the current data and the future directions of myeloma CAR-T therapies.

sBCMA Plasma Level Dynamics and Anti-BCMA CAR-T-Cell Treatment in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Novel chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) target the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expressed on multiple myeloma cells. Assays monitoring CAR-T cell expansion and treatment response are being implemented in clinical routine.

METHODS

Plasma levels of soluble BCMA (sBCMA) and anti-BCMA CAR-T cell copy numbers were monitored in the blood, following CAR-T cell infusion in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. sBCMA peptide concentration was determined in the plasma, applying a human BCMA/TNFRS17 ELISA. ddPCR was performed using probes targeting the intracellular signaling domains 4-1BB und CD3zeta of the anti-BCMA CAR-T construct.

RESULTS

We report responses in the first five patients who received anti-BCMA CAR- T cell therapy at our center. Four patients achieved a complete remission (CR) in the bone marrow one month after CAR-T infusion, with three patients achieving stringent CR, determined by flow cytometry techniques. Anti-BCMA CAR-T cells were detectable in the peripheral blood for up to 300 days, with copy numbers peaking 7 to 14 days post-infusion. sBCMA plasma levels started declining one to ten days post infusion, reaching minimal levels 30 to 60 days post infusion, before rebounding to normal levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm a favorable response to treatment in four of the first five patients receiving anti-BCMA CAR-T at our hospital. Anti-BCMA CAR-T cell expansion seems to peak in the peripheral blood in a similar pattern compared to the CAR-T cell products already approved for lymphoma treatment. sBCMA plasma level may be a valid biomarker in assessing response to BCMA-targeting therapies in myeloma patients.

Targeting BCMA to Treat Multiple Myeloma: Updates From the 2021 ASH Annual Meeting

With the gradual improvement of treatment regimens, the survival time of multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been significantly prolonged. Even so, MM is still a nightmare with an inferior prognosis. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is highly expressed on the surface of malignant myeloma cells. For the past few years, significant progress has been made in various BCMA-targeted immunotherapies for treating patients with RRMM, including anti-BCMA mAbs, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and BCMA-targeted adoptive cell therapy like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell. The 63rd annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology updated some information about the application of BCMA in MM. This review summarizes part of the related points presented at this conference.

A BCMA/CD16A bispecific innate cell engager for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Despite the recent progress, multiple myeloma (MM) is still essentially incurable and there is a need for additional effective treatments with good tolerability. RO7297089 is a novel bispecific BCMA/CD16A-directed innate cell engager (ICE^®) designed to induce BCMA+ MM cell lysis through high affinity binding of CD16A and retargeting of NK cell cytotoxicity and macrophage phagocytosis. Unlike conventional antibodies approved in MM, RO7297089 selectively targets CD16A with no binding of other Fcγ receptors, including CD16B on neutrophils, and irrespective of 158V/F polymorphism, and its activity is less affected by competing IgG suggesting activity in the presence of M-protein. Structural analysis revealed this is due to selective interaction with a single residue (Y140) uniquely present in CD16A opposite the Fc binding site. RO7297089 induced tumor cell killing more potently than conventional antibodies (wild-type and Fc-enhanced) and induced lysis of BCMA+ cells at very low effector-to-target ratios. Preclinical toxicology data suggested a favorable safety profile as in vitro cytokine release was minimal and no RO7297089-related mortalities or adverse events were observed in cynomolgus monkeys. These data suggest good tolerability and the potential of RO7297089 to be a novel effective treatment of MM patients.

An Overview of CAR T Cell Mediated B Cell Maturation Antigen Therapy

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is one of the incurable types of cancer in plasma cells. While immense progress has been made in the treatment of this malignancy, a large percentage of patients were unable to adapt to such therapy. Additionally, these therapies might be associated with significant diseases and are not always tolerated well in all patients. Since cancer in plasma cells has no cure, patients develop resistance to treatments, resulting in R/R MM (Refractory/Relapsed Multiple Myeloma). BCMA (B cell maturation antigen) is primarily produced on mature B cells. It's up-regulation and activation are associated with multiple myeloma in both murine and human models, indicating that this might be an effective therapeutic target for this type of malignancy. Additionally, BCMA's predictive value, association with effective clinical trials, and capacity to be utilized in previously difficult to observe patient populations, imply that it might be used as a biomarker for multiple myeloma. Numerous kinds of BCMA-targeting medicines have demonstrated antimyeloma efficacy in individuals with refractory/relapsed MM, including CAR T-cell (Chimeric antigen receptor T cell) treatments, ADCs (Antibody-drug conjugate s), bispecific antibody constructs. Among these medications, CART cell-mediated BCMA therapy has shown significant outcomes in multiple myeloma clinical trials. This review article outlines CAR T cell mediated BCMA medicines have the efficiency to change the therapeutic pattern for multiple myeloma significantly.

Use of serum B-cell maturation antigen levels to predict outcomes for myeloma patients treated with ruxolitinib, lenalidomide and methylprednisolone

Previous retrospective studies have shown that serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) levels predict outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing new treatments. Specifically, baseline levels and changes during treatment of this protein predict both progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival. However, prospective studies are lacking evaluating sBCMA for determining outcomes among MM patients undergoing new treatments. Thus, we evaluated whether its baseline levels and changes during treatment in the amount of this serum marker predict outcomes among 38 relapsed/refractory MM patients treated with ruxolitinib, lenalidomide and methylprednisolone in a phase 1 trial. Patients with baseline sBCMA levels in the lowest three quartiles had longer PFS (median PFS 136 vs. 28 days; p < 0.0001). This was also shown for patients with baseline levels below the median (median PFS 140 vs. 77 days; p = 0.0225). PFS was shorter for patients whose sBCMA levels increased ≥25% through their first cycle (median PFS: 50 vs. 134 days, p = 0.0022), second cycle (median PFS: 50 vs. 141 days, p = 0.0273), and during the first three cycles of study treatment (median PFS: 50 vs. 220 days, p < 0.0001). No patient whose sBCMA increased ≥25% during cycle 1 responded whereas the majority (58%) of patients whose level increased <25% responded. This is the first prospective study to determine whether sBCMA levels predict outcomes for MM patients undergoing a non-BCMA directed treatment regimen and demonstrates that baseline levels and its changes during treatment predict PFS and the likelihood of responding to their treatment. These results add to the growing literature suggesting that this serum marker will be useful for determining outcomes for patients undergoing treatment for MM.

Promising Antigens for the New Frontier of Targeted Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma

Simple Summary

Defining the specificity and biological sequalae induced by receptors differentiated expressed in multiple myeloma cells are critical for the development of effective immunotherapies based on monoclonal antibodies. Ongoing studies continue to discover new antigens with superior tumor selectivity and defined function in regulating the pathophysiology of myeloma cells directly or indirectly in the immunosuppressive bone marrow microenvironment. Meanwhile, it is urgent to identify mechanisms of immune resistance and design more potent immunotherapies, alone and/or with best combination partners to further prolong anti-MM immunity.

Abstract

The incorporation of novel agents in recent treatments in multiple myeloma (MM) has improved the clinical outcome of patients. Specifically, the approval of monoclonal antibody (MoAb) against CD38 (daratumumab) and SLAMF7 (elotuzumab) in relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM) represents an important milestone in the development of targeted immunotherapy in MM. These MoAb-based agents significantly induce cytotoxicity of MM cells via multiple effector-dependent mechanisms and can further induce immunomodulation to repair a dysfunctional tumor immune microenvironment. Recently, targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), an even MM-specific antigen, has shown high therapeutic activities by chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), as well as bispecific antibody (BiAb), with some already approved for heavily pretreated RRMM patients. New antigens, such as orphan G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) and FcRH5, were identified and rapidly moved to ongoing clinical studies. We here summarized the pathobiological function of key MM antigens and the status of the corresponding immunotherapies. The potential challenges and emerging treatment strategies are also discussed.

Current State of the Art and Prospects of T Cell-Redirecting Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients eventually develop multi-drug-resistant disease with poor survival. Hence, the development of novel treatment strategies is of great importance. Recently, different classes of immunotherapeutic agents have shown great promise in heavily pre-treated MM, including T cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). These BsAbs simultaneously interact with CD3 on effector T cells and a tumor-associated antigen on MM cells, resulting in redirection of T cells to MM cells. This leads to the formation of an immunologic synapse, the release of granzymes/perforins, and subsequent tumor cell lysis. Several ongoing phase 1 studies show substantial activity and a favorable toxicity profile with BCMA-, GPRC5D-, or FcRH5-targeting BsAbs in heavily pre-treated MM patients. Resistance mechanisms against BsAbs include tumor-related features, T cell characteristics, and impact of components of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Various clinical trials are currently evaluating combination therapy with a BsAb and another agent, such as a CD38-targeting antibody or an immunomodulatory drug (e.g., pomalidomide), to further improve response depth and duration. Additionally, the combination of two BsAbs, simultaneously targeting two different antigens to prevent antigen escape, is being explored in clinical studies. The evaluation of BsAbs in earlier lines of therapy, including newly diagnosed MM, is warranted, based on the efficacy of BsAbs in advanced MM.

The Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in the Era of Bi-Specifics Antibodies and CAR T Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains largely incurable despite enormous improvement in the outcome of patients. Over the past decade, we have witnessed the "era of monoclonal antibody (moAb)", setting new benchmarks in clinical outcomes for relapsed and newly diagnosed MM. Due to their excellent efficacy and relative safe toxicity profile, moAbs in combination with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have become the new backbone of upfront anti-MM therapy. Yet, most patients will eventually relapse and patients who become refractory to IMiDs, PIs and moAbs have a dismal outcome. Emerging T-cell directing therapies, such as bispecific antibody (bsAb) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) have shown unprecedented responses and outcomes in these heavily pretreated and treatment-refractory patients. Their clinical efficacy combined with high tolerability will likely lead to the use of these agents earlier in the treatment course and there is great enthusiasm that a combination of T cell directed therapy with moAbs can lead to long duration remission in the near future, possibly even without the need of high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Herein, we summarize the role of naked moAbs in MM in the context of newer immunotherapeutic agents like bsAb and CAR T therapy.

The benefits of early intervention using lenalidomide for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: emerging data and its promising clinical impact

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma is preceded by the early stages: monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (M.G.U.S.) and smoldering myeloma (S.M.M.), which are less genomically complex and where patients are overall healthier with preserved quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the current evidence in risk stratification and initial therapy for these patients with the goal to delay progression to and/or cure multiple myeloma.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in the understanding of the factors that contribute to myeloma evolution coupled with new therapeutics that have high efficacy and limited toxicity have revolutionized our approach to early myeloma. Although our current recommendation continues to be to observe S.M.M. outside of clinical trials, the clinical benefit of lenalidomide sets the stage for combinations with immunotherapy, which, in our opinion, will likely lead to regulatory approvals and more widespread treatment of early myeloma.

Prognostic and predictive biomarker developments in multiple myeloma

New approaches to stratify multiple myeloma patients based on prognosis and therapeutic decision-making, or prediction, are needed since patients are currently managed in a similar manner regardless of individual risk factors or disease characteristics. However, despite new and improved biomarkers for determining the prognosis of patients, there is currently insufficient information to utilise biomarkers to intensify, reduce or altogether change treatment, nor to target patient-specific biology in a so-called predictive manner. The ever-increasing number and complexity of drug classes to treat multiple myeloma have improved response rates and so clinically useful biomarkers will need to be relevant in the era of such novel therapies. Therefore, the field of multiple myeloma biomarker development is rapidly progressing, spurred on by new technologies and therapeutic approaches, and underpinned by a deeper understanding of tumour biology with individualised patient management the goal. In this review, we describe the main biomarker categories in multiple myeloma and relate these to diagnostic, prognostic and predictive applications.

BCMA in Multiple Myeloma-A Promising Key to Therapy

Despite the discoveries of numerous agents including next generation proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease. The field of myeloma treatment in refractory or relapsed patients after standard therapy entered a new era due to the B-cell maturation antigen (BMCA) targeted approach. BCMA is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family with high expression in mature B-lymphocytes and plasma cells. Given the understanding of BCMA mechanism of action in MM, BCMA plays a promising role as a therapeutic target. Several clinical trials are underway to evolve the current BCMA targeted treatment concept such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), bispecific T cell engagers (BITEs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Current results of representative BCMA trials may close the gap of the unmet clinical need to further improve the outcome of heavily pretreated MM patients with the potency to change the paradigm in newly diagnosed and refractory MM. This comprehensive review will give an update on various BMCA targeted treatment modalities (ADCs, BITEs, CAR T cell therapy) and its existing results on efficacy and safety from preclinical and clinical trials.

Exposure-Response Analyses for Therapeutic Dose Selection of Belantamab Mafodotin in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Belantamab mafodotin is an antibody–drug conjugate comprising a humanized anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA) monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a protease‐resistant maleimidocaproyl linker. Single‐agent belantamab mafodotin showed clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the phase I DREAMM‐1 and phase II DREAMM‐2 studies and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for RRMM treatment. To support monotherapy dose selection, the relationship between Cycle 1 exposure (derived using a population pharmacokinetic model) and clinical response (for multiple efficacy and safety end points) was explored. In DREAMM‐2, efficacy end points (probability of response (PoR) and progression‐free survival (PFS)) were associated with exposure in univariate evaluation; however, once disease burden factors were included in the model (e.g., baseline soluble BCMA, ß₂‐microglobulin), exposure was no longer significant. Patients with higher disease burden had lower exposure. In DREAMM‐1, belantamab mafodotin exposure was the only variable to correlate with PoR and PFS. Probability of corneal events (keratopathy), but not dry eye or blurred vision, was strongly associated with belantamab mafodotin exposure (DREAMM‐2). Higher cys‐mcMMAF maximum plasma drug concentration (C_max) and lower baseline platelet count were associated with increased probability of thrombocytopenia (DREAMM‐1 and DREAMM ‐2). In general, safety end points were more strongly associated with belantamab mafodotin exposure than efficacy end points, particularly after disease factors and patient characteristics were taken into account. Overall, these findings supported the monotherapy dose recommendation of belantamab mafodotin as 2.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks in patients with RRMM who have received four or more prior therapies.

The evolving status of immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: the future role of bispecific antibodies

Treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have improved dramatically over the past 10 years. However, patients with high-risk disease such as those with Stage III disease by the Revised International Staging System, the presence of adverse cytogenetics, or who are refractory to proteosome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and monoclonal antibodies may have dismal outcomes. These patients represent an urgent ongoing need in MM. One of the hallmarks of MM is immune dysfunction and a tumour-permissive immune microenvironment. Ameliorating the immune-paresis could lead to improved outcomes. The role of immunotherapies has been growing at an exponential pace with numerous agents under development in clinical trials. In the present review, we provide an overview of immunotherapies in MM, focussing on bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). We review efficacy outcomes from the published clinical trials and consider the important safety aspects of these therapies, in particular the risk of cytokine-release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and how these compare with patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T cells. We discuss the MM epitopes being targeted by BsAbs, either in clinical or preclinical stages, and we consider where these therapies might best fit within the future ever-changing paradigm of MM treatment.

Targeting BCMA in Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite considerable advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, a significant number of patients still progress on current available therapies. Here, we review treatment modalities used to target BCMA in the treatment of MM, specifically antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), bispecific antibody constructs, and chimeric antibody receptor (CAR) modified T-cell therapies. We will provide an overview of therapies from these classes that have presented or published clinical data, as well as data on mechanisms of resistance to these novel agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials exploring different BCMA-targeting modalities to treat multiple myeloma are underway and demonstrate promising results. In relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, anti-BCMA ADCs and bispecific antibody constructs are showing impressive efficacy with manageable side effect profiles. In parallel, adoptive cellular therapy has induced dramatic durable responses in multiply relapsed and refractory myeloma patients. Therapeutic approaches targeting BCMA hold significant potential in the management of multiple myeloma and will soon be incorporated in combination with current standard therapies to improve outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma. In addition, novel approaches are being evaluated to overcome resistance mechanisms to anti-BCMA therapies.

European Myeloma Network perspective on CAR T-Cell therapies for multiple myeloma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CAR-T) have dramatically changed the treatment landscape of B-cell malignancies, providing a potential cure for relapsed/refractory patients. Long-term responses in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non Hodgkin lymphomas have encouraged further development in myeloma. In particular, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR-T have established very promising results in heavily pre-treated patients. Moreover, CAR-T targeting other antigens (i.e., SLAMF7 and CD44v6) are currently under investigation. However, none of these current autologous therapies have been approved, and despite high overall response rates across studies, main issues such as long-term outcome, toxicities, treatment resistance, and management of complications limit as yet their widespread use. Here, we critically review the most important pre-clinical and clinical findings, recent advances in CAR-T against myeloma, as well as discoveries in the biology of a still incurable disease, that, all together, will further improve safety and efficacy in relapsed/refractory patients, urgently in need of novel treatment options.

Endogenous soluble receptors sBCMA and sTACI: biomarker, immunoregulator and hurdle for therapy in multiple myeloma

BAFF and APRIL regulate B cell homeostasis by binding to their three receptors BAFFR, BCMA and TACI. The complexity of this system is further increased by shedding of these three receptors; this reduces signaling due to the display of less surface receptors. Further, soluble forms, sBCMA and sTACI, were detected in body fluids and serve as biomarker in malignancies, autoimmune diseases and immunodeficiencies. sBCMA and sTACI function as decoys blocking BAFF and APRIL. BCMA is a promising therapeutic target in multiple myeloma, but sBCMA may reduce therapeutic activity of CAR T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. Insights into the biochemical mechanism of shedding of BCMA can be harnessed to improve BCMA-directed therapy by blocking its shedding with a γ-secretase inhibitor.

Impact of Endocytosis Mechanisms for the Receptors Targeted by the Currently Approved Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)-A Necessity for Future ADC Research and Development

Biologically-based therapies increasingly rely on the endocytic cycle of internalization and exocytosis of target receptors for cancer therapies. However, receptor trafficking pathways (endosomal sorting (recycling, lysosome localization) and lateral membrane movement) are often dysfunctional in cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revitalized the concept of targeted chemotherapy by coupling inhibitory antibodies to cytotoxic payloads. Significant advances in ADC technology and format, and target biology have hastened the FDA approval of nine ADCs (four since 2019). Although the links between aberrant endocytic machinery and cancer are emerging, the impact of dysregulated internalization processes of ADC targets and response rates or resistance have not been well studied. This is despite the reliance on ADC uptake and trafficking to lysosomes for linker cleavage and payload release. In this review, we describe what is known about all the target antigens for the currently approved ADCs. Specifically, internalization efficiency and relevant intracellular sorting activities are described for each receptor under normal processes, and when complexed to an ADC. In addition, we discuss aberrant endocytic processes that have been directly linked to preclinical ADC resistance mechanisms. The implications of endocytosis in regard to therapeutic effectiveness in the clinic are also described. Unexpectedly, information on endocytosis is scarce (absent for two receptors). Moreover, much of what is known about endocytosis is not in the context of receptor-ADC/antibody complexes. This review provides a deeper understanding of the pertinent principles of receptor endocytosis for the currently approved ADCs.

Mechanisms of Action of the New Antibodies in Use in Multiple Myeloma

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against antigen-specific of multiple myeloma (MM) cells have Fc-dependent immune effector mechanisms, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), but the choice of the antigen is crucial for the development of effective immuno-therapy in MM. Recently new immunotherapeutic options in MM patients have been developed against different myeloma-related antigens as drug conjugate-antibody, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. In this review, we will highlight the mechanism of action of immuno-therapy currently available in clinical practice to target CD38, SLAMF7, and BCMA, focusing on the biological role of the targets and on mechanisms of actions of the different immunotherapeutic approaches underlying their advantages and disadvantages with critical review of the literature data.

Predictive Role of Immune Profiling for Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients

Despite new efficacy drugs and cell therapy have been used for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, some patients will relapse over time. We wonder the immune system play a vital role as well as MM cell during the development of disease. It is clear that the characteristic of myeloma cell is associated with the survival of MM patients. However, the link between the immune profiling and the prognosis of the disease is still not entirely clear. As more study focus on the role of immunity on multiple myeloma pathogenesis. There are plenty of study about the predictive role of immunity on the survival of multiple myeloma patients. Up to mow, the majority reviews published have focused on the immunotherapy and immune pathogenesis. It is indispensable to overlook the predictive role of immunity on multiple myeloma patients. Here, we give a review of vital previous works and recent progress related to the predictive role of immune profiling on multiple myeloma, such as absolute lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocytes and cytokines.

Serum BCMA levels predict outcomes in MGUS and smoldering myeloma patients

Soluble BCMA (sBCMA) levels are elevated in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). However, the association between sBCMA levels and prognosis in MGUS and SMM has not been studied. We retrospectively analyzed sBCMA levels in stored samples from 99 MGUS and 184 SMM patients. Baseline sBCMA levels were significantly higher in MGUS and SMM patients progressing to MM during clinical follow up. When stratified according to the median baseline sBCMA level for each cohort, higher levels were associated with a shorter PFS for MGUS (HR 3.44 comparing sBCMA ≥77 vs <77 ng/mL [95% CI 2.07-5.73, p < 0.001] and SMM (HR 2.0 comparing sBCMA ≥128 vs <128 ng/mL, 95% 1.45-2.76, p < 0.001) patients. The effect of sBCMA on PFS was similar even after adjusting for the baseline MGUS or SMM risk stratification. We evaluated paired serum samples and found that sBCMA increased significantly in MGUS and SMM patients who eventually progressed to MM, whereas among MGUS non-progressors the sBCMA level remained stable. While our results require independent validation, they suggest that sBCMA may be a useful biomarker to identify MGUS and SMM patients at increased risk of progression to MM independent of the established risk models.

Baseline serum B-cell maturation antigen levels predict time to disease progression for patients with smoldering multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with smoldering (S) disease are defined by a lack of CRAB/SLiM criteria but may transform into disease requiring treatment. The International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for SMM uses serum M-protein, serum-free light chain ratio, and bone marrow plasma cell percentage. We investigated whether baseline serum B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) levels are predictive of disease progression among 65 patients with SMM. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to establish a definition for high-risk baseline sBCMA. Mantel Byar analysis was used to examine whether high-risk sBCMA was correlated with shorter time to transformation, and a time-dependent cox proportional hazard was used to determine whether it is independent of other risk factors. A z test for proportions was used to compare the percentage of patients that progressed among high-risk versus low-risk sBCMA patients. A baseline sBCMA level ≥137.5 mg/ml was found to be the optimal cutoff between high- and low-risk SMM patients. Patients with high-risk sBCMA levels had a shorter time to transformation (P = .000332). sBCMA was also higher at the time of transformation than baseline levels (P = .0116). sBCMA was the only variable found to be significantly predictive of time to transformation and additionally was found to be independent of other risk factors. In this study, we have shown for the first time that sBCMA levels predict transformation of SMM to active disease and that these levels increase at the time of transformation. These results are consistent with other studies showing that active MM patients undergoing therapy with higher baseline sBCMA levels are more likely to progress early and its levels increase at the time of disease progression.

Bispecific T Cell Engagers for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Achievements and Challenges

MM is the second most common hematological malignancy and represents approximately 20% of deaths from hematopoietic cancers. The advent of novel agents has changed the therapeutic landscape of MM treatment; however, MM remains incurable. T cell-based immunotherapy such as BTCEs is a promising modality for the treatment of MM. This review article discusses the advancements and future directions of BTCE treatments for MM.

Baseline and Changes in Serum B-Cell Maturation Antigen Levels Rapidly Indicate Changes in Clinical Status Among Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Starting New Therapy

BACKGROUND

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is expressed on malignant plasma cells from patients with multiple myeloma (MM). These patients have higher levels of serum (s)BCMA than healthy subjects, and levels correlate with disease status. The half-life of sBCMA is only 24-36 h, and levels are independent of renal function.

OBJECTIVE

We determined whether baseline sBCMA values, a ≥ 25% increase, and a ≥ 50% decrease during treatment predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among 81 patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) starting new treatments.

METHODS

Serum was obtained on day 22 of each patient's 28-day cycle of new therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank comparison tests were used to determine the effect of baseline sBCMA. The effect of percentage change in sBCMA was investigated using time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Patients with baseline sBCMA levels above the median had a shorter PFS (p = 0.0077), and those in the highest quartile had a shorter PFS (p = 0.0012) and OS (p = 0.0022). A ≥ 25% increase at week 4, week 8, and anytime through week 12 predicted a shorter PFS (p = 0.0011, p = 0.0005, and p < 0.0001, respectively). A ≥ 50% decrease at week 4, week 8, and anytime through week 12 predicted a longer PFS (p = 0.0045, p = 0.029, p = 0.0055, respectively). A ≥ 25% increase in sBCMA occurred before progression according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria in 67.5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate the potential for the use of sBCMA as a new biomarker for monitoring patients with RRMM.

Belantamab Mafodotin for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: An Overview of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety

Despite the introduction of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in the chemotherapy regimens for newly diagnosed (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), the occurrence of drug resistance remains a challenge in MM patients. This is mainly in the advanced stage of the disease when treatments are limited, and the prognosis is abysmal. Nevertheless, novel molecules and therapeutic approaches are rapidly moving through the several phases of drug development and could address the need for new treatment options. The recent innovative B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) targeted immunotherapies, such as belantamab mafodotin, the first-in-class monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), induce an effective and durable response in triple-class refractory disease and to be approved in MM. In contrast with the other BCMA-targeted therapies as CAR T cells with a complex manufacturing process, and bispecific antibodies, both requiring inpatient hospitalization to monitor the occurrence of severe adverse events, belantamab mafodotin is an “off-the-shelf” drug that can be administered in an outpatient setting. Many belantamab mafodotin-based combinations are under evaluation in Phase I, II, and III clinical trials either late or in early RRMM patients. Ocular toxicity represents a peculiar side effect of belantamab mafodotin. This toxicity is generally manageable with adequate dose reductions or delays since most patients who developed keratopathy recovered on treatment and discontinued ADC are rare. Here, we described the most recent clinical data of belantamab mafodotin and discussed the possible leading role of this intriguing agent in the near future of MM treatment.

Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma-Time for a Second Major Paradigm Shift

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogenous disease and remains mostly incurable with a small group of patients achieving long-term disease remission. The past decade witnessed enormous efforts to break the circulus vitiosus of tumor-induced immunosuppression and to re-engage the immune system to fight cancer. The first-in-class anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab, has shown unprecedented responses especially in combination with other novel agents in both newly diagnosed and relapsed MM. There has been great interest in harnessing the power of T cells with bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies in hematologic malignancies including MM. These immune-based approaches have shown notable antimyeloma effects with deeper, durable responses in early clinical trials of heavily pretreated patients with MM with limited therapeutic options. Several trials are underway investigating both single and combinatorial immune therapies at different stages with a hope to bring major transformation in MM. In the current review, we summarize how an immunologic approach offers promise for the treatment of MM and is setting the stage for second major paradigm shift 2 decades after the emergence of thalidomide and novel therapeutics.

Tumor burden limits bispecific antibody efficacy through T cell exhaustion averted by concurrent cytotoxic therapy

BCMA-CD3-targeting bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are a recently developed immunotherapy class which shows potent tumor killing activity in multiple myeloma (MM). Here, we investigated a murine BCMA-CD3-targeting BsAb in the immunocompetent Vk*MYC and its IMiD-sensitive derivative Vk*MYC^hCRBN models of MM. The BCMA-CD3 BsAb was safe and efficacious in a subset of mice, but failed in those with high-tumor burden, consistent with clinical reports of BsAb in leukemia. The combination of BCMA-CD3 BsAb with pomalidomide expanded lytic T cells and improved activity even in IMiD resistant high-tumor burden cases. Yet, survival was only marginally extended due to acute toxicity and T cell exhaustion, which impaired T cell persistence. In contrast, the combination with cyclophosphamide was safe and allowed for a tempered pro-inflammatory response associated with long-lasting complete remission. Concurrent cytotoxic therapy with BsAb actually improved T cell persistence and function, offering a promising approach to patients with a large tumor burden.

CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: more room for improvement

The emergence of various novel therapies over the last decade has changed the therapeutic landscape for multiple myeloma. While the clinical outcomes have improved significantly, the disease remains incurable, typically in patients with relapsed and refractory disease. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have achieved remarkable clinical success in B-cell malignancies. This scope of research has more recently been extended to the field of myeloma. While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is currently the most well-studied CAR T antigen target in this disease, many other antigens are also undergoing intensive investigations. Some studies have shown encouraging results, whereas some others have demonstrated unfavorable results due to reasons such as toxicity and lack of clinical efficacy. Herein, we provide an overview of CAR T-cell therapies in myeloma, highlighted what has been achieved over the past decade, including the latest updates from ASH 2020 and discussed some of the challenges faced. Considering the current hits and misses of CAR T therapies, we provide a comprehensive analysis on the current manufacturing technologies, and deliberate on the future of CAR T-cell domain in MM.

Targeted Therapies for Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma continues to be a challenging disorder to treat despite improved therapies and the widespread use of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. Although patient outcomes have improved, the disease continues to invariably relapse, and in the majority of cases, a cure remains elusive. In the last decade, there has been an explosion of novel drugs targeting cellular proteins essential for malignant plasma cell proliferation and survival. In this review, we focus on novel druggable targets leading to the development of monoclonal antibodies and cellular therapies against surface antigens (CD38, CD47, CD138, BCMA, SLAMF7, GPRC5D, FcRH5), inhibitors of epigenetic regulators such as histone deacetylase (HDAC), and agents targeting anti-apoptotic (BCL-2), ribosomal (eEF1A2) and nuclear export (XPO1) proteins.

A new decade: novel immunotherapies on the horizon for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Survival in multiple myeloma (MM) has improved due to the ongoing revolution of therapeutic approaches. Nevertheless, many patients relapse, and additional novel approaches are required to prolong remissions and prevent disease progression.

AREAS COVERED

Considering the success of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD38 and SLAMF7 in relapsed/refractory MM (R/R MM), additional antigens expressed on malignant plasma cells are being investigated as treatment targets. Among these, many trials are focusing on B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), using either antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), bispecific T cell engagers (TCE), or chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T). Other potential targets include the myeloma markers CD138, GPRC5D, FcRH5, the plasma cell differentiating factors APRIL, TACI and BAFF, and the immune checkpoint proteins CD47 and TIGIT. Additionally, novel immunomodulatory Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulators (CELMoDs) offer the potential to overcome resistance to conventional immunomodulatory agents. Based upon PubMed and abstract searches primarily from the past 4 years, here we review the data supporting novel immunotherapies for R/R MM.

EXPERT OPINION

Overcoming disease resistance remains a challenge in R/R MM. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting MM antigens and/or enhancing immune cell function offer the potential to prolong survival and are actively being investigated in clinical trials.

Belantamab mafodotin in combination with novel agents in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: DREAMM-5 study design

Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a BCMA-targeted antibody-drug conjugate recently approved as monotherapy for adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received ≥4 prior therapies. Belamaf binds to BCMA and eliminates myeloma cells by multimodal mechanisms of action. The cytotoxic and potential immunomodulatory properties of belamaf have led to novel combination studies with other anticancer therapies. Here, we describe the rationale and design of DREAMM-5, an ongoing Phase I/II platform study evaluating the safety and efficacy of belamaf combined with novel agents, including GSK3174998 (OX40 agonist), feladilimab (an ICOS; GSK3359609), nirogacestat (a gamma-secretase inhibitor; PF-03084014) and dostarlimab (a PD-1 blocker) versus belamaf monotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Clinical trial registration: NCT04126200 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Oncolytic herpes simplex virus infects myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo

Because most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) develop resistance to current regimens, novel approaches are needed. Genetically modified, replication-competent oncolytic viruses exhibit high tropism for tumor cells regardless of cancer stage and prior treatment. Receptors of oncolytic herpes simplex virus 1 (oHSV-1), NECTIN-1, and HVEM are expressed on MM cells, prompting us to investigate the use of oHSV-1 against MM. Using oHSV-1-expressing GFP, we found a dose-dependent increase in the GFP⁺ signal in MM cell lines and primary MM cells. Whereas NECTIN-1 expression is variable among MM cells, we discovered that HVEM is ubiquitously and highly expressed on all samples tested. Expression of HVEM was consistently higher on CD138⁺/CD38⁺ plasma cells than in non-plasma cells. HVEM blocking demonstrated the requirement of this receptor for infection. However, we observed that, although oHSV-1 could efficiently infect and kill all MM cell lines tested, no viral replication occurred. Instead, we identified that oHSV-1 induced MM cell apoptosis via caspase-3 cleavage. We further noted that oHSV-1 yielded a significant decrease in tumor volume in two mouse xenograft models. Therefore, oHSV-1 warrants exploration as a novel potentially effective treatment option in MM, and HVEM should be investigated as a possible therapeutic target.