Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Globe Pulsed Field System for High-definition Mapping and Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation ablation. Radiofrequency ablation has been the most common source of energy used to achieve PVI until now. In recent years, cryoballoon ablation has gained popularity due to its ability to perform PVI in a 'single-shot' fashion. In both cases (radiofrequency and cryoablation), the main limitation is their inability to achieve durable lesions without causing collateral damage to adjacent structures. In contrast, pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation is a non-thermal energy source that causes cell apoptosis by applying an electric current to the tissue. Lesions created by a field of energy seem to be more contiguous than traditional ablation, and the risk of damage to adjacent tissues is largely avoided due to the properties of the tissues and electrical fields. In recent years, new catheters capable of delivering PEF have been developed and are now undergoing clinical testing. In this article, we describe a complete solution for PVI: a single multielectrode catheter with 3D mapping capabilities that can deliver PEF in a single-shot PVI fashion with targeting beyond the pulmonary veins.

Coronary Arterial Spasm During Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has a unique safety profile when used to treat atrial fibrillation, largely related to its preferentiality for myocardial tissue ablation, in particular, esophageal sparing. A pentaspline catheter was the first such PFA system studied clinically for atrial fibrillation ablation; in these initial regulatory trials, the catheter was used for pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation. Since its regulatory approval in Europe, in clinical practice, physicians have ablated beyond pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation to expanded lesion sets in closer proximity to coronary arteries. This is an unstudied important issue because preclinical and clinical data have raised the potential for coronary arterial spasm. Herein, we studied the vasospastic potential of PFA lesion sets, both remote from and adjacent to coronary arteries.

METHODS

During routine atrial fibrillation ablation using the pentaspline PFA catheter, coronary angiography was performed before, during, and after pulsed field applications. The lesion sets studied included: (1) those remote from the coronary arteries such as pulmonary vein isolation (n=25 patients) and left atrial posterior wall ablation (n=5), and (2) ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (n=20) that is situated adjacent to the right coronary artery.

RESULTS

During pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation, coronary spasm did not occur, but cavotricuspid isthmus ablation provoked severe subtotal vasospasm in 5 of 5 (100%) consecutive patients, and this was relieved by intracoronary nitroglycerin in 5.5±3.5 minutes. ST-segment elevation was not observed. However, no patient (0%, P=0.004) had severe spasm if first administered parenteral nitroglycerin, either intracoronary (n=5) or intravenous (n=10), before treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary vasospasm was not provoked during PFA at locations remote from coronary arteries, but when the energy is delivered adjacent to a coronary artery, PFA routinely provokes subclinical vasospasm. This phenomenon is attenuated by nitroglycerin, administered either post hoc to treat spasm or as prophylaxis.

Prognostic Value of Left Atrial Calcification After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Left atrial calcification (LAC) has occasionally been observed in patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) by chest computed tomography (CT). However, the evidence regarding the clinical impact of LAC in patients with AF is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the prevalence of LAC in AF patients and evaluate its clinical significance after AF ablation.

METHODS

This observational registry included AF patients who received computed tomography and serial transthoracic echocardiography between January 2010 and November 2017. The primary composite outcome included cardiovascular death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

Among 534 patients (72 ± 13 years, 62.5% men) who met the inclusion criteria, 31 (5.8%) had LAC. In multivariable analysis, AF ablation was associated with an 11.8-fold (odds ratio: 11.8; 95% CI: 2.03-227.65) increased risk of the development of LAC in AF patients. Among 218 patients with AF ablation, LAC was detected in 30 (13.8%) patients. Prior stroke (HR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.08-6.93) and multiple ablation procedures (HR: 4.21; 95% CI: 1.63-10.87) were independently associated with the development of LAC in AF-ablation patients. During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the primary composite outcome occurred in 11 patients in the LAC group (39.8 per 1,000 person-years) and 10 patients in the non-LAC group (8.9 per 1,000 person-years). The adjusted HR for the primary composite outcome in the LAC group, as compared with the non-LAC group, was 2.81 (95% CI: 1.16-6.84; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of LAC was a significant and independent prognostic factor for identifying major adverse cardiovascular events after AF ablation.

Validation of seven risk scores in an independent cohort: the challenge of predicting recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation

Purpose

Several predictive scores for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after AF ablation have been developed. We compared the predictive value of seven previously described risk scores ((CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASC, HATCH, APPLE, CAAP-AF, BASE-AF2, MB-LATER) for prediction of AF recurrence risk at 12 months after AF ablation in our patient cohort. Further, we aimed to identify additional variables to predict recurrences after AF ablation.

Methods

We used data from our digital AF ablation registry to compare the previously published scores in an independent cohort (n = 883, 50.8% with paroxysmal AF). The scores were chosen based on earlier publications and availability of relevant data.

Results

The BASE-AF2 (AUC 0.630, p < 0.001), MB-LATER (AUC 0.612, p < 0.001), CAAP-AF (AUC 0.591, p < 0.001), APPLE (AUC 0.591, p < 0.001) and CHA2DS2-VASC (AUC 0.547, p = 0.018) scores had a statistically significant but modest predictive value for 12-month AF recurrence. None of the scores were significantly superior. Other analyzed scores had no predictive value. There was no difference in the predictive value for 12-month recurrence of AF between first procedure vs. redo procedure and RF ablation vs. cryoablation. Unlike other scores, MB-LATER showed better predictive value for paroxysmal vs. persistent AF (AUC 0.632 vs. 0.551, p = 0.038). In the multivariate logistic regression, only age (p = 0.006), number of prior electrical cardioversions (p < 0.001) and early AF recurrence (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of AF recurrence.

Conclusion

Despite numerous available scores, predicting recurrences after AF ablation remains challenging. New predictors are needed, potentially based on interventions, as well as novel genetic, functional and anatomic parameters.

A prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation for the recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) after post-circular pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation (CPVA)

AIM

To construct a prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after the post-circular pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation (CPVA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 289 patients with PAF who underwent CPVA for the first time. The patients were randomly divided into modeling group and verification group at the ratio of 75:25. In the modeling group, the multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze and construct a prediction model for post-CPVA recurrence in PAF patients, which was then validated in the verification group.

RESULTS

(1) After 3-6 months of follow-up, the patients were divided into sinus rhythm group (252 cases) and recurrence group (24 cases); (2) In the modeling group, the age, left atrial diameter (LAD), and the degree of MR (mild, moderate, severe) were higher in recurrence group than that of the sinus rhythm group, and the left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAV) was lower in recurrence group (all p < .05). (3) A model for predicting the recurrence of PAF after radiofrequency ablation was constructed in the modeling group. The equation was: Logit(P) = -3.253 + .092 × age + 1.263 × mild MR + 2.325 × moderate MR + 5.111 × severe MR -.113 × LAAV. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was .889 in modeling group and .866 in verification group, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

The prediction model of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after CPVA in PAF patients has good predictive efficacy, specificity, and accuracy.

Management of cardiac diseases in liver transplant recipients: Comprehensive review and multidisciplinary practice-based recommendations

Cardiac diseases are one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation (LT). Prior studies have shown that cardiac diseases affect close to one-third of liver transplant recipients (LTRs) long term and that their incidence has been on the rise. This rise is expected to continue as more patients with advanced age and/or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis undergo LT. In view of the increasing disease burden, a multidisciplinary initiative was developed to critically review the existing literature (between January 1, 1990 and March 17, 2021) surrounding epidemiology, risk assessment, and risk mitigation of coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, heart failure, and valvular heart disease and formulate practice-based recommendations accordingly. In this review, the expert panel emphasizes the importance of optimizing management of metabolic syndrome and its components in LTRs and highlights the cardioprotective potential for the newer diabetes medications (e.g., sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitors) in this high-risk population. Tailoring the multidisciplinary management of cardiac diseases in LTRs to the cardiometabolic risk profile of the individual patient is critical. The review also outlines numerous knowledge gaps to pave the road for future research in this sphere with the ultimate goal of improving clinical outcomes.

Outcomes of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent data have shown an advantage of rhythm control over rate control for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, the data regarding efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) compared with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with AF is lacking. Therefore, we sought to evaluate recurrence of arrhythmia, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular deaths, stroke/TIA, and all-cause readmissions of CA compared with AAD in patients with AF.

METHODS

Systematically searched through PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane for randomized control trials that compared CA and AAD in atrial fibrillation patients. Review Manager 5.4 and OpenMetaAnalyst were used to analyze the data. Data was pooled for the outcomes using random-effect models (DerSimonian and Laird) and reported as pooled odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

A total of 4822 patients were included. The CA group had 2417 patients while the AAD group included 2405 patients. Pooled data demonstrated that the CA arm had a statistically significant decrease in risk for recurrence of arrhythmia as compared to AAD (OR 0.25; [95% CI, 0.18-0.36]; p < 0.001). All-cause readmission was statistically significantly lower in CA as compared to AAD (OR 0.33; [95%CI, 0.17-0.63]; p < 0.001). For other secondary outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between CA and AAD with regard to all-cause mortality (OR 0.75; [95% CI, 0.55-1.03]), cardiovascular death (OR 0.76; [95% CI, 0.22-2.54]), bleeding (OR 1.09, [95% CI 0.74, 1.61]), or stroke/TIA outcome (OR 0.90, [95% CI, 0.59-1.37]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of pooled data from 16 RCTs, CA utilization for atrial fibrillation had improved freedom from arrhythmia as well as reduced all-cause readmission compared with AAD.

Very High-Power Short-Duration, Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The Prospective Multicenter Q-FFICIENCY Trial

BACKGROUND

QDOT MICRO (QDM) is a novel contact force-sensing catheter optimized for temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation. The very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) algorithm modulates power, maintaining target temperature during 90 W ablations for ≤4 seconds.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate safety and 12-month effectiveness of the QDM catheter in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using the vHPSD mode combined with conventional-power temperature-controlled (CPTC) mode.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study, patients with drug-refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with QDM catheter with vHPSD as primary ablation mode, with optional use of the CPTC mode (25 to 50 W) for PV touch-up or non-PV ablation. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of primary adverse events within ≤7 days of ablation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from documented atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and acute procedural, repeat ablation, and antiarrhythmic drug failure.

RESULTS

Of 191 enrolled participants, 166 had the catheter inserted, received RF ablation, and met eligibility criteria. Median procedural, RF application for ablating PVs, and fluoroscopy times were 132.0, 8.0, and 9.1 minutes, respectively. The primary adverse event rate was 3.6%. Imaging conducted in a subset of participants (n = 40) at 3 months did not show moderate or severe PV stenosis. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 12-month rate for primary effectiveness success was 76.7%; freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was 82.1%; clinical success (freedom from symptomatic recurrence) was 86.0%; and freedom from repeat ablation was 92.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Temperature-controlled paroxysmal AF ablation with the novel QDM catheter in vHPSD mode (90 W, ≤4 seconds), alone or with CPTC mode (25 to 50 W), is highly efficient and effective without compromising safety. (Evaluation of QDOT MICRO Catheter for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Subjects With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [Q-FFICIENCY]; NCT03775512.).

Cryoballoon catheter ablation or drug therapy to delay progression of atrial fibrillation: A single-center randomized trial

Background

Delaying atrial fibrillation (AF) progression is a key goal in cardiovascular treatment. However, numbers of previously published studies on delayed AF progression are relatively limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a cryoballoon catheter ablation (CA) strategy could delay AF progression compared to anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Methods

A total of 204 subjects were enrolled in the trial, including 102 in the cryoballoon CA group and 102 in the AAD group. Participants were followed up with for 36 months. The primary study endpoint was the first occurrence of persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia, while secondary endpoints included the event rates of persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 and 2 years. The primary safety endpoint was serious adverse events.

Results

Overall, the 36-month follow-up was completed by 154 subjects (75.5%). At 3 years, documented progression from paroxysmal AF to persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia had occurred in 2 of the 102 patients assigned to undergo cryoballoon CA [2.203% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.554–8.537)] and in 17 of the 102 patients assigned to receive AADs [20.223% (95% CI, 13.040–30.604)] [hazard ratio (HR), 0.107; 95% CI, 0.043–0.262; P < 0.001]. Lower rates of progression in the cryoballoon CA group compared to the AAD group were already obvious at 1 year [1.053% (95% CI, 0.149–7.238) vs. 5.284% (95% CI, 2.233–12.237)] [HR, 0.193; (95% CI, 0.039–0.956; P = 0.09)] and 2 years [2.203% (95% CI, 0.554–8.537) vs. 12.430% (95% CI, 7.066–21.371)] (HR, 0.169; 95% CI, 0.057–0.501, P < 0.001). Serious adverse events occurred in 7 of the 102 patients (6.9%) in the cryoballoon CA group and 9 of the 102 patients (8.8%) in the AAD group.

Conclusion

Cryoballoon CA was superior to AAD therapy in preventing the occurrence of persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with paroxysmal AF who had not received prior rhythm control therapy. Serious adverse events were rare.

Right atrial appendage firing in atrial fibrillation

Background

The role of atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers located at the left atrium, superior vena cava, crista terminalis and coronary sinus (CS) is well established. While these regions are classically targeted during catheter ablation, the role of right atrial appendage (RAA) drivers has been incompletely investigated.

Objective

To determine the prevalence and electrophysiological characteristics of AF driver’s arising from the RAA.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and procedural data of 317 consecutive patients who underwent an AF ablation procedure after bi-atrial mapping (multipolar catheter). We selected patients who presented with a per-procedural RAA firing (RAAF). RAAF was defined as the recording of a sustained RAA EGM with a cycle length shorter than 120 ms or 120 &lt; RAAF CL ≤ 130 ms and ratio RAA CL/CS CL ≤ 0.75.

Results

Right atrial/atrium appendage firing was found in 22 patients. The prevalence was estimated at 7% (95% CI, 4–10). These patients were mostly men (72%), median age: 66 yo ± 8 without structural heart disease (77%). RAAFs were predominantly found in paroxysmal AF patients (63%, 32%, and 5% for paroxysmal, short standing and long-standing AF, respectively, p &gt; 0.05). RAAF median cycle length was 117 ms ± 7 while CS cycle length was 180 ms ± 10 (p &lt; 0.01).

Conclusion

In 317 consecutive AF ablation patients (22 patients, 7%) the presence of a high-voltage short-cycle-length right atrial appendage driver (RAAF) may conclusively be associated with AF termination. This case series exemplifies the not-so-uncommon role of the RAA in the perpetuation of AF.

Influence of atrial fibrillation type on outcomes of ablation vs. drug therapy: results from CABANA

AIMS

Influence of atrial fibrillation (AF) type on outcomes seen with catheter ablation vs. drug therapy is incompletely understood. This study assesses the impact of AF type on treatment outcomes in the Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial (CABANA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

CABANA randomized 2204 patients ≥65 years old or <65 with at least one risk factor for stroke to catheter ablation or drug therapy. Of these, 946 (42.9%) had paroxysmal AF (PAF), 1042 (47.3%) had persistent AF (PersAF), and 215 (9.8%) had long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF) at baseline. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. Symptoms were measured with the Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI), and quality of life was measured with the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT). Comparisons are reported by intention to treat. Compared with drug therapy alone, catheter ablation produced a 19% relative risk reduction in the primary endpoint for PAF {adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 1.30]}, and a 17% relative reduction for PersAF (aHR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.22). For LSPAF, the ablation relative effect was a 7% reduction (aHR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.36, 2.44). Ablation was more effective than drug therapy at reducing first AF recurrence in all AF types: by 51% for PAF (aHR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.62), by 47% for PersAF (aHR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43,0.65), and by 36% for LSPAF (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41,1.00). Ablation was associated with greater improvement in symptoms, with the mean difference between groups in the MAFSI frequency score favouring ablation over 5 years of follow-up in all subgroups: PAF had a clinically significant -1.9-point difference (95% CI: -1.2 to -2.6); PersAF a -0.9 difference (95% CI: -0.2 to -1.6); LSPAF a clinically significant difference of -1.6 points (95% CI: -0.1 to -3.1). Ablation was also associated with greater improvement in quality of life in all subgroups, with the AFEQT overall score in PAF patients showing a clinically significant 5.3-point improvement (95% CI: 3.3 to 7.3) over drug therapy alone over 5 years of follow-up, PersAF a 1.7-point difference (95% CI: 0.0 to 3.7), and LSPAF a 3.1-point difference (95% CI: -1.6 to 7.8).

CONCLUSION

Prognostic treatment effects of catheter ablation compared with drug therapy on the primary and major secondary clinical endpoints did not differ consequentially by AF subtype. With regard to decreases in AF recurrence and improving quality of life, ablation was more effective than drug therapy in all three AF type subgroups.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT00911508.

Early Rhythm Control Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Low-Risk Patients : A Nationwide Propensity Score-Weighted Study

BACKGROUND

Rhythm control is associated with lower risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with usual care among patients recently diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of approximately 2 or greater in EAST-AFNET 4 (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the results can be generalized to patients with low stroke risk.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Nationwide claims database of the Korean National Health Insurance Service.

PARTICIPANTS

54 216 patients with AF having early rhythm control (antiarrhythmic drugs or ablation) or rate control therapy that was initiated within 1 year of the AF diagnosis.

MEASUREMENTS

The effect of early rhythm control on the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or myocardial infarction was compared between eligible and ineligible patients for EAST-AFNET 4 (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, approximately 0 to 1) using propensity overlap weighting.

RESULTS

In total, 37 557 study participants (69.3%) were eligible for the trial (median age, 70 years; median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, 4), among whom early rhythm control was associated with lower risk for the primary composite outcome than rate control (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.92]). Among the 16 659 low-risk patients (30.7%) who did not meet the inclusion criteria (median age, 54 years; median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, 1), early rhythm control was consistently associated with lower risk for the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.81 [CI, 0.66 to 0.98]). No significant differences in safety outcomes were found between the rhythm and rate control strategies regardless of trial eligibility.

LIMITATION

Residual confounding.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, the beneficial association between early rhythm control and cardiovascular complications was consistent among low-risk patients regardless of trial eligibility.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Republic of Korea.

Impact of catheter ablation versus medical therapy on cognitive function in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. It is unclear whether the restoration of sinus rhythm with catheter ablation may modify this risk. We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing cognitive outcomes following catheter ablation with medical therapy (rate and/or rhythm control) in atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Searches were performed on the following databases from their inception to 17 October 2021: PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. The inclusion criteria comprised studies comparing catheter ablation against medical therapy (rate and/or rhythm control in conjunction with anticoagulation where appropriate) which included cognitive assessment and/or a diagnosis of dementia as an outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 599 records were screened. Ten studies including 15,886 patients treated with catheter ablation and 42,684 patients treated with medical therapy were included. Studies which compared the impact of catheter ablation versus medical therapy on quantitative assessments of cognitive function yielded conflicting results. In studies, examining new onset dementia during follow-up, catheter ablation was associated with a lower risk of subsequent dementia diagnosis compared to medical therapy (hazard ratio: 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.42-0.88, p < 0.05)).

CONCLUSION

The accumulating evidence linking atrial fibrillation with cognitive impairment warrants the design of atrial fibrillation treatment strategies aimed at minimising cognitive decline. However, the impact of catheter ablation and atrial fibrillation medical therapy on cognitive decline is currently uncertain. Future studies investigating atrial fibrillation treatment strategies should include cognitive outcomes as important clinical endpoints.

Clinical Significance of Adenosine-Induced Atrial Fibrillation after Complete Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Background: Adenosine can cause dormant electrical conduction between the pulmonary vein and left atrium after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Adenosine can also induce atrial fibrillation (AF) during catheter ablation. However, the clinical outcomes and effects of additional ablation for the trigger sites of adenosine-induced AF (AIAF) are unknown. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of AIAF. Methods: Between January 2010 and September 2019, we analyzed 616 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), including wide-area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and post-PVI adenosine testing. Results: Among 616 patients, 134 (21.7%) and 34 (5.5%) showed dormant conduction and AIAF, respectively. Eight patients (1.3%) had both dormant conduction and AIAF. The AF recurrence rate was not significantly different between patients with and without AIAF (16.7% vs. 18.6%, log-rank p = 0.827) during a mean follow-up period of 17.9 ± 18 months. Additional RFCA for the trigger site was attempted in 10 patients with AIAF; however, the recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias was also not different between the groups with and without additional ablation (20% vs. 16.7%, log-rank p = 0.704). Conclusions: AIAF after PVI was not clinically associated with recurrence during long-term follow-up. Ablation of the trigger site in AIAF did not improve the clinical outcomes.

Catheter ablation and thoracoscopic ablation in long persistent atrial fibrillation with large left atrium

Background

Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but the clinical outcomes of PVAI are unsatisfactory in patients with persistent AF and a large left atrium (LA).

Objectives

We investigated the clinical outcomes following radiofrequency ablation (RFCA), cryoballoon ablation (CBA), and thoracoscopic maze in patients with persistent AF and a large LA.

Methods

We included patients with consecutive persistent AF who had a large LA (LA diameter >50 mm) and underwent RFCA, CBA, or thoracoscopic maze surgery. In the RFCA group, additional linear ablation was performed at the physician’s discretion. The endpoint was 12 months without recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia, including AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia, following a 90-day blanking period.

Results

We recruited 89 persistent AF patients with a large LA who underwent RFCA (n = 32), CBA (n = 38), or the thoracoscopic maze procedure (n = 19). During the 12-month follow-up, 48 (53.9%) cases of AF recurrence were observed. There was no prognostic difference between groups (50.0% in RFCA vs. 52.6% in CBA vs. 63.2% in thoracoscopic maze, all P > 0.05). Early recurrence during the blanking period was a significant predictor of late recurrence for RFCA and CBA, but not for the thoracoscopic maze.

Conclusion

In persistent AF patients with a large LA, we did not find a prognostic difference RFCA, CBA, or a thoracoscopic maze procedure in recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Early recurrence predicted late recurrence in catheter ablation, but not in thoracoscopic maze.

Deep Learning Model for Predicting Rhythm Outcomes after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Current guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) emphasized that radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) should be decided after fully considering its prognosis. However, a robust prediction model reflecting the complex interactions between the features affecting prognosis remains to be developed. In this paper, we propose a deep learning model for predicting the late recurrence after RFCA in patients with AF. Aiming to predict the late recurrence (LR) of AF within 1 year after pulmonary vein isolation, we designed a multimodal model based on the multilayer perceptron architecture. For quantitative evaluation, we conducted 4-fold cross-validation on data from 177 AF patients including 47 LR patients. The proposed model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve-AUROC, 0.766) outperformed the acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation (APPLE) score (AUROC, 0.605), CHA2DS2-VASc score (AUROC, 0.595), linear regression (AUROC, 0.541), logistic regression (AUROC, 0.546), extreme gradient boosting (AUROC, 0.608), and support vector machine (AUROC, 0.638). The proposed model exhibited better performance than clinical indicators (APPLE and CHA2DS2-VASc score) and machine learning techniques (linear regression, logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting, and support vector machine). The model will support clinical decision-making for selecting good responders to the RFCA intervention.

Impact of a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic on diagnosis-to-ablation time

Background

Outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) improve as the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) shortens. Use of a protocol-based integrated care model through a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic (AFC) may serve to standardize treatment pathways and decrease DAT.

Objective

To evaluate the DAT and clinical characteristics of patients with AF referred from an AFC vs a conventional electrophysiology clinic (EC).

Methods

Retrospective analysis was completed in consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation at Riverside Methodist Hospital in 2019 with minimum 1 year follow-up. Patients were categorized based off their CA referral source (AFC vs EC) and where the initial visit following index diagnosis of AF occurred (AFC vs EC).

Results

A total of 182 patients (mean age 65 years, 64% male) were reviewed. Patients referred from an AFC (21%) had a median DAT of 342 days (interquartile range [IQR], 125-855 days) compared to patients referred from EC (79%) with a median DAT of 813 days (IQR, 241-1444 days; P = .01). Patients with their index visit following AF diagnosis occurring in the AFC (9%) had significantly shorter median DAT (127 days [IQR, 95-188 days]) compared to EC (91%) (789 days [IQR, 253-1503 days]; P = .002). Patients with DAT <1 year had lower AF recurrence than patients with DAT >1 year (P = .04, hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.3418-1.000).

Conclusion

DAT is a modifiable factor that may affect CA outcomes. Significant reductions in DAT were observed in patients evaluated through a dedicated AF clinic.

Impact of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Quality of Life

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults. It is a complex arrhythmia leading to increased morbidity and mortality requiring thorough assessment and classification to guide therapy and to assess whether to pursue rate or rhythm control therapy. To obtain rhythm control, several strategies are available with different advantages and disadvantages concerning success rate and safety. Apart from antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation is a well-established invasive therapy to treat atrial fibrillation. As quality of life is a very important factor to pursue rhythm control, several studies investigated on the specific impact of catheter ablation on quality of life. Catheter ablation shows a beneficial effect on quality of life in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation independent of the timepoint and strategy of catheter ablation.

Early diagnosis and better rhythm management to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: the 8th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference

Despite marked progress in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), detecting AF remains difficult and AF-related complications cause unacceptable morbidity and mortality even on optimal current therapy. This document summarizes the key outcomes of the 8th AFNET/EHRA Consensus Conference of the Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eighty-three international experts met in Hamburg for 2 days in October 2021. Results of the interdisciplinary, hybrid discussions in breakout groups and the plenary based on recently published and unpublished observations are summarized in this consensus paper to support improved care for patients with AF by guiding prevention, individualized management, and research strategies. The main outcomes are (i) new evidence supports a simple, scalable, and pragmatic population-based AF screening pathway; (ii) rhythm management is evolving from therapy aimed at improving symptoms to an integrated domain in the prevention of AF-related outcomes, especially in patients with recently diagnosed AF; (iii) improved characterization of atrial cardiomyopathy may help to identify patients in need for therapy; (iv) standardized assessment of cognitive function in patients with AF could lead to improvement in patient outcomes; and (v) artificial intelligence (AI) can support all of the above aims, but requires advanced interdisciplinary knowledge and collaboration as well as a better medico-legal framework. Implementation of new evidence-based approaches to AF screening and rhythm management can improve outcomes in patients with AF. Additional benefits are possible with further efforts to identify and target atrial cardiomyopathy and cognitive impairment, which can be facilitated by AI.

Presenting Pattern of Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes of Early Rhythm Control Therapy

BACKGROUND

Whether atrial fibrillation (AF) pattern or timing of AF therapy modifies the effectiveness of early rhythm control (ERC) is not known.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients presenting with different AF patterns on ERC vs usual care.

METHODS

The effects of ERC were compared in first-diagnosed AF (FDAF), paroxysmal AF (paroxAF), and persistent AF (persAF) in this prespecified analysis of the EAST-AFNET 4 (Early treatment of atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention) trial. Associations between AF pattern and primary outcomes (first primary outcome: cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure and acute coronary syndrome; second primary outcome: nights spent in hospital per year) were compared over a mean follow-up of 5.1 years. Changes in health-related quality of life were assessed by the EQ-5D.

RESULTS

FDAF patients (n = 1,048, enrolled 7 days after diagnosing AF) were slightly older (71 years of age, 48.0% female) than patients with paroxAF (n = 994, 70 years of age, 50.0% female) and persAF (n = 743, 70 years of age, 38.0% female). ERC reduced the primary outcome in all 3 AF patterns. Hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome were highest in FDAF (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.83-2.69; P for interaction = 0.032) compared with paroxAF (IRR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.32-1.25) and persAF (IRR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25-1.00). FDAF patients spent more nights in hospital (IRR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.12-1.70; P for interaction = 0.004) than paroxAF (IRR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.67-1.03), and persAF (IRR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.80-1.30) patients. ERC improved health-related quality of life (EQ-5D score) in patients with paroxAF and persAF but not in patients with FDAF (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

ERC reduces the first primary composite outcome in all AF patterns. Patients with FDAF are at high risk for hospitalization and acute coronary syndrome, particularly on ERC. (Early treatment of atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention trial; ISRCTN04708680; Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial [EAST]; NCT01288352; Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial [EAST]; EudraCT2010-021258-20).

Cost-utility analysis of Cryoballoon ablation versus Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in Iran

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia (Calkins H, et al. 2012). There are various methods to treat AF of which Ablation is one of the most effective. We aimed to assess the cost-utility of Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) compared to Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat patients with paroxysmal AF in Iran. A cost-utility analysis was done using a decision-analytic model based on a lifetime Markov structure which was drawn considering the nature of interventions and the natural progress of the disease. Costs data were extracted from medical records of 47 patients of Shahid Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical Center in Tehran in 2019. Parameters and variables such as transition probabilities, risks related to side effects, mortality rates, and utility values were extracted from the available evidence. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also done. TreeAge pro-2020 software was used in all stages of analysis. In the base case analysis, the CBA strategy was associated with higher cost and effectiveness than RFA, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $11,223 per Quality-adjusted life year (QALY), which compared to Iran’s GDP per capita as Willingness to pay threshold, CBA was not cost-effective. On the other hand, considering twice the GDP per capita as a threshold, CBA was cost-effective. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the findings of base case analysis, showed that RFA was cost-effective and the probability of cost-effectiveness was 59%. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the results of the study have the highest sensitivity to changes in the RFA cost variable. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness results were not robust and are sensitive to changes in variables changes. Primary results showed that CBA compared to RFA is not cost-effective in the treatment of AF considering one GDP per capita. But the sensitivity analysis results showed considerable sensitivity to changes of the ablation costs variable.

Acupuncture versus pharmacological conversation in treatment of atrial fibrillation in a randomized controlled trial: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effect of conventional drugs combined with acupuncture therapy on the conversion of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods

We searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wan fang Data, VIP, and CBM to collect data in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture included patients with atrial fibrillation. Publication time was limited from the beginning to May 15, 2021. The primary outcome is the number of participants who converted successfully.

Results

A total of 11 papers were included in this study. The combined effect indicated that acupuncture significantly effectively benefitted the patients with atrial fibrillation (RR = 1.208, 95% CI 1.123, 1.298, P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis of persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and the timing of acupuncture suggested that the addition of acupuncture was not statistically significant in the treatment of persistent AF compared to the control group (RR = 1.147, 95% CI 0.811, 1.623 P = 0.147). The combination of acupuncture was more effective in paroxysmal AF RR = 1.148 (95% CI 1.064, 1.239) P < 0.001. In addition, when the acupuncture time was limited to 20 min, it had the best treatment effect (RR = 1.510, 95% CI 1.25, 1.82).

Conclusions

The combination of pharmacological resuscitation with acupuncture significantly improved the conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to pharmacological resuscitation only. The most significant benefit was achieved with an acupuncture duration of < 20 min. Thus, the combination of acupuncture could be considered in clinical practice for the resuscitation of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Economic Evaluation of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation from the Perspective of the UK

Randomised evidence supports an early rhythm control strategy as treatment for AF, and catheter ablation outperforms medical therapy in terms of effectiveness when studied as first- and second-line treatment. Despite evidence consistently showing that catheter ablation treatment is superior to medical therapy in most AF patients, only a small proportion receive ablation, in some cases after a prolonged trial of ineffective medical therapy. Health economics research in electrophysiology remains limited but is recognised as being important in influencing positive change to ensure early access to ablation services for all eligible patients. Such information has informed the updated recommendations from the recently published National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guideline on the diagnosis and management of AF, but increased awareness is needed to drive real-world adoption and to ensure patients are quickly referred to specialists. In this article, economic evaluations of catheter ablation versus medical therapy are reviewed.

A Chronicle of Hybrid Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy: From Cox Maze to Convergent

The burden of AF is increasing in prevalence and healthcare resource usage in the UK and worldwide. It can result in impaired quality of life for affected patients, as well as increased risk of stroke, heart failure and mortality. A holistic, integrated approach to AF management is recommended, which may include a focus on reducing risk factors and on medical management with anticoagulation and anti-arrhythmic drugs. There are also various ablation strategies that may be considered when anti-arrhythmic drugs fail to alleviate symptoms and reduce AF burden. These ablation techniques range from standalone percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation to open surgical ablation procedures concomitant with cardiac surgery. More recently, hybrid ablation that combines aspects of both surgical and electrophysiologically targeted ablation has been described. This article reviews the evolution of ablation strategies, beginning with the origin of the Cox maze IV procedure and continuing to the recent hybrid convergent approach, and provides a summary of the associated outcomes.

Catheter Ablation is Superior to Antiarrhythmic Drugs as First-Line Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is a well-established therapy for rhythm control in patients who are refractory or intolerant to anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD). Less is known about the efficacy of catheter ablation compared with AAD as a first-line strategy for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of catheter ablation vs. AAD in patients naïve to prior rhythm control therapies.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared catheter ablation to AAD for initial rhythm control in symptomatic AF and reported the outcomes of (1) recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs); (2) symptomatic AF; (3) hospitalizations; and (4) symptomatic bradycardia. Heterogeneity was examined with I2statistics. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We included five trials with 994 patients, of whom 502 (50.5%) underwent catheter ablation. Mean follow-up ranged from one to five years. Recurrences of AT (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.25-0.52; p<0.001) and symptomatic AF (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.18-0.57; p<0.001), and hospitalizations (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.15-0.42; p<0.001) were significantly less frequent in patients treated with catheter ablation compared with AAD. Symptomatic bradycardia was not significantly different between groups (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.18-1.65; p=0.28). Significant pericardial effusions or tamponade occurred in eight of 464 (1.7%) patients in the catheter ablation group.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that catheter ablation has superior efficacy to AAD as an initial rhythm control strategy in patients with symptomatic AF.

Catheter ablation using advanced porous tip contact force–sensing radiofrequency catheter: Impact on health care utilization among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF); however, little is known about its impact on health care utilization for patients with PsAF. The ThermoCool SmartTouch SF (STSF) catheter (Biosense Webster) incorporates an advanced porous tip and contact force–sensing technology.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine health care utilization among patients with PsAF who underwent ablation with the STSF catheter.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database identified patients with PsAF undergoing CA with the STSF catheter in inpatient and outpatient settings. The proportion of patients experiencing AF-related inpatient admissions, outpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, electrical cardioversion, and a composite outcome in the 12 months pre- vs postablation were compared using the McNemar test. Subanalyses were performed on study outcomes by race/ethnicity.

Results

The final sample included 3077 patients (mean age 65.9 years; 31.7% female). Among patients with PsAF undergoing ablation with the STSF catheter, relative reductions in health care utilization in the 12 months post- vs preablation included 55.3% in AF-related inpatient admissions (P <.0001), 38.9% in outpatient admissions (P <.0001), 52.4% in ED visits (P <.0001), and 61.2% in electrical cardioversions (P <.0001). Composite outcome utilization in the 12 months post- vs preablation declined by 40.2% (P <.0001) for the overall cohort, 40.0% for White patients (P <.0001), 52.2% for Black patients (P <.0001), and 50.1% for Asian patients (P = .032).

Conclusion

Significant improvements in health care utilization were observed among PsAF patients who underwent ablation using the STSF catheter. Improvements were particularly marked in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.

Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Aged ≥80 Years

AIMS

The prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly increase with age. Catheter ablation is already recommended in the guidelines for this selected elderly population. This study aimed to explore the safety and effectiveness of AF catheter ablation in patients aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

The data were based on the China-AF study. Patients with AF aged ≥80 years who received catheter ablation from August 2011 to December 2020 were selected. Catheter ablation included bilateral circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation with or without additional linear ablation. Patients were followed up every 6 months. Arrhythmia-free curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyse the predictors for post-ablation recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients were included in the study. Many patients had comorbidities: 73.7% had hypertension and 29.3% had diabetes mellitus. All patients achieved successful bilateral circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation. Total complications were noted in nine of 270 (3.3%) patients and nine of 286 (3.1%) ablation procedures. After the first ablation procedure, 74% of the whole cohort-78% patients with paroxysmal AF, and 66% patients with persistent AF - were free from atrial tachyarrhythmia at follow-up to 12 months. Patients with persistent AF, longer AF duration, and history of ischaemic stroke were more likely to have AF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AF aged ≥80 years, although with many comorbidities, had low complication rates and favourable outcomes after catheter ablation. Catheter ablation was a safe and effective treatment to achieve sinus rhythm in the selected elderly patients.

DIFFERENCES IN OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION UNDERGOING CATHETER ABLATION WITH VERSUS WITHOUT INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Background

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) use can lead to early detection of periprocedural complications and may improve patient outcomes by providing real‐time visualization of catheter location and the treatment area during cardiac ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective

Examine complications and 12‐month healthcare use among patients with AF undergoing CA with versus without ICE use during the procedure in a real‐world setting.

Methods

The 2015–2020 IBM MarketScan® Database was used to identify non‐elderly adults (age 18–64 years) undergoing CA for AF. Patients were classified into ICE/non‐ICE groups based on the presence or absence of ICE procedure codes. Patients in each group were matched on study covariates using propensity scores. Peri‐procedural complications, 12‐month cardiovascular (CV) or AF‐related inpatient admission, repeat CA, and cardioversion were compared using a Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

1371 patients were identified in each study cohort (ICE and non‐ICE) after propensity matching. Patients who had CA with ICE had a significantly lower rate of complications than those without (2.9% vs. 5.8%; p < .001). The risk of complications was 50% lower with ICE use (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.72). For assessment of 12‐month healthcare utilization, 1250 patients were identified in each cohort after propensity matching. ICE use was associated with a 36% lower risk of 12‐month repeat ablation (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.49–0.83). No differences in CV‐ or AF‐related inpatient admission and cardioversion were observed.

Conclusion

Among patients with AF, the use of ICE during an ablation procedure was associated with lower incidence of complications and repeat ablation.

Outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with or without silent pulmonary veins from prior ablation procedure

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary venous (PV) electrical recovery underlies most arrhythmia recurrences after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Little is known about procedural profiles and outcomes of patients with electrically silent PVs upon redo ablation for AF.

METHODS

In a prospectively maintained registry, we enrolled 838 consecutive patients (2013-2016) undergoing redo ablation procedures. Ablation procedures targeted the PVs, the PV antra, and non-PV sites at operators' discretion. Procedural profiles and clinical outcomes were assessed. The primary outcome was freedom from AF after a 3-month blanking period. The secondary outcome was improvement in quality of life.

RESULTS

Most patients undergoing redo AF ablation (n = 684, 82%) had PV reconnection while the remaining 154 (18%) had electrically silent PVs. Patients with recurrent AF and electrically silent PVs were older (66 vs. 64 years, p = .02), had more prior ablation procedures (median 2 IQR 1-3 vs 1 IQR 1-2 p = .001), were more likely to have non-paroxysmal AF (62% vs. 49%, p = .004) and atrial flutter (48% vs. 29%, p = .001) and had significantly larger left atrial volumes (89 vs. 81 ml, p = .003). Patients with silent PVs underwent a more extensive non-PV ablation strategies with antral extension of prior ablation sets in addition to ablation of the roof, appendage, inferior to the right PVs, peri-mitral flutter lines, cavotricuspid isthmus lines and ablation in the coronary sinus. Upon one year of follow-up, patients with electrically silent PVs were less likely to remain free from recurrent atrial arrhythmias (64% vs. 76%, p = .008). Regardless of PV reconnection status, redo ablation resulted in improvement in quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Rhythm control with extensive ablation allowed maintenance of sinus rhythm in about two thirds of patients with silent PVs during redo AF ablation procedures. Regardless of PV reconnection status, redo ablation resulted in improvement in quality of life. This remains a challenging group of patients, highlighting the need to better understand non-PV mediated AF.

Reflections on the usefulness of today's atrial fibrillation ablation procedure endpoints and patient-reported outcomes

The improvement of Patient-reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life, is the main indication for atrial fibrillation ablation. Despite this guideline derived indication for an AF ablation procedure the current standardized primary endpoint in AF ablation trials is still rhythm-related, and primarily a 30-second long AF episode. The review presents reflections on the non-rational arguments of using rhythm related endpoints rather than Patient-reported outcomes in AF ablation procedure trials despite the mismatch between many of the rhythm related variables and symptoms. Arguments for health-related quality of life as the most optimal primary endpoint in clinical trials are presented while atrial fibrillation burden is presented as the most optimal electrical complementary endpoint, apart from being the major variable in mechanistic trials.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Endpoints of Five Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia that occurs in 2–4% of adults and poses a threat to human health. Thus, comparison of the efficacy and safety of therapies for AF is warranted. Here, we used network analysis to compare efficacy (arrhythmia recurrence and re-hospitalization) and safety (ischemic cerebral vascular events, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality) endpoints among five major therapies for AF.

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched, and relevant literature was retrieved. Only studies that made comparisons among the therapies of interest and involved patients with AF were included. Pairwise comparisons and frequentist method (SUCRA plot) analyses were conducted.

Results

In total, 62 studies were included in the pooled analysis. In pairwise comparisons, atrioventricular nodal ablation plus permanent pacemaker (AVN + PPM) was associated with a significantly higher risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence than surgical ablation [odds ratio (OR): 23.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.97–287.59, fixed-effect model; 3.82, 95% CI: 1.01–559.74, random-effects model]. Furthermore, radiofrequency ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular mortality than medication in pairwise comparison (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29–0.83, fixed-effect model; OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27–0.9, random-effects model). Frequentist analysis indicated that AVN + PPM had the best performance in reducing the risk of safety and efficacy endpoints.

Conclusion

Non-pharmaceutical therapies showed superior performance to traditional drug therapy in lowering the risk of safety and efficiency endpoint events. AVN + PPM performed best in reducing the risk of safety and efficacy endpoints.

Mapping Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Therapy to Guide Endocardial Ablation

BACKGROUND

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be effective, yet has mixed results. It is unclear which endocardial lesions delivered as part of hybrid therapy' will best augment surgical lesion sets in individual patients. We addressed this question by systematically mapping AF endocardially after surgical ablation and relating findings to early recurrence, then performing tailored endocardial ablation as part of hybrid therapy.

METHODS

We studied 81 consecutive patients undergoing epicardial surgical ablation (stage 1 hybrid), of whom 64 proceeded to endocardial catheter mapping and ablation (stage 2). Stage 2 comprised high-density mapping of pulmonary vein (PV) or posterior wall (PW) reconnections, low-voltage zones (LVZs), and potential localized AF drivers. We related findings to postsurgical recurrence of AF.

RESULTS

Mapping at stage 2 revealed PW isolation reconnection in 59.4%, PV isolation reconnection in 28.1%, and LVZ in 42.2% of patients. Postsurgical recurrence of AF occurred in 36 patients (56.3%), particularly those with long-standing persistent AF (P=0.017), but had no relationship to reconnection of PVs (P=0.53) or PW isolation (P=0.75) when compared with those without postsurgical recurrence of AF. LVZs were more common in patients with postsurgical recurrence of AF (P=0.002), long-standing persistent AF (P=0.002), advanced age (P=0.03), and elevated CHA2DS2-VASc (P=0.046). AF mapping revealed 4.4±2.7 localized focal/rotational sites near and also remote from PV or PW reconnection. After ablation at patient-specific targets, arrhythmia freedom at 1 year was 81.0% including and 73.0% excluding previously ineffective antiarrhythmic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

After surgical ablation, AF may recur by several modes particularly related to localized mechanisms near low voltage zones, recovery of posterior wall or pulmonary vein isolation, or other sustaining mechanisms. LVZs are more common in patients at high clinical risk for recurrence. Patient-specific targeting of these mechanisms yields excellent long-term outcomes from hybrid ablation.

Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Catheter Ablation in Patients with Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices

Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation for thromboembolic prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial (LA) catheter ablation (CA) in patients with LAAO devices has not been well investigated. Here, we report on the safety and efficacy of LA CA in patients with nitinol cage or plug LAAO devices. Methods: A total of 18 patients (aged 67 ± 11 years; 14 males; 5 paroxysmal AF) with LAAO devices (nitinol cage, n = 10; nitinol plug, n = 8) and symptomatic LA tachyarrhythmias were included. Periprocedural and follow-up data were assessed. Results: A total of 20 LA CA procedures were performed at a median of 130 (63, 338) days after LAAO. The strategy of CA consisted of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (n = 16), linear lesions (n = 14) and complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (n = 6). No major adverse events occurred periprocedurally. Repeated transesophageal echocardiography showed no device-related thrombus, newly developed peridevice leakage or device dislodgement. After a median follow-up period of 793 (376, 1090) days, four patients (22%) experienced LA tachyarrhythmias recurrence and two received redo LA CA. No patients suffered stroke or major bleeding events during follow-up. Conclusions: LA CA in patients with LAAO devices (either nitinol cages or nitinol plugs) seems to be safe and efficient in our single-center experience.

The Increasing Role of Rhythm Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

The considerable mortality and morbidity associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) pose a substantial burden on patients and health care services. Although the management of AF historically focused on decreasing AF recurrence, it evolved over time in favor of rate control. Recently, more emphasis has been placed on reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes using rhythm control, generally by using safe and effective rhythm-control therapies (typically antiarrhythmic drugs and/or AF ablation). Evidence increasingly supports early rhythm control in patients with AF that has not become long-standing, but current clinical practice and guidelines do not yet fully reflect this change. Early rhythm control may effectively reduce irreversible atrial remodeling and prevent AF-related deaths, heart failure, and strokes in high-risk patients. It has the potential to halt progression and potentially save patients from years of symptomatic AF; therefore, it should be offered more widely.

Clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after technologic advances including contact force-guided and ablation index-guided ablation

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the influence of technological advances on ablation outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (PeAF). Radiofrequency ablation for patients with AF has advanced, including contact force (CF)-sensing catheters and the ablation index (AI).

Methods

Between 2009 and 2018, we analyzed 173 patients with PeAF who underwent catheter ablation. We categorized them into three groups: AF ablation without CF and AI information (no-CF group, n = 63), with CF without AI (CF-only group, n = 49), and with optimal AI-guided ablation (AI group, n = 61). Early (within 3 months, ER) and late (from 3 months to 1 year, LR) AF recurrence after ablation was assessed. Procedure-related complications were also evaluated.

Results

The baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 groups, excluding the baseline antiarrhythmic drug history. Additional substrate modification after pulmonary vein isolation was significantly low in frequency in the AI group (71.4%, no-CF; 69.4%, CF-only; 41.0%, AI, p = 0.001). The AI group had a shorter mean procedure-related time than the other groups. Both ER and LR of PeAF showed a trend of reduction with technological advances. With a short experience (less than 1 year), the CF-only group showed more ER and LR than that shown by the AI group. However, with a long experience (more than 1 year), ER and LR occurred similarly in the two groups. Procedure-related complications improved with technological advances.

Conclusion

As ablation technology advanced, favorable clinical outcomes with short procedural times were observed. However, prospective, large multicenter studies are needed to verify these results.

Hybrid Convergent Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Hybrid Convergent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) combines minimally invasive surgical (epicardial) and catheter (endocardial) ablation. The procedural goal is to achieve more extensive, enduring ablation of AF substrate around the pulmonary veins, posterior wall, and vestibule of the posterior wall left atrium.

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on safety and effectiveness of contemporary Hybrid Convergent procedures.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and manual searches identified primary research articles on Hybrid Convergent. Inclusion criteria focused on contemporary practices (epicardial ablation device and lesions). Clinical outcomes at 1 year or later follow-up, patient population, procedural details, and major adverse events (MAE) were recorded.

Results

Of 249 records, 6 studies (5 observational, 1 randomized controlled trial) including 551 patients were included. Endocardial energy sources included radiofrequency and cryoballoon. Hybrid Convergent ablation was mostly performed in patients with drug-refractory persistent and longstanding persistent AF. Mean preprocedural AF duration ranged between 2 and 5.1 years. Most patients (∼92%) underwent Hybrid Convergent in a single hospitalization. At 1 year follow-up or later, 69% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61%–78%, n = 523) were free from atrial arrhythmias and 50% (95% CI: 42%–58%, n = 343) were free from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs. Thirty-day MAE rate was 6% (95% CI: 3%–8%, n = 551).

Conclusion

Hybrid Convergent ablation is an effective ablation strategy for persistent and longstanding persistent AF. Contemporary procedural approaches and published strategies aim to mitigate complications reported in early experience and address delayed inflammatory effusions.

Effects of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation on Cardiac Reserve Using Preload Stress Echocardiography in Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

The effects of catheter ablation on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been reported. We assessed cardiac function in more detail using the leg positive pressure (LPP) technique and found that contractile reserve is particularly important in relation to exercise tolerance and prognosis. In this study, we used the LPP technique to examine changes in contractile reserve immediately after ablation and 6 months later. We prospectively enrolled patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF at 2 institutes. We performed LPP stress echocardiography 2 to 3 days after (FU-1) and 6 months after (FU-2) ablation to examine changes in cardiac function indexes. The primary end point was improvement in contractile reserve. Ultimately, 109 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 9.6 years; 70% men) underwent 2 sessions of LPP stress echocardiography. The median CHA₂DS₂-VAS_C score was 2 (interquartile range 13). From FU-1 to FU-2, the change in the stroke volume index after the LPP maneuver increased in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF with low CHA₂DS₂-VAS_C scores (both p <0.05). Regardless of AF subtype, contractile reserve at FU-2 improved in patients with low CHA₂DS₂-VAS_C scores compared with that at FU-1. In contrast, patients with high CHA₂DS₂-VAS_C scores had no change. In conclusion, patients with AF with a low CHA₂DS₂-VAS_C score had improved contractile reserve after ablation, whereas patients with high scores did not show any improvement. Aggressive interventions in patients with high scores may lead to better management after catheter ablation.

Rate versus rhythm control for atrial fibrillation: from AFFIRM to EAST-AFNET 4 - a paradigm shift

The clinical choice between rate or rhythm control therapies has been debated over the years. In 2002, the AFFIRM trial demonstrated that the rhythm-control strategy had no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy. Eighteen years later, EAST-AFNET 4 showed that the rhythm-control approach is better than rate control in reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a recent diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). During the time between AFFIRM and EAST-AFNET 4, rhythm control understanding, specifically ablation, improved, while rate-control strategies remained the same possibly leading to the change in results seen in EAST-AFNET 4. This review seeks to evaluate the rate- and rhythm-control strategies, focusing on the important clinical trials in the past two decades. These trials have shown great advancement in AF management; however, the search for the best approach to controlling AF and minimizing the burden of symptoms is still a work in progress and needs further research.

Systematic, early rhythm control strategy for atrial fibrillation in patients with or without symptoms: the EAST-AFNET 4 trial

AIMS

Clinical practice guidelines restrict rhythm control therapy to patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The EAST-AFNET 4 trial demonstrated that early, systematic rhythm control improves clinical outcomes compared to symptom-directed rhythm control.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prespecified EAST-AFNET 4 analysis compared the effect of early rhythm control therapy in asymptomatic patients (EHRA score I) to symptomatic patients. Primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, stroke, or hospitalization with worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome, analyzed in a time-to-event analysis. At baseline, 801/2633 (30.4%) patients were asymptomatic [mean age 71.3 years, 37.5% women, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.4, 169/801 (21.1%) heart failure]. Asymptomatic patients randomized to early rhythm control (395/801) received similar rhythm control therapies compared to symptomatic patients [e.g. AF ablation at 24 months: 75/395 (19.0%) in asymptomatic; 176/910 (19.3%) symptomatic patients, P = 0.672]. Anticoagulation and treatment of concomitant cardiovascular conditions was not different between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary outcome occurred in 79/395 asymptomatic patients randomized to early rhythm control and in 97/406 patients randomized to usual care (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval [0.6; 1.03]), almost identical to symptomatic patients. At 24 months follow-up, change in symptom status was not different between randomized groups (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

The clinical benefit of early, systematic rhythm control was not different between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in EAST-AFNET 4. These results call for a shared decision discussing the benefits of rhythm control therapy in all patients with recently diagnosed AF and concomitant cardiovascular conditions (EAST-AFNET 4; ISRCTN04708680; NCT01288352; EudraCT2010-021258-20).

Comparison of the Mid-Term Outcomes of Robotic Magnetic Navigation-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction: Currently, numerous ablation techniques are available for atrial fibrillation (AF), in addition to manual radio frequency ablation. The aim of this prospective, non-randomized concurrent controlled trial was to compare the mid-term efficacy and procedural outcomes of persistent AF (PerAF) using cryoballoon (CB) and robotic magnetic navigation (RMN). Methods: Two hundred PerAF patients were assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo catheter ablation using RMN (RMN group) or CB (CB group). The primary endpoint was freedom from AF recurrence following a 3-month period after the index ablation. The secondary endpoint was peri-procedural outcomes, including the total procedure time, left atrial procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and fluoroscopy dose. The Two-step cluster analysis was used to determine the efficacy of RMN and CB between the different groups. The Cox proportional hazard model and restricted cubic spline were used to determine predictors for AF recurrence. Results: At the mean follow-up of 28.1 ± 9.7 months, the primary endpoint was achieved in 71 PerAF patients in the RMN group and in 62 PerAF patients in the CB group (71% vs. 62%, p = 0.158). Compared with CB, RMN-guided ablation led to a longer procedure time (p < 0.001), but with less radiation (p < 0.001). Cluster analysis returned two clusters of patients and RMN was favorable for one cluster (p = 0.037), in which more patients presented with diabetes mellitus and smaller left atria. Conclusions: For patients with PerAF, CB is generally equivalent to RMN-guided ablation with regard to overall efficacy. RMN-guided ablation could be favorable in specific patient populations presenting with diabetes mellitus and smaller left atria.

Association Between Age and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the CABANA Trial

BACKGROUND

Observational data suggest that catheter ablation may be safe and effective to treat younger and older patients with atrial fibrillation. No large, randomized trial has examined this issue. This report describes outcomes according to age at entry in the CABANA trial (Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation).

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation ≥65 years of age, or <65 with ≥1 risk factor for stroke, were randomly assigned to catheter ablation versus drug therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, the composite of mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization, and recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Treatment effect estimates were adjusted for baseline covariables using proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Of 2204 patients randomly assigned in CABANA, 766 (34.8%) were <65 years of age, 1130 (51.3%) were 65 to 74 years of age, and 308 (14.0%) were ≥75 years of age. Catheter ablation was associated with a 43% reduction in the primary outcome for patients <65 years of age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.30-1.09]), a 21% reduction for 65 to 74 years of age (aHR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.54-1.16]), and an indeterminate effect for age ≥75 years of age (aHR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.75-2.58]). Four-year event rates for ablation versus drug therapy across age groups, respectively, were 3.2% versus 7.8%, 7.8% versus 9.6%, and 14.8% versus 9.0%. For every 10-year increase in age, the primary outcome aHR increased (ie, less favorable to ablation) an average of 27% (interaction P value=0.215). A similar pattern was seen with all-cause mortality: for every 10-year increase in age, the aHR increased an average of 46% (interaction P value=0.111). Atrial fibrillation recurrence rates were lower with ablation than with drug therapy across age subgroups (aHR 0.47, 0.58, and 0.49, respectively). Treatment-related complications were infrequent for both arms (<3%) regardless of age.

CONCLUSIONS

We found age-based variations in clinical outcomes for catheter ablation compared with drug therapy, with the largest relative and absolute benefits of catheter ablation in younger patients. No prognostic benefits for ablation were seen in the oldest patients. No differences were found by age in treatment-related complications or in the relative effectiveness of catheter ablation in preventing recurrent atrial arrhythmias.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT00911508.