Effect of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Event-Free Survival Among Children With High-risk First-Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Neurotoxicity Associated with Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is a milestone in the treatment of poor-prognosis pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is expected to improve treatment outcomes and reduce doses of conventional chemotherapy without compromising the effectiveness of the therapy. However, both chemotherapy and immunotherapy cause side effects, including neurological ones. Acute neurological complications occur in 3.6–11% of children treated for ALL. The most neurotoxical chemotherapeutics are L-asparaginase (L-ASP), methotrexate (MTX), vincristine (VCR), and nelarabine (Ara-G). Neurotoxicity associated with methotrexate (MTX-NT) occurs in 3–7% of children treated for ALL and is characterized by seizures, stroke-like symptoms, speech disturbances, and encephalopathy. Recent studies indicate that specific polymorphisms in genes related to neurogenesis may have a predisposition to MTX toxicity. One of the most common complications associated with CAR T-cell therapy is immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Mechanisms of neurotoxicity in CAR T-cell therapy are still unknown and may be due to disruption of the blood–brain barrier and the effects of elevated cytokine levels on the central nervous system (CNS). In this review, we present an analysis of the current knowledge on the mechanisms of neurotoxicity of standard chemotherapy and the targeted therapy in children with ALL.

The Current Landscape of mRNA Vaccines Against Viruses and Cancer-A Mini Review

Both infectious viral diseases and cancer have historically been some of the most common causes of death worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic is a decidedly relevant example of the former. Despite progress having been made over past decades, new and improved techniques are still needed to address the limitations faced by current treatment standards, with mRNA-based therapy emerging as a promising solution. Highly flexible, scalable and cost-effective, mRNA therapy is proving to be a compelling vaccine platform against viruses. Likewise, mRNA vaccines show similar promise against cancer as a platform capable of encoding multiple antigens for a diverse array of cancers, including those that are patient specific as a novel form of personalized medicine. In this review, the molecular mechanisms, biotechnological aspects, and clinical developments of mRNA vaccines against viral infections and cancer are discussed to provide an informative update on the current state of mRNA therapy research.

Somatic FOXC1 insertion mutation remodels the immune microenvironment and promotes the progression of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignant hematological diseases in children. An immunosuppressive microenvironment, particularly regulatory T cell (Treg) infiltration, has been documented to be highly associated with childhood ALL. This present study, based on genetic factors, was aimed at investigating the mutations potentially involved in the immunosuppressive microenvironment in childhood ALL. After whole-exome sequencing was used on DNA extracted from the T cells of ALL bone marrow samples, we found the FOXC1 H446HG induced a increased Treg while decreased cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) in bone marrow. The mutation of FOXC1 in T cell promoted the proliferation of leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. CpG islands formed by insertion mutation led to an abnormal increase in exon methylation and were associated with the suppression of FOXC1. Decreased FOXC1 attenuated the transcription of HDAC1, thus resulting in the activation of KLF10 through increasing H3K27 acetylation in the promoter region. In conclusion, the de novo insertion mutation in FOXC1 induced suppression of FOXC1, thereby promoting a Treg/CTL shift in the ALL immune microenvironment. The FOXC1 H446HG mutation might be a potential therapeutic target for ALL in the future.

Sex-based disparities in outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group report

BACKGROUND

Boys with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have historically experienced inferior survival compared to girls. This study determined whether sex-based disparities persist with contemporary therapy and whether patterns of treatment failure vary by sex.

METHODS

Patients 1 to 30.99 years old were enrolled on frontline Children's Oncology Group trials between 2004 and 2014. Boys received an additional year of maintenance therapy. Sex-based differences in the distribution of various prognosticators, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), and subcategories of relapse by site were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 8202 (54.4% male) B-cell ALL (B-ALL) and 1562 (74.3% male) T-cell ALL (T-ALL) patients were included. There was no sex-based difference in central nervous system (CNS) status. Boys experienced inferior 5-year EFS and OS (EFS, 84.6% ± 0.5% vs 86.0% ± 0.6%, P = .009; OS, 91.3% ± 0.4% vs 92.5% ± 0.4%, P = .02). This was attributable to boys with B-ALL, who experienced inferior EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.1-1.3; P = .004) and OS (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P = .046) after adjustment for prognosticators. Inferior B-ALL outcomes in boys were attributable to more relapses (5-year cumulative incidence 11.2% ± 0.5% vs 9.6% ± 0.5%; P = .001), particularly involving the CNS (4.2% ± 0.3% vs 2.5% ± 0.3%; P < .0001). There was no difference in isolated bone marrow relapses (5.4% ± 0.4% vs 6.2% ± 0.4%; P = .49). There were no sex-based differences in EFS or OS in T-ALL.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex-based disparities in ALL persist, attributable to increased CNS relapses in boys with B-ALL. Studies of potential mechanisms are warranted. Improved strategies to identify and modify treatment for patients at highest risk of CNS relapse may have particular benefit for boys.

Recent Advances in Treatment Options for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Simple Summary

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common blood cancer in pediatric patients. Despite the enormous progress in ALL treatment, which is reflected by a high 5-year overall survival rate that reaches up to 96% in the most recent studies, there are still patients that cannot be saved. Treatment of ALL is based on conventional methods, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. These methods carry with them the risk of very high toxicities. Severe complications related to conventional therapies decrease their effectiveness and can sometimes lead to death. Therefore, currently, numerous studies are being carried out on novel forms of treatment. In this work, classical methods of treatment have been summarized. Furthermore, novel treatment methods and the possibility of combining them with chemotherapy have been incorporated into the present work. Targeted treatment, CAR-T-cell therapy, and immunotherapy for ALL have been described. Treatment options for the relapse/chemoresistance ALL have been presented.

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common blood cancer in pediatric patients. There has been enormous progress in ALL treatment in recent years, which is reflected by the increase in the 5-year OS from 57% in the 1970s to up to 96% in the most recent studies. ALL treatment is based primarily on conventional methods, which include chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Their main weakness is severe toxicity, which prompts dose reduction, decreases the effectiveness of the treatment, and, in some cases, can lead to death. Currently, numerous modifications in treatment regimens are applied in order to limit toxicities emerging from conventional approaches and improve outcomes. Hematological treatment of pediatric patients is reaching for more novel treatment options, such as targeted treatment, CAR-T-cells therapy, and immunotherapy. These methods are currently used in conjunction with chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the swift progress in their development and increasing efficacity can lead to applying those novel therapies as standalone therapeutic options for pediatric ALL.

Lineage Conversion in Pediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Leukemia under Blinatumomab Therapy

We report incidence and deep molecular characteristics of lineage switch in 182 pediatric patients affected by B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), who were treated with blinatumomab. We documented six cases of lineage switch that occurred after or during blinatumomab exposure. Therefore, lineage conversion was found in 17.4% of all resistance cases (4/27) and 3.2% of relapses (2/63). Half of patients switched completely from BCP-ALL to CD19-negative acute myeloid leukemia, others retained CD19-positive B-blasts and acquired an additional CD19-negative blast population: myeloid or unclassifiable. Five patients had KMT2A gene rearrangements; one had TCF3::ZNF384 translocation. The presented cases showed consistency of gene rearrangements and fusion transcripts across initially diagnosed leukemia and lineage switch. In two of six patients, the clonal architecture assessed by IG/TR gene rearrangements was stable, while in others, loss of clones or gain of new clones was noted. KMT2A-r patients demonstrated very few additional mutations, while in the TCF3::ZNF384 case, lineage switch was accompanied by a large set of additional mutations. The immunophenotype of an existing leukemia sometimes changes via different mechanisms and with different additional molecular changes. Careful investigation of all BM compartments together with all molecular -minimal residual disease studies can lead to reliable identification of lineage switch.

Pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with blinatumomab in a real-world setting: Results from the NEUF study

BACKGROUND

Prior to regulatory approval of blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R Ph- BCP-ALL), blinatumomab was made available via an expanded access program (EAP).

PROCEDURE

This retrospective observational study included patients receiving blinatumomab in the EAP between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2017 who were followed until death, entry into a clinical trial, end of follow-up, or end of the study period (December 31, 2017), whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

Among 113 children enrolled, 72 were diagnosed with R/R Ph- BCP-ALL and 41 were minimal residual disease positive (MRD+, either Ph- or Ph+). In the R/R group, 38 (53%) patients achieved hematological response within two cycles. Of these, 19 (50%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) without bridging myelosuppressive therapy. Of 36 patients in the R/R group evaluable for MRD, 30 (83%) had an MRD response. In the R/R group, median relapse-free survival was 5.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months. Of 36 patients in the MRD+ group who were evaluable for MRD after two cycles, 27 (75%) had an MRD response. Overall, 24 (59%) of the MRD+ patients proceeded to HSCT without other bridging therapy. Median disease-free survival was 13.6 months; median OS was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world pediatric cohort, blinatumomab was effective within two cycles. Over half of patients with R/R Ph- BCP-ALL achieved hematological response and most achieved MRD response in the MRD+ group, confirming the efficacy of blinatumomab in pediatric trials.

Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults

Simple Summary

Outcome of patients with Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) dramatically improved during the past 20 years with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Their great efficacy in young and fit patients led to question our reliance on chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Moreover, these well-tolerated treatments can be safely administrated even in the elderly that represent the majority of Ph+ ALL patient. This review will focus on the recent changes of paradigm in the management of Ph+ ALL patients and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Abstract

Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) is the most common subtype of B-ALL in adults and its incidence increases with age. It is characterized by the presence of BCR-ABL oncoprotein that plays a central role in the leukemogenesis of Ph+ ALL. Ph+ ALL patients traditionally had dismal prognosis and long-term survivors were only observed among patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1). However, feasibility of allo-HSCT is limited in this elderly population. Fortunately, development of increasingly powerful tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) from the beginning of the 2000′s dramatically improved the prognosis of Ph+ ALL patients with complete response rates above 90%, deep molecular responses and prolonged survival, altogether with good tolerance. TKIs became the keystone of Ph+ ALL management and their great efficacy led to develop reduced-intensity chemotherapy backbones. Subsequent introduction of blinatumomab allowed going further with development of chemo free strategies. This review will focus on these amazing recent advances as well as novel therapeutic strategies in adult Ph+ ALL.

Temporal changes in incidence of relapse and outcome after relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia over three decades; a Nordic population-based cohort study

Relapse remains the main obstacle to curing childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The aims of this study were to compare incidence of relapse, prognostic factors, and survival after relapse between three consecutive Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology trials. Relapse occurred as a primary event in 638 of 4 458 children (1.0-14.9 years) diagnosed with Ph-negative ALL between 1992 and 2018. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 17.3% (95% CI 15.4-19.2%) and 16.5% (95% CI 14.3-18.8%) for patients in the ALL1992 and ALL2000 trials, respectively, but decreased to 8.4% (95% CI 7.0-10.1%) for patients in the ALL2008 trial. No changes in duration of first complete remission and site of relapse were observed over time; however, high hyperdiploidy, and t(12;21) decreased in the ALL2008 trial. The 4-year overall survival after relapse was 56.6% (95% CI 52.5-60.5%) and no statistically significant temporal improvements were observed. Age ≥10 years, T-cell immunophenotype, bone-marrow involvement, early and very early relapse, hypodiploidy, and Down syndrome all independently predicted worse outcome after relapse. Improvements in the primary treatment of childhood ALL has resulted in fewer relapses. However, failure to improve outcome of remaining relapses suggests a selection of harder-to-cure relapses and calls for new therapeutic strategies.

Blinatumomab Nonresponse and High-Disease Burden Are Associated With Inferior Outcomes After CD19-CAR for B-ALL

PURPOSE

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CD19-CAR) and blinatumomab effectively induce remission in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but are also associated with CD19 antigen modulation. There are limited data regarding the impact of prior blinatumomab exposure on subsequent CD19-CAR outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of children and young adults with relapsed or refractory ALL who received CD19-CAR between 2012 and 2019. Primary objectives addressed 6-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS), stratified by blinatumomab use. Secondary objectives included comparison of longer-term survival outcomes, complete remission rates, CD19 modulation, and identification of factors associated with EFS.

RESULTS

Of 420 patients (median age, 12.7 years; interquartile range, 7.1-17.5) treated with commercial tisagenlecleucel or one of three investigational CD19-CAR constructs, 77 (18.3%) received prior blinatumomab. Blinatumomab-exposed patients more frequently harbored KMT2A rearrangements and underwent a prior stem-cell transplant than blinatumomab-naïve patients. Among patients evaluable for CD19-CAR response (n = 412), blinatumomab nonresponders had lower complete remission rates to CD19-CAR (20 of 31, 64.5%) than blinatumomab responders (39 of 42, 92.9%) or blinatumomab-naive patients (317 of 339, 93.5%), P < .0001. Following CD19-CAR, blinatumomab nonresponders had worse 6-month EFS (27.3%; 95% CI, 13.6 to 43.0) compared with blinatumomab responders (66.9%; 95% CI, 50.6 to 78.9; P < .0001) or blinatumomab-naïve patients (72.6%; 95% CI, 67.5 to 77; P < .0001) and worse RFS. High-disease burden independently associated with inferior EFS. CD19-dim or partial expression (preinfusion) was more frequently seen in blinatumomab-exposed patients (13.3% v 6.5%; P = .06) and associated with lower EFS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

With the largest series to date in pediatric CD19-CAR, and, to our knowledge, the first to study the impact of sequential CD19 targeting, we demonstrate that blinatumomab nonresponse and high-disease burden were independently associated with worse RFS and EFS, identifying important indicators of long-term outcomes following CD19-CAR.

Neutropenia and Infection Prophylaxis in Childhood Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pediatric oncology patients frequently experience episodes of prolonged neutropenia which puts them at high risk for infection with significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we review the data on infection prophylaxis with a focus on both pharmacologic and ancillary interventions. This review does not include patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with hematologic malignancies are at highest risk for infection. Bacterial and fungal prophylaxis decrease the risk of infection in certain high-risk groups. Ancillary measures such as ethanol locks, chlorhexidine gluconate baths, GCSF, IVIG, and mandatory hospitalization do not have enough data to support routine use. There is limited data on risk of infection and role of prophylaxis in patients receiving immunotherapy and patients with solid tumors. Patients with Down syndrome and adolescent and young adult patients may benefit from additional supportive care measures and protocol modifications. Consider utilizing bacterial and fungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. More research is needed to evaluate other supportive care measures and the role of prophylaxis in patients receiving immunotherapy.

Targeted inhibitors and antibody immunotherapies: Novel therapies for paediatric leukaemia and lymphoma

Despite improved outcomes achieved in the last decades for children with newly diagnosed leukaemia and lymphoma, treatment of patients with refractory/relapsed disease remains a challenge. The cure rate is still unsatisfactory and often achieved at the cost of significant morbidity. Exploring treatment with novel agents should offer less toxic therapeutic options, without compromising efficacy. Bispecific and antibody-drug conjugates targeting CD19 and CD22 (blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin) play an important role in the treatment of relapsed and refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL); antibodies targeting CD123 and CD38 are also under investigation for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and T-ALL, respectively. Targeted therapy with small molecules is of primary importance for specific genetic subtypes, such as BCR-ABL-positive ALL, FLT3-ITD AML and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma. KMT2A-directed targeted therapy with menin inhibitors holds promise to be of relevance in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemias, known to have dismal prognosis. Target inhibition in cellular pathways such as BCL-2, RAS, MEK, Bruton's tyrosine kinase, JAK-STAT or CDK4/CDK6 inhibition may be suitable for different diseases with common mutated pathways. Nevertheless, development and approval of new agents for paediatric cancers lags behind adult therapeutic options. New regulations were implemented to accelerate drug development for children. Considering the number of oncology medicinal products available for adults and the rarity of paediatric cancers, prioritisation based on scientific evidence and medical need, as well as international collaboration, is critical. Herein, we review the current status of drug development for children with leukaemia and lymphoma, excluding cellular therapy despite its well-known significance.

Exploiting Natural Killer Cell Engagers to Control Pediatric B-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Natural killer (NK) cells represent a promising cell type in antitumor immunotherapy for efficacy and safety, particularly in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. NK cells have been shown to exert antileukemia activity in the context of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Products have been developed to boost the activation of NK cells only when cross-linked by tumor cells, avoiding any off-target effect. Here, we tested the in vitro effect of different NK-cell engagers (NKCE), which trigger either NKp46 or NKp30 together with CD16A, and target either CD19 or CD20 to induce killing of pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Target cells were NALM-16 and MHH-CALL-4 cell lines and four primary leukemias, while effector cells were resting NK cells derived from healthy donors and pediatric patients with leukemia after αβT/B-depleted haplo-HSCT. The NK cell-resistant MHH-CALL-4 was efficiently killed using all NKCEs. Boosting of NK activity against MHH-CALL-4 was also evident by degranulation and IFNγ production. Because of the lack of CD20 and high expression of CD19 on primary BCP-ALL, we focused on NKCEs targeting CD19. NKp46- and NKp30-based NKCEs displayed similar potency at inducing NK-cell activity, even when challenged with primary BCP-ALL blasts. Their efficacy was shown also using NK cells derived from transplanted patients. NKCE-induced activation against BCP-ALL can override HLA-specific inhibitory interactions, although the strongest response was observed by the alloreactive NK-cell subset. These data support the therapeutic use of NKp46/CD16A/CD19-NKCE to fight refractory/relapsed leukemia in pretransplantation or posttransplantation settings.

Far-Red Light Triggered Production of Bispecific T Cell Engagers (BiTEs) from Engineered Cells for Antitumor Application

Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), which have shown potent antitumor activity in humans, are emerging as one of the most promising immunotherapeutic strategies for cancer treatment in recent years. However, the clinical application of BiTEs nowadays has been hampered by their short half-life in the circulatory system due to their low molecular weight and rapid renal clearance. Inevitable continuous infusion of BiTEs has become a routine operation in order to achieve effective treatment, although it is costly, inconvenient, time-consuming, and even painful for patients in some cases. To develop an on-demand, tunable, and reversible approach to overcome these limitations, we assembled a transcription-control device into mammalian cells based on a bacterial far-red light (FRL) responsive signaling pathway to drive the expression of a BiTE against Glypican 3 (GPC3), which is a highly tumor-specific antigen expressed in most hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). As demonstrated in in vitro experiments, we proved that the FRL sensitive device spatiotemporally responded to the control of FRL illumination and produced a therapeutic level of BiTEs that recruited and activated human T cells to eliminate GPC3 positive tumor cells. By functionally harnessing the power of optogenetics to remotely regulate the production of BiTEs from bioengineered cells and demonstrating its effectiveness in treating tumor cells, this study provides a novel approach to achieve an in vivo supply of BiTEs, which could be potentially applied to other formats of bispecific antibodies and facilitate their clinical applications.

Bispecific Antibodies and Other Non-CAR Targeted Therapies and HSCT: Decreased Toxicity for Better Transplant Outcome in Paediatric ALL?

This review will address the place of innovative, non-chemotherapy, non-CAR-T targeted therapies in the treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL), focusing on their use in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) context. The focus will be on the agent with the most experience to date, namely the bispecific T-cell engater (BiTE) blinatumomab, but references to antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as inotuzumab ozogamicin and monoclonal antibodies such as daratumamab will be made as well. Specific issues to be addressed include: (1) The use of these agents to reduce measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to HSCT and their potential for improved transplant outcomes due to reduced toxicity compared to traditional chemotherapy salvage, as well as potentially increased toxicity with HSCT with particular agents; (2) the appropriate sequencing of innovative therapies, i.e., when to use BiTEs or antibodies versus CARs pre- and/or post-HSCT; this will include also the potential for impact on response of one group of agents on response to the other; (3) the role of these agents particularly in the post-HSCT relapse setting, or as maintenance to prevent relapse in this setting; (4) special populations in which these agents may substitute for traditional chemotherapy during induction or consolidation in patients with predisposing factors for toxicity with traditional therapy (e.g., Trisomy 21, infants), or those who develop infectious complications precluding delivery of full standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy during induction/consolidation (e.g., fungal infections); (5) the evidence we have to date regarding the potential for substitution of blinatumomab for some of the standard chemotherapy agents used pre-HSCT in patients without the above risk factors for toxicity, but with high risk disease going into transplant, in an attempt to decrease current rates of transplant-related mortality as well as morbidity; (6) the unique toxicity profile of these agents and concerns regarding particular side effects in the HSCT context. The manuscript will include both the data we have to date regarding the above issues, ongoing studies that are trying to explore them, and suggestions for future studies to further refine our knowledge base.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Paediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Curative Treatment Option or Bridge to Transplant?

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) targeting CD19 has been associated with remarkable responses in paediatric patients and adolescents and young adults (AYA) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL). Tisagenlecleucel, the first approved CD19 CAR-T, has become a viable treatment option for paediatric patients and AYAs with BCP-ALL relapsing repeatedly or after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Based on the chimeric antigen receptor molecular design and the presence of a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, tisagenlecleucel can persist for a long time and thereby provide sustained leukaemia control. "Real-world" experience with tisagenlecleucel confirms the safety and efficacy profile observed in the pivotal registration trial. Recent guidelines for the recognition, management and prevention of the two most common adverse events related to CAR-T - cytokine release syndrome and immune-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome - have helped to further decrease treatment toxicity. Consequently, the questions of how and for whom CD19 CAR-T could substitute HSCT in BCP-ALL are inevitable. Currently, 40-50% of R/R BCP-ALL patients relapse post CD19 CAR-T with either CD19- or CD19+ disease, and consolidative HSCT has been proposed to avoid disease recurrence. Contrarily, CD19 CAR-T is currently being investigated in the upfront treatment of high-risk BCP-ALL with an aim to avoid allogeneic HSCT and associated treatment-related morbidity, mortality and late effects. To improve survival and decrease long-term side effects in children with BCP-ALL, it is important to define parameters predicting the success or failure of CAR-T, allowing the careful selection of candidates in need of HSCT consolidation. In this review, we describe the current clinical evidence on CAR-T in BCP-ALL and discuss factors associated with response to or failure of this therapy: product specifications, patient- and disease-related factors and the impact of additional therapies given before (e.g., blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin) or after infusion (e.g., CAR-T re-infusion and/or checkpoint inhibition). We discuss where to position CAR-T in the treatment of BCP-ALL and present considerations for the design of supportive trials for the different phases of disease. Finally, we elaborate on clinical settings in which CAR-T might indeed replace HSCT.

Blinatumomab as a Bridge Therapy for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Refractory/Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Simple Summary

Immunotherapies are modern treatment modalities, giving hope for improvements of frozen cure rates in many childhood malignancies. More intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy cycles didn’t improve cure rates, only increase number of adverse events. Blinatumomab, a bispecific CD3/CD19 antibody construct, has been successfully used in relapsed/refractory r/r B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and toxicity of blinatumomab in 13 children with r/r BCP-ALL. The response rate in our cohort of patients was 85%, with subsequent feasible HSCT in 11 out of 13 children. Although our study had some limitations with regard to its retrospective design and limited patient population, it clearly showed blinatumomab as not only a feasible but also an effective therapeutic option in pretreated children with r/r BCP-ALL, with a tolerable toxicity profile, paving the way for an HSCT procedure. To date, this is the first retrospective study from Poland on efficacy and toxicity of blinatumomab therapy in children with r/r ALL.

Abstract

Despite the progress that has been made in recent decades in the treatment of pediatric acute leukemias, e.g., converting acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from a fatal to a highly curable disease, 15–20% of children still relapse. Blinatumomab, a bispecific CD3/CD19 antibody construct, has been successfully used in relapsed/refractory r/r B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and toxicity of blinatumomab in 13 children with r/r BCP-ALL. Between 2017 and 2021, thirteen children, aged 1–18 years, with r/r BCP-ALL were treated with blinatumomab. Two patients were administered blinatumomab for refractory relapse without complete remission (CR), one due to primary refractory disease, and ten patients were in CR with minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥ 10⁻³. The response rate in our cohort of patients was 85%, with subsequent feasible HSCT in 11 out of 13 children. Ten children reached MRD negativity after the first blinatumomab administration. The three-year OS for the study patients was 85% (Mantel–Cox, p < 0.001) and median follow-up was 24.5 (range: 1–47). All responders proceeded to HSCT and are alive in CR, and MRD negative. Although our study had some limitations with regard to its retrospective design and limited patient population, it clearly showed blinatumomab as not only a feasible but also an effective therapeutic option in pretreated children with r/r BCP-ALL, with a tolerable toxicity profile, paving the way for an HSCT procedure.

The cure of leukemia through the optimist's prism

Progress is occurring at a dizzying rate across all leukemias. Since the authors' review of the topic in Cancer in 2018, numerous discoveries have been made that have improved the therapy and outcomes of several leukemia subsets. Hairy cell leukemia is potentially curable with a single course of cladribine followed by rituximab (10-year survival, ≥90%). Acute promyelocytic leukemia is curable at a rate of 80% to 90% with a nonchemotherapy regimen of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide. The cure rate for core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is ≥75% with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Survival for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is close to that for an age-matched normal population with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, a previously incurable disease, may now be potentially curable with a finite duration of therapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and venetoclax. The estimated 5-year survival rate for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) exceeds 70% with intensive chemotherapy and ponatinib, a third-generation BCR-ABL1 TKI, and more recent nonchemotherapy regimens using dasatinib or ponatinib with blinatumomab are producing outstanding results. Survival in both younger and older patients with ALL has improved with the addition of antibodies targeting CD20, CD19 (blinatumomab), and CD22 (inotuzumab) to chemotherapy. Several recent drug discoveries (venetoclax, FLT3 and IDH inhibitors, and oral hypomethylating agents) are also improving outcomes for younger and older patients with AML and for those with higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Blinatumomab in Children and Adolescents with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-Life Multicenter Retrospective Study in Seven AIEOP (Associazione Italiana di Ematologia e Oncologia Pediatrica) Centers

Five-year event-free survival in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) currently exceeds 80-85%. However, 15-20% of patients still experience a relapsed/refractory disease. From 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020, thirty-nine patients, 0-21 years old with r/r BCP-ALL were treated with blinatumomab with the aim of inducing remission (n = 13) or reducing MRD levels (n = 26) in the frame of different multiagent chemotherapy schedules, in seven AIEOP centers. Patients were treated in compassionate and/or off-label settings and were not enrolled in any controlled clinical trials. Treatment was well tolerated; 22 (56.4%) patients reported adverse events (AE) on a total of 46 events registered, of which 27 (58.7%) were ≤2 grade according to CTCAE. Neurological AEs were 18 (39.1%); only two patients required transient blinatumomab discontinuation. Complete remission (CR) rate was 46% for the 13 patients treated with ≥5% blasts and 81% PCR/FC MRD negativity in the 26 patients with blasts < 5%. Median relapse-free survival was 33.4 months (95% CI; 7.5-59.3); median overall survival was not reached over a mean follow-up of 16 months. In our study, as in other real-life experiences, blinatumomab proved to be effective and well-tolerated, able to induce a high rate of CR and MRD negativity.

Blinatumomab In pediatric relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: RIALTO expanded access study final analysis

The safety and efficacy of blinatumomab, a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager molecule, for treatment of pediatric relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) were examined in an open-label, single-arm, expanded access study (RIALTO). Children (>28 days, <18 years) with CD19+ R/R B-ALL received up to five cycles of blinatumomab by continuous infusion (cycle: 4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) and measurable residual disease (MRD) response within the first two cycles, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) after treatment. At final data cutoff (1/10/20), 110 patients were enrolled (median age, 8.5 years; 88% ≥5% blasts at baseline). Blinatumomab treatment resulted in a low incidence of grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome (n=2 [1.8%]) and neurologic events (n=4 [3.6%]). No blinatumomab-related fatal adverse events were reported. The probability of response was not affected by the presence of cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities. Median OS was 14.6 months (95%CI: 11.0─not estimable) and was significantly greater for MRD responders versus MRD non-responders (not estimable vs 9.3; HR 0.18, 95%CI: 0.08─0.39). One-year OS probability was higher for patients who received alloHSCT versus without alloHSCT post-blinatumomab (87% versus 29%). Median RFS for MRD responders (n=57) was 8.0 months (95%CI:3.4─10.1) versus 2.8 months (95%CI: 0.3─9.2) for MRD non-responders (n=10). Of patients achieving CR after 2 cycles, 73.5% (95%CI: 61.4%-83.5%) proceeded to alloHSCT. These findings support the use of blinatumomab as a safe and efficacious treatment for pediatric R/R B-ALL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02187354).

Insights into Modern Therapeutic Approaches in Pediatric Acute Leukemias

Pediatric cancers predominantly constitute lymphomas and leukemias. Recently, our knowledge and awareness about genetic diversities, and their consequences in these diseases, have greatly expanded. Modern solutions are focused on mobilizing and impacting a patient’s immune system. Strategies to stimulate the immune system, to prime an antitumor response, are of intense interest. Amid those types of therapies are chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates (ADC), which have already been approved in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), i.e., NOD-like receptors (NLRs), Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and several kinds of therapy antibodies are well on their way to showing significant benefits for patients with these diseases. This review summarizes the current knowledge of modern methods used in selected pediatric malignancies and presents therapies that may hold promise for the future.

Novel Treatments for Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Acute B-Cell Lineage Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Precision Medicine Era

With the markedly increased cure rate for children with newly diagnosed pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), relapse and refractory B-ALL (R/R B-ALL) remain the primary cause of death worldwide due to the limitations of multidrug chemotherapy. As we now have a more profound understanding of R/R ALL, including the mechanism of recurrence and drug resistance, prognostic indicators, genotypic changes and so on, we can use newly emerging technologies to identify operational molecular targets and find sensitive drugs for individualized treatment. In addition, more promising and innovative immunotherapies and molecular targeted drugs that are expected to kill leukemic cells more effectively while maintaining low toxicity to achieve minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and better bridge hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have also been widely developed. To date, the prognosis of pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL has been enhanced markedly thanks to the development of novel drugs. This article reviews the new advancements of several promising strategies for pediatric R/R B-ALL.

Blinatumomab for treating pediatric B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A retrospective real-world study

OBJECTIVES

Blinatumomab was shown to be safe and effective for consolidation therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of blinatumomab in pediatric B-ALL patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study that included patients who initiated blinatumomab treatment between October 1, 2020 and June 20, 2022. Patients with B-ALL diagnosis, age below 18 years, and at least one blinatumomab treatment cycle were included. Treatment-related toxicities were assessed.

RESULT

Totally 23 pediatric patients were included in this study, with a median age of 6 years (range, 2 to 11 years). Blinatumomab therapy was applied for MRD-positive (disease ≥0.01%, n = 3) or chemotherapy-ineligible (n = 20) B-ALL cases. The median follow-up time was 9 months, and all evaluable patients achieved complete molecular remission with undetectable MRD. Four relapsed B-ALL cases proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) without further bridging therapy, while the others underwent maintenance chemotherapy after blinatumomab treatment. Grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia, white blood cell decrease and seizure were observed in 57%, 48% and 4.3% of patients, respectively. One case discontinued therapy due to neurologic toxicities. Elevated cytokine levels were observed in 4 patients. In all 23 patients, increased T-cell and low B-cell counts (<10/μl) were detected during blinatumomab therapy.

CONCLUSION

These encouraging results suggest blinatumomab in pediatric B-ALL patients with MRD⁺ or chemotherapy-related toxicities is effective and safe in the short run, although long-term follow-up is still needed.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants: A quarter century of nationwide efforts in Japan

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with KMT2A gene rearrangement (KMT2A-r) in infants is a biologically and clinically unique disease and one of the most difficult to cure forms of pediatric leukemia. Multicenter clinical trials have been carried out in Japan since the mid-1990s by introducing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission, which led to a modest improvement in outcome of infants with KMT2A-r ALL. Because of the emerging evidence that HSCT does not benefit every infant with KMT2A-r ALL, the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group trial MLL-10 introduced risk stratification using age and presence of central nervous system leukemia, and introduced intensive chemotherapy, including high-dose cytarabine in early consolidation; indication of HSCT was restricted to the patients with high-risk features. The trial resulted in excellent 3-year event-free survival of 66.2% (standard error, 5.6%) and overall survival of 83.9% (standard error, 4.3%) for 75 patients with KMT2A-r ALL recruited between 2011 and 2015. This Japanese experience and the results of the infant ALL trials worldwide suggest the importance of introducing effective therapy in the early phase of therapy, thus clearing minimal residual disease as rapidly as possible. However, further improvement in outcome is unlikely with conventional treatment approaches. Introduction of biology-driven novel agents and/or immunotherapies through international collaboration would be key solutions to overcome the disease.

The safety of blinatumomab in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Blinatumomab is a bispecific CD19-directed CD3 T-cell engager that has proven efficacy in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite its efficacy, it has also been associated with the development of potentially serious adverse events such as the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety profile of blinatumomab in terms of serious adverse events, CRS, and neurologic events (such as seizure and encephalopathy) in pediatric patients with B-cell ALL.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed up to December 10, 2021 to retain pediatric clinical trials on blinatumomab. A random effect meta-analysis approach was used. This study followed the PRISMA statement. Four out of the 255 initial references were selected, of which 2 were phase 1/2 clinical trials and 2 phase 3 clinical trials. Blinatumomab was associated with a lower risk of serious adverse events (Risk ratio RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99), febrile neutropenia (RR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06-0.26), infection (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.56), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93) compared to chemotherapy. No difference in the risk of CRS (RR, 8.37; 95% CI, 0.27-260.97) and seizure (RR, 6.43; 95% CI, 0.79-53.08) was observed between groups, while for encephalopathy a higher risk was associated with blinatumomab compared to chemotherapy (RR, 8.90; 95% CI, 1.08-73.29).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the good safety profile of bliantumomab in treating pediatric patients with B-ALL.

Incidence of subsequent malignancies after total body irradiation-based allogeneic HSCT in children with ALL - long-term follow-up from the prospective ALL-SCT 2003 trial

Total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning is associated with superior leukemia-free survival in children with ALL undergoing HSCT. However, the risk for subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMN) remains a significant concern. We analyzed 705 pediatric patients enrolled in the prospective ALL-SCT-BFM-2003 trial and its subsequent registry. Patients &gt;2 years received conditioning with TBI 12 Gy/etoposide (n = 558) and children ≤2 years of age or with contraindications for TBI received busulfan/cyclophosphamide/etoposide (n = 110). The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of SMN was 0.02 ± 0.01 and 0.13 ± 0.03, respectively. In total, 39 SMN (34 solid tumors, 5 MDS/AML) were diagnosed in 33 patients at a median of 5.8 years (1.7-13.4), exclusively in the TBI group. Of 33 affected patients, 21 (64%) are alive at a median follow-up of 5.1 years (0-9.9) after diagnosis of their first SMN. In univariate analysis, neither age at HSCT, donor type, acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, nor CMV constituted a significant risk factor for SMN. The only significant risk factor was TBI versus non-TBI based conditioning. This analysis confirms and quantifies the increased risk of SMN in children with ALL after conditioning with TBI. Future strategies to avoid TBI will need careful tailoring within prospective, controlled studies to prevent unfavorable outcomes.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in the Youngest: Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Beyond

The ALL SCTped 2012 FORUM (For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age) trial compared outcomes for children ≥4 years of age transplanted for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) who were randomised to myeloablation with a total body irradiation (TBI)-based or chemotherapy-based conditioning regimen. The TBI-based preparation was associated with a lower rate of relapse compared with chemoconditioning. Nevertheless, the age considered suitable for TBI was progressively raised over time to spare the most fragile youngest patients from irradiation-related complications. The best approach to use for children <4 years of age remains unclear. Children diagnosed with ALL in their first year of life, defined as infants, have a remarkably poorer prognosis compared with older children. This is largely explained by the biology of their ALL, with infants often carrying a KMT2A gene rearrangement, as well as by their fragility. In contrast, the clinical presentations and biological features of ALL in children >1 year but <4 years often resemble those presented by older children. In this review, we explore the state of the art regarding haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children <4 years, the preparative regimens available, and new developments in the field that may influence treatment decisions.

The effects of foot reflexology on pain and physiological indicators in children with leukemia under chemotherapy: a clinical trial study

BACKGROUND

Foot reflexology is a popular complementary medicine method; however, previous studies have shown conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate the impact of foot reflexology on pain and physiological responses caused by intrathecal injection of chemotherapy drugs in children with leukemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This clinical trial included 80 children with leukemia. The participants received 20 min foot reflexology (10 min each foot). The primary measured outcomes included pain and physiological indicators (blood pressure and heart rate).

RESULTS

The results showed that foot reflexology had a significant effect on reducing pain (p = 0.002) and improving physiological indicators [blood pressure (p = 0.002) and heart rate (p = 0.003)].

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the present study, which shows the positive effect of foot reflexology on the improvement of pain and physiological indicators, foot reflexology can be used as a complementary treatment along with conventional therapies.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Shifting Indications in the Era of Immunotherapy

Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia generally carries a good prognosis, and most children will be cured and become long-term survivors. However, a portion of children will harbor high-risk features at the time of diagnosis, have a poor response to upfront therapy, or suffer relapse necessitating more intensive therapy, which may include allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Recent advances in risk stratification, improved detection and incorporation of minimal residual disease (MRD), and intensification of upfront treatment have changed the indications for HSCT over time. For children in first complete remission, HSCT is generally reserved for those with the highest risk of relapse. These include patients with unfavorable features/cytogenetics who also have a poor response to induction and consolidation chemotherapy, usually reflected by residual blasts after prednisone or by detectable MRD at pre-defined time points. In the relapsed setting, children with first relapse of B-cell ALL are further stratified for HSCT depending on the time and site of relapse, while all patients with T-cell ALL are generally consolidated with HSCT. Alternatives to HSCT have also emerged over the last decade including immunotherapy and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. These novel agents may spare toxicity while attempting to achieve MRD-negative remission in the most refractory cases and serve as a bridge to HSCT. In some situations, these emerging therapies can indeed be curative for some children with relapsed or resistant disease, thus, obviating the need for HSCT. In this review, we seek to summarize the role of HSCT in the current era of immunotherapy.

MRD in adult Ph/BCR-ABL-negative ALL: how best to eradicate?

Evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) during first-line treatment and after salvage therapy is part of the standard management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Persistent or recurrent MRD is one of the most relevant prognostic factors and identifies a group of patients with resistance to standard chemotherapy. These patients have a high risk of relapse despite continued first-line therapy. Although stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an appropriate strategy, patients with high MRD show an increased relapse rate even after SCT. Approximately one-quarter of adult ALL patients develop an MRD failure, defined as MRD above 0.01% after standard induction and consolidation. The best time point and level of MRD for treatment modification are matters of debate. In order to eradicate MRD and thereby improve chances for a cure, new targeted compounds with different mechanisms of action compared to chemotherapy are being utilized. These compounds include monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and molecular targeted compounds. Essential factors for decision-making, available compounds, and follow-up therapies are discussed.

Immunotherapies in acute leukemia

In the past decade, immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising field of therapeutic progress in acute leukemia. Antibody-drug conjugates are now combined to standard chemotherapy backbones in both acute myeloid (AML) and lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). CD19 targeting immune cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have been approved in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and pave the way to promising developments in acute myeloid leukemia. Next generation immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting TIM-3 or CD47 binding by SIRPα on macrophages are tested in combination to hypomethylating agents to improve survival of unfit AML patients with acceptable safety profiles. This review summarizes the antibody-derived strategies developed in the field of acute leukemias with a specific focus on recently approved drugs.

Paediatric Strategy Forum for medicinal product development of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in children and adolescents with cancer: ACCELERATE in collaboration with the European Medicines Agency with participation of the Food and Drug Administration

The seventh multi-stakeholder Paediatric Strategy Forum focused on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for children and adolescents with cancer. The development of CAR T-cells for patients with haematological malignancies, especially B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL), has been spectacular. However, currently, there are scientific, clinical and logistical challenges for use of CAR T-cells in BCP-ALL and other paediatric malignancies, particularly in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), lymphomas and solid tumours. The aims of the Forum were to summarise the current landscape of CAR T-cell therapy development in paediatrics, too identify current challenges and future directions, with consideration of other immune effector modalities and ascertain the best strategies to accelerate their development and availability to children. Although the effect is of limited duration in about half of the patients, anti-CD19 CAR T-cells produce high response rates in relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL and this has highlighted previously unknown mechanisms of relapse. CAR T-cell treatment as first- or second-line therapy could also potentially benefit patients whose disease has high-risk features associated with relapse and failure of conventional therapies. Identifying patients with very early and early relapse in whom CAR T-cell therapy may replace haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and be definitive therapy versus those in whom it provides a more effective bridge to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a very high priority. Development of approaches to improve persistence, either by improving T cell fitness or using more humanised/fully humanised products and co-targeting of multiple antigens to prevent antigen escape, could potentially further optimise therapy. Many differences exist between paediatric B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL) and BCP-ALL. In view of the very small patient numbers with relapsed lymphoma, careful prioritisation is needed to evaluate CAR T-cells in children with Burkitt lymphoma, primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma and other NHL subtypes. Combination trials of alternative targets to CD19 (CD20 or CD22) should also be explored as a priority to improve efficacy in this population. Development of CD30 CAR T-cell immunotherapy strategies in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma will likely be most efficiently accomplished by joint paediatric and adult trials. CAR T-cell approaches are early in development for AML and T-ALL, given the unique challenges of successful immunotherapy actualisation in these diseases. At this time, CD33 and CD123 appear to be the most universal targets in AML and CD7 in T-ALL. The results of ongoing or planned first-in-human studies are required to facilitate further understanding. There are promising early results in solid tumours, particularly with GD2 targeting cell therapies in neuroblastoma and central nervous system gliomas that represent significant unmet clinical needs. Further understanding of biology is critical to success. The comparative benefits of autologous versus allogeneic CAR T-cells, T-cells engineered with T cell receptors T-cells engineered with T cell receptor fusion constructs, CAR Natural Killer (NK)-cell products, bispecific T-cell engager antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates require evaluation in paediatric malignancies. Early and proactive academia and multi-company engagement are mandatory to advance cellular immunotherapies in paediatric oncology. Regulatory advice should be sought very early in the design and preparation of clinical trials of innovative medicines, for which regulatory approval may ultimately be sought. Aligning strategic, scientific, regulatory, health technology and funding requirements from the inception of a clinical trial is especially important as these are very expensive therapies. The model for drug development for cell therapy in paediatric oncology could also involve a 'later stage handoff' to industry after early development in academic hands. Finally, and very importantly, strategies must evolve to ensure appropriate ease of access for children who need and could potentially benefit from these therapies.

Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular Consensus on genetically modified cells. II: CAR-T cell therapy for patients with CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a novel therapeutic modality for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with robust outcomes in patients with refractory or relapsed disease. At the same time, CAR-T cell therapy is associated with unique and potentially fatal toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicities (ICANS). This manuscript aims to provide a consensus of specialists in the fields of Hematology Oncology and Cellular Therapy to make recommendations on the current scenario of the use of CAR-T cells in patients with ALL.

Cardiac Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Isolated extramedullary relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurs in soft tissues and various organs outside the testis and central nervous system. Treatments such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and more novel modalities such as immunotherapy have eradicated ALL at extramedullary sites. In some instances, survival times for relapsed ALL at these sites are longer than those for relapsed disease involving only the bone marrow. Isolated relapse of ALL in the myocardium is rare, especially in children, making diagnosis and treatment of it difficult. More recent treatment options such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy carry a high risk of cytokine release syndrome and associated risk of worsening cardiac function. Herein we present the case of an 11-year-old boy who presented with relapsed symptomatic B-cell ALL in the myocardium following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This is an unusual presentation of relapsed ALL and this case demonstrates the associated challenges in its diagnosis and treatment. The case report is followed by a literature review of the advances in treatment of pediatric leukemia and their application to extramedullary relapse of this disease in particular.

Other (Non-CNS/Testicular) Extramedullary Localizations of Childhood Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma-A Report from the ALL-REZ Study Group

Children with other extramedullary relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia are currently poorly characterized. We aim to assess the prevalence and the clinical, therapeutic and prognostic features of extramedullary localizations other than central nervous system or testis in children with relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) treated on a relapsed ALL protocol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with relapse of ALL and LBL, treated according to the multicentric ALL-REZ BFM trials between 1983 and 2015, were analyzed for other extramedullary relapse (OEMR) of the disease regarding clinical features, treatment and outcome. Local treatment/irradiation has been recommended on an individual basis and performed only in a minority of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 132 out of 2323 (5.6%) patients with ALL relapse presented with an OEMR (combined bone marrow relapse n = 78; isolated extramedullary relapse n = 54). Compared to the non-OEMR group, patients with OEMR had a higher rate of T-immunophenotype (p < 0.001), a higher rate of LBL (p < 0.001) and a significantly different distribution of time to relapse, i.e., more very early and late relapses compared to the non-OEMR group (p = 0.01). Ten-year probabilities of event-free survival (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS) in non-OEMR vs. OEMR were 0.38 ± 0.01 and 0.32 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0204) vs. 0.45 ± 0.01 and 0.37 ± 0.04 (p = 0.0112), respectively. OEMRs have been classified into five subgroups according to the main affected compartment: lymphatic organs (n = 32, 10y-pEFS 0.50 ± 0.09), mediastinum (n = 35, 10y-pEFS 0.11 ± 0.05), bone (n = 12, 0.17 ± 0.11), skin and glands (n = 21, 0.32 ± 0.11) and other localizations (n = 32, 0.41 ± 0.09). Patients with OEMR and T-lineage ALL/LBL showed a significantly worse 10y-pEFS (0.15 ± 0.04) than those with B-Precursor-ALL (0.49 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). Stratified into standard risk (SR) and high risk (HR) groups, pEFS and pOS of OEMR subgroups were in the expected range whereas the mediastinal subgroup had a significantly worse outcome. Subsequent relapses involved more frequently the bone marrow (58.4%) than isolated extramedullary compartments (41.7%). In multivariate Cox regression, OEMR confers an independent prognostic factor for inferior pEFS and pOS.

CONCLUSION

OEMR is adversely related to prognosis. However, the established risk classification can be applied for all subgroups except mediastinal relapses requiring treatment intensification. Generally, isolated OEMR of T-cell-origin needs an intensified treatment including allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as a curative approach independent from time to relapse. Local therapy such as surgery and irradiation may be of benefit in selected cases. The indication needs to be clarified in further investigations.

Impact of Blinatumomab Treatment on Bone Marrow Function in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Simple Summary

Myelosuppression is a side effect of chemotherapy, in which the production of red and white blood cells and platelets is reduced, increasing risk of infections. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE^®) molecule, is a novel anticancer drug that kills acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells while sparing majority of the normal bone marrow cells. Results from our study, which compared the effects of blinatumomab treatment with chemotherapy on bone marrow function in a large number of patients with ALL, indicated that the decrease in blood cell counts was more severe and lasted longer after chemotherapy compared with blinatumomab treatment, in which the effects were transient. Survival in patients treated with blinatumomab achieving complete remission was more similar between those with incomplete recovery of blood cell counts versus those with complete blood cell counts than the corresponding survival outcomes seen with chemotherapy. In conclusion, blinatumomab treatment caused transient myelosuppression when compared with chemotherapy.

Abstract

Association of blinatumomab treatment with myelosuppression was examined in this study. Peripheral blood counts were assessed prior to, during, and after blinatumomab treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph−) B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n = 267) and Ph+ BCP-ALL (n = 45) from the TOWER and ALCANTARA studies, respectively, or chemotherapy in patients with Ph− BCP-ALL (n = 109) from the TOWER study; all the patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL and responders achieving complete remission (CR) or CR with partial/incomplete hematological recovery (CRh/CRi) were evaluated. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed in patients achieving CR and CRh/CRi. Median leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts increased during two blinatumomab cycles but remained low longer after chemotherapy. Among the responders, there was a trend that a greater proportion of patients achieved CR with blinatumomab (Ph−, 76.5%; Ph+, 77.8%) versus with chemotherapy (Ph−, 63.6%). In the TOWER study, the survival prognosis for patients achieving CRh/CRi versus CR with blinatumomab was more similar (median OS, 11.9 (95% CI, 3.9–not estimable (NE)) vs. 15.0 (95% CI, 10.4–NE) months, p = 0.062) than with chemotherapy (5.2 (95% CI, 1.6–NE) vs. 18.9 (95% CI, 9.3–NE) months, p = 0.013). Blinatumomab treatment, with only temporary and transient myelosuppression, resulted in a greater survival benefit than chemotherapy.

Anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: a narrative review with focus on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

CD19 is a cell surface protein that is found on both healthy and malignant B cells. Accordingly, it has become an important target for novel treatments for non-Hodgkin lymphomas and B-cell leukaemia. Three anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies with distinct mechanisms of action have been developed for the treatment of B-cell malignancies.

METHODS

We reviewed the preclinical and clinical data on the development of the newly approved anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies blinatumomab, tafasitamab and loncastuximab tesirine, and consider their place in the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.

RESULTS

Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager that binds to both CD19 on B cells and CD3 on T cells, facilitating antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. Blinatumomab significantly prolongs overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, although cytokine release syndrome and severe neurotoxicity may necessitate discontinuation. Tafasitamab, which has modified anti-CD19 Fab and Fc regions, has significantly enhanced affinity for both CD19 and effector cell receptors compared with unmodified anti-CD19. In L-MIND, tafasitamab plus lenalidomide provided an overall response rate (ORR) of 57.5% in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients non-transplant eligible. Loncastuximab tesirine is an antibody-drug conjugate that has been studied as monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib in 3L + relapsed or refractory DLBCL. The ORR was 48.3% in a phase II trial of loncastuximab tesirine. The optimal place of anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies in therapy has yet to be determined, but the prospect of improved outcomes for at least some patients with treatment-resistant B-cell malignancies appears likely, particularly in those with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis.

Role of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: bridge to transplantation or stand-alone therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the curative potential for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, with or without consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in the treatment of children and young adults with B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

RECENT FINDINGS

CAR-T targeting CD19 can induce durable remissions and prolong life in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Whether HCT is needed to consolidate remission and cure relapse/refractory B-ALL following a CD19 CAR-T induced remission remains controversial. Preliminary evidence suggests that consolidative HCT following CAR-T in HCT-naïve children improves leukemia-free survival. However, avoiding HCT-related late effects is a desirable goal, so identification of patients at high risk of relapse is needed to appropriately direct those patients to HCT when necessary, while avoiding HCT in others. High disease burden prior to CAR-T infusion, loss of B-cell aplasia and detection of measurable residual disease by flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing following CAR-T therapy associate with a higher relapse risk and may identify patients requiring consolidative HCT for relapse prevention.

SUMMARY

There is a pressing need to determine when CD19 CAR-T alone is likely to be curative and when a consolidative HCT will be required. We discuss the current state of knowledge and future directions.

Factors Impacting Overall and Event-Free Survival following Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be used to consolidate chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy-induced remissions for patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but little is known about the factors impacting overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for post-CAR hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The present study's primary objective was to identify factors associated with OS and EFS for consolidative HSCT following CAR-induced complete remission (CR) in transplantation-naïve patients. Secondary objectives included evaluation of OS/EFS, relapse-free survival and cumulative incidence of relapse for all patients who proceeded to HSCT, stratified by first and second HSCT, as well as the tolerability of HSCT following CAR-induced remission. This was a retrospective review of children and young adults enrolled on 1 of 3 CAR T cell trials at the National Cancer Institute targeting CD19, CD22, and CD19/22 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT01593696, NCT02315612, and NCT03448393) who proceeded directly to HSCT following CAR T cell therapy. Between July 2012 and February 2021, 46 children and young adults with pre-B ALL went directly to HSCT following CAR therapy. Of these patients, 34 (74%) proceeded to a first HSCT, with a median follow-up of 50.8 months. Transplantation-naïve patients were heavily pretreated prior to CAR T cell therapy (median, 3.5 lines of therapy; range, 1 to 12) with significant prior immunotherapy exposure (blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and/or CAR T cell therapy in patients receiving CD22 or CD19/22 constructs (88%; 15 of /17)). Twelve patients (35%) had primary refractory disease, and the median time from CAR T cell infusion to HSCT Day 0 was 54.5 days (range, 42 to 127 days). The median OS following first HSCT was 72.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 months to not estimable [NE]), with a median EFS of 36.9 months (95% CI, 5.2 months to NE). At 12 and 24 months, the OS was 76.0% (95% CI, 57.6% to 87.2%) and 60.7% (95% CI, 40.8% to 75.8%), respectively, and EFS was 64.6% (95% CI, 46.1% to 78.1%) and 50.9% (95% CI, 32.6% to 66.6%), respectively. The individual factors associated with both decreased OS and EFS in univariate analyses for post-CAR consolidative HSCT in transplantation-naïve patients included ≥5 prior lines of therapy (not reached [NR] versus 12.4 months, P = .014; NR versus 4.8 months, P = .063), prior blinatumomab therapy (NR versus 16.9 months, P = .0038; NR versus 4.4 months, P = .0025), prior inotuzumab therapy (NR versus 11.5 months, P = .044; 36.9 months versus 2.7 months, P = .0054) and ≥5% blasts (M2/M3 marrow) pre-CAR T cell therapy (NR versus 17 months, P = .019; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .035). Primary refractory disease was associated with improved OS/EFS post-HSCT (NR versus 21.9 months, P = .075; NR versus 12.2 months, P = .024). Extensive prior therapy, particularly immunotherapy, and high disease burden each individually adversely impacted OS/EFS following post-CAR T cell consolidative HSCT in transplantation-naïve patients, owing primarily to relapse. Despite this, HSCT remains an important treatment modality in long-term cure. Earlier implementation of HSCT before multiply relapsed disease and incorporation of post-HSCT risk mitigation strategies in patients identified to be at high-risk of post-HSCT relapse may improve outcomes.

Targeted Therapy in the Treatment of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Therapy and Toxicity Mechanisms

Targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of poor-prognosis pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with specific genetic abnormalities. It is still being described as a new landmark therapeutic approach. The main purpose of the use of molecularly targeted drugs and immunotherapy in the treatment of ALL is to improve the treatment outcomes and reduce the doses of conventional chemotherapy, while maintaining the effectiveness of the therapy. Despite promising treatment results, there is limited clinical research on the effect of target cell therapy on the potential toxic events in children and adolescents. The recent development of highly specific molecular methods has led to an improvement in the identification of numerous unique expression profiles of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The detection of specific genetic mutations determines patients’ risk groups, which allows for patient stratification and for an adjustment of the directed and personalized target therapies that are focused on particular molecular alteration. This review summarizes the knowledge concerning the toxicity of molecular-targeted drugs and immunotherapies applied in childhood ALL.

Utilizing the prognostic impact of minimal residual disease in treatment decisions for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the first pediatric cancer where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has demonstrated its importance to improve risk-based treatment approaches. The most standardized tools to study MRD in ALL are multiparametric flow cytometry and realtime-quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification-based methods. In recent years, MRD measurement has reached greater levels of sensitivity and standardization through international laboratory networks collaboration.

AREAS COVERED

We herewith describe how to assess and apply the prognostic impact of MRD in treatment decisions, with specific focus on pediatric ALL. We also highlight the role of MRD monitoring in the context of genetically homogeneous subgroups of pediatric ALL. However, some queries remain to be addressed and emerging technologies hold the promise of improving MRD detection in ALL patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging technologies, like next generation flow cytometry, droplet digital PCR, and next generation sequencing appear to be important methods for assessing MRD in pediatric ALL. These more specific and/or sensitive MRD monitoring methods may help to predict relapse with greater accuracy, and are currently being used in clinical trials to improve pediatric ALL outcome by optimizing patient stratification and earlier MRD-based interventional therapy.

Secondary Dysgammaglobulinemia in Children with Hematological Malignancies Treated with Targeted Therapies

Targeted therapies have emerged as innovative treatments for patients whose disease does not respond to conventional chemotherapy, and their use has widely expanded in the field of pediatric hematologic malignancies in the last decade. While they carry the promise of improved disease control and survival and are currently investigated in first-line treatment protocols for patients with poor prognostic markers, they are associated with a considerable incidence of specific toxicities, including cytokine-release syndrome, neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, endocrine adverse events, and infectious complications. Iatrogenic or secondary dysgammaglobulinemia is a main consequence of targeted therapies using monoclonal antibodies and other antibody-derived treatments that target specific antigens on lymphoid cells (blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, rituximab), chimeric antigen receptor T cells, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib) and, to a lesser extent, checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab). This review discusses the diagnosis and incidence of secondary or iatrogenic dysgammaglobulinemia in children treated with targeted therapies for leukemias and lymphomas, and options for monitoring and treatment.

The Role of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers potentially curative treatment for many children with high-risk or relapsed acute leukemia (AL), thanks to the combination of intense preparative radio/chemotherapy and the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. Over the years, progress in high-resolution donor typing, choice of conditioning regimen, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis and supportive care measures have continuously improved overall transplant outcome, and recent successes using alternative donors have extended the potential application of allotransplantation to most patients. In addition, the importance of minimal residual disease (MRD) before and after transplantation is being increasingly clarified and MRD-directed interventions may be employed to further ameliorate leukemia-free survival after allogeneic HSCT. These advances have occurred in parallel with continuous refinements in chemotherapy protocols and the development of targeted therapies, which may redefine the indications for HSCT in the coming years. This review discusses the role of HSCT in childhood AL by analysing transplant indications in both acute lymphoblastic and acute myeloid leukemia, together with current and most promising strategies to further improve transplant outcome, including optimization of conditioning regimen and MRD-directed interventions.