Effect of the Addition of Cetuximab to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Radiation Therapy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0436 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Definitive chemoradiotherapy plus cetuximab for cancer in the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for localized oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

This non-randomised multicentre phase II trial recruited patients aged 18-75 with WHO performance status 0-2 having squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction, T2-4, N0-3, M0 not suitable for surgery. Chemotherapy was three 21-day cycles of fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 D1-5 and oxaliplatin D1 (cycle 1:130mg/m 2, cycle 2-3:85 mg/m 2). Radiotherapy was 50Gy in 2Gy/fraction, 5 days a week, concurrent with cycle 2 and 3 and weekly cetuximab. The primary objective was loco-regional control at one year.

RESULTS

52 patients were included. 51 were eligible for toxicity and survival analysis and 46 for recurrence analysis. Full radiotherapy dose was delivered to 80%, 75% received all three cycles of chemotherapy and 75% received four or more doses of cetuximab. The most common related grade III-IV adverse events were gastro-intestinal(16), hypersensitivity(6) and infection(5). There were two drug-related deaths. Within six months from the end of treatment, six patients died from complications from fistulas. The loco-regional control rate at one year was 47.3%(95%CI 30.9%-62.1%). Overall survival at three years was 29.1%(95% CI 17.4-41.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin and fluorouracil given concurrent with radiotherapy and cetuximab had an acceptable safety profile and showed a clinical response in patients with locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. However, the primary end-point was not met, and the addition of cetuximab to definitive chemoradiotherapy cannot be recommended.

Radiochemotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer: final results of a randomized phase 2 trial (LEOPARD-2)

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab when added to radiochemotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer.

Methods

This randomized phase 2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01787006) compared radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab (arm A) to radiochemotherapy (arm B) for unresectable esophageal cancer. Primary objective was 2‑year overall survival (OS). Arm A was considered insufficiently active if 2‑year OS was ≤40% (null hypothesis = H₀), and promising if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was >45%. If that lower limit was >40%, H₀ was rejected. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LC), metastases-free survival (MFS), response, and toxicity. The study was terminated early after 74 patients; 68 patients were evaluable.

Results

Two-year OS was 71% in arm A (95% CI: 55–87%) vs. 53% in arm B (95% CI: 36–71%); H₀ was rejected. Median OS was 49.1 vs. 24.1 months (p = 0.147). Hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.30–1.21). At 2 years, PFS was 56% vs. 44%, LC 84% vs. 72%, and MFS 74% vs. 54%. HRs were 0.51 (0.25–1.04) for progression, 0.43 (0.13–1.40) for locoregional failure, and 0.43 (0.17–1.05) for distant metastasis. Overall response was 81% vs. 69% (p = 0.262). Twenty-six and 27 patients, respectively, experienced at least one toxicity grade ≥3 (p = 0.573). A significant difference was found for grade ≥3 allergic reactions (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.044).

Conclusion

Given the limitations of this trial, radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab was feasible. There was a trend towards improved PFS and MFS. Larger studies are required to better define the role of cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer.

Construction of Biocompatible Dual-Drug Loaded Complicated Nanoparticles for in vivo Improvement of Synergistic Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

Combination chemotherapy is a routine treatment for esophageal cancer, but some shortcomings, such as drug toxicity and side effects, greatly limit the clinical application of combination therapy. To overcome these shortcomings, we have developed a mesoporous silica nanoparticle system that was used to load doxorubicin and β-elemene. β-elemene was encapsulated in the pore of mesoporous silica nanoparticle and doxorubicin was electrostatically adsorbed on the surface of mesoporous silica nanoparticle by hyaluronic acid to construct dual drugs synergistic nanoparticles (bMED NPs, ~77.15 nm). In vitro studies demonstrated that bMED NPs had a good treatment effect in esophageal cancer cell lines. In vivo fluorescence imaging results demonstrated that bMED NPs could accumulate in tumor sites and achieve in vivo long-term circulation and continuous drug release. In addition, bMED NPs exhibited significant antitumor effects in the esophageal cancer mouse model, which may provide a great platform for esophageal cancer chemotherapy.

Research of the mechanism on miRNA193 in exosomes promotes cisplatin resistance in esophageal cancer cells

Purpose

Chemotherapy resistance of esophageal cancer is a key factor affecting the postoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. Among the media that transmit signals between cells, the exosomes secreted by tumor cells mediate information transmission between tumor cells, which can make sensitive cells obtain resistance. Although some cellular exosomes play an important role in tumor’s acquired drug resistance, the related action mechanism is still not explored specifically.

Methods

To elucidate this process, we constructed a cisplatin-resistant esophageal cancer cell line, and proved that exosomes conferring cellular resistance in esophageal cancer can promote cisplatin resistance in sensitive cells. Through high-throughput sequencing analysis of the exosome and of cells after stimulation by exosomes, we determined that the miRNA193 in exosomes conferring cellular resistance played a key role in sensitive cells acquiring resistance to cisplatin. In vitro experiments showed that miRNA193 can regulate the cell cycle of esophageal cancer cells and inhibit apoptosis, so that sensitive cells can acquire resistance to cisplatin. An in vivo experiment proved that miRNA193 can promote tumor proliferation through the exosomes, and provide sensitive cells with slight resistance to cisplatin.

Results

Small RNA sequencing of exosomes showed that exosomes in drug-resistant cells have 189 up-regulated and 304 down-regulated miRNAs; transcriptome results showed that drug-sensitive cells treated with drug-resistant cellular exosomes have 3446 high-expression and 1709 low-expression genes; correlation analysis showed that drug-resistant cellular exosomes mainly affect the drug resistance of sensitive cells through paths such as cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction, and the VEGF and Jak-STAT signaling pathways; miRNA193, one of the high-expression miRNAs in drug-resistant cellular exosomes, can promote drug resistance by removing cisplatin’s inhibition of the cell cycle of sensitive cells.

Conclusion

Sensitive cells can become resistant to cisplatin through acquired drug-resistant cellular exosomes, and miRNA193 can make tumor cells acquire cisplatin resistance by regulating the cell cycle.

Dosimetric analysis of lymphopenia during chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Background

Lymphopenia during chemoradiation (CRT) for esophageal cancer (EC) can adversely affect clinical outcomes. We sought to explore an association between lymphopenia and dosimetric parameters during CRT for EC.

Methods

After IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed 54 patients treated with either definitive or neoadjuvant CRT for EC. Absolute lymphocyte count was recorded weekly during CRT up and graded according to the common terminology of adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters were collected based on vertebral body, body dose, dose to peripheral lymphocytes, and spleen. Logistic regression correlated Grade 4 toxicity with DVH parameters and linear regression analysis correlated absolute lymphocyte nadir counts with DVH parameters. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were constructed to define dosimetric thresholds.

Results

There were a total of 21 Grade 4 events (38.8%) of lymphopenia. Increasing vertebral volume receiving ≥10 Gy (OR 1.1, P=0.04), ≥20 Gy (OR 1.1, P=0.03), ≥30 Gy (OR 1.1, P=0.012), or mean body dose (OR 1.04, P=0.032) were correlated with Grade 4 lymphopenia on multivariable logistic regression. The dosimetric parameters most predictive of Grade 4 toxicity via a ROC analysis included absolute vertebral volume receiving 10 Gy >289 cc, 20 Gy ≥270 cc, and vertebral volumes receiving 30 Gy ≥197 cc. On multivariable linear regression increasing volume receiving 20 Gy (Beta -0.004, P=0.001), 30 Gy (Beta -0.005, P=0.0046), and mean body dose (Beta -0.002, P=0.001) all correlated with absolute lymphocyte nadir.

Conclusions

Lymphopenia, a known negative prognostic factor in EC, is closely correlated with the volume of vertebral bodies receiving radiation during CRT for EC. Dosimetric sparing of the vertebral bodies may result in better outcomes.

Sequential boost of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with chemotherapy for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase II study

PURPOSE

This prospective phase II study aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sequential boost of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with chemotherapy for patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients with histologically or cytologically proven inoperable ESCC were enrolled in this study (ChiCTR-OIC-17010485). A larger target volume for subclinical lesion was irradiated with 50 Gy, and then, a smaller target volume only including gross tumor was boosted to 66 Gy. The fraction dose was 2 Gy, and no elective node was irradiated. Concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy of fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 , days 1-3) plus cisplatin (25 mg/m2 , days 1-3) was administered every 4 weeks, for 4 cycles in total. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 65 years (range: 45-75 years), and 69 patients (78.4%) were men. With the median follow-up of 26 (range: 3-95) months, the 2- and 5-year PFS were 39.3% and 36.9%, respectively, and overall survival (OS) were 57.1% and 39.2%, respectively. Tumor stage and concurrent chemotherapy were independent OS predictors. Major acute adverse events were myelosuppression and esophagitis, most of which were grades 1-2. Nine percent and 2.3% of patients had grade 3 acute esophagitis and late esophageal strictures, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential boost to 66 Gy by IMRT with chemotherapy was safe and effective for inoperable ESCC. A randomized phase III study to compare with standard dose of 50 Gy is warranted.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Over Radiotherapy After R0 Resection for Stage II-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

This study compared the effectiveness and safety of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) containing paclitaxel (PTX) and cisplatin (DDP) with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after R0 resection for stage II-III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).

Materials and Methods

After propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, 87 TESCC patients treated with PORT were matched 1:1 to 87 patients who received POCRT between July 2012 and December 2018. Radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 200 cGy per day to a total dose of 5000 cGy. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of DDP (25 mg/m²) for 3 days plus PTX (135 mg/m²) on day 1 every 3 weeks.

Results

Patient- and disease-related characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) times were 39.2 and 31.0 months, respectively. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 31.9% and 19.1% in the PORT group and 45.1% and 35.1% in the POCRT group, respectively. Statistical significance was demonstrated by comparing OS and DFS (P=0.022 and 0.016, respectively). Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that in node positive TESCC patients, the POCRT group was significantly different from the PORT group regarding OS and DFS (P=0.049 and 0.039, respectively). POCRT decreased distant metastasis over PORT (P=0.044) with manageable toxicities. Multivariate analysis revealed that aside from factors associated with tumor stages, treatment modality was another strong prognostic factor for both OS and DFS (P=0.015 and 0.010, respectively).

Conclusion

Stage II-III TESCC patients could benefit from POCRT with manageable toxicities. Future well-designed prospective studies are highly warranted to confirm the findings in our report.

Pericardial effusion after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The literature regarding pericardial effusion after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for esophageal cancer was lacking. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT.

METHODS

A total of 126 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. The pericardial effusion was determined on computed tomography scan of the chest and graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by the log-rank test. The risk factors of pericardial effusion were determined with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 14.0 months. Thirty-seven (29.4%) patients had pericardial effusion after a median interval of 6.6 months since the end of IMRT. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion of any grade was higher in patients with mean heart dose > 23.45 Gy (p = 0.00018), heart V30 > 33.55% (p = 0.00015), mean pericardium dose > 20.33 Gy (p = 0.00027), and pericardium V20 > 42.55% (p = 0.00018). Furthermore, eight (6.3%) patients had symptoms related to pericardial effusion and were considered as cases with pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3. The cumulative incidence of pericardial effusion ≥ grade 3 was higher in patients with pericardium V30 > 65.80% (p = 0.00028), V40 > 55.35% (p < 0.0001), and V60 > 24.70% (p = 0.0021). Multivariate analyses showed the above dose-volume parameters predicted the risk of pericardial effusion in esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-volume parameters predicting the risk of pericardial effusion were identified in esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT. They could be applied as constraints of IMRT for esophageal cancer.

Nimotuzumab, an EGFR‑targeted antibody, promotes radiosensitivity of recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Local tumor recurrence is one of the main causes for the failure of esophageal cancer treatment following radiotherapy. Previous studies have demonstrated that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‑targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy is expected to become an effective means to control tumor recurrence. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect and mechanism of nimotuzumab (an EGFR‑targeted antibody) in the treatment of recurrent esophageal carcinoma. The radiation responses of two esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines, EC109 and TE‑1, with or without nimotuzumab, were first evaluated by CCK‑8 assay. Colony formation and apoptosis were used to measure anti‑proliferation effects. It was demonstrated that nimotuzumab arrested the cell cycle at the G2 phase in vitro. Western blotting and immunofluorescence analysis were used to determine signaling pathway changes. It was observed that nimotuzumab inhibited phosphorylation of EGFR in EC109 cells. Furthermore, recurrent tumor models were established and it was identified that the degree of tumor hypoxia was positively associated with EGFR overexpression. In EC109 cell xenografts, nimotuzumab combined with radiation led to a significant delay in recurrent tumor growth compared with that of radiation alone (P<0.001 for 0 Gy pre‑irradiation, P=0.005 for 20 Gy pre‑irradiation, P=0.005 for 10 Gy pre‑irradiation). These results suggest that nimotuzumab combined with radiation may be an effective means to control recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with EGFR overexpression.

The emerging role of proton therapy for esophagus cancer

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plays an essential role in the treatment of esophageal cancer as either curative or neoadjuvant therapy. When delivered with conventional photon-based techniques, multiple adjacent organs at risk including the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, stomach, and bowel, receive considerable radiation dose which may contribute to acute and late adverse events (AEs). Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers a reduction in radiation exposure to these organs and potentially an improvement in the therapeutic ratio. Herein we discuss the emerging role of PBT for esophageal cancer, including rationale, treatment planning, early dosimetric and clinical comparisons of PBT with photon-based techniques, ongoing prospective trials, and potential areas of opportunity for the incorporation of PBT with the goal of improving outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer.

Phase I Trial of Intensity-Modulated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Boost with Concurrent Chemotherapy Immediately Following Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Patients Primarily with Advanced Intra-thoracic/Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas

PURPOSE

Local persistence and relapse of disease in the gross tumor volume (GTV) account for the majority of treatment failures after standard chemoradiation therapy. The primary objective of this phase 1 trial was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) boost to the GTV with concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin after standard-dose chemoradiation therapy, using image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were given weekly doses of paclitaxel (45 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the curve 1.5) for 5 weeks with concurrent radiation therapy (50 Gy), immediately followed by an HFRT boost to the GTV with the same chemotherapy regimen. The boost doses were escalated in increments of 7.2 Gy delivered in 6 twice-daily fractions of 1.2 Gy using a modified Fibonacci design. Once the MTD was established, additional patients were treated at that dose to determine the safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The incidence of dose-limiting toxicity was 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 1 of 6 (grade 4 esophagitis), 0 of 3, and 2 of 3 (1 case each of grade 5 esophageal fistula and grade 3 pneumotitis) at 7.2, 14.4, 21.6, 28.8, 36, and 43.2 Gy, respectively, indicating an MTD of 36 Gy. Ten patients treated with this MTD showed no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common acute grade 3 or greater toxicities were esophagitis (26%) and neutropenia (19%). Late toxicity of grade 2 esophageal stricture occurred in 4 patients. The overall response rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 42%-93%) in the entire cohort. The 1-year local control rate was 100% among those receiving a cumulative dose of the MTD or greater.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of the HFRT boost after standard chemoradiation therapy in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy was 36 Gy, resulting in the cumulative tumor dose of 86 Gy in patients primarily with advanced intrathoracic/cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and not adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. A phase 2 study to further evaluate this regimen is underway.

Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy with Oxaliplatin, Infusional 5-Fluorouracil, and Cetuximab Followed by Postoperative Docetaxel and Cetuximab in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E2205)

BACKGROUND

A standard approach to treating resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery; however, recurrence is common. To improve this, we designed a single-arm, phase II trial that added an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, cetuximab (C), to CRT, with the hypothesis that EGFR inhibition would improve pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We aimed to increase the pCR rate from 25% to 45%. A Simon two-stage design (α and β of 0.10) required pCR/enrolled 5/18 for stage 1 and 14/40 total. CRT: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1, 15, and 29; infusional 5-fluorouracil 180 mg/m2 /24 hours × 35 days; C 400 mg/m2 day 1 then 250 mg/m2 days 8, 15, 22, and 29 and radiation (intensity modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] allowed) 180 cGy/day × 25 fractions (Monday through Friday). Following esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT): weekly docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and C 250 mg/m2 5 out of 6 weeks for two cycles.

RESULTS

Of 21 eligible patients enrolled, 17 had surgery; 4 died before operation (due to pulmonary embolism 4 days after CRT, G3 diarrhea, progressive disease during CRT, sepsis/hypoxia during CRT, and acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]). pCR = 7/17. Three postoperative deaths due to ARDS resulted in seven total study-related deaths. Of the 14 remaining patients, 12 started and completed adjuvant CT. Two of seven patients with pCR died, both of ARDS. Out of the 21 eligible subjects in this study, 13 have died and 8 remain alive. The use of IMRT did not correlate with ARDS.

CONCLUSION

This regimen demonstrated promising activity. Toxicity was significant, with seven study-related deaths leading to closure after stage 1. All postoperative deaths were due to ARDS. This regimen is not recommended.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Esophageal cancer is a disease with a high death rate. The current treatment involves giving chemotherapy plus radiation followed by surgery, but this cures only a quarter of patients. In order to improve survival, better treatments are needed. This trial evaluated the addition of a novel drug, cetuximab, to chemotherapy plus radiation. Unfortunately, the side effects were too great and the study was stopped early.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery with and without cetuximab in patients with resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized, open-label, phase III trial (SAKK 75/08)

Background

This open-label, phase III trial compared chemoradiation followed by surgery with or without neoadjuvant and adjuvant cetuximab in patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma.

Patients and methods

Patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to two cycles of chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2) followed by chemoradiation (45 Gy, docetaxel 20 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2, weekly for 5 weeks) and surgery, with or without neoadjuvant cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly and adjuvant cetuximab 500 mg/m2 fortnightly for 3 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

In total, 300 patients (median age, 61 years; 88% male; 63% adenocarcinoma; 85% cT3/4a, 90% cN+) were assigned to cetuximab (n = 149) or control (n = 151). The R0-resection rate was 95% for cetuximab versus 97% for control. Postoperative treatment-related mortality was 6% in both arms. Median PFS was 2.9 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0 to not reached] with cetuximab and 2.0 years (95% CI, 1.5-2.8) with control [hazard ratio (HR), 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.07; P = 0.13]. Median overall survival (OS) time was 5.1 years (95% CI, 3.7 to not reached) versus 3.0 years (95% CI, 2.2-4.2) for cetuximab and control, respectively (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01; P = 0.055). Time to loco-regional failure after R0-resection was significantly longer for cetuximab (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90; P = 0.017); time to distant failure did not differ between arms (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64-1.59, P = 0.97). Cetuximab did not increase adverse events in neoadjuvant or postoperative settings.

Conclusion

Adding cetuximab to multimodal therapy significantly improved loco-regional control, and led to clinically relevant, but not-significant improvements in PFS and OS in resectable esophageal carcinoma.

Clinical trial information

NCT01107639.

Roles for Autophagy in Esophageal Carcinogenesis: Implications for Improving Patient Outcomes

Esophageal cancer is among the most aggressive forms of human malignancy with five-year survival rates of <20%. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process that degrades and recycles damaged organelles and misfolded proteins to maintain cellular homeostasis. While alterations in autophagy have been associated with carcinogenesis across tissues, cell type- and context-dependent roles for autophagy have been reported. Herein, we review the current knowledge related to autophagy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), the two most common subtypes of esophageal malignancy. We explore roles for autophagy in the development and progression of ESCC and EAC. We then continue to discuss molecular markers of autophagy as they relate to esophageal patient outcomes. Finally, we summarize current literature examining roles for autophagy in ESCC and EAC response to therapy and discuss considerations for the potential use of autophagy inhibitors as experimental therapeutics that may improve patient outcomes in esophageal cancer.

Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis

Background and objectives

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94–05 has demonstrated that higher dose radiation didn’t improve outcome of patients with esophageal cancer (EC). However, several retrospective studies showed that a higher dose radiation based on modern radiotherapy techniques could improve overall survival (OS) and local control rate (LCR) of patients with EC, especially esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). As trials have provided updated and controversial data, we performed this updated meta-analysis to investigate whether high-dose (> = 60 Gy) radiotherapy in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) could yield benefit compared to standard dose radiotherapy.

Methods

A systematic literature search was carried out in the database of MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. All studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2018 on the association between radiation dose and curative efficiency in EC were included in this meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to evaluate the time-to-event data employing RevMan version 5.3.

Results

Eight articles with a total of 3736 patients were finally included. Results indicated that there was a significant benefit in favor of high dose radiotherapy (HD-RT) regarding OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.72–0.84, p < 0.001; 2-year OS risk ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.14–1.37, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.001, HR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.57–0.87) and LRFS (P < 0.001, HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.36–0.74) .

Conclusions

HD-RT (> = 60 Gy) based on modern radiotherapy techniques in definitive CCRT appears to improve OS, PFS amd LRFS compared to the SD-RT in patients with ESCC.

A phase I study evaluating combined nimotuzumab and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in locally advanced esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined nimotuzumab and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with clinically resectable, locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus nimotuzumab were eligible for study participation. Radiotherapy was administered in 1.8 Gy once daily for 5 days per week up to a total dose of 41.4 Gy. Weekly nimotuzumab (200 mg/week) was administered following paclitaxel and carboplatin on the same day for 5 weeks. The primary end-point was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and the secondary end-point was the safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients with a median age of 58 years were enrolled in this study. pCR was observed in 51.6% patients. Grade 3 acute toxicities were observed in 6 patients (9.4%), shown as bone marrow suppression. 7 patients experienced grade 1 transient skin rash during nimotuzumab treatment. The median PFS time and OS time were 64.6 and 68.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined nimotuzumab and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for clinically resectable, locally advanced esophageal cancer showed a significant anticancer effect with tolerable toxicities.

From genetics to signaling pathways: molecular pathogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has one of the fastest rising incidence rates in the U.S. and many other Western countries. One of the unique risk factors for EAC is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a chronic digestive condition in which acidic contents from the stomach, frequently mixed with duodenal bile, enter the esophagus resulting in esophageal tissue injury. At the cellular level, progression to EAC is underlined by continuous DNA damage caused by reflux and chronic inflammatory factors that increase the mutation rate and promote genomic instability. Despite recent successes in cancer diagnostics and treatment, EAC remains a poorly treatable disease. Recent research has shed new light on molecular alterations underlying progression to EAC and revealed novel treatment options. This review focuses on the genetic and molecular studies of EAC. The molecular changes that occur during the transformation of normal Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma are also discussed.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: progress and opportunities

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the common malignant tumors in the world. More than half of patients with ESCC were detected in advanced or metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis and lost the opportunities of surgery. Currently, surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are most utilized in clinical practice, however, they are associated with limited survival benefits. Recognition of the limitation of traditional antitumor strategies prompt the development of new means to treat human cancer. In recent years, studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors (eg PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, CTLA-4 inhibitors, etc.) in ESCC have shown promising results. In addition, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor and traditional antitumor strategies for ESCC has caused extensive interest, and the results are encouraging. Previous analysis indicated that tumor cell PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation load (TMB), microsatellite instability-high status (MSI-H), and other biomarkers have relatively correlated with the efficacy of immunotherapy. This review explores the recent studies investigating checkpoint inhibitors in ESCC.

Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 9 by a novel inhibitor enhances radiosensitization and identifies Axl as a novel downstream target in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) transcriptionally regulates several proteins and cellular pathways central to radiation induced tissue injury. We investigated a role of BAY1143572, a new highly specific CDK9 inhibitor, as a sensitizer to radiation in esophageal adenocarcinoma. In vitro synergy between the CDK9 inhibitor and radiation was evaluated by clonogenic assay. In vivo synergy between the CDK9 inhibitor and radiation was assessed in multiple xenograft models including a patient’s tumor derived xenograft (PDX). Reverse phase protein array (RPPA), western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and qPCR were utilized to identify and validate targets of the CDK9 inhibitor. The CDK9 inhibitor plus radiation significantly reduced growth of FLO-1, SKGT4, OE33, and radiation resistant OE33R xenografts and PDXs as compared to the cohorts treated with either single agent CDK9 inhibitor or radiation alone. RPPA identified Axl as a candidate target of CDK9 inhibition. Western blot and qPCR demonstrated reduced Axl mRNA (p = 0.02) and protein levels after treatment with CDK9 inhibitor with or without radiation in FLO-1 and SKGT4 cells. Axl protein expression in FLO-1 xenografts treated with combination of CDK9 inhibitor and radiation was significantly lower than the xenografts treated with radiation alone (p = 0.003). Clonogenic assay performed after overexpression of Axl in FLO-1 and SKGT4 cells enhanced radiosensitization by the CDK9 inhibitor, suggesting dependency of radiosensitization effects of the CDK9 inhibitor on Axl. In conclusion, these findings indicate that targeting CDK9 by BAY1143572 significantly enhances the effects of radiation and Axl is a novel downstream target of CDK9 in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Development of an Empirically Calibrated Model of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in High-Risk Regions

Objective

This study constructs, calibrates, and verifies a mathematical simulation model designed to project the natural history of ESCC and is intended to serve as a platform for testing the benefits and cost-effectiveness of primary and secondary ESCC prevention alternatives.

Methods

The mathematical model illustrates the natural history of ESCC as a sequence of transitions among health states, including the primary health states (e.g., normal mucosa, precancerous lesions, and undetected and detected cancer). Using established calibration approaches, the parameter sets related to progression rates between health states were optimized to lead the model outputs to match the observed data (specifically, the prevalence of precancerous lesions and incidence of ESCC from the published literature in Chinese high-risk regions). As illustrative examples of clinical and policy application, the calibrated and validated model retrospectively simulate the potential benefit of two reported ESCC screening programs.

Results

Nearly 1,000 good-fitting parameter sets were identified from 1,000,000 simulated sets. Model outcomes had sufficient calibration fit to the calibration targets. Additionally, the verification analyses showed reasonable external consistency between the model-predicted effectiveness of ESCC screening and the reported data from clinical trials.

Conclusions

This parameterized mathematical model offers a tool for future research investigating benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness related to ESCC prevention and treatment.

Treatment in esophagogastric junction cancer: Past, present and future

Adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction represent 27% of all gastric tumors. n recent years, it has been classified as an entity of its own, with specific treatments that are sometimes differentiated from gastric treatments. Treatment can be based on chemotherapy (CTx) or chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) that is administered preoperatively (neoadjuvant), postoperatively (adjuvant) or perioperatively. There are studies that have tested several treatment modalities, but there is currently no single protocolized sequence. The results point to an improvement in survival when we administer preoperative treatment, with evidence in favor of CRTx and CTx. Studies are already underway with targeted treatment that aim to increase the activity of traditional chemotherapy. In the next few years, we should know the role of immunotherapy in this group of patients.

Association of Industry and Academic Sponsorship With Negative Phase 3 Oncology Trials and Reported Outcomes on Participant Survival: A Pooled Analysis

Importance

Only 3.4% of cancer drugs evaluated in phase 1 trials are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, with most failing in phase 3 trials.

Objective

To investigate whether an association exists between the sponsorship and conduct of a negative phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) investigating a cancer drug that lacked supporting phase 2 trial evidence for that drug, and to evaluate the association with overall survival among patients randomized to the experimental arm of such phase 3 trials.

Data Sources

Articles in the Lancet, Lancet Oncology, JAMA, JAMA Oncology, and Journal of Clinical Oncology published between January 2016 and June 2018 were searched.

Study Selection

Phase 3 RCTs of cancer drugs that failed to improve the primary end point were selected and any prior phase 2 trial of the same drug that supported the phase 3 trial was selected without any date or journal restrictions.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Percentages of negative phase 3 RCTs of cancer drugs that lacked any phase 2 evidence, had a negative phase 2 trial, or had a positive phase 2 study were extracted. Associations were assessed using the Fisher exact test. Pooled hazard ratios and 95% CIs for the overall survival of patients enrolled in these negative phase 3 RCTs were estimated using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Negative phase 3 RCTs with a lack of a phase 2 trial or the presence of a negative phase 2 trial and overall survival of enrolled patients in the phase 3 RCTs.

Results

In this meta-epidemiological study, 67 negative phase 3 RCTs on cancer drugs, which included 64 600 patients, met the criteria of being sponsored by industry or academic groups, of which 42 RCTs (63%) were industry sponsored and the remaining 25 RCTs (37%) were academic. A phase 2 trial was not available for 28 of these trials (42%). Of 29 trials (43%) with a phase 2 trial available, 8 trials (28%) failed to meet their primary end points and 5 of those were industry sponsored. There was no association with overall survival for patients participating in these negative phase 3 RCTs (pooled hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.02). When the pooled analysis was limited to the 27 RCTs with a hazard ratio above 1.00, the overall pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06-1.16). No association between having a negative or undefined phase 2 trial and trial sponsorship was found using the Fisher exact test.

Conclusions and Relevance

More than 40% of the negative phase 3 RCTs in oncology published in these 5 journals were conducted without a supporting phase 2 trial and were sponsored by both academia and industry. Running such trials not only may risk loss of resources owing to a failed trial but also may be associated with decreased patient survival. Further research and regulations in this area appear warranted.

Slight advantages of nimotuzumab versus cetuximab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nimotuzumab (Nimo) versus cetuximab (C225) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). A total of 95 patients with LA-ESCC were retrospectively reviewed, including 65 in Nimo and 30 in C225. The results showed that the ORR in Nimo (61.0%; CR 22.0%, 13/59; PR 39.0% 23/59) was slightly higher than that in C225 (43.5%; CR 8.7%, 2/23; PR 34.8%, 8/23) but without significant difference (p = 0.81). The DCR was 79.7% vs. 73.9% in C225, favoring Nimo plus CCRT (p = 0.04). The median PFS in Nimo was significantly longer than that in C225 (19.6 months vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.02). The median OS of the whole cohort, the Nimo group and the C225 group were 21.3, 24.5, and 20.9 months, respectively. The rates of OS at 1-, 3-year in Nimo were 77.7% and 33.5%, compared to 73.3% and 20.0% in C225 (HR = 1.17, p = 0.23). Grade 3 or worse hematological toxicity and non-hematological toxicity (radiation esophagitis) in Nimo were similar with that in C225 (21.5% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.91; 26.1% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.56). No grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis occurred neither Nimo group nor C225 group. Nimo plus CCRT improved DCR and PFS of patients with LA-ESCC and had a tendency of prolonged survival compared to C225 plus CCRT. Our results suggest that the combination of Nimo and CCRT may be a reasonable option in this population.

Prognostic and Predictive Factors for the Curative Treatment of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

An overview of promising prognostic variables and predictive subgroups concerning the curative treatment of esophageal and gastric cancer from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ASCO/ESMO conferences were searched up to March 2019 for RCTs on the curative treatment of esophageal or gastric cancer with data on prognostic and/or predictive factors for overall survival. Prognostic factors were deemed potentially clinically relevant according to the following criteria; (1) statistically significant (p < 0.05) in a multivariate analysis, (2) reported in at least 250 patients, and (3) p < 0.05, in ≥ 33% of the total number of patients in RCTs reporting this factor. Predictive factors were potentially clinically-relevant if (1) the p-value for interaction between subgroups was <0.20 and (2) the hazard ratio in one of the subgroups was significant (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

For gastric cancer, 39 RCTs were identified (n = 13,530 patients) and, for esophageal cancer, 33 RCTs were identified (n = 8618 patients). In total, we identified 23 potentially clinically relevant prognostic factors for gastric cancer and 16 for esophageal cancer. There were 15 potentially clinically relevant predictive factors for gastric cancer and 10 for esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSION

The identified prognostic and predictive factors can be included and analyzed in future RCTs and be of guidance for nomograms. Further validation should be performed in large patient cohorts.

Optimal management of gastroesophageal junction cancer

Although recent decades have witnessed incremental improvements in the treatment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) carcinoma, outcomes remain modest. For locally advanced esophageal cancer, the addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation to surgery is considered the standard of care. Chemotherapy remains the primary treatment for metastatic disease and improves survival over best supportive care. However, the prognosis for patients with GEJ cancers, which are treated along the same paradigms as esophageal and gastric carcinomas, remain poor because of the emergence of chemoresistance and limited targeted therapeutic approaches, which include agents that target the HER2 and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the chemorefractory setting have confirmed the activity of immunotherapy in esophagogastric cancer. Ongoing immunotherapeutic strategies are being evaluated in both the locally advanced and metastatic settings. This review focuses on the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic GEJ carcinomas, which encompass all tumors that have an epicenter within 5 cm proximal or distal to the anatomical Z-line (Siewert classification). Because the vast majority of GEJ tumors are adenocarcinoma, the management of adenocarcinoma is the focus of this review. Evolving approaches and areas of clinical equipoise are discussed.

The optimal neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer

Esophagectomy is the cornerstone of intentionally curative treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatments have been introduced to minimize the risk of development of locoregional- and/or distant recurrences. Chemotherapy is used based on the results of the MAGIC- and the OEO2-trials and chemoradiotherapy became part of standard treatment after the publication of the CROSS-trial. Although several studies have compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, no robust evidence on the optimal neoadjuvant treatment has been obtained as yet. Several studies indirectly comparing both modalities suggest a benefit for chemoradiotherapy in the number of pathologically complete responders, radical resection rate and possibly even in overall survival. Large randomized controlled trials like the Neo-AEGIS-, ESOPEC- and NeXT-trials are currently addressing this topic. A relatively new aspect of esophageal cancer treatment is the administration of monoclonal antibodies. Several monoclonal antibodies have been tested in, mostly, advanced esophageal cancer treatment. Cetuximab has also been tested as addition to neoadjuvant- and definitive treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, showing mixed results. This review aims at providing an overview of the currently available neoadjuvant treatments in esophageal cancer.

Comparing Paclitaxel Plus Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil regimen versus the cisplatin plus fluorouracil regimen in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group or the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group. The patients in the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group were treated with paclitaxel and fluorouracil one cycle per week in dCRT for five cycles followed by paclitaxel and fluorouracil one cycle per month in consolidation chemotherapy for two cycles. The patients in the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil group were treated with cisplatin and fluorouracil one cycle per month in dCRT for two cycles followed by two cycles in consolidation chemotherapy. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. The primary end point was 3-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-six patients with ESCC in six centers were recruited at a 1:1 ratio between April 2012 and July 2015. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 48.7 months (interquartile range, 42.6-60.9). The 3-year OS was 55.4% in the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group and 51.8% in the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group (hazard ratio, 0.905 [95% CI, 0.698 to 1.172]; P = .448). The 3-year progression-free survival was also not significantly different between the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group and the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group (43.7% v 45.5%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.973 [95% CI, 0.762 to 1.243]; P = .828). Compared with the cisplatin plus fluorouracil group, the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group had significantly lower incidences of acute grade 3 or higher anemia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue (P < .05), but higher incidences of acute grade 3 or higher leukopenia, radiation dermatitis, and radiation pneumonitis (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The paclitaxel plus fluorouracil regimen did not significantly prolong the OS compared with the standard cisplatin plus fluorouracil regimen in dCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Endostatin and Oxaliplatin-Based Chemoradiotherapy for Inoperable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Phase II Study

LESSONS LEARNED

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy based on oxaliplatin and endostatin was effective with the objective response rate exceeding 80%, and the treatment-related toxicities were acceptable.The treatment compliance of the current combination was much higher, without significant reduction in survival outcomes, than historical reports.

BACKGROUND

This phase II trial aimed at assessing the efficiency and safety of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) using oxaliplatin (OHP) and endostatin in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Radiotherapy was delivered with a daily fraction of 2.0 Gy to a total dose of 60.0 Gy over 6 weeks. Endostatin and OHP were both intravenously administered at doses of 7.5 mg/m² daily for 2 weeks and 135 mg/m² on day 1, respectively, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

The analysis included 37 patients. The median age was 63 years (range: 49-71 years), and all patients were stage III-IVA. Of these patients, 97.3% (36/37) completed the dCRT course with an ORR of 83.8%, including 10 (27.0%) patients with complete response and 21 (56.8%) patients with partial response. The median overall survival (OS) time was 18.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6-26.4) with a 2-year OS rate of 39.6% (95% CI: 0.202-0.590). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.6-15.4) with a 2-year PFS rate of 20.2% (95% CI: 0.049-0.355). Grade 3 toxicities included esophagitis (five patients) and leukocytopenia (three patients). Grade 4 leukopenia was observed in one patient. Late toxicity was infrequent, and no treatment-related death occurred. Posttreatment dysphagia scores were significantly improved when compared with baseline (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

dCRT based on OHP and endostatin resulted in high treatment compliance with manageable toxicities. This combination resulted in encouraging ORR without compromising survival outcomes. It should be validated in future clinical studies.

Influence of 3D-CRT and conformal IMRT on thyroid function of patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer and comparison of clinical efficacy

Clinical efficacy in patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer was compared between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and conformal intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Medical data of 120 esophageal cancer patients undergoing RT in the Radiology Department in Xiaogan Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Xiaogan, China) from March 2015 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 3D-CRT group (treated with 3D-CRT, n=60) and IMRT group (treated with IMRT, n=60). The target conformal index (CI), PTV maximum dose (D_max), PTV D_min and PTV D_mean in both groups were observed. Changes in double-lung V5, double-lung V20, double-lung V30 and spinal cord D_max in both groups were also observed. The serum free triiodothyronine (FT3), free tetraiodothyronine (FT4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations were detected via chemiluminescence assay. Moreover, the short-term efficacy and radiation injury were observed. CI in IMRT group was significantly higher than that in 3D-CRT group (P<0.001). The organ-at-risk dose parameter V20 in IMRT group was obviously lower than that in 3D-CRT group (P<0.001). Serum FT3 and FT4 concentrations in both groups before RT were significantly higher than those after RT (P<0.05), but the TSH concentration was significantly lower than that after RT (P<0.05). Serum FT3 and FT4 concentrations in IMRT group after RT were obviously higher than those in 3D-CRT group (P<0.05). The incidence rates of radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis in IMRT group were remarkably lower than those in 3D-CRT group (P<0.05). IMRT can reduce the double-lung V20 in patients, improve the target conformal degree, better protect the normal tissues, cause less damage to thyroid function, and reduce radiation injury during and after RT of esophageal cancer.

Phase IB Study of Induction Chemotherapy With XELOX, Followed by Radiation Therapy, Carboplatin, and Everolimus in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies have shown synergy between everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, radiation, and platinum agents. We conducted a phase IB trial to determine the recommended phase II dose of everolimus with carboplatin and radiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage II/III esophageal cancer were enrolled. Following 2 cycles of Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (XELOX), patients with no disease progression, received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and concurrent weekly carboplatin (area under the curve=2), with escalating doses of everolimus. A standard 3+3 dose escalation design was used.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled. Two patients were screen failures and 4 were removed due to poor tolerance to XELOX (n=2) or disease progression (n=2). All treated patients had adenocarcinoma. Median age was 58 (44 to 71 y) and 85% were male patients. One patient at dose level 1 was replaced due to ongoing anxiety. One of 6 patients had a dose-limiting toxicity of bowel ischemia that was fatal. At dose level 2, two of 6 patients had a dose-limiting toxicity (fever with neutropenia and nausea). The recommended phase II dose of everolimus was 2.5 mg QOD. Grade ≥3 toxicities included lymphopenia (11%), nausea (10%), low white blood cell (8.0%) vomiting (5.5%), decreased neutrophils (4.0%). All patients achieved an R0 resection with a pathologic response rate of 40% and a pathologic complete response (ypCR) rate of 23%. The 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 50% and 49.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II dose of everolimus with concurrent weekly carboplatin and radiation is 2.5 mg QOD.

EGFR inhibitor C225 Increases the Radio-Sensitivity of Human Breast Cancer Cells

Objective: This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of C225 on the radio-sensitivity of MDA-MB-231 cells line and to disclosure underlying mechanism. Methods: CCK8 assay was used to measure the proliferation inhibition of C225 on MDA-MB-231 cells. The combined effects of C225 plus radiation on the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells were also evaluated by CCK-8 assay. The clonogenic assay was performed to evaluate the cell surviving fractions and to determine the radio-sensitizing effect of C225 on MDA-MB-231 cells. The apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were analyzed by flow cytometry. Western blot analysis was used to detect the expression of p-EGFR, p-Akt, p-P38, and caspase-3. Results: C225 had an inhibiting effect on the proliferation of cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The cloning formation capacity was decreased in C225 plus radiation group. C225 increased radio-sensitivity of cells and led to cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase markedly. Cells treated with C225 and radiation predominantly exhibited G0/G1 phase arrest and significant decreased in the fraction of cells in the S phase. Moreover, C225 and radiation significantly increased the apoptosis rate of cells. Decreased cell proliferation was further supported by the down-regulation of p-EGFR and its downstream singling pathway proteins such as p-Akt and p-P38. The up-regulation of the Caspase-3 expression in C225 plus radiation group revealed that C225 could increase radiation-inducing cell apoptosis. Conclusion: C225 could increase the radio-sensitivity of cells, which may be due to the anti-proliferative synergistic effect between C225 and radiation as well as the down-regulation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Analysis of SPARC and TUBB3 as predictors for prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the predictive efficacy of secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) and the class III β-tubulin (β-tubulin III, TUBB3) in predicting therapeutic effect in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) who received nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy(CT) followed by surgery.

METHODS

Patients with stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma of different stages are recruited. The tumor biopsy tissues prior treatment from enrolled patients were examined by SPARC and TUBB3 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Correlations between SPARC/TUBB3 expression and response to chemotherapy and long-term survival in patients received surgical resection was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients with stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. Of the 35 enrolled patients, 30 successfully completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent R0 resection, 3 refused surgery after chemotherapy, and 2 failed to undergo radical surgery after chemotherapy. Out of patients undergoing surgery, pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 6 patients (6/30, 20%). The 1, 2 and 5-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 70.0%, 36.6% and 33.3%, respectively. The 1, 2 and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.3%, 63.3% and 36.6%, respectively. SPARC and TUBB3 IHC was performed on the tumor biopsy tissues which were obtained from patients before treatment. Correlation between SPARC/TUBB3 expression and long-term survival in patients was studied. Both the median DFS and OS between SPARC negative samples and SPARC positive staining samples have no statistical difference. However, the median DFS and OS in TUBB3 negative patients was better than those in TUBB3 positive patients (p = 0.002 for DFS, p = 0.001 for OS). In addition, patients with pCR had longer OS and DFS time than those without pCR.COX regression analysis showed that TUBB3 prior treatment and pCR were independent prognostic factors in ESCC patients undergoing sequential surgery after preoperative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

TUBB3 negative expression prior treatment and pCR may indicate a better prognosis for stage II and III ESCC patients after nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy following radical esophagectomy.

Molecular pathogenesis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Identification of the antitumor effects of miR‑145‑3p on gene regulation

Although miR‑145‑5p (the guide strand of the miR‑145 duplex) is established as a tumor suppressive microRNA (miRNA or miR), the functional significance of miR‑145‑3p (the passenger strand of the miR‑145 duplex) in cancer cells and its targets remains obscure. In our continuing analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) pathogenesis, the aim of the present study was to identify important oncogenes and proteins that are controlled by miR‑145‑3p. Overexpression of miR‑145‑3p significantly reduced cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasive abilities, and further increased apoptotic abilities. In ESCC cells, 30 possible oncogenic targets were identified that might be regulated by miR‑145‑3p. Among these targets, dehydrogenase/reductase member 2 (DHRS2) and myosin IB (MYO1B) were focused on to investigate their functional roles in ESCC cells. DHRS2 and MYO1B were directly regulated by miR‑145‑3p in ESCC cells by dual luciferase reporter assays. Aberrantly expressed DHRS2 and MYOIB were detected in ESCC clinical specimens, and their overexpression enhanced cancer cell aggressiveness. Genes regulated by antitumor miR‑145‑3p were closely associated with the molecular pathogenesis of ESCC. The approach based on antitumor miRNAs may contribute to the understanding of ESCC molecular pathogenesis.

Combination of novel systemic agents and radiotherapy for solid tumors - part I: An AIRO (Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology) overview focused on treatment efficacy

Over the past century, technologic advances have promoted the evolution of radiation therapy into a precise treatment modality allowing for the maximal administration of dose to tumors while sparing normal tissues. In parallel with this technological maturation, the rapid expansion in understanding the basic biology and heterogeneity of cancer has led to the development of several compounds that target specific pathways. Many of them are in advanced steps of clinical development for combination treatments with radiotherapy, and can be incorporated into radiation oncology practice for a personalized approach to maximize the therapeutic gain. This review describes the rationale for combining novel agents with radiation, and provides an overview of the current landscape focused on treatment efficacy.

Combination of novel systemic agents and radiotherapy for solid tumors - Part II: An AIRO (Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology) overview focused on treatment toxicity

Clinical development and use of novel systemic agents in combination with radiotherapy (RT) is at nowadays most advanced in the field of treatment of solid tumors. Although for many of these substances preclinical studies provide sufficient evidences on their principal capability to enhance radiation effects, the majority of them have not been investigated in even phase I clinical trials for safety in the context of RT. In clinical practice, unexpected acute and late side effects may emerge especially in combination with RT. As a matter of fact, despite combined modality treatment holds potential for enhancing the therapeutic ratio, some concerns are raised from the lack of high-quality clinical data to guide the care of patients who are treated with novel compounds in conjunction with RT. The aim of this review is to provide, from a radio-oncological point of view, an overview of the most advanced combined treatment concepts for solid tumors focusing on treatment toxicity.

Cetuximab for esophageal cancer: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence indicates that cetuximab (CET) combined with chemoradiotherapy may be effective for patients with esophageal cancer. However, the recent results are still contradictory and no consensus has yet been reached on this issue. To evaluate the clinical effects and safety of CET, we conducted an updated meta-analysis by retrieving published data up to June 2018.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in several electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI database and Chinese Biomedicine Database using subject terms and free terms. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the efficiency and safety of CET.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five RCTs reported localized esophageal cancer and other five RCTs reported metastatic esophageal cancer. For these patients with localized esophageal cancer, CET could not significantly improve the response rate, overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS, 1-5 years). But CET treatment might increase the incidences of diarrhea (OR = 2.07; CI = 1.01-4.25) and rash (OR = 16.91; CI = 3.20-89.42). For other patients with metastatic esophageal cancer, the addition of CET significantly increased the response rate (OR = 3.34; CI = 1.90-5.88), disease control rate (OR = 2.92; CI = 1.49-5.71) and 2-year overall survival (OR = 2.78; CI = 1.20-6.46) compared with the control group. However, CET could not improve the 1-year overall survival and might make patients with metastatic esophageal cancer more susceptible to rash (OR = 5.50; CI = 2.14-14.14). No significant differences in other adverse effects were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that adding CET to multimodal therapy significantly improved response rate and disease control rate for patients with metastatic esophageal cancer rather than patients with localized esophageal cancer. CET might be a safe therapeutic choice, but CET failed to significantly improve the overall survival and PFS for patients with localized or metastatic esophageal cancer.

Chemotherapy and novel targeted therapies for operable esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional cancer

During the past decades, several treatment strategies such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy have been shown to improve the prognosis of resectable esophageal cancer. Patients with squamous cell tumors respond better to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to adenocarcinoma. Therefore, in squamous tumors neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the preferred strategy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both effective in patients with adenocarcinoma. Chemoradiotherapy trials have shown higher rates of pCR, pN0 and R0 resection rates compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials. Nonetheless, it is still unclear whether one strategy should be preferred over the other in terms of overall survival for adenocarcinoma. Based on the currently available evidence, the addition of targeted agents, such as VEGF and EGFR inhibitors, to the aforementioned strategies does not lead to survival benefit. Novel targeted treatment strategies that are currently being investigated include inhibition of HER2, PD-1 or the PD-1 ligand. Molecular subgroup analysis can contribute to better understanding of disease pathogenesis and prediction of response to treatment.

Mouse avatar models of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma proved the potential for EGFR-TKI afatinib and uncovered Src family kinases involved in acquired resistance

Background

No approved targeted agents are available for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Informative genomic analysis and mouse patient-derived xenografts (PDX) also called mouse avatar can greatly expedite drug discovery.

Methods

Six ESCC cell lines and 7 out of 25 PDX models derived from 188 biopsies with clear molecular features were employed to evaluate the sensitivity of several EGFR blockers in vitro and in vivo, as well as the underlying antitumor mechanisms of the most promising EGFR-TKI afatinib. Mechanisms involved in acquired resistance of afatinib were explored based on established resistant cell lines and PDX models followed by an attempt to reverse resistance.

Results

Compared with other EGFR blockers, the second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib exerted superior antitumor effects in ESCC, and EGFR copy number gain (CNG) or overexpression was proposed to be predictive biomarkers. Afatinib played its antitumor effects by inhibiting EGFR downstream pathways, as well as inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at G1. It was increased phosphorylation of Src family kinases (SFKs), rather than MET upregulation, that conferred to acquired resistance of afatinib. Dual blockade of EGFR and SFKs could overcome afatinib resistance and warrants validation in clinical practice.

Conclusion

Both ESCC cell lines and PDXs with EGFR CNG or overexpression are potential candidates for afatinib, and concomitant EGFR/SFKs inhibition could reverse afatinib-acquired resistance caused by SFKs activation in ESCC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13045-018-0651-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Combining immunotherapy with radiation therapy in thoracic oncology

Thoracic malignancies comprise some of the most common and deadly cancers. Immunotherapies have been proven to improve survival outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and show great potential for patients with other thoracic malignancies. Radiation therapy (RT), an established and effective treatment for thoracic cancers, has acted synergistically with immunotherapies in preclinical studies. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the clinical benefits of combining RT with immunotherapies and the optimal manner in which to deliver these complementary treatments.

Skin toxicity with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of 65 randomized controlled trials

We performed a meta-analysis to fully investigate the skin toxicities of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (EGFR-MoAbs) in cancer patients. The relevant studies of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients treated with EGFR-MoAbs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched for articles published till November 2017. The relevant RCTs in cancer patients treated with EGFR-MoAbs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. 65 RCTs and 25994 patients were included. The current meta-analysis suggests that the use of EGFR-MoAbs significantly increases the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade skin toxicity, such as rash, hand-foot syndrome, dry skin and oral mucositis. Rash was the most common skin toxicity. Patients receiving nimotuzumab were associated with the least risk of skin toxicity. The risk of high-grade skin toxicity tended to be higher in the study in which the EGFR-MoAbs treatment duration was longer. The available data suggested that the use of EGFR-MoAbs significantly increases the risk of developing skin toxicity. Physicians should be aware of skin toxicity and should monitor cancer patients when receiving EGFR-MoAbs.

Recent advancements in esophageal cancer treatment in Japan

The 11th edition of the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer (EC) was published in 2017. Some correction was made in the depth of tumor invasion to be consistent with the TNM classification by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). With regard to surgery, short-term safety and long-term effectiveness under thoracotomy/video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery are expected to be proven by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG)1409 study. Results of nutritional management and countermeasures for adverse events not only during the perioperative period but also during EC chemotherapy were reported. From now on, the pursuit of low invasiveness and radicality is desired. Esophageal surgery is also expected to be safe at all institutions. To determine the optimal modality of preoperative treatment and a novel chemo(radio)therapy regimen for patients with distant metastasis, the results of the ongoing JCOG1109 and 0807 studies are being released. The effect of the addition of molecular targeted drugs on chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation has not yet improved overall survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs could offer a potential new treatment approach for patients with treatment-refractory advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network reported the results of a comprehensive genome analysis and molecular analysis of SCC and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Further differentiation of SCC and adenocarcinoma by molecular characterization analysis may be useful for the development of clinical trials and targeted drug therapies as precision medicine. The era of ultimate minimally invasive surgery and personalized treatment has begun. Large, prospective studies will be required to confirm the value of these advancements.

Feasibility of definitive chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were aged 76 years or older, had a histopathologic diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and were treated at the Kitasato University Hospital between January 2010 and March 2016. Chemotherapy consisted of nedaplatin in an intravenous dose of 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil in an intravenous dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, repeated every 4 weeks for 2 cycles. Radiation therapy consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions for thoracic tumors and 61.2 Gy for cervical tumors.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were studied. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 79 years (range, 76-85 years), clinical stage I/II/III/IV (7/8/8/2, respectively), and surgically resectable/unresectable (17/8, respectively). The completion rates of radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy were 100% and 84%, respectively. Grade ≥3 acute toxicities included neutropenia (76%), leukopenia (72%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (28%), anorexia (32%), oral mucositis (20%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and esophagitis (8%). Grade ≥3 late toxicities included esophageal stenosis (12%) and pleural effusion (4%). The complete response rate was 64%. In the median follow-up period of 18.9 months, the 1-year overall survival rate was 68%.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive chemoradiation therapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil may be a feasible treatment option for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Lapatinib in combination with paclitaxel plays synergistic antitumor effects on esophageal squamous cancer

PURPOSE

Paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy was proven to be efficacious in treating patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, the toxicity and the development of resistance limited its anticancer efficiency. The present study was to evaluate the antitumor effects of lapatinib, a dual tyrosine inhibitor of both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), combined with paclitaxel on the esophageal squamous cancer.

METHODS

MTT assays were used to evaluate the effects of the combination of lapatinib and paclitaxel on the growth of esophageal squamous cancer cell lines (KYSE150, KYSE450, KYSE510 and TE-7). The activity of the combination of two agents on cell invasion, migration and apoptosis was measured by wound healing assay, transwell assay and Annexin V-FITC/PI stain assay. Western blot assay was used to analyze the effects of the two agents on the EGFR/HER2 signaling. The in vivo efficacy was evaluated in KYSE450 xenograft nude mouse model.

RESULTS

The combination of lapatinib and paclitaxel was highly synergistic in inhibiting cell growth with a combination index of < 1, and suppressed significantly the invasion and migration capability of esophageal squamous cancer cells. Esophageal squamous cancer cells displayed increased rates of apoptosis after treatment with lapatinib plus paclitaxel. The phosphorylated EGFR and HER2 as well as the activation of downstream molecules MAPKs and AKT significantly decreased when exposed to lapatinib and paclitaxel. In vivo studies showed that the combination of two agents had greater antitumor efficacy than either agent alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of lapatinib with paclitaxel showed synergistic antitumor activity, suggesting their potential in treating patients with esophageal squamous cancer.

The current status of multimodality treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

A multimodality approach plays a key role in the treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Currently, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin with radiotherapy is the standard treatment in this population. dCRT regimens using 5-FU plus leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), and carboplatin plus paclitaxel have been investigated in prospective clinical trials. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody has been evaluated in combination with dCRT; however, this combination has not revealed any additive benefits. Induction chemotherapy using docetaxel plus 5-FU plus cisplatin has also been under investigation. Although long-term survival and cure have been observed in some patients by dCRT, most patients experience local failure or distant metastasis and eventually die from the disease. Salvage surgery is an important option if the residual or recurrent tumors after dCRT can be resectable, but is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality. Introduction of radiotherapy using a new technique with dose escalation is expected to improve efficacy without increasing radiation-related toxicities. Immunotherapy in combination with radiotherapy has also gathered attention. For the establishment of new and effective treatments in the field of unresectable locally advanced ESCC, a collaboration between clinical researchers and basic researchers is warranted.