101
|
Anders CK, Winer EP, Ford JM, Dent R, Silver DP, Sledge GW, Carey LA. Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibition: "targeted" therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16:4702-10. [PMID: 20858840 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-0939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
In contrast to endocrine-sensitive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, novel agents capable of treating advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are lacking. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are emerging as one of the most promising "targeted" therapeutics to treat TNBC, with the intended "target" being DNA repair. PARPs are a family of enzymes involved in multiple cellular processes, including DNA repair. TNBC shares multiple clinico-pathologic features with BRCA-mutated breast cancers, which harbor dysfunctional DNA repair mechanisms. Investigators hypothesized that PARP inhibition, in conjunction with the loss of DNA repair via BRCA-dependent mechanisms, would result in synthetic lethality and augmented cell death. This hypothesis has borne out in both preclinical models and in clinical trials testing PARP inhibitors in both BRCA-deficient and triple-negative breast cancer. The focus of this review includes an overview of the preclinical rationale for evaluating PARP inhibitors in TNBC, the presumed mechanism of action of this novel therapeutic class, promising results from several influential clinical trials of PARP inhibition in advanced breast cancer (both TNBC and BRCA deficient), proposed mechanisms of acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors, and, finally, concludes with current challenges and future directions for the development of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
102
|
Zhang X, Wan G, Mlotshwa S, Vance V, Berger FG, Chen H, Lu X. Oncogenic Wip1 phosphatase is inhibited by miR-16 in the DNA damage signaling pathway. Cancer Res 2010; 70:7176-86. [PMID: 20668064 PMCID: PMC2940956 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1) was identified as an oncogene amplified and overexpressed in several human cancers. Recent evidence suggested that Wip1 is a critical inhibitor in the ATM/ATR-p53 DNA damage signaling pathway. Wip1 dephosphorylates several key DNA damage-responsive proteins and reverses DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoints. Previous reports showed that Wip1 was transcriptionally induced by p53 at the early stage of the DNA damage response. To investigate the temporal and functional regulation of Wip1, we identified a microRNA, miR-16, that specifically targets the mRNA of Wip1 and thus negatively regulates the expression level of Wip1. miR-16 itself is induced immediately after DNA damage. Therefore, the increase in Wip1 protein level is significantly postponed compared with that of its mRNA level, preventing a premature inactivation of ATM/ATR signaling and allowing a functional completion of the early DNA damage response. To better understand miR-16 biological functions in the context of cancer cells, we examined its expression in mammary tumor stem cells and found it to be markedly downregulated in mammary tumor stem cells. Overexpression of miR-16 or inhibition of Wip1 suppresses the self-renewal and growth of mouse mammary tumor stem cells and sensitizes MCF-7 human breast cancer cells to the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin. Together, our results suggest an important role of miR-16 in the regulation of Wip1 phosphatase in the DNA damage response and mammary tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinna Zhang
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Guohui Wan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sizolwenkosi Mlotshwa
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Vicki Vance
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Franklin G. Berger
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Hexin Chen
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Xiongbin Lu
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Molyneux G, Geyer FC, Magnay FA, McCarthy A, Kendrick H, Natrajan R, Mackay A, Grigoriadis A, Tutt A, Ashworth A, Reis-Filho JS, Smalley MJ. BRCA1 basal-like breast cancers originate from luminal epithelial progenitors and not from basal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7:403-17. [PMID: 20804975 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 603] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2009] [Revised: 06/04/2010] [Accepted: 07/01/2010] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers frequently have a distinctive basal-like phenotype. It has been suggested that this results from an origin in basal breast epithelial stem cells. Here, we demonstrate that deleting Brca1 in mouse mammary epithelial luminal progenitors produces tumors that phenocopy human BRCA1 breast cancers. They also resemble the majority of sporadic basal-like breast tumors. However, directing Brca1 deficiency to basal cells generates tumors that express molecular markers of basal breast cancers but do not histologically resemble either human BRCA1 or the majority of sporadic basal-like breast tumors. These findings support a derivation of the majority of human BRCA1-associated and sporadic basal-like tumors from luminal progenitors rather than from basal stem cells. They also demonstrate that when target cells for transformation have the potential for phenotypic plasticity, tumor phenotypes may not directly reflect histogenesis. This has important implications for cancer prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Molyneux
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
104
|
Lopez-Garcia MA, Geyer FC, Natrajan R, Kreike B, Mackay A, Grigoriadis A, Reis-Filho JS, Weigelt B. Transcriptomic analysis of tubular carcinomas of the breast reveals similarities and differences with molecular subtype-matched ductal and lobular carcinomas. J Pathol 2010; 222:64-75. [PMID: 20593406 DOI: 10.1002/path.2743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2010] [Accepted: 05/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Tubular carcinoma (TC) is an uncommon special type of breast cancer characterized by an indolent clinical course. Although described as part of a spectrum of related lesions named 'low-grade breast neoplasia family' due to immunophenotypical and genetic similarities, TCs, low-grade invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDC-NSTs), and classic invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) significantly differ in terms of histological features and clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pure TCs constitute an entity distinct from low-grade IDC-NSTs and from classic ILCs. To define the transcriptomic differences between TCs and IDC-NSTs and ILCs whilst minimizing the impact of histological grade and molecular subtype on their profiles, we subjected a series of grade- and molecular subtype-matched TCs and IDC-NSTs and molecular subtype-matched TCs and classic ILCs to genome-wide gene expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarrays. Unsupervised and supervised analysis revealed that TCs are similar at the transcriptomic level to grade- and molecular subtype-matched IDC-NSTs. However, subtle yet significant differences were detected and validated by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR, which may in part explain the reported more favourable outcome of TCs. Transcriptomic differences between TCs and molecular subtype-matched classic ILCs were more overt, predominantly due to lower expression of proliferation and cell cycle genes in TCs and down-regulation of cell adhesion/extracellular matrix-related genes in classic ILCs. Our results support the existence of a 'low-grade breast neoplasia family'; however, the transcriptomes of these lesions display small, yet important differences, which, together with their distinct biological behaviour, warrant their separation as discrete entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Lopez-Garcia
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
105
|
Hawthorn L, Luce J, Stein L, Rothschild J. Integration of transcript expression, copy number and LOH analysis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. BMC Cancer 2010; 10:460. [PMID: 20799942 PMCID: PMC2939551 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2009] [Accepted: 08/27/2010] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A major challenge in the interpretation of genomic profiling data generated from breast cancer samples is the identification of driver genes as distinct from bystander genes which do not impact tumorigenesis. One way to assess the relative importance of alterations in the transcriptome profile is to combine parallel analyses that assess changes in the copy number alterations (CNAs). This integrated analysis permits the identification of genes with altered expression that map within specific chromosomal regions which demonstrate copy number alterations, providing a mechanistic approach to identify the 'driver genes'. Methods We have performed whole genome analysis of CNAs using the Affymetrix 250K Mapping array on 22 infiltrating ductal carcinoma samples (IDCs). Analysis of transcript expression alterations was performed using the Affymetrix U133 Plus2.0 array on 16 IDC samples. Fourteen IDC samples were analyzed using both platforms and the data integrated. We also incorporated data from loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis to identify genes showing altered expression in LOH regions. Results Common chromosome gains and amplifications were identified at 1q21.3, 6p21.3, 7p11.2-p12.1, 8q21.11 and 8q24.3. A novel amplicon was identified at 5p15.33. Frequent losses were found at 1p36.22, 8q23.3, 11p13, 11q23, and 22q13. Over 130 genes were identified with concurrent increases or decreases in expression that mapped to these regions of copy number alterations. LOH analysis revealed three tumors with whole chromosome or p arm allelic loss of chromosome 17. Genes were identified that mapped to copy neutral LOH regions. LOH with accompanying copy loss was detected on Xp24 and Xp25 and genes mapping to these regions with decreased expression were identified. Gene expression data highlighted the PPARα/RXRα Activation Pathway as down-regulated in the tumor samples. Conclusion We have demonstrated the utility of the application of integrated analysis using high resolution CGH and whole genome transcript analysis for detecting driver genes in IDC. The high resolution platform allowed a refined demarcation of CNAs and gene expression profiling provided a mechanism to detect genes directly impacted by the CNA. This is the first report of LOH integrated with gene expression in IDC using a high resolution platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesleyann Hawthorn
- Medical College of Georgia Cancer Center, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
106
|
Constantinidou A, Jones RL, Reis-Filho JS. Beyond triple-negative breast cancer: the need to define new subtypes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010; 10:1197-1213. [DOI: 10.1586/era.10.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
107
|
Agurs-Collins T, Dunn BK, Browne D, Johnson KA, Lubet R. Epidemiology of Health Disparities in Relation to the Biology of Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer. Semin Oncol 2010; 37:384-401. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
108
|
Dunning MJ, Curtis C, Barbosa-Morais NL, Caldas C, Tavaré S, Lynch AG. The importance of platform annotation in interpreting microarray data. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:717. [PMID: 20688273 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70115-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
109
|
Through a glass darkly: advances in understanding breast cancer biology, 2000-2010. Clin Breast Cancer 2010; 10:188-95. [PMID: 20497917 DOI: 10.3816/cbc.2010.n.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of breast cancer as a clinical and biologic entity has been gaining granularity for several decades; in particular, the importance of hormone receptors and HER2 were realized long ago and have served as the impetus for therapeutic agents that have improved the cure rate of estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-positive breast cancer and the lives of thousands of women. The past decade brought even more understanding of the complexity of breast cancer biology through the development and clinical applications of array-based technologies for discovery and prognostication. We now realize that there are at least 5 intrinsic subtypes within breast cancer, at least one of which-the basal-like-currently lacks targeted therapies and is the most pressing therapeutic challenge for the next decade. We have several validated prognostic profiles that allow increased thoughtfulness in adjuvant decision making. With this understanding also comes the recognition that if breast cancer represents several biologically distinct entities, then breast cancer risk assessment and treatment must take this heterogeneity into account, which complicates trial design and interpretation. Despite therapeutic advances and the development of a number of targeted agents against hormone receptor signaling, HER2, and angiogenesis, we have significant challenges to overcome. These include the need for more tissue-based studies to allow us to understand the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance within and across subtypes, and the need to revisit risk and prevention by subtype.
Collapse
|
110
|
Milagre C, Dhomen N, Geyer FC, Hayward R, Lambros M, Reis-Filho JS, Marais R. A mouse model of melanoma driven by oncogenic KRAS. Cancer Res 2010; 70:5549-57. [PMID: 20516123 PMCID: PMC2896549 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-4254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The small G-protein NRAS is mutated in 22% of human melanomas, whereas the related proteins KRAS and HRAS are mutated in only 2% and 1% of melanomas, respectively. We have developed a mouse model of melanoma in which Cre recombinase/LoxP technology is used to drive inducible expression of (G12V)KRAS in the melanocytic lineage. The mice develop skin hyperpigmentation, nevi, and tumors that bear many of the cardinal histopathology features and molecular characteristics of human melanoma. These tumors invade and destroy the underlying muscles and cells derived from them can grow as subcutaneous tumors and colonize the lungs of nude mice. These data establish that oncogenic KRAS can be a founder event in melanomagenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Milagre
- Signal Transduction Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Nathalie Dhomen
- Signal Transduction Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Felipe C Geyer
- Molecular Pathology Team, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Robert Hayward
- Signal Transduction Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Maryou Lambros
- Molecular Pathology Team, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Molecular Pathology Team, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Richard Marais
- Signal Transduction Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Koike S, Kodera Y, Nakao A, Iwata H, Yatabe Y. Absence of the caveolin-1 P132L mutation in cancers of the breast and other organs. J Mol Diagn 2010; 12:712-7. [PMID: 20581046 DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Caveolin-1 belongs to a family of scaffolding proteins, and the P132L point mutation of this gene has been found in up to 16% of all examined breast cancers. Subsequent studies have revealed that the P132L mutation exerts a dominant negative effect through misfolding during caveolin-1 oligomerization. However, this mutation has not been validated in other series of breast cancer samples. Contradictory to the suggested tumor suppressor function, overexpression of caveolin-1 is common in various cancer types. To clarify these inconsistent results, we examined the caveolin-1 mutation in a large series of breast cancer specimens. We first used a standard direct sequencing method and found that none of the 99 breast cancers tested had this mutation. Then we developed a sensitive method for a paraffin section that could detect the mutant allele at a rate of as little as 0.1% among wild-type allele copies. Even when using this sensitive method, none of the 80 estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors had the P132L mutation. Furthermore, 270 cancers in various organs were examined, and no caveolin-1 mutations were detected. These results raise doubt about the presence of the caveolin-1 P132L mutation in breast cancer and other cancer types, and thus further studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Koike
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
112
|
Xu C, Liu Y, Wang P, Fan W, Rue TC, Upton MP, Houck JR, Lohavanichbutr P, Doody DR, Futran ND, Zhao LP, Schwartz SM, Chen C, Méndez E. Integrative analysis of DNA copy number and gene expression in metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma identifies genes associated with poor survival. Mol Cancer 2010; 9:143. [PMID: 20537188 PMCID: PMC2893102 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2010] [Accepted: 06/11/2010] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Lymphotropism in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most important prognostic factors of 5-year survival. In an effort to identify genes that may be responsible for the initiation of OSCC lymphotropism, we examined DNA copy number gains and losses and corresponding gene expression changes from tumor cells in metastatic lymph nodes of patients with OSCC. Results We performed integrative analysis of DNA copy number alterations (CNA) and corresponding mRNA expression from OSCC cells isolated from metastatic lymph nodes of 20 patients using Affymetrix 250 K Nsp I SNP and U133 Plus 2.0 arrays, respectively. Overall, genome CNA accounted for expression changes in 31% of the transcripts studied. Genome region 11q13.2-11q13.3 shows the highest correlation between DNA CNA and expression. With a false discovery rate < 1%, 530 transcripts (461 genes) demonstrated a correlation between CNA and expression. Among these, we found two subsets that were significantly associated with OSCC (n = 122) when compared to controls, and with survival (n = 27), as tested using an independent dataset with genome-wide expression profiles for 148 primary OSCC and 45 normal oral mucosa. We fit Cox models to calculate a principal component analysis-derived risk-score for these two gene sets ('122-' or '27-transcript PC'). The models combining the 122- or 27-transcript PC with stage outperformed the model using stage alone in terms of the Area Under the Curve (AUC = 0.82 or 0.86 vs. 0.72, with p = 0.044 or 0.011, respectively). Conclusions Genes exhibiting CNA-correlated expression may have biological impact on carcinogenesis and cancer progression in OSCC. Determination of copy number-associated transcripts associated with clinical outcomes in tumor cells with an aggressive phenotype (i.e., cells metastasized to the lymph nodes) can help prioritize candidate transcripts from high-throughput data for further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Xu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
113
|
Shiu KK, Natrajan R, Geyer FC, Ashworth A, Reis-Filho JS. DNA amplifications in breast cancer: genotypic-phenotypic correlations. Future Oncol 2010; 6:967-84. [PMID: 20528234 DOI: 10.2217/fon.10.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA copy number changes in cancer cells, in particular, amplifications, occur frequently, have prognostic impact and are associated with subtypes of breast cancer. Some amplicons contain well-characterized oncogenes, including 11q13 (CCND1) and 17q12 (HER2). HER2 amplification and overexpression defines the HER2+ subgroup of breast cancer patients and is both a prognostic marker for poor outcome and a predictive marker for response to anti-HER2 targeted therapies. Therefore, there is considerable interest in documenting the locations of other recurring amplifications in breast cancers as they may also provide a rich source of new biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets for these subgroups. This article focuses on the genomic profiling of breast cancer, with an emphasis on the characteristics of the amplifications found in subtypes of breast cancer, including luminal (ER+)/HER2(-)), HER2+ and basal-like (ER(-)/HER2(-)), and discusses their known or potential roles in cancer biology and their clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Keen Shiu
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW36JB, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
114
|
Lopez-Garcia MA, Geyer FC, Lacroix-Triki M, Marchió C, Reis-Filho JS. Breast cancer precursors revisited: molecular features and progression pathways. Histopathology 2010; 57:171-92. [PMID: 20500230 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03568.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Increasingly more coherent data on the molecular characteristics of benign breast lesions and breast cancer precursors have led to the delineation of new multistep pathways of breast cancer progression through genotypic-phenotypic correlations. It has become apparent that oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and -negative breast lesions are fundamentally distinct diseases. Within the ER-positive group, histological grade is strongly associated with the number and complexity of genetic abnormalities in breast cancer cells. Genomic analyses of high-grade ER-positive breast cancers have revealed that a substantial proportion of these tumours harbour the characteristic genetic aberrations found in low-grade ER-positive disease, suggesting that at least a subgroup of high-grade ER-positive breast cancers may originate from low-grade lesions. The ER-negative group is more complex and heterogeneous, comprising distinct molecular entities, including basal-like, HER2 and molecular apocrine lesions. Importantly, the type and pattern of genetic aberrations found in ER-negative cancers differ from those of ER-positive disease. Here, we review the available molecular data on breast cancer risk indicator and precursor lesions, the putative mechanisms of progression from in situ to invasive disease, and propose a revised model of breast cancer evolution based on the molecular characteristics of distinct subtypes of in situ and invasive breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Lopez-Garcia
- Molecular Pathology Team, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
115
|
Staaf J, Jönsson G, Ringnér M, Vallon-Christersson J, Grabau D, Arason A, Gunnarsson H, Agnarsson BA, Malmström PO, Johannsson OT, Loman N, Barkardottir RB, Borg Å. High-resolution genomic and expression analyses of copy number alterations in HER2-amplified breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12:R25. [PMID: 20459607 PMCID: PMC2917012 DOI: 10.1186/bcr2568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2009] [Revised: 03/05/2010] [Accepted: 05/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HER2 gene amplification and protein overexpression (HER2+) define a clinically challenging subgroup of breast cancer with variable prognosis and response to therapy. Although gene expression profiling has identified an ERBB2 molecular subtype of breast cancer, it is clear that HER2+ tumors reside in all molecular subtypes and represent a genomically and biologically heterogeneous group, needed to be further characterized in large sample sets. METHODS Genome-wide DNA copy number profiling, using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and global gene expression profiling were performed on 200 and 87 HER2+ tumors, respectively. Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer (GISTIC) was used to identify significant copy number alterations (CNAs) in HER2+ tumors, which were related to a set of 554 non-HER2 amplified (HER2-) breast tumors. High-resolution oligonucleotide aCGH was used to delineate the 17q12-q21 region in high detail. RESULTS The HER2-amplicon was narrowed to an 85.92 kbp region including the TCAP, PNMT, PERLD1, HER2, C17orf37 and GRB7 genes, and higher HER2 copy numbers indicated worse prognosis. In 31% of HER2+ tumors the amplicon extended to TOP2A, defining a subgroup of HER2+ breast cancer associated with estrogen receptor-positive status and with a trend of better survival than HER2+ breast cancers with deleted (18%) or neutral TOP2A (51%). HER2+ tumors were clearly distinguished from HER2- tumors by the presence of recurrent high-level amplifications and firestorm patterns on chromosome 17q. While there was no significant difference between HER2+ and HER2- tumors regarding the incidence of other recurrent high-level amplifications, differences in the co-amplification pattern were observed, as shown by the almost mutually exclusive occurrence of 8p12, 11q13 and 20q13 amplification in HER2+ tumors. GISTIC analysis identified 117 significant CNAs across all autosomes. Supervised analyses revealed: (1) significant CNAs separating HER2+ tumors stratified by clinical variables, and (2) CNAs separating HER2+ from HER2- tumors. CONCLUSIONS We have performed a comprehensive survey of CNAs in HER2+ breast tumors, pinpointing significant genomic alterations including both known and potentially novel therapeutic targets. Our analysis sheds further light on the genomically complex and heterogeneous nature of HER2+ tumors in relation to other subgroups of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Staaf
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Barngatan 2B, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
- CREATE Health Strategic Center for Translational Cancer Research, Lund University, BMC C13, SE 22184, Lund, Sweden
| | - Göran Jönsson
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Barngatan 2B, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
- CREATE Health Strategic Center for Translational Cancer Research, Lund University, BMC C13, SE 22184, Lund, Sweden
| | - Markus Ringnér
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Barngatan 2B, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
- CREATE Health Strategic Center for Translational Cancer Research, Lund University, BMC C13, SE 22184, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Vallon-Christersson
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Barngatan 2B, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
- CREATE Health Strategic Center for Translational Cancer Research, Lund University, BMC C13, SE 22184, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dorthe Grabau
- Department of Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, University Hospital, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Adalgeir Arason
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali-University Hospital, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Haukur Gunnarsson
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali-University Hospital, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Bjarni A Agnarsson
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali-University Hospital, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Per-Olof Malmström
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Barngatan 2B, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Oskar Th Johannsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
- Department of Oncology, Landspitali-University Hospital, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Niklas Loman
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Barngatan 2B, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali-University Hospital, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Åke Borg
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Barngatan 2B, SE 22185 Lund, Sweden
- CREATE Health Strategic Center for Translational Cancer Research, Lund University, BMC C13, SE 22184, Lund, Sweden
- Lund Strategic Research Center for Stem Cell Biology and Cell Therapy, Lund University, BMC B10, SE 22184, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Health disparities in breast cancer: biology meets socioeconomic status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 121:281-92. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0827-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2009] [Accepted: 02/26/2010] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
117
|
Chari R, Thu KL, Wilson IM, Lockwood WW, Lonergan KM, Coe BP, Malloff CA, Gazdar AF, Lam S, Garnis C, MacAulay CE, Alvarez CE, Lam WL. Integrating the multiple dimensions of genomic and epigenomic landscapes of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2010; 29:73-93. [PMID: 20108112 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-010-9199-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Advances in high-throughput, genome-wide profiling technologies have allowed for an unprecedented view of the cancer genome landscape. Specifically, high-density microarrays and sequencing-based strategies have been widely utilized to identify genetic (such as gene dosage, allelic status, and mutations in gene sequence) and epigenetic (such as DNA methylation, histone modification, and microRNA) aberrations in cancer. Although the application of these profiling technologies in unidimensional analyses has been instrumental in cancer gene discovery, genes affected by low-frequency events are often overlooked. The integrative approach of analyzing parallel dimensions has enabled the identification of (a) genes that are often disrupted by multiple mechanisms but at low frequencies by any one mechanism and (b) pathways that are often disrupted at multiple components but at low frequencies at individual components. These benefits of using an integrative approach illustrate the concept that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. As efforts have now turned toward parallel and integrative multidimensional approaches for studying the cancer genome landscape in hopes of obtaining a more insightful understanding of the key genes and pathways driving cancer cells, this review describes key findings disseminating from such high-throughput, integrative analyses, including contributions to our understanding of causative genetic events in cancer cell biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Chari
- Genetics Unit - Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
118
|
|
119
|
Turner N, Pearson A, Sharpe R, Lambros M, Geyer F, Lopez-Garcia MA, Natrajan R, Marchio C, Iorns E, Mackay A, Gillett C, Grigoriadis A, Tutt A, Reis-Filho JS, Ashworth A. FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2010; 70:2085-94. [PMID: 20179196 PMCID: PMC2832818 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 577] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Amplification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) occurs in approximately 10% of breast cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. However, it is uncertain whether overexpression of FGFR1 is causally linked to the poor prognosis of amplified cancers. Here, we show that FGFR1 overexpression is robustly associated with FGFR1 amplification in two independent series of breast cancers. Breast cancer cell lines with FGFR1 overexpression and amplification show enhanced ligand-dependent signaling, with increased activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT signaling pathways in response to FGF2, but also show basal ligand-independent signaling, and are dependent on FGFR signaling for anchorage-independent growth. FGFR1-amplified cell lines show resistance to 4-hydroxytamoxifen, which is reversed by small interfering RNA silencing of FGFR1, suggesting that FGFR1 overexpression also promotes endocrine therapy resistance. FGFR1 signaling suppresses progesterone receptor (PR) expression in vitro, and likewise, amplified cancers are frequently PR negative, identifying a potential biomarker for FGFR1 activity. Furthermore, we show that amplified cancers have a high proliferative rate assessed by Ki67 staining and that FGFR1 amplification is found in 16% to 27% of luminal B-type breast cancers. Our data suggest that amplification and overexpression of FGFR1 may be a major contributor to poor prognosis in luminal-type breast cancers, driving anchorage-independent proliferation and endocrine therapy resistance.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/enzymology
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Cell Adhesion/genetics
- Cell Growth Processes/genetics
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
- Estradiol/analogs & derivatives
- Estradiol/pharmacology
- Female
- Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/pharmacology
- Fulvestrant
- Gene Amplification
- Gene Silencing
- Humans
- MAP Kinase Signaling System
- Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/metabolism
- Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3/metabolism
- Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism
- Phosphorylation
- RNA, Messenger/biosynthesis
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/biosynthesis
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics
- Receptors, Estrogen/biosynthesis
- Tamoxifen/analogs & derivatives
- Tamoxifen/pharmacology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Turner
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Alex Pearson
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Rachel Sharpe
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Maryou Lambros
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Felipe Geyer
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Maria A Lopez-Garcia
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Rachael Natrajan
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Caterina Marchio
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Elizabeth Iorns
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Alan Mackay
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Cheryl Gillett
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit, King's College London School of Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit, King's College London School of Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Andrew Tutt
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Unit, King's College London School of Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Alan Ashworth
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Combinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 120:293-308. [PMID: 20107892 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0746-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2009] [Accepted: 01/12/2010] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Current clinical management of breast cancer relies on the availability of robust clinicopathological variables and few well-defined biological markers. Recent microarray-based expression profiling studies have emphasised the importance of the molecular portraits of breast cancer and the possibility of classifying breast cancer into biologically and molecularly distinct groups. Subsequent large scale immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated that the added value of studying the molecular biomarker expression in combination rather than individually. Oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors and HER2 are currently used in routine pathological assessment of breast cancer. Additional biomarkers such as proliferation markers and 'basal' markers are likely to be included in the future. A better understanding of the prognostic and predictive value of combinatorial assessment of biomarker expression could lead to improved breast cancer management in routine clinical practice and would add to our knowledge concerning the variation in behaviour and response to therapy. Here, we review the evidence on the value of assessing biomarker expression in breast cancer individually and in combination and its relation to the recent molecular classification of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
121
|
Integrative molecular profiling of triple negative breast cancers identifies amplicon drivers and potential therapeutic targets. Oncogene 2010; 29:2013-23. [PMID: 20101236 PMCID: PMC2852518 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 328] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) have a relatively poor prognosis and cannot be effectively treated with current targeted therapies. We searched for genes that have the potential to be therapeutic targets by identifying genes consistently over-expressed when amplified. Fifty-six TNBCs were subjected to high-resolution microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH), of which 24 were subjected to genome-wide gene expression analysis. TNBCs were genetically heterogeneous; no individual focal amplification was present at high frequency, although 78.6% of TNBCs harboured at least one focal amplification. Integration of aCGH and expression data revealed 40 genes significantly overexpressed when amplified, including the known oncogenes and potential therapeutic targets, FGFR2 (10q26.3), BUB3 (10q26.3), RAB20 (13q34), PKN1 (19p13.12), and NOTCH3 (19p13.12). We identified two TNBC cell lines with FGFR2 amplification, which both had constitutive activation of FGFR2. Amplified cell lines were highly sensitive to FGFR inhibitor PD173074, and to RNAi silencing of FGFR2. Treatment with PD173074 induced apoptosis resulting partly from inhibition of PI3K-AKT signalling. Independent validation using publicly available aCGH datasets revealed FGFR2 gene was amplified in 4% (6/165) of TNBC, but not in other subtypes (0/214, p=0.0065). Our analysis demonstrates that TNBCs are heterogeneous tumours with amplifications of FGFR2 in a subgroup of tumours.
Collapse
|
122
|
Geyer FC, Lopez-Garcia MA, Lambros MB, Reis-Filho JS. Genetic characterization of breast cancer and implications for clinical management. J Cell Mol Med 2009; 13:4090-103. [PMID: 19754664 PMCID: PMC4496116 DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00906.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a genetic disease caused by the accumulation of mutations in neoplastic cells. In the last few years, high-throughput microarray-based molecular analysis has provided increasingly more coherent information about the genetic aberrations in breast cancer. New biomarkers and molecular techniques are slowly becoming part of the diagnostic and prognostic armamentarium available for pathologists and oncologists to tailor the therapy for breast cancer patients. In this review, we will focus on the contribution of breast cancer somatic genetics to our understanding of breast cancer biology and its impact on breast cancer patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe C Geyer
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|