Exercise echocardiography as a screening test for coronary artery disease and correlation with coronary arteriography

Diagnostic and prognostic value of stress testing in older persons

OBJECTIVE

To review the diagnostic and prognostic utility of exercise and pharmacologic stress testing in older individuals.

DATA SOURCE

A computer-assisted search of the literature, followed by a manual reference review of pertinent articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies addressing the use of exercise and pharmacologic stress testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) detection and prognosis were reviewed. Emphasis was placed on those studies applying these procedures to older populations.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent data were extracted regarding the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy and safety of exercise and nonexercise stress testing techniques in older patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Available data from relevant articles were summarized and the merits and limitations of the available techniques discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous studies over the past 2 decades support the usefulness of the exercise ECG and exercise thallium-201 perfusion scan for detecting CAD in older populations. Although exercise echocardiography generally appears to have diagnostic and prognostic accuracy similar to thallium-201 imaging, greater technical difficulty with this technique is frequently encountered in older patients. Non-exercise forms of stress testing, particularly those employing pharmacologic agents such as dipyridamole, adenosine, or dobutamine, combined with either thallium-201 scintigraphy or echocardiography, allow accurate CAD diagnostic and prognostic assessment in even very frail older patients. Additional studies are needed to compare the accuracy and cost-benefit ratio of the many stress testing modalities now available for older patients.

Feasibility of exercise stress echocardiography for the follow-up of children with coronary involvement secondary to Kawasaki disease

BACKGROUND

The development of coronary aneurysms as sequelae of Kawasaki disease can result in myocardial ischemia, infarction, and sudden death. Traditionally, these patients have undergone coronary angiography and nuclear stress imaging for risk stratification and follow-up. However, angiography is invasive, and both modalities expose the patient to repeated radiation, which is an important issue in children. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of performing exercise stress echocardiography in children diagnosed with coronary abnormalities secondary to Kawasaki disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Treadmill exercise stress echocardiographic studies were performed in 28 children ages 6 to 16 years. All had acute Kawasaki disease 1 to 10 years before study, and coronary artery abnormalities were identified during previous echocardiographic imaging. Patients were exercised using a standard Bruce protocol. Transthoracic echocardiographic images, obtained in the parasternal long, short, apical two- and four-chamber views immediately before and after exercise, were digitized for review and analysis. In baseline studies before exercise, wall motion abnormalities were identified in 2 patients; these segments became normal with exercise. Two patients developed new exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities that corresponded to angiographically defined critical stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. No patients had resting or exercise-induced ECG evidence of ischemia. There were no adverse reactions, and 26 of 28 patients had normal exercise tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with coronary artery involvement resulting from Kawasaki disease, exercise stress echocardiography is a safe, noninvasive procedure and may identify children with myocardial ischemia that was not detected with ECG stress test alone.

Stress echocardiography. Part I. Exercise echocardiography: techniques, implementation, clinical applications, and correlations

OBJECTIVE

To describe the techniques and applications of exercise echocardiography.

DESIGN

We review pertinent experimental and clinical studies from the literature and present our experience with the first 2,000 patients who underwent exercise echocardiography in our laboratory.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The indications for and contraindications to exercise echocardiography and the advantages, limitations, and accuracy of this procedure in comparison with other techniques for detecting coronary artery disease are discussed.

RESULTS

Exercise echocardiography is increasingly used for the noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease because, in addition to its diagnostic capabilities, it offers attractive features such as portability, versatility, rapid availability of results, and relatively low cost. For accurate interpretation of the results, the workload achieved and the time between completion of exercise and image acquisition must be considered. The major limitation of exercise echocardiography is the high degree of operator dependence. For accurate interpretation of regional wall motion abnormalities and recognition of ischemic changes, specific training and extensive experience are necessary.

CONCLUSION

Although exercise echocardiography has only relatively recently become a widely used technique, it has proved to have considerable accuracy in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (mean sensitivity, 84%; mean specificity, 87%). In high-volume laboratories, feasibility studies have shown success rates between 90 and 99%; thus far, reproducibility has been satisfactory. Other applications of exercise echocardiography being studied are follow-up monitoring after revascularization, determination of prognosis, and assessment of valvular heart disease.

Limited usefulness of exercise testing and thallium scintigraphy in evaluation of ambulatory patients several months after recovery from an acute coronary event: implications for management of stable coronary heart disease. Multicenter Myocardial Ischemia Research Group

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the value of noninvasive testing to predict cardiac events in patients with stable coronary disease after hospital admission (and risk stratification) for an acute coronary event.

BACKGROUND

Exercise testing with thallium perfusion imaging identifies patients with obstructive coronary artery disease and has been used to stratify patients after myocardial infarction. Its usefulness for predicting cardiac events in patients with stable coronary disease after recovery from an acute coronary event was explored.

METHODS

Nine hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled 1 to 6 months after hospital admission for a coronary event. Patients underwent exercise treadmill testing with planar thallium-201 scintigraphy and were followed up for an average of 23 months (range 6 to 43). End points were 1) unstable angina requiring hospital admission, nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death; 2) nonfatal infarction or cardiac death; or 3) cardiac death alone.

RESULTS

Twelve patients died of cardiac causes (1.2%); 32 had a nonfatal myocardial infarction (3.4%); and 79 patients (8.4%) developed unstable angina in the first year. Exercise testing improved proportional hazards models constructed from clinical variables for all three end points (p < 0.05). The perfusion scan further improved models for the end points (nonfatal infarction or cardiac death and cardiac death alone, p < 0.05). However, the exercise test with or without thallium added little to the overall prediction of primary events (area under the receiver operating curve increased from 0.649 to 0.663), and only 2% to 13% of patients with abnormal results either had a nonfatal infarction or died.

CONCLUSIONS

Thallium-201 scintigraphy and exercise testing variables identify patients at risk for subsequent cardiac events. However, the poor predictive performance of these tests in this group of patients with stable coronary disease severely limits their usefulness. These results suggest a limited role for exercise and thallium testing in predicting cardiac events in patients with known coronary disease.

Color Doppler myocardial imaging: a new technique for the assessment of myocardial function

Color Doppler myocardial imaging is a new technique that has been developed specifically to allow color Doppler imaging of myocardial wall motion rather than blood pool imaging. Such a technique has the potential to interrogate velocities, accelerations, and Doppler signal strength within the myocardial wall. Moreover, the concomitant enhancement of the myocardial Doppler signal after an intravenous injection of a transpulmonary echocardiographic contrast agent could permit the noninvasive assessment of regional myocardial perfusion. Thus this new imaging modality could be a valuable adjunct to the ultrasound assessment of myocardial ischemia.

A consideration of current clinical options for stress imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of coronary artery disease

The evolution of technology and our health care system, tinctured by advocacy groups for specific imaging modalities, has produced controversy, relating to the optimal stress imaging method for coronary disease evaluation. Stress perfusion scintigraphy and stress echocardiography advocates seem to make claims that each nullify the other. This extensive, in-depth review of the subject presents facts as well as opinion and experience in an effort to assess the full portrait of the issue for consideration by advocates as well as those many yet undecided. The issue is an evolving one, affected strongly by the reader's own experience. The presentation is not meant to be the final word. Rather, it seeks to present a basis for understanding and progress in both fields.

Identification of multivessel coronary artery disease by exercise echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the ability of exercise echocardiography to identify multivessel coronary artery disease and ascertain its incremental value when combined with clinical and exercise test variables.

BACKGROUND

Although exercise echocardiography has been shown to be accurate for the detection of coronary artery disease, little is known about its utility for identifying multivessel involvement, and its incremental value when combined with clinical and exercise test variables has not been studied.

METHODS

One hundred fifty consecutive patients were selected on the basis of having had an exercise echocardiographic and a coronary angiographic study within 6 months without any revascularization procedure. Significant coronary artery disease (> or = 50% diameter stenosis in any major coronary artery) was present in 117 patients, and multivessel (two- or three-vessel) disease was present in 90 patients. The exercise echocardiographic studies were reviewed by an experienced observer unaware of the results of the coronary angiogram.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity and specificity of exercise echocardiography for the identification of multivessel disease were 73% and 70%, respectively. A stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the number of abnormal regions on the postexercise images as the strongest independent predictor of multivessel disease; also significant were a history of myocardial infarction and ST segment depression of at least 2 mm on the peak exercise electrocardiogram.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise echocardiography adds independent and incremental information to clinical and exercise test variables for identifying multivessel coronary artery disease.

Comparison of dobutamine and exercise echocardiography for detecting coronary artery disease

There has been no study comparing the efficacy of dobutamine and exercise echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) or their physiologic effects at ischemic threshold in the same group of patients. To accomplish this, 52 patients presenting for coronary angiography underwent supine ergometer exercise and dobutamine echocardiography. Compared with angiography, the overall sensitivity of detecting CAD was 78% for exercise and 86% for dobutamine echocardiography (p = NS). The sensitivities of detecting patients with 1-, 2-, 3- and multivessel CAD with exercise echocardiography were 63, 80, 100 and 90%, respectively, and with dobutamine echocardiography 75, 90, 100 and 95%, respectively (p = NS, exercise vs dobutamine). The specificity of both tests was 87%. At ischemic threshold, heart rate was significantly lower with dobutamine than with exercise echocardiography (91 +/- 3 vs 114 +/- 3 beats/min; p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure was significantly lower with dobutamine testing (155 +/- 5 vs 176 +/- 6 mm Hg; p < 0.01), and rate-pressure product was significantly lower with dobutamine stress (14.1 +/- 0.7 vs 19.8 +/- 0.8 x 10(3) beats/min x mm Hg; p < 0.001). It is concluded that the efficacy of detecting CAD by exercise and dobutamine echocardiography is comparable, and the physiology at ischemic threshold of the 2 methods is significantly different and suggests a different means of inducing myocardial ischemia.

Comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography and stress thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography for detecting coronary artery disease

Dobutamine stress echocardiography and stress thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were compared for detecting coronary artery disease in 120 consecutive patients who underwent concomitant quantitative coronary angiography. The left ventricle was divided into anterior, inferior, and lateral regions. Wall motion or perfusion abnormalities observed within each region were classified as ischemia or fixed abnormality. Both tests showed 81% agreement in all 120 patients. Complete agreement was observed in 77% of the 360 regions analyzed. The overall sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography and thallium-201 SPECT for the detection of coronary artery disease was 85% and 89%, and the specificity was 93% and 85%, respectively. A good correlation was found between the wall motion score index and perfusion defect size at peak stress and at rest (r = 0.70). Dobutamine stress echocardiography and thallium-201 SPECT exhibit a comparable accuracy for diagnosing coronary artery disease, localizing coronary artery stenosis, and detecting regional myocardial abnormalities. The wall motion score index may be useful for evaluating the myocardial area at risk.

Comparative evaluation of bicycle and dobutamine stress echocardiography with perfusion scintigraphy and bicycle electrocardiogram for identification of coronary artery disease

In 66 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), exercise electrocardiography (ECG), exercise echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography (dosage, 5 to 40 micrograms/kg/min), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile (MIBI) and coronary angiography were performed prospectively to compare methods for detecting CAD. CAD was defined as 70% luminal area stenosis in at least 1 coronary artery at coronary angiography. Significant CAD was present in 50 patients. Compared with exercise ECG, exercise echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography and MIBI-SPECT had a significantly higher sensitivity (52% vs 80, 79 and 89%; p < 0.01, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in sensitivity between exercise echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography and MIBI-SPECT. Specificity of MIBI-SPECT was lowest (71%), whereas exercise ECG, exercise and dobutamine echocardiography had higher specificities (93, 87 and 81%, respectively). Significance, however, was not achieved. Differences in overall accuracy between exercise echocardiography (82%), dobutamine stress echocardiography (80%) and MIBI-SPECT (85%) were not significant. Comparison with accuracy of exercise ECG (62%) was significant (p < 0.05, p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). In 1-vessel disease, exercise ECG had a lower sensitivity (45%) than exercise and dobutamine echocardiography and MIBI-SPECT (79, 78 and 84%; p < 0.02, p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively). Regarding the 24 patients with false-negative exercise ECG results, 67% had positive exercise echocardiography findings, 71% positive dobutamine echocardiography results and 84% positive technetium-99m MIBI-SPECT results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Echocardiography and coronary artery disease

Echocardiography is playing an increasingly important role in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. With the addition of new digital technology and new technological advances, such as multiplane transesophageal echocardiography and intravascular ultrasound, there is every expectation that this use of cardiac ultrasound will grow even more rapidly in the near future.

Supine bicycle stress echocardiography: peak exercise imaging is superior to postexercise imaging

The abilities of peak exercise (PEAK) stress echocardiography versus postexercise (POST) stress echocardiography to detect coronary artery disease were evaluated in 136 consecutive patients undergoing supine bicycle stress echocardiography and coronary arteriography: 42 (31%) had normal coronary vessels, 38 (28%) had single-vessel disease, 34 (25%) had double-vessel disease, and 22 (16%) had triple-vessel disease. The results were as follows: (1) For detection of disease in the group of patients, sensitivity of PEAK versus POST was 94% versus 83% (p < 0.01) and specificity was 88% versus 90%. (2) For detection of disease in specific vessels, sensitivity of PEAK versus POST was 90% versus 72% (p < 0.0001) and specificity was 89% versus 92%. (3) For evaluation of the three major coronary arteries, sensitivity of PEAK versus POST was 96% versus 85% (p < 0.05) for the left anterior descending artery, 90% versus 65% (p < 0.01) for the right coronary artery, and 79% versus 60% (p < 0.05) for the left circumflex coronary artery. There were no differences in specificity. (4) The percent diameter stenosis of vessels normalizing from PEAK to POST versus vessels abnormal at PEAK and POST was 80.6% +/- 16% versus 85.9% +/- 14%, p = 0.07. There were no differences in exercise parameters between patients with and without resolution from PEAK to POST. (5) PEAK versus POST accuracy for identification of patients with multivessel disease was 93% versus 68% (p < 0.001). We conclude that stress echocardiography performed during peak exercise is superior to postexercise stress echocardiography.

Paradoxic hypotension during dobutamine stress echocardiography: clinical and diagnostic implications

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the prevalence, magnitude and clinical implications of a hypotensive response during dobutamine stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is an accurate noninvasive method for detecting coronary artery disease. It has been associated with unexpected hypotension in a proportion of patients. Hypotension occurring during exercise testing has been associated with an increased prevalence of multivessel coronary artery disease and a poor prognosis. The clinical significance of hypotension when seen during dobutamine infusion for diagnostic testing is unknown.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics, coronary artery anatomy (n = 41), ventricular function at rest and during dobutamine infusion and prognosis were evaluated in 115 patients experiencing hypotension during dobutamine stress echocardiography and compared with data in 59 nonhypotensive catheterized patients for comparison of coronary anatomy and in 239 nonhypotensive patients for prognostic purposes.

RESULTS

Hypotension occurred in 115 (20%) of 568 consecutive patients studied with dobutamine stress echocardiography. It was gradual in 73 and precipitous in 42 patients. There were no statistical differences among the hypotensive groups and the index group in prevalence or severity of coronary disease or in prognosis during 15 months compared with findings in nonhypotensive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypotension occurs commonly during dobutamine stress echocardiography, and patients with dobutamine-induced hypotension constitute a heterogeneous group. Unlike hypotension occurring with exercise testing, dopamine-induced hypotension is not invariably associated with advanced coronary disease or an adverse prognosis.

Digital supine bicycle stress echocardiography: a new technique for evaluating coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of digital supine bicycle stress echocardiography, a new technique for evaluating coronary artery disease during peak exercise.

BACKGROUND

Prior stress echocardiographic techniques have not utilized peak exercise imaging to determine the extent and location of coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Two-hundred twenty-two patients were studied: 180 underwent both supine bicycle stress echocardiography and coronary arteriography; 42 had a < 5% likelihood of disease. Forty-three patients had normal coronary arteries, 55 had single-vessel, 42 had double-vessel and 40 had triple-vessel coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

Supine bicycle stress echocardiography was 93% sensitive, 86% specific and 92% accurate for identifying patients with coronary artery disease irrespective of prior myocardial infarction or achievement of > or = 85% maximal predicted heart rate. The "normalcy" rate in the low probability group was 100%. Supine bicycle stress echocardiography was 87% sensitive, 89% specific and 88% accurate for specific vessel identification. The sensitivity was greatest for the left anterior descending compared with the right coronary artery and the left circumflex coronary artery (95% vs. 81% vs. 78%, p < 0.01) and for vessels in patients with double- and triple-vessel compared with single-vessel disease (90% vs. 89% vs. 78%, p < 0.05). The procedure was significantly more sensitive for detection of vessels with 90% to 100% compared with 50% to 70% diameter stenosis (91% vs. 81%, p < 0.05) and was 88% correct in the prediction of multivessel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Supine bicycle stress echocardiography is a highly accurate tool for evaluating coronary artery disease, identifying both the patient with coronary artery disease and the location and extent of disease.

Prognostic usefulness of positive or negative exercise stress echocardiography for predicting coronary events in ensuing twelve months

Stress echocardiography is useful in diagnosing myocardial ischemia in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study examines the correlation between the results of exercise stress echocardiography and cardiac event rates within 12 months after testing in patients referred for evaluation of possible myocardial ischemia. Cardiac events, defined as myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or death, were tabulated for 360 patients with > or = 12 months of follow-up, or a cardiac event within 12 months of follow-up, or both. Wall motion abnormalities at rest were present in 60% of patients. A positive stress echocardiogram, defined as the development of new or worsened wall motion abnormalities, was obtained in 18% of patients (65 of 360), and > or = 1 cardiac event during follow-up was present in 14% (n = 49). A cardiac event occurred in 34% of patients (22 of 65) with a positive stress echocardiogram and in 9% (27 of 295) with a negative one. Myocardial infarctions occurred in 9% of patients with a positive stress echocardiogram compared with 2% with a negative test. An insufficient exercise capacity to reliably exclude ischemia was present in 63% of patients (17 of 27) with a cardiac event despite a negative stress echocardiogram. The predictive value of the stress echocardiographic results was enhanced by combining these results with the electrocardiographic results. In summary, a positive stress echocardiogram was associated with a threefold increased incidence of any cardiac event, and a fourfold increased incidence of myocardial infarction within 12 months of follow-up compared with a negative stress echocardiogram.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Detection of coronary artery disease with upright bicycle exercise echocardiography

This study examined the advantages and limitations of upright bicycle exercise echocardiography in the evaluation of a large series of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The study population consisted of 309 patients (231 men, mean age 57 +/- 11 years) who underwent exercise echocardiography within 8.5 +/- 16.1 days of coronary angiography. All stress electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and angiographic data were reinterpreted in a blinded manner by the investigators. No patient was excluded because of poor echocardiographic image quality. Wall motion was analyzed at baseline, peak exercise, and immediately after exercise with a 16-segment model, and a regional wall motion score index was calculated at each stage. Abnormalities were ascribed to the distribution of the three coronary arteries and correlated with qualitative angiography. There were 126 patients with wall motion abnormalities at rest and 211 (75%) with coronary artery disease. The stress electrocardiogram (ECG) was negative in 61, positive in 144, and nondiagnostic in 104, yielding a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 89%. Echocardiography was normal in 76 of 98 patients without coronary disease (78% specificity) and abnormal in 193 of 211 patients with disease (91% sensitivity). Sensitivity was higher among patients with multivessel disease compared with those with single vessel disease (95% versus 86%, respectively, p = 0.03). Among patients with normal wall motion at rest (n = 183), sensitivity was 83% and specificity was 84%. Of the 104 patients with a nondiagnostic stress ECG, echocardiography correctly identified 95% of those with coronary disease and 75% of those without disease. Among 82 patients with a wall motion abnormality at rest, an additional exercise-induced wall motion abnormality developed in 32 of 46 patients (70%) with multivessel disease and seven of 32 (22%) with single-vessel disease. Overall, echocardiography detected 258 of 392 (66%) individual coronary lesions. Accuracy was higher for lesions in the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries (both 79%) compared with the left circumflex artery (36%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, upright bicycle exercise echocardiography is an accurate technique for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and is especially valuable in patients with a nondiagnostic stress ECG. The test provides supplemental information on the extent and location of coronary lesions and is useful in patients with and without prior myocardial infarction.

Supine bicycle stress echocardiography versus tomographic thallium-201 exercise imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease

To compare the accuracy of supine bicycle stress echocardiography (SBSE), a new technique for evaluating coronary disease during peak exercise, with tomographic thallium-201 exercise imaging (SPECT), 71 patients were evaluated by SBSE, SPECT, and coronary arteriography. Twenty patients had normal coronary vessels; 22 had single-vessel, 14 had double-vessel, and 15 had triple-vessel disease. There were no differences in sensitivity (90% vs 92%), specificity (80% vs 65%), and accuracy (87% vs 85%) between SBSE and SPECT for the group of 71 patients. The results were similar in patients with and without prior myocardial infarction and with single-, double-, or triple-vessel disease. There were no differences between SBSE and SPECT for disease detection for the group of 213 individual vessels in sensitivity (88% vs 80%), specificity (87% vs 84%), and accuracy (88% vs 82%), but SBSE was more sensitive for the left anterior descending artery (97% vs 82%, p < 0.005) and for arteries involved in triple-vessel disease (93% vs 69%, p < 0.01) and more specific for the right coronary artery (88% vs 66%, p < 0.01). Supine bicycle exercise was associated with significantly lower maximal heart rates than treadmill exercise but with significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures. There were no differences in heart rate x systolic blood pressure. We conclude that SBSE and SPECT are equally reliable for coronary disease detection in patients and for evaluation of disease in specific arteries with the exception of SBSE's higher sensitivity for the left anterior descending artery and arteries involved in triple-vessel disease and higher specificity for the right coronary artery.

Exercise echocardiography

Exercise testing is an indispensable component of clinical cardiology. Latent disease or the full extent of a problem may not be apparent on a resting examination. Some form of stress is frequently necessary, especially in patients with coronary disease, to appreciate whether a patient has stress-induced ischaemia as manifested by exercise-induced chest discomfort, a drop in blood pressure or electrocardiographic changes of ischaemia. Unfortunately as with every test ECG and clinical monitoring have limitations. Patients may have ischaemia without pain, ECG changes may be non-specific, a resting abnormal ECG has limited value, and the location and amount of ischaemic muscle is not directly assessed. Monitoring the echocardiogram adds significant additional information to routine stress testing. By visualising the myocardium in the exercising individual, it is possible to assess a fundamental manifestation of ischaemia, regional wall motion abnormalities. This information helps identify the vessels and the amount of muscle involved. In addition resting wall motion abnormalities may detect clinically silent infarction or hibernating myocardium. Direct visualisation of the exercising heart provides an improved understanding of a patient's cardiac status. The technique is particularly useful in evaluating revascularisation procedures. Advances in instrumentation have reduced or eliminated many of the technical difficulties with obtaining and interpreting exercise echocardiograms. This examination has become an extremely useful adjunct to routine stress testing.

Exercise echocardiography after coronary artery bypass grafting

Exercise echocardiography was used to assess the adequacy of regional myocardial perfusion in 125 patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. There were 108 men and 17 women (mean age 65 years) evaluated from 6 weeks to 16 years (mean 7 years) after surgery. Resting parasternal long- and short-axis and apical 4- and 2-chamber echocardiograms were recorded, digitized and stored. Maximal, symptom-limited upright treadmill exercise was then performed with continuous electrocardiographic monitoring. Repeat echocardiographic imaging and digitization were repeated within 1 minute of exercise termination. Resting and postexercise digitized echocardiograms were compared. A normal regional wall motion response to exercise consisted of improved segmental contraction and was used to predict uncompromised regional vascular supply. Unimproved or worsened segmental contraction after exercise was abnormal and was used as a predictor of regional vascular insufficiency. All patients underwent cardiac catheterization within 1 month after exercise testing. Regional coronary insufficiency was considered to exist when a segment's major vascular conduit exhibited greater than or equal to 50% luminal diameter reduction. Compared with the simultaneously acquired stress electrocardiogram, exercise echocardiography had superior sensitivity (98 vs 41%), specificity (92 vs 67%), positive predictive value (99 vs 91%), and negative predictive value (86 vs 12%) (p less than 0.001, 0.1, 0.01 and less than 0.001, respectively). In addition, exercise echocardiography correlated closely with the extent and regional distribution of compromised vascular supply. Exercise echocardiography is a highly sensitive, specific and accurate screening test for abnormal global and regional myocardial vascular supply in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting.

Exercise echocardiography

Exercise echocardiography is a versatile, noninvasive diagnostic test that involves the recording and interpretation of 2-dimensional echocardiograms prior to, during, and after exercise. By analyzing and comparing wall motion at each stage, a prediction about the presence or absence of coronary artery disease can be made. The development of a wall motion abnormality is both sensitive and specific for the presence of a significant coronary stenosis. Changes in regional systolic function during exercise enable the clinician to distinguish between infarction and ischemia. Thus, the test yields information on the presence, extent, severity, and location of coronary artery disease. Echocardiography can be adapted to almost any form of stress, although treadmill or bicycle exercise are most commonly employed. An advantage of bicycle stress echocardiography is the opportunity to image during exercise, rather than relying on postexercise recording. This contributes to enhanced sensitivity, although false-positive results may increase due to the difficulties of analyzing wall motion during strenuous exercise. Exercise echocardiography increases the diagnostic accuracy of stress testing in a manner similar to radionuclide perfusion imaging. It is particularly useful in the setting of an ambiguous stress electrocardiography (ECG) or when a false-negative or false-positive result is suspected. It has been successfully applied to patients following revascularization and yields useful prognostic data in a variety of clinical situations. Exercise echocardiography is being increasingly utilized as a safe and accurate test in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Sonicated serum albumin in contrast echocardiography: improved segmental wall motion depiction and implications for stress echocardiography

We undertook to study the ability of intravenously administered sonicated albumin microbubbles to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity, enhance endocardial delineation, and thereby improve the interpreter's confidence in evaluating regional wall motion in patients whose baseline echocardiograms were believed to be technically difficult because of limited endocardial resolution. We studied 30 adult patients with endocardial border dropout of greater than or equal to 20% on routine echocardiography. Efficacy was evaluated by the investigator and 2 blinded observers using an opacification grading system of 0 (no appearance in LV cavity) to 3+ (full LV chamber opacification). Effective opacification was indicated by a score of greater than or equal to 2+. Border delineation improvement equaled a change from grade A (not well delineated) to grade B, C, or D (well delineated) of at least 1 of 6 LV wall segments. Initially all patients received a 0.08 mL/kg injection. The patient received 2 additional injections of 0.14 and 0.08 mL/kg given 5 minutes apart if the initial volume produced at least 2+ LV opacification. Otherwise, a final injection of 0.22 mL/kg was given. In all cases, the patients' arms were raised after injection to enhance venous passage. When graded by the investigator, 29 patients (97%) exhibited greater than or equal to 2+ opacification. When graded by the blinded observers, 27 patients (90%) exhibited greater than or equal to 2+ opacification. Improved border delineation was noted by the investigator in 90% of patients, and the blinded observers noted improvement in 97% (excluding 1 patient who, if scored by a blinded observer, would have received a higher dose of contrast agents).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The value and promise of echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease

Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography have become extremely useful in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Echocardiography is noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, and has no known biohazards. It offers unequaled information about cardiac anatomy and function. In the acute setting it is useful in the diagnosis of AMI and its complications. It is an excellent tool for monitoring therapy. Echocardiography has been shown to be useful in risk stratification upon presentation to the emergency ward and prior to hospital discharge. Stress echocardiography has broadened and sharpened the diagnostic and prognostic information. Contrast echocardiography has promise for demonstrating coronary artery flow. Research in ultrasonic myocardial tissue characterization shows potential for differentiating ischemic myocardium from infarcted myocardium. Thus, echocardiography is likely to become increasingly important in the future management of patients with AMI.

Accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease

The diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) (incremental infused doses of 5, 10, 20 and 30 micrograms/kg/min) was evaluated in 141 patients who underwent coronary arteriography within 2 weeks of DSE. All patients were being evaluated for known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). DSE was interpreted blindly as normal or showing evidence of CAD, depending on the presence of resting or inducible wall motion abnormalities. Coronary arteriograms were reviewed in a blinded, quantitative fashion. DSE had a sensitivity of 96% for detecting patients with CAD, and a specificity of 66%. For the 53 patients with normal resting wall motion, sensitivity was 87% and specificity 91%. The protocol was well-tolerated by all patients. In comparison with wall motion analysis, 12-lead electrocardiograms during dobutamine infusion revealed ischemic changes in only 17% of patients with CAD. It is concluded that DSE is a clinically useful and accurate means for detecting CAD, its specificity is hindered in patients with resting wall motion abnormalities, and it can safely be used in patients with known cardiac disease.