101
|
Birch J, Rishbeth C, Payne SR. Nature doesn't judge you - how urban nature supports young people's mental health and wellbeing in a diverse UK city. Health Place 2020; 62:102296. [PMID: 32479372 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Reviewed research reveals a lack of young people's voices articulating if and how urban nature supports their mental health and wellbeing. This paper presents qualitative research with young multi-ethnic urban residents living in a northern UK city and offers an important counter-narrative to the pervasive notion of childhood nature-deficit disorder. Using interviews and creative arts workshops, we explored the value of urban nature for the mental health and wellbeing of 24 young people aged 17-27 years, 9 of whom had lived experience of mental health difficulties. Trees, water, open spaces and views were frequently experienced nature typologies offering benefits. Deteriorating landscapes, young people's shifting identities and perceived time pressures disrupted support. Young people expressed how urban nature encounters were experienced as accepting and relational, offering a: stronger sense of self; feelings of escape; connection and care with the human and non-human world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Birch
- Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, UK.
| | - Clare Rishbeth
- Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
102
|
Lauwers L, Trabelsi S, Pelgrims I, Bastiaens H, De Clercq E, Guilbert A, Guyot M, Leone M, Nawrot T, Van Nieuwenhuyse A, Remmen R, Saenen N, Thomas I, Keune H. Urban environment and mental health: the NAMED project, protocol for a mixed-method study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031963. [PMID: 32086354 PMCID: PMC7045166 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mental health issues appear as a growing problem in modern societies and tend to be more frequent in big cities. Where increased evidence exists for positive links between nature and mental health, associations between urban environment characteristics and mental health are still not well understood. These associations are highly complex and require an interdisciplinary and integrated research approach to cover the broad range of mitigating factors. This article presents the study protocol of a project called Nature Impact on Mental Health Distribution that aims to generate a comprehensive understanding of associations between mental health and the urban residential environment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Following a mixed-method approach, this project combines quantitative and qualitative research. In the quantitative part, we analyse among the Brussels urban population associations between the urban residential environment and mental health, taking respondents' socioeconomic status and physical health into account. Mental health is determined by the mental health indicators in the national Health Interview Survey (HIS). The urban residential environment is described by subjective indicators for the participant's dwelling and neighbourhood present in the HIS and objective indicators for buildings, network infrastructure and green environment developed for the purpose of this project. We assess the mediating role of physical activity, social life, noise and air pollution. In the qualitative part, we conduct walking interviews with Brussels residents to record their subjective well-being in association with their neighbourhood. In the validation part, results from these two approaches are triangulated and evaluated through interviews and focus groups with stakeholders of healthcare and urban planning sectors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Privacy Commission of Belgium and ethical committee from University Hospital of Antwerp respectively approved quantitative database merging and qualitative interviewing. We will share project results with a wide audience including the scientific community, policy authorities and civil society through scientific and non-expert communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lauwers
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Sonia Trabelsi
- Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Ingrid Pelgrims
- Department of Risk and Health Impact Assessment, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hilde Bastiaens
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Eva De Clercq
- Department of Risk and Health Impact Assessment, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ariane Guilbert
- Department of Risk and Health Impact Assessment, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Madeleine Guyot
- Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Michael Leone
- Nature and Society Team, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tim Nawrot
- Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Catholic University College Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Van Nieuwenhuyse
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Catholic University College Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Health Protection, Laboratoire National de Santé, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Roy Remmen
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Nelly Saenen
- Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Thomas
- Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Hans Keune
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Nature and Society Team, Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Purtle J, Nelson KL, Counts NZ, Yudell M. Population-Based Approaches to Mental Health: History, Strategies, and Evidence. Annu Rev Public Health 2020; 41:201-221. [PMID: 31905323 PMCID: PMC8896325 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
There is growing recognition in the fields of public health and mental health services research that the provision of clinical services to individuals is not a viable approach to meeting the mental health needs of a population. Despite enthusiasm for the notion of population-based approaches to mental health, concrete guidance about what such approaches entail is lacking, and evidence of their effectiveness has not been integrated. Drawing from research and scholarship across multiple disciplines, this review provides a concrete definition of population-based approaches to mental health, situates these approaches within their historical context in the United States, and summarizes the nature of these approaches and their evidence. These approaches span three domains: (a) social, economic, and environmental policy interventions that can be implemented by legislators and public agency directors, (b) public health practice interventions that can be implemented by public health department officials, and (c) health care system interventions that can be implemented by hospital and health care system leaders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Purtle
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA;
| | - Katherine L Nelson
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA;
| | | | - Michael Yudell
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Domènech-Abella J, Mundó J, Leonardi M, Chatterji S, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B, Koskinen S, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Haro JM, Olaya B. Loneliness and depression among older European adults: The role of perceived neighborhood built environment. Health Place 2019; 62:102280. [PMID: 32479358 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Depression and loneliness act in a synergistic way among older adults. We tested two indicators of the perceived neighborhood built environment (BE) as moderators of the association between these conditions in older European adults. Positive perceptions of neighborhood BE were related to lower levels of loneliness but not to major depressive disorder (MDD). Reporting low BE usability was significantly related to a higher likelihood of feeling lonely except for those suffering from MDD, whereas reporting low BE walkability was significantly related with a high likelihood of loneliness particularly among those with MDD. Therefore, improving neighborhood BE and, specifically, its walkability, might result in a reduction in the prevalence of loneliness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Domènech-Abella
- Department of Sociology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jordi Mundó
- Department of Sociology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matilde Leonardi
- Department of Neurology, Public Health and Disability, Italian National Neurological Institute "Carlo Besta" Foundation IRCCS (Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico), Milan, Italy
| | - Somnath Chatterji
- Department of Health Statistics and Information Systems, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medical Sociology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Seppo Koskinen
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos
- Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Haro
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; Kind Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Beatriz Olaya
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Li J, Manning N, Mechelli A. Digging deeper in Shanghai: towards a 'mechanism-rich' epidemiology. Int Health 2019; 11:S14-S23. [PMID: 31670823 PMCID: PMC6822688 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are very few close-up sociological or anthropological data informing epidemiological and psychiatric research design and/or contributing to our understanding of the relationship between mental health and specific forms of urban life. Furthermore, research on the relationships between urbanicity and mental disorder has paid little attention to the global diversity of urban experience, such as in cities in China, India and Brazil. Methods Two innovative methods can be employed to unveil the diversified urban experience of migrants in China, i.e. an ethnography-informed sociological deep surveying instrument and an ecological momentary assessment with a smartphone app. This article introduces the design and pilot survey of these new instruments towards a ‘mechanism-rich’ epidemiology. Results The ethnography-informed survey instrument enabled us to include some of the issues from the ethnography and successfully ‘dig deeper’ into respondents’ social experience. The pilot of the smartphone app serves as ‘proof of principle’ that we can recruit respondents in Shanghai, and that we can receive and use the data. Conclusions Both of these pilots have demonstrated good feasibility for studying mobility, urban life and mental health. Our next steps will be to extend the Shanghai sample, to use the app in Sao Paulo and Toronto and then hopefully in India and Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-Sen University, Tangjiawan Town, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.,Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, School of Global Affairs, King's College London, 30 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, UK
| | - Nick Manning
- Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, School of Global Affairs, King's College London, 30 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, UK
| | - Andrea Mechelli
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Jokela M. Neighborhoods, psychological distress, and the quest for causality. Curr Opin Psychol 2019; 32:22-26. [PMID: 31362181 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Neighborhood characteristics have been associated with psychological distress, but it is uncertain whether these associations are causal. The current article reviews data from interventions and quasi-experimental studies that have addressed the question of causality of neighborhood associations. Overall, data from neighborhood interventions, longitudinal studies, and twin studies have provided only limited and inconsistent evidence to support causal interpretation of neighborhood associations with psychological distress: very few findings have been replicated across different samples, and many associations have been observed only with some of the multiple measures included the studies. Studies that examine the effects of neighborhood change on people's wellbeing are needed to improve causal inference and policy relevance of neighborhood studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Jokela
- Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Does selective migration bias the health impact assessment of urban regeneration programmes in cross-sectional studies? Findings from a Dutch case study. Health Place 2018; 55:155-164. [PMID: 30591231 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
We examined if the assessment of the health impact of a national Dutch regeneration programme depends on using either a repeated cross-sectional or longitudinal study design. This is important as only the latter design can incorporate migration patterns. For both designs, we compared trends in medication use between target and control districts. We found differences in medication use trends to be modest under the longitudinal design, and not demonstrable under the repeated cross-sectional design. The observed differences were hardly influenced by migration patterns. We conclude that in the Netherlands migration patterns had little effect on the health impact assessment of this national urban regeneration programme, so either the cross-sectional or longitudinal evaluation study design will do.
Collapse
|