Adolescent Mental Health and Resilience Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess levels of depression, anxiety, and resilience factors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a school sample of adolescents. We also aimed to examine the compensatory and protective effects of individual, family, and school resilience factors on adolescent mental health.

METHODS

We used fall 2019 and fall 2020 survey responses from a cluster randomized controlled trial implemented in 20 schools in a Midwestern county. The sample consisted of 3,085 responses from students in grades 5 and 6. Multilevel mixed-effects models with cluster robust standard errors were used to investigate the associations between exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health (anxiety, depression), and resilience factors (future orientation, family engagement, and having a caring school adult).

RESULTS

Anxiety, but not depression, was higher in fall 2020 compared to fall 2019. Family engagement increased during the pandemic, while future orientation of the student body was lower during that time and the prevalence of having a caring adult at school was unchanged. A positive future orientation was associated with lower levels of anxiety and depression, while having a caring school adult was associated with lower depression. Adolescents with less positive future orientations, low family engagement, and no caring school adults experienced the greatest increases in anxiety.

DISCUSSION

Positive future orientations, family engagement, and supportive nonparental adult relationships had compensatory and protective effects on adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adding these measures to the inventory of modifiable resilience factors during natural disasters may promote healthy adaptation among adolescents.

Social policies and change in education-related disparities in mortality in Japan, 2000-2010

Persistent socioeconomic disparity in mortality is a widely observed phenomenon despite improvements in the economic standard of living and the prevailing universal healthcare coverage policy. In this study, we selected Japan as a case in which public universal coverage has maintained horizontal equity in healthcare access while demographic and economic challenges have affected the life chances of vulnerable subpopulations over the past decade. We assessed the changing trends in the education-related disparity in mortality over a decade across demographic subpopulations for different causes of death, with the goal of generating social policy lessons to contribute to closing the mortality gap. Using a deterministic data merge between nationwide census and death records, we estimated age- and sex-specific mortality rates for 14 causes and their education-related gradients with absolute and relative indices of inequality in 2000 and 2010 via Poisson regression. Estimation parameters were standardized to the age structure of the sub-population of high school graduates in 2000 as the reference. The results demonstrated that the relative gaps in all-cause mortality persisted despite a decrease in the average mortality rate over the study period. The absolute gaps in mortality increased for preventable causes of death associated with lifestyle behavior choices. The average mortality worsened among socioeconomically vulnerable populations such as youth and women, who were left behind in the existing social/economic policy. External causes of death such as suicide and traffic accidents showed decreasing absolute gaps in a subpopulation targeted by universal social and labor policy measures. These change patterns indicate that, compared with a high-risk approach, a universal policy approach to dealing with societal and fundamental causes of health inequality seems more effective in reducing the education-related mortality gap in both absolute and relative terms.

•

Socioeconomic gaps in mortality persist despite extended healthcare coverage.

•

Education-related mortality gaps were confirmed in 2000 and 2010 in Japan.

•

Relative inequality in preventable diseases increased under checkup-for-all policy.

•

Youth and women, left behind in the current social policy, faced worsened gaps.

•

Mortality gaps decreased when a universal policy on societal causes was adopted.

Does selective migration bias the health impact assessment of urban regeneration programmes in cross-sectional studies? Findings from a Dutch case study

We examined if the assessment of the health impact of a national Dutch regeneration programme depends on using either a repeated cross-sectional or longitudinal study design. This is important as only the latter design can incorporate migration patterns. For both designs, we compared trends in medication use between target and control districts. We found differences in medication use trends to be modest under the longitudinal design, and not demonstrable under the repeated cross-sectional design. The observed differences were hardly influenced by migration patterns. We conclude that in the Netherlands migration patterns had little effect on the health impact assessment of this national urban regeneration programme, so either the cross-sectional or longitudinal evaluation study design will do.