Impact of timing of device removal on mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections

Cardiac implantable electronic device and vascular access: Strategies to overcome problems

For arrhythmia treatment or sudden cardiac death prevention in hemodialysis patients, there is a frequent need for placement of a cardiac implantable electronic device (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization device). Leads from a cardiac implantable electronic device can cause central vein stenosis and carry the risk of tricuspid regurgitation or contribute to infective endocarditis. In patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring vascular access and cardiac implantable electronic device, the best strategy is to create an arteriovenous fistula on the contralateral upper limb for a cardiac implantable electronic device and avoidance of central vein catheter. Fortunately, cardiac electrotherapy is moving toward miniaturization and less transvenous wires. Whenever feasible, one should avoid transvenous leads and choose alternative options such as subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator, epicardial leads, and leadless pacemaker. Based on recent reports on the leadless pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator effectiveness, in patients with rapid progression of chronic kidney disease (high risk of renal failure) or glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m², this option should be considered by the implanting cardiologist for future access protection.

Lead Management and Lead Extraction

Management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has become complex given the complications that can occur with implanted lead systems. Clinical problems such as infection, lead failure, and occluded vessels create situations that demand intervention to remove leads. Due to adhesions that occur in the venous system and at the endomyocardial attachment site, simple traction to remove a lead is often not sufficient. Infection is a mandatory reason to remove the entire CIED system. Tools and techniques are now available that enable a skilled operator to extract leads with a great deal of efficacy and safety.

Successful conservative management of a permanent pacemaker pocket infection: a less invasive approach

We present a successful conservative management strategy for a frail elderly patient with a cardiac resynchronisation pacemaker who presented with evidence of an Enterobacter cloacae pacemaker pocket infection. A device washout and debridement procedure was performed, with reburial of the device in a new prepectoral pocket and creation of a closed-loop continuous antibiotic infusion into the infected pacemaker pocket. This was followed by a 6-week course of ambulatory intravenous antibiotic therapy. This conservative management strategy avoided the need for a more invasive and high-risk full device extraction, which the patient clearly stated he did not wish to have. Up-to-date consensus management guidelines recommend extraction of the entire implanted system in this situation; however, in this case we demonstrate an alternative conservative management option, which may be suitable for frail elderly and comorbid patients or for patients who decline device extraction.

Low lateral thoracic site for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A viable alternative in patients with limited access options after infected device extraction

BACKGROUND

Device reimplantation after extraction because of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in pacemaker-dependent patients can be challenging in individuals with limited access options.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe a straightforward, low lateral thoracic implantation technique for patients with a patent axillary vein but unavailable bilateral pectoral sites.

METHODS

Nine pacemaker-dependent patients (mean age 70 ± 13 years, 7 male) who underwent CIED extraction and low lateral thoracic reimplantation in whom bilateral pectoral sites were unavailable were included in the study.

RESULTS

Extraction was performed a median of 10 (interquartile range [IQR] 8-13) days before CIED reimplantation (4 dual-chamber, 3 single-chamber, 2 cardiac resynchronization therapy). The new generator was implanted in the low lateral thoracic region ipsilateral to the extracted generator in 7 patients (78%) and contralateral in 2 patients (22%), via a subcutaneous pocket in 6 (67%) and submuscular pocket in 3 (33%). Median procedure duration was 85 (IQR 61-116) minutes, median fluoroscopy time was 7.2 (IQR 5.7-10.9), minutes and median fluoroscopy exposure was 26.0 (IQR 10.0-110.5) mGy. No acute complications occurred. Over median follow-up of 92 (IQR 31-131) days, 1 patient experienced right atrial lead dislodgment (122 days postimplantation) requiring lead revision. No patients experienced recurrent device infection.

CONCLUSION

In pacemaker-dependent patients with limited prepectoral and vascular access options, a low lateral thoracic implantation site is a viable alternative to surgical epicardial or femoral pacing systems. This simple implantation technique is a safe and effective option in selected patients who require a single-chamber, dual-chamber, or biventricular pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Biomarker-based diagnosis of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infections: A prospective, multicentre, case-control evaluation

Background

The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has risen steadily, yet the rate of cardiac device infections (CDI) has disproportionately increased. Amongst all cardiac device infections, the pocket infection is the most challenging diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to improve diagnosis of such pocket infection by identifying relevant biomarkers.

Methods

We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with invasively and microbiologically confirmed pocket infection. None of the patients had any confounding conditions. Pre-operative levels of 14 biomarkers were compared in infected and control (n = 50) patients. Our selected biomarkers included white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), lipopolysaccharide binding protein, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP), polymorphonuclear-elastase, presepsin, various interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

Results

Of the 25 patients with isolated pocket infection (70±13years, 76% male, 40% ICDs), none presented with leukocytosis. In contrast, they had higher serum levels of HS-CRP (p = 0.019) and PCT (p = 0.010) than control patients. Median PCT-level was 0.06 ng/mL (IQR 0.03–0.07 ng/mL) in the study group versus 0.03 ng/mL (IQR 0.02–0.04 ng/mL) in controls. An optimized PCT cut-off value of 0.05 ng/mL suggests pocket infection with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 82%. In addition TNF-α- and GM-CSF-levels were lower in the study group. Other biomarkers did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of isolated pocket infections requires clinical awareness, physical examination, evaluation of blood cultures and echocardiography assessment. Nevertheless, measurement of PCT- and HS-CRP-levels can aid diagnosis. However, no conclusion can be drawn from normal WBC-values.

Clinical trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01619267

Technologies for Prolonging Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Longevity

Prolonged longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is needed not only as a passive response to match the prolonging life expectancy of patient recipients, but will also actively prolong their life expectancy by avoiding/deferring the risks (and costs) associated with device replacement. CIEDs are still exclusively powered by nonrechargeable primary batteries, and energy exhaustion is the dominant and an inevitable cause of device replacement. The longevity of a CIED is thus determined by the attrition rate of its finite energy reserve. The energy available from a battery depends on its capacity (total amount of electric charge), chemistry (anode, cathode, and electrolyte), and internal architecture (stacked plate, folded plate, and spiral wound). The energy uses of a CIED vary and include a background current for running electronic circuitry, periodic radiofrequency telemetry, high-voltage capacitor reformation, constant ventricular pacing, and sporadic shocks for the cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. The energy use by a CIED is primarily determined by the patient recipient's clinical needs, but the energy stored in the device battery is entirely under the manufacturer's control. A larger battery capacity generally results in a longer-lasting device, but improved battery chemistry and architecture may allow more space-efficient designs. Armed with the necessary technical knowledge, healthcare professionals and purchasers will be empowered to make judicious selection on device models and maximize the utilization of all their energy-saving features, to prolong device longevity for the benefits of their patients and healthcare systems.

Infections in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Diagnosis and Management in a Referral Center

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Infections in cardiac implantable electronic devices are increasing due to the expansion of the indications of these devices. The management of some aspects is controversial. Here, we report our broad experience.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2015, 325 infections (196 local and 129 systemic) were registered; 28.5% of them were referred from other centers: 229 pacemakers, 69 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and 27 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. The follow-up was at least 1 year after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Percutaneous traction (PCT) was the most frequent procedure (n=280) in local (n=166) and systemic infections (n=114), with complete extraction of the system in 82.5% of the patients, clinical success in 89%, and few complications (2 deaths attributable to the technique). Overall mortality was 1% in local infections and 8% in systemic infections. After 212 complete PCT, a new device was placed in 209: of these, a contralateral system was implanted in the same procedure in 152 (73%) and in a second procedure in 57, with no differences in relapses (2 in the 1-stage procedure, and 1 in the 2-stage procedure).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous traction in experienced hands has good results with very few complications. It is possible to perform contralateral implantation of the new device on the same day without increasing the risk of relapse.

Device-related infective endocarditis in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients - Single center registry with over 2500 person-years follow up

AIM

To assess incidence, predisposing factors and outcomes of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

High-volume, single-center cardiology database was screened to identify all CDRIE cases, based on modified Duke criteria, amongst 765 consecutive CRT implantations between 2002 and 2015 (70.8% de novo implantations, 13.7% and 15.5% up-grades from pacemaker and implantable cardioverter–defibrillator [ICD], respectively). During the median follow-up (FU) of 1207 days (range: 256–2664) overall 38 CDRIE (4.97%) cases were identified (incidence: 15/1000 person-years). Multivariate Cox regression model, incorporating significant baseline differences as covariates (model 1), demonstrated that both up-grade from ICD to CRT and higher baseline NYHA class were independently associated with increased risk of CDRIE (adjusted HR 4.29, 95%CI 1.93–9.57; and HR 2.43, 95%CI 1.32–4.49, respectively). In the second model (including all differences with P < 0.2) up-grade from ICD (HR 4.36, 95%CI 1.96–9.69), higher NYHA class (HR 2.04, 95%CI 1.11–3.75), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR 5.85, 95% CI 1.46–23.52), lower baseline hemoglobin level (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.50–0.94) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.05–5.77) were all independently associated with higher risk of CDRIE. All-cause mortality in patients with CDRIE was significantly higher than in subjects without infective complications (68.4% vs. 33.7%, P < 0.001), and 50% of patients with CDRIE died during index hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CDRIE in CRT recipients is almost 5% within 3.5 years post implantation. Up-grade from ICD and high baseline NYHA class flag up patients at high-risk of CDRIE. CRT-related infective complications are associated with very poor prognosis.

Lead-related infective endocarditis: Factors influencing early and long-term survival in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction

BACKGROUND

Lead-related infective endocarditis (LRIE) is a serious infectious disease with uncertain prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors that influence survival in patients with LRIE undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE).

METHODS

Clinical data obtained from 500 consecutive patients with LRIE undergoing TLE in the reference center in the years 2006 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the effect of demographic, clinical, and procedure-related factors on 30-day and long-term survival (mean 3-year follow-up).

RESULTS

Analysis of 30-day survival after TLE revealed 19 deaths (3.8%), with long-term mortality (mean 3-year follow-up) of 29.3% (146 deaths). Multivariate analysis showed unfavorable effects of age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.056, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.030-1.082); decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.687, 95% CI 0.545-0.866); renal failure (HR 3.099, 95% CI 1.865-5.150); and presence of vegetation fragments remaining after TLE (HR 1.384, 95% CI 1.089-1.760). Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated statistically worse prognosis in patients with large vegetations (>2 cm) and with vegetation remnants. Better prognosis was associated with LRIE coexisting with generator pocket infection.

CONCLUSION

Long-term mortality in LRIE patients is still high. Factors that influence negatively on prognosis include large cardiac vegetations and their remnants after TLE. Such vegetations develop most frequently in patients with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and renal failure. Probably, early detection of LRIE would tend to limit the formation of large vegetations that invade the adjacent cardiac structures.

Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic EnveloPe Infection PrevenTion Trial (WRAP-IT)

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is a major complication that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to determine whether Medtronic TYRX absorbable envelope reduces the risk of CIED infection through 12 months of follow-up post procedure.

METHODS

WRAP-IT is a randomized, prospective, multi center, international, single-blinded study. Up to 7,764 subjects who are undergoing CIED generator replacement, upgrade, or revision, or a de novo CRT-D implant, will be enrolled and randomized (1:1) to receive the TYRX envelope or not. The primary endpoint is major CIED infection throughout 12 months of follow up after the procedure. Data will be analyzed with an intention to treat approach. WRAP-IT will also assess the performance of Medtronic's lead monitoring algorithms in subjects whose CIED includes a transvenous right ventricular defibrillation system.

CONCLUSIONS

WRAP-IT is a large randomized clinical trial that will assess the efficacy of TYRX absorbable envelope in reducing CIED infection, define its cost effectiveness, and will also provide a unique opportunity to better understand the pathophysiology and risk factors for CIED infection.

Management of bacteremia in patients living with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have become a critical component in management of patients with cardiac rhythm disturbances, heart failure, and prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, infection remains a major complication of CIED implantation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality for device recipients. Early-onset CIED infections frequently originate from the generator pocket, secondary to device or pocket contamination at the time of implantation, and may progress to involve device leads or cardiac valves. However, hematogenous seeding of the device leads from a remote source of bacteremia is not infrequent in patients with late-onset CIED infections. Whereas CIED pocket infection can be diagnosed in the majority of cases based on physical findings at the pulse generator site, device lead infection may only manifest with fever and positive blood cultures. However, not every patient with a CIED and positive blood cultures has underlying CIED lead infection. Consequently, management of bacteremia in a CIED recipient without local signs of infection presents a significant challenge. The risk of underlying CIED lead infection in patients presenting with bacteremia depends on several factors, including the type of microorganism isolated in blood cultures, duration and source of bacteremia, type of CIED, and number of device-related procedures. These risk factors must be considered when making decisions regarding the need for further diagnostic imaging and whether to retain or remove the device. In this article, we review the published data regarding risk of CIED infection in patients presenting with bacteremia and propose an algorithm for appropriate evaluation and management.

New horizon for infection prevention technology and implantable device

There has been a significant increase in the number of patients receiving cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) over the last two decades. CIED infection represents a serious complication after CIED implantation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, newly advanced technologies have offered attractive and suitable therapeutic alternatives. Notably, the leadless pacemaker and anti-bacterial envelope decrease the potential risk of CIED infection and the resulting mortality, when it does occur. A completely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator is also an alternative to the transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), as it does not require implantation of any transvenous or epicardial leads. Among the patients who require ICD removal and subsequent antibiotics secondary to infection, the wearable cardioverter defibrillator represents an alternative approach to inpatient monitoring for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. In this review paper, we aimed to introduce the advanced technologies and devices for prevention of CIED infection.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk

The incidence of infection following implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing at a faster rate than that of device implantation. Patients with a CIED infection usually require hospitalisation and complete device and lead removal. A significant proportion die from their infection. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is associated with rare but serious complications including major vascular injury or cardiac perforation. Operator experience and advances in lead extraction methods, including laser technology and rotational sheaths, have resulted in procedures having a low risk of complication and mortality. Strategies for preventing CIED infections include intravenous antibiotics and aseptic surgical techniques. An additional method to reduce CIED infection may be the use of antibacterial TYRX™ envelope. Data from non-randomised cohort studies have indicated that antibacterial envelope use can reduce the incidence of CIED infection by more than 80 % in high-risk patients and a randomised clinical trial is ongoing.

Lead extractions in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infections: Single center experience

Background

Lead extraction using laser sheaths is performed mainly for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. However, there are few reports concerning the management of CIED infections in Japan.

Methods and results

Lead extraction procedures were performed in 183 patients targeting 450 leads (atrial leads: 170, ventricular: 181, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs): 79, and coronary sinus: 20). One hundred twenty patients (65.6%) presented with pocket infections without the presentation of an endovascular infection. Blood cultures were positive at least once in 63 patients (34.4%). Complete procedure success was achieved for 437 leads (97.1%) while partial removal occurred in nine, and failure in four leads. Major complications directly related to the procedure occurred in five patients (2.7%). Two of the four patients with a cardiac tamponade required a surgical repair. All patients received intravenous antibiotics, at least, one week after the procedure. Pocket or systemic infections were successfully controlled in 181 patients (98.9%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci (30.1%) and Staphylococcus aureus (37.1%) were the most common causes of CIED infections.

Conclusion

The current status of CIED infections in Japan seems to be similar to that previously reported from foreign countries. The optimal treatment of CIED infections involves the complete explantation of all hardware, followed by antibiotic therapy.

Management of Cardiac Electronic Device Infections: Challenges and Outcomes

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is an increasing problem. Reasons for this are uncertain, but likely relate to an increasing proportion of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) devices implanted, as well as implantations in 'higher risk' candidates, i.e. patients with heart failure, diabetes and renal failure. Challenges within the field of CIED infections are multiple with prevention being the most important challenge. Careful prescription of CIED treatment and careful patient preparation before implantation is important. Diagnosis is often difficult and delayed by subtle signs of infection. Treatment of CIED infection includes complete system removal in centres experienced in CIED extraction and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Meticulous planning and preparation before system extraction and later CIED re-implantation is essential for better patient outcome. Future strategies for reducing CIED infection should be tested in sufficiently powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trials.

Conservative therapy for the management of cardiac implantable electronic device infection

Along with the increased frequency of implantation, the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which can have serious or fatal complications, has also increased. Although several successful conservative therapies for CIED infection have been reported, retained infected devices remain a source of relapse, which is closely related to a higher mortality rate. Presently, complete hardware removal is initially recommended for infected CIED patients, and indications for conservative therapy, including continuous administration of antibiotics, require careful consideration.

On the other hand, complete removal is not required for superficial or incisional infection at the device pocket if an infection does not involve the device, but the patient should be closely followed for progression to deeper infection, which would require extraction.

Differences of Mortality Rates between Pocket and Nonpocket Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infections

BACKGROUND

A steady rise in the use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), particularly in the elderly, has led to an increase in device-related infections. Although often studied and reported as a single entity, these complications in fact comprise a heterogeneous group. Specific subgroups may be associated with distinct mortality risks.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients who underwent device extraction for CIED-related infection at a single tertiary referral center between 1991 and 2007 were reviewed. Infections were divided into four subgroups: primary pocket site infection (PPSI), pocket site infection with bacteremia, primary/isolated bacteremia (PIB), and device-related infective endocarditis (DRIE). Clinical presentation, laboratory data, and mortality rates were obtained by chart review and by querying the Social Security Death Index.

RESULTS

A total of 387 cases were analyzed. The overall in-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were 7.2% and 25.3%, respectively. Patients with PIB or DRIE had significantly higher mortality rates (hazard ratio [HR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-4.6 and HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.6-4.1, respectively) when compared with patients in the PPSI group. Patients who did not receive a new device during the initial admission also had a higher 1-year mortality rate compared to those who did (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.8-4.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our patients with CIED-related infections requiring extraction/hospitalization had a significant mortality risk. Presence of pocket site infection carried a more favorable prognosis, regardless of the presence of bacteremia. Early detection and prevention of CIED-related infections with PIB (i.e., no pocket site involvement), especially for high-risk populations, is needed.

Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

This article illustrates the important role that lead extraction plays in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Individualized care of the patient is paramount when considering lead management strategies. The critical care nurse must have a comprehensive understanding of the indications, procedural considerations, and preprocedural and postprocedural care for patients undergoing lead extraction procedures, thereby improving patient safety and maximizing patient outcomes.

Lead extractions: indications, procedural aspects, and outcomes

As a result of more cardiac implantable electronic devices being placed, a trend toward increasing device infections, and concerns regarding lead malfunction, there is an increased need for lead extraction skills and comprehensive lead management programs. This review discusses the current indications for lead extractions as well as the training requirements and tools and technology needed to create the foundation for a successful lead management program.

Early diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic device generator pocket infection using ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT

AIMS

To examine the utility of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in the early diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) generator pocket infection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 86 patients with CIEDs were evaluated with (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging: 46 with suspected generator pocket infection and 40 without any history of infection. (18)F-FDG activity in the region of the generator pocket was expressed as a semi-quantitative ratio (SQR)-defined as the maximum count rate around the CIED divided by the mean count rate between normal right and left lung parenchyma. All patients underwent standard clinical management, independent of the PET/CT result. Patients with suspected generator pocket infection that required CIED extraction (n = 32) had significantly higher (18)F-FDG activity compared with those that did not (n = 14), and compared with controls (n = 40) [SQR: 4.80 (3.18-7.05) vs. 1.40 (0.88-1.73) vs. 1.10 (0.98-1.40), respectively; P < 0.001]. On receiver operator characteristic analysis, SQR had a high diagnostic accuracy (area under curve = 0.98) for the early identification of patients with confirmed infection (i.e. those ultimately needing extraction)-with an optimal SQR cut-off value of >2.0 (sensitivity = 97%; specificity = 98%).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the potential benefits of evaluating patients with suspected CIED generator pocket infection using (18)F-FDG PET/CT. In this study, (18)F-FDG PET/CT had a high diagnostic accuracy in the early diagnosis of CIED generator pocket infection, even where initial clinical signs were underwhelming.

Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection

Despite improved preventive measures, infection associated with the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) to treat often life-threatening conditions is rising at an average annual rate of almost 5 %. This rise is being driven by the increasing complexity of CIED technology and by the advancing age and co-morbidities of the patients. Although CIED infection is usually suspected based on local signs at the generator pocket site, diagnosis can be challenging in patients presenting no local manifestations or symptoms. Diagnostic methods include microbiological testing and echocardiography, and may be completed by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan in selected cases. CIED infection requires a multidisciplinary approach in view of hardware extraction, targeted antibiotic therapy and reimplantation on an as-needed basis. Antibiotic prophylaxis targeting staphylococcal flora is recommended but the relation of these infections to medical care exposes patients to multi-resistant bacteria. New preventive measures utilising an antibacterial sleeve look promising. Treatment can be started on an empirical basis using an antistaphylococcal agent but must be continued using targeted antibiotic therapy. Crucial questions remain as to the best prevention strategy, optimal duration and timing of antibiotic therapy, and the most effective reimplantation technique.

Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of implantable cardiac electronic device infection. Report of a joint Working Party project on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC, host organization), British Heart Rhythm Society (BHRS), British Cardiovascular Society (BCS), British Heart Valve Society (BHVS) and British Society for Echocardiography (BSE)

Infections related to implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICEDs), including pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, are increasing in incidence in the USA and are likely to increase in the UK, because more devices are being implanted. These devices have both intravascular and extravascular components and infection can involve the generator, device leads and native cardiac structures or various combinations. ICED infections can be life-threatening, particularly when associated with endocardial infection, and all-cause mortality of up to 35% has been reported. Like infective endocarditis, ICED infections can be difficult to diagnose and manage. This guideline aims to (i) improve the quality of care provided to patients with ICEDs, (ii) provide an educational resource for all relevant healthcare professionals, (iii) encourage a multidisciplinary approach to ICED infection management, (iv) promote a standardized approach to the diagnosis, management, surveillance and prevention of ICED infection through pragmatic evidence-rated recommendations, and (v) advise on future research projects/audit. The guideline is intended to assist in the clinical care of patients with suspected or confirmed ICED infection in the UK, to inform local infection prevention and treatment policies and guidelines and to be used in the development of educational and training material by the relevant professional societies. The questions covered by the guideline are presented at the beginning of each section.

Increased long-term mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections

BACKGROUND

Device infection is associated with increased mortality in patients receiving cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. However, long-term mortality associated with CIED infections has not been systematically analyzed in larger studies. This study sought to determine the long-term mortality associated with CIED infection in a large cohort of Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

We used a retrospective study design to analyze 3-year mortality in 200,219 Medicare fee-for-service patients admitted for CIED generator implantation, replacement, or revision between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, race, and 28 comorbidities was performed to determine the relative risk (RR) of death in the 12 quarters following CIED infection.

RESULTS

Patients with CIED infection, compared to device recipients without infection, had increased mortality that persisted for at least 3 years after the admission quarter for all device types: pacemakers (PMs: 53.8% vs 33%; P < 0.001), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD: 47.7% vs 31.6%; P < 0.001), and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D: 50.8% vs 36.5%; P < 0.001). After adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities, significantly increased RR of death following CIED infection persisted for at least 3 years following PM infection, and for at least 2 years with single- and dual-chamber ICD infection.

CONCLUSIONS

CIED recipients who develop device infection have increased, device-dependent, long-term mortality even after successful treatment of infection. The etiology of this persistent increased risk of death associated with CIED infection is unknown and merits further investigation.

Rare infection of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead with Candida albicans: case report and literature review

Infection of implanted cardiac devices has a low rate of occurrence. Fungal infections of such devices represent an atypical phenomenon, associated with high mortality. Both medical and surgical therapies are recommended for a successful outcome.

A 60-year-old woman with past medical history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement, sarcoidosis and diabetes presented with fevers and atypical pleuritic chest pain. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a highly mobile 2.09 cm by 4.49 cm mass associated with the ICD wire. Blood cultures were positive for Candida albicans. The patient underwent sternotomy for removal. The vegetation was 4 cm by 2 cm by 2 cm in size, attached to the right ventricle without interference with the tricuspid valve. The patient was treated with micafungin for 2 weeks and then fluconazole for 6 weeks.

In this case report, we describe the rare infection of an ICD lead with C. albicans, in the form of a fungal ball. This is the 18th reported case of Candida device-related endocarditis and the first reported in a woman. Prior case reports have occurred primarily in pacemaker rather than ICD leads. The vegetation size is also one of the largest that has been reported, measuring 4 cm at its greatest length.

As Candida device-related endocarditis is so rare, and as fatality occurs in half of cases, clinical management can only be derived from sporadic case reports. Therefore, the course of this patient’s disease care will be a useful adjunct to the current literature for determining treatment and prognosis in similar cases.

Clinical presentation and outcomes of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Infection is a serious complication of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Kidney failure is as an independent risk factor for CIED infection and associated mortality. The presence of multiple comorbid conditions may contribute to varied clinical presentations and poor outcomes in hemodialysis (HD)-dependent patients with cardiac device infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

CIED infections in HD patients (n=17) and non-HD patients (n=398) at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, between 1991 and 2008.

OUTCOMES

Surgical management and death.

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical presentations, microbial organisms.

RESULTS

Of 415 patients admitted with CIED infection, 17 (4%) were receiving maintenance HD therapy. Among those on HD therapy, mean age was 72±15 (SD) years, 59% were women, and 53% had a central venous catheter for dialysis access. All 17 patients receiving HD therapy presented with CIED-associated bloodstream infection and 41% of these had infected vegetations on CIED leads or cardiac valves. A majority (82%) were managed with complete device removal and almost half (43%) received a replacement device when bloodstream infection cleared. Device infection was associated with significant short-term mortality in HD patients and 90-day survival was only 76% in this group of patients.

LIMITATIONS

Smaller sample size, majority white cohort, observational study.

CONCLUSIONS

CIED infection in patients receiving HD usually is associated with bloodstream infection and frequently is complicated with device-related endocarditis. Despite complete device removal in the majority of HD patients with infection, mortality remains high.

Implantable defibrillator lead extraction with optimized standard extraction techniques

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads might not be extracted especially in developing countries because of the high cost and lack of specialized tools. We aimed to evaluate transvenous extraction of ICD leads using optimized standard techniques.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed clinical characteristics, optimized extraction techniques and the feasibility of extraction for 40 patients (33 males; mean age 47.9 ± 16.1 years) with 42 ICD leads.

Results

Complete procedural success rate was 95.2% (40/42), and the clinical success rate was 97.6% (41/42). One ICD lead required cardiothoracic surgery. Minor complications occurred in three cases (7.5%), and no major complications or death occurred. Locking stylets were used to extract most leads (34, 81.0%) and almost half of the leads (20, 47.6%) required mechanical dilatation to free fibrotic adhesions; these leads had been implanted for a longer period of time than the others (43.7 ± 18.2 vs. 18.4 ± 13.4 months, P < 0.05). Three-quarters of the leads (30, 71.4%) were extracted with locking stylets plus manual traction (12, 28.6%), or mechanical dilatation with counter-traction (18, 42.8%) by the superior vena cava approach and one-quarter of the leads (11, 26.2%) were removed by optimized snare techniques using the femoral vein approach. Median extraction time was 20 min (range 2–68 min) per lead. Linear regression analysis showed that the extraction time was significantly correlated with implant duration (r = 0.70, P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1–58 months), no infection, or procedure-related death occurred in our series.

Conclusions

Our optimized procedure for transvenous extraction of ICD leads provides a practical and low-cost method for standard procedures.

Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections

Infection reduces survival in cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) recipients. However, the clinical predictors of short- and long-term mortality in patients with CIED infection are not well understood. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with CIED infection who were admitted to Mayo Clinic from January 1991 to December 2008. Survival data were obtained from the medical records and the United Sates Social Security Index. The purported risk factors for short-term (30-day) and long-term (>30-day) mortality were analyzed using univariate and multivariate models. Overall, 415 cases of CIED infection were identified during the study period. The mean follow-up duration for the 243 patients who were alive at the last follow-up visit was 6.9 years. In a multivariate model, heart failure (odds ratio 9.31, 95% confidence interval 2.08 to 41.67), corticosteroid therapy (odds ratio 4.04, 95% confidence interval 1.40 to 11.60), and presentation with CIED-related infective endocarditis (odds ratio 5.60, 95% confidence interval 2.25 to 13.92) were associated with increased short-term mortality. The factors associated with long-term mortality in the multivariate model included patient age (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.36), heart failure (hazard ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 2.86), metastatic malignancy (hazard ratio 5.99, 95% confidence interval 1.67 to 21.53), corticosteroid therapy (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 3.18), renal failure (hazard ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 2.74), and CIED-related infective endocarditis (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 2.41). In conclusion, these data suggest that the development of CIED-related infective endocarditis and the presence of co-morbid conditions are associated with increased short- and long-term mortality in patients with CIED infection.