Cycling of the Sm-like protein Hfq on the DsrA small regulatory RNA

Tn10/IS10 transposition is downregulated at the level of transposase expression by the RNA-binding protein Hfq

We show in this work that disruption of the hfq gene in Escherichia coli causes a large increase in IS10 transposition when IS10 is present on a multi-copy plasmid. Hfq is an RNA-binding protein that regulates the expression of a large number of genes at the post-transcriptional level by promoting the pairing of mRNAs with partially complementary short RNAs. As the translation of IS10 transposase mRNA (RNA-IN) is inhibited by an IS10-encoded anti-sense RNA (RNA-OUT), it seemed likely that Hfq would negatively regulate Tn10/IS10 transposition by promoting anti-sense inhibition of RNA-IN translation. Consistent with this, we show that Hfq promotes pairing of RNA-IN and RNA-OUT in vitro and downregulates RNA-IN expression in vivo. However, we also show that Hfq negatively regulates Tn10 transposition when no functional anti-sense RNA is produced. Taken together, the results suggest that Hfq acts at two distinct steps to inhibit Tn10/IS10 transposition. This is the first example of Hfq regulating a bacterial transposition reaction.

Mechanism of positive regulation by DsrA and RprA small noncoding RNAs: pairing increases translation and protects rpoS mRNA from degradation

Small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) regulate gene expression in Escherichia coli by base pairing with mRNAs and modulating translation and mRNA stability. The sRNAs DsrA and RprA stimulate the translation of the stress response transcription factor RpoS by base pairing with the 5' untranslated region of the rpoS mRNA. In the present study, we found that the rpoS mRNA was unstable in the absence of DsrA and RprA and that expression of these sRNAs increased both the accumulation and the half-life of the rpoS mRNA. Mutations in dsrA, rprA, or rpoS that disrupt the predicted pairing sequences and reduce translation of RpoS also destabilize the rpoS mRNA. We found that the rpoS mRNA accumulates in an RNase E mutant strain in the absence of sRNA expression and, therefore, is degraded by an RNase E-mediated mechanism. DsrA expression is required, however, for maximal translation even when rpoS mRNA is abundant. This suggests that DsrA protects rpoS mRNA from degradation by RNase E and that DsrA has a further activity in stimulating RpoS protein synthesis. rpoS mRNA is subject to degradation by an additional pathway, mediated by RNase III, which, in contrast to the RNase E-mediated pathway, occurs in the presence and absence of DsrA or RprA. rpoS mRNA and RpoS protein levels are increased in an RNase III mutant strain with or without the sRNAs, suggesting that the role of RNase III in this context is to reduce the translation of RpoS even when the sRNAs are acting to stimulate translation.

Positive regulation by small RNAs and the role of Hfq

Bacterial small noncoding RNAs carry out both positive and negative regulation of gene expression by pairing with mRNAs; in Escherichia coli, this regulation often requires the RNA chaperone Hfq. Three small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), DsrA, RprA, and ArcZ, positively regulate translation of the sigma factor RpoS, each pairing with the 5' leader to open up an inhibitory hairpin. In vitro, rpoS interaction with sRNAs depends upon an (AAN)(4) Hfq-binding site upstream of the pairing region. Here we show that both Hfq and this Hfq binding site are required for RprA or ArcZ to act in vivo and to form a stable complex with rpoS mRNA in vitro; both were partially dispensable for DsrA at 37 degrees C. ArcZ sRNA is processed from 121 nt to a stable 56 nt species that contains the pairing region; only the 56 nt ArcZ makes a strong Hfq-dependent complex with rpoS. For each of these sRNAs, the stability of the sRNA*mRNA complexes, rather than their rate of formation, best predicted in vivo activity. These studies demonstrate that binding of Hfq to the rpoS mRNA is critical for sRNA regulation under normal conditions, but if the stability of the sRNA*mRNA complex is sufficiently high, the requirement for Hfq can be bypassed.

Genomic SELEX for Hfq-binding RNAs identifies genomic aptamers predominantly in antisense transcripts

An unexpectedly high number of regulatory RNAs have been recently discovered that fine-tune the function of genes at all levels of expression. We employed Genomic SELEX, a method to identify protein-binding RNAs encoded in the genome, to search for further regulatory RNAs in Escherichia coli. We used the global regulator protein Hfq as bait, because it can interact with a large number of RNAs, promoting their interaction. The enriched SELEX pool was subjected to deep sequencing, and 8865 sequences were mapped to the E. coli genome. These short sequences represent genomic Hfq-aptamers and are part of potential regulatory elements within RNA molecules. The motif 5′-AAYAAYAA-3′ was enriched in the selected RNAs and confers low-nanomolar affinity to Hfq. The motif was confirmed to bind Hfq by DMS footprinting. The Hfq aptamers are 4-fold more frequent on the antisense strand of protein coding genes than on the sense strand. They were enriched opposite to translation start sites or opposite to intervening sequences between ORFs in operons. These results expand the repertoire of Hfq targets and also suggest that Hfq might regulate the expression of a large number of genes via interaction with cis-antisense RNAs.

Translational activation of rpoS mRNA by the non-coding RNA DsrA and Hfq does not require ribosome binding

At low temperature, translational activation of rpoS mRNA, encoding the stationary phase sigma-factor, σ^S, involves the small regulatory RNA (sRNA) DsrA and the RNA chaperone Hfq. The Hfq-mediated DsrA-rpoS interaction relieves an intramolecular secondary structure that impedes ribosome access to the rpoS ribosome binding site. In addition, DsrA/rpoS duplex formation creates an RNase III cleavage site within the duplex. Previous biochemical studies suggested that DsrA and Hfq associate with the 30S ribosomal subunit protein S1, which implied a role for the ribosome in sRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation. Here, we show by ribosome profiling that Hfq partitions with the cytoplasmic fraction rather than with 30S subunits. Besides, by employing immunological techniques, no evidence for a physical interaction between Hfq and S1 was obtained. Similarly, in vitro studies did not reveal a direct interaction between DsrA and S1. By employing a ribosome binding deficient rpoS mRNA, and by using the RNase III clevage in the DsrA/rpoS duplex as a diagnostic marker, we provide in vivo evidence that the Hfq-mediated DsrA/rpoS interaction, and consequently the structural changes in rpoS mRNA precede ribosome binding. These data suggest a simple mechanistic model in which translational activation by DsrA provides a translationally competent rpoS mRNA to which 30S subunits can readily bind.

Structure of Escherichia coli Hfq bound to polyriboadenylate RNA

Hfq is a small, highly abundant hexameric protein that is found in many bacteria and plays a critical role in mRNA expression and RNA stability. As an "RNA chaperone," Hfq binds AU-rich sequences and facilitates the trans annealing of small RNAs (sRNAs) to their target mRNAs, typically resulting in the down-regulation of gene expression. Hfq also plays a key role in bacterial RNA decay by binding tightly to polyadenylate [poly(A)] tracts. The structural mechanism by which Hfq recognizes and binds poly(A) is unknown. Here, we report the crystal structure of Escherichia coli Hfq bound to the poly(A) RNA, A(15). The structure reveals a unique RNA binding mechanism. Unlike uridine-containing sequences, which bind to the "proximal" face, the poly(A) tract binds to the "distal" face of Hfq using 6 tripartite binding motifs. Each motif consists of an adenosine specificity site (A site), which is effected by peptide backbone hydrogen bonds, a purine nucleotide selectivity site (R site), and a sequence-nondiscriminating RNA entrance/exit site (E site). The resulting implication that Hfq can bind poly(A-R-N) triplets, where R is a purine nucleotide and N is any nucleotide, was confirmed by binding studies. Indeed, Hfq bound to the oligoribonucleotides (AGG)(8), (AGC)(8), and the shorter (A-R-N)(4) sequence, AACAACAAGAAG, with nanomolar affinities. The abundance of (A-R-N)(4) and (A-R-N)(5) triplet repeats in the E. coli genome suggests additional RNA targets for Hfq. Further, the structure provides insight into Hfq-mediated sRNA-mRNA annealing and the role of Hfq in RNA decay.

Experimental approaches for the discovery and characterization of regulatory small RNA

Following the pioneering screens for small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) in Escherichia coli in 2001, sRNAs are now being identified in almost every branch of the eubacterial kingdom. Experimental strategies have become increasingly important for sRNA discovery, thanks to increased availability of tiling arrays and fast progress in the development of high-throughput cDNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). The new technologies also facilitate genome-wide discovery of potential target mRNAs by sRNA pulse-expression coupled to transcriptomics, and immunoprecipitation with RNA-binding proteins such as Hfq. Moreover, the staggering rate of new sRNAs demands mechanistic analysis of target regulation. We will also review the available toolbox for wet lab-based research, including in vivo and in vitro reporter systems, genetic methods and biochemical co-purification of sRNA interaction partners.

Effect of salt and RNA structure on annealing and strand displacement by Hfq

The Sm-like protein Hfq promotes the association of small antisense RNAs (sRNAs) with their mRNA targets, but the mechanism of Hfq's RNA chaperone activity is unknown. To investigate RNA annealing and strand displacement by Hfq, we used oligonucleotides that mimic functional sequences within DsrA sRNA and the complementary rpoS mRNA. Hfq accelerated at least 100-fold the annealing of a fluorescently labeled molecular beacon to a 16-nt RNA. The rate of strand exchange between the oligonucleotides increased 80-fold. Therefore, Hfq is very active in both helix formation and exchange. However, high concentrations of Hfq destabilize the duplex by preferentially binding the single-stranded RNA. RNA binding and annealing were completely inhibited by 0.5 M salt. The target site in DsrA sRNA was 1000-fold less accessible to the molecular beacon than an unstructured oligonucleotide, and Hfq accelerated annealing with DsrA only 2-fold. These and other results are consistent with recycling of Hfq during the annealing reaction, and suggest that the net reaction depends on the relative interaction of Hfq with the products and substrates.

Multiple target regulation by small noncoding RNAs rewires gene expression at the post-transcriptional level

Small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs), often in conjunction with Hfq protein, have increasingly been shown to regulate multiple rather than individual mRNAs, thereby reprogramming gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. This review summarizes how and when several such regulators (CyaR, DsrA, GcvB, OmrAB, RNAIII, RybB, RyhB) act upon multiple targets.

Effect of Hfq on RprA-rpoS mRNA pairing: Hfq-RNA binding and the influence of the 5' rpoS mRNA leader region

The rpoS mRNA encodes a stress response transcription factor in Escherichia coli. It is one of a growing number of mRNAs found to be regulated by small RNAs (sRNA). Translation initiation of rpoS mRNA is enhanced by two sRNAs, DsrA and RprA, that pair to the same site near the rpoS start codon in the presence of the Hfq protein. In this work, we examine the interaction of E. coli Hfq with RprA and two portions of the rpoS mRNA leader region. One rpoS RNA, rpoS-L, contained the entire 565-nucleotide leader region, while the other, rpoS-S, contained the 199-nucleotide sequence surrounding the start codon. An RNase H assay indicated both rpoS RNAs have similar secondary structures in the translation initiation region. Hfq formed two complexes with RprA in a gel mobility assay with binding parameters similar to values previously determined for DsrA. Unlike DsrA, Hfq binding to RprA was inhibited by poly(A) and influenced by Hfq mutations on both the distal and proximal surfaces. Hfq increased the level of RprA binding to both rpoS RNAs but showed a much larger enhancement when rpoS-L, the entire leader region, was examined. The lower affinity of RprA for rpoS-L versus rpoS-S in the absence of Hfq suggests that Hfq overcomes an inhibitory structure within rpoS-L in stimulating RprA binding. Similar results were obtained with DsrA. The results indicate that the full upstream leader sequence of rpoS mRNA influences Hfq-facilitated annealing of RprA and DsrA and is likely to be involved in its regulation.

Quality control of bacterial mRNA decoding and decay

Studies in eukaryotes and prokaryotes have revealed that gene expression is not only controlled through altering the rate of transcription but also through varying rates of translation and mRNA decay. Indeed, the expression level of a protein is strongly affected by the steady state level of its mRNA. RNA decay can, along with transcription, play an important role in regulating gene expression by fine-tuning the steady state level of a given transcript and affecting its subsequent decoding during translation. Alterations in mRNA stability can in turn have dramatic effects on cell physiology and as a consequence the fitness and survival of the organism. Recent evidence suggests that mRNA decay can be regulated in response to environmental cues in order to enable the organism to adapt to its changing surroundings. Bacteria have evolved unique post transcriptional control mechanisms to enact such adaptive responses through: 1) general mRNA decay, 2) differential mRNA degradation using small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs), and 3) selective mRNA degradation using the tmRNA quality control system. Here, we review our current understanding of these molecular mechanisms, gleaned primarily from studies of the model gram negative organism Escherichia coli, that regulate the stability and degradation of normal and defective transcripts.

The rpoS mRNA leader recruits Hfq to facilitate annealing with DsrA sRNA

Small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) regulate the response of bacteria to environmental stress in conjunction with the Sm-like RNA binding protein Hfq. DsrA sRNA stimulates translation of the RpoS stress response factor in Escherichia coli by base-pairing with the 5' leader of the rpoS mRNA and opening a stem-loop that represses translation initiation. We report that rpoS leader sequences upstream of this stem-loop greatly increase the sensitivity of rpoS mRNA to Hfq and DsrA. Native gel mobility shift assays show that Hfq increases the rate of DsrA binding to the full 576 nt rpoS leader as much as 50-fold. By contrast, base-pairing with a 138-nt RNA containing just the repressor stem-loop is accelerated only twofold. Deletion and mutagenesis experiments showed that sensitivity to Hfq requires an upstream AAYAA sequence. Leaders long enough to contain this sequence bind Hfq tightly and form stable ternary complexes with Hfq and DsrA. A model is proposed in which Hfq recruits DsrA to the rpoS mRNA by binding both RNAs, releasing the self-repressing structure in the mRNA. Once base-pairing between DsrA and rpoS mRNA is established, interactions between Hfq and the mRNA may stabilize the RNA complex by removing Hfq from the sRNA.

Deep sequencing analysis of small noncoding RNA and mRNA targets of the global post-transcriptional regulator, Hfq

Recent advances in high-throughput pyrosequencing (HTPS) technology now allow a thorough analysis of RNA bound to cellular proteins, and, therefore, of post-transcriptional regulons. We used HTPS to discover the Salmonella RNAs that are targeted by the common bacterial Sm-like protein, Hfq. Initial transcriptomic analysis revealed that Hfq controls the expression of almost a fifth of all Salmonella genes, including several horizontally acquired pathogenicity islands (SPI-1, -2, -4, -5), two sigma factor regulons, and the flagellar gene cascade. Subsequent HTPS analysis of 350,000 cDNAs, derived from RNA co-immunoprecipitation (coIP) with epitope-tagged Hfq or control coIP, identified 727 mRNAs that are Hfq-bound in vivo. The cDNA analysis discovered new, small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) and more than doubled the number of sRNAs known to be expressed in Salmonella to 64; about half of these are associated with Hfq. Our analysis explained aspects of the pleiotropic effects of Hfq loss-of-function. Specifically, we found that the mRNAs of hilD (master regulator of the SPI-1 invasion genes) and flhDC (flagellar master regulator) were bound by Hfq. We predicted that defective SPI-1 secretion and flagellar phenotypes of the hfq mutant would be rescued by overexpression of HilD and FlhDC, and we proved this to be correct. The combination of epitope-tagging and HTPS of immunoprecipitated RNA detected the expression of many intergenic chromosomal regions of Salmonella. Our approach overcomes the limited availability of high-density microarrays that have impeded expression-based sRNA discovery in microorganisms. We present a generic strategy that is ideal for the systems-level analysis of the post-transcriptional regulons of RNA-binding proteins and for sRNA discovery in a wide range of bacteria.

Translational activation by the noncoding RNA DsrA involves alternative RNase III processing in the rpoS 5'-leader

The intricate regulation of the Escherichia coli rpoS gene, which encodes the stationary phase sigma-factor sigmaS, includes translational activation by the noncoding RNA DsrA. We observed that the stability of rpoS mRNA, and concomitantly the concentration of sigmaS, were significantly higher in an RNase III-deficient mutant. As no decay intermediates corresponding to the in vitro mapped RNase III cleavage site in the rpoS leader could be detected in vivo, the initial RNase III cleavage appears to be decisive for the observed rapid inactivation of rpoS mRNA. In contrast, we show that base-pairing of DsrA with the rpoS leader creates an alternative RNase III cleavage site within the rpoS/DsrA duplex. This study provides new insights into regulation by small regulatory RNAs in that the molecular function of DsrA not only facilitates ribosome loading on rpoS mRNA, but additionally involves an alternative processing of the target.

The RNA binding protein Hfq interacts specifically with tRNAs

Hfq is an RNA binding protein that has been studied extensively for its role in the biology of small noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in bacteria, where it facilitates post-transcriptional gene regulation during stress responses. We show that Hfq also binds with high specificity and nanomolar affinity to tRNAs despite their lack of a canonical A/U rich single-stranded sequence. This affinity is comparable to that of Hfq for its validated ncRNA targets. Two sites on tRNAs are protected by Hfq binding, one on the D-stem and the other on the T-stem. Mutational analysis and competitive binding experiments indicate that Hfq uses its proximal surface (also called the L4 face) to bind tRNAs, the same surface that interacts with ncRNAs but a site distinct from where poly(A) oligonucleotides bind. hfq knockout strains are known to have broad pleiotropic phenotypes, but none of them are easily explained by or imply a role for tRNA binding. We show that hfq deletion strains have a previously unrecognized phenotype associated with mistranslation and significantly reduced translational fidelity. We infer that tRNA binding and reduced fidelity are linked by a role for Hfq in tRNA modification.

RNA misfolding and the action of chaperones

RNA folds to a myriad of three-dimensional structures and performs an equally diverse set of functions. The ability of RNA to fold and function in vivo is all the more remarkable because, in vitro, RNA has been shown to have a strong propensity to adopt misfolded, non-functional conformations. A principal factor underlying the dominance of RNA misfolding is that local RNA structure can be quite stable even in the absence of enforcing global tertiary structure. This property allows non-native structure to persist, and it also allows native structure to form and stabilize non-native contacts or non-native topology. In recent years it has become clear that one of the central reasons for the apparent disconnect between the capabilities of RNA in vivo and its in vitro folding properties is the presence of RNA chaperones, which facilitate conformational transitions of RNA and therefore mitigate the deleterious effects of RNA misfolding. Over the past two decades, it has been demonstrated that several classes of non-specific RNA binding proteins possess profound RNA chaperone activity in vitro and when overexpressed in vivo, and at least some of these proteins appear to function as chaperones in vivo. More recently, it has been shown that certain DExD/H-box proteins function as general chaperones to facilitate folding of group I and group II introns. These proteins are RNA-dependent ATPases and have RNA helicase activity, and are proposed to function by using energy from ATP binding and hydrolysis to disrupt RNA structure and/or to displace proteins from RNA-protein complexes. This review outlines experimental studies that have led to our current understanding of the range of misfolded RNA structures, the physical origins of RNA misfolding, and the functions and mechanisms of putative RNA chaperone proteins.

Conversion of stable RNA hairpin to a metastable dimer in frozen solution

Previous studies employing a 79-nucleotide (nt) RNA indicated that this RNA could form two bands in a native polyacrylamide gel while one band was observed in a denaturing gel. This report describes an investigation on the nature of the two corresponding structures and the segment responsible for forming the slower mobility band. Sedimentation equilibrium of the 79-nt RNA was consistent with the two gel bands corresponding to monomer and dimer forms. The portion of the RNA required for dimer formation was explored using a secondary structure prediction algorithm of two 79-nt RNAs linked in a head-to-tail fashion. The predicted structure suggested that the first 21-nt at the 5' end of each RNA formed a self-complementary duplex. A ribonuclease H assay carried out with RNA prepared as monomer (M), or a mixture of monomer and dimer (M/D), gave results consistent with the predicted M and D structures. Gel mobility experiments on 5' and 3' segments of the 79-nt RNA also indicated that dimer formation was due to the 21-nt 5' end. Studies on the 21-nt RNA molecule and sequence variants showed that this sequence can form a hairpin and a dimer complex. Unexpectedly, the hairpin to dimer conversion was shown to occur at high efficiency in frozen solution, although little or no conversion was observed above 0 degrees C. The results indicate that a freezing environment can promote formation of intermolecular RNA complexes from stable RNA hairpins, supporting the notion that this environment could have played a role in the evolution of RNA complexity.

An Hfq-like protein in archaea: crystal structure and functional characterization of the Sm protein from Methanococcus jannaschii

The Sm and Sm-like proteins are conserved in all three domains of life and have emerged as important players in many different RNA-processing reactions. Their proposed role is to mediate RNA-RNA and/or RNA-protein interactions. In marked contrast to eukaryotes, bacteria appear to contain only one distinct Sm-like protein belonging to the Hfq family of proteins. Similarly, there are generally only one or two subtypes of Sm-related proteins in archaea, but at least one archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii, encodes a protein that is related to Hfq. This archaeon does not contain any gene encoding a conventional archaeal Sm-type protein, suggesting that Hfq proteins and archaeal Sm-homologs can complement each other functionally. Here, we report the functional characterization of M. jannaschii Hfq and its crystal structure at 2.5 A resolution. The protein forms a hexameric ring. The monomer fold, as well as the overall structure of the complex is similar to that found for the bacterial Hfq proteins. However, clear differences are seen in the charge distribution on the distal face of the ring, which is unusually negative in M. jannaschii Hfq. Moreover, owing to a very short N-terminal alpha-helix, the overall diameter of the archaeal Hfq hexamer is significantly smaller than its bacterial counterparts. Functional analysis reveals that Escherichia coli and M. jannaschii Hfqs display very similar biochemical and biological properties. It thus appears that the archaeal and bacterial Hfq proteins are largely functionally interchangeable.

Regulation of the yjjQ-bglJ operon, encoding LuxR-type transcription factors, and the divergent yjjP gene by H-NS and LeuO

The yjjQ and bglJ genes encode LuxR-type transcription factors conserved in several enterobacterial species. YjjQ is a potential virulence factor in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. BglJ counteracts the silencing of the bgl (beta-glucoside) operon by H-NS in E. coli K-12. Here we show that yjjQ and bglJ form an operon carried by E. coli K-12, whose expression is repressed by the histone-like nucleoid structuring (H-NS) protein. The LysR-type transcription factor LeuO counteracts this repression. Furthermore, the yjjP gene, encoding a membrane protein of unknown function and located upstream in divergent orientation to the yjjQ-bglJ operon, is likewise repressed by H-NS. Mapping of the promoters as well as the H-NS and LeuO binding sites within the 555-bp intergenic region revealed that H-NS binds to the center of the AT-rich regulatory region and distal to the divergent promoters. LeuO sites map to the center and to positions distal to the yjjQ promoters, while one LeuO binding site overlaps with the divergent yjjP promoter. This latter LeuO site is required for full derepression of the yjjQ promoters. The arrangement of regulatory sites suggests that LeuO restructures the nucleoprotein complex formed by H-NS. Furthermore, the data support the conclusion that LeuO, whose expression is likewise repressed by H-NS and which is a virulence factor in Salmonella enterica, is a master regulator that among other loci, also controls the yjjQ-bglJ operon and thus indirectly the presumptive targets of YjjQ and BglJ.

The C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Hfq is required for regulation

The Escherichia coli RNA chaperone Hfq is involved in riboregulation of target mRNAs by small trans-encoded non-coding (ncRNAs). Previous structural and genetic studies revealed a RNA-binding surface on either site of the Hfq-hexamer, which suggested that one hexamer can bring together two RNAs in a pairwise fashion. The Hfq proteins of different bacteria consist of an evolutionarily conserved core, whereas there is considerable variation at the C-terminus, with the γ- and β-proteobacteria possessing the longest C-terminal extension. Using different model systems, we show that a C-terminally truncated variant of Hfq (Hfq₆₅), comprising the conserved hexameric core of Hfq, is defective in auto- and riboregulation. Although Hfq₆₅ retained the capacity to bind ncRNAs, and, as evidenced by fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays, to induce structural changes in the ncRNA DsrA, the truncated variant was unable to accommodate two non-complementary RNA oligonucleotides, and was defective in mRNA binding. These studies indicate that the C-terminal extension of E. coli Hfq constitutes a hitherto unrecognized RNA interaction surface with specificity for mRNAs.

Hfq stimulates the activity of the CCA-adding enzyme

Background

The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq is known as an important regulator involved in many reactions of RNA metabolism. A prominent function of Hfq is the stimulation of RNA polyadenylation catalyzed by E. coli poly(A) polymerase I (PAP). As a member of the nucleotidyltransferase superfamily, this enzyme shares a high sequence similarity with an other representative of this family, the tRNA nucleotidyltransferase that synthesizes the 3'-terminal sequence C-C-A to all tRNAs (CCA-adding enzyme). Therefore, it was assumed that Hfq might not only influence the poly(A) polymerase in its specific activity, but also other, similar enzymes like the CCA-adding enzyme.

Results

Based on the close evolutionary relation of these two nucleotidyltransferases, it was tested whether Hfq is a specific modulator acting exclusively on PAP or whether it also influences the activity of the CCA-adding enzyme. The obtained data indicate that the reaction catalyzed by this enzyme is substantially accelerated in the presence of Hfq. Furthermore, Hfq binds specifically to tRNA transcripts, which seems to be the prerequisite for the observed effect on CCA-addition.

Conclusion

The increase of the CCA-addition in the presence of Hfq suggests that this protein acts as a stimulating factor not only for PAP, but also for the CCA-adding enzyme. In both cases, Hfq interacts with RNA substrates, while a direct binding to the corresponding enzymes was not demonstrated up to now (although experimental data indicate a possible interaction of PAP and Hfq). So far, the basic principle of these stimulatory effects is not clear yet. In case of the CCA-adding enzyme, however, the presented data indicate that the complex between Hfq and tRNA substrate might enhance the product release from the enzyme.

Communication between RNA folding domains revealed by folding of circularly permuted ribozymes

To study the role of sequence and topology in RNA folding, we determined the kinetic folding pathways of two circularly permuted variants of the Tetrahymena group I ribozyme, using time-resolved hydroxyl radical footprinting. Circular permutation changes the distance between interacting residues in the primary sequence, without changing the native structure of the RNA. In the natural ribozyme, tertiary interactions in the P4-P6 domain form in 1 s, while interactions in the P3-P9 form in 1-3 min at 42 degrees C. Permutation of the 5' end to G111 in the P4 helix allowed the stable P4-P6 domain to fold in 200 ms at 30 degrees C, five times faster than in the wild-type RNA, while the other domains folded five times more slowly (5-8 min). By contrast, circular permutation of the 5' end to G303 in J8/7 decreased the folding rate of the P4-P6 domain. In this permuted RNA, regions joining P2, P3 and P4 were protected in 500 ms, while the P3-P9 domain was 60-80% folded within 30 s. RNase T(1) digestion and FMN photocleavage showed that circular permutation of the RNA sequence alters the initial ensemble of secondary structures, thereby changing the tertiary folding pathways. Our results show that the natural 5'-to-3' order of the structural domains in group I ribozymes optimizes structural communication between tertiary domains and promotes self-assembly of the catalytic center.

Hfq structure, function and ligand binding

Recent studies on Hfq have provided a deeper understanding of the multiple functions of this pleiotropic post-transcriptional regulator. Insights into the mechanism of Hfq action have come from a variety of approaches. A key finding was the characterization of two RNA binding sites: the Proximal Site, which binds sRNA and mRNA; and the Distal Site, which binds poly(A) tails. Hfq was shown to interact with PAP I, PNP and RNase E, proteins that are involved in mRNA decay and in vitro, was shown to form fibres, the physiological significance of which is unknown. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) studies directly demonstrated the role of Hfq as a chaperone that facilitates the interaction between sRNAs and target mRNAs. There are still, however, some unresolved questions.

Spectroscopic observation of RNA chaperone activities of Hfq in post-transcriptional regulation by a small non-coding RNA

Hfq protein is vital for the function of many non-coding small (s)RNAs in bacteria but the mechanism by which Hfq facilitates the function of sRNA is still debated. We developed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay to probe how Hfq modulates the interaction between a sRNA, DsrA, and its regulatory target mRNA, rpoS. The relevant RNA fragments were labelled so that changes in intra- and intermolecular RNA structures can be monitored in real time. Our data show that Hfq promotes the strand exchange reaction in which the internal structure of rpoS is replaced by pairing with DsrA such that the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the mRNA becomes exposed. Hfq appears to carry out strand exchange by inducing rapid association of DsrA and a premelted rpoS and by aiding in the slow disruption of the rpoS secondary structure. Unexpectedly, Hfq also disrupts a preformed complex between rpoS and DsrA. While it may not be a frequent event in vivo, this melting activity may have implications in the reversal of sRNA-based regulation. Overall, our data suggests that Hfq not only promotes strand exchange by binding rapidly to both DsrA and rpoS but also possesses RNA chaperoning properties that facilitates dynamic RNA–RNA interactions.

Interactions of ribosomal protein S1 with DsrA and rpoS mRNA

Ribosomal protein S1 is shown to interact with the non-coding RNA DsrA and with rpoS mRNA. DsrA is a non-coding RNA that is important in controlling expression of the rpoS gene product in Escherichia coli. Photochemical crosslinking, quadrupole-time of flight tandem mass spectrometry, and peptide sequencing have identified an interaction between DsrA and S1 in the 30S ribosomal subunit. Purified S1 binds both DsrA (K(obs) approximately 6 x 10(6) M(-1)) and rpoS mRNA (K(obs) approximately 3 x 10(7) M(-1)). Ribonuclease probing experiments indicate that S1 binding has a weak but detectable effect on the secondary structure of DsrA or rpoS mRNA.

Base-pairing requirement for RNA silencing by a bacterial small RNA and acceleration of duplex formation by Hfq

SgrS is an Hfq-binding small antisense RNA that is induced upon phosphosugar stress. It forms a ribonucleoprotein complex with RNase E through Hfq to mediate silencing of the target ptsG mRNA encoding the membrane component of the glucose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system. Although SgrS is believed to act on ptsG mRNA through base pairing between complementary regions, this was not previously tested experimentally. We addressed the question of whether SgrS indeed forms an RNA-RNA duplex with ptsG mRNA to exert its regulatory function. Specific single nucleotide substitutions around the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence of ptsG completely eliminated SgrS action while compensatory mutations in SgrS restored it. A systematic mutational analysis of both ptsG and SgrS RNAs revealed that six base pairs around SD sequence of ptsG are particularly important for SgrS action. We also showed in vitro that SgrS forms a stable duplex with the ptsG mRNA, and that Hfq markedly facilitates the rate of duplex formation.

Escherichia coli Hfq binds A18 and DsrA domain II with similar 2:1 Hfq6/RNA stoichiometry using different surface sites

Hfq is a RNA-binding protein in Escherichia coli that plays an essential role in post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs by facilitating pairing of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) to mRNA target sites. Recent work has provided evidence that E. coli Hfq has two distinct RNA-binding surfaces. In this study, a comparative sequence-structure analysis of hfq genes in bacterial genomes was employed to identify conserved residues that may be involved in binding RNA. A covariance of residue properties at neighboring positions 12 and 39 and conserved surface residues with high propensities at binding sites of RNA-binding proteins suggested several sites for Hfq-RNA interactions. On the basis of these predictions, eight mutant Hfq proteins were produced and their interactions were examined with the 38 nucleotide (nt) domain II of DsrA ncRNA (DsrA(DII)) and A(18) by a gel-mobility shift assay, fluorescence anisotropy, and fluorescence quenching. Mutations on the proximal surface of Hfq had a small affect on Hfq binding to A(18) (<or=2-fold), while the mutations Y25A and K31A on the distal surface decreased affinity to A(18) by 100-fold in solution. Mutations F39A and R16A on the proximal surface reduced affinity to DsrA(DII) by 6-8-fold, while other mutations on the distal or proximal surfaces affected affinity to DsrA(DII) by <or=2-fold using the gel-mobility shift assay. The F39A/L12F double mutation partially regained the affinity for DsrA(DII) lost by the F39A mutation. The latter observation is consistent with the implied importance of an aromatic residue at position 12 or 39 suggested by the sequence covariance. Titration experiments indicate a 2:1 Hfq(6)/RNA stoichiometry for the strong binding complexes of Hfq with either A(18) or DsrA(DII) and suggests that RNA-induced dimer formation of Hfq(6) is a common feature of Hfq-RNA interactions.

Thermodynamics of RNA duplexes with tandem mismatches containing a uracil-uracil pair flanked by C.G/G.C or G.C/A.U closing base pairs

The thermodynamics governing the denaturation of RNA duplexes containing 8 bp and a central tandem mismatch or 10 bp were evaluated using UV absorbance melting curves. Each of the eight tandem mismatches that were examined had one U-U pair adjacent to another noncanonical base pair. They were examined in two different RNA duplex environments, one with the tandem mismatch closed by G.C base pairs and the other with G.C and A.U closing base pairs. The free energy increments (Delta Gdegrees(loop)) of the 2 x 2 loops were positive, and showed relatively small differences between the two closing base pair environments. Assuming temperature-independent enthalpy changes for the transitions, (Delta Gdegrees(loop)) for the 2 x 2 loops varied from 0.9 to 1.9 kcal/mol in 1 M Na(+) at 37 degrees C. Most values were within 0.8 kcal/mol of previously estimated values; however, a few sequences differed by 1.2-2.0 kcal/mol. Single strands employed to form the RNA duplexes exhibited small noncooperative absorbance increases with temperature or transitions indicative of partial self-complementary duplexes. One strand formed a partial self-complementary duplex that was more stable than the tandem mismatch duplexes it formed. Transitions of the RNA duplexes were analyzed using equations that included the coupled equilibrium of self-complementary duplex and non-self-complementary duplex denaturation. The average heat capacity change (DeltaC(p)) associated with the transitions of two RNA duplexes was estimated by plotting DeltaH degrees and DeltaS degrees evaluated at different strand concentrations as a function of T(m) and ln T(m), respectively. The average DeltaC(p) was 70 +/- 5 cal K(-)(1) (mol of base pairs)(-)(1). Consideration of this heat capacity change reduced the free energy of formation at 37 degrees C of the 10 bp control RNA duplexes by 0.3-0.6 kcal/mol, which may increase Delta Gdegrees(loop) values by similar amounts.

Evaluation of the Dynamic Structure of DsrA RNA from E. coli and Its Functional Consequences

DsrA RNA is an 87-nucleotide regulatory non-protein-coding RNA of Escherichia coli for which two secondary structure models (I and II) have been proposed. We have compared these models by the energy calculations, which revealed that the currently accepted model II should be rejected on the basis of thermodynamics. Here we provide new results of nuclease footprinting analysis and the application of RNA technologies that have not previously been used for DsrA RNA structural studies, such as hydrolysis with RNase H, DNAzyme, hydroxyl radicals and lead. These approaches together with bioinformatics calculations provided strong arguments for a new model III. This model clearly shows that the long U-rich region between hairpins 1 and 2 is double-stranded. These findings shed new light on DsrA RNA-Hfq interactions.

Small RNA regulators and the bacterial response to stress

Recent studies have uncovered dozens of regulatory small RNAs in bacteria. A large number of these small RNAs act by pairing to their target mRNAs. The outcome of pairing can be either stimulation or inhibition of translation. Pairing in vivo frequently depends on the RNA-binding protein Hfq. Synthesis of these small RNAs is tightly regulated at the level of transcription; many of the well-studied stress response regulons have now been found to include a regulatory RNA. Expression of the small RNA can help the cell cope with environmental stress by redirecting cellular metabolism, exemplified by RyhB, a small RNA expressed upon iron starvation. Although small RNAs found in Escherichia coli can usually be identified by sequence comparison to closely related enterobacteria, other approaches are necessary to find the equivalent RNAs in other bacterial species. Nonetheless, it is becoming increasingly clear that many if not all bacteria encode significant numbers of these important regulators. Tracing their evolution through bacterial genomes remains a challenge.

Molecular chaperones and quality control in noncoding RNA biogenesis

Although noncoding RNAs have critical roles in all cells, both the mechanisms by which these RNAs fold into functional structures and the quality control pathways that monitor correct folding are only beginning to be elucidated. Here, we discuss several proteins that likely function as molecular chaperones for noncoding RNAs and review the existing knowledge on noncoding RNA quality control. One protein, the La protein, binds many nascent noncoding RNAs in eukaryotes and is required for efficient folding of certain pre-tRNAs. In prokaryotes, the Sm-like protein Hfq is required for the function of many noncoding RNAs. Recent work in bacteria and yeast has revealed the existence of quality control systems involving polyadenylation of unstable noncoding RNAs followed by exonucleolytic degradation. In addition, the Ro protein, which is present in many animal cells and also certain bacteria, binds misfolded noncoding RNAs and is proposed to function in RNA quality control.

Stationary-phase regulation of RpoS translation in Escherichia coli

In enteric bacteria, adaptation to a number of different stresses is mediated by the RpoS protein, one of several sigma factors that collectively allow a tailored transcriptional response to environmental cues. Stress stimuli including low temperature, osmotic shock, nutrient limitation, and growth to stationary phase (SP) all result in a substantial increase in RpoS abundance and activity. The mechanism of regulation depends on the specific signal but may occur at the level of transcription, translation, protein activity, or targeted proteolysis. In both Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, SP induction of RpoS in rich medium is >30 fold and includes effects on both transcription and translation. Recently, we found that SP control of rpoS transcription in S. enterica involves repression of the major rpoS promoter during exponential phase by the global transcription factor Fis. Working primarily with E. coli, we now show that 24 nucleotides of the rpoS ribosome-binding site (RBS) are necessary and sufficient for a large part of the increase in rpoS translation as cells grow to SP. Genetic evidence points to an essential role for the leader nucleotides just upstream of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence but is conflicted on the question of whether sequence or structure is important. SP regulation of rpoS is conserved between E. coli and S. enterica. When combined with an fis mutation to block transcriptional effects, replacement of the rpoS RBS sequence by the lacZ RBS eliminates nearly all SP induction of RpoS.

Functional dissection of sRNA translational regulators by nonhomologous random recombination and in vivo selection

Small nontranslated RNAs (sRNAs) regulate a variety of biological processes. DsrA and OxyS are two E. coli sRNAs that regulate the translation of rpoS, which encodes a protein sigma factor. Due to their structural complexity, the functional dissection of sRNAs solely by designing and assaying mutants can be challenging. Here, we present a complementary approach to the study of functional RNAs, in which highly diversified RNA libraries are generated by nonhomologous random recombination (NRR) and processed efficiently by in vivo selections that link RNA activities to cell survival. When applied to DsrA and OxyS, this approach rapidly identified essential and nonessential regions of both sRNAs. Resulting hypotheses about DsrA and OxyS structure-function relationships were tested and further refined experimentally. Our findings demonstrate an efficient, unbiased approach to the functional dissection of nucleic acids.

Regulation of translation via mRNA structure in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

The mechanism of initiation of translation differs between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and the strategies used for regulation differ accordingly. Translation in prokaryotes is usually regulated by blocking access to the initiation site. This is accomplished via base-paired structures (within the mRNA itself, or between the mRNA and a small trans-acting RNA) or via mRNA-binding proteins. Classic examples of each mechanism are described. The polycistronic structure of mRNAs is an important aspect of translational control in prokaryotes, but polycistronic mRNAs are not usable (and usually not produced) in eukaryotes. Four structural elements in eukaryotic mRNAs are important for regulating translation: (i) the m7G cap; (ii) sequences flanking the AUG start codon; (iii) the position of the AUG codon relative to the 5' end of the mRNA; and (iv) secondary structure within the mRNA leader sequence. The scanning model provides a framework for understanding these effects. The scanning mechanism also explains how small open reading frames near the 5' end of the mRNA can down-regulate translation. This constraint is sometimes abrogated by changing the structure of the mRNA, sometimes with clinical consequences. Examples are described. Some mistaken ideas about regulation of translation that have found their way into textbooks are pointed out and corrected.

Hfq-dependent regulation of OmpA synthesis is mediated by an antisense RNA

This paper shows that the small RNA MicA (previously SraD) is an antisense regulator of ompA in Escherichia coli. MicA accumulates upon entry into stationary phase and down-regulates the level of ompA mRNA. Regulation of ompA (outer membrane protein A), previously attributed to Hfq/mRNA binding, is lost upon deletion of the micA gene, whereas overexpression of MicA inhibits the synthesis of OmpA. In vitro, MicA binds to the ompA mRNA leader. Enzymatic and chemical probing was used to map the structures of MicA, the ompA mRNA leader, and the complex formed upon binding. MicA binding generates a footprint across the ompA Shine-Dalgarno sequence, consistent with a 12 + 4 base-pair interaction, which is additionally supported by the effect of mutations in vivo and by bioinformatics analysis of enterobacterial micA/ompA homolog sequences. MicA is conserved in many enterobacteria, as is its ompA target site. In vitro toeprinting confirmed that binding of MicA specifically interferes with ribosome binding. We propose that MicA, when present at high levels, blocks ribosome binding at the ompA translation start site, which-in line with previous work-secondarily facilitates RNase E cleavage and subsequent mRNA decay. MicA requires the presence of the Hfq protein, although the mechanistic basis for this remains unclear.

Bacterial small RNA regulators

Small regulatory RNAs can modify the activity of proteins and the stability and translation of mRNAs. They have now been found in a wide range of organisms, and can play previously unsuspected critical regulatory roles. The bacterial small RNAs include two major classes. The largest family(with at least 20 members in Escherichia coli K12) acts by base pairing with target mRNAs to modify mRNA translation or stability; this class of RNAs also uses an RNA chaperone protein, Hfq. DsrA is the best-studied example of this family of RNAs. It has been shown to positively regulate translation of the transcription factor RpoS by opening an inhibitory hairpin in the mRNA, and to negatively regulate translation of hns by pairing just beyond the translation initiation codon. The class of RNAs that modify activity of proteins is exemplified by CsrB and CsrC of E. coli, two RNAs that bind to and inhibit CsrA, a protein translational regulator. Homologs of CsrA and related regulatory RNAs have been implicated in the regulation of gluconeogenesis, biofilm formation,and virulence factor expression in plant and human pathogens.

Micros for microbes: non-coding regulatory RNAs in bacteria

Small non-coding RNAs with important regulatory roles are not confined to eukaryotes. Recent studies have led to the identification of numerous small regulatory RNAs in Escherichia coli and in other bacteria. As in eukaryotic cells, a major class of these small RNAs acts by base-pairing with target mRNAs, resulting in changes in the translation and stability of the mRNA. Roles for these non-coding pairing RNAs in bacteria have been demonstrated in several cases. Because these non-coding RNAs act post-transcriptionally, they impose a regulatory step that is independent of and epistatic to any transcriptional signals for their target mRNAs.